The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutEVERGREEN PARK SECOND FILING THIRD REPLAT - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2003-07-31PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: September 6, 1996 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #24-96 Third Replat of Evergreen Park, 2nd Filing PLANNER: Mitch Haas Cj�-1 7.1�} All comments must be received by: Tuesday, Sep , 1996 EVERGREEN PARK SECOND FILING 3rd REPLAT 1st Submittal Engineering Department Comments 10/10/96 UTILITY PLANS 1/7 Title Sheet: • Please provide more detail on the vicinity map - i.e. label the local streets surrounding the project. The purpose of the map is to provide the inspectors, other users of the plans for reference, etc. an accurate location of where the project is in the city as well as what the limits of the project are. Date: I C- �� Al 6 Signature CHECK. IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS (Cont.) PLAT SITE LANDSCAPE UTILITY schedule a meeting, please call me as soon as possible. With the submittal of revisions, please include the enclosed redlined plans. Following the staff review of the resubmittal and once any outstanding issues are resolved, a hE�aring date will be set and affected property owners notified. As you are ,aware, the City is implementing a new development review process. Plan revisions may now be submitted at any time. Hearing dates will be assigned by City Staff when all issues have been addressed. Please contact me for the number of folded revisions required for each document prior to the submittal of plan revisions. Best Regards,, Leanne A. Harter xc: Jay Stoner/R.J.Develco Tim Blandford Stormwater Utility file/Project Planner REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: October 2, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #24-96 Evergreen Park Subdivision, Third Replat, 2nd Filing - (LDGS) Replat PLANNER: Leanne Harter All comments must be recieved no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, October 22,1997 As you review the project, Bob Blanchard would like to be notified of issues as they are discovered. GENERAL COMMENTS: See the utility plans for comments and concerns. Date: io/ z j / 9-r Signature: CHECK HERE IF YOU PIISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS` " _ Plat _ Sile _ Dram* Report _ Ok Utility — Rapine Utility _ Landscape City of Fort Collins Commu_-.ty Planning and Environmental services Current Planning October 28, 1997 Mary Wohnrade Northern Engineering 420 South Howes Street Suite 202 Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 RE: Evergreen Park 2"d Filing, Third Replat, #24-96 Dear Mary, City staff has reviewed the revisions submitted for Evergreen Park 2"d Filing, Third Replat, #24-96 and offers the following comments. 1. An updated list of affected property owners must be submitted. The names of affected property owners shall be typed on mailing labels (33 names per sheet-8 '/z x 11 sheets) and a zeroxed list of the labels shall be resubmitted as well. 2. Please replace the vicinity map on the subdivision plat. The attached vicinity map can be used. The one on the revisions is still difficult to read and will not reprint clearly. 3. Please add a general note on the subdivision plat that Lot 1 through Lot 9 on Block One will not have access from Conifer Street. 4. Please add the following language above the signature line for the Director of Engineering (remove it from beneath the signature line as it is somewhat confusing): APPROVED AS TO FORM: By the Director of Engineering of the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, this Day of A.D. Year Director of Engineering 5. Comments from Water/Wastewater, Engineering, and Stormwater are attached. 281 North College Avenue - P0. Box 580 - Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 - (970) 221-6750 - FAX (970) 416-2020 This completes the review comments at this time. The project has been scheduled for an administrative hearing to be held on November 20, 1997, at 1:30 PM at 281 North College Avenue. The lists (on mailing labels) of all Affected Property Owners must be received by Monday, November 3, to allow for proper public notification. If this date is not met, the hearing date will be rescheduled to early December. Please contact me if you have any questions. Best Regards, J Leanne A. Harter, AICP xc: Tim Blandford Stormwater Utility file/Project Planner PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins DATE: 8 May, 1998 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: Evergreen Park, 2 Filing, 3r`i Replat ENGINEER: Tim Blandford All comments must be received by: June 3, 1998 No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) GENERAL COMMENTS: You will need to provide us with an offsite easement for the concrete pan that runs along the north side of Conifer Street. The easement will need to be an original document with original signatures. No copies, faxes, etc. will be accepted. Date: G /9 /98 Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS ® PLAT ® SITE ® UTILITY ® LANDSCAPE Plat: • Remove the language in the note at the top of the page which references vacation of the streets. Street right-of-way can only be vacated by Ordinance of the City Council - not by replat. Unless the rights -of way are changing, there should be no r.o.w. to vacate. If there is existing r.o.w., or portions of existing r.o.w., proposed for vacation, separate legals must be prepared and a vacation Ordinance must be taken through City Council before recording the replat. • If the existing r.o.w. is not changing with this replat, then ideally the boundary for the replat should follow the existing r.o.w. (Yew Court as well as Sitka Street) rather than have a double dedication of r.o.w. • Even though the platted rights--of-way are wider than the normal residential street standard, please provide the standard 9' wide utility easement along the front of all lots to ensure there is adequate room for current methods of utility installation. • Make sure the platted drainage easements match the widths required on the grading and utility plans. Also, it appears sidelot drainage easmeents are necessary. • Please provide a readable and useable vicinity map as noted above. • Label the Conifer Street r.o.w. and its width 2/7 Final Grading and Erosion Control Plan • Please see comments shett 6/7 regarding proposed transverse grate in Conifer Street. 