HomeMy WebLinkAboutFORT COLLINS GOOD SAMARITAN VILLAGE - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2003-11-06PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: December 8, 1997 TO: Engineering Pvmnt
PROJECT: #55-95F Fort Collins Good Samaritan Village
Type II (LUC) ODP
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, January 7,1998
A Soils Report will need to be submitted if street construction is required with this devolvement.
Date:
CHECK HE IF YOU WISH TO RECQVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_ Plat _ Site _ Ohio Report _ Ok
_ Utiity _Redline Utility _ landscape
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: February 24, 1998 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #27-96A Good Samaritan Village - Type II
(LUC) ODP
All comments must be received by Mike Ludwig no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, March 18,1998
Date: Signature:
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_ PDt _ Site _ Drainage Report _ Oler
_ Utility _ Redline Utility _ landscape
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: October 6, 1998 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #51-98 Fort Collins Good Samaritan Village -
PDP (LUC) Type II
All comments must be received by Mike Ludwig no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, November 4, 1998
MAJOR COMMENTS:
note: refer to the individual sheets for specific comments and concerns
Sheet 1 of 19: TITLE SHEET
O Please modify the General Notes.
O Please remove the language about reproducing plans or provide the City of Fort Collinswith
documentation giving us permission to make copies of them once they are approved.
O Please modify the title of the utility plans.
O Please provide a signing and striping plan for Trilby Road.
Sheet 1 of 2: Final Plat
O Please modify the Attorney's Certification to reflect the language currently being used.
O There are no subdivisions under the Land Use Code. Please modify the title.
Continue to sheet 2 -+
Date:
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
✓ Pit ✓ Site _ DfaMe Report _Odle
Utility ✓ Redline Utility r hn&*
Continued from sheet 1...
Sheet 2 of 2: Final Plat
O Please check the ROW being dedicated with this development. Trilby is classified as a minor
arterial. Therefore, this development will need to dedicate 42 feet of ROW if it has not
already been done. By looking at it, and assuming that the centerline of Trilby follows the
section line, this development will need to dedicate an additional 12 feet of ROW with a 15
foot utility easement behind that (per City standards).
O Tract 'B' will need to be dedicated as an access easement.
O It appears that a portion of an existing utility easement will need to be vacated because of
the dedication of ROW along Trilby Road.
Sheet 6 of 19: Horizontal Control Plan
O The City does not allow private drives to be named.
O Please clarify if the internal roads are private roads or private drives.
O Please change the indicated accesses to driveway accesses as shown in the City street
standards.
O Both the cross section along Trilby Road and Constellation Drive do not meet the City street
standards. Please modify.
Sheet 11 of 19: Trilby Road - Plan and Profile
O Please enlarge the scale of the plan view.
O Please remove the contours from the plan view.
O Please providethe interim and ultimate design of Trilby Road (ultimate design is a preliminary
design) for 1000 feet beyond the construction limits.
O Please provide both flowline and centerline profiles.
O Please provide the necessary intersection spot elevations as per the City street standards.
O Please provide all curb return profiles.
O If the internal roads are private drives, the entrances will need to be paved with concrete as
per the City standards.
O Please remove all unnecessary elevations.
O Please provide the necessary flowline curve information on this sheet.
O Please show and label all easements.
O Please show and label all major utility crossings in the profiles. Include stations and invert
elevations.
Sheet 12 of 19: Constellation Drive - Plan and Profile
O Please enlarge the scale of the plan view.
O Please remove the contours from the plan view.
O Please provide both flowline and centerline profiles.
O Please provide the necessary intersection spot elevations as per the City street standards.
O Please provide all curb return profiles.
O If the internal roads are'private drives, the entrances will need to be paved with concrete as
per the City standards.
O Please remove all unnecessary elevations.
O Please provide the necessary flowline curve information on this sheet.
O Please show and label all easements.
Continue to sheet 3 •
Continued from sheet 2...
O Please show and label all major utility crossings in the profiles. Include stations and invert
elevations.
O The flowline doesn't meet the City's street standards. Please modify.
O Please provide a few cross sections of Constellation Drive showing both flowlines, elevations,
dimensions, etc.
Sheet 13 of 19: Plan and Profile
O Please clarify if the internal roads will be private drives or private roads.
O Please show both flowline profiles.
O Please show all match lines.
O Please provide a typical section on this sheet.
O Please provide the necessary flowline information on this sheet.
O Please show and label all utility crossings.
O Please show all curb return profiles.
O Please enlarge the scale of the plan view
O Please remove the contours and unnecessary spot elevations.
O Please station all PCR's in the plan and profile views.
O Please label all grade breaks.
Sheet 14 of 19: Plan and Profiles
O Please clarify if the internal roads will be private drives or private roads.
O Please show both flowline profiles.
O Please show all match lines.
O Please provide a typical section on this sheet.
O Please provide the necessary flowline information on this sheet.
O Please show and label all utility crossings.
O Please show all curb return profiles.
O Please enlarge the scale of the plan view
O Please remove the contours and unnecessary spot elevations.
O Please station all PCR's in the plan and profile views.
O Please label all grade breaks.
Sheets 15 thru 17 of 19: Details
O All street details need to be from the City of Fort Collins except for Fort Collins/Loveland
Water District and South Fort Collins Wastewater District.
Sheets 18 of 19: Street Sections
O Cross sections need to show both interim and ultimate improvements. The cross sections
for the ultimate design need to extend for 1000 feet beyond the construction limits.
O Please provide a few cross sections of Constellation Drive showing both flowlines, elevations,
dimensions, etc.
0 The typical cross section of Trilby Road does not meet our street standards. Please modify.
Commi 'ty Planning and Environmental
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
November 12, 1998
Fort Collins Good Samaritan Village
c/o Ken Merritt
Landmark Engineering Ltd.
3521 W. Eisenhower Blvd.
Loveland, CO 80537
Dear Ken,
ervices
Staff has reviewed your documents for the Fort Collins Good Samaritan Village Phase
1 Project Development Plan that were submitted on October 5, 1998 and would like to
offer the following comments:
1. The Fort Collins Loveland Water District and the South Fort Collins Sanitation
District stated the following:
a. The District will require easements, on the District's standard easement form,
for all facilities that are not located within the public ROW.
b. The Districts do not allow trees or landscaping within the District's easement.
C. The District's approval block is required on all sheets except the property
plat.
d General note #1 on Sheet 1 of 19 is to be modified to indicate that all water
and sanitary sewer construction shall conform to the District's specifications
and requirements.
e. A separate fire line and back -flow prevention device is to be installed into the
existing building.
f. A new domestic service, meter and vault is to be installed to the existing
building. The vault is to be located in the right-of-way or utility easement.
g. All utility crossings are to be identified on the profiles.
h. The District's typicals are to be used for water and sanitary sewer facilities.
All others are to be deleted.
281 North COIICge Avel}UC • PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020
i. The review was not completed due to the lack of adequate and appropriate
information. The District will require another review.
You may contact Mr. Terry Farrill, Systems Engineer, at 226-3104 ext. 14, with any
questions regarding these ccmments.
2. U S WEST stated the following:
a. Review of these plans should not be construed as a commitment that
telephone facilities sufficient to serve this project are presently available. US
WEST will provide telephone service in accordance with the rates and tariffs
on file with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission.
b. Telephone facilities generally occupy rear lot utility easements, which must
be located on terrain which permits trenching operations.
C. The developer is responsible for the provision of all conduit for telephone
facilities within the commercial and multifamily portions of the project.
owner also provides terminal room space and power for the
terminals, generally in a utility room. Contact the U S WEST Engineer for
conduit specifications for the telephone entrance cable.
d. Two of the cabinets shown as transformers on the drawings are telephone
equipment located in an exclusive easement. While these cabinets co
relocated at the developer's expense, it would be very costly to do so. e
developer may wish to redesign the project to leave these cabinets in place
with landscaping around them.
e. All relocation of existing telephone facilities required by these plans w", ke
paid for by the developer.
f. A 15' x 30' U S WEST easement at the southwest corner of the property is
not shown on the plat. Please refer to the attached easement for further
information.
3. The Poudre Fire Authority stated the following:
a. Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property and
posted with a minimum 6-inch numerals on a contrasting background.
Bronze numerals on brown brick is not acceptable.
b. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an
approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1,000
gallons of water per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. Hydrants shall
be of an approved type as defined by the water department and the fire
department. No commercial buildings can be greater than 300 feet from a
fire hydrant.
4. Public Service Company stated the following:
a. 13-foot wide areas from the back of the walk to the rear line of the utility
easement are required for adequate utility separation. 10-feet as shown is
not adequate.
b. Gas lines will be located back of walk. No trees are to be planted in this
easement within 4 feet of gas lines.
