Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES-07/01/1971-Regular229 1 MINUTES OF MEETING July 1, 1971 The City Council of the City of Fort Collins met in regular session at 1:30 P.M.- in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building on Thursday, July 1, 1971. Present: Councilmen Carson, Lopez, Councilwoman Preble and Councilman Peterson. Absent: Councilman Feed. Also Present: Tom Coffey, City Manager Arthur A. March, City Attorney .Charles Liquin, Director of Public Works Mayor Carson presided. DISPENSINC OF MINUTES Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilman Peterson, that the reading of the minutes of June 24, 1971, be dispensed with. Upon a roll call, all members of the Council voted in the affirmative. PROCLAMATION: The Fourth of July will mark the 195th anniversary of the founding of our nation. As we celebrate this hstori.c crate, our nation is faced with its greatest clnallence; a burgeoning population, restless youth impatient for fulfillment of our na- tion's ideals, demands for greater civil rights, and the sap- ping of our country's moral strength through increased crime, drug abuse and poverty. Communities throughout the nation are declaring this Independence Day, July 4th, as "Honor America Day" in an effort to encourage an expression of appreciation for the bless- ings and greatness of our country. It is the opinion of this office that this activity should be recognized as an effort to unite Americans at a time when our patriotism and respect for the nation's purposes should be i encouraged by all responsible citizens. Therefore, by virtue of the powers vested in this office, I, Karl Carson, Mayor of Fort Collins, do hereby proclaim Sunday, July 4, 1971, as "Honor America. Day" and call upon all citizens, organizations, churches, schools and lay groups to recognize this special day through appropriate programs. Dated at the City of Fort Colli>,s, this 1st day of July, - 1971. Attest: �hn Bariel, Clerk `')Qarl Carson, ZIayor City of Fort Collins, City of F oft Collins, SF.AT.,j Colorado Colorado AGENDA ITEM 2A FINDING'S AND RESOS,UTION 71-SS 20 July_l,_1971 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF i FORT COLLINS CONCERNING AN APPLICATION FOR A CLASS C LICENSE FOR THE SALE OF 3_2 FERMENTED MALT `- BEVERAGES -- The application of William A. Rcser, King business as Fonta's Pizza Palace, for a Class C license for the sale of 3.2 fo=ented ...ait , beverages at 133 north College Avcnue, Fort Collins, Colo iVaso, came on for tearing before the City Council on Thursday, June 2:,11971; and the City Council, laving hoard the testimony produced and rccci.ad th_ ovidonce offered at said hearing and having considered an& .Neighed the same, now makes the following findings: 1. The premises for which the license is applied for are presently operated by the applicant as a pizza parlor. 2. The applicant presented letters of reco:;londation wit tac application and at the hearing presentod.potitlons supporting the appli— cation. No one appeared in opposition to the granting of the license, and no petitions were presented opposing the granting of the license. 3. The evidence produced at the hearing shores that the neQh- borhood needs the license applied for, and the desires of the inhabitants of the neighborhood do not oppose the issuance oI- the license. RUSOLUTiON, OF TAE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS CONCERNING AN APPLICATION FOR A CLASS C LICENSE FOR THE SALE OF 3.2 FERMENTED MALT MVERAGES ' WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Fort Collins has heard the application of William A. Reser, doing business as Fonta's Pizza Palace, for a Class C license for the sale of 3.2 fermented malt bevczages; and WHEREAS, the City Council has ]:1ado its findings upon the evi- dence presented at the hearing. NOTE, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS that the application of William A. Reser, doing business as Fonta's Pizza Palace, for a Class C license for the sale of 3.2 fermantod malt beverages at 133 North College ::venuo, Fort Collins, Colorado, be a lad the same hereby is granted in accordance with the findings of the City Council herein. Passed and adopted at a IcEular meeting of the Ci Ly Council held this first dry of July, A. L`.1971. Motion was m ade by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, that this resolution be adopted. Upon a roll call, all members voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 2B CONTINUATION OF HEARING OM OCCUPATIONAL TAX FEES 231 ..—...... ,• .•,.. ..aa:�vrx�.•eu•+ra.+.._+vur.van»v:..:�.w.ua��u..awc.w ..,...:.:v; -- w.S:aa�� �: •'-.�.- 3ra' ••: �•.• -•�—"— -.. �aT+1C�"':'..''E'.9.