3/7 Final Drainage Plan • Please make sure easements on the plat are adequate for proposed drainage facilities - in particular the swales and pans. • Need more information on existing contours on adjacent lots and additional swale cross -sections. 4/7 Sitka Street and Yew Court Plan and Profile • Try to eliminate cutting existing pavement to get utility services to lots at the ends. It is best if those services can be installed in area to be paved. If existing pavement must be cut, show limits of patching required. • There appear to be errors in the elevations shown in plan view and those shown on the profiles and stationing on south flowline for Sitka Street. Please check and revise. • Complete flowline profile information around return on east flowline Yew Court. • The soils report is outdated. Final pavement design must meet the City's current criteria which went into effect in April. Please obtain a copy in the Engineering Department. • Show the centerline of Yew Court in Sitka profiles. • Maintain a minimum 2.00% (max. 4.00%) cross slope in the cul-de-sac. Standard showing 1.00% minimum is incorrect. 5/7 Overall Utility Plan • Show utility patching at west end of Sitka Street on the street plan also 6/7 Sanitary Sewer Line A Plan/Profile • It should also be noted that this is a detail sheet for the Conifer Street storm sewer • Please show the limits of all proposed cuts and patching of the existing asphalt in Conifer ;3treet. Engineering Inspection will need to review the proposed work. Depending on the condition of the existing roadway, alternative methods of crossing Conifer may be required or additional patching and repair limits may be imposed. • Transverse grates are not a City standard. Supporting documentation must be submitted to evaluate the installation of one for further consideration. The City's concerns include the following: - How effective are these grates ? They tend to plug rather easily. What additional maintenance requirements is such a structure going to add ? - How do they affect snowplowing, sweeping, utility maintenace and other street maintenance operations? - Are they appropriate for streets with bike lanes ? Conifer street is a bike route and as more area of the street is utilized for travel and turn lanes in the future, the bike lanes will get pushed to the outside area where this grate is proposed to be. Please explain why another solution or standard curb opening inlet is not an acceptable design for this situation. Without any supporting documentation and purpose for the use of such a structure, it is not possible to evaluate whether or not to allow its installation. Streets, Stormwater, and Engineering must all agree to allow this structure in the r.o.w. and must be able to justify why it is appropriate to allow anything non-standard. 7/7 General Details - No Comments PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Plannin DATE: 11 April, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #24-96 Third Replat of Evergreen Park 2nd Filing PLANNER: Mike Ludwig ENGINEER: Tim Blandford All comments, must be received by: BNo Problems Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) GENERAL COMMENTS: Sheet 1 of 7: Cover Sheet • Please reference t he soils report/pavement design • Need to reference the project benchmark from the "Black Bolt Survey" Sheet 4 of 7: Sitka Street and Yew Court Plan and Profile Plan View • Dimension the area of pavement to be patched. • The dimensions for the R.O.W. on the plan view do not match what s shown on the `'typical cross-section". Please correct. • Show and reference the 6' concrete pan detail. • Include a legend like what is shown on the other sheets. Comments continued on the next page Date: Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: PLAT SITE UTILITY LANDSCAPE Comments continued from the previous page • Percent grade on the plan view doesn't match what is shown on the profile. Profile View • Missing a station on the profile for Yew Court (west flowline). • The transition segment on Yew Court is too flat. You need to have a minimum of 0.40Xj grade. • Grade breaks need to be included where shown on the profiles. Provide the stations where they are located and the elevations at the particular points. • Need to show the curb return profiles. • Show the cross pan in the profiles. • Need a vertical curve on the east flowline of Yew Court. The grade break is too large. • Extend the flowlines of Sitka Street to the point where it matches up with the existing curb and gutter. • Need to provide grade breaks on both flowline profiles for Sitka Street. General Comments • Some information is missing from the typical asphalt section detail. • The dimensions provided on the typical cross-section don't add up correctly. Please check and modify. Sheet 5 of 7: Overall Utility Plan • Show the patching limits with dimensions. • Some of the text is too small to read. Please enlasrge. • Will there be enough clearance between the water line and the sewer line at the intersection of Yew Court and Sitka Street? If not, need to concrete encase. Make sure that a detail is referenced. • Missing water and sewer services on lot 6 of block 7. • Please clarify the easement along lot 10 