Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMemo - Mail Packet - 3/28/2023 - Memorandum From Kirk Longstein Re: Oil And Gas Decision PointsPlanning, Development & Transportation Services Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522.0580 970.416.2740 970.224.6134- fax fcgov.com Page 1 of 13 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 23, 2023 TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Kelly DiMartino, City Manager Tyler Marr, Deputy City Manager Caryn Champine, Director of Planning, Development and Transportation Paul Sizemore, Community Development and Neighborhood Services Director Clay Frickey, Interim Planning Manager FROM: Kirk Longstein, Senior Environmental Planner RE: Oil and Gas Decision Points The purpose of this memo is to provide Council with a summary of stakeholder feedback and suggested changes to the Land Use Code unanimously adopted (6-0) on First Reading on December 20, 2022. Additionally, staff has outlined three decision points for Council’s consideration: (1) Second Reading of the Land Use Code, (2) Operational Standards, and (3) Terminating the existing Operator Agreement. Bottom Line: Decision Point 1 – Second Reading of the Land Use Code (LUC), April 4, 2023 Since the First Reading (December 20, 2022), staff conducted additional engagement with the community. A summary of the feedback from that effort is in the next section of this memo. Based on the additional feedback received during this time, Council can consider the following decision points related to the LUC:  (Staff recommendation) Adopt the LUC updates without modifications, and to address environmental group feedback, staff suggest adopting development review submittal requirements administratively after adoption of the Code; or  Adopt the LUC updates with minor modifications directed by Council at Second Reading and based on Industry and environmental group feedback highlighted below; or  Contingent upon Decision Point 2: If Council directs staff to create local Operational Standards, as suggested by environmental groups, Council could choose to pause adoption of the LUC changes to align schedules and actions. Decision Point 2 – Operational Standards: Staff heard feedback from environmental groups a desire to create locally adopted operational standards similar to Larimer County Code. Unfortunately, those standards adopted by neighboring jurisdictions like Broomfield, Boulder, and Larimer County are not “plug and play Code language” based on how the Fort Collins Code DocuSign Envelope ID: 5B1A0B39-FE0B-492F-8726-5099FB8387B5 is organized and administered. As an example: there are several general development standards throughout the existing land use code that would apply to applications for new oil and gas facilities. Based on previous discussions with Council, expanding these standards beyond existing land use and municipal code sections was considered redundant, covered by the State (COGCC) standards and that sufficient work was occurring between the City and County in this space. However, if Council determines it is important to explore this concept further, then staff recommends a future Work Session and further public outreach related to potential consideration of additional regulations through updates to the Municipal Code along with resource considerations for an inspection, enforcement, and compliance program. Decision Point 3 – Terminate the Operator Agreement: In addition to the Land Use Code and operational standards discussion, staff will also be bringing forward a Resolution to Terminate the existing Operator Agreement with Prospect Energy. This Agreement was developed prior to the stricter regulatory environment in place today and has less restrictive requirements, thus staff is recommending that Council terminate this Agreement so that the Land Use Code requirements apply. Stakeholder Feedback Summary: City Staff released draft code language on November 8 (version 1) and discussed with several individuals representing Industry and environmental advocacy groups as well as boards and commissions. Based on stakeholder feedback changes were made to version 1 and a version 2 draft of the Oil and Gas Development Standards were adopted unanimously (6-0) on December 20, 2023. Following First Reading, several environmental groups expressed concerns that the proposed LUC development standards lack a full regulatory framework. To address their concerns, staff held a panel discussion to better familiarize community partners with code elements on March 9, 2023 (44 attendees). Environmental Groups were represented by Larimer Alliance, Sierra Club, 350 Colorado, Fort Collins Sustainability Group, and Colorado Rising. These groups have shared that the currently proposed regulations are not consistent with the full intent of SB 19-181 and as such would neglect the City’s opportunity and duty to reduce unnecessary public health, safety, welfare, and environmental risks for Fort Collins’ current and future residents. The Environmental Groups also stated that staff should take a more comprehensive vision