HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARMONY SCHOOL SHOPS THIRD - Filed GC-GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE - 2004-09-07SEP 06 '01 13:2e FR AER
3035263394 TO 9-19702216378 P.03i06
Page 2
Sheri. Wamhoff
September 6, 2001
Ik development is :more conceptual at the moment. In that case, perhaps it is more^
appropriate to rcfcr to AER as the Owner of Lot I and the Phase I or Lot 1 Developer and L
Western VII as the Owner of Lot 2 and the Phase II or Lot 2 Developer.
Recitals:
In general the Recitals should be revised to reflect that AER will develop Phase I
or Lot 1, and Western VII will develop Phase II or Lot 2, and that the provisions that
follow apply to each of them as to their respective developments.
With respect to Phase I (Lot l), I would appreciate it if a Recital could be added J (-rr
1' which refers specifically to the approved final development plan, since the DA often
refers to plans in general, but there is no specific reference to the plans for this project. J
This will assist us in working with our bank to obtain Letters of Credit to secure w�
performance of the work included in Phase I of the approved plans. Perhans a rnfaranra
to the specific approved plans could appear in the second W1MREA0' I)a.cg.
1, and/or the fourth WHEREAS paragraph.
General Conditions:
Starting on the bottom of Page 1 and continuing through Page 4, you have
outlined general provisions telating to the development of the "Property." Sin" the
"Property" description encompasses the entire development and does not take into
account the fact that AER will only develop Lot 1, and Western VII will only develop
Lot 2, perhaps a sentence could be added following the words "General Conditions" in N
Paragraph I at the bottom of Page 2, which states something like: "These General
Conditions shall apply separately to the development activities of each Developer k�
improving Lot 1 and Lot 2, respectively, as each such Lot is developed_"
Then, where there is any reference in Sections A through K to the "Property," Ali
perhaps amending the word to refer to " ... the Lot being developed. " or some
similar words would clarify the phasing of the two projects.
Section D on Page 2 refers to the sequencing of work, but you have indicated in '
?0l Exhibit A that this does not apply. It is my understanding that the final developiucnt
�.' plans show separate utility connections for the most part for the buildings on each Lot. , __
Consequently, I believe it may be clearer if this paragraph and/or the Exhibit were } w
revised to state that each Lot Developer will complete those utilities and/or streets 1.
identified in Section D which are intended to serve only the Lot being developed. 1}J
,ate
Section E should also state that each Lot Developer will pay for facilities required
for their respective Lots. - a">
r1 At the end of Section F, at the top of page 3, adding the words " ... of the
applicable Lot." should clarify this section.
cLi lv�.�c-c'
PROJECT
i
11KNAA COMMENT SHEET ,
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: October 25, 2000 TO: PFA
PROJECT: 1#42-89H Hannony School Shops, 3rd Filing —
PDP - Type 1 (LUC)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
November 22, 2000
Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference
ADDRESS NUMERALS:
Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a
minimum of 6 inch numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown
brick are not acceptable). 1,
WATER SUPPLY:
Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an approved
roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gallons of water per minute at
a residual pressure of 20 psi. No commercial building can be greater then 300 feet from a
Fire hydrant.
BUILDING AREA: AREA:
e feet and must be fire contained or fire sprinklered.
Buildings A and B exceed 5000 squat
- 1 %- oc- C
Signature
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report _Other
Utility Redline Utility _Landscape
City of Fort Collins
PROJECT
i.■..� COMMENT SHEET
City of Foil Collins
Current Planning
DATE: October 25, 2000 TO: Stormwater Util
PROJECT: #42-89H Harmony School Shops, 3" Filing —
PDP - Type 1 (LUC)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
November 22, 2000
Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference
It may not be completely clear in the manual, but under the new LUC there are no
preliminary submittals. All submittals should be final submittals and completed to
that standard. Engineering drawings submitted to the City of Fort Collins Stormwater
Division should be completed to the standard listed in the City of Fort Collins Storm
Drainage Design Criteria manual. Therefore the comments enclosed will not be
comprehenswe and many new comments should be expected upon the return of the
subsequent submittal.
2. Approval of this project will be contingent on the completion of the proposed resizing
of the detention pond in addition to the completion of the review process to ensure
compliance with all city specifications listed in the City of Fort Collins Storm
Drainage Design Criteria manual. We have enclosed material to assist in the
determination of the flows from your site. The offsite flows from the property to the
north must he considered in your calculations as well. The maximum allowable
release will be 15.1 cis. Please provide detention so the 15.1cfs release rate will not
exceeded.
RESPONSE:
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS o ��nSulo�
_Plat Site /DrainageReport _Other
_futility �Redlinc Utility �Landscapc S
Please show that the capacity of the inlets on Milestone Dr. will not be exceeded with
the addition of flow from basin 6.
RESPONSE:
4. Water quality must be addressed on site. Onsite water quality is a requirement that
will not be waved. Water quality and onsite detention should be considered in the
redesign of the drainage system. Any water detained must be done in a drainage
easement.
RESOPNSE:
5. Please provide cross sections of the swale and trickle pan and show the 1.33*100-yr
WSEL. Please provide spot elevations along the pan to define flow direction.
RESPONSE:
Please provide calculations for the storm sewer pipe and swale being installed. Show
that any new structure can convey I00yr flows. Also note that the storm sewer
junction with the box culvert may require a special manhole. We will allow a
connection here without a manhole if a detail of the connection is provided. Notice
that the box culvert is 1'X 6' and please correct inverts. Please provide a detail of
how the box will be closed off at the north end.
RESOPNSE:
7. Please provide some means of conveyance for the parking lot flows to the swale and
also provide riprap protection of the slope where flows enter the swale. Call out any
structures that will be installed and include dimensions for riprap on plans.
RESPONSE:
S. Please ensure that all basins are delineated on the based on grading. See redlined
onsite drainage area plan.
RESPONSE:
Erosion/Sediment Control Comments:
1. This is a preliminary submittal; erosion control plan will be checked when a complete
submittal has been made.
February 26, 2001
Ted Shepard
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
281 N. College Ave.
Fort Collins, CO 80521
Re: Harmony School Shops 3rd Filing
Dear Ted,
COOM@@ o
urban design, inc.
3555 Stanford road, suite 105
fort collins, colorado 80525
(970) 226-4074
fax (970) 226-4196
e@cityscapeud.com
Staff comments received in a letter, dated November 29, 2000, have been reviewed, and plan
revisions based on those comments have been made to the Project Development Plans and
Preliminary Plat. The following are specific responses to the staff review comments made:
Engineering conment sheet:
Site and LS Plan-
1. The sidewalk between the child care center and the associated parking has been widened to
seven feet.
