HomeMy WebLinkAboutEmail - Read Before Packet - 6/3/2014 - Email From Darin Atteberry Re: Agenda Item #21 - West Nile Virus - Board And Commission Discussion1
Debra Unger
From: Debra Unger on behalf of Darin Atteberry
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 11:29 AM
To: Bob Overbeck
Cc: Darin Atteberry; CCSL; Mike Calhoon; Dan Weinheimer; Kelly DiMartino; Sarah Kane
Subject: RE: Agenda Item #21 WNV (Council SAR #26150)
Attachments: 168210_AIR_QUALITY_ADVISORY_BOARD_MINUTES_NOV-18-2013.pdf; 168211
_NATURAL_RESOURCES_ADVISORY_BOARD_MINUTES_MAR-19-2014.pdf; 168212
_PARKS_AND_RECREATION_BOARD_MINUTES_MAR-26-2014.pdf
Bob,
Per your request, attached are City Board meeting minutes that include WNV updates.
Debra Unger
Executive Administrative Assistant
City Manager’s Office
(970) 221-6266
Click here to Tell Me About My Service ... I Want to Know!
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Overbeck
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 12:15 PM
To: Darin Atteberry
Subject: Item # 10 WNV (Council SAR #26150)
Darin
Can I see all the comments from the 3 city boards who reviewed the WMV plan ASAP
Thanks
Bob
Sent from my iPhone
----------
Bob Overbeck
City Councilmember
District 1
City of Fort Collins
(970) 817-1411
boverbeck@fcgov.com
NATURAL RESOURCES ADVISORY BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 19, 2014
DATE: Wednesday, March 19, 2014
LOCATION: 215 N. Mason Conference Room 1-A
TIME: 6:00–8:30pm
For Reference: Joe Piesman, Chair 970-691-6697
Bob Overbeck, Council Liaison 970-988-9337
Susie Gordon, Staff Liaison 970-221-6265
Present:
Joseph Piesman, Chair
Joe Halseth
John Bartholow
Liz Pruessner
Harry Edwards
Alexa Barratt
Robert Mann
Staff Present:
Susie Gordon, Staff Liaison
Dianne Tjalkens, Admin/Board Support
Bruce Hendee, Chief Sustainability Officer
Lindsay Ex, Senior Environmental Planner
Mike Calhoon, Parks Supervisor
Ted Shepard, Chief Planner in Community Planning and Neighborhood Services
Guests:
David Tweedale, citizen
Jim Flesher, citizen
Kevin Jones, Fort Collins Area Chamber of Commerce
Call meeting to order: Joe Piesman called the meeting to order at 6:02pm.
Public Comments: None
Review and Approval of February 19, 2014 minutes
Harry moved and Joe Halseth seconded a motion to approve the February 19, 2014 NRAB minutes.
Motion passed unanimously, 6-0-0 (Alexa was not present for vote).
AGENDA ITEM 1— Sustainability Planning Overview
Bruce Hendee, Chief Sustainability Officer, discussed Sustainability Services Office’s activities.
Bruce gave a one-page summary of items the service area is working on for the BFO process. The
strategic plan informs budget offers. The Sustainability Services Area was formed in 2011, and has had
some good headway. In the BFO process, the service area is asking for a total of 8 new FTEs, including
a new urban agriculture and policy person to coordinate the efforts on local foods. Through
Environmental Services they are asking for a full time pest manager. Mike added that they have been
researching models; the focus is on integrated pest management throughout the City including the
Emerald Ash Borer and West Nile. Staff is also considering a grants writer. Social Sustainability is
requesting an additional social sustainability specialist and a finance coordinator. The department is
developing
“clusters”, and would like to hire a coordinator. Operations Services is requesting a full time energy
manager. Some key program activities under Environmental Services are: a resolution asking for change
in the Climate Action Plan and greenhouse gas goals; zero waste goals; safety goals; and an energy
reduction goal (electricity and fuels). There is also a need for a new treatment process at the waste water
treatment plant, and staff is requesting additional funding for the integrated recycling center. FortZED
has been reorganized and has developed specific projects listed on the handout. The community
information hub is an application that will allow individuals to walk through the FortZED district and
monitor building energy use and identify solar and geothermal, etc. FortZED is working with CSU on
wind production. There is a test facility near Sterling monitoring overall wind. The velocity level is
slightly below ideal thus far. Platte River Power Authority is also creating a program around wind
energy and is working with FortZED. FortZED has been retooled as a pro-typing system and the
boundaries have been removed. Another FortZED project is using smart thermostats that can be more
effective during peak load periods. Utilities is looking at a performance based model; they are working
with Schneider Electric. In this model, they look at a neighborhood and can show what deep energy
retrofits would benefit the consumers’ energy use, and the third party developer pays for the retrofit. The
waste water treatment plant uses more energy than any other facility. In order to move from using
chlorine to ultraviolet disinfection processes, prior to release, the plant needs to use more energy.