^w 13'�' Mr. William Allen, Attorney, representing some of the 3.2 beer outlets, was present, and said that the occupational tax is a discriminatory license. He stated that the _ State charges operators of hard liquor establishments eleven times more than the 3.2 oper- ators and the City license fees for each classification is not out of line. Mr. Allen said that two or three 3.2 establishments do the bulk of the bi_inecc ].ccally and the rest juct get by, therefore the small businesses would be penalized if the occupational taxes were increased. Mayor Carson suggested a tax based on gross business, also Councilman? roposed a tax based on capacity of each establishment, but neither suggestion was received with much interest by the 3.2 operatorg in the audience. Mr. Allen said most of the outlets have alarm systems and•can prevent any trouble that might arise and most of them cooperate with the police, that the report showed a 4 1/2 checks a day, but these are routine checks and every business in town has routine checks and he did not think that the 3.2 beer establishments cost anywhere near the charge shown in the report. Mayor Carson read excerpts from the beer and liquor rules and regulations, and stated he did not think these had ever been challenged. Mr. Allen said he believed that Grand Junction had challenged He said that the 3.2 operators had become involved in the occupational tax through the back door and so far have not had much to say. ' stat'n Mary Alice Brigs, operator of the Seven Seas Establishment, was present/t�af in the last two years they had had only three incidents, one was the back door robbed and the other two were minors, that they assist the Police as much as possible, and that the occupational tax is unamerican. Paul Haumont was present and spoke at length regarding this matter, stating7being the operator of Giuseppes and the Ram's Inn, that he does the bulk of the business and has a bulk of violations, that many come out of town and that any business with a lot of people is going to have a certain amount of disturbances. He stated he would propose that a minumum fine be placed on people changing drivers licenses and coming in under 16 years of age, that this would give the City a good income, that as it is now, the operator gets the fine, that he thought the law is too lenient with the youngsters that falsify their ID's. After further discussion, Mayor Carson stated he thought this matter requires further consideration and be taken under advisement, that it is a matter that is difficult to pinpoint, and if any of the operators had anything to contribute in the way of suggestions, to present them to the City Manager. Councilman, Lopez asked for more information from other cities as to what they charge. Attorney Allen stated that a 1969 report from the Municipal League showed that of 52 cities reporting, that 41 had a lower occupational tax than Fort Collins and 11 had the same or higher. Motion was made by Councilwoman Preble, seconded by Councilman Lopez, that this matter be taken under advisement. Upon a roll call, all members voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 3A COMMUNICATION Fort Collins City Council c/o Mr. Karl E. Carson, Mayor P. 0. Box.580 Dear Mayor Carson: During the last several months the Fort Collins -Loveland Airport Board has been examining the needs =or expansion of the Fort Collins -Loveland Municipal Airport. This analysis has been made pursuant to contacts the Board has had with industrial leaders, governmental leaders; and other individuals in Northern Colorado concerning air transportation needs. It is the consensus of the Board that before any further major improvements are made at any airport there. should be conducted a systems study of the total air t ransporation needs of Northern Colorado. This study could be either a regional analysis or a part of a state-wide examination. Based on the immediate needs facing this area, the Board feels that a regional study is appropriate. Thus, the Board has requested that I write you and the members of your council for the purpose of soliciting your support of such a study. Further, we respectively request that the Larimer-Weld Regional Planning Commission he designated as the entity to make such a study. Matching funds are available from the Federal Aviation Agency for this purpose. It isanticipatedthat such a study would take a considerable length of time to complete. 232 July 1, 1971 'Thus, it is imperative that the study begin as soon as possible in order to meet the growth needs of the Northern Colorado community. I, or members of the Board would be happy to meet with you to discuss this matter. If You have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely yours, Fort Collins -Loveland Airport Board Don W. Hataway Secretary The City Manager said a study was made about ten years ago. Councilman Peterson requested a study made of the budget and -see if this study fits into the budget. Mayor Carson said a systems study is necessary before an airport may participate in increased Federal funding for airport development. He said the joint airport would have a better chance for receiving federal funds if it were designated a regional facility. After discussion, motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Preble that this systems study be approved. Upon a roll call,'all members voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 3B TION DISTRICT NO. 64 Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, that this be rerdoved from the table. Upon a roll call, all members voted in the affirmative. COMMUNICATION: Dear Yayor Carson: Ordinance \o. 16, 971 states: A public work or<mprovement, the cost o: wlich, i. ao'_c or in part, is to be assessed by the City against _e pro?arty specially benefited on reco-.mendation ofttheeby� ^mil be I itiated by e City Cou.. 1 Director o= ^e= of the propar^y Owners to b- ublic ^.ones^or o _ let'_Lion Ok:.6_ affeCLCd thereby. lae public 'Works D" cpartment is SeCtlO.