2. The cross pan has been corrected.
3. The driveway has been aligned so that the proposed driveway centerline intersects with the
existing driveway centerline at the centerline of Milestone Drive.
4. The buildings do not extend into the easements. Verification of this will be completed with
building permit review.
Plat-
t. The proper signature blocks are provided.
2. A certificate of dedication paragraph is provided.
3. Maintenance and repair guarantee language is included.
4. The proper signature blocks are provided.
5. A notice of other documents paragraph is provided.
6. Vacation of the temporary easements is noted on the revised plat.
7. A cross -access easement has been added in the shared parking and drive area to permit
access for both lots.
8. No structures are proposed in the easements.
9. The improvements have been removed from the plat.
10. A drainage easement has been added, as appropriate.
11. Children's World attorneys have indicated that US West will not need to sign the plat since it
is not owned in fee. US West has easement rights but should not be required to sign the
plat. Therefore, no signature block is provided for them.
12. The red -lines on the plat has been addressed on the revised plat.
Utility Plans
1. A title sheet has been added and the title has been changed.
2. General notes have been added.
3. City signature blocks are added.
4. The vacated easements have been removed.
5. The driveway has been aligned so that the proposed driveway centerline intersects with the
existing driveway centerline at the centerline of Milestone Drive.
6. The access drive is now shown as concrete to the property line.
7. Dimensions for the drive have been added.
8. The radius entry has been removed and a standard entry added such that a variance will not
be required.
9. Curb removal and replacement limits are shown as well as a note that patching must be to
City of Fort Collins standards.
10. Curb and gutter details are included.
11. A driveway detail is included.
12. Details of the pedestrian ramps at the drive are included.
13. Parking lot drainage does not exit through the driveway.
14. A plat has been included with the utility set.
2. Stormwater comment sheet:
1. A Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report and Plan is included with this resubmittal.
2. The Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report and Plan address the issue of the detention
pond resizing and the consideration of offsite flows to the subject site. Calculations are
included in the report to demonstrate that the 15.1 cfs allowable release rate can be met.
3. Water/Wastewater comment sheet:
♦ The landscape design has been coordinated with the civil design to alleviate conflicts.
♦ A 4 foot separation between the building envelopes and the meter pits is maintained.
♦ The meter pits and curb stops are located adjacent to mains, as requested.
♦ All meter pits and curb stops are shown and labeled. The mains and services lines are
clearly labeled as well.
♦ Separate water and sewer services are provided for each building.
♦ A minimum of 10 feet has been maintained between all underground utilities.
♦ The fire hydrant(s) is connected to the main with a swivel tee. All utility connections are
shown and labeled.
♦ All appropriate details are now shown.
♦ Standard general notes are now included.
♦ No fire lines or irrigation taps are expected to be needed for the development.
4. Light & Power comment sheet:
♦ The existing stub at the site entrance will be extended onto the site to provide electric
service.
♦ Electric Line and transformer locations for each building — and associated easements — have
been determined through discussion with Light & Power.
Keyed Note 11 on the Utility Plans as been removed.
5. Poudre Fire Authority comment sheet:
All UBC and UFC requirements will be met. Further detail will be provided with the Final
Compliance Plans and with building permits.
The requested Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis is included with this resubmittal. This
report specifically addressed the questions you raised regarding the appropriateness of the
proximity of the child care center to the Diamond Shamrock filing station.
6. Poudre Fire Authority— see responses above.
7. Plat comments —
A. The proper signature blocks have been added to the plat.
B. The extraneous CAD layers have been removed.
C. A cross -access easement has been added in the shared parking and drive area to permit
access for both lots.
8. The parking associated with the child care center is not intended to serve as shared parking
during "staggered peak periods." Due to the nature of the child care center, it is likely that it will
share at least some of the same peak hours as the office buildings — with peak hours ranging
from 7:15 am to 8:30 am, and 3:30 pm and 6:00 pm. The child care center would actually
prefer additional parking beyond what is shown based on their experiences in other locations,
but is restricted by the lot size and city codes. We would request the requested number of
spaces be approved. The hours of operation of the child care center are anticipated to be from
7am — 6pm.
9. The parking has been reconfigured to offer a ramp in the area of the front entrance to facilitate
safer pedestrian access.
10. A number of circumstances led to a misunderstanding on the parking for Lot 2. Building A is
intended to be a 2-story office building with a total of 10,000 square feet of leasable area (the
elevations have been modified accordingly), which in conjunction with the square footage for
Building B provides a total of 16,000 square feet of office space on Lot 2. The maximum
parking allotment for that area, therefore, is 48 spaces. The parking area was revised to provide
more screening, to the dumpster area at the end of the entry drive, which leaves Lot 2 with a
total of 46 proposed parking spaces.
11. Lighting Plan:
A. This sheet has been added to the plan set.
B. The detail has been revised to re-emphasize the cutoff distribution of the luminaires, while
still indicating the azimuth aiming (or orientation) of the luminaire, which relates the plan
view arrow symbol of the fixture with the aiming in the detail, specifying each luminaire's
photometric zero azimuth. The IESNA Roadway Luminaire Classification information has
been added to the luminaire schedule.
C. The illumination on the adjacent lots has been reduced where feasible, with the 13-foot
poles located at the project perimeter.
D. House side shields are not available for the luminaires used in the project perimeter.
E. The luminain: adjacent to the landscaping area to the northeast has been respecified to
reduce the illumination as requested.
F. The luminain= schedule has been revised to indicate the quantity of each type.
G. A statistical summary of the proposed lighting has been added, showing the maximum,
minimum and average values for the illuminance values shown on the plan.
H. This information is noted.
I. Cut sheets are attached to this response letter.
12. Landscape Plan:
A. The street tree selected for Milestone Drive has been changes.
B. The street trees have been relocated between the curb and walk, where practical.
C. An additional parking island has been added to ensure no more than 15 spaces occur in a
row.
D. A tree has been added as requested.
E. The spacing of the trees in the central island has been modified as requested.
F. Additional landscape materials have been added to buffer Lot 28 from the potential impacts
of the play areas. With the existing 6' rear yard fence, the orientations of that home and the
single -story Building B, the location of the existing stormwater conveyance system, and the
potential uses in Building B, it seems a better use of resources to concentrate landscaping
efforts on other areas of the site. We do not feel that there will be any adverse impacts to
Lot 34.
G. The phasing line has been clarified to coincide with the proposed lot line.
13. Playground fence:
A. The height of the fence is indicated as 6 feet.
B. The intent is to use a black vinyl -clad chain link fence material that will be densely
vegetated, per city code. The fence along the east and north will be vegetated with a
creeping vine.
