Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEVERGREEN PARK REPLAT - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2003-07-31CONCEPTUAL REVIEW STAFF COMMENTS MEETING DATE: October 5, 1992 ITEM: Evergreen Park Lot 4, IL Site Plan Review APPLICANT: Bob Gomez 4533 Moccasin Circle LaPorte, CO 80535 LAND USE DATA: This is a proposal to expand an existing IL Site Plan to add additional outdoor storage to an approved warehouse use and to expand the use onto the lot to the south. The property is located north of Conifer Street, south of Bristlecone Drive, east of College Avenue at 1314 Red Cedar Circle. COMMENTS: 1. The Zoning Department has made a determination to allow a temporary, certificate of occupancy to be issued, for a 2 year time period, once the I-L Site Plan and Utility Plans have been approved. A permanent certificate would be issued only upon completion of the paving and required interior parking lot landscaping. In the meantime, compacted road base will be allowed for this particular use. 2. Please refer to the parking lot landscaping guidelines and handouts when drawing up your landscape plan. The intent of the landscaping is to provide a buffer strip around the perimeter of the lot and to screen the outdoor storage area from adjacent properties and streets. Staff would be looking for a mix of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs to provide winter screening as well. 3. Light and Power development charges are based on the size of the site. Lot 3 charges have been paid. Lot 4 charges have not been paid. A separate bill will be sent for these charges, to be paid as a condition of continued service to Lot 3. There will be additional charges if and when a building is constructed on Lot 4. 4. Continue to work with Glen Schlueter at the Stormwater Utility to address all drainage concerns on this property. There was a condition of approval on Lot 3, that the Grading and Drainage Plans be approved by the Stormwater Utility, prior to the issuance of any building permits or certificates of occupancy. As far as I know, your Utility, Grading, and Drainage Plans are not complete at this time. 5. Poudre Fire Authority does not have a problem with the interim road bass_. They will be concerned about adequate access around the buildings, if and when, they are constructed. J » EVERGREEN PARK, BLOCK 5, LOTS 5 & 6 COMMENTS CONTINUED • PROVIDE CONCRETE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AT THE ENTRANCE • INDICATE THE WIDTH OF THE DRIVE • LOCATE THE DRIVE RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE(S) DETAILS - SHEE-f 4 • STREET INTERSECTION GUTTER DETAIL - IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE THIS IT NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO REFLECT A DRIVEWAY CONDITION. SHOW AND INDICATE CONCRETE TO THE PROPERTY LINE. MODIFY THE WALKS AS NECESSARY TO REFLECT WHAT IS TO BE INSTALLED. • ACCESS RAMP DETAIL - DON'T NEED TO CURVE THE WALK AROUND SINCE IT A DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND NOT A STREET INTERSECTION. rrort Collins Current Plan`r PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DATE: 20 October 1995 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT: Redwood St. ReplatNo. 1 �•l�1�. Evergreen park PLANNER: Engineering All comments must be received by: Friday November 3, 1995 No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns see be low) Date: _� C', CxELT' YOU Signature: FISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS: ❑ PLAT ❑ SITE QLANDSCAPE COXMLWrFy PLANNING U 11LITY E'` WRO,'YMENTAL SERVICES • 231 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX Sgp FORT COLLINS, COLD CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT RADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750 PROJECT City of Fort Collins COMMENT SKEET wnmr� urrent Planning DATE: 20 October 1995 DEPARTMENT: jegec_ PROJECT: Redwood St. Replat No.1 Evergreen Parr PLANNER: Engineering All comments must be received by: Friday November 3, 1995 ❑ No Problems i Problems or Concerns (see below) • Cover Sheet 1. Provide 2 benchmarks referenced from the Black Bolt Survey. • Plan & Profile 1. Provide slopes of the street before and after this section of Redwood St.. 2. Provide PC's and PT's for the baseline on the plan view. 3. Provide a curve table. 4. Dimension sidewalk setback. 5. Fill and radius the area where the sidewalk begins its detachment, as shown on the plan. Date: i'/- cI - S�� Signature: CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS: ff� PL ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE Q,--'UTILrrY COMMUNITY PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES • 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750 CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT City of Fort Collins urrent Planning PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DATE: 20October 1995 DEPARTMENT: -PSCc, PROJECT': Redwood St. Replat No.1 Evergreen Park PLANNER: Engineering All comments must be received by: Friday November 3, 1995 No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below) Date: / Z 49 Z `j' -s' Signature: CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS: ❑ PL ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE ❑ UTILITY COMMUNITY PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES • 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750 CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Comm, ty Planning and Environmenta. ervices Current Planning City of Fort Collins November 3, 1995 Greg D. Fisher, Architect 3115 Clyde Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 Dear Greg, Staff has reviewed your documents for the Evergreen Park, Block 5, Lots 5 and 6, I-L Site Plan, that were submitted on October 6, 1995, and would like to offer the following comments: The Light and Power Utility states that street trees must be a minimum of 40 feet from street lights. 2. The Building Inspections Department offers the following comments: a. The site shall be accessible to persons with disabilities in accordance with Uniform Building Code Section 3103 and UBC Appendix Section 3106. Provide designated and marked accessible routes between building and the public way and accessible parking and buildings. Provide parking and signs per Appendix Section 3107. All required exits and all building entrances located within six inches of grade must be accessible to a person in a wheelchair and must be connected to the public way (public sidewalk) by an "accessible route of travel" complying with the American National Standards Institute publication Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities. Running slopes on accessible routes shall not exceed 1:20 with cross slopes not exceeding 1:48. Accessible parking and access aisles shall comply with the above referenced standards with slopes not exceeding 1:48 in any direction. Please show connections to the public sidewalk for all entrances and exits. b. The proposed warehouse/office buildings exceed 5,000 square feet in size and therefore must be equipped with an automatic fire suppression system or compartmentalized in sections of less than 5,000 square feet by fire resistive construction in accordance with Sections 3802, UBC as amended by the City of Fort Collins. Please add a General Note to the Site Plan regarding this requirement. The Zoning Department offers the following comments: a. A barrier (i.e. fence) which prohibits access by vehicles other than emergency vehicles, must be installed at the edge of the asphalt paving and the temporary gravel turnaround. This fence can be removed once the turnaround is paved with Phase 2. 281 North College Avenue - P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0380 - (970) 221-6730 FAX (970) 221-6378 TDD (970).224-6002 If the; applicant chooses to pave the turnaround with Phase 1, appropriate landscaping must be installed. b. Please show the location of trash dumpsters on the site plan. All dumpsters must be fully enclosed (not visible), gated, and located on a paved surface. C. A bike rack is needed for each of the warehouse/office buildings. d. A 5' landscaping strip is required along all parking/lot lines under the Phase 2 parking extension. e. A 2" caliper deciduous trees are needed on the north and south sides of the parking lot along the property lines. f. A 5' landscaping strip is required along the north and south property lines. It is currently only 2' or 3' at the "back-up" sections of the parking lot. g. City Code requires parking lots to have 6% interior landscaping. At the present time, this proposal only provides 440 square feet of interior landscaping. A total of 1,346 square feet of interior landscaping is needed. Interior landscaping does not include the five foot landscape strip along the property lines nor the ten foot landscape strip between the parking lot and Blue Spruce Drive. 4. The Poudre ]Fire Authority stated that the office/warehouse buildings on lots 5 and 6 exceed the 150' access requirement by approximately 20'. The applicant must either provide an additional fire lane access back to Blue Spruce Drive, access to adjacent properties, or fire sprinkler both of the buildings. 5. The Water and Wastewater Utility offers the following comments: Please show the existing water and sanitary sewer mains in Blue Spruce Drive on the Site Plan. b. Please show the water and sewer services to the proposed buildings and identify the proposed location for the curb stops and meter pits on the Site Plan. Please add standard details for the water and sanitary sewer services, meter settings/pits, etc. to the Site Plan. d. A 4 foot separation distance for shrubs and a 10 foot separation distance for trees must be maintained from all water and sanitary sewer services. Please coordinate the location of all landscaping and services with the site engineer/designer. 6. The Water Conservation Specialist offers the following comments: a. The Landscape Plan shall contain a note calling for the review and approval by the City of Fort Collins of the required landscape irrigation system, prior to the issuance of a building permit. b. The landscape plan shall include the total area (in square feet) for each landscape category. Landscape categories are distinguished by their water requirements and intended maintenance level. Examples of possible categories include, but are not limited to, high water turfgrass, low water turfgrass, low water planting beds, moderate water planting beds, and non -plant areas (paved areas, etc.). Please refer to page 4 of the attached Water Conservation Standards for Landscaping for further guidance. 7. Attached is a copy of the comments received from the Engineering Department. 8. Attached is a copy of the comments received from the Stormwater Utility. 9. The Planning; Department offers the following comments. a. Please add a scale for the Vicinity Map. b. Please revise General Note 1 on the Site Plan to state: "Existing zoning is I-L, Limited Industrial." C. Please revise General Note 2 on the Site Plan to state: "See Landscape Plan (Sheet 2 of :3) for all landscape requirements." d. Please revise the Planning certification block to state: Approved: By the Director of Planning of the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, this day of Director of Planning e. Please number the Site Plan as "Sheet 1 of 3", the Landscape Plan as "Sheet 2 of 3", and the Building Elevations as "Sheet 3 of 3". f. Please clearly delineate the phasing line which separates Phases 1 and 2 and label Phases 1 and 2. g. The Site Plan shows a note which states "Edge of Phase 2 asphalt/landscape mulch bed typ." However, the Landscape plan has a note which designates the limit of landscaping as the edge of Phase 1. All landscaping for Phases 1 and 2 should be shown on the Landscape Plan and notes coordinated. h. Please indicate the total square footage of each of the proposed buildings within the footprint of each building. Please provide typical dimensions for the standard and handicap parking spaces. Staff suggests that sidewalks along the north property line of lot 5 and south property line of lot 6 be added to allow pedestrian connections from the proposed buildings to the public sidewalk along Blue Spruce Drive. This may require four parking spaces to be; deleted. k. Office facilities require safe and handicap accessible routes to the building entrances. It appears that each of the "bays" are designed to be an office/warehouse. Access to the building entrances is gained via automobile travel lanes and/or through travel/parking areas for vehicles accessing the proposed overhead doors to the buildings. Staff suggests that the buildings be shifted towards the center of the site to allow for pedestrian access to entrances on the north side of the warehouse/office building on Lot 5 and to the south side of the warehouse/office building on Lot 6. If pedestrian entrances are provided as described in comment K, staff suggests that the windows and glass doors be moved to the north side of the warehouse/office building on Lot 5 and to the north side of the warehouse/office building on Lot 6. M. Please indicate the color(s) of the proposed buildings on the elevations. This completes the review comments at this time. Additional comments may be forthcoming as the various departments and reviewing agencies continue to review this request. Once the above stated comments have been addressed, Staff will schedule an Administrative Hearing with the Director of Planning for this I-1. Site Plan. Please contact me at: 221-6206 if you have any questions or concerns related to these comments. I would like to schedule a meeting with you as soon as possible, if necessary, to discuss these comments. Sincerely,, Michael Ludwig Project Planner xc: Sheri Wamhoff Stormwater Utility file/Project Planner PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planninf DATE: /--3 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT: -51z " -/r,-,F,j /°� r L. PLANNER: All comments must be received by: ❑ No Problems O---­Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) • COVER SHEET 1. Rename project (page heading and title blocks): "Utility Plans for Redwood Street Improvements / Bayberry Circle to Conifer Street / (being a portion of Replat No. 1, Evergreen Park). 2. Update vicinity map to accurately depict Redwood St. and Bayberry Circle. • SHT. 2 OF 4 1. Bearings, curve data, and PC/PT distances do not correlate with each other; please check and correct. 