The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFOX HILLS SECOND - Filed RV-ROW VACATION - 2003-11-12FtOW, 30gcs 1 wa Oral: MEMORANDUM v% 22 US U. — 22 Mark: McCallum, Development Review Engineer DATE: August 19, 1999 RE: RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION REQUEST FOR FOX HILLS, 2ND (ALONG WEST COUNTY ROAD 38E) FILING Attached for your review and comment is a legal description explaining the proposed area of right-of-way vacation. The right-of-way vacation is the result of a platting error. Evidently the recorded plat dedicated more right-of-way than necessary. In reviewing the vacation requesl:, my analysis determines that the surveyor's claim is accurate. To make a long story shorter, the right-of-way to be vacated and retained (labeled as dedicated) is shown on the legal description sketch. The right-of-way to be vacated will be incorporated into Tract "A", which is owned by the Fox Hills Community Association. A ]! 5-foot utility easement will be dedicated in Tract "A" in replace of a Portion of the right-of-way to be vacated (see attached sketch). The final right-of-way along West County Road 38E will be 50 feet from centerline. Take a look at this and let me know if you have any questions. Please sign and return comments to Mark McCallum in the Development Review Center by Friday, September 3, 1999. If we do not hear from you by this date, we will assume you have no objection to the proposed vacation. If you have any questions please call me (Mark) at 221-6605. Thank you. No Problems Problems/Concerns as follows 8-26-99 L!S /.�Esr HAs i- 4� co,vau�T �irN .s moo P,aie cABL� L 141/ r SOLlT/i — DC.9 TEIJ APP.PoXimAT�Ls 17 /± AlcR rf/ orC Tf1E R/GifT OF L•'.95 L/.t/� To �EYRCf1T-n'�"EEya[[R ff7YAc/QED Z�RRty/nlG, U- LUEsi CAN NOT l�i4CATE _ _p T_..OF_.-P POSE A7/0/V -_0F_ i 2T:.0F _ ra FN 5028 r` O O O Ci N =E -1 N_.__.F L.S _S E. co"l>-F trJ�urrtR i� j 8-210-9i US ldesr64mme T l�i9CATET'f1t_EX/ST/A/G 1�1 RIGHT OFlJAS—LIS/JEYrIIAS s�rraae= l - 4 " (f CA)D u ► T wiTN .4 /Mz)pvle C48LE JAI /rin -_ter-7-4rsYc ovretl4Zae.,Sec 33=2-G9-� nn�--1V�9'40_'3-9=w_y.o7•az�(u.Ts.) va LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY: A part of County Road 38-E in Fox Bills Second Filing, City of Fort Collins, County of Larimer, State of Colorado which begins at a point on the East line of Red Fox Road which bears N89040'39"W 607.46 feet and again N00°11'08"E 1319.89 feet and again N00°09'17"W 1168.59 from the South 1/4 comer of Section 33, Township 7 North, Range 69 West of the 6th P.M. and run thence N00°09' 17"W 38.24 feet; thence along the arc of a 20.00 foot radius curve to the right a distance of29.81 feet, the long chord of which bears N42°32'30"E 27.13 feet; thence N85°14'56"E 254.41 feet; thence S00000'00"E 35.61 feet; thence S84039'35"W 254.80 feet; thence along the arc of a 20.00 foot radius curve to the left a distance of 29.61 feet, the long chord of which bears S42015'09"W 26.98 feet to the point of beginning, containing 0.2310 acres more or less. 5F d O Q, d I MEMORANDUM TO: FPk`-w�11-5 6 f TLC FROM: Mark McCallum, Development Review Engineer DATE: August 19, 1999 RF: RIGI I"I'-OF-WAY VACATION REQUEST FOR FOX HILLS, 2ND FILING (ALONG WEST COUNTY ROAD 38E) Attached for your review and comment is a legal description explaining the proposed area of right-of=way vacation. The right-of-way vacation is the result. of a nlatting error. Evidently the recorded plat dedicated more right-of-way than necessary. In reviewing the vacation request. in,, analysis determines that the surveyor's claim is accurate. To nuke a long story shorter, the right-of-way to be vacated and retained (labeled as dedicated) is shown on the legal description sketch. The right-of-way to be vacated will be incorporated into Tract "A", which is owned by the Fox Hills Community Association. A IS -foot utility easement will be dedicated in Tract "A" in replace of a portion of the right-of-way to be vacated (see attached sketch). The final right-of-way along West County Road 38E will be 50 feet from centerline. I ake a look at this and let me know if you have any questions. Please sign and return comments to !dark McCallum in the Development Review Center by Friday. September 3, 1999. If vcc do not hear from you by this date, we will assume you have no objection to the proposed vacation. If you have any questions please call me (Mark) at 221-6605. Thank you. No Problems Problems/Concerns as follows It/en17'-J 61e&"rtuo /f ,d7-1T Li;b% 6P%V'&!x.5 a/3h-i MEMORANDUM TO: 17ou1 t-JLNT-R�01 rP� — FROM: Mark McCallum, Development Review Engineer DATE: August 19, 1999 RE: RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION REQUEST FOR FOX HILLS, 2No FILING (ALONG WEST COUNTY ROAD 38E) Attached for your review and comment is a legal description explaining the proposed area of right-of-way vacation. The right-of-way vacation is the result of a platting error. Evidently the