C. Solid wood was determined not to be the best material choice for this fence. There is a
concern that an unmanageable and potentially hazardous condition could be created along
the northern boundary where a 15' landscape buffer has been added. Solid fencing along
the parking area would create an unpleasant environment along the walkway to the building.
Also, it does not seem to fit with the Harmony School character, while the black -clad fence
effectively disappears visually behind any landscaping.
D. As we decided to continue with the chain -link fence, a fence detail seemed unnecessary.
14. The "tulip tile" lis illustrated on the columns of the child care center building. There are four
tiles on the south elevation, and two each on the north, east, and west elevations. We have
reviewed the pattern of tiles on the Harmony School and find that it appears that the proposed
tiles do provide the needed connection to this detail on the historic school — especially given the
decreased scale of these proposed buildings. The staff -recommended band of tiles above the
doorways of the buildings is not a feature on any other buildings on the Harmony School Shops
site — including the school itself — and with the tiles measuring 12" x 36" each, it is difficult to
integrate more of them into the smaller scale buildings without them becoming overwhelming.
We would like to note, however, that the brick soldier course along the top of the exterior walls
of the child care center is planned to be the lighter, cream color brick, such as is used on the
Diamond Shamrock buildings, and may serve to highlight these "tulip tiles."
15. Signage locations on Buildings A & B have been added to the elevations.
16. The sign language has been removed from the elevations, and the elevations have been more
clearly labeled.
17. Site Plan:
A. The extraneous CAD layers have been removed from the Landscape Plan.
B. A building envelope is shown, with dimensions and distances noted.
C. The width of the walks next to the child care centers have been expanded one foot for
increase safety. The remainder of the walks on site are all a minimum of six feet wide.
D. One of the HC spaces is dimensioned.
E. The legend) has been moved, as requested.
F. A "Total" column has been added to the Land Use Breakdown.
G. The signature blocks have been revised, as requested.
H. The signature blocks have been revised, as requested.
I. The signature blocks have been revised, as requested.
J. The scale of the site plan has been changed, as requested.
K. The index has been revised.
L. An additional title in the lower left and right of all sheets has been added.
18. We have reviewed the layers that are shown on the Landscape Plan, and believe that the utility
and proposed grading should remain as they are important in the review of the landscape plan.
In a previous phone conversation, you mentioned the desire to notify the immediately -adjacent
neighbors about this project proposal. I have obtained copies of the Larimer County property
records with the owners of each of those adjacent lots and am prepared to contact them. I would,
however, like to further discuss what type of contact may be necessary. As there is no L.U.C.
required neighborhood meeting for PDP's, I would like to avoid the preparation and time involved in
a full-blown neighborhood meeting presentation if possible. I propose, alternatively, that we send
each owner a letter describing the proposed project, with a colored site/Is plan and architectural
elevations, with contact information if they would like to further discuss any specific concerns. I
think that should suffice for alerting the neighbors that something is proposed at this time, and
providing them the opportunity and means to raise any questions or concerns they might have
regarding the project:. Let's discuss this issue further in the next week and decide how to proceed.
We look forward to a timely and favorable review of the revised plans submitted with this letter.
Please ensure that all reviewers are provided a copy of this letter so they may review the written
responses to their comments. Please contact me with any further questions.
Sincerely,
Kimberly Straw, AUc.IP
Project Manager
Copy to: Michael Morlock, Aramark Educational Resources
Stan Whitaker, Western Property Advisors
Eric Morff, Farnsworth & Polk
David Keith, Marshall Design
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: February 27, 2001 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #42-89H HARMONY SCHOOL SHOPS, 3RD
FILING — PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN —
TYPE II - (LUC)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current
Planning no later than the staff review meeting:
March 21, 2001
1-1 No Comment
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
**PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE
REFERENCE**
Harmony School shops 3"' filing Sheet 1 of March 30, 2001
Site and landscape plan
I . See utility plan for sight distance easement that is needed.
2. The phase line can not be the property line. The phase line needs to be on the east side of the drive isle as this is the
minimum amount ofdrive that is needed to access the Child Care Facilitv.
3. The parking stalls on the north side of the parking lot are to short with the curb stops as shown. The curb stop need to
be placed behind the edge of pavement for the 17 foot stall shown if you are not putting a curb there. The stalls across
from this adjacent to buildings A and B appear to short. What is the actual dimension of these stalls?
Plat
I . Change the font on the plat as indicated, as it is not readable.
2. Show the sight distance easement that is needed from the access drive.
3. Number the plat sheets with the sheet containing the signatures being sheet I of 2.
Utility plans
I . I did not notice with the last review that a sight distance easement is needed for the access drive. The easement as
shown on the plans affects Building A. The building can not encroach into the casement. This is a public safety issue
and the easement is needed. Comer sight distance is measured from a point on the access drive at 10 feet back from
the Ilowline to a point 310 feet along the centerline of the roadway. (sec attached figure)
(continued on next page)
CHECK HERD IF YOU WISH TO RECENE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report _ Other
utility Redline Utility Landscape
Datc:
Signature:
SEP 06 '01 13:20 FR AER
3035263394 TO 9-19702216378 P.04i06
Page 3
Sheri Wamhoff
September 6, 2001
In Section 1, at the bottom of Page 3, it should be clarified that a Developer of a .^
specific Lot will only be required to pay fees relating to its specific Lot.
Special Conditions:
References throughout the Special Conditions (Sections A through J, pages 4
through 11) to "this Development" should be changed to refer to the "Lot being
developed" and a general statement to the effect that the Special Conditions will be
applicable to each Lot separately should be added following the beading to Section 11—
Special Conditions to clarify that each Lot Developer will be responsible for satisfying
conditions as to its own Lot.
Based on my discussion with Stan Whitaker and your indication that you had also
discussed it with Roberta at Western VII, I assume that you are checking into whether or
not the stun specified in Section B for the installation of the Warren Lake Trunk Sewer
had already been paid_ If it has, perhaps Section B(1) should be revised to say "Not
Applicable" or it should state that this fee has been paid as it maybe applicable to both
Lots.