of what protections are available and needed, and to prepare a substantially revised and enhanced regulatory package. Environmental group feedback can be summarized in the following themes:  Development application requirements: Include requirements for detailed submittal documents in the Land Use Code to align with the required documents submitted to COGCC;  Operational Standards: Include requirements for a regulatory/compliance program; and  Process/Next Steps: Pause on adoption of LUC updates, open a public process to evaluate additional code elements, and re-consider LUC updates at the same time as additional operational standards and an ongoing compliance program are considered. Industry groups have also provided feedback along the way as a potential LUC applicant. These groups were represented by the American Petroleum Institute (API) and Colorado Oil and Gas Association (COGA). Comment letters from these groups can be summarized under DocuSign Envelope ID: 5B1A0B39-FE0B-492F-8726-5099FB8387B5 the following themes:  Setback Requirements: Setback requirements are too restrictive and do not allow for conditions or variances.  Development application requirements: Development application submittal procedures are too administratively burdensome and redundant with COGCC processes. Decision Point 1: Second Reading of the Land Use Code (LUC), April 4, 2023 Based on the summary of stakeholder feedback above, Council can address this feedback in multiple ways: Development Application Requirements: As noted above, environmental stakeholders believe the City needs to increase the application requirements in the Land Use Code and industry stakeholders believe the City needs to remove redundancies.  Increase application requirements: The COGCC submittal requirements for reviewing a new oil and gas location in addition to reviewing the Commission’s rules for ongoing operational standards includes a full development plan. If Council is supportive of increasing application requirements by adding these submittal requirements to a local development application, City Staff recommend approval of these additional submittal details as part of administratively approved master submittal list for oil and gas facilities and oil and gas pipelines. Implementing this recommendation administratively rather than in the LUC allows staff to update requirements as the industry changes or if there are further changes at the state level. For reference and review, Staff prepared a draft of the development application submittal master list for oil and gas facilities and a copy is attached to this memo for Council’s review.  Relieve administrative burden and redundancy: Industry stakeholders have suggested the code proposal is duplicative with regulations put forth by the COGCC. It is correct that some of the regulations are duplicative, and in some cases stricter. The purpose, based on Council input, is to align with our local development process, development requirements, and reflect the local context. The draft code also requires local review before submitting to the COGCC. This is allowable based on COGCC rules and would facilitate a more predictable COGCC process for new operators/facilities. If Council wishes to change the development review to be concurrent with COGCC, staff will have language ready to include as an amendment to the Second Reading draft. Operational Standards: This recommendation from the environmental groups is not part of the Land Use Code and is captured in Decision Point 2 for Council consideration. Setbacks: Currently, an applicant can request modifications to the setback distance standards from the State and landowners, under COGCC Rule 604. The industry stakeholders are requesting the City allow local modification of standards which is currently not allowed under the code proposal. If Council wishes to allow a local modification of standards staff will have language ready to include as an amendment to the Second Reading draft. Decision Point 2: Operational Standards DocuSign Envelope ID: 5B1A0B39-FE0B-492F-8726-5099FB8387B5 As noted above, environmental stakeholders requested a more complete regulatory framework to include more enforcement and compliance that is in addition to the State operational standards. Access to mineral resources within the City is already limited, with only two producing wells operating in an older legacy oil field. Furthermore, no new oil or gas fields of interest have been identified outside of the existing field in NE Fort Collins, and proposed LUC code updates to be considered on April 4, 2023, would effectively limit additional oil and gas locations and redevelopment at existing sites to less than 1% of the City. While there are no current or anticipated compliance concerns at sites within City limits, there is an ongoing area of concern related to a site with oil and gas storage and production facilities located just outside City limits, adjacent to the Hearthfire residential neighborhood (referred to as the “Hearthfire Facility”). On August 9, 2022, the Colorado Department of Health and Environment (CDPHE) issued a Compliance Advisory for this facility, and the County has recommended further compliance action. This site has a history of violations related to record- keeping requirements, leak detections, and gas flaring. In May 2022, a fire occurred at this site, adding to the concerns. To address concerns that have been raised regarding compliance and enforcement, staff is pursuing the following:  Leak detection: The City and County have entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA), wherein the City is purchasing an Optical Gas Imaging Camera (OGI) for use by County. The County is in the process of procuring the camera and training new staff to operate it for leak detection at sites within and near Fort Collins, as well as other locations in the County.  Financial Assurances: Based on requirements enacted in April of 2022, Prospect Energy submitted a Financial Assurances Plan to the State in November 2022. Staff and the County have the authority to review these plans and have both requested a Hearing with the State, because staff does not believe these plans are sufficient to cover potential reclamation of wells within City limits (the City should be notified of the State’s response to the Hearing request in Q2). In addition, these regulations allow for the City to request that low-producing or non-operational wells be plugged and abandoned (reclaimed); the City will place this request after the Hearing date/result from the Financial Assurances Plan is resolved.  Air Quality Monitoring: In Fort Collins, the most pressing need for continuous monitoring is for emissions just outside of City limits near the Hearthfire facility. This is the only site in the area with storage and transport facilities, and concerns and complaints are ongoing. To address this, the City is working with Larimer County to develop a continuous air quality monitoring and response plan for this site. The plan will include continuous measurements of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and action points to trigger inspection responses, which would in turn prompt further compliance-related action. This monitoring is anticipated to be operational in Q3 or Q4 of 2023. Recommended Next Steps: In previous discussions, Councilmembers have expressed that these actions paired with the applicable State (COGCC) standards are sufficient to address the need for an inspection and enforcement program. However, staff continue to hear a desire for the City to expand its regulatory framework. Therefore, we wanted to bring this feedback to the Council's attention. DocuSign Envelope ID: 5B1A0B39-FE0B-492F-8726-5099FB8387B5 Staff recommends continued adoption of the LUC development standards for new oil and gas facilities on Second Reading, as this restricts new oil and gas to less than 1% of the City as well as other benefits outlined in the meeting materials. If Council desires an additional layer of regulatory compliance (inspection and enforcement) by the City, staff recommends a W ork Session in Q2 of 2023 to provide additional direction regarding consideration of operational standards along with an associated enforcement/inspection program. Decision Point 3: Operator Agreement In 2013, the City of Fort Collins entered into an Operator Agreement (OA) with Prospect Energy, the sole oil and gas operator in the City. At the time, the City had enacted a voter-initiated ban on hydraulic fracturing, which was later overturned by the Colorado Supreme Court in 2016. The OA was intended to exempt the current operator from the ban as long as the agreement included strict controls and adequately protected public health, safety, and welfare, as determined by City Council. The OA is set to renew in 5-year terms and was automatically extended in 2018, but Council may choose to terminate the agreement prior to renewal in May 2023. Recommended Next Steps: Staff recommends termination of the agreement and will be brought to Council via Resolution on April 4, 2023, for the following reasons:  The OA, as written, exempts the current operator (Prospect Energy) from the City’s development review process; and  The "Best Management Practices" in the 2013 OA are outdated and not as stringent as the newer COGCC and CDPHE standards and regulations adopted since SB-181. Next Steps in addressing Fort Collins Comprehensive Regulatory Framework  April 4, 2023 Second Reading of the ordinance Amending the Land Use Code to Regulate new Oil and Gas Facilities and Pipelines.  April 4, 2023 Resolution - termination of an Oil and Gas Operator Agreement between the City of Fort Collins and Prospect Energy  TBD – If directed by Council, Work Session and further public outreach related to potential consideration of additional regulations through updates to Municipal Code along with resource considerations for an inspection, enforcement and compliance program.  