HomeMy WebLinkAboutFOSSIL CREEK DESIGN CENTER PUD - Filed GC-GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE - 2003-11-04STATE OF COLOR ADO
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P.O. Box 850
Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850
(303) 353-1232
JAN 9
January 3, 1988
Mr. Mike Herzig
Development Coordinator
Ft. Collins Planning Dept.
P.O. Box 580
Ft. Collins, CO 80522
Dear Mr. Herzig:
Larimer Co., S.H. 287
Ft. Collins Design Ctr.
File: Carpet Exchange
Between Fairway Ln. and
Fossil Cr. Pkwy. on E.
Side SH 287
DOH File 45100
We have reviewed the Utility Plans for the Fort Collins Design Center,
and we add the following to our previous comments on this development.
The Grading and Utility Plan sheet shows two utility line taps
within S.H. 287 right of way. Prior to any utility -related work within
the right of way, Mr. Henry Rangel of this office should be contacted at
350-2111 regarding a Utility Permit.
This plan sheet also shows the temporary right -turn -only access to
S.H. 287. The design details of this access will be finalized in the
required Access Permit.
The planned permanent access at the south property line should also
be shown. Identification of this access is needed to avoid conflicts with
the southern utility line and ensure compatibility of this access with the
overall building plan.
Thank you for the opportunity to review these plans. Please contact
me at 350-2168 if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
DOUGLAS BANES
DISTRICT ENGINEER
Wallace R.,Jacobson
Development Planning//ccess Coordinator
WJ:mbc
cc: Yost/Rangel
Area Foreman
File: Jacobson via Crier
4. Assume Snead Drive is extended beyond the Carpet
Exchange, angled to the east, and joins Fossil Creek
Parkway at its present location. Is Fossil Creek
Parkway wide enough to accommodate an intersection that
will -require a sharper- than the normal 90 degree turn
when approached from College Avenue?
S. The median is narrow along the Fossil Creek. Parkway.
Will the Fossil Creek Parkway -Snead Drive intersection
require a left turn lane?
Obviously our subdivision feels there are traffic issues that
need additional consideration.
Traffic issues regrading this proposed project are addressed in
the LDGS under items 4, 6, and 26. Given the uncertainty of the
traffic issues a definite yes to 'these items would seem unlikely.
The Fossil Creek Meadows Homeowners Association requests the
Planning and Zoning Board to withhold final approval of the
Carpet Exchange Project until the Unresolved drainage/runoff
issues and the uncertainty of the traffic issues are resolved.
Sincerely;
Rodney C. Van Velson
President, Fossil Creel; Meadows Homeowners Association
=16 Parkway Circle North
Fort Collins, CO 80525
cc Ed Stoner, Mayor
Laurie O"Dell, Planning and Zoning Board
Sanford Fern, Planning and Zoning Board
Jan Shepard, Planning and Zoning Board
Jim klatask.e, Planning and Zoning Board
Rex Burns, Planning and Zoning Board
Frank Gro<nik, Planning and Zoning Board
Lloyd Walker, Planning and Zoning Board
Moe Meleleburg, County commissioner
Tom Peterson, Planning Director
Sherry Albertson -Clark, Planning Department
Mike Griffith, Legal Counsel
Harold Swope, President, Fairway Estates
��
message. Dated; 0 /10/89 at 0925.
Subjects Reply to Fossil Creek: Devel.opment rReview
Sender: Bob SMITH / ChL. L!U1 Contents: 2.
CC: Mike HERZIG / CFC52/01
Part 1.
FROM: Bob SMITH / CFC52/01
TO: Tom PE.TERSON / CFC52/01
CC;: Mike HERZIG / CFC52/01
Part 2
We are `fiery aware of these developments and the issues accordingly. However,
our reviews are extremely hindered by either the material not being
submitted in a timely manner to allow for adequate review time, or the
submittal of substandard materials. We have not seen the plans for the
Carpet Exchange yet and I feel we are in the same position as last.
month'=_; P&Z meeting. In essence, I'm concerned about the process of
allowing developments to proceed when submittals are not in on time.
