HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARVARD - Filed GC-GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE - 2004-08-10Statement of Planning Objectives Submitted by Developer of:
PRiCi,1MiNARY PI,AN AMI;IJHMI?NT
TO YHE
]IARVARD ';Ui',I)IVISItIN
I'I,ANNI;D UNIT 1)I,VKLnI'MI-:NT
The 11,11v,nd Subdivision Pl nnu"d Unit Development (PIID)
was ,approved by the Fort Collins City Council several years ago.
App] ic,)nt, brin'l the oC propert_y wi thin I he PUP, sa c lcs an
amcndment Ilit'l -to to permit her to better utilize said property.
Si.te I'ropo:;ed for Development.
Legal Description: Lot 1, Harvard Subdivision, Second
Piling, in the City of Fort Collins, according to
the recorded Plat thereof, County of Larimer, State
of Colorado.
Present Owner: Leona 11. 6,ind
Proposed Owner: Leona M. Sand
Present Zoning: H-B Highway Business
Proposed Zoning: H-B highway Business
Planning ObjecLives .
The Harvard Subdivision PUD, in its present form, con-
templates construction upon the property (Lot 1) of one single
story commercial building with a gross floor area of 6360 square
feet. A portion of the building, if constructed at the location
indicated by the Final Unit Development Plan for the PUD, will
encroach upon Lye right of way for an irrigation ditch which
traverses the property, a fact which apparently was overlooked
at the time the PUD was approved. The irrigation ditch is a
lateral or feeder off of the New Mercer Ditch.
Because it will be impossible to construct the building
at its contemplated location upon the property, the Applicant
redo csts approval of an amendment to the Development Plan to per-
mit the building to he constructed at a site which will not
interfere with the irrigation ditch right of way.
It is contemplated that the building, when completed,
will be occupied by two separate businesses. one tenant will be
Major Motor Supply, Inc., a corporation owned and controlled by
the Applicant, Leona M. Sand. The remaining portion of the
building will be leased to a comport-ible retail -wholesale business
(for example, a lighting fixture store) which attracts a rela-
tively low volume of customer traffic, as aloes Major Motor Supply,
Inc.
Both businesses will require considerable space for
display and storage areas because of the nature and size of the
merchandise which both will handle. Unfortunately, the proposed
size of the building is not adequate to accomodate these
businesses. For this reason, permission is renuested to increase
the gross floor ..area of the building to provide for 6,200 square
feet of retail space and 2,800 square feet of storage area.
M&I consulting engineers
4710 South College Ave. Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
Telephone (303) 226-2323
Mason Street South
M & I No. 1624-001
November 3, 1980
Mr. Milo Bunker
University Realty
P. 0. Box 471
Ft. Collins, CO 80522
RE: Mason Street South Development
Dear Milo:
Per your request we have completed preliminary drainage calcula-
tions for approximately 5.83 acreslocated at the southeast corner
of Mason Street and Harvard Street.
The site has approximately 320 feet of frontage along Harvard
Street: and 870 feet of frontage along Mason Street. There are
no major drainage ways within the project limits and, in fact,
off -site drainage contributing to the site is negligible.
An irrigation lateral known as the Vance Lateral runs from west to
east along the northerly boundary of the site. This lateral is
no longer used for irrigation purposes and serves as a storm
drainage system for the City of Fort Collins. The system termi-
nates at Lake Sherwood.
The proposed development slopes generally from southwest to north-
east at approximately 1%. Natural drainage is accepted in its
undeveloped state by the Vance drainage system.
The drainage policy and procedures established by the City of
Fort Collins were used for analyzing the storm runoff. The amount
of storm runoff for the development was determined by the Rational
Method. This procedure equates the design peak flow to the area,
amount of rainfall on that area, and a multiplier that is deter-
mined by the physical characteristics of the area under study. A
runoff coefficient of 0.25 for existing conditions, as recommended
by the storm drainage specifications for the City of Fort Collins,
was used to determine the existing storm runoff on the site. The
design of all drainage presented in this report is based on the
rainfall intensity duration curves developed by the City of Fort
Collins Engineering Department.
Mr. Milo Bunker
November 3, 1980
Page 2
It is recommended that the development detain on -site a 100-year
runoff and discharge it at a 2-year historical rate. This will
meet the current policy requirements of the City of. Fort Collins
and relieve the developer of liability from downstream properties.
The 2-year historical runoff rate from the site is 1.57 cfs.
Using this runoff rate and a study of the cumulative runoff in a
100-year storm after development yields a detention pond with a
minimum capacity of 46,700 cubic feet.