However, they are also looking at recapturing biogas to reduce the overall energy consumption. Melissa
Hovey is moving ahead with the Green Building Program that looks at opportunities in the built
environment. Sustainable Neighborhoods will look at the triple bottom line in neighborhoods. We have a
large amount of suburban development. We are good at infill and redevelopment, but not so good at
reducing the environmental footprint of suburbs. Three neighborhoods will be identified and will be
asked to participate in this study. Bruce is working with Drive Electric to normalize using electric
vehicles as well. Bruce discussed the Revive property (southwest corner of Willox and N. College) and
the ownership group that has come to the City to ask for financial assistance. It would be the first
geothermal neighborhood in Fort Collins. It would participate in the solar program and utilizes
permeable pavers. He is excited about the project and is working through the financial part now. A
Sustainability Assessment Tool is being developed and the hope is for adoption later this year. The Gap
Analysis is underway by Social Sustainability right now, looking at the real needs in the community,
who should be providing them, and what the City’s role is. That will direct the Social Strategic Plan.
Colorado Clean Energy Cluster has a transportation initiative for getting to Denver International Airport
2
and back with no fossil fuels. Water Innovation Cluster is looking at the water-energy nexus, and
nutrient loading and in-stream water quality. Woodward is moving along. Transmission lines are
opening and the bike trail will re-open in about two weeks. Foothills Mall went to Council with the
contract and had a lot of environmental conditions in the agreement. There is a team to ensure
compliance.
Discussion/Q & A:
• Liz asked that raptor mortality be monitored with wind production because it is hard on birds. Bruce said
the City is sensitive to that issue.
• Joe asked how a neighborhood is defined. Lindsay said 53% of our carbon emissions are from buildings.
When buildings are redeveloped, we can make changes, but what about the neighborhoods that aren’t
redeveloped? Neighborhoods that are not distinct can apply the boundaries themselves.
• Liz asked if an affordable housing component could be part of the Revive project. Bruce said it would not
be “affordable” but “attainable” and will add rooftops to the north side of the city.
• Joe Piesman said he thinks when people think of affordable they want middle income housing to be
cheaper. Bruce said staff is looking at this issue on a spectrum, from those who are lowest income and
need a home now, to affordable housing across a range of incomes.
• Harry asked about the new greenhouse gas goals and said that generation of electricity contributes to
greenhouse gases, primarily from burning coal. He wonders if Rawhide will move from coal to natural
gas. Bruce answered that we generate a fair amount of energy from natural gas at Rawhide already. Harry
said it is mostly in the summer for peak loading. Bruce said it may be part of their portfolio
diversification strategies.
• Joe Piesman said there is a five-board committee meeting regarding the greenhouse gas goals. The
committee is coming up with a list of action items to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Bruce said the
expertise would be valuable to bring to the advisory group for the Climate Action Plan. Bruce will check
in with Lucinda.
• Bob Mann said this board has discussed that in addition to receiving information and providing
recommendations, there are members who would like to be more proactive and focus on one or two issues
that action can be taken on. He asked Bruce for suggestions for where the board can focus its energy.
Bruce said the board should think of areas it might want to help. He suggested that the board discuss
some ideas and bring them to him. Bob said a challenge for many boards is overlap, there are those on the
board very concerned with energy issues, but there is an Energy Board for that. Bruce said to think of the
kind of contribution the board wants to make: research or technical assistance? Joe Piesman said the
board has discussed working on Poudre flow issues and Nature in the City. He added solid waste and the
integrated recycling facility and greenhouse gases are also of interest.
• Harry added that there was a study done in Germany to gauge how much people would be willing to pay
for green energy. Germany gets 20% of its electric energy from renewable sources. The survey showed
participants would be willing to pay 8 cents more per kilowatt hour. He wonders if a study like this could
be done here. Bruce said Utilities has had this discussion.
