Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOTTONWOOD RIDGE - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2003-07-31SEP 22,95 11:15 FR US WEST FT COLLINS 3032247600 TO 9-2216370 P.01iO3 cityof red couins Cux mntP1a ninQ PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DATE: 18 September 1995 DEPARTMENT. qsWE57F PROJECT: #31-94A/CotConwood Ridge Subdivision: Final PLANNER: Stove Galt AI comments must be received by: Friday, 29 September !__t No Problems ® Problems or Concerns (see below) Date: Signature: Signature: CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECE VE PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS: SITE LANDSCAPE UTILITY q_vMp VkMA,% i Y1.AXMMU %7 *M 4"WONmNFAL sERvicm .. 2M NORTH COLLEGE, P.O.BO% WO FORT COUWI , C4owRA w S05=4M �M)222-6958 CUMULI PLANNING 1CPAIMTNT -2- RIGHT OF WA Y - How do we get to the ditch, and how many feet do we have to burn, maintain, spray herbicides, clean, move earth, and etc... ? This right of way shall be conveyed to the ditch company with a warranty deed free of liens and encumbrances. *See attached copy Seven Springs Ranch P.U.D. Paragraph 8 page 6 DRAINAGE - How is drainage going to be kept our of the Trilby Lateral Ditch? The topography of the land causes many concerns with drainage especially the elevation of the Trilby. *See attached copy Seven Springs Ranch P.U.D. Paragraph 13 page 8 UTILITY LINES - including water, sewer, gas, electric, and cable TV will be located under Trilby Lateral Ditch. *See attached copy Seven Springs Ranch P.U.D. Paragraph 14 pages 8 and 9 CONCRETE LINING OF TRILBY LATERAL DITCH - the developer has the responsibiltity for lining the ditch with concrete. *See attached copy Seven Springs Ranch P. U. D. Paragraph 7 pages 5 and 6 PROTECTIVE COVENANTS - the developer has the responsibility for these covenants. *See attached copy Seven Springs Ranch P.U.D. Paragraphs 15 & 16 pages 9, 10, and 11 TRESPASSING - the developer needs to read *copy Seven Springs Ranch P.U.D. Paragraph 17 pages 11 and 12 RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF DEVELOPER - the developer needs to read *copy Seven Springs Ranch P.U.D. Paragraph 20 page 13 -3- The developers need to read the Seven Springs P. U. D. (23 October 79) and use it as the official guide line for their relationship with the Trilby Lateral Ditch Co.. This document was designed and written to avoid problems that have happened with, developers and ditch companies in the past. Sincerely, James W. Robbins, President Trilby Lateral Ditch Company cc: Trilby Lateral stock holders James Martell, Attorney at Law COTTONWOOD RIDGE SUBDIVISION - 2ND REVIEW JANUARY 2, 1 996 PLAT: PAGE I OF 4 • PLEASE REMOVE REFERENCE TO TRACTS IN THE DEDICATION STATEMENT. THE TRACTS THEMSELVES ARE NOT BEING DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC. HOWEVER, THE TRACTS NEED TO BE CALLED OUT AND LABELED AS EASEMENTS WHEREVER APPLICABLE. EASEMENTS ARE DEDICATED l"O THE PUBLIC/CITY UNLESS THEY ARE FOR PRIVATE PURPOSES (SUCH AS IRRIGATION LATERALS) AND LABELED AS SUCH. • THE ATTORNEY'S CERTIFICATION SHOULD BE MOVED OVER BY THE STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP. THIS IS NOT THE CITY ATTORNEY IT IS THE OWNER'S PRIVATE ATTORNEY CERTIFYING THE OWNERSHIP. • NOTE 55 REFERENCES CONSTRUCTION OF A FENCE - WHO IS CONSTRUCTING IT AND WHEN? I'M NOT SURE THIS NOTE NEEDS TO BE ON THE PLAT, IT IS MORE APPROPRIATE FOR THE UTILITY PLANS. • NOTE 9 SHOULD STATE THAT NO PORTION OF ANY STRUCTURE IS ALLOWED IN THE SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT AREA. HEIGHT OF FENCES AND VEGETATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 316°. • REMOVE THE APPLICANT AND OWNER LISTING ON THE RIGHT. THE OWNERSHIP STATEMENT AND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE ARE THE APPROPRIATE STATEMENTS FOR THIS INFORMATION. PAGE 3 OF 4 • SHEETS 3 AND 4 DUPLICATE INFORMATION - TYPICALLY THE MATCH LINE IS A COMMON BOUNDARY THAT FOLLOWS LOT LINES AND THEN EVERYTHING BEYOND IS GHOSTED OUT SO THERE IS NO OVERLAP OF INFORMATION FROM SHEET TO SHEET. THIS IS A DRAFTING PREFERENCE ONLY, NOT A REQUIREMENT. • ALL TRACTS MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED AS TO WHETHER THEY ARE EASEMENTS AND IF SO WHAT TYPE OF EASEMENT, NOTES MUST BE ADDED TO STATE PURPOSE, OWNERSHIP, AND MAINTENANCE OF EACH TRACT. • TYPICALLY, REAR LOT EASEMENTS ARE NEEDED FOR ALL LOTS INCLUDING THOSE WHICH ABUT TRACTS SINCE US WEST AND CABLE T.V. STILL GO WITHIN LOTS AND NOT IN THE TRACTS. • IS THE PV AND L CANAL TRACT EXISTING LAND OWNED BY THEM OR IS IT BEING CREATED WITH THIS PLAT AND DEEDED TO THEM? AGAIN, PLEASE ADD NOTES TO EXPLAIN PURPOSE, OWNERSHIP, AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATION FOR ALL TRACTS. • THERE ARE PARCELS WHICH ARE NOT LABELED NEXT TO LOTS 31 AND 32. • THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AT THE UPPER RIGHT CORNER IS BEING REPLATTED WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE OLD EASEMENT IS BEING VACATED BY THIS PLAT. • THE BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT SHOULD BE MODIFIED TO SHOW THAT 20 FEET OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR SHIELDS STREET IS BEING DEDICATED WITH THIS PLAT AND LABELED AS SUCH. • PARCEL B IS LABELED TRACT E" ON SHEET 4, WHICH IS IT? WHAT IS THIS PARCEL INTENDED FOR? IT MUST BE DEEDED TO THE OWNER OF THE OUTPARCEL SINCE CITY CODE DOES NOT ALLOW ANYONE TO CREATE A STRIP OF LAND OWNED BY SOMEONE ELSE BETWEEN A PROPERTY AND A PUBLIC STREET. THE CITY WILL NEED PROOF THAT THE PARCEL IS BEING DEEDED TO THE OWNER OF THE OUTPARCEL. • THE EASEMENT NOTES ARE UNCLEAR. IT MAY BE CLEANER AND EASIER TO CALL OUT A 1 O FOOT EASEMENT THAN A 9.1 7 FOOT EASEMENT. NOTE 3 IS NOT CLEAR AS TO WHICH BOUNDARY IS BEING REFERRED TO - ALSO, THESE NOTES ARE OFTEN OVERLOOKED BY HOMEOWNERS AND BUILDERS - IT IS BEST TO JUST SHOW ALL EASEMENTS ON THE LOTS. • SOME OF THE IRRIGATION LATERAL, TRAIL, AND UTILITY EASEMENT BOUNDARIES ARE UNCLEAR. PLEASE DEFINE THE LIMITS, START AND END OF EACH EASEMENT BY ADDING LINES AND/OR APPROPRIATE NOTES AND DIMENSIONS. THE IRRIGATION LATERALS SHOULD BE IN PRIVATE EASEMENTS AT WHATEVER WIDTH IS REQUESTED BY THE DITCH COMPANIES. THEREFORE, ADDITIONAL UTILITY EASEMENT IS NECESSARY ADJACENT TO THE PRIVATE EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY INSTALLATION PAGE 