HomeMy WebLinkAboutFORT COLLINS NATATORIUM AND ICE RINK PUD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2003-10-29CONC:EP" UAL REVIEW
STAFF COMMENTS
.. ..r.:: .«m-z :ii: , .. k . b .-t.{! _:n+tr. ?-��{;z=dN�ny eFa.� .w ;E,•.•";.� 're. ..Y.. I{I:7:,YR nsi „;wrµ �•r `,�kC'?a8�
MEETING DATE: _December 3, • '•#
ITEM: Ice Arena & Natatorium PUD
APPLICANT: City of Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Department, C/O H.R. Phillips,
PO Box 580, Fort Collins, CO 80522
LAND USE DATA:
ice arena and natatorium located on the northwest corner of Stuart and River-
side streets.
COMMENTS:
1. Neighborhood meeting is scheduled for December 13 in City Council Cham-
bers.
2. Hydrant locations should be indicated and sprinkler connections indicated.
3. Treatment of exit for major events should be detailed.
4. Would like to see how Parkwood East condos are impacted by this project.
Please provide evidence.
5. Storm drainage variance will be required.
6. Streets should be built to City standards. There is some question as
to widths of streets.
7. A variance to 660 feet cul-de-sac length will need to be requested for
two points.
8. Vacation of Stuart Street needs to be processed at some time as prelimi-
nary plan.
9. Applicant should address, in writing, the neighborhood meeting comments.
10. Should look at prioritizing Riverside south rather than directing into
parking lot.
11. Cul-de-sac at east end of Stuart Street should be brought east of Creek -
wood.
12. Landscaping should recognize site distance problems.
,3. Pedestrian tie to tennis court parking should be provided.
14. Staff questions whether parking will occur on public street. If so, how
does this effect fire access.
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
May 21, 1985
Eldon Ward
Cityscape Urban Design
21 Old Town Square Suite 242
Fort Collins, CO 80522
Dear Eldon,
The staff has reviewed the application for final PUD and subdivision plat
approval of the Ice Arena and Pool PUD and offers the following comments:
1. Public Service Co, has an existing gas line in Stuart Street. Any
vacation of the ROW will need to include dedication of utility
easements. The vacation of Stuart Street must be processed now. The
City will need a letter from Everitts and H.R. Phillips requesting the
vacation. In addition, a legal description of the vacation and an
8 112" x 11" map showing the vacation and an indication of what is
remaining as easements should be submitted.
2. The pedestrian ramp at the east side of the "U" should wrap the radius.
3. Please indicate interior radii. Parking islands for eastern part of
parking will not meet fire access requirements.
4. Width of all sidewalks should be indicated on the site plan.
5. Curb cuts will need to be concrete to property line. Please indicate
on site plan.
6. Signage should be provided that indicates no parking on both sides of
entrance aisle, on both sides of the "U", and in the cul-de-sac on
Stuart Street. Stop signs should be indicated including the ones at
the neck down area of Riverside Avenue.
7. The "keyed bollards" should be outside of the ROW. Exact location of
the bollards. should be reviewed by Rick Ensdorff. Also, the staff
would recommend that perhaps one bollard at both ends of the fire
access way might be sufficient to restrict automobile traffic but yet
allow for safe and easy bicycle access.
n w�i nonn�niT of nniniinic nnn cinni
Ice Arena/Pool Commer
Eldon Ward
5/21/85 - Page 2
8. The patterned concrete should be deleted from the public R V, Please
revise.
9. The applicants should provide a written variance request froar the
requirement of deadend access of 660 feet. Reasons for the request
and its impact should be included in the written materials.
10. The Police Department has reviewed the request and has several com-
ments. See me for details.
11. The angled portions of the building envelope need to be dimensioned.
12. A note should be added to the site plan indicating that any future
building areas, deck and landscaping will require the approval of the
City, following the normal planned unit development process.
13. A note should be added to the "land use" information that 99 space
overflow parking is existing and indicate its location.
14. All signs must comply with sign code.
15. Has provision been made for bus and motorhome parking? Please indicate
on site plan.
16. On February 25, 1985, the Planning and Zoning Board approved the
preliminary plan with two conditions. The applicants should provide a
written response as to how each of these conditions have been met in
the final plans.
17. Given the existing topography of the area, the proposed sidewalk be-
tween the parking area and the softball fields may present grade
problems. Is this going to present a problem? If so, how is it going
to be resolved.
18. The energy conservation notes need to be detailed.
19. A note needs to be added to the site plan indicating that major events
in the pool and in the ice rink will not occur at the same time.
20. Additional comments on the landscape plan will be available when we
meet on this project.
