The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWESTCHASE PUD LOT 3 LDS CHURCH - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2005-03-08Project Comments Sheet ILI Departments De Selected p City of Fort Collins Department: Transportation Planning Date: June 1, 2004 Project: WESTCHASE PUD, 2ND FILING, LDS CHURCH PDP -TYPE I All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: June 02, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: General Number: 17 Created: 6/1 /2004 [611/041 Sidewalks which are adjacent to head -in parking (surrounding the proposed building envelope) need to be at least 6 feet in width unless wheel -stops are provided. Please widen walks to this dimension OR show wheel stops in the appropriate locations on future plan -sets. Number: 18 Created: 6/1 /2004 [6/1/04] The walkway in the NW portion of the site that connects to the existing facility on Timberline appears to end abruptly at the eastern -most drive aisle (immediately south of the trash enclosure). This is problematic in that there is no clear way for a pedestrian to proceed to the building entrance. This could be remedied by expanding the eastern curb face radius outward, carrying the building side walkway out into the new extension, and painting/striping a crosswalk across the drive aisle. See red -line for a visual description of this comment. Number: 19 Created: 6/1 /2004 [6/1/04] The walkway connecting the existing sidwalk on Trilby Rd to the parking lot (swc of site) is an ill-advised configuration as it dumps pedestrian traffic directly into the parking lot with no clearly defined route of access to any building entrance. See redline on master utility plan for a configuration that may be more appropriate and useful- 1 r Gt o Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other Utility _ Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Number: 4 Handicap access for the site is provided on east and south portions of the property. The new building is totally handicap accessible. The LDS Church is providing stairs for pedestrian access to the west from Timberline because planning is requiring it. There is no code or standard that says we have to provide a ramp or handicap site accessibility to three sides of our site. The LDS Church does not want the stairs because they will not be used. They would prefer not to build a ramp because there are two other ways (east and south) to have handicap accessibility to the site not to mention vehicular access from three driveways. Why does there need to be handicap site access for more than two sides of the site? Where is the code that says a ramp is required at this location when other ways are provided? Number: 5 Van accessible spaces have been labeled on the architectural site plan. Number: 6 Street trees are shown in the Landscape plans along Carmicheal. The landscape architect has informed me that the strip of land between the sidewalk and the street curb is less than five feet. Street trees are required to be in a five foot strip. This is a conflict of the engineering standards. Number: 7 A tree has been added to the west end parking island near the detention pond as requested. Number: 8 All the landscape plantings and trees are identified on the plant schedules on sheets L1 and L2. Number: 9 All landscaping plant counts are identified on the plant schedules on sheets L.1 and L2. Number: 10 Steeple height is listed on the architectural site plan notes. It is also labeled on the elevation sheets. Number: 11 Elevations and plans for the trash enclosure are provided on sheet A4 Number: 12 No response required Number: 13 The LDIS church is working with the Poudre Fire authority about possible painting and signage of a fire lane. The code informs us that if the building is sprinkled then the requirements for fire lane identification can be waived. The fire department will inform us of the requirements by the time the building is approved for permit. The LDS Church is happy to comply with any and all Poudre Fire Authority requests. We have accommodated the fire department by moving the fire hydrant, the "Y" connection to the building, and moving the fire alarm panel to the north side of the building. This all will show up in the construction drawings in the permit review. Number: 14 The building has identifying signage and numbers on the elevation sheets that should meet the Poudre Fire Authorities requirements Number: 15 The water supply will be verged with the water department. To the best of our knowledge we meet the standards. We will provide a letter from the City of Fort Collins Water department verifying the flows are adequate. Number: 16 The knox box will be located on the n orth entry of the building per the request of the Poudre Fire Authority. Number: 17 The sidewalks around the building have all been changed to six feet wide. Number: 18 The walkway on the northwest portion of the site has had curb cuts installed to accommodate pedestrian traffic to the building. This is updated in the current plans. The LDS church will install pedestrian stripping if the planning requires it as a standard. Number: 19 The walkway on the southwest corner of the site has been deleted and relocated adjacent to the south entry drive of Tribly Road. The site now has pedestrian access from all sides. The LDS church will install pedestrian stripping if the planning requires it as a standard. Number: 20 No comment was provided Number: 21 Storm sewer alignment is shown on current landscape plans Number: 22 Justification for not providing water quality measures are in the updated report. The water quality measures have already been provided in the regional detention ponds. Number: 23 Drainage calculations are provided in the updated report. Number: 24 The current drainage report is stamped and signed. Number: 25 There is no work off the site. The current plans are updated to show this. Number: 26 The flows from the OS are currently routed through the pond because any other solution would be non -compliant with the master plan drainage report for this development. Number: 27 The name of the project is on all the drawings with the same title block Number: 28 The legal and plat should all be on the updated civil plans. Number: 29 Signs are shown on the architectural site plan stating that this drive is one way. Other "Do not enter signs" are also shown on the plans. The north east entry drive cannot be narrowed because it meets the width and fire access requirements for the Poudre Fire Authority. This drive will also be part of the fire lane. This has all been coordinated with Ron Gonzalas with the Poudre Fire Authority. Number: 30 We are asking for a variance request for the north east drive onto to Carmicheal. We need this drive for fire access to the building and site circulation. The adjacent property owner to the north would not grant us a site triangle easement. We are proposing that this drive is a one way entry. This drive is also the fire departments fire lane. We need this easement for fire safety and access to the property. Number: 31 All the sidewalk ramps have been changed per the request. See updated drawings. 4 Number: 32 The drawings have been updated and there is no grading off the property. Number: 33 Added an inlet as per discussion with engineers - see updated plans. Number: 34 Driveways are concrete to the property line — see updated plans. Number: 35 The driveway on Tribly has been changed to 24'-0" required. Number: 36 The sidewalks around the building have all been changed to six feet wide. Number: 37 Documents are provided on easements with drawings — see updated submittal. Number: 38 The detention has been moved so as to not conflict. Number: 39 The walk to Timberline has stairs and will be detailed on permit review documents. The stairs will meet code requirements. Number: 40 Will include standard general notes on permit plans as requested. Number: 41 Scanning standards will be reviewed before permit documents. Number: 42 The emergency access easement still needs to be provided. It will be 24'- 0" wide and enter on the Northeast driveway and loop around the building to the south east driveway on to Carmicheal. We are in communication with the Poudre Fire Authority concerning this matter and the fire lane issues. Number: 43 Dimensions for the driveways to the property lines are in attached drawing with this response letter. Number: 44 The street repair notes requested have been included in the new updated plans. 5 Number: 45 All driveway radiuses are 15'-0" and are shown on attached drawing. Number: 46 Reviewed and addressed plan comments Number: 47 We believe all comments are addressed. Number: 48 Contact has been made with the lateral user — we do not need approval for the lateral line. Number: 49 Signature lines have been added to the updated utility plans. Number: 50 No comment provided Number: 51 An erosion control estimate is provided in the new updated drainage report. Number: 52 Rip rap and drainage pan details are shown on all updated drawings. The LDS Church requests that you consider and approve the request of their development plans. We will be happy to address any problems, questions or other requirements to obtain approval without another submission. We are willing to work with all the departments to obtain approval this time around. We have targeted November 1, as the beginning of construction. Sincerely, Jeffery S. Krueger Krueger Architects & Planners Inc. (970) 613-1788 phone (970) 613-8435 fax z m U FIA PF i M mmolill M--4 3 I Project Comments Sheet F' Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: September 30, 2004 Project: WESTCHASE PUD, 2ND FILING, LDS CHURCH PDP - TYPE I All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: September 29, 2004 (Vote - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: General Number: 27 [9/28/041 Name is not yet consistent. [6/2/04] What is the name of this project? the documents. Created: 6/2/2004 Need to make sure that it is consistent on all of Number: 29 Created: 6/2/2004 [9/28/04] No signage for the one-way drive has been shown on the utility plans. Show proposed signage and pavement markings to control the access as a one way drive. [6/2/04] Need to show the signage that is to be installed to identify the one way driveway and keep people from