Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMemo - Mail Packet - 8/4/2020 - Memorandum From Theresa Connor, Ken Sampley, Mike Beckstead Re: Boxelder Creek Watershed Dams Update (Dams B-2, B-3, B-4, B-5 And B-6)Page 1 of 3 Utilities electric · stormwater · wastewater · water 700 Wood Street PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6700 970.221.6619 – fax 970.224.6003 – TDD utilities@fcgov.com fcgov.com/utilities M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 29, 2020 TO: Mayor Troxell and Councilmembers THROUGH: Darin Atteberry, City Manager FROM: Theresa Connor, P.E., Interim Executive Director, Utilities Ken Sampley, P.E., Director, Stormwater Engineering and Dev Review Mike Beckstead, Executive Advisor RE: Boxelder Creek Watershed Dams Update (Dams B-2, B-3, B-4, B-5 and B-6) Bottom Line: The State Engineer’s Office (SEO) Division of Dam Safety recently updated its regulations governing dams of this type to allow for a Risk and Consequence analysis approach. This approach is different than prior prescriptive regulations and introduces the determination of "potential failure modes" and characterizes the "likelihood" of the failure mode within a risk context. This analysis has been completed for the Boxelder Creek Watershed Dams using recently updated technical information in collaboration with stakeholders from the City of Fort Collins (Fort Collins), Larimer County (Larimer), the Towns of Wellington and Timnath, the North Poudre Irrigation Company (NPIC), the SEO Division of Dam Safety, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and the consulting firm of Short Elliot Hendrickson Inc (SEH). It was concluded that no major reconstruction or rehabilitation of Dams B-2, B-3 and B-4 is needed at this time (given the probability of a major event is exceptionally low) if the following recommended improvements and actions are implemented for each of these dams: 1. Update the respective Emergency Action Plans (EAPs); and, 2. Install water level monitoring and advance warning systems. Dams B-5 and B-6 were determined to meet current SEO regulatory requirements, however routine maintenance activities such as removal of vegetative growth and other minor items is needed at each facility. Representatives from the stakeholders will be meeting over the next 2-3 months to further develop and refine the scopes of service for this work and associated cost estimates. An IGA will be established to allocate financial responsibilities for these improvements as well as future operations and maintenance activities. Fort Collins Stormwater staff has submitted a 2021 BFO offer in the amount of $200,000 to fund its anticipated respective share of the costs for the improvements listed above. DocuSign Envelope ID: 46440182-213E-42C1-96EA-D193874ABFDD Page 2 of 3 Background: A series of flood control dams were built in the 1970s and 1980s to protect agricultural lands from flooding and erosion damage. At the time, the NPIC acted as the local partner with the Soil Conservation Service (SCS), now the NRCS, and with the United States Department of Agricultural (USDA) to build the dams. NPIC currently operates and maintains the dams. In 2014, the SEO completed a routine review of the dams for certification. The land use changes downstream of Dams B-2, B-3 and B-4 from agricultural use to suburban and urban development required a change in the dam classification from “moderate” to “high hazard”. This change in classification of the dams could require expensive rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of the dam emergency spillways and embankments. NPIC and NRCS initiated Supplemental Watershed Plan and Environmental Assessments (SWPEAs) for Dams B-2 and B-3 in 2015 to evaluate alternatives to bring the facilities into compliance with current SEO and Federal regulations and dam safety standards. B-4 was not included due to funding limitations. In accordance with SEO criteria at that time, if improvements are not made and the dams are decertified, there would be a dramatic change to the downstream floodplain impacting over 1,000 residences and businesses in Wellington, Larimer County, Fort Collins, and Timnath. These dams need to be in place and functional to provide 100-year flood protection for downstream properties and to work in conjunction with the recently-completed Boxelder Basin Regional Stormwater Authority (BBRSA) improvements. The Draft B-2 and B-3 SWPEAs were completed in 2017 and 2018. The assessments identified a range of potential improvements to each of the dams that included spillway modifications, overtopping protection installed on the dam embankments, or decommissioning. Conceptual alternative cost estimates varied widely from $3 to $25 Million (depending on the dam under review). In mid-2018, representatives from Fort Collins and Larimer County approached other local governments to form a stakeholder group to further evaluate the Boxelder Creek Watershed Dams and to determine actions and responsibilities to appropriately address flood protection efforts. An IGA was established in April 2019 by the stakeholders to review and refine the potential improvements and to develop potential cost-share approaches to capital and operations and maintenance costs. SEH reviewed the draft SWPEAs and provide comments that resulted in revisions to the hydrologic modeling, updated alternative evaluations, and updates to the conceptual estimated costs. Boxelder Creek Watershed Dams Risk and Consequence Analysis: The SEO Dam Safety Division is the agency responsible for ensuring all dams within Colorado meet standards to protect the general public. The Division updated its Rules and Regulations for Dam Safety and Dam Construction on January 1, 2020 (Colorado Rules). As a result, a new approach to assess dam safety has been incorporated into the rules. The Comprehensive Dan Safety Evaluation (CDSE) tools and process include the completion of a Potential Failure Mode Analysis (PFMA) to evaluate and reduce dam safety risk. This CDSE process enables the determination of "potential failure modes" and then characterizes the "likelihood" of the failure mode within a risk context. Confidence levels are associated DocuSign Envelope ID: 46440182-213E-42C1-96EA-D193874ABFDD Page 3 of 3 with the characterization, along with information that can modify the characterization or confidence levels. The result is a semi-quantitative risk assessment of the dam as opposed to a qualitative report of observations, which provides the framework to determine if and what actions are required to improve public safety. The PFMA process was used to evaluate Dams B-2, B-3 and B-4 (Dams B-5 and B-6 were not included since they currently meet SEO regulatory requirements). Figure 1 below illustrates what the Risk Summary Charts are for Dams B-2, B-3 and B-4). Figure 1 – Risk Summary Chart – Dams B-2, B-3, and B-4 SEH’s risk analysis indicates that the risks associated with the dams would be greatly mitigated if adequate warning of flooding could be provided. Additionally, the current 2015 Emergency Action Plans (EAPs) for the dams do not explicitly describe the triggers for emergency actions. The two recommendations from the SHE report are: 1. Update the EAPs for Dams B-2, B-3 and B-4; and, 2. Install water level monitoring and warning systems at Dams B-2, B-3 and B-4. There are no external construction costs associated with updating the EAP’s. There would be potential consulting costs (no estimate yet) to develop the updated EAP plans and documents. The conceptual costs for the monitoring systems are expected to range from $225,000 to $325,000. Implementing these recommendations would change the Consequence Levels from Level 4 to Level 3 for each dam. The risk would then move from a yellow to green cell as shown above. In accordance with SEO Dam Safety Division regulations, risks that fall in the green cells do not compel requirements for spillway and/or dam rehabilitation. The SEH report entitled “Executive Summary for Project Development for Boxelder Watershed Dam Rehabilitation - Hydrologic Analyses of Boxelder Watershed Dams B-2, B- 3, B-4, B-5, and B-6” gives a good synopsis of the hydrologic modeling and results as well as the PFMA results and is available for review in the Stormwater Engineering and Development Review Division office. DocuSign Envelope ID: 46440182-213E-42C1-96EA-D193874ABFDD