• Joe Piesman added that there is a low sign-up rate for the optional $10 fee to use green energy that is
currently available.
3
AGENDA ITEM 2— Nature in the City
As a follow-up to the Board’s discussion in September, Lindsay Ex, Sr. Environmental Planner,
provided an update on the Nature in the City Strategic Plan that began in January, and solicited
feedback on the project’s direction regarding a triple bottom line approach for assessing nature within
the urban environment.
Lindsay thanked the board for its past support to Council for the project. She said that more and more
people are living in urban environments so the natural environment that people are accessing is in urban
areas, such as parks and stormwater detention ponds. She showed O’Dell’s stormwater pond and how it
is integrated into the entryway design. She said Fort Collins has grown out and is now growing back in.
We have a Growth Management Area and are encouraging infill and redevelopment. We have done a
good job at protecting nature; this program is to create and enhance areas close to where people live and
work. The three phases are inventory and assessment, developing a strategic plan, and implementation.
Staff has been investigating best practices used in other communities, and inventorying what we already
have. This summer, staff will look at eight different land use sites including parks, natural areas, creeks
and canals, schools, etc. CSU will help with the study design and City staff will do the field work. They
will look at birds, butterflies and vegetation, take site samples, and are exploring opportunities to offer
“citizen science” opportunities to study bees. The scale of each site is ½ acre and more. The value to
people is also being researched: what is the benefit of nature for people? One study showed notable
Body Mass Index differences in people who lived closer to open areas. There will be workshops,
interactive maps, and open houses to engage the public in the process. From the economic side, staff is
looking at home values, business retention and attraction, etc. Once the individual areas are assessed,
they will determine gaps. Once gaps are determined, policy will be addressed as well as connectivity.
Final phases will be prioritization, developing design guidelines and land use code changes, and
implementation. Nature in the City was awarded money from the City’s Sustainability Innovation Fund
to create a green wall on the Mason Corridor in conjunction with CSU and other partners. March 26,
6:00–8:00pm at the Lincoln Center is a Visioning Workshop.
Discussion/Q & A:
• John said he lives behind the hospital and there are many roundabouts. He has seen birds nesting in the
centers of the roundabouts. Lindsay said staff wants to hear this anecdotal information to enhance their
data collection.
• Liz said the West Nile virus technical advisory committee is discussing eliminating mosquito growth in
stormwater and detention facilities. Some of the strategies to make them less desirable for mosquitos
make them less desirable for everyone. Lindsay said she will discuss this further with Mike and she
mentioned that design guidelines will try to balance not attracting undesirable species like skunks and
mosquitos.
• Joe Piesman said she mentioned community gardens, parks and natural areas, but their mission is not to
build more, correct? This is to pick out smaller opportunities? Lindsay said we are not going to miss
opportunities. Other places may come up in the process. In the gap areas staff will look at whether there is
need for a natural area or park. Joe asked if there is consideration for putting in a park, will Nature in the
City help direct that? Lindsay said they are looking at quality as well as quantity to prioritize areas.
• Harry asked the purpose of including Singapore in the packet of information. Lindsay said they are one of
the best in the world and are calling themselves the Garden City. Harry said it is extremely crowded.
Lindsay said they are part of a larger project called BiophilicCities. Harry said he would be surprised to
see wildlife running around Singapore. Bob said you must start with where you are.
• Joe Halseth asked if there was room to sample more types of wildlife. He said people like to see deer and
raccoons. There might be cheaper ways to sample some of these sights including cameras and existing
data. Lindsay said they are focusing on wildlife that can be influenced. Larger mammals go where they
want. Joe Halseth suggested collaring foxes and deer, or using current data, as well as a camera trapping
initiative.
• Harry asked if the proposal to construct a recreation center in south Fort Collins was dead. Mike said
there is talk of putting one next to the southeast corner park in the Fossil Creek High School area. There is
a designated area already. Harry said it might be possible to interface some of the goals of the natural
areas with the recreation center, so users could achieve tranquility by being close to nature. Lindsay said
that is the intention of this project. She wants to mainstream nature into our other projects.
• Harry said if you look at Westminster, they have put parks on the peripheries of natural areas
successfully. They have five or six facilities that are well done. Mike added that has been done with some
parks in Fort Collins, and continues to be in the plans.