Section C(1) might be clarified by stating that the first Developer wt11 be — �c �4 + C
responsible for installation of off -site storm drainage improvements which may be
required in connection with the Development. As I understand it AER will install the on -
site drainage improvements necessary to convey storm water from the child care site
around the back of Lot 1 to the culvert under Milestone Drive in connection with its
development. In addition, as the first to develop, AER may perform minor grading on
Lot 2 which will ensure that any storm water draining from Lot 2 continues to reach the
culvert until future development of Lot 2. It is likely that AER will be the first to
develop, so it is my understanding that the off -site improvements to the retention basin
are probably going to be AER's initial responsibility. vy;
Section C(2) should reflect that each Lot Owner shall be responsible for these
cJ matters as they relate to their separate Lots. ` V:, t r
r�
I believe that when we spoke you indicated that you would double-check to see if A', 1 Al
c
the amount of the security deposit required in this Section was for both Lots or just the
Phase I development. Please revise if this guarantee is to be reduced �'' x <✓-� J" C
As I stated on the phone, AER will not be grading Lot 2 to its final proposed
grades. Section 4 should be clarified to state that each Developer will be responsible only
for the final grade and certifications relating to its individual Lot. `'
Section 5 on Page 6 refers to residential lots. Should this section be re -worded to —
be applicable to this cormnercial development.
Harmony School shops 3rd filing Sheet 2 of 2 March 30, 2001
2. I f possible please move the signature blocks to the bottom right comer, as this is the standard location.
3. Provide a index of sheets on the cover page.
4. Need to indicate the phasing to be done on the utility plans. The site and landscape plans indicate that the project will
be phased. The phasing of the project may require some temporary drainage facilities. If so these needed to be shown
and indicated on the plans. Indicate what utilities are to be installed with each phase.
�. Provide project benchmark information. I have attached copy of points near the site for your use and information.
0. Would prefer that the general notes are placed on the cover sheet rather than the utility sheet.
7. The details provided need to be readable. Please increase size so that the text is readable.
REVISION
..
COMMENT SHEET
116
DATE: February 27, 2001 DEPT: Water/Wastewater
PROJECT: #42-89H Harmony School Shops, 3rd Filing —
Project Development Plan - Type II (LUC)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
March 21, 2001
➢ Are 1 ''/2" water services truly needed for each of these buildings? Provide
assumed water use demands for our review.
Provide utility easements for a curb stops and fire hydrants.
➢ Provide required landscape/utility separation distances on the landscape plans.
Maintain 4 feet minimum depths of bury over all sanitary sewer mains and
services.
➢ Both the water and sewer mains were stubbed into this site. Clearly reflect this
on the overall utility plans and define all connections to the existing water and
sewer main stubs.
➢ Maintain 5 feet separation between water/sewer mains and flow lines of the curb
and gutter.
➢ No water services are permitted beyond the last fire hydrant.
5 Provide the meter pit detail with the next submittal.
See site, landscape and utility plans for additional comments.
Date: 3 - Zv - o Signature:
( IIF.('K HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
x Plat X Site Drainage Report _Other
x Utility X Redline Utility x Landscape
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: February 27, 2001 TO: Technical Svs
PROJECT: #42-89H HARMONY SCHOOL SHOPS, 3RD
FILING — PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN —
TYPE II - (LUC)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current
Planning no later than the staff review meeting:
March 21, 2001
❑ No Comment
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
**PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE
REFERENCE**
Ui1I14P Ct�4blE
61C'�
IINt'��sr�,
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
N Plat Site Dreinage Report Other
utility Redline Utility Landscape
Date: Signature:
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: February 27, 2001 TO: Stormwater
PROJECT: #42-89H HARMONY SCHOOL SHOPS, 3RD
FILING — PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN —
TYPE II - (LUC)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current
Planning no later than the staff review meeting:
March 21, 2001
ElNo Comment
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
**PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE
REFERENCE**
1. Please note that in addition to the temporary construction BMP's for erosion control,
a permanent USDCM 40-hour extended detention basin is required. Please provide a
water quality extended detention basin with calculations for percent impervious,
volume, and outlet in the report.
RESPONSE:
(over) CC . Ted S
ForMs�
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS N Plat -Site _c Drainage Report k Other a"ime-is
k Utility bRainc Utility '>-Landseape
Date: __30/o r __ _ Signature:
4.(fF
Please limit the outflow of the site to 15.1 cfs, per the Timberline Farm Master Plan
and a telephone conversation with Glen Schleuter on 3/20/01. This may require
onsite detention, which would best be integrated with the water quality pond. Please
include calculations for this. Also, please size an emergency spillway to carry the
entire 100-year flow from the site with 1 foot of freeboard in the event of a clogged
inlet, and show the location and a cross section on the plans.
RESPONSE:
3. Please analyze the storm sewer for the limiting flow of 15.1 cfs. Please note that per
a City field visit, the box culvert opening is not 1.4 feet (the total height maybe).
Please calculate capacity of this culvert using the size of the actual opening of the box
culvert. The storm sewer will be reviewed in more detail when these calculations are
received.
'RESPONSE:
4. '.Please provide a detail of the junction of the 14"x23" elliptical RCP with the box
culvert. A special manhole may also be required. Because. of the low opening of the
box culvert relative to the incoming pipe, explicit plans will -be needed when this
feature is constructed in the field. This is a repeat comment.
RESPONSE:
5. -Please provide a note on the profile drawings stating that all storm sewers shall be
inspected by the City of Fort Collins. Also, please use the allowable site release rate
rather than the capacity, and show all rim elevations.
RESPONSE:
6. 'Please clarify the C-coefficient used in the hydrology for the offsite areas draining to
Pond 1. , Please show impervious areas in the Sunstone subdivision to help verify the
coefficients used.
RESPONSE:
7. Please show cross sections of all swales on the plans, not just the trickle pans. Please
provide calculations and drawings showing that swales have capacity for freeboard of
1.33*Q100, while fitting into the easements provided.
MIT9826"
HannonySchShps2.doc Paget of
8. Please note that one foot of freeboard is not currently provided between the eastern
overflow swale and the adjacent building. This should be addressed in the next
submittal, probably with the creation of the onsite pond and spillway.
RESPONSE:
9. Please affix the Fort Collins General Notes, benchmark, and vicinity map to the cover
sheet per SDDC Section 2.2.1.1.
RESPONSE:
Erosion/Sedimerit Control Details:
Straw bales cannot be installed on concrete or asphalt. It would be effective to utilize
a gravel filter sediment trap on the pond outlet until construction is complete and
resecding/sodding are established. If there is regrading of the off -site area, a
sediment trap should be utilized there, and reseeding/mulching should be noted on
that sheet.
RESPONSE:
The report discusses the use of straw mulch, there needs to be a note to this effect on
the plan, and if appropriate, an indication of the area to be mulched.
RESPONSE:
Please refer to the redlined plans and report for additional comments.
