Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES-02/17/1966-Regulare 565 1 February 17, 1966_ MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CO?JNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, Held day, February 17, 1966, at, 1:30 o'clock P.M. Present: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. City Coffey, City Attorney March and City Engineer Fischer. Motion was made by Councilman McMillan, seconded by Councilman Carson, that the reading of the minutes of the last regular meeting held February 10, 1966, be dispensed with. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. The dedication of the North 401 of the Fahrenbruch Annexation for right-of-way for public street along Drake Road was presented as one of the stipulations of the recom- mendations of the Planning and Zoning Board in reference to the Fahrenbruch Annexation. Notion was made by Councilman McMillan, seconded by Councilman Carson, that the dedication be accepted. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, AlcMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following; communication was presented and read at. length: Fort Collins, Coloradd February 16, 1966 City of Fort Collins Port Collins, Colorado Gentlemen: You have asked to be advised specifically what number of shares of Northern olorado Water Conservancy District water will be sold to the City under our letter of ecember22, 1965. Please be advised that the number of shares (acre feet) of said Northern Colorado a ter Conservancy District water subject of our sale and purchase and relevant to the ahrenbruch Annexation is twenty (20). Ylurs very truly, /sl Jack Fahrenbruch THE STRACHAN COMPANY /sl By John L. Strachan The above water was offered to the City on December 22, 1965 , as a portion of ter necessary under the rules and regulations of annexation for the Fahrenbruch Annexatior tion was made by C,)uncilman Bennett, seconded by Councilman Kruchten, that the offer of shares of Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District water be accepted and the water rehased. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, Millan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes- None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following ordinance was presented and read onsebond reading: ORDINANCE NO. 11, 1966 OPTING AND APPROVTNG THE PLAT OF WHAT IS KNOWN AS THE FAHRENBRUCH ANNEXATION TO THE CITY FORT COLLINS AND TO BE INCJUDED WITHIN THE LIMITS IN D JURISDICTION THEREOF, PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY CO NTATNED IN ARTICLE 11, CHAPTER 139, COLORADO REVISED STATUTES, 1953 Motion was made by Councilman McMillan, seconded by Councilman Carson, that Ordi- nee No. 11, 1966, be adopted and become a law upon passage. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: ne. The President declared the motion adopted. The following ordinance was presented on second reading: ORDINANCE NO. 12, 1966 CFPTTNG AND APPROVING THE PLAT OF WHAT IS KNOWN AS THE BARTFLS1 FIRST ANNEXATION TO THE TV OF FORT COLLINS AND AINEDOINEARTICLEEDII�,ITHIN CHAPTERELIMITS AND 139, COLORADO REVIISEDIOSTATUTESO,F1953RSUANT TNr ATTTHORITY CONT 566 Motion was made by Councilman Bennett, seconded by Councilman Kruchten, that Ordinance No. 12, 1966, be adopted and become a law upon passage. Roll was called result as follows: .Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following ordinance was presented on second reading: ORDINANCE NO. 13, 1966 ACCEPTING AND APPROVING THE PLAT OF WHAT IS KNOWN AS THE WEST LAPORTE AVENUE SECOND ANNEX- ATION TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AND TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE LIMITS AND JURISDICTION THEREOF, PURSUANT TO THG AUTHORITY CONTAINED IN ARTICLE 11, CHAPTER 139, COLORADO REVISED STATTTTES, 1953 Motion was made by Councilman Carson, seconded by Councilman Bennett, that Ordi- nance No. 13, 1966, be adopted and become a law upon passage. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following ordinance was presented on second reading: ORDINANCE NO. 14, 1966 ACCEPTING AND APPROVING THE PLAT OF WHAT IS KNOWN AS THE VALLEY HI SUBDIVISION FIRST ANNEX- ATTON TO THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AND TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE LIMITS AND JURISDICTION THW,REOF, PURSUANT TO THE, AUTHORITY r,ONTATNED IN ARTICLE 11, CHAPTER 139, COLORADO REVISED 4TATTTTES, 1953 Motion was made Councilman nruchten, seconded by Councilman Bennett, that Ordi- nance No. 14, 1966, be adopted and become a law upon passage. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following ordinance was presented on second reading: ORDINANCE NO. 15, 1966 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2-10, SECTION 2-12 AND SECTION 2-13 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, 1958, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO APPLICAT FOR LICENSES TO SELL FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGES Motion was made by Councilman McMillan, seconded by Councilman Carson, that Ordinance No. 15, 1966, be adopted and become a law upon passage. Roll was called result! as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following ordinance was presented on first reading: ORDINANCE NO. 21, 1966 BEING AN ORDTNANCE AMENDING SECTION 1-13.58 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FORT rOLTTIS, 1958, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO MEMBERSHIP IN THE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD Motion was made by Councilman Bennett, seconded by Councilman Kruchten, that Ordinance No. 21, 1966, be considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 17th day of February, A. D. 1966, and to be presented for final passage on the loth day of March, A. D. 1966. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following petition for annexation was presented and read at length: PETITION FOR ANNEXATION The undersigned hereby petition the Council of the City of Fort Collins for the annexation of the below described property to the City of Fort Collins, Colorado. A tract of land situate in the County of Larimer, State of Colorado, to -wit: 567 A tract of land situate in the NFI of Section 16, Township 7 North, Range 69 West Of the Sixth P.M. which considering the East line of said NE4 as bearing S. 000 32' E. and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto is contained withi the boundary lines which begin at a point which bears S. 000321 E. 1320.00 feet and again N. 89°43130" W. 660.00 feet from the NE corner of said Section 16, said point of beginning being the NW corner of the West Elizabeth Foothills Annexation run thence S. 00°39' F. 660.00 feet to the NE corner of the West Elizabeth Street AnnesatiO n; run thence along the North line of the West Elizabeth Street Annexati a distance of 90.35 feet; thence N. 00°32' W. 660.00 feet, more or less; thence S. 89043130" E. 89.00 feet to the point of beginning, containing 1.3587 acres mor or less. Said Petitioners allege: 1. It is desirable and necessary that such territory be annexed to the City of Fort Collins. 2. Not less than 1/6 of the perimeter of said property is contiguous with the City of Fort Collins. id he ity f Fort 3. A community of interWs1lebesurbanizedbetweents aproperty rtOo inthenearfuture,andsaidproperty Golhns, said property is urban or integrated with the City of Fort Collins. is integrated or is capable of being landownersthe and of more than 50% ;rf the 4. The signers of this petition cosprise alleys - above described property, exclusiVe of WHEREFORE said retitioners request that the City of Fort Collins approve the annexation of said territory, and said petitionerrictuand erequest h the South 220.00feetrof said th 00 feet of said territory be n_laced in the R- L Dist e zoning ordinance. territory be placed in the R-M District under th A/ Ronald 0. King 2200 W. Elizabeth 2-7-66 Mrs. Barbara L. King STATE OF COLORADO) ss. COUNTY OF LARTM R) The undersigned being first duly sworn upon his oath states: That he was the circulator of the attached petition for ttonbend that each signature therein is the Signature of the person whose name it purports /s/ Gene Allen Subscribed and sworn to before me this 7th day of February, A. D. 1966, by: Gene Allen offi.cial seal. Witness my hand and My commission exnires0 February 3, 1968. /s/ John Bartel Notary Public by Councilman Carson, seconded by Councilman McMillan, that this Motion was made betition be referred to the Planning and Zoning Board for their recommendation. Roll was called resulting_ as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Naves: None. T he President declared the motion adopted. The following petition for rezoning was presented and read at length: PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR REZONING STATE OF COLORADO) ss. CO'RJTY OF LARTMIF.R) v OF FORT COLLTNS, COLORADO TO THE CITY COTTNCTL OF THE CIT "'Itlemen: in the owners of 0% of the following described being 5 °/ g property, WtendorFogteColllns, Situate intheCtyCounty of Larimer, State of Colorado, to -wit: FZONED R-M FROM R-L: A portion of the West Elizabeth Street R of Fort Collins, Colorado, contained within the boundary AnnexationTOoBtse .,6g the East line of the NET of Section 16 Township 7 North 4 , P lines which oOn e Sixth P.M. as bearing S. 00032, E. and with all bearings con - of the thereto begin at a point which bears N. 89°43130" W. 660.00 Range 69 West ative , W. 390.00 feet from the East 4 corner of said Section 16 tained hereiinnrNl p0o�5, y� 270.00 feet; thence N. 89043'30" W. 90.35 feet; thence feet andthenee N. OCfeet; thence S. 8903'30" E. 89.80 feet to the point of begin - and run 27p,00 83 acres, more or less, p g S. 00032' E. 0.55 ning, containing _ portion TO BF REZONEDof Fort tOCollins,AColorado, ocontained twithin bthe boundary eth Street. TRACT B to the C3ing the East line of the NE4 of Section 16, Township 7 North, Annexation consider Sixth P.M. as bearing S. 000321 E. and with all bearings Rlines ange whit of there tive thereto begin at a point which bears N. 89°43'30" W- 69 Section Range d her' In theNEa89°43c30neW.o89.80dfeet; thenceaS. 00°3nd run 2, Ece390.00°feet; 660.00 feet Pnce E 8g.00 feet to the point of beginning, containing 0.8004 390.00 fee 89°43i30" thence more or less. acres, '568 Containing ( See discription) acres, more or less do respectfully petition and request that the City Council amend the zoning ordinance of the City of Fort Collins by changing said above described land from zones as described in the above discription. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Ronald D. King Mrs. Barbara L. King STATE OF COLORADO) ) ss. COTTNTY OF LARIMER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 15th day of February, 1966 By Ronald D. King & Barbara L. King for the purposes therein set forth. My commission expires 2/3/68. s/ John Bartel otary 176blic Motion we;s made by Councilman Bennett, seconded by Councilman Carson, that this petition be referred to the Planning and Zoning Board for their recommendation. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following petition was presented and read at length: PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR REZONING STATE OF COLORADO) ) ss. COUNTY OF LARINIER) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO Gentlemen: We, the undersigned, being the owners of 500 of the following described property, situate in the City of Fort Collins, County of Larimer, State of Colorado, to -wit: DESCRIPTION CF TRACT A TO BE REZONED FROM R-L TO B-G: A tract of land situate in the SE4 of Section 22, Township 7 North, Range 69 W. of the Sixth P.M., City of Fort Collins, Count, of Larimer., State of Colorado, which considering the South line of said SE4 as bearing due West and the East line of said SE4 as bearing N. 00039' W. and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto is contained within the boundary lines which begin at a point which bears West 50100 feet and again N. 00°39' W. 50.00 feet from the SE corner of said Section 22 and run thence N. 00039' W. 760.00 feet; thence S. 89°21' W. 563.00 feet; thence S. 430 581 W. 516.26 feet; thence South 382.00 feet; thence East 930.00 feet to the point of beginning, containing 14.5273 acres more or less. DESCRIPTION OF TRACT B TO BE REZONED FROM R-L TO R-M: A tract of land situate in the SE4 of Section 22, Township 7 North, Range 69 West of the Sixth P.M., City of Fort Collins, County of Larimer, State of Colorado, which considering the South line of said SE4 as bear- ing due West and the East line of said SE' as bearing N. 00°39' W. and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto is contained within the boundary lines which begin at a point which bears West 50.00 feet and again N. 00°39' W. 810.00 feet from the SE corner of said Section 22 and run thence S. 89021' W. 463.00 feet; thence N. 00039' W. 520.90 feet to a point on the North line of the Sz of the Sz of said Section 22; thence S. 89053'3 E. 463.13 feet along said North line; thence S. 00°39' E. 80.62 feet; thence S. 89°21' W. 188.27 feet; thence S. 00°39' E. 197.00 feet; thence N. 89021' E. 188.27 feet; thence S. 00039' E. 237.14 feet to the point of beginning, containing 4.6537 acres more or less. DESCRIPTION OF TRACT C TO BE REZONED FROM R-L TO R-M: A tract of land situate in the SE4 of Section 22, Township 7 North, Range 69 West of the Sixth P.M., City of Fort Collins, Countv of 1,2rimer, State of Colorado, which considering the South line of said SE' as bearing due West and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto is contained withi th.e boundary lines which begin at a point which bears West 50.00 feet and again N. 00029' W. 50.00 feet and again West 930.00 feet from the SE corner of said Section 22 and run thence West 1184.00 feet; thence North 220.00 feet; thence N. 41032' E. 110.00 feet; thence N. 650181 E. 343.00 feet; thence S. 24°42' E. 235.00 feet; thence N. 62023' E. 128.00 feet; thence N. 81026' E. 90.00 feet;thenceS. 74"33'4O" E. 206.26 feet; thence East 300.00 feet; thence South 250.00 feet to the point of beginning, containing 8.1561 acres more or less. DESCRIPTION OF TRACT D TO REZONED FROM R-L to RH: A tract of land situate in the SE4 of Section 22, Township 7 North, Range 69 West of the Sixth P.M., City of Fort Collins, County of Larimer, State of Colorado) which considering the South line of said SE4 as bearing due West and with all Fearings contained herein relative thereto is contained within the bound- ary lines which begin at a point which bears West•50.00 feet and again N. 00039' W. 50.00 feet and again West 930.00 feet and again North 250.00 feet from the SE corner of said Section 22 and run thence West 300.00 feet; thence N. 74033140" W. 206.26 feet; thence S. 81°26' W. 90.00 feet; thence S. 62°23.' W. 128.00 feet; thence N. 24042' W. 235.00 feet; thence N. 65°18' E. 287.00 feet; thence N. 72°37' E. 210.00 feet; thence N. 45040' E. 145.00 feet; thence N. 02'28' E. 180.00 feet; thence N. 33033' E. 100.00 feet; thence N. 77058' E. 340.00 feet; thence N. 31°24' E. 248.57 feet to a point on the North line of the S', of the S, of said Section 22; thence S. 89053130" E. 162.00 feet along said North line; thence S. 00°39 E. 520.90 feet; thence S. 89021' W.•100.00 feet; thence S. 43058' W. 516.21 feet; thence South 132.00 feet to the point of beginning, containing 13.5064 acres more or less. r 0"� February 17, 196 Do respectfully petition and request that the City Council amend the zoning ordinance of the City of Fort Collins by changing said above described land from the above zones to the (see description) zones. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED THE DRAKE CO. Is/ Howard E. Jo•nes, Partner M. S. McClaran, Partner Darrel T. Blake, Partner John M. Shields, Partner STATE OF COLORADO) CO?TNTY OF LARIMER ) s s . The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 14th day of Feb. 1966 By Howard E. Jones, M. S. McClaran, Darrel T. Blake & John M. Shields for the purposes therein set forth. My commission expires February 27, 1966. /a/ Herschel N. Downing Notary Public Motion was made by Councilman McMillan, seconded by Councilman Carson, that this Petition be referred to the Planning and Zoning Board for their recommendation. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following communication was presented and read at length: T0: Tom Coffey, City Manager February 16, 1966 FROM. C. Adam Fischer, Director of Public Works RE: Establishment of Storm Sewer Improvement District No. 14. At the regular City Council meeting July 8, 1965, the Council by unanimous vote directed the City Manager to "attempt to form a storm sewer district" which would serve the area in the vicinity of the intersection of Shields and Elizabeth Streets. The Department has approached some of the property ow ners Uho would be affected by the The of such a district, and has received the necessary 1% of signed peti- tions from the owners to initiate the improvement. In accordance with Section 15-56 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, this office would recommend that the Council atprove these petitions and create the