• Liz asked if there were specific BFO offers the board should know about to support Nature in the City.
Lindsay said she is working with Sustainable Neighborhoods. Homeowner Associations (HOA) want to
do natural conversions, and she is looking at how to help them do that.
• Joe Piesman asked if the City can give conservation easements. Lindsay said farmers are very interested
in that. There are opportunities to think outside the traditional conservation toolbox.
• Joe Piesman asked for a quarterly update.
• Bob Mann said it is easy for him to see Nature in the City in terms of physical attributes, but when he
thinks of nature services, he thinks of natural processes, not just what we see but how nature is working.
He is not sure how that fits. Nature cycles and has integrated systems. Lindsay said staff wants to support
this and has struggled with creating definitions that include natural cycles but hopes that the inclusion of
natural processes in the definition begins to get at that.
AGENDA ITEM 3— West Nile Virus Program
Mike Calhoon, Parks Supervisor, described changes being proposed by the Technical Advisory
Committee for the City’s West Nile Virus policies, as well as feedback received from City Council at
their 3/18/14 work session.
Mike gave a PowerPoint presentation on the recommendations that are going to be given to Council.
Their purpose is to reduce risk of West Nile while mitigating risks of managing the disease. City
Council asked staff to reconvene a technical advisory committee (TAC), add TAC representatives,
develop a program manual, and review program response guidelines. Staff has developed an outline of a
manual that has been taken to the TAC; they are investigating best management practices, and plan to
have a completed manual to Council by April. Mike explained that the TAC is made up of 10
volunteers. Members are experts from CSU, the County, etc. The three-person advisory panel still exists
and is under consideration. The TAC provides technical expertise and recommendations to Council
regarding the City’s policies. The TAC recommendations include: better communication like paid
announcements, educational videos, posters, etc.; larval management that expands the boundary of the
larval control program and returns to a weather based larval program; and source reduction that is
5
mostly educational and works with employees in other departments. Mike explained the proposed opt-
out program that would allow urban famers and bee keepers to opt-out, outside of the pesticide sensitive
registry. There would be an annual renewal with an inspection of the property. Mike explained the idea
of zones. There are a number of triggers that start sprayings. The idea is to use the trap data, which is
comprehensive, to focus on specific areas. The zone approach would most likely mean spraying more
often, but in smaller areas, controlling the issue before it becomes city-wide.
Discussion/Q & A:
• Joe Piesman asked if, in the county, they know where Culex tarsalis mosquitos are located. Mike said
agricultural lands on the east side of town and south east near Fossil Creek. Joe wondered if there are key
properties that the City could work with. Mike said he will be working with CSU Extension on this issue.
• Liz asked what the County is doing about West Nile. Mike said there are sentinel traps to monitor for the
state. The County only uses adulticide when the City is spraying areas that go into the county. Larimer
and Weld are hot spots. Having a district approach has some sense to it. One idea is to have a mill levy
tax, or create a pest district.
• Joe Piesman thought Fort Collins didn’t pay a mill levy for weed control. Mike said he is pretty sure we
do as we are within the district.
• Joe Piesman said if you are allowing opt-out, you may as well not spray. Mike explained the balancing act
that needs to happen with an opt-out program. Joe Halseth added that if you allow the opt-out, you are not
able to judge from trapping whether you made a difference.
• Joe Piesman asked if the southeast “pops” hot first, do the cases of the virus match that. Mike said there
was higher incidence of human cases in the southeast, but we are a mobile community and it is hard to tell
where people were when they were infected.
• John asked if Council said they don’t want adulticiding, can the County say you have to. Mike said no.
By the time a human case is reported, the infection is three weeks old. There is a natural cycle of
mosquito activity. We try to get to the end of the season without spraying. However, it is an issue of risk
management. Joe Piesman added that if you are spraying for human cases, you are spraying for revenge.
• Mike said that an HOA trigger for spraying is number of mosquitos in a trap. The City’s program is about
virus control, not nuisance control.
• Liz said it was interesting to hear about Weld County ignoring the problem. Communities make these
decisions. Mike added that the City tried to use the least invasive strategies possible. They want to time it
right, so you get the most bang for the buck. In the last season, 84% of infections occurred before the
adulticiding. If you are going to make the application, when are you going to do it?
• Joe Halseth said it is very important Council understand if we remove human cases and blood donors
from the equation, and move to zones, how that would affect timing and spraying. This would require
employing a statistician.