C. Due to the "tightness" of the project, a utility coordination meeting is
suggested.
5. The Street Oversizing Coordinator stated the following:
a. Trilby Road is to be improved to arterial standards along the frontage of this
subdivision. Street Oversizing will participate in the cost of the
improvements.
b. Constellation Drive is to be improved to collector standards. Street
oversizing will participate in the cost of the improvements.
C. The street oversizing capital expansion fee for retirement community
dwelling units is $511 per dwelling unit.
d. The street oversizing capital expansion fee for medical office on this site is
calculated to be $15,604.50.
6. The Zoning Department stated the following:
a. Please remove the topographical lines from the Final Site and Landscape
Plans.
b. Please move the building setback and development requirements from Sheet
1 to the Site Plan (Sheet 2 of 8)
C. The Therapy Center will be allowed 13 parking spaces based on 4.5 spaces
per 1,000 square feet of building. 19 spaces are shown on the plan.
d. The maintenance / service area is allowed 12 parking spaces based on 5
spaces per 1,000 square feet of building. 19 spaces are shown on the plan.
e. Are any trash dumpsters provided or is trash taken care of by individual
tenants/residents?
f. Please locate bike racks near entrances to the therapy center building and
maintenance building.
t t.
g. Please provide enhanced pedestrian crossings at street intersections.
Please add landscaped islands to the existing parking lot(s) as noted on the
redlined plan Set from Current Planning.
59 parking spaces are required for the 34 dwelling units (1.75 spaces x 31,
2-bedroom units; 1.5 Maces x 3, 1-bedroom units). Only 42 off-s':--t
spaces are provided. T;ne applicant is proposing two spaces in the garage
and two spaces in the driveway but the City doesn't allow the counting 31
tandem spaces. Therefore, only 34 legal spaces are being provided. The
MMN District allows adjacent on -street parking to count towards meeting the
required number of spaces (Section 3.2.2[k][3]). Since parking is allow d
only on one side of the street, how many legal spaces can be create
Zoning is unable to determine if 59 legal parking spaces are beirg provided
until the on -street parking is shown.
j. The building setback information on sheet 1 of 14 does not comply with the
Land Use Code. Required residential setbacks are stated in Section 3.5.Zl' ]
of the Land Use Code. The required front setback is 15 feet frcm C.-
property line. The setback information indicates 15 feet from the back of
walk. Please either delete the setback data or request a modification of
standard.
k. Please do not plat building envelopes.
Please delete the "General Setback Notes" from Sheet 1 of 14 as they do not
comply with the Land Use Code. A modification of standards will be required
if the applicant chooses for the notes to remain.
7. Comments from the Building Inspections Department are attached.
8. The Water Conservation Specialist stated that the landscape plan shall include
the total area (in square feet) for each landscape category. Landscape categories
are distinguished by their water requirements and intended maintenance level.
Examples of possible categories include, but are not limited to, high water turfgr� cs,
low water turfgrass, low water planting beds, moderate water planting bed: .
non -plant areas (paved areas, etc.). Please refer to the attached Water
Conservation Standards for Landscaping and Irrigation for further information.
9. The Post Office requests that an alternate street name be selected for Cottonwood
Circle. The name Cottonwood is currently in use a 2 separate locations in Fort
Collins.
10. The Light and Power Utility stated the following:
a. Any system modifications or relocating of existing electric facilities will be at
the expense of the owner.
b. Transformer locations and meter locations will need to be coordinated.
C. Depth must be maintained over existing electrical facilities in conjunction with
the National Electrical Safety Code. This could be a potential problem along
Cottonwood Circle.
d. Normal electric policies and charges will apply.
11. The Police Dispatch Department stated the following:
a. Pinewood needs to be renamed as "sound -a -likes" exist.
b. Cedarwood needs to be renamed as the street name already exists.
C. Aspenwood needs to be renamed as "sound -a -likes" exist.
d. Cottonwood needs to be renamed as the street name already exists.
e. The circle drive (Cottonwood) needs to be split into two separate streets to
avoid duplicate hundred blocks.
12. TCI of Fort Collins stated the following:
a. TCI of Fort Collins would like to see if building envelopes could be numbered
or lettered. After reviewing the plat map, there are concerns with the
buildings around Tract C. TCI does not feel there is room between building
envelopes to service the buildings anywhere but a front easement. There is
only room between three building envelopes.
b. If these buildings are only rentals, TCI of Fort Collins will need a Broadband
utility easement. This can be obtained by working with the Commercial
Accounts Executive, Reneta Santoro. She can be reached at (970) 493-
7400 8am to 5pm Monday thru Friday. No plans to service this subdivision
will be made until this easement is provided.
13. The City Traffic Engineer stated that improvements to the geometry of the Trilby
Road / US 287 intersection will be required. Please contact Eric Bracke at 224-
6062 to discuss these improvements.
14. The Natural Resources Team stated the following:
a. Please utilize one trash hauler to minimize truck traffic and impact on
surrounding streets.
b. Please incorporate recycling with trash facilities (see attached).
15. The Current Planning Department stated the following:
a. A redlined plan set cf the Site Plan(s), Landscape Plan(s), Building
Elevations, and Lightir:g P!an is attached. Please return all redlined
documents to the Current Planning Department.
b. Please revise the title of all the plan sheets to state "Fort Collins Good
Samaritan Village, Phase 1 (1- rcels C, E, H, J), Project Development =ian".
C. Please delete the Landmark Engineering copyright note on all of the plan
sheets as the plans will be recorded and filed at the City of Fort Collins. The
documents must be reproduced on request by the public.
Mormallne me
d. Please revise the Land Use Summary Information as noted on the redlined
plan set.
e. Please revise the Phase 1 Land Use Data as indicated on the redlined of n
set. The parcel letters should match the parcel designations on the CDP.
Have acreages changed? Have future phases of development been
eliminated? Please provide percentages by Parcel and Phase. The parking
information for the dupiex-triplex development needs to be revised.
f. The building setback and development requirements information is
inconsistent with the Land Use Code. Please refer to comments by the
Zoning Department.
g. Please deleted the General Setback Notes as they are inconsistent with the
Land Use Code.
h. Please revise the Planning Certification to reference approval by the Director
of Planning and leave the year of approval blank on all certifications.
i. Please revise the Index of Drawings.
j. Please renumber the page as Sheet 1 of 8.
Sheet 2 of 14:
k. Please delete this sheet from the plan set. The spiral bound narrative
adequately provides this information. The spiral bound narrative will need
to be revised to reflect changes in the Parcel letters, acreage, parking, etc.
I. Please provide distinction among existing development, the Phase 1
boundary, and future phases on the Site Plan.
"'`'.> PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Plannini
DATE: January 6,1998 DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: #55-95F Fort Collins Good Samaritan Village
Type 11 (LUC) ODP
PLANNER: Mike Ludwig
1. Need to provide second point of access from Constellation
Dr. to line up with Uranus St..
2. Need to ask for a modification to Section 3. 6. 3 . F -
Utilization and provision of sub -arterial street connectivity to
and from adjacent developments and developable parcels.
Date: Signature:
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ PLAT
❑ SITE
❑ UTILITY
❑ LANDSCAPE
M. Please label the future multi -family residential, future long-term care
residential and future accessory use as "not a part of this submittal"
n. Please label the square footage of the maintenance / service building,
gazebo and therapy center.
o. Please renumber the page as Sheet 2 of 8.
P. Please separate from the PDP Plan set and renumber as the plat Sheet 1 of
2.
q. Please revise the Planning approval certification to reference the Director of
Planning.
r. Please leave the year of approval blank on all certifications as the plan will
not be approved in 1998.
S. Please separate from the PDP plan set and renumber as the plat Sheet 2 of
2.
RUM4110MINEAM
t. Please delete from the PDP plan set. This sheet is needed only for
reference during the review. It will not be recorded.
U. Please delete from the PDP plan set. This sheet is needed only for
reference during the review. It will not be recorded.
V. Additional landscaped parking lot islands are needed on the south and east
sides of the existing long term care facility.
W. Ornamental trees at 25 foot spacing and 30-inch high shrubs are needed
along the edges of the existing parking south and east of the existing long
term care facility.
X. Additional trees are needed around the perimeter of the existing long term
care facility in order to have full tree stocking within 50 feet of the building.
Y. Some existing trees are decignated to be removed. Has mitiga*^r bean
provideo? Please meet witn the City Forester (221-6361) to discu.•s whicn
trees are proposed to be removed and what mitigation will be required.
