Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Mail Packet - 3/21/2017 - Agenda - Memorandum From John Hutto Re: March 23, 2017 Meeting With City Of Fort Collins/City Of Loveland Re: Police Training FacilityCity of ,„.,Fort Collins Services MEMORANDUM DATE: March 16, 2017 TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Darin Atteberry, City Manage FROM: John Hutto, Chief of Police Office of the Chief of Police 2221 South Timberline Road PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 970.221.6550 970 416.2085 - fax Ihutto©fcgov.com RE: March 23, 2017 Meeting with City of Fort Collins/City of Loveland re: Police Training Facility In January of 2013 the Loveland City Council identified a police training facility as a top priority. The Loveland Police Department was facing an uncertain future with the facilities they were using at the time for training. Concurrently, Fort Collins Police Services was having a strategic conversation about our Department's current and future training needs. Given the similar needs between our two Departments as well as the potential benefits of forging a partnership that would be beneficial to both our communities we engaged in a conversation about the feasibility of a joint project. The result of those conversations was an agreement to develop a proposal leading to a Police Regional Training Center. In July of 2013 the leadership of both communities directed that we go forward with the development of a proposal for review and Fort Collins joined with Loveland as a 50/50 capital partner. The remainder of 2013 and the 1st quarter of 2014 was spent doing due diligence for the business model, identifying an appropriate location, and drafting the initial conceptual plans for the project. In April of 2014 a joint meeting of the Fort Collins City Council and the Loveland City Council was held. This meeting demonstrated that there was a general consensus for moving forward with the project and the project team continued working and provided answers to the questions raised. The project team reached out to all of our law enforcement partners in the region in order to solicit input on their needs and the feasibility of additional capital partners for the project. Overwhelmingly, the response we received was that, while they were unable to come aboard as capital partners, they would most certainly be a user of the facility on a fee basis. In November of 2015, the Fort Collins City Council unanimously approved and appropriated funds for the design of the proposed facility. A vote of the Loveland City Council for the same or t of purpose in December of 2015 failed on a 4-4 split with one recusal. This effectively put the project on hold. 2016 saw leadership changes in Loveland. A new City Manager was hired as well as a new Police Chief. The training challenges, needs, and deficiencies faced by our two Departments continued to be an issue. The two City Managers, the Loveland Police Chief, and I met and discussed the history of the project and agreed that we should rekindle the conversation and seek to move the project forward. The major elements from the original project agreements remain in place. The facility will be designed and built at a location that has been identified on the west side of the airport. Loveland and Fort Collins will be 50/50 partners in the capital costs associated with design and construction. The facility is intended to primarily meet the current and foreseeable skills training needs of our two departments. Unused capacity will be available to sell to other regional agencies resulting in a potential revenue stream. Since the initial project conversations there have been a couple of significant changes. Loveland has indicated that in addition to being a 50/50 capital partner that they want to