Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEVANGELICAL COVENANT CHURCH PUD LOT 1 4825 SOUTH LEMAY AVENUE - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2003-07-31CONCEP-LIAL REVIEW STAFF COMMENTS MEETING DATE: December 10, 1984 IT E M : Oakridge West PUD - Master Plan APPLICANT: Eldon Ward, Cityscape Urban Design, 419 Canyon, Suite 300, Fort Collins, CO 80521 LAND USE DATA: 27 acres of church, office and neighborhood shopping in the Master Plan and 10 acres of church and office (5 acres each) in the preliminary plan, located on the southwest corner of Harmony Road and Lemay Avenue COMMENTS: 1. Future school or day care facilities associated with the church should be planned for at this time. 2. Should submit preliminary plans for conceptual review before submitting. 3. Water lines are existing. Some extensions will be required. 4. Traffic Impact Study will be required. 5. Oakridge Drive will change its name as it bends south. 6. Question office land use. If it is "best" land use then character of office needs to be residential. Also question need for another neighborhood shopping in this area. 7. Clustering of office buildings is recommended. Office buildings should be reduced in height near future residential. Jim Cox From: Elaine Kleckner February 25, 1985 Page 3 24. The Traffic Impact Study states that a child care center is a proposed use but your written narrative does not state this. Please clarify what the proposed uses are. 25. Show future expansions on the site plan. 26. Additional parking may be desirable. I suggest we discuss this topic when we meet. Before Staff can proceed with processing the application for development approval, a revised site plan reflecting the above comments will be required. For those items that cannot be shown on the site plan, a letter resolving those issues should be provided. Revisions are due in the Planning Office by noon on March 5, 1985. I would suggest we meet as soon as possible to discuss the Staff comments. Colored renderings and reductioons are due by 4:30 on March 15 along with 10 copies of the plan for the Planning and Zoning Board. If I can assist in any way, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, / Elaine Klec ner Planner cc: Sam Mutch, Planning Director Bonnie Tripoli, Development Coordinator 'V D A TE 29 Mar 85 DEPARTj+ ITE`� 9-85B EVANGELICAL COVENANT CHURCH PUD, Phase I Cuo""MMENTS i DA it 29 Mar 85 DE7")ARTNIE FEN]: 9-85B EVANGELICAL COVENANT CHURCH PUD, Phase i CITY OF FORT COLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION April 30, 1985 Ms. Alli Efthimiou Lee Architecture Plus, P.C. 318 East Oak Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 Dear AlIi; Staff has reviewed the Final PUD Plan for Evangelical Covenant Church and would like to offer the following comments. Revisions reflecting these comments should be submitted by 4:30 on Friday, May 3rd, to guarantee a spot on the May Planning and Zoning Board agenda. Revisions that cannot be shown on the plans should be addressed in writing. 1. A temporary turnaround on Oakridge Drive should be shown on the site plan and the plat. It can be dedicated on the plat or by separate document. 2. A widening of Lemay is to be completed with this project. Bonnie Tripoli should have a Development Agreement completed within the week to address this and Oakridge Drive. 3. Compact parking spaces can be smaller. Check zoning requirements. Dimension the width of all stalls. 4. Please make sure that all revisions to the Preliminary PUD that occurred after the Final submittal are reflected on the Final PUD plan. Check my letters of February 25th and April 12th to see that these requirements have been met. Changes occurred in engineering, land- scaping, site plan and elevations. You will also recall that some of the detailed information on the Oakridge alignment was removed from the site plan and the extent of the first phase was clarified. 5. In terms of storm drainage, Bonnie has forwarded comments to Phil Robinson of Stewart and Associates. Revisions and more detail have been requested. w .w OFFICE OF COMMUNITY e 300 LaPorte Ave. • P O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 • (303)221-6750 DEVELOPMFNT, PLANNING DIVISION Evangelical Church Co nts 4/30/85 - Page 2 6. The building envelope and dimensions should be shown on the site plan. Show distances of the envelope to at least two property lines. 7. At least 6% interior parking lot landscaping is required. Intensifica- tion of shrub plantings around the parking area could satisfy this requirement. 8. Show bike racks. 9. Indicate that compact parking spaces will be signed accordingly. 10. The width of utility easements on the plat and site plan are not consistent. 11. The Police Department sees the need for additional parking lot and walkway lighting. 12. Approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan was conditioned on additional foundation plantings on the Final PUD landscape plan. Colored renderings and PMT's are due by 4:30 on Friday, May loth. Final documents, such as mylars, Development Agreement and Site and Landscape Covenants, are due by noon on May 16th. If I can provide any other information, please let me know. Sincerely, �laTne Kleckner Planner CC: Sam Mutch, Planning Director Bonnie Tripoli, Development Coordinator Commu.uty Planniniz and Environmental �crvices [Tanning Department Cite of Fort Collins November 15, 1993 Mr. Ken Field Robb, Brenner and Brelig Architects 125 South Howes Street Fort Collins, CO 80521 Dear Ken: Staff has completed its interdepartmental review for Evangelical Covenant Church, Phase Two, Preliminary and Final P.U.D. The following comments are offered: 1. The driveway radius at Oak Ridge Drive can only be a maximum of 20 feet, not 30 feet as shown. One option would be to widen the drive section from 24 up to a maximum of 35 feet but the radius should be 20 feet. 2. Please utilize the current detached sidewalk standard which calls for a detached sidewalk that becomes attached at the ramp at the intersection. Since Oak Ridge Drive is a collector strixt, the walk should be four feet wide and detached from the back of curb by a minimum of 4.5 feet. If the walk meanders outside of the public right-of-way, then it must be placed within a dedicated access easement and have a minimum centerline radius of 60 feet. 3. The plat should include the surveyor's certificate, and include full curve data in the legal description. 4. Driveways must be constructed of concrete to the property line. 5. The Utility and Grading Plan needs more detail on the limits of the detention pond and should show the dimensions of the parking lot. ���I \llrth Averuu • P 0 13oV For- Collm,, (ll K(1���'_�����1� • �. ,Il;� 11!_ ---i� 6. U.S. West cautions that any relocation of existing facilities required by these plans will be paid for by the developer. 7. The Poudre Fire Authority requires that the fire sprinkler service line be connected to the fire sprinkler system on the north side of the building directly adjacent to the sidewalk on. Oak Ridge Drive. 8. The fire service water main must be calculated to meet the design requirements for automatic fire extinguishing standards as specified by the National Fire Protection Area (13), and sized accordingly. 9. Since the sidewalk on Oak Ridge Drive is going to be detached, there should be street trees located between the sidewalk and the curb. Perhaps a portion of the trees that are located south of the sidewalk could be shifted north. The applicant is encouraged to consider adding and shifting trees accordingly so there is a formal streetscape on Oak Ridge Drive. 10. Staff is concerned about the appearance on the west elevation of the gymnasium. This area would benefit from additional landscape material to minimize the mass of the structure. 11. The site plan should include dimensions of the building footprints of the additions. 12. Staff is concerned about exterior security lighting. The P.U.D. should indicate that all building and pole -mounted fixtures shall feature down directional, sharp cut-off luminaries. This would address the issues related to light spillage off the site. The height of the pole -mounted fixtures should also be specified. Also, Staff is encouraging the use of high pressure sodium as the lamp versus mercury vapor or metal halide. High pressure sodium is more energy efficient and casts a soft yellowish glow, not a sharp bluish glow. 13. Staff suggests that the gymnasium elevation feature one or two horizontal reveals to add depth to the: facade and help break up the mass. 14. The Planning and Zoning Board approval block should delete the reference to 1987. This concludes Staff comments at this time. In order to stay on schedule for the December 13, Planning and Zoning Board meeting, please note the following deadlines: Plan revisions are due November 24, 1993. P.M.T.'s, '10 prints, renderings are due Dec. 6, 1993. Attached is a request for information that will be necessary in the drafting of the Development Agreement. This document should be completed and returned. Also, please note that comments from the Engineering Department are being forwarded to the consulting engineer under separate cover. As always, please call if there are any questions or concerns regarding these comments. Sincerely: Ted Shepard Senior Planner xc: Sherry Albertson -Clark, Chief Planner Kerrie Ashbeck, Civil Engineer CONCE2 TUAL REVIEW Sa, a G ]jME MEETING DATE: ,January 14, 1985 ITEM : Evangelica Covenant Church APPLICANT: Jim Cox, Architecture Plus, 318 East Oak, Fort Collins, CO 80521 LAND USE DATA: 30,000 square feet of church on 5 acres, located on the west side of South Lemay approximately 1/2 mile south of Harmony Road COMMENTS: 1. Easements will be required along all streets (15 foot along Lemay and 8 foot along other streets). 