Z. Please renumber the page as Sheet 3 of 8.
aa. Please revise Landscape Note 1 to state that the overall qu ;tity and
species will not change without the review and approval of a minor
amendment.
ab. Please revise Landscape Note 5 to state that the financial document v.,ili :)e
for 125% of the landscape materials and installation.
ac. Please correct a spelling error (ferm "from') in Landscape Note 6.
ad. Please delete Landscape Note 12 and replace with standard tree prete-lion
notes from Section 3.2.1 [G] of the Land Use Code.
ae. Please delete Landscape Notes 15 and 16.
af. Deciduous trees can be 2" caliper and ornamental trees 1.5" caliper urlp"
the increased size is proposed / required as mitigation for removal of exie:
vegetation.
ag. Please provide the quantities of each plant species.
ah. Please renumber the page as Sheet 4 of 8.
ai. Please delete this sheet from the plan set as this information should be
included in the bid documents for the landscape contractor. This sheet will
not be recorded.
aj. Please renumber this page as Sheet 5 of 8.
ak. Please delete the note at the lower right corner of the page.
al. Please indicate proposed building colors on the building elevations.
am. Please renumber the page as Sheet 6 of 8.
an. Please delete the note at the lower right corner of the page.
ao. Please renumber the page as Sheet 7 of 8.
ap. Lighting levels must be shown 20 feet beyond all property lines. The lighting
levels 20 feet beyond the property lines cannot exceed 0.1 foot-candles.
aq. A maximum lighting level of 10 foot-candles is allowed at any point on the
site.
ar. Please renumber the page as Sheet 8 of 8.
16. Comments and redlined documents from Engineering Department are attached.
Please return all redlined documents with plan revisions.
17. Comments and redlined documents from the Stormwater Utility are attached.
Please return all redlined documents with plan revisions.
This completes the review comments at this time. Additional comments may be
forthcoming as the various departments and reviewing agencies continue to review this
request.
Please contact me for the number of folded revisions required for each document
prior to the submittal of plan revisions.
Please provide a written response to each of the above stated comments with the submittal
of plan revisions. Please contact me at 221-6206 if you have any questions or concerns
related to these comments.
Sincerely,
Michael Ludwig, AICP
City Planner
xc: Tim Blandford
Stormwater Utility
Current Planning File #27-96B
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: January 5, 1999 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #51-98 Fort Collins Good Samaritan Village,
PDP, Type II (LUC)
All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, January 27, 1998
ElNo Comment
1 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
MAJOR COMMENTS:
note: refer to the individual sheets for specific comments and concerns
O Please remove the language about reproducing plans or provide the City of Fort Collins
with documentation giving us permission to make copies of them once they are approved.
O Modify the note describing Tract'B'. It doesn't represent the amount of ROW that needs
to be dedicated with this development.
O Please check the ROW being dedicated with this development. Trilby is classified as a
minor arterial. Therefore, this development will need to dedicate 42 feet of ROW if it has
not already been done. By looking at it, and assuming that the centerline of Trilby follows
the section line, this development will need to dedicate an additional 12 feet of ROW with
a 15 foot utility easement behind that (per City standards).
O It appears that a portion of an existing utility easement will need to be vacated because of
the dedication of ROW along Trilby Road.
Continue to sheet 2 °+
Date: Z/t
Signature:
CN�CK HERE IF YOu WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS ' '�
✓ Plat ✓ Site Dmi W RePort _ Other
7Utiuty ✓Redline Utility —/ Landscape
City of Fort Collins
Continued from sheet 1...
O Modify the General Notes.
O Reference the current soils report
O You will need to reference the new vertical datum the City is using. Fort Collins no longer
uses the Black Bolt Survey.
O The plat needs to be numbered independently from the utility plans.
O Constellation is classified as a collector street. You will need to dedicate an additional 8
feet of ROW.
O You will need to dedicate a 9 foot utility easement along Constellation per the current street
standards.
O Reduce the curb return radii into the site to 15 feet.
O The driveway entrances need to be paved with concrete to the property line per City
standards. Please note on the plans.
O The sidewalk on the west side of Drive'A' needs to be extended to Trilby Road.
O Provide cross sections every 100 feet along Trilby Road for 1000 feet east and west of the
site. Show new location of the north flowline (different from what the Ridgewood Hills folks
did) and the existing flowline on the south side.
O Provide curb return profiles.
O You need to address the comments for Constellation Drive made with the previous
submittal.
O Modify the typical cross section of Trilby Road. It has been downgraded to a minor arterial.
O Constellation Drive is a collector w! parking. Modify the typical cross section.
O Modify the signing and striping plan to reflect the new ROW dedication and location of the
north flowline.
Commr. ty Planning and Environmentai _rvices
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
February 5, 1999
Ms. Kim Lambrecht
Landmark Engineering
3521 West Eisenhower Blvd.
Loveland, CO 80537
Dear Kim:
Staff has reviewed the request for Good Samaritan Village Project Development Plan and
offers the following comments:
Engineering comments are provided on the attached comment sheet. There are
two important comments that are repeated here for emphasis:
A. Please check the right-of-way being dedicated with this development.
Trilby is classified as a minor arterial. Therefore, this development will
need to dedicate 42 feet of right-of-way (half of the total width of 84 feet
as measured from the centerline) if has not already been done before.
Assuming that the centerline of Trilby Road follows the section line, this
development will need to dedicate an additional 12 feet of right-of-way
plus the standard 15 foot wide utility easement behind the property line.
B. It appears that a portion of an existing utility easement will need to be
vacated because of the dedication of right-of-way along Trilby Road.
C. Constellation is classified as a collector street. You will need to dedicate
an additional eight feet of right-of-way along Constellation plus the
standard nine feet wide utility easement behind the property line.
2. Comments from the Stormwater Department are attached.
Comments from Transportation Planning include the following:
A. It will be necessary a pedestrian crossing on Tribly at
Constellation/Avondale. This pedestrian crossing will need to be designed
to include a center median/pedestrian refuge area based on Tribly's
roadway classification (minor arterial) and the character of the resident
population of God Samaritan Village.
ti I ,North College Avenue • [). Box ,580 • Fort Collins, CO R0S_''_-0580 • (970) 22I-67-50 • FAX (970) 416-2020
B. In order to satisfy the bicycle level of service standards, a bikelane is
needed along the Trilby frontage.
C. A pedestrian connection should be made to the transit stop at College and
Trilby.
D. Attached sidewalks within the project should be a minimum of six feet
wide.
E. Bicycle parking should be provided at the main building entrances.
D. Please see attached redlines for further comments.
4. Poudre Fire Authority requires that fire lanes be a minimum of 20 feet wide with
minimum turning radii of 20 inside and 40 feet outside. The two 90 degree turns
south of the Therapy Center do not appear to meet this standard. This area
appears to create an awkward turning movement for cars as well as fire trucks.
5. If any portion of an exterior wall is greater than 150 feet from the fire lane, then
the building must be equipped with an approved automatic fire extinguishing
system.
Please note that the fire lane shall be feature curbs painted red and signed "No
Parking — Fire Lane."
7. Address numerals for all buildings shall be a minimum of six inches in height.
Numerals must contrast with the background color for visibility.
8. In terms of parking, the intent of the Land Use Code is provide a minimum
number of parking spaces for residential dwelling units and a maximum number
for non-residential uses. In order to not provide the full required number of 98
spaces for the existing dwelling units, please provide a letter from the operations
manager of the facility that fully describes the living situation. Information is
needed for the following:
A. Please describe the extent of the kitchen or cooking facilities within the
units.
B. Please describe whether or not the residents within these existing units
have access to a central dining facility.
C. Please survey these residents to provide information on how many own
vehicles that need an onsite parking space.
D. Please indicate how many parking spaces are presently devoted to these 64
units.
Based on this information, we can evaluate the request to not provide the minimum
number of required spaces for the existing 64 units.
There are six "P-F street lights on the west side of the western most access drive.
This is the property line abutting single family homes. We recommend placing
these fixtures on the east side of the roadway so as to minimize the impact on the
adjacent residential lots.
10. In general, the plan set is very complete and thorough. On sheets two and three,
however, could you please delete all of the offsite trees. This information is not
necessary and tends to make the plans look very busy and cluttered.
This concludes Staff comments at this time. As always, please feel free to call our office
if you have any questions or to set up a meeting with the appropriate Staff.
Sincerely:
Ted Shepard
Chief Planner
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: April 6, 1999 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: #27-9613 Fort Collins Good Samaritan Village —
PDP — Type II (LUC)
All comments must be received by Troy Jones no later than the staff
review meeting:
Wednesday, April 28, 1999
ElNo Comment
Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
MAJOR COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO THE P & Z HEARING:
note: refer to the individual sheets for specific comments and concerns
O You will need to provide a plan and profile sheet for Constellation Drive. Constellation needs to be brought up
to City standards including curb, gutter, and sidewalk.
O Include the maintenance and guarantee notes on the plat. Refer to the attached sheet.