4 OF 4 • REMOVE "RAVINE" AND JUST LABEL AS TRACT F. • SAME COMMENTS AS FOR PAGE 3 - DEFINE AND DIMENSION EASEMENTS, NOTE PURPOSE, OWNERSHIP, AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL TRACTS • THE APPLEWOOD IRRIGATION EASEMENT IS CUT OFF BY THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR MICA COURT - IS ADDITIONAL EASEMENT NECESSARY ? • AS NOTED ON THE LAST REVIEW, ADD A PLAT NOTE TO RESTRICT DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO LOT I TO THE WESTERNMOST EDGE OF THE LOT. THAT WAY , IF AND WHEN THE OUTPARCEL REDEVELOPS AND STREET ACCESS TO SHIELDS COULD BE CONSTRUCTED OPPOSITE THE ENTRANCE TO CLARENDON HILLS, THE STREET STUB OF KININAK CIRCLE COULD BE REMOVED AND LOT I WILL STILL HAVE STREET FRONTAGE AND ACCESS WITH MINIMAL DISRUPTION. • REFERENCE TO PLAT NOTE 9 IS NOT CORRECT. UTILITY PLANS TITLE SHEET • PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE HYDROLOGIC STUDY DONE FOR THE SUBDRAIN SYSTEM. THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT HAS NOT RECEIVED ONE YET • RENUMBER SHEETS TO INCLUDE TITLE SHEET AS PAGE I SHEET I AND 2 • /' PHASING IS INOT CLEAR. PLEASE USE ANOTHER METHOD OF SHOWING PHASE LINES AND INDICATE WHAT IMPROVEMENTS ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED WITH EACH PHASE. ANY TEMPORARY MEASURES SUCH AS SWALES, FIRE HYDRANTS, TURNAROUNDS AT THE END OF DEAD END STREETS.... MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ANY TEMPORARY TURNAROUNDS WILL REQUIRE DEDICATION OF A TEMPORARY EASEMENT. • , MODIFY THE SIDEWALK ALONG SHIELDS STREET TO MATCH THE CURRENT STANDARD - SAMPLE ATTACHED TO SHEET 22 SHEET 3 • WATER AND SEWER PLANS SHOULD REFERENCE SHEETS FOR SUBDRAIN DESIGN • PLEASE PROVIDE A LEGEND TO DELINEATE WATER LINES, SEWER LINES, SUBDRAIN SYSTEM, STORM SEWERS, AND LATERALS • CLEARLY SHOW PHASING AND LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EACH PHASE SHEET 4 • SAME COMMENTS AS SHEET 3 • NEED OFF -SITE EASEMENT/APPROVALS FOR THE IRRIGATION WORK ON THE RIDGES PROPERTY • REFERENCE DETAIL FOR APPLEWOOD IRRIGATION CONNECTION TO EXISTING PVC • SHOW THE DESIGN FOR THE INTERIM CONNECTION TO SHIELDS _STREET TO THE EXISTING E.O.A. SEE COMMENTS ON SHEET 22 SHEET 5 THROUGH SHEET 9 • THE CITY NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT IS REVIEWING THE PROPOSED CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, DROP STRUCTURES, ... THE STORMWATER AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WILL BE MEETING WITH THEM TO GO OVER THE PROPOSED DESIGN AND ANY COMMENTS WILL BE FORWARDED SEPARATELY. SHEET 1 O THROUGH 1 3 • PROVIDE A LEGEND TO DISTINGUISH WATER LINES, SEWER LINES, SUBDRAINS, .. • SHOW PHASE LINES AND LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EACH PHASE INCLUDING ANY INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS NECESSARY FOR ANY GIVEN PHASE. • THE CITY DOES NOT ROUTE PLANS TO THE DISTRICT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL SO YOU WILL NEED TO WORK WITH THE WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT DIRECTLY (TERRY FARRILL) • THE SEWER PROFILE SHOULD SHOW THE SUBDRAIN AND CLEANOUTS SHEET 1 4 THROUGH 1 6 • THE SEPARATE SHEETS SHOWING THE SUBDRAIN SYSTEM ARE APPRECIATED, HOWEVER, PLEASE SHOW THE SUBDRAIN SYSTEM MORE CLEARLY IN THE PLAN VIEW. INCLUDE CLEANOUT LOCATIONS IN PLAN VIEW AND CLEARLY SHOW OUTFALL FOR SYSTEM AS WELL AS START POINT. • ON CLEANOUT DETAIL, CALL OUT TYPE AND SIZE OF PIPE SPECIFIED FOR THE CLEANOUT • PLEASE REFERENCE DETAILS FROM SHEET TO SHEET FOR CLEANOUT AND SERVICE WYE SHEET 1 9 THROUGH 21 • OVERALL, GOOD STREET DESIGN INFORMATION - CURVE DATA, CENTERLINE STATIONING, TRUE LENGTH OF CURVES, PROFILES AROUND CURB RETURNS, SPOT ELEVATIONS.... MADE IT EASY TO CHECK KEY DESIGN POINTS • WATCH SPOT ELEVATIONS AROUND THE CURB RETURNS THEY ARE FLAT IN SOME LOCATIONS PLEASE MODIFY TO DRAIN AND NOT CREATE "BIRD BATHS" AT THE RETURN • BE SURE STREET NAMES REFERENCED MATCH NEW STREET NAMES • SHOW PHASE LINES AND ANY TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENTS NECESSARY AT THE END OF ANY GIVEN PHASE - E.G. A TEMPORARY 80' DIAMETER ROAD BASE TURNAROUND IS NEEDED AT THE TEMPORARY DEAD END OF ANY PUBLIC STREET. IN ADDITION, A TEMPORARY EASEMENT MUST BE GRANTED FOR ANY SUCH TURNAROUND. • IT IS SUFFICIENT TO CARRY ALL STREET GRADES AND SPOT ELEVATIONS OUT TO THE NEAREST HUNDREDTH. • A FEW GRADES AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE MISSING ON THE PROFILES. PLEASE CHECK. • CALL OUT CLASS OF PIPE FOR IRRIGATION LATERAL CROSSINGS. THE PIPE MUST WITHSTAND TYPICAL LOADING FOR THE COVER PROVIDED. • DEFINE CROWN TRANSITION IN AND OUT OF THE MID BLOCK CROSS PAN ON PLAN VIEW SHEET 22 • PLEASE SHOW THE IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO THE OUTPARCEL TO BE CONSTRUCTED • PLEASE MODIFY THE SIDEWALK ALONG SHIELDS STREET TO MEET THE NEW STANDARD SAMPLE PROVIDED • A SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN IS REQUIRED. • CITY STAFF HAS DISCUSSED WHAT IS TO BE DONE ABOUT THE IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO THE OUTPARCEL AND THE COTTONWOOD RIDGE SUBDIVISION. THE CITY WOULD FRONT THE COST TO BUILD THE IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO THE OUTPARCEL AT SUCH TIME AS THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH ARE CONSTRUCTED. IN ADDITION TO THE SHIELDS STREET DESIGN ALREADY PROVIDED FOR THE ARTERIAL WIDENING, THE CITY IS REQUESTING COTTONWOOD RIDGE TO DESIGN AN INTERIM IMPROVEMENT ALONG SHIELDS STREET MUCH LIKE WHAT WAS DONE WITH THE LAURIE P.U.D. TO THE SOUTH (GRADING, SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION, INTERIM CONNECTION TO EXISTING EDGE OF ASPHALT). THE DEVELOPER WOULD THEN ESCROW HIS PORTION OF THE SHIELDS STREET IMPROVEMENTS (CURB AND GUTTER, PORTION OF THE PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK IF HE CHOOSES NOT TO CONSTRUCT IT NOW). THAT WAY, THE CITY CAN CONSTRUCT A LARGER PORTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE FUTURE ALL AT ONCE INSTEAD OF IN A PIECEMEAL FASHION. FOR EXAMPLE WHEN THE GRESS PROPERTY REDEVELOPS AND/OR WHEN THE CITY WIDENS THE WEST SIDE OF SHIELDS TO THE SOUTH OF LAURIE P.U.D., THE IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO COTTONWOOD RIDGE AND LAURIE P.U.D. WOULD ALSO BE CONSTRUCTED. THIS IS DONE THROUGHOUT THE CITY WHERE DEVELOPMENT IS NOT OCCURRING IN A CONTIGUOUS FASHION