^.S 0= street concern ed at this ti^e with «h:2d I condi y_L, n the City that art dan^2 r0 L•S �. -ons c<^.used b• < o due to c as r, result of tae �ackeofaade�uatevwidthand andLsidew��;sty coadi`icns "^ the i ^rove,enthas o previceuslyee`Ceyvmd�peLiLjO.^.$ frO:n peOp12 _ntere5^ed 1 `�'-fir Of Itie_ Street - P.S^ pet' LSOII$ are on Gile .q t: LO... EaS.` ?rospeCL LO E2SL Stuart � ::e main accesshe ?2if the City Cleric. -his ' and =eights to fenbu_g`_, Sc o = ., roadway provides and prrspect estates o� -row the en Lire g, -ghlander are in constant danZer f• areas, and the students using from the vehicular <• o this strew_ I traffic. ' 1--rale Drive fr0" :v'�.SL S:ulbe-_• r oudre :-_ZZ School e" Street to the South boundary of the c.Zool property is a iangerous street from the staadpci the veh_cular load of some 1650 nt o= to the 12rg2 number of stuoe-ussusen*dthisaroad1l as, be,ng dangerous school. as access to the sectionswir,{;abefh Street.fro:s eppro:cimatcl Ho c--^,h, and t? et Portion y Hospital Lane to its inter- a%d 2iverside Drive is the tr'^�• _on oL :;c:.u�a between Elizabeth Street :..gh_arder Iei�. - ?al point of ingress and egress _or �i.s Subdivision and is furthermore, the of < for the Port Collins A.^rula.�ace Se --Vice. ? nt o. dispatch I am c-clos ng herewith Service a let :rom a lc aer =ro e _or. Col,ir, ter e..oade� r s :_,hula ice 0=0 and a pctitior co: tainir.o�156 ' `� =- . ?oar Sea c: ,ur i-g ght., outlin'u nctures fro- pee?'_c is :.c rea ��� as •-IaZards and dust condition,.,. In accordance wit: the above ^ hcrcwith recont.._..d entioned Ordinance tic. 16 �71 i.g Lw^ I aw he C_ Council l � . pavi-•g '=prove:aent dist•-i t�f .y .ne` iait_�te the coaso:.idated areas. - c or the ^prove cnt of the t - ae .-::ova _wank you .or yo _ consida_atioa is th / is tor. Rasocc--`-lyazrlyours, -e - . 2�3 AGE14DA ITEM 3C REPORT TO: Tom Coffey, City T11RU: Charles Liduin, Director of Public 19or1ks 1 _ FROM; Roy A. Eingman, City Zngineer RE: Consolidated Street Irnrovement District No. 64 (Including Street Lighting) It is iecor.:TMendcd'that the following streets and an alley be included in Consolidated Street Improvement District No. 64, as providcd.for in Chapter 15 of the Code of Ordinances, as amended: I 1. Impala Drive be ateen �v;ulberry Street and a point 902 feet northerly (south line of Poudre High School.) 2. Welch Street between Prospoct Road and Stuart Street. 3. Clover Lane between LaPorte Avenue and a point 428 feet northerly. 4. Elizabeth Street between 150 feet cast of Lenay Avenue and McHugh Street, excluding south side between 150'east of Lemay Avenue and the alley east of Luke Street, and including adjoining McHugh Street between Riverside Drive and a point 200 feet east of Patton Street. 5. Alley bounded by Laurel Steet, Plum Street, Remington Street and College Avenue. The paving cost estimates, including the cost of street lighting, for the various portions of the district are as follows: 1. Impala Drive between mulberry Street and a point 902 feet northerly (south line of Poudre High School): Assessable frontage: 1,772.49 feet Total estimated construction cost: $8,275.00 Fstimated construction cost per front foot: $4.67 per foot Estimated cost per front foot (including 17%)• $5.46 per foot Estimated City expense: $164.00 2. 1;c:ch Street between Prospect Road and Stuart Street: Assessable frontage: 2,818.04 feet Total estimated'construction cost: $25,538.00 Estimated construction cost per front fort: $8.85 per foot Estimated cost per front foot (including 17%). $10.36 per foot Estimated City exponse: $13,742.00 3. Clover Lane bot:•:een LaPorte Avenue and a point 428 feet northerly: Assessable frontage: Total estimated construction cost: 868.00 feet $8,628.QO Estimated construction cost per front foot: $9.45 per foot Estimated cost per font foot (including 17%): $11.05 Per foot Estimated City expense: $554.00. 4. Elizabeth .Street bet,::een 150 feet east of Lemav Ave. c% and ;:c Z:i Street, excludlnZ south side bet::'ce:7 150 fcct of Lemay Avenua and the alley east of Luke Street, and lnclu'di::s adjoining '-:cough Street between Riverside Drive and a noint 200 feet east: of Patton Street: .Assessable fronta e: 1,768.83 fact � 234 Total estimated construct?on cost: Estimated construction cost per front foot: Estimated cost per front foot (including 17a): Estimated City expense: $20,323.00 $11.81 per foot $13.81 per foot $2,044.00 S. Alley bounded by Laurel Street, Plum Street, Remington Street and College Avenue: Assessable frontage: 838.00 feet Total estimated construction cost: $3,001.00 Estimated construction cost per front foot: $?