The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHOMESTEAD PUD SECOND - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2004-11-12COUNTY REFERRAL -, City of Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET Current Planning COMMENTS TO: Matt Lafferty FROM: Engineering TYPE OF MEETING: Larimer County Planning Commission PROJECT: Homestead PUD 2"d PD & PLD THRIJ: City of Fort Collins Planning Department PLANNER: Bob Barkeen City comments must be received in Current Planning Department by: April 10, 2002 No Problems i�lfyroblems or Concerns (see below or attached) 1 IN Date: _Signature:_ _ _ City of Fort Collins From: Dave Stringer To: rhayes@larimer.org Subject: Homestead PUD 2nd Roxann, Following are my comments for the Homestead PUD 2nd filing; 1. Need to dedicate an additional 7 feet on Ziegler Road. This is a 2 lane Arterial on City Master Street Plan with a 1/2 right of way width of 42 feet. 2. Add note to plat about fence restrictions for all lots that have the 2 foot drainage pan at the back lot line. 3. Reduce the size of the "elbow" on Hearthside Drive. See LUCASS detail 7-26. 4. Need to show enlarged details on Plat for temporary cul-de-sac and easement at Ketcher and Ziegler for distance and bearings. 5. Tangent Length between curves on Hearthside Drive to be minimum 100 feet as per LUCASS table 7.3 6. Need signature of owners of interest of the Muskrat irrigation ditch on Plat and utility plans. 7. Cul-de-sac's need to reflect Poudre Fire Authority's requirement of 50 foot flowline radii. 8. Refer to revised plans from Northern Engineering for pipe work at Ziegler and Kechter Roads . 9. Use directional access ramps (typ) 10. Provide access easement and walkway from Ironstone Court to Ziegler Road 11. Relocate type III barricades at temporary turnaround. location will not work for emergency access, move to property line. 12. Design and install curb, gutter and sidewalk on Ketcher and Ziegler Roads. 13. Additional comments will be made on more complete submittals. dstringer@fcgov.com CC: Bob Barkeen COUNTY REFERRAL m^rlmmil COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Colliris Current Planning; COMMENTS TO: Matt Lafferty FROM: ENGINEERING TYPE OF MEETING: Concept Review PROJECT: Homestead PUD 2n1 PD U PLD THRU: City of Fort Collins Planning Department PLANNER: Bob Barkeen City comments must be received in Current Planning Department by: February 26, 2003 ❑ No Problems 0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: 1. Plat page 2/3. Irrigation easement needs to be in separate easement from public easements (typical) 2. Sheet A 1. Is signature needed from owner of irrigation lateral? 3. Sheet R l . Add a note to the effect that the final limits of asphalt repair will be determined in the field by the engineering inspector. 4. Sheet R4. Same comment as above plus use directional access ramps at all locations of radii. 5. Sheet R9. Are the street names and directions correct? 6. Sheet Rl 1. Appears to me that the intersection grades and cul-de-sac grades to work. Cross slopes are either to flat or steep. Need to add riprap detail size etc at end of CazG on Old Legacy drive. 7. Sheet R 12. Same comment as # 6. 8. Sheet SS3. Is sanitary sewer RCP or PVC pipe? 9. Sheet ST2. Same comment per irrigation lines not allowed in public easements. 10. Sheet D 1. I didn't see any sheets that referred to trail detail. 11. Sheet D2. Fed's now require truncated domes for access ramps, use City of Greeley detail for stamped concrete domes., Typ. Sidewalk depth is 6 inch not 4 as shown on detail. Date: March 28, 2003 N NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. May 21, 2003 Dave Stringer City of Fort Collins Engineering Department 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 RE: Homestead PUD 2nd PD and PLD Dear Dave: This letter is in response to your First Final Plat Comments letter dated March 28, 2003. With the submittal of this letter, Northern Engineering Services is also submitting the revised Final Utility Plans, dated May 21, 2003. Revisions to the plan set include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. The irrigation main has been revised and approved by you. The irrigation easement has been separated from the public utility easements. 2. Signature of the irrigation ditch owner has been added to the Existing Conditions Plan. 3. Note has been added to Sheet R1 to the effect that the final limits of asphalt repair will be determined in the field by the engineering inspector. 