The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBROOKFIELD - Filed CS-COMMENT SHEETS - 2003-05-28PROJECT _11WE" COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Plannira! DATE: May 22, 2000 TO: PROJECT: Brookfield Pilot Project — Pre -submittal Meeting All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs of Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for fitture reference The meeting will be located at 700 Wood Street C 1: 30 in the Training Room sigliature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins STAFF PROJECT REVIEW u f�' Ok 1'Ul'� �U111I19 Chateau Development Tom Iskivan 8101 East Prentice Ave Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Date: 8/23/01 Staff has reviewed your submittal for BROOKFIELD PDP, #18-99A, and we offer the following comments: 29,6 fiXf'' /� /,,A ISSUES: Engineering �t� r1 �� r � ,4,v g Issue Contact. Marc Virata The PDP submittal shows only one point of access to the site (via Rock Creek). It has always been the City's position that two points of access to the site are required. The utility plans should show a second connection being fully designed and made at this time (Le Fever Drive and/or Harmony Hill Drive.) 11 Issue Contact. Marc Virata Letters of intent are required for all offsite easements prior to a hearing on the project (this may include a letter of intent from a property owner(s) necessary to have a second point of access to the site. 12 Issue Contact. Marc Virata Add Natural Resources to all utility plan approval blocks (not just the detail sheets and cover sheet.) 13 Issue Contact. Marc Virata The utility plans do not show any subdrains proposed in the development. Is this the case? Are basements no longer being provided as an option? Proposed subdrains need to be shown in both plan and profile view with cleanouts as recommended on the subdrain report. 14 Issue Contact. Marc Virata In general, the grading plan needs to provide contour elevations. The grading plan was difficult to interpret because of the lack of labeling of contour elevations throughout. 15 Issue Contact. Marc Virata What are the grades that will occur for the sidewalk connecting to the regional trail off of Northern Lights Drive on the northeast comer of the property? This could appear to be steep. 1 of 4 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Issue Contact., Marc Virata The final grading and erosion control plan for the northwest corner of the site is not shown on the plan set. This needs to be provided (the overall master grading plan does not suffice as it is not scaled to a typical scaled utility plan drawing .) Issue Contact: Marc Virata Sheet 7 shows an elevation on a private drive off of Steelhead Drive that does not appear to be correct. Issue Contact: Marc Virata Label sidewalk culverts as being metal culverts in instances where drainage flows enter public right-of-way. Issue Contact: Marc Virata Sheet 10 dyes not show the extent of grading on the southeast corner of the site, please expand this information. Issue Contact: Marc Virata Show the transition points for the road designs approaching intersections as redlined. 1-1 The transition point needs to be identified/distinguished from typical spot elevations. Issue Contact: Marc Virata Ensure that the grid on all profile views is dark enough to be reproducible, it appears too light on all sheets. Issue Contact: Marc Virata Why are PCR's shown on sheet 30 for Cinquefoil offsite? Issue Contact. Marc Virata Sheet 33 shows at the intersection of Harmony Hill Drive and Brookfield Drive a negative cross -slope, is this intended? Issue Contact. Marc Virata On Sheet 37, at the intersection of Northern Lights Drive and Le Fever Drive it should be verified that a 2-4% cross slope is maintained. At one point, the cross slope calculates to 4.6%. Issue Contact: Marc Virata A vertical curve is needed on Sheet 38 on the west side of Northern Lights Drive, south of Harmony Hill Drive. Issue Contact: Marc Virata Add a second benchmark to the General Notes (using City of Fort Collins Vertical Control.) Issue Contact: Marc Virata A note should be added to the General Notes that all recommendations of the underdrain report by ACE shall be complied with (assuming subdrains are still being proposed.) ID 2 of 4 28 29 30 Issue Contact: Marc Virata Add "may also be amended from time to time and may" on the Notice of Other Documents, as redlined. Issue Contact: Marc Virata Replace Tanana Drive with Northern Lights Drive where shown. (on the plat) Issue Contact. Marc Virata Have the street names been approved by the appropriate City entities? Stormwater Utility 2 5 7 N. 10 Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque The pond release rate is required to equal the site release rate of 19.84 minus any undetained 100-year developed flows. There is undetained flows along the east side of the project that release straight into the Fossil Creek Inlet Ditch. Please delineate a basin for this area of the site and quantify the flows that are free releasing. These flows can be subtracted from the site release rate to obtain the new pond release rate. Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Please document the offsite flows to the west of the property and size the swale along the west side of Cinquefoil Lane accordingly. These flows can be referenced from the Willowbrook project and included in the text of this report. Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Please provide a 20-foot drainage easement for the 60-inch storm sewer rather than a 15-foot easement and show on the plat. Pipe is too large for this narrow of an easement. Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Please provide swale cross -sections on the grading or drainage plans for all swales. Also, some swales need calculations as well. Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Please include a plan and profile for storm sewer ST-9. If this is to be constructed with Willowbrook, than add note " To be constructed by others" Issue Contact. Wes Lamarque Erosion/Sediment Control Comments: 1. The report indiates the detention pond will be utilized as a sediment trap. Please indicate this on the plan. 2. Erosion control surety calculations were not found. 3of4 31 Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque A discharge permit is required for FCRID and approval of the additional flows to the outfall is required by the irrigation company before approval of the plans. 32 Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Please provide overflow swales for all sump inlets on site. They need to be sized for the 100-year flow and provide conveyance to the detention pond. Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes REPEAT COMMENT: Need to provide a building envelope on site plan and plat for the cabana/pool, and the 2 car garages next to building envelopes 32 and 34. These structures appear to be in Tract D easement. 2 Issue Contact: Peter Barnes REPEAT COMMENT: Does the square footage on the plat for Tracts A,B,C,D, and E include the area of the building envelopes? The tract square footages are being described as the area outside of the envelopes. If so, then they need to account for the envelopes somewhere. 3 Issue Contact. Peter Barnes 24' drive aisle width is required in the double -loaded parking lot at the northeast corner of the site. Section 3.2.2(L)(1) Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Yours Truly, TED SHEPARD. City Planner 4 of 4 Current Planning DATE: August 29, 2001 PROJECT: BROOKFIELD PDP, #18-99A All comments must be received by TED SHEPARD in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: August 22, 2001 1Vote - Please identify your redlines for future reference Dept: Engineering 9 Issue Contact: Marc Virata The PDP submittal shows only one point of access to the site (via Rock Creek). It has always been the City's position that two points of access to the site are required. The utility plans should show a second connection being fully designed and made at this time (Le Fever Drive and/or Harmony Hill Drive.) 11 Issue Contact: Marc Virata Letters of intent are required for all offsite easements prior to a hearing on the project (this may include a letter of intent from a property owner(s) necessary to have a second point of access to the site. 12 Issue Contact: Marc Virata Add Natural Resources to all utility plan approval blocks (not just the detail sheets and cover sheet.) 13 Issue Contact: Marc Virata The utility plans do not show any subdrains proposed in the development. Is this the case? Are basements no longer being provided as an option? Proposed subdrains need to be shown in both plan and profile view with cleanouts as recommended on the subdrain report. 14 Issue Contact: Marc Virata In general, the grading plan needs to provide contour elevations. The grading plan was difficult to interpret because of the lack of labeling of contour elevations throughout. 1 of 6 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Issue Contact. Marc Virata What are the grades that will occur for the sidewalk connecting to the regional trail off of Northern Lights Drive on the northeast corner of the property? This could appear to be steep. Issue Contact. Marc Virata The final grading and erosion control plan for the northwest corner of the site is not shown on the plan set. This needs to be provided (the overall master grading plan does not suffice as it is not scaled to a typical scaled utility plan drawing.) Issue Contact. Marc Virata Sheet 7 shows an elevation on a private drive off of Steelhead Drive that does not appear to be correct. Issue Contact: Marc Virata Label sidewalk culverts as being metal culverts in instances where drainage flows enter public right -of --way. Issue Contact. Marc Virata Sheet 10 does not show the extent of grading on the southeast corner of the site, please expand this information. Issue Contact. Marc Virata Show the transition points for the road designs approaching intersections as redlined. The transition point needs to be identified/distinguished from typical spot elevations. Issue Contact. Marc Virata Ensure that the grid on all profile views is dark enough to be reproducible, it appears too light on all sheets. Issue Contact: Marc Virata Why are PC"P"s shown on sheet 30 for Cinquefoil offsite? Issue Contact: Marc Virata Sheet 33 shows at the intersection of Harmony Hill Drive and Brookfield Drive a negative cross -slope, is this intended? Issue Contact. Marc Virata On Sheet 37., at the intersection of Northern Lights Drive and Le Fever Drive it should be verified that a 2-4% cross slope is maintained. At one point, the cross slope calculates to 4.6%. Issue Contact: Marc Virata A vertical curve is needed on Sheet 38 on the west side of Northern Lights Drive, south of Harmony Hill Drive. Issue Contact: Marc Virata Add a second benchmark to the General Notes (using City of Fort Collins Vertical Control.) 