„58,,per foot Estimated cost per front foot (including 17%): $4.19 per oot estimated City expense: $160.0 Total estimated construction cost for the district: $65,765.00 Total estimated City expense for the district: $16,664.00 In order to proceed with the improvo;.jont district, it is necessary for the City Coracil to adopt the plans, specific:.tions and cost estimates for tie district, and publish notice of the .district. It is also necessary to provide for the ad-ministrative espenso of processing the district. The following are recommended percentages of the total cost to cover each portion of the expense: Engineering 6% Logal and publication 206 Interest during construction 4% Collection and certification to county 5% TOTAL 17% In addition, the Council must set forth the period over which the cost of the improvement may be paid and the rate of interest which will be carried with -- the installments. It is recommended that these be ten years and 6 percent. Respectfully submitted, Roy A.. Bingman City Engineer ✓✓✓ Motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilman Lopez, that this report be accepted and referred to the City Attorney to prepare the necessary resolution. Upon a roll call, all members voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 3D RESOLUTION 71-59 Oi• T!!E COUNCIL OF 1;:E CITY OF FOi21' COLLINS ACCEPTING A i :iCO::?:G\i1:1':'i0X FROM '!'i... 1 1: 11:01'OR Oi PU31,1C WORKS R!iGARDING THE IN!!'!A!'!ON 01: A SPLCIAL I;•i`'ROv `!L°NT DISTIiICi, S'i'i;':'ING Trill NE.:i)-. .:! \;TUF. , E, AND THE LOCATION GF Ti!E I`•:?ROViifi_iNTS TO iiL :-ADE, DE5C ;IB!?:G THE ATRE-A TO 3E ASSESSED FOR TiiG AND. DIRECTING 7T1E O PCITY ENGINE,AND PRHS!:NT TO T:!E CITY COUNCIL THENECESSARY ISFOR;•9;CION FOR TaE FO:1'•_ATICN 01•: SAID DISTRICT t.:IEREAS, the Director of Public .7orks has to t:. City Council.t4at a special ir,orovc:eat district be created for t o purpose of installin certain public i:rorovca:cnts i•1 the City; and 235 0 WHEREAS, the City Council has received such reco cndation and desires to continue with the formation of such special improvement district. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OA THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS: Section 1. That the recormlcndation of the Director of Public Works is hereby received and accepted following: Section 2. That the improvements to be constructed are the The improvement of the streets and alleys within the District by the installation of cure, gutter, street pavement, sidewalks and street lighting. and that such improvements are needed in order to facilitate the use of and decrease the required maintenance on the streets being improved Section 3. The location of the improvements to be made is as follows: A. Impala Drive - from Mulberry Street to a point 902 feet North of Mulberry Street (the South line of poudre High School property). B. Welch Street - between Prospect Road and Stuart Street. C. Clover Lane - between LaPorte Avenue and a point 428 feet .North of LaPorte Avenue. D. Elizabeth Street - between a point 150 feet East of Lemmay Avenue and McHugh Street (excluding the South side between a point 150 feet East of Lemay Avenue and the alley East of Luke Street) and including the adjoining McHugh Street between Riverside Drive and a point 200 feet East of Patton Street. E. The alley in the bloc'k bounded by Laurel Street, Plu.a Street, Remington Street and'College Avenue. Section 4. The City Engineer is hereby directed to prepare and present to the Council the following — A. Preliminary plans and specifications of the improve - cents proposed. B. An estimate of the total cost of such improvements, including the cost of constructing the same, engineering, legal and advertising costs, interest during construction and until assessments are made by ordinance against the properties benefited, and other lncide:ltal costs. �I 236 — ---- — — -- - -- -- uly_—] �: 1971 C. A IC:ap OI the district tri Ct tO be a5s OSS eG f01' t.^.e COSt GI tT.e L':iDrOV C;'3ents. SOct1Gn S. The City CG'1PC11 neroby fll:es a-d Get eri:uneS tf:at the prOJOSCd to be lnsta=led On all Of the loc.^.'l1Gi s delgilatod. under Se Ctioil 3 above are su OStaatially ti1C sam0, anCi si:Cil s lmprove:aents are to be consolid:tcd into one improvc-ment district to be, kno,;:n as Consolidated Street Pavino'ard' Street Lihting District No. 64, i but each sop2rate location -Is desiZnated lri SCCt IOn ,i abUVe s�^. all De ' considerod as a separate area for the purpose of remonstrance and assessment . Passeu and adopted at a re ulor mecti;ic of t;,e City Council held this first day of July,. A. D. 1971. Karl E. Carson ATTEST: /s/ John Bartel City Clerk Motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilman Lopez, that this resolution be adopted. Upon a roll call, all members voted in the affirmative. Councilman Lopez asked why Fast Elizabeth to Lemay was not: paved. lie was advised by the Director of Public Works that they need petitioners wanting this, that it would mean removal of three trees on Stover. He said there were two women who dial not want it paved because of traffic, stating until about a year ago this section was not in the City, that the paving of this area would not be this year but maybe next year will have the proposal. AGENDA ITEM 3E RESOLUTION 71-60 OF THE COUNCIL 01: THE CITY OF PORT COLLINS ADOPTING THE REPOR"I' 01: 'I'lili CITY ENGINEER ON THL I STIMAT'L'D COST AND ASSL'SSMENTS FOR CONSOLIDATED