AND THE WIDENED STREET CAPACITY IS NOT NEEDED IMMEDIATELY. THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WILL INCLUDE LANGUAGE DESCRIBING THE DEVELOPERS OBLIGATION FOR SHIELDS STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND THE ESCROW. (PLEASE NOTE THAT THE WESTBURY P. U. D. TO THE NORTH IS CONSTRUCTING THEIR SHIELDS STREET IMPROVEMENTS NOW SINCE A TURN LANE INTO WESTBURY DRIVE IS NEEDED, OTHERWISE THE CITY WOULD HAVE JUST COLLECTED MONEY IN ESCROW AND BUILT THE IMPROVEMENTS LATER WHEN THEY COULD BE PART OF A SHIELDS STREET WIDENING PROJECT ADJACENT TO MORE PROPERTIES) • THE CITY DOES REQUIRE THE DESIGN TO BE COMPLETED FOR THE ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENTS - WHICH HAS BEEN PROVIDED, PLEASE ADD TO THE PLANS THE INTERIM GRADING AND IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO SHIELDS. THE LAURIE P.U.D CHOSE TO CONSTRUCT THE SIDEWALK AS A WAY TO PROVIDE A FINISHED EDGE TO THE PROJECT BUT IS ESCROWING FUNDS FOR THE ULTIMATE CURB AND GUTTER AND DEVELOPERS PORTION OF THE PAVEMENT. • FOR ARTERIAL STREET DESIGN, INCLUDE THE EXISTING FLOWLINE ON THE EAST SIDE OF SHIELDS. IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE PROFILE LABELED "EXISTING SECTION LINE'S IS ALSO THE EXISTING CENTERLINE • DESIGN THE VERTICAL CURVE FOR A 50 M.P.H. DESIGN SPEED SHEETS 23 THROUGH 25 • MINOR COMMENTS NOTED ON PLANS - STREET NAMES, GRADES TO THE NEAREST HUNDREDTH, SHOW CROWN LINE IN OFFSET CUL-DE-SAC SHEETS 26 AND 27 • SINCE THE CITY WILL LIKELY RECONSTRUCT THE EAST SIDE OF SHIELDS STREET AT THE TIME THE WEST SIDE OF SHIELDS IS CONSTRUCTED, THE CROSS SLOPES DESIGNED ARE ACCEPTABLE:. NORMALLY, ARTERIAL STREETS ARE DESIGNED AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO A 2.00% CROSS -SLOPE SO FUTURE OVERLAYS DON'T RESULT IN EXCESSIVE CROSS - SLOPES. THE CITY WILL BE LOWERING THE CENTERLINE SINCE THE EAST SIDE HAS GREATER THAN 2.00% CROSS -SLOPES AND THUS THE CROSS -SLOPES AS DESIGNED FOR THE WEST SIDE ARE WITHIN A RANGE THAT WILL WORK TO CREATE CLOSE TO A 2.00% CROSS SLOPE ON THE WEST AND EAST SIDES. THE NEED TO RECONSTRUCT THE EAST SIDE OF SHIELDS IS ANOTHER REASON THE CITY WOULD LIKE COTTONWOOD RIDGE TO ESCROW FUNDS AND DELAY CONSTRUCTION OF THE ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENTS ON THE WEST SIDE OF SHIELDS STREET UNTIL A LATER TIME WHEN A LARGER PROJECT CAN BE DONE AS A WHOLE. ALSO, BY THAT TIME, THE OUTPARCEL MAY BE READY TO REDEVELOP. SHEET 26 • NEED DESIGN OF PARAPET WALLS SHEET 30 AND 31 • SPECIFY CLASS OF PIPE TO BE USED UNDER STREET. MUST BE DESIGNED TO CARRY LOADING FOR COVER PROVIDED - PLEASE PROVIDE CALCS City of Fort, Collins Planninq DATE: PROJECT "" COMMENTSHEET DEPARTMENT: PROJECT: PLANNER: All comments must be received by: ❑ No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below) U1'17D� "� GUi� 'ENT WQ �IE t�DT11U coPY 'TkYYP1 ON 1.'(�Ul D � Cif �' V� i'fk1" � i�'��1 � 'D�E�� C-� ►J l ISC-1,U Date: Signature: CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS: ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE UTILITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 PLANNING DEPARTMENT (303)221-6750 • D�� . tati��rt• W1lh� ��tc.� VU1Ut,iNLj ye-t—FLAIT7, rM JVJ (�.; C-, L� ► IJ mkt ����k _�� CQN ST��: �� G�,�m-I.Y . �� ► s wow 1 u v � Tit eo 'D•I-�f—�G.c.11�-�- -� D(ZC-�����) OAS %IU 6N'tla -ems`j-, w) ui�jle G . i1S CAIJ 1FWI VIE-7 00UB��tcGN Td At)- 4 J 1.v7 (S fp<F A,Tl rO,,,, COTTONWOOD RIDGE P.U.D. Engineering Department Comments August 20, 1996 1/39 Title Sheet: • If necessan/, update date on final mylars to match month of submittal of final mylars. • City approval block must appear on all sheets of the utility plan set (except the plat). If the City does not need to sign certain sheets we will mark N/A. * Just a reminder that all ditch companies, irrigation lateral representatives, and the Water and Sanitation District, must sign the final mylars before the mylars are submitted to the City for final approval. The City signs off on the mylar originals which are then -eturned to the engineer. We then request a mylar sepia set and 4 sets of blueline prints with each sheet signed and stamped by a Colorado P.E. be returned to the City for our use and permanent records. The engineer retains the original mylars with all signatures on them. 2/39 & 3/39 Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plans: • Please highlight the note about the interim and ultimate Shields Street improvements by putting a box around it, using bold type or larger type, or some other means of making the note stand out on the plans. Thanks. • Modify the (Phase 1 boundary to include the full street frontage along Lot 14 as it appears on Sheet 5 (not cutting diagonally across the street) 11 /39 Stormwater Details and Tables: • Show and clarify interim and ultimate improvements along Shields Street (for example the area inlet, interim grading, note that curb and gutter is future, etc.) 24/39 Aqua Fria Drive Plan and Profile: • Double check elevations called out in plan versus those noted on profile at intersection with Fairchild Drive. 29/39 Shields Street Cross -Sections: • Note/label which cross -sections are for future construction. Be sure to show sidewalk at proper location in all cross -sections (i.e. back of 5 foot wide walk must be on the property/r.o.w. line) with the minimum required 2 foot area t 2.00% behind the walk to support it and to provide a place for pedestrians to step off the walk, and then a min/max of 4:1 to existing or proposed grade: 30/39 Cross -Sections Shields street/ Interim Grading and Striping: • Same comments as sheet 29 City of Fort Collins Current Planning PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DATE: 18 September 1995 DEPARTMENT:41C�aj' PROJECT: ##31-94A/Cottonwood Ridge Subdivision: Final PLANNER: Steve Olt All comments must be received by: Friday, 29 September ❑ No Problems �roblems or Concerns (see below) -�b-SG�-� � �s/' � %Zt1 +7 Px�� io �— S� a..�. •� s.►s.._�it-� � -- �as�,..tf N.-c.6 yb e�cf+�-•-d urbsf a J/ •,.t/ofs� �'*-�.-v�1� 1�'� -c� j e.•-c� /etr G !'�� rig 7b Jaa.�-.-�"' — �G n L�3 li • • ,5/N� G bG �O,�S �!� G�-/ C'�.SrS% �S j-�` i'r► v a.�� �c-� v'e-- ,a. cJ 4- s-/' ��� S.s�e� Zo' d-S lJ� 7'c. SrarT+� v E b ttw-�o��- !o ¢ � 70 �/o' a.�l� sdc, • �-S = T � � LDS 9.