The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHELLENIC PLAZA - Filed GC-GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE - 2009-11-30Number: 21 Created: 3/8/2007 [318/07] Please show the total area for all landscape categories (based on water requirements and maintenance levels). See the PDP Submittal Requirements for a list of items to be included on all landscape plans. Completed, refer to plan Number: 22 Created: 3/8/2007 [3/8/07] Per Section 3.2.1(D)(2)(b) canopy shade trees (not ornamental) are required behind the sidewalk along Birch St every 30 to 40 feet. If the building is moved north as we discussed for drainage purposes, then canopy shade trees will be required. If the building stays where it is proposed now, perhaps a mix of canopy and ornamental trees could be explored. Due to the proximity of the building to the street and sidewalk area, there is not adequate space for canopy trees. As the trees mature, they would grow into the building, which would be detrimental to both the building and the trees. Ornamental trees are proposed for this area, planted at an average of 20'-0" o.c. and will be up -sized from the required minimum tree sizing in lieu of the canopy trees. Number: 23 Created: 3/8/2007 [3/8/07] Per Section 3.2.1(E)(4)(a) trees shall be provided every 40 feet along side lot line of parking setback areas. Please provide such trees along the western edge of the parking lot areas. Canopy Trees have been added to this area Number: 24 Created: 3/8/2007 [3/8/07] Please show existing (and any proposed) fences on or adjacent to this property. Additional parking lot screening may be required for the adjacent residential uses. Proposed cedar fence shown. Number: 25 Created: 3/8/2007 [3/8/07] It does not appear that you are meeting the 6 percent parking lot interior landscaping requirement. Please provide calculations to confirm. The Landscape area for the interior parking area is now in compliance with the code. An attached exhibit is included, showing the calculated areas. Number: 26 Created: 3/8/2007 [3/8/07] Please add additional landscaping to completely screen the north side of the trash enclosure located on the north edge of the property. Done. Page 2 Number: 68 Created: 3/14/2007 [3/14/07] Landscape strip required along the 13 compact spaces along western property line. Sidewalk shown; should be removed as the sidewalk appears to dead end at both ends anyway. Please address. Sidewalk required by the Planning Dept. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans and schedule a submittal appointment when you are ready to submit your revisions. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, Shelby Sommer Associate City Planner Page 11 r• r Citv of Fort Collins Don Brookshire Eastpoint Studio, LLC 552 Kinnikinnik Ct. Windsor, CO 80550 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Date: 05/04/2007 Staff has reviewed your submittal for HELLENIC PLAZA PDP (635 S. SHIELDS ST.) - TYPE I, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer Topic: Building Elevations Number: 80 Created: 4/25/2007 [4/25/07] Please use a different font or font size for the dimensions on the building elevations. It's a bit difficult to read now and I don't think it will scan clearly later. Revised elevations are included with our resubmittal. The font size has been enlarged. Topic: Landscape plan Number: 27 Created: 3/8/2007 [4/25/07) (Please Address Before Hearing) It is still unclear on the plans what landscaping is existing (if any) on the neighboring property's landscape setback area. Will you maintain this with this project? The Plants on the west side ofthe property will be planted within the boundary oj'this project. The plants canopy r>>ill eventually grow over the property line. [3/8/07] Minimum width of any landscape setback area along a lot line is 5 feet. Please address this issue along the western property line by providing more information about what is existing on the adjacent property and/or a modification of standards request. In previous meetings with City Staff, it was discussed that this planting area was narrower than the minimum. It was determined that the proposed design would be acceptable with the addition of the sidewalk within this area. It was also considered that the adjacent property was vacant, and the landscape area between the properties would share in the planting area. Number: 74 Created: 4/25/2007 [4/25/07] (Please address before Hearing) Per LUC section 3.2.1(E)(5) landscape islands with a tree must be 8 feet in its smallest dimension. This is a problem for the landscape island area highlighted on the landscape plan. Can you shift that entire row of parking to the west 3 feet to satisfy this standard? The landscape island has been enlarged, by shifting the parking spaces to the west. Page 1 Number: 75 Created: 4/25/2007 [4/25/07] (Please address before Hearing) The comment response