The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCARRIAGE AUTO SERVICE SHOP - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2004-07-23PROJECT i.� COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins REC,D Current Plannine DATE: July 16, 2003 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #43-94I HORSETOOTH BUSINESS PARK, CARRIAGE AUTO SERVICE SHOP — TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: August 13, 2003 Note - PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference Nante (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat Site _Drainage Report _Utility Redline Utility Landscape gal City of Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet �r Selected Departments Citv of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: October 9, 2003 Project: HORSETOOTH BUSINESS PARK, CARRIAGE AUTO SERVICE SHOP - TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: October 08, 2003 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General Number: 38 Created: 8/13/2003 Original Comment: Please clarify how the new ROW on Timberline was calculated This development Is responsible for a total of 70.5' of ROW, measured from the centerline of Timberline Road. The new ROW and easements should be clearly shown on all plan sheets, with dimensions for existing and proposed ROW labeled. Please show and label the centerline of Timberline on the overall utility plan. 9.21.03 - Repeat - From the original comment, some items still need to be addressed: Again, on all plans, the ROW and easements should be labeled and dimensioned. The dimensions should match on all plans; right now, the site, landscape, plat, and utility plan dimensions of the new ROW all vary. Please revise to match the plat. Number: 42 Created: 8/13/2003 Please see redlines (including the redlined utility plan checklist) for any additional comments. Repeat 9.22.03 - This round, I've addressed the missing checklist items in another comment rather than returning the checklist. Number: 56 Created: 9/22/2003 The items not checked off as complete on the utility plan checklist from the first round of review were not addressed. Please address the following: I . Reference to the updated or current soils report on the cover page. 2. Finish grade elevations provided for lot corners. 3. On the Overall Utility Plan, please provide ROW, property lines and easements with dimensions and labels. 4. A legend should be provided on each sheet of the utility plan set. Topic: Landscape plan Number: 45 Created: 8/13/2003 Original Comment:Please place the street trees in their ultimate location: the parkway area when Timberline is built out to 6 lanes. Please note the specific dimensions for locations of these trees (le: 3 feet from the existing back of walk). Repeat 9.22.03: These trees still need to be shown in the ultimate parkway area. Looking at the plans, It appears that there will be a 5' strip between the ultimate sidewalk location and the current sidewalk location. The trees should be /6.�,63 c:....,.....e Date /CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other Utility Redline Utility = Landscape Page I placed in the middle of this strip and labeled to be planted 2.5' from the existing back of walk, if what is shown on the plans is scaled correctly. The existing walk should not have to be moved to accomplish this. This comment was verified with Ted Shepard in Current Planning. Topic: Plat Number: 48 Created: 8/13/2003 Original comment: Should the lot be labeled as Lot I? Repeat comment 9.22.03: What is the property then, if not a Lot? Is it a Tract? It needs to be something. Number: 49 Created: 8/13/2003 Please see redlines for changes to plat wording. Please use the city's standard surveyor's statement (as redlined) and rearrange the text of the guarantees and statements of ownership and dedication so that the owner's signature Is the first signature below these, then the attorney's certificate, then city signatures at the end. Repeat 9.22.03 - Some typos still need to be corrected. Page 2 Project Comments Sheet City of Fort Collins Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: December 3, 2003 Project: HORSETOOTH EAST BUSINESS PARK, CARRIAGE AUTO SERVICE SHOP - TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: I December, 1, 2003 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General Number: 38 Created: 8/13/2003 Original Comment: Please clarify how the new ROW on Timberline was calculated This development is responsible for a total of 70.5' of ROW, measured from the centerline of Timberline Road. The new ROW and easements should be clearly shown on all plan sheets, with dimensions for existing and proposed ROW