explore a different model for determining how O&M is administered. The original agreement focused on the size of our respective Departments. This resulted in a 2/3-1/3 split. Loveland is now proposing either a 50/50 split or a model that is based on usage to cover the O&M. The other significant change involves conversations with Front Range Community College. FRCC is developing a POST certified law enforcement academy at their Fort .Collins campus. This academy will require mandated hours for firearms and driving training. There are currently no facilities in the immediate area that will meet this requirement for them. The proposed Regional Training Center would meet this need. FRCC represents another for -fee user. The Loveland City Council met last month and received an update on the project. They indicated that there is support once again for moving forward. This brings us to this next step; a joint meeting to seek alignment and direction. In the evolution of this project over the last few years we have been responsive to all of the feedback, questions, and suggestions that have been provided. The result is a proposal that meets our needs and is responsible in scope. From the early days of this project Fort Collins Police Services has appreciated the opportunity to have this conversation with our elected officials and the Community. We have also been cognizant and grateful of your recognition that well-resourced training is critical to providing the service our Community expects and deserves. By leveraging regional partnerships we have a unique opportunity that will not only raise the bar for our training but do so in a fiscally responsible way. Agenda Item Summary Fort Collins City Council Item Number: Date: March 23, 2017 Staff: Chief John Hutto Subject: First reading of Ordinance Number XXX, 2017, appropriating revenue in the General Fund and authorizing the transfer of appropriated amounts between accounts and projects for design of the Police Regional Training Center. Executive Summary: In January of 2013 the Loveland City Council identified a police training facility as a top priority. Concurrently, Fort Collins Police Services was having a strategic conversation about our Department's current and future training needs. Given the similar needs between our two departments, as well as the potential partnership benefits that would be beneficial to both communities, we engaged in a feasibility assessment of a joint project. In July of 2013, following the assessment, the leadership of both communities directed that we move forward with the development of a proposal for review with Fort Collins joining Loveland as a 50/50 capital partner. That partnership now seeks permission to move forward to a facility design phase. Background/Discussion: The remainder of 2013 and into 2014 was spent developing the business model, identifying an appropriate location, and drafting the initial conceptual plans for the project. In April of 2014, a joint meeting of the Fort Collins City Council and the Loveland City Council was held. There was a general consensus for moving forward with the project. The project team spoke to our regional law enforcement partners to solicit input on their needs and the feasibility of additional capital partners for the project. Regional agencies responded that, while they were unable to assist as capital partners, they would certainly utilize the facility on a fee basis. In November of 2015, the Fort Collins City Council unanimously approved and appropriated $800,000 for the design of the proposed facility. Loveland's progress was delayed and that money was held back. Since that time, the two City Managers and the two Police Chiefs met and discussed the project and agreed to rekindle the conversation and seek to move the project forward. The