improvement district and by resol- tliroin, order the City Engineer to make the necessary surveys, maps, plans and specifica- Isl C. Adam Fischer Director of Public Works The following resolution was presented and read at length: RESOLUTION OF THE COTTNCTL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS CONSOLIDATING PETITIONS FOR AN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT INTO ONE TMPROVT04FNT DISTRICT FOR ALL PURPOSES, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO MAKE THE NECESSARY SURVEYS AND PREPARE A MAP, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATFS OF COST OF A PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, TOGETHER WITH A SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING A PERMANENT CONSOLIDATED IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the owners of more than one per cent (1%) of the property to be assessed for the same have petitioned the City Council under the provisions of Chapter 15 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, 1958, as amended, relating to local public improvements, for the organization of a permanent improvement district for the purpose of installing storm sewer improvements for the following property, situate in the County of Larimer, State of Colorado, to -wit: Beginning 825.0' South from the NE corner W. Sectiont15,Townshipn7 North, Range L. 69 West of the 6th P.M., thence N. 89 4 y Randleman Subdivision in the City of Fort Collins, thence West 20.61 to the NW corner of Lot 4 of the C. W. Johnson Subdivision in the City of Fort Collins, thence South 110.0' to the NE corner of Lot 3 of the said C. W. Johnson Subdivisio thence West 112.9' tthence estthe NW rner 303.5' tottheoNWtcornerWofJLotson 24;SAlvin1L. Miller thence North 90.he, of Fort Collins, thence North 20.0', thence West 104,51, Subdivision in the City thence West 460.01, thence S. 000201 E. 5.01, thence and thence South 165•e , The Miller Brothers Second Subdivision, 00.69' to the SW corner of Lot 12, Larimer County Canal No. 2, West i� -East right of way line of the which point is also the E the East right of way line of Larimer thence in a southerly direction int whichfoll�siS� 89054,28" E. 334.08' from the NW corner ofSetotion iSpoTownship 7 North, Range 69 West, thence N. 89°54'28" W. County Canal Fairview Subdivision, thence S. 6003110" of the SE; corner Ninth thence S• 21030'40" E. 182.24', thence Of the , 60.Or to the NF ° 1,40" E. 43roar , secon F, 120.06', thence S• 4 to the NW corned of tEhe361.261,Fthence wS. 53°30'41"�E, S. 52°10'00" E. 288.e0 0', thence N. Ha 450£ the Second Fairview Subdivision S. 80°00' corner of Lot 8, Block 8 thence corner 86.47' to the. NE 570 thence N. 24147,20" E. 61.301, to the NW corner of Lot 1 of the Tenth Fairview Subdivision, thence S. 53030'41" W. 36.05', thence S. 10°30'00" E. 130.351, thence S. 02°12' W. 215.55' to the NW corner of Lot 11, Block 7 Fairview Subdi- vision, First Filing, thence S. 07°16' E. 141.141, thence S. 02122' E. 346.44, to the SW corner of Lot 2, Block 6 of the Eighth Fairview Subdivision, thence S. 07026'10" F. 101.06', thence S. 62°17130" E. 149.271, thence S. 00002130" E. 111.53' to the SW corner of N2 of SET of SET of Section 15, township 7 North, Range 69 West of the 6th P.M., thence S. 89028'30" E. 497.981, thence S. 230.331, thence E. 500.00', thence N. 2.81, thence E. 330.0' to the East line of Section 15, Township 7 North, Range 69 West of the 6th P.I., thence North along said section line 549.19', thence S. 89°53'14" E. 663.78' to the SE corner of the Campus Gardens Addition, thence N. o00Oo'37" W. 331.28,, thence N. 89°53'49" W. 483.78' to a point which is 1,324.65' North and 180.0' East from the SE corner of Section 15, Township 7 North, Range 69 West, thence North 1325.65' to a point 180.0' East from the W4 corner of Section 15, Township 7 North, Range 69 West of the 6t1a P.M., thence North 1303.6' to the South right of way line of Laurel Street, thence West 180.01, thence North 519.3' to the point of beginning; WHEREAS, said petitions were duly received by the City Council together with a eport of the City Engineer, which report found the same duly signed and representing the equired per cent of the property to be assessed, and recommended that appropriate action by he City Council be taken thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVFD BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS that all of the said petitions covering the above mentioned area be and they are hereby consol- idated into one petition and shall form one improvement district to be known as Consolidated Storm Sewer Improvement District No. 14, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer be and he is hereby authorized, emnowered and directed to make a complete survey of the proposed consolidated district, and to preoare a mac, plans, and specifications and an estimate of the cost of improvements in said district, and the amount to be assessed to the respective properties located in said district, and upon completion of said work, said Engineer shall make report to the City Council for appropriate action for the purpose of organizing said consolidated district as provided by law and constructing the permanent improvements therein, in accordance with said plans and specifications. Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held this 17t1a day of February A. D. 1966. Harvey G. Johnson or ATTEST: /s/ Miles F. House City Clerk Motion was made by Councilman Carson, seconded by Councilman McMillan, that this esolution be adopted. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, arson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion dopted. The following report was presented and read at length: 0: Tom Coffey, City Manager rom: C. Adam Fischer, Director of Public Works E: Storm Sewer Improvement District $14 February 16, 1966 Attached are the maps, plans and specifications requested by the City Council for torm Sewer Improvement District #14. Also attached is a tabular summary of those proper- ies which have been included in the district and a map showning the boundary of the dis- rict. Also attached is a detailed estimate of the total cost of the project. nience: The following brief summary of the estimate of costs is provided for your con- 1. Total Estimated Cost of District A. Estimated Cost of Construction- 110,618.27 B. R. 0. W. 14,511.00 SUB -TOTALS 125,129.27 C. 10% interest during construction, engineering, collection, legal 12,512.93 SUB -TOTAL $ 137,642.20 D. Refund on previously constructed 4,916.07 sections II Total Area of District A. Area presently inside City Limits $ 142,558.27 $ 142,558.27 6,291,671 sq. ft 5,624,171 sq. ft. B.' Area presently outside City Limits (Note: 253,234 sq. ft of this property is in the process of being annexed) SUB -TOTAL 667,500 ,291, 71 sq. ft. 571 February 17, 1966 C. C.S.U. Property in District 1,233,440 sq. ft. D. Private property (inside City) 4,390',731 E. Private property (outside City) 667,500 SUB -TOTAL 6,291,671 sq. ft. 1 z 558.27 Estimated Cost/sq. ft. ,24 _ 0.023/sq.ft. Estimated Cost: A. Private lot containing 10,000 sq. £t. = 10,000 x 0.023 = 61230.00 B. Colorado State University - 1,233,440 x $ 0.023 28,369.12 C. Property outside City Limits - 667,500 x 0.023 = 15,352.50 Council should note that the City does not have authority to include property outside the City in an assessment district. The 615,352.00 (or more properly $$9,528.12 because 253,234 sq. ft. of property presently outside the City is being annexed) will have to be absorbed by the Citv and recovered as annexation takes place. It has been indicated that Colorado State University has funds available to cover their share of the assessment. /s/ C. Adam Fischer Director of Public Works The following resolution was presented and read at length: RESOLUTION OF THE COTTNCTL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS ADOPTING THE REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER ON THE ESTIMATED COSTS AND ASSFSS14ENTS FOR CONSOLIDATED STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 140. 14, AND APPROVING THE DFTATLS ARID SPECTFICATTONS FOR THE SAME, DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF INSTALI NIENTS AND THE TIME TN WHICH COSTS SHALL BE PA''ABLE, THE RATE OF INTEREST TO BE CHARGED ON UNPAID INSTALLMENT, AND THE PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED FOR THE SAME, AND AUTHORIZING THE PUB- LICATION AND MATLTNG OF NOTICE TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS OF ALL REAL ESTATE IN SAID DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED 4T�D TO ALL PERSONS INTERESTED GENERALLY, AND FIXING THE DATE OF HEARING WHEN THE CITY COUNCIL WILL CONSTDFR THE ORDERING BY ORDINANCE OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, heretofore the City Council by resolution directed the City Engineer to make a survey of the proposed Consolidated Storm Sewer Improvement District No. 14 for the Purpose of preparing a map, plans and specifications, and estimate of the costs of said improvements in said District, and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made his report of the estimated costs and assess- ments for said District and has Presented the details and specifications for the same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TITS COTTNCTL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS that the details and specifications as Presented by the City Engineer for said Consolidated Storm Sewer Improvement District No. 14 be and the same hereby are accepted and adopted; a TTTAT the assessments for the cost of installing the improvements in said District 1,,4111 be made unon all of the lots and lands in said district in proportion as the area of each piece of real estate in the district is to the area of all the real estate in the dis- trict, exclusive of streets and alleys in the district, provided that the City at large shall pay such portion of the amount assessed against the property outside the limits of the Citv of Fort Collins as is not Paid by the owners of said property; and THAT said assessments shall be payable in ten (10) equal annual installments with interest on the unpaid installments at the rate of six per cent (6/) per annum; and THAT the estimated costs and assessments, map of the District, schedule showing the annroximate amount to be assessed per square foot upon the several properties in the District, all as presented by the City Engineer, be and the same hereby are accepted and adopted; and THAT Thursday, the 17th day of March, A. D. 1966, at the hour of 1:30 o'clock in the afternoon, or as soon thereafter as the matter may come on for hearing, in the Council Chambers in the City Hell, City of Fort Collins, is the date on which the Council of the City of Fort Collins will consider the ordering by ordinance of the proposed improvements and hear all complaints and objections that may be filed in writing concerning the proposed improvements by the owners of any real estate to be assessed or any persons interested; and THAT the City Clerk be and he hereby is directed to give notice by publications and mailing to the owners of property to be assessed and all interested persons 'generally, all as set forth in Section 15-57 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, 1958, as amended. Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held this 17t1a day of (February, A. D. 1966. /s/ Harvey G. Johnson Mayor I ATTEST : F. Hous lerk Motion was made by Councilman Carson, seconded by Councilman McMillan, that this resolution be adopted. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Naves: None. The President declared the motion adopted 572 February 17, 1966 Mr. Jack Nicol, Realtor, was present and spoke briefly objecting' to the cost per square foot estimate of the City Engineer. It appears that his figures were not based on the same area as the City Engineer's and he obtained the larger assessment for the pro- perty in which he is interested. He was advised that any objections to assessments could be filed at the hearing date for the passage of the assessing ordinance if he felt that the assessment was not based on the true cost of the district. The following communication was presented and read at length: TO: Tom Coffey, City Manager February 14, 1966 FROM: C. Adam Fischer, Director of Public Works RE: Storm Drainage Study The 1966 budget of the City provides money for the development of a comprehensive City Storm Drainage study. At present, storm drainage considerations of Fort Collins's rapidly developing new subdivisions receive only secondary attention. "What areas are contributing surface run-off" ...."what will be the ultimate storm drainage needs of the area?". .."How will the develonment of this area and the concentration of its storm drain - acre effect areas in lower parts of the drainage basin?", are questions which are never answered fully in the processing of a new development plan . Such questions can only be answered by making a detailed storm drainage study of the area and other areas in the drainage basin. Develorers are unwilling to pay the engineer engaged to design the utiliti s of the subdivision for the additional time it would require to develop a complete storm drainage plan. At the same time; it is impractical to think that the City Engineering Denartment could make a complete storm drainage study each time a new area is developed. A developer does not normally question the importance of well designed plans for Sanitary Sewers, electrical power, water, or for the most part even street lights and paving; but the same awareness does not extend to storm sewers. The reason is more involved than simpl the old story of the man not being able to fix the hole in the roof when it's raining and considering it unneccessary when the rain stops. As implied above, the engineering cost involved in a complete storm drainage plan for a particular area would ordinarily exceed the cost of designing any of the other untilitiew. The size of a water or sewer main required to serve a new subdivision is essentially determine solely by the number of people who will untimately reside in the subdivision. There are many more factors involved in sizing t he storm sewer. First, a storm drainage study is almost never limited to the area of the subdivision, but rather related to the total area of the drainage basin (inside and outside the subdivision). On the total area, not only people, but the type of development and future develonment is an important factor. The slope and topography of the total area, the shape and location of the basin, along with a number of other factors enter into such a design. A storm drainage facility designed to serve t he ultimate development of the total area might be grossly oversized for may ,years. Economic considerations preclude t he con- strl:ction of a storm drainage structure which will "never" become over -loaded. But even with a structure designed according to, say a ten -,year storm, it will be taxed (in theory) only once ever, ten years. The hesitancy of the developer to provide structures of a size to serve such neriodic use is understandable. Further, a develorer raises objection to financing complet elv a storm drainage structure which has been over -sized beyond the requirements of his own area in order to carry the run-off from areas above his. At the same time, the import- ance of adequate storm drainage facilities cannot be denied. The damage which can result from inedaquate storm drainage facilities is at least comparable, if not exceeds, the damag w'nich can result from a similar inadequacy in sizing one of the other number of utilities required in urban development. In the attached sheet, the Planning Director and I have attempted to outline the City's objectives in making the study and the various areas we would expect to have covered With your approval of the outline, we would propose to proceed with the development of the plan according to the following steps:' 1. Send the outline to the various engineering firms in th area who have expres sed interest in making such a study or who appear to be qualified to made such a study. 2. Begin interviews with the various interested qualified firms. 3. Choose a firm, enter into a contract and proceed to develop thn study. /a/ Adam Fischer Director of Public Works /s/ Gene Allen Planning Director After discussion between the members of the Council, City Manager and Director of public Works, motion was made by Councilman McMillan, seconded by Councilman Carson, that this report be accepted and the recommendation of the Director of Public Works be approved and that they proceed to outline the study for presentation to various engineerirg firms interested in making such study and report back to the Council as to the cost of same. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: None. 'The President declared the motion adopted. 