HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 10/13/2020 - CAMERON PEAK FIRE: WATER AND AIR QUALITY IMPACTSDATE:
STAFF:
October 13, 2020
Mark Kempton, Water Production Manager
WORK SESSION ITEM
City Council
SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION
Cameron Peak Fire: Water and Air Quality Impacts.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this item is to inform Council of the status of the Cameron Peak Fire, the Fire’s potential effects on
the City’s drinking water supply, air quality impacts, planned watershed restoration activities, and future land
restoration and water treatment funding needs.
GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED
1. A 2% water rate increase is planned for 2022. Anticipating watershed restoration costs related to the
Cameron Peak Fire, what feedback does Council have regarding moving the water rate increase up a year
earlier to 2021?
2. The City of Greeley has volunteered to be the Project Sponsor for the Federal Emergency Watershed
Program (EWP) which entails 100% up-front costs and a 25% cost match after reimbursement. What direction
does Council have regarding the City partnering with Greeley and sharing the 25% cost match?
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION
The Cameron Peak Fire (CPF) ignited on August 13th, 2020 in the Arapaho and Roosevelt Nation al Forests near
Cameron Pass and Chambers Lake. The CPF is currently 125,000 acres with 22% containment at the time of this
report (9/30/2020). As this fire and other regional fires continue to burn, the smoke has impacted local air quality.
At this time, there are no known impacts to water supply infrastructure owned by the City of Fort Collins.
The fire is burning primarily in the Cache la Poudre River watershed which provides approximately 50% of the
annual drinking water supply for the City of Fort Co llins. Similar to the High Park Fire (HPF) in 2012, the
aftereffects of the fire will likely affect the quality of the City’s raw water supply for some years to come. The
aftereffects of widespread forest fires typically include increased and more frequent rain and snowmelt runoff,
increased ash and sediment in the river, increased likelihood of mud flows, and an overall degradation of water
quality, particularly after thunderstorms.
In 2012, the City’s water supply experienced several of the effects of th e High Park Fire causing the Water
Treatment Facility to go off the Poudre River for over 100 consecutive days and relying on 100% Horsetooth
Reservoir water. We are fortunate that we have two independent water supplies. This is a result of excellent
planning and foresight by previous Councils and staff.
As the full impacts of the fire become more apparent, it is likely that the Poudre River will start to experience
impaired water quality, particularly during Spring snowmelt and Summer thunderstorms in th e watershed. During
these impaired water quality runoff events, the City’s Water Treatment Facility is able to continue to treat water. In
cases where the water becomes too impaired to treat, staff can implement several options to prevent impaired
water entering the City’s drinking water supply. These include Poudre River monitoring & shutting off the Poudre
intake during rain storms, switch to 100% Horsetooth water (City has adequate water supplies in HT), utilize both
sedimentation basins (Pleasant Valley Pipeline basin was constructed after High Park Fire), increase chemical
October 13, 2020 Page 2
treatment processes, increased communication with customers, while maintaining all drinking water quality
standards.
While the Cameron Peak Fire (125,000 acres) has exceeded the acre age of the High Park Fire (87,000 acres),
the water quality effects of both fires will likely be similar. The High Park Fire area produced several high turbidity,
ash, and sediment laden river flows in 2012 and in 2013. However, the 2013 Flood had an advan tage in that it
washed most of the sediment and ash out of the river system, resulting in improved water quality runoff from the
HPF burned areas. It is unlikely that the CPF burned area will experience a flood of that magnitude again soon, so
the effects of the CPF will probably be felt for a much longer time than those of the HPF.
Staff has implemented several enhanced and new water quality monitoring measures to address impacts of the
fire on water supplies. Two early warning water quality alert station s have been installed on the Poudre River
upstream of the Water Treatment Facility’s Poudre River Intake. These systems provide treatment operators
advance notice of when to temporarily bypass impacted river water. In addition, existing long -term monitoring
programs have been adapted to capture impacts of the fire and storm sampling will assist in tracking watershed
recovery and answering key questions about treating fire-impacted water.
POST-FIRE WATERSHED RECOVERY
The City plans to engage in post-fire recovery activities that focus primarily on protections for water supplies in the
Poudre River Watershed including supply reservoirs and the Poudre River itself. Although treatment plans have
not yet been developed, the type of work will likely focus on em ergency hillslope stabilization (e.g. aerial mulching
and seeding), sediment catchment basins around reservoirs, and stream channel stabilization where persistent
erosion occurs. All work associated with repairing damage to private assets like homes, build ings, roads, and
other structures is being managed by Larimer County.
