Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMULBERRY AND LEMAY CROSSINGS - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2004-08-17Planning Objectives for Beantrees, Inc Beantrees, Inc is a start up drive through specialty coffee business. We will offer a variety of espresso based drinks, hot and cold, brewed coffee, chaff and traditional tea, steamers, smoothies, hot chocolate and prepackaged cold drinks. In addition we will offer a limited menu of food items that will compliment coffee drinks including breakfast burritos, specialty breads, biscotti, sweet rolls, breads and bars, and cookies. The business will be located on commercial zoned property located at 432 12" Street, i.e., Lot 3 of Mulberry and Lemay Crossing, first filing, just north of Supermarket Liquors and east of Super Walmart. The building will be approximately 440 square feet located in the southwest corner of the property. The site is located in the FEMA floodplain. The building will be elevated 24 inches above the 100 year water surface elevation. The building's design will be drive through specific, i.e., with a window dedicated to drive through purchases. Cars will access this window on the east side of the building. A one way drive will be located east of the building. The entrance will be from the existing south curb cut shared with Supermarket Liquors, with the exit to be located north of the building, approximately half way between the entrance and Magnolia Street. A walk up window for pedestrians will be located on the west side of the building and will be easily accessed from the existing sidewalk. The building will have a small indoor seating area for up to 15 customers. A handicap accessible bathroom and ramp will enhance pedestrian and sit-down traffic. The exterior of the building will be tastefully finished in an adobe look with a tiled awning, with an emphasis on visual esthetics from all angles. Hours of operation are tentatively scheduled for 5:30 am to 2:30 pm daily. Per an agreement with Supermarket Liquors, employees will park in their existing parking lot or use a bike rack. No on site parking will be available. contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable). 1997 UPC 901.4.4 Number: 15 Created: 12/8/2003 This comment pertains to the proposed project located at 432 12th street, Lot 3 of Mulberry and Lemay Crossing. WATER SUPPLY: Commercial No commercial building can be greater then 300 feet from a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gallons of water per minute at a residual pressure of 20 :psi. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2 [12/8/03] Number: 16 Created: 12/8/2003 This comment pertains to the proposed project located at 432 12th street, Lot, 3 of Mulberry and Lemay Crossing. HOOD & DUCT FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM: If grease laden vapors are produced in the preparation of any of the food items a Hood & Duct Fire Suppression System shall be required. Department: Police Gerdom Topic: General Number: 49 [12/10/031 No Comments. Issue Contact: Joseph Created: 12/10/2003 Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Drainage Number: 34 Created: 12/9/2003 If the pond is to outlet onto the Supermarket Liquors property, a drainage easement would be required from the property line of the development to a designated drainage way or right-of-way. Having the pond outlet onto the street adjacent to this property may be a lot simplier. Please revise. Number: 35 Created: 12/9/2003 Please change orifice size to one 3/8-inch diameter hole per row. See drainage report. Pale 6 Number: 36 Created: 12/9/2003 Please include_ a water quality outlet box detail per City standard as well as any other drainage details relevant to this site. Number: 37 Created: 12/9/2003 A drainage easement is required for the limits of the detention pond and the outfall pipe. Number: 40 Created: 12/9/2003 Please add basin and pond summary tables to the drainage plan. Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control Number: 39 Created: 12/9/2003 1. Plan needs notes, BMP's, calculations, etc. Topic: Floodplain Number: 38 Created: 12/9/2003 1.There are numerous items on the floodplain review checklist that have not been included on the plans and the drainage report. See attached review checklist for required items. 2. The grading of the driveway is not above the BFE of 4932. Therefore, it does not meet the dryland access requirement. Please review and revise the grading to be above the BFE. 3. The cross-section and BFE lines must be shown on the plans along with a note stating the entire site is in the floodplain. 4. All "floatable" items - bike rack, trash bin, tables, chairs, etc. need to be noted as being anchored. 5. Please identify the elevation of any HVAC equipment on the plans and in the drainage report. It must be 2 ft. above the BFE. 6. A floodplain use permit and $25 permit fee are required. 7. A FEMA elevation certificate will be required after construction in order to obtain a CO. Department: Traffic Operations Issue Contact: Eric Bracke Topic: traffic Number: 2 Created: 11/24/2003 [11/24/031 No issues and the TIS has been waived. Page 7 Department: Transfort Smith Topic: General Number: 3 [11/25/031 No comments Issue Contact: Garold Created: 11/25/2003 Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Topic: Site Plan Number: 32 Created: 12/9/2003 FYI - Just a reminder, there will be no on -street parking permitted on 12th Street. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Topic: ZONING Number: 5 Created: 12/4/2003 [12/4/03] If customers want to go inside, where are they supposed to par!