major elements from the original project agreements remain in place. The facility will be designed and built on the west side of our regional airport. Loveland and Fort Collins will be 50/50 partners in the capital costs associated with design and construction. The facility is intended to primarily meet the current and foreseeable skills training needs of our two departments. Unused capacity will be available to sell to other regional agencies resulting in a potential revenue stream. The Loveland City Council met last month and indicated that there is support to move forward. This brings us to this next step; a joint meeting to seek alignment and direction. Financial Impact: A BFO offer for $1,080,000 in 2017 was approved. Since the initial project conversations, Loveland has indicated that in addition to the 50/50 capital partner they want to also explore a different model for determining how O&M is administered. The original agreement focused on the size of our respective departments resulting in a 2/3-1/3 split. Loveland is now proposing either a 50/50 split or a model based on usage. The other significant change involves conversations with Front Range Community College (FRCC) which is developing a law enforcement academy. That academy will require mandated firearms and driving training and its director has indicated a desire to utilize our Regional Training Center since there are no facilities in the immediate area that will meet their requirements. FRCC represents another for - fee user. Environmental Impacts: Will be assessed and managed during the design phase. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance on first reading. Board or Commission Recommendation: N/A Public Outreach: The public in both municipalities has been aware of this discussion due to on -going discussions with Council. We have been responsive to all of the feedback, questions, and suggestions that have been provided Attachments: Cover Letter, (2) Letters of Support -Fraternal Order of Police, PowerPoint presentation for Joint Council Session. LOVELAND FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE 52 PO BOX 2292 • Loveland, Colorado 80539 www.lovelandfoplodge52.org Rob Pride President Jennifer 'lines Secretary June 27, 2016 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council members: On behalf of the men and women of the Loveland Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) Lodge 52, we are writing this letter to you in support of the new training facility being reconsidered. Our membership is comprised of law enforcement officers of all ranks and their diverse policing knowledge is extensive. Nowhere is there a pool of officers with more cumulative, experience -based law enforcement knowledge than in the F.O.P. Loveland F.O.P Lodge 52 now represents over 96% of the sworn personnel within the Loveland Police Department. As you know, a survey of our membership in 2015 revealed a new training facility to be the lowest priority in a list of ten areas our members were asked to rank. During that time, our membership was at a height of frustration and exhaustion due to ongoing s fling shortages and leadership issues which were not being addressed. Your commitment to our staffing problem with the immediate addition of officers to the 2016 budget; in conjunction with the new vision, leadership direction and rejuvenation we have already experienced with Chief Ticer, the frustrations and concerns of our members in these areas have significantly reduced. Our members were never not in support of the training center. They only voiced there were more urgent issues which needed to be addressed first. As we wrote to you in 2014, we support a training facility which meets the growing and changing needs of Loveland's community and police force. We