• Joe Piesman asked about blood donor reporting. Liz and Joe Halseth said that data comes from the state
and is unreliable because many cases are not reported. Joe Halseth added that the City Manager could also
make decisions not to spray the entire town if he has all of the information. Mike said the idea of a
floating zone would require a certain number of traps. But when you are spraying you need to have
borders to be able to educate the public.
• John said he leans toward the Weld County end of things (not spraying), but appreciates looking at it from
a data driven point of view.
• Joe Piesman said if you could get someone to look at your data, to determine a number of cases
prevented, that would help the case for spraying.
6
AGENDA ITEM 4— River Downtown Redevelopment Zone District and Downtown Historic
District Standards
Ted Shepard, Chief Planner in Community Planning & Neighborhood Services discussed proposals
regarding historic buildings and overall character of the downtown river area.
Ted said that the City has asked project managers to visit more boards and commissions. This is an
urban design project, but it is near the river. He showed a map of the historic area, which is governed by
federal, state and local. Phase 1 includes streetscaping. Phase 2 includes Legacy apartments, the old
asphalt batch plant, and the townhomes near Northside Aztlán Community Center. There is a
contentious review process to get the projects incorporated. The RDR Zone is now the River District and
City Council has asked them to beef up design standards. The idea is to use alleys as better connections.
Suggested improvements include adding more plazas off the sidewalks, putting parking in the back,
having decorative fences and walls, and more details on specific building design standards. This area is
somewhat industrial, so the idea is to preserve character, and have new development that is respectful
but not imitative. The RDR has river landscape standards, bank stabilization standards, and outdoor
spaces standards. They are not doing anything with zoning, height allowances, etc. There is talk of a
parking structure in the area.
Discussion/Q & A:
• John said because this is the Natural Resources Advisory Board, he would like to focus on the natural
resources and he thinks the river is it. He wonders if there are other areas for discussion. Ted said if the
board has input on preserving the character of the area, he would like that as well.
• John asked if what they are working on would change any of the encroachments on the river. Ted said the
only site that is potentially redevelopable is Ranchway. Ranchway’s present owners are looking for an
exit strategy. Historic preservation says you can do many things inside the building, but the outside needs
to remain.
• John asked whether there would be a pedestrian path along the west side of the river. Ted said there is a
little dead-end path, which is on private property. As Ranchway develops, the new owner will do its own,
but the connection is difficult due to the grade.
• Harry asked whether The Summit went through this review process. Ted said it went through the
Planning Department. He thinks it could have been given more detail. It’s in the international style, which
is not very popular in Fort Collins. It is very dense and urban, and concentrates on infill. It has a stark
look to it and fills up a lot of sky. The counter to that is that there were 92 mobile homes that were
destroyed in a natural disaster on that property. It puts college students near the university and because of
the “three unrelated” rule there was pressure on the housing market. Harry said it is an unattractive
project.
• Joe Piesman asked if the Feeder Supply company is leaving. Ted said yes, with a willing seller and
willing buyer. Joe Piesman said he heard all the changes the City was requiring made the business
unviable. Ted said he heard that too, but there is nothing the City does to an existing business that
discourages them from doing business. John added that the DDA could do that, though. Ted said he is
unsure, but the DDA is a taxing entity targeted toward a certain set of public improvements. They have
7
their own board, as well as a sunset clause. Joe Piesman asked if it was going to be converted to a
restaurant. Ted said yes.
• Liz asked about the height standards in the district and said that Ranchway feed is a very tall building. If
someone bought it, could they build another structure that tall? Ted said no. Also, Ranchway Feed doesn’t
really have “stories” for their height. Because of the historic character they probably could not remove the
silos.
• Joe Halseth asked if Ted was consulting with John Stokes. Ted said yes, and with Craig in Parks. Their
projects are somewhat aligned. Joe Halseth said the proposals show pedestrian linkages.
• Joe Piesman said that Encompass One is right on the bank.
• Liz said she hopes the Nature in the City initiative is kept in mind in this district. Ted said there is a
concept plan for a pocket park across from El Burrito. They want the area to be more bike friendly, but as
redevelopment occurs, each development may not have a Nature in the City element.