-? If they park at Supermarket Liquors they will have to walk through the parking lot, down the driveway and then a long 12th Street - that just isn't very accessible. Number: 6 Created: 12/4/2003 [12/4/03] From a users point of view, the hours of operation are very limited - why only stay open till 2:30 p.m. - There are a lot of coffee drinkers who might want coffee at 3:00, when they get off work etc. Number: 7 Created: 12/4/2003 [12/4/03] Note the building height on the elevations Number: 8 Created: 12/4/2003 [12/4/03] Please don't show sign locations on the elevations. Signs w:11 be reviewed and permitted separately through Zoning prior to their installation Number: 9 Created: 12/4/2003 [12/4/03] The dumpster enclosure is only 4 feet tall, this won't be tall enough to adequately screen a standard dumpster - Review this or note the type of dumpster that will be used if different Number: 10 Created: 12/4/2003 [12/4/03] What is the color scheme for the exterior - please note on the elevations Page 8 Number: 11 Created: 12/4/2003 [12/4/03] Combine landscaping details onto one page Number: 12 Created: 12/4/2003 [12/4/03] need landscaping along the drive aisle - See 3.2.1 for landscaping requirements The following comments were expressed at staff review on December loth Engineering: 1. Letters of intent are needed for off -site easements if the storm drainage is intended to go to the south and east from this detention pond. The letters must be provided to the City before going to public hearing. 2. An easement is needed for a portion of the on -site detention pond. 3. A cross -access and parking agreement is needed with Supermarket Liquors. 4. The handicapped ramp is in a utility easement behind the 121h Street right-of-way. This may interfere with some utilities. 5. What is the status of the existing recycled asphalt drive? Is it to remain or be eliminated? Stormwater: 1. Staff is recommending that the site be drained to 12th Street. Drainage can be redirected to 12th Street without much re -grading of the pond required. Then off -site easements from other property owners would not be necessary. 2. No water quality box outlet detail has yet been provided for review. 3. An easement is needed for a portion of the detention pond on -site. 4. Erosion control is needed. Page 9 5. Please work with Marsha Hilmes-Robinson on the floodplain comments. She can be reached at 224-6036. 6. A variance for the "dryland access" requirement is needed from the Water Board. This variance must be done prior to the City being able to approve and sign the final development plans. Light & Power: 1. Power will come from the existing electric vault in the north porticn of this site. Please coordinate a transformer location with Doug Martine. He can be reached at 224-6152. Planning: 1. Len Hilderbrand of Xcel Energy indicated that the applicant should contact Connie Woodward, at 225-7843, for installation of gas service. She will need load information. This item could be ready for a Planning and Zoning Board public hearing if comments are addressed in a timely fashion. Staff is tentatively putting it on the January 15, 2004 P&Z agenda. Please see the attached Revision Routing Sheet for the number of copies of each document to re -submit when addressing the comments. Also, be sure and return all of the red -lined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yo T to- rs teve Olt, City Planner cc: Sheri Wamhoff, Engineering Wes Lamarque, Stcrmwater Stewart & Associates Current Planning File #36-96H Page 10 Jan 15 04 08:33a Austin Cale 9702820356 p.3 14 January 2004 Beantrees, Incorporated 901 Sailors Reef Fort Collins, CO 80525 Attn: Eileen Turgeon & Diana May Dear Eileen & Diana, This letter documents our understanding and agreement to the removal of the existing asphalt drive bordering the south property line of Lot 3 at 432 12t' Street, Fort Collins, Colorado as part of the sale of this property. The purchase agreement between David G. Joyce and Stephen D. Joyce (Sellers) and Eileen Turgeon (Buyer) shall include the following terms regarding the existing asphalt driveway. )> The Buyer shall be allowed to remove the existing asphalt strip to accommodate the new driveway and landscaping requirements for the Beantrees drive through coffee house. The Buyer is not responsible for relocation or replacement of the existing asphalt driveway on their property or any adjacent property. These terms become effective upon the execution of the "Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate" between David G. Joyce and Stephen D. Joyce and Eileen Turgeon. These terms will be included in the "Addendum to Vacant Land/Farm and Ranch Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate". Signed, David G. Joyce Stephen D. Joyce Jan 15 04 08:33a Austin Cale 9702820356 p.2 22 December 2003 Beantrees, Incorporated 901 Sailors Reef Fort Collins, CO 80525 Ann. Eileen Turgeon & Diana May Dear Eileen & Diana, This letter documents our verbal agreement on property easements between Lot 3 at 432 121" Street, Fort Collins, Colorado and the property directly to the south of this lot containing Supermarket Liquors. The purchase agreement between David G. Joyce and Stephen D. Joyce (Sellers) and Eileen Turgeon (Buyer) includes the following terms regarding the shared property. ➢ We agree to give the Buyer access to the property through a shared driveway on 121h Street spanning the south end of the Lot 3 property and the north end of the property where Supermarket Liquors is located. We agree to let Beantrees utilize an existing trash dumpster on the north end of the Supermarket Liquors property. These terns become effective upon the execution of the "Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate" between David G. Joyce and Stephen D. Joyce and Eileen Turgeon. These terms will be included in the "Addendum to Vacant Land/Farm and Ranch Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate". Signed, David G. Joyce Stephen D.Joyce City of Port Collins Current Plannim DATE. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET December 25, 1996 D LI l . Ing I V lllixt PROJECT: #36-96 Lemay Towne Center - Overall Development Plan PLANNER: Ted Shepard All comments must be received by: Monday, January 13, 1997 A Preliminary Soils Report including a traffic study will need to be submitted with each final project_ Date: _ _ cj Signature , CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE ❑ UTILITY PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: May 26, 2005 TO: Engineering Pavement #36-96N Mulberry and Lemay Crossing, Lot 2, Centennial Bank Major Amendment, Type II All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: June 15, 2005 Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) is ,'Ll� Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other_ _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of F�Col Project Comments Sheet CityofFort Collins Selected Departments Date: June 17, 2005 Project: MULBERRY & LEMAY CROSSING, LOT 2, CENTENNIAL BANK MAJOR AMENDMENT, TYPE II All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: June 15, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic; General Number. g Created: 6/17/2005 [6/17105] The title of the plans should be "Mulberry and Lemay Crossing, Filing No 3, Lot 2 — Centennial Bank..." Number: 10 Created: 6/17/2005 16/17/05] Please show the building envelope on the utility plans (include the drive thru canopy). Number: 11 [6/17/05] Label the easements. Created: 6/17/2005 Number: 12 Created: 6/17/2005 [6/17/05] Mostly for your information there is a private no -build easement located in the plaza to the north of the property. I do not have any information on the dimensions of this. It may not impact this site at all —just wanted you to be aware of it. Number. 13 Created: 6/17/2005 [6/17/05] Ramps are shown at all driveway crossings except for the ones at the western driveway. I know that the Home Depot had planed for a bunch of the curb line to be flush with the pavement, but it is not clear if that is what is happening here. The utility plans have a note around part of this curb that it is outfall curb and gutter. Number: 14 Created: 6/17/2005 [6/17/05] 1 did not receive a landscape plan — I will review that next round. I I - Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat CX Site Drainage Report Other C� Utility LaC Redline Utility �_ Landscape Page 1 6aProject Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: February 4, 2004 Project: MULBERRY & LEMAY CROSSING, 1ST FILING, LOT 3, BEANTREES PDP - TYPE II AND FINAL PLAN All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: February 04, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: General Number: 44 Created: 12/10/2003 [2/3/04] The easement will need to be provided with the submittal of the mylars. [12/10/031 Will need to dedicate an easement to the City for the area of the detention pond that goes outside of the existing drainage easement. Number: 46 Created: 12/10/2003 [2/3/04] You did provide this, but please add an arrow from this note to the concrete channel as well. [12110/03] Add the following note with an arrow pointing toward the new driveway. If pavement is disturbed, street patching to standards is required. Number: 56 Created: 2/4/2004 [2/4/04] The mylars need to be signed by Elco and Boxelder before we will accept them for signature. i 7 1 Signature L � Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other fi�U Utility _ %� Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 6aProject Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: August 17, 2005 Project: MULBERRY & LEMAY CROSSING, LOT 2, CENTENNIAL BANK MAJOR AMENDMENT, TYPE II All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: August 17, 2005 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: General Number: 14 Created: 6/17/2005 [8/17/05] Should probably show the meter pit location on the landscape plan. (6/17/051 1 did not receive a landscape plan — I will review that next round. Y// � O's�— Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISION Plat Site Drainage Report Other Ak" Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 REVISION COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: August 3, 2005 TO: Engineering PROJECT PLANNER: Ted Shepard #36-96N Mulberry and Lemay Crossing, Lot 2, Centennial Bank Major Amendment Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: August 17, 2005 Note --Please identify your redlines for future reference No Problems ,Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape irovcITT [let ' 1, 2000 I odd R. Whipple_ P.L. CllAssociates, Inc. -07 W71" Avc., Ste_ 2( o Spolamc, WA 99204 Dent' "Dodd, I have completed imp review of the revision that you submitted for sheets CS3.so, CS50-1 CS 11 .12, CS I I �'0, Cs 1 s.SO and C.S I I of the Mulberry Lemav Cross ic's Offsite improvement plans. M' comments for die outs tandim-irens lollow. I have included my otit'inal comment,'our tcsl once to that comment (per response letter dated October'_'. '001); Lind me repk, upon rcv Us