I would be happy to discuss this in more detail at your convenience.
Bob
End of Item 12.
Intray .
MEETING SUMMARY
Fossil Creek Design Center
Monday, March 13, 19
TO: Ken
Goff, Hunter Architectural Group
Dick
Rutherford, Stewart
and Associates
Tom
Peterson
Glen
Schlueter
Mike
Herzig
Ric
Richter
Eric
Bracke
FRO.`.1: Shcrry
Albertson -Clark
DATE: March
14, 1989
Meeting Attendance: Bob Leigh (Leigh, Scott, Cleary), Dan Hunter (Hunter
Architectural Group), Denny Odette (developer), Ken Goff (Hunter
Architectural Group), Rhys Christianson (Realtor), Tom Peterson (Planning
Department), Dick Rutherford (Stewart and Associates), Bob Wilkinson (Natural
Resources Division), Eric Bracke (Transportation Division), Mike Herzig
(Engineering), Ric Richter (Engineering), Glen Schluetter (Storm Water Utility).
Sherry Albertson -Clark (Planning Department).
A meeting was held in the Council Information Center on Monday, March 13,
1989 at 11:00 A.M. to discuss the status of the Fossil Creek Design Center PUD
Final Plan. Specific issues under discussion were the extension of Snead Drive
to Fossil Creek Parkway and the status of storm drainage. The following
summarizes the discussions held at this meeting:
Status of Project Elements
Planning - need site plans with any changes noted; written information
addressing hours of operation, parking lot lighting, buffer strip (who installs,
when installed, who will maintain), is fencing needed for existing home at
Fossil Creek Parkway.
Engineering, - determination of any necessary street improvements depends on
traffic impact information. Will need off -site easements, r-o-w dedications
(signed copies) by March 23.
Storm Drainage - still need to see details on inlet.
Traffic - need to see revised traffic impact information addressing the Snead
Drive connection.
General discussion:
Discussion took place regarding whether Snead Drive would be connected as
part of this projcct. City would not require the connection for this project
and understood that the proposed connection has been planned due to the
adjacent property owner's request. If the street connection is separated from
this project, it could be submitted April 5 and given the full 7-week revieNv
process.
Discussion took place regarding reverting back to the original temporary access
to Fossil Creek Parkway and delaying the Snead Drive connection.
Revised traffic impact figures are not completed. If the temporary access is
used, might require some improvement at the College/Fossil Creek Parkway
intersection. The need for a dcccl lane may also be triggered and if so,
additional right-of-way may be necessary. If the temporary access is used, n
Icft-turn bay on Fossil Creek Parkway may be needed, as would an overlay to
this intersection on Fossil Creek Parkway.
Storm Water Utility staff is suggesting developer install an energy dissipater to
dissipate water flow at the point it enters Fossil Creek. Developer will do this
and Stewart's has prepared designs. Storm Water Utility has also asked
developer to provide a sediment/grease trap at the southeast corner of the
project. This would be a "pilot project" and City would reimburse full cost of
design, construction and maintenance. Developer would be responsible for
contacting three consulting firms to prepare estimates of proposed design. This
item would not delay final approval of project.
Further discussion took place regarding the use of the temporary access to
Fossil Creek Parkway. Use of this access could require an overlay on Fossil
Creek Parkway, from College to the temporary access point. This overlay
would be about 150' in length, as a maximum 4" overlay 50' in width (specifics
to be determined, based on review of traffic numbers). Existing landscaping in
the median would need to be relocated.
If the temporary access is proposed the following items apply'
I. Need to show temporary access intersection with Fossil Creek Parkwav on
utility plans;
2. A letter (or agreement from adjacent property owner) giving the property
owner's approval for construction of the temporary road. Staf f would
recommend an agreement to protect the developer. City should be given copy of
the document used.