letter states that 11 of the trees will be up -sized to mitigate the loss of existing trees. It is unclear on the landscape plan which 11 trees are specified for up -sizing. There are 14 trees that will he up -sized and are all labeled on the plan as "mitigation trees " Number: 76 Created: 4/25/2007 [4/25/07] Since many of the existing trees will be preserved, please add tree protection notes (LUC Section 3.2.1(G) to the Landscape Plan). Done Number: 77 Created: 4/25/2007 [4/25/07] (Please address before Hearing) You may want to show the proposed lighting fixtures on the site and/or landscape plan. Several of the proposed trees are in the same locations as the lights, and when those trees mature they will most likely impact the lighting levels. This is not a requirement, but definitely something to consider. Light lQe locations have been added to the landscape Plan. Topic: Shadow Analysis Number: 72 Created: 4/20/2007 [4/20/07] The shadow analysis is incorrectly labeled as the landscape plan. Corrected Number: 86 Created: 4/30/2007 [4/30/07] (Please address before hearing) The shadow analysis looks good - thanks for providing this. The visual analysis is on the right track but still needs some work before the hearing ... the photos are great, but please refer to Section 3.5.1(G)(1)(b) for specific information to include in the visual analysis. At a minimum you need a visual analysis that: a. identifies the extent to which existing views may be blocked; b. depicts in graphic form views before and after the project, utilizing photographs of the area and neutral drawings derived from at least two (2) points from which the proposal will be commonly viewed, one (1) of which should be a vista towards the foothills; and c. indicates these points of observation on an inset map or plan of the area; and Page 2 d. a summary of the key conclusions of the shadow and visual analysis, and steps to be taken to comply with the review standards set forth above. Topic: Site Plan Number: 78 Created: 4/25/2007 [4/25/07] The small text for the legal description probably won't scan well. You'll also need a vicinity map on the site plan. You may want to consider doing a separate cover page for the site plan and include all of the signature blocks, land use statistics, vicinity map and legal description on it, and it might give the site plan a little room to "breathe." A total of the land use statistics (NCB and MMN) would be helpful as well. Site data and .signature blocks have been moved to a separate title sheet. Number: 79 Created: 4/25/2007 [4/25/07] Please see redlines for additional comments/typos on the site plan. Redlined comments have been addressed Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Engineering Number: 35 Created: 3/13/2007 (4/26/07] Carry over comment. Design looks good, please prepare and submit local portion cost estimate for review. [3/13/07] You will need to submit a construction cost estimate for the Coy Street ultimate design for the frontage obligation. This cost will be collected as a cash in lieu payment and provided in the development agreement. A local Portion Cost estimate has been prepared and is part o f this submittal. Number: 54 Created: 3/13/2007 [4/26/07] Please pay with final plan review $1,081.75. Thank you. [3/13/07] The PDP submittal review fee was not calculated correctly. An additional $81.75 is due. Please submit this payment prior going to hearing. `AA Number: 64 Created: 3/13/2007 [4/26/07] Field meeting resulted in approval of 6 foot wide attached walk along Birch Di,�5 ... matches sidewalk on south side of street. } [3/13/07] The sidewalk on Birch does not meet LCUASS standards for local residential streets. Minimum 6 foot parkway and 4. oot detached sidewalk. The approved 6'-walk- is shown on the plans. Number: 65 Created: 3/13/2007 (4/26/07] Please show cross slope at cross walk on Shields Street access and provide a cross section or adequate elevation data on the plan to verify that a .'ry monolithic pan will be poured to carry flows south along Shields with a minimum of 0.5 percent fall. Page 3 [3/13/07] Please calculate and show the cross slope on the access to Shields at the cross walk. 2% is the maximum cross slope allowed under ADA guidelines. A section detail hay been added to the grading sheet to .show that the cross walk has a cross slope that is no greater then 2%. It also shows the approximate grade cif the `'driveway" including the pan along Shields Street. Number: 81 Created: 4/26/2007 [4/26/07] The Plat is showing an existing 10 foot wide ditch easement running east - west from Shields Street. If you wish to vacate this easement by the Plat, the ditch owner will need to sign the final plat and a standard vacation note must be added to the plat. You may also record a termination of easement by separate document signed by the ditch owner. Either way, the City will need at a minimum, a letter of intent