2. See #1, Cover Sheet. • SHT. 3 OF 4 1. Please contact Basil Hamden with Stormwater Utilities concerning the curvilinear stormwater pipe routing; may need to provide deflection data. 2. Our map shows Bayberry Circle coming in from the west; please check and correct. 2. See #1, Cover Sheet. Date: l Signature: -(41 CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF F:EVISIONS ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE [3-1ftILITY PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: 1-26-96 DEPT.: ENGINEERING PROJECT: Redwood St. Improvements PLANNER: Engr. All comments must be received by: ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) • SHEET 2 / 5 1. Correct error in pavement section notes. • SHEET 3 / .5 1. Please change Note 3. To state: The city of Fort Collins shall be responsible for maintenance of the storm drainage system after certification, and acceptance by the city. Date: /-'zG 5 Signature: CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS F LAT ITE LANDSCAPE [2--'UTILITY 6. Please redraw the entrance gate to accurately reflect the type of gate that is being proposed. The way the gate on the drawing is shown is not acceptable to the Fire Authority. 7. You will have to provide a Knox box to the Fire Authority to put the (late code in, to enable the Fire Authority to access the property in the case of an emergency. 8. A building permit will be required for any additional buildings on these lots. 9. If either building is greater than 5,000 square feet in uncontained area, you will be required to install an automatic fire sprinkler system or divide the interior into smaller areas. 10. Engineering requires that you design, pave, and complete the public improvements (curb, gutter, walk, and pavement) to Red Cedar Circle to the south property line. There is a possibility of a repay agreement to receive reimbursement as other properties in the area develop. 11. A Development Agreement and Utility Plans (including the street design) must be complete and signed prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for the outdoor storage area. Please complete the enclosed "Development Agreement" form as soon as possible. 12. Planning Staff is concerned about screening and buffering of a fairly unsightly use, which outdoor storage tends to be. Staff suggests the use of evergreen trees and shrubs, in addition to deciduous plantings. Security lighting should be down directional with a short cut-off of light to prevent light spillage off -site. 13. Please contact Ken Kirchoff at the Police Department (221- 6833) for additional information on crime prevention in this area. City of Fort Collins Current Plannint DATE: PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DEPT.: SW W/WW ENGR'G PROJECT: 12, ee�,JL-s PLANNER: ----- All comments must be received by: ❑ No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) ,,l Ile f-1 A/ r >> J Date: Signature: CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE ❑UTILITY PROJECT COMA4ENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Plamiimy DATE: 2q en# - 'q t, DEPART?v1ETN-T: =ij, --9 PROJECT: �':,� LOT- 4P, P, ANC E R: All comments must be received' E] -No ProClern S L! Problems or Conce:ms (see below or attached) EVERGREEN PARK, LOT 6, BLOCK 4 (AMERICAN MOBILE WELDING - AMENDED (PAGE I OF 2) FEBRUARY 7, 1 996 SITE PLAN • THE TWO POSSIBLE BUILDINGS AND THE MISCELLANEOUS OUTSIDE STORAGE AREAS ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE UTILITY PLANS. REVISIONS TO THE UTILITY PLANS IS NEEDED TO SHOW THESE: BUILDINGS AND THE PROPOSED GRADING AROUND THEM. IN ADDITION AN AMENDMENT TO THE DRAINAGE REPORT IS NEEDED TO ADDRESS THE ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE AND ANY CHANGES TO THE DRAINAGE PATTERNS. • THE EAST HALF OF THE SITE IS CURRENTLY SHOWN TO DRAIN TO THE EAST. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT OFFSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED AND IT IS ALSO POSSIBLE THAT OFFSITE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE NECESSARY. THIS WILL BE DETERMINED BY STORMWATER IN THEIR REVIEW. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) Date: Signatune. CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF RE;VISIONS ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE 0 UTILITY EVERGREEN PARK, LOT 6, BLOCK 4 (AMERICAN MOBILE WELDING - AMENDED (PAGE 2 OF 2) FEBRUARY %, 1 996 • THE TWO PROPOSED MISCELLANEOUS OUTSIDE STORAGE AREAS ON THE NORTH AND THE NORTHERN MOST POSSIBLE FUTURE BUILDING SITE ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT. PER THE NOTE ON THE PLAN REGARDING THIS EASEMENT THE PROPOSED FENCE ACROSS THIS EASEMENT, THE STRUCTURE AND THE OUTSIDE STORAGE MAY NOT BE ALLOWED IN THIS AREA. THE NOTE ON THE PLAN STATES IT WELL - 'THE TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT IS A RESTRICTED AREA, AND ACCESS WITHIN THE EASEMENT AREA MUST NOT BE IMPEDED. THE FOLLOWING ARE PROHIBITED ON THE UNITED STATES EASEMENT WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION, LOVELAND, CO.: STRUCTURES, FENCES, DRILLING WELLS, CHANGES IN TOPOGRAPHY, AND PERMISSION TO THE PUBLIC FOR ANY USE.' A COPY OF THIS WRITTEN PERMISSION IS NEEDED FOR ANYTHING TO BE DONE IN THIS AREA. NO BUILDING PERMITS ARE ISSUED FOR ANY STRUCTURE IN AN EASEMENT, THEREFORE ANY STRUCTURE TO BE LOCATED IN THIS EASEMENT WOULD NEED WRITTEN PERMISSION SPECIFIC TO WHAT COULD BE BUILT WHERE. • THE PROPOSED FENCE THAT IS SHOWN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING GOES ACROSS THE DRAINAGE SWALE AND THE DETENTION AREA. THIS MAY BE PROBLEM IF IT IMPEDES THE FLOW OF WATER IN ANY WAY. • THE TWO WESTERN MOST MISCELLANEOUS OUTSIDE STORAGE AREAS APPEAR TO BE IN THE DETENTION AREA, THIS MAY CAUSE A CHANGE IN THE DETENTION AREA BOUNDARY. Corn:nu v Planning and Environmental +_srrent Planningl y� OiL iyp. City of Fort Coi ;'-1s February 29, 1996 Mr. Dennis Smilie American Mobile Welding 2917 Loch Lomond Drive LaPorte, CO 80505 Dear Mr. Smiley: rvices Staff has reviewed the request to amend the American Mobile Welding I-L Site Plan Review and offers the following comments- 1. The northern 37.5 feet of the lot is encumbered by a transmission line easement granted to Western Area Power Administration. The note on the approved site plan states that this easement is a restricted area. Therefore, outside storage and possible future building should be kept out of this easement. 2. There is a concern that the two possible buildings and miscellaneous outside storage areas are not shown on the approved Utility Plans. Revisions to the Utility Plans are needed to account for these structures. In particular, the drainage and grading for the new buildings must be documented. In addition, an Amendment to the Drainage Report is needed to address the increase in impervious surface and any changes to the drainage patterns. Also, will the two new buildings require water and sewer services? If so, please indicate. Please contact Sheri Wamhoff, 221-6750, to begin the Utility Plan Amendment process. 3. The east half of the site is currently shown on the approved plans to drain to the east. Since new development is proposed for the eastern part of the site, it is possible that offsite drainage easements will be required and it is also possible that off -site drainage improvements may be necessary. These requirements will be determined by the Stormwater Utility. 4. The proposed fence that is shown on the north side of the building goes across the drainage swale and the detention area. This may be a problem if it impedes the flow of water in any way. 5. The two western most miscellaneous outside storage areas appear to be in the stormwater detention area. This may cause a change in the detention area boundary. -81 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 FAX (970) 221-6378 • TDD (970) 224-6002 6. As a result of the above comments, the Utility Plans may have to be revised. The contact person for revising the Utility Plans is Sheri Wamhoff, 221-6750. 7. The Poudre Fire Authority cautions that portions of the two proposed buildings are beyond the 150 feet fire access as measured from the curb cut. This will require the buildings to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system. For further information, please contact Roger Frasco, at the Fire Prevention Bureau, 221-6570. 8. The I-L, Limited Industrial Zone District allows warehouses and enclosed storage as permitted uses. The key is that the storage must be "enclosed" in order to be a permitted use. Consequently, the perimeter fencing must be solid to screen the outdoor storage. The fence may be solid wood or masonry. Chainlink with slats will not be allowed. P!ease revise the site plan accordingly. 9. Please add a note to the plans that there will be outside storage beyond the enclosed ,yard. 10. In front of the two parking spaces, there is a location designated for one of the Honey Locust trees. This location should be shifted slightly to the north since it now indicated directly over a water line. Before planting, this water line should be located. The tree should be planted about 10 feet from the water line. This may involve shifting the other three trees slightly to the north also. 11. Please add the following note to the P.U.D.: "No trees to be planted within 10 feet of a water or sewer line, including the water meter pit, and no shrubs within four feet." 12. Please identify the surface treatment of the yard area. Is this area to be asphalt, gravel, grass? This concludes Staff comments at this time. Please contact the Planning or Engineering Departments if you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely: Ted Shepard Senior Planner xc: Sheri Wamhoff, Civil Engineer Glen Schlueter, Stormwater Engineer Comm -lity Planning and Environment,-' Services Current r'lanning City of Fort Collins April 30, 199�7 Shear Engineering Corporation 4836 South College Avenue, Suite 12 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Premier Custom Builders, Inc. 401 A South Link Lane Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 RE: Lots 1-2, Block 5, Replat of'Evergreen Park Dear Mr. Shear: Staff has reviewed your plans for the Replat of Evergreen Park, Lots 1-2, Block 5 that were submitted on April 1, 1997, and would like to offer the following comments. 1. The Zoning Department offered the following comments: a) Trees/landscaping will be required along drives adjacent to the side and rear property lines. b) Canopy trees are required at each landscaped island —the two adjacent to the buildings will require canopy trees as well. c) Buildings can be located no greater than 30' from the front property line (they are shown at 80'). Thus, building orientation will require no parking in the front of the buildings. d) If two drives are between the buildings, then diagonal parking at the north building will need to be turned around as a conflict would exist. One-way drives are required as is, however room does exist for ninety degree parking rather than angled parking. A two-way drive is allowable. e) What is the asphalt parking for associated with the south building? Is this for truck parking? f) For the vehicle parking, show striping or leave as part of the drive. g) The Code requires an 80' landscaped buffer along the north lot line. A ?hl 'forth College Av,-ntti • P(). E-ox 5SO • Fert Co lli c,. CO 50522-0550 • (97(1) 221-6750 • FAX (970) t16-2020 30"' landscaped buffer is required along Blue Spruce. 2. The Building Inspections Department comments are attached. 3. Poudre Fire Authority offers the following comments: a) The 6-unit building on the north part of Lot 1, Block 5 must be fire separated between Unit 3 and Unit 4. b) Access lane around ' this building must be signed "Fire Lane -No Parking". 4. Comments from the Engineering Department are attached. 5. Comments from Water and Wastewater are attached. 6. The Traffic Operations Department states that a Traffic Impact Study is not required. 7. The Current Planning Department offers the following comments: a) The Land Use Code requires that along arterials streets and any other streets that directly connect to other districts, buildings are to be sited so that a building face abuts upon a required 30' minimum landscaped yard for at least 30% if the building frontage. Such a building face shall not consist of a blank wall. The west elevation shows that the building face along Blue Spruce Drive is blank. Therefore, some architectural details must be added to eliminate this. b) New building color shades are to be neutral, with a medium or dark color range, and no white, bright or reflective. The Code does state that buildings materials shall not create excessive glare. A two hundred foot building constructed with metal ribbed siding may have a glare. Please introduce other buildings materials that will serve to eliminate the glare as well as to add architectural detailing and avoid a monotonous, blank wall. c) An 80' deep landscaped yard must be provided along the north property line and the east property line. The Code states the this buffer must be provided along any boundary line that adjoins a residential land use or a zone district characterized by residential uses. The north and east property lines abut the MMN (Medium -Density Mixed Use) zoning district. d) All storage, loading and work operations must be screened from view along all the north lot line as well as the! east lot line as these are boundary lines between districts. e) Existing zoning is I -Industrial District. It is listed under the, General Notes as I-L, Limited Industrial. f) There should be a pedestrian connection between the landscaped islands closer to Blue Spruce and those connecting to the buildings. Use paving materials other than asphalt to define this, and show on the site plan. g) Please show the trash collection areas and the necessary landscape screening on the landscape and site plans. This completes the review comments at this time. Additional comments may be forthcoming as the various departments and reviewing agencies continue to review this request. Please provide a written response to each of the above stated comments with the submittal of plan revisions. Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have any questions or concerns that are related to the comments. If you would like to schedule a meeting, please call me as soon as possible. As you are aware, the City is implementing a new development review process. Plan revisions may now be submitted at any time. Hearing dates will be assigned by City Staff when all issues have been addressed. Please contact me for the number of folded revisions required for each document prior to the submittal of plan revisions. Best Regard;, Leanne A. Harter xc: Ward Stanford Stormwater Utility file/Project Planner Commui—y Planning and Environmental-_rvices Current Planning Citv of Fort Collins March 10, 19998 Jerry Russell 1314 Redcedar Circle Fort Collins, CO. 80524 Dear Jerry, Staff has reviewed your revisions for the TOY SHED Project Development Plan (PDP) development proposal that were submitted to the City on February 9, 1999, and would like to offer the following comments: 1. This property is located at the southeast corner of Redcedar Circle between Conifer Street and Blue Spruce Drive. It is in the I - Industrial Zoning District. The proposed recreational vehicle, boat and truck storage use is permitted in this District, subject to an administrative review (Type 1) and public hearing for a decision. However, this Project Development Plan (PDP) must go to a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning; Board because a modification of a standard is required, which automatically changes the request to a Type II, P 8& Z Board review. 2. Doug Martine of the Light & Power Department stated that development of this site (even for parking/vehicle storage only) will initiate Light & Power development charges. These charges are estimated to be $14,500.00, with payment required as a condition of continued electric ser,7ice to the existing building. Please contact Doug, at 224-6152 between 7:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., if you have questions. 3. Peter Barnes, Gary Lopez, and Jenny Nuckols of the Zoning Department offered the following comments: a. What. kind of "recycled asphalt" will this parking surface be? Will it be loose crushed asphalt or the kind with an adhesive compound? b. The actual uses for these two lots must be listed on the Site Plan. ''81 North College Avenue • PO. Box 380 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-67450 • FAX (970) 416-2020 C. Solid fencing is required along the rear (east) lot line, in addition to the front and side (west and north) lot lines. The Site Plan shows a chain link fence along the rear lot line and the Landscape Plan shows a solid fence. Please correct this on the Site Plan to show a solid fence, which is required by the LUC [Sections 3.5.1(J)(2) and 3.8.11(2)]. d. Provide dimensions of all structures shown on the Site Plan and label them existing. e. There still is a question as to whether there will be some sort of shade cover/ canopy over these parking spaces, similar to the other lot with RV storage. If so, elevations for the proposed structures should be provided for review. f. Street trees, selected from a City -approved street tree list, are required every 30' to 40' along the Redcedar Circle frontages (west and north sides of the property) as per Section 3.2.1[D][2][b] of the LLUCJ. Although the ornamental trees as proposed are on the list as trees with a mature height of 40' or less, there should be some larger shade trees included for more of a canopy appearance. g. Is there a residence on Lot 3? There is a building labeled Rec./Office. Should it be Res./Office? h. Since the access to Lots 1 8s 2 is obtained through Lot 3, should the legal description include Lot 3? Please contact Peter, Gary, or Jenny, at 221-6760, if you have questions about these comments. 4. A copy of the comments received from Donald Dustin of the Stormwater Utility is attached to this letter. Also, he is forwarding a red -lined copy of the drainage report to the applicant. Please contact Donald, at 221-6589, if you have questions about his comments. 5. A copy of the comments received from Mark McCallum of the Engineering Department is attached to this letter. Also, he is forwarding; easement dedication information and language to the applicant. Please contact Mark, at 221-6750, if you have questions about his comments. Commu._,y Planning and Environmental arrvices Planning Department City of Fort Collins October 24, 1994 Joe Frye Vaught -Frye Architects 1113 Stoney Hill Drive Fort Collins„ CO 80525 Dear Joe, Staff has reviewed your documents for the Evergreen Park, Lots 17, 18, 19: I-L Site Plan Review that were submitted October 10, 1994, and would like to offer the following comments: 1. No drainage or erosion control report has been received by the Stormwater Utility Department. It appears that drainage will be a significant issue in the site plan review. If on -site detention is required, it could significantly impact the layout of this project. This I-L Site Plan Review will not continue until a drainage report is submitted. Please contact Glen Schlueter at 221-6589 as soon as possible for drainage report requirements. 2. No utility plan for this property has been received showing the location of all public utilities and service lines. This I-L Site Plan Review will not continue until a utility plan is submitted to the Planning Department. 3. Water and sewer utilities should be shown on the landscape plan also. No trees should be planted within 10' and no shrubs within 4' of any existing or proposed service lines, meter pits, or utility lines. 4. Please contact the Light and Power Engineering Department concerning power requirements for the site. The location of the transformer may need to be changed. 5. The utility easement width adjacent to the right-of-way should be such that from the back of walk to the rear line of the utility easement is 13' minimum. 6. The parking lot landscaping does not meet code requirements. The souith parking lot and north loading area must contain interior landscaping which is equivalent to 6% of the total area of that parking/loading area. A five foot landscape buffer must be installed adjacent to the north loading area curb. 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6750 6. Roger Buffington of the Water/Wastewater Department offered the following comments: a. Include a note on the Landscape Plan pertaining to landscape/utility separation distances. b. Red -lined copies of the Site, Landscape, and utility plans have been forwarded to the applicant. Please contact Roger, at 221-6681, if you have questions about these comments. The following comments and concerns were expressed at the Staff Review meeting on March 3rd: Engineering 7. The sidewalks as shown along the Redcedar Circle frontages do not match on the site Plan and utility plans. 8. A variance request is needed, and must be submitted for review, for the sidewalk and parkway widths along Redcedar Circle. This request should be submitted to Cam McNair, the City Engineer. The variance should be submitted, and a decision given, prior to this development request going to a public hearing for the land use. 9. The City is not asking for additional street right-of-way for Redcedar Circle along Lots 1 8s 2. Stormwater 10. The site Plan and utility plans do not match regarding the proposed sidewalks. 11. An easement is needed for the detention pond. 12. The grading plan shows retention in the parking lot. Water quality needs to be addressed, ideally through a landscaped area. 13. A detail is needed for the outlet chase through the sidewalk. 14. If the surface material changes, then that would change the storm drainage calculations. Planning 15. Section 3.5.1 [J] [ 1 ] of the LUC sets forth a requirement that no areas for outdoor storage shall be located within 20' of any public street or public sidewalk. In this case, the applicant wants to place a solid wood fence approximately 12' behind the curb along Redcedar Circle (public street) and directly adjacent to the sidewalk along the streets (public sidewalk). Therefore, it was necessary for the applicant to request a modification of the aforementioned standard, which has been done. Staff will recommend approval of this request, similar to what was done on the previous requests, if the City Engineer approves a variance request for the widths of the sidewalk and parkway. This action does elevate the development request to a Type II, Planning and Zoning Board review. 16. The landscape parkway must be at least 6' in width. 17. How will the plant materials be established and maintained, especially from a watering standpoint? If an irrigation system is to be provided this must be identified on the Landscape Plan. This completes the staff comments at this time. Additional comments will be forthcoming as they are received from City departments and outside reviewing agencies. Under the development review process and schedule there is no revision date mandated by the City. The amount of time spent on revisions is up to the applicant. Upon receipt, the revisions will be routed to the appropriate City departments and outside reviewing agencies, with their comments due to the project planner no later than the third weekly staff review meeting (Wednesday mornings) following receipt of the revisions. At this staff review meeting the item will be discussed and it will be determined if the project is ready to go to the Planning and Zoning Board for a decision. If so, will be scheduled for the nearest Board hearing date with an opening on the agenda. Please return all drawings red -lined by City staff with submission of your revisions. The number of copies of revisions for each document to be resubmitted is on the attached Revisions Routing Sheet. You may contact me at 221-6341 to schedule a meeting to discuss these comments. Sincerely, Steve Olt Project Planner cc: Engineering Stormwater Utility Zoning Light & Power Water/ Wastewater Stewart 8s Associates Project File July 6, 1998 Project No: 1466-14-96 Ward Stanford City of Fort Collins Engineering Department P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524 Re: Lots I & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park; Ft. Collins, Colorado Dear Ward, This letter serves as the response to your review comments concerning the final utility plans for Lots 1 R 2, Block `i, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park. We have addressed the utility plan review comments as follows; Cover Sheet: * The notes and title on the cover sheet have been revised as requested. * The vicinity map is at a scale of I" = 1000', and has been noted. Project Development: Plan and Landscaping Plan:. * There is no sidewalk indicated at the east and west ends of the building located on lot 2. Note 12 on sheet 2 refers to a 6" barrier curb only. A detail for the 6" barrier curb without sidewalk is in detail D-I 1 on the detail sheet. * We request reconsideration for continuing to use attached 4'walk, and not detaching the 4.5 foot sidewalk. We feel the attached sidewalk is appropriate because it is consistent with the existing sidewalk adjacent to the site on the north side of the site, and across the street. Also, detaching the walks creates future conflicts with the existing electric line by burying the utility under the concrete. Future extensions of the sidewalk will directly conflict with electric pedestals and vaults. We feel the attached sidewalk alignment shown on the plans is preferable to "Industrial Local Standard" detached sidewalk. * We have provided a turn around with a 40' radius at the rear of lot 2 for the Poudre Fire Authority. In an attempt to respond to both the Poudre Fire Authority's need to have a firm/stable driving surface, and the Natural Resource Department's requirement to minimize development in a buffer zone around the regional pond, we are proposing to use a grid matrix paving block which will allow grass to grow up within the turn around. The grass will blend in with the pond grass and landscaping. A detail has been added to the Grading Sheet. The turn around is located within a proposed Drainage, Access and Utility Easement. This easement will be dedicated by separate document. A copy of the easement dedication language and an exhibit are attached for your convenience. The turn around provides the necessary coverage with 150' maximum distance (fire hose length) from the possible fire truck locations. 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 FAX (970) 282-0311 July 6, 1998 Page 2 Project No: 1466-14-96 Master Improvements Plan: * The comment responses for the previous sheet explain a detail for barrier curb without sidewalk being added to the detail sheet. * Refer to the previous response section for a discussion of sidewalk options. We feel the attached sidewalk alignment shown on the plans is preferable to "Industrial Local Standard" detached sidewalk. * The turn around at the rear of lot 2 provides the necessary coverage with 150' maximum distance (fire hose length) from the possible fire truck locations. Site Cross Section Sheet: * A 5' slope easement is being negotiated from the owner of Lot 3, Block 5 in order to provide the required 4:1 side slope along the south property line of lot 2. A reciprocal 5' slope easement is being provided on Lot 2, Block 5 for the owner of Lot 3, Block 5. A copy of the easement dedication language and exhibits are attached for your convenience. Detail Sheet: * We have added a barrier curb detail without sidewalk. This detail corresponds to note 12 on the Master Improvements Plan. This concludes our response to your review comments concerning the final utility plans for Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park. If you have further questions or comments, or if you require additional information, feel free to contact us at 226-5334. Sincerely, Larry . Ketcham,P.E. Shear Engineering Corporation LPK / 1pk cc: Dave Phillips; Premier Custom Homes Leanne Harter; City of Fort Collins Planning Tom Dugan; Pinecrest Planning and Design Commui i Planning and Environmental .` vices Current Planning Citv of Fort Collins August 5, 1998 Brian Shear Shear Engineering 4836 South College Avenue, Suite 12 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Dear Brian: City staff has reviewed the revisions submitted for the Evergreen Park, Block 5, Lots 1 and 2 and would like to offer the following comments: 1. Comments from the Engineering Department are attached. 2. Comments from the Stormwater Utility are attached. 3. Comments from Water/Wastewater are attached. 