going out the driveway the wrong way. It is recommended that the driveway be narrowed as it comes in off of the street. Number: 30 Created: 6/2/2004 [9/28/041 A variance has not yet been received. See Section 1.9.4 of LCUASS for information regarding the content and format for this request. This needs to be submitted and reviewed prior to hearing. Can be submitted separately from a plan submittal - provide adequate exhibits. [6/2/04] Need to 'submit a variance request for the northern most driveway. It does not meet the minimum spacing requirements per Table 7-3. This variance request will be considered based on the justification provided within the variance. Number: 32 Created: 6/2/2004 [9/28/041 No grading is now shown occurring off -site, but you are also not showing how this site will tie into the grades along the North property line. Need to show how will tie to grades. If not within property will need to have off -site easements. Need to see that the '-signature /c / e Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Y Site Drainage Report Other 0lvV-eV-`11_�t Utility X Redline Utility >/,_ Landscape Page 1 proposed grades and how propose to tie in prior to hearing. Will need letter of intent from adjacent property owner prior to scheduling a hearing if grading goes off -site. [6/2/04] As shown - showing some minor grading occurring off site to the north. Need to provide letters of intent: for off -site easements for this grading or revise the plan so that all grading ties into existing contours on this property. Number: 33 Created: 6/2/2004 (9/231041 As much as I can tell — hard to read the spots — still draining to the street. Are showing inlets in the driveways — if these are at a low point they will solve the issue. Need a rise of a couple of inches in the flowline between the inlet and the row line. It is okay if the large flows overtop this rise and flow out to the street provided the smaller storms and low flows are captured in the low point. [6/2/04] The two driveways onto Carmichael Street have drainage that comes out the driveway across the sidewalk. This is not allowed per Section 7.7.4 of LUCASS. We have allowed up to 750 square feet of area to sheet flow across the driveway a variance request, but both drives have much larger areas than that that drain across the drive. The grading and drainage needs to be modified so that the drainage does not cross the driveway. Number: 35 Created: 6/2/2004 19/28104] It appears this is being met, but the driveway widths are not labeled on the utility plans. Still suggest that the one way drive be narrowed to at least 20 feet. [6/2/04] A minimum driveway width of 24 feet is required for commercial uses. The driveway onto Trilby does not meet this. Although this is the requirement, narrowing of the one way drive is encouraged and would be approved due to the nature of this drive. Number: 36 Created: 6/2/2004 (9/28/041 Shown as 6 foot walks — but doesn't appear to be a raised curb. Nothing in the plans indicates that it is raised. Not shown as inflow or outflow curb, doesn't appear to be showing ped ramps for the handicap stalls. Clarify. If it is not curb need to show curb stops. If curb need to show the ramps needed for the handicap stalls and any curb stops that are needed for the ramped area. [6/2/04] All the sidewalks in front of the parking spaces need to be 6 foot wide minimum. If this sidewalk is flush with the pavement then wheel stops need to be provided. If is is a curb then ramps need to be: shown for the handicap spots. Number: 37 Created: 6/2/2004 19/28/041 1 have received the legal descriptions — I will have them checked for closure. Prior to accepting mylars for signature fully completed and signed easement documents need to be provided. I have provided a copy of the information sheet on the easement process and a copy of the easement language. Please let me know if you have any questions about the easement language or process. 16/2104] Need to provide easements by separate document for all additional easement that are needed on site. It appears that there will be several drainage easements and a couple of utility easements that will be needed. Number: 39 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/04] Text response says these are stairs — Label them as such on the plans. [6/3/04] The walk out to Timberline, is this a ramp or stairs, don't know what the lines mean. Page 2 Number: 40 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/30/041 Have provided the general notes — still need to add the construction notes or provide the following note on the plans: The Construction Notes under subsection Street Improvement Notes and Traffic Signing and Pavement Marking Construction Notes in Appendix E-2 of the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS) shall apply and be followed by this project as applicable. [6/3/04] Need to provide our standard general notes and applicable construction notes. I can provide an electronic copy of the general notes if you would like them. Number: 41 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/04] Looking better, but still do not meet our scanning requirements. [6/3/04] Please review the scanning requirements and make sure the plans meet those standards. Number: 42 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/04] Need to show and label this easement on the plans. [6/3/04] Define the emergency access easement? Show the boundaries of the easement on the plans. This will need to be dedicated by separate document. Number: 43 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/04] Not yet shown on the utility plans. [6/3/04] Provide dimensions to locate the driveways from the Property line. Number: 44 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/04] Need to show the approximate area of street cut and repair on the master utility plan. This area needs to include the area disturbed by the driveway installations. I have marked the general area. Please let me know if you have questions. [6/3/04] Add the following note to the utility plan and show a general area of street repair. Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Number: 45 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/041 The radii are not yet labeled on the utility plans. [6/3/04] Identify the radius for the driveways — they should be 15 ft radii. Number: 46 Created: 6/3/2004 19/28/04] Still applicable. [6/3/04] See plans for additional comments. Number: 47 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/04] A new check sheet has been returned with the redlines. Please resubmit the check sheet and the redlines with the next submittal. [6/3/04] See check sheet for additional items that needed to be addressed prior to hearing. Please address other items noted in the check sheet prior to or with final compliance submittal. Number: 48 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/04] Per a conversation with one of the water users for the irrigation line that crosses the property I have been told that they are okay with the changes to the irrigation line. He specifically spoke of changes to a manhole. Per the plans submitted there are no changes shown or called out to be done to this line. Are there changes to the system proposed? If Page 3 so they need to be identified. It also seems that Westchase HOA is responsible for the maintenance and liability for this line through the neighborhood. Therefore we need to have the HOA and the irrigation users sign off on the plans or sign off on a letter that they are okay with the changes shown on the utility plans and have reviewed them. If a letter is provided a half size copy of the sheets they reviewed and okayed need to be provided. Need a letter of intent from the HOA and the irrigation users that they plan to approve the changes prior to scheduling for hearing. [6/3/04] Need to add ditch companies signature to the plans (grading plan) as you are grading over the line. Number: 71 Created: 9/30/2004 [9/30/04] The following three items need to be addressed prior to being able to schedule this project for hearing. Variance request for the driveway spacing #30, how do the grades tie in along the N property line #32, and the irrigation line #48. Number: 72 Created: 9/30/2004 [9/30/04] 1 have provided a copy of the information for development agreement sheet. need this filled out and returned to me. Number: 73 Created: 9/30/2004 [9/30/04] General notes — need to fill in the information on note 19, need to provide two benchmarks, and you are missing two general notes. Number: 74 Created: 9/30/2004 [9/30/04] The revision block is for listing revisions made to the plans after they are approved by the City. Remove the text that is in them. Number: 75 Created: 9/30/2004 [9/30/041 We are working on some new ADA pedestrian ramp details that meet the newly imposed federal standards. These will be provided to you with the next round of review. i C_n Page 4 e0o0qui Project Comments Sheet ��■ Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: June 3, 2004 Project: WESTCHASE PUD, 2ND FILING, LDS CHURCH PDP - TYPE I All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: June 02, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: General Created: 6/2/2004 Number: 27 [6/2/04] What is the name: of this project? Need to make sure that it is consistent on all of the documents. Number: 28 Created: 6/2/2004 (612/041 The legal needs to reference the lot and plat. Number: 29 Created: 6/2/2004 [6/21041 Need to show the signage that is to be installed to identify the one way driveway and keep people from going out the driveway the wrong way. It is recommended that the driveway be narrowed as it comes in off of the street. Number: 30 Created: 6l2/2004 16/2/041 Need to submit a variance request for the northern most driveway. It does not meet the minimum spacing requirements per Table 7-3. This variance request will be considered based on the justification provided within the variance. Number: 31 Created: 6/2/2004 [6/2/04] The driveway should not be shown with corner ramps. They will run straight across per the driveway detail. Additional ramps need to be provided at the access drive across from Merlot Ct to allow for crossing of the street. It makes sense to line the north one up with the walkway coming off of the site. Number: 