3. If drainage and utilities are shifted to this alignment, casements and
dedications are needed. Drainage and utilities may stay in the Snead Drive
alignment.
4. No College Avenue improvements will be required.
-2-
5. Snead Drive should be shown ending ❑t the south property line of this
project. Citv staff has received adequate information to determine that th
street connection with Fossil Creek Parkway would function safely.
6. Vegetation in Fossil Creek Parkway should be relocated. Developer intends
to place note on site plan indicating that the City Arborist would CvalUatC
vegetation to determine if relocation were feasible and recommend alternative
placement. locations, with developer responsible for relocating vegetation.
If Snead Drive is extended with this proiect, the following, items apply:
I. Traffic impact study will be reviewed to determine any necessary
improvements. Improvements could include an overlay on Fossil Creek Parkway
from Collcgc to the Snead Drive intersection.
2. Information addressing Snead Drive issues tic. buffer strip, disposition of
landscaping, in median, cte.) must be submitted.
Proieet deadlines:
Monday, March 20:
I. PMT reduction of site and landscape plans, plat.
2. Ten (10) folded sets of site and landscape plans.
3. Colored rendering (unfolded). Staff would suggest that if Snead Drive is
connected, a rendered :to plan be submitted, as well as the rendered landscape
plan.
Thursday, March 23:
I. Signed deeds of off -site casements and right-of-way to be dedicated.
2. Signed development agreement.
3. Copy of agrccment(s) with adjacent property owner.
4. Completed utility plan review.
-3-
June 1, 1990
Mr. Mike Brown
Colorado Commercial Builders
1240 S. Parker Road
Suite 100
Denver, Colorado 80237
RE: Fossil Creek Design Center in Fort Collins
Dear Mr. Brown:
We have reviewed the referenced project for compliance with the
Districts' specifications on water and sewer lines. Our inspection
found that a number of items are not complete or have been
installed incorrectly. The remaining work items include the
following:
Water
1. The eight -inch valve, which extends from the 14-inch
main near highway U. S. 287 requires a four -foot
extension to the operating nut. A tracer wire is
required on this valve as well.
2. The south fire hydrant needs to be raised about 12
inches.
3. The fire hydrant on the south side of Fossil Creek
Drive at U. S. 287 reauires relocation.
4. The eight -inch valve, which originates from the
south side of Fossil Creek Drive, needs a new valve
box. The valve box is not straight and is installed
incorrectly.
5. A :line stubs out from the eight -inch line which
runs east to west along the south side of the
development. A plug at the end of the stubout
leaks and requires repair.
Sewer
1. An eight -inch PVC sewer drains the Design
Center to an existing manhole in Fossil Creek
Drive. The new pipe extends into the manhole
by two feet and is approximately one and one-
half feet above the invert. You need to cut
the pipe and construct a fillet beneath to
prevent solids deposition; seal the space
between the new pipe and the manhole wall with
an adapter and grout into manhole.
2. A manhole, which is not shown on the
construction drawings, has been installed
between manhole Nos. 2 and 3. Ramneck_ within
the manhole needs to be trimmed and grouted.
The pipe exiting the south side of the manhole
has .a lot' spot on the outside of the manhole
which requires correcting. The grout on the ---
raising rings is rough and needs to be
smoothed.
3. Manhole' has several problems that require
attention. The manhole is in need of
additional riser rings. The pipe entering from
the east is clogged with concrete causing water
to back up in the line. The south invert is
partially clogged with concrete. The four -inch
service line enters the manhole flow channel
perpendicularly. The line needs to be
channelled or transitioned into the main
channel flow.
In addition to the above deficiencies, we will need a set of as -
built drawings and costs for all water and sewer improvements..
The District will not accept these facilities without proper
installation. Please contact this office as soon as possible to
resolve these concerns.
