HomeMy WebLinkAboutMemo - Mail Packet - 5/3/2022 - Memorandum From Teresa Roche Re: Follow Up: April 18 Council Compensation And April 7 Council Finance Committees
Human Resources Department
215 N. Mason, 2nd Floor
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6535
DATE: April 28, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Teresa Roche, Human Resources
RE: Follow Up: 4/18 Council Compensation and 4/7 Council Finance Committees
_____________________________________________________________________
I hope each of you is well.
Follow Up from April 18 Council Compensation:
• The draft minutes from the April 18 Compensation Committee meeting.
• Revised slides from hrQ on Council Compensation Analysis—there was a request at
the meeting to also display compensation benchmarks by mean; slides 10, 12, and 14
are new.
• Julie and I are meeting to finalize the May 24 agenda; however, at the last meeting, we
decided that hrQ will present the “cost of living analysis” analysis.
Follow Up from April 7 Council Finance Committee:
• Kelly asked if our compensation philosophy was a Council policy or admin policy. I said
the latter as that is all I knew since joining the City and committed to learning more. I too
was curious. The follow-up research entailed reviewing all the ordinances and
resolutions online related to compensation and the pay plan. I have documents going
back to 1970 on the pay plan adoption and 1990, 1992, and 1993 for the total
compensation policy. It was very specific and generous on competitive positioning.
• Before additional time is invested, it will be helpful to know what next and if there is a
specific request from the Council for the Council Compensation Committee or me.
TR
Compensation Policy Committee
April 18, 2022, 3:30 – 4:30 p.m.
Meeting Minutes
Members in attendance: Councilmember Susan Gutowsky; Councilmember Shirley Peel; Councilmember
Julie Pignataro, Chair
Staff in attendance: Kelly DiMartino, Interim City Manager; Kyle Stannert, Deputy City Manager; Teresa
Roche, Human Resources; Carrie Daggett, City Attorney; Kelley Vodden, Director of Compensation,
Benefits, and Wellness; Melanie Clark, Executive Administrative Assistant; Wendy Bricher Finance
Analyst; Steve Engemoen, Senior Compensation Analyst
Presenter in attendance: Brian Wilkerson, hrQ
The Compensation Policy Committee (Committee) meeting was held on April 18, 2022, virtually through
a Zoom webinar.
Agenda
• Call Meeting to Order
• Approve Minutes from March 21, 2022
• Discussion Items:
o Review hrQ Presentation on Updated Analysis on Council Pay and Benefits
o Decide on the next steps
• Adjournment
Next Meeting: May 24, 2022, 3:30 to 4:30 p.m.
The meeting began at 3.36 p.m.
Councilmember Shirley Peel moved to approve the minutes from March 21, 2022. Councilmember Julie
Pignataro seconded the motion. Approval was 3-0.
Bottom line: The committee appreciated the analysis and asked for additional information. They wanted
time to reflect on what they believe the subsequent right actions are for Council to consider, and the
topic is on the May meeting.
Brian Wilkerson shared the results of the City Council Compensation and Benefits Benchmark Study. The
comparison survey included peer cities as well as front-range cities.
Brian shared annual compensation comparisons for the Mayor. He explained that there was no
correlation found between a city's population or area size to the number of Councilmembers. Colorado
Springs was not included due to the different form of government.
Councilmember Pignataro asked why they chose the median instead of the mean data. She stated that it
would be helpful to see everything. Brian explained that the statisticians felt the median was a more
accurate reflection of the date.; however, he will gladly update the slides.
Councilmember Pignataro did not see the number of constituents per Councilmember in the data. Brian
shared that they did not find consistent data or a typical pattern identified.
Brian shared that Fort Collins has the lowest compensation level for City Council among the peer cities in
the study, and two cities along the front range are lower than Fort Collins. The survey also showed that
four cities report a higher salary for the Mayor Pro Tem than other Councilmembers. Fort Collins is also
unique in that community members must vote on changes to how the salaries are considered for
Council compensation. Councilmember Gutowsky had asked earlier what the current method was, and
Teresa researched this. She shared that Charter Article II Section 3 provides an annual compensation
adjustment for the Mayor and Council based on changes to the Consumer Price Index Urban (CPI-U) and
shared she has the salary data from 2011 through 2022 if anyone is interested.
The survey found that Fort Collins is in alignment with expense reimbursements.
Participation in benefits was available in five peer cities and three Front Range cities. In almost all cases,
the elected officials did not take advantage of the benefits. Additionally, other benefits beyond the
employee offerings were not found.