STREET PAVING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 64 , APPROVING THE DETAILS AND SP12CIFICATIONS FOR SUCH PROPOSED DISTRICT, DETERMINIiNG Till-, MOUNP OR PROPORTION OF THE TOTAL COST TO BE PAID BY A METHOD OTHER THAN ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PROPERTY IN THI: DISTRICT, THE NUMBER OF INSTALLMENTS AND THE TIME WITHIN WHICH THE COST OF THE IMPItOVEIMENTS ASSESSED AGAINST PROPERTY IN T111: DISTRICT WILL BE PAYABLE, THE RATE OF INTEREST TO BE CHARGED ON UNPAID INSTALLMENTS, THE PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS, THE METHOD OF TLAKING SUCH ASSESSMENTS, AND THE DATE- WHEN THE COUNCIL. RILL HOLD A HEARING AND CONSIDER THE ORDERING BY ORDINANCE OF THE PROPOSED I 1%1PI:OV fLM,:NTS WHEREAS, hcrctofore the City Council by resolution directed the City Engineer to make a complete survey of proposed Consolidated Street Paving and Street Li,ghting District No. 64 includin.g the preparation of a map, plans and specifications, and estimate of cost of the improvements in said proposed district; and i`;HEREA,�, tile City I?ngincer has made nis.report and has presented the details and specifications for the proposed district. NO1'1, THERE -FORE., Bi: TT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF Tlli? CITY OF FORT COLLINS: 237 J,uly_1,=19.7.1 n estimate as presented by the City Engineer for said district be and the same hereby are accepted and approved. Section 2. The following amount or proportion of the total cost of such improvements shall be paid by the City at large and not by assessments against i.r^_perty in the iistrin, tc--1 it: 06,664.00. Section 3. The property to be assessed for the improvements shall be as follows: All lots and lands abutting the street or alley to be improved. Section 4:' Assessments for the cost of installing the improve- ments in the district will be made as follows: Upon all of the lots and lands abutting upon the indivi- dual.:streets and alleys to be improved within the district in proportion as the frontage of each lot or tract of land on a particular street or alley is to the frontage of all lots and lands on such particular street or alley so improved, all as provided in Section 15-63 (a) and Section 15-64 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Fort Collins, Colorado,.1958, as amended. Section S. Said assessments shall be payable in ten equal annual installments, with interest an the unpaid instamments At the rate of six per cent ( 60) per annum. Section 6. That on Thursday, the 19th day of August 1, 1971, at the hour of 1:30 o'clock P.M., or as 'soon thereafter as the matter may come on for hearing, in the Council Chambers of: the City Hall, City of Fort Collins, is the date on which the Council of the City of Fort Collins will consider the ordering by ordinance of the proposed improve- ments and hear all complaints and objections that may be made and filed in writing concerning the proposed improvements by the owners of any real estate to be assessed or any persons interested generally. Section 7. The City Clerk be and he hereby is directed to give notice by publication and mailing to the owners of property to be assessed and to all interested persons generally, all as set forth in Section 15756 of the Code of Ordinances of Ge City of Fort Collins, Colorado, 1958, as amended. Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held this first day of July, A. D. 1971 ATTEST: City Clerb — 238 -- —----------- ------ ----- July l,_1971 motion was made by Councilwoman Preblc, seconded by Councilman heterson, that this resolution be adopted. Upon a roll call, all members voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEH 3F RE_�0,`iT OF CITY ENNIGINEER T0; 'o:6 COffoy, City )1a:1?�^T 'Pi1RU: Ch,trios Liquin, Director of Pudic }'io-'s FROM: Roy A. iinL:al, City En:%ineor RE:. Sanitary Sc'WO—ac Imp ro;' is?oat Di .Lies 7 No. J It is I•CCO'.b Or1dCCi fiat the Jr G7C_i;1c5 2bati::^�% tt:i: f0110':: lit C% st"•cct Cc included in Sani':.^_ry Sower la's): GYc; i'i :;1 ;: Distric" No. 57, as U"1'o V1QCd TOr ill Chapter 15 of t'.1CCode Gf Ordiavi ncc a5 .. ?CIIGCd: luipala Dr1vG from a Uollli iO .J fect north 0= f? 17Crr,' Street t0. fl pOln 902 TCCt nGrtl?c'T1y Oi .iUl UC rry' StrCC:. (south li-c of drC Pou" High School%. It is also rec0;,;710;1C.led that the benefited area for asscssm�ont pu2'p OScs be. limited to 100 feet of property depth. file cost esti;nate for the District is as folio'', s: Asscs5able area: 129,866 sn.;:;;. Total estimated construction Cost: $10,433.00 Estimated Construction Cost per square foot. Of assessable area: $0.08034 per sq.ft. Estimated cost per square foot of assessable area Ci.nciudina 17%): $0.0.93919 per sq.ft. Estii-,ated City Espen.se; None In older to proceed liith the '-- rovemient district, It is i1CCB5S2ry =Gr the City Council t0 adopt t".0 p:ans, 5:)e Ci.fl Cations, t'he Cost es tl:-:aZas for the district, and t0 puDlis".1 the notice Gf Clio district. It is also 7?Ccossary t0 p_'01':_C:C for i:i?G' adianl5 t2'at 11 C;C:)CnsCS G= procol,sln �(, the di strict. T:?c fo 1l of l%%; .. C rc CO";!" 'c - elided pG'r CCn �. ;c�.,S G= tL:; total cos;: t0 COvCr'Cach por'ion o1 thc e;L-p3nsCs: En�i.nccri,. 