Very sincerely,
Michael D. DiTullio
District Manaaer
_ r.
i
P, t cm� �•
June 28, 1990
Mr. Michael Herzig
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580
Dear Mike:
J U L 2 1990
This letter is to bring to your attention matters relating to the Carpet Exchange
development on South College, and in particular, the lack of any firm agreement or any
written or recorded instruments giving Mr. O'Dette any easements of any kind for
utilities, streets or drives across Kensington Properties' land lying immediately south of
the Carpet Exchange development.
His attorney, his architect and I had tentatively agreed that Kensington would grant
the temporary access easement from the present location of Fossil Creek Parkway to his
south boundary, provided he paid to us at this time all amounts necessary to construct
Snead Drive across our property to connect to Fossil Creek Parkway when it is moved to
its permanent new alignment. The amount was to include all engineering and related
costs unless he has already paid for those, and the amount was to be established by
getting bides on the engineered plans from at least three qualified contractors.
As you can see from an inspection of the property belonging to Kensington, O'Dette
has proceeded to install storm sewer, other utilities and his temporary access on our land
without :legal right to do so.
I believe that the City should help resolve these matters prior to approving any
further construction or occupancy of the Carpet Exchange site.
I will be pleased to meet with you and them toward the end of resolving this problem
in an expeditious manner.
1PH/ 102
Yo�n�'Gw/
.%Paul Heffron
July 26, 1990
Ken Goff
c/o Hunter Architectural Group
4720 Table Mesa Drive
Boulder, CO 80301
Dcar Ken:
City staff has reviewed the requested administrative change for the Fossil
Creel: Design Center, to relocate a handicapped access ramp in the parking lot.
This request has been approved with the following conditions:
I. Three copies of revised site and landscape plans and building elevations
(hor Phase II) be submitted for City files.
_. Release of the full building permit for Phase II be held until all
requirements for construction of Phase I be completed. Included, would be any
public improvements yet to be completed, acquisition of off -site casements from
Paul Hcffron and replacement of any plant or landscape materials that are in
need of replacement.
II you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
Sherry Albertson -Clark. AICP
Chief Pla ter
cc Mike Herzig, Engineering Department
Dave Stringer, Engineering Department
Dan Coldiron, Pcrmits and Inspections Division
6
�asairua:lic.:$—
Ciiv of fort Coilins
August 27, 1990
Denny Odette
1133 S. Platte River Drive
Denver, CO 80223
Dear Mr. Odette:
This letter is written to update you on the current status of the. Fossil Creek
Design Center PUD (aka Carpet Exchange) in Fort Collins and to encourage
your cooperation in the timely completion of all remaining items from the first
phase of the development of this site.
As you may know, City staff has received a number of calls from adjoining
property owners in the past twelve months, regarding various aspects of the
Fossil Creek Design Center that have yet to be completed. We have continued
to work with these property owners, as well as with your representatives on
the site, to attempt to resolve any issues that are related to the approved PUD.
In addition, there are various items required by the City as part of the first
phase of development that have yet to be completed. At this time, it appears
necessary to update you on the status of each item and to seek your
cooperation in completing the necessary work.
The following is a list and status of each of the remaining items to be
completed:
I. Pavement overlay of Fossil Creek Drive;
2. Storm drainage inlet at the south end of Snead Drive;
3. Pavement of end of Snead Drive;
4. Sidewalk along the south side of the building, final grading, seeding
and
landscaping (all to be completed with phase two);
5. Replacement of dead or dying plant materials;
6. Repair of irrigation system (owned by Fossil Creek Meadows Homeowner's
Association) in Fossil Creek Drive;
7. Administrative change for relocation of plant materials from the north
side
of the Carpet Exchange and increase in size of trash receptacle
area
(administrative change approved August 27, 1990 with condition
that
vertical plant materials be provided to screen appearance of larger
trash
enclosure), and
8. Acquisition of casement from Paul Heffron.
An escrow fund in the amount of $1,950.00 is being held for replacement of
dead plant material (rc: item 5 above); however, we would prefer that you
rcplaec these materials. rather than the City utilizing the escrow funds for
repLucmcnt. heat S regarding the acquisition of an off -site casement has also
resulted in a hold on the building permit for the development of phase two
until this item is ac.ontphshed.