Councilmember Pignataro asked about the cost of healthcare for City employees. She asked if any of the
benefits allowed for an expanded family or if it was only for the individual. Brian stated that from what
he could remember, they offered to the Councilmember only, and the trend was they paid the entire
cost of the premium.
Councilmember Susan Gutowsky believed that it would be awkward if the benefit totaled their full
compensation and that it would end once their term ended. Teresa shared under the Consolidated
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) that health coverage starts from the date the covered
employee's health insurance ends and, depending on the type of qualifying event, may last for 18
months, 29 months, or 36 months.
Brian shared they found that discussions about pay often triggered broader conversations in the
community regarding Council duties and accountabilities. He explained that the responsibilities of the
Mayor and City Council are most often outlined in the City Charter and noted several cities have gone to
the effort of expanding on those outlines and have listed specific duties, requirements, and expectations
of the roles in either job descriptions, a manual or brochure.
Teresa explained that Brian had shared a couple of position descriptions he received as part of having
these conversations and is happy to share these if there was interest.
Councilmember Gutowsky believes that it would be helpful to have an expanded list of duties for future
Councilmembers and will be asking that Council do this. Brian shared that most who went through this
process felt like it was a worthwhile exercise and found conversations with members of the public were
helpful.
Councilmember Shirley Peel asked what led to the decision in November 2010 for the community to
vote to change the form of our city government from a council-manager form of government to a
council-mayor structure. Brian shared that he believes the population size may have had something to
do with it, though Kyle Stannert explained he was not aware of the population being a trigger that led to
this change by the voters.
Teresa asked the committee members what they wanted to consider with this information.
Councilmember Pignataro stated that she is interested in getting a more diverse Council in the future
and was hoping the survey would bring forward more concrete conclusions. She is not sure where she
wants to go from here.
Councilmember Peel shared that she went into this with the idea of making it feasible for more people
to be able to serve on the Council. She is disappointed by the results. Councilmember Peel feels that it
has highlighted the need to have a job description to point out the time it takes and the expectations.
Councilmember Peel shared that Colorado Springs is an interesting idea and wondered at what point we
need a stronger Mayor form of government. She feels that being on Council is a full-time job.
Councilmember Pignataro stated they might want to consider when other communities have
transitioned to a strong mayor form of government.
Councilmember Gutowsky is not supportive of the idea of benefits and is uncomfortable with the
assumptions that if more pay or benefits were offered, it would bring more diversity to Council and who
is running. She believes that knowing Councilmembers' requirements and letting people know they can
make it work would be a draw for people. She would like to consider making the campaign process
shorter and lowering costs.
Councilmember Pignataro clarified that she did not mean to imply that benefits would draw diversity to
the Council. She was coming from her personal experience with being on Council.
Councilmember Gutowsky wants to be sure their salary is not such that the community expects full-time
work from Councilmembers.
Councilmember Pignataro would like to touch base on this again in May.
The meeting adjourned at 4:30 p.m.
City of Fort Collins
City Council
Compensation
Benchmark Study
April 2022
•City Council Structure
•Annual Compensation
•Reimbursements/Allowances
•Benefit Eligibility
•Documentation of Council Duties
Topics
2
•Data was collected in March 2022 via virtual meetings with City Human Resources
employees, via email and online research.