32 Created: 612/2004 [6/2/041 As shown - showing some minor grading occurring off site to the north. Need to provide letters of intent for off -site easements for this grading or revise the plan so that all grading ties into existing contours on this property. Number: 33 Created: 6l2/2004 [6/2/041 The two driveways onto Carmichael Street have drainage that comes out the driveway across the sidewalk. This is not allowed per Section 7.7.4 of LUCASS. We have allowed up to 750 square feet of area to sheet flow across the driveway a variance request, but both drives have much larger areas than Signature Dale CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat -X Site Drainage Report :X Other Utility ;'� Redline Utility Landscape Page I EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATIONS PREPARATION: Determine to whom the easement is being dedicated. Deeds of dedication to the City must come through the city for acceptance by Council and are recorded at the County by the City Clerk's office. The process for acceptance of deeds is described in more detail below. Easements between private parties such as construction easements or cross access easements are prepared and recorded at the County by the private parties. The city may request copies of such easements to verify that the developer has received permission from adjacent owners to do certain work off -site, however the City does not need an original document and does not process or record private easement dedications. Right-of-way is a permanent dedication of land to the City for public street purposes and the dedication statement on the deed is modified accordingly. (See the language in the sample dedication statement handout.) The paragraph regarding maintenance is also modified since the City does take oveir maintenance of right-of-way upon completion and acceptance of the street improvements. For easement dedications, insert the appropriate language for the type of easement being granted Temporary of Permanent If possible, on temporary easements add language to describe an event which will trigger expiration of the easement if the future. e.g. Temporary turn -around easement expiring upon extension of the street to another through street or upon dedication of another turn -around easement. This eliminates the need to vacate the easement at a later time. Type of easement - drainage, utility, access, Easements can be combinations of these. Across easements should specify pedestrian and bicycle of nonvehicular public access, emergency access, general public access, or some combination of these. SUBMITTAL: Dedication statement -complete and appropriate for the type of easement being granted (includes maintenance statement) - Blank for City Clerk's acceptance provided at the bottom (see sample deed) -owner's signature including all lien holders and notary Legal description included in dedication statement or attached and labeled as Exhibit "A" - prepared by a licensed professional land surveyor Attorney's certificate or title insurance policy attached -Attorney signing certificate can be any private attorney (typically representing the owner of grantor) it is not the City Attorney. Sketch showing the easement location PROCESS: Turn all development related deeds of dedication in to the Development Review Center. One original of all documents must be submitted. Stormwater Utility, Parks, Natural Resources, ... may request copies, but the original must be delivered to the Development Review office. Format of the deed is checked to see if it is correct and complete. Special language added or certain modification may require review by the City Attorney. Legal description is checked. If errors are found, deed is returned for correction. Once the deed and legal are correct, a vicinity map and agenda item are prepared for the City Council Agenda. Generally, deeds are on the consent agenda under "Routine Deeds and Easements". Upon acceptance by Council, deed are recorded with the Larimer County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the City Clerk. Current recording fees are $6 for the first sheet of each document and $5 for each additional sheet. Items that are recorded include, but are not limited to the dedication statement, attorney certification, signature pages, the legal description, and the sketch. Checks should be made out to: Larimer County Clerk and Recorder The first sheet of the document must have a space at the top of the page of at least 1" high x 4" wide for the county to use for the recording process. If this is not provided an additional blank sheet will be needed for the recording information and you will be charged the 5 dollars to record it. %M,)Project Comments Sheet M Selected Departments of Forl Collins Department: Engineering Date: September 30, 2004 Project: WESTCHASE PUD, 2ND FILING, LDS CHURCH PDP -TYPE I All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: September 29, 2004 Mote - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: General A[9/umber: 27 28/04] Name is not yet consistent. [6/2/04] What is the name of this project? the documents. Created: 6/2/2004 Need to make sure that it is consistent on all of tumber: 29 Created: 6/2/2004 9/28/04] No signage for the one-way drive has been shown on the utility plans. Show proposed signage and pavement markings to control the access as a one way drive. [6/2/04] Need to show the signage that is to be installed to identify the one way driveway and keep people from going out the driveway the wrong way. It is recommended that the driveway be narrowed as it comes in off of the street. Number: 30 Created: 6/2/2004 [9/28/04] A variance has not yet been received. See Section 1.9.4 of LCUASS for information regarding the content and format for this request. This needs to be submitted and reviewed prior to hearing. Can be submitted separately from a plan submittal - provide adequate exhibits. [6/2/04] Need to submit a variance request for the northern most driveway. It does not meet the minimum spacing requirements per Table 7-3. This variance request will be considered based on the justification provided within the variance. Number: 32 Created: 6/2/2004 19/ /04] No grading is now shown occurring off -site, but you are also not showing how this e will tie into the grades along the North property line. Need to show how will tie to grades. If not within property will need to have off -site easements. Need to see that the Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat a Site Drainage Report ?` Other i'4 c'c ` Y Utility X Redline Utility /_ Landscape Page I proposed grades and how propose to tie in prior to hearing. Will need letter of intent from adjacent property owner prior to scheduling a hearing if grading goes off -site. [6/2/04] As shown - showing some minor grading occurring off site to the north. Need to provide letters of intent for off -site easements for this grading or revise the plan so that all grading ties into existing contours on this property. Number: 33 Created: 6/2/2004 [9/28/04] As much as I can tell — hard to read the spots — still draining to the street. Are showing inlets in the driveways — if these are at a low point they will solve the issue. Need a rise of a couple of inches in the flowline between the inlet and the row line. It is okay if the large flows overtop this rise and flow out to the street provided the smaller storms and low flows are captured in the low point. [6/2/04] The two driveways onto Carmichael Street have drainage that comes out the driveway across the sidewalk. This is not allowed per Section 7.7.4 of LUCASS. We have allowed up to 750 square feet of area to sheet flow across the driveway a variance request, but both drives have much larger areas than that that drain across the drive. The grading and drainage needs to be modified so that the drainage does not cross the driveway. Nu er:35 Created: 6/2/2004 /28/041 It appears this is being met, but the driveway widths are not labeled on the utility plans. Still suggest that the one way drive be narrowed to at least 20 feet. [6/2/04] A minimum driveway width of 24 feet is required for commercial uses. The driveway onto Trilby does not meet this. Although this is the requirement, narrowing of the one way drive is encouraged and would be approved due to the nature of this drive. Number 36 Created: 6/2/2004 8/04] Shown as 6 foot walks — but doesn't appear to be a raised curb. Nothing in the plans indicates that it is raised. Not shown as inflow or outflow curb, doesn't appear to be showing ped ramps for the handicap stalls. Clarify. If it is not curb need to show curb stops. If curb need to show the ramps needed for the handicap stalls and any curb stops that are needed for the ramped area. [6/2/04] All the sidewalks in front of the parking spaces need to be 6 foot wide minimum. If this sidewalk is flush with the pavement then wheel stops need to be provided. If is is a curb then ramps need to be shown for the handicap spots. Number: 37 Created: 6/2/2004 [9/28/04] 1 have received the legal descriptions — I will have them checked for closure. Prior to accepting mylars for signature fully completed and signed easement documents need to be provided. I have provided a copy of the information sheet on the easement process and a copy of the easement language. Please let me know if you have any questions about the easement language or process. [6/2/04] Need to provide easements by separate document for all additional easement that are needed on site. It appears that there will be several drainage easements and a couple of utility easements that will be needed. Ny mber: 39 Created: 5/3/2004 9/28/04] Text response says these are stairs — Label them as such on the plans. [6/3/04] The walk out to Timberline, is this a ramp or stairs, don't know what the lines mean. Page 2 Numb r.40 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/3 4] Have provided the general notes — still need to add the construction notes or p vide the following note on the plans: The Construction Notes under subsection Street mprovement Notes and Traffic Signing and Pavement Marking Construction Notes in Appendix E-2 of the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS) shall apply and be followed by this project as applicable. [6/3/04] Need to provide our standard general notes and applicable construction notes. can provide an electronic copy of the general notes if you would like them. Number: 41 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/041 Looking better, but still do not meet our scanning requirements. [6/3/04] Please review the scanning requirements and make sure the plans meet those standards. Number: 42 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/04] Need to show and label this easement on the plans. [6/3/04] Define the emergency access easement? Show the boundaries of the easement on the plans. This will need to be dedicated by separate document. Num er:43 Created: 6/3/2004 8/041 Not yet shown on the utility plans. 