j—�
Citv of Fort Collins
Develc tent Services
Plennin Department
December 13, 1988
Mr. Ken Goff
5378 Starling Drive
Boulder, CC) 80301
[)car Mr. Goff
In response to your inquiry about scheduling for the _nroice
1 am sorry that your client misunderstood the length of our dcvclopment
review process and based decisions on a misunderstanding. My staff assures me
that you were advised to obtained a copy of the Land Development Guidance
Systcm which outlines the development review process and all submittoi
requirements prior to submitting the preliminary plan. You were also sent a
copy of our Development Rcview Schedule with specific dates. The typical
project takes 14 weeks to get from preliminary submittal to final approval. The
development review process generally requires that amount of time to ade-
quately review plans, send comments, review revisions, meet with applicants,
iron out problems, and generate a staff report for the Planning and Zonin;
Board.
The deadlines established in our review process are not arbitrary and at the
same time they arc not completely inflexible. Although the City would like to
work with you to solve your client's dilemma, we cannot guarantee that your
project will be heard by the Planning and Zoning Board in January. 1Vhat I
can do is allow you to submit final plans December 16 as you indicate in your
negotiations it is possible that the project could be scheduled for the January
P&Z meeting. Acceptance of the final submittal in no way obligates the City
to hear the project in January. Be aware that a final PUD plan entails com-
plcted and signed utility construction documents and a development agreement.
In the case of the Carpet Exchange, access agreements with adjoining property
owners will also be required prior to final approval.
Please contact myself or Linda Ripley if you have further questions regarding
the scheduling of the Carpet Exchange project.
Sincerely,.
Director of Planning'-
xe: Joe Frank, Assistant Planning Director
Linda Ripley, Project Planner
Mike flerzig, Development Coordinator t.
300 LaPorte ACenuc • PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6750
I would urge your cooperation in assuring that all of these remaining items
receive your immediate attention, so that the remainder of this development
may be completed in a more timely fashion. Based on the recent history of
this development, City staff will be more stringent in the issuance of future
Temporary Certificates of Occupancy if all development improvements are not
completed prior to a request for a Certificate of Occupancy. As a final note,
I would suggest that the construction vehicle that has been parked at the end
of Snead Drive be moved (if not already moved) as soon as possible.
Please feet free to contact me should you have any questions regarding this
matter.
Sincerely, i/
>44 -&"
Shcrry Alb tson-Clark, AICP
Chief Planner
cc Tcrry Brown, Colorado Commercial Building, Inc., 1240 S. Parker Road,
#100, Denver, CO 80231
Ken Goff., Hunter Architectural Group, Ltd., 5378 Sterling Drive, Boulder,
CO 80301
wen Bell, 400 Greenvale Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80525
/Mike Herzig, Engineering Department
Dave Stringer, Engineering Department
Peter Barnes, Zoning
file
Develol ent Services
Planning Department
City of Fort Collins
April 8, 1991
Terry Drahota
Drahota Construction Co.
P. 0. Box 1488
Fort Collins, CO 80522
Dear Terry:
This letter is in follow-up to our meeting last week regarding the Fossil Creek
Design Center PUD and is intended to summarize all remaining items that need to
be completed for this development.
The following is a list of items that we discussed, as well as anything else I
have gleaned from our records, for Phases One and Two:
Phase One
1. Pavement overlay of Fossil Creek Drive (as per approved utility plans);
2. Water quality inlet at the southeast corner of the site;
3. Completion of the south end of Snead Drive on this property, (including
grading and seeding of top soil between this site and Fossil Creek Parkway);
4. Sidewalk along College Avenue;
5. Replacement of dead or dying plant material;
6. Grading and seeding around water flow dissipator at Fossil Creek;
7. Headwall installed at Fossil Creek to prevent further erosion;
8. Replacement of trees and shrubs, weed barrier and rock mulch in Fossil Creek
Parkway median that were relocated for the median cut (as noted on the
utility plans).
