Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFAIRBROOKE PUD SEVENTH - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2003-07-31—,� Commu "V Planning and Environmental rvices Planning Department T Citv of Fort Collins June 25, 1993 Mark Linder Linder Real Estate 3500 JFK Parkway Suite 221 Fort Collins, CO 80525 Dear Mark, Alyle - Staff has reviewed your submittal for Fairbrooke ODP and Fairbrooke PUD, 7th Filing and offers the following comments: 1. US West will provide telephone service in accordance with the rates and tariffs on file with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission. The developer is responsible for provision of all trench, street crossings, and ditch crossings for telephone facilities within the project, and the developer pays up front construction costs for facilities within the development. 2. Any relocation of existing telephone facilities required by these plans will be paid for by the developer. 3. Please refer to redlined comments on the Preliminary Utility Plan for comments from the Water and Wastewater Utility. 4. Fire hydrants must be provided at standard spacing. 5. Please consider selecting another street name, as a Somerville Court already exists in the 80526 zip code area. 6. Please include relevant pages and/or plans from the referenced drainage reports in an appendix of the report for this project. Please indicate on the Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan and in the report, how flows along the southeasterly property line will enter the gutter of Cedarwood Drive. Will a sidewalk chase be used. 7. At final, please document that the C value associated with the planned site layout will be comparable to the value assumed for this development by the Fairbrooke S.I.D. drainage report (1983). Calculate a C value based upon estimates of street, roof, driveway, and lawn areas for the development. At final, please complete the erosion control plan by calculating a performance standard and effectiveness and by providing an erosion control construction sequence. Please consider whether an off -site gravel inlet filter located at the inlet nearest this development would be effective in helping control erosion from this site. Please specify location of straw bales. 8. Placing a. concrete surface drainage pan in the rear of lots 12- 15 is undesirable both from a planning perspective and from a water quality perspective. Please consider the pros and cons of using a subsurface drainage pipe to handle nuisance flows in this area. 9. Please see additional minor comments in the drainage report and on the Preliminary Plans. 10. Existing trees need to be pruned to City Forestry medium prune standards.. Please put a note on the site plan to this effect. 11. Tim Buchanan would like to visit the site with you to evaluate the condition of existing trees and talk about protection techniques which should be used during construction. Any protection techniques required, should be documented on the plans. 12. Additional street trees should be added west of the existing trees on Prospect. 13. Individua.l service locations to each home will need to be located at the front wall or on the sidewall as long as the service is located no further than 5' from the corner because of the building envelopes proximity to the lot line. 14. Landscaping in easements will need to be coordinated with PSCO to maintain proper clearances. 15. Lots 11 and 15 qualify as solar oriented lots. Lot 4 is exempt from the ordinance because it is greater than 15,000 sq. ft. _-n size. Staff calculated that 42% of the lots are solar oriented (8 of 19 eligible lots). This information should be included on the plat and site plan. 16. Please provide additional details about the type of fencing that is ;proposed. Staff suggests cedar fencing with brick columns, a typical upgrade to fencing on arterial streets. It is very likely that owners of Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7 will want to fence the back yard area. Please detail on the plans, what will be allowed. What is shown on the plans is probably not realistic:, given the nature of Prospect Road in the future. 17. More infc=. ation is needed on the plans to describe what type, height, etc. of fencing will be allowed on Lots 1, 3, and 15- 20. Where will streetscape landscaping be placed in these areas? Backyards adjacent to collector streets tend to present this dilemma. Staff would like to know how you will solve this. 18. There may be site distance easement requirements on Lot 3. Engineering has standard language concerning fencing and landscaping for this easement. 19. Is Prospect Road shown on the plans as it is shown on the SID? 20. See redli.ned Utility Plans for additional comments. 21. Please note who will be constructing the 12' walk. 22. On the density chart you have taken 5 points for neighborhood facilitiets, please explain this, is this the walk? You do not need there points to be at your proposed density of 3.86. Forty points would be sufficient. 23. Who will be responsible for installation of landscaping along Prospect Road? It should be noted on the plans. 24. A Homeowner's Association or adjacent lot owners shall be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaping in the Prospect Road ROW (except for maintenance which is by City Forestry). Amend note 5 on the landscape plan to include the ROW. The covenants should include information about maintenance of berms and landscaping along Prospect Road. 25. Label PR--1 property and Bauder Elementary School on the site plan and plat. 26. Please submit a narrative to explain what you are asking for on the Overall Development Plan amendment. Please include in your explanation information about land use and overall density both before and after the proposed change. You should also include information about the nature of land uses in the general area (outside of the ODP) and the nature of land uses allowed on the vacant portions of the ODP. This information should be submitted both in letter form and noted on the ODP. The land use table should be expanded to include the land uses and densities for all of the Tracts. Overall ODP density should be calculated based on the gross acreage. 27. You can note that City Staff has asked you to amend Tracts B and E, after the fact, and that you do not have ownership of these Tracts. Perhaps another way to make it clear that you only havE! "control" of Tract D, you could label the signature block in larger letters as "SIGNATURE BLOCK FOR TRACT D". You may want: to indicate that amendments to B and E are "housekeeping items". 