Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMemo - Mail Packet - 3/5/2019 - Memorandum From Lucinda Smith And Matt Zoccali Re: Proposed Changes To Federal Mercury And Air Toxics Regulations1 Environmental Services PO Box 580 215 North Mason Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6600 970.224.6177 - fax fcgov.com MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Troxell and Councilmembers THRU: Darin Atteberry, City Manager Jeff Mihelich, Deputy City Manager Jackie Kozak-Thiel, Chief Sustainability Officer Kevin R. Gertig, Utilities Executive Director FROM: Lucinda Smith, Director, Environmental Services Matt Zoccali, Senior Manager, Environmental Regulatory Affairs DATE: February 26, 2019 RE: Proposed Changes to Federal Mercury and Air Toxics Regulations The purpose of this memorandum is to respond to a request made at the February 19, 2019 City Council meeting under Other Business to evaluate the mercury rule and indicate whether or how this might dovetail with the City’s environmental objectives. PRPA perspective on this was also requested. Bottom-Line The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a proposed rulemaking affecting the Federal Mercury and Air Toxics Rule (MATS). Among other things, the package proposes that it is not “appropriate and necessary” to regulate hazardous air toxics based on a cost benefit analysis. EPA is not currently proposing to weaken existing standards but is taking comment on making additional changes. Even if MATS Rule requirements were removed this would not impact technologies and operations already in place that reduce hazardous air pollutant emissions from the Platte River Power Authority Rawhide Energy Station because the State of Colorado maintains more stringent regulations for mercury pollution. Additionally, it will not change the City of Fort Collins’ strategies, policies, or procedures related to pollution prevention and environmental stewardship. City policies exist that would not support weakening of air pollution standards. Regulatory Background Section 112 of the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) requires the EPA to regulate Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs), from categories of industrial facilities. In December 2000 determined it was “appropriate and necessary” (A&N) to regulate coal- and oil- fired power plants and added such units to the CAA List of Categories of Major and Area Sources In 2012, the EPA promulgated the MATS, which sets standards for all HAPs emitted by coal- and oil-fired electric generating units (EGUs) with a capacity of 25 megawatts or greater. The main DocuSign Envelope ID: 26A213C1-BAEA-43E5-83AC-248A2D14E8AC 2 concern regarding mercury emissions is deposition in the watersheds, and impact on human health and wildlife. Summary of Proposed Changes EPA is proposing a revision to its response to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Michigan v. EPA (2015) which held that the EPA erred by not considering cost in its determination that regulation of HAPs emissions from coal- and oil-fired EGUs is appropriate and necessary. On December 27, 2018, the EPA proposed to revise the Supplemental Cost Finding for the MATS rule, as well as the CAA-required risk and technology review (RTR). The EPA proposes to determine that it is not “appropriate and necessary” to regulate HAP emissions, including mercury, from power plants under Section 112 of the CAA, based on cost benefit analysis. Further, the EPA is proposing that in making this determination that it is not “appropriate and necessary” would not remove coal- and oil-fired EGUs from the list of affected source categories under regulation nor would it affect the 2012 MATs, which would remain in place. EPA is taking comment on alternative interpretations of the impacts of its proposed finding. Additionally, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Air Quality Control Division, regulates emissions of mercury from power plants at levels more stringent that the Federal requirements and Platte River Power Authority must, and does, comply with these standards. The proposed MATS Rule will not impact the requirements at the State level. Platte River Power Authority Perspective Representatives of Platte River Power Authority (PRPA) have provided City staff with input on this question. Regardless of EPA rule-making related to the latest MATS proposal, PRPA has no plans to change anything operationally related to controlling emissions of HAP. PRPA has continuous (24/7/365) emissions monitoring and activated carbon injection technologies, that reduce HAP emissions below all regulatory standards. Relevant City Policies The City of Fort Collins has numerous policies that support air quality improvement and reductions in environmental damage associated with energy generation. Examples are provided below. City of Fort Collins Legislative Policy Agenda 2019 o Air Quality 1. Supports programs and policies that improve public health and air quality and support rapid attainment of National Ambient Air Quality Standards, including ozone. o Energy 1. Supports efforts that promote energy affordability, safety, and reductions in fossil fuel generated consumption for residents, businesses and institutions. DocuSign Envelope ID: 26A213C1-BAEA-43E5-83AC-248A2D14E8AC 3 2. Supports reductions in environmental damage caused by energy extraction and production. 9. Supports minimizing the environmental impacts of all forms of energy. 2018 City Strategic Plan o Environmental Health – promote, protect and enhance a healthy and sustainable environment  4.2 Improve indoor and outdoor air quality Staff would be happy to provide more information if requested. CC: Chris Wood, Environmental Services Manager, Platte River Power Authority DocuSign Envelope ID: 26A213C1-BAEA-43E5-83AC-248A2D14E8AC