• Joe Piesman said the City should consider vehicle-free days on some of those streets. There are many
places that do that. It would be ideal for the breweries. Ted said there is an idea around Hahn Plumbing
that Chestnut could go through and be a no-car street. We would not take access away from anyone; it is
only possible with redevelopment.
• Joe Piesman asked if the Open Door Mission is moving. Ted said he does not know, but should a business
choose to redevelop they will not have to go through an unpredictable review process because they will
have new standards in the land use codes.
AGENDA ITEM 5— Integrated Recycling Facility
Susie Gordon, Sr. Environmental Planner in Environmental Services provided an update on possible
financial enhancement to the IRF project for construction of both Phases 1 and 2, which will be
considered by Council on April 22.
Susie said the Council will be reviewing the status of the integrated recycling center project at their
April 22 work session. In February, several members of Council brought up the idea of fully funding
the integrated recycling facility. Meantime, Staff is working with a contractor who may be hired to run
the facility and is also releasing an RFP for construction.
Discussion/Q & A:
• Joe Piesman asked if the board made a recommendation at the April 16 board meeting, it could be in
Council’s packet for April 22.
• Liz said Bruce alluded to eliminating Rivendell and moving everything to one spot. Susie said this is true.
It would be consolidated into one location.
• Susie said the development costs are due to improvements that need to be made to the undeveloped land.
The City’s ownership of the land, however, also meant avoid the costs of buying a piece of property.
Building is expected in June and July.
AGENDA ITEM 6— May 6 Resolution for Landmark Federal Wilderness Act – 50th Anniversary
Joe Piesman said the board is invited to attend the May 6 meeting, when Council’s adoption of the
resolution will be recognized.
8
AGENDA ITEM 7— Other Business
Review City Council’s 6-Month Planning Calendar
• Disposable Bag ordinance going to Council in May. Open House on April 3, 11:30am-1:00pm in
the Community Room.
• At the April 16 meeting, John Stokes will discuss the River Plan and overall Natural Areas
Master Plan.
• The board would like to continue discussions on the low-flow initiative.
• April meeting should include an action item for fully funding the integrated recycling facility.
• Leave discussion time for how the board can connect with Nature in the City and updates.
• Leave time to discuss the potential kayak park.
• Joe Piesman will be absent for the April meeting. Joe will include Harry on agenda planning.
Announcements
• None.
Adjournment: Harry moved to adjourn. Joe Piesman seconded. Meeting adjourned at 8:50pm.
Approved by the Board on April 16, 2014
Signed
____________________________________ April 25, 2014
Dianne Tjalkens, Administrative Clerk II Date
9
Parks & Recreation Board Meeting – March 26, 2014
Page 1 of 4
BE A GOOD STEWARD: Protect & Respect your Parks, Trails & Recreation Facilities
Call Meeting to Order: Bruce Henderson called the meeting to order 5:33pm.
Agenda Review & Items of Note: None
Citizen Participation: None
Approval of Minutes: Discussion: None Dawn Theis made the motion to approve the Parks & Recreation Board
minutes of February 26, 2014, seconded by Jessica MacMillan – Minutes approved 8:0
Meeting Summary
• The Board was updated on the West Nile Virus Technical Advisory Committee, and their mission to “reduce the
risk of human WNV infection while limiting adverse human health and environmental impacts”. Council
direction was for the TAC to reconvene and add representatives from urban agriculture and pesticide sensitive
registry, develop a program manual, and review program response guidelines. The TAC has met several times to
discuss the program operations and provide enhancement recommendations. The P&R Board was asked to
provide any feedback via email.
• Presentation on the Lincoln Corridor Plan final draft phase that will be presented to City Council on April 15;
with P&R Board recommendation. The Parks & Recreation Board made a motion to support Council approval of
the Lincoln Corridor Plan with emphasis on the needs and priorities of the businesses and neighborhoods as
presented in the Plan. A vote was taken with unanimous approval of 8:0
• Ragan Adams and Bruce Henderson will alternate meetings to represent the P&R Board as joint liaisons to the
Bicycle Advisory Board.
• Report on the Natural Areas activities at Soapstone Prairie this summer. They will be celebrating Soapstone
Prairie –“Looking Forward by Looking Back” featuring presentations and activities on site. There are additional
events through the summer at Soapstone, culminating with a symposium in October featuring Lindenmeier
experts.
PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD MINUTES
Regular Meeting
Wednesday March 26, 2014
5:30 p.m.
