Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMemo - Mail Packet - 1/31/2017 - Memorandum From Travis Storin Re: Gallagher Amendment And 2017 Residential Rate AdjustmentsProperty taxes are computed as: Actual Value × Assessment Rate × Mill Levy = Property Tax To maintain the 45/55 relationship between residential and non-residential properties, the variable in the above equation that gets adjusted is the Assessment Rate for residential property. This process is approved by the General Assembly and managed by the Colorado Division of Property Taxation. The Assessment Rate for non-residential property, meanwhile, remains a static 29% under the provisions of the Gallagher amendment. This “Gallagher Adjustment” has taken place nine times since the adoption of the amendment. At Gallagher’s inception, the Assessment rate was 21% for residential property. By 2016 this rate fell to 7.96%. This means that $1 million in residential property is assessed at $79,600 while $1 million in non-residential property is assessed at $290,000. Table 1 below displays the relationship of residential assessment rates to non-residential rates subsequent to the passage of the Gallagher Amendment: Table 1: Enacted Assessment Rates Years Residential Non-Residential 1983-1986 21.00% 29.00% 1987 18.00% 29.00% 1988 16.00% 29.00% 1989-90 15.00% 29.00% 1991-92 14.34% 29.00% 1993-94 12.86% 29.00% 1995-96 10.36% 29.00% 1997-98 9.74% 29.00% 1999-2000 9.74% 29.00% 2001-02 9.15% 29.00% 2003-04 7.96% 29.00% 2005-06 7.96% 29.00% 2007-08 7.96% 29.00% 2009-10 7.96% 29.00% 2011-12 7.96% 29.00% 2013-14 7.96% 29.00% 2015-16 7.96% 29.00% Gallagher adjustments are only triggered when appreciation in residential property values takes place at a faster relative pace than nonresidential properties. Colorado’s high-growth housing market combined with recent trends in the oil and gas sector have created conditions where a Gallagher adjustment downward from the current 7.96% is highly likely for the 2017 tax year (2018 collections). This periodic Gallagher adjustment effectively dampens growth in, or even decreases, the property tax collections of local governments in that the full increase in residential valuations is not passed directly to taxpayers. Further, nonresidential properties effectively pay a considerable 2 tax premium when compared to residential properties, and this gap widens with each Gallagher adjustment. Statewide commercial property accounts for approximately 25% of total property value but makes up 55% of the assessed value. Finally, the Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR) amendment of 1992 intersects with the Gallagher amendment in an impactful way. While the Gallagher amendment results in automatic reductions in the residential Assessment Rate, the opposite situation where there is higher appreciation in non-residential property vs. residential property do not trigger an automatic increase to the rate. This is due to TABOR provisions that require any tax increase to have voter approval. Recent Events On January 13 the Colorado Department of Local Affairs (DOLA) published preliminary findings of the Residential Assessment Rate Study used for determining the target residential assessed value percentage and the necessary residential Assessment Rate. A final report is submitted in April of 2017 to the General Assembly, and the Assembly will select the new rate to enact. The preliminary study finds a target Assessment Rate of 6.56% and a target residential assessed value split of 43.79%. Historically this preliminary study’s Assessment Rate has been highly correlative to the rate that is ultimately enacted by the General Assembly. A link to this study is included at the bottom of this memo. On January 14 The Denver Post published an article outlining several of the fiscal tensions the Gallagher Adjustment may have across the state. As the adjustment is done at a statewide level, communities outside of the Front Range Urban Corridor are disproportionately affected given the concentration of growth that has taken place in that part of the state. In some locations property tax collections are expected to drop despite increases in valuations. A link to this article is included at the bottom of this memo. Implications for the City The City reported $20.0 million in property tax collections in 2015. The City remits 67.5% of this to Poudre Fire Authority by IGA and the remaining 32.5% goes to support ongoing services in the General Fund. All else equal, the potential Gallagher Adjustment from 7.96% to 6.56% would represent a 17.6% decrease in residential property tax collections. However, through staff communications with the Larimer County Assessor’s Office and review of the DOLA study, 2017 residential valuations are expected to grow at a higher rate than 17.6% vs. the 2015 valuations (two-year assessment cycle), resulting in an estimated overall increase in assessed value of 5%-8% in 2017 (2018 collections year) in spite of the potential Gallagher Adjustment. While this estimate is early and subject to change and the Assessor’s Office has not completed its 2017 reappraisals, it is unlikely that the City would experience a decrease in 2018 or 2019 in property tax collections. For reference, the 2017-2018 adopted City budget assumed 2% growth per year in property tax revenues and as of now this estimate appears to be appropriately conservative. In short, this does not impose an immediate challenge to balancing the City budget. However, the implications to longer term financial planning are very serious and will likely require voter intervention at some point. Fort Collins would need to see increases in valuations in excess of the periodic Gallagher reduction in order to stay net-neutral in property tax revenues. 3 In effect, this implies that Fort Collins residential valuations would need to appreciate faster than the rest of the state’s residential markets during times in which residential properties are increasing in value faster than commercial. Supporting Attachments: http://www.denverpost.com/2017/01/13/tax-soaring-home-values-colorado/ https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/dola/residential-assessment-rate 4