2. On -site detention of storm drainage will be required. If it is a part of overall drainage system, this needs to be indicated. 3. Lemay Avenue will need to be fully improved as it abuts the property. 4. The phasing of streets will need to be addressed. Normally, all streets need to be installed at front end. 5. Curb cut to parking needs to be approximately 200 feet from Lemay Avenue. This means shifting the building. 6. Traffic impact study will be required. This study should be a factor in future plans for day care, school, etc. The traffic impact study needs to address need for curb cut to Lemay Avenue. Curb cut to Lemay should not be a jo nt curb cut to adjacent properties. _ 7. Oakridge Drive alignment and design needs to be justified in terms of larger properties west of Lemay Avenue. DATA 5 FEb 85 mommomm" wmwmmmwm� IDEPARTMENOT «--x 7•�--m ITBAm 1-85B FOSSIL CREEK COMMERCIAL PUD - MASTER PLAN COMMENTS a �� �'A TE. 5 Feb 85 Ljr.RTMENT r�� 1 -85C FOSSIL CREEK COMMERCIAL, 1st PHASE f Preliminary ITEM: COMMENTS 641 6 Feb 85 DAP T= Z] T =two I TE11: 9-85 EVANGELICAL COVENANT CHURCH - MASTER'PLAN I r 1 6 FEB 85) T 1l E i `' i fT DO '� 9-85A EVANGELICAL COVENANT CHURCH - Preliminar -106 1-) 6 MEM0RAMDU;I Bob Snow Mountain Bell-Eytginee ri:ng �124 ], Magnol i a TO: _ ollins, CO 80521 FR0",1: Bonnie Tripoli, Development Coordinator RE: Utility Plans DATE: February 7, 1985 FEB 1 0 GEPASI.M1Et4'f Submitted for your revieA and comment are utility plans for Evangelical Covenant Church Please respond by February 22, 1985 CITY OF FORT COLLINS February 25, 1985 Mr. Jim Cox Architecture Plus 318 East Oak Street Fort Collins, CO 80521 Dear Jim: Staff has reviewed the Master Plan and Phase 1 Preliminary PUD Plan for Evangelical Covenant Church and would like to offer the following comments: Mactar Plan 1. Floor area of each phase should be shown. 2. Pedestrian and bicycle routes should be shown on the Master Plan. 3. In terms of development phasing, more detail is needed. For example, in what order would future phases be added and what parking serves those future phases or sub -phases? Preliminary Plan 1. A 10 foot utility easement must provided along all streets according to Light and Power. 2. Temporary storm drainage is required for the site at least until the improvement under the railroad berm is in place. The release rate from the site must not exceed the historic rate. The final drainage report must be much more detailed and the Storm Drainage Department suggests that you refer to the Drainage Manual. 3. No outlet presently exists for the sanitary sewer serving this property. 4. The plan mustbe properly dimensioned. We cannot complete our review without detailed dimensioning of right -of -way, driveways, parking, walkways, etc. OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER Jim Cox From: Elaine Kleckner February 25, 1985 Page 2 5. Streets must be designed to City standards. In terms of design, a parking area off of Oak Ridge Drive would work better. 6. All walkways and handicapped ramps must be shown on the plan. 7. A City standard curb cut on Lemay is required. 8. Include the right -of way for Oak Ridge Drive as a part of this property. 9. Phasing of Oak Ridge Drive must be determined. We should meet to discuss this as soon as possible. 10. The project must be a part of a subdivision. A Preliminary Subdivision Plat is required at this stage of the planning process. 11. The project must be a PUD. Include this in the title. 12. Show property line dimensions on the site plan. 13. Indicate the building envelope and show dimensions. Show the distance to property lines. 14. Clearly designate the property boundary. 15. Raised curbing should be provided in the parking lot to protect landscaping. 16. All signs must comply with the Sign Code. 17. Oak Ridge Drive must be in place to meet fire access requirements. 18. Provide one hydrant near the Lemay entrance and two on Oak Ridge Drive. 19. The building must be fully sprinklered. Check with the Fire Department on additional requirements. 20. Landscaping should be intensified overall. Plantings along the public right-of-way should be increased with both deciduous and coniferous plantings. Include a schedule of plant materials and provide more detail on the areas against the building. Provide a description of ground cover and proposed methods of maintenance. Show existing vegetation on the plan if there is any. 21. The architectural elevations lack detail. Please describe exterior materials, colors, texture, etc. 22. The west elevation appears particularly massive. Steps should be taken to make the design more compatible with residential development. 23. Provide information on proposed signage.