HomeMy WebLinkAboutHORSETOOTH COMMONS PUD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2009-03-12darlie: 6 Jan 87 110 d
rtme:�t:
ITEM: 96-81E McWILLIAMS GATE at HORSETOOTH COMMONS Preliminary& Final
(formerly Williamsburg)
COMMENTS:
Z�
n
EWA
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
ENGINEERING SERVICES
January 16, 1987
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ted Shepard, Project Planner
FROM: Jim Newell, Civil I Engineer
9 �, ✓f
RE: Project Comments for McWi-liams Gate, Preliminary & Final
Listed below are the comments for McWilliams Gate at Horsetooth from the
City Engineering Department.
Engineering Comments:
1) After seeing the different phases come in for this area, I have some
confusion about the name of this plat and what the rest of the devel-
opment will be called. Please ask the applicant to explain his
intentions.
2) The plat must show the dedication of the drainage easement where they
propose the detention ponds.
3) The proposed island in the cul-de-sac must be an outlot (not dedi-
cated to the City) with a utility access easement. Also, a note is
needed on the plat saying the City is not responsible for maintenance
of the outlot. If the cul-de-sac is to remain a City street, then
the surface must be designed with full depth asphalt, or a concrete
surface, to reduce the weathering effects of the irrigation runoff.
4) Please use the dedication statement attached to comments on the plat.
5) A statement is needed on the plat prohibiting access on Stonegate
Drive for lots with frontages on this Drive.
ENGINEERING SERVICES
McWilliams Gate Comments
Jan. 16, 1987 - Page 2� �
6) The plat shows McWilliams Drive and the utility plans show McWilliams
Gate. Please correct.
7) There are numerous design features :which do not meet current City
Standards. Below is a list of most non-standard features. Please
prepare a complete list with an explanation for each one and justifi-
cation for a request of a variance.
A) Local street width is 36' with 54' R-O-W.
B) Curb radii must be 20' at intersections.
C) Minimum radii for center line of collectors is 610', for locals
is 240', this includes cul-de-sacs. "Lower design speeds may be
used ... if approved in writing by the City Traffic Engineer
prior to preliminary submittal". Please note this in Standards.
D) Curb return radii for cul-de-sac is 50'.
These comments reflect the concerns of the Engineering Department at this
time. I suggest a meeting with the applicant, or representative, soon so
we can start discussing these matter.
xc: Mike Herzig, Development Coordinator
File
DATE =. Feb "e, DEPARTN/ItNT:
ITEM: 96-81F HORSETOOTH COMMONS CONVENICE CENTER - Re 4 d
No Problems
iz Problems or Concerns (see below)
0
vise Preliminar,
ate
Signature