6/3/04] Provide dimensions to locate the driveways from the Property line. Number: 44 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/04] Need to show the approximate area of street cut and repair on the master utility plan. This area needs to include the area disturbed by the driveway installations. I have marked the general area. Please let me know if you have questions. [6/3/04] Add the following note to the utility plan and show a general area of street repair. Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Number: 45 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/ 4] The radii are not yet labeled on the utility plans. /3/041 Identify the radius for the driveways — they should be 15 ft radii. Number: 46 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/041 Still applicable. [6/3/04] See plans for additional comments. Number: 47 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/041 A new check sheet has been returned with the redlines. Please resubmit the check sheet and the redlines with the next submittal. [6/3/04] See cheek sheet for additional items that needed to be addressed prior to hearing. Please address other items noted in the check sheet prior to or with final compliance submittal. Number: 48 Created: 6/3/2004 [ 8/04] Per a conversation with one of the water users for the irrigation line that crosses he property I have been told that they are okay with the changes to the irrigation line. He specifically spoke of changes to a manhole. Per the plans submitted there are no changes shown or called out to be done to this line. Are there changes to the system proposed? If Page 3 so they need to be identified. It also seems that Westchase HOA is responsible for the maintenance and liability for this line through the neighborhood. Therefore we need to have the HOA and the irrigation users sign off on the plans or sign off on a letter that they are okay with the changes shown on the utility plans and have reviewed them. If a letter is provided a half size copy of the sheets they reviewed and okayed need to be provided. Need a letter of intent from the HOA and the irrigation users that they plan to approve the changes prior to scheduling for hearing. [6/3/04] Need to add ditch companies signature to the plans (grading plan) as you are grading over the line. Num er:71 Created:9/30/2004 /04] The following three items need to be addressed prior to being able to schedule this project for hearing. Variance request for the driveway spacing #30, how do the grades tie in along the N property line #32, and the irrigation line #48. N er:72 Created:9/30/2004 /30/041 1 have provided a copy of the information for development agreement sheet. I need this filled out and returned to me. Num r:73 Created:9/30/2004 PR*/041 General notes — need to fill in the information on note 19, need to provide two benchmarks, and you are missing two general notes. Nu r:74 Created:9/30/2004 jR60/041 The revision block is for listing revisions made to the plans after they are approved by the City. Remove the text that is in them. Number: 75 Created: 9/30/2004 [9/30/04] We are working on some new ADA pedestrian ramp details that meet the newly imposed federal standards. These will be provided to you with the next round of review. Page 4 ,. Project Comments Sheet lieslIP F - Selected Departments C iK I Inrl C ullins Department: Stormwater Utility Date: October 1, 2004 Project: WESTCHASE PUD, 2ND FILING, LDS CHURCH PDP - TYPE I All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: September 29, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: Details Number: 80 Created: 10/1 /2004 [10/1/04] Please provide a detail for the water quality outlet boxes. Topic: Drainage Report Number: 24 Created: 6/1 /2004 [9/28/041 At final please make sure the report is signed and stamped by a registered PE. Topic: Easements Number: 50 Created: 6/4/2004 [9/28/04] [6/4/04] Please provide easements by separate document for the areas of the pond and storm sewer on site that extend beyond the limits of the existing easements. Topic: Erosion Control Number: 77 Created: 10/1/2004 [1011104] Sediment/Erosion Control Plan Comments Westchase 2nd September 29, 2004 The stormwater management plan is incomplete per City of Fort Collins specifications lacking a report, callculations, schedule (Appendix B??), plan notes, etc. Plan will be reviewed when a complete submittal is made. Topic: General Number: 76 Created: 10/1 /2004 e 6� a vt Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility _ Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 The pond bottoms slope seems to have minimal fall. A drainage pan may be needed in order to minimize nuisance flows and route the flows from the incoming pipe pipe invert to the pond outlets. Please provide a detail of the reconfigured pond outlet structure. Provide spillway locations and design for all proposed detention ponds. Nee Project Comments Sheet n = Selected Departments ( ih of Putt (ulluns ww�r��s Department: Stormwater Utility Date: October 1, 2004 Project: WESTCHASE PUD, 2ND FILING, LDS CHURCH PDP - TYPE I All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: September 29, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: Details Number: 80 Created: 10/1 /2004 [10/1/04] Please provide a detail for the water quality outlet boxes. Topic: Drainage Report Number: 24 Created: 6/1 /2004 [9/28/04] At final please make sure the report is signed and stamped by a registered PE. Topic: Easements Number: 50 Created: 6/4/2004 19/28/04] [6/4/04] Please provide easements by separate document for the areas of the pond and storm sewer on site that extend beyond the limits of the existing easements. Topic: Erosion Control Number: 77 Created: 10/1 /2004 [10/1/04] Sediment/Erosion Control Plan Comments Westchase 2nd September 29, 2004 The stormwater management plan is incomplete per City of Fort Collins specifications lacking a report, calculations, schedule (Appendix B??), plan notes, etc. Plan will be reviewed when a complete submittal is made. Topic: General Number: 76 Signature Created: 10/1 /2004 16 Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility _ Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 [10/1/041 Please show how grades to the north will tie into existing grade. At present the plans show a disconnect in these elevations that would need to be handled by a easement or a retaining wall. Topic: Grading Number: 25 Created: 6/1/2004 [9/28/041 [6/1/04] Will there be any grading on the lot to the north of this site 7 Some of the proposed contours show potential grading outside of the lot area, if so, a letter of intent for the easement will be required from the owner of that lot prior to hearing. Topic: Irrigation line Number: 82 Created: 10/ 1 /2004 [10/1/041 It seems that the irrigation line is crossing the detention pond area, since the cover over that line is being reduced, approval of these plans by the ditch company owners will be required. Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 21 Created: 6/1 /2004 [9/28/04] [6/1/04] Please shcw alignment of storm sewer on landscape plan in order for us to evaluate the tree placement and separation issues. Topic: Off -site flows Number: 26 Created: 6/ 1 /2004 [9/28/04] [6/1/04] Flows from basin OS are currently routed through the pond. A better system would be obtained if these flows bypass the pond and are connected more directly into the pond outflow pipe. Number: 78 Created: 10/1/2004 [10/1/04] Rather than using a flared end section with a trash rack to collect runoff from the Topic: Pipe profiles Number: 79 Created: 10/1 /2004 110/1/041 Please show hydraulic grade lines for all pipe profiles. Topic: Plans Number: 81 Created: 10/1 /2004 [10/1/04] Grading plan is in general too busy and difficult to read. There are several instances where elevations are impossible to decipher, please make sure plan is readable. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 52 Created: 6/4/2004 [9/28/041 [6/4/04] Please place riprap at all pipe outlet locations. Provide a detail for such riprap. The storm lines have a 0.20 % slope which is below the recommended minimum Page 2 that that drain across the drive. The grading and drainage needs to be modified so that the drainage does not cross the driveway. Number: 34 Created: 6/2/2004 [6/2/04] The driveways need to have concrete to the property line, per the detail, not the cross pans as shown, Number: 35 Created: 6/2/2004 [6/2/04] A minimum driveway width of 24 feet is required for commercial uses. The driveway onto Trilby does not meet this. Although this is the requirement, narrowing of the one way drive is encouraged and would be approved due to the nature of this drive. Number: 36 Created: 6/2/2004 [6/2/04] All the sidewalks in front of the parking spaces need to be 6 foot wide minimum. If this sidewalk is flush with the pavement then wheel stops need to be provided. If is is a curb then ramps need to be shown for the handicap spots. Number: 37 Created: 6/2/2004 [6/2/04] Need to provide easements by separate document for all additional easement that are needed on site. It appears that there will be several drainage easements and a couple of utility easements that will be needed - Number: 38 Created: 6/3/2004 [6/3/04] Detention can not occur within the row, so make sure that the contour for the high water level does not cross into the row. Number: 39 Created: 6/3/2004 [6/3/04] The walk out to Timberline, is this a ramp or stairs, don't know what the lines mean. Number: 40 Created: 6/3/2004 [6/3/04] Need to provide our standard general notes and applicable construction notes. I can provide an electronic copy of the general notes if you would like them. Number: 41 Created: 6/3/2004 [6/3/04] Please review the scanning requirements and make sure the plans meet those standards. Number: 42 Created: 6/3/2004 [6/3/04] Define the emergency access easement? Show the boundaries of the easement on the plans. This will need to be dedicated by separate document. Number: 43 Created: 6/3/2004 [6/3/04] Provide dimensions to locate the driveways from the Property line. Number: 44 Created: 6/3/2004 [6/31041 Add the following note to the utility plan and show a general area of street repair. Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Number: 45 Created: 6/3/2004 [6/3/04] Identify the radius for the driveways — they should be 15 ft radii. Number: 46 Created: 6/3/2004 [6/3/04] See plans for additional comments. Page 2 The pond bottoms slope seems to have minimal fall. A drainage pan may be needed in order to minimize nuisance flows and route the flows from the incoming pipe pipe invert to the pond outlets. Please provide a detail of the reconfigured pond outlet structure. Provide spillway locations and design for all proposed detention ponds. Page 3 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW ( i(N iif rorl ( nllln, KRUEGER ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS Date: 10/01/2004 JEFF KRUEGER 407 N. LINCOLN AVE. LOVELAND, CO 80537 Deliver to: Brian Keyes c/o Jeff Scott Colorado Denver Project Management Office 3263 Fraser St., Suite 1 Aurora, CO 80011-1245 Staff has reviewed your 2nd round submittal for WESTCHASE PUD, 2ND FILING, LDS CHURCH PDP - TYPE I, and we offer the following comments: Thr 1t.Jlicii ed c nvnent responses are by Bryan Keys. Keys & Associates- Architects (7 t 9) 634-3751 18 November 2004 ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Anne Aspen Topic: General Number: 71 Created: 9/30/2004 [9/30/041 The following three engineering items need to be addressed prior to being able to schedule this project for hearing: the variance request for the driveway spacing (Comment #30), how the grades tie in along the N property line (Comment #32) and the irrigation line issues (Comment #48). Assuming a positive outcome at hearing, all remaining issues will need to be addressed prior to plan approval. Additional comments may be made in final compliance. To make your November break ground deadline, I suggest that you address all issues right away and initiate the final compliance review prior to going to hearing so that the processes can overlap. I also suggest that you stay in close contact with me and Sheri, the project engineer to make sure all issues are addressed properly. Tlw R1-70est for the driveway spacing is submitted with this package. The grading IhorevLSPd plans The plans have 176eo revised so hat no grades are changing over the irrigation tine Number: 63 Created: 9/28/2004 [9/28/04] The photometric plan shows adequate lighting around the building fronts but indicates no lighting for the parking areas. The parking areas need to have 1.0 footcandle of light throughout to provide safety and functionality to the parking area at night without adversely affecting adjacent property. Lighting sources must not create glare and must be concealed and fully shielded with sharp cutoff capability to minimize uplight, spill light and unnecessary diffusion on adjacent property. Light levels measured 20' out from the property line shall not exceed 0.1 footcandle of light. Ad(fibonal paikloo lot light fixtures have keen added to meet these requirements. the revised ptratomelric plan reflects the change Page I Number: 64 Created: 9/28/2004 [9/28/041 If any future response letters are required, please organize them by department, as done on the comment letter, not by comment number. The comment number is merely a tracking device in our computerized system. Your letter is difficult to read since it cannot be read side by side with the comment letter nor does it include the language from the original comment letter. Agreed Number: 67 Created: 9/28/2004 [9/28/04] Thank you for making your title blocks consistent. However, the name is not correct. The name it will be filed under is Westchase P.U.D. 2nd Filing LDS Church PDP- Type I. The project name has been corrected on all sheets Number: 68 Created: 9/28/2004 [9/28/041 There are still a few ramps shown as corner ramps. Sheri's comment #31 has not been fully addressed. See redlines. Ramps have been changed per the requirement. Number: 69 Created: 9/28/2004 19/28/04] Scanning standards will need to be met before approval of these plans by the Planning Director. The drafting has been cleaned up to meet the standards Topic: Transportation Number: 62 Created: 9/28/2004 [9/28/04] 1 echo Dave Averill's comments regarding pedestrian connections from Trilby. In your response letter, your response to Comment #4 asks, 'Where is the code that says a ramp is required at this location when other ways are provided?" To answer, the issue is not just to accommodate disabled visitors, but also pedestrians and bicycles, as well as people pushing strollers, etc. There are many references in the Land Use Code, including 3.2.2(A), 3.2.2(B), 3.2.2 ( C)(1) and ( C)(1)(a), 3.2.2( C)(2), 3.2.2( C)(5)(a), 3.2.2( C)(6), 3.2.2(D) and (D)(1), all of which you must comply with. That means you need to address Dave Averill's comment from the first round of review. You need to create a convenient and safe pathway from both Timberline and from Trilby to the building. Where the pathway intersects with the driveways, you will provide mitigation as laid out in the above code references. Given the large grade change, you need not provide a ramp across from Timberline as that would essentially mean a bridge. In every other way, this site needs to be accessible and safe for all forms of transportation, especially as a part of a Neighborhood Center. Aq r ��rl w. e added a sidewalk from Trilhv next to the detention pond that provides safe 84cess from T'41hi`1W,e and added This �,)pg7t does rpquir, a stair due to the elevation differeoces Number: 65 Page 2 Created: 9/28/2004 19/28/041 The pedestrian area between the building and the pavilion does not work. See redlines. We can discuss more creative solutions that will work to make that path safe and convenient at staff review. The pedestrian access to the Pavilion has been revised to create a safe path Number: 66 Created: 9/28/2004 [9/28/041 Each handicap accessible parking space must have ramp access to the sidewalk surrounding the building. One easy way to accomplish this is to dip the sidewalk down where it meets the loading zones. Ramp access has been added by ramping the walk as you suggest Department: Engineering Topic: General Number: 27 [9/28/04] Name is riot yet consistent. [6/2/04] What is the name of this project? the documents. Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Created: 6/2/2004 Need to make sure that it is consistent on all of The project name has been changed as requested Number: 29 Created: 6/2/2004 [9/28/041 No signage for the one-way drive has been shown on the utility plans. Show proposed signage and pavement markings to control the access as a one way drive. [6/2/04] Need to show the signage that is to be installed to identify the one way driveway and keep people from going out the driveway the wrong way. It is recommended that the driveway be narrowed as it comes in off of the street. 1Ne hnve added a Dimensiomng. Signing and Striping Plan to the plan set The driveway ha, been narrowed to 20 feet Number: 30 Created: 6/2/2004 [9/28/04] A variance has not yet been received. See Section 1.9.4 of LCUASS for information regarding the content and format for this request. This needs to be submitted and reviewed prior to hearing. Can be submitted separately from a plan submittal - provide adequate exhibits. [6/2/04] Need to submit a variance request for the northern most driveway. It does not meet the minimum spacing requirements per Table 7-3. This variance request will be considered based on the justification provided within the variance. The Variance for driveway spacing is submitted with this package Number: 32 Created: 6/2/2004 [9/28/041 No grading is now shown occurring off -site, but you are also not showing how this site will tie into the grades along the North property line. Need to show how will tie to grades. If not within property will need to have off -site easements. Need to see that the proposed grades and how propose to tie in prior to hearing. Will need letter of intent from adjacent property owner prior to scheduling a hearing if grading goes off -site. Page 3 [6/2/04] As shown - showing some minor grading occurring off site to the north. Need to provide letters of intent for off -site easements for this grading or revise the plan so that all grading ties into existing contours on this property. We have revised the grading along the nn lh property line which shows that all matches ro existing contours occurs on -site Number: 33 Created: 6/2/2004 [9/28/04] As much as I can tell — hard to read the spots — still draining to the street. Are showing inlets in the driveways — if these are at a low point they will solve the issue. Need a rise of a couple of inches in the flowline between the inlet and the row line. It is okay if the large flows overtop this rise and flow out to the street provided the smaller storms and low flows are captured in the low point. [6/2/04] The two driveways onto Carmichael Street have drainage that comes out the driveway across the sidewalk. This is not allowed per Section 7.7.4 of LUCASS. We have allowed upto 750 square feet of area to sheet flow across the driveway with a variance request, but both drives have much larger areas than that that drain across the drive. The grading and drainage needs to be modified so that the drainage does not cross the driveway. We have added a Grading Elevation Plan to the construction set.. which frees up the (ir.j,!inn and Drainage Plan The proposed inlets in the :rave access poirls }�+� r , � nnri r.,r�s I�✓ h�x�.