List of Cities in Benchmark Study
Peer Cities
•Wilmington, NC
•Naperville, IL
•Asheville, NC
•Greensboro, NC
•Oklahoma City, OK
•Eugene, OR
•Plano, TX
Front Range Cities
•Arvada
•Greeley
•Colorado Springs
•Thornton
•Loveland
•Lakewood
3
Cost of Living Comparison Survey Cities
Source: US Census Bureau; smartasset.com
Total Taxes Housing Food
Asheville, NC 83,393 94,589 13.4%-8%3%-19%-14%
Eugene, OR 156,185 176,654 13.1%-2%18%-13%-4%
Greensboro, NC 269,666 299,035 10.9%-3%3%-9%-11%
Naperville, IL 141,853 149,540 5.4%7%4%14%-4%
Oklahoma City, OK 579,999 681,054 17.4%5%2%-13%-12%
Plano, TX 259,841 285,494 9.9%-4%-16%0%-8%
Wilmington, NC 106,476 115,451 8.4%1%3%1%-8%
Arvada 106,781 124,367 16.5%similar 0%0%0%
Colorado Springs 420,691 479,257 13.9%-5%0%-11%-3%
Greeley 93,156 109,084 17.1%-6%0%-14%-4%
Lakewood 143,294 156,195 9.0%similar 0%0%0%
Loveland 67,000 76,341 13.9%similar 0%0%0%
Thornton 119,753 142,118 18.7%similar 0%0%0%
Fort Collins 144,461 169,810 17.5%
COL Compared to Fort Collins
City
2010
Population
2020
Population
% Change in
Population
4
Study Results
5
Confidential
•City Council sizes range from 5 to 10 members, with 5 of the 14 cities in the study having 8
members; there is no correlation between a city’s population or area size to the number of
Council members
City Council Structure Summary
All Elected from
Ward or District
Mix of Wards and
At Large All Elected At Large
Number of Cities 6 4 4
•None of the Front Range cities in the study have a City Council where all members are
elected At Large
•Research did not uncover processes used to determine Ward or District boundaries; ordinances may contain
vague wording such as “equal populations”
•Mayors are usually considered part of the City Council with the same voting rights as
members; principal duties are to preside over City Council meetings and serve as the
ceremonial head of the city
•Mayor Pro Tem positions are selected from current Council members and fill in for the
Mayor should they be unavailable
•Most City Councils have staggered elections, with members serving 4-year terms
•If term limits are stated, the limit was generally 2 terms
•Mayors are also elected to 4-year terms
6
Council Structures –Peer Cities
7
City
2020
Population
Area in
Square
Miles
City Council
Structure Terms Notes
Fort Collins 169,810 57.2 - Mayor
- 6 Council Members,
from Districts
-Mayor: 2 year terms, limited to 3
terms
- Council: 4-year staggered terms,
limited to 2 terms
Mayor presides over City Council meetings, ceremonial head of City; signs legal
documents;
Mayor Pro Tem: chosen from Council, 2-year term;
Council is responsible for policy decisions
Asheville, NC 94,589 45.6 - Mayor
- 6 Council Members
-All At Large
- 4-year staggered terms
- Mayor on separate ballot
- Mayor: Presides over City Council; ceremonial head; no veto power
- Vice Mayor: Appointed by City Council
- City Council: Determines the needs to be addressed and the degree of service to be
provided by city government
Eugene, OR 176,654 44.1 - Mayor
- 8 Council Members,
All from 8 Wards
- 4-year staggered terms
- Mayor on separate ballot
- Mayor: Has no vote except in case of tie; formal representative of City
- City Council: Responsible for passing laws, setting community goals, adopting policy,
and deciding which services the City will provide.
Greensboro, NC 299,035 129.0 - Mayor
- 8 Council Members, 3
At Large, 5 from
Districts
- 4-year terms - Mayor: Presides over City Council
- Mayor Pro Tem: Selected from Council Members
- City Council: Sets and directs policy regarding City government operations; executed by
City Manager
Naperville, IL 149,540 38.8 - Mayor
- 8 Council Members
- All At Large
-Approving City policies, ordinances and other regulations.
- Responsible for matters dealing with employee salaries and benefits.
Oklahoma City,
OK
681,054 606.3 - Mayor
- 8 Council Members,
All from 8 Wards
- 4-year terms - Mayor: Part of City Council
- City Council: Develop City priorities
Plano, TX 285,494 71.7 - Mayor
- 7 Council Members
-All At Large
- 4-year terms
- Term limited to 2 terms
- Mayor: Part of City Council
- City Council: District residency requirement for members in Places 1 through 4
Wilmington, NC 115,451 51.4 - Mayor
- 5 Council Members
-All At Large
-Mayor: 2-year term
- Council: 4-year staggered terms
- Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem: Part of City Council
- Mayor Pro Tem: chosen from Council
Council Structures –Front Range Cities
8
City
2020
Population
Area in
Square
Miles
City Council
Structure Terms Notes
Fort Collins 169,810 57.2 - Mayor
- 6 Council Members,
from Districts