Board Chair:
Bruce Henderson, Chair 2014
bmhender6@gmail.com
Council Liaison:
Gino Campana – gcampana@fcgov.com
Staff Liaisons:
J.R. Schnelzer, 970-221-6301 – jrschnelzer@fcgov.com
Craig Foreman, 970-221-6618 – cforeman@fcgov.com
Bob Adams, 970-221-6354 – badams@fcgov.com
Parks & Recreation Board Meeting – March 26, 2014
Page 2 of 4
Full Minutes
AGENDA ITEMS:
Presentation from the West Nile Virus Team
The City has been working with West Nile Virus for 12 years. Last year, 2013, was the most active a year with
neuroinvasive cases since 2003. The City created a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to work on a West Nile Virus
policy; and the TAC mission is to “Reduce the risk of human WNV infection while limiting adverse human health and
environmental impacts”. The purpose is to mitigate WNV in the community using the least invasive methods to the most
(adulticiding) invasive method. The WNV program is funded by the general fund, natural areas fund and the utilities
fund. http://www.fcgov.com/westnile/
Council direction after the October 29, 2013 work session asked to; reconvene the TAC, add representatives from urban
agriculture and pesticide sensitive registry, develop a program manual, and review program response guidelines.
Currently, the TAC has reviewed program manuals from the City of Boulder and is using their manual as an example.
They have also been investigating the best management practices of other agencies in Washington, Florida, California and
the Xerces Society. A draft manual will be completed for the Council Work Session in April.
The TAC is comprised of city-appointed experts, and provides technical recommendations to City Council regarding the
WNV management policy; and has met several times to discuss the program operations and provide enhancement
recommendations. The recommendations are:
• Communication: Use existing tools of bill inserts, PSAs, door hangers and add videos, City website postings and
Cable 14.
• Laval Management: Expand the existing 1 mile outside City limits to 2-3 miles outside City limits and return to a
weather based larval program
• Source Reduction: Education of City employees to perform backyard inspections, and County inspectors as well
as working with CSU Extension to assist with agricultural watering practices
• Vector District Approach: Support the implementation of a mosquito control district and fund by a dedicated mill
levy tax.
• Opt-Out Program: Under discussion due to concerns over potential program efficacy issues.
• Zones: Under discussion due to pending additional research with CSU statistician
The consensus items of Communication, Larval Management and Source Reduction equates to a $75,000 enhancement.
The non-consensus items will be brought to Council in May for direction.
Board feedback via email is welcome. There will be an Integrated Pest Management Coordinator BFO offer through
Environmental Health and Sustainability.
Discuss
Board – Were there any reported adverse cases from spray?
Staff – There was not one case of someone impacted from spraying reported from PVH or Health Department.
Board – What about a loss of hives?
Staff – I’m not aware of any hives that were lost.
Board – How many cases of West Nile were reported?
Staff – 60 total cases, 9 neuroinvasive cases and 3 blood donors. 84% of the cases contracted pre-spraying and 16% of the
cases contracted were the week of spraying or after. We only spray when absolutely necessary and we take it very
seriously.
Board – What about adding more bat boxes?
Staff – Natural Areas does have a program to promote bat boxes
Lincoln Corridor Plan Q&A Session
The Lincoln Corridor Plan final draft is ready to go to Council on April 15; and a letter of recommendation from the P&R
Board is welcome.
The Lincoln Corridor Plan is a priority as there are longstanding existing infrastructure deficiencies and some emerging
issues in the area need to be addressed. In addition, it has been noted in the City Plan as a “gateway” to downtown. As
Parks & Recreation Board Meeting – March 26, 2014
Page 3 of 4
discussed in the past, there have been many opportunities for community engagement and we addressed many of the
issues that were brought forth and incorporated them into the final draft plan.
The project cost, including design and construction will be approximately $19.3 million. Operation and maintenance is
estimated at $92,000 (medians= $72,600/parkways=$19,500). The funding gap is about $8 million. The project would be
a phased approach.
Separately funded from the Lincoln Corridor Plan is the Neighborhood Improvement Plan. The feedback received from
the community outreach was to improve the infrastructure in these neighborhoods. There will be a BFO offer for
$850,000 to improve the area with sidewalks, way-finding, transit stop improvements, push-button pedestrian
signal/crosswalk, and possibly new neighborhood park elements.