�„ Ip, kn�+ t a ,-t hive (�rlJnnte!4 r!?rnot RIorE' Pie Ise sec the revised plans Number: 35 Created: 6/2/2004 19/28/04] It appears this is being met, but he driveway widths are not labeled on the utility plans. Still suggest that the one way drive be narrowed to at least 20 feet. [6/2/04] A minimum driveway width of 24 feet is required for commercial uses. The driveway onto Trilby does not meet this. Although this is the requirement, narrowing of the one way drive is encouraged and would be approved due to the nature of this drive. the rme way drive has been changed to 20 feel in width The drive to Trilby is now 24 feet Pfe-use see the r+cvi (7imensioning Signina and Striping Plan Number: 36 Created: 6/2/2004 [9/28/041 Shown as 6 foot walks — but doesn't appear to be a raised curb. Nothing in the plans indicates that: it is raised. Not shown as inflow or outflow curb, doesn't appear to be showing ped ramps for the handicap stalls. Clarify. If it is not curb need to show curb stops. If curb need to show the ramps needed for the handicap stalls and any curb stops that are needed for the ramped area. [6/2/04] All the sidewalks in front of the parking spaces need to be 6 foot wide minimum. If this sidewalk is flush with the pavement then wheel stops need to be provided. If is is a curb then ramps need to be shown for the handicap spots. Th,, sidei-valks around the building are a 'turned down" walk with a 6 inch vertical face The ;r; 1 � t sicnrs rmw the curbs around the huilding in all cases so there is no gutter �78rk,i7Q Number: 37 Page 4 Created: 6/2/2004 [9/28/04] 1 have received the legal discrpitions — I will have them checked for closure. Prior to accepting mylars for signature fully completed and signed easement documents need to be provided. I have provided a copy of the information sheet on the easement process and a copy of the easement language. Please let me know if you have any questions about the easement language or process. [6/2/04] Need to provide easements by separate document for all additional easement that are needed on site. It appears that there will be several drainage easements and a couple of utility easements that will be needed. Acknowledged Number: 39 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/04] Text response says these are stairs — Label them as such on the plans. [613/04] The walk out to Timberline, is this a ramp or stairs, don't know what the lines mean. Clarified that these are stairs Number: 40 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/30/04] Have provided the general notes — still need to add the construction notes or provide the following note on the plans: The Construction Notes under subsection Street Improvement Notes and Traffic Signing and Pavement Marking Construction Notes in Appendix E-2 of the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS) shall apply and be followed by this project as applicable. [6/3/04] Need to provide our standard general notes and applicable construction notes. can provide an electronic copy of the general notes if you would like them. We have added the applicable notes on the second page of the Cover Sheet Number: 41 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/04] Looking better, but still do not meet our scanning requirements. [6/3/04] Please review the scanning requirements and make sure the plans meet those standards. we have made smme rtarification items is drafting for plan legibility Please see the revised plans- Number: 42 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/04] Need to show and label this easement on the plans. [6/3/04] Define the emergency access easement? Show the boundaries of the easement on the plans. This will need to be dedicated by separate document. The easements including the emergency access easement now shown on the Easemert irking no oettina 'he easement documents executed Number: 43 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/04] Not yet shown on the utility plans. [6/3/04] Provide dimensions to locate the driveways from the Property line. Shown on the new Dimensioning_ Striping and Signage plan. Number: 44 Page 5 Created: 6/3/2004 [9128/04] Need to show the approximate area of street cut and repair on the master utility plan. This area needs to include the area disturbed by the driveway installations. I have marked the general area. Please let me know if you have questions. [6/3/04] Add the following note to the utility plan and show a general area of street repair. Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Vvn have c,h��w- the Ore P,t ciit and rena, r ireaS or The ',1t,l!ty plan and have added the note to the plans Number: 45 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/041 The radii are not yet labeled on the utility plans. [6/3/04] Identify the radius for the driveways - they should be 15 ft radii. Shown on the new Dimensioning. Striping and Signage plan. Number: 46 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28104] Still applicable. [6/3/04] See plans for additional comments. Number: 47 Created: 6/3/2004 19/28/04] A new check sheet has been returned with the redlines. Please resubmit the check sheet and the redlines with the next submittal. [6/3/04] See check. sheet for additional items that needed to be addressed prior to hearing. Please address other items noted in the check sheet prior to or with final compliance submittal. Agreed Number: 48 Created: 6/3/2004 [9/28/04] Per a conversation with one of the water users for the irrigation line that crosses the property I have been told that they are okay with the changes to the irrigation line. He specifically spoke of changes to a manhole. Per the plans submitted there are no changes shown or called out to be done to this line. Are there changes to the system proposed? If so they need to be identified. It also seems that Westchase HOA is responsible for the maintenance and liability for this line through the neighborhood. Therefore we need to have the HOA and the irrigation users sign off on the plans or sign off on a letter that they are okay with the changes shown on the utility plans and have reviewed them. If a letter is provided a half size: copy of the sheets they reviewed and okayed need to be provided. Need a letter of intent from the HOA and the irrigation users that they plan to approve the changes prior to scheduling for hearing. [6/3/04] Need to add ditch companies signature to the plans (grading plan) as you are grading over the line. T.he revised plans have no changes to the grading over the property line as discussed in our rnr oo iq t^,pith thr ovV-r userrepreserataPvP Jim t.efter We have added the HOA President off ` c� rk t44, wllt havP'h(,,t nAlLlrn for she tinar 177yiaRi. Page 6 Number: 72 Created: 9/30/2004 [9/30/04] 1 have provided a copy of the information for development agreement sheet. I need this filled out and returned to me. We are working, on completing this letter hat do not yet know who the General Contractor l,c ./,Is soon > that is finakzed we ati ll suhmil Number: 73 Created: 9/30/2004 [9/30104] General notes — need to fill in the information on note 19, need to provide two benchmarks, and you are missing two general notes. This has heen added to the plans Number: 74 Created: 9/30/2004 [9/30/04] The revision block is for listing revisions made to the plans after they are approved by the City. Remove the text that is in them. Removed text Number: 75 Created: 9/30/2004 [9/30/04] We are working on some new ADA pedestrian ramp details that meet the newly imposed federal standards. These will be provided to you with the next round of review. The new ramp details are added. Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore Topic: Utility Plans Number: 53 Created: 9/15/2004 [9/15/04] n addition construction note needs to be added to the cover sheet of the utility plans stating that; Site Improvements and construction of the exterior of the proposed structure be conducted between July 16 and February 28 of any given year. This note will also be include in the development agreement language. We have added the note to the utility plans Number: 54 Created: 9/15/2004 [9/15/041 Provide a riprap detail. Indicate in detail that riprap will be buried with 6" of topsoil and either sod or seeded with appropriate ground cover. We have specified that all on rap is honed and provided a detail drawing Department: Police Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Topic: General Number: 70 Created: 9/29/2004 [9/29/041 1 agree with Anne's comment about parking lot lighting. Also, the building surrounds should also be at 1.0fc and walkway to pavilion should have at least 0.5fc. Trash enclosure should be well lit (min 0.5fc) AND avoid landscape materials that might provide concealment. Plant materials in parking lot need to be planned with light fixtures to avoid dark zones in photometrics. Page 7 Parking lot fighting has been revised with a new photometric plan Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: Drainage Report Number: 24 Created: 6/1/2004 [9/28/04] At final please make sure the report is signed and stamped by a registered PE. Agreed Topic: Easements Number: 50 Created: 6/4/2004 [9/28/041 [6/4/04] Please provide easements by separate document for the areas of the pond and storm sewer on site that extend beyond the limits of the existing easements. Working on easements Topic: Erosion Control Number: 51 Created: 6/4/2004 [9/28/04] [6/4/04] Please provide in the report an erosion control estimate for the surety as required per City standards. The erosion control estimate is located at the end of the erosion control report It is recommended that the detention ponds be used as sediment traps to prevent any silt from leaving the site. This !ten} was discussed in a meeting with staff at the beginning of the year. and has been ti t{1r 9Ctnr (lr Z,nanp UI?r}/Rcpjlra S%lillyC th'3} tt}e r+, ;ter fn tl?p regionc)l detenbnn ponrt Topic: Grading Number: 25 Created: 6/1/2004 [9/28/041 [6/1/04] Will there be any grading on the lot to the north of this site ? Some of the proposed contours show potential grading outside of the lot area, if so, a letter of intent for the easement will be required from the owner of that lot prior to hearing. We have revised the grading so that all grading will he on -site Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 21 Created: 6/1/2004 [9/28/041 [6/1/04] Please show alignment of storm sewer on landscape plan in order for us to evaluate the tree placement and separation issues. Added Page 8 Topic: Off -site flows Number: 26 Created: 6/1/2004 [9/28/04] [6/1/04] Flows from basin OS are currently routed through the pond. A better system would be obtained if these flows bypass the pond and are connected more directly into the pond ouff low pipe. Arl r1cm/ledor-1 Hr. kvpver the entire Block I!. Lots 1 2 and 3 were to direct storm water to the S?Ctfori vlh"'re -f r Topic: Utility Plans Number: 52 Created: 6/4/2004 [9/28/04] [6/4/04] Please place riprap at all pipe outlet locations. Provide a detail for such riprap. We ii? ive added rip ran at all pion outlet locations We have specified the on rap to he hime(i per City request The storm lines have a 0.20 % slope which is below the recommended minimum. Th- stihir:t 24 RCP stni-mPne is only intended to he a 'connecting pipe between the ! L_"!: a, r.t , 4/qn ,v!th ihp nnoti a s,ii ��cfffr; , is The pond bottoms slope seems to have minimal fall. A drainage pan may be needed in order to minimize nuisance flows and route the flows from the incoming pipe pipe invert to the pond outlets. We have added a concrete pan to the detention pond(s) Please provide a detail of the reconfigured pond outlet structure. A (1(,t;)d for the recenf!outed onod outlet structure is located on the Grading and Drainage Pkin Provide spillway locations and design for all proposed detention ponds. 