HomeMy WebLinkAboutPARK CENTRAL PUD PHASE I - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2004-08-24(- ct--? )(--,
lir4 O-F
J
r—
�1-� X� C��.�„^„�/n�,//,/i1�2 C�isJL�.� �;�' - 1�jvvC,�i rc_r�=•
#,-PT �-z
.
q,- -� Lr, kc) ,i -
� Pr�ccr... ,v�•�ds
c r,
0
1—,
(�
I 1
`d.oC�� (III
�1
1 11 i
l 1
III envr,teS Ac rC, -%o i-3:
7 h (' J
C
1 � r
e_}-
1
.YY T E :
DEPART NI E NT �� P
I
M
r
CO
R
R
Sidewalks and parking spaces shown within existing sewer easement must
be removed.
No trees or shrubs can be planted within existing sewer easement.
A repay is due on the 12" water line in Prospect.
t1le&
To: Virgil Taylor, Parks Superintendent
FM: Mauri Rupel, Engineering
RE: Subdivision Utility Plans
Submitted for your
review and comrnnt
are
utility plans for
P4- e/f
ems/rre-4L
PiJ.0
qua5E
2
Please respond by Ac3
7/
�2c
'_m: Doug martin, Light and Pods Department
F.POJ1: Mauri Rupel, I�ngineering Services
RE: Subdivision Utility Plans
DACE: fna 9 /9 8' Z
Sutrutted for your review aril con lent are utility plans for A K!G
Please respond at your earliest convenience.
l98 Z
!
s,Fm a.v .2E F+'�iR c 17_ t sue'' T_ on/ p.Posf'F'c7,.
- R Pd E R m M M C •" "1 .
j'
i
.._ .-;'i _i (OI_i_INS
i'I AXN1,4G 1)1V1S10i'd
February 25, 1982
P.O. dO)f SC{I, I0;tt COLI lij1 , (_OIndAt)O
Mr. Frank Vaught
ZVFK Architects/Planners
216 blest: Mountain Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80521
Dear Frank:
1
oil 66) 431 ON
. EXL655'
The staff has reviewed the application for Final PUD approval of Park Central
PUD, First Phase and would offer the following cowients:
1. The patterned concrete at the entrance to the project should be eliminated.
2. Location of 42-inch CHP needs to be verified and in a utility easement.
3. The tennis court sidewalk should be linked with the Welch Street sidewalk
for emergency service purposes.
4. The entire building will have to be provided with approved fire sprinklers
or adequate separation will have to be provided between the fire sprinkled
portion and the non -fire sprinkled portions of the building. Please note.
5. A note on the site plan should be added that the 33-inch sanitary sewer
will be moved and the easement vacated by the applicants prior to any
issuance of a building permit for the future expansion, the cost of which
will be borne by the owners.
6. Dimensions of building envelopes need to be indicated in detail on
the site plan.
7.- The pool, decks and tennis courts should be in a building envelope and
dimensioned.
0. The loading zone should be no less than 10-feet in any dimension and must
be 500-sf or more in total area. Please revise.
9. The typical dimensions of parking spaces and aisle widths should be
indicated.
10. Height of fence around tennis courts should be indicated.
11. The sidewalks, parking and landscaping in the 33-inch sewer easement must
be moved out; of the easement.
Mr. Frank Vaught
ZVFK Architects/Planne,
February 25, 198?
Page 2
12. A repayment is due on the 12-inch water line in Prospect Road.
13. A 12-foot util ity easement should be provided along Prospect Road.
14. The final landscape plan does not appear to meet the intent of the
preliminary plans in terms of:
a. Landscaping and berming of tennis courts along Prospect Street and
Welch Street.
b. Providing a shade tree of an approved species a minimum of every
50-feet along Prospect Street.
c. Landscaping and berming treatment along Prospect Street to screen
parking areas.
d. Berming along north edge of building.
Also, the staff has reviewed the plant list and would recommend that the
Austrian Pines (3) be installed at an 8-foot BB minimum, Blue Spruce (5)
be installed at minimums of 8-feet and 10-feet BB, and the Pinion Pine
(2) be installed at a minimum of 8-feet BB in height in order to provide
immediate effect as was illustrated by the applicants at the preliminary
plan stage.
e. Landscape treatment along Spring Creek.
15. The sidewalk connection between the Spring Creek trail and the internal
sidewalk system should he indicated on the landscape plan.
16. The landscape plan should include detail and types of fixtures for tennis
court lighting.
