Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport - Read Before Packet - 8/9/2016 - Powerpoint Presentation Re: Agenda Item #2 - Transportation Capital Expansion Fee Assessment1 Transportation Capital Expansion Fee Assessment City of Fort Collins Engineering 2 • Capital Expansion Fees charge new developments for their proportionate share of the cost of new capital facilities required to serve them. • Currently in the process of updating the Transportation Capital Expansion Fee • The Street Oversizing Capital Expansion Fee was implemented in 1979 • Between 1998 and 2013, constructed $77 Million in improvements • Last update in 2005 Introduction Roadway CIP Plan 3 Transportation Capital Transportation Capital Street Oversizing Fees Developer Local Street Obligation Process 4  Council Finance Committee - Nov 2015 and June 2016  P&Z Work session – June 2016  Chamber of Commerce Legislative Affairs – Aug 5, 2016  Council Work Session – August 9, 2016  Transportation Board – August 17, 2016  Outreach to Builders and Developers – Sept thru November  Council Hearing – Fall 2016 Recommended Changes 5 • Changing the name from “Street Oversizing” to “Transportation Capital Expansion Fee” • Using Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) as the basis for determining impact, instead of trips generated. • Simplify the transportation impact fee schedule from 43 categories of use to only a handful; Residential (by size of unit) and three broad categories for commercial, office, and industrial. • Increase fee to include additional improvements Name Change 6 Changing the name to Transportation Capital Expansion Fee reflects the purpose of the Program to expand the transportation system instead of just widening streets. VMT as Basis for Impact 7 Using Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT): More accurately ties the fee to demand on the transportation system. Compared to existing fee rates, will generally result in higher fees for residential and reduced fees for commercial uses. 8 Simplify the Fee Schedule 9 Currently 43 categories, change to: • Residential (by size of unit) • Commercial (single rate) • Office and other services (single rate) • Industrial (single rate) Would match other Capital Expansion Fee rates, reduce confusion, and simplify administration. Cost neutral, but would result in higher or lower fees for certain uses as a result of collapsing the categories. 10 Methodology Change Only Option is calculated on the City’s Capital Improvement Plan and assumes funding for streets and intersection improvements at similar levels to the existing program. 11 Methodology Change Plus Option adds the proportionate cost attributable for mitigation of the impacts of new development of additional intersection turn lanes, signals, Bike, pedestrian, etc. Residential Comparison 12 RESIDENTIAL Square Feet Current Fees Methodolog y Only TCEF Methodolog y Plus TCEF The Flats MF 1150 $2,143 $3,151 $3,804 Bucking Horse SF 1690 $3,112 $4,089 $4,936 Trail Head SF 1820 $3,112 $4,830 $5,831 Rigden 17th SF 2490 $3,112 $5,417 $6,539 Non Residential Comparison 13 14 • Are there any questions or concerns about the adjustments being considered to the Transportation Capital Expansion fees?  Any comments regarding the idea of further increasing the fee to capture additional development impacts on capacity improvements, such as intersections , roundabouts, traffic signals, Bike and Pedestrian improvements? General Direction Sought: 15