� ,`.. Date: Signature: CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS: ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE ❑ UTILITY COMMUNITY PLANNING and ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES... 281 NORTH COLLEGE, P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750 CURRENT PLANNING DEPART14ENT PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: PROJECT: PLANNER: ENGINEER: Sheri Wamhoff DEPT: Engineering B,No Problems ' Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) Cottonwood Ridge Subdivision (sheet 1 of 2) April 8, 1999 • The black bolts are no longer maintained or listed within the City vertical control. Need to reference from benchmarks that are on the list. • ADS pipe is no longer allowed in City Streets - the underdrain pipe needs to be changed to a PVC pipe where located within Public ROW • On sheet 5 - provide a note; Street patch to be in accordance with current Street Repair and Reconstruction Standards and Guidelines. • Per stormwater requirements a pan is needed where swale slope is less than 2% (Cross Section Basin J) • Remove the pavement design from the plans. Pavement design is to be per the recommendations of a Final Soils Report. The Final Soils Report is to be done once the grading for the streets is complete. Therefore the pavement design is for existing subgrade conditions. • Delete non applicable notes on Shields Street improvements - to reflect what is to be built and such. Show a pavement taper across the outlot for the interim improvements. Add a note on the south of the property to tie into existing improvements. And show a type III barricade at the end of the street improvements. Add note on cross section - saw cut or mill existing edge of asphalt and tie into the existing asphalt in accordance with Street Repair and Reconstruction Standards. ntinued on next page) �-/� ,�' '-C�=-/� D�a��: Signature: ,' PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ PLAT ❑ SITE ❑ UTILITY ❑ LANDSCAPE Cottonwood Ridge Subdivision (sheet 2 of 2) April 8, 1999 • On Shields street x-sections: Walk needs to be shown at the back of the row in all x-sections and grading adjusted to for such to occur. Add note: Saw cut or mill existing edge of asphalt and tie into the existing asphalt in accordance with Street Repair and Reconstruction Standards (typical). • Need to make sure that all the details are readable - we will not sign plans with detail or text that is not readable. • Provide: mid -block ramp detail D-12.6, Additions to existing walk detail D-20, Detail #4 Plat from mapping - Are curves C49, C50, C51 and C68 correct? Distance on north line of Lot 23 is incorrect. Curve is missing on. the west line of Lot 50. See plat for additional comments from eng Use current plat language and attorney certification statement. The ownership statement and signatures should be the same on the plat as those on the development agreement. Make changes to the plat notes as noted on the plat. Need to dedicate the trail easement that is referenced in the notes on Lots 59 and 60. See additional comments on the plat I am awaiting on a response from emergency services to see if the street name Kininak Circle is acceptable. You provided a drawing and legal description for the waterline and pedestrian easement on the ridge property to me for review. The waterline easement needs to be dedicated to the district and the access easement to the City. So this will be two separate documents. The easement dedicated to the district shall be in their required format and handled thru them. We just need a copy of the recorded document. The pedestrian easement as well as the two temporary turnaround needed on site shall be dedicated to the city. See attached for sample dedication language and attorney certification paragraph. A dedication statement, attorney certification, legal description and sketch are needed for each easement. We will also need a check for the filing fees for these documents. The cost is a $1 per document ,you would have 3) and $5 per sheet being recorded (this is typically 4 pages per document). The check for the filing fees needs to be made out to: Larimer County Clerk and Recorder not the City. Once received these will be reviewed to make sure the legal closes and the dedication statements are correct. I am also attaching the Development Construction Permit (DCP) Application and a brochure, as well as a draft copy of the development agreement. Cottonwood Ridge Subdivision January 2000 • The last sentence of note 41 is not a part of the note - it is directions for the writer. • The black bolts are no longer maintained or listed within the City vertical control. Need to reference from benchmarks that are on the list. • Sheet 7 - The profile for the Thayer/ Ridge lateral labels the pipe as a 8" PVC pipe the plan sheets label it as a 15"ADS pipe. The west invert elevation differs between the plans also. On Sheet 4 and sheet 17. • Sheet 17 - see above plus - detail has conflicting info. • Sheets 22 -24, and 26-29 Add note to typical x-section - Final pavement design to be per the final soils report. • n escrow id not being provided - a cash payment Sheet 25 - remove note #4 under Phase I. A with each building permit is being done to satisfy the requirement. • sheet 29 and 30 - remove the interim improvemnts labels from sections 19+00 to 23+00. All improvements shown are to be built and are not interim improvements. • sheet 29 and 30 - remove "or rotomill" from sawcut note. Per section III.F.1 of the Street Repair and Reconstruction Standards and Guildlines must be saw cut. • Sheet 30 - remove note on plan section "extend asphalt to existing EOP" and aspalt line. • Sheet 32 - Make changes to new Driveway Approach detail and Mid-vblock Ped ramp as shown and add detail #4 see attached for detail. Plat Has been checked and is acceptable. Attorney certification is still needed. Before the city will sign the plans the above mention changes need to be made as well as the comments from stormwater and natural resources be addressed. I also need to receive the following before the mylars will be signed: 1) a copy of the recorded waterline easement dedicated to the district. 2) The dedication documents for the pedestrian easement on the ridge site.