573 The following descriptions for rezoning of certain portions of West Prospect annexation to the City of Fort Collins, to be known as Elliott Miller West Foothills Sub- division, was presented. This rezoning is in line with the discussion held on,February 3, 1966, regarding the rezoning of this tract and is presented by the developers: Following are the descriptions of four tracts of land, which are proposed to be zoned B-L, R-H, R-M and R-L, which are sit_jate in the NW4 of the NW4 of Section 21, Townshi 7 North, Range 69 West, of the 6th P.M., and which, considering the north line of said NW,� as bear- ing S. 89041' E. and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto, are more parti- cularly described as follows: B-L ZONE Begin at the NW corner of said Section 21 and run thence S. 89041+ E. 556.00 feet; thence S. 00046' E. 192.00 feet; thence along the arc of a 75.34 foot radius curve to the right a distance of 48.29 feet the long chord of which bears S. 17035'30" w. 47.46 feet; thence s. 35057' W. 486.79 feet; thence along the arc of a 49.33 foot radius curve to the right a distance of 46.28 feet the long chord of which bears S. 62°49130" W. 44.60 feet; thence S. 89042, W. 212.07 feet; thence N. 00035' w. 655.85 feet to the point of beginning. R-H ZONE Begin at a point which bears S. 69°41' E. 556.00 feet from the NW corner of said Section 21 and run thence S. 00046' E. 192.00 feet; thence along the arc of a 75.34 foot radius curve to the right a distance of 48.29 feet the long chord of which bears S. 17°35'30" W. 47.46 feet; thence 9. 35057' W. 486.79 feet; thence along the arc of a.49.33 foot radius curve to the right a distance of 46.28 feet the long chord of which bears S. 62049'30" W. 44.60 feet; thence S. 89142' W. 212.07 feet; thence S. 00°35' E. 175.00 feet; thence N. 89°42' E. 211.20 feet; thence along the arc of a 224.33 foot radius curve to the left a distance of 210.45 feet the long; chord of which bears N. 62°49'30" E. 202.67 feet; thence N. 35°57' E• 486.79 feet; thence along the arc of a 250.34 foot radius curve to the left a distance of 160.42 feet the long chord of which bears N. 17°35'30" E. 157.69 feet; thence N. 00046' W. 188.69 feet; thence N. 89041' W. 175.03 feet to the point of beginning. R-M ZONE 1' E. 731.00 feet from the NW corner of said Section Begin at a point which bears S. 890411 21 and run thence S. 00046' E. 188.69 feet; thence along the are of a 250.34 foot radius curve to the right a distance of 160.42 feet the long nceachordtof whicharc bears S331foot'r0 W. 157.69 feet; thence S. 25°57' '^i• 4_86.79 feet, us curve to the right a distance of 210.45 feet the long chord of which bears S. 6204913011 W. 202.67 feet; thence S. 89042' W. 211.20 feet; thence S.0000357 E.c140- 000ofeet; the lthence N. 89°42, E. 210.51 feet; thence along the arc of a 364.33 ° u E. curve to feet; thence distance of 341eft a .7i feet the long chord of which bears N. 62 49 N. 35057' E. 486.79 feet; thence along the arc of a 390.34 foot radius curve to the left a distance of 250.14 66.7 feet the long chord of which bears N. 17035130" E. 245.88 feet; thence N. 00046+ W. 186.04 feet; thence N. 89041' W. 140.03 feet to the point of beginning. R-L ZONE and run thence S. 89041' E. 1291.00 feet; thence Begin at the NW corner of said Section 21 S.g00°46' E. 1376.94 feet; thence S. 89°42' w. 1295.25 feet; thence N. 00°35' W. ZONE, feet to the point of beginning, EXCEPT the above thr ee described trracts for B-L ZONE, and R-M ZONE Motion was made by Councilman McMillan, seconded by Councilman Carson, that the zoning, as presented, be approved and referred to the City Attorney to prepare the necessary resolution regarding same and that the preliminary subdivision plat for which this rezoning appl-es be referred to the Plannng and Zoning Board for their recommendation.• Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. eared before the Council in reference to the traffic conditions Mr. Jack Nicol a pp at Laurel and Shields Streets, in which he stated that it is almost impossible in the morning, noon and in the evening to make a left turn on Laurel Street south on Shields and traffic congestion. He was advised tht urged that some control be installed to relief this traffic lights were in the process of being installed soon at Mulberry and Shields and that this control should have some effect on the traffic flow south on Shields. He was also advised that by 1967, that a traffic light Would also be installed on West Prospect and South Shields which wo+ald also O°ntrol traffic to some extent and that any study of traffic the ffic Clow from Laurel on to Shields whould be P°spthed Camp until securieffect these tyand thePoliceaDepartments d that Camp an be determined. He was also advise to care cf the traffic in and out of the parking are working to oreoare a traffic chart take this should relief some of the traffic during the even - area for the new gymnasium and that for basketball games and other wise. The City ing hours when the new gymnasium is in use it might be 4anager advised him that Possible to have a traffic officer at this intersection win during these rush periods in order to determine the necessity of traffic control at this I point. See Page 575 Mr. Jack H. Rutter, Electrician, presented the following petition/in which he stated that the City was in dire need of a qualified electical building inspector. After discussion by Mr. Rutter and members of the Council, motion was made by Councilman Carson, secomded by Councilman McMillan, that this petition be referred to the City Manager, City Engineer and Building Inspector for study and consideration. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes; None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following dedication deed was presented and read at length: DEDICATION DEED KNOW ALL MFN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned PAUL E. WFNKE and GALE E. HFTMAN, Trustees of the Mildred G. Becksted and Alva J. Becksted Trust for valuable consid- eration do hereby dedicate, quit claim and convey unto THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, A Municipal Corporation, the West 50 feet of the SW4 NW4 of Section 21, Township 7 North, Range 69 West of the 6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado, for street and highway purposes. DATED this 13th day of January, A. D. 1966. Isl Paul E. Wenke Gale E. Heiman STATE OF COLORADO) ) ss. COUNTY OF LARIMER) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 13t1a day of January, A. D. 1966, by Paul E. Wenke and Gale E. Heiman as Trustees of the Mildred G. Becksted and Alva J. Becksted gust. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires December 17, 1966. /s/ Patricia A. Shaffer Notary Public Motion was made by Councilman Bennett, seconded by Councilman Kruchten, thatthis dedication be accepted. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following report was presented and read at length: February 15, 1966 TO: Mr. Tom Coffey, City Manager FROM: Roy E. Hollady, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Change of Ordinance Sir: On April 15, 1965, the Second reading of Ordinance 28 - amending the Traffic Code and removing parking meters was made. This ordinance eliminated the parking meters in the downtown area of the City of Fort Collins and changed the parking time to a two hour limit. As a result of this change, this officer and Mr. C. Adam Fischer, Director of Public Works, recommend that the following locations be changed from a one hour parking limit to a two hour parking limit: 1. Center of the 100 and 200 blocks of South College Avenue - 2 hours 2. Center of the 100 block on North College Avenue - 2 hours. 3. Center of the 100 block of West Mountain Avenue - 2 hours 4. Center of the 100 block of East Mountain Avenue - 2 hours We believe that it would be better to establish uniform parking limitations. Such uniformi will make our enforcementjob much easier in the downtown area. Respectfully submitted, Is/ Roy E. Hollady Dhief of Police Motion was made by Councilman Carson, seconded by Councilman Bennett, that this recommendation of the Chief of Police be approved. Roll was called resulting as follows: 575 ;r;taa# 'Ion on 'e 574 Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. The following communication was presented and read at length: February 17, 1966 TO: Tom Coffey, City Manager FROM: Gordon F. Clyde, Chief Building Inspector TURD: C. Adam Fischer, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Ordinance Number 19, 1964, Regulating Curb Cuts and Driveways At the City Council meeting of February 10, 1966, a memo w®s read concerning clarification of the referenced ordinance. The Council deferred action on the questions pending research and recommendations from the City Manager. In the opinion of the City Attorney, the Curb Cut Ordinance applies only where curbs are installed. The City Attorney also stated that in his opinion there should be no change in the method of providing relief for hardships. Following discussions with the Chief of Police and the City Planner, it appears that adequate policy guidance concerning curb cuts is available. It is therefore recom- mended that Mr. Wolfs letter and drawing be referred back to the Building Inspection De- partment and that no action to change the ordinance be taken at this time. Respectfully submitted, /a/ Gordon F. Clyde Chief Building Inspection Bob Wolf was present and said that his client could not wait for an appeal from Ithe Zoning Board of Anpeals at their regular meeting to be held the second week of March. The Council suggested that the Zoning Board of Appeals might hold a special meeting to consider this question and it will be necessary for the Building Inspector to request said special meeting from the President of the Zoning Board of Appeals. The City Manager advised the Council that he had negotiations with Mr. Burnham of Burnham Aviation Company in closing Christman Field and that he had negotiated an agreement for said closing on March 1, 1966 for a payment of $6,000.00. Motion was made by Council- man McMillan, seconded by Councilman Bennett, that the Council accept the recommendation of the City Manager for settlement of the lease between Burnham Aviation and the City in the amount of $6,000.00. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: None. The President declared the motion adopted. TO: FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL We the undersigned wish to protest the raise in city license fees for certain building trades workers for the following reasons: 1. Electricians, Plumbers, and Sheet Metal Workers are required to have licenses Carpenters, Roofers, Drywallers, Painters are not. 2. The license does not seem to keep the work within the trade. (Carpenters do wiring, Plumbers unhook and rehook garbage disposer, electrical wiring furnace men hook up wiring to furnaces, appliance repairmen wire in for dryers, etc.) 3. The renewal fee in Denver is $5.00 for Journeyman. 4. The Building Inspection Department does not seem tc give adequate electrical inspections. If employers and workers are required to buy permits and licenses they should be afforded decent inspections, as it is impossible for people who try to do a good job to compete with those who do not, and get away with it due to lack of proper inspection. The above petition contained 42 names of electrical trade. Motion was made by Councilman Kruchten, seconded by Councilman Bennett, that the Council adjourn. Roll was called resulting as follows: Ayes: Councilmen Johnson, Carson, McMillan, Bennett and Kruchten. Nayes: None. The President declared ta motion adopted and the Council adjourned. ATTEST: City Clerk