Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Mail Packet - 1/9/2018 - Urban Renewal Authority Ura Committee Agenda - January 8, 2018Finance Administration 215 N. Mason 2nd Floor PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6788 970.221.6782 - fax fcgov.com AGENDA Urban Renewal Authority URA Committee January 8, 2018 10:45 am - noon CIC Room - City Hall URA 1. N College URA Strategy 30 minutes P. Rowe 2. Whitewater Park 30 minutes P. Rowe COUNCIL FINANCE COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Staff: Patrick Rowe, Redevelopment Coordinator Date: January 8, 2018 SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION North College Plan area challenges and opportunities discussion with members of the North College Citizens Advisory Group. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to provide background information that may be helpful to the Finance Committee with its discussion with members of the North College Citizens Advisory Group. The North College Urban Renewal Authority (URA) tax increment financing will conclude in 2030. With only 13 years of tax increment collections remaining, and several years fewer after a new project is constructed and assessed, the value of remaining tax increment is depreciated. For this reason, it’s important for the URA to be strategic with a final investment effort in the area. In this vein, the URA along with its consultant Economic and Planning Systems, is undertaking a strategic investment plan for North College, while simultaneously exploring specific investment opportunities including, notably, a west side regional storm system. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED This item and discussion is an opportunity for the North College Citizens Advisory Group to interface with the URA Finance Committee. No direction is being sought by Staff at this time; as the strategic investment plan solidifies, Staff anticipates future URA Finance Committee engagement. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The North College Urban Renewal Plan area was established in 2004. Generally, the plan area is comprised of the North College Avenue commercial corridor extending from the Poudre River on the south to the City limits on the north. With a 25-year life, the North College tax increment will conclude with a final collection in 2030. This leaves the URA with 13 years of increment collections remaining, and several years fewer after accounting for the time lag to generate new increment due to entitlement, construction/assessment, and increment collection. In recognition of this waning opportunity, Staff is engaged in a strategic planning exercise to identify and prioritize investment opportunities in the North College area. The URA has engaged Economic and Planning Systems (EPS) to assist in producing a North College Strategic Investment Plan. Staff is in receipt of a draft report, which includes the following preliminary conclusions: • Specific Focus Area strategies – Identification and specific strategies in 3 key areas of opportunity and impact. • Lacking key infrastructure. o West side stormwater outfall system; o Access connections; • More proactive role in land assembly – In recognition of the challenges due to the fragmented ownership of the area. • Consider land banking property suitable for affordable housing – In recognition that the plan area contains moderately priced land that may be developed and/or land banked for affordable housing purposes. • Storefront Improvement Program – To beautify and improve existing local retailers and businesses. The next steps of the strategic investment plan effort include: • Modifying the focus area strategies to take account of the availability of key parcels necessary to facilitate development and/or public projects. • Further analysis on the west side stormwater system, including refinements to new increment projections and potential phasing. • Additional analysis on prioritization of focus areas and area wide strategies. Staff anticipates completion of the strategic investment plan in February. ATTACHMENTS (numbered Attachment 1, 2, 3,…) CAG Discussion – NC URA Plan Area 1 January 8, 2018 Plan Area Background • Last increment collection in 2030 (13 years of increment remaining) • Increment created after project is built and placed on tax rolls • Available fund balance ~$900K (less Whitewater Park support) 