21. On Friday, June 14, 8 1/2" x 11" PMT reductions and colored renderings
of the plans and plat will be due. On Monday, June 17th, ten (10) full
size copies of the site plan, building elevations and landscape plan
should be delivered to this office. No later than noon Thursday, June
20th, signed mylars of the site, landscape plan, subdivision plat and
building elevations should be submitted. Also on that date, a signed
"Site and Landscape Covenants" document should be submitted.
Ice Arena/Pool
Eldon Ward
5/21/85 - Page
Commente
3
I would recommend we meet
comments. Revisions to the
delivered no later than noon
the above deadlines be follo
meeting of the Planning
questions, please feel free
r_Sincerely,
Joe Fr nk
Senior City Planner
as soon as possible to discuss the above
plans reflecting the above comments, should be
on Wednesday, June 5th. It is important that
wed if the item is to be considered at the June
and Zoning Board. If you should have any
to call me.
CC: Sam Mutch, Planning Director
Bonnie Tripoli, Development Coordinator
® g E DEPARTMFNT eN
6
NOR"
la Him 11
r�"-n iz L. I I v I I I MPkfw
N�
ITEM: dad :Z�Cf A si 14 r�� to j
dn
le""'OMMENTS,
z1
Project
:teaCOMMENT SHEEI
DATE: 5.13.02'. DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: EPIC 2nd Sheet of Ice Minor Amendment
PLANNER: Troy Jones
ENGINEER: ]Katie Moore
❑ No Problems
0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Comments:
• Utility plan submittal should be taken care of in one of two ways:
• Submit a completely new set of utility plans, perhaps with the original title but subtitled to
reference the 2"1 Sheet of Ice (or something in that vein). —OR-
• Bubble out the changes on the original set of utility plans, making notes on those sheets to refer to
the new sheets.
• For either method, the cover sheet needs to be new and include the current general notes and will
require a new signature block. Bubbling out new items on the index will not be needed if the
entire sheet is new.
• Sight distance is an issue for the existing driveway on the west side of Riverside and the driveway off
the cul-de-sac providing access to the apartment complex. Please reference Figure 7-16 in the
Larimcr County Urban Area Street Standards for sight distance requirements. Sight distance area
needed outside of the ROW will require dedication of an easement for that area, which results in
landscaping restrictions. The easement and restriction language need to be included on the site and
landscape plans as well as the utility plans.
• All details for construction should be shown on the detail sheets and include LCUASS drawing or
figure numbers.
• A sidewalk on the east side of Riverside should be installed from the northmost driveway to the
existing sidewalk around the Cul-de-sac
• Shouldn't there be handicapped stalls in this parking lot?
• Please dimension all stalls. If the width varies, please label the narrowest portion.
• Please provide the easement vacation request for the portion of the building that juts into the utility
easement.
• The driveway cut proposed on the north side of the addition does not meet standards. Any non-
residential use requires a minimum width of 24' for the driveway cut.
• Any work offsite will require offsite easements. It appears that work will be performed in the
Railroad ROW; please provide easements for this.
Date: May 24, 2002 Signature:
Pt.EASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS
'0111at 0 Site 0 Utility ❑ Landscape ❑ Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS
Because Riverside is not built to Collector standards, and the Master Street Plan calls for Riverside to
be a Collector, one of several things needs to happen:
• Dedicate ROW' and easements to current standards (for a major collector, this would be an
additional 6' of ROW on the west side, plus a 9' utility easement).
• Amend the Master Street Plan to change the classification of Riverside in this location.
• Apply for (and receive) a modification to the Land Use Code, sections 3.6.1 B and 3.6.2A.
Development Review Comments — Page 2
Community Planning and Environmental Services
Current Planning
Citv of Fort Collins
June 26, 2002
Russ Lee
BHA Design
4803 Innovation Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80523
SUBJECT: Minor Amendment— EPIC 2"d Sheet of Ice
Dear Mr. Lee:
This letter is in response to your Minor Amendment application to construct a 32,200 square foot
building addition to the Edora Pool and Ice Center, reconfigure the loading and service area of
the site, and construct a 26 space parking lot.