4. The Current Planning Department offered the following comments: a) Please label sheet one as being the site plan. b) Please indicate on the site and landscape plans that the crosswalk will be striped and/or enhanced. c) The sidewalk must be detached in accordance with the adopted City street standards. d) Please add a general note regarding details on the type of fencing, height, and materials. e) Is there any mechanical equipment? If yes, please show on the site and landscape plans (if ground -mounted) or the elevations (if rooftop -mounted.) In either case, all mechanical equipment will be required to be screened according to the requirements of the Land Use Code. f) Please provide details of the trash collection areas. The response 281 North College Avenue • PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 8052-'-0580 0 (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020 note submitted with the submittal of revisions states that the same materials used on the fence is intended for the trash collection areas. Please provide a design of the trash collection areas that shows the materials as well as the overall appearance and functionality. g) The response letter states that the maximum number of parking spaces is exceeded by 5%. In order to exceed the maximum number of allowable parking spaces, a request for alternative compliance is required, or the amount of parking lot interior landscaping must be increased by 5% as well. Therefore, if the second option is followed, the minimum percentage for the parking lot interior landscaping requirement is 11 %. h) Please correct the spelling errors on the landscape plan. i) Please remove note #22 from the landscape plan as it is redundant with the general notes on the site plan. j) Please add the cross section of the channel to the landscape plan (it is currently on a separate sheet in the utility plans, and should be included in both places.) k) The number of Austrian Pines shown on the landscape plan exceeds the maximum percentage of any one particular species as outlined in Section 3.2.1(D)(3) of the Land Use Code. This section requires that the plan cannot include plantings (trees) that exceed 25% maximum of any one species. Please replace this tree with another type. 1) On the elevations, there is only one building shown. Are the two buildings identical? Please label the buildings on the elevations. In addition, please include the colors, materials, and dimensions on the elevations. m) According to the requirements of the Land Use Code, all primary entrances need to have some sort of sheltering element such as a porch or awning or canopy, etc. Please add these elements to all primary entrances to the buildings. n) Please provide additional details on the fence. o) Please provide samples on the types of materials proposed to be used. That concludes staff comments at this time. Additional comments may be forthcoming as various departments continue their review of the project development pllan. It appears as if another round of revisions will be required to address the remaining outstanding concerns, including the possible need to submit a request for alternative compliance. A hearing date for the Planning and Zoning Board will be scheduled when all issues have been addressed. If you have any questions regarding these comments, .please feel free to contact me at 221-6750. Best regards, Leanne A. Harter, AICP City Planner xc: Mark McCallum file Commu y Planning and Environmental rvices Current Planning w1_ City of Fort Collins Brian Shear Shear Engineering Corporation 4836 South College Avenue, Suite 12 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 RE: Lots 1-2, Block 5, Replat of Evergreen Park Dear Brian: August 11, 1998 Representatives from the Engineering Department, Poudre Fire Authority and Current Planning Department met last Friday to discuss the above -referenced project. There are substantial concerns related to fire access through the site, and the comments listed below reflect necessary changes to comply with Code requirements. In addition, there are comments related to off -site grading and defining the LOD line that must be addressed with the submittal of revisions. 1. A turn -around for fire vehicles will not be permitted in the detention area as proposed on the plans. Turn-arounds must be placed in a location wherein unobstructed access is allowed at all times, and the proposed location shown on the plans does not guarantee this type of access may be maintained. 2. The fire access lane on the south of the building on Lot 2 must be a minimum width of 20' and signed as a fire lane with no parking allowed. If these requirements cannot be met, the building must be fire sprinklered. 3. The curb return for this access road must be clearly signed as one-way. 4. A 13'6" clearance must be maintained along the south of the fire lane. This clearance must remain unobstructed, without the slope as shown on the plans. With the submittal of revisions, please submit a cross section of the south property line of Lot 2 that demonstrates the clearance for fire emergency vehicles and location of landscaping elements. 5. With the submittal of revisions, please provide a letter of intent from adjoining property owners wherein off -site grading will occur. 6. The Limits of Development line and 100' buffer must be shown on all plans, including the utility plans. 2Hl North College Avenue • PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 41h-2020 If you have any questions regarding these comments, please do not hesitate to call me at 221-6750. Best egards, Leanne A. Harter xc: Mark McCullum Stormwater Utility Ron Gonzales/Poudre Fire Authority file/Project Planner Evergreen Park, I-L Site Plan Review October 24, 1.994 Page 2 7. A bike rack must be added to the site plan. 8. U.S. West has requested that you contact Tim Weaver at 224- 7516, 3 months before the start of construction for telephone conduit requirements. 9. The landscape plan shall contain a general note calling for the review and approval by the City of Fort Collins of any required irrigation system for the landscape. It should also include the total area (in square feet) for each landscape category. Landscape categories are distinguished by their water requirements and intended maintenance level. Please refer to page 4 of the attached City of Fort Collins Water Conservation Standards For Landscapes for further guidance. 10. The proposed building must be fire contained to 5,000 square feet or less areas or the building must be fire sprinklered. See also the attached comments from Sharon Getz (221-6760) of the Building Inspection Department. 11. Tim Buchanan, City Forester, has requested that you change the three ";Bechtel Crabapple" trees on the south side of the building as this type of Crabapple tree is very disease prone. He recommends either "Spring Snow Crabapple" or "Radiant Crabapple" trees as replacements. 12. Alley paving will be required from Conifer Street to the north edge of the loading area and must be shown on all plans. Additional paving will be required when and if this property is developed further north. This completes the review comments at this time. No further review of this request will occur until drainage and utility plans are submitted. An administrative hearing will not be scheduled until all materials, have been reviewed. Please contact me at 221-6206 if you have any questions or concerns related to these comments. I would like to schedule a meeting with you as soon as possible, if necessary, to discuss these comments. sincerely, �f Michael Ludwig Project Planner xc: Kerrie Ashbeck Advance Planning Stormwater Utility Transportation Parks & Recreation file/Project Planner September 23, 1998 Project No: 1466-14-96 1 SHEAR ENGINEERING Mark McCullum CORPORATION City of Fort Collins Engineering Department P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524 Re: Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park; Ft. Collins, Colorado Dear Mark, This letter represents a formal request for a variance from the minimum parkway width of 6.5 feet for an industrial local street. This variance request is for the project referenced above. The decision to detach the sidewalk was made at a meeting between City personnel and the developer and personnel from Shear Engineering on Thursday, September 3, 1998. Larry Ketcham discussed this issue with you on Friday, September 11, 1998. You both agreed that the minimum parkway width could not be obtained and that the roadway width was wider than the current local industrial street section. You indicated that you would support the reduced parkway width and that we should formally request this variance. This letter also serves as the response to your review comments concerning the final utility plans for Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park. We have addressed the utility plan review comments as follows; Master Improvements Plan ❑ The sidewalk has now been detached in accordance with the decisions made at our meeting on Thursday, September 3, 1998. ❑ Relocation of the electric utilities is not required according to Janet McTague of the City of Fort Collins Light and Power Utility. ❑ The walk is 4.5 foot wide according to the Typical Street section for a local industrial street. The back of walk is at the ROW line. ❑ This results in a parkway width of less than the required 6.5 feet for an industrial local street. ❑ The fire access on the south side of Lot 2 has been widened to 18 feet. This was agreed to be Ron Gonzales of the Poudre Fire Authority. ❑ This has shifted all proposed improvements on the site 3 feet to the north. ❑ Widening the fire access has also eliminated the need for the turn around in the detention pond. 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 FAX (970) 282-0311 September 23, 1998 Page 2 Project No: 1466-14-96 Re: Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park; Ft. Collins, Colorado Grading Plan ❑ The grading in the pond has been revised to reflect the elimination of the turn around. Site Cross Sections ❑ The site cross section sheet has been included in the Project Development plan set for your convenience. ❑ A note has been added to the plan indicating the limits of planting that can occur in the channel. This is per the request of Basil Harridan at our meeting on Thursday, September 3, 1998. ❑ A copy of the access, drainage and utility easement exhibit is attached for you convenience. This concludes our response to your review comments concerning the final utility plans for Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park. If you have further questions or comments, or if you require additional information, feel free to contact us at 226-5334. Sincerely, Reviewed by, Mark Oberschmidt, Design Engineer Larry P. Ketcham, P.E. Shear Engineering Corporation Shear Engineering Corporation cc: Dave Phillips-, Premier Custom Homes Leanne Harter; City of Fort Collins Planning Tom Dugan-, Pinecrest Planning and Design September 23, 1998 Project No: 1466-14-96 .HI SHENGINLeanne Harter CORPO City of Ft. Collins Planning Department P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524 Re: Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park; Ft. Collins, Colorado Dear Leanne This letter serves as the response to your review comments concerning the final utility plans for Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park. We have addressed the utility plan review comments as, follows; ❑ The sidewalk has now been detached in accordance with the decisions made at our meeting on Thursday, September 3, 1998. a Relocation of the electric utilities is not required according to Janet McTague of the City of Fort Collins Light and Power Utility. ❑ The walk is a 4.5 foot wide according to the Typical Street section for a local industrial street. The back of walk is at the ROW line. ❑ This results in a parkway width of less than the required 6.5 feet for an industrial local street. Therefore we are requesting a variance from this requirement from the City Engineering department. This variance request in included in the response letter to Mark McCullum. A copy is attached for your convenience. ❑ The site cross section sheet has been included in the Project Development plan set for your convenience. ❑ A note has been added to the plan indicating the limits of planting that can occur in the channel. This is per the request of Basil Hamdan at our meeting on Thursday, September 3, 1998. Responses to written comments a. The project development plan is for reference only and is listed in the index as such. There is no need to change it to site plan. b. The crosswalk has been labeled as being striped on all appropriate sheets c. The sidewalk is now detached. d. A note has been added to the building elevations indicating the type of fencing material to be used. 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 FAX (970) 282-031 1 September 23, 1998 Page 2 Project No: 1466-14-96 Re: Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park; Ft. Collins, Colorado e. Mechanical equipment will be installed at the eastern end of the unit on lot 1. The mechanical equipment will be installed inside the fenced yards of the building on Lot 2. The equipment will be screened in accordance with the Land Use Code. f. Details of the trash collection areas are now provided. g. We have reduced the number of parking spaces from 44 to 40. h. Spelling errors on the Landscape plan have been corrected. i. Note 22 has been removed from the Landscape plan. J. The cross sections are called out on the Landscape plan. k. The number of Austrian Pines has been reduced so that it no longer exceeds the maximum percentage. I. The second building elevation is now included in the project development plan set. m. Awnings have been added to the building elevations. n. Additional fence details are not provided. The fence is still called out as a 6' vinyl fence. o. The developer has been informed via a copy of this letter that you would like to see the types of the materials used for the fence. This concludes our response to your review comments concerning the final utility plans for Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park. If you have further questions or comments, or if you require additional information, feel free to contact us at 226-5334. Sincerely, Mark Oberschmidt, Shear Engineering Corporation Attachments Reviewed by, 1 Larry P. Ketcham, P.E. Shear Engineering Corporation cc: Dave Phillips; Premier Custom Homes ,/Mark McCullum City of Fort Collins Engineering Tom Dugan; Pinecrest Planning and Design SZ. W 16 .0 .6 (OdVI)SONVI) ,y !2 0 � d 3 � 0 v qr T 'd xb SS:6 86, TT 'daS Commu: f Planning and Environmental,' Current Planning City of Fort Collins October 21, 1998 Brian Shear Shear Engineering Corporation 4836 South College Avenue, Suite 12 Fort Collins, CO 80525 Dear Brian, Post -it' Fax Note F sp-mN !