labeled. Please show and label the centerline of Timberline on the overall utility plan. 9.21.03 - Repeat - From the original comment, some items still need to be addressed: Again, on all plans, the ROW and easements should be labeled and dimensioned. The dimensions should match on all plans; right now, the site, landscape, plat, and utility plan dimensions of the new ROW all vary. Please revise to match the plat. 12.3.03 - REPEAT - Now the ROW on the plat is different than what was shown previously, and the rest of the plans (except the overall utility plan) match each other. What's going on? Please be sure to show the new ROW line as the new property line. On all the plans, the existing ROW line is shown as the future property line when, in truth, the future property line is the same as the new ROW line. Please switch the linetypes: darker for the new ROW, lighter for the old. Only the Overall utility plan shows the additional corner of ROW needed on the NE corner of the site. Please provide this additional ROW on the plat and match on all plans. Number: 56 Created: 9/22/2003 The items not checked off as complete on the utility plan checklist from the first round of review were not addressed. Please address the following: s/1. Reference to the updated or current soils report on the cover page. ✓2. Finish grade elevations provided for lot corners. ✓3. On the Overall Utility Plan, please provide ROW, property lines and easements with dimensions and labels. -�4. A legend should be provided on each sheet of the utility plan set. 12.3.03 - REPEAT- none of the above items were addressed. Number: 64 Created: 12/3/2003 [ 12/3/031 Some of the lines are too light to be reproduced. Please ensure that all lines will be reproducible when submitting mylars. 12.1T03 Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat i Site Drainage Report Other_ i Utility �� Redline Utility i Landscape Page I Topic: Plat Number: 48 Created: 8/13/2003 Original comment: Should the lot be labeled as Lot 1? Repeat comment 9.22.03: What is the property then, if not a Lot? Is it a Tract? It needs to be something. Repeat comment 12.3.03: Now there is a building envelope within an area that is still not defined as a Lot or Tract. Number: 49 Created: 8/13/2003 Please see redlines for changes to plat wording. Please use the city's standard surveyor's statement (as reclined) and rearrange the text of the guarantees and statements of ownership and dedication so that the owner's signature is the first signature below these, then the attorney's certificate, then city signatures at the end. Repeat 9.22.03 - Some typos still need to be corrected. Repeat 12.3.03 - What happened? The wording has all been rearranged and changed again. Please change it back to the way it was last round. Number: 62 Created: 12/3/2003 t 12/3/031 Why did the ROW dedication along Timberline change from 10.5 to 15.5'? According to previous calculations, 10.5' was sufficient. Did something change? Whichever it needs to be, please make sure the plat matches the site, landscape, and utility plans. Number: 63 Created: 12/3/2003 t 12/3/03] Did a layer get turned off? Missing: PSCO 10' util esmt PSCO 20' util esmt Rec # for existing ROW on Timberline Page 2 December 29, 2003 Mr. Ted Shepard City of Fort Collins Planning Department 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 Re: Response to comments letter, for CARRIAGE AUTO SERVICE SHOP Project No.: 0695-121 Dear Ted, The comments below address the issues raised by city staff regarding the Carriage Auto Service Shop Project. Please also refer to the redlines for additional responses. ISSUES: Engineering — Katherine Moore No reS Fone +D Number: 62 Issue resolved per discussions with Katie Moore & Wally Muscott. Number: 63 Issue resolved per discussions with Katie Moore & Wally Muscott. Number: 64 Line types were darkened slightly where needed. Stormwater Utility — Wes Lamarque Topic: Drainage Number: 65 Water Quality outlet structure has been revised. Topic: Erosion Control — Basil Hamden Surety calculations have been provided. Hay bales have been added at the outlet structure to provide erosion control. Silt fencing was added on the North side of the site where needed. There are no inlets on this site, the note has been removed. Straw bales now exist at the outlet structure. This note has been revised. Thank you, TST, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS � Laura M. Ludwig LML/sjk TST, INC. 748 Whalers Was - Building 1) Consulting Engineers Fort Collins, CO 81525 (970)226-0557 Metro (303) 595-9103 Fax (970) 226-0204 Email info(&tslinc.com w.wAstinc-corn PROJECT lowl"i COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current