of the comments at d -Ile mansi have eliminated those comments that wer suislhcturily addressed. Sheet CS3.50 1) My comment: South tloWhtle - Lincoln Ave improvements. The vertical curve starting at Lemay sta 36 01 71 has an incorrect h value. correct value 1 10If.92 s9) = 74.32 This is still incorrect Your response vertical curv_c data chanced My reph: It doesn't .ppear to be chanced the k value is still shown as _'9 41. At a value of 29,11 it doesn't meet the - 7-mph desien speed requested. A k= 30 is a 25 mph design. As indicated later" the vertical carve needs to tic iuto'he lade that is adjacent to it A grade break at the point of tic in is not acceptable. '-i My comment: South flowline - The vertical curve starting at 32+ 4.?5 has an incorrect K value. correct value: 93S%(.9_'-.4 41 - 6S,7� This is still incorrect Your response .Vertical curve data chanced. My reph: It doesn't appear to be changed the k value is shown as 63.13. As indicated later- the vertical cut sc needs to tic into the crude that is *djacent to it. A wade break at the point o1 tie in is not acceptable. �) Nh comment: So-tth Ilowline=Hie aalues associated with sta 31---t6 ,'6 differ from those shown on sheet 5.1i3. Ile distance k still different - values do not correspond on sheets 3.50, s.02 and I 1 20. Your response- u>nec cd ngin - ;ror tom ke these she is con_istent. Vly reph. I h; ou the van i sir on hect 1 I.'_0 still differs. Sheet CS5.02 4) My comment: Intersection Plans - L. Magnolia and 12'a L. Magnolia and Lcmav, S. Lemav and G. Lincoln - This derail a ill wo;l' fol the interim, but wim the ultimate the crown line can not lbllow the centerline of -the road_ it will need to 10110%c the median so that drainaec on the north side of the mediem will not Ihnv hack totcard the median. s'o ultimate d tail provided hut the ultimate dc,;cn shectstill shows the crotcn lu the north of!he median. -- Your response: fhe eel ons_on_ h '' qrl wd I__'S 1 h ry [Teen chm_cd to show the crown illthe mcch,ui nut on the cencrline. �Nfi reply: I Il;, is u nc you base chamcd these sheets, but nosh the elevation indicajuut the low spot is tut of rccl on �hccl I ';� 0' a; the eroc%n s to the south of that point. It appears that coc .still get positive Il.oi+ 'o ih:u point :uid the ,lope line just ❑see .o �,c t;pdatecf. Bubble any than ces and submit for'wraturc. Sheet CS11.12 5) My comment: Future south Lemay plan and profile_ The vertical curve starting at sta aft i-53.23 on the left Ilowlllie has an roamed K value, correct value 20O,(41-.40) -- 2,16.91 there are two different slopes listed as the s!upe Where the vertical curvcs tic to7cihcr. Which is it? .41 or .70 if it is .7 then the value listed on this shccl is correct. but the value listed on sheet I 1 20 is then incorrect. Your response [hc t0 _:ole hour C_S I. 112 and tl c_.I1 grade trout shot CS 1 1.20 Cate a Crude hI�uk in_the_eurb Ilotaline chere the wo verttl curves racer Phis _lade [,teak is less than 1°h as allowed p 'r I tit". (orluu 1)esi urd Consutic, ion CTtu ra. Standn ds and sr)Cch- iccrwws +or Su ecu SiJcvcalk_. 11 c, s and c th CT PtIMIC % ,I%, Sip pl nen_Nc I. Jammu 1099"_Section I_02 11 , 06-e. N1v reply: You can not haac a = Lade break that occurs n-er no distance The vertical curve ties now the wade at that point :1 smooth vcrtrcal cunVe %vIil not occur with what you are trvina to do. This still needs to he corrected. 6) My comment: Future south Lemay plan and profile - The vertical curve startine at sta 38+26,79 on the right Ilowline has an incorrect K value, correct value: 200 (,401 .89) - 155.04 This is still incorrect - have 1.3 , listed at the curve, but this not the ,lope being lied into. Your response: the I _ oracle Was chamred to 1.29 on sheet CS I I.11The ncw_ 129 er tdc from sheer C S I I . I2 an I the 89-,, tide min -sheet CS 1120 create a crade breal- n the curb flowline where the two vertical curves MCCI My reply: You can not have a grade break that occurs over no distance. The vertical curve ties into the tirade tit that point. A smooth vertical curve Will not occur With what you are trying to do_ This still needs to be corrected. Sheet CS11?0 7) My comment: future Lincoln Ave improvements - The vertical curve starting at Lemay sta 36-05J1 on the south flowline has an incorrect K value, ccrrect value: 110/( 59-.92) = 74.32 This doesn't meet the min requirements for sC-niph desicn (min 90). 1 his is still incorrect. Your response:. Vertical curve data chanced. My reply: It was not chanced. Althoush since this is a vertical curve around a curb return the desi_vn ,vith it value of 74.32 will be acceptable if the chamee is made to this value. 8) My comment: Future Lincoln Ave improvements - The vertical curve starting at sta 32--54.25 on the south flowline has an incorrect K value, correct value: 93.5/L92-,44) - 68.75 This doesn't meet the min requirements for s0-mph design (min 110). This is still incorrect. Your response: no response required. My reply: Nothing was done to correct the value or address the tact that this curve doesn't meet standar(s. A variance was requested for the interim desicn and was acceptable for the interim design only. the ultimate design need's to meet 50-11111h design requirements or you are not eligible for reimbursement on I .incoin Ave_ 9) My comment: As indicated above, the vertical curve starting at station 28+80.16 on the north flowline may have an incorrect flowline value. There are two different slopes listed for the slope where the vertical curves tic together. Which is it? .41 or 70 if It is .41 then the value listed on this sheet is correct, but the value listed on sheet 1 1,1'_ is then incorrect. Vour response: the 70 Lrage trout sheet CS 1.12 and the _41urade from sheet CS I.I '0 create a grad - brake in the Cub Howling where the'wo vertical cuncs meat This grade break is less than 1041 as allowed_ c, fort CollinStands d and Spe cihcations tOr St cets Stdowalks. AIlccs :in,I Other Pit HI 9y ns, Surnp entent Vc I Idnuar. 