from the ditch owner stating that the ditch easement is no longer needed or desired. This must be resolved prior to scheduling a hearing for the project. This easement was a general easement which was not dedicated to any one. It will be vacated with the Final Plat. Number: 82 Created: 4/26/2007 [4/26/07] Please provide addition spot - flowline elevation data at the Shields access to show drainage being conveyed at 0.5 percent min. in a monolithically poured pan. You can also provide a simple cross section at this location to show how this is to be constructed. Additional points and clarification have been added to the grading plan. Number: 83 Created: 4/26/2007 [4/26/07] Please extend arrows from standard street cut note to all areas in the ROW with proposed street cuts (access points) Done. Number: 84 Created: 4/26/2007 [4/26/07] The north and south flow line sag curves for the Coy Street design do not meet LCUASS standards. Minimum K values must be 30 or greater. Lengthening the vertical curve should solve the problem. See LCUASS Table 7-3. The curves have been revised or replaced with segmented grade breaks moth the allowable 0.4% grade breaks. Number: 85 Created: 4/26/2007 [4/26/07] Please submit a revised plan for any scheduled hearings. Thank you. Topic: Tech. Services Number: 89 Created: 5/2/2007 [5/2/07] Many line over text conflicts on the Site and Landscape Plans. Please see redlines for clarification and correct with final plan submittal. These text conflicts have been revised ZZ Page 4 Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Topic: Electric Utility Number: 73 Created: 4/24/2007 [4/24/07] The developer will need to coordinate power requirements by providing a completed Commercial Service (C-1) form to Light & Power Engineering. The reply comments to the previous round of City staff comments indicated that the form was attached to the resubmittal. The form was not included in the Light & Power packet for the resubmittal. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 90 Created: 5/2/2007 [5/2/07] STREET ADDRESSING: Please note that PFA is emphasizing consistency in addressing. Future projects shall comply with International Fire Code and PFA policy, which require that buildings be addressed off the street that provides access to the site. In the future, a project such as this will receive a Birch Street address, which is the actual, accurate street that provides access onto the site. The two lots in this project at one time had Shields Street access; however, the development is starting from scratch, the property is being redeveloped, and access is not off Shields Street. PFA's emphasis on consistent addressing requirements ensures accurate, clear addressing, which enables PFA to provide emergency services as expeditiously as possible. We appreciate PFA allowing this development to proceed with 609 S. Shields addressing. TVe believe this will better serve the commercial tenants and their customers, all of which front onto S. Shields Street. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Engineering Number: 56 Created: 3/13/2007 [5/4/07] 1 think the crossing of the drive aisle/exit might need to be slightly reconfigured for pedestrian safety. We will need to discuss this at final compliance. This issue has been discussed and resolved by keeping the current design. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 69 Created: 3/15/2007 [5/2/07] Reminder Comment [3/15/07] A drainage easement is required for the limits of the detention area. There is a blanket easement in place on the final plat. This is covered by a note that states "all area outside of the _building envelope is designated as a drainage easement ". Number: 71 Created: 3/16/2007 Page 5 [5/2/07] Repeat Comment -The comment below can be addressed with an informal meeting at City Utilities. [3/16/07] After the amount of detention volume is agreed upon, the grading plan reviewed to show this volume is achievable, offsite flows shown to safely pass through the site, PDP can go to a hearing. The volume required is now achievable as shown on the plans with an off -site temporary construction easement to prevent ponding on the neighbor's property. Number: 88 Created: 5/2/2007 [5/2/07] The detention pond needs to have some freeboard. This can be discussed at Final Compliance. There is 1, fbot of freeboard provided fi-om the top of pond to the finish floor of the proposed building. The two emergency spillways in the parking areas prevent ponding much higher than the 100 year iwsel. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Water/Wastewater Number: 58 Created: 3/13/2007 [5/2/07] [3/13/071 Provide water service sizing calc's for the residential service for review Sizing calculations using AWWA-22 are included in this submittal. Number: 87 Created: 5/2/2007 [5/2/07] Add to the note on the 1.5" water service on Shields indicating that that it is for commercial water service. This has been added Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Gary Lopez Topic: Zoning Number: 91 Created: 5/2/2007 [5/2/07] Issues resolved ok Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, Shelby Sommer Associate City Planner Page 6 CIVIL ENGINEERS` VARIANCE REQUEST To: Sheri Wamhoff, P.E. Engineering Development Review Manager City of Fort Collins PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 From: Jade P. Miller, P.E. ora P, s•. DMW Civil Engineers c 0.1 33885 Date: February 14, 2007 Hellenic s,•- nic Plaza, Fort Collins, Colorado Project No. BSX 1 435 WEST 29" STREET LOVELAND, CO B053B (970) 461 -2661 FAx (970) 461-2665 WWW. DMWCIVILENGINEERS.COM On behalf of our client with the above referenced project, we are requesting variances to the City's Standard Design Criteria. Per the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards, Fig 7-2F, a 15 foot wide easement shall be provided behind the Right -of -Way for 4-Lane Arterial streets. Also, per the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards, Fig 7-9F, a 9 foot wide easement shall be provided behind the Right -of -Way for Residential Local streets. The proposed easements for the Hellenic Plaza Development are 3 and 6 feet behind the Right -of -Way for Shields Street (a 4-Lane Arterial) and Birch Street (a Residential Local), respectively (please see attached). This variance is being requested due to physical constraints on the site. Also, since many ' utilities are already installed along these two existing streets, the need for the easements p is reduced. The affected utility companies were contacted to get information regarding the need for additional easement. As a result, many indicated no easement requirements. The 3 and 6 foot easements for Shields Street and Birch Street are a result of utility company requests for easements. In conclusion, full compliance with the Standard Design Criteria would impose undue hardship in developing the site. It is our opinion that the proposed design will adequately meet the intent of the standards for the health, safety and welfare of the public. 'sl iMuiS 90131M9 YYY� Y {. rs.s. — o. n 1 I y 1� ' 1 1 i1 y m W 11 11 11 1� II 11 I j• I. 1 p Is I 1j I� j1 I a 11 ---------_ 1 1 ♦� ...�,._. .. ..,... a .�., . ,,,—�— .—..r♦��, � �� / I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1� It j 1 i ji l 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 l t 1 1 1 I 1* Page 1 of 1 Sheri Langenberger - helenic plaza From: Sheri Langenberger To: Randy Maizland Date: Friday, December 21, 2007 11:31:43 AM�� Subject: helenic plaza Randy Just wanted to let you know the outcome of yesterdays meeting regarding the sidewalk along Shields St. I agreed that they can place the 6 foot sidewalk 2 feet from the row and it would work for us and the future section. This will be a better solution that having the sidewalk placed up against the building (we would normally be asking for 2 feet additional sidewalk or the building to be setback an additional 2 feet to accommodate the encroachment on the usable sidewalk width). So this will make the sidewalk work better, give them 2 feet in which to do some foundation plantings and would ultimately reduce the parkway width to 6 feet (which is the minimum width we allow for a parkway). Ideally they would also place the street trees 3 feet off of the sidewalk edge, so they will fall within the ultimate parkway and not have to be located at such time as the roadway is widened. I think this is what they are going to do, but they needed to talk to Barbra and still may want to place the sidewalk where they had been showing it. They are aware that if they do that they are not eligible for street oversizing reimbursement and we would want them to escrow for the future sidewalk relocation. Shelby was also in the meeting so if you have any question next week you can talk to her as well. We asked that they resubmit plans to you showing what they decided and were going to do. Sheri file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\swamhoff\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW}00002.HTM 3/18/2008 Number: 27 Created: 3/8/2007 [3/8/07] Minimum width of any landscape setback area along a lot line is 5 feet. Please address this issue along the western property line by providing more information about what is existing on the adjacent property and/or a modification of standards request. Due to the walkway connecting Birch St. to Coy street, the landscape area has been reduced in width. We are proposing to cooperate with the adjacent property to share the landscape area, between the parking lots. Landscape is being shown on the plans for this area. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: Landscape plan Number: 8 Created: 3/6/2007 [3/6/07] Check with Tim Buchanan, City Forester for evaluation of existing trees (cottonwoods) on site. Plans call for removal of trees. Mitigation may be required. We have met with Tim Buchanan on site to evaluate the existing trees. It was determined that 11 of the proposed trees are required to be up -sized as replacement for the trees to be removed. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer Topic: Plat Number: 7 Created: 3/2/2007 [3/2/07] Larimer County Assessor: Currently the owner of Lot 3, Ray L Randleman Sub is Mccain, Eloise R Family Trust 97151-14-003. Topic: Site Lighting Number: 29 Created: 3/8/2007 [3/8/07] Light levels along the north side of the building fronting on Birch are higher than what is necessary. For better uniformity and conservation purposes please consider reducing the number of fixtures proposed in this area. Photometric plan revised accordingly. Number: 30 Created: 3/8/2007 [3/8/07] Due to the close proximity of this development to neighboring properties, there are structures located very close to or within 20 feet from the property line. Please try to reduce these measurements to 0.1 foot-candle in these highlighted areas. Photometric plan revised accordingly. Topic: Site Plan Number: 18 Created: 3/8/2007 [3/8/07] In the NCB portion of the project you propose 735 sq. ft. of commercial "business service" uses. Medical/dental clinics, professional offices and Page 3 REVISION Cityof Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: April 19, 2007 TO: Engineering PROJECT PLANNER: Shelby Sommer # 30-05A HELLENIC PLAZA PDP — TYPE I PLEASE NOTE: Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: May 2, 2007 Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference _Pg� No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other X c ff _ r-CA'Vk D4—" fo Utility Redline Utility _Landscape (� ZA° "F Vr City of Fort Collins /% WA CA-1 Me t ,l PROJECT Citvof Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: February 23, 2007 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT PLANNER: Shelby Sommer # 30-05A HELLENIC PLAZA PDP — TYPE I Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: March 14, 2007 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference 2- No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) Jl\,-emu 1-4) Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins PROJECT City of Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: February 23, 2007 TO: Trans. Planning PROJECT PLANNER: Shelby Sommer # 30-05A HELLENIC PLAZA PDP — TYPE I Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: March 14, 2007 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems Pa Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, r DMS) e Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape P City of Fort Collins PROJECT City of Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: February 23, 2007 TO: Technical Services PROJECT PLANNER: Shelby Sommer # 30-05A HELLENIC PLAZA PDP — TYPE I Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: March 14, 2007 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) alzu 3 t, Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Port Collins CIVIL ENGINEERS To: Planning Staff Department of Current Planning City of Fort Collins PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 From: Jade P. Miller, P.E. DMW Civil Engineers, Inc. Date: November 28, 2007 3400 WEST 1 6T" STREET BUILDING 5, SUITE Z GREELEY, CO 80634 (970) 378-6935, FAX (970) 378-6997 WWW. DMWCIVILENGINEERS.COM Project: Sigma Chi redevelopment (Hellenic Plaza) Fort Collins, Colorado Project No. BSX On behalf of our client with the above referenced project, we are writing to clarify issues with the vacation of an existing irrigation easement noted on the Hellenic Plaza plat prepared by Stuart and Associates. Based upon the original plat of the Ray L. Randleman Subdivision, the easement was granted for irrigation purposes but not to a particular grantee. Therefore, a letter of intent, as requested by the City, cannot be obtained as there is no grantee. personal/business service shops are permitted in this zone district, subject to Planning and Zoning Board approval, not Administrative approval. If you still intend on pursuing an Administrative review rather than Planning and Zoning Board then you will need to make the portion of the building in the NCB area residential only. Commercial use removed from the NCB zone. Number: 28 Created: 3/8/2007 [3/8/07] At least one handicap parking space must be van accessible (8 feet wide plus 8 foot access aisle). Parking revised to accommodate 2 van accessable parking spaces. Number: 31 Created: 3/8/2007 [3/8/07] Per Section 3.2.5 the trash/recycling enclosure shall be designed to allow walk-in access without having to open the main enclosure service gates. This is important because of the potential conflict with vehicles exiting the parking lot and open gates to the southern trash enclosure. Trash enclosure revised to include walk-in access from side. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Engineering Number: 34 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Utility Plan Cover Sheet: Please revise the cover sheet per the redline comments (date, vicinity map, sheet index, geotech info) Remove the typical street section from the cover sheet. Please add the plat to the Utility Plan set for reference as sheet 3. Revised sheet per redlines. Number: 35 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] You will need to submit a construction cost estimate for the Coy Street ultimate design for the frontage obligation. This cost will be collected as a cash in lieu payment and provided in the development agreement. Acknowledged. Number: 36 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Please submit a formal variance request for driveway separation as listed on General Note 48. Both variance requests have been discussed prior to the submittal and will be approved. Will include with this submittal. Number: 37 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Grading Plan General: It has been mentioned that the building layout and detention areas may change to provide additional detention and water quality. Please revise the Grading Plan per the preliminary review comments provided on the redlines. Label all proposed new walks with dimensioning. Call out all new access ramps and curb drains in the ROW with details. Revised. Number: 38 Created: 3/13/2007 Page 4 [3/13/07] For the access on Shields, please provide additional flow line spot elevations and a cross section on the Grading Plan sheet. Show that a minimum 0.5 percent gradient is maintained across the access. Please provide typical construction details for all on -site drainage improvements such as infall and outfall curb and gutter, pans, drains etc.... Revised. Number: 39 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Please coordinate with stormwater to determine if a drainage easement needs to be dedicated for any detention areas or drainage improvements. Acknowledged. Number: 40 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Please clearly show and label the limits of ROW on the Utility Plan sheet. Added. Number: 41 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Please label and dimension new proposed sidewalks on the Utility Plan Sheet. Added. Number: 42 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Call out all proposed ramps and all drainage structures within the ROW with standard details. Added. Number: 43 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Please provide proposed signing and striping for the Shields controlled access on the utility Plan sheet. Added. Number: 44 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] The proposed sidewalk on Shields should tie back into the existing attached walk to the north. Please show this on all applicable plan sheets. Revised. Number: 45 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] The sidewalk connection from Coy Street to Birch Street should be constructed within a public access easement. Please dedicate this easement on the Plat and show and label the easement on the Utility Plan sheet. Added. Number: 46 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] The 90 degree intersection bulbs on Coy Street shall be designed per LCUASS standard 7-24. If this standard design has a significant negative impact on the Hellenic Plaza site, we may be flexible with parkway and sidewalk locations/dimensions to make it fit well. Revised, will discuss impacts after submittal. Number: 47 Created: 3/13/2007 Page 5 [3/13/07] Please provide North and South flowline profiles in your preliminary design. See additional redline comments regarding profile slope at the sag curve and inlet location. Revised. Number: 48 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Please clearly show existing and proposed limits of ROW on the Coy Street design. Revised. Number: 49 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] The typical street section shown with rollover curb and gutter requires a total ROW dedication of 53 feet per the LCUASS standard. Please dedicate additional ROW to accommodate rollover C&G or use vertical C&G. Revised. Number: 50 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] 'Please call out the proposed concrete pan and sidewalk inlet with details on the street design. Label and dimension sidewalks, parkway and curb to curb pavement on plan view Added. Number: 51 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Some of the text on the typical/standard details is difficult to read. Will not copy or scan well. Revised. Number: 54 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] The PDP submittal review fee was not calculated correctly. An additional $81.75 is due. Please submit this payment prior going to hearing. Number: 64 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] The sidewalk on Birch does