-Mayor: 2 year terms, limited to 3
terms
- Council: 4-year staggered terms,
limited to 2 terms
Mayor presides over City Council meetings, ceremonial head of City; signs legal
documents;
Mayor Pro Tem: chosen from Council, 2-year term;
Council is responsible for policy decisions
Arvada 124,402 38.8 - Mayor
- 5 Council Members; 4
from Districts, 1 At
Large
- Duties of Mayor and City Council members laid out in detail
Colorado Springs 479,257 194.9 - Full-time Mayor
- 9 Council Members
- 6 from equally
populated districts, 3 At
Large
- 4-year terms
- Term limited to 2 terms
- Has had Strong Mayor structure since 2011
- Mayor is Full-time elected positions, not part of City Council, has veto authority
- City Council can override veto with 2/3 majority
Greeley 109,084 48.8 - Mayor
- 6 City Council
- 4 from Wards, 2 At
Large
- 4-year staggered terms - Mayor is part of City Council
Lakewood 156,195 43.0 - Mayor
- 10 Council Members, 2
from each of 5 Wards
- 4-year staggered terms - Mayor is part of City Council, no veto power
- Mayor Pro Tem chosen annually
Loveland 76,341 34.4 - Mayor
- 8 Council Members, 2
from each of 4 Wards
- No term limits - Mayor has same voting rights as other City Council Members
- Mayor Pro Tem is elected by Council with same term as Mayor
- City Council residency requirement of 1 year in Ward prior to election
Thornton 142,118 35.9 - Mayor
- 8 Council Members, 2
from each of 4 Wards
- 4-year staggered terms - Mayor is part of City Council
Annual Compensation -Mayor
Annual Compensation -Mayor
Minimum Median Maximum
Peer Cities $15,228 $24,000 $29,925
Front Range
Cities*
$12,000 $18,000 $38,800
All Cities*$12,000 $24,000 $38,800
Fort Collins $16,074
•Annual salaries for the Mayor’s
role range from $12,000 to
$38,800. The $38,800 is an
outlier as it is $8,875 higher than
the next highest mayor salary.
•Only two cities (one peer and one
Front Range) have a lower
compensation level for Mayor
than Fort Collins.*Data for Colorado Springs is not included as they have a Full-Time
Mayor government structure.
9
Mean Annual Compensation -Mayor
•Compensation for the Mayor of Fort
Collins falls below both the mean and
median across all comparisons (Peer,
Front Range, or All Cities).
Annual Compensation –Mayor
Minimum Mean Maximum
Peer Cities $15,228 $24,035 $29,925
Front Range
Cities*
$12,000 $22,160 $38,880
All Cities*$12,000 $23,254 $38,800
Fort Collins $16,074
*Data for Colorado Springs is not included as they have a Full-Time
Mayor government structure.
Annual Compensation –Mayor Pro Tem
•4 Cities report a higher salary for
the Mayor Pro Tem than other
Council members; 3 of the cities
are on the Front Range, only 1
peer city has this practice.
•Compensation for Mayor Pro Tem
of Fort Collins is the same as City
Council.
*Data for Colorado Springs is not included as they have a Full-Time
Mayor government structure.9
Annual Compensation –Mayor Pro Tem
Minimum Median Maximum
Peer Cities $19,000
Front Range
Cities
$9,600 $15,000 $21,000
All Cities $9,600 $17,000 $21,000
Fort Collins Same as City Council: $10,712
Mean Annual Compensation –Mayor Pro Tem
•Four cities are represented in the data,
as most cities provide the same
compensation for the Mayor Pro Tem as
City Council.
•Fort Collins does not have a different
compensation level for Mayor Pro Tem.
Annual Compensation –Mayor Pro Tem
Minimum Mean Maximum
Peer Cities $19,000
Front Range
Cities
$9,600 $15,200 $21,000
All Cities $9,600 $16,150 $21,000
Fort Collins Same as City Council: $10,712
Annual Compensation –City Council
Minimum Median Maximum
Peer Cities $12,000 $13,214 $23,377
Front Range
Cities
$6,250 $12,500 $18,000
All Cities $6,250 $13,000 $23,377
Fort Collins $10,712
Annual Compensation –City Council
•Annual salaries for the City Council
members range from $6,250 to
$23,377, with 13 of the 14 cities falling
at or below $18,000.
•Only two Front Range cities have a
lower compensation level for City
Council than Fort Collins.
•Fort Collins has the lowest
compensation level for City Council
among the peer cities in the study.
•City Council salaries are customarily set
by ordinance. In order to adjust Council
or the Mayor’s salary, City Council must
approve by a vote, allowing the increase
to be effective past the next election
date.
10
•Two peer cities, within the ordinance regarding
compensation, have allowed for annual
increases using a defined inflation factor. Fort
Collins also follows this practice.
Mean Annual Compensation –City Council
•Compensation for the Fort Collins City
Council falls below both the mean and
median across all comparisons (Peer,
Front Range, or All Cities).