17. Treatment of trash areas should be indicated on landscape plan.
18. The sidewalk connection between the recreational building and future
buildings to the west, along the south edge of the parking lot, should
be maintained as was approved on the preliminary plan.
19. The 6-foot separation between the street curb and the sidewalk along
Welch Street and Prospect Street should be noted on the site plan. The
sidewalk transition at the intersection of Welch Street and Prospect
Street does not appear to meet City standard.
20. Building elevations should be submitted immediately for staff review and
approval. Evidence should be provided which illustrates proposed treatment
of rooftop to screen rooftop equipment per Planning and Zoning Board
condition.
21. Location of security lighting of building should be indicated.
hr. Frank Vaught
ZVFK Architects/Planners
February 25, 1982
Page 3
I would recommend we meet as soon
as possible to
discuss the
above comments.
Revisions to the plans
should be
received by this
office no
later than Friday,
March 5, 1982. Also,
on Monday.
March 15, 1982,
8-1/2`Bl"
reductions and
colored renderings of
the site and
architectural
elevations
should be submitted.
1f you should have any
questions,
please feel free
to call.
Sincerely,
Joe Frank
Senior Planner
JF/fsr
cc: Ken Waido, Acting Planning Director
Josh Richardson, Development. Engineer
01,
a
0
co
V/
E
E
0
U
%
Iten1 i�� ✓<'�<i ��
Comments
z
r e,wee
LLM
0,
ern
fe
N e lO P /� F'o7/loCs / L,.�/ Lc... 4 t✓/z+ c._r c
TO: Bob Smith, Assistant City Engineer - Drainage
FM: Bonnie Tripoli, Development Engineering Analyst
RE: Subdivision Utility Plans
DATE:
Submitted for your review and comment are utility plans for
Please respond by
r/
t,
/
r
A
P�
i
V
TO: Doug Martine, Light and Power
FM: Bonnie Tripoli, Development Engineering Analyst
RE: Subdivision Utility Plans
DATE:
Submitted for your review and comment are utility plans for
Please respond by e -
�Z-/6-ZZ-
RECEIVED
DEC 16 1982
DEPARTtv.EN r
/3DNN/E pc VEca/'F�
I�Z/In/�Er tMt'/T C2
S !/ 60C,5 T S 6M E'✓TS
Oc NE c.
L
s 7n9K� 6o cA ri a.✓1' TUST PRic.e
ATER C��r Oc
7 L � o iris74
it
x-A _
1 _
[�\
nnIll
k(-�_'c`_i-��-yam
�e
CC7 i �r1 OC tiT d-1—) S KC
c
__--
- J .
I � `
cc,
CITY OF FORT (:OI-I-INS P.O. BOX 580, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO80522 PH (303) 484-4220
me t'txxre
DEVELOPMENT CENTER
December 21, 1982
Mr. Frank Vaught
ZVFK Architects/Planners
218 West Mountain
Fort Collins, CO 80521
Dear Frank:
EXT. 655
The staff has reviewed the application for preliminary planned unit development
approval for Park Central and would offer the following comments:
1. The sidewalk along public streets should be attached at the corner for
75-feet then transition back from the curb (60-foot radius at transition).
Please indicate on site plan.
2. The site plan should indicate handicapped ramps at curb cuts and at
intersections.
3. The pedestrian cover directly west of the traffic circle should be
identified and noted that it will be a minimum of 13-ft, 6-inches in
height.
4. Please identify what the rectangular structure is located west of the
westernmost curb cut to Prospect Street.
5. Indicate on site plan new and existing curb and gutter.
6. The health club and some of the retail buildings are not within 150-feet
of a fire accessway. Please justify.
7. If the Spring Creek floodway is being designed differently than has been
previously approved, then a floodplain permit and variance will be required.
8. The applicant should coordinate the trail alignment in the floodway with
Ted Ruttledge of the Parks and Recreation Department. What is the phasing
plan for improvements to floodway? (Please indicate on site plan.)
9. It is recommended that all areas outside of building envelopes be dedicated
as utility easement." Public Service Company will not be responsible for
compaction of gas trenches.
10. Dimensions of building envelopes should be indicated.
Mr. Frank Vaught
ZVFK Architects/Planners
December 21, 1982
Page 2
11. Decks at offices must be indicated in building envelopes.
12. The pool and tennis courts must be within a building envelope. Please
indicate.
13. Loading zones for retail and office space must be indicated.
14. Future expansion of health club must be in building envelope.
15. What uses are sharing parking spaces? Please provide written justification
for sharing of spaces.