1979_Sc t n 1.o2_0 _.06-e. Ah reply: You can not have ❑ Crude break nt„t ocears over no distance. The vertical curve ties into the -rude at that point. :A smooth vertical curve mli trot occur with what you are trying to (1o. This still needs to he corrected. Sheet CS12.50 and CS12.51 10) My comment: Lincoln Avenue Cross -sections - Stations 31 -50 throuah sta 32-()0 show the future left turn median and north Ilowline location in the wrote place. the south Ilowline of the left turn median should be located J2 feet fiam the south flow!ine. This would be a ?-foot median and then the north Flnwline shall he �6 feet from the north tknvline oftlie median since you have included a west bound ri_lit turn lane in your deSien. I f om station 31--�0 to 32 -00 and 33---0 to 35---so the width of the Southern lanes tiom tlo%ti line to Ilos+dine scales out at 3d feet_ I lie width of Ltc northern lanes et stations 31--50. 32 00, 33- 00, and appear incorrect ako thcv either n be. -,more of in one case less than the dimensions scaled out on the plan tc:e. II is not clear w-here the cro%m line of this street is to be as you are constructing it. Arc you ahvays nhowint it at Oy Your response Checked and corrected v, idths. The crown has been mp_ved into the median as indicated by the Ilowlmc clevutions added to the sections. — My repivThe was done and is meat, but now the cross slope grades on the north side of -the median do not nice[ minimum standards. Stations 31 -00 to 33 -s0 do not meet minimum _`4) grade requirements the trades of the median on the north side can prcbabIy be adjusted so that the 21'o can be met Station 34 4 00 is at , 0"'. on the north side so it needs to be labeled as such. Station 3 I 00 on the south side is not at 29b please label it as it doesn't meet the 20'". With this slope charl"inti need to identtfo if arc any places Nohere the interim pavement doesn't correspond with the ultimate elevations. Please provide updated =hects for signature. All changes made should be bubbled and marked. if there are any other chanter/ revisions that have been made to these plans thev need to be shown and labeled. Include original si,nature blocks out these Sheets and am revision signatures. If you would like the molars returned please let me know As indicated previously That without an acceptable ultimate desitm for Lincoln Ave., reimbursement on Lincoln Ave. will be limited as reitnbarsement can only occur for portions of file roadway that are built to an acceptable ultimate section_ This applies to street overizir, * reimbursement as well as reimbursement from the property owner fit the local sect potion adjacent to the site. Per Secttou ILD.2. of the Dcvetopment Agreement Subject to the conditions ofthis A_rc•emcnt. the City acres to reimburse the Developer for the local street improvcmer s on Lemay Avenue and I-incohr Avenue tut those portions orsaid streets abunimli the Buffalo Run Apartments PUD as shown on the approved final development plan documents, Im the portion of which improvements are constructed to the ultimate desig❑ and cross section for said roadways. ...... This iotormation is being forwarded onto Matt Baker. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, She] I L, Wamhoi'f, P E. Cc: Matt Baker, City of Fort Collins Engineering Ben Drake, Gotdherg Property Associates Inc. Kurt Prinslow, CLC Associates IC..'s3.— Jul}18, 2001 Ramsey D. Myatt Myatt Brandcs & Gast, PC 323 South College Avenue, Suite 1 Fort Collins, CO 80524-2845 RE: Waync & Mary Spccht Dear Mr. Myatt: Reference is made to your letter dated July 12, 2001, of the same subject (copy attached). The offer to which you refer was made at a meeting on May I", over 2-'h months ago. At that time, the concrete curb/gutter/sidewalk work was underway, and the paving on East Magnolia Street had not been done. I had made the field decision to modify the plans by substituting a concrete gutter pan in place of the rollover curb -and -gutter on the north side of Magnolia Street. This was in response to property owner concerns about drainage and access. I firmly believe that was the correct decision. Had Mr. Spccht accepted m% offer at the time it was made, I would have been willing to pay for removing a portion of the concrete gutter pan and replacing it with rollover curb -and -gutter in front of his property, as called for on the plans. This would have been a relatively minor expense at that time However, it would be far too cost[v to change this now that the work has all been completed. As it affects the Spccht property, the constructed improvements allow cast' access without changing the historic drainage patterns. I can see no reason to change what has been built. Incidentally, curb cuts are not rcalh necessary with rollover curb -and -gutter, although many people prefer to have the curb cut. As constructed, Mr. Specht's propertv has what is in essence a continuous curb cut for his entire propertv frontage. This resembles the previous condition on Magnolia, and it is what the property owners on that north side of the street asked for. If I can be of further assistance on this matter, feel free to contact me at 221-6605. Sincerely, Cam