Q3 2023 – First Reading of Land Use Code Development Standards regulating new development reverse setbacks from existing oil and gas facilities. CC:  Cassie Archuleta, Air Quality Program Manager  Lindsay Ex, Environmental Services Director  Brad Yatabe, Senior Assistant City Attorney DocuSign Envelope ID: 5B1A0B39-FE0B-492F-8726-5099FB8387B5 ATTACHMENT 3.23.2023 DRAFT SUBJECT TO CHANGE City of Fort Collins Application for Permit For New Oil and Gas Facilities Development application submittal master list for oil and gas facilities Introduction & Instructions to Applicant This application form requires information from, and provides guidance to, applicants for permits, pursuant to the City Fort Collins Oil and Gas Facilities and Pipelines Land Use Code Standards (“Development Standards”). This application is supplementary to, and not in replacement of the specific and detailed requirements of the Development Standards. Any conflict between the requirements of the Development Standards as generally described in this application form, and the Development Standards themselves, shall be resolved in favor of the Development Standards. Conceptual Review Prior to submitting an application for a permit under the Development Standards, the prospective applicant must schedule and attend a conceptual review pursuant to Section 3.12.3 of the Land Use Code. At or before the Conceptual Review meeting, the applicant shall provide staff with the following information: (a) Names and addresses of all persons or interests proposing the designated activity; (b) The application fee, pursuant to Section 2.2.3(D) of the Land Use Code (c) Alternative Location Analysis. The alternative location analysis must include, at a minimum, the following information: 1) A map depicting the following elements within three (3) miles of the proposed surface location. (This requirement is limited to one (1) mile for a proposed single vertical or directional well): i. All mineral rights held or controlled by the applicant; and ii. The location of all features listed in the "Preliminary Site Analysis." 2) Unless waived by the Director, the analysis shall evaluate a minimum of three potential locations that can reasonably access the mineral resources within the proposed drilling and spacing unit(s), including the following information for each site: i. General narrative description of each location; ii. Any location restrictions that the site does not satisfy; iii. Any existing surface use agreements or other documentation regarding legal property rights; iv. Off-site impacts that may be associated with each site; v. Proposed truck traffic routes and access roads for each location; and DocuSign Envelope ID: 5B1A0B39-FE0B-492F-8726-5099FB8387B5 vi. Any information pertinent to the applicable review criteria that will assist the Director in evaluating the locations. 3) Preliminary Site Analysis. The Preliminary Site Analysis shall include maps with the following information: a. All drilling and spacing units proposed by the applicant within one (1) mile of the City's boundaries; b. All features defined below that are wholly or partially within one (1) mile of the proposed oil and gas facility: i. Any existing or future building approved as occupiable space, as defined in the City’s Building Code; ii. City parks or City property intended to be used for City parks; iii. City maintained trails and trailheads or City property intended to be used for City trails and trailheads; iv. Outdoor venues, playgrounds, permanent sports fields, amphitheaters, or other similar places of outdoor assembly; v. City natural areas; vi. Existing and approved oil and gas facilities and pipelines; vii. Areas within the FEMA 100-Year Floodplain boundary; viii. The centerline of all USGS perennial and intermittent streams and the map will indicate which surface water features are downgradient; ix. Active reservoirs and public and private water supply wells of public record; x. Natural habitats and features as defined in Section 3.4.1 of the City Land Use Code, within one (1) mile of the proposed oil and gas facility; xi. High priority habitat as defined by the COGCC; and xii. Disproportionately impacted communities, as defined by the COGCC. (d) Any additional information requested by the Director as necessary to facilitate a productive pre-application meeting and to enable the Director to make a determination of the required permitting procedure and applicable portions of the Development Standards. Mineral Interest Owner Certification Any application which requires compliance with § 24-65.5-101, et seq., C.R.S., (Notification to Mineral Owners of Surface Development) shall not be considered to have been submitted as complete until the applicant has provided a certification signed by the applicant confirming that the applicant or its agent has examined the records of the Larimer County Clerk and Recorder for the existence of any mineral estate owners or lessees that own less than full fee title in the property which is the subject of the application, and stating whether or not any such mineral estate owners or lessees exist. In addition, for purposes of the Permit Authority convening its initial public hearing on any application involving property which mineral estate owners or lessees owning less than