✓) The dedication documents for the two temporary turnarounds since they are not being dedicated on the plat 4) check for filling fees. A dedication statement, attorney certification, legal description and sketch are needed for each easement. We will also need a check for the filing fees for these documents. The cost is $5 per sheet being recorded (this is typically 4 pages per document). The check for the filing fees needs to be made out to: Larimer County Clerk and Recorder not the City. Once received these will be reviewed to make sure the legal closes and the dedication statements are correct. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET Current Plannine DATE: September 25, 2002 TO: Engineering PROJECT: Street name changes for Cottonwood Ridge (File #31- 94A) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: October 9, 2002 Please see the attached sheets for: the requested new street names, the subdivision plat reductions, and the "rules" for street name changes. The names have been checked against and reserved with the Larimer County Street Inventory System. Note - PLEASE identify your redlines_ or future reference Niyu > c,��rnjAj 8ktelbpiqujO a dc� � T vu_oja u-fcAc Ud mli 4�u Name (please print) J /, 9 CHECK HERE IF Y SH TO EIVE COP OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape C3tyofF�. > > a a O1 GI m ro G v v v s+ s+ 0 m o u° u : o I w fA I C U W U U li G L) ro ro �4 U. N W U •G' ro z x c Z II � C Q q �n Iv ° a v Q) a rl L) > b ro ro U 74 U RS U P. ol °I p o C4 H C •moo m Q a rl rl ro G m $4 m a p M A . co W U UI E C O G = N L (6 O. C CL = O C y N = y C C t6 O O y � p C O � C CI C •O L 01 C OJ � d O y L °c ca cc > m ` '- s C r T� C L Z H`Oa m u o7-1 C) L B < a c o <c ea _ U U a,E O C 0 q L G c ° o m U a F p m U E m C) CL � j OI X _ m C W 11-1 O O 27 N N .V U O •d O N Of y C omaa>>a ro � �. .oI 3 = y F N Z z of c � L _ m o•d f R Ir- �� 2• �'1 ❑W �o � o W6, haE O �w W mew Z w VO2 e�; 11 CB'09L1 14 69'LS9 3 0010.00 S M ,00,L4.00 N �axrs smv� wms a �a M?Ale - a y� crav n .vaum x e� az oar.vv x'y i o a 6. 4 'l � _ -- x 71 J � _' k � ♦ o a q_ .. 6 I 3 o_,_._ \ Ea mow- IP " @� olR['J L_�TQ J Ti L �qJ if r[9fr d r «_•-__� u ssza � .aaoono . � anrao wdiiO li 4.1 z NI z L / . Fa_nFa3�a..a:yR3C.F ys8 �>gs�E�'e�z,p=s6aa a3.ae°:.......... sa ry � Z W 0 0 I L�y�J yxzxmz mmn w�yam ov 11 LB'Rb IL M ,00,tb.00 N '0'fl'd 3901a 3N1 (0330 11 f l'6t W P � a O d so�3lws woos �`. I I I m yi ZL'FZt m 5 m a 3 .pO,SS.YO a�. _U. 1�`yJyl! /i15ai fiC'e!L I A4.1 JJ3C.� 3G�.\ 19 � �4 I Ll iris .I E E.' 5 $^ afA \FL Is:l 4k: ZW 7 y444 Y z wm�m ¢F Cp Q ain V� ��ozm F aw W gdn� m MCy Fy C., ii Q 3 aA........++=BMX:^L=aS_8r=di8e ----XBXhhiXkhh:x"k:hBhXXar_aa,% ttll NO i ,.,,,,,I r o -a=assaaaaR::%asa%aaa a:a:Asaa=aaaaixa: �k o@ a as a x axa a as s a 'I = � ¢ aa88 888 888a8888 ^ry88 8888tl^8^- 83 I \ 588882x::x58:aa8:ada8=8XAe:___.. __,a% �I�_ — J �as._88:xRXC�Z8=888x::XB.k=:B=X.B.X..XSx mze.w : 8 8X88X='k'9a:.BBaAXaXB:%B•an^$ :e.*'°'^••=< O to H ia� �� �'_ o.'i Y .i 4 d4 9 \ g -� h .A gi des g.......................�......�... �......�... O � �F'•� +^ \R aaa'aa%=a88RRA8%a=:aaA833RaSiFBa:SaaB„aa [q �1 Z \ # � ,>••' _ Ta \\ / SAaa:aAaadaa:::ai:a%i R•:aak88k8:%%.-kdd fll �' a ^ �\ ayy-y laa alelis ' � � m :„ - f • � � = � s%aaaxAaaaaasassasasas sa RAsaaassaaaaa •,I 0 \ r _`.,mac i»+, R:xx5S9Ax#�4a2_83xYa-.::x_S88x8:a2A8X: •� �aXx::B%'aaE%ai::aR=exaik_�BB^X::BAX:i P _9 / 1j L@'84IIM 1 *, N ,.00,:a:oak::a:%a8:a:aa::%xaaaA=ai%.:ax:::a R:a:ac: n w = (Cmc 14 0l'6ttl) _ _:a•:. __•a:a: ...........................,.......�............�....�.............. �. w-, S — 4•^y^83^:a:a§a o:+:&...i_69X.e ax__:..:88a..AR�EE:8888_..:C m m U g.'.'_.:.^.. to „ � __:: - X;,._.B^X_r.,.x::k:Ba8X"BXXaxB-iX:Xx AX_ To .......:...... 8aa: '$ ,...;,.........................a=:'== afld 37021 3H! a:k::.: N , _ ..a-^x::RR. ... ..... ... ..... Street Name Changes The name of a street may be changed to avoid potentially confusing duplications. The applicant will be responsible for all costs associated with the actual installation of new or changed street name signs. Information regarding these costs can be obtained from the Streets Department at 970-221-6615. The applicant must submit a letter to the Engineering Department requesting the proposed name change. The following procedure should be followed in changing a street name. Step One — Application The applicant submits one copy of a letter that includes the following information: A. Name of the subdivision, PUD, or PDP in which the street to be renamed is located; B. Existing and proposed street name; C. Reason for requesting street name change; D. Evidence that all affected property owners on the subject street have been notified and are in agreement with the street name change. Section 24-91 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins provides for a list of eligible names approved by the City Council from which new arterial and collector street names must be chosen. Step Two — Review The street name change request is routed by City staff to all affected City departments and agencies for their review and comments. Approximately two weeks later, the review comments are sent back to staff. If there are any problems, staff contacts the applicant to coordinate any necessary changes. If there are not problems with the request, City staff prepares a written report for review by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled business meeting (first or third Tuesday of every month). The City Council may approve or deny the street name application. Step Three — Follow-up If approved by the City Council, staff will contact the necessary City departments and agencies and inform them of the street name change so that sign changes can be made. The costs for making new signs will be charged to the applicant requesting the street name change. W APR 2 7 2004 I MEMORANDUM TO: Jim Dewilde, Xcel Energy FROM: Sheri Wamhoff, Development Review Engineer DATE: April 15, 2004 RE: REQUEST TO VACATE A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT Attached for your review and comment is a sketch showing Cottonwood Ridge, located west of Shields Street and south of Harmony Road. The Developer of this subdivision wishes to vacate a portion of the 6 foot side lot utility easement on Lot 61, as shown on the attached drawing. No reason has been given for the vacation request. Please sign and return any comments to Sheri L. Wamhoff in the Development Review Center by April 29, 2004. If we do not hear from you by this date, we will assume you have no objections to the proposed vacation. Please call Sheri at 221-6750 if you have any questions. Thank you. -14-11�0 Problems O K TU Vh ch-TE Problems/Concerns as follows: 7Jl.