HarmonySchShps2.doc Page 3 of 3
REVISION
COMMENT
DATE: February 27, 2001 TO: PFA
SHI
PROJECT: ##42-89H HARMONY SCHOOL SHOPS, 3RD
FILING — PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN —
TYPE II - (LUC)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current
Planning no later than the staff review meeting:
March 21, 2001
No Comment
a Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
*"PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE
ADDRESS NUMERALS: REFERENCE**
Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a
minimum of 6 inch numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown
brick are not acceptable). 9? 1Jf `_'O t -- A
WATER SUPPLY:
Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an approved
roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gailons ofwater per minute at
a residual pressure of 20 psi. No commercial building can be greater then 300 feet from a
tire hydrant.
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site _ Drainage Report _ Other
Utility Redline Utility Landscape
Date: — -, - — _— Signature:
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS:
Requirement meet in previous submittal.
BUILDING AREA:
Buildings A and B exceed 5000 sq. $. and must be fire contained or fire sprinklered.
NOTE: Poudre Fire Authority requires a "Knox Box" to be mounted on the front of
every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm system.
�� "r' �' i;. R; -2i
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: May 23, 2001 TO: Technical Services
PROJECT: #42-89H Harmony School Shops, 3rd Filing, PDP
-- Type II (LUC)
Al comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current
Planning no later than the staff review meeting:
June 13, 2001
No Continent
ElProblems or Concerns (see below or attached)
**PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE
REFERENCE**
-
,Z
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Site Drainage Report _ Other
Datuilo Redline Utility Landscape _Signature:
City of Fort Collins
Project Comments Sheet
Selected Departments
Citv of Tort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: .June 12, 2001
PROJECT: Harmony School Shops, 3rd Filing - PDP - Type 11 #42-8911
All comments must be received by TED SHEPARD in Current Planning no later than the
staff review meeting:
Note - Please identift• pour redlines for future reference
Dept: Stornnvater Utility
10
11
Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan
Pond release rate:
Please note that the pond release rate should be done in accordance with the
enclosed
Milestone Drive drainage plan. According to the plan the total release rate from
the pond can be
up to 18.8 cfs, which is the combined release rate from basins G-1 and 8-1.
Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan
Basin delineation:
According to the Milestone Drive plan, the northesasterly part of Winterstone
Drive drains
into an existing catch basin on Winterstone and not to the inlet on Milestone.
Please correct
drainage plan basin delineation.
1 of 2
SEP 06 '01 13:21 FR AER
3035263394 TO 9-19702216778 P.05i06
Page 4
Sheri Wamhoff
September 6, 2001
Section 8 should stated that both Developers will be responsible for the
��v
t ` maintenance of the drainage facilities —APR and Western VII will need to separately
address the allocation of costs relating to maintenance of off -site drainage facilities that
serve both Lots.
JK�
up1s.. fit
Section D2 provides for the payment of reimbursement fees for the construction
of Timberline Road and Milestone Drive. This Section should be clarified to provide that
each Lot Owner/Developer shall pay the fee applicable to its Lot in order to cbls_'
building permit. In other words, the fee due for the Lot retained by '✓h chm,ld
not have to be paid in order for AER to get a permit for development of Lot 1. x `=c -
I discussed Section D(3) with you briefly on the phone. AER has taken the P
position with Western VII that any reimbursement fees applicable to Lot 1 which may
relate to improvements to Harmony Road are to be borne by Western VII, per the terms
of our purchase agreement with Western VII. I believe you have had some contact with V7
Roberta at Western VII about this provision and that you may consider confining the
responsibility for these costs to the remaining property owned by Western VII in Filing 2. c C
Either way, it is AER's position that this reimbursement is not AER's responsibility. If it
is determined that this charge must be collected as to all or any part of Filing 3 before a
building permit issues for Lot 1, the fee(s) must be paid by Western VII at the time of
AER's closing on Lot 1,
Miscellaneous:
v Again, a general statement indication that these provisions apply to each /—
Developer as to each separate Lot and a change in any reference to the "Property" or "this
Development" to refer only to the Lot being developed by a Developer s',^, Y
necessary.
The Information you will need for Section N relating to Notices to the
Developer/Owner of Lot 1 will be as follows:
Attn: Real Estate Services
ARAMARK Educational Resources, Inc.
573 Park Point Drive
Golden, CO 80401
Section P on Page 14 can be deleted in light of the fact that both AER and ; ✓
Western VTI need to be parties to the DA as both Developers and Owners. In order for ,
the obligations of the Developers to survive any transfer, it may be advisable to include
language stating that the provisions of the DA shall run with the land and be binding
upon successors in interest, though you may already have that covered in Section I on
Page 12.
12 Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan
Overflow design:
Please provide a trash rack on the culvert out of the site. The trash rack should
be designed to be self
cleaning, with a transverse slope. Please ensure that there is at least one foot
of freeboard in the
condition where the outlet pipe is plugged between overtopping water surface
elevation and the
minimum opening elevation of the buildings adjacent to that outlet pipe. As
currently designed there
is only a foot of freeboard between the building Finished Floor elevation and the
overflow crest elevation.
13 Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan
Water quality:
Please clearly out off -site water quality outlet revision on the plans. Please
clearly
state in the report that the water quality mitigation will be done in the off -site
pond.
Please clarify who maintains this water quality outlet, add a note on the plans
14 Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan
Erosion Control:
Please identify the areas to be seeded and mulched on the erosion control
plan.
15 Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan
Culvert capacity:
Please note that 1.4 feet is the outside dimension of the culvert and due to wall
thickness
the inside dimension should be used for pipe capacity calculations.
�r1Z1°1
signalu •e Date
CIIECK IIFRE IF YOU LAVISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat Side _ Drainage Report Other
Utility __ Redline Utility Landscape
2 of
Project Comments Sheet
„ Selected Departments
Citv of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: June 13, 2001
PROJECT: Harmony School Shops, 3rd Filing - PDP - Type H #42-89H
All comments must be received by TED SHEPARD in Current Planning no later than the
staff review meeting:
Note - Please identify rota• redlines for figure reference
Dept: Water Wastewater
16 Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
REPEAT REPEAT Show all water/sewer lines on landscape plans and provide
required landscape/utility separation distances.
17 Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
Water services must remain the same size from the main to a point 5 feet
downstream of the meter pit.
18 Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
Draw meter pits to scale and maintain 4 feet of separation between the outside
wall of meter pits and all permanent structures.
19 Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
Connection to the existing water main must be made using a tapping saddle.
20 Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments.
1 of 2
Signature ell
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
/Plat XSite
X Utility Redline Utility
Drainage Report Other
XLandscape
2 of2
Transportation Services
Engineering Department
City of Fort Collins
September 11, 2001
Ms. Leslie A. Armstrong
National Director of Real Estate
Aramark Educational Resources
573 Park Point Drive
Golden, Co 80401
RE: Harmony School Shops P Development Agreement
Dear Leslie,
This letter is in response to your letter of September 6, 2001 commenting on the draft development
agreement (DA) for Harmony School Shops 3`d Piling that was sent to you. Your comments were
reviewed by the City Attorneys' office and myself from the Engineering Department and we offer you the
following response to your comments.