O Incorporate the new plat language on the plat. Refer to the attached sheet.
O You will need to dedicate a 9 foot utility easement along Constellation Drive per City standards.
O You will need to dedicate a 15 foot utility easement along Trilby Road per City standards,
O Remove 'Tract B' from the plat and simply label it as'ROW to be dedicated with this plat'.
O You will need to submit any offsite easements to the City for review and acceptance. Filing fees will be required
once those figures have been determined.
O Provide a signing and striping plan for Trilby Road showing the existing and proposed signing and striping.
O You will need to provide a design of the landscaped median along Trilby Road.
O Address all of the comments from the last submittal.
O You will need to submit cross sections of Trilby Road with your next submittal.
Date: �• 31a ,76 Signature:
CHECK HERE IF YOl/ WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
✓Plat _✓ Site _ Drainage Repoli _ Other
✓Unity sLAedline utiity ✓ Landscape
Commu- ✓ Planning and Environmental ` vices
Current Planning
Citv of Fort Collins
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Kim Lambrecht
Landmark Engineering
3521 W. Eisenhower Blvd.
Loveland, CO 80537
April 28, 1999
Staff reviewed the Submittal of the Good Samaritan Village PDP and offers the following
comments.
COMMENTS:
1. Transportation Planning:
a. 5 foot sidewalks on the interior of the site are OK.
b. You still need to provide bicycle parking in front of the existing building.
c. You need to provide striped pedestrian crosswalks at the 3 locations where the
western private drive has parking lot driveway access points. The first being the
parking lot access on the south side of the existing building, the second being the
First parking lot entrance on the parking lot west of the existing long term care
facility, and the third being the driveway access to the maintenance and service
building.
d. Whatever you work out with Tim Blandford on the design of the Trilby
island/median pedestrian safe area will satisfy transportation's concerns for the
crosswalk.
Stormwater:
a. You have satisfied all their concerns that are required to be addressed prior to the
P&Z hearing, however you will need to follow up on a few issues for final
compliance.
3. Engineering Department:
a. All on site easements (including stormwater ponds) must be dedicated on the plat.
b. Stanley Dunn from Landmark and Tim Blandford are going to meet on Friday
4/30 to discuss the requirements for Trilby Rd. cross sections and the Trilby
median/island.
c. The variance request has been approved by Cam McNair, the City Engineer.
'Ni \wrlh ( ')Il( Avrnur 3uN �80 Fort Collins, CO 80523-0580 • (Q70) 221-(,7 I) • FAX (9'Q) 41i�-_U3U
Commuz ! Planning and Environmental ; vices
Current Planning
Citv of Fort Collins
January 14, 1998
Fort Collins Good Samaritan Village
c/o Ken Merritt
Landmark Engineering Ltd.
3521 W. Eisenhower Blvd.
Loveland, CO 80537
Dear Ken,
Staff has reviewed your documents for the Fort Collins Good Samaritan Village Overall
Development Plan that were submitted on December 8, 1997 and would like to offer the
following comments:
The Fort Collins Loveland Water District and the South Fort Collins Sanitation
District offers the following comments:
a. The District will require easements, on the District's standard easement form,
for all facilities that are not located within the public ROW.
b. The Districts do not allow trees or landscaping within the District's easement.
C. The Districts have no objections provided all District requirements are
satisfied.
You may contact Mr. Terry Farrill, Systems Engineer, at 226-3104 with any
questions regarding these comments.
2. The Engineering Pavement Department stated that a Soils Report will need to be
submitted during PDP and Final review if street construction is required with this
development.
3. The Engineering Department stated that a second point of vehicular access is
needed to Constellation Drive at the intersection of Constellation Drive and Uranus
Street.
4. The Parks Planning Department stated that the single-family and multi -family
residential units will be assessed neighborhood and community park fees based
upon the square footage of each dwelling unit.
181 �Jorth College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970)121-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020
d. Engineering must also be provided a copy of the documentation of the off -site
stormwater easement.
4. Current Planning:
a. The project has tentatively been scheduled for the May 20, 1999 Planning and
Zoning Board hearing provided you can satisfy staffs concerns and supply PMT's
and renderings to us by Tuesday May 4`h.
If you have any questions about these or any other issues related to this project please feel
free to call me at 221-6750.
ours trlu^ly,/
Vv
I
Troy Tones
City Planner
cc: Tim Blandford
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS
Fort Collins Good Samaritan Village May 28, 1999
COMMENTS:
1. Transportation Planning:
a. S foot sidewalks on the interior of the site are OK.
Thank you for accepting our proposal.
b. You still need to provide bicycle parking in the front of the existing building.
Additional bicycle parking has been provided at the front of the existing building.
You need to provide striped pedestrian crosswalks at the 3 locations where the western private
drive has parking lot driveway access points. The first being the parking lot access on the south
sided of the existing building, the second being the first parking lot entrance on the parking lot
west of the existing long term care facility, and the third being the driveway access to the
maintenance an service building.
Striped pedestrian crosswalks have been shown on the drawings at the three locations mentioned
above.
d. Whatever you workout with Tim Blandford on the design of the Trilby island/median pedestrian
safe area will satisfy transportation's concerns for the crosswalk
A landscaped median with pedestrian area of refuge has been added to the drawings as
coordinated with the Engineering Department.
1. Stormwater:
a. You have satisfied all their concerns that are required to be address prior to the P&Z hearing,
however you will need to follow up on a few issues for final compliance.
Further stormwater concerns have been addressed later in this document.
2. Engineering Department:
a. All on site easements (including stormwater ponds) must be dedicated on the plat.
The entire site has will be dedicated as an easement for buildings, drainage, utilities, etc.
b. Stanley Dunn from Landmark and Tim Blandford are going to meet on Friday 4 30 to discuss the
requirements for Trilby Rd. cross sections and the Trilby median island.
Results of the meeting are reflected in the drawings, and in subsequent correspondence with the
Engineering Department.
c. The variance request has been approved by Cam McNair, the City Engineer.
Thank you for considering our request.
( Landmarh Ltd.
3521 W Eisenhower Blvd. Loveland, Colorado 80537 Phone: 970-667-6286 FAX: 970-667-6298 Email: tndmrk 2 net
d. Engineering must also be provided a copy of the documentation of the off -site stormwater
easement.
The acquisition of the off -site stormwater easement is still being negotiated between the two
parties. A draft of the easement documentation is included in the Drainage Report.
3. Current Planning:
a. The project has been tentatively been scheduled for the May 20, 1999 Planning and Zoning
Hoard hearing provided you can satisfy staffs concerns and supply PMT's and renderings to us
by Tuesday May 4°i.
We will bypass this P&Z hearing, and be prepared for the June 17 hearing.
Landmark Ltd.
3521 W. Eisenhower Blvd. Loveland, Colorado 80537 Phone- 970-667-6286 FAX: 970-667-6298 Email: Indmrkga mrnet
Engineering Department
• You will need to provide a plan and profile sheet for Constellation Drive. Constellation needs to be
brought up to City standards including curb, gutter and sidewalk.
Plan and profile sheets are included for Constellation Drive. However, during this most recent
submittal a variance request related to minimum street standards for Constellation Drive was
submitted to the City. While ultimately denied, this notice came at such a time that any changes
would require additional time to integrate into the overall design package. This issue was relayed to
Mr. McNair. Further, Mr. McNair will be providing specific direction as to how best to tackle the
design issues associated with the requested variance. Final improvements along Constellation Drive
will be submitted in the final compliance package, per the direction of Engineering.
• Include the maintenance and guarantee notes on the plat. Refer to the attached sheet.
Revisions have been made to the plat.
Incorporate the new plat language on the plat. Refer to the attached sheet.
Revisions have been made to the plat.
• You will need to dedicate a 9-foot utility easement along Constellation Drive per City standards.
The entire site is one easement dedicated to residential units and other buildings, private drainage,
landscape, public vehicular and pedestrian access, signage, and public and private utilities.
• You will need to dedicate a IS foot utility easement along Trilby Road per City standards.
The entire site is one easement dedicated to residential units and other buildings, private drainage,
landscape, public vehicular and pedestrian access, signage, and public and private utilities.
• Remove 'Tract B' from the plat and simple label it as 'ROW to be dedicated with this plat'.
Revisions have been made to the plat.
• You will need to submit any offsite easements to the City for review and acceptance. Filing fees will
be required once those figures have been determined.
Off site easements related drainage release at the northwest corner of the site is currently being
negotiated between the Client and an adjacent landowner. Attached with the drainage report are
copies of the draft agreement. Final easement agreements are expected to be received prior to the
June 17`h P&Z meeting, and will be forwarded under separate document when finalized.
Provide a signing and striping plan for "Trilby Road showing the existing and proposed signing and
striping.
Signing and striping are in the plans now.
r Landmarh Ltd.
3521 W Eisenhower Blvd. Loveland, Colorado 80537 Phone: 970-667-6286 FAX 970-667-6298 Email: Indmrk@rmi.net
You will need to provide a design of the landscaped median along Trilby Road.
A landscaped median design is provided in the construction set.
Address all of the comments from the last submittal.
Hopefully, we've got them all.
• You will need to submit cross sections of Trilby Road with your next submittal.
Cross sections are provided with this construction set, as well as the appropriate road detail.
Q1_nndmnrk Ltd.
3521 W. Eisenhower Blvd. Loveland, Colorado 80537 Phone: 970-667-6286 FAX: 970-66 /1b296 F mail: mamncUwrmi net
Stormwater Comments (April 28, 1999)
The portion of basin 11 that includes the north side of Trilby Road appears to direct flows to
Constellation Drive (basin 43), instead of to pond 51a. Please verify the flow patterns and make
any necessary changes to the plans and calculations.
RESPONSE:
The delineation of basin 11 has been modified to reflect that correct drainage patterns along
Trilby Road to Constellation Drive. Flow patterns are now revised to reflect the new delineation.
This change is also reflected in the SWMM.
2. What happens if the inlets in basins 21, 22, 41, and 42 are clogged? Where will the flows be
directed? Please refer to Section 7.4 of the Storm Drainage Design Criteria for more information.
Streets can be used for overflows, as long as adjacent buildings are at least 1' above the overflow
elevation.
RESPONSE:
SWMM analysis incorporating plugged inlets indicate that backwater will not adversely impact
adjacent structures, and will be over the 1' freeboard required between the 100-year WSEL's and
lowest first floor elevations. Discussions of backwater conditions for plugged inlets is provided
in the drainage report text.
The buildings in the north portion of basin 32 would seem to drain into the adjacent street, yet the
basin delineations indicate flows will be directed to the swale in basin 32. Should the flows be
directed to the streets? If so, please make the appropriate basin changes. If not, please show how
the flow will be directed to the swale.
RESPONSE:
Correct. The delineation of basin32 has been modified to reflect the proper flow paths. Flows
associated with this change are now directed to the interior street. These changes are also
reflected in the SWMM.
4. Please provide 10' of clearance between storm sewer SD-1 and the 6" water line in the southwest
comer of the property.
RESPONSE:
The 6" water line is to be abandoned at the time that the 8" replacement water line becomes
operational. While this was noted on the most recent construction drawing set submitted,
notation of the 6" water line to be abandoned is provided on an additional demolition plan sheet
provided with this submittal.
Undmnrh Utd.
3521 W_ Eisenhower Blvd- Loveland, Colorado 80537 Phone. 970-667-6286 FAX 970-667-6298 Email- Indmrk(cfvri.net
5. Please show all utilities that cross the storm sewers at the site. Water lines that cross under or
within 18" over any storm sewers should be concrete encased.
RESPONSE:
All utility crossings are now identified on the drawings, and are in accordance with City criteria.
6. Please do not calibrate the developed SWMM using the given tables. Instead, please base the
SWMM parameters on the actual physical conditions at the site. In particular, please adjust the
overland flow lengths at the site.
RESPONSE:
No calibration is incorporated in this SWMM submittal. Discussion in the report merely states
that no calibration to unit peak discharge rates was performed.
7. Please use the invert of the outlet as the starting elevation for the raring curves of the two
detention ponds. In addition, please use all of the calculated storage -discharge points in the
SWMM runs. Also, please use a width of 0 or 0.1 for the outlet pipe of both detention ponds in
SWMM, since the rating curve dictates the discharge.
RESPONSE:
Cops, appropriate inverts are now on rating curves for ponds. All S-Q points are now in the
curves. Pipe widths have been modified to reflect discharge via rating curves.
S. The SWMM output indicates that the storm sewers are surcharging in the 100-year event. Please
provide some means in the SWMM to alleviate this problem (i.e., overflow components, enlarged
storm sewers, etc.).
RESPONSE:
Overflow elements have since been added to the models. Rerun of SWMM models now indicate
no surcharging within the storm lines.
9. Please provide 100-year HGL's on each storm sewer profile in the plans and show the
calculations in the report.
RESPONSE:
100-Year HGL's are provided on the drawing set.
10. The drainage summary tables on the drainage plan and in the text do not appear to match the
SWMM output. Please clarify these values and make the necessary changes.
RESPONSE:
Summary tables in previous submittal are taken from the hydrograph summary for each basin,
representing the peak discharge for each on -site basin. This was a misunderstanding on our part,
Landmark Ltd.
3521 W. Eisenhower Blvd. Loveland, Colorado 80537 Phone: 970-667-6286 FAX: 970-667-6298 Email: Indmrk aOmu.net
and we have included the peak discharge as conveyed from each basin by the respective
conveyance element. Table 2 in the report provides the associated Conveyance Element with the
various runoff rates.
11. Will the Tracts on the plat be designated as access, drainage, and utility easements? If so, please
denote this on the plat? If not, please provide drainage easements for all the drainage facilities.
Also, please show the off -site drainage easements near the northwest corner of the site on the plat.
RESPONSE:
The whole site is designated as an access, drainage and utility easement. Preliminary off -site
easements are provided with submitted drainage report. Finalized easements will be provided
under separate cover prior to the P&Z meeting (approved by Bob Blanchard — City of Ft. Collins,
5/25/99).
12. Please provide water quality volume calculations for Pond 53. Water quality volumes should not
be considered for detention volumes. It is a concern that if the 100-year WSEL of Pond 53
increases, backflow will occur out of the northern most inlet on Constellation Drive. Please
address these concerns.
RESPONSE:
Water quality calculations for Pond 53 are provided for pre -development and construction
periods, and are included with the Erosion Control Report under separate cover. No water quality
calculations were performed for fully developed conditions as the entire site will be sodded,
paved and landscaped such that the little or no sediment transport will occur.
With respect to water backing up into the northernmost inlet on Constellation Drive, the storm
system has been designed to accommodate full conveyance and detention up to the 100-year
storm. Essentially, Pond 53 will accept total site runoff, with no surcharging or backwater
occurring that will escape to Constellation Drive. As such, no release of sediment or otherwise is
anticipated.
Erosion/Sediment Control Comments
Plan is OK.
RESPONSE:
Alright. Discussions between Kim Lambreebt (Landmark) and Troy Jones (City Planning)
indicate that no copy of the erosion control report will be necessary for this specific submittal.
Copies will be provided with the final submittal.
Please refer to redlined plans and report for additional review comments.
Plan/report redlines have been identified, and addressed.
21_andmarh Ltd.
3521 W Eisenhower Blvd Loveland, Colorado 80537 Phone 970-667-6286 FAX 970-661-b296 rman mamrKSTMI.nee
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: July 21, 2000 TO: Mapping
PROJECT: ##27-96B Fort Collins Good Samaritan Village
PDP (LUC)
All comments must be received by Troy Jones in Current
Planning no later than the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, August 16, 2000
No Comment
d Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
FCGS V15
**PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE**
opiJ j DAeY t L£GRL C"S E .6'
Z. Sc C� OEiZ of SEGTio^1Jit (�nvVd 6LLED '4 MS J CI RIJE 2.
Date: vi
1 lll'1 IFYOU WISH 1 RECEIVE COPIESOF REVOM
P19 site Dramp Rep Other
Utility Rdine Utility i9
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: July 21, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: #27-9613 Fort Collins Good Samaritan Village PDP
(LUC)
PLANNER: Troy Jones
ENGINEER: Tim Blandford
All comments must be received by: August 16, 2000
❑ No Problems
0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Comments:
• Please modify the General Notes and General Construction Notes. Refer to the
attached sheets.
• Please extend the sidewalk along Trilby to the west property line. Install a Type II
barricade and include a detail in the utility plan set.
• The easements along Constellation and Trilby don't seem to match what is proposed
on the plat. Please address and modify the plans as necessary.
• All accesses into this site need to be constructed with concrete to the property line.
Please indicate this on the plans.
• PLEASE INCREASE THE SCALE OF THE DRAWINGS. THEY ARE EXTREMELY
DIFFICULT TO REVIEW.
• Please remove the existing and proposed contours from the street plan and profile
sheets.
• Please remove the utilities from the street plan and profile sheets except the storm
sewers.
• Please provide curve information on the plan and profile sheets for all curves being
proposed in the public ROW. Include the radius, tangent length, angle, and arc length.
• New curb and gutter needs to be constructed along the entire length of Constellation
Drive adjacent to this project.