6 Lo.aal $ Publications 2` interest durin-' construction t Collection and ccrtificati.oa to CoLsay S o TOTAL 1 /% hi addition the Council '.us --ort'n C11C De<]A OV01 .i.^). Cil t::u CGS' Of the ii.:OrOVG':::C:i?i: ..:1 DC paid -,_il t t}1C ar Tate Of lil iCrcSt .till C._. Y: it11 the ins t a`l;i.:a?ts. I4 rC Co:u.- :1000i slat: tflc IL..,_a'l=:Cnt�s ten years th C? into;cst Cha-='dtu of (i )--ce -i i)C_ L:..'. i..... yam--:;- '" \ ��/ `i`/�. �� %`✓✓''p^`^ �. Councilman Lopez asked theme w s any presecent to make this a longer term. The City Attorney advised him that on the first reading of the ordinance, the residents can make that renuest. 239 Motion was made by Councilwoman Preble, seconded by Councilman Peterson, that this report be accepted. Upon a roll call, all members voted in the affirmative. AGCfTDA ITEH 3G RESOLUTION 71-61 OF THE COUNCIL 01' TIN] CITY OF FORT COLLIN'S ACCHp"fL\G A REMIIMENP PION FROM 'I'll[: DIRECTOR Of: PUBLIC ViORKS REGARDING THE INITIATION 01' A SPECIAL IMIIROVEPIENT DISTPICT, STATING THE NEED FOR, TJlE NATUI:E OF, AND THE LOCATION OF 771E IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE, DPSCRIBING THE AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR '171E SAME, ANDDII:GC'I'1VG 'fI]E CITY ENGINEI R TO PREPARE AND P,^.ESENT TO 'fill' CITY COUNCIL THE NECESSARY INFORiMTION FOR Tf1E FORMATION OF SAID DISTINCT WHEREAS, the Director of Public IVer}CS has recommended to the City Council that a special improvement district be created for the purpose of installing certain public improvements in the City; and WIIERL'AS, the City Council has received such recommendation and !desires to continue t•:ith the formation of such special improvement district. NOW, THEREFORI., BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY 01' FORT COLLINS: Section 1. That the recommendation of the Director of Public 117orks is hereby received and accepted... Section 2. That the improvements to be constructed are the foll.oming: Installation of sanitary sewer lines. and that such improvements are needed in order to provide sanitary,sel,:er service to the properties served by the same. Section 3. The location of the improvements to be made is as follo;.rs: On Impala Drive frog, a point 105.8 feet North of Mulberry Street: to a point 902 feet North of. Mulberry Street. bect3.on 'I. The City Engineer is hereby directed to prepare and present to the Council. the £olloi:,ing: A. Prelinu.nary plans and specifications of the i.mprove- meats proposed. 0 FA 240 July 1, 1971 B. An ostimate of the total cost of such improvements, including the cost of constructing the same, engineering, legal and advertising costs, interest during construction and until assessments are made by ordinance against: the properties benefited, and other incidental costs. C. A map of the district to -be assessed for the cost of the improvements. Section S. That the improvement district to be formed pursuant hereto shall be designated as Sanitary Sewer Improvement District No. 57. Passed and adopted at .a regular meeting of the City Council.. held this first clay of July, A. D. 1971.. i Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, that this resolution be adopted. Upon a roll call, all members voted In the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 3H RESOLUTION 71-62 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY 01: FORT COLLINS ADOPTING THE REPORT 01" '1'I1E CITY ENGINEER ON THE ESTIMATED COST AND ASSESSMENTS FOR SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 57 APPROVING THE ll -TAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUCH PROPOSED DIS"I'RICI', DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OR PROPORTION OF THE TOTAL COST TO BE PAID BY A METHOD OTHER THAN ASSESSMENT'S AGAINST. . PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT, THE NUMBER OF INSTALLMENTS AND THE TIClE WITHIN WHICH THE COST OF THE_IMPROVE'MENTS ASSESSED AGAINST PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT WILL BE PAYABLE, THE RATE OF INTEREST TO BE CHARGED ON UNPAID INSTALLMENTS, THE PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS, THE M13THOD 017 MAKING SUCH ASSESSMENTS, AND THE DATE k'HEN THE COUNCIL WILL HOLD A HEARING AND CONSIDER THE ORDERING BY ORDINANCE OF THE PROPOSED IMPPOVEMENTS WHEREAS, heretofore the City Council by resolution directed the City Engineer to make a complete survey of proposed Sanitary Sewer Improve- ment District No. 57 including the preparation of a map, plans and specifications, and estimate of cost of the improvements in said proposed district; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made his report and has presented the details and specifications for the proposed district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS: Section 1. 