of block 6. It seems to be labeled as a 6' utility & drainage easement as well as a 10' drainage easement. • Please label all easements. • Include a not about the type of stationing being used. Is it flowline or centerline stationing? • Will the 3' pan be removed and replaced with a 6' pan between culvert 2 and culvert 3? If so please note. • Include invert elevations on culvert 3. • Show the area being patched for the installation of the storm sewer at inlet 1 and give dimensions. • Need a referenced detail of the outlet to the east detention pond and elevations. Comments continued on the next page ur Comments continued from the previous page Sheet 6 of 7: San. Sewer Line A P&P and Conifer Street Storm Sewer • Show the patching limits with dimensions. • Identify the type of stationing that is being used on the snaitary sewer profile. • Label the size of the tee used. • Need north arrows on the plan views. • Is the stationing flowline or centerline stationing? Please note. Sheet 6 of 7: San. Sewer Line A P&P and Conifer Street Storm Sewer Make sure that all of the details have been referenced throughout the plan set. Sheet 7 of 7: General Details Make sure that all of the details have been referenced throughout the plan set. REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: May 19, 1997 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT: #24-96 Evergreen Park Subdivision, 3rd Replat (LDGS) PLANNER: Leanne Harter All comments, must be recieved no later than the staff review meeting: Wednesday, June 11, 1997 GENERAL COMMENTS: SHEET I OF 7: COVER SHEET • PLEASE MOCiIFY THE GENERAL NOTES. A COPY OF THE GENERAL NOTES IS INCLUDED FOR YOUR REFERENCE. SHEET I OF I : THIRD REPLAT OF EVERGREEN PARK SECOND FILING • WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE A LETTER FROM THE U.S.B.R. STATING THAT IT IS ALRIGHT TO SHARE THEIR EASEMENT WITH THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT. • REFER TO SHEET I OF I FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. SHEET 4 OF 7: SITKA STREET AND YEW COURT PLAN AND PROFILE • PROVIDE CROSS -SECTIONS ALONG SITKA STREET EVERY 50'. • YOU WILL NEED TO CONTACT RICK RICHTER REGARDING THE SOILS REPORT THAT IS REFERENCED. IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THIS REPORT WILL NEED BE UPDATED TO MEET OUR CURRENT STANDARDS. • SHOW A TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION OF YEW COURT. COMMENTS CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE OW Date: 9 _iu,.,E ,1997 Signature: CHECK HERE IF YOU KNISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS x Plat _ Site _ Iha * Report x Utility x Rt" Utility Iand* City of Fort Collins COMMENTS CONTINUED FROM THE PREVIOUS PAGE... • PROVIDE STATION EQUATIONS AT THE PCR'S. • INDICATE THAT THE TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION ALONG SITKA STREET VARIES. • REFER TO SHEET NUMBER 4 OF 7 FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. SHEET 55 OF 7: OVERALL UTILITY PLAN • SHOW THE REPLACEMENT OF THE ASPHALT PATCHING ON SITKA STREET TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE STREET, INCLUDING THE CONCRETE PAN. • SHOW WHERE THE CROSS -SECTIONS OF THE VALLEY PANS ARE BEING TAKEN AT. MAKE SURE THAT THE CROSS -SECTIONS ARE REFERENCED. • REFER TO SHEET NUMBER 5 OF 7 FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. SHEET 6 OF 7: SAN. SEWER LINE A P&P AND CONIFER STREET STORM SEWER • INDICATE ON THE PLAN VIEW WHERE THE CROSS -SECTIONS FOR THE PANS ARE BEING 11 CUT". • LABEL PAN II , PAN 2, AND THE EXISTING PAN CLEARLY ON THE PLAN VIEWS. • THE SCHEDULE FOR THE PROPOSED PANS IS TOO SMALL. PLEASE ENLARGE. • REFER TO SHEET NUMBER 6 OF 7 FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. SHEET 7 OF 7: GENERAL DETAILS • MAKE SURE THAT ALL OF THE DETAILS HAVE BEEN REFERENCED THROUGHOUT THE PLAN SET. • NEED TO PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE HANDICAP ACCESS BEING PROPOSED. Commu..lty Planning and Environmental services Current Planning City of Fort Collins June 16, 1997 Mary Wohnrade Northern Engineering 420 South Howes Street Suite 202 Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 RE: Evergreen Park 2"d Filing, Third Replat, #24-96 Dear Mary, City staff has reviewed the revisions submitted for Evergreen Park 2"d Filing, Third Replat, #24-96 and offers the following comments. 1. An earlier correspondence dated September 26, 1996, from Mitch Haas, stated "The pavement division of the Engineering Department has stated that the soils rE)port is out of date, and a new soils investigation is needed. The pavement designs should be revised accordingly." This comment was never addressed and remains applicable. Please submit a new soils investigation and revised pavement designs. 2. An updated list of affected property owners must be submitted. The names of affected property owners shall be typed on mailing labels (33 names per sheet-8 1/z x 11 sheets) and a zeroxed list of the labels shall be resubmitted as well. 3. The Vicinity Map is still difficult to read. In addition, please show the zoning on the Vicinity Map, note the scale, and better highlight the location of the site. (See redlined plans for further comments.) 4. Renumber and label the notes as shown on the redlines. 5. Comments from Water/Wastewater, Engineering, and Stormwater are attached. This completes the review comments at this time. Additional comments may be forthcoming as the various departments and reviewing agencies continue to review this request. Please provide a written response to each of the above stated comments with the submittal of plan revisions. Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have any questions or concerns that are related to the comments. If you would like to 281 ?north College Avenue • PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020