It is recommended that the site grading be designed to accommodate
the necessary stormwater storage and the discharge of 1.57 cfs be
directed to the Vance drainage ditch. One suggestion for discharge
is the installation of an 8" diameter pipe at 1.70% grade.
It is also recommended that the drainage calculations be updated
when a final development plan is available.
Calculations for the information contained herein are available
on request.
If we can be of further assistance in this matter please contact
me.
Very truly yours,
M & 1, IN�C,.
Lloyd G. McLaughlin
LGM/lk
Page 2
Statement of Planning Objectives Submitted by Developer of:
PRELIMINARY PLAN AMENDMENT
TO THE
HARVARD SUBDIVISION
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
The increase in size will permit the Applicant to ful-
fill her objectives for development of the property to its best
utilization without detracting from the overall objectives of the
PUD as originally conceived and approved. Fven with the increase
in building size, ample area will remain for anticipated parking
needs and for landscaped open space.
Development Schedule.
Construction of all improvements upon the property will
commence as soon as final approval of the proposed Amendment is
granted and can be expected to be completed within 120 days
thereafter.
S IA IF FARM
PAIIL f,IcCJY, Agency ",1anageF
insuRA"cF
Auto— LI(e— hlnallh— Hcmc and Dainrss
Post Office or. `fi' 116 ',,st Harvard
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
Phone: Off, 484-7581 Res. 482-7901
May 14, 1977
City of Fort Collins, Colorado
Planning and Zoning Board
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter is to explain and support the Harvard Development
Company's request for a modification in their PUD which would
allow State Farm Insurance Companies to include a drive through
facility in their new building for their use.
State Farm has operated a"Drive In Claims" office at the
116 West Harvard address for the past three years, but with-
out the desired safer drive through arrangement. This quick
claims service is for the convenience of their customers and
eliminates the standard requirement of three estimates. The
drive through facility would be a help to the customer and
the adjustor/estimator when processing claim forms during times
of inclement weather. After the valid repair cost estimate
is completed the claimant then takes the authorization to the
auto body repair shop of his choice for the repairs.
Generally, the claims office will write the repair estimate on
about 5 or 6 cars per day, 2 to 3 on Fridays and Saturdays.
On a "large volume" day State Farm will estimate 10 to 11 cars.
No significant increasein volume may be expected in a facility
of this size.
Sincerely,
Paul McCoy, Agency anager
® HARVARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
HEAL ESTATE AND DFVELOFMENE Post O"icc Bo.2033 Fort (01-,. Colorado 80521
Telephone 303- 4847576
May 15, 1977
City of Fort Collins, Colorado
Planning and Zoning, Board
Port Collins, Colorado
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This request is for an ammendment in the Harvard Subdivision P.U.D.
zoned HB located at the southwest corner of Harvard Drive and the South
College Avenue frontage road.
The requested proposal is to add to the building plans of building
"B" a drive -through inspection facility to be used for, the damage
estimation of vehicles insured by the State Farm Insurance Company, the
future occupants of the building.
Buildings "C" and "D" are in place. The drive -through is to be a
part of buildings "B" and "A". (Building "A" to be built at a future
time.) The proposed facility will have electrically operated doors to
allow front entry and rear exit of vehicles.
The proposal would require a minor relocation of the west Harvard Street
entry to center on the drive -through facility, thus creating a safer traffic
flow.
It has been found that the two -stall loading zone of the existing
building "C" is more than ample during business hours and this proposal also
seeks to change the two -stall requirement to one stall each for buildings
"A", "B" and " C"
Sincerely,
J In Batson, Partner
�arvard Development
JB:kas
cc: file
IJ J
James H. Stewart and Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
January 30, 1978
Mr. Roger Krempel
Public Works Director
Fort Collins City Hall
P. 0. Box 580
Port Collins, CO 80522
Dear Mr. Krempel:
In early December, 1977, I received a print of a riser detail from
Mr. John Effinger of the City of Fort Collins Water and Sewer Department,
to be used on the Overland -Prospect Relief Collector Sanitary Sewer. The
riser detail was added to the drawings on this project; it is labeled
RISER DETAIL - ALT. #1.
Several engineers in our office reviewed the detail and felt that the
forces that will be acting on both the sewer main and house sewer will cause
Vitrified Clay Pipe to shear and a PVC pipe to deflect. Modifications were
added to the detail. to help relieve stress at the more critical points.
However, we still_ feel a thorough analysis of the detail is required to
determine any further modifications needed to resist the combination of
stresses that could be imposed on it both during and after construction to
prevent possible failure.