�ua�/ O t�2i�Df Map Output Page 1 of 1 LOT 61 OF Cottonwood Ridge sidelot easement vacation proposal waAaaoRraD o 77 legend s ` - Parcae Railroads Street CAntarirres .. .. A/ Rlvors. Streams and �. PICARD Ui --_. Ditches c Bodies of Water - City Ur it City Umits `3 vracn[csoa R�A+coa *00016CRCCRCT AYMDRD Cr.. ►`P armed vdi AaN3-4"ydahi IA to MDSRIW. _---0®$fffl lAT Lel `i$15 C p AVEA45. http://gisims.fcgov.com/smiet/com. esri. esrimap. Esrimap?ServiceName=overview&Client... 4/ 15 /2004 PROJECT City of Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET M�mm Current Planning DATE: 18 September 1995 DEPARTMENT:��aY PROJECT: #31-94A/Cottonwood Ridge Subdivision: Final PLANNER: Steve Olt All comments must be received by: Friday, 29 September [] No Problems ErProblems or Concerns (see below) Date: =���95- Signature: CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS: [3-- SITE [� LANDSCAPE UTILITY COMMUNITY PLANNING and ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES... 281 NORTH COLLEGE, P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 (303)221-6750 CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT ♦ (14 coo o� C) N \ d& \ 'N O a K u ^�wW W��2 O �hzi J 4808 4814 L 4820 S�j6t� i� OB'OL l� 9T'EL � 3AI80 3773AVYVO N ,0K IJ 96'2E2 3 ,00,00.00 N ld 00'001 ..■ MEMORANDUM TO: Doug Martine, Light and Power FROM: Sheri Wamhoff, Development Review Engineer DATE: April 15, 2004 RE: REQUEST TO VACATE A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT Attached for your review and comment is a sketch showing Cottonwood Ridge, located west of Shields Street and south of Harmony Road. The Developer of this subdivision wishes to vacate a portion of the 6 foot side lot utility easement on Lot 61, as shown on the attached drawing. No reason has been given for the vacation request. Please sign and return any comments to Sheri L. Wamhoff in the Development Review Center by April 29, 2004. If we do not hear from you by this date, we will assume you have no objections to the proposed vacation. Please call Sheri at 221-6750 if you have any questions. Thank you. No Problems jC GG f T Problems/Concerns as follows: 2 17 !F �Ffl��✓p � Gu✓z►3 �vS N7V MA1'� �4 d1�')V �v"fY /' % Lo�/}i�a✓ -T'N!S 1/fju�T !f poi .ram Ifflaffrelo"k, Dim TO: Dennis Greenwalt, Comcast FROM: Sheri Wamhoff, Development Review Engineer DATE: April 15, 2004 RE: REQUEST TO VACATE A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT Attached for your review and comment is a sketch showing Cottonwood Ridge. located west of Shields Street and south of Harmony Road. The Developer of this subdivision wishes to vacate a portion of the 6 foot side lot utility easement on Lot 61. as shown on the attached drawing. No reason has been given for the vacation request. Please sign and return any comments to Sheri L. Wamhoff in the Development Review Center by April 29, 2004. If we do not hear from you by this date, we will assume you have no objections to the proposed vacation. Please call Sheri at 221-6750 if you have any questions. Thank you. -9 No Problems Problems/Concerns as follows: MEMORANDUM TO: Glen Schluter, Stormwater FROM: Sheri Wamhoff, Development Review Engineer DATE: April 15, 2004 RE: REQUEST TO VACATE A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT Attached for your review and comment is a sketch showing Cottonwood Ridge, located west of Shields Street and south of Harmony Road. The Developer of this subdivision wishes to vacate a portion of the 6 foot side lot utility easement on Lot 61, as shown on the attached drawing. No reason has been given for the vacation request. Please sign and return any comments to Sheri L. Wamhoff in the Development Review Center by April 29, 2004. If we do not hear from you by this date, we will assume you have no objections to the proposed vacation. Please call Sheri at 221-6750 if you have any questions. Thank you. No Problems Problems/Concerns as follows: 5, dfacAed Comme*ut6. o�—,U-i} ,� Cottonwood Ridge -Lot 61 Easement Vacation — Stormwater Utility 4-28-04 1. This easement cannot be vacated without a redesign of the drainage swale within the easement and dedication of a new easement. The swale/channel was designed to take offsite flows from the Ridge development on the west and pass them through Cottonwood Ridge. The channel is to carry 3.28 cfs and has four grade control drop structures in it above the point where is discharges into a sidewalk culvert. 2. The window wells being constructed are protruding into the easement by 2 feet. This is allowed as long as a professional engineer provides calculations for the capacity of the swale cross section at the window well locations. It needs to be shown that the flow is contained within the easement or additional easement is needed. The design engineer will need to consider what the grade will be when a house is built on lot 62. This revision will then dictate the future grading of Lot 62 so the owner of that lot should be included in this decision. 3. Two of the grade control drop structures have been partially buried by the construction of the house on lot 61. They will need to be cleaned up or replaced if they have been damaged beyond repair. This needs to be done before a C.O. for lot 61 can be released by Stormwater Engineering. 