Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLOCK 112 259 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE - Filed GC-GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE - 2004-11-05April 2. 2003 Katie Moore City of Fort Collins Engineering Department Re: Damaged Concrete Dear Katie, On Wednesday March 19. 2003 1 observed a City of Fort Collins employee using a skid steer loader to remove snow on the North West corner of Olive Street and College Avenue. Ile was working quickly and did not use much caution with regard to the new sidewalk. A few days latter I observed numerous locations where the equipment damaged the concrete and paving stones. I am submitting photos of these for your review. As you know I am currently in the process of re -developing this property. You indicated to me that I would be responsible for repairing damaged concrete on the site as part of the city's development requirements. I am concerned that I will be responsible for paying for damages caused by The City of Fort Collins and the negligence of their employee. This sidewalk was quite new and did not have any major damage to it prior to the incident on March 19. Please advise me of your impression of this matter. I would like assurances from the city that I will not be held responsible for these damages. Sincerely J Steve Levinger Historic Armstrong Hotel Owner No Text Community Planning and Environmental Services Advance Planning Department City of Fort Collins April 30, 2003 Katie Moore Development Review Civil Engineer Engineering Department City of Fort Collins 281 N. College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 RE: Rehabilitation of the New Mountain Empire Hotel, 249-261 S. College Avenue Dear Ms. Moore: As staff to the Landmark Preservation Commission, I would like to convey to you their strong support that the doors be allowed to swing out on the Olive Street commercial storefronts of the New Mountain Empire Hotel, 249-261 S. College Avenue. On April 23, 2003, during their regular meeting, the Commission approved conceptual rehabilitation plans for the building that included the Olive Street storefront doors swinging -out over the right-of-way. Historical photographs show that this was the way they were originally designed_ The only other option to the building owner would be to recess the doors, and this was never the historical configuration on this side of the building. The general consensus was that the sidewalk is wide enough in this area, and that the basement entrance stairwell would tend to guide passers-by further away from the building. If you have any questions, you may reach me at 221-6597. Thank you for your consideration of the Landmark Preservation Commission's mission to follow the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, and their recommendation for this building. Sincerely, Carol Tunner Historic Preservation Planner cc: Steve Levinger 281 No rth College Avenue PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO80522-0580 • (970)221-6376 FAX (970) 224-6111 • TDD (970) 224-6002 • E-mail aplammng(u fcgov.com June 12, 2003 Katie Moore City of Fort Collins Department of Engineering Re: Item J, pg. 30, appendix E, LCUASS Dear Katie, I am requesting a change in the language of the following statement that 1 am required to annotate on the cover sheet of the Utility plans for 259 S. College Ave. "The Empire Hotel"- The statement as required reads: `9 hereby affirm that these final construction plans were prepared under my direct supervision in accordance with all applicable City of Fort Collins and State of Colorado standards and statutes, respectively; and that I am fully responsible for the accuracy of all design, revisions, and record conditions that I have noted on these plans." I would like to change the statement to read as follows: "I hereby affirm that these final construction plans were prepared under my direct ,'supervision in accordance withICity of Fort Collins and State of Colorado standards and statutes applicable to this property, respectively;(and that I am responsible for the accuracy of the design noted on these plans." I am requesting this change in language because the subject property is an existing building. As such, there are many existing underground utilities and site conditions that have been previously designed, constructed, and revised without the benefit of supervision, input, or design assistance from my civil engineer Richard S. Beardmore, P.E.. Please; let me know if this change in language is acceptable in light of the unique nature of this submittal. I have spoken with Paul Eckman about this matter. He indicated he would defer to the Engineering Departments decision regarding this matter. I can be reached at 430-0407 if you have any questions. I look forward to your response. Sincerely, rf Z- Steve Levinger a-d E:S9S-b2Z-OLG -+09uzna-1 anags d8i:i0 60 ZS unr