/Dept Phone # '� Z ro— vices 7671 Date Fron• Co. Phon, Fax # �I7_ I Ipages" ZZl -(o 2g6 l -2o2c� Staff has reviewed your documents for the Evergreen Park, Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat that were submitted on September 28, 1998, and offers the following comments: Please revise the site data on the Site Plan. A total of 21,500 square feet of building coverage is proposed. By doing this, the future addition may would only be subject to the issuance of a building permit. The open space information also needs to be reduced accordingly to reflect the total building square footage. 2. A signed letter of intent or signed easement must be provided from the property owner to the south for off -site grading. 3. A signed letter of intent or signed easement is needed from the property owner to the east for any off -site grading or drainage. 4. The modification narrative does not adequately address the criteria for which the modification is requested. Staff suggests that the history section up to the summary be deleted as conformance with all other criteria does not appear to be support for a modification. Staff suggests that the summary of the modification request address four points: 1) what is the purpose of the 80 foot setback requirement (reference purpose section of the criteria]; 2) what additional landscaping is proposed; 3) where is additional landscaping proposed; and 4) how does the additional landscaping achieve the same purpose as the required setback. 5. Landscaping (tree centers) on the Landscape Plan do not fall within the proposed 7 foot landscape strip indicated on the cross sections. Please revise. 6. Please label sheet 1 as the Site Plan rather than the PDP. 7. One mechanical pad is shown for the building on Lot 1. The mechanical pad is proposed to be located at the end of the future addition to building one. How will this mechanical equipment be screened until the future addition is constructed? Staff suggests landscaping. 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020 8. Trash enclosures should be constructed of concrete/masonry block and have steel gates rather than standing seam metal. The standing seam metal will likely be damaged by backing trucks, etc. 9. Please provide samples of proposed building materials. 10. Please substitute Summit Ash trees for the Marshall Seedless Ash trees on the south property line. 11. Please delete the limit of development line label on the Site Plan. Only show the limit of disturbance line and the 100 foot setback dimension from the limit of disturbance line. 12. Please provide non -vertically exaggerated cross sections from the north and south property lines to the respective buildings. Landscaping must be shown on the cross sections. 13. Please label all building and fencing colors on the building elevations. 14. Please show the mechanical pads on the Site Plan. This completes the review comments at this time. Additional comments may be forthcoming as the various departments and reviewing agencies continue to review this request. Please contact me for the required number of plan copies prior to submitting plan revisions. Please provide a written response to each of the above stated comments with the submittal of plan revisions. This project is tentatively scheduled for the December 17, 1998 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing. However, the ability of this project to remain on the December 17, 1998 agenda is pending the submittal of revisions no later than November 16, 1998. Revisions must satisfactorily address all of the above stated comments. Please contact me! at 221-6206 if you have any questions or concerns related to these comments. Sincerely, *41Z 4- Michael Ludwig, AICP City Planner xc: Mark McCallum, Engineering Current Planning File #24-96A PROTECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: 9 November, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #50-91D Evergreen Park, Lots 1&2, The Toy Shed- PDP - Type I PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received by: 12/02/98 ®No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) General Comments: 0 See redline comments on all sheets of the Site and Landscape Plans. More specific comments will be mentioned below. Site and Landscape Plan: 0 The street section for an industrial local street requires a 4.5' detached sidewalk with 6.5' of parkway. The sidewalk to the south for the existing property is attached. The sidewalk can remain attached by means of a formal variance with the City Engineer. We recommend the applicant submits a design that is as follows: • A 4.5' sidewalk along the entire proposed property. • The sidewalk should transition at an appropriate location. Specifically, at the point where the existing property transitions into the proposed development or at the northwest corner of the property. City Staff would recommend the former. Note: If you have questions in regard to the variance, please give me a call at 221- 6605 Date: 4 Signature. PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS:' PLAT [� SITE UTILITY ff'LANDSCAPE November 16, 1998 Project No: 1466-14-96 1 SHEAR ENGINEERING Basil Harridan / Donnie Dustin CORPORATION City of Ft. Collins St:ormwater Utility P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524 Re: Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park; Ft. Collins, Colorado Dear Basil and Donnie, This letter serves as the response to your review comments concerning the final utility plans for Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park. The plans were re -submitted on September 28, 1998. The review comments are dated October 21, 1998. We have addressed the utility plan review comments as follows; Written Comments 1. The plat is a recorded plat. No work has been done to the plat for this reason. The limits of the floodplain from the FIRM are now shown on the following sheets • Drainage and Erosion Control Plan • Site Plan • Master Improvements Plan 2. The outlet pipe capacity calculations can be found on pages 5 and 6 in the detention section of the drainage calculations. The hydraulic grade line for the outlet pipe from the detention pond has been provided. 3. The dimensions of the riprap apron are now called out on the Drainage and Erosion Control plan as well as the storm sewer profile located on the Grading Plan. A riprap detail is now shown on the Grading Plan. There is also a note on the Drainage and Erosion Control plan to see the detail on the Grading Plan. Riprap calculations are now provided in the Erosion Control Appendix (Appendix II). 4. Calculations show that during the 100-year event, the ponding will be confined to the limits of the proposed pond and channel. The 100-year WSEL is shown on the plan and is shaded. A legend has been provided which clarifies the shading. The flow capacity of the typical parking lot section has been determined to be approximately 228 cfs. The Q100 to the pond is only 12.49 cfs. The Haestads printouts are included in Appendix 1 for your reference. A detail of the 2' pan is provided on the detail sheet. 5. The floodplain use permit and application fee is attached with this submittal. 6. The Access, Drainage, and Utility Easement has been signed by the owner, and is provided for processing by the City of Fort Collins. 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 FAX (970) 282-0311 December 1, 1994 Project No. 1448-011-94 Kerry Ashbeck City of Fort Collins Planning Department P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80522 Re: Lot 6, Block 4, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park; Fort Collins, Colorado Dear Kerry, We have addressed the utility plan comments for the above referenced project and are re- submitting mylars for signature. We have not received comments from the Stormwater Utility. Apparently, based on several comments made by City Departments and Utilities, there is a belief that this project has been submitted as a replat. It has not. Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park is an existing plat and Lot 6, Block 1 is an existing platted lot. Therefore, reference comments concerning wider easements, etc. have not been addressed. This will be discussed in the response to follow. Response to comments from Engineering: * This is not a replat. A copy of the plat will be forwarded to you as soon as we receive a legible copy from Larimer County. The plat will be added to the plan set for reference. * The title on the Cover Sheet has not been revised. The title is based on the actual name of the existing plat. * There is existing; four (4') foot attached sidewalk on the North side of the site (The Toy Shed project). Detail D-20 has been added to the plans. Response to comments from the Water and Sewer Utility: * The water meter pit has been added and labeled. The stop box has been dimensioned from the easement line to meet current City of Fort Collins utility coordination requirements. ,t The sewer service has been stationed from the existing downstream manhole. Response to comments from the Fire Official: The proposed building has a total area of approximately 3200 square foot. Therefore, a sprinkler system is not required and a separate fire line has not been added to the plans. Response to comments from Light and Power: * The owner has been informed to contact light and power concerning power requirements and charges. Response to comments from Public Service Company: * The utility easement has not been widened as this is an existing easement defined with an existing plat. This project does not propose a replat. * A note has been added to the plans stating that "No trees are to be planted within 4 feet of gas lines". 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Is, CO 80525 (303)226-5334 November 16, 1998 Page 2 Project No: 1466-14-96 Re: Lots 1 & 2., Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park; Ft. Collins, Colorado Erosion / Sediment Control Comments • BNIP details are provided on the Grading Plan (Sheet 3) and the Detail Sheet (Sheet 6). • A sediment trap detail is shown on the Grading Plan. There is a note on the Drainage and Erosion Control Plan to see the Grading Plan for the detail. • The seeding specifications shown on the Drainage Plan are for temporary seeding only. The seeding notes were requested after an earlier submittal. Refer to the Landscape plan for limits and specification on the final seeding. Due to the size and character of the proposed project, it is not anticipated "temporary seeding" will be necessary. Final seeding should be completed in the prescribed schedule. Report Redlines • The redlined items in the report have been clarified or corrected as needed. Plan Redlines Cover Sheet • The floodplain note has been added to the General Notes. • The maintenance note has been added to the Drainage Plan. Project Development Plan — now called Site Plan • The ROW width is labeled. Master Improvements Plan • The ROW width is labeled. • The bearings and distance are now called out for both lots • The limits of the 100-year flood plain taken from the FIRM is now shown on the this plan. • A vicinity map is not included with the plat because it is a recorded plat. Gradina Plan • The outlet structure detail represents a 3' diameter orifice in all views. • The hydraulic grade line is represented on the profile of the storm sewer from the detention. November 16, 1998 Page 3 Project No: 1466-14-96 Re: Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park; Ft. Collins, Colorado Drainage and Erosion Control Plan • The dimensions of the riprap apron are now called out on the Drainage and Erosion Control plan as well as the storm sewer profile located on the Grading Plan. A riprap detail is now shown on the Grading Plan. There is also a note on the Drainage and Erosion Control plan to see the detail on the Grading Plan. • A 2' valley pan detail is provided on the detail sheet. • The 100-year WSEL noted on the Drainage and Erosion Control Plan refers to the N'SEL with the limits of the Pond. The limits of the ponding are shown on the plan and a legend indicates the type of shading. • The limits of the 100-year ponding are now shaded on the Drainage and Erosion Control Plan. Sitework Cross Sections • The High Water Elevation is only represented in channel itself. The 100-year WSEL noted on the Drainage and Erosion Control Plan refers to the WSEL with the limits of the Pond. It does not affect the areas that are represented by sections A -A and B-B. This concludes our response to your review comments concerning the final utility plans for Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, R.eplat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park. We feel that all comments have been addressed adequately and a request for mylars after your next review is appropriate. If you have further questions or comments, or if you require additional information, feel free to contact us at 226-5334. Sincerely, Mark Oberschmidt, Shear Engineering Corporation Attachments Reviewed by, Larr . Ketcham, P.E. Shear Engineering Corporation ce Dave Phillips; Premier Custom Homes Michael Ludwig; City of Fort Collins Planning Mark McCullUm, City of Fort Collins Engineering Tom Dugan; Pinecrest Planning and Design November 16, 1998 Project No: 1466-14-96 SHEAR ENGINEERING Michael Ludwig, AICP CORPORATION City of Ft. Collins Planning Department P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524 Re: Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park; Ft. Collins, Colorado Dear Michael, This letter serves as the response to your review comments concerning t11e final utility plans for Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park. The plans were submitted on September 28,1998, and the review comments are dated October 21, 1998. We have addressed the utility plan review comments as follows; 1. The land use breakdown on the Site Plan (previously Project Development Plan) has been revised as requested. 2. The slope easement with the landowner on the south of the property has been recorded with the county. A copy is attached for your records. 3. Information has been sent to Mr. Zdenek, representing Bayberry Development, the landowner on the east of the property for his review and approval. A copy of Mr. Zdenek's previous letter of approval for Lots 5 & 6, Block 5, is attached for reference. The discharge from the current project, Lots I & 2, Block 5 is directed to the pond that is in an existing drainage easement which is identical to the request made for Lots 5 & 6, Block 5. Mr. Zdenek's previous letter explains that the current easements around the regional pond should be sufficient and states, "No additional easements are required." We anticipate that the requested letter for approval will be similar. When Mr. Zdenek's letter is available we will forward the letter to your office immediately. 