1. Upon review of your application revisions addressing the following comments are necessary:
Current Planr ing [Troy Jones] — Approved with conditions 6/26/02. 1) Take off the areas
labeled "future building area (subject to PUD amendment)" from the site plan, and "future
construction" on the landscape plan as this addition uses up that ability to expand through
minor amendment. 2) Bring in revised drawings addressing all conditions and requested
revisions in quantities specified on the attached routing sheet. 3) Upon approval bring in
mylars of site plan, landscape plan and elevations to Current Planning, and utility plan mylars
must be submitted in accordance with Engineering Comments.
b. Zoning [Peter Barnes] — Approved with conditions 5/13/02. 1) Need pedestrian crosswalk
across Riverside to the from new parking lot to the other side of Riverside, 2) should remove
the new parking spaces that "back-up" into the driveway entrances off Riverside, 3) need to
show building envelope dimensions, 4) the new parking lot on east side of Riverside is a new
parking lot, therefore it has to have 1 handicap space as required in 3.2.2(K)(5)(d). Need to
submit new site plan showing revisions.
c. Light & Power [Doug Martine] — Approved with conditions 6/7/02. See the attached letter
from Doug Martine and a blank Commercial C1 form.
d. Stormwater [Wes Lamarque] — Revisions needed 6/4/02. See the attached comment sheet
from Stormwater. Also see the sediment/erosion control plan comments dated June 4.
e. Water & Wastewater [Jeff Hill] — Revisions needed 6/5/02. See the attached comment
sheet from Water/Wastewater.
f. Engineering [Katie Moore] Revisions needed 5113/02. See attached comment sheet and
redlined landscape plan.
2. Approvals have been granted from the following departments:
a. Current Planning [Troy Jones] — Alternative Compliance Request Approved 6/24/02.
'S 1 .North College :wc ime • PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (97 0) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020
Transportation Planning [Tom Reiff] — Approved with suggestion 5129/02. There is currently
a `cow path' connecting Riverside Ave to the UP Railroad Trail. Consider providing a
connection to the trail from the parking lot to prevent future `cow paths' and damage to the
parking lot landscaping. In this case, pedestrian and bicycle LOS requirements seem to be
met, however be sure that whenever a TIS is submitted, the bike and pedestrian components
of the TIS must be included. This TIS is silent on bike/peds.
a. Poudre Fire Authority [Ron Gonzales] - Approved with condition (prior to CO) 6/21/02.
Access & Water Supply are adequate per site plan. Minor Amendment has PFA approval
pending the extension of the fire sprinkler system and the modification of the Fire Alarm
System. Prior the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, these systems shall be tested and in
service meeting PFA requirements. Park Planning & Development [Craig L. Foreman] —
Approved 6/4/02.
Advanced Planning [Pete Wray] — Approved 5/13/02. In reviewing the alternative compliance
request, Advance Planning has not concerns regarding the number of spaces. The inventory
that was conducted appears to cover the different events. I have attended most of the big
events over the past year and parking has not been an issue. The second sheet of ice use
will be staggered and not conflict with other events. The additional parking added to the east
of the building will help, especially for employee parking needs. Advance Planning supports
the alternative compliance request.
c. Traffic Operations [Eric Bracke] — Approved 5/23/02. See that attached e-mail giving an
explanation of how the TIS is adequate.
d. Forestry [Tim Buchanan] — Approved 6-24-02.
e. Natural Resources [Doug Moore] — Approved 5/23/02.
ince ly,
y .Jon
Ci y anner
cc: Peter Barnes
Wes Lamarque
Doug Martine
Jeff Hill
Katie Moore
MINOR AMENDMENT REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: July 2, 2002 TO: Engineering
PROJECT: EPIC Ice Arena 2r,d Sheet of Ice — Minor
Amendment
All comments must be received by Troy Jones no later than the
staff review meeting:
July 17, 2002
F� No Comment
F] Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
**PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE
REFERENCE**
Date: Signature:
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_ Plat _ Site Drainage Report _ Other
Utility Redline Utility Landscape
City of Fort Collins
Revision
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: 7.3.02 DEPT: ENGINEERING
PROJECT: EPIC 2nd Sheet of Ice Minor Amendment
PLANNER: Troy Jones
ENGINEER: Katie Moore
❑ No Problems
0 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached)
Comments:
• Utility Plan cover sheet:
• A number of items are missing from this sheet. Please see the utility plan checklist and redlines
for details.
Utility plans:
• Please see the utility plan checklist (attached and redlined) for missing items on the utility plans.
• Where is the overall utility plan sheet?
• Driveways should be depicted and labeled as concrete to the (new) ROW.
• Please clarify with additional spot elevations that driveways will have some high point near the
ROW line and will drain from this high point to the flowline.
• Since work is being proposed in the RR ROW, please provide a signature line for the RR.
• Al details for construction should be shown on the detail sheets and include LCUASS drawing
or figure numbers. (repeat)
General:
• Why is there a crosswalk shown where there are no ramps to access it? Please eliminate or move
crosswalk, keeping in mind that sight distance is an issue in this area.