2 of 6 27 28 29 30 36 Issue Contact Marc Virata A note should be added to the General Notes that all recommendations of the underdrain report by ACE shall be complied with (assuming subdrains are still being proposed.) Issue Contact: Marc Virata Add "may also be amended from time to time and may" on the Notice of Other Documents as redlined. Issue Contact. Marc Virata Replace Tanana Drive with Northern Lights Drive where shown. (on the plat) Issue Contact: Marc Virata Have the street names been approved by the appropriate City entities? Provide a phasing plan on the utility plan set. 3 of 6 Issue Contact. Marc Virata 37 4of6 Issue Contact: Marc Virata Second point of access concern. The question of providing a second point of access for the Brookfield development was brought up at yesterday's pilot project meeting. In response to this question, I have had discussions with Ron Gonzales (Poudre Fire Authority) as well as research past discussion on this issue. On January 26, 2001 the Transportation Operations Director, Gary Diede had issued a letter stating the reed for Brookfield to have "at least two points of access from the existing public street network with one of the connections providing an adequate improvement to the City's Improved Arterial Street Network..." With the construction of Rock Creek Drive to Ziegler Road (by Willow Brook, or in the event of Willow Brook not making/completing the connection, by Brookfield) it is understood that this will serve as the main point of access. The second (emergency access) was originally envisioned to be either: 1) a connection west of the site to Cambridge Avenue which would connect to Harmony Road or, 2) Cinquefoil Lane to Harmony Road. This is evident by this same letter, as well as staff notes regarding Willow Brook/Brookfield connections. It is now my understanding that the Brookfield Developer is envisioning this second point of access to be made through streets internal to Willow Brook out to Kechter Road. Based upon discussion with PFA, the creation of a second point of access by way of through Willow Brook is not acceptable and needs to be relooked at. There is the first concern that Brookfield needs to have a separate second point of access independent of Willow Brook. By providing Brookfield's second point of access through Willow Brook internal streets, there is the risk of this second point of access not being maintained during the construction of Willow Brook, especially within the "Phase 1" area of Willow Brook which is not needed for emergency access by Willow Brook. For this reason, from a life safety standpoint, Brookfield's second point of access needs to stand on its own and should not be made through a developing neighborhood. There is also the concern regarding the length of this second point of access. With PFA approaching this site from Harmony Road to the northwest of the site, it is understood that the main point of travel via Harmony Road south on Ziegler Road to Rock Creek Drive east, is a direct connection to Brookfield. However, the second point of access requires emergency response to travel a half mile south of the Rock Creek/Ziegler intersection, over a half mile east on Kechter Road, then an additional half mile north internal to Willow Brook to get to Brookfield. Again, from a life safety standpoint, emergency response time is of concern, especially when considering that the emergency access portion internal to Willow Brook will be through a neighborhood where residential speed limits would be adhered to. The City feels alternatives need to be looked at. As examples, either the connection west to Cambridge Avenue to Harmony Road or, Cinquefoil Lane to Harmony Road as previously mentioned, would be better alternatives. Either connection would require a much shorter total distance! in emergency response travel from Harmony Road (potentially only a quarter mile of travel on Cinquefoil off Harmony), whereupon PFA would have a more direct access with a faster response time and also not run the risk of access internal from another development compromising the ability to access Brookfield in a life safety situation. As such, the next submittal of Brookfield should show a proposed design of the second point of access to the site. Let me know of any concerns regarding this. 5 of 6 Signature Date VA, CHECK HERE IIFYOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _/Plat _ ate _ Drainage Report b/Utility JRedline Utility Landscape 6 of 6 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: August 15, 2000 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: 418-99A Brookfield PDP (II) PLANNER: Ron Fuchs ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received by. - Wednesday, September 06, 2000 General Comments ♦ See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility plan, site & landscape plan, and plat. More specific comments will be mentioned below. Two Points of Access: ♦ With regard to connectivity to an improved arterial street, maintaining two points of access to this development and other street design and construction related issues, these are issues that are starting to be answered by the City and CDOT. Conversations with CDOT and per City's September 7 & 14, 2000 Transportation Coordination, it was determined that Brookfield PDP (and Willowbrook PDP depending on phasing) will have to design and construct Rock Creek Drive to Ziegler Road and construct Cambridge Drive to Harmony Road. At this time Cinquefoil Lane will not be connected to Harmony Road. The basis for this decision is primarily in the interest of providing adequate allocation of traffic to the full arterial network with the emphasis of not over burdening Harmony Road. The design (or cross section) of Cambridge Drive has been discussed briefly between the Applicant and the City, but should be revisited to discuss the intersection with Cambridge Drive and Harmony Road. Currently, the City will require that the Cambridge Drive and its intersection with Harmony Road be constructed to its full capacity (double lefts acceleration and deceleration lanes; Etc.), to the "State of Colorado: State Access Code (1998)" and in accordance with State Hwy. 68 access management plan. (Note: CDOT will not allow any waivers to the street construction and design on Harmony Road.) In addition, access to Cambridge Drive will need to be improved to 3/4 movement. Date: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS: Signature: ❑ PLAT ❑ SITE ❑ UTILITY NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS 0 LANDSCAPE REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: September 12, 2001 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #18-99A Brookfield - PDP - Type II (LUC) PILOT PROJECT All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: September 26, 2001 F� No Comment F-1 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** 0MCK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONSSignature: _ Plat Site _ Drainage Report _ Other Utility Redline Utility Landscape Citv of Fort Collins R-EVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: September 26, 2001 DEPT: ENGINEERING PROJECT: #1.8-99A Brookfield PDP —Type H (LUC) PLANNER: Ted Shepard ENGINEER: Marc Virata All comments must be received by: September 26, 2001 ❑ No Problems Q Problems or Concems (see below or attached) General Comments: • Letters of intent are required for all offsite easements prior to a hearing on the project. [9/26] Ensure that the grantor's address is written on the actual deeds of dedication. Utility Plan Comments: — - • Sheet 10 still does not show the extent of grading on the southeast corner of the site, in discussing this with Stormwater, they want this information — please expand this information. • Ensure that the grid on all profile views is dark enough to be reproducible, it appears too light on all sheets. [9/26] This was done on the street designs, but not the utility designs. • Cross sections are not shown for the swale areas on Sheet 6A of the grading plan. • The lot lines for the single family attached lots don't appear to split the garages down the middle on some of the sheets, see Sheet 7 and 10. • A culvert appears to be missing on Sheet 8. • A timber retaining wall is called out on Sheet 9 for this wall? Who is obligated to construct this? Where is a detail • Some utility plan sheets show a pedestrian connection from Northern Lights Drive to the trail, is this intended? I don't recall the outcome on this ped connection. • The subdrain outfall shown on Sheet 13 needs to have a sufficient easement for maintenance by the HOA. In looking at the utility plans for Willow Brook which appears to construct this, the depth of the subdrain main outfall is as much as 15' below proposed ground. This would require 40' of easement width centered on the subdrain main where it leaves right-of-way. • Provide the sheet showing the vertical installation of the subdrain outfall that was on the Willow Brook plan set, within this set for reference purposes. • The subdrain design for Brookfield shows an 8" subdrain. The subdrain report from ACE specifies 10". An update to the report from ACE needs to be submitted to the City on this change. In addition, this update should verify that the new outfall design does not result in a surcharge of the system. Date: September 26. 2001 Signature: c ` PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS 2 Plat 2 Site El Utility 21 Landscape 0 Drainage Report 0 NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS Sheet 17 shows a subdrain stub that appears to be placed incorrect. Transition points are not shown in all cases or are shown in some cases where I don't believe they are intended (on a through street of a T-intersection). The transition points in some instances are not the required minimum 30' in distance from the flowline of the intersecting street. Plat Comments: Show reception numbers for all recorded easements (the easements recorded with Willow Brook should now be recorded at the County.) The pedestrian path along the east edge of the property that runs north/south should be in a pedestrian access easement. (Tract D is not called out as an access easement.) Development Review Comments — Page 2 ' ' PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Plannint! DATE: August 15, 2000 TO: Mapping/Drafting PROJECT: #18-99A Brookfield Project Development Plan — Type II - (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 5, 2000�-� Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference Z. 5TA iC,—me Aj —, 6F Gc v nsH,P 4 _Z�z0,C�7-(cam._; 5 I .A 1 ��hi z�� i ! � % !v C-u rn L 0 7— R./I T IS Co Pi cut, ��CT- AT T�eA S &u ,3m i T- t a, Gu r,._ -7--(—E 1 S 11 1 M (5 — P\- L� \,/ I 6&,kj Signature CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Citv of Fort Collins REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: January 17, 2001 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #18-99A BROOKFIELD - PDP —TYPE II (LUC) PILOT PROJECT All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: February 7, 2001 F-1 No Cornment F-1 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENC ** q ' 1. AJADD l4) o P b i rJ L- " L'. r� a!-- 'Fenvr�� N IL 1,1 4 vv, s a� jo r o ue d b,, � w, e 31. SP Y v I c a 9? 3. j�il.� �,0r��l7 S�'r�Q� �q5 roc Cii��t�- ►�tq+..-BPS 0)A '0hee� Hid, e-V1ve/opeS c &Joj �o �owie owlilPrs� 5 So -1-i e e.x-� 5" z es a ve_ o ti 2 S wl ot11 S 'c— v" q y ` I� a rc IP . CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Dat'&il :� Sitc Drainage Report SignatukP cr Utility _ Redline Utility — Landscape Citv of Fort Collins REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: August 1, 2001 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #18-99A Brookfield PDP -Type II (LUC) (Pilot Project) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: August 22, 2001 F� No Comment F� Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) "PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** /, �utlD/�2S1 � y��RG GGDS�'• D uJD �DitJ G: �C / T'/ O F,ro eT G'QGG /N.S it �D G6Gf%GC��6�5 L�O/J�/i/�itt1� lr a S �e eT M q vH. P S q Pp DAM HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONSSignature: , , `1 s. _1 _ Piat _ Site _ Drainage Report _ Other _ Utility _ Redline Utility _ Landscape 606 i Citv of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Callins Current Plannint! DATE: Auatist 15, 2000 