For the Cameron Peak Fire, three general pathways exist for implementing the full scope of post -fire treatments
and are detailed in the table below. The City is most likely to engage a nd assist in funding work through the
Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) program and through supplemental treatments through the Local
Recovery Group.
Program Name Scope of Work Responsible Party Timeframe
Burned Area
Emergency Response
(BAER)
Summarize impacts
within burn area;
identify USFS values at
risk; implements post-
fire treatments on US
Forest Service (USFS)
Lands.
US Forest Service
As soon as possible
following fire
containment.
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
(NRCS) – Emergency
Watershed Protection
(EWP) Grant Program
Identifies affected
values on private and
State Lands;
recommends
emergency hillslope
stabilization measures.
EWP Sponsor (City of
Greeley) implements
treatments.
NRCS & EWP
Sponsor; Cities of Fort
Collins and Greeley,
and other potential
partners to cost-share
the 25% match
requirements for all
treatments.
Potential near-term
actions to protect water
supply reservoirs (Nov).
Majority of hillslope
treatments will occur
late Spring 2021,
following snowmelt.
Local Recovery Group -
Supplemental
Treatments (beyond
BAER & EWP)
Address restoration
needs not met by EWP
or BAER by directing
additional funding to
targeted projects.
Local Recovery Group
members: work led by
Coalition for the Poudre
River Watershed, along
with local agencies,
water providers,
businesses and non-
profits.
Mid- to long-term; 2021
and beyond.
October 13, 2020 Page 3
The Coalition for the Poudre River Watershed (CPRW) on behalf of the Local Recovery Group is curren tly
coordinating post-fire debris flow modeling to identify priority areas for treatments. This shared approach to
priority setting will assist in coordinated application of treatments and will help to leverage financial contribution of
all involved parties. Modeling work will be performed by the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado
State University.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
Many uncertainties remain related to the extent and timing of the start of post -fire recovery work. The
uncertainties include the fact that the fire continues to actively burn making the full extent of damage unknown,
the ultimate number of cost-sharing partners, and that discussions with USFS and NRCS are ongoing about the
possible eligible uses for EWP funds. The current estimate for the City’s cost-share is between $1.0- $4.3 million
dollars. In cooperation with members of the Local Recovery Group, City staff are currently drafting contracts and
Intergovernmental Agreements that could support the City’s engagement in post-fire recovery activities.
It is anticipated that there will be some costs associated with this fire that will be the obligation of the Water
Enterprise Fund. The table below summarizes the 10-year rate and debt issuance forecast that was presented to
the Council Finance Committee in January 2020. It reflects the anticipated capital investment needs and ongoing
operations and maintenance (O&M) expenses associated with the water utility for the next decade without the fire.
Additional capital investments and O&M expenses resulting from the fire will require either realizing additional
revenues through a rate increase, drawing down reserves ahead of the next debt issuance or delaying other
capital investments.
If the proposed 2.0% rate increase for 2022 were to be implemented in 2021 this would increase revenues in
2021 by roughly $600,000. This will be discussed further with the Council Finance Committee on October 19th .
HORSETOOTH OUTLET PROJECT AND WATER RESTRICTIONS
Water restrictions began on October 1st, per the City Managers Declaration and Order of Water Restrictions for
Fort Collins Utilities.
Fort Collins Utilities (Utilities) has been coordinating with the other water providers, who are also impacted by the
Horsetooth Outlet Project (HOP), potential impacts from the Cameron Peak Fire, and severe drought. As of
September 30, East Larimer County and West Fort Collins Water District have instated similar outdoor water
restrictions. North Weld County Water District will be proposing water r estrictions to their Board in October and
Fort Collins-Loveland Water District’s Board has decided to take a voluntary approach and is asking customers to
stop uses, similar to the other districts’ water restrictions.
Utilities staff have been focused on preparing for Oct. 1 by conducting the following efforts and will continue
throughout the declared water restrictions:
• Communicating with diverse and numerous engagement and outreach efforts, including but not limited to, a
press release, print, web, and radio advertisements, numerous presentations to various community groups,
direct mailing postcards to all Utilities customers, bill inserts July through November and customer
notifications via email.
• Reviewing 88 raw water registration and exception permits for new lawn installations and active/athletic
playing fields to-date.
• Responding to 333 emails and voice mails regarding HOP and water restrictions since July 2020.
October 13, 2020 Page 4
• Developing a HOP water demands tracker that will be updated Monday, Wednesday, and Friday each week
and available to the public at fcgov.com/HOP to monitor progress towards the goal of 15 million gallons per
day (capacity of the backup pump system).