not meet LCUASS standards for local residential streets. Minimum 6 foot parkway and 4.5 foot detached sidewalk. Revised to 6'. see comment no. 55. Number: 65 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Please calculate and show the cross slope on the access to Shields at the cross walk. 2% is the maximum cross slope allowed under ADA guidelines'. Added. Department: Forestry Topic: Landscape plan Number: 70 Issue Contact: Tim Buchanan Created: 3/16/2007 [3/16/07] The applicant needs to contact the City Forester, Tim Buchanan to meet on -site to evaluate the existing trees and determine required mitigtion. Plant notes are needed on the landscape plan. The applicant needs to contact the City Forester to obtain required forestry notes. Refer to Landscape Plan Page 6 Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Topic: Landscape plan Number: 3 Created: 2/28/2007 [2/28/07] A landscape plan showing a planned streetlight on Birch St. has been sent to the landscape architect (Eastpoint Studio). It appears that one or more street trees will need to be relocated or eliminated to meet the clearance requirements between streetlights and trees. Street Light is now Shown on the Landscape plan and trees relocated accordingly. Topic: Utility plan Number: 2 Created: 2/28/2007 [2/28/07] It is suggested that the new electric line to cross Birch St. be located 10 ft. west of the fire line shown on the utility plan. This way the developer only has to make one patch of the street. Revised. Number: 4 Created: 2/28/2007 [2/28/07] The electric transformer will need to be a minimum of 1.5 ft. north of the location shown on the utility plan to provide the minimum of 2 ft. between the back of the sidewalk and the edge of the transformer. It is assumed, but not obvious, that this relocation will still provide the required 3 ft. of clearance between the back of the transformer and the edge of the building. Also, please not that the transformer cannot be located under a building overhang or eve. Relocated to west. Number: 5 Created: 2/28/2007 [2/28/07] In order to confirm the dimensions of the transformer, Light & Power will need a completed Commercial Service Information (C-1) form for both building's electric services. This form can be obtained from Light & Power Engineering (970)221-6700. Form completed and attached to this re -submittal. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 9 Created: 3/6/2007 [3/6/07] 3 STORIES/AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS: An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout mixed -use occupancy structures when residential occupancies are located on the third story. The sprinkler system shall comply with NFPA 13 requirements. 97UFC 1003.2.9 Building is fully sprinklered. Number: 10 Created: 3/6/2007 [3/6/07] WATER SUPPLY: Fire hydrants, where required, must be the type approved by the water district having jurisdiction and the Fire Department. (ARE OTHER FIRE HYDRANTS LOCATED ON OR NEARBY THE PROPERTY THAT CAN BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN?) Hydrant spacing and water flow must meet Page 7 minimum requirements based on type of occupancy. Minimum flow and spacing requirements include: Commercial, 1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not further than 300 feet to the building, on 600-foot centers thereafter; residential within Urban Growth Area, 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not further than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter; residential outside Urban Growth Area, 500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not further than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter. These requirements may be modified if buildings are equipped with automatic fire sprinkler systems. 97UFC 901.2.2.2 Acknowledged. Number: 11 Created: 3/6/2007 [3/6/07] REQUIRED ACCESS: A fire lane is required. This fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed at all times. A fire lane plan shall be submitted for approval prior to installation. In addition to the design criteria already contained in relevant standards and policies, any new fire lane must meet the following general requirements: • Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface (asphalt or concrete) capable of supporting fire apparatus weights. Compacted road base shall be used only for temporary fire lanes or at construction sites. • Have appropriate maintenance agreements that are legally binding and enforceable. • Be designated on the plat as an Emergency Access Easement. • Maintain the required minimum width of 20 feet throughout the length of the fire lane (for buildings three or more stories in height, minimum width is 30 feet along at least one long side of the structure). If a fire lane cannot be provided, the building shall be fire sprinklered. 97UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1 Provided. Number: 12 Created: 3/6/2007 [3/6/07] FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: Fire department connections shall be installed remote from the buildings, and located on the street or fire lane side of buildings, fully visible and recognizable from the street or nearest point of fire department vehicle access or as otherwise approved by the fire code official. Contact Carie Dann to coordinate an approved location for the FDC. 2006 International Fire Code 912.2.1 and PFA Bureau Policy Will coordinate. Number: 13 Created: 3/6/2007 [3/6/07] KNOX BOX: Poudre Fire Authority requires a "Knox Box" to be mounted on the front of every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm system. 97UFC 902.4; PFA BUREAU POLICY 88-20 `Knox Box' will be provided with the construction documents. Number: 14 Created: 3/6/2007 [3/6/07] FIRE LINE REQUIREMENT: Buildings that are required to be fire sprinklered shall have a minimum 6-inch fire line unless hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fire line. Provided. Page 8 Number: 15 - Created:3/6/2007 [3/6/07] COY ACCESS: During the development process, we discussed vehicle traffic on Coy. What is being done to mitigate crossover traffic? Vertical curb & gutter and landcaping. Number: 16 Created: 3/6/2007 [3/6/07] ADDRESS NUMERALS Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of six-inch (6) numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable).97UFC 901.4.4 So noted and to be included on construction documents. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Engineering Number: 55 Created: 3/13/2007 UPDATE from 3/7/2006 site visit: a 6' attached walk to match the south side of Birch St. will be acceptable. Revised. [3/13/07] The 4.5' attached walk on Birch will not be allowed. The LCUASS standard for a residential local requires a 4.5' detached walk with a 6' parkway at a minimum. Number: 56 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] 1 think the crossing of the drive aisle/exit might need to be slightly reconfigured for pedestrian safety. We will need to discuss this at staff review. Revised. Number: 57 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] The alternative modes analysis in the TIS is acceptable. So noted. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Landscape plan Number: 63 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Add note on separation distances from water/sewer lines, and adjust plant locations to provide required separations. Trees and Shrubs have been relocated Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 52 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Per meeting with the City, applicant is trying to provide additional detention volume. Once this is completed, applicant can meet with the Stormwater department to determine if the new revised volume will be adequate. This meeting can be scheduled any time and does not have to be during a submittal period. Acknowledged. Number: 53 Created: 3/13/2007 Page 9 [3/13/07] Grading plan will be reviewed once revisions are made. Acknowledged. Number: 69 Created: 3/15/2007 [3/15/07] A drainage easement is required for the limits of the detention area. Acknowledged. Number: 71 Created: 3/16/2007 [3/16/07] After the amount of detention volume is agreed upon, the grading plan reviewed to show this volume is achievable, offsite flows shown to safely pass through the site, PDP can go to a hearing. Acknowledged. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Water/Wastewater Number: 58 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Provide water service sizing calc's for the residential service for review. Number: 59 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Revise the 6" connections to the water main in Birch to be made with tapping saddles. Revised. Number: 60 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Revise utilities on Birch side to provide separation between water facilities and underground electric. Revised. Number: 61 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Fire hydrant location is very congested. Comment 55 is requiring a 6 foot parkway between street and detached walk. This would seem to offer some options for the hydrant location. 6' parkway was not used (revised no. 55). This needs further discussion. Number: 62 Created: 3/13/2007 [3/13/07] Install new curb stop on the existing 1-1/2" water service ahead of the meter pit. Added. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Gary Lopez Topic: Zoning Number: 66 Created: 3/14/2007 [3/14/07] Indicate bidg dimensions on site plan. Building envelope dimensions are shown. The exact building dimensions within this envelope may vary slightly. Number: 67 Created: 3/14/2007 [3/14/07] Note required that no CO/TCO will be issued without landscape completion or financial security of 125% of remaining landscaping installation value. Noted. This note has been added to the Landscape Plan Page 10