The sections are laid out as they were in your letter with the addition of identifying each paragraph by a
letter under each section.
I. Parties:
a) As per our telephone conversation, a conversation with Roberta Martin of Western VII Investments I
have added them as a Developer within the first paragraph of the DA. Western VII Investments is now
a signatory as the "Developer" and as the "Owner" and Aramark Educational Resources, Inc (AER) is a
signatory as the "Developer" (see attached copy of the draft DA). We do not feel that it is necessary to
identity what each party is to develop, the agreement is to state what is to be done. Which party to do it
does not matter to the City, if the work required is not completed building permit(s) and/or certificate(s)
of occupancy can be held. In your letter it states that the purchase of the property by AER will occur
after a draft DA is agreed upon. If this transaction is to occur before the DA is signed the identification
ol'parties and ownership on the DA will need to be modified to reflect what the parties are at the time
of signing. The plat will also need to reflect the current ownership at the time of filing. The plat can
not be filed until the utility plans and DA for the project are signed and what ever other documents that
the Current Planning Department may require in order to file the plat
2. Recitals:
a) The DA identifies that there are two developers as indicated above the City does not feel that it is
necessary to identify what each party is to develop. The split in who is responsible for what should be
a separate private agreement that the City is not a part of. It does not matter to the City which party
does what as long as the items that are required to be completed are completed.
b) It was asked that a reference be made to the approved final development plans. The second whereas
statement of the DA does specifically reference the utility plans and includes those documents in the
defined teen "final development plan documents". "WHEREAS, the Developer desires to develop the
I'lorth� .vII Ayv��u ?O.: rov -80 - Fo t(-Alms,:_ 0�2^_-�8811 • �u7(1) 1 +60� • i\i'170)"1 57' yl .
%I %t A' :goA.com
Property and has submitted to the City all plats, plans (including utility plans), reports and other
documents required for the approval of a final plan according to the City's development application
submittal requirements master list (the final development plan documents) copies of which are on
file in the office of the City Engineer and made a part hereof by reference; and"
3. General Conditions:
a) The addition of a paragraph indicating that these paragraphs apply to both developers is not needed.
b) Request to delete the word "Property" within Section I. paragraphs A through K and replace it with
`the lot being developed', Property is a defined term, it is defined in the first whereas statement in the
DA and is related to the legal description of the property. `The lot being developed' is not a defined
term and could not be universally substituted for and provide the same meaning as Property does
within the DA.
c) Information can be added into Exhibit A regarding the sequencing of work. In order to do this I will
need to receive a copy of the utility plans as the last copy I received was returned with comments and I
do not have a set of plans that shows the phasing. Please provide a set of plans and information can be
added to Exhibit A although it should be noted that doing the work as it is defined by the phasing on
the utility plans does not constitute work out of sequence. It is work within the sequence defined on
the plans.
d) You asked that Section LE state that the Developer of each Lot will pay for facilities required for their
respective lots. Section LE as it exists states that "... the Developer agrees to pay for all water, sanitary
... and other improvements required by this Development as shown on the Final Development Plan
Documents ...". As discussed previously Final Development Plan Documents is a defined term that
includes such approved documents as the utility plans and the utility plans show the phasing of this
property and how the utilities are to be installed for each phase. Therefore the utility installations that
the Developer will be required to install are those shown for the phase in which they are constructing.
It should be noted that if phase 2 were to proceed prior to or not concurrently with Phase 1, Phase 2
would be required to install the utilities shown with Phase 1.
e) It was requested that "of the applicable Lot" be added to the end of Section I.F. It doesn't make sense
to do this, the phasing plan approved as part of the utility plan set defines this. Beside the only street
improvements associated with this project are the driveway connection and the utility connections
which are located below the driveway connection, and all of this work needs to be installed with Phase
t) This is not needed, since this fee is paid at the time of building permit request the fee paid is for that
lot.
4. Special Conditions:
a) Request to change "this Development" to "Lot being developed". Development is a defined term in
the first whereas statement of the DA and is the appropriate word for reference in these paragraphs.
"The following changes can and will be made:
Section II.C.3 regarding the erosion control amount. This amount can be split up by
the phasing. In order to do this the Engineering consultant will need to update the erosion
control calculations that were done in the drainage report to reflect the phasing and this
information will need to be approved by the stonnwater department. Once this information is
approved the paragraph can reflect the deposit required for each phase.
Section II.C.4 — in the first sentence the following can be added "and/ or lots" after
buildings so that it reads "...the following additional requirements shall be followed for all
buildings and/or lots in this development."
b) It is my understanding that the paragraph under Section II.B. I is under review by the City. If it is
determined that this paragraph is no longer applicable it will be deleted.
c) It is not necessary to identify that the first developer is responsible for construction the off -site
drainage improvements. As per Section II.C.1 these improvements have to be completed prior to the
issuance of any certificate of occupancy, they maybe built by either Developer, but neither Developer
will receive a certificate of occupancy until these improvements are built and certified.
d) It was requested chat Section II.C.2 regarding maintenance of storm drainage facilities be split
indicating that each lot owner is responsible for these matters as they relate to their separate Lots. This
is not possible since the drainage facilities for the two lots in this development are combined. As per
the DA if the drainage facilities no longer comply with the approved plans the City shall give the
Developer (both developers) notice. It is up to the two developers to determine their responsibility in
this event and how the work to bring the facilities back to standards is to be done.
e) As indicated in paragraph 4.a) above the erosion control amount as specified in Section II.C.3 can be
split by phases.
f) As per Section II.C.1 and ILCA certification of all on -site and off -site drainage improvements
associated with this development as well as certification that the lot and building finish floor
elevation(s) have been graded correctly and built according to plans is required prior to issuance of
certificate of occupancy for a building. Per this either developer is responsible for the final grades and
building elevations for the lot and building they are requesting a certificate of occupancy for, as well as
the drainage improvements for the Development whether they are on that lot or the other lot.
Therefore a statement that each developer is only responsible for the final grade and certifications
relating to its lot can not be made.
g) In Section II.C.5 the word `houses' will be changed to `buildings'.
h) Since Developer as defined in the first paragraph of the DA represents both parties Section ILC.8 does
not need to be modified to represent that both developers are responsible.
i) The last sentence of Section ILD.2 states "Payment shall be made to the City for each lot prior to the
issuance of any building permit on such lot." This clearly indicates that the payment for the lot on
which the building permit is being requested is what is required. No further clarification is needed.
j) A meeting with Western VII regarding Section ILD.3 is currently being scheduled to discuss this
paragraph. If this paragraph is to remain payment will be due at the time of building permit for each
lot. It doesn't matter who pays this, but each lots portion will need to be paid prior to issuance of a
building permit for that lot.