Date: August 16, 2000 Signature:
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS
Cd Plat d Site 9 Utility d Landscape ❑ Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS
5. The Zoning Department offers the following comments:
a. Each of the orcaosed uses are allowed in the MMN District. Please refer to
the Current Planning Department's comments regarding the exact
designation of uses and type or review each use will be subject to.
b. Phase 1A is listed as single family attached housing having a density of 5.61
dwelling units per acre. Section 4.-�(D)(1)(a) of the Land Use Code re- i-s--s
a minimum density of 7 dwelling units per acre for any phase in a nuiti-
phase development. A Modification of Standards must be approved by the
Planning and Zoning Board.
6. The Light and Power Utility offers the following comments:
a. Light and Power is planning to assume responsibility for supplying electricity
to Good Samaritan Village in April of 1998.
b. The existing development will be served without any Light and Power
development fee charges. New development will be billed for n :.,, i
development fees.
7. The Traffic Operations Department offers the following comments:
a. The Department's primary concern is the east / west leg of the Trilby Rea t
and US 287 intersection.
b. The west leg of the Trilby Road and US 287 intersection has existing
deficiencies.
8. The Natural Resources Department did not state any concerns. The apple
may, however, need a state air quality permit for construction (manageme,.. ,
fugitive dust). Please contact the Larimer County Health Department
(Environmental Health) at 498-6775 with any questions regarding air quality permits.
9. The Public Service Company stated that they have no concerns with the 00P.
Easements must be adequate for all utilities.
10. U S WEST offers the following comments:
a. Review of these plans should not be construed as a commitment that
telephone facilities sufficient to serve this project are presently available. US
WEST will provide telephone service in accordance with the rates and tariffs
on file with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission.
b. Telephone facilities generally occupy rear lot utility easements, which must
be located on terrain which permits trenching operations.
• The proposed flowline grades for Constellation Drive do not meet the minimum grades
per the City's street standards. Please refer to the letter from the City Engineer dated
June 2, 1999.
• Please modify the median detail per the attached sheet.
• The detail for the outfall curb and gutter needs to comply with the City's standards.
• Please show the signing and striping on the same plan.
• Please provide curve information for the median. Include the radius, tangent length,
angle, and arc length.
• Contact Ward Stanford of the City's Traffic Operations Department about the correct
striping to be used.
• Please modify the details as shown on sheet 21 of 25.
• Please modify the notes on the Plat.
Development Review Comments — Page 2
Commur' Planning and Environmental E vices
Current Plannin"'
Citv of Fort Collins
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Kim Lambrecht
Landmark Engineering
3521 W. Eisenhower Blvd.
Loveland, CO 80537
August 24, 2000
Staff reviewed the Submittal of the Good Samaritan Village PDP and offers the
following comments.
COMMENTS:
1. Stormwater, Engineering, Technical Services (formerly Mapping & Drafting),
Traffic Operations, Fort Collins - Loveland Water District:
a. Please see the attached reclined plans and/or comment sheets from these
departments.
2. Current Planning:
a. Section 2.2.11 of the Land Use Code requires that an applicant submit
revisions based on this letter within 90 days or the project application
becomes null and void. Your response to the City's concerns is due by
November 22, 2000. A 30 day extension to this deadline is available. All
requests for an extension should be directed to the Current Planning
Director. If remaining issues are those that do not require plan revisions, a
status report verifying continuing efforts toward resolving the issues is
required within the same timeline.
b. I would like to set up 2 meetings with your development team, myself (Troy
Jones), Tim Blandford of our Engineering Department, Basil Hamdon of our
Stormwater Department, and Terry Ferril of the South Ft. Collins -Loveland
Water District. The first meeting should happen a.s.a.p. and would be to go
over the details of your comments. The second meeting should be after your
have integrated the comments into your design to go over them prior to
resubmittal.
�II� nw Lr ��I ILr'- ( ,lllro, (I �fl��'-(1-iN0 i,'%'(11 �' -. - 11 • F:AC i9-01 -4h, 3l1'_0
c. Lorimer County Engineering has been routed a copy of this to comment on
the Constellation impacts. As soon as I receive comments from them I will
forward them on to you.
If you have any questions about these or any other issues related to this project
please feel free to call me at 221-6750.
l�
ours truly,
I'
I l
Troy J nes
City Planner �I
cc: Tim Blandford
Basil Hamdan
Terry Farril
sponse to Staff Review Comments
rt Collins Good Samaritan — Project Development Plan October 11,
The following answers are offered in response to City of Fort Collins Staff Comments for the Fort
Collins Good Samaritan Village Project Development Plan submittal:
Current Planning
1 a. Responses for all departments that submitted comments are included here.
2a. We will follow proper procedures to insure that the project application remains active.
2b. Meetings to review comments and review updated drawings have occurred.
2c. Please forward any additional comments from Larimer County Engineering if there are any.
Light and Power
— Coordination of transformer and meter locations will occur.
— If any relocation or modification of existing electrical facilities occurs, the developer will be
responsible for the expensed incurred.
— We will continue to monitor the impacts of grading on the existing electrical facilities, and
make adjustments as required.
— Application of normal electrical policies and charges is understood.
— Location and relationship of street trees and streetlights along Constellation and Trilby have
been evaluated. At this time, there are no conflicts. Please provide us a plan for any City
streetlights that are proposed along these two streets.
Zoning
1. The Therapy Building has been noted as existing.
2. Crosswalks will be painted.
3. At this time, no benches are being shown with this project. Memorials in the form of benches
are frequently made to Good Samaritan Village, and as such, they typically will place them
throughout the site when the opportunity arises.
4. The 'road' running through the development is a Private Driveway. We will label the parking
shown as 'private drive parking', and will make available additional spaces in front of building
pads 1 and 2.
FTCG 6G8804 A6 301
Landmark Engineering Ltd.
Mapping
1. Boundary and legal close.
2. Labeling of SE Corner has been corrected.
3. The 'Statement of Other Documents' has been added.
Engineering
General Notes and General Construction Notes have been modified.
Sidewalk along Trilby Road has been extended to the west property line. A barricade detail has
been added to the Utility Plan set.
Easements along Trilby Road and Constellation Drive have been reviewed and coordinated on
all drawings.
All accesses to the site are constructed with concrete to the property line as a minimum, and
have been labeled as such.
The scale of the drawings has been increased.
Existing and proposed contours have been removed from the street plan and profile sheets.
Utilities (with the exception of storm sewers) have been removed from the street plan and
profile sheets.
Curve data has been added to all curves with the public R.O.W.
New curb and gutter will be shown along the entire length of Constellation Drive adjacent to
this project.
The median details have been modified per the details given to us.
The detail for outfalI curb and gutter has been modified to comply with City Standards.
Signing and striping plans are currently being worked on and will be provided as soon as
possible.
Curve information for the median has been shown on the plans.
Correct striping has been shown.
Details on sheet 21 of 25 have been modified.
Notes on the Plat have been modified.
FTCG 6G8804 A6 301
Landmark Engineering Ltd.
Stormwater
1. Drafting conventions have been modified to make the drawings more legible.
2. The off -site drainage area has been shown and considered in the drainage calculations.
3. Grades in this area have been adjusted to alleviate any potential for flooding the Maintenance
Building.
4. Storm sewers and/or building envelopes have been modified to eliminate any conflicts.
5. The grading in the vicinity of Detention Pond 51 has been modified so the water will spill into
the interior roads and to the inlets by the maintenance building.
6. Additional spot elevations have been shown in this area. Issue of standing water, and how to
address it, will be discussed with the client.
7. Details and specifications for the pump system have been included with this resubmittal.
8. Cross -sections for the overflow spillway from Pond 53 have been included on the plans as well
as the corresponding calculations in the report.
9. (see comment 8)
10. The storm sewer profiles have been reviewed so the values on the profiles match values shown
elsewhere. A note has been included on the sheets that indicates the storm sewers shall be
inspected by the City. The riprap pad locations with dimensions have been included on the
profiles.
11. Class III RCP has been specified for storm lines under the streets.
12. There will be no phasing of the infrastructure for this project.
13. The existing drainage text and SWMM sections have been removed from the report.
14. We are in the process of developing a detail for the flood gates and one will be provided as
soon as possible.
15. We are in the process of developing the plans and details for the off -site drainage improvements
in the two cul-de-sacs and they will be provided as soon as possible.
16. The UDSWM model has been modified.
17. Calculations showing how the imperviousness of each SWMM basin was obtained have been
included in the report.
18. The requested column has been included.
19. The conveyance element data list has been revised.
FTCC 6C8804 A6 301 3
Landmark Engineering Ltd
20. The storage values have been revised.
21. The plugged outlet conditions for pond 53 without a plugged condition at pond 51 has been
modeled.
22. The StormCAD output indicating the two systems are interconnected and the pipe profile data
for all pipes has been included.