2 Plan Area Background 3 Plan Area Objectives • Address infrastructure deficiencies • More urban approach to College Ave • More complete street network • Greater connections to Downtown • Enhanced appearance and design • Support & complement downtown core Challenges • Stormwater system (outfall) • Street network – local/collector • Fragmented ownership; • Challenging parcel configurations – e.g., long-narrow; • Obsolete structures; Opportunities 4 • Strategic Investment Plan Undertaking – Draft Conclusions • Specific Focus Area strategies – 3 focus areas; • Facilitate installation of stormwater system; • More proactive role in land assembly; • Improve street connections; • Consider land banking property suitable for affordable housing; • Storefront improvement program; Proposed Improvements 5 Conceptual NCDID Improvement Cost 6 Table 5.1 Estimated Construction Costs Description Cost General Costs $675,000 Storm Sewer C and Pond C $313,125 Storm Sewer B and Pond B $1,976,590 Storm Sewer A and Pond A $1,454,835 Total $4,419,550 Total with Contingency $5,303,460 With Storm Sewer A Extension $1,386,800 Total (with extension) $5,806,350 Total with Contingency (with extension) $6,967,620 Goal of NCDID Project 7 The goals of NCDID: • Mitigate local flooding (up to and including the 100-year storm event) • Stormwater outfall – for existing development and projected new development • Regional water quality and detention for development (50% of requirements; remaining 50% addressed on-site via Low Impact Development requirements) Benefits of the Project NCDID will provide the following benefits: 1) The project will provide a needed stormwater outfall for those properties and one for the entire area. 2) Some properties are land locked and need an easement to get to an existing storm sewer. 3) Increase developable area (adding larger buildings, more buildings or parking lots) 4) Reduce maintenance costs from detention ponds. 5) Greater potential for success if the surrounding area is developed and improved via stormwater and street coordinated improvements. 6) Increased capacity of the North College storm sewer reducing flooding of frontage properties. 8 Flood Risk Heat Map 9 Stormwater CIP Project Priorities 10 NCDID System Funding Development (impact fee – based on new impervious surface) City Stormwater (financing for existing conditions and flood control) URA (financing gap) 11 Next Steps • Stormwater CIP Updates and Prioritization • Updated Cost Estimates for Highest Priority Projects – [TIMING FROM MATT] • Updated prioritization – [TIMING FROM MATT] • Design-Implementation Strategy • Consider phasing / constraints / funding scenarios – Jan/Feb 2018 • URA may fund next level of design (w/ partial reimbursement from Stormwater at later date) • Budget Offer FY 2019/2020 (may be independent offer) 12 13 42" RCP 60" RCP 42" RCP POND C 36" RCP 30" RCP 18" RCP 48" RCP 60" RCP 58" X 91" HERCP 24" RCP 24" RCP 36" RCP POUDRE RIVER RAILROAD RAILROAD ALPINE ST POUDRE RIVER PINON ST HEMLOCK ST VINE DRIVE RAILROAD HICKORY STREET CONIFER ST COLLEGE AVENUE RAILROAD LOW POINT LOW POINT OVERFLOW LOW POINT DRY CREEK 24" RCP 66" RCP 66" RCP 60" RCP 60" RCP 48" RCP 4'X9' RCBC 72" RCP 24" RCP 24" RCP 24" RCP 24" RCP 24" RCP COLLEGE AVENUE POND B 22.8 AC-FT POND A ALTERNATE LOCATION POND A 54" RCP 48" RCP (ALT A) (ALT A) 60" RCP (ALT A) 36" RCP (ALT A) 4'X7' RCBC (ALT A) 30" RCP 48" RCP (ALT A) 36" AB WATERLINE 24" ELCO WATERLINE 36" AB WATERLINE Figure 3.1 Proposed Storm COUNCIL FINANCE COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Staff: Kurt Friesen, Director Park Planning and Development Matthew Day, Sr. Landscape Architect Patrick Rowe, Redevelopment Coordinator, Economic Health Office Date: January 8th, 2018 SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION URA funding request for the Whitewater Park EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of the item is to request approval of $300,000 funding from the URA for the Whitewater Park. The Whitewater Park is a planned 12.5 acre park that includes world class whitewater features, park gathering spaces, river overlooks, fish passage and habitat, stormwater improvements and restoration of the area. The project will include many items beyond the whitewater features such as art in public places, road improvements, parking, pedestrian circulation, gathering spaces, wetlands and