McNair, PE City Engineer cc: Gary Dicde Paul Eckman Don Lawhead Lance Newlin Dave Stringer Glen Schleutcr RAINISF.Y n. MYATT ROM W. 13RANDI11N.1R_ 1C1C11AR1)5. GAS I' 11 nn1a) .1. IOlINSoN Dmi,iX, Murn.Y BRIAN R. LFOM MYATT BRANDES & GAST PROF17SSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS A,bD COUNSELORS AT LA14 CI.O('KTOWER SQUARF 323 SOUL H COI_ I. FGF A% h_ Lc ,SU11131 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80524-2845 July 12, 2001 Cam McNair, City Engineer City Engineer's Office City of Fort Collins 281 North College .Avenue For[ Coliins, CO 80524 Re: Wayne and Mary Specht Dear Mr. McNair: TIeLEPuovF (970)482-4846 FACSIM11L (970) 482-303 9 VIA HAND DELIVERY After due consideration. Mr. and Mrs. Specht have decided to accept your offer to replace the curb and gutter in front of their property on East Magnolia Street and to replace it with the improvements outlined on the blueprints which they were shown. It is our understanding that it will be necessary to instia�l curb cuts to their property when the new Curb is installed. My clients request the curb Cut 80' west of their west property line with the curb cut running 60' wide from that point east. From the cast property line, they would like to have the curb cut 19' from the east property line and for the curb cut to be l 12' wide. If you need follow-up information or data concerning the Specht property, please do not hesitate to contact me or Mr. and Mrs. Specht directly. Their phone number is 226-5223. Thank you for your attention to this request. Very truly yours, MYATT BRANDES & GAST PC r�r E ,l By: If Iry 1W Ramsey DC att RDM/frb pc: Wayne and Mary Specht IF \W PCARDM\SPLCI IT1Cily Inginccr Iv wpd) Tra:lvo .,":On Sery;ces >ine: � ing lrra,tment is MWANIMMOGFMACAMAMMMOM August 1, 2000 1. Mr. Mark Goldberg Goldberg property Associates, Inc. 1120 Lincoln Street, Suite 1101 Denver. CO 80203-2136 RE: Roundabout Schedule and Cost Share Dear Mr. Goldberg: The Mulberry-Lemay Roundabout design team, led by Balloffet and Associates, assures me that the roundabout project is on track for a September 1, 2000, bid date to construction contractors. Your associate, Ben Drake, as well as representatives of CLC Associates, have participated in the weekly design meetings, and I am sure that they can verify the extensive progress that has been made to date. Right -of way plans have been completed and submitted to CDOT, and acquisitions of the necessary properties have commenced. Environmental and stormwater issues have been addressed and essentially resolved- The geometries of the roundabout in its ultimate configmation have been established, and plans for interim staging are well underway. Utility plans are virtually complete, although some additional discussions are taking place regarding the fate of the 24-inch diameter water line- Associated elements of the project, such as the design of the bicycle/pedestrian bridge, the creation of a public education program and the design of the center island landscaping, are also progressing satisfactorily. I have every reason to be confident that the City will be prepared to advertise the project to qualified construction contractors by September I" Accordingly, it is tlhe Citv's expectation that you will fulfill your obligation to pay the local street portion of the intersection improvements, as well as other agreed upon costs, in accordance with the Development Agreement dated June 22, 2000 As of today, that dual cost figure for the developer's share is still being discussed, but it is my understanding that Ben Drake and Matt Baker are very close to agreement on what the number should be. We are currently awaiting a revised submittal- which needs to include the utility costs and other items cited in Exhibit D of the Development Agreement. It appears that your obligation will be for approximately $800,000 plus the additional S200,000 which you agreed to contribute toward the design and construction of the bicycle/pedestrian bi idge over the Poudre River. The Citv looks forward to the receipt of these t'unds by August I5, 2000. Also, for your information, the IGA with CDOT, which is also discussed in the Development Agreement, has beer drafted and agreed upon by both City and CDOT statT The IGA will be Page 2 Rowidahow Schedule and Cost Share August 1, 2000 presented to Fort Collins City Council for approval at its August 15°i meeting. Assuming it is approved, the CDOT State Engineer is expected to finalize the IGA by the end of August, 2000. It is obvious that the City fully intends to proceed with the construction of the Roundabout. The City appreciates your cooperation in this endeavor. As always, feel free to contact me or anyone on the City staff should you have any questions. Sincerely, qv ),e�,�'l Cam McNair, PL- City Engineer cc: Lucia Liley, March & Liley Bob Kitchell, Qalloffet & Associates John Fischbach, City Manager Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Cityof fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: February 3, 2004 Project: MULBERRY & LEMAY CROSSING, 1ST FILING, LOT 3, BEANTREES PDP - TYPE II AND FINAL PLAN All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: February 04, 2004 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: General Number: 44 Created: 12/10/2003 [2/3/04] The easement will need to be provided with the submittal of the mylars. [12/10/031 Will need to dedicate an easement to the City for the area of the detention pond that goes outside of the existing drainage easement. Number: 46 Created: 12/10/2003 [2/3/04] You did