16. Please indicate type and height of fence enclosure of tennis courts.
17. Applicant should submit architectural elevations for the project.
18. Phasing of project should be indicated on the site plan.
19. The site plan should indicate energy conservation features per Absolute
Criteria #29 of the All Development land use category.
20. The staff would like to work with the applicant regarding vehicular circula-
tion. The staff has some suggested changes to improve the flow of traffic
on -site and from surrounding arterial streets.
21. The site plan should indicate all existing significant vegetation and
their fate.
22. Additional landscape treatment is recommended along Lemay Avenue and
Prospect Street. Height of berms should be indicated.
23. The staff questions the need for the sidewalk which runs east and west in
the central portion of the project. Please provide evidence to justify
the plan.
24. Prior to approval of the revised plan, the final PUD of the health club
should be filed. The final subdivision plat and the open space guarantee
needs to be submitted by the applicant.
25. The site plan should indicate the type of restaurants being proposed
(fast food, sit down, etc.).
26. The Planning Objectives should be revised to indicate the items which are
required as detailed in the Planned Unit Development regulations.
27. Additional landscaping is recommended between the parking area and the
Santanna ,Apartments for screening purposes. Width of interior sidewalks
should be shown.
Mr. Frank Vaught
ZVFK Architects/Planner
December 21, 1982
Page 2
I would recommend we meet as soon as possible to discuss the above comments.
I will be out of town until after New Year's. Please contact Fran Ramsey to
arrange an agreeable time to meet. Revisions to the preliminary plan reflecting
the above comments should be delivered to me no later than Janyary 11, 1983.
Also, on January 18, 1983, 8-1/2"xll" reductions and colored renderings of all
plans and elevations should be submitted to this office. If you should have
any questions, please feel free to call.
Sincerely yours,
Joe Frank
City Planner
JF/f
cc: Mauri Rupel, Development Center Director
Bonnie Tripoli, Engineering Analyst
ZVFK architects/planners
a professional corporation
218 west mountain avenue
fort Collins, co. 80521 usa
telephone 303 493-4105
February 9, 1983
Joe Frank
City of Fort Collins
Planning Division
Post Office Box 580
Fort Collins, Colorado 80522
Dear Joe,
Revisions have been made to the Park Central PUD Preliminary Site
Plan in response to staff comments. Specific responses are as follows:
1. The sidewalk along the intersections of Lemay-Prospect and
Welch -Prospect has been revised to meet city standards.
2. Handicapped ramps are indicated at curb cuts and at intersections.
3. The pedestrian canopy west of the vehicle cul-de-sac is no longer
indicated.
4. The gas pump island located west of the westernmost curb cut to
Prospect Street is no longer indicated.
5. New and existing curb and gutter are indicated on the site plan.
6. Portions of the health club and one retail building are not within
150 feet of a fire accessway and will be furnished with fire
extinguishing equipment. Refer to note on site plan.
7. Comment, concerning revisions to previously approved Spring Creek
floodway is noted.
8. The phasing plan for improvements to the floodway will be indicatd
on the Final Site Plan.
9. Recommendation to dedicate all areas outside building envelopes as
"utility easement" is noted.
10. Dimensions of building envelopes other than the health club will
be indicated on the Final Site Plan.
11. Decks at offices will be indicated on the Final Site Plan.
12. The pool and tennis courts are within a dimensioned building
envelope.
13. Loading zones for retail and office are indicated.
14. Future expansion of the health club are included in a dimensioned
building envelope.
15. A parking analysis based on city recommended parking ratios and
estimated parking demands at daily intervals is enclosed. The
parking analysis concludes 16% of total on site parking demand can
be shared.
16. The type and height of fence enclosing the tennis courts are
indicated.
17. Architectural elevations will be provided at final submission.
18. Phasing of project development is indicated on the Site Plan.
19. Energy conservation features per Absolute Criteria #29 of the All
Development land dse category are addressed in the revised
Planning Objectives.
20. Vehicular circulation has been revised. Refer to Site Plan.
21. All existing trees are indicated on the Site Plan and will be
retained.
22. Additional landscape treatment along Lemay Avenue and Prospect
Street is provided with berm heights indicated.
23. The central sidewalk system running east and west has been elimi-
nated from the Site Plan.
24. The necessity of recording the Final PUD of the health club prior
to approval of the revised plan is noted.