TO: Engineering Pavement PROJECT: #18-99A Brookfield Project Development Plan - Type II - (LUC) All comments must be received by Ron Fuchs no later than the staff review meeting: September 5, 2000 Note- Please identify your redlines for future reference The Geotechn.ical report dated August 12,1999 prepared by A.G. Wassenaar, Inc. indicates high a swell potential of the soils on this site. The City of Fort Collins requires that swell consolidation tests in the road way areas be conducted at 100 to 150 PSF. Mitigation for the soils under the public improvements will be required this should be addressed in this report. Sigttatdre CHECK IRE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape 6 0 *Mr- iA City of Fort Collins REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: September 12, 2001 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #18-99A Brookfield - PDP - Type II (LUC) PILOT PROJECT G I All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning jig later than the staff review meeting: September 26, 2001 No Comment Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **,PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** / �3atdPJi e✓ L.CGA5C, % 1 �Z ? 1-1 il' a- 3 rz v•� c i3 c 21 f-/../ i D U1 BY: '<?MCK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONSSignature: _ Plat _ site _ Drainage Report _ Other _ Utility _ Redline Utility _ LandsW MIA Citv of Fort Collins City of Fort Collins Memorandum Date: April 28, 2005 To: From: Sheri Wamhoff, Project Engineer RE: REQUEST TO VACATE a portion of a Tract D, Brookfield, a private and emergency access, drainage, public access and public utility easement Attached for your review and comments are a vacation request and a sketch by the Applicant showing the property located on Northern Lights Drive just north of Precision Drive and the portion of the private and emergency access, drainage, public access and public utility easement proposed for vacation along the west side of the property. The Applicant proposes vacating an approximately 118 by 136-foot-wide portion of Tract D along the west property line, and is requesting the easement vacation because they would like to construct an a swimming pool, deck, and shade structures in this location. Also included with this memorandum is a copy of their request. Please sign and return any comments to Sheri Wamhoff in Development Review Engineering by May 12, 2005. If no correspondence has been returned by this date, it will be assumed that you have no objections to the proposed vacation. Please feel free to contact me at 970/221.6605, if you have any questions. Thank you. No problems Problems/Concerns as follows: Katie's Utility Contact Sheet Prcject&&A2 Due date: f �05 STORMWATER r ` Basil Hamdan 700 Wood (970)224-6035 Matt Fater (221-6389x2146) LIGHT & POWER U Doug Martine 700 Wood (970)224-6152 WATER/WASTEWATER �VOl1(✓ Roger Buffington 700 Wood 221-6854 QWEST I� ATTN: Engineering dept Bill Johnson 3351 Eastbrook I" Floor Fort Collins, CO 80525 Rich Stiverson (970)377-6401 (970) 6891204 cell rrulli@gwest.com lspencer(cgwest com rstiverson@gwest, com Lin Spencer y r �or CO/XCELENERGY p,� > S phanie Rich 1901 E. Horsetooth Rd. Fort Collins, CO 80525 Stephanie Rich 2257828 Rick Traynor 225-7827 cell:227-9827 rick.travnoramce lenergy. com fames dewilde@xcelenergy.com gary huett a xcelenergy_com Q COMCAST Dennis Greenwalt 1201 University Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80521 484-7166/Cell227-0143 dennis_greenwalt@cable.comcast.com Please note that CDOT will have to approve changes to Harmony Road. ♦ I realize this is a 50% submittal, but more information is needed for a thorough engineering review. As a group, we might discuss what I am looking for at 50%. Also, I did not make comments that would appear to be obvious, such as locating the building envelopes on the plat, so as you review my redlines, please be aware that all applicable standards for street design still apply. ♦ Please include all horizontal information (i.e. curb return radii, centerline radii, tangents; etc.). ♦ In accordance with Land Use Code Section 3.6.2(L)(2)(f), drainage from private alleys shall not be directed over public sidewalks. ♦ Please show all access ramps, driveway approaches, street and sidewalk widths; etc. Also, provide all details. ♦ The cross section for Cinquefoil Lane north of Astor Way should be discussed at the meeting with CDOT, private interests and the City. ♦ A pedestrian/ bicycle connection to the east should be provided. Obviously, this item should be discussed at the next meeting. ♦ The soils report indicated that high ground water is apparent throughout the site. Please be aware that a groundwater analysis is required if a subdrain system is needed to facilitate building on this site. Please see attached copies of our requirements for a groundwater study. If you have questions or would like to see filed reports give me a call at 221.6605. ♦ The signature column and the project sign are being proposed in the location where utilities would be installed. I need verification that the utilities agreeable to the locations of the aforementioned items or the column and project sign will have to be relocated. ♦ This project will need offsite right-of-way and easement dedications (or letters intent) prior to public hearing. The utility plans should show all offsite right-of-way and easements to be dedicated. ♦ Please provide more detailed grading. FC/LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT & `L`fJ S FC SANITATION DISTRICT Terry Farrill 5150 Snead Dr. Fort Collins, CO 80525 (970)226-3104 x14 tfarrill@fclwd.com US CABLE/INTERMOUNTAIN CABLE US Cable of Coastal -Texas. L.P. 111 West South First Street P.O. Box 356 Johnstown, CO 80534 Contact Person: Rich Fremstad, Construction Manager Phone & Email: Office Phone: 970.587.2243 