provide this, but please add an arrow from this note to the concrete channel as well. [12/10/03] Add the following note with an arrow pointing toward the new driveway. If pavement is disturbed, street patching to standards is required. \ J t i Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility Redline Utility Landscape Page 1 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: December 12, 2003 Project: MULBERRY & LEMAY CROSSING, 1ST FILING, LOT 3, BEANTREES PDP -TYPE II All comments must be received by Steve Olt in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: December 10, 2003 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: General Created: 12/10/2003 Number: 41 [12/10/031 Need letter of intent for off -site easement(s) needed, prior to hearing. Number: 42 Created: 12/10/2003 [12/10/03] Need off -site easement for the drainage pipe to be installed and for the path the flows go off -site. Number: 43 Created: 12/10/2003 [12/10/031 Need access easement for the shared driveway. This can be an easement (private or public) or an access agreement. If it is to be a private easement or agreement, we will need to receive a signedyf this. And I would recommend that it by filed by the applicant at the county. Part of this area is on this site, part ofit Number: 44 Created: 12/10/2003 [12/10/03] Will need to dedicate an easement to the City for the area of the detention pond that goes outside of the existing drainage easement. Number: 45 Created: 12/10/2003 112/10/031 Locate the driveways. Provide a distance from a property line. Number: 46 Created: 12110/2003 (12/10/03] Add the following note with an arrow pointing toward the new driveway. If pavement is disturbed, street patching to standards is required. Number: 47 Created: 12/10/2003 112/10/031 Provide curb, gutter and sidewalk detail and detail 2201 if waterline cut into street is to remain. Number: 48 Created: 12/10/2003 [12110/03] On the landscape plan the detention pond is labeled as existing grass to remain. This entire area will be regarded, so the existing grass won't really remain. It will need to be reseeded or resoded. Number: 50 Created: 12/12/2003 [12/12/031 Engineering Pavement comments: 12th Street is less than 5 years old any cuts will require maill and inlay. 4-211 ' Date Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other Z Utility <_ Redline Utility Landscape Page I 6 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Cilc fort Collins Beantrees, Inc. Date: 12/12/2003 c/o Eileen Turgeon & Diana May 901 Sailors Reef Fort Collins, CO. 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for MULBERRY & LEMAY CROSSING, 1ST FILING, LOT 3, 13EANTREES PDP - TYPE II, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: Building comments Number: 17 Created: 12/8/2003 [12/8/03] Rick Lee of the Fort Collins Building Department indicated that he is forwarding the various codes and standards that will be enforced by the City. Included are the minimum accessibility requirements for the installation of the water closet (toilet room). These documents are enclosed with the comment letter to the applicant. Number: 24 Created: 12/8/2003 [12/8/03] The Site Plan indicates that the building height is to be 201; however, the scaled building height(s) on the Building Elevations Plan is 13' to 151, depending on where the measurement is taken. The Site Plan should be changed to reflect this. Number: 25 Created: 12/8/2003 [12/8/03] The signage must be taken off of the Building Elevations Plan (west and south elevations). This site is not in the Residential Neighborhood Sign District. The signage will be enforced (both building and monument signs) by the Zoning Department per the City's Sign Code allowances and requirements at time of building permit application. Number: 26 Created: 12/8/2003 [12/8/03] Show building heights on the Building Elevations Plan. Number: 27 Created: 12/8/2003 [12/8/03] Is the 5' x 5' Trash & Mechanical Enclosure large enough for both? Does this plan accommodate the possibility for recycling? Page 1 Topic: General Number: 51 Created: 12/12/2003 [12/12/031 The entry drive should be narrowed down to 15, to match the width of the drive along the east side of the building. The existing recycled asphalt emergency drive on the south property line should either be incorporated into the new drive for this development or moved a little to the south to create a 5' wide landscape strip on this property. Number: 52 Created: 12/12/2003 (12/12/031 On the Site & Landscape Plans, please rote what type of "existing fence" is along the east property line. Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 21 Created: 12/8/2003 [12/8/03] How will the "existing grasses to remain" area east and north of the drive (between the street, drive, and fence to the east) be maintained? Number: 22 Created: 12/8/2003 [12/8/03] The -first 2 street trees north of the northerly (exit) drive cut are shown to be spaced at 50' on -center on Sheet 1 of 2 of the Landscape Plan but 40' on -center on Sheet 2 of 2 of the Landscape Plan. Number: 23 Created: 12/8/2003 [12/8/03] The proposed Autumn Purple Ash (shade) street trees are not on the City's approved street tree list. Please make a species selection from the approved list. Also, please check with Tim Buchanan, the City Forester, at 221-6361, to determine if the Cockspur Hawthorn is an approved ornamental street tree species. There are several Hawthorns that are on the list. Topic: Lighting Number: 53 Created: 12/12/2003 [12/12/03] There are a couple of spot lighting levels shown on the