4. The modification narrative has been revised. A copy is attached. 5. Landscaping is in fact located in the 7' landscaping easement, and the 9'drainage easement and the utility easement. Based on discussions with Basil Hamdan at the meeting on September 3, 1998, he indicated that planting could extend into the easement provided that it is above the calculated 100-year water surface elevation. A note has been added to the cross section sheets indicating that, "No trees or shrubs are to be planted below the elevation of 68.50 feet. This is to provide at least 1 foot of freeboard above the anticipated HtiVL noted on each cross section". 6. The Project Development Plan has been renamed "Site Plan", as requested. 7. The mechanical pad for the building on Lot 1 has been relocated tip to the north east corner of the building. The new location provides screening with the proposed landscaping and trees. 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 FAX (970) 282-0311 November 16, 1998 Page 2 Project No: 1466-14--96 Re: Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park; Ft. Collins, Colorado 8. The trash enclosures are now detailed as block constriction. The details are found on the Landscaping Plan. 9. A sample of the building material is not readily available. However, we have attached a color copy of the Lester Uni-rib color chart and schematic view of the siding. We hope this will provide the necessary information. 10. The requested revision to the trees has been completed on the Landscaping Plan. The Landscaping Plan also reflects revisions based on the Amended Modification Request, which substantially increased the trees on the north side of the project in conjunction with the request to reduce the buffer to 32 feet. 11. The requested revision to the Limit of Development Line labeling has been completed on the Site Plan (previously Project Development Plan). 12. A non -exaggerated cross section sheet has been added to the plan set. Landscaping is shown as requested. 13. The building colors have been listed on the building elevations. The walls are proposed to be "white sand", the roofs are proposed to be "Forrest Green", and the stucco accents are proposed to be "Sahara Tan". A color chart is attached to this letter. 14. The mechanical pads have been added to the Site Plan (previously Project Development Plan), and the blaster Improvement Plan. This concludes our response to your review comments concerning the final utility plans for Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. l) of Evergreen Park. We feel that all comments have been addressed adequately and a request for m_ylars after your next review is appropriate. Signatures may be obtained from the departments and mylars held by you until the approval letter from Mr. Ldenek is provided. If you have further questions or comments, or if you require additional information, feel free to contact us at 226-5334. Sincerely, Larry . etcl am, P.E. She, r Engineering Corporation Attachments cc: Dave Phillips; Premier Custom Homes Mark MCCUIhrm City of Fort Collins Engineering Tom Dugan; Pinecrest Planning and Design November 16, 1998 Project No: 1466-14--96 III � SHEAR ENGINEERING Roger Buffington CORPORATION _ City of Fort Collins Water and Wastewater Utility 700 Wood Street Ft. Collins, Colorado 80521 Re: Lots I & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park; Ft. Collins, Colorado Dear Roger, This letter serves as the response to your review comments concerning the final utility plans for Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park. The plans were re -submitted on September 28, 1998 The review comments are dated October 21, 1998. We have addressed the latest utility plan review comments on the attached redlines. Master Improvements Plan o The natural gas line has been shown on the Master Improvement Plan, Landscape Plan and Site Plan (previously the Project Development Plan). ❑ The existing waterlines and hydrants in the proximity of the project have been shown on the Master Improvement Plan, Landscape Plan and Site Plan (previously the Project Development Plan). ❑ The notes for the concrete encasement of the sanitary sewer main have been revised on the Master Improvement Plan. ❑ We have revised and clarified the notes and details for the gravity blocks and thrust blocks. The plan redlines requested verification of the sizing of the gravity blocks. Please refer to the attached worksheet and excerpt of DIPRA reference. The 0.50 cy gravity block is adequate with a design pressure of 150 psi and a safety factor of 1.5. ❑ The water services and fire lines have been extended to the buildings on the Master Improvement Plan, Landscape Plan and Site Plan (previously the Project Development Plan). ❑ The "Sewer Joint Encasement Detail" on the detail sheet has been replaced by the "Concrete Encasement Detail". 4836 S. Collage, Suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 FAX (970) 282.0311 November 16, 1998 Page 2 Project No: 1466-14-96 Re: Lots I & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park; Ft. Collins, Colorado Master Improvements Plan (redlined comments): ❑ The note referring to the installation and verification of the water and sewer main locations has been revised. The italicized portion of the text reflects the revisions. The note now reads as follows: "INSTALLATION SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL ITEMS 1- 3 ARE COMPLETED!!! l . Verify exact horizontal and vertical location of existing water and sewer line prior to installation of fire line lowering and deliver this information to Shear Engineering Corporation. 2. Shear Engineering Corporation shall provide City of Fort Collins Water Utility with updated fire line lowering detail indicating actual elevations for approval prior to installing fire line. 3. City of Fort Collins Water Utility shall approve detail prior to installation. • If 18 inch vertical clearance over the sewer line cannot be achieved, lower 4 inch fire service under sewer line and concrete encase sewer line 10 feet either side of crossing. • See encasement detail on detail sheet. • See fire line lowering detail provided by Shear Engineering after horizontal and vertical location of sewer and water are verified. • Fire line lowering detail on this sheet is for reference only until water and sewer locations are verified. This concludes our response to your review comments concerning the final utility plans for Lots l & 2, Block 5, R'.eplat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park. We feel that all comments have been addressed adequately and a request for mylars after your next review is appropriate. if you have further questions or comments, or if you require additional information, feel free to contact us at 226-5334. Sincerely, Laf P. Ketcham, P.E. Shear Engineering Corporation Attachments cc: Dave Phillips; Premier Custom Homes Michael Ludwig; City of Fort Collins Planning Mark McCullum, City of Fort Collins Engineering Tom Dugan; Pinecrest Planning and Design November 16, 1998 Project No: 1466-14-96 CENGINEERING Mark McCullum City of Fort Collins Engineering Department P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524 Re: Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park; Ft. Collins, Colorado Dear Mark, This letter serves as the response to your review comments concerning the final utility plans for Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park. The plans were submitted on September 28,1998, and the review comments are dated October 21, 1998. We have addressed the utility plan review comments as follows; Parkway Width Variance Comments: ❑ Thank you for you help and support on the variance request for the reduced parkway width. Easement Dedication Comments: ❑ The slope easements have been recorded with the County on September 16, 1998. Copies are attached for your records. ❑ The access, drainage and utility easement is signed and attached for processing. Master Improvements Plan: ❑ A detail for a siingle or "one way" access ramp has been created and added to the detail sheet. This concludes our response to your review comments concerning the final utility plans for Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat (No. 1) of Evergreen Park. We feel that all comments have been addressed adequately and a request for mylars after your next review is appropriate. If you have further questions or comments, or if you require additional information, feel free to contact us at 226-5334. Sincerely, Larr P. Ketcham, P.E. Shear Engineering Corporation Attachments cc: Dave Phillips; Premier Custom Homes Michael Ludwig; City of Fort Collins Planning Tom Dugan; Pinecrest Planning and Design 4836 S. College, suite 12 Ft. Collins, CO 80525 (970) 226-5334 FAX (970) 282-0311 Cornmi.i. v Planning and Environmental -vices Current Planning City of Fort Collins December 9, 1998 Jerry Russell 1314 Redcedar Circle Fort Collins, CO. 80524 Dear Jerry, Staff has reviewed your documentation for the TOY SHED Project Development Plan (PDP) development proposal that was submitted to the City on November 3, 1998, and would like to offer the following comments: 1. This property is located at the southeast corner of Redcedar Circle between Conifer Street and Blue Spruce Drive. It is in the I - Industrial Zoning District. The proposed recreational vehicle, boat and truck storage use is permitted in this District, subject to an administrative review (Type 1) and public hearing for a decision. The Project Development Plan (PDP) must go to a public hearing before an administrative hearing officer for a decision unless any modifications of standards are required, which would automatically change the request to a Type II, Planning and Zoning Board review. 2. Doug Martine of the Light & Power Department offered the following comments: a. The normal electric development charges will apply as a condition to continued electric service to the existing site, even if no additional electric service is required. b. The underground electric system will need to be extended behind the sidewalk along Redcedar Circle prior to installing fence or landscaping. C. The developer is encouraged to contact Doug Martine, at 224-6152 (between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m.), to coordinate the above items. 28 t North College Avenue • P0. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX ('970) 4lo-2U20 3. Ron Gonzales of the Poudre Fire Authority offered the following comments: a. A 20' wide fire lane is required through this proposed project. b. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150' from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. This fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed. A fire lane plan shall be submitted for approval prior to installation. Any building not meeting this criteria shall be fire sprinklered. C. Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted on a contrasting background (example: bronze numerals on a brown brick are not acceptable). Please contact Ron, at 221-6570, if you have questions about these comments. 4. Peter Barnes, Gary Lopez, and Jenny Nuckols of the Zoning Department offered the following comments: a. Plant material abbreviations, instead of numbers, should be used to identify the proposed trees and shrubs on the Landscape Plan. b. A landscape design/installation person should be retained to prepare and oversee this plan for the project. There are several standard landscape notes that are missing from this plan. C. Solid fencing is required along the rear (east) lot line, in addition to the front and side (west and north) lot lines. d. A note regarding the requirement to install the landscaping or provide a letter of credit, escrowed money, or bond for 125% of the value of the landscaping is needed on the Landscape Plan. e. Are the parking stalls going to be covered with a canopy or some other kind of cover? If so, elevations for the proposed structures should be provided for review. f. Street trees, selected from a City -approved street tree list, are required every 30' to 40' along the Redcedar Circle frontages (west and :north sides of the property) as per Section 3.2.1[D][21[b] of the Land Use Code (LUC). g. What is the proposed surfacing for this vehicle storage lot? This should be identified on the Site Plan. 5. A copy of the comments received from Sharon Getz of the Building Inspection Department is attached to this letter. 6. Copies of the Comment Sheet and general information for Water Conservation Standards for Landscaping and Irrigation Systems, received from Laurie D'Audney, the City's Utility Education Specialist, are attached to this letter. 7. A copy of the comments received from Donald Dustin of the Stormwater Utility is attached to this letter. Also, he is forwarding a red -lined copy of the drainage report to the applicant. Please contact Donald, at 221-6589, if you have questions about his comments. 8. A copy of the comments received from Mark McCallum of the Engineering Department is attached to this letter. Also, he is forwarding a red -lined copy of the Site Plan and the City's Street Repair and Reconstruction Standards and Guidelines to the applicant. Please contact MELrk, at 221-6750, if you have questions about his comments. 9. Roger Buffington of the Water/Wastewater Department offered the following comments: a. Show all existing and proposed water and sanitary sewer mains and services on an overall utility plan. b. Will an irrigation tap be needed for this development? If so, show and label the location. C. Red -lined copies of the Site, Landscape, and utility plans have been forwarded to the applicant. Please contact Roger, at 221-6681, if you have questions about these comments. PAGE 2 December 1, 1994 Project No. 1448-0 L-94 Re: Lot 6, Block 4, Replat No. 1 of Evergreen Park; Fort Collins, Colorado If you have any further questions or comments, please call at 226-5334. We would also ask that you route copies of the response letter to those courtesy copied below. Sincerely, Mark Oberschmidt, EIT Shear Engineering Corporation BW S / be cc: Dennis Smilie Roger Buffington (Water and Sewer) Light and Power Jim Slagle (PSCo) Poudre Fire Authority The following comments and concerns were expressed at the Staff Review meeting on December 2nd: Engineerinz 10. The City wants a detached sidewalk (minimum of 4.5' wide) along the Redcedar Circle frontages, especially along the north side. A variance request must be submitted for review if the applicant wants any of the sidewalk to be attached. Stormwater 11. Where is the 100-year floodplain on this site? 12. A floodplain use permit must be applied for and approved by the Stormwate:- Utility. 13. A drainage easement is needed for ponding on -site. 14. No detail of the pond outlet structure has yet been provided to the City for review. 15. The applicant must request a variance for not detaining on -site for 1/2 of the street volumes for stormwater. 16. The stormwater runoff and drainage areas as submitted are incorrect. Planning 17. Section 3.5.1 [J] [ 1 ] of the LUC sets forth a requirement that no areas for outdoor storage shall be located within 20' of any public street or public sidewalk. I:,i this case, the applicant wants to place a solid wood fence approximately 12' behind the curb along Redcedar Circle (public street) and 5' behind the sidewalk along the streets (public sidewalk). Therefore, it was necessary for the applicant to request a modification of the aforementioned standard, which has been done. This action does elevate the development request to a Type II, Planning and Zoning Board review. 18. The previous Toy Shed approvals and implementation provide an attached sidewalk along Redcedar Circle, a 5' wide landscape strip along and outside of what is now a solid wood cedar fence, and a landscape strip inside the fence. This new proposal does not propose a landscape strip inside the fence (to be consistent with the existing facility). 19. Is there to be any lighting on this site? If so, information about the locations and type of lighting is needed. 20. The Landscape Schedule on the Landscape Plan must be expanded to include the botanical names of the plant materials, as well as the common names. 21. Two of the proposed street tree varieties are not acceptable street trees (see the attached City's Official Street Tree Species list). Other plant materials may be suspect, in terms of appropriateness and sustainability. 22. How will the plant materials be established and maintained, especially from a wagering standpoint? If an irrigation system is to be provided this must be identified on the Landscape Plan. 23. The scale of the Landscape Plan is not 1" = 20', as indicated on the plan. It is probably 1" = 10' (based on scaled dimensions). 24. Copies of the most current Owner's Certification and Planning and Zoning Board Certification signature blocks for the Site Plan are attached to this letter. Due to the need for a modification of a standard in the LUC, this item will go the P & Z Board, not the Director of Planning. 25. After reviewing the request for modification of the outdoor storage setback standard that was submitted to the City by the applicant for review, several questions or observations arise: a. # 1, page 1: "The original building plan showed it this way and was approved." There is no original building plan (or any other plan) for Lots 1 & 2 of Evergreen Park. b. #6, page 1: "Granting of this request would result in a better looking facility." Based on the requirements of the LUC, this facility would have to look as good, if not better, than the proposed plan. C. #1, :page 2: "A solid 6' cedar fence at street frontage has been added to screen the facility would be better than the chain link fence providing no screening." As per Section 3.8.11 [ I] of the LUC, a chain link fence is not an option and, therefore, the comparison is irrelevant. d. #5, page 2: "The cedar wood fence is more appealing than the chain link fencing." Again, as per Section 3.8.11 [ 1 ] of the LUC, a chain link fence is not an option and, therefore, the comparison is irrelevant. 26. Based on a recent visit to the site it was discovered that a chain link fence had recently been placed around the entire property of Lots 1 & 2 of Evergreen Park, the site had been graded and surfaced with gravel, and storage of vehicles has been and is taking place. The site work and storage of vehicles, prior to approval of the current development request, is in violation of the City's Land Use Code. In light of this, it is difficult to consider a. modification of required standards in the LUC (requesting sub -standard setbacks and screening for an outdoor storage facility) and to make a favorable recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board. This completes the staff comments at this time. Additional comments will be forthcoming as they are received from City departments and outside reviewing agencies. Under the development review process and schedule there is no revision date mandated by the City. The amount of time spent on revisions is up to the applicant. Upon receipt, the revisions will be routed to the appropriate City departments and outside reviewing agencies, with their comments due to the project planner no later than the third weekly staff review meeting (Wednesday mornings) following receipt of the revisions. At this staff review meeting the item will be discussed and it will be determined if the project is ready to go to the Planning and Zoning Board for a decision. If so, will be scheduled for the nearest Board hearing date with an opening on the agenda. Please return all drawings red -lined by City staff with submission of your revisions. The number of copies of revisions for each document to be resubmitted is on the attached Revisions routing Sheet. You may contact me at 221-6341 to schedule a meeting to discuss these comments. Sincerely, i Steve Olt Project Planner cc: EngineerirLg Stormwater Utility Zoning Light & Power Water/ Wastewater Stewart & Associates Project File PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: 12 February, 1999 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #50-91D Evergreen Park, Lots 1&2, The Toy Shed- PDP - Type I PLANNER: Steve Olt ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received by: 3/03/99 El No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) General Comments: 0 The dedication statements for each drainage easement should be submitted separately. • Provide accurate legal descriptions for each easement dedication statement along with exhibits. 0 The access ramp on the site plan should designed the same as the access ramp shown on the utility plan. 0 An additional 3 feet of R.O.W. should be dedicated along the frontage of the property. Another option would be to request a variance to the parkway width. �cc j,kL C, -I2c. LSIb%IS I U C tAL.C11TE Date: Signature: --zll�-ti PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: [a PLA/T El SITE UTILITY ,[ LANDSCAPE REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: April 30, 1999 PROJECT: #50-91D Toy Shed DEPT: ENGINEERING PDP—Type II (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 General Comments: ♦ See all redlines comments on the utility and site plans, and all Qasement and right-of-way dedications. I did mention that I will suggest a hearing date of June 3`d, but I can not confirm that date until Steve Olt from Current Planning returns from vacation. ♦ The City Engineer has sent down a memorandum, which allows Staff to look at right-of-way in a different way. The new outlook will allow us to only ask.for 1-foot of right-of-way. With that in mind, the new option would look as follows (Staff will still require you to move your fence that runs north/south 2 additional feet. Also, although the dedication changes from 3 feet to 1-foot, all easements will have to be modified and/ or correct as explained below): c._ A,X ij�_� L��c7c- .� Date: - �-7610 Signature: e. — Please s nd copies of marked revisions Plat >�Siite XUtility XLandscape ❑ NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS11 �at, City of Fort Collins ♦ With this option The City of Fort Collins will not require a development agreement that stipulates that the property owner will be responsible for the cost of moving the sidewalk, fence, and street trees. ♦ There will not be a need for a right-of-way encroachment.per:mil. ♦ All other comments mention in the Utility Plan, and Right -Of -Way and Easement Comments will apply. Utility Plan Comments: ♦ There are some minor revisions to the "General Notes". ♦ Include the Current Date under the title on the Cover Sheet. ♦ Please show that the 100-year flood elevation is outside the proposed right-of-way. ♦ Please show both the additional right-of-way line and utility easement line. Right -Of -Way and Easement Comments: ♦ The following is a list of comments for the drainage easement dedications: 1. Please make sure the drainage easements do not encroach into the proposed right-of- way. 2. A licensed professional land surveyor in the state of Colorado must sign and stamp all easements. 3. All of the exhibits should be "cleaned -up" per our discussion on April 29, 1999. 4. The heading on each exhibit should state that this is "Drainage Easement Dedication". ♦ The following is a list of comments for the utility easements dedication: The utility easement should be 4 feet as shown below. However, the utility easement dedication should commence 6 feet from the existing property line. The legal description is thus not correct and should be changed appropriately. nuTY Gs, 2. A licensed professional land surveyor in the state of Colorado must sign and stamp all easements. ♦ The following is a list of comments for the right-of-way dedication: 1. The City of Fort Collins will require that only 1-foot of right-of-way be dedicated for this project. 2. Provide an attorney's certificate. 3. A licensed professional land surveyor in the state of Colorado must sign and stamp all easements. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: July 31, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #50-91E Evergreen Park, The Toy Shed, WTF (LUC1) PLANNER: Ron Fuchs ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received by: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 General Comments ♦ Although this WTF application is providing a co -location for other wireless telecommunications companies, it does not provide those companies with a means to get to that pole. Please submit an easement agreement that would provide access for other wireless telecommunications companies. ♦ Supposedly there was a letter submitted for review from a Professional Engineer in Colorado explaining that the pole will collapse as opposed to topple. In accordance with Land Use Code Section 3.8.1(c)(l ) a copy of that shall be submitted to justify non-compliance with setback requirement. ♦ In accordance with LUC Section 3.8.1(C)(2), WTF shall be consistent with the architectural style of the surrounding architectural environment, considering roof form, mass, color, texture, and character. This is more of planning concern so I will leave the enforcement of the code to the appropriate planning departments, but my interpretation of the code would suggest that the poles mass and character does nol: fit in with the surrounding architectural environment. i Date:' CSC Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES ❑ PLAT OF MARKED REVISIONS:, SITE ❑ UTILITY ❑ NO COMMENTS —SUBMIT MYLARS 0 LANDSCAPE PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current PlanninP DATE:4-30-97 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: Evergreen Park, Replat #1 Block 5 ,Lots 1 & 2 PLANNER: Leanne Harter I . Please extend the pavement cuts ( the western edge of the cuts ) out of the wheel paths; either to the center of the drive lane or to the center of the street. 2. Please provide the design for the retaining wall and extend the top edge a minimum of 6" above the d6ve lane pavement to act as a curb. The drive lane sloping to the ditch drop- off, without ,any barriers, inadvertently provides an opportunity for vehicular problems in bad weather. Make sure northern side of development still has a way to drain storm waters, with the included curb. 3. Show limits of ditch re -construction and new grade lines, and provide more data on the cross -sections, ie., elevations, widths, and slope of the re -constructed ditch. 4. Please show and label any temporary and/or permanent erosion control measures used on the re -constructed ditch walls. 5. Please provide a letter from the owner of the 38' drainage and utility easement (if not the City), and the offsite land owner, accepting ditch changes. Will also need a temporary construction easement if any construction activity is outside of property boundaries. 6. City would like to have the center access drive area designated as a shared access easement since the development is remaining as 2 lots and neither drive lane half meets City std's without the other drive lane half. 7. Please provide a letter detailing expected vehicle trips from this development from the owners perspective and from the I.T.E. manual. See other minor comments throughout the plans******************** Date: 4-30-97 PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED Signature: ? ' /' ,/7/ REVISIONS: E3 PLAT SITE UTILITY EE3 LANDSCAPE ervices December 28, 1994 Joe Frye Vaught -Frye Architects 1113 Stoney Hill Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 Dear Joe, Planning staff has reviewed your "revised" documents for the Evergreen Park, Lots 17, 18, 19: I-L Site Plan Review that were received December 21, 1994, and would like to offer the following comments: 1. Utility and Drainage Plans are currently being reviewed. The Engineering Department will forward the comments to you after December 30, 1994. 2. Item #3 on the comment letter dated October 24, 1994, stated: Water and sever utilities should be shown on the landscape plan also. No trees should be planted within lop and no shrubs within 41 of any existing or proposed service lines, meter pits, or utility lines. Proposed service lines, meter pits, or utility lines on Lots 17, 18, 19 are not shown and must be added to the landscape plan. 3. Item #5 on the comment letter dated October 24, 1994 stated: The utility easement width adjacent to the right-of-way should be such that from the back of walk to the rear line of the utility easement is 13, minimum. The utility easement scaled 1W on the original submittal and remained. 11h' on the revised plans. 