23. The outlet from pond 53 is no longer under pressure flow.
24. New street capacity calculations have been included.
25. Actual stage -storage calculation for each pond has been included.
26. The downstream pipe is no longer under pressure. The size of the orifice plate on the plans
matches the size in the report.
27. The new SWMM peak flow rates have been used for the calculation in other areas of the report.
28. Water quality has been addressed in the report.
Erosion/Sediment Control Comments
1. The erosion/sediment control report is currently be revised and will be provided as soon as
possible.
Fort Collins — Loveland Water District / South Fort Collins Sanitation District
Easements, on the standard District form, will be generated for all water and sewer lines that do not
fall within public R.O.W.
Landscaping has been removed from District easements.
General Notes have been modified to indicate that water and sewer line construction will conform
to the latest District standards.
District requirements have been met with regard to the vacation of the easement located in the
Duplex Development area.
Flow detection will be provided on the Back Flow Prevention Device fire line. Fire Hydrants or
connections will not be placed between the main and the Back Flow Prevention Device.
The new 8-inch water line will be tied to the existing 24-inch water line, and the existing 8-inch
line on the north side of Trilby Road will be abandoned.
All utility crossings are shown on the profiles.
District typical details are now shown on the plans.
FTCG 6G8BO4 A6 301 4
Landmark Engineering Ud.
There will be no phasing of the infrastructure for this project.
We will not show any concrete encasements on the districts utilities.
The water line will be located at least 5 feet from the face of the curb.
FTCG 6G8B04 A6 301
Landmark Engineering Ltd.
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: November 2, 2000
DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: #22-96B Fort Collins Good Samaritan Village PDP
PLANNER: Troy Jones
ENGINEER: Marc Virata
All comments must be received by: November 22, 2000
❑ No Problems
0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
The project is ready for a hearing from Engineering's perspective, provided utility plan comments #1 & 3
are addressed prior to scheduling of a hearing. A cursory review to verify these issues are addressed is
needed prior to scheduling a hearing, though a formal round of review isn't required.
Site Plan Comments:
l . The site plan still indicates that curb and gutter on Constellation Drive adjacent to this site is to
remain. Please correct.
2. Coordinate the pcd refuge design with the utility plan (see Utility Plan Comment 93).
Utility Plan Comments
l . Show the proposed cross -slopes across the asphalt patch on Constellation Drive on the cross-section
sheet (as was done on Trilby Road.) Add cross sections on stations 7+00, 8+00, & 9+00. The
asphalt patch should closely match the existing cross slope grade; it appears that towards station
13+00 the asphalt patch does not provide positive drainage. In situations similar to Station 13+00 all
along the flowlinc, the asphalt patch should be lengthened to 8' (or other similar design
modifications) to ensure that positive drainage (2-41/0 cross -slope) is maintained across the patch.
2. The rollover curb and gutter proposed on Constellation Drive should be vertical curb and gutter as
Constellation Drive is a collector street. I lowever, since the variance request that was accepted by
the City Engineer on 6/2/99 implied that the rollover curb and gutter shown on plan set was
acceptable, in fairness vertical curb can't be required.
3. In discussion with Transportation Planning, the design of the pedestrian refuge should not result in
angled crosswalks. In order to meet pedestrian level of service criteria, access ramps should be
constructed on both sides of the roadway to ensure that the crosswalks are not angled to the
pedestrian refuge island.
4. Show asphalt patches for the tie in of utilities on both Constellation Drive and Trilby Road. The final
sire and location of these patches are to be determined by the City Engineer/City Inspector at the time
Date: November 13, 2000 Signature:
111.1`.ASIi SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISION-S'
2 Plat 2 Site 0 Utility 0 Landscape ❑ Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS
the street cuts are made.
5. Edit the note on Sheet 14 accordingly ("type IIf' not "tape" barricade.)
6. Should the General Notes specify minimum & maximum cover over waterlines? The numbers cited
are lbr the City and I believe the District has a different depth requirement. Correct the phone
number shown on General Note #7.
7. Add Utility Plan (and District) approval blocks on sheets 22, 28, & 29.
8. I'm assuming that Note 1 on Sheet 5 of 29 refers to an offsite construction on right-of-way, and as
such offsite casements are not required — otherwise letters of intent from the property owner(s) is
required prior to a hearing.
Plat Comments:
1. See redlined changes with regards to Notice of Other Documents language and replacing Director of
1?ngineering with City Engineer where shown.
2. 1 don't believe that Note 12 in Schedule B. Exceptions applies to the City,1 believe the District would
be accepting a sanitary system. This easement must be vacated prior to the plat recording.
(See redlines for any additional comments)
Development Review Comments — Page 2
C. The developer is responsible for the provision of all conduit for telephone
facilities within the commercial and multifamily portions of the project. The
owner also provides terminal room space and power for the telephone
terminals, generally in a utility room. Contact the U S WEST Engineer for
conduit specifications for the telephone entrance cable.
d. Two of the cabinets shown as transformers on the drawings are telephone
equipment located in an exclusive easement. While these cabinets can be
relocated at the developer's expense, it would be very costly to do so. The
developer may wish to redesign the project to leave these cabinets in place
with landscaping around them.
e. All relocation of existing telephone facilities required by these plans will be
paid for by the developer.
11. The Poudre Fire Authority offers the following comments:
a. Please provide two or more fire hydrants for the single-family attached
residential area. Hydrant spacing shall not exceed 600 feet. Hydrants shall
be looped to the existing water main.
b. Please extend any fire alarm or fire sprinkler systems to protect the new
physical therapy addition.
C. Please submit any inventory of hazardous materials or chemicals to be
stored/used in the maintenance shop.
12. The Transportation Planning Department requests that vehicular access for Dial -
a -Ride be accommodated and pedestrian access be provided throughout the
development.
13. Comments from the Stormwater Utility are at ed. CW�w P� �*A T� y
14. The Current Planning Department offers the following comments: `W�
]
a. Staff has determined that the spiral bound narrative (81/2 x 11) format is the
most appropriate for reporting the goals and purposes of the Good
Samaritan Overall Development Plan. Therefore, items A, B, C, D, E, and
may be removed from ODP Sheet 1 of 6; Sheet 2 of 5 may be eliminated;
and Sheet 4 of 6 may be eliminated. Sheets 5 and 6 of 6 will not be
recorded and should be separated from the plan set. Only the revised
Sheets 1 and 3 of 6 will be recorded. Please re -number the sheets of the
plan set.
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: November 2, 2000 TO: Tech Svs
PROJECT: #22-96B Fort Collins Good Samaritan Village
All comments must be received by Troy Jones in Current Planning
no later than the staff review meeting: M �
November 22, 2000
❑ No Comment
ElProblems or Concerns (see below or attached)
**PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE**
J. ?1./1 T � LE6A L GGoSE, 9%
2. 191A11F1dj/0ti C / Je-S Arco c� %�c'i�dy 1� C""1srG4ATi6�
A ✓Z L Cu i l /�i� % �-1 c/ /�C 1��+/D � v .7r 1 C14 S67"I e
G /N�' 1 - /�crAS� / om/Y.
3. �cli�,�:.v� EN✓c�Lc�P�S o✓��D��aP �/-)�amc�N ; s .-I
1s a. ra. J I uS vi e e o ! t-k.- P-/L L2 a� j r i
1 I J1 e a tor.
S. �oI�SI 13 �I iy Say it
be qoq;/A� )etl IS t� 1,3 r, Sq L."
aS c�edica�ed �
Date:
Signature:
CHECIyHERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
lat _ site _ Drainage Report _ Other
Unity _ Redline Utility Landscape
7�7
Community Planning and Environmental Services
Current Planning
Citv of Fort Collins
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Kim Lambrecht
Landmark Engineering
3521 W. Eisenhower Blvd.
Loveland, CO 80537
November 29, 2000
Staff reviewed the Submittal of the Good Samaritan Village PDP and offers the
following comments.
COMMENTS
1. Stormwater, Zoning, Engineering, Technical Services (formerly Mapping &
Drafting), Traffic Operations, Transportation Planning, Light and Power,
Fort Collins - Loveland Water District:
a. Please see the attached reclined plans and/or comment sheets from these
departments.
2. Current Planning:
a. Section 2.2.11 of the Land Use Code requires that an applicant submit
revisions based on this letter within 90 days or the project application
becomes null and void. Your response to the City's concerns is due by
February 27, 2001. A 30 day extension to this deadline is available. All
requests for an extension should be directed to the Current Planning
Director. If remaining issues are those that do not require plan revisions, a
status report verifying continuing efforts toward resolving the issues is
required within the same timeline.
b. While all comments must be ultimately resolved, all comments with the
exception of Stormwater will not hold up going to hearing. You have the
choice of another full round of review or you can work directly with Basil
from Stormwater to resolve the Stormwater issues. As soon as I hear from
Basil that you are ready to go to hearing, we can schedule the hearing.