Phase Two
1. Revised site, landscape and utility plans, to reflect the administrative
change approved for Phase Two approved July 25, 1990; and
2. Signed deed of dedication for easement on the Paul Heffron property to the
south.
One other item that I am aware of is the need to evaluate the design of the
landscape island in Fossil Creek Parkway at College Avenue. City staff will
evaluate this design once the pavement overlay of Fossil Creek Parkway is
completed.
If you have any questions or need clarification on any of these items, please do
not hesitate to contact me or any of the other staff members I have copied this
letter to. We all look forward to a timely completion of this project and will
be happy to assist you toward this end.
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80722-0580 • (303) 221-67,0
DI`rl SIOY
P.O. Box 850
Greeley. Colorado 80632-0850
(303) 353-1232
December 28, 1988
Larimer Co.,
Ft. _11ins .,.sign Ctr.
File: Carpet Exchange
M._ L,'nda "_.p,ey
T.,. a.rd
Planning Department _.
_ Fossil Cr. Pkwy. on
''
City o-' Ft. Collins
— - E. Side SH 287
P.O. Box 580
Ft. Cc1L ns, CO 80522
DOH File 45100
Dear Ms. Ripley:
We have reviewed the plans for the Fort Collins Desi*a Cente^ (formerly
The Carnet .xchar,-),Llic` -.re ref. - ;,you to „h; _ ,eni,s in our _ L'+/88 tte_
..`:is project. 11 app ghat the applicant has taken into consideration
our comments with regard to access to S.H. 287 and provision of alternative
ar We again emphasiz_- the -ed for a- _',c-ess � t with appropriate
�_.> itions for the temporary and future right -turn -only access points.
We note on the P.U.D. plat that an additional ten feet of right of way
is to be dedicated rather than the 20 feet recommended in our previous
letter. If all of the additional 20 feet t of right of way for a 70-foot
width from the highway centerline cannot be required, a reservation or
easement should be provided for the remainder.
The ".andscape Plan snows seven nreposed trees and numerous shrubs
to low -profile landscaping within this right of way, but we are concerned
that the trees could conflict with future highway needs and may present a
safety hazard. These trees should be located outside of the projected
hi hwr.v ri--h' of +o c -n - rc _._+;-a.l. corf7;.c'.s. TY,i- acu'.'
mu 'ng them east of lie sidewalk shown on the plan.
Thank you for the opportunity to review these plans. Please contact
me at 350-2168 if you have any questions.
WJ:mbc
cc: D. Yost
Area Foreman
File: Jacobson
via Crier
Very truly yours,
DOUGLAS RAMES
DISTRICT ENGINEER
_ I_ZELF a
Wallace RJacobson
Development Planning/./ Access Coordinator
Fossil Creep Meadows homeowners Association
January 18, 1999
Tom Peterson
Planni.nq Director
Development Services\.Planning Department
o> Laporte Avenue
P.O. Bo;: 580
Fort Collins, Colorado B052-5
Dear- Tom:
The Board of Directors of Fossil Creek Meadows Homeowners
Association (FCMHA) and the residents of our subdivision
appreciate the recent efforts your department has made in
granting us an additional opportunity for neighborhood input into
the proposed Carpet Exchange and Pace Warehouse projects. This
additional dtaloque should create a better understanding between
the concerns of our residents and the project proponents.
One of the major concerns of the neighborhood is that future
development will proceed without a comprehensive drainage plan.
If this Occurs there is the potential for serious drainage
problems and accelerated runoff. Additional runoff from future
development projects looms as a major potential threat to the
natural environment in the Fossil Creel; drainage. Without an up—
front comprehensive drainage plan developers may be concerned
only with their individual projects however, the cumulative
effect of all these projects, when the area has been fully
developed, creates the potential for a disastrous environmental
impact.