We would like to recommend that the Water and Sewer. Department remove this
detail from the Overland -Prospect Relief Collector Sanitary Sewer project.
A mcetinf„ at your convenience, to discuss this topic in more depth would be
welcomed.
Sincerely,
JAMES H. STEWART AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Donald. McClelland, P.E.
dw
(` ullli IIVIIZ 1II I(MI� • PU Ru\1'."1 • I,1RI(III I nl ult:\n��Hu'�97 • II I11'n�IVI \HId9n Vlrvl •i:fl
m
r�
/?/'7;'-'-
,`, uppor/ Io He 0/
A (,'IGss C Concrele
v
h/i'�" .'d•'t ; -s-/!/UE'EO CO/NJC,e'E/T/E" .SU/'�O�T.•
f�.PA��CN --Z � ,• o ' � I DU FT, /�,� W%E BE�AiYC//
��-
/�<<rr �E r/waesT,c�dcrEo
CONc',e�"TE` SU.�OD,�T
DECT/ON
,Z)Z T1I
.9 --14
_ Ca�vice-.E ram' T
AC.E-O-
�`a,EeEo G,POUNO
s U o�0,4�7 T 1 o,e /✓J�E �TNc1?1
,1.4 l/ESl//LL E `//_SCONS/N
PcF� f c E�>fEL, Di>;A E VO4 Ze
oFTAILNu 7
A'FY '
.P/3',tR N/TN /✓Y& 4T f jA1C.V "ONN dN PL fjAlf T.+(aJ.• H
,f/Jl;Q N/YNO:/T I✓Y,F "4ANc.q S.i/ONN eN dLgNS TNUS:
[•�/ FOR O/V E- d/C63 ZAXC .Q ----I
TNNN dTd/�' O/r1i N.fYON l��
I 1
i
� / � N/TN e� P/,✓! ONG Y� �/ I
�\ r14/A/ SE%/E.?
h//7,v
TEES
RIaS'.FAf L7c`�TrQ�l S
STapp Q9 9EgL£D !✓/T,v O.44VIf qNo
Ho7 POURED HARD STEEP • ASPHALT ✓olNT
144
LEgO �� Oq/fUM ? �V h
44 0 o.. FYcq Sr4 t. G..
� /n- Cor✓C.P6TE ry-
(Ci7ADE C)
s F
0i"Vinod c/n//n IO[TAII- N' �i
A�
CITY OF FORT COLLINS P. 0, BOX 580, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522 PH (303) 484-4220
WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES
February 1, 1978
Mr. Donald J. McClelland, P.E.
James Ii. Stewart and Associates
214 North. Bowes
Port Collins, Colorado 80521
Dear Mr. McClelland;
In response to your letter of the 30th on the sewer riser detail
for the Prospect -Overland Sewer, I have no quarrel with the action
you have taken. Perhaps in that recognizing the construction
practices here are frequently less than par, your detail is even
better.
I mentioned to Jim earlier that my experience involves the use of
perhaps a. thousand or more risers somewhat similar to the detail
John Effinger recormended. To this date, and I recently checked,
there has been no known shear failure as you suggested might
happen. The following practices probably are influencing factors.
Inspection of construction was rigid and continuous. Backfilling
arm
d the riser was extremely critical and depending on the
height of the riser, bracing often was necessary. All trenches
were jet flushed by City flushers to assure optimum trench restora-
tion. All risers and laterals were of extra heavy cast iron soil
pipe. This was common in most mid -western conservative cities.
The riser detail as attached was almost universal because of the
respect of zoned allocation of utility space in the right-of-way.
Sanitary sewers were reserved the center 4 + with no vertical
limitations. Sanitary sewer laterals were allotted the space from
7' to 10' below the surface. Similarly other space is allocated
for other utilities. The slanting riser as proposed violates the
space normally reserved for storm sewer construction and we would
not have allowed a slanting riser.
Shearing off of the tie or wye branch for the laterals near the
attachment to the main is a real_ problem and as you point out must
be considered. This is particularly true when plumbers are allowed
to install the service laterals. This shearing was stopped by the
second detail I have attached. 'Phis then, along with the E.II. C.I.
soil piix� almost totally eliminated service and connection problems.
Here we find some of our greatest infiltration problems to occur
`X
Mr. Donald J. McClelland, P.E.
February 1, 1978
2
after the plumbers hook up to the lateralL left at the street
line.
Very truly yours,
�i2oge E;jKrempel, P.E.
WatereUtilities Director
PEK/sl
cc: Don Parsons
Roy Bingman
Tom Hays