are excited to hear these discussions are happening again and urge you to reconsider your stance on this matter. Public Safety is a critical service to the community and the citizens of Loveland who expect and deserve the best. Loveland Police officers are a dedicated group of professional men and women who make service to the community their highest priority and are proud to answer that call. They are well trained, highly educated and among the best in the nation. To maintain this high standard and level of service, we must make a priority of constantly searching for innovative and advanced ways to best train our officers. To achieve this, we must have the support and understanding of both our citizens and their elected officials. A Proud Tradition in haw Enforoement LOVELAND FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE 52 PO BOX 2292 • Loveland, Colorado 80539 www.lovelandfoplodge52.org Rob Pride President Jennifer Hines Secretary Training Facility- Page 2 In the past, there has been much discussion about the funding mechanisms and the need for such a facility. While we leave the financial strategies for funding such a facility in your capable hands, we want to make clear the need for this facility to become a reality. The officers and instructors who use our current facilities on a regular basis for training would tell you they are not adequate. Nor will they meet our needs as the city, police department and demands for quality service continue to grow in the future. The lot at the Fire Training Grounds was not designed or equipped to house high-speed driving, evasive maneuvers or training techniques designed to disable vehicles fleeing from apprehension. It is essential for officers operating high performance vehicles called upon to utilize higher speed emergency response and pursuit driving techniques be able to train those maneuvers and techniques properly. The confined space at the fire training grounds does not allow for this. Although some of our basic firearms training needs are met at currently utilized facilities, some crucial components are not. Distance rifle training is limited at the indoor facility we currently use. We do not have active "shoot house" training abilities. This type of dynamic training is essential in keeping our officers highly trained with the latest tactics and techniques when engaging armed suspects and hostage situations in an urban environment. The new firearms facility being proposed would eventually address these issues and deficiencies in our current firearms training. We applaud this councils' ongoing commitment to prioritizing public safety for the citizens we serve. Public safety has been the top priority for our citizens and you have continued to echo this; most recently with your unprecedented approval of up to 12 new police officers to address our staffing shortages. It was also evident in your initial approval of $18 million for this facility to be built. This vote showed the importance you have placed on keeping your police officers well trained and your community safe. There has been discussion in the past about "simulators" and providing simulation training in lieu of the proposed training facility. Although we welcome simulators in addition to the proposed training facility, this type of training would not be a replacement for the hands on operational training of a high speed driving track or an automated, live fire shooting facility. There is no A Proud Tradition in Law Enforcement LOVELAND FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE 52 PO BOX 2292 • Loveland, Colorado 80539 www.lovelandfoplodge52.org Rob Pride President Jennifer Hines Secretary Training Facility- Page 3 question simulation training can be beneficial in our profession. But this type of training simply can't