4. The west end of the swale along the property line is not at final grade so soil is blocking any flow from getting into the swale. This too needs to be corrected before a C.O. can be released by Stormwater Engineering. GDS MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis Greenwalt, AT& T Broadband ✓ok- Bob Rulli, Qwest ✓ O'u- Jim Dewilde, Xcel Energy ✓ ok- N GGlen Schluter, Stormwater Roger Buffington, Water/ Wastewater ✓ O"V-- Doug Martine, Light and Power ✓ole —wo'a-a Terry Farrill, South Fort Collins Sanitation District ok � FROM: Sheri Wamhoff, Development Review Engineer DATE: April 15, 2004 RE: REQUEST TO VACATE A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT Attached for your review and comment is a sketch showing Cottonwood Ridge, located west of Shields Street and south of Harmony Road. The Developer of this subdivision wishes to vacate a portion of the 6 foot side lot utility easement on Lot 61, as shown on the attached drawing. No reason has been given for the vacation request. Please sign and return any comments to Sheri L. Wamhoff in the Development Review Center by April 29, 2004. If we do not hear from you by this date, we will assume you have no objections to the proposed vacation. Please call Sheri at 221-6750 if you have any questions. Thank you. No Problems Problems/Concerns as follows: ITEM NO. 2 MEETING DATE 11/18/04 STAFF Shen WamhofF City of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Resolution PZ04-31: Vacation of a portion of the 6 foot wide sidelot utility easement on Lot 61 of Cottonwood Ridge, located west of Shields Street and south of Harmony Road. APPLICANT: George Hart Progressive Living Structures 4190 N. Garfield Loveland, CO 80538 OWNER: Alan and Catherine Martin 4815 Caravelle Drive Fort Collins, Co 80526 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request to vacate a portion of the 6 foot wide utility easement on the south side of Lot 61 of Cottonwood Ridge, located west of Shields Street and south of Harmony Road. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution PZ04-31 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Owner has requested the vacation of a portion of the 6 foot wide utility easement on Lot 61 of Cottonwood Ridge. The utility easement is not needed, but a drainage easement is needed and the property owners are dedicating this easement along the southern property line of this lot. The utility companies have been contacted and have no problems with the proposed vacation. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (970)221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ITEM NO. 3 MEETING DATE 11/18/04 91% (001169=aft"a a I STAFF Sheri Wamhnff _ City of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOAR STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Resolution PZ04-32 - Accepting the dedication of a drainage easement on Lot 61 of Cottonwood Ridge, located west of Shields Street and south of Harmony Road. OWNER: Alan and Catherine Martin 4815 Caravelle Drive Fort Collins, Co 80526 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request to accept a drainage easement on Cottonwood Ridge, more particularly described on Exhibit"A". RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution PZ04-32 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A drainage easement was not dedicated along the south property line of Lot 61 although a drainage swale was designed and built along this property line. The dedication of the drainage easement provides the easement necessary to accommodate this drainage swale. An easement is also being dedicated along the northern property line of Lot 62 to accommodate this swale as well. Since the lots are owned by two different property owners two deeds of dedication were needed. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O.Eox580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (970)221-6750 PLANNING DEPAK7 MENT ITEM NO. 4 MEETING DATE 11/18/04 mow A" (Noffirlsaft"al STAFF Qhuri�dhmhofF_ City of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Resolution PZ04-33 - Accepting the dedication of a drainage easement on Lot 62 of Cottonwood Ridge, located west of Shields Street and south of Harmony Road. OWNER: Progressive Living Structures, Inc. A Colorado Corporation 4190 Garfield Loveland, Co 80538 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request to accept a drainage easement on Cottonwood Ridge, more particularly described on Exhibit"A". RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution PZ04-33 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A drainage easement was not dedicated along the north property line of Lot 62 although a drainage swale was designed and built along this property line. The dedication of the drainage easement provides the easement necessary to accommodate this drainage swale. An easement is also being dedicated along the southern property line of Lot 61 to accommodate this swale as well. Since the lots are owned by two different property owners two deeds of dedication were needed. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. PO.Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (970)221-6750 PLANNING DEPAKTMFNT City of Fort Collins Planning PROJECT COMMENTSHEET DATE: 1, ; -�, rJ DEPARTMENT: ! PROJECT: PLANNER: L-T All comments must be received by: 2,� E] No Problems M(Problems or Concerns (see below) HYDROLOGIC STUDY IS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPANY ALL SUBDRAIN SYSTEM DESIGNS IN E PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY BY REVISION DATE. ITCH LATERALS BEING PIPED WITHIN THE PROPERTY MUST BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE -IE AMOUNT OF PIPE BENEATH THE PUBLIC STREETS. DESIGN CROSSINGS TO BE ERPENDICULAR TO THE PUBLIC STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY WHEREVER POSSIBLE. Date: I �I �`�� Signature:��;� CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS: ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE 'a UTILITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580 PLANNING DEPARTMENT (303)221 -6750 SHIELDS STREET DESIGN NEEDS TO BE MORE DETAILED. ARTERIAL STREET DESIGNS ARE REQUIRED TO SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED OR FUTURE FLOWLINES (BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET), CENTERLINE PROFILE EXITING/PROPOSED, STREET CROSS -SECTIONS EVERY 50 FEET SHOWING CROSS SLOPES, STRIPING AND SIGNING PLAN, OFFSITE DESIGN INFORMATION TO SHOW THE PROPOSED DESIGN ADJACENT TO THE SITE TIES TO DESIGN OR EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AT THE ENDS, INFORMATION ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE STREET TO SHOW EXISTING OR PROPOSED STREET INTERSECTIONS AND/OR DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS - SEE COMMENTS ON UTILITY PLAN SET. IDEALLY, THE ACCESS TO THE DEVELOPMENT FROM SHIELDS STREET SHOULD OCCUR ACROSS FROM CLARENDON HILLS DRIVE. DUE TO THE OUTPARCEL, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE AT THIS TIME TO LINE UP THE ACCESS POINTS. HOWEVER, SUGGEST LIMITING DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO LOT I TO THE WEST SIDE OF THE LOT SO THAT IN THE FUTURE, IF ACCESS TO SHIELDS