full fee title in the property have been certified by the applicant to exist, the application shall not be considered to have been submitted as complete until the applicant has provided an additional signed certification confirming that the applicant has, at least 30 days prior to the initial public hearing, transmitted to the City and to the affected mineral estate owners and lessees the notices required by C.R.S. §24-65.5-101, et seq. General Submission Requirements DocuSign Envelope ID: 5B1A0B39-FE0B-492F-8726-5099FB8387B5 All applications for permits under the Development Standards are required to be accompanied by general submission requirements: 1. Completed application form; 2. Identify what other city, state or federal permits are required in order to initiate and complete the Project: ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ __ ___________________________________________________________________ __ Detailed Submission Requirements 1. Information describing the Project (a) Executive summary of the proposal indicating the scope and need for the Project. (b) The legal description of the proposed development site (c) An index map showing the general location of the Project area and its relationship to surrounding topographic and cultural features. A standard U.S.G.S. quadrangle map would usually be adequate for an index map. (d) Ownership of the surface of the area of land to be affected. (e) A topographic map or maps showing location, nature, and density of the proposed development or land use change. (f) Aerial photographs, when available, of reasonable scale and of a date which reasonably portrays the current condition of the area to be covered by the permit application. The area to be covered by the permit shall be outlined on the aerial photograph. (g) Plans and specifications of the Project in sufficient detail to evaluate the application against the applicable Review Criteria. (h) Schedules for designing, permitting, constructing and operating the Project, including the estimated life of the Project. (i) Description of relevant conservation techniques to be used in the construction and operation of the Project. (j) Description of demands that this Project expects to meet and basis for Projections of that demand. (k) List of adjacent property owners [within 1000 feet of any Project component], and their mailing addresses. 2. Property rights, other permits and approvals (a) Description of property rights that are necessary for or that will be affected by the Project, including easements and property rights proposed to be acquired through negotiation or condemnation. (b) Specify how the proposed development will utilize existing easements or rights-of- way for new associated distribution or collector networks; DocuSign Envelope ID: 5B1A0B39-FE0B-492F-8726-5099FB8387B5 (c) Copies of any permits or approvals related to the Project that have been granted. (d) Copies of relevant official federal and state consultation correspondence prepared for the Project; a description of all mitigation required by federal, state and local authorities; and copies of any draft or final environmental assessments or impact statements required for the Project. 3. Land Use (a) Provide a map at a scale relevant to the Project describing existing land uses and existing zoning of the proposed Project area and the Project service area, including peripheral lands which may be impacted. The land use map shall include but need not necessarily be limited to the following categories: residential, commercial, industrial, extractive, transportation, communication and utility, institutional, open space, outdoor recreation, agricultural, forest land and water bodies. Show all special districts (school, fire, water, sanitation, etc.) within the Project area. (b) All immediately affected public land boundaries should be indicated on the map. Potential impacts of the proposed development upon public lands will be visually illustrated on the map as well as described in the text. (c) Detail the agricultural productivity capability of the land in the development area and source development area (SCS classification) (d) Specify whether and how the proposed Project conforms to the City’s planning policies, including without limitation, the Fort Collins Comprehensive Plan. (e) Specify whether and how the proposed Project conforms to applicable regional and state planning policies. (f) Specify whether and how the proposed Project conforms to applicable federal land management policies. (g) If relevant to the Project design, describe the agricultural productivity capability of the land in the Project area, using Soils Conservation Service soils classification data. 4. Financial feasibility of the Project (a) Relevant bond issue, loan and other financing approvals or certifications (ex: approved bond issues; bond counsel opinion). (b) Business plan that generally describes the financial feasibility of the Project. 5. Areas of Paleontological, Historic or Archaeological Importance. Description of the impacts and net effect of the Project on sites of paleontological, historic or archaeological interest. 