Photometric Plan that exceed the allowable maximum of 10 foot candles. Also, the lighting levels on the exit drive, near the street, appear to be too high. Please see the red - lined Photometric Plan that is enclosed with this comment letter. Are all the lights down directional and shielded to prevent glare and light spillage? It is difficult to tell from the plans. See Sections 3.2.4(D)(7)&(8) of the Land Use Code (LUC) . Page 2 Number: 54 Created: 12/12/2003 [12/12/03] Are the Metal Halide and Fluorescent light fixtures the best solution and do they meet the standards set forth in Sections 3.2.4(D)(3)&(5) of the LUC? Topic: Site Plan Number: 18 Created: 12/8/2003 [12/8/03] The drive for this project starts at a 20' width and narrows down to 15' on the curve near the southeast corner of the site. Is it possible that this whole drive could be 15, in width, which would allow for a 5' wide landscape strip along the south property line? There needs to be some landscape buffer in this area. Number: 19 Created: 12/8/2003 [12/8/03] Is there an existing sidewalk on the east side of 12th Street along the Supermarket Liquors property? Number: 20 Created: 12/8/2003 [12/8/03] Is it possible to include 2 or 3 parking spaces on this site to accommodate the patrons that want to walk into the building for a drink? The Planning objectives indicate that there will be a small indoor seating area for about 15 people plus t:1e outdoor patio, which will probably have seating. Where will these people park to patronize the coffee house? If the only parking for this project is to be in the Supermarket Liquors lot (for both employees and patrons) then a shared parking agreement with the liquor store is needed. A copy of the agreement must be provided to the City for review and to be put on file. Number: 28 Created: 12/8/2003 [12/8/03] There appears to be about 5' between the bicycle rack and the bottom of the steps up to the outdoor patio (please see red -lined Site Plan). Is this enough space to ensure that bicycles will not block the steps? Number: 29 Created: 12/9/2003 [12/9/03] The Site Plan is very responsive to the Site Design standard set forth in Section 4.17(E)(2)(a) in the C - Commercial Division of the LUC. Page 3 Number: 30 Created: 12/9/2003 [12/9/03] Although the placement of the building does not satisfy the "build -to" line standard set forth in Sections 3.5.3(B)(2)(a)0b) of the LUC, it does satisfy the exception to the standard as set forth in Section 3.5.3(9)(2)(d)1 regarding the provision of an outdoor patio that directly relates to the adjacent street and sidewalk (12th Street). Therefore, the "build -to" line standard is satisfied. Number: 31 Created: 12/9/2003 [12/9/03] The development plan must provide for additional landscaping (trees and shrubs) in a 5' wide setback area from the south property line to satisfy Sections 3.2.1(E)(4)(a)&(b) of the LUC. Topic: Utilities Number: 13 Created: 12/8/2003 [12/8/03] Mike Scheid of the East Larimer County Water District (ELCO) indicated that his comments are included on a red -lined set of utility plans that are being forwarded to the applicant with this comment letter. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: General Nytmber: 41 Created: 12/10/2003 V/`r12/10/03] Need letter of intent for off -site easement(s) needed, prior to hearing. rJalmber: 42 Created: 12/10/2003 [12/10/031 Need off -site easement for the drainage pipe to be installed and for the path the flows go off -site. Number: 43 [12/10/031 Need acc This can be an easem agreement. If it is will need to receive recommend that it by Part of this area is Created: 12/10/2003 ss easement for the shared driveway. nt (private or public) or an access to be a private easement or agreement, we a signed copy of this. And I would filed by the applicant at the county. on this site, part of it is off site. Number: 44 [12/10/03] will need to dedicate a the area of the detention pond that existing drainage easement. Created: 12/10/2003 n easement to the City for goes outside of the Pale 4 Number: 45 Created: 12/10/2003 [12/10/031 Locate the driveways. Provide a distance from a property line. Number: 46 Created: 12/10/2003 [12/10/03] Add the following note with an arrow pointing toward the new driveway. If pavement is disturbed, street patching to standards is required. Number: 47 Created: 12/10/2003 [12/10/031 Provide curb, gutter and sidewalk detail and detail 2201 if waterline cut into street is to remain. Number: 48 Created: 12/10/2003 [12/10/031 on the landscape plan the detention pond is labeled as existing grass to remain. This entire area will be regarded, so the existing grass won't really remain. It will need to be re -seeded or re -sodded. Number: 50 Created: 12/12/2003 /L12/12/03] Engineering Pavement comments: 12th Street is less than 5 years old so any cuts will require mill and inlay. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Topic: General Number: 1 Created: 11/24/2003 [11/24/031 The developer will need to coordinate a location for a pad type electric transformer on the site, and the remaining electric development charges with Light & Power Engineering (221-6700). Department: Natural Resources Topic: General Number: 4 [11/28/03] No issues. Issue Contact: Doug Moore Created: 11/28/2003 Department: PFA Issue Contact: Michael Chavez Topic: General Number: 14 Created: 12/8/2003 This comment pertains to the proposed project located at 432 12th street, Lot 3 of Mulberry and Lemay Crossing. ADDRESS NUMERALS: Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of 6 inch numerals on a Page 5