replace the value in driving our actual vehicles during a simulated response or pursuit; or actually firing our duty weapons in a dynamic environment. As Loveland Police Officers, we understand and value the daily trust placed in us as we carry out our duties. We also recognize the importance of receiving the best training available to maintain the high standard our citizens have come to know and appreciate in our service. You have demonstrated time and again how you also value and understand its importance. We believe the proposed training facility is the next step in maintaining that high standard for our officers and this community. We appreciate your vigilant work in managing the city's financial situation. As you navigate through this discussion and funding options again, please know the men and women of the Loveland Fraternal Order of Police do believe we have a true need for new training facilities. We strongly support this endeavor and urge your support as well. Sincerely, Rob Pride President Loveland Lodge 52 Fraternal Order of Police Lodae52pridea,gmail.com A Proud Tradition in Law Enforcement F Northern Colorado FOP Lodge #3 Dear Citizen Representatives, February 28, 2017 The Northern Colorado Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #3, who represents the women and men of more than 20 law enforcement agencies in northern Colorado, are asking for your support of the new training facility in a joint venture between Loveland and Fort Collins. There are many foundations to successful employees, but the main ones are: • Hire the right people; do extensive backgrounds. • Equip those you hired with the tools to succeed. • Train those you hired by providing the best available training from the beginning to the end of their career. Most agencies in northern Colorado have hiring standards that vet all applicants and hire those most likely to succeed in law enforcement careers. Those agencies also provide equipment to perform the duties of all employees in law enforcement. The greatest area of concern from Lodge #3's perspective is the ability and facilities to train those employees hired and equipped. As we look across the country on those agencies making negative national headlines, many of those headlines could be avoided if law enforcement personnel had better and more training. Failure to train is one of the key components in judicial litigation across the country that have cost the city, county, state and federal agencies millions, if not billions of dollars nationwide. As the northern front range continues its accelerated expansion, the need for a regional training facility is at a critical junction. Many of our members still train at facilities built over 40 years ago. These obsolete, dysfunctional, if not unsafe facilities barely meet the minimum standards we set for our agencies. The membership of Lodge #3 realizes this is a substantial investment in the future of law enforcement in northern Colorado, and applauds those tasked with the decision to invest in a new, state of the art training facility. Not only will a new facility show the employees they are valued, the relationships built with our communities are worth every penny we invest in everyone safety. Sincerely. Membership of Lodge #3 POB 56, Fort Collins, CO 80522-0056 t mail: fop3fc53@yahoo.com Police Regional Training Center Joint Council o) C .� cn � c .92 0 r- .F.+ Q LL a) }, Q Z O �. �S O co co cL L . ' 0 U 0 = c c t .0 t 2 (13 I LL O LL Staff Recommendation • • • • • >, .0 0 U O 1.2�1� c 'L W a) c _ Q W o_ ) o c a co a)^` ANA♦' Na) Wcii co c .c O a) 0 o Q 0 .F• 2 c co a) ca o c-o .E o E co cU co Fs= UU) c CO o > CD 0 To >' c a)cr) 'cali h O . c c >+ 0. N L c Q . V V O 'd, a.