• Working closely with coordinating City Departments, such as Code Compliance and Environmental Services;
and others.
• Assisting impacted City Departments, such as Parks, Streets, Connexion and others, with permits, raw water
registration and other water restriction guidance.
More information regarding HOP and water restrictions can be found here: fcgov.com/HOP and fcgov.com/water-
restrictions. Customer and community inquires can be directed to HOP@fcgov.com and 970-416-8040.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Powerpoint Presentation (PPTX)
1
Cameron Peak Fire: Effects on Air and Water Quality
Mark Kempton, Jill Oropeza, Lance Smith, Cassie Archuleta
10/13/2020
Presentation Outline
•Cameron Peak Fire overview
•Wa ter quality impacts and High Park Fire comparison
•BAER process, watershed restoration, partnering, and projected costs
•Financial considerations
•Air Quality Update
•Questions for Council
2
Questions for Council
1.A 2%water rate increase is planned for 2022.Anticipating watershed
restoration costs related to the Cameron Peak Fire,what feedback does City
Council have regarding moving the water rate increase up a year earlier to
2021?
2.The City of Greeley has volunteered to be the Project Sponsor for the Federal
Emergency Wa tershed Program which entails 100%up-front costs and a 25%
cost match after reimbursement.What direction does Council have regarding
the City partnering with Greeley and sharing the 25%cost match?
3
4
JO1
Slide 4
JO1 [@Mark Kempton] - this is a possible replacement slide that includes both the map and the fire stats.
The other text you had previously included, I added in the notes below. Feel free to use or not!
Jill Oropeza, 9/29/2020
Photo Credit: Michael Menefee, CNHP, 2012 5
Wildfire Comparison
•124,021 acres
•~5% private land, ~95% federal
land
•Began August 2020
•93 structures, 31 homes lost
•Long term watershed restoration is
a key requirement
•87,284 acres
•~50% private land, ~50% federal
land
•Began June 2012
•259 homes lost
•11 ,000 acres treated with mulch
•100 days off Poudre River (100%
Horsetooth water)
•2013 flood washed ash and
sediment from river
Cameron Peak Fire High Park Wildfire
6
JO2
Slide 6
JO2 I think slide can be eliminated and the content included in the previous slide's talking points
Jill Oropeza, 9/29/2020
Wa ter Treatment Response
•Increase Poudre River monitoring &
shut off intake during rainstorms
•Switch to 100% Horsetooth water
•Utilize both sedimentation basins
(PVP basin was constructed after High
Park Fire)
•Increase chemical treatment
processes (Alum and Carbon)
•Increase communication with
customers
•Maintain all drinking water quality
standards
7
Wildfire Impacts
8
Monitoring Water Quality Impacts
•Real-time measurements for treatment operations
•Early-Wa rning Water Quality Alert System
•Collaborative long-term monitoring program
•Post-fire recovery monitoring
•Wa ter treatment studies
9
GS2
Slide 9
GS2 caption what we are looking at here
Gretchen Stanford, 9/30/2020
Possible Recovery Pathways
Post-Fire
Recovery
US Forest
Service
(USFS)
Burned Area
Emergency
Response
(BAER)
Report
USFS BAER treatments & long-term recovery plan
NRCS
Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) Program
Mid-and long-term recovery, Local Recovery Group
(Coalition for the Poudre River Watershed)
Federal lands
Private & state lands w/ limited
opportunities on USFS land
10
•Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS) program addresses immediate
post-fire threats to life and property, on
private and State lands
•EWP Sponsor -60 days from the end of the
event to request NRCS EWP assistance
•EWP Sponsor awarded funds based on
damage surveys
•25% match requirement, 75%
reimbursement from NRCS after work is
complete
Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP)
11
•Secures funding for additional
post-fire restoration needs
•Coordinates with EWP and
BAER treatments to maximize
impact
•Led by Coalition for Poudre
River Watershed (CPRW) &
Larimer County
•Includes non-profit groups,
local agencies and water
providers
Local Recovery Group
12
Estimated Timeline
13
Recovery
planning begins
USFS treatments completed
Emergency protections
EWP assessments
Implementation of
watershed treatments
BAER report complete
Prioritize treatments
EWP Sponsor request
Snow cover
Planning & contracting
EWP contract completion
Future restoration planning
September November Summer
FallDecember -SpringOctober
2020 2021
Estimated Cost of Post-Fire Recovery
14
Estimated cost-share for City of Fort Collins*$1.0M -$4.3M
Estimate Includes:
•Implementation of EWP (minimal & enhanced scope) and supplemental USFS
watershed treatments
•Project management support (2 years)
•Post-fire treatment studies
•Other technical assistance (debris flow modeling)
* Large uncertainty in cost due to unknown scope of federal EWP program.