28. According to my research, the following land uses are existing or proposed at Fairbrooke ODP: Tract A undeveloped 163 townhomes 21.8 ac Tract B Filings 4,5,6 27 SF, 2 patio, 4 plex 6.3 ac Tract C Sommerville 10 duplex units, 4 SF 2.6 ac Tract D undeveloped 71 townhomes/patio 10.2 ac Tract E Filing 1 71 SF 18.9 ac Tract F Filing 3 40 SF 9.7 ac Tract G undeveloped church use 5.0 ac Tract H Filing 2 53 SF 10.9 ac Tract H undevl part 28 apartments 2.4 ac Tract I developed detention 8.8 ac Tract J undeveloped 10 townhomes 1.8 ac TOTAL 483 units gross density (excluding Tract G) gross density (excluding G and I) 98.4 ac 483 DU/93.4ac= 5.2 DU/ac 483 DU/84.6ac= 5.7 DU/ac With the proposed changes to Tract D, excluding the church, existing farm house, and school site, the gross density would be 483DU/89.6ac= 5.4 DU/ac. Further excluding the detention area would increase the density to 483DU/80.8ac= 5.98DU/ac or 6.0 DU/ac. This concludes staff comments at this time. In order to stay on schedule for the July 26, 1993 Planning and Zoning Board hearing, please note the following deadlines: Plan revisions are due July 7, 1993 by 12:00 noon. PMT's, colored renderings, and 10 prints are due July 19th. Final mylars and other documents are due July 22nd by 12:00. Please be aware that if a development agreement and utility plans are required with this project, these documents and plans must be signed prior to the Planning and Zoning Board Hearing. If not, a condition will be placed on the project giving you 60 days to finalize the plans and agreement, after which time, you must submit a request for an extension from the Planning and Zoning Board. If you have any questions about these comments or would like to schedule a time to meet to discuss them, please contact me at 221- 6750. Sincerely, X Kirsten Whetstone Project Planner cc: Kerrie Ashbeck, City Engineering City Stormwater Utility Stewart and Associates, Project Engineer File Commu y Planning and Environmental Planning Department Citv of Fort Collins August 17, 1993 Mark Linder Linder Real Estate and Development Co. 3500 J.F.K. Parkway Suite 221 Fort Collins, CO 80525 Dear Mark, :-vices Staff has reviewed your submittal for Fairbrooke PUD 7th Filing Final and offers the following comments: 1. US West will provide telephone service in accordance with rates and tariffs on file with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission. The developer is responsible for provision of all trench, street crossings, and ditch crossings for telephone facilities within the project, and the developer pays up front construction costs for facilities within the development. 2. Any relocation of existing telephone facilities required by these plans will be paid for by the developer. 3. Review of these plans should not be construed as a commitment that telephone facilities sufficient to serve this project are presently available. 4. What is the easement width on the southeasterly side of Lot 15? 5. The title of the plat should read "Being a Replat of a portion of Tract. D Fairbrooke SID". (This comment is from mapping, and I will verify that it is correct. It seems to me that the Fairbrooke SID was never officially filed as a subdivision plat). 6. Comments on the final utility plans will be included under separate: cover. Staff encourages you to contact the various utility reviewing agents as soon as possible to find out if they have major problems with your late submittal. There is always the risk that unresolved utility issues will delay the project's Planning and Zoning Board date. 7. Fire hydrants must be provided within 400' of all lots. 8. Transfort has a bus stop located on the southeast corner of Prospect and Cedarwood and requests that construction of the walk be compliant with the American Disabilities Act in terms of accessibility. To be compliant, the sidewalk must be 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6750 attached to the street curb for 10 feet parallel to the roadway. A 10' long concrete pad could be placed between the current planned sidewalk and curb. The slope is to be perpendicular to the roadway at 1:50 (2%) maximum. The 10' pad should begin at a distance of sixty feet from the intersection (see attached drawing). 9. Parkland fees are $779.00 per unit and are collected at the time of :building permit issuance. 10. Please add a note to the landscape plan that installation of all landscaping being provided by the developer, be completed prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. 11. A soils report and pavement design must be submitted and approved prior to final approval. 12. The design along Prospect Road should reflect the City's plans, in terms of sidewalk width, separation from curb, etc. Please contact Kerrie Ashbeck about the particular details. 13. Add the words "for each lot" to note 7. 14. Note 6 should read "If a privacy fence is required by the lot owner adjacent to Prospect Road, it shall be constructed so that it remains south of the berm area. 15. Please show details of the Cedarwood frontage. What will this area look like (ie curb, walk, fence)? Staff suggests that fencing be discouraged, or be set back from the property line with street trees planted outside the fence. Shrubbery hedges would be appropriate as well. What we want to avoid is the look created by a solid 6' high wood fence and walk combination, as occurred at Sundisk Village (on Windmill Drive). I am certain, if you take a drive out there you will be convinced to design your project differently. The City will not be maintaining any landscaping along Cedarwood Drive. This concludes staff comments at this time. In order to stay on schedule for the September 27, 1993 Planning and Zoning Board hearing, please note the following deadlines: * Plan revisions are due September 8th, 1993 by 12:00 noon. * PMT1s, colored renderings, and 10 prints are due September 20th. * Final mylars and other documents are due September 23rd. Please be aware that if a development agreement and utility plans are required with this project, these documents and plans must be signed prior to the Planning and Zoning Board Hearing. If not, a condition will be placed on the project giving you 60 days to finalize the plans and agreement, after which time, you must submit a request for an extension from the Planning and Zoning Board. If you have any questions about these comments or would like to schedule a time to meet to discuss them, please contact me at 221- 6750. Sincerely, Kirsten Whetstone Project Planner cc: Kerrie Ashbeck, City Engineering -.--- City Stormwater Utility Stewart and Associates File