Page '2
Our subdivision is very concerned when we look to the north and
see what has occurred within the Fairway Estates subdivision.
Apparently the planning system did not require a comprehensive
drainage plan and/or allowed an inadequate drainage system to to
implemented in the vicinity of College Avenue and Harmony Road.
Incidentally, our subdivision is also affected by some of the
same drainage problems that impact the Fairway Estates
subdivision. Downstream from Fairway Estates the increased
runoff has caused severe streambank: erosion in the reach of Mail
Creek that flows through our subdivision. In the future when our
neighborhood becomes fully developed we do not want a similar
problem to occur.
Our subdivision is proposing that a comprehensive drainage plan
be developed for the portion of the Fossil Creek watershed that
extends from the western boundary of our subdivision to the
railroad tracks located approximately 1/4 mile west of Highway
#2B7. At the very least this drainage plan should address (1)
the amount of runoff (cfs) Fossil Creek can accommodate without
causing downstream flood damage and excessive streambank erosion
and (2) provide mandatory guidelines for future development
projects planned in this portion of the watershed. These
guidelines would insure there are adequate retention ponds
designed to release runoff at a rate that does not cause
extensive runoff and streambank erosion along Fossil Creek.
The FCMHA would welcome the opportunity to participate; within
our financial capabilities and through the contribution of in --
kind technical expertise (in the fields of geology, hydrology
geomorphology, environmental biology, etc.); in the preparation
of a comprehensive drainage plan for the portion of the Fossil
Greek: watershed near our subdivision.
The Fossil. Creek drainage plan that has already been developed,
which,we believe from information received from the city, was
done in 1980-81, does not appear to contain enough site specific
data to provide the details we think are necessary to protect our
neighborhood. Also this plan may not have taken into account the
recent change in zoning or larger commercial development (which
by necessity includes large paved parking areas) along the
"South College Strip". The comprehensive drainage plan we are
Page _
proposing should be adopted before additional development
projects are approved and should take into account all the
present and foreseeable future runoff predictions that may occur
in the upper basin of Fossil Creek.
The potential for excessive surface runoff into Fossil Creek and
the request for a comprehensive drainage management plan will be
two issues that must be discussed and resolved at future
meetings.
As a subdivision we have taken a personal interest in the reach
of Fossil Creek that flows through our property. Our recreation
facilities extend along both sides of Fossil Creek, Dr. Alex
Cringan, CSU Wildlife Management Professor, has developed a
wildlife management plan for our subdivision including the
riparian areas along both Fossil Creek and Mail Creek, the FCMHA
now furnishes trees and shrubs for our residents to plant and
create additional wildlife habitat, and our subdivision contains
a'butterfly species, the Two Spotted Skipper, that has been found
in only three other locations in our state and is currently
listed in Colorado as a species within the special concern
category. Annually in the spring the residents ❑f Fossil Creek
Meadows participate in a cleanup day that includes removing
debris that has washed downstream or blown into Mail and Fossil
Creeks.
If we seem over protective of our streams and riparian areas its
because we have, though neighborhood involvement, developed a
respect for and enjoy the environments that Fossil Creek offers.
We have made this stream an integral part of our subdivision and
do not want to see Fossil Creek turned into a unnatural
conveyance channel that moves runoff from improperly planned
developed areas and/or sprawling "acres of pavement" that
prevents natural seepage into the watershed and artificially
collects acres of surface waters that are then funneled into the
closest drainage.
Page 4
The FCMHA Board of Directors and the residents in our subdivision
appreciate•yo).)r cooperation and we just want assurance there is a
positive approach taken in planning a drainage system for the
future development that will take place in our neighborhood.
Please keep us informed about the progress of our request for the
development of a comprehensive drainage plan for the Fossil Creek
drainage.