Wa ter Fund Financial Considerations
15
*A 2% rate increase is expected to increase
operating revenues $500-600K annually
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Rat e Inc reas e 0%0%2%0-2%0-2%0-2%1-3%1-3%1-3%2-4%2-4%
Debt Is suanc e $55-65M $30-35M
$209M of capital work is ex pec ted t o be needed between 2020 and 2030 in addition to t he c urrent capital appropriat ions
$0.0
$5.0
$10.0
$15.0
$20.0
$25.0
$30.0
$35.0
$40.0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019$ millions502 -Water Fund
Available Reserves
Air Quality Update
16
September 30, 2020
NOAA GOES-16 Satellite Image
Regional
Air Quality
Index (AQI)
Good
Moderate
Unhealthy for
Sensitive
Groups
Unhealthy
Ve ry Unhealthy
17
AQ Update
N
Cheyenne
Fort Collins
Denver
Mullen Fire (WY)
Cameron Peak
Fire (CO)
EPA F ire and Smoke Map: https://fire.airnow.gov/
Longs Peak
37 Miles “A”
5 Miles
Local
18
AQ Update
Longs Peak
37 Miles “A”
5 Miles
10/5/2020, 4pm
(186 µg/m3)
Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5)ConcentrationDate and Ti me
Real-time AQ data and visibility images:
fcgov.com/AQdata
Questions for Council
1.A 2%water rate increase is planned for 2022.Anticipating watershed
restoration costs related to the Cameron Peak Fire,what feedback does City
Council have regarding moving the water rate increase up a year earlier to
2021?
2.The City of Greeley has volunteered to be the Project Sponsor for the Federal
Emergency Wa tershed Program which entails 100%up-front costs and a 25 %
cost match after reimbursement.What direction does Council have regarding
the City partnering with Greeley and sharing the 25%cost match?
19
20
Mark Kempton, Interim Deputy Director –Wa ter Resources & Tr eatment
mkempton@fcgov.com, office: 970-221-6692, cell: 970-682-4988
Jill Oropeza, Director –Sciences
joropeza@fcgov.com,office: 970-416-2529,cell:970-568-6808
Lance Smith, Director –Utilities Finance
lasmith@fcgov.com, office: 970-221-6524, cell: 970-213-0143
Cassie Archuleta, Manager, Environmental Sustainability,
carchuleta@fcgov.com, office: 970-416-2648
Contact Information
Communications and Outreach
Internal
•ICS team participant
•Utility-wide Wednesday email
•City intranet page
•Collaboration with experts on media
requests
•Collaboration with Sustainability’s
air quality team
•Collaboration with CPIO
External
•Public Information Officer collaboration
with federal, state and city organizations
•Utility website
fcgov.com/utilities/2020-wildfires
•Customer account notifications and
water quality reports communicated
•Media requests –print, on air and film
•Social media, including Facebook live
events
21
22
Maximize water available during HOP
Be prepared for changing conditions
We need your help: City and community
working together to reduce risk
HOP Need: Reduce treated
water demand to typical winter
(indoor) levels this October.
Wa ter Restrictions
23
NOT ALLOWED OCT. 1 ~ NOV. 30
•Lawn watering (residential and inactive
areas of parks/fields)
•Ve hicle washing at home
•Pressure/power washing hard surfaces
ALLOW ED
•Drip and hand watering trees, plants,
food production
•Active/athletic fields, new sod/seed (permit)
•Raw water (registration)
•Indoor use
Full list of water restrictions at
fcgov.com/water-restrictions
Looking forward: Strengthen
Horsetooth infrastructure now,
before anticipated fire-related
runoff events in spring and
after impact Poudre River
•Reliance on Poudre River and reliable
backup pump system
Limited capacity based on winter
(indoor) use
•Cameron Peak Fire impacts to Poudre
River increase likelihood of backup pump
dependence
•Ongoing hot and dry conditions driving
high demand
Restrictions Address Changing Conditions
24
25
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Million GallonsFort Collins Utilities Daily Water Demand
CURRENT DEMAND HISTORICAL DEMAND GOAL
THANK YOU!THANK YOU!
Daily water demand has reduced significantly, but we still need
your help. Stop outdoor water use to help us reach the goal water
demand needed during HOP (15 MGD).