6. Noise Mitigation. A noise report and mitigation plan must be submitted as part of the application for a project development plan. The noise report and mitigation plan must include the following information: a. During construction, drilling, and completion activities, the City will require continuous noise monitoring for all oil and gas facilities located with ½ mile (2,640 feet) of any DocuSign Envelope ID: 5B1A0B39-FE0B-492F-8726-5099FB8387B5 existing Building Units. The City may adjust this distance based on the location, nature, and size of the facility. The City may require continuous noise monitoring to be conducted by an approved third‐party consultant. b. The hours of maximum noise emissions, type, frequency, and level of noise to be emitted, and proposed mitigation measures.  c. A minimum five-day baseline noise analysis which must include Saturday and Sunday as two of the days.  d. Modeled maximum A- and C-weighted decibel levels for all phases of development shall be presented using contour maps from the oil and gas facility (combining noise sources) at 350 feet, 500 feet, 1000 feet, 2,000 feet, and to the property line of the adjacent properties. Contour maps shall be provided that demonstrate both unmitigated and mitigated decibel levels.  e. A plan of proposed mitigation measures to be implemented by the oil and gas facility during each phase of development shall be provided to ensure compliance with the maximum permissible noise levels as listed in the Code of the City of Fort Collins Chapter 20, Article II.  f. Compressor engines for natural gas are prohibited within the City limits except for wellhead, sales, and gas lift compressors, air and/or gas gathering compressors which shall be located on the oil and gas locations.  Operator shall use acoustic wall enclosures for compressor engines where necessary to provide visual and/or noise mitigation. Any compressors that are used as part of the vapor recovery units use to control air pollution will be limited to a maximum of eight (8) small engine drive units.  Vapor recovery unit compressors will be installed with sound walls to buffer noise. 7. Visual Mitigation. A visual mitigation plan must be submitted as part of the application for a project development plan and such plan must demonstrate how the proposed oil and gas facility will blend into the surrounding environment, including consideration of landscape berming, facility colors, and use of existing and new vegetation and contours. The visual mitigation plan must include photographic simulations of the oil and gas facility with proposed mitigation measures. 8. Air Quality. Description of the impacts and net effect the Project would have on air quality during both construction and operation, and under both average and worst case conditions, considering particulate matter and aerosols, oxides, hydrocarbons, oxidants, and other chemicals, temperature effects and atmospheric interactions. Such plan must demonstrate compliance with the specifications and requirements as outlined in Chapter 11 Section 3.3 of Larimer County’s Land Use Code. 9. Air Monitoring. An air monitoring plan must be submitted as part of the application for a project development plan. Such plan must Demonstrate compliance with Ambient Air Monitoring methods and reporting specifications as set forth in Chapter 11 Section 3.3 of Larimer County’s Land Use Code, and include how the operator will conduct the following: g. Baseline Monitoring: Baseline monitoring shall be conducted within five hundred (500) feet of a proposed oil and gas location over at thirty (30) day period prior to construction of the oil and gas facility. b. Monitoring during Drilling, Completion and Production Phases: High frequency monitoring shall be conducted during drilling and completions activities and continue until three years have passed from the date the last well drilled on the site has entered the production phase, unless a building approved for human occupancy is within one thousand (1000) feet of the edge of the working pad surface. In such instance, high frequency monitoring shall be required until all wells are plugged and abandoned. DocuSign Envelope ID: 5B1A0B39-FE0B-492F-8726-5099FB8387B5 10. Community Outreach Plan. A community outreach plan must be submitted as part of the application for a project development plan for any oil and gas location proposed to be located within two thousand six hundred and forty (2640) feet of any building approved for human occupancy under the building code and must provide for consultation, outreach, and engagement that includes: a. Describe any measures taken to directly mitigate adverse impact to occupants of any buildings approved for human occupancy. b. Providing at least thirty (30) days advance written notice to occupants of any buildings approved for human occupancy of mobilization in, rig up. c. Providing written notice to occupants of any building approved for human occupancy within ten (10) days after any reportable events that could have off-site impacts including fires, explosions, blow-outs, venting, or spills over one-hundred (100) barrels in volume. 11. Odor Complaint Response Plan. Plan should also describe odor response procedures, Continuation of high frequency monitoring will be required if repeated emissions at threshold concentrations are detected or as a result of repeated odor violations. 12. Water Source Plan. As part of the application for a project development plan, the Operator will provide the City with details regarding the source or sources of water to be used at the oil and gas facility during the drilling phase and completion phase and during hydraulic fracturing. d. The Operator will provide the City with a will serve letter from each water provider stating that sufficient water is available to support the estimated volumes of water to be utilized. e. All water for hydraulic fracturing shall be transported to the Oil and Gas Locations by means other than by truck, unless the Operator demonstrates extenuating circumstances that prevent water delivery through other means. If water is delivered by truck, Operator shall submit a traffic control plan to the City engineer for approval prior to hydraulic fracturing, and trucks shall be limited to a maximum of seven (7) days to deliver water. If the transportation of water by means other than truck exceeds seven (7) days, the Operator will seek any necessary amendments to the Oil and Gas Project Development Plan. 13. Waste Management Plan. Must detail how all solid and liquid wastes will be addressed. The plan must demonstrate how the oil and gas facility will comply with the following requirements: f. All fluids must be contained and there shall be no discharge of fluids.   g. Wastewater must be stored in tanks, transported by tanker trucks and/or pipelines, and disposed of at licensed disposal or recycling sites in accordance with applicable law.  h. The location and type of secondary containment and stormwater measures as required in Chapter 11 Section 3.3 of Larimer County’s Land Use Code. 14. Surface Water Quality (a) Map and/or description of all surface waters to be affected by the Project, including description of provisions of the applicable regional water quality management plan, any NPDES Permit, or Section 404 Federal Clean Water Act Permit that applies to the Project. (b) Descriptions of the immediate and long-term impact and net effects that the Project would have on the quantity and quality of surface water under both average and worst case conditions. DocuSign Envelope ID: 5B1A0B39-FE0B-492F-8726-5099FB8387B5 (c) Provide a surface and subsurface drainage analysis. 15. Groundwater Quality (a) Map and/or description of all groundwater, including any and all aquifers underlying or affected by the Project. At a minimum, the description should include: i. groundwater flow directions and levels. ii. existing groundwater quality and classification. iii. location of all water wells potentially affected by the Project and their uses. iv. description of the impacts and net effect of the Project on groundwater. 16. Soils, Geologic Conditions and Natural Hazards (a) Map and/or description of soils, geologic conditions, and natural hazards including but not limited to soil types, drainage areas, slopes, avalanche areas, debris fans, mud flows, rock slide areas, faults and fissures, seismic history, and wildfire hazard areas, all as relevant to the Project area. (b) Descriptions of the risks to the Project from natural hazards. (c) Descriptions of the impacts and net effect of the Project on soil and geologic conditions in the Project area. (d) On an appropriate map, indicate any floodplain associated with the proposed development. Documentation of historical flooding activity should be included. Documentation of historical flooding activity should be included. 17. Hazardous Materials (a) Description of all solid waste, hazardous waste, petroleum products, hazardous, toxic, and explosive substances to be used, stored, transported, disturbed or produced in connection with the Project, including the type and amount of such substances, their location, and the practices and procedures to be implemented to avoid accidental release and exposure. (b) Location of storage areas designated for equipment, fuel, lubricants, and chemical and waste storage with an explanation of spill containment plans and structures. 18. Monitoring and Mitigation Plan (a) Description of all mitigation that is proposed to avoid, minimize or compensate for adverse impacts of the Project and to maximize positive impacts of the Project. (b) Describe how and when mitigation will be implemented and financed. (c) Describe impacts that are unavoidable that cannot be mitigated. (d) Description of methodology used to measure impacts of the Project and effectiveness of proposed mitigation measures. (e) Description, location and intervals of proposed monitoring to ensure that mitigation will be effective. DocuSign Envelope ID: 5B1A0B39-FE0B-492F-8726-5099FB8387B5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5B1A0B39-FE0B-492F-8726-5099FB8387B5