restoration, historic preservation and interpretation, removing the Coy diversion structure and south bank walls, cleaning up industrial properties, and creating a stormwater basin that returns water to the river. The project also includes a layout the supports future trail alignments, pedestrian bridge, and an upper terrace gathering space that can be enhanced without the need for FEMA or US Corps of Engineers permitting. The Whitewater Park project has funding sources of $9,018,000 and a proposed budget of $9,467,000. The current project scope has been reduced and the project team is value engineering project elements, methods and means. The project team has reduced the amount of hardscape areas, reduced river seating areas, replaced concrete walks with soft paths, phased parking, and reduced landscape elements to what is required by code. The project team is continuing with value engineering efforts to close the budget gap. Items the team is working on are reducing dewatering and water treatment, making utility connections for the south bank at the Powerhouse Campus, using angular granite versus rounded river rock, repurposing onsite materials, and potentially adjusting the timing of the improvements to work in the river first to free up dewatering contingencies and apply those funds to help complete the upland efforts and afford site amenities. Our project team is also working with the River Commissioner to see if the irrigation/ditch companies could take water out through the irrigation ditches, bypass the work site, and return the flows to the river downstream. The approach would reduce the amount of dewatering and water treatment necessary for the project as well as reduce risk associated with in-stream work. The project team is also working to see if water removed from the site could be diverted to the sanitary sewer and not require the costly water treatment system associated with the State dewatering permit. And finally, we continue to seek opportunities to repurpose on-site materials, reduce hauling and handling and divert any materials from the landfill. The URA funds are very important to the project and without the additional funds to help bridge the budget gap, the project will need to eliminate the bridge foundations, redesign a smaller wall at the south bank overlook plaza, and redesign Vine drive to eliminate parallel parking. The Whitewater Park will be a recreational asset for the area, generating interest and activity. Additionally, the project: • Improves Vine Drive by adding 19 parallel parking spaces, a continuous bike lane, curb and gutter, and a formalized the right of way strip with street trees, irrigation and turf grass • Provides improved stormwater conveyance by removing the Coy diversion structure, lowering the river, and terracing the banks to allow places for people and habitat • Creates a new stormwater basin to return storm flows to the river • Results in floodmap revision by significantly reducing the Poudre River floodway, opening significant area to development • Creates fish passage and river habitat that has not existed since the original diversion structure was constructed in the late 1800’s • Enhances habitat diversity through native plantings that support avian species • Cleanup of the area; the project is removing degraded buildings, obsolete concrete structures and walls, and pruning and removing hazardous trees that have been neglected for a long time • Creates historic interpretation of the site including the Coy Diversion and headgate, the Hersh Quonset, the Union Pacific and BNSF railway bridges, and the Grotto • Future alignment of the Poudre Trail will cross the river at the Whitewater Park and connect under the BNSF bridge, through Gustav Swanson Natural Area and replace the at-grade crossing at Linden with a grade separated crossing under the Linden bridge GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. Does the URA Finance Committee support the Whitewater Park Project funding request for $300,000? 