'That the report, plans, specifications, map and estimate as presented by the. City Engineer for said district be and the same hereby are accepted and approved. Section 2. The folloi.,ing amount or proportion of tno total cost of such improvements shall be paid by the City at larcc.and not by assessments against property in the district, to -wit: None 241 Section 3. The property to be assessed for the improvements shall be as follows: The property described on Exhibit A attached hereto and . by this reference made a part hereof. Section 4. Assessments for the cost of installing the improve- ments in the district will be made as follows: Upon all the real. estate in the district; the real estate comprising the district being more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto, and by this reference made a part hereof, in proportion as the area of each piece of real estate in the district is to the area of all the real estate in the d]AM M exclusive of streets and alleys in the district, all as provided in Section 15-63 (c) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, . 1958, as amended. Section S. Said assessments shall be payable in ten equal t i annual installments, with interest on the unpaid iistamments at'the rage of six per cent (6 %) per annum. Section 6. That on Thursday, the 19th day of August , 1971, at the hour of 1:30 o'clock P.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may come on for hearing, in the Council. Chambers of the City Hal), Ci.t:y of Fort Collins, is the date on which the Council of. the City of Fort Collins will consider the ordering by ordinance of the proposed improve - Monts and hear all complaints and objections that may be made and filed in writing concerning the proposed improvements by the owners of any real estate to be assessed or any persons interested generally. Section 7. The City Clerk be and he hereby is directed to give notice by publication and mailing to the owners of property to be assessed and to all interested persons generally, all as set forth in Section IS-,S6 . of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Fort Collins, Colorado, 1958; as amended. - Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held this first day of July, A: D. 1971. /s/ Karl E. Carson Mayor ATTEST: /s/ John Bartel _ City Clerk Motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilman Lopez, that this resolution be adopted. Upon a roll call., all members voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 3I BIDS - BUTLER TYPE BUILDING, SEWER PLANTS Summary of the bids: v 92 24` 4 Garfield Construction Co. Burton Builders Company M & I Constructors, Inc. Al }Lockett Colorado Commercial. Builders Total Bid Did not respond to invitation $ 13,290.00 12,200.00 Did not respond to invitation, n;a-,_�-�a t^ it at Mr. Ed Hilgenberg_, Supt., Water & Sewer, has evaluated the bids and all specifications have been met by the low bidder. The recommendation is that M & I Contractors be awarded the contract in the amount of $12,200.00. Respectfully submitted, E. M. Kuppinger Purchasing Agent: Motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilman Lopez, that the recommendation of the Purchasing be approved. Upon a roll call, all. members of the Council. voted n the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 3J BIDS - 15 - 25 KVA Transformers Summary of the bids: Total Award as Recommended $ 3,660.00 Engineering Estimate 4,545.00 Difference $ 885.00 Mr. John St. John, Associate Electrical. Engineer, has evaluated the bids and all specifi- cations have been met by the low bidder. The recommendation is that R.T.E. Corp., c/o Lewis Associates be awarded the contract in the amount of $4,660.00. Respectfully submitted, /s/ E. M. Kuppinger Purchasing Agent Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, that the recommendation of the Purchasing agent be approved. Upon a roll call, all members voted in the affirmative. AGENDA ITEM 3K BIDS - THREE-PHASE, SUBMERSIBLE OIL SWITCHES Summary of bids: McGraw -Edison $2,153.00 ea. Extension $ 6,459.G9 Mine & Smelter (Alternate 1) 2,365.00 ea. 7.095.00 Mr. Tim Sagen, Electrical Engineer, has evaluated the bids. A copy of Mr. Sagen's recommendationis attached. Based on the recommendation, it is suggested the award be made accordingly: Mine & Smelter Supply $ 7,095.00 Respectfully submitted, /s/ E. M. Kuppinger Purchasing Agent Motion was made by Councilman Lo_rez, seconded by Councilman Peterson, that the recommendation of the Purchasing/be approved. Upon a roll call, all members voted in the affirmative. Agent Mrs. A. R. Thomas was present questioning the article_ in paper of installation of sidewalks and asked how can people vote when they are not here, stating they had never had any notifi- cation of this. Mayor Carson advised Mr. Thomas that they had a request from the Board for Sidewalks in certain areas as they felt not having sidc�..al}s was a hazard to the school children, that this had b=.en studied and eliminated som-, that then=_.is quite a lot of concrete work that needs to be done and -,.-ill be in areas where there is none, but is still be fore the Council. Ile said notification will be sent to all concerned. Mrs. Thomas asked why they had to have sidewalks when there had never been any. 240 The City Attorney advised the Council that a request had been made for the transfer of a temporary use permit of Northern Colorado Plater Conservancy District, on a permanent basis. COMMUNICATION ._ NORTHERN COLORADO :'iA'C :R COi1,]I:a�'A;!CY DISTRICT. City of Fort Collins P.O. so;. 