Annual Compensation –City Council
Minimum Mean Maximum
Peer Cities $12,000 $15,169 $23,377
Front Range
Cities
$6,250 $11,984 $18,000
All Cities $6,250 $13,699 $23,377
Fort Collins $10,712
•Expense reimbursements are defined within the City ordinances as “reasonable and
necessary expenses”; limitations and rules for approval are generally included
•3 of the 14 cities do not reimburse for expenses
•Common reimbursements include:
•Travel to Council-related conferences, meetings, classes
•Mileage to attend events where they are representing the City
•Cell phone, laptop and/or internet service allowances or provision
•Meals during Council meetings
•Office supplies
•Association dues
•Greensboro, NC was the only city reporting an annual car allowance for City Council
members:
•Mayor: $4,200
•Mayor Pro Tem: $3,600
•City Council: $3,000
Expense Reimbursements
11
Eligible to
Participate
Not Eligible to
Participate
Fort Collins
Peer Cities 5 2
Front Range
Cities
3 2
(1 Not Available)
Benefit Eligibility
Health, Vision, Dental Insurance Participation•When City Council members are eligible
to participate in the Health Insurance
benefits provided to City employees,
cities require the member to pay the full
premium. In cities interviewed, it was
reported as a “rare” event when Council
members would participate.
•Minimal other benefits are provided by
the cities to the Council members:
•Voluntary life insurance can be
purchased in a few cities
•Arvada, CO was the only city to
report a provision that allows a
Council member to participate in
retirement, the supplemental 457
plan
12
Mayor City Council
•Signing legal instruments
•Review and approve budgets
•Represent city in local and regional meetings and events
•Represent the city to the press
•Approves Council members expenditures
•Serves on boards and commissions
•Review and approve budgets
•Determine policy for City direction
•Evaluate performance of City Manager, City Attorney and
City Clerk
•Attending council meetings and planning sessions
•Attending strategic planning meetings
•Participating in groundbreakings, ribbon cuttings and
grand openings
•Attending community events
•Participation in local, regional and national organizations
•Hosting events within ward
•Attending conferences away from City
Documentation of Council Duties
Most often, the duties for the Mayor and City Council are briefly outlined in the City Charter.
The descriptions generally state that the Mayor is the ceremonial head of the city and presides
over Council meetings. City Councils are charged with setting the direction and policy of the
City to be carried out by the City Manager and staff.
However, several cities, have gone to the effort of expanding on those outlines and have listed
specific duties, requirements and expectations of the roles in either job descriptions, a manual
or a brochure.
13
Thank You
Brian Wilkerson bwilkerson@hrqinc.com (303) 564-5686
Julie Stanek julie@hrqinc.com (970) 310-5582
Appendix –ICMA 2018 Municipal Form
of Government Survey excerpts
19
Confidential
ICMA 2018 Survey Results -Chief Elected Official
Source: 2018 Municipal Form of Government Survey; ICMA
Survey Highlights
• The vast majority of chief elected
official positions are part-time and
receive an annual salary or stipend.
• Local governments rarely place
term limits on chief elected
officials, but those that do most
often limit those terms to two four-
year terms.
• Most chief elected officials may
vote on all issues during council
meetings.
ICMA –Chief Elected Official
Source: 2018 Municipal Form of Government Survey; ICMA
ICMA –Chief Elected Official
Source: 2018 Municipal Form of Government Survey; ICMA
ICMA City Council
Council Survey Highlights
• Being a member of the council is
rarely a full-time position. Over 90
percent of respondents indicated that
their council member positions are all
part-time.
• Term limits on council positions are
rare overall but are most commonly
found in communities with 100,000
residents or more.
• Less than one in five responding local
governments have concurrent council
terms. Few local governments put all
council seats up for election in the
same year.
Source: 2018 Municipal Form of Government
Survey; ICMA
Survey Highlights
•Local elected officials are nearly
always paid a salary or stipend.
•Chief elected officials (mayors or
the council president) are paid an
average of $16,837 per year. •
Full-time mayors are paid an
average of $61,723.
•Part-time council members are
paid an average of $5,244 per
year.
•Some local governments
symbolically pay their elected
officials $1 per year. This typically
only happens among council-
manager communities in which
elected officials do not provide
day-to-day administration.
ICMA –Mayor/Council Compensation
Source: 2018 Municipal Form of Government Survey; ICMA
ICMA –Mayor/Council Compensation
Source: 2018 Municipal Form of Government Survey; ICMA