Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHANNA SECOND - Filed GC-GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE - 2004-08-09ENGINEERING DIVISION July 16, 1980 Mr. Phil Larson James Street Builders 202 Remington Fort Collins, Colorado Dear Mr. Larson: Since our meeting on Monday at f� iling, detention pond, I have drawings for this construction. the site of the Hanna Subdivision, Second had an opportunity to review u i ity You indicated the pond inlet was lover than the outlet. According to the utility drawings, this inlet should be almost one foot higher than the outlet (5007.5 and 5006.6 respectively). You indicated the pond had been graded correctly. According to the utility drawings and the drainage cal- culations submitted with those drawings, the bottom elevation of the pond should be approximately 5007.0. If the facility was graded correctly, there certainly would not be as much water ponding on the west end as there is. I also noticed sore ponding on the east side of the outlet. Perhaps it would be beneficial for you and Mr. Rutherford to review the utility drawings and the improvements as constructed before we proceed any further, specifically with respect to the apparent inconsistencies I've outlined above. As I advised you at our meeting, until this matter is resolved, the City will not accept the responsibility for maintaining this detention facility. If you have any questions, please advise. Sincerely, Marc Civil Engineer II cc: Dave Stringer Mauri Rupel -� Dick Rutherford /4"0- � . 484-3220 Ext. 728 ENGINEERING DIVISION August 8, 1980 Mr. Glen Larson James Street Builders 202 Remington Fort Collins, Colorado Dear �1r. Larson, This letter is a follow-up on my letter of July 16th regarding the detention pond on Hanna Subdivision, Second Filing. As I indicated at that time, the facility has apparently not been constructed in accordance with the approved utility plans, and therefore cannot be accepted by the City for maintenance. Since my last letter, we have continued to receive complaints from homeowners in the area concerning the condition of the site. They have indicated that they have received no response to their repeated requests to you to cut the weeds in the area to attempt to control the insects. I realize that the water in the pond makes any maintenance in the area difficult, and I am sure you are dealing with the homeowners as well as you can. My concern is really the timing of corrective measures. If you could give me some indication of your schedule for correcting the problems with this pond, I could at least pass this information on to the homeowners when we receive complaints. I would appreciate hearing from you at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, A"'-- �, Marc rbeen Engineering / y D&M — �A FM IMDO �l 7►LPtt � ��