Office Fax: 970.587.4208 Email: rfi•emstad@uscablecolorado.com rfremstad@co.uscable. com Trans Planning Kathleen Reavis 224-6140 Platte River Power Authority — Tom McCormick Poudre Fire Authority — Ron Gonzales ELCO Web Jones hwebsterAfrii.com 493-2044 Citvof Fort Collins Memorandum Date: April 28, 2005 To:o r �Jt/111 v�GJ }m 1 vv C4t Lt�QS I� r From: Shen' Wamhoff, Project Engineer RE: REQUEST TO VACATE a portion of a Tract D, Brookfield, a private and emergency access, drainage, public access and public utility easement Attached for your review and comments are a vacation request and a sketch by the Applicant showing the property located on Northern Lights Drive just north of Precision Drive and the portion of the private and emergency access, drainage, public access and public utility easement proposed for vacation along the west side of the property. The Applicant proposes vacating an approximately 118 by 136-foot-wide portion of Tract D along the west property line, and is requesting the easement vacation because they would like to construct an a swimming pool, deck, and shade structures in this location. Also included with this memorandum is a copy of their request. Please sign and return any comments to Sheri Wamhoff in Development Review Engineering by May 12, 2005. If no correspondence has been returned by this date, it will be assumed that you have no objections to the proposed vacation. Please feel free to contact me at 9701221.6605, if you have any questions. Thank you. XONO problems Problems/Concerns as follows: 7JUN -- 2 0 2005 JI City of Fort Collins Memorandum Date: April 28, 2005 To: �} SCO/ �C Z �1�� Sit ��(9^n 621J\ From: Sheri Wamhoff, Project Engineer RE: REQUEST TO VACATE a portion of a Tract D, Brookfield, a private and emergency access, drainage, public access and public utility easement Attached for your review and comments are a vacation request and a sketch by the Applicant showing the property located on Northern Lights Drive just north of Precision Drive and the portion of the private and emergency access, drainage, public access and public utility easement proposed for vacation along the west side of the property. The Applicant proposes vacating an approximately 118 by 136-foot-wide portion of Tract D along the west property line, and is requesting the easement vacation because they would like to construct an a swimming pool, deck, and shade structures in this location. Also included with this memorandum is a copy of their request. Please sign and return any comments to Sheri Wamhoff in Development Review Engineering by May 12, 2005. If no correspondence has been returned by this date, it will be assumed that you have no objections to the proposed vacation. Please feel free to contact me at 970t221.6605, if you have any questions. Thank you. No problems jtl Problems/Concerns as follows: WE PRUFA1TLY HAVE A fY-f" PE GAS MAIN LdCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE DF NDI? H£RN L1414TS DR. THIS MAIN LAYS APPROWMRT£lY 6' EAST OF EAST PROPERTY LINE QF NaRTHFPN 110473 bk, WE WILL NEEA A MIAfIMUM DF AT Lcmr 9, TO xEmAm Ax A UT1LII-V EMEMENT ALM& THIf ROAD R.& k/. /.eN N11d6e"o1VD PEJ/G/YER 6/4c/os�- Memorandum Date: April 28, 2005 To: -L)r, u9 nRw-kl V , L'cp � To -"\Mr From: Sheri Wamhoff, Project Engineer RE: REQUEST TO VACATE a portion of a Tract D, Brookfield, a private and emergency access, drainage, public access and public utility easement Attached for your review and comments are a vacation request and a sketch by the Applicant showing the property located on Northern Lights Drive just north of Precision Drive and the portion of the private and emergency access, drainage, public access and public utility easement proposed for vacation along the west side of the property. The Applicant proposes vacating an approximately 118 by 136-foot-wide portion of Tract D along the west property line, and is requesting the easement vacation because they would like to construct an a swimming pool, deck, and shade structures in this location. Also included with this memorandum is a copy of their request. Please sign and return any comments to Sheri Wamhoff in Development Review Engineering by May 12, 2005. If no correspondence has been returned by this date, it will be assumed that you have no objections to the proposed vacation. Please feel free to contact me at 970/221.6605, if you have any questions. Thank you. (� No problems &6u k S /D-DS Problems/Concerns as follows: 6 TST. INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS To: Sheri Wamhoff, City of Fort Collins - Engineering From: Natalie Dickinson, TST, Inc. Consulting Engineers Date: April 25, 2005 Re: Brookfield Easement Vacation The following is a request for an easement vacation at Brookfield. Please see the attached Vicinity Map for Brookfield's location. As platted, Tract D is the area between the eastern right-of-way line of Northern Lights Drive and the eastern property line of Brookfield. Tract D is dedicated as private and emergency access, drainage, public access and public utility easement outside of building envelopes. Please see Final Plat Outer Boundary Sheet 2 of 4 for reference. Near the intersection of Northern Lights Drive and Precision Drive there is a Club House Building Envelop; we would like to vacate a portion of the Tract D easement adjacent to the Club House Building Envelop in order to construct a swimming pool, deck area, and shade structures. Please see the exhibit titled Brookfield Easement Vacation. I am hopeful that the above information, as well as the attachments, provides complete information in regards to the requested easement vacation at Brookfield. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact me at 226.0557 or by email at ndickinsonta'�.tstinc.com. L- 2 3 34 SITE HARMONY ROAD a g i a c tl q J O Q Vl U � N Li v U W Z 5 ¢ 4 v Q 3 ry ¢ W 0 w W z J l7 ]ROD(C.R. W U N KECHTER 36) 8 9 FOSSIL CREEK 10 RESERVOIR i VICINITY MAP AWYONnos uamo 1V'Id IVNld a1361NOONG Ef 6 N A i3 yky�� E�1 2YE V 0 z 1 3 2 „ 9 � o- o � �o ap }�43 s E : � 6 {A a p{ E p1 pFt B ° A age B �E Yg !a? &a fix t a aA ai BROOKFIELD Building EASEMENT VACATION I Envelope I 30 F— 50.8' 4 , Club 49.7• House Building i Envelope ( Envelope Existing Club 7 I House Building Envelope Tract D Proposed Portion of 1178 Existing Tract 0 Easement to be Vacated. PRECISION DRIVE WALE T.49 i IMe1.1-' ,,, .< „,: „.Pw I I Building Envelope 748 Wholers Way, 81dg. 0 I I 31 Fort Collins, Colorado Phone: 970.226.0557 Fov: 970.226.0204 _ I Job no. 0788.0074.00 K:\788\074\dwgs\pool esent v.c.ti.n.dwg April 25, 2005 f PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: August 15, 2000 PROJECT: #18-99A Brookfield PLANNER: Ron Fuchs ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received by. - DEPT: ENGINEERING PDP (II) Wednesday, Septembe(.06, 2000 General Comments ♦ See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility plan, site & landscape plan, and plat. More specific comments will be mentioned below. Two Points of Access: ♦ With regard to connectivity to an improved arterial street, maintaining two points of access to this development and other street design and construction related issues, these are issues that are starting to be answered b.y the City and CDOT. Conversations with CDOT and per City's September 7 & 14, 2000 Transportation Coordination, it was determined that Brookfield PDP (and Willowbrook PDP depending on phasing) will have to design and construct Rock Creek Drive to Ziegler Road and construct Cambridge Drive to Harmony Road. At this time Cinquefoil Lane will not be connected to Harmony Road. The basis for this decision is primarily in the interest of providing adequate allocation of traffic to the full arterial network with the emphasis of not over burdening Harmony Road. The design (or cross section) of Cambridge Drive has been discussed briefly between the Applicant and the City, but should be revisited to discuss the intersection with Cambridge Drive and Harmony Road. Currently, the City will require that the Cambridge Drive and its intersection with Harmony Road be constructed to its full capacity (double lefts acceleration and deceleration lanes; Etc.), to the "State of Colorado: State Access Code (1998)" and in accordance with State Hwy. 68 access management plan. (Note: CDOT will not allow any waivers to the street construction and design on Harmony Road.) In addition, access to Cambridge Drive will need to be improved to 3/4 movement. Date: Signature: / ?'✓i'� :ram% _--- PLEASE SEND COPIES ❑ PLAT OF MARKED REVISIONS: ❑ SITE ❑ UTILITY El NO COMMENTS — SUBMIT MYLARS 0 LANDSCAPE Please note that CDOT will have to approve changes to Harmony Road. ♦ I realize this is a 50% submittal, but more information is needed for a thorough engineering review. As a group, we might discuss what I am looking for at 50%. Also, I did not make comments that would appear to be obvious, such as locating the building envelopes on the plat, so as you review my redlines, please be aware that all applicable standards for street design still apply. ♦ Please include all horizontal information (i.e. curb return radii, centerline radii, tangents; etc.). ♦ In accordance with Land Use Code Section 3.6.2(L)(2)(0, drainage from private alleys shall not be directed over public sidewalks. ♦ Please show all access ramps, driveway approaches, street and sidewalk widths; etc. Also, provide all detai Is. ♦ The cross section for Cinquefoil Lane north of Astor Way should be discussed at the meeting with CDOT, private interests and the City. ♦ A pedestrian/ bicycle connection to the east should be provided. Obviously, this item should be discussed at the next meeting. ♦ The soils report indicated that high ground water is apparent throughout the site. Please be aware that a groundwater analysis is required if a subdrain system is needed to facilitate building on this site. Please see attached copies of our requirements for a groundwater study. If you have questions or would like to see filed reports give me a call at 221.6605. ♦ The signature column and the project sign are being proposed in the location where utilities would be installed. I need verification that the utilities agreeable to the locations of the aforementioned items or the column and project sign will have to be relocated. ♦ This project will need offsite right-of-way and easement dedications (or letters intent) prior to public hearing. The utility plans should show all offsite right-of-way and easements to be dedicated. ♦ Please provide more detailed grading. REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: January 17, 2001 DEPT: Engineering PROJECT #18-99A Brookfield PDP Type II PLANNER: Ted Shepard ENGINEER: Mark McCallum All comments must be received by: February 7,2001 ❑ No Problems Q Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) General Comments ■ See redlined comments on all sheets of the utility plan, site & landscape plan, and plat. More specific comments will be mentioned below. • The soils report indicated that high ground water is apparent throughout the site. Please be aware that a groundwater analysis is required if a subdrain system is needed to facilitate building on this site. Please see attached copies of our requirements for a groundwater study. If you have questions or would like to see filed reports give me a call at 221.6605. ■ Two Points of Access: Show the design for Rock Creek Drive with this plan set. Also, show the design necessary to maintain two points of access. • Show phasing on the utility plans. Utility Plan Comments Cover Sheet; Sheet 1 of 33: ■ Please change the General Notes (see attached document). ■ The ditch