25. Restaurant: type is indicated.
26. The Planning Objectives have been revised and a copy is enclosed.
27. Additional landscaping is provided between the parking area and the
Santana Apartments. Widths of interior sidewalks are indicatd.
On February 18, 1983 the following information will be forwarded:
*Colored Site Plan
*81/2" x 11" reduction of Preliminary Site Plan
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Tom Olund
i to'.' fir Ia . , x
j ..
PRELIMINARY
ITEM.
COMMENTS
2a2ti6c��/�
Lx
,mot
RECEIVED
-n1 � •� iJVJ
TO: Doug Martine, Light and Power
FM: Bonnie Tripoli, Development Engineering Analyst
RE: Subdivision Utility Plans
DATE: /)G ''c�5-�
Submitt
ed
for your review and comment are utility plans for
Please respond by J—r //11
?2 i L— Zd l el �
fjr N
4 -,13 --? 3
j c�CL•cST OPEC SC'h`4-
CiTS Ems+-+c' 7" T�
a
-sr-� aF OE �.2.
' cflsi-M citi7 O ✓ f
✓i'Jin/r.MVM o F l2
TO: Bob Smith, Assistant City Engineer - Drainage
FM: Bonnie Tripoli, Development Engineering Analyst
RE: S bdivisign Ftli]i Plans
1l Cs i
DATE:
Submit2ed)for your r eve and commen� tic-' plans for
%rf21i, zd t`18�
Please respond by
I,
1
Mob
TARANTID
STANTON
& TAGGIE
CONSULTING ENGINEEFIS
City of Fort. Collins
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
Attn: hls. Bonnie Tripoli
Dear Bonnie:
Nover.;ber 23, 192"
Re: PaT'1: Central
Job 'Ic. 83-252-050
Enclosed is one copy each of drawing numbers one and two of the
original. Plat for Phase I of the above referenced project. Additionally, I
have the following comments:
Regarding the 5' easement along Prospect Street:
1. I spoke with Cary Huett at PSCO. Their existing gas line is
North of the centerline of Prospect Street so he is not concerned
with an ea-senent need here.
2. I spoke with Doug Martine at. City
Eight and Power. Fie told me
they
may place their line between
curb and sidewalk,
but in no
case
further South than W South of the South edge" of
the walk.
Tt,is
would still be well within the
R.O.W. so there is
no problem
with
Light and Power.
3. 1 spoke with Iry Trout at Mountain Bell. He felt he would likely
shale the trench with Lighr and Power, so he is satisfied.
I hope this answers any questions you may have regarding the easement.
Sincerely,
times R. Dub er, P.F.
TARANPO, STF,LITON & TAME
CONSOLTTNG ENG=PE
JRD:lac
112VV. 11 TH AVE. 6412 S. COLLEGE AVE.
HOLDREGE, NE 68949 FORT COLLINS, CO 80525
(308) 995-6677 (303) 226-0557
CONCEP d'UAL REVIEW
STAFF COMMENTS
MEETING DATE: APril 22, 1985
ITEM: Park Central PUD
APPLICANT: Osprey, Inc., C/O Randy Larsen, Larsen & Associates, 323 South
College Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521
LAND USE DATA:
Change in location of offices and retail (68,000 square feet of office, 16,000
square feet of retail, 4,500 square feet of restaurant and convenience store)
on 20 acres located on the southeast corner of Lemay and Prospect.
COMMENTS:
1. 150 foot fire access must be provided to all buildings, unless they are
sprinkled.
2. Traffic Impact Study will be required. Need to look at curb cuts, Welch
Street, 7-11 use, etc.
3. Parking impact study will be required.
4. Rebuilding of deceleration lane at existing entrance to project will be
required if they are removed.
5. Architecture will need to blend with existing.
6. Question the design of the gas pumps.
7. Paved pedestrian access points to trail is recommended.
8. Introduction of trees and shrubs in front of buildings will be
required.
9. Parking appears to be very close to street in some areas.
10. Parking on southside of 4,000 square foot restaurant should be removed
to facilitate smoother flow of taffic on main circulation drive.
CI TY OF FORT COLLINS P.O. BOX 580, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522 PH (303) 484-4220
PLANNING and DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT EXT. 652
7c= l'uec�� GUoeKs
Joe- t2401t
I /e 11 n 14 a Y7 d f SAP_K_ 1! iv7-" C—
Poo comlv'44s 0/7 'VI 7 100 plan wyl As A/lows
1. 7' sidewalks will be required along Prospect Road and Lemay Avenue. Access
ramps will be required at all entries and street intersectionc. NO-r cF_a �60
y All entries to project to be designed as standard driveway cuts, not curb
returns.