�av '�>, E a? O 213 c�=mom �,�= 2> 4a—_—)co li cB U — ri c 0- it�•O c (, O U = 'c� . o �UUoo•�U _Oc c rn>, UU� EU�0E'ma)o'co Uoc� U�c v' c coi'�'o to ~ U Cl a) TD CO °=.c Coo coo O W O 0) c a) ,� O LL J U a) L L. L. JJ O J�'a L''W G) LL CD p i N N M 03 a_5 L. c) d Q= a) In C8 O N 1� Q. qr. -7Q—O o«Qci OLLZ0 c N • • • • N • • • N • • • N co .N U) N co Y 0 c c0 > 0 -J CO 2 L .Q N LL L' co co November and December of 2016. c O1 - VI O U N N o o oj N 0 0 a) C 'a O O N -Co (I) 4 'CI • N > CD a) v) V- N o cm2 o O .c N .� (NI0 O i> O >, N O N 0 a) ca � N -0 0a) O a coU 0 (o C O N c N C U O> vQ c c o ° ;n C = >, a`) C p co. or.° ui >, O ° L 0 w :2 0 cn L O o m I-cLLU Ea U Q I O asa)o .c o 1... U +N ` co N U) Q `: a) a)O O U I — CO C U 0. O 0 O N'a CMJ = Oa. U O O — c O N)C c�> Qvo c ma). cci )V cUao L.L. ° m o°° "F-1 C a)N C aN Q o)0 c •• aca O v 2 •n O H X Vc �� ) �"V—tea. 0,5 W I coa 2;c 5 o o ij oCU N >, y c` i 0) ••�'� O cm O a) N N 0 QAi.— ' O +' c = '� c O a) .> C C N-o N Q V ��0 1—'caa.21—�cC c a) Ccui it". . . . Li_ 2 Y In U cc; M 1_4I a. O CN co - U U E ( 3 2 > as c — C.) di 4 I a) .cr O O N V� U N 13 E Ci N 0 C ER E oa a) 0 C N a) 0 0) N I N Cl) - L iii E i N (I)cc"2 U 0. C35 n' a) N N L U) O O 06 E E -t 0 O ) N U Y +■+ — co O a) Q l--- E U f6 a) a) O R�,� C� 0 f_ =��t co a) C.)V N Q a) "O 'a t� N 0) O. CC(A CC rnt U 2 • m m m ° O U1 N M N M M '-i N. 4 N rl -i i�1 m N 000 003 011 O ei N N c•1 i lO N O e-1 N O M M N n m rn O oo O r•1 1' 14 N' rl 4 Tr Tr 1L11 M o '-1 0 a f0 H. 10 u u c c 0 0. o. t 0 0 1n IIIIM at b4 4.1 13 v g 00 m cu 4.0 M s 7 0 Q O 'p OiS '0 I= v j 0 L` v 0 m u .5 Q m 00 Y > 00 a LL C CO ro 0� 0 M 0 b0 C N a! W C U W O C O C Cb0 N b0 U , O b0 .N C GUON.02j N OCr Y OJto�+ c0 0. g y 13 'C N Ow i 7 f0 OaOmii U ma+ O O it v�++ 6.13 + . • . —1 N ^ N N N a-1 eI N e1 Cr Cr N -1 m N in O 0 , '.I 44 in. N N as r-i N 0 44 cr r-Im a m N N !r M N in. IA 0 . Sit Tot o N o 8 :te. 0. w 0 LA i O •- o cn la Ito c O = 1 v 1/1 CO C o v_ t' 2.(0 m0 ■_ To CD" rn 2 i 4- o le ._ _. .0 t2 c ,cn L. C) > L 0.1.-.t. 0 2 To a) a. Li J it v, o . . 4.4 RS RS ca O Ira LL >I 0 ca LL Z Anticipated Capital Need ($000's) 50% Share Ln N al 1/4 Ln N a1 $ 18,519 I N Loveland Total C 0 U 0 L > 0 N > al N o N e^i N aJ a) E 1z a) N a O L a ill Design & Architecture Site Work Construction Track Construction Range & Classroom Construction O d7N O O N c O 0 O • •= •W N N O E O 2 c O a) N C6 2 c ""E =--; c2 Eh TU o 1.1- CO O • • • Cl) 0 Vra 0. E >+ N C Q to •ice 4"" CD -NC N N Q N m M � • • 03 W 03 tV ( co - 00 • • M Track/Skid Pad 576 1,152 1,152 1,152 1,152 Ranges (2) 576 1,152 1,152 1,152 1,152 Classroom (3) 864 1,728 1,728 1,728 1,728 Total Segments 2,016 4,032 4,032 4,032 4,032 I Segments Consumed by FC/Loveland Track/Skid Pad 61 126 130 134 139 Ranges(2) 329 676 697 719 742 Classroom (3) 696 1,431 1,474 1,522 1,570 Total Segments 1,086 2,234 2 301 2,376 2,450 Percentage of All Segments Used Track/Skid Pad 11% 11% 11% 12% 12% Ranges (2) 57% 59% 60% 62% 64% Classroom (3) 81% 83% 85% 88% 91% Total Segments 54% 55% 57% 59% 61%I N O N 2022 2021 2020 2019 Total Segments N 0 0 0 V1. N O O N O 0 N n O Training Facility Operating Costs 01 N r-1 %--1 l0 01 O1 00 t n. a) 11) a) 0 O Y OD a) r0 L U 0 a) a) a) CC E v ro u 0) u_ 0 0- CC Rental Revenue No FRCC cadet revenue • C O CO 10 N To O co O � 4) O c c o a) N CO > E ti = cC N N O C Coc cC ea Q co cn . . N N O� 1.0 N Vl V1 rn o N N a-1 N rN oN 0 00 c c c to 0 Y1 L a Operations, Supplies, Maint tor.' 00 of iA 00 4,4 e-i 00 M iR e.i a N 1,4 i/► 00 000 1.4 Training Facility Net Cost NN O O N N 0 N 0 0 0 0 Share of Net Cost Lfl rn rl 0 0 a Share - Loveland Share - Fort Collins (Total Facility Net Cost 0 in 0 4.4 in 4-0 O V Op c a:+ co I- d a 0 'u co u. wo c C 11 L. H Loveland Savi O N 41 .