7-1r, ornprqr,ory spillway is located on the west side of Carmichael which flows will sheotflr)vv to the sheet section Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Transportation Number: 59 Created: 9/28/2004 [9/28/04] The walkway connecting the existing sidwalk on Trilby Rd to the parking lot (east of Trilby Rd access) is an ill-advised configuration as it dumps pedestrian traffic directly into Page 9 Number: 47 Created: 6/3/2004 [6/3/04] See check sheet for additional items that needed to be addressed prior to hearing. Please address other items noted in the check sheet prior to or with final compliance submittal. Number: 48 Created: 6/3/2004 [6/3/04] Need to add ditch companies signature to the plans (grading plan) as you are grading over the line. Number: 49 Created: 6/3/2004 [613/041 Need to add the City signatures to all sheets. Also need to add district signatures to the utility plans. Page 3 the parking lot with no clearly defined route of access to any building entrance. This is basically the same comment I had about the previous walkway location, which at the time was located at the sw corner of the parking lot (proximate to the detention pond). In the previous round of review, it was mentioned that perhaps it was possible to run the walkway east of the detention pond and adjacent (6 foot attached) to the parking lot. Is there a good reason that this solution cannot be accomplished? See redlines on the site plan for clarification. The sidewalk has been relocated as described above. Number: 60 Created: 9/28/2004 [9/28/04] Where pedestrians must cross drive aisles, some mitigation technique (striping, signing, special pavement markings, etc.) must be provided to place emphasis and priority on the pedestrian (3.2.2c1 a). Pedestrian striping has been added. Number: 61 Created: 9/28/2004 [9/28/04] The sidewalk crossing of the north 'one way entrance drive" appears to have radial curb ramps. These need to be directionall across the drive entrance. All ramps have been changed to directional. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Topic: Zoning Number: 55 Created: 9/21/2004 [9/21/04] Please remove signage elevations from the elevations sheet. Signage will be reviewed seperately and shouldn't be part of the approved plans. Signage has been emoved Number: 56 Created: 9/21/2004 [9121/04] Label all accessory building elevations as to what they are Done Number: 57 Created: 9/21/2004 [9/21/041 Need to add a note to the Landscape Notes regarding installation prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy - see section 3.2.1(1)(4) for proper wording Added note Number: 58 [9/21 /04] Created: 9/21/2004 Contact me when the hearing items (at a minimum) have been addressed and I will schedule the administrative hearing. Remember to also address the other issues promptly so we can initiate the final compliance round of review, preferably to overlap with your hearing in order to get the project approved and meet your November deadline for breaking ground. Page 10 If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6206. Sincerely, Anne H. Aspen City Planner Page 11 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Department: Transportation Planning Date: November 2, 2004 Project: WESTCHASE PUD, 2ND FILING, LDS CHURCH PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL COMPLIANCE All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: November 03, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Transportation Number: 83 Created: 10/27/2004 [10/27/041 On the "Sidewalk Pedestrian Plan" there is a sidewalk leading from Trilby Rd (east side of Trilby access/drive aisle) that is really leading to nowhere except the parking lot. It also doesn't show up on any of the other plansheets. I would suggest you drop this from the plan as pedestrian access considerations are being met without the inclusion of this small piece of infrastructure. Everything else looks great. Thanks to the project team for quickly and adequately addressing my earlier comments/concerns pertaining to this project. Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _ Site Drainage Report Other �Utility _� Redline Utility —7— Landscape Page I Cityof Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Department: ]Engineering )' Pl Date: November 3, 2004 Project: v _ WESTCHASE PUD, 2ND FILING, LDS CHURCH PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL COMPLIANCE All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: November 03, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: General Number: 30 Created: 6/2/2004 [11/2/04] variance received - I have the following comments on it. Please expand on how the 100 foot spacing is just as safe as the 150 ft spacing 19/28/04] A variance has not yet been received. See Section 1.9.4 of LCUASS for information regarding the content and format for this request. This needs to be submitted and reviewed prior to hearing. Can be submitted separately from a plan submittal - provide adequate exhibits, [6/2/04] Need to submit a variance request for the northern most driveway. It does not meet the minimum spacing requirements per Table 7-3. This variance request will be considered based on the justification provided within the variance. Number: 33 Created: 6/2/2004 [11/2/04] The areas are still draining to the street. A high point has not been provided. As designed the driveways do not meet standards. [9/28/041 As much as I can tell — hard to read the spots — still draining to the street. Are showing inlets in the driveways — if these are at a low point they will solve the issue. Need a rise of a couple of inches in the flowline between the inlet and the row line. It is okay if the large flows overtop this rise and flow out to the street provided the smaller storms and low flows are captured in the low point. [6/2/04] The two driveways onto Carmichael Street have drainage that comes out the driveway across the sidewalk. This is not allowed per Section 7.7.4 of LUCASS. We have allowed up to 750 square feet of area to sheet flow across the driveway with a variance request, but both drives have much larger areas than that that drain across the drive. The grading and drainage needs to be modified so that the drainage does not cross the driveway. Signature Date CHECK: HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Number: 37 Created: 6/2/2004 [11/2/04] We have checked the legals and they close. I have a couple of comments on the dedication language. Where it reads 'a permanent easement for' the easement type only (i.e. drainage and utility) not drainage and utility easement A needs to be in the document. Also need to provide the legal address for the property owner somewhere on the document. [9/28/04] 1 have received the legal descriptions — I will have them checked for closure. Prior to accepting mylars for signature fully completed and signed easement documents need to be provided. I have provided a copy of the information sheet on the easement process and a copy of the easement language. Please let me know if you have any questions about the easement language or process. [6/2/04] Need to provide easements by separate document for all additional easement that are needed on site:. It appears that there will be several drainage easements and a couple of utility easements that will be needed. Number: 41 Created: 6/3/2004 [11/2/04] still a few areas that do not meet scanning requirements - I don't want your plans to be rejected when Final plans are submitted in. [9/28/04] Looking better, but still does not meet our scanning requirements. [6/3/04] Please review the scanning requirements and make sure the plans meet those standards. Number: 42 Created: 6/3/2004 [11/2/041 you provided an easement exhibit sheet which is great, but you still need to show the easements on the plans so that we know how they relate to the proposed improvements. [9/28/04] Need to show and label this easement on the plans. [6/3/04] Define the emergency access easement? Show the boundaries of the easement on the plans. This will need to be dedicated by separate document. Number: 44 Created: 6/3/2004 [11/2/04] The areas being shown do not come close to meeting our street cut standards - I know what you show will not be exact, but you need to show that the cut and patch will go to the center of the travel lane and not just a couple of foot patch. [9/28/04] Need to show the approximate area of street cut and repair on the master utility plan. This area needs to include the area disturbed by the driveway installations. I have marked the general area. Please let me know if you have questions. [6/3/04] Add the following note to the utility plan and show a general area of street repair. Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Number: 46 Created: 6/3/2004 [11/2/04] Still applicable. [9/28/04] Still applicable. [6/3/04] See plans for additional comments. Page 2 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: November 3, 2004 Project: WESTCHASE PUD, 2ND FILING, LDS CHURCH PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL COMPLIANCE All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: November 03, 2004 Mote - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: General Number: 30 Created: 6/2/2004 [11/2/041 variance received - I have the following comments on it. Please expand on how the 100 foot spacing is just as safe as the 150 ft spacing [9/28/04] A variance has not yet been received. See Section 1.9.4 of LCUASS for information regarding the content and format for this request. This needs to be submitted and reviewed prior to hearing. Can be submitted separately from a plan submittal - provide adequate exhibits. [6/2/04] Need to submit a variance request for the northern most driveway. It does not meet the minimum spacing requirements per Table 7-3. This variance request will be considered based on the justification provided within the variance. Number: 33 Created: 6/2/2004 [11/21041 The areas are still draining to the street. A high point has not been provided. As designed the driveways do not meet standards. [9/28/041 As much as I can tell — hard to read the spots — still draining to the street. Are showing inlets in the driveways — if these are at a low point they will solve the issue. Need a rise of a couple of inches in the flowline between the inlet and the row line. It is okay if the large flows overtop this rise and flow out to the street provided the smaller storms and low flows are captured in the low point. [6/2/04] The two driveways onto Carmichael Street have drainage that comes out the driveway across the sidewalk. This is not allowed per Section 7.7.4 of LUCASS. We have allowed up to 750 square feet of area to sheet flow across the driveway with a variance request, but both drives have much larger areas than that that drain across the drive. The grading and drainage needs be modified so that the drainage does not cross the drivewa Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Number: 37 Created: 6/2/2004 [11/2/041 We have checked the legals and they close. I have a couple of comments on the dedication language. Where it reads 'a permanent easement for' the easement type only (i.e. drainage and utility) not drainage and utility easement A needs to be in the document. Also need to provide the legal address for the property owner somewhere on the document. [9/28/04] 1 have received the legal descriptions — I will have them checked for closure. Prior to accepting mylars for signature fully completed and signed easement documents need to be provided. I have provided a copy of the information sheet on the easement process and a copy of the easement language. Please let me know if you have any questions about the easement language or process. [6/2/04] Need to provide easements by separate document for all additional easement that are needed on site. It appears that there will be several drainage easements and a couple of utility easements that will be needed. Number: 41 Created: 6/3/2004 [1112/041 still a few areas that do not meet scanning requirements - I don't want your plans to be rejected when Final plans are submitted in. [9/28/041 Looking better, but still does not meet our scanning requirements. [6/3/04] Please review the scanning requirements and make sure the plans meet those standards. Number: 42 Created: 6/3/2004 [11/2/041 you provided an easement exhibit sheet which is great, but you still need to show the easements on the plans so that we know how they relate to the proposed improvements. [9/28/04] Need to show and label this easement on the plans. [6/3/04] Define the: emergency access easement? Show the boundaries of the easement on the plans. This will need to be dedicated by separate document. Number: 44 Created: 6/3/2004 [11/2/04] The areas being shown do not come close to meeting our street cut standards - I know what you show will not be exact, but you need to show that the cut and patch will go to the center of the travel lane and not just a couple of foot patch. [9/28/04] Need to show the approximate area of street cut and repair on the master utility plan. This area needs to include the area disturbed by the driveway installations. I have marked the general area. Please let me know if you have questions. [6/3/04] Add the following note to the utility plan and show a general area of street repair. Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Number: 46 Created: 6/3/2004 [11/2/041 Still applicable. [9/28/04] Still applicable. [6/3/04] See plans for additional comments. Number: 91 Created: 11/3/2004 [11/3/04] Please provide a section of the wall design. Page 2 N Project Comments Sheet c;tt,fr,tt� tom! Selected Departments Department: Stormwater Utility Date: June 4, 2004 Project: WESTCHASE PUD, 2ND FILING, LDS CHURCH PDP -TYPE I All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: June 02, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: Drainage talcs Created: 6/1/2004 Number: 23 [6/1/04] Please provide supporting documentation from the first fling justifying the assigned release rates from this site. Topic: Drainage Report Created: 6/1/2004 Number: 24 ofiAt final please make sure the report is signes and stamped by a registered PE. Topic: Easements Number: 50 Created: 6/4/2004 [6/4/041 Please provide easements by separate document for the areas of the pond and storm sewer on site that extend beyond the limits of the existing easements. Topic: Erosion Control Created: 6/4/2004 Number: 51 [6/4/04] Please provide in the report an erosion control estimate for the surety as required per City standards. It is recommended that the detention ponds be used as sediment traps to prevent any silt from leaving the site. Topic: Grading Number: 25 Created: 6/1/2004 [6/1/04] Will there be any grading on the lot to the north of this site ? some of the proposed contours show potential grading outside of the lot area, if so, a letter of intent for the easement will be required from the owner of that lot prior to hearing. Topic: Landscape Plan Created: 6/1/2004 Number: 21 [6/1/04] Please show alignment of storm sewer on landscape plan in order for us to evaluate the tree placement and separation issues- UQIe CHECK HERE Iy YOU WISH TO RF EIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS tat " ✓ D ainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility ".9- pe Page 1 Topic: Off -site flows Created: 6/1/2004 Number: 26 [6/1/041 Flows from basin OS are currently routed through the pond. A better system would be obtained if these flows bypass the pond and are connected more directly into the pond outflow pipe. Topic: Utility Plans Created: 6/4/2004 Number: 52 [6/4/041 Please place riprap at all pipe outlet locations. Provide a detail for such riprap. The storm lines have a 0.20 % slope which is below the recommended minimum. The pond bottoms slope seems to have minimal fall. A drainage pan may be needed in order to minimize nuisance flows and route the flows from the incoming pipe pipe invert to the pond outlets. Please provide a detail of the reconfigured pond outlet structure. Topic: water Quality Created:6/1/2004 Number: 22 [6/1/041 Please provide water quality measures on your site as none seem to have been shown on the plans or addressed in the report. Page 2 Project Comments Sheet ZM) Selected Departments Citvof Port Collins Department: Transportation Planning Date: September 28, 2004 Project: W'ESTCHASE PUD, 2ND FILING, LDS CHURCH PDP - TYPE I All comments must be received by Anne Aspen in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: September 29, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Transportation Number: 59 Created: 9/28/2004 [9/28/041 The walkway connecting the existing sidwalk on Trilby Rd to the parking lot (east of Trilby Rd access) is an ill-advised configuration as it dumps pedestrian traffic directly into the parking lot with no clearly defined route of access to any building entrance. This is basically the same comment I had about the previous walkway location, which at the time was located at the sw corner of the parking lot (proximate to the detention pond). In the previous round of review, it was mentioned that perhaps it was possible to run the walkway east of the detention pond and adjacent (6 foot attached) to the parking lot. Is there a good reason that this solution cannot be accomplished? See redlines on the site plan for clarification. Number: 60 Created: 9/28/2004 [9/28/041 Where pedestrians must cross drive aisles, some mitigation technique (striping, signing, special pavement markings, etc.) must be provided to place emphasis and priority on the pedestrian (12.2cla). Number: 61 Created: 9/28/2004 [9/28/04] The sidewalk crossing of the north 'one way entrance drive" appears to have radial curb ramps. These need to be directional) across the drive entrance. 1� 2Pi(01 Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat '*�'_Site Drainage Report Other r'Utility _ * Redline Utility —Landscape Page l REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: September 9, 2004 TO: Technical Services r"r (' G'L.LI PROJECT: 1419-OIC Westchase PUD, 2nd Filing, LDS Church PDP — Type I All comments must be received by Anne Aspen no later than the staff review meeting: September 29, 2004 No Comment .D Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** i l c ?C.,4 r— / J ,Nn lrv� �yv�C R l:�-eCp�ln �s -1 Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Date City of Fort Collins September 10 h 2004 B No KRUEGER ARCHITECT] 6 7LA/ViEW Vic 407 Aorth Urn do Avenue Aite 105 Loveland, C.olorodo 8 0 5 5 7 970-615-1788 fm 970-61- 8d Anne Aspen Current Planning City of Fort Collins 281 N. College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80522 Re: West Chase PDP, 2nd Filing, LDS Church PDP Type 1 Request Modification for standards Dear Anne, Below are responses to the staff comment review and project comment sheet. The responses are numbered to coincide with the numbers given for staff and project comments. Attached are the original comment and review sheets. Number:1 Roundabout analysis will not occur at this time. Number: 2 Topo lines have been removed off the architectural site plan. Number: 3 The building envelope has been labeled, overall foot print has been dimensioned and dimensions to property lines have been shown.