Flood plain changes must be coordinated with and approved by storm
drainage engineers prior to planning board review. Check with Bob Smith
in the Public Works Depart;cent.
Pt1145e tevIeul �'1�l/ �^lym A/' a 01V II'Ol�1
-4-o Ixe
W A K.s 4AV c- -gar► s µ .wa l A s !�' N 0-r J2r
NOT MeANDe(L
r#.vs
0 -r
RS
5 T1A *I O AQ p
�Q11lE
Ct1T'
1� Q.crSIo�NT1ra� YAWI,7. IMF FAMIL4
tS MbK Zs/
.� �a`'�3 — 8 o t3 StMI t1'N � e4S 1.1 OT � Cb� CO►�lZ-14 GT>s"A
l a t i 7 May 85�
_ �
PARK. CENTRAL - P99tUM 24-80H
COMMENTS
a-w �t,vJ
j'�
7 May 85
75
T �T\ 1�^`'!'
��11
:�. i •/�i y
I "]
� J I �..�. 1 Y-
i J
J'� .'ram
,
;fin PARS: CENTRAL - AMENDED
1110 AM7"'
24-80H
J s
;� � ) ; i�✓� ; '��� ii��S �S/S i
�� ✓r�i� S S�/2SS i�S
ivS Sc=SiSS S��iS� %��.
No Text
S { t� 7 May 85 Dt'
t y`
PARK; CENTRAL - AMENDED 24-80H
��cE�v1=a
PnAY 1 � �985
4lt.N�'NFN"f
D", Aq'
1 a J 7 May 85 DEP
t- PARK CENTRAL - AMENDED 24-80H 3
�'r'�
DA7 May 85�
i--�n PARK CENTRAL - AMENDED 24-80H
Vr;3n lo,')er try 11% ubwli e� SvwQ iiEG z-
1'Uh S Se q e ra w e2.ki GCS rd w 4 A l s
qo �v�b�ms �o rud z r�v� c�r�ih2°
-50A
•-
SATE
QWMEN i S
DEP!- RTMEN i wad
patt Gutw
No sewer services to be tapped directly into the 33" sewer line.
Abandoned sewer would have to be dug up and removed.
8" water line required.
No sidewalks, parking stalls, trash bins, etc., allowed within existing sewer
easement.
Repay for the 12" water line in Prospect Street. $4995.53
/V/8
f4 "1 -
al �rhn-.�� I �J1LL VJOT i_'" ar dye Fratl)fl&- c� o safe �`F✓ref
l , o by o��uv�C /iC/T� rY14y z1rn17 cJftvlrTi�J Of %iSH! /L%f7TE�
n 1A) 7o GUfPs 7 _ -
c��?ec�
7
i�) J✓rve 7/ee�s Zo a�eyn �"crW --5fiPe7 srross S7/eIfZ'
J
,mac •r.
Ne ? A.,(, OW67V7exI-7
�rnniT - Need
crt��*N�ez1� j�r� E
M)LL toSr/'w.� CveeL
�fYor//rm
Q s / S� Lav r
cu h h �u f rn� p po ��
�' Nee
MOWa bill,
C. BOX 580, FORT COLLINS COLORADO 80522 PH (303) 484 4220
CITY OF FORT COLLINSLINSS O
ea-..._��,�.�,".. �,�..t nm:.xwn'uxare�..w.-,.s. _::.-:.s�r^•a,a-era-. ^_ a _....-^.^n=,a .. _...-.,,,w,..;.sav�!..+a+`..�a+�e�a_+w>...
PLANNING DIVISION EXT. 655
December 22, 1981
Mr. Frank Vaught
ZVFK Architects/Planners
218 West Mountain Avenue
Fort Collins, CC 80521
Dear Frank:
The staff has reviewed the application for preliminary PUD approval of Park
Central, and would offer the following comments:
1. The staff is very concerned about the Health Club's compatibility with
the adjacent; single-family development in terms of scale, bulk and build-
ing height; and, architectural design. Applicant should provide evidence
to justify the plan design.
2. Additional screening should be provided at perimeter of property where
it abuts residential uses.
3. The staff would recommend that the applicant re-evaluate the plan in terms
of emphasizing the eastern access point to Prospect Street as the main
entrance to the project, while de-emphasizing the western access point.
4. The intersection in the parking lot located 200-feet south of the eastern
entrance from Prospect Street will cause hazardous and awkward turning
movements and should be re -designed.