-1 O i 1 t/) 'LA- N 00 ft:1 t-1 1/1-ifli O 1f1 011 ti O 00 uoipn4suo3 N O N aoo f0 Y C 0) a) CC C 2 a X W O) � > 0) L (10 Y F C C 0 CU cc CJ - C v ° L LL co) Total Loveland Hard Savin IA Total Loveland Soft Savin 1) Fort Collins Savings N 0 N 0 N 01 a-i O lt) t/) N t/) 4/)1 �1 t/) a --I N M 1f1 ri ID MI II t/) N t/) 1/N V)I N r I t/). M tf) a-i V11 M 00 a --I t0 _ V). V). V) N v„ 00 uoipn4suoD N Ln VI t/) INt/) t/)I t/) a4 t/) M VI. -I n 0 01 C 0) Q X W 0) ID ) LL M C CO U C C c t > m Q) > N VI to v" O1 C C C c c0 o o o C Uy y L i� t L o 0 0 LL LL LL LL Total FC Hard Savings H Total FC Soft Savin N O N N N a-1 N O N N O N cri N 1I N l" 1 N o N VI- i/i ... L/1 Ol P. IA O lM D r NI e.l v Ln m m LEA re N M M M et' ef V V v 4.4 t!} 4/1• i? VI 03 0 bO C E 0 N tn rts 0 76 • N N C CD 0 0 Loveland Share of Cost Budget Impact -Loveland (High Case) *Note: lease for airport land not included, offsets current city contribution 0 u 0 LL 0 0 0 fd f0 a E Training Facility Budget N 01 O co N Lf1 C1 Ll1 O O LO IMf O r♦ l.0 0 NN iA V1 N in. in. G1 If N O Lv 01 ri O 1.0 r. V► V► iA iA in. L!1 l0 ap7�f O lD Q0^11 •��p• fpr�p1• ••• O 1� .-I 1� iA iA iA in. in. N ei 1.0 O CO eel ^ 1-1 Jw J- Jw► Jw JVw �^-I N a=I l.0 O v . e-I F V1 in. N O Ln F LC ei▪ t in. 171 F 0�1 i/1 iA iA i/► iA i/1. C bn t/f 11) 0 FC Share of Cost tko j co Ln U LL iA in V1 iA iA Total Fort Collins LA w A >- 0 0 • t--I O 0 Lf1 Ln Cr) aU U O 0 O U 00 00 C C .0 C C as N C c LL IL- IA N C C O 0 O U t O 0 LL LL Budget Impact- FC- 20yr (Base Case) Budget Impact - FC -10 yr (Base Case) Budget Impact - FC- 20 yr (High Case) Budget Impact - FC -10 yr (High Case) *Note: lease for airport land not included, offsets current city contribution co a E a) L •C O �((0' a) I — a) > O CO 0- (/) o a) -0 o a) o oU > _ • Q LL 0 0) 1) 4- -0 (0 a L L U O O To to U co TD • • 0_ U COco Fort Collins cts a) 0 J Chief John Hutto L L LLJ CD la-) C) O 0 a) CO D Z CD V (3 u) c >- N Q N -6 c N CO a c Q N (0 CO L a) CD cLt-LU U 2 as c a) }, (B = u 'LJ =U ❑ 0_ <ocgo:Ia Chief Robert L. Ticer N V 012 • More refined data based • 0) a) 0) 0 • C Y Ch E O • V _c U a) Q C o E Annual Operations and Maintenance Costs Sq Ft Cost Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 N co (4 to M 34,666 I 73,158 0 h N CA 27,434 42,7971 38,408 I O N 113,705 j co O 60,777 53,180 I O 131,896 I O 111,425 634,576 I N N N $125,664 33,656 33,656 L _ 71,027 O N 69 (0� N 7 37,289 rnM �O v N O 59,007 51,631 OS 128,054 v t0 Or°O Oco N- CO NO N N iA 32,676 32,676 0 (0 (0 $256 313 25,859 cMNr O V (0 M 107,177 0 (0 57,289 50,128 N r 124,324 (oo, to 105,029 1 598,149 j 2020j oTr vnrrn� co .-MM(0Nt ui -- Tr oco (0ao N (A . 25,106 co (0 of CO 35,149 in ((0 v 104,056 ((0 (0 55,620 f 48,668 Lc) n 120,703 I L 5,150 101,970 580,727 2019 0) (0 r O ea I 18,954 18,954 40,000 h P co. EA 15,000 23,400 I 21,000 0) CD Nto 0) CO N 0)M a-N t0(cM N- 29,077 t0 ,- (0 72,115 n n O M 60,923 346,962 nNi a- 0 W a- 0 n a- to N a- 0 0 N 0 r 0 0 (V !A 19,500 19,500 tt) 0) '- to 0 '- Oj n (0 27,000 27,000 27,000 0 M 49,500 Staff Expense Full lime Campus Manager (1 FTE) 1 Facility Support - Maintenance Tech (0.5 FTE) Facility Support - Building Attendent (0.5 FTE) Administration Support (1 FTE) Total Staff Expense Main Building -Adman/Classrooms/Support Custodial Maintenance and Repair . N 7O w 7 0 p O) N Total Main Building Expense Pistol and Rifle Range - 25 Pistol / 10 Rifle Lana Custodial Maintenance and Repair N O) P S Operational Supplies Total Range Expense Driving Track & Support Buildings to a 0 p 2:7 N 0 Capital Renewal Capital Renewal N 00 a�-1 u'1-I r-1 N N 00 a -I -I rtr)rst -I N N 00 In tri N 1 e-I rl N N 00 Lfl Lnr-i � n n In t11 00 4.9 d eta N Y � o a) N a) o ao ra H H cc u O O 2,016 4,032 Total Segment C 71) O LL CU E O u c cu 40 a Hw 01 N O ✓ • N Li i-1 01 N tD t0m a -I aN1 t.DD t0 N 0�1 m tD Track/Skid Pad E 0 vi cto '^ 2,376 2,450 a, tat a, To H 0, c O cg tin O ba 0, N L^fl N g N .i 11 N 00 N %-1 O C71 ttD lND