company should sign the cover sheet and all pertinent sheets throughout the utility plans. Plat Comments; Sheets 1 to 4 of 4: • Please add all language as required in plat language attachment (see redlined comments on sheet 1). • Please provide all necessary offsite easements and right-of-way as shown with blue highlighter. At the minimum letters of intent will be needed prior to public hearing. ■ Please dedicate a nine foot utility easement for all lots that connect to a public street. ■ Do Lots 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13,14, 26, 31, 32, 33, 34, 34, 36, 37, 39 and 40 have to extend to the public street right-of-way? Grading Plan; Sheets 6 & 7 of 33. • Provide signature blocks for the city and the ditch company. Date: February 15, 2001 Signature: PLEASE SEND COPIES OF MARKED REVISIONS ❑ Plat El"Site ID Utility ❑Landscape ❑'Drainage Report ❑-NO COMMENTS -SUBMIT MYLARS ■ Please use the typical driveway detail D-15 as opposed to the radii approach driveway. The radii approach driveway needs to be granted under a modification to Land Use Code Section 3.6.2(L)(2)(e). ■ Please show all construction and grading easements necessary for this development (see yellow highlighted areas). Note that letters of intent for all these easements will be needed prior to public hearing. ■ Please show street: stubs for Cinquefoil Lane (both north and south), Tamien Drive (west), Brookfield Drive (north) and Dolly Varden Drive (west). This should be shown to comply with Land Use Code Section 3.6.3 fl. ■ Show more grading detail for the parking stalls. ■ 1 question the location of the bridge structure. Is it the most suitable location from a topographic standpoint? Does the applicant intend to pay its fair share? • Please show a full design for the bridge structure, along with a possible connection to the east. ■ A connection should be made from Tanana Drive to the bridge structure. Please coordinate between the site plans and utility plans as to the correct location of the trail. ■ Please note that Rock Creek Drive will have to be designed and constructed with Brookfield or this development will have to wait for Willow Brook approval. Overall Utility Plan; Sheets 8 & 9 of 33: ■ All driveways must be constructed with concrete inside the right-of-way. ■ Please show the trail and bridge system correctly. In addition specify the material (concrete) and its dimension (10 feet). Local Street Comments Sheets 22 to 27 of 33: ■ Please show all curb return profiles. ■ Please correct all curve data tables. Include all curb return radii. Curves C3 and C4 on the Cinquefoil Lane Plan and Profile do not meet the minimum 240-foot centerline curve radii requirement for local streets. ■ Please correct all intersection details. In most cases the through street does not maintain a 2% cross slope. Also, clearly show the crown transition to the through street. Please add elevations as redlined. ■ Please show a 500-foot offsite design for Cinquefoil Lane (both north and south), Tamien Drive (west), Brookfield Drive (north) and Dolly Varden Drive (west). The design should show Type III barricades from back -of -walk to back -of -walk for all stub streets. The Type III barricades should have a sign as shown in the attachment. ■ Provide a signing and striping plan for Cinquefoil Lane. ■ Is the transition for Cinquefoil Lane from 46 feet to 48 feet appropriate at the Tamien Drive intersection? I would think the transition should occur at the north property line. We should discuss the transition with Transportation Planning and Traffic Operations. • Tanana Drive should connect from the southern property line to Rock Creek Drive with this development. Please provide letters of intent for the offsite right-of-way and construction easements. Also, see comment made above and redlines in the utility plans about the construction of Rock Creek Drive. Street Details; Sheet 29 of 33: ■ See redlined comments and attachments. Development Review Comments — Page 2 Site and Landscape Plan Comments ■ Please show street stubs for Cinquefoil Lane (both north and south), Tamien Drive (west), Brookfield Drive (north) and Dolly Varden Drive (west). This should be shown to comply with Land Use Code Section 3.6.3 fl. ■ Please use the typical driveway detail D-15 as opposed to the radii approach driveway. The radii approach driveway needs to be granted under a modification to Land Use Code Section 3.6.2(L)(2)(e). • The 16-foot drive aisles is acceptable in terms of a private alley configuration, considering a public alley can be reduced to 12 feet; however, in locations where there are parking stalls the minimum one -side loading width is 20 feet for 90-degree parking (see LUC Section 3.2.2(L) — Table A). ■ The proposed driveways along Tanana Drive shall not exceed 25 feet. ■ Please show the trail and bridge system. In addition specify the material (concrete) and its dimension (10 feet). • Please dimension typical parking stalls for each parking lot. Also, make sure that all sidewalks adjacent to a parking stall with an overhang as a minimum 6-foot sidewalk. ■ All fences should be setback 1.5 feet from the back -of -walk. ■ All monument signs and other structures should not be within the utility easements. Development Review Comments — Page 3 REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: August 1, 2001 TO: Engineering PROJECT: #18-99A Brookfield PDP -Type II (LUC) (Pilot Project) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: August 22, 2001 F-1 No Comment F-1 Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) **PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR REDLINES FOR FUTURE REFERENCE** DACK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RFCEIVF._CONS OF REVISIONSSignature: Plat _ Site _ Drainage Report _ Other Utility Redline Utility Landscape6= Citv of Fort Collins