5. Miscellaneous:
a) As indicated previously Property is a defined term and will not be replaced by reference to the Lot
being developed.
b) Information regarding notices to the Developer for AER will be added to the DA. The information
will not be identified as the contact information for Lot I though, if any information needs to be sent to
.,the Developer it will be sent to all parties represented as the Developer as the City will not try
determine which partv(ies) listed should be notified, but notify all parties listed as contacts for
Developer.
c) Section IILP can not be deleted as long as Western VII is also listed as the owner of the Property. If
both parties are owners and developers than this paragraph can be deleted as separate reference to
developer and owner is not needed.
d) 1 had previously received the shown changes for the Western VII signature block and those changes
have been made.
If you have any questions, please contact Sheri Wamhoff at 221-6750.
Sincerely,
Sheri Wamhoff, PE
cc: W. Paul Eckman — City of Fort Collins
Ted Shepard, Planner - City of Fort Collins
Stanley E. Whitaker — Western Property Advisors
Mike Maxwell — Hassler, Fonfara and Maxwell LLP
file
ENGINEERS
ARCHITEC,S
Farnsworth_
SURVEYORS
p
GIAOUP
SCIENIISTS
January 2, 2002
City of Fort Collins
Engineering Department
281 North College Avenue
Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-0580
Attn: Ms. Sheri Wamhoff
Dear Sheri:
Re: Harmony School Shops
Third Filing
Milestone @ Timberline
Fort Collins, CO
FG Project #200284.1
We are in receipt of the latest review comments regarding the PDP mylars for the above -referenced project.
We offer the following responses.
Water/Wastewater Comments
16. All water/sewer lines are shown on the landscape plans and the required separation distances are
provided. Refer to the enclosed landscape plan.
20. All references to the construction of the water -main taps have been removed as requested. Refer to
sheet PDP-3.
21. A copy of the latest site and landscape plan is enclosed as requested.
22. All red -line comments have been addressed. Refer to sheet PDP-3.
Stormwater Utility Comments
23. References to the existing concrete box have been revised as requested. Refer to sheets PDP-3 and
PDP-4. The overflow swale has been identified as requested. Refer to sheet DA-1. Three copies of
the Final Drainage Study are enclosed as requested.
Please contact me with any further comments or questions regarding this project. Thank you for your
assistance.
Sincerely,
FARNSWORTH GROUP, INC.
Eric W. Mo
Engineer Intern
EWM/srm
Enclosure
AVANTI / BENCHMARK / DORG�N / FARNSWORTH & POLK / FARNSWORTH & WYLIE / MASSMANN / NIETZ-AVANTI / WISCHMEYER
2UAI II N nV, SUIIF 200, SI. LOU IS, IA063119 2304 / 314-962-7900 (FAX) 314-962-1253 / www.f-w.com
rdA PROJECT
fww&�=901 COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Engineering
DATE: May 24, 2004 DEPT: Water & Wastewater
PROJECT: Harmony School Shops 3rd Filing Rev.
All comments :must be received by Sheri Wamhoff no later than:
June 1, 2004
➢ Maintain 10 feet minimum separation between proposed fire hydrant and electric
vault.
➢ The City of Fort Collins Utilities does not install infrastructure for development.
Please correct note 10 on the revised utility plans to read Contractor shall install
fire hydrant.
➢ Include dimensions between water line taps (3 foot minimum separation
between taps).
➢ Maintain 10 feet of separation between gas service and water/sewer services.
➢ See utility plan for other comments.
Date: - Signature: CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
PLAT SITE _DRAINAGE REPORT OTDERJ'E
X ur LI"rY _REDLINE UTILITY _LANDSCAPE:
City of Fort Collins
REVISION
DATE: JUNE 3, 2004 DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: Harmony School Shops, 3`d Filing
ENGINEER: Sheri Wamhoff
Comments:
I . The revised sheet needs to be 24x36; we will not file larger or smaller sizes.
2. All of the notes for the Phasing need to be bubbled, most of this notes are changing.
3. Need to add the following note back onto the plans. V. New concrete entrance per City of Fort Collins
standards. Refer to detail on sheet PDP-5.
4. Number 22 needs to be a part of Phase 1. All of the sidewalk along Milestone Drive needs to be built with
Phase 1. This will provide your pedestrian connectivity that is required.
5. Number 18 needs to be deleted. Stormwater has told me that the entire pond needs to be built and certified
with the first Phase that is built.
6. The electric transfbrmer locations. The transformers pads for what is now Phase 1 where never shown on the
site and landscape: plans and thus were probably never reviewed by Light and Power. They were shown on
the utility plans, but light and power rarely reviews the utility plans and they did not sign off on the utility
plans approving the shown locations. Light and Power needs to review the transformer location. They will
either do this when the minor amendment to the landscape plan is submitted or when I get revisions back I will
route them a copy of the utility plan so that they can comment on the transformer pad location. I don't believe
that you want the transformer in the middle of the pond (I believe it is too far away from a paved surface and
the placement here would require the pond volume to be reevaluated.) My guess is that you will want to locate
the transformer a; close to Milestone as you can to reduce the installation charges.
The saw cut and patch for the services for Phase 1 will need to be the full width of the street.
8. Need to expand the bubbles to include any changes that have been made.
9. The fire hydrant adjacent to the driveway can be delayed until Phase 2, but would make more sense to put it in
now as you would only need to cut and patch the street and pay the street cut fee in this location once.
10. See additional comments on the plans.
H . Please return all redlined plans with resubmittal and provide 4 new/,blluleline copies for review.
Date: June 3, 2004 Sign a:5-
a-Mtt-
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS
0 Plat ❑ SiteAUtility 0 Landscape 0 Drainage Report ❑ NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS
SEP 06 '01 13:21 FP AER
3035263394 TO 9-19702216378 P.06i06
Page 5
Sheri Wamhoff
September 6, 2001
The signature block for Western VII Investments, LLC is incorrect.
Though you may want to consult Roberta to verify this, I believe it should read as
follows:
WESTERN V11INVESTMENT, LLC,
A Delaware limited liability company `
By: Western Property Advisors, Inc., i
A Colorado corporation,
Its Attorney -in -Fact
LE
Stanley E. Whitaker, Jr.
Vice President
I look forward to discussing these changes with you as soon as you've had a
chance to review them. If need be, I would be willing to visit with you and a
representative of Western VII in your offices to discuss any matters about which you
have questions to expedite the preparation of a final draft acceptable to the City and the
Developers.