a --I Classroom (3) n M N N Total Segments 0 co) N c CO3 G ba 0 O (oobo u L a O 0 0 m n 0�1 O 0 0 m o • 0 0 N tL0 0 • 00 Nt.01 03 a-1 to 00 J O Q / 2022 2023 Track/Skid Pad 576 1,152 1,152 1,152 1,152 Ranges (2) 576 1,152 1,152 1,152 1,152 Classroom (3) 864 1,728 1,728 1,728 1,728 Total Segments 2,016 4,032 4,032 4,032 4,032 Segments Consumed by FC/Loveland Track/Skid Pad 61 126 130 134 139 Ranges(2) 329 676 697 719 742 Classroom (3) 696 1,431 1,474 1,522 1,570 Total Segments 1 086 2,234 2,301 2,376 2,450 Segments Rented Track/Skid Pad 134 215 268 537 1Ranges(2) 55 88 111 221 Classroom (3) 42 67 84 158 Total Segments - 231 370 463 916 Percentage of All Segments Used Track/Skid Pad 11% 23% 30% 35% 59% Ranges (2) 57% 64% 68% 72% 84% Classroom (3) 81% 85% 89% 93% 100% Total Segments 54% 61% 66% 70% 83% O N O N O N 2019 Total Segments a o H 0 0 0 i/. N 4.0 Vl 0 u ea d a 0 CO i 1- Revenue v. O&M cost Assumptions: N Cl) — >1 as (D -0 N N 4- p O O p 5 p = N N p 0.,.C E O — a) a) L N� N 0) � U U>+NC) a .O ti N N�- OwCV 0 C (0 moo (0 LL ea CC O CC v) N .0 M O N ei N O 01 O N O O N N. °' `"—� v N 0011 N a-I-1 ei N ei NI Ol I -I ei ei 0000 0 O N V1 Class Charge to Outside User a, c a, CC E a) a, U O 0_ U cc LL Rental Revenue N • N a-4 to N. in N N O 01 O N N r—I crt M l0 O 00 00 O 00 2 Q Iz a, (r) ai °- ' ocu CC co 00 0 ( i 0) . Q o a O u Total Expense Training Fadlity Net Cost N N 00 Lfl Ln n a -I a- a--1 N N OO Lf1 LC) N a --I a --I i•-• ai a-i r1' N N 00 Ln Ln a1 a- 1 ai ai "1. N N 00 Ln VI CV a-1 a-i a -I N Ln Ln 00 N�O N M O N et N O l0 O N1 Total Sekme Ol N O aI N LLn a-1 Ol N M .--I N a1 r\ Ln ri O N M Ol N a1 lD Cr a -I' (ID aNI lla Cr tD N O0l M 1.0 Track/Skid Pad 0J OD co Classroom (3) 2,376 2,450 ap-1 N Total Segments 0) 4.1 C 0) c E 40 0) Track/Skid Pad Classroom (3) M M Total Segments Sessions/YearI N M a-i l0 M M M O N O a-1 M M Class Name Force Options Shooting [Incident Command System Internal Affairs Investigations Interview/Interrogation Leadership School Less Lethal/Taser Mobile Field Force/Riot Control Officer Survival Range - Officers - Pistol Range - Officers - Rifle Range - Tactical Team - Pistol Range - Tactical Team - Rifle 1 Sessions/Year N 1. l0 U1 00 1. a--1 26 N MM l0 N M Class Name Accident Investigation Active Shooter Course Building Searches Crime Scene Investigation Criminal Investigations Defensive Tactics Drill Tower Rappelling Driving - Low Speed Road Course (20 mph ma.) Driving - Skid Pad (Skid Recovery Pad) Driving- Skills Pad - (Backing, Serpentine Maneuvering) Firearm Instructor School First Aid/CPR E 0 O L 0) as ea U — ii=0 - LL=O cli"----- M N Oa4 'a6') O O O Great Guns L 0 .0 O ▪ + a)C' O O L Li) C .o to N 15 C o o c N t C O 0 •— te Nti en- L in L O p2 4) ZH2 . • a) C 'O as 'O U = a) - ifO U CU 7.3 a) c L i C = a)"_ �O a) O >' p > E O O C o O 0 08 N a3 v- U O a) .0 .0 co U L Q a) a)O U a)— Op OO a) C 0 00 CD2 00 > N O C C.)L L v- ( Q >, L N O p 0 +r CO -a a) a) C 'O 603 = (n 0)0 75 a) -p O a) cts E a) a) .0 aCL ) 2" W iU ''' N L U .0 R3 C Cl) -C= a) c) O C -C N C L cu p 0 L C N O O c, >;t3C a)�.a) LL = to O• cm>v�fi Q. EN CD t)Oci VNL.'U p4) +r =3O U >CN1 a)[O ca ow C_ Y = E O C 0) p LL (15 cu Q'OC0C0 C a) O VI =.C.'.' O� 4- O E t6 C C 5 L a) U O � y' L D p cn LL C O 2 O cn as ^ OO C_ in OCcuc� > W _C ,C O CU 1= W = ,CC o Q N 0 UN vOU po .2 C (� • • • • • (� a) (a LLO LL-c L.T. CI') Co N LO C) L CD 0 ,VD s- 0 0 L 0 N N 0 N 0 cr) N L L N N N _U ') p NliL O O ci N > v 0 N O M O d. N O C co c\1 _a N N O '- UJ 'a N 3 to O 0 .- O O cn N O 4) N c U E c -a N O 4- O ' N - C "0 U F. 2 o 7� 0 N u) in o a) a) o LC) L N .0 N O N =_c 4)� O O p Li L N U V U O V O 5 c o ° o c� O CD0LLc* rn}, CD > CDO O CON N c cu 0_0 N 0 (o = CU C Q". Lf) O c O O� co= c O c N 0- = V) = O V 16 co O Q p Q O) MON N O) — d) r O d) >, • >, • N r- CO CO 0 C)