PlanninE REC.D DATE: July 16, 2003 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #43-94I HORSETOOTH BUSINESS PARK, CARRIAGE AUTO SERVICE SHOP — TYPE II (LUC) P13\ All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: August 13, 2003 Note -PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference /l/D 6411-5 eA) T-lEy1P1191 /YJ%'TIN�T-!e LEGRL. f Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape �i City of Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet Will elected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: August 13, 2003 Project: HORSETOOTH BUSINESS PARK, CARRIAGE AUTO SERVICE SHOP - TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: August 13, 2003 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General Number: 38 Created: 8/13/2003 Please clarify how the new ROW on Timberline was calculated This development is responsible for a total of 70.5' of ROW, measured from the centerline of Timberline Road. The new ROW and easements should be clearly shown on all plan sheets, with dimensions for existing and proposed ROW labeled. Please show and label the centerline of Timberline on the overall utility plan. Number: 39 Created: 8/13/2003 Please use ghosted or alternate -weight lines for all existing features. It appears as though the office building to the west is included in this project. Number: 40 Created: 8/13/2003 Elk Road no longer exists, it is simply a private drive which is not allowed to be named. Please remove the name "Elk Road" from the plans. Number: 41 Created: 8/13/2003 Please clarify the location of the existing sidewalk along Timberline and whether new curb and gutter is proposed south of the site on the private drive. These two areas don't seem to match up on the utility plans and the site and landscape plans. Number: 42 Created: 8/13/2003 Please see redlines (including the redlined utility plan checklist) for any additional comments. Topic; Grading plan Number: 43 Created: 8/13/2003 It appears as though the existing sidewalk is going to be re -graded in one area. Is this what was intended? Number: 44 Signature Created: 8/13/2003 8.13.03 Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS/ Plat _� Site Drainage Report ✓ Other V z;r,�- ✓ Utility ✓ Redline Utility ✓ Landscape Page 1 The line types used are so similar that it is difficult to decipher the curb line from a grade line from an easement line. Please use more discernible Ilnetypes. Topic: Landscape plan Number: 45 Created: 8/13/2003 Please place the street trees in their ultimate location: the parkway area when Timberline is built out to 6 lanes. Please note the specific dimensions for locations of these trees (le: 3 feet from the existing back of walk). Topic: Plat Number: 46 Created: 8/13/2003 The plat for the Horsetooth East Business Park PUD, 2nd Filing, says there are a 10.5' access easement and a I S' utility and drainage easement dedicated by separate document along Timberline. Where are these and do they need to be vacated? Number: 47 Created: 8/13/2003 How was the existing ROW for Timberline Road dedicated? Please provide a reception number/book and page reference. Number: 48 Created: 8/13/2003 Should the lot be labeled as Lot 1? Number: 49 Created: 8/13/2003 Please see redlines for changes to plat wording. Please use the city's standard surveyor's statement (as reclined) and rearrange the tent of the guarantees and statements of ownership and dedication so that the owner's signature is the first signature below these, then the attorney's certificate, then city signatures at the end. Topic: Utility plan cover sheet Number: 50 Created: 8/13/2003 Please re -title with: "Utility Plans For:" as the preamble and include the current month and year below the legal description. Number: 51 Created: 8/1312003 Please place the index on the right side of the sheet and do not include the plat in the sheet set numbering. It should be referred to as "(for reference only)" Number: 52 Created: 8/1312003 Please provide the PE statement on the cover sheet. Page 2 Ripley, September 17, 2003 Ted Shepard City of Fort Collins Planning Department 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 RE: Response to comments letter, for CARRIAGE AUTO SERVICE SHOP. Dear Ted, The comments below address the issues raised by city staff regarding the Carriage Auto Service Shop Project. Please also refer to the redlines for additional responses. ISSUES: Engineering — Katie Moore Topic: General Number: 38 Theflalf Right -Of -Way was calculated 70.50 Feet from the existing Centerline of 'Timberline Road, being 10' East of the section Line. This Line is shown on the Utility plan for Fox Meadows. See Page 2 of the Plat. Number: 39 See plans. Number: 40 Line types were adjusted. See plans. Number: 41 See plans. Number: 42 Redline comments have been addressed on plans — also please reference responses to Grading comment number 45, and Current Planning comment number 3. Topic: Grading Plan Number: 43 No there is not going to be any re -grading of the existing sidewalk. Contours have been adjusted accordingly. ial 111h...1 N1-0.,-A— :mi1,,;1,1 Number: 44 Additional labels have been added and linetypes have been adjusted to make it easier to read. Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 45 Per meeting with Ted Shepard and to create visual continuity, we are leaving the street trees so that they form a continuous line with the rest of the street trees already along �j Timberline, and also so that the existing walk may remain continuous rather than being moved to accommodate the location of the trees for a future date. Topic: Plat Number: 46 Noted. Said Plat is the only record of these easements. They were never dedicated by the Plat or any other document. These easements fall within the right -of way and within existing recorded utility easements. —'Mow do �u%cW ? Number: 47 -'Noted. Please see sheet 2 of the plat for this information. Number: 48 No. We are not creating a lot. The title commitment does not reference a lot. l � &'5 o2t a- lot, ',A k&: - is t} 7 Number: 49 Noted. Please see sheet 2 of the plat for the changes. Topic: Utility plan cover sheet Number: 50 Title has been changed and current month and year have been added. Number: 51 Sheet index has been moved to the right and the plat removed from sheet numbering. Number: 52 PE statement has been added to the cover. Light & Power — Monica Moore Topic: General Number: 2 Acknowledged - see plans for location of pad. Number: 3 See site plan. PFA — Michael Chavez Topic: General Number: 27 Acknowledged. Number: 28 An existing fire hydrant is located south of this development close enough to fulfill criteria requirements. This hydrant is called out on the utility plan, sheet 4. Number: 29 1) Storage tanks will be located in the basement of the garage area— see site plan for label. 2) Acknowledged — see Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis. Stormwater Utility — Wes Lamarque Topic: Drainage Number: 33 A water quality outlet structure has been added. Number: 34 Acknowledged. Additional text has been added. Number: 35 Flow calculations have been revised. Number: 36 Design point locations have been revised. Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control Number: 37 1. Text has been updated. 2. The soil to the east of the Swale will be disturbed slightly and will therefore require us to keep the silt fence. 3. Note has been updated. Water Wastewater — Jeff Hill Topic: General Number: 30 Meter pit has been added and labeled appropriately. Number: 31 Appropriate notes have been added. Number: 32 Appropriate details have been added. See sheets 5&6 of the Utility Plans. Zoning — Peter Barnes Topic: zoning Number: 21 See site plan. Number: 22 See site plan. Number: 23 See land use statistics table on site plan. Number: 24 See elevations. Number: 25 See landscape plan. Number: 26 Current Planning — Ted Shepard 1. See site and landscape plans. 2. See general notes on site plan. 3. As discussed in meeting, we endeavor to achieve a campus feel within the three sites of Carriage Wash, the Convenience store, and this project, the Carriage Auto Service Shop. In this we intend to unify the three automotive -related businesses rather than visually separate them from each other. This will be easily accomplished as all have been developed by the same developer, and two are still owned by them. They also have a working relationship with the owner of the Convenience store. 4. See elevation. Technical Services 1. Noted. Please see sheet 1 of the plat for changes. 2. Noted. Added a dim. Please see sheet 2 of the plat 3. Noted. Please see sheet 2 of the plat for changes. 4. Please see sheet 2 of the plat for recording information. Forestry — Tim Buchanan See Landscape Plans. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: September 17, 2003 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: ##43-94I HORSETOOTH BUSINESS PARK, CARRIAGE AUTO SERVICE SHOP PDP — TYPE II (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: October 8, 2003 tl ElNo Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** 2, 6, vets Ls OL,jcS Cart (t SrlL` 10 `E S L C, k: VT- ( 6 to' L 1-rW FT z �.�L T (E ,A 2Ct(_,L) PA I2.A L_ Ld' c— - .OJT be SG U . Nc�t>os .Q Name (please print) — Date l S• LS�3%%� ca..'rcc, SiC�iJ i'c�1.T, SeTr/i j C_s _i CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other