4. Item #6 on the comment letter dated October 24, 1994 stated: The parking lot landscaping does not most code requirements. The south parking lot and north loading area must contain interior landscaping which is equivalent to 6% of the total area of that parking/loading area. A fives foot landscape buffer must be installed adjacent to the north loading area curb. 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 380 Fort Collins, CO 80722-0380 • (303) 221-67-50 FAX (303) 221-6378 TDD (303) 224-6002 `& PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Colllins Current Plannin Date: 1-28-98 Dept: ENGINEERING Project: # 24-96A; Evergreen Park, Blk. 5, Lots 1 & 2, Replat, PDP. Engineer:�lWard Stanford Planner: Leanne Harter ® /y ,New /� use �a�i.►i7 o��r ���r PiaJ'ec�. 47 d v .vo i �vo...i i u %r o� i+ f Id UTILITY PLANS Please date all sheets. Cover Sht.: See changes to Gen. Notes; include date in title; scale Vicinity map. Sheet 2: Detach and widen sidewalk to City "Industrial Local" std's. Show sidewalk at "Barrier Curb" locations. This layout requires discussion w/ PFA (Ron Gonzales) to verify 15' south access lane is acceptable. Sheet 5: Please revise 3:1 southern slope to a minimum of 4:1. PDP, LANDSCAPE -PLAN See all Sheet 2 comments above. Date: 98 Signature: �c PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: PLAT ❑ SITE ❑ UTILITY ❑ LANDSCAPE City of Fort Collins Current Plannini Date: 1-28-•98 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Dept: ENGINEERING Project: # 24-96A; Evergreen Park, Blk. 5, Lots 1 & 2, Repllat, PDP. Engineer:: Ward Stanford Planner: Leanne Harter Alp le, = /y NPw C.0 f �rs.�r w. �/ �e �.s ��..,7 over L��s �ro✓ ���. -t atv .vo f —A `-)sir o� M f d r ere UTILITY -PLANS Please date all sheets. Cover Sht.: See changes to Gen. Notes; include date in title; scale Vicinity map. Sheet 2: Detach and widen sidewalk to City "Industrial Local" std's. Show sidewalk at `Barrier Curb" locations. This layout requires discussion w/ PFA (Ron Gonzales) to verify 15' south access lane is acceptable. Sheet 5: Please revise 3:1 southern slope to a minimum of 4:1. U bi 0 WIN►It1W."I a a ' :► See all Sheet 2 comments above. Date: /-fig- 58 Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: PLAT ❑ SITE ❑ UTILITY ❑ LANDSCAPE Commune , Planning and Environmental S. Aces( N I M Current Planning Citv of Fort Collins February 5, 1998 Shear Engineering Corporation 4836 South College Avenue, Suite 12 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Premier Custom Builders, Inc. 401 A South Link Lane Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 RE: Lots 1-2, Block 5, Replat of Evergreen Park Dear Mr. Shear: Staff has reviewed revisions submitted for the Replat of Evergreen Park, Lots 1-2, Block 5 and would like to offer the following comments. 1. The Zoning Department offered the following comments: a) PleasE� include some foundation shrubbery on the north side, similar to that along the building frontages. b) Regarding the "fenced storage" area at the south side of Lot 2, if this is to be used for exterior storage area, full screening will be required. c) PleasE� label the building envelope and show the distance to lot lines (i.e., what is the envelope for the south building; what does 40' typ. X 40' typ. Mean; can the units be larger; what is the distance to the east or south lot line.) 2. Comments from the Engineering Department are attached. 3. The Traffic Operations Department offers the following comments: a) The southern drive aisle is too narrow (please see the attached redlined plans.) b) Will there be overhead garage doors on the buildings on lot 2? c) How will vehicles maneuver in and out of the back fenced area on lot 2? 4. The Advance Planning Department offers the following comments: 281 :North College Avenue • PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • kl) 0) 221-6750 • FAX (070) 416-2020 a) Please research the possibility of an alternative choice to ponderosa pines (perhaps Austrian Pine). 5. The Natural Resources Department offers the following comments: a) Please show the high water line for the regional pond. b) Show the Limits of Development line on the site and landscape plans. Please contact Rob Wilkinson with the Natural Resources Department to determine the location of this line. c) Are there any existing trees that will be impacted by the proposed development? d) Will an access easement to the pond be required? e) The buffer area between the development and regional pond will need to include native trees and shrubs. Please contact the Natural Resources Department for a list of species that can be used. 6. The Current Planning Department offers the following comments: a) Elevations were not included with the submittal of revisions. Please include those with the next submittal. b) Please remove the utility plan approval block from the site and landscape plans. c) Please add general notes as indicated on the site plan, including notes on the bike rack, maintenance of landscaping, site lighting (down -directional, cut-off lighting). d) Is there any site lighting? Lighting should be shown on all plans. e) Please provide a cross section of the ditch to the north of lot 1 which shows the ditch, limit of development line, the high water line, any proposed trees/shrubs, and the distance to the building. f) Please number the sheets. g) Please provide information on the type of material to be used for the fence and provide a detail of the fence. h) Please show a detail of the trash collection areas and provide additional screening of the trash area on Lot 1. i) The pedestrian crossing needs to be clearly defined according to Section 3.2.2(C )(5)(a) Walkways. j) The signature block should be revised to reflect the Planning and Zoning Board rather than the Director of Planning. In addition, signature blocks for the attorney and owner's certifications should be added. k) Please show the square footage of the buildings and label the proposed uses for the buildings. In addition, please provide the number of employees per use. This information is needed to accurately determine the maximum number of parking spaces. The reference to the number of parking spaces required -two per three employees needs to be changed to reflect what is allowed by the Land Use Code. 1) Please see the attached redlined plans for additional comments. 7. Comments from Stormwater Utility are attached. I would like to schedule a site visit at your convenience so that we can discuss the issues outlined by the Natural Resources Department and Stormwater. Please call be at 221-6750 and we can determine some times that would work. This completes the review comments at this time. Additional comments may be forthcoming as the various departments and reviewing agencies continue to review this request. Please provide a written response to each of the above stated comments with the submittal of plan revisions. Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have any questions or concerns that are related to the comments. If you would like to schedule a meeting, please call me as soon as possible. Best Regards, Leanne A. Harter xc: Mike Dean Stormwater Utility file/Project Planner REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: 29, July 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: 924-96A Evergreen Park, Lots 1-2, Blocks, LUC Type I PDP PLANNER: Leanne Harter ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: Utility Plans Cover Sheet: Scale for the Vicinity map. Sheet 2: 2. Detach the sidewalk to City "Industrial Local" Standards. The electric utility will have to be relocated. 3. The turn around area in the southeastern corner (in the detention basin) has a variety of issues associated with its construction: (a.) The 10:1 slope is not appropriate. It should not exceed a grade more than 8°10. (b.) Due to potentially high water levels and drainage runoff from the parking drive, maintenance and soil stability is a question as to whether the soil - pavement grid matrix turn around area will be able to function consistently (especially when it is used as a fire access turn around). (c.) Proper signalization should be put in place to designate it as a turn around area. (d.) The turn around area is a natural buffer area with potential environmental problems associated with its construction. 4. The southern access (potential fire access) must have a width of 20 feet if it is to be used as a. fire lane access. In general, if this access is widened, the turn around area will not be necessary. PDP, Landscape 5. See all Sheet 2 comments above. REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE=9, .ly 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: 924-96A Evergreen Park, Lots 1-2, Block5, LUC Type I PDP PLANNER: Leanne Harter ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: Utili _ Plans Cover Sheet: Scale for the Vicinity map. Sheet 2: 2. Detach the sidewalk to City "Industrial Local" Standards. The electric utility will have to be relocated. The turn around area in the southeastern corner (in the detention basin) has a variety of issues associated with its construction: (a.) The 10:1 slope is not appropriate. It should not exceed a grade more than 8%. (b.) Due to potentially high water levels and drainage runoff from the parking drive, maintenance and soil stability is a question as to whether the soil - pavement grid matrix turn around area will be able to function consistently (especially when it is used as a fire access turn around). (c.) Proper signalization should be put in place to designate it as a turn around area. (d.) The turn around area is a natural buffer area with potential environmental problems associated with its construction. 4. The southern access (potential fire access) must have a width of 20 feet if it is to be used as a fire lane access. In general, if this access is widened, the turn around area will not be necessary. PDP, Landscape 5. See all Sheet 2 comments above. REVISION COMMENT SHEET �oJ DATE: September 28, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #24-96A Evergreen Park, Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat -Type 1 - PDP/FC PLANNER: Mike Ludwig ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: Parkway Width Iariance Comments: 0 Cam McNair, the City Engineer approves the variance request. Attach is a copy of the variance approval letter. Easement Dedication Comments: • The slope easement proposed with the owner of lot 3 to the south is a private easement which should be recorded at the County by the private parties. After the easement has been recorded, the City would like a copy of the easement to verify that the developer has received permission from the owner of lot 3. 0 The access drainage and utility easement will have to be signed before they can be routed through the process. At this point, the information provided is correct. Utility, Site, and ]Landscape Plan Comments: 0 The access ramps crossing the driveways should be a modified, one-way version of Detail 12.7 in the City Street Design Manual or provide an alternative design to be reviewed. Include a sketch on the Detail Sheet. Date: 2�� Signature: Please send copies of marked revisions .-Plat Site ,Utility Landscape City of Fort Collins REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: November 17, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: 424-96A Evergreen Park, Lots 1 & 2, Block 5, Replat -Type 1 - PDP/FC PLANNER: Mike Ludwig ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting: 0 NO COMMENTS Date: , �-;) � ����' Signature: � t �--- Please end copies of marked revisions flat , _Site Utility_ Landscape City of Fort Collins Evergreen Park, I-L Site Plan Review December 28, 1994 Page 2 Preliminary calculations indicate that the proposed interior landscaping is 2% of the total area of the south parking lot and north loading area. The. five foot landscape adjacent to the north loading area curb is required by code. The review of this submittal does not include future uses on Lot 17. Future uses will be required to submit a separate I-L Site Plan submittal for Lot 17. However, the project as shown, will be assessed fees based on the total acreage of Lots 17, 18, and 19. Staff recommends the removal of the "skeleton" future office / manufacturing / warehouse and Lot 17 from this I-L Site Plan to avoid being assessed fees for undeveloped land. The 6% interior landscaping and 5' buffer requirements must either be met or: 1) a request for a variance would need to be approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals; or 2) the I-L Site Plan would need to be withdrawn and this project be re- submitted as a P.U.D. 5. Item #7 on the comment letter dated October 24, 1994 stated: A bike rack must be added to the site plan. Staff has been unable to locate the bike rack on'the revised Site Plan. Please clarify. This completes the review comments at this time. An administrative hearing Will not be scheduled until all materials have been reviewed. Please contact me at 221-6206 if you have any questions or concerns related to these comments. I would like to schedule a meeting with you as soon as possible, if necessary, to discuss these comments. Sincerely, Michael Lu wig Project Planner xc: Kerrie Ashbeck Stormwater Utility file/Project Planner Gty of Fort Collins Current Planning PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DATE: 16 October 1995 DEPARTMENT: F_j;,,",(f,�, 1-6 ) J PROJECT: 45-95 EVERGREEN BUSINESS PARK, Blk 5 Lots 5 & 6 IL Site Plan Review PLANNER:Erng}neering-- L u'DW 1q All comments must be received by: Wednesday, November 1 ❑ No Problems ❑Problems or Concerns (see below) SITE PLAN • AT ENTRANCE DR, PROVIDE CONCRETE TO PROPERTY LINE • BETTER INDICATE THE PHASING LINE LOCATION UTILITY PLANS - COVER • MODIFY NOTE 9 FROM "...ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TWENTY-FOUR..." TO THE FOLLOWING "... ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (221 -660S) AND THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR (221 -6S69) TWENTY-FOUR... MASTER IMPROVEMENTS PLAN - SHEET 2 • THE DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO THIS SITE, PREFER THAT A DRIVE CUT TYPE ACCESS IS PROVIDED. THERE IS NO NEED FOR THE SIDEWALKS TO WRAP AROUND THE ENTRANCE, THEY CAN BE TAKEN STRAIGHT ACROSS (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) Date: .�� Signature CF[ECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS: ❑ SIT'E ❑ LANDSCAPE ❑ UTILITY COMMUNITY PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES • 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221fi750 CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT