The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFORT COLLINS ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATES - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2003-10-29. dale: _ ,�_�_� � - deiDartmei it: 9 f : ITEM: 209-78B FORT COLLINS ORTHOPEDIC CLINIC - Preliminary & Final COMMENTS: p jl� 57 =01 ,a4zv- AZe- P j date: 5 August deioartmei it: IT 209-78B FORT COLLINS ORTHOPEDIC CLINIC - Preliminary & Final COMMENTS: No A-PbL",•,- .e .. .. ■ ' �. Jr w . 1:6� y�Y.wJ.:.". .:.:..(.- .. .. _ �:�+...s <•, c.. .:+�4 �+.i�i.�.�•'%Y.�'.�!"i^_'�'i�M�iwFiM'i , `obJiiR�:Tfs�ts �1'0✓ date: de .,. Ya` •ix a7t t t Og F rfi,a iEs+a`x�✓r ', �:r .t a_'°:; t�► ITEM: 209-78B FORT COLLINS ORTHOPEDIC CLINIC - Preliminary & Final COMMENTS �ed�u4ll by pla/ of "EA-*i E/ '�k Yvin&r+� P. u.n. or- o., o{'" 1 ya s �rvu . IOV12!e __. ._ ._. .....a�•:. ..-.,+�..w-..;y er..9t�.s�'a�$'XLw:'.�L•`_`�:s,i-.��s;;�ya.,�,,,,,��,L?�. I CI OF FORT COLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION M E M O R A N D U M Bob Snow Mountain Bell -Engineering 124 W. Magnolia TO: Fort Collins, CO 80521 FROM: Mike Herzig, Development Coordinator RE: Subdivision Utility Plans DATE: August 6, 1986 Submitted for your review and comment are utility plans for: FORT COLLINS ORTHOPEDIC CLINIC Please respond by: Friday, August 22, 1986 -_ _ _ _ '•....�.�...-4...1_.. -. 1i i��.w'�..Y OFFICE OF COMMUNITY 300 LaPorte Ave. P.O Box 580 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 (303) 221 6750 DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF FORT COLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION August 26, 1986 Frank Vaught Vaught/Frye Architects 2900 S. College, Suite L-C Fort Collins, CO. 80525 Dear Frank: Staff has reviewed your submittal for Fort Collins Orthopedic Clinic, Riv- erside Commercial PUD, 2nd Filing, Lot 513, Preliminary and Final and offers the following comments: 1. A new parking and access agreement is needed to address modifications to the parking and access arrangement created by this project, as well as the building expansion proposed on lots 4 and 4A to the north. See Jim Gefroh with Gefroh/Hattmann to coordinate this agreement. 2. The 17 foot parking stalls must have sufficient space provided for over- hang without impairing the use of the walkways. The walkways should provide a minimum of 4 feet of pedestrian passageway beyond the over- hang. If 19 foot stalls are used, tire stops must be provided. The 24 foot traffic: aisles must also be maintained between the parking stalls and the curb. The handicap parking space should be 13 feet wide. 3. The access on the northwest corner of the lot does not conform to the proposed parking and circulation plan for lots 4 and 4A. The two plans need to be coordinated. 4. The need for the loading zone in the west parking lot is questioned. A handicap parking stall could be more appropriate. 5. Pedestrian access ramps should be shown in the sidewalk surrounding the parking lot. 6. The utility easements dedicated by the plat of East Elizabeth Medical P.U.D. will have to be utilized for extension of natural gas service. 7. Any modifications required to the existing underground utilities must be paid by the developer. No part of the building can be inside a utility easement. 411r 4, OFFICE OF COMMUNITY 300 LaPorte Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 (303) 221-6750 DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING DIVISION Fort Collins Orthope Clinic Page 2 8. Has the existing capacity of the parking lot detention been verified by a field study? This question is asked, because a nearby property has been experiencing flooding from relatively minor storms, and many detention areas were not checked after construction for capacity and some recent projects have uncovered gross deficiencies. 9. Will the parking lot to the south be utilized by this building? If so, how does pedestrian circulation work? Also, please define the use of the paved area on the south side of the building (patio?). 10. The landscaping looks good, but what are those dotted areas under and surrounding the Honeylocusts? If they are to be sodded, they should be labeled as such. 11. A profile is needed for the sidewalks between the proposed building and the existing orthopedic clinic. Will there be a ramp? Revisions are due September 5, 1986. PMT's, colored renderings, and 10 blueprint copies for the P&Z Board are due September 12th, with Final docu- ments due September 18th. This is the extent of staff's comments at this time. Please contact me if you have questions, or would like to set up a meeting to discuss these con- cerns. Sincerely, Blob Wilkinson City Planner CC: Tom Peterson, Planning Director Mike Herzig, Development Coordinator NAUGI IT' TRYE rcllitcc t S 2900 SO. COLLEGE SUITE L-C FT. COLLINS,CO. September 8, 1986 Mr. Bob Wilkinson Community Development Department Planning Division P. O. Box 580 Fort Collins, C 80522 Dear Bob, The following items deal with staff comments and changes made on the Fort Collins Orthopedic Clinic, Riverside Commercial P.U.D., 2nd Filing, Lot 5B. I. Our clients are working closely with the owners of lots 4 & 4A in an effort to obtain the required signatures on a new parking and access agreement. 2. Any walkway abutting a 17' parking stall will be a minimum of 6' and 24' will be maintained between all parking stalls. The handicap stall will be 13' wide x 17'. 3. Parking and access on the west side of the building now conforms to the plan for lots 4 & 4A. 4. The loading zone in the west parking lot was intended for trash removal; however, a common trash area has been relocated on the island northeast of the building and the loading zone has been eliminated. 5. Pedestrain access ramps are shown on west & east sidewalks at the curbs. 6. It is understood that any modifications to existing utilities is the responsibility of the developer. 7. Dick Rutherford of Stewart & Assoc. is addressing the detention capacity of the parking lot in a separate letter. 8. The south parking lot will primarily be used by the existing building; however, there is a sidewalk on the west side of that building that connects directly to the new facility. Mr. Bob Wilkinson September 8, 1986 Page two 9. The dotted areas on the landscape plan have been labeled as lawn. 10. The existing building elevation is 4957.8' and the proposed building will be 495'.01. The existing sidewalk along the north side of the existing building slopes down to the we-st', therefore we are anticipa- ting a minimum grade change in the sidewalk connection. In no case will the slope exceed l' in 12' which complies with handicap access. 11. ; CCvered cc,miaction is desirable tetween th,:! two buildings a5 was rli r-liacc-d criain;11y at conceptual rc;li eF1_ The ccnrlectic2 cull clear span across the utility easement and no Foundation structure will be in the easement. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have any questions. Bee re rds, i Frank g h t VAUGHT-FRYE ARCHITECTS VF/jb cc: Ray Bridges