5. The driveway cuts should be designed as curb cuts, not as curb returns
as indicated on the site plan.
6. The staff questions the desirability and efficiency in the design and
alignment of the drive leading southeast from the most westerly curb cut
to Prospect Street. Please justify.
7. The staff would like to discuss the overall concept of the main vehicular
circulation spine of the project as it relates to traffic movement.
8. The Spring Creek Trail may be located on the south side of Spring Creek
which will traverse both the subject property and Santana Apartments prop-
erty. This alternative should be indicated and planned for on the site
plan.
Mr. Frank Vaught
ZVFK Architects/Planners
December 22, 1981
Page Two
9. The trail as indicated on the plan should be redesigned to allow for access
under the bridge at Lemay Avenue as well as access to the sidewalk along
Lemay Avenue.
10. The landscape plan should provide for at least one shade tree of an approved
species for every 50-lineal feet of arterial street.
11. The site plat; should indicate the existing and proposed floodplain.
12. The applicant will need, prior to building permit application, approval
by the Corps of Engineers for development adjacent to the floodplain.
13. The plan should provide a minimum 15-foot setback from rear of sidewalks
or curbs, as applicable, from the buildinas for installation of utilities.
If this is a problem, I would recommend you meet as soon as possible with
the City's Utility Coordinating Committee (contact Mauri Rupel in Engineer-
ing Services Division).
14. The Light and Power Department will require a 15-foot easement on Prospect
Street, and an 8-foot easement on Lemay Avenue and Welch Street.
15. Sewer service will not be permitted directly from the 33-inch sewer line.
If this sewer is relocated for this project, the abandoned sewer would
have to be dug up and removed at developer's expense. The relocation of
the sewer line should be closely coordinated with the Water and Sewer Divi-
sion as it will be relocated in the floodplain. No sidewalks, parking,
trash bins, etc. will be allowed within this sewer's easement.
16. There is a repayment required for the 12-inch water line in Prospect Street
in the amount of $4,995.53.
17. The tennis courts must be in building envelopes. Are the courts lighted?
If so, how will the lights be screened from surrounding residential uses?
18. The loading zones must be a minimum of 500 sf in area with no dimension
less than 10-feet.
19. Motorcycle parking should be indicated.
20. The pool and deck, restaurant deck, and plaza covers in commercial area
should be in building envelopes.
21. Existing and proposed easements should be indicated on site plan.
tor. Frank Vaught
ZVFK Architects/Planners
December 22, 1981
Page Three
22. The site plan should indicate that all structures will be within 150-feet
of the access roadwav for those structures to allow for emergency equipment
access, or the buildings will be equipped with automatic fire extinguishing
systems.
23. Security lighting of all buildings and parking lots must be indicated.
24. The data of the 150-foot area surrounding the project should include densi-
ties of residential units; commercial uses, location of single-family struc-
tures; and existing trees and bushes surrounding -che site.
25. Bicycle parking should be indicated for the building cluster on the corner
of Lemay Avenue and Prospect S reet.
26. The number of existing trees and bushes in the southwest corner of the
development as shown on the site plan does not appear to coincide with
what is an the property. Also, there is a tree along Prospect Road which
should be saved. but is nog indicated on the site plan. Please revise.
27. The site data should include the number of motorcycle and bicycle spaces
and, in addition to the height, the number of stories in the sturctures
should be provided.
28. The staff questions the points you have taken on Point Chart A, as submit-
ted. We should meet as soon as Possible to discuss this item.
29. Preliminary Plans must conform to all City design criteria and standards
for streets (i.e., minimum right-of-way, minimum street width, minimum
centerline radius, etc.). If variances to City design criteria. and standards
are being requested, they must be specifically indicated or, the site plan
for special review. it will be assumed by the City staff that any streets
not labelled w"h design specifications meet City standards on the prelimin-
ary plan.. even if they do not specifically scale out to exact design
criteria and standards.
1 would suggest we meet as soon as possible to discuss the above comments. Revi-
sions to the PUD plan reflecting the above comments should be delivered to this
office no later than Monday, January 11, 1982 (5 copies). Also. on Monday,
January 18, 1982, 8-1/2"xll" reductions of all plans and colored renderings of
the site plan should be submitted. Please feel free to call if you should have
any questions.
Sincerely,
Joe Frank
Senior/Planner
JF/fsr
cc: Josh Richardson, Development Engineer
Ken Waido, Acting Planning Director