Plan documents are available online at: http://www.fcgov.com/advanceplanning/lincoln.php
Discussion
Board – What percentage of trees, turf, flowers, etc. are in the corridor?
Staff – The Plan meets the current parkway treatment standards.
Board – How will you phase the project to deal with the $8 million gap?
Staff – There are various ways we can phase the project, this will still have to be determined.
Board – Can you get a loan?
Staff – This would have to be determined.
Board – How was this determined to be a gateway?
Staff – Historically, Lincoln was the entrance into downtown before Mulberry.
Board – Would this be competing with other offers?
Staff – It would be competing with other capital projects for BOB II funds.
Board – What’s the time frame of construction?
Staff – 8-10 years is optimistic with work possibly starting 2018/2019
Parks & Recreation Board Motion
The Parks & Recreation Board made a motion to support Council approval of the Lincoln Corridor Plan with emphasis on
the needs and priorities of the businesses and neighborhoods as presented in the Plan. A vote was taken with unanimous
approval of 8:0
STAFF UPDATES
Parks Updates
• Parks is working on BFO offers, and will have a draft to Marty by April 11; and we should be bringing
information to the Board on the offers for the May meeting
• Both Park Rangers are actively working in the parks and along the trails.
• Fields are open and being used
Recreation Updates
• Recreation is focusing on BFO offers, same as Parks.
• Operations Plan – starting focus group meetings
Park Planning Updates
• The Poudre Trail by the Woodward Site is now open.
• Park Planning is also working on BFO offers. The enhancement to be aware of is the Conservation Trust money
to go back to funding the trail construction only.
• Southeast Community Park plan has four neighbors approach with concerns about traffic, lights, etc. One
neighbor was recently new to the area, but the other three had not attended any of the open houses. Gino will be
visiting with them, but wanted to make the Board aware in case this grew into a bigger issue.
Parks & Recreation Board Meeting – March 26, 2014
Page 4 of 4
Bicycle Advisory Board Liaison Update
The BAC meets the forth Monday of the month at 6:00pm. They have a representative from most of the other boards with
only three at-large members. They discuss transportation issues as they relate to bicycling.
Discussion
Board - Are any P&R Board members interested in being a liaison to the BAC?
Board – Ragan Adams proposed that she and Bruce Henderson alternate meetings to represent the P&R Board as joint
liaisons. Bruce agreed.
Board Work Plan Items
Discussed and assigned members to various work plan items.
• Budget – Bruce Henderson - No Update
• Communications – Jessica MacMillan & Dawn Theis – No Update
• Sustainable Practices – Scott Sinn & Carey Wilkening - No Update
• Parks – Michael Chalona - No Update
• Trails – Mary Carlson & Brian Carroll – No Update
• Recreation – Dawn Theis - No Update
• Other Projects/Programs
Natural Areas – Brian Carroll & Mary Carlson
o Brian Carroll reported on activity at Soapstone Prairie Natural Area – Sketching Lindenmeier
Landscapes. On May 17 from 9am-12pm folks are invited bring sketching pads and hiking boots
and follow in the traditions of Edwin G. Cassedy, the Smithsonian artist who sketched the terrain at
Lindenmeier during the Smithsonian visit 80 years ago. Afterwards, they will be celebrating
Soapstone Prairie –“Looking Forward by Looking Back” featuring presentations and activities on
site. There are additional events through the summer at Soapstone, culminating with a symposium in
October featuring Lindenmeier experts.
Schedule of Articles/Calendar
No update.
Bullet Points
• Update on the West Nile Virus Technical Advisory Committee, and their mission to “reduce the risk of human
WNV infection while limiting adverse human health and environmental impacts”.
• Presentation on the Lincoln Corridor Plan final draft phase that will be presented to City Council on April 15;
with P&R Board recommendation.
• Report on the Natural Areas activities at Soapstone Prairie this summer.
Adjournment: Meeting adjourned 7:38pm
Respectfully submitted,
Carol Rankin
Carol Rankin
Administrative Supervisor Parks
Board Approved Minutes 4/23/14: 5:0
Board Attendance
Board Members: Ragan Adams, Mary Carlson, Brian Carroll, Bruce Henderson, Jessica MacMillan, Scott Sinn, Dawn
Theis, Carey Wilkening
Staff: Craig Foreman, JR Schnelzer, Bob Adams, Carol Rankin, Mike Calhoon