• Please ensure that all lines are reproducible. Certain grey areas overlay and wash out lines
underneath.
• The sight distance easements and restriction language need to be included on the site and
landscape plans as well as the utility plans. (repeat)
• The utility easement vacation was never completed. Please work with Dennis Greenwalt
(AT&T Broadband) to resolve his concerns.
• Any work offsite will require offsite easements. It appears that work will be performed in the
Railroad ROW; please provide easements for this. (repeat)
• Olfsite easements must be completed prior to approval of plans.
/Y
Date: July 23.2002 Signature
v
PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS
0 Plat 2 Site Rl Utility 2 Landscape ❑ Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS
DATE 4 January 1985 DEPARTMENT
MMMMMM� ����
M
j !I-'Z- r'�\!,NK POOL PUD - Preliminary 3 - P�
ITEVIN
COMMENTS
lUD LL EM 5 —
DE L/
q 7
D Zf-Q Le C
F/� L'I L 1
I -) (- a f),
JR Engineering Responses to City Comments
July 25, 2002
Engineering — 7.3.02 — Katie Moore
■ Utility
Plan Cover Sheet
o
Added "Utility Plans For..." in the title
o
Added additional Bench Mark reference for a total of two.
o
Referenced Soils Report
o
We will stamp 6 "paper sets" once mylars are signed by the City
o
PE statement added to the drawings
o
Typical Street Section added to the drawings
o
"Overall Utility Plan" added to the Existing Topography sheet title
o
Added Date of Drainage and Erosion Control Report
o
Added specifics to the Approved Variance Request
o
Removed "Private Property" from Parking Lot Notes
o
Railroad Property issues dealt with — see email
■ Grading,, Drainage & Erosion Control Plans
o
Top of foundation elevation note was added to Drainage Sheet
o
Sight distance easement is shown on Horizontal Control Plan
o
Concrete Pavement on driveways up to the ROW is indicated on the Grading
Plan
o
Elevations and direction of flow on the driveways have been indicated.
o
C'rosswalk location has been revised based upon your recommendation
o
Revised shading on Grading Plan to make more legible
o
Details have been labeled as LCUASS standards with number unless they are
modified details for parking lots, etc.
General
o Sight distance restriction language has been included on the landscape plans and
sight distance easement is shown on the Horizontal Control Plan
o Dennis Greenwalt has provided a letter that he is in agreement the proposed
easements — see letter.
o Railroad Property issues dealt with — see email
o Revisions were made so that no offsite easements will be required.
Water & Waste,water-7.9.02-Jeff Hill
■ Utility "easement" document was provided for your review per Katie Moore.
■ Landscape/Utility separation has been maintained — also added note regarding
waterline lowering per your direction.
■ Them were no comments on the Utility Plans to be addressed and comments on the
landscape plans were addressed.
Stormwater Utility-7.19.02-Basil Hamdan
■ Spillway has been revised to remove grading from railroad property and the spill from
major ev.-nts has been directed to the existing 24" pipe. The water quality outlet details
and summary table on the detail sheet specify the water surface elevation, the number of
rows, number of openings and the diameter of the openings.
■ Drainage- reservation areas are being provided for the water quality pond and storm
sewers outside the ROW or existing drainage "easements".
■ Railroad issues handled with email.
DATE. 4 January 19P5 DEDARTMENT
IT: ICE RINK AND POOL PUD - Preliminary 3-p�
COMMENTS
`
, � �~��~� ~~ ~—c�L�_�'
/ /'� '~rt-� 7
/ / / �_''�c,`^^~'- '^ / 1 /��. �-`� /
/7 7 ' / / `
/�~ . .~ / / -/
�
/ ~�/
, / � � / '`��
/ / -� �-/ ~ _ / / / /
/ \/ ' --- ' ' �/ '
' )" ~~ r--`
/`/ ' . /
/ �� L.`^_� ~��,����
'�
~cT /
,�-_�/^� �^�-~�~-�-°' - ~ '~° ~
�
/ �.-_' ' l /'��,
/ , /^_/ `~�°�- `~_�� __'~_-^_ -- ~ - _- _ --
CITY OF: FORT COLLINS
COMMUNITY DEVI=LOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
January 28, 1985
Mr. Eldon Ward
Cityscape Urban Design
419 Canyon, Suite 300
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
Dear Eldon:
Staff has reviewed the application for preliminary approval of the Ice Arena
and Pool PUD and offers the following comments:
1. Please contact Bob Snow at 224-7473 or Les Thompson at 224-7470 for
information on Land Development and Trench by Owner requirements for
telephone facilities.