Sincerely yours,
C (/ Wvl--
Rodne. Van Velson
President, Fossil Creek Meadows Homeowners Association
-16 Parkway Circle North
Fort Collins, Colorado e0525
ccc Ed Stoner, Mayor
Laurie O'Dell, Planning and Zoning Board
Sanford Kern, Planning and Zoning Board
Jan Shepard, Planning and Zoning Board
Jim k::lataske, Planning and Zoning Board
David Edwards, Planning and Zoning Board
Re;; Burns, Planning and Zoning Board
Frank Groznik, Planning and Zoning Board
Lloyd Walker, Planning and Zoning Board
Moe Mekelburg, County Commissioner
Linda Ripley, City Planning Department
Bob Smith, City Storm Water Utility Department
Harold Swope, President - Fairway Estates
Mike Griffith, legal counsel
V bcc: Tom Peterson
cc: Council
r;ike Davis
Fossil Creek Meadows Homeowners Association
February 22,-1999
Planning and Zoning Board
City of Fort Collins
P.O. Pox 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
RE CARPET EXCHANGE P.U.D. FINAL
Dear Board Members:
The proponents of the Carpet Exchange project have met with our
neighborhood on several occasions to discuss project designs.
The Fossil Creek Meadows Homeowners Association appreciate the
efforts the Planning and Zoning Board and the City Planning Staff
has made in making these additional meetings available for
neighborhood input. In particular these meetings have been
helpful to help US understand the scope of this project. The
overriding concern of the subdivision, related to building
design, has been that we don't want our neighborhood turned into
a "Warehouse District". Our subdivision realizes that
development ;along South College is inevitable. We loot: for input
from the Planning and Zoning Board to guide future development so
it blends into our neighborhood.
However, at these meetings two issues, drainage/runoff and
traffic, have not been resolved between the neighborhood and the
project proponents.
DRAINAGE
In my January 18, 1989 letter (copy attached) to Tom Peterson,
Planning Director of Development Services\Planning Department, I
outlined the concerns of our subdivision regarding drainage and
runoff issues. Apparently the concerns about future
drainage/runoff problems have not been adequately addressed in
the proposed Carpet Exchange project.
It appears the drainage plan for the Carpet Exchange project
consists merely of getting the water into the Fossil Creek as
quickly soon as possible and let Fossil Creek solve the runoff
problem. This is unacceptable to our subdivision because if all
future development projects are allowed to continue this
Practice, the cumulative effect of future storm drainage will be
disastrous to downstream interests along Fossil Creel:. We are
reiterating our request for the development of a site specific_
drainage management plan for our neighborhood. Quite simply we
want an indication of what the cumulative effect of the total
runoff into Fossil Creek will be when the area between College
Avenue and our subdivision is fully developed.
It is interesting to look at the drainage upstream from Rolland -
Moore Park in the Spring Creek drainage. I am specifically
referring to the residential area between Drake and Horsetooth
directly south of Rolland -Moore Park. Several detention sites to
temporarily contain surface water runoff are located in that
area, apparently to protect downstream interests. Our
subdivision loot: at this residential area, and others in the
City, and wonder why this concept shouldn't be tried in our
neighborhood. If the effects of future runoff are not planned
before development occurs, Fossil Creek will be subjected to the
same drainage problems that are now present along Mail Creek
through the Fairway Estates subdivision.
The Land Development Guidance System (LDGS) addresses our
concerns about drainage in items 7, G, 11, and 20. We ask far
your additional consideration and study of these items.
TRAFFIC
The traffic issues surrounding the Carpet Exchange project
remained an elusive issue at our neighborhood meetings probably
because of the uncertainty of droving Fossil Creek Parkway and the
entrance to our subdivision. This is somewhat understandable but
the "indecis'i.veness of the traffic issue makes the neighborhood
uneasy. Some of this uneasiness comes from wondering:
1. If and when will Fossil Creek Parkway and our entrance
be moved?
2. If our entrance is not moved before this project is
completed will our present entrance be large enough
and/or safe enough to accommodate the increase in
traffic caused by this project?
3. The entrance signs to our subdivision are small and
with a large commercial business using our entrance we
are in danger of loosing our identity as a subdivision.