recorded plat dedicated more right -of -"ay than necessary. In reviewing the vacation request, my analysis determines that the surveyor's claim is accurate. To make a long story shorter, the right-of-way to be vacated and retained (labeled as dedicated) is shown on the legal description sketch. The right-of-way to be vacated will be incorporated into Tract "A", which is owned by the Fox Hills Community Association. A 15-foot utility easement will be dedicated in Tract "A" in replace of a portion of the right-of-way to be vacated (see attached sketch). The final right-of-way along West County Road 38E will be 50 feet from centerline. "Cake a look at this and let me know if you have any questions. Please sign and return comments to Mark McCallum in the Development Review Center by Friday, September 3, 1999. If we do not hear from you by this date, we will assume you have no objection to the proposed vacation. If you have any questions please call me (Mark) at 221-6605. 'I hank you. No Problems az Problems/Concerns as follows L Jr% Z Z V-6153 6 MEMORANDUM TO: FoJ Go nAt,r s PcuDe� t12F G}c.Pr oie-W-' FROM: Mark McCallum, Development Review Engineer DATE: August 19, 1999 RE: RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION REQUEST FOR FOX HILLS, 2No FILING (ALONG WEST COUNTY ROAD 38E) Attached for your review and comment is a legal description explaining the proposed area of right-of-way vacation. The right-of-way vacation is the result of a platting error. Evidently the recorded plat dedicated more right-of-way than necessary. In reviewing the vacation request, my analysis determines that the surveyor's claim is accurate. To make a long; story shorter, the right-of-way to be vacated and retained (labeled as dedicated) is shown on the legal description sketch. The right-of-way to be vacated will be incorporated into Tract "A", which is owned by the Fox Hills Community Association. A 15-foot utility easement will be dedicated in Tract "A" in replace of a portion of the right-of-way to be vacated (see attached sketch). The final right-of-way along West County Road 38E will be 50 feet from centerline. "Fake a look at this and let me know if you have any questions. Please sign and return comments to Mark McCallum in the Development Review Center by Friday, September 3, 1999. If we do not hear from you by this date, we will assume you have no objection to the proposed vacation. If you have any questions please call me (Mark) at 221-6605. Thank you. No Problems- ��i't bY- 5 i Problems/Concerns as follows MEMORANDUM TO: I K AG[� / �0 FROM: Mark McCallum, Development Review Engineer DATE: August 19, 1999 RE: RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION REQUEST FOR FOX HILLS, 2ND FILING (ALONG WEST COUNTY ROAD 38E) Attached for your review and comment is a legal description explaining the proposed area of right-of-way vacation. The right-of-way vacation is the result of a platting error. Evidently the rccordcd plat dedicated more right-of-way than necessary. in reviewing the vacation request, my analysis determines that the surveyor's claim is accurate. To make a long story shorter, the right-of-way to be vacated and retained (labeled as dedicated) is shown on the legal description sketch. The right-of-way to be vacated will be incorporated into Tract "A", which is owned by the Fox Hills Community Association. A, 15-foot utility easement will be dedicated in Tract "A" in replace of a portion of the right-of-way to be vacated (see attached sketch). The final right-of-way along West County Road 38E will be 50 feet from centerline. Take a look at this and let me know if you have any questions. Please sign and return comments to Nlark McCallum in the Development Review Center by Friday, September 3, 1999. If we do not hear from you by this date, we will assume you have n� o— objection -- to tile proposed. vacation. If you have any questions please call me (Mark) at 221-6605. Thank you. ><No Problems 0 ZZq/ Problems/Concerns as follows AUG 3 1 1999 �� Transport, _on Services Engineering Department Citv of Fort Collins September 7, 1999 Dick Rutherford Stewart & Associates 103 S. Meldrum Street P.O. Box 429 Port Collins, CO 80522 Dear Dick: 1 routed the proposed easement vacation for ox Hills, �2`daround to all the appropriate utilities. The only negative response was from eJoyce Takemoto's, US West concern is that they have an existing conduit in the right-of-way to be vacated. Even the 15-foot utility adjacent to the right-of-way does not adequately alleviate her concerns for the telephone conduit is not within the proposed utility easement. Therefore, before this proposed right-of-way vacation, the applicant will have to address US West concerns. If there any question, call me at 221-6605. Thanks. Sincerely, iA64 --- Mark McCallum Civil Engineer 11 Enclosure (2 Sheets) 281 North College Avenue • P.O. BOX 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6605