4. Note has been added to Sheet R4 to the effect that the final limits of asphalt repair will be determined in the field by the engineering inspector. Directional access ramps have been added to the intersection. 5. The incorrect street name and direction has been revised on Sheet R9. 6. The intersection grades and cul-de-sac grades have been revised and improved; however, not all of the standards are possible to meet in the cut -de -sacs. The 1.0% flowline minimum was maintained in the cul-de-sacs for drainage purposes, but since the driving speeds will be slower in the cul-de-sacs, the cul-de-sac cross slopes vary outside of the limits of the LCUASS. 7. Same response as number 6. 8. The sanitary sewer pipe is PVC and the plans have been corrected. 9. See response to number 1. 10. The Utility Plans now refers to the trail detail. 11. The truncated dome detail has been added to the access ramp detail. The sidewalk depth of 4-inches has been revised to reflect 6-inches. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 970-221-4158 ext. 111 if you have any further questions or comments concerning this project. Sincerely, NORT ER ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. l e n L. Keefe D:\Projects\HRT\Admin\fort collins engineerinf resyonses May-03.doc 420 SOUTH HOWLS, SUITE 202 / FORT C LLINS, OL RADO 80521 / 970.221,4158 / FAX 970.221,4159 Current Planning COMMENTS TO: Matt Lafferty FROM: ENGINEERING TYPE OF MEETING: Concept Review PROJECT: Homestead PUD 2nd PD & PLD THRU: City of Fort Collins Planning Department PLANNER: Bob Barkeen City comments must be received in Current Planning Department by: February 26, 2003 ❑ No Problems R1 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: l . Plat page 2/3. Irrigation easement needs to be in separate easement from public easements (typical) 2. Sheet Al. Is signature needed from owner of irrigation lateral? 3. SheetRI. Add a note to the effect that the final limits of asphalt repair will be determined in the field by the engineering inspector. 4. Sheet R4. Same comment as above plus use directional access ramps at all locations of radii. 5. Sheet R9. Aire the street names and directions correct? 6. Sheet R1 1. Appears to me that the intersection grades and cul-de-sac grades to work. Cross slopes are either to flat or steep. Need to add riprap detail size etc at end of CUG on Old Legacy drive. 7. Sheet R 12. Same comment as # 6. 8. Sheet SS3. Is sanitary sewer RCP or PVC pipe? 9. Sheet ST2. Same comment per irrigation lines not allowed in public easements. 10. Sheet DI. I didn't see any sheets that referred to trail detail. 11. Sheet D2. Fed's now require truncated domes for access ramps, use City of Greeley detail for stamped concrete domes., Typ. Sidewalk depth is 6 inch not 4 as shown on detail. Date: May 29, 2003 Signature: COUNTY REFERRAL na�=gj COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collln;s Current Planning COMMENTS TO: Matt Lafferty FROM: ENGINEERING TYPE OF MEETING: PLD&PD PRO]ECT: Homestead P.U.D. 2nd Filing THRU: City of Fort Collins Planning Department PLANNER: Bob Barkeen City comments must be received in Current Department by: 0 No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Comments: No additional comments Date: Planning Dave Stringer C'itvnf Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments. Department: Engineering Date: September 26, 2003 Project: HOMESTEAD P.U.D. 2ND FILING - ANNEXATION & ZONING - TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Troy Jones in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: October 011 2003 Mote - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Dave Stringer Topic: map Created: 9/26/2003 Number: 2 Annexation needs to include all of road rights -of -way, including rights -of -way dedicated by Plat to county Number: 3 Created: 9/26/2003 This is not an annexation map. Show outer boundary distances, bearings and etc. Include contiguous boundary see attached example Number: 4 Created: 9/26/2003 Include total perimeter, contiguous boundary ratio, total area, appropriate signature blocks and etc. See attached example Number: 5 Created: 9/26/2003 Questions, please call �, & =�> Date CUECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS L----Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1