2. The Water Utility would prefer to see the new water line installed in
the extension of Riverside Avenue rather than through the parking lot as
shown. An easement must be retained for the existing water and sewer
lines in Stuart Street.
3. The vacation of the Stuart Street ROW will need to occur after final
approval of the PUD. There will need to be an agreement from the
southern property owner requesting the vacation as well as a written
request from the City's project manager.
4. Handicapped ramps should be indicated.
5. The public sidewalk should continue around entire border of the cul-de-
sac on Stuart Street. Please revise.
6. Riverside Drive will need to be platted and dedicated for the entire
distance. Please indicate.
7. Offsite cul-de-sac must be dedicated at final.
8. City standard curb cuts for loading and employee parking area will be
required. Please indicate on site plan.
-. � ;..: ,tea �-�._.�..�•�� n�"""�'b�
x
i.,. n. .. .. v.'..x >! .i....'i .. ai"<.rt..�WJkc! .. � wwr. r_:':.. r .. r �. '.. �. ..k„ ... . e, . . ... . / ., ... .> .i— r..J . .. 4....r ...1+•—.".+
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY 300 LaPorte Ave. • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, Colorado 30522 • (303)221-0;50
DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
Mr. Eldon Ward
From: Joe Frank
January 28, 1985
Page Two
9. Secondary access points will need to be posted for "no parking". Please
indicate on site plan.
10. Show sprinkler connection and hydrants (one hydrant should be placed
within 150' of the siamese).
11. The Police 'Department has some serious problems with the street design
and access limitations from Stuart Street. I strongly urge you to
contact Donn Hopkins to discuss this issue as soon as possible.
12. The final plan documents will need to be on 24" x 36" sheets.
13. Only those parking spaces which are labeled "compact parking - employees
only" may be of less than standard dimensions. Long term parking
dimensions are not acceptable. Please revise.
14. Please indicate typical dimension of "employee parking" spaces.
15. Height of berms should be indicated.
16. The surrounding 150 foot area information is incomplete. Please revise.
17. Parking islands should include low lying shrubs in addition to trees.
Foundation plantings around the building should be increased. A formal
street tree planting should be provided along all public streets.
Larger than standard size trees and evergreens are recommended for
strategic locations. Additional screening of parking is recommended
from areas of public view.
18. Treatment of security lighting of building and parking lot to reduce
glare into adjacent residential areas should be considered. Please
provide detail as to how this will be accomplished.
19. The applicants should provide a written response to the issues
identified at the last two neighborhood meetings.
20. Energy conservation measures should be noted on the site plan.
21. Building elevations should be submitted for the west and south sides of
the building. Exterior materials and colors should be noted. The trees
on the elevations should be removed.
22. Please deliver three copies of the Traffic Impact Report to me as soon
as possible.
23. On Monday, February 18, 1985, 8 1/2" x 11" reductions and colored
renderings of all plans should be submitted. Also, ten full size copies
of all plans should be delivered to me.
Mr. Eldon Ward
From: Joe Frank
January 28, 1985
Page Three
I recommend we meet as soon as possible to discuss the above comments.
Revisions to thE! plans should be submitted to me no later than Monday,
February 4, 1985„ If the above deadlines cannot be followed, I recommend the
item be continued until the March hearing of the Planning and Zoning Board.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely, ,
Joe Frank,
Senjor City Planner
cc: Bonnie Tripoli, Development Coordinator
Sam Mutch, Planning Director
7.--� �7 7
7 May 85 , D
DA, Lj iL— a WN]E N j
-1kil a ICE ARENA AND POOL PUD - Final 3-85A
,r s -
i
a ,
�r 11 air T
7 May 85 � �1 � N] jM
waft.---�
f' I V E D
TIE!M ICE ARENA AND POOL PUD - Final 3-85A° n MAY 15 1985
car- C6vo S Aw 'F�< t577^' r� 1 6A s (.r wr— ►)\) 51vwrl-
-�T 5 1?- o - K-) • UL 0 E -r7�A-r FiKKTr�l\In,5 f5 A5'T—
C.rLgrsx wovnc> r�r� • "1b w PD,"T clr a, pr--r. . E - e 1Z. o, w
i. (N F ! � �.1Dlha �2 , G✓OVLb bTZ-O,p�3s1�O V*A %IOHI
In�1%Ou1iEs 'jl'i► 5 �iQS L� ? �� So o, r-'v�sGr�c_ S •v.4d-
Cc� . �V:e TS �T v?-i L i r L`S'45, C�iv7` �llj 15 ,gam
�:L cam: cam. &o p�" .