2. Does the URA Finance Committee recommend this request be brought forward to the URA Board for consideration? BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The City initiated and funded the master plan for the Poudre River Downtown Project during the 2013/2104 BFO process. The project included a comprehensive planning process for the Poudre River from Shields street to Mulberry. The master plan was approved by City Council in fall 2014 (Resolution 2014-093). The Master Plan identified the area between the Union Pacific and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad as the initial priority for City investment, this area is now the Whitewater Park. The Whitewater Park project area includes College Avenue, the old Coy irrigation diversion structure and headgate, the CSU Powerhouse Campus, Gustav Swanson Natural Area, properties along Vine Drive, and 2 railroads. The Whitewater Park project makes improvements to the river system and surrounding areas by addressing the Poudre River Downtown Master Plan’s core objectives. These objectives are: Flood Mitigation • Improve public safety and protect properties from damaging floods • Reduce or eliminate 100-year flood overtopping of College Avenue • Reduce or eliminate the 100-year flow split along Vine Drive • Reconnect the river to its floodplain while maximizing the beneficial environmental and recreational uses of the river corridor Habitat • Conserve and restore the existing riparian ecosystem to promote river health and resilience • Deliver continuous, connected aquatic and riparian habitat for fish wildlife, trees and plants • Achieve and maintain diverse and sustainable native fish, wildlife, and plant populations. Recreation • Provide a mix of active and passive recreational amenities both in and along the river which encourage a safe, healthy, outdoor lifestyle • Provide community gathering places and promote connectivity between recreational opportunities along the river corridor Funding for the phase one project is provided from several sources: Community Capital Improvements Program $4,000,000 Natural Areas $1,000,000 Stormwater $1,000,000 General Fund (2015) $1,000,000 Parks $ 418,000 Public and Private Fundraising $1,600,000 Total Project Budget $9,018,000 Project Cost is summarized as: Vine Drive, parking and stormwater enhancements $ 513,000 Property acquisition and cleanup $1,000,000 River enhancements $3,675,000 Gathering areas and pedestrian bridge abutments $1,157,000 Landscape elements $ 233,000 Design, engineering, and contractor cost $2,887,000 Project contingencies $ 455,000 Total Project Cost $9,647,000 1 Poudre River Whitewater Park Kurt Friesen, Park Planning & Development Director 01-08-2018 Council Approved Master PIan 2 • Natural Systems Connectivity • Stormwater Enhancements • Recreation 3 Council Approved Master PIan 4 Project Funding Sources 5 Community Capital Improvement Program $ 4,000,000 Natural Areas $ 1,000,000 Stormwater $ 1,000,000 General Fund (2015) $ 1,000,000 Parks $ 418,000 Public and Private Fundraising $ 1,600,000 Total Funding $ 9,018,000 Project Cost Estimate 6 Vine Drive, Parking and Storm Sewer Improvements $ 513,000 Property Acquisitions and Cleanup $ 1,000,000 River Enhancements $ 3,675,000 Gathering Areas & Bridge Abutment $ 1,157,000 Landscape Enhancements $ 233,000 Design, Engineering & Contractor Costs $ 2,887,000 Contingency $ 455,000 Total Estimated Cost $ 9,647,000 Approximate Shortfall $ 629,000 Funding Request • Seeking $300,000 of URA funding • This would fund the • Vine Drive Street Improvements and Parallel Parking • Vine Drive Stormwater Improvements • Vine Drive ROW Landscape Enhancements 7 URA Benefits 1. Desirable Amenity for Businesses and Residents 8 URA Benefits 2. Improved Vine Drive with Additional Parking 9 Existing Condition URA Benefits 10 2. Improved Vine Drive with Additional Parking – 19 spaces added 11 3. Vine Drive Floodway Channelization URA Benefits Existing Condition 12 3. Vine Drive Floodway Channelization URA Benefits Proposed Condition 13 4. Increased flood flow under College Ave bridge Channelization URA Benefits [Matt insert picture] 5. Facilitates future improved connectivity to Downtown Schedule 14 URA Schedule January 8, 2018 URA CAG 2nd Meeting January 8, 2018 URA Finance Committee Meeting Feb 6, 2018 (Tentative) URA Meeting (Tentative) Questions for URA Finance • Does URA Finance support the Project funding request for $300,000? • Does URA Finance recommend this request be brought forward to the full URA Board for consideration? 15 16 Sewer Layout ASSOCIATES LEGEND NOT TO SCALE DRAINS TO POND C NO WQ REQUIRED DRAINS TO POND B NO WQ REQUIRED DRAINS TO POND A NO WQ REQUIRED DRAINS TO THE NORTH COLLEGE STORM SEWER SYSTEM Attachment 1 Conceptual Storm Sewer Layout Page 1 of 1