SKI V',nth ('nllo2,c Acrriue • IX). Gm -80 • flirt Collins, CO'S05224)80 • (e7()22I-67�U • FAX (970) 416-2030
If you have any questions about these or any other issues related to this project
please feel free to call me at 221-6750.
i 1
Yours truly,
i
Troy Jones
City Planner
cc: Marc Virata
Basil Hamdan
REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
4,uR
;a
DATE: March 14, 2001
DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: #27-96C Good Samaritan PDP
PLANNER: Troy Jones
ENGINEER: Marc Virata
All comments must be received by: April 4, 2001
❑ No Problems
0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Plat Comments:
1. Please replace the plat language with the newer language emailed in electronic format.
2. The building envelopes should not encroach within easements. Please redefine the building
envelopes to be outside of any easements.
Site Plan Comments:
1. (Repeat comment) The site plan still indicates that curb and gutter on Constellation Drive adjacent to
this site is to remain. Please correct.
2. (Repeat comment) Coordinate the ped refuge design with the utility plan
(see UtilityTIlan-Conmiiepit
43}.
Utility Plan Comments
1. The General Notes have since been revised. An electronic version of this was emailed to the
engineer.
2. Constellation Drive design needs to be relooked at. A uniform street cut should be designed in order
to not compromise pavement integrity. The cut should result in a consistent cross slope from the
centerline of Constellation Drive and may necessitate removal to the centerline of the roadway. Note
that the removal and replacement to the centerline may actually be easier and cheaper from a
construction standpoint rather than the proposed jagged sawcut design.
3. Indicate on the Trilby Road plan and profile that new vertical curb and gutter is to be installed.
d. In general on the street plan and profile streets and intersection details, please ensure that STA's
match between plan and profile view. ensure that the spot elevation on the plan and profile sheet
matches the intersection details sheet, and indicate on the plan and profile sheets where STA's also
are PCR's.
5. /As opposed to referencing the General Notes. please provide a note next to each instance where an
asphalt patch is shown indicating the following: "Limits of street repair are approximate. Final limits
Date: April 122001 Signature: j
PLEASF SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISION'
0 Plat Q Site 2 Utility Rl Landscape ❑ Drainage Report ❑ NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYI,ARS
to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with
City Street repair standards."
(See redlines for any additional comments)
Development Review Comments — Page 2
b. The following information in the ODP Land Use Chart needs to be revised:
• The Land Use for Parcel B should be listed as Existing Long Term
Care Facility (for the assisted living portion of the building) and
Existing Multi -family Residential, if each independent living unit has
a kitchen. If each independent living unit does not have a kitchen,
then the sole land use is Existing Long Term Care Facility.
• Are the single-family attached dwellings proposed on Parcel C going
to have a property line down the middle? If not, the land use
designation should be "duplex dwellings". The Description column
needs reflect this clarification. Please also add a note to the Land
Use Column for Parcel C which indicates that the proposed use will
be subject to a "Type 1" land use review.
• Please add a note to the Land Use Column for Parcel D which
indicates that the proposed Multi -family Dwellings will be subject to a
"Type , " land use review.
• Will the physical therapy center proposed on Parcel E be restricted to
clientele who are residents of the Good Samaritan Village? If yes, the
Land Use Column for Parcel E should state "Accessory Use (Type 1
Review)". If the clientele is not restricted to residents of the Good
Samaritan Village, then the Land Use Column for Parcel E shoi d
state "Clinic (Type 2 Review)".
• Please add a note to the Land Use Column for Parcel F which
indicates that the Accessory Use will be subject to a `Type 1 " land use
review.
• Please add a note to the Land Use Column for Parcel G
indicates that the Accessory Use will be subject to a'Type 1 " land use
review.
• Please add a note to the Land Use Column for Parcel H which
indicates that the Accessory Use will be subject to a'Type 1" land
review.
• Please add a note to the Land Use Column for Parcel I which
indicates that the Long Term Care Facility will be subject to a 'Type
2" land use review.
• Please provide a square footage for the existing building on Parcel B.
• The floor area ratios are incorrect. The floor area ratio is calculated
by dividing the building square footage by the parcel square footage
(currently calculated inversely).
• The building height for Parcel C needs to be a minimum of 1.5
stories.
• The parking information for Parcel C indicates a minimum of 2 spaces
per unit will be provided. The code allows a maximum of 2.5 spaces
per unit. Please verify that no more than 2.5 spaces per unit will be
proposed.
C. The Description and On and Off Site improvement Information in the ODP
Phasing Chart may need to be revised based upon comment b.
d. The first sub -note beneath the Land Use Chart indicates that unused units
will be allocated to a density pool, etc. This note needs to be clarified. First,
the overall density of the development and of any phase must satisfy
minimum/maximum density requirements of the MMN District or be granted
a Modification of Standard by the Planning and Zoning Board. Second, the
density of any parcel may not exceed the density range indicated for that
parcel without receiving approval for a plan amendment.
e. The Index of Drawings should be revised/renumbered to reflect only two
sheets (currently sheets 1 and 3 of 6).
Please add a Planning and Zoning Board Certification and Signature Block
for the Secretary of the Planning and Zoning Board on Sheet 1 of 6.
g. The size of the parcel (in acres), number of acres, range of dwelling units,
and density/square footage must be indicated on each parcel on Sheet 3 of
6.
h. Pedestrian access should be indicated to Parcel D from Constellation Drive
at the approximately the intersection of Constellation Drive and Pulsar Street.
i. Please refer to the Engineering Department's comments regarding the need
for an additional vehicle access to the site from Constellation Drive.
j. The Review Standards for Overall Development Plans are contained in
Article 2.3.1 [H] of the Land Use Code. Based upon these standards, the
current ODP does not comply with the following sections of the Land Use
Code:
Section 4.5[D][1][a] - Density
• Phase 1, Parcel C is 5.61 du/acre rather than the minimum of
7 du/acre. A modification of standards was requested but
requires additional documentation. Please refer to Current
Planning Comment "m".
1{
Section 4.5[E][1][a] - Blcck Si,ucture
Three block types required. No Civic Block currently provided.
Section 4.5[E][1 ][b] - Block Types and Standards
• Residential Blocks (C and D/E) comprise 66% of the
development plan rather than 85% - 90%.
• Mixed Use Block (A/B/F/G/H/1) comprises 34% of the
development plan rather than 0% - 5%.
• No commercial/retail use is provided in the mixed -use
Minimum 30% of block required.
• No Civic Block provided (minimum 10% of the development
plan required). Please refer to Current Planning comment "I".
The revised ODP must either comply with these Sections of the C ---'- r
Modifications of Standards must be submitted with request/justifi�,uLion
documentation based upon the Division 2.7 of the Land Use Code.
The individual PDP/Final applications will also be reviewed for compliance
with the applicable standards of the Land Use Code.
k. A street is needed on the west boundary of Parcels D and E connecting the
eastern most Trilby Road entrance to the proposed east/west internal drive
on the north side of Parcel E.
Staff suggests that a 1.4 acre park be provided as a Civic Use Block r
center of the development plan.
M. The Market Study that was submitted as documentation for a Modification
of Standard to Section 4.5[D][1][a] - Density, has been forwarded to the
Affordable Housing Staff of the Advance Planning Department. In ger-gal
it appears that requests for Modifications to Standards are being base
the following:
that the granting of the modification would neither be detrimental to
the public good nor impair the intent and purposes of the Land Use
Code; and that the granting of a modification from the s'--rt
application of the standard would result in a substantial benefit to he
city by reason of the fact that the project would substantially address
an important community need specifically and expressly defined and
described in the city's Comprehensive Plan, adopted policy, ordinance
or resolution.
The applicant must contact the Affordable Housing Staff of the Advance
Planning Department and obtain a letter that certifies that the proposed
Overall Development Plan will substantially address an important community
need (housing for the elderly) specifically and expressly defined and
described in the city's Comprehensive Plan, adopted policy, ordinance or
resolution (i.e. Fort Collins Consolidated Plan).
This completes the review comments at this time. Additional comments may be
forthcoming as the various departments and reviewing agencies continue to review this
request.
As you are aware, the City is implementing a new development review process. Plan
revisions may now be submitted at any time. Planning and Zoning Board dates will be
assigned by City Staff when all issues have been addressed.
Please contact me for the number of folded revisions required for each document
prior to the submittal of plan revisions.
Please provide a written response to each of the above stated comments with the submittal
of plan revisions. Please contact me at 221-6206 if you have any questions or concerns
related to these comments.
Sincerely,
X4-
Michael Ludwig, AICP
City Planner
xc: Dave Stringer
Stormwater Utility
file/Project Planner