Thanks for your assistance with respect to this and the DCP permitting process. 1
have passed all of the information you have sent me concerning the actual DCP
permitting process along to John Finnemore in our construction den-rtm-r' f,r lh;c Ime. in
applying for permits when he is prepared to do so.
Sin ely,
esli A. Armstrong
National Director of Real Estate
(303) 526-3381; FAX: (303) 526-3394
e-mail: armstrong-lcslic@aer.aramark.com
cc: John Finnemore; Chris Bardwell
Stanley E. Whitaker, Jr. (via facsimile)
Mike Maxwell (via facsimile)
Original sent via U.S. Mail
** TOTAL PAGE.06 **
PROJECT
/-!c9m
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: October 25, 2000 TO: Transfort
PROJECT: #42-89H Hannony School Shops, 3rd Filing
PDP - Type 1 (LUC)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
November 22, 2000
Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference
Siq a afitYel
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat ✓.Site _Drainage Report Other
Utility Redlille Ctility _Landscape
Citv of Fort Collins
PROJECT
i..�� COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Callins
Current Planning
DATE: October 25, 2000 TO: Sheri Wamhoff
PROJECT: #42-89H Harmony School Shops, 3rd Filing —
PDP - Type 1 (LUC)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
November 22, 2000
pqe- Pll?pse identify �our redlines for future reference
I ku nom Sc r s wps mg hdet 1 of _ Novembe 28, 2000
Site and landscape plan
I . The sidewalk along the west edge of the parking lot - due to the fence and the parking overhang the effective width of
this sidewalk is only 3 feet. Suggest that you widen the sidewalk out to 7 feet.
2. Provide concrete to the property line at the entrance drive not the cross -pan shown.
3. It appears that the east side of the driveway needs to move further east to align with the driveway across the street.
d. It looks like the YA cerner of building A may extend slightly into the easement. No structure may be within an
casement. And need to verify that the overhang extending into the easement does not exceed code requirements.
Plat
I. Need to include the statement of ownership and subdivision language.
�. Providecertificate ofdedicationparagraph.
_. Provide maintenance guarantee and repair guarantee language.
d. Provide attornev certification paragraph.
i. Provide notice of other documents paragraph.
6. Need to indicate that you are vacating the temporary 20' utility, drainage, slope and construction easement along
Milestone Drive and the 50' temporary construction easement along Timberline Road with the filing of this plat. And
the language in the dedication statement needs to reflect that not all easements are to remain.
7. The objectives for this project said that there would be an access easement across the parking and drive areas. I don't
see anything shown.
Y. It appears that the corner of Building A crosses into the easement. No structures are allowed within the easements.
Should also look at the overhang for this building and make sure that it meets code criteria for allowable extension into
an casement.
9. Remove the improvements from the plat.
(Continued on next page)
Sr,ttatury�C�c,-Z �-�
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO REC
COPIES OF REVISIONS
Plat
Sitc _Drainage Report Other
Utility linc Utility ;Landscape
City of Fort Collins
Harmony Scholl shops 3`a filing Sheet oft November 28, 2000
10_ The NE corner where the drainage pan is needs to be a drainage easement. A portion of this already is, but not all of it.
I I _ What is the boundary of the US West easement and the other easement along the north property line? Do these
overlap? US West will need to sign the plat.
12. See additional comments on the plat.
Utility plans
I_ Provide title on the first sheet of the utility plans - "Utility Plans for Harmony School Shops 3`a Filing".
2. Provide general notes (see attached)
3. Provide City signature block on each sheet of the utility plans.
d. Don't show the vacated easements on the utility plans.
�. It looks like the entrance driveways east edge needs to be moved east slightly so that it lines up better with the access
drive across the street.
6. Show that the access drive is concrete to the property line.
7. Identify the driveway width and indicate its location based on a dimension from a property line.
S. Will need to submit a variance request for the use of a radius drive. Variance request needs to include justification and
be submitted and signed by a licensed engineer. Max radius that could be used is I S feet. (note: under proposed
smndards this access point would not meet volume requirements for a radius entry)
9. Indicate the limits of curb removal and replacement and show the area to be patched. Also note that patch is to meet
City requirements and standards for patching.
10_ Provide curb and gutter details (D-I I) for any curb, gutter or walk replacement that is needed.
1 1. Need drivewav detail. If the variance for the radius drivewav is approved then von will need to combine details for the
driveway usin, details D-15 and D-17.
11 Also may need a detail for the pedestrian ramps at the driveway - this depends on the final design of the driveway
13. Can not drain the parking lot area out the driveway across the sidewalk. It doesn't appear that you are doing that, but
wasn't sure.
14. The plat needs to be included in the utility plan set. The plat should still be numbered separately, but included in the
lublc of contents for the utility plan set and a copy will be a part of the final filed set of utility plans.
/001t h_ PROJECT
City of Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET
Current Planning
DATE: October 25, 2000 DEPT: Water & Wastewater
PROJECT: #49-82H Harmony School Shops, 3rd Filing
PDP — Type I (LUC)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, November 22, 2000
Coordinate the landscape design with the civil design and provide the required
landscape/utility separation distances.
Y Maintain a 4 feet separation distance between the building envelopes and the
outside wall of the meter pits.
Place proposed meter pits and curb stops adjacent to mains.
Show and label all curb stops and meter pits on the overall utility plan. Clearly
define the sizes of all water and sewer mains and services.
Separate water and sewer services are required for each building.
Maintain 10 feet of separation between all thrust blocks and all other
underground utilities.
Fire hydrants must connect to the mains with a swivel tee. Show and label all
fittings, tees, thrust blocks, valves, etc.
Include all appropriate standard City of Fort Collins water and sewer details on
the detail sheet.
Include standard general notes pertaining to water line depth and polywrapping
of D.I.P.
i Will fire lines or irrigation taps be needed for this development?
See site, landscape and utility plans for other c mments.
Date: /(-Z%—OU Signature:
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES
EPOR —ZIOINSHE
X PL,A'I X ti ED UR,AIRAGE REPORT _OTHER6&
S liIILI'IY Y Rfi I11 .I Ft_l'711.ITy V L,AA'DSCAPF,
City of Fort Collins
PROJECT
(iu .� COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins.
Current Planning
DATE: October 25, 2000 TO: Technical Services
PROJECT: #42-89H Harmony School Shops, 3rd Filing —
PDP - Type 1 (LUC)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
November 22, 2000
Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference
Signature
CI IECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
VPlat Site Drainage Report Other
Utility Redline Utility Landscape
City of Fort Collins