IS ABLE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE OUTPARCEL, THE OTHER ACCESS COULD BE VACATED AND THE STREET REMOVED AND LOT I WOULD STILL HAVE STREET" FRONTAGE FOR THE DRIVEWAY. SEE REDLINED PLANS. ALL DITCH COMPANIES AND LATERALS MUST SIGN THE PLAT AS OWNERS IN INTEREST. IN ADDITION, THEY NEED TO SIGN OFF ON THOSE UTILITY PLANS SHEEErS SHOWING THE DESIGN FOR THEIR LATERAL NETWORK ON THE PROPERTY. RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FOR SHIELDS STREET IS NOT CLEAR ON THE PLAT. SEE REDLINED UTILITY PLANS AND PLAT FOR MORE DETAILED ENGINEERING COMMENTS SEP 22'95 11:15 FR US WEST FT COLLINS 3032247GOO TO 9-2''16370 P.02iO3 September 22, 1995 Re: Cottonwood Ridge Review of these plans should not be construed as a commitment that telephone facilities sufficient to serve this project are presently available. U S WEST will provide telephone service in accordance with the rates and tariffs on file with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission. I The developer_ is responsible for provision of all trench for telephone facilities, including street crossings and ditch crossings, w-ithin the project, and the developer pays up front construction costs for facilities within the development. Telephone facilities generally occupy rear lot utility easements, which must be located on terrain which permits trenching operations. These plans do not show the buried telephone cables along the west side of South Shields Street, so we are unable to determine exactly how these existing cables would be affected. Any relocation of existing telephone facilities required by these plans will be paid for by the developer. Susan M_ Peterson Capacity Provisioning Field Engineer 970-224-7473 TO: FROM DATE: RE: MEMO Mr. Steve Olt, City of Fort Collins Planner Mr. Terry W. Farrill, Systems Engineer September 25, 1995 Cottonwood Ridge Subdivision r_� South Fort Collins Sanitation District The Fort Collins - Loveland Water District and the South Fort Collins Sanitation District have reviewed the above mentioned project and submit the following comments; The District's sign -off block is required on all sheets except the property plat. The general notes on the title sheet are to be corrected to indicate that all water and sanitary sewer line construction shall conform to the most current Fort Collins - Loveland Water District and South Fort Collins Sanitation District Specifications. Easements, on the District's standard easement form, is required for all facilities that are not located within the street R-O-W. Residential fire sprinkler systems are to be incorporated with the domestic tap, after the meter in accordance with District requirements. The four (4) inch water line is to be deleted. The water service meter pits for lots 68, 69 & 70 are to be located within the cul de sac R-O-W. The homeowner is responsible for repair and maintenance of the service line beyond the meter pit. Residential fire sprinkler systems are to be incorporated with the domestic tap, after the meter in accordance with District requirements. The lots that require pumps and force service lines for the sanitary sewer are to be identified on the property plat. A note is to be included that the homeowner is responsible for all repair, maintenance and liability of the sanitary sewer system to the manhole connection. The profiles are to include all utility crossings. The District's details are to be used for the water and sanitary sewer lines. The details are to include the "Typical Curb Stop Installation" detail. The 15 inch RCP irrigation line in Fair Lane is to be relocated to the west of manhole C-1. Skewed crossings are to be minimized. The underdrain system is not to be located within the same trench as the water line. Detail `A' on sheet 10 should indicate five (5) foot bury over the water line. The water line encasement details, sheet 17, is not allowed in the District. The design should incorporate a concrete cap for erosion protection. The Districts will require another review due to the nature and number of the above comments. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 226-3104, ext. 14, if you have any questions or require additional information. cc: Mr. Michael D. DiTullio, District Manager TRILBY LATERAL DITCH CO. 5801 So. Shields Street Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 Jim Robbins, President, Tel. 226-3312 9/2& 95 TO: CITY OF FORT COLLINS, CURRENT PLANNING SUBJECT. PROJECT COMMENT SHEET- PROJECT #31 - 94 A / COTTON- WOOD RIDGE SUBDIVISION: FINAL Attention : Steve Olt and Planning Department of Fort Collins: I asked Mr. Olt over the telephone, to be contacted on this subdivision over a year ago. I was not contacted or informed in anyway, and there are serious liability problems as well as ditch maintenance concerns that should have been addressed in the preliminary. I asked Mr. Olt in a September 1995 meeting on Harmony Ridge to make sure ditch companies are notified automatically by the city so we can make sure that the rights of the ditches are not violated. The Trilby Lateral Ditch has been here since 1897, and we depend on the water for our farms. We also were not notified of the neighborhood meeting on Harmony Ridge PUD, and we appreciate the Ridge Homeowners Association letting us know about the meeting, or we would have been passed over once again. Also of concern is the time period of turning the project comment sheets back in to the City of Fort Collins. We received this information on Thurday September 21, and it is due on September 29, 1995. This is not enough time for the ditch company, since the communication from the City of Fort Collins was completely lacking with these projects leaving the Trilby Lateral ditch (a neighbor) out �of a very important loop.. CONCERNS: The headgate where Applewood Estates, Trilby Lateral, City of Fort Collins (Fossil Creek) have water taken out. Safety and Liability. The developer and city need to make sure safety is number 1. No trespassing on the ditch or headgate. If someone fell in it could be fatal. The ditch company assumes no responsiblity for this liabilty, since it was here before the development. EGRESS- How do we get tractors, weed burning equipment, people, heavy equipment to the Trilby Lateral to maintain it? *See attached copy Seven Springs Ranch P.U.D. 23 October79. Paragraph 8 Page 6.