5;°0 Fort Collins, Colorado 90521 Re: Transfer of Water Allotment Contract Temporary Use Perm!ts/Class B Contract Dear Sirs: We note that the City of Fort Collins now holds allotment contracts under Temporary Use Permits totalling 191 acre-foot units. You mill probably recall that Temporary Use Permits were devised by the District to permit municipalities to accumulate a number of small allotment contracts until such time as the quantity of grater thus accumulated o-rould make a transfer to a full Municipal (Class B) Contract v,orthv.hi le. We have, therefore, prepared the necessary "Application . . . for Cancellation of Temporary Use Permits"; and we enclose a copy of the application for a Municipal Contract which, in part, takes the form of an Ordinance to be passed by the City. You may wish to make certain changes to the proposed form of Ordinance, but, if you do, we would suggest that you check with this District in advance to make certain that such changes are acceptable to the District, If no changes are made and after passage of the Ordinance, both copies of the enclosed Ordinance and both copies of the "Application . , , for Cancellation of 'ie;,iporary Use Permits" should be executed by the City and returned to this District. Obviously, if it is neces- sary to make any changes to the Ordinance submitted herCWith, those applications will have to be re -typed to reflect the necessary changes. In order to accom-modate the required publication of ordinances by tic' City of Fort Collins, we anticipate that your application for transfer to a Municipal Contract (Clan: B) can be presented to our Board on August 13, 1971. ble would appreciate having your completed application in our office at least 10 days prior to the August Board meeting. If it is your intent to trrns`er additional water in the near future, it should again be transferred on Temporary Use Permits until such time as it becomes advisable to transfer a further block of :rater to a permanent contract. If you have any questions or if we can assist you in any ,,ray, please let us know. .Youyver -ply, Acting Sec retary� ORDINANCE 140. 33, 1971 AN ORDINANCE TO APPLY AND CONTRACT FOR BENEFICIAL USE. OF WATER OI! BEHALF OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, A MUNICIPAL COR.PORATIOii, AND PRESCRIBING THE TERi4S FOR APPLICATION FOR AD! ALLOTI•tEidT OP 114"TER TO SAID CITY OF FORT COLLINS BY NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSER- VANCY DISTRICT I -lotion was made by Councilman 1971, be considered favorably 1971, and to be presented for call, all members voted it th The City Mana er stated that would like to suggest in this and an official. hearing to be Lopez, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, that Ordinance No. 33, on first reading and ordered published this first day of July, final passage on the 22nd day of July, 1971. Upon a roll affirm=.f ive . the letters Cor.Cerrjina the sidewalks have not gone out Yet, letter to set aside a date for discussion, notif,, the owners held, to set a hearing date and elate :rill ire in the letter. 244 July 1, 1971 COMMUNICATION TO: Tom Coffey, City Manager FROM: Charles Licuin, Director of Public Works RE: Sewer Line Extension Utility drawings are being submitted by L_. Smit and :;.. G'_n'_ey, each :'• , � for mobile; horse parks west of College Avenue and Soulk 0! Willox Lame. 'These two parks can be served with a serer paralleling the railroad and tying into the North College system at Hemlock Street, and they are willing to install an 8 inch line for this purpose. If an 8 inch line is installed and connected on Hemlock Street, the line will not be of sufficient elevation to allot: for any extension, in which case, we are proposing that the line be increased in size to a 12 inch, which will be adequate to accommodate all of Section 33 north Of Willox Lane to Highway 287. By installing a 12 inch line, it will be necessary then to build a line from Hemlock Street to the end of the line just completed to accommodate the North College Sanitation District. The estimated cost of the line from Hemlock Street to Vine Drive is $75,000. II Permission is requested to proceed with the design and construction of this line, which is shown as solid rod on the enclosed map. The dotted line is the serer to be constructed by the mobile home parks. Respectfully submitted,I Charles L} ;uin Director of Public Works The City Manager recommended that from hemlock to Vine Street, the City pick up the differ- ence between the 8 inch and the 12 inch line. Councilman Lopez asked if 4lillox or Hemlock Will getthe most traffic with the building of these 250 units. He was advised that there will be an access on either street. Motion was made by Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, that this recommendation be approved. Upon a roll call, all members voted in the affirmative ;with the exception of Councilman Lopez, who voted in the negative. Mayor Carson stated that dog and cat traps are available for use. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Councilman Lopez, seconded by Councilwoman Preble, adjourn. Upon a roll call, all members of the Coun that the Council /il voted in the affirmative and the Council adjourned. ATTEST: