Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 06/09/2020 - PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN DATE : June 9 , 2020 STAFF : Honore Depew, Interim Policy and Project Manager WORK SESSION ITEM John Stokes , Natural Resources Director City Council Kelly DiMartino , Deputy City Manager SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Parks and Recreation Master Plan . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item meets the following COVID- 19 emergency priority for being on the Council agenda : • Priority 4 - substantially complete and has included significant community outreach . Council direction at this time will help ensure that work does not have to be redone and can continue to move forward . The purpose of this item is to provide an update and seek feedback on the Parks and Recreation Master Plan , including proposed goals and vision statement as well as an overview of community outreach . An overview of the Master Plan process and findings will be presented by Andrew Dobshinsky, Associate Planner with The Olin Studio . GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1 . What feedback do Councilmembers have on the proposed goals? 2 . Do Councilmembers have questions or reactions to the proposed holistic vision framework for public space? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The Parks and Recreation Policy Plan was last updated in 2008 , (now called a Master Plan ) . Community expectations have evolved , and survey data collected during this planning process provides insights into these evolving community perspectives . The Master Plan update effort began in late 2019 and is nearing the halfway point. In October 2019 , a work session with Council was conducted that outlined ten desired plan deliverables : 1 . Parks and Recreation Systems Vision , Goals and Metrics 2 . Identification of Existing and Needed Parks and Recreation Facilities 3 . Parks and Recreation Build Out Strategy 4 . Parks and Recreation Design Standards and Guidelines 5 . Strategy for Incorporating Special Interest Group Requests 6 . Community Health Alignment 7 . Park Design Process 8 . Park Refresh Strategy 9 . Life Cycle Strategies 10 . Paved Trails Since the work session in October, staff has been working with a consultant team , stakeholders , and the community to identify parks and recreation needs , assess how Fort Collins compares to other peer and benchmark communities , and identify key issues and priorities the plan should address . As noted above , identifying a strategy for park refresh is a desired outcome of the plan , as well as a Council priority for 2020 . The following is a summary of the community engagement activity, proposed vision statement and goals , and key findings and opportunities identified to date . June 9 , 2020 Page 2 Community Engagement Together with the consulting team , staff utilized several different engagement tools to help the community guide development of the Master Plan . Key engagement strategies have included : • Survey - A statistically valid survey was deployed at the end of 2019 . From the 511 responses received , the results achieved a demographically representative sample of the community with a confidence level of 95 % and precision of +/- 4 . 33% . Results from the survey demonstrate how highly residents value the system of parks and recreational facilities in Fort Collins . It is possible to pinpoint community preferences based on the responses . A summary of the survey results is attached to this AIS (Attachment 1 ) . A full report is available . • Open Houses - Two open houses were held in February 2020 , engaging over 300 visitors . One open house was held at the Lincoln Center, and one at Preston Middle School . City staff and the consultant team were able to interact with interested members of the community and quantifiable data was collected using informational boards . All materials were translated into Spanish and interpretation services were available at both events . • Pop-up Events - Three pop-up events were held at various locations throughout the community, including Foothills Mall , downtown Fort Collins , and the Old Town Library . This unique engagement strategy enabled the team to interact with residents directly in an unannounced and spontaneous format, enabling input from residents who may not normally participate in a traditional community engagement format. • Stakeholder Meetings - In November 2019 and February 2020 a series of special meetings were held to hear directly from key partners (e . g . , PSD , CSU ) and representatives of various user groups (e . g . , bicyclists , disc golf enthusiasts , etc. ) . These key stakeholders provided valuable feedback on potential improvements and partnerships . • OurCity Web Page - An engagement webpage at < https ://ourcity .fcgov. com/parksandrec> provides a valuable resource for project updates and ongoing collection of ideas and feedback as the planning effort progresses . • Boards and Commissions - Representatives from about a dozen boards are part of an ad hoc group known as the Advance Review Committee (ARC) . These board members act as liaisons to their respective boards for feedback and regular updates . Staff will also be engaging directly with key boards , such as the Parks & Recreation Board , as the planning effort continues . Proposed Vision Statement and Goals At the heart of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan will be a vision statement supported by a framework of goals and actions based on : • Careful appraisal of existing parks and amenities , recreational facilities and programs ; • Extensive engagement with stakeholders and community members , including a statistically valid survey; • Comparison to both peer and aspirational communities ; and • An examination of how the complete system of parks and recreational facilities is viewed by residents and visitors in a holistic context of accessible public space . A vision statement for Parks and Recreation has been developed for consideration : Parks, trails, and recreation facilities in Fort Collins are an invitation for all residents to further wellness, curiosity, innovation, and community - as an integral part of the city's iconic, interconnected public space. The basis for Plan recommendations is the adoption of broad Goals for an ideal future state , Actions that move the system towards that future , and specific Methods or steps that implement the goals and actions . The following proposed goals for the Master Plan were developed based on expert analysis , Council direction , staff input, and community engagement: 1 . Provide equitable access to parks . 2 . Provide equitable access to recreational experiences . 3 . Expand the active transportation network to support access to parks and recreation . 4 . Protect and enhance natural and historic resources in parks and increase related activities . June 9 , 2020 Page 3 5 . Ensure the financial sustainability of parks and recreation . 6 . Strengthen partnerships to leverage resources for mutual benefit. 7 . Ensure parks , paved trails , and recreation facilities are operated and maintained efficiently and to defined standards . 8 . Promote the synergy between parks , recreation , and economic development. 9 . Improve marketing and communication to enhance operations and user satisfaction . 10 . Elevate the design and connection to nature in parks and recreation facilities . 11 . Continue to enhance safety and security in all parks and facilities . If supported by Councilmembers , the team will refine the specific Actions and Methods for each goal , over the coming months . This will include vetting implementation strategies with stakeholders , staff, and the community. Key Findings and Opportunities Through comprehensive analysis conducted as part of the parks and recreation needs assessment and benchmarking efforts , in addition to recommendations from consultant team and staff leaders , several key findings and opportunities have been identified . These include : 1 . Imageability/Physical Vision of the System . As outlined in the attached presentation (Attachment 2) , the City parks and recreation system has evolved tremendously since its inception in the pre -plan era , dating back to 1873 when Fort Collins was established ; through 1963 , when the first Parks & Recreation Plan was developed ; through the 1980 's , the parks and recreation system developed steadily . Then , in the early 1990's , the Natural Areas program was established , resulting in a dramatic increase in land acquisitions . This dramatic change was transformational , enabling unparalleled access to public space , and providing a key quality of life improvement dearly loved by Fort Collins residents today . Fort Collins has a very long history of actively acquiring and designating public space for the use of residents and visitors . A key concept that has emerged in this update to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan is how the system is viewed overall - the concept of imageability. From the perspective of most residents and visitors it is access to the complete inventory of parks , recreational facilities , trails , natural areas , and other open space (such as stormwater management property and schools ) that matters . How these elements are classified , funded , and managed is important administratively, but for the public to visit and enjoy them it only matters how accessible and connected they are . As the next evolution of the parks and recreation system is considered over the coming 10 -20 years , it will be strategically beneficial to consider system improvements holistically, inclusive of the entire system of municipally owned public space - including parks , trails , recreation facilities , natural areas , and even stormwater management land . Showing a complete image of the City's open space reinforces connections between these resources and illustrates how each department' s efforts also support an interconnected network that is greater than the sum of its parts . This holistic view will not only provide for improved planning for the future , but also support better imageability of the system both within and outside the community. Staff team intends to develop the Parks and Recreation Master Plan within this larger public space context, as demonstrated by the proposed vision statement. 2 . System and Funding Analysis . Staff and the consulting team are conducting a thorough and detailed analysis of the entire inventory of parks and recreational facilities . The assessment includes an appraisal of assets and amenities throughout the system using benchmark communities , national trends , and survey data as guideposts . From this work current levels of service can be compared , and future need predicted . A population -based level of service for a specific amenity shows how many of that feature there are , per capita , in Fort Collins . For example , there are currently 2 . 5 playgrounds per 10 , 000 people in Fort Collins . To satisfy population growth , community desire , and trends the level of service analysis may recommend increasing to 3 playgrounds per 10 , 000 . This same methodology is being applied across the system of Parks and Recreational amenities . It includes careful scrutiny of accessibility to different features of the system and sets standards for access (e . g . , no more than a 10- minute walk to a park , or 5-minute drive to a recreation center) . And the analysis includes an evaluation of the funding structures in place to support development, maintenance , replacement , and programming . Staff will bring more detailed findings related to options for funding strategies to the Council Finance Committee in July . June 9 , 2020 Page 4 Some preliminary findings from the system analysis : Parks : • Large and diverse Parks system ( 1 , 190 acres ) • Expansive inventory of assets creates systematic pressures o Operational (short-term ) o Capital ( long-term / lifecycle replacement) • Lifecycle replacement of Parks amenities is under funded • Development of an asset management system by Parks and Park Planning and Development is crucial to the future success of Parks maintenance Recreation : • 60 % of community participating in Recreation programs suggests strong value • Recreation typically recovers more than half of expenditures , even including overhead costs such as maintenance from Operation Services • Annual budget shortfall difficult to make up short term given COVID - 19 constraints and the already high rate of recovery • Increased cost recovery possible on longer (5- 10 year) time horizon Next Steps Staff will continue to work with the consultant team in developing the Master Plan draft over the next several months . Financial considerations will be discussed at the July 20 , 2020 Council Finance Committee meeting . Another Council work session is scheduled for August 25 , 2020 , to coincide with additional community outreach . The final Master Plan is anticipated to be considered for adoption in late 2020 or early 2021 . ATTACHMENTS 1 . Parks and Recreation Survey Results Summary ( PDF ) 2 . Powerpoint Presentation ( PDF ) ATTACHMENT 1 SURVAL REM AM Overall , how would you rate the physical condition of the you or other members of your household have visited during the past 12 months? PARKS , NATURAL AREAS , OR OPEN SPACES RECREATION FACILITIES HAVE NOT VISITED POOR 4 % HAVE NOT VISITED 1 % FAIRS 12 % 2 % EXCELLENT EXCELLENT POOR 42 % 1 % 28 % FAIR 7 % O 95 % OEX CELLENT OR GOOD EXCELLENT OR GOOD AMONG THOSE WHO AMONG THOSE WHO HAVE PARTICIPATED HAVE PARTICIPATED GOOD 49 % GOOD 51 % emonmL SURVAL REM M do How would you rate the overall quality of recreation programs offered by the City of Fort Collins that you and members of your household have participated in during the past 12 months? EXCELLENT HAVE NOT 19 % PARTICIPATED 41 % Fx88 % nn AMONG THOSE WHO HAVE PARTICIPATED GOOD POOR 33 % 1 % FAIR 5 % CmmmmL SURVI& REM Im do Do you feel that there are sufficient public parks , natural areas , and open spaces within walking distance of your residence? 79 % YES emonmL SURVI& REM M do From the following list , please check ALL the communities in the area that you and members of your household have visited or used for parks and recreation facilities in the past 12 months . LARIMER COUNTY ' . LOVELAND • ' . WINDSOR DENVER LA PORTE BOULDER BELLVUE GREELEY WELLINGTON OTHER emonmL SURVAL REM How well do parks , paved trails , How important are quality parks , paved recreation facilities/programs in Fort trails , recreation facilities , and programs Collins reflect the identity of the City? to the identity of Fort Collins? MINIMALLY MINIMALLY 20/ 1 / � NOT IMPORTANT SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT 1 % 19 % 12 % 80 % O O VERY WELL SOMEWHAT OR VERY IMPORTANT VERY VERY WELL IMPORTANT 80 % 85 % R � r I ' Do you agree that parks , paved trails , and recreation facilities in Fort Collins are beautiful ? STRONGLY DISAGREE DISAGREE 2 % 1 % r 98 % AGREE OR STRONGLY AGREE STRONGLY AGREE 55 % emonmL SURVI& REM M am Please indicate if YOU or any member of your household has a need for each type of outdoor facility listed below. Needs Not Needs Met Partly Met COMMUNITY GARDENS 15 . 0 % DOG PARKS 13 . 0 % NAT. AREAS/WILDLIFE HABITAT 13 . 0 % WATER PLAY FEATURES E W 12 . 9 % MOUNTAIN BIKE COURSES 12 . 1 % HIKING TRAILS 10 . 8 % PARK SHELTERS/ PICNIC AREAS 10 . 5 % UNPROGRAMMED SPACES 9 . 4 % DOWNTOWN PARKS & PLAZAS 8 . 9 % COURTS ( P-/ H - BALL, BOCCE ) 8 . 5 % PAVED, MULTI - USE TRAILS 8 . 5 % RENTABLE EVENT SPACE 7 . 4 % BIKE PARKS 6 . 8 % TENNIS COURTS 6 . 3 % RECTANGULAR SPORTS FIELDS 5 . 6 % VOLLEYBALL COURTS 4 . 9 % PLAYGROUNDS 4 . 6 % OTHER 4 . 3 % SKATE PARKS 4 . 1 % BASKETBALL COURTS 4 . 1 % DIAMOND ATHLETIC FIELDS 4 . 0 % alsor SURVI ' REI m do Which FOUR of the OUTDOOR FACILITIES are MOST IMPORTANT to your household ? 1st Choice 2nd 3rr PAVED, MULTI - USE TRAILS 64 . 8 % HIKING TRAILS 57 . 5 % NAT. AREAS/WILDLIFE HABITAT 52 . 6 % UNPROGRAMMED SPACES ' 38 . 2 % PLAYGROUNDS 22 . 5 % DOG PARKS 20 . 9 % DOWNTOWN PARKS & PLAZAS 19 . 2 % COMMUNITY GARDENS 13 . 1 % WATER PLAY FEATURES 12 . 9 % RECTANGULAR SPORTS FIELDS 9 . 8 % MOUNTAIN BIKE COURSES 9 . 0 % PARK SHELTERS/ PICNIC AREAS 8 . 6 % TENNIS COURTS 5 . 9 % COURTS ( P-/ H - BALL, BOCCE ) 4 . 9 % DIAMOND ATHLETIC FIELDS 4 . 1 % RENTABLE EVENT SPACE 3 . 7 % BIKE PARKS 2 . 9 % OTHER 2 . 9 % BASKETBALL COURTS 1 2 . 5 % SKATE PARKS 2 . 0 % VOLLEYBALL COURTS 1 . 8 % SURVI& RE M AN Priority Investment Rating : Outdoor Facilities Low Priority Medium Priority ( 70 + ) High Priority ( 125 + ) NAT. AREAS/WILDLIFE HABITAT 168 HIKING TRAILS 161 PAVED, MULTI - USE TRAILS 157 UNPROGRAMMED SPACES 122 COMMUNITY GARDENS 120 DOG PARKS 120 WATER PLAY FEATURES 106 MOUNTAIN BIKE COURSES 95 DOWNTOWN PARKS & PLAZAS 89 PARK SHELTERS/ PICNIC AREAS 84 PLAYGROUNDS 65 COURTS ( P-/ H - BALL, BOCCE ) 64 RENTABLE EVENT SPACE 55 RECTANGULAR SPORTS FIELDS 53 TENNIS COURTS 51 BIKE PARKS 50 VOLLEYBALL COURTS 36 OTHER 33 DIAMOND ATHLETIC FIELDS 33 BASKETBALL COURTS 31 SKATE PARKS 30 SURVI& RE M AN Priority Investment Rating : Outdoor Facilities Low Priority Medium Priority ( 70 + ) High Priority ( 125 + ) 3 NAT. AREAS/WILDLIFE HABITAT 168 2 HIKING TRAILS 161 1 PAVED, MULTI - USE TRAILS 157 4 UNPROGRAMMED SPACES 1122 COMMUNITY GARDENS 120 DOG PARKS 120 WATER PLAY FEATURES 106 MOUNTAIN BIKE COURSES 95 DOWNTOWN PARKS & PLAZAS 89 PARK SHELTERS/ PICNIC AREAS 84 PLAYGROUNDS 65 COURTS ( P-/ H - BALL, BOCCE ) 64 RENTABLE EVENT SPACE 55 RECTANGULAR SPORTS FIELDS 53 TENNIS COURTS 51 BIKE PARKS 50 VOLLEYBALL COURTS 36 OTHER 33 DIAMOND ATHLETIC FIELDS 33 BASKETBALL COURTS 31 SKATE PARKS 30 emonmL SURVI& REM M am Please indicate if YOU or any member of your household has a need for each type of indoor facility listed below. Needs Needs Not Met Partly Me - INDOOR WATER PARK 22 . 6 % SWIMMING POOL 21 . 9 % EXERCISE & FITNESS EQUIP. 21 . 6 % WALKING/JOGGING TRACK 20 . 0 % MULTI - PURPOSE GYMS 14 . 1 % LAP POOL 13 . 3 % SPACES FOR MEETINGS/PARTIES 13 . 1 % HEALTH CLINIC 12 . 7 % SPACES FOR FITNESS/ DANCE 12 . 0 % ARTS, CRAFTS , GAMES ROOMS 12 . 0 % INDOOR COURTS 11 . 4 % MAKER SPACES 9 . 4 % INDOOR SPORTS FIELDS 7 . 6 % DESIGN LABS 6 . 6 % CLASSROOM SPACES 6 . 2 % DINING . 5 . 0 % COMPUTER ROOMS 3 . 9 % OTHER , 1 . 4 % R I � r ' EM sm AN Which FOUR of the INDOOR FACILITIES are MOST IMPORTANT to your household ? 1st Choice 3rd 4th SWIMMING POOL 38 . 6 % EXERCISE & FITNESS EQUIP. �! 38 . 2 % WALKING/JOGGING TRACK 27 . 6 % LAP POOL 18 . 2 % INDOOR WATER PARK 20 . 1 % MULTI = PURPOSE GYMS 16 . 8 % INDOOR COURTS 15 . 5 % SPACES FOR FITNESS/ DANCE 14 . 7 % SPACES FOR MEETINGS/PARTIES 12 . 3 % ARTS, CRAFTS , GAMES ROOMS 9 . 0 % HEALTH CLINIC 8 . 8 % INDOOR SPORTS FIELDS 7 . 8 % DINING 6 . 8 % CLASSROOM SPACES 6 . 7 % MAKER SPACES 5 . 1 % OTHER 2 . 3 % DESIGN LABS 2 . 2 % COMPUTER ROOMS 2 . 0 % alsor SURVI ' REM M AN Priority Investment Rating : Indoor Facilities Low Priority Medium Priority ( 70 + ) High Priority ( 125 + ) SWIMMING POOL 197 EXERCISE & FITNESS EQUIP. 195 WALKING/JOGGING TRACK 160 INDOOR WATER PARK 147 LAP POOL 113 MULTI - PURPOSE GYMS 106 SPACES FOR FITNESS/ DANCE 91 INDOOR COURTS 91 SPACES FOR MEETINGS/PARTIES 90 HEALTH CLINIC 79 ARTS, CRAFTS, GAMES ROOMS 76 MAKER SPACES 55 INDOOR SPORTS FIELDS 54 CLASSROOM SPACES 45 DINING 40 DESIGN LABS 35 COMPUTER ROOMS 22 OTHER 12 alsor SURVI ' REM M AN Priority Investment Rating : Indoor Facilities Low Priority Medium Priority ( 70 + ) High Priority ( 125 + ) * SWIMMING POOL 197 2 EXERCISE & FITNESS EQUIP. 195 13 WALKING/JOGGING TRACK 160 INDOOR WATER PARK 147 A 40'P' LAP POOL 113 MULTI - PURPOSE GYMS 106 SPACES FOR FITNESS/ DANCE 91 INDOOR COURTS 91 SPACES FOR MEETINGS/PARTIES 90 HEALTH CLINIC 79 ARTS, CRAFTS, GAMES ROOMS 76 MAKER SPACES 55 INDOOR SPORTS FIELDS 54 CLASSROOM SPACES 45 DINING 40 DESIGN LABS 35 COMPUTER ROOMS 22 OTHER 12 emonmL SURVI& REM M do Program or Activity Needs . Please indicate if YOU or any member of your household has a need for each type of program or activity listed below. Needs Not Needs Met Partly Met FITNESS/WELLNESS 15 . 0 % FARM & GARDENING 13 . 0 % SENIORS ( 50 + ) 13 . 0 % NATURE (OUTDOOR REC . & ED . ) 12 . 9 % AQUATICS ( LESSN . , FIT. , TEAMS ) 12 . 1 % STEM PROGRAMS 10 . 8 % ARTS & CRAFTS CLASSES 10 . 5 % ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP 9 . 4 % VOLUNTEERING 8 . 9 % SPECIAL EVENTS/ FESTIVALS 8 . 5 % SPORT DROP- IN PLAY 8 . 5 % HISTORY 7 . 4 % SPORTS LEAGUES 6 . 8 % TEENS 6 . 3 % YOUTH & FAMILY 5 . 6 % EARLY CHILDHOOD 4 . 9 % INCLUSION SUPPORT FOR DIS . 1 4 . 6 % SPECIALIZED PROG . FOR DIS . 4 . 3 % ICE SKATING ( LESSN . , CLIN . , TM . ) 4 . 1 % COMPUTER ACCESS 4 . 1 % OTHER 4 . 0 % SURVJ& RESULTS m am Which FOUR of the PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES are MOST IMPORTANT to your household ? 1st Choice '' � � 3rd 4th NATURE (OUTDOOR REC . & ED . ) 43 . 8 % SENIORS ( 50 + ) 33 . 3 % FITNESS/WELLNESS 30 . 9 % SPECIAL EVENTS/ FESTIVALS 29 . 9 % AQUATICS ( LESSN . , FIT. , TEAMS ) w 18 . 0 % SPORTS LEAGUES 17 . 0 % YOUTH & FAMILY 16 . 0 % ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP 13 . 5 % ARTS & CRAFTS CLASSES 12 . 1 % VOLUNTEERING 11 . 2 % FARM & GARDENING 9 . 8 % EARLY CHILDHOOD 8 . 6 % STEM PROGRAMS 8 . 2 % TEENS 7 . 8 % HISTORY ] 6 . 3 % SPORT DROP- IN PLAY 5 . 5 % INCLUSION SUPPORT FOR DIS . 3 . 9 % SPECIALIZED PROG . FOR DIS . 3 . 9 % ICE SKATING ( LESSN . , CLIN . , TM . ) 3 . 9 % COMPUTER ACCESS 1 . 2 % OTHER 1 1 . 2 % SURVI& RE M AN Priority Investment Rating : Programs Low Priority Medium Priority ( 70 + ) High Priority ( 125 + ) NATURE (OUTDOOR REC . & ED . ) 172 FITNESS/WELLNESS 171 SENIORS ( 50 + ) 149 SPECIAL EVENTS/ FESTIVALS 120 AQUATICS ( LESSN . , FIT. , TEAMS ) 108 FARM & GARDENING 96 ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP 88 ARTS & CRAFTS CLASSES 86 SPORTS LEAGUES 85 VOLUNTEERING 82 YOUTH & FAMILY 80 STEM PROGRAMS 78 SPORT DROP- IN PLAY 62 TEENS 62 HISTORY 61 EARLY CHILDHOOD 54 INCLUSION SUPPORT FOR DIS . 41 SPECIALIZED PROG . FOR DIS . 39 ICE SKATING ( LESSN . , CLIN . , TM . ) 31 COMPUTER ACCESS 21 OTHER 7 SURVI& RE M AN Priority Investment Rating : Programs Low Priority Medium Priority ( 70 + ) High Priority ( 125 + ) 1 NATURE (OUTDOOR REC . & ED . ) 172 3 FITNESS/WELLNESS IN 171 4 SENIORS ( 50 + ) 149 2 SPECIAL EVENTS/ FESTIVALS 120 AQUATICS ( LESSN . , FIT. , TEAMS ) 108 FARM & GARDENING 96 ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP 88 ARTS & CRAFTS CLASSES 86 SPORTS LEAGUES 85 VOLUNTEERING 82 YOUTH & FAMILY 80 STEM PROGRAMS 78 SPORT DROP- IN PLAY 62 TEENS 62 HISTORY 61 EARLY CHILDHOOD 54 INCLUSION SUPPORT FOR DIS . 41 SPECIALIZED PROG . FOR DIS . 39 ICE SKATING ( LESSN . , CLIN . , TM . ) 31 COMPUTER ACCESS 21 OTHER 7 emonmL SURVI& REM How supportive are you of some increase in taxes to fund the types of parks , trails , and recreation facilities that are most important to you and your household ? NOT SUPPORTIVE 15 % VERY SUPPORTIVE 35 % r NOT SURE 67 % 17 % VERY OR SOMEWHAT SUPPORTIVE SOMEWHAT SUPPORTIVE 32 % emooL SURVAL REM M am Please CIRCLE ALL the ways you would be willing to travel to . For each , please write in the MAXIMUM minutes you would be willing to travel to get there . PLAYGROUND COMMUNITY CENTER SPORT FIELD COMMUNITY GARDEN hi = d .11 E 0 1 N I 1 0 < 5 < 10 < 15 < 20 < 30 31 + < 5 < 10 < 15 < 20 < 30 31 + < 5 < 10 < 15 < 20 < 30 31 + < 5 < 10 < 15 < 20 < 30 31 + MINUTES MINUTES MINUTES MINUTES emonmL SURVI& REM M do Please check ALL the reasons that prevent you or members of your household from using parks and recreation facilities or programs in Fort Collins more often . DON 'T KNOW WHERE TO GO/WHAT ' S OFFERED 32 . 9 % PEOPLE EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS THERE 23 . 1 % TOO FAR FROM OUR RESIDENCE 21 . 3 % PROGRAM TIMES ARE NOT CONVENIENT 21 . 1 % DESIRED FACILITY/ PROGRAM IS NOT OFFERED 18 . 6 % DON ' T HAVE TIME OR INTEREST 17 . 2 % FEES ARE TOO HIGH 15 . 1 % LACK OF PUBLIC RESTROOMS 13 . 3 % PARKS ARE TOO CROWDED 12 . 1 % AQUATICS ( LESSN . , FIT. , TEAMS ) 11 . 5 % FACILITY OPERATING HOURS NOT CONVENIENT 10 . 0 % REGISTRATION FOR PROGRAMS IS DIFFICULT 8 . 4 % NO VISIBLE PATROLLING PRESENCE 7 . 6 % FACILITIES LACK RIGHT EQUIPMENT 7 . 4 % OTHER 7 . 4 % FACILITIES ARE NOT WELL MAINTAINED 6 . 8 % POOR/UNCOMFORTABLE PARK ATMOSPHERE 4 . 7 % USE FACILITIES IN OTHER CITIES 4 . 3 % POOR CUSTOMER SERVICE BY STAFF 3 . 5 % NOT ACCESSIBLE BY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 3 . 5 % INADEQUATE LIGHTING 3 . 5 % NOT ACCESSIBLE TO PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES 2 . 9 % ACTIVITIES GOING ON MAKE ME FEEL UNSAFE 2 . 0 % 1 HEAR NEGATIVE THINGS ABOUT PARKS 1 . 6 % NOT ENOUGH PEOPLE TO FEEL COMFORTABLE 1 . 4 % FEAR OF GETTING INJURED 1 . 2 % SURVEY R r Im Please check ALL the ways you travel to the parks and recreation facilities that you use . 92 % 80 % 69 % 9 % 4 % 2 % 1 . 4 % 0 . 8 /o o DRIVE WALK BIKE MAX BUS SHARE OTHER SHARE SURVAL REI Please rate how supportive you would be of each of the following actions the City of Fort Collins could take to improve parks , trails , and recreation facilities . NEW PARK DESIGN 1. I1 _ � YG _ _ PARK REFRESH PURCHASING & DEVELOPING NEW REPLACING AMENITIES IN KIND REPLACING W/ DIFFERENT AMENITIES NOT NOT NOT SUPPORTIVE VERY SUPPORTIVE VERY SUPPORTIVE VERY NOT 14 % SUPPORTIVE NOT 16 % SUPPORTIVE NOT 27 % SUPPORTIVE SURE 56 % SURE 45 % SURE 36 % 14 % 16 % 27 % to PF 79 % 77 % 65 % SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT OR VERY OR VERY OR VERY SUPPORTIVE SUPPORTIVE SUPPORTIVE SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT SUPPORTIVE SUPPORTIVE SOMEWHAT 23 % 33 % SUPPORTIVE 29 % emonmL SURVI& REM do The following are some of the benefits that you and your household may receive from PARKS , TRAILS , RECREATION FACILITIES , AND PROGRAMS provided by the City of Fort Collins . For each potential benefit , please indicate your level of agreement . Strongly Strongly Agree + Disagree Disagree Agree S . Agree IMPROVES PHYSICAL HEALTH & FITNESS I 99 . 0 % MAKES CITY MORE DESIRABLE TO LIVE 98 . 8 % PROVIDES OPPS . FOR LEISURE INTERESTS I 98 . 1 % IMPROVES OVERALL QUALITY OF LIFE I 98 . 1 % IMPROVES MENTAL HEALTH / REDUCES STRESS I 97 . 4 % PRESERVES OPEN SPACE & ENVIRONMENT I 97 . 1 % INC . PROP. VALUES IN SURROUNDING AREAS I 97 . 0 % PROMOTES TOURISM IN CITY I ' 91 . 2 % HELPS ATTRACT NEW RESIDENTS & BUSINESSES ' 90 . 4 % PROTECTS HISTORICAL ASSETS OF CITY I 89 . 7 % INCREASES OPPS . FOR CULTURES TO INTERACT ' 84 . 1 % HELPS REDUCE NEIGHBORHOOD CRIME . 82 . 5 % ATTACHMENT City of 06 - 09 - 20 Fort Collins •7> r, JILWA IV FAA v , y r ' Y. �i J • ).. 5 . F.-. '`� }. ,. . ✓:. a ' .. :t t' r `�'�' !. �i �. ♦ 441. S ,rr ,r5 a , 4+ 1 _ 'r .9a .lii" Jp a -r u:- _a +:t.. y 1 . ,' •, t 'C r tl . 1 r ';k PA . . .. ,1.` i. / Y. v hh �p,r ♦/ lt .• r . , , , . ! .. ^ , r . V ' b V . •1•,t r t/ a' F/�(s•. . � r :. t l; 'r -r`+.i •,5'ia . t�' � . aY � . _ .#. yr. dr' . yy �. . Y . ` i ' r" t •� ., 1 /" . / y .. !rtr ST ." �rL/S�v .�F' Ylyr - er. i>:.,L�! Tr � lr . . . . , r ,[ a . . y. 1 . ' , IY1 � ' � t ' � r� 1 1b.G - 'llae h v.� .�lY9 ,,j `� - �. _ � . •. . r .. )„ t r+r ( r �� } f � + t • 4. - _ k.. , , r;q` r . X'- >.a! t ^ss a . X 1�•i�• .4#fir Yrdr r �, .I 'r `+ I.y jr hr . rjr . � t .. p: �`d^, F ', S .t. . .. JY! r �> -I .� .7 . Vk I + . ,I . .` � , q� :: ' . at us ♦, -y..^ . y,/� - �� '}>' .a ' '♦ .. r r /l t.l '-/, . 1' _ kr,;AIL , Fz IM �. >>- m >T r �a ,. s•�? ti ::.=�r� Is +vl.-•�fi' `r -a y h f t U' . ,�i �'N4�� ��,���,d�+.. V/"%, ` ram �' 4� y , � - -tj � 1 � - ,i. YI'I' .JD^ yr > y !.•1,,��2 ` s Yam. _ �Y� \+~r/jr � '_ A' \ � � ✓ ^�� .. .' tV Y'-� � �✓t` - e .i `'�"M`r r _ _ >' ;�S •- r u .. / . }r1 _ P ''� 1 ! > ' t` ! f -3-. -^/. L.. ' Z r,, , 'J�R'��?t� 1t y • a1 :� - � j i• /� .. r F _ ^t�h _ Pf N •� 1� .: \c , 4 . , S .✓ r ��YI. , "A . • \ At. may. '^c '! r• w ..'• c. r /^ M � _A .r1-4 J� • w , \ . 8 „ ,fir ^ ` .'/ - S' r ,;' ANN ip ' �" t _ .Ll t r , � is - E \ _ ^ . \o , 911 - r , .t R' 1 ' M"► _a� r .( �Mle-r:.;�r 9�, Sw yrt 1 ' � .s .. .2. - A Air _ • ` , s. - .,1 ¢ • _.a ,"� f. i ' �,{¢� P e ' - � ' 7 Za )� . , '\ a.. I %� .� pq •� ,�••tof l r . �( _ _ r '3: Y.'r 1 <`� . + r ,S l t �. ' ire. L � . :f r tr..f� �. - � r ^ • /1 \.,' , ISI IA `' a + / _ r ti i �`•, .�.g,. f.. ' _y=,' ,f+ L �. lam, . / - �• a.^ � IvIA. r -tea'or. It +'y of ,a ._.♦ �a4 4, t .p� ? 9 /lJ 1rb ���x� JtllY��,' �.. i t � 1 F } r ` Parks & Recreation Master Plan r It ` Community Services OLIN of MM �t Collins pop W� M PM QUESTIONS FOR COUNCIL What feedback do Councilmembers have on the proposed goals ? Do Councilmembers have questions or reactions to the proposed holistic vision framework for public space? FartCollins o Co ' PLANNING Community Engagement Analysis Statistically Funding Open HouseSeries 2 Valid Survey Strategies 1 Open House Benchmarking Series 1 Stakeholder 7 Interviews 1 Level of Our City City Council Website City Council Work Session Best Service Work Session Practices Project Needs Priority Final Master Initiation Assessment Setting Plan Fall Winter Spring - Summer Summer - Fall 2019 2020 2020 J 2020 City of Fort Collins PROCESS STATISTICALLY VALID SURVEY LEVEL OF OPEN HOUSES & POP - UPS SERVICE CORE TEAM , STAFF, BOARD MEMBERS STANDARDS STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS . � r POLICY MASTER FRAMEWORK PLAN BENCHMARKING LIFE CYCLE , AMENITIES / FACILITIES INVENTORY ' REFRESH , _ BUILD OUT TRENDS AND BENEFITS ♦ _ PARTNERSHIPS & FUNDING INVENTORY RECREATION ASSESSMENT FACILITY / DESIGN ASSESSMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES 4 Fort Collins COMPONENTSPROPOSED PLAN Introduction Policy Recommendations / • Vision Strategic Directions Context • Goals , Actions with Rationales • Benchmarking ( integrated throughout ) • Value of Parks and Recreation • Standards ( Level of Service , Access , Design ) • Existing Plans • Ongoing Planning Efforts Implementation Plan • Demographic / Recreation Trends • Implementation Responsibilities • Partners Existing Conditions and Interpretation • Time Frames • Public Space Network • Funding • Recreation Facilities • Trails Physical Vision Plan • Ownership ( Other Parts of the System ) Appendices • Programs Summary of Engagement and Interpretation City of For/lt Collins !` Our Understanding Fort Collins HISTORY = NETWORK 1873 - 1962 : Pre Plan Era - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Public Space Acreage 1 50000 45000 r 40000 35000 30000 h - 25000 1952: City Park Pool 20000 15000 10000 5000 mm5,652 - 1873 1963 1974 1988 1996 2008 2019 • Rec Facilities — Parks 1873 - City of Fort Collins is established 1937 - Recreation Commission forms L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �! ; Nf �� Sou. a Ew. USGS. MM Fort Collins HISTORY = NETWORK 1963 Parks & Recreation Plan - 1973 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - " Public Space Acreage 1 50000 45000 r 40000 T 35000 30000 - 25000 20000 15000 10000 : 8,411 l2 i 5000 1873 1963 1974 1988 1996 2008 2019 • Rec Facilities — Parks 1873 - City of Fort Collins is established 1937 - Recreation Commission forms 1963 - First Parks & Rec Plan L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �! ' Nf � Soul a: Ew. USGS. MM Fort Collins HISTORY = NETWORK 1974 Open Space Plan - 1987 Public Space Acreage 1 50000 45000 - - - - - - - - - - - - ' 40000Mill 35000 30000 T 1978: North Aztlan CC - • 25000 1974: Mulberry Pool • 20000 - • 15000 10000 i93600 f � 5000 L -rr 987: EPIC 04 1873 1963 1974 1988 1996 2008 2019 r • Rec Facilities — Parks l 1873 - City of Fort Collins is established J 1937 - Recreation Commission forms 1963 - First Parks & Rec Plan 1974 - Open Space Plan is written, trail system is planned - - - _ _ _ L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (V - • � �"�!� �� � $001LR6_ E611. USG$. MM Fort Collins HISTORY = NETWORK 1988 Parks & Recreation Plan - 1995 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Public Space Acreage 1 50000 45000 r 40000 P 35000 30000 25000 • 20000 • • 15000 ~� 11,683 10000 5000 '�- 476 _ `' • 1995: Senior Center 1873 1963 1974 1988 1996 2008 2019 • • Rec Facilities — Parks — Natural Areas 1873 - City of Fort Collins is established 1937 - Recreation Commission forms � : 1 1963 - First Parks & Rec Plan 1974 - Open Space Plan is written, trail system is planned -- 1988 - Parks & Rec Plan 1992 - Natural Areas Program is established L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 Fort Collins HISTORY = NETWORK 1996 Parks & Recreation Plan - 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Public Space Acreage 50000 45000 Woo s- 40000 i40 551 7 35000 30000 � 25000 . - • � ` - • - - 20000 , 15000 �r 10000 5000 - 765 �' • 1873 1963 1974 1988 1996 2008 2019 n� • Rec Facilities — Parks — Natural Areas 1873 - City of Fort Collins is established 1pl 1937 - Recreation Commission forms � �{" � � - 1 J 1963 - First Parks & Rec Plan 1974 - Open Space Plan is written, trail system is planned - 1988 - Parks & Rec Plan 1992 - Natural Areas Program is established 1996 - Parks & Rec Plan r ' ' Sources'. Ertl. GSGS, NGM F M wm � 0� 00 f W Fort Collins HISTORY = NETWORK 2008 Parks & Recreation Plan - 2020 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Public Space Acreage � '` - - - - - - - - - - '=• 50000 ' 45000 s- 40000 7 35000 / 30000 25000 20000 4 15000 a �� 10000 s 5000 861 tiC °f" 1873 1963 1974 1988 1996 2008 2019 ` • Rec Facilities — Parks — Natural Areas ��^t 2016: Footh Is tivlt C t �• � rr 1873 - City of Fort Collins is established �► 1937 - Recreation Commission forms I �.r V ML 1963 - First Parks & Rec Plan y ; 1974 - Open Space Plan is written, trail system is planned ML 1988 - Parks & Rec Plan 1992 - Natural Areas Program is established 7 1996 - Parks & Rec Plan 2008 - Parks & Rec Plan ��� , r 2013 - Paved Recreation Trail Master Plan 2014 - Natural Areas Master Plan ` ` Sources: Ertl. USGS, NOM Eiiiiii­ Fort Collins LEVEL OF SERVICE City Plan - 10 minute walk to public space WHERE WILL WE FOCUS OUR EFFORTS? GHG Emission Reduction Progress & Targets 2017 emit heat. Scientists ttribute a z;million warming:increase . - . . - - 4J million to an 2ozo 20°/p to mmmo What is COe? X REDUCTION emitted naturally and from 0% aFnucriox - EnergyE - natural gas. gasoline and . . Globalaso.oao _... _..... -_ 2030 warming contributions from of carbon dioxide equivalent 2050 Policies seek to increase the amount of CO. that would have the same global warming potential as other GHGs. Community carbon inventory 11, number of residents who have ' • • " WT IT TAAKE?KE? • access to natural areas , parks and/ come from... T or open space within a 10 - minute 21% - Natural gas IPID ASTE walk of their home , emphasizing Water-related factors USTAINABLE VIDECRE, BUILDING NATURAL I S: F PRACTICES USAGE existing gaps and areas planned Changes recommended in this City Plan update reflect a focus on: for intensification . . Prioritizing pragmatic, positive =Transition from fossil fuel to Coordinating clim a atlaptation and cos[-effective solutions renewable-energy systems and resilience p nning efforts Policies seek to ensure Focus on policies and City Plan pro as a coordinated affordability, reliability infrastructure to transition and cokes' set of policies and sustainability in their electricity sources, natural gas to Stan ongoing climate implementation. use in buildings and petroleum adap ion and resilience planning a Promoting sustainable for transportation to renewably th ghout the community development practices supplied electricity ncreasing access to Policies seek to reduce net energy .Aligning land use antl and water use in new and existing transportation decisions Policies seek to increase the development. The Structure Plan and number of residents who have .Water resources Transportation Plan work in access to natural areas, parks antl/ Policies seek to ensure that water tandem to promote development or open space within a 10-minute is used wisely and our community patterns and transportation walk of their home, emphasizing is prepared for a changing climate. behaviors that reduce VMT. existing gaps and areas planned FORT COLLINS CITY PLAN lo CityF6rt CollinsCo ' SERVICELEVEL OF Areas within a 10 minute walk of Parks and Natural Areas ■ Parks i Natural Areas ' 0 P-L ' r h " ML f � W r .7 F714p f m Fort Collins LEVEL OF SERVICE Areas within a 10 minute walk of Parks and Natural Areas ■ Parks ■ Natural Areassib - Gaps _ � - - - J h � 1 l ` W moo MAI I I r, f no Fort Collins LEVEL OF SERVICE Areas within a 10 minute walk of Mni Parks and Natural Areas ■ Parks ■ Natural Areas , : �N h _. ff Gapse, IPA �7 V r n Fort Collins = IMAGEABILITY How is the city ' s public space network represented ? : ,IA - - p tv All 1 ainl - I V r Fb Visit Fort Collins City of Fort Collins City of Fort Collins Fort Collins Chamber of Commerce Natural Areas Trail Map Fort Collins IMAGEABILITY - What does the city ' s image of public space want to be? - - ------ ----- ------ n IP n _ 7 - • 4FO 4ro Visit Fort Collins City of Fort Collins City of Fort Collins Fort Collins Chamber of Natural Areas Trail Map Commerce Fort Collins Boston ( 1878 - 1896 ) Minneapolis ( 1916 ) _ _ _ • _ MAP OF II 9NNEAPOLIS PARK SYSTEM Y r Mred� w i 1 EMERALD - POND / ��,' RrveaaAv NECKLACE w _ :. . O PLWFED v4vEas a �.�..._ ARNOLD • ! BACK BAY FENS ARBORETUM Igo LL LEGEND ,� Feu. O xwaw PUBLIC . BOSfON DD .n.cwa GARDEN S'OMMON .cunmm4 ws�uEr wiururx sin.�'•"�•� crcuu 1F - •w ^.. I ,\ Fort Collins IMAGEABILITY Philadelphia 46 ... .. . Ph� .+dp�. . � rI NYS-' 1VAN I .1 — l � x ram.. .... ..-.._. �..... v - - � • . j Ll bl o 4 V � i \l II il1Y ` I SD L ' Lbi � \ 111 = > 1 : '• Owl it 2 i it • : • 11 . 111 . . . . \ . • ! �L f . Ili 111,{ • t1 . 1 � � 1 t \ 1 _ • •` t • • . i 1 1 I , l I • ' I_____JLJ�� e r • r 1 • ' Fj i i I n --- • to411m, like • • Fort Collins IMAGEABILITY San Antonio Y�1N to J /6 -. � •� � UY�f� M.W. ,Y W Y4m � � ti � 0 IYlfy�l•11OMN. � M 1 M1 .an. cex � `) *• � '•is? "� . wm � '°'r"'y^ .urea 61 v.�i�.'.:.�/, FI . C - RIVERALx t � tly " " r r_ \ 1 ® �w��.r �•�� A cis � � � Pat w,r t10 - Iz ; Y6[Y. . ®�Wru..u� ® • Yr Q mraar•. . L V , �� i P rwaa fia una. ,.ram feW 001, .:.14kS10f • IW ��`� • YAW O y ka 16p.n 1p mttttte r..0 c.ap.ae at ms r fup4k . cat Meta r� Wtitmway .1 � <i.a�way.Wa � cat M+ r 4 Fort Collins CONCEPTUALpw� Fort Collins - Complete System ? .— J \ 4 J 1 1 y 4 r Fort Collins pop VISION HIERARCHY C ' ► CE VISION LIPVB NATURAL TRAILS PARKS & STORMWATER FOCO POUDRE AREAS MASTER MASTER PLAN RECREATION MASTER PLAN CREATES SCHOOL PLAN VISION VISION MASTER PLAN VISION VISION DISTRICT VISION VISION Fort Collins DRAFT VISION Parks , trails , and recreation facilities in Fort Collins are an invitation to all residents to sustain and build wellness , curiosity, innovation , and community - as part of the city ' s iconic , interconnected network of public space . FartCollins o Coll ' WilORGANIZATION CITY COMMUNITY SERVICES John Stokes * RECREATIONDEVELOPMENTR NATURAL AREAS CULTURAL OPERATION New SERVICES SERVICES Mike Calhoon Bob Adams Kurt Friesen Zoe Shark * Jim McDonald Ken Mannon Director Director Director Director Director Director • Maintenance • Programming Purchasing land , Purchase & • Manages Gardens Indoor facility - Parks - Indoor water rights manage Natural on Spring Creek maintenance - Trails - Outdoor Design of new Areas • Manages Cultural - Medians • Manages parks Nature - based Centers and Public - Street Trees recreation Build new paved education Art • Outdoor Facility facilities trails programming • Manages Scheduling Development Nature in the City Community • Natural Area Gardens • Park Rangers Review Rangers Parks Forestry Golf Cemetery * Interim City of For/lt Collins !` Engagement to Date Fort Collins IIIIIIIIPPPP� ENGAGEMENT Who we have spoken with Organizations ( Stakeholders ) • Bicycle Colorado • Liberty Charter School • Bike Fort Collins • Northern Colorado Disc Golf • CSU • Overland Mountain Bike Association • Cycles for Youth • Poudre School District • Downtown Business Association • Rocky Mountain Adventures • Downtown Development Authority • Tennis Association • Fort Collins Areas Swim Team • Triple Crown Sports • Fort Collins Baseball Club • Twin Silo BMX • Fort Collins Running Club • University Bike Advisory Committee • Fort Collins Ultimate Frisbee • Visit Fort Collins • Fort Collins Womens Hockey • YourGroupRide . com • Larimer County Dept of the Built Environment f on Fort Collins ENGAGEMENT Statistically Valid Survey � Native American: 0.9% Asian: 3.4% Other: 3.5% Black: 1 .6% Target Responses : U 0 Responses Obtained : 511 White: 88.9% City Breakdown Confidence Level : 95 % Asian: 3% � NativeAmerican: 2% Other: 1 % Black: 2% Precision : • 433 % White: 91 % Survey Breakdown City of Fort Collins ENGAGEMENT How important are quality parks , paved trails , recreation facilities , and programs to the identity of Fort Collins? MINIMALLY 2 % NOT IMPORTANT SOMEWHAT 1 % 12 % 97 % SOMEWHAT OR VERY IMPORTANT VERY IMPORTANT 85 % Fort Collins Which FOUR of the OUTDOOR FACILITIES are MOST IMPORTANT to your household ? 1st Choice 3rd 4th PAVED, MULTI - USE TRAILS 64 . 8 % HIKING TRAILS 57 . 5 % NAT. AREAS/WILDLIFE HABITAT ' 52 . 6 % UNPROGRAMMED SPACES 38 . 2 % DOG PARKS DOWNTOWN PARKS & PLAZAS COMMUNITY GARDENS WATER PLAY FEATURES 12 . 9 % RECTANGULAR SPORTS FIELDS 9 . 8 % MOUNTAIN BIKE COURSES 9 . 0 % PARK SHELTERS/PICNIC AREAS 8 . 6 % TENNIS COURTS 5 . 9 % COURTS ( P=/H - BALL, BOCCE) ■ 4 . 9 % DIAMOND ATHLETIC FIELDS 4 . 1 % RENTABLE EVENT SPACE 3 . 7 % BIKE PARKS 2 . 9 % OTHER 2 . 9 % BASKETBALL COURTS 2 . 5 % SKATE PARKS Li 2 . 0 % VOLLEYBALL COURTS [I 1 . 8 % • Fort Collins Which FOUR of the INDOOR FACILITIES are MOST IMPORTANT to your household ? 1st Choice 2nd 3rc ' } � SWIMMING POOL 38 . 6 % EXERCISE & FITNESS EQUIP. 38 . 2 % WALKING/JOGGING TRACK 27 . 6 % LAP POOL 20 . 1 % INDOOR WATER PARK MULTI - PURPOSE GYMS INDOOR COURTS SPACES FOR FITNESS/DANCE SPACES FOR MEETINGS/PARTIES 12 . .5 % ARTS, CRAFTS, GAMES ROOMS 9 . 0 % HEALTH CLINIC 8 . 8 % INDOOR SPORTS FIELDS 7 . 8 % DINING 6 . 8 % CLASSROOM SPACES E 6 . 7 % MAKER SPACES F—ff 5 . 1 % OTHER L[ 2 . 3 % DESIGN LABS 1 2 . 2 % COMPUTER ROOMS ITT 2 . 0 % f pop Fort Collins ir ENGAGEMENT Which FOUR of the PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES are MOST IMPORTANT to your household ? 1st Choice 2nd 3rd _ 4th NATURE (OUTDOOR REC . & ED . ) 1W 43 . 8 % SENIORS ( 50 + ) 33 . 3 % FITNESS/WELLNESS 30 . 9 % SPECIAL EVENTS/ FESTIVALS 29 . 9 % 18 . 0 % SPORTS LEAGUES 17 . 0 % YOUTH & FAMILY 16 . 0 % ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP 13 . 5 % ARTS & CRAFTS CLASSES 12 . 1 % VOLUNTEERING 11 . 2 % FARM & GARDENING 9 . 8 % EARLY CHILDHOOD 8 . 6 % STEM PROGRAMS 8 . 2 % TEENS 7 . 8 % HISTORY LM 6 . 3 % SPORT DROP- IN PLAY 5 . 5 % INCLUSION SUPPORT FOR DIS . 3 . 9 % SPECIALIZED PROG . FOR DIS . 3 . 9 % ICE SKATING ( LESSN ., CLIN ., TM . ) 3 . 9 % COMPUTER ACCESS 1 . 2 % OTHER 1 . 2 % Fort Collins ENGAGEMENT Z t What improvements would encourage youwalk or bike to more to lk - % Public Open Houses ® YY kA perks Oj v _ { i t r t : A, Admomw ANN Ilk AM ''a" ':• z' >4q, • , �``0°na„i my Your _ r - Y Fort Collins ppppp� ENGAGEMENT Pop Up Engagement • Foothills Mall • Visit Fort Collins • Library 4 ti t Describe Fort Collins parks and recreation in three words. , — NMWAM to spfld 01 ,h wn9 mpovrmenrs to parks and r -+ tyr... ♦., s: w RKe, r ma yoo enocafe to each? Describe Fort Collins parks and recreation in three Des<riba los parpues y la recreation de Fort Collins en hes palabras. b' •' ^"• '° '• •••^^^ '-+^ `- •^ ••• ...•.. � M 11 Al r. * f a J rs s n[n _ Tell us ■ here! r I r r � ■ — rl i b r I ur a/d M _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ d Oro 1 . J R6Creat 1 City of Fort Collins PROCESS ENGAGEMENT STATISTICALLY VALID SURVEY LEVEL OF OPEN HOUSES & POP - UPS SERVICE CORE TEAM , STAFF, BOARD MEMBERS STANDARDS STAKEHOLDER INTERil V 11 IEWANALYSIS II POLICY MASTER III q FRAMEWORK PLAN BENCHMARKING LIFE CYCLE , AMENITIES / FACILITIES INVENTORY REFRESH , BUILD OUT TRENDS AND BENEFITS PARTNERSHIPS & FUNDING INVENTORY RECREATION ASSESSMENT FACILITY / DESIGN ASSIIIESSMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES 35 Fort Collins FRAMEWORKPOLICY LOS ANGELES RIVER MASTER PLAN WHAT Goal 6 . Provide equitable , inclusive , an ideal future state and safe access to parks and trails . WHY rationale In online surveys , the top two activities that people participate in along the river are walking ( 53 % ) and bicycling ( 40 % ) , yet the top two reasons people do not visit the river are safety concerns ( 48 % ) and lack of activities ( 46 % ) . This is apparent when looking at available parks and trails . Many cities along the LA River do not meet the World Health Organization ' s minimum standards of 2 . 2 acres of parks per thousand people , and only 31 of the river ' s 51 miles have trails . Fort Collins FRAMEWORKPOLICY LOS ANGELES RIVER MASTER PLAN WHAT Goal 6 . Provide equitable , inclusive , an ideal future state and safe access to parks and trails . Actions 6 .1 . Fill gaps to create a that move towards the ideal state connected system of multi - modal trails . Methods 6 .1 .1 . Complete missing sections of the LA specific implementation steps for actions River bike path . 6 .1 . 2 . Complete planned county and municipal trails that connect to the LA River, such as the Compton Creek trail . Fort Collins FRAMEWORKPOLICY LOS ANGELES RIVER MASTER PLAN WHAT Goal 6 . Provide equitable , inclusive , an ideal future state and safe access to parks and trails . Actions 6 .1 . Fill gaps to create a that move towards the ideal state connected system of multi - modal trails . WHO parties responsible for Implementation Department of Parks and Recreation potential implementation partners municipal parks and recreation departments HOW existing funding sources capital budget potential new funding sources Lower LA River Parks District WHEN timeframe long - term ( 0 - 20 years ) •t ;i siIi . ' l � ..:g �i ! v .fW t ?'tea:•,:,p0i" Parks Recreation Trails , + jo. �Ib1;4 ry ::^ 0 I. A A - •r _ , _ ., �,.;:%s' .. . �- 1 IS _ __. 'a, � ORi Count � _ - , I ._i Resources Funding Partnerships O & M 1191C ., _ • ; , = Recreator - • ' all110, iuiu+ill Id I. ' Economic - Health Communication Design Safety Fort of RECREATION Fort Collins has fewer programs in a mature stage and more programs in the saturated and decline phases of their life cycle than is best practice . Q observation / analysis 04 stakeholder conversations :.',i public input Fort of RECREATION Fort Collins has fewer programs in a mature stage and more programs in the saturated and decline phases of their life cycle than is best practice . Facility availability is hindering city program and club growth , particularly fields , indoor spaces , ice , pools . Q observation / analysis 04 stakeholder conversations :.',i public input Fort of RECREATION Fort Collins has fewer programs in a mature stage and more programs in the saturated and decline phases of their life cycle than is best practice . Facility availability is hindering city program and club growth , particularly fields , indoor spaces , ice , pools . 41 % of residents haven ' t participated in recreation programs in the past year. Q observation / analysis 04 stakeholder conversations :.',i public input Fort of RECREATION Fort Collins has fewer programs in a mature stage and more programs in the saturated and decline phases of their life cycle than is best practice . Facility availability is hindering city program and club growth , particularly fields , indoor spaces , ice , pools . Q 41 % of residents haven ' t participated in recreation programs in the past year. City Council is interested in maker and innovation spaces . Facility fees are low compared to other communities ; groups would pay more . -A, ` 88 % of those who have participated rate programs as excellent or good . ( More people in the east central area and fewer people in the southwest rate them as excellent . ) 90 % of people who have visited rate the physical condition of recreation facilities as excellent or good . ( Fewer people in the northeast and southwest rated them as excellent . ) Q �� �� Three of the most important indoor facilities are related to aquatics — pools , lap pools , and water parks — followed by exercise and fitness and walking tracks . Q observation / analysis 04 stakeholder conversation ._ 419 public input wp� Fort Collins PROPOSED GOAL Provide equitable access to recreational experiences . W • Provide recreational amenities z 0 according to level of service standards . • Expand year - round usability of existing a recreational amenities . c� z • Strive for universal access . o • Ensure program offerings continue to a respond to changing user needs . �' • Continue to expand access through the J a reduced rate program and adaptive z recreation z w H O a •t 1hL I ifl.•` ��,111 1! Parks Recreation Trails Provide equitable access to parks. Provide equitable access to Expand the active transportation recreational experiences, network to support access to parks and recreation . II/ -- ' �►^` r L7.7 OE FV `r. di IL l CO, Resources Funding Partnerships O & M Protect and enhance natural and Ensure the financial sustainability of Strengthen partnerships to leverage Ensure parks, paved trails, and recreation historic resources in parks, and parks and recreation , resources for mutual benefit , facilities are operated and maintained increase related activities, efficiently and to defined standards. Recreator . . . • 1 f Economic Health communication Design Safety Promote the synergy between parks, Improve marketing and Elevate the design and connection Continue to enhance safety and recreation, and economic health , communication to enhance operations to nature in parks and recreation security in all parks and facilities, and user satisfaction. facilities. FartCollins o Co ' PLANNING Community Engagement Analysis Statistically Funding Open HouseSeries 2 Valid Survey Strategies 1 Open House Benchmarking Series 1 Stakeholder 7 Interviews 1 Level of Our City City Council Website City Council Work Session Best Service Work Session Practices Project Needs Priority Final Master Initiation Assessment Setting Plan Fall Winter Spring - Summer Summer - Fall 2019 2020 2020 J 2020 Fort Collins DRAFT VISION Parks , trails , and recreation facilities in Fort Collins are an invitation to all residents to sustain and build wellness , curiosity, innovation , and community - as part of the city ' s iconic , interconnected network of public space . Fort Collins FUNDING ANALYSIS Capital Investment Park and Operations & Lifecycle Facility New Parks and Maintenance Replacement Refresh Facilities Total • of Ownership of MM �t Collins pop W� M PM QUESTIONS FOR COUNCIL What feedback do Councilmembers have on the proposed goals ? Do Councilmembers have questions or reactions to the proposed holistic vision framework for public space? Fort Collins Parks : Provide equitable access to parks . Recreation : Provide equitable access to recreational experiences . Trails : Expand the active transportation network to support access to parks and recreation . Resources : Protect and enhance natural and historic resources in What feedback do parks , and increase related activities . Co u n c i l m e m b e rs have on the Funding : Ensure the financial sustainability of parks and recreation . Partnerships : Strengthen partnerships to leverage resources for proposed goals ? mutual benefit . O & M : Ensure parks , paved trails , and recreation facilities are operated and maintained efficiently and to defined standards . Economic Health : Promote the synergy between parks , recreation , and economic health . Communication : Improve marketing and communication to enhance operations and user satisfaction . Design : Elevate the design and connection to nature in parks and recreation facilities . Safety: Continue to enhance safety and security in all parks and facilities . • Fort Collins pugLlC SPACE VISION Do Councilmembers have questions or reactions to the proposed holistic vision NATURAL AREAS TRAILS PARKS & STORMWATER FOCO POUDRE MASTER PLAN MASTER PLAN RECREATION MASTER PLAN CREATES SCHOOL framework for public space ? VISION VISION MASTER PLAN VISION VISION DISTRICT VISION VISION DATE : June 9 , 2020 STAFF : Honore Depew, Interim Policy and Project Manager WORK SESSION ITEM John Stokes , Natural Resources Director City Council Kelly DiMartino , Deputy City Manager SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Parks and Recreation Master Plan . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item meets the following COVID- 19 emergency priority for being on the Council agenda : • Priority 4 - substantially complete and has included significant community outreach . Council direction at this time will help ensure that work does not have to be redone and can continue to move forward . The purpose of this item is to provide an update and seek feedback on the Parks and Recreation Master Plan , including proposed goals and vision statement as well as an overview of community outreach . An overview of the Master Plan process and findings will be presented by Andrew Dobshinsky, Associate Planner with The Olin Studio . GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1 . What feedback do Councilmembers have on the proposed goals? 2 . Do Councilmembers have questions or reactions to the proposed holistic vision framework for public space? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The Parks and Recreation Policy Plan was last updated in 2008 , (now called a Master Plan ) . Community expectations have evolved , and survey data collected during this planning process provides insights into these evolving community perspectives . The Master Plan update effort began in late 2019 and is nearing the halfway point. In October 2019 , a work session with Council was conducted that outlined ten desired plan deliverables : 1 . Parks and Recreation Systems Vision , Goals and Metrics 2 . Identification of Existing and Needed Parks and Recreation Facilities 3 . Parks and Recreation Build Out Strategy 4 . Parks and Recreation Design Standards and Guidelines 5 . Strategy for Incorporating Special Interest Group Requests 6 . Community Health Alignment 7 . Park Design Process 8 . Park Refresh Strategy 9 . Life Cycle Strategies 10 . Paved Trails Since the work session in October, staff has been working with a consultant team , stakeholders , and the community to identify parks and recreation needs , assess how Fort Collins compares to other peer and benchmark communities , and identify key issues and priorities the plan should address . As noted above , identifying a strategy for park refresh is a desired outcome of the plan , as well as a Council priority for 2020 . The following is a summary of the community engagement activity, proposed vision statement and goals , and key findings and opportunities identified to date . June 9 , 2020 Page 2 Community Engagement Together with the consulting team , staff utilized several different engagement tools to help the community guide development of the Master Plan . Key engagement strategies have included : • Survey - A statistically valid survey was deployed at the end of 2019 . From the 511 responses received , the results achieved a demographically representative sample of the community with a confidence level of 95 % and precision of +/- 4 . 33% . Results from the survey demonstrate how highly residents value the system of parks and recreational facilities in Fort Collins . It is possible to pinpoint community preferences based on the responses . A summary of the survey results is attached to this AIS (Attachment 1 ) . A full report is available . • Open Houses - Two open houses were held in February 2020 , engaging over 300 visitors . One open house was held at the Lincoln Center, and one at Preston Middle School . City staff and the consultant team were able to interact with interested members of the community and quantifiable data was collected using informational boards . All materials were translated into Spanish and interpretation services were available at both events . • Pop-up Events - Three pop-up events were held at various locations throughout the community, including Foothills Mall , downtown Fort Collins , and the Old Town Library . This unique engagement strategy enabled the team to interact with residents directly in an unannounced and spontaneous format, enabling input from residents who may not normally participate in a traditional community engagement format. • Stakeholder Meetings - In November 2019 and February 2020 a series of special meetings were held to hear directly from key partners (e . g . , PSD , CSU ) and representatives of various user groups (e . g . , bicyclists , disc golf enthusiasts , etc. ) . These key stakeholders provided valuable feedback on potential improvements and partnerships . • OurCity Web Page - An engagement webpage at < https ://ourcity .fcgov. com/parksandrec> provides a valuable resource for project updates and ongoing collection of ideas and feedback as the planning effort progresses . • Boards and Commissions - Representatives from about a dozen boards are part of an ad hoc group known as the Advance Review Committee (ARC) . These board members act as liaisons to their respective boards for feedback and regular updates . Staff will also be engaging directly with key boards , such as the Parks & Recreation Board , as the planning effort continues . Proposed Vision Statement and Goals At the heart of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan will be a vision statement supported by a framework of goals and actions based on : • Careful appraisal of existing parks and amenities , recreational facilities and programs ; • Extensive engagement with stakeholders and community members , including a statistically valid survey; • Comparison to both peer and aspirational communities ; and • An examination of how the complete system of parks and recreational facilities is viewed by residents and visitors in a holistic context of accessible public space . A vision statement for Parks and Recreation has been developed for consideration : Parks, trails, and recreation facilities in Fort Collins are an invitation for all residents to further wellness, curiosity, innovation, and community - as an integral part of the city's iconic, interconnected public space. The basis for Plan recommendations is the adoption of broad Goals for an ideal future state , Actions that move the system towards that future , and specific Methods or steps that implement the goals and actions . The following proposed goals for the Master Plan were developed based on expert analysis , Council direction , staff input, and community engagement: 1 . Provide equitable access to parks . 2 . Provide equitable access to recreational experiences . 3 . Expand the active transportation network to support access to parks and recreation . 4 . Protect and enhance natural and historic resources in parks and increase related activities . June 9 , 2020 Page 3 5 . Ensure the financial sustainability of parks and recreation . 6 . Strengthen partnerships to leverage resources for mutual benefit. 7 . Ensure parks , paved trails , and recreation facilities are operated and maintained efficiently and to defined standards . 8 . Promote the synergy between parks , recreation , and economic development. 9 . Improve marketing and communication to enhance operations and user satisfaction . 10 . Elevate the design and connection to nature in parks and recreation facilities . 11 . Continue to enhance safety and security in all parks and facilities . If supported by Councilmembers , the team will refine the specific Actions and Methods for each goal , over the coming months . This will include vetting implementation strategies with stakeholders , staff, and the community. Key Findings and Opportunities Through comprehensive analysis conducted as part of the parks and recreation needs assessment and benchmarking efforts , in addition to recommendations from consultant team and staff leaders , several key findings and opportunities have been identified . These include : 1 . Imageability/Physical Vision of the System . As outlined in the attached presentation (Attachment 2) , the City parks and recreation system has evolved tremendously since its inception in the pre -plan era , dating back to 1873 when Fort Collins was established ; through 1963 , when the first Parks & Recreation Plan was developed ; through the 1980 's , the parks and recreation system developed steadily . Then , in the early 1990's , the Natural Areas program was established , resulting in a dramatic increase in land acquisitions . This dramatic change was transformational , enabling unparalleled access to public space , and providing a key quality of life improvement dearly loved by Fort Collins residents today . Fort Collins has a very long history of actively acquiring and designating public space for the use of residents and visitors . A key concept that has emerged in this update to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan is how the system is viewed overall - the concept of imageability. From the perspective of most residents and visitors it is access to the complete inventory of parks , recreational facilities , trails , natural areas , and other open space (such as stormwater management property and schools ) that matters . How these elements are classified , funded , and managed is important administratively, but for the public to visit and enjoy them it only matters how accessible and connected they are . As the next evolution of the parks and recreation system is considered over the coming 10 -20 years , it will be strategically beneficial to consider system improvements holistically, inclusive of the entire system of municipally owned public space - including parks , trails , recreation facilities , natural areas , and even stormwater management land . Showing a complete image of the City's open space reinforces connections between these resources and illustrates how each department' s efforts also support an interconnected network that is greater than the sum of its parts . This holistic view will not only provide for improved planning for the future , but also support better imageability of the system both within and outside the community. Staff team intends to develop the Parks and Recreation Master Plan within this larger public space context, as demonstrated by the proposed vision statement. 2 . System and Funding Analysis . Staff and the consulting team are conducting a thorough and detailed analysis of the entire inventory of parks and recreational facilities . The assessment includes an appraisal of assets and amenities throughout the system using benchmark communities , national trends , and survey data as guideposts . From this work current levels of service can be compared , and future need predicted . A population -based level of service for a specific amenity shows how many of that feature there are , per capita , in Fort Collins . For example , there are currently 2 . 5 playgrounds per 10 , 000 people in Fort Collins . To satisfy population growth , community desire , and trends the level of service analysis may recommend increasing to 3 playgrounds per 10 , 000 . This same methodology is being applied across the system of Parks and Recreational amenities . It includes careful scrutiny of accessibility to different features of the system and sets standards for access (e . g . , no more than a 10- minute walk to a park , or 5-minute drive to a recreation center) . And the analysis includes an evaluation of the funding structures in place to support development, maintenance , replacement , and programming . Staff will bring more detailed findings related to options for funding strategies to the Council Finance Committee in July . June 9 , 2020 Page 4 Some preliminary findings from the system analysis : Parks : • Large and diverse Parks system ( 1 , 190 acres ) • Expansive inventory of assets creates systematic pressures o Operational (short-term ) o Capital ( long-term / lifecycle replacement) • Lifecycle replacement of Parks amenities is under funded • Development of an asset management system by Parks and Park Planning and Development is crucial to the future success of Parks maintenance Recreation : • 60 % of community participating in Recreation programs suggests strong value • Recreation typically recovers more than half of expenditures , even including overhead costs such as maintenance from Operation Services • Annual budget shortfall difficult to make up short term given COVID - 19 constraints and the already high rate of recovery • Increased cost recovery possible on longer (5- 10 year) time horizon Next Steps Staff will continue to work with the consultant team in developing the Master Plan draft over the next several months . Financial considerations will be discussed at the July 20 , 2020 Council Finance Committee meeting . Another Council work session is scheduled for August 25 , 2020 , to coincide with additional community outreach . The final Master Plan is anticipated to be considered for adoption in late 2020 or early 2021 . ATTACHMENTS 1 . Parks and Recreation Survey Results Summary ( PDF ) 2 . Powerpoint Presentation ( PDF ) ATTACHMENT 1 SURVAL REM AM Overall , how would you rate the physical condition of the you or other members of your household have visited during the past 12 months? PARKS , NATURAL AREAS , OR OPEN SPACES RECREATION FACILITIES HAVE NOT VISITED POOR 4 % HAVE NOT VISITED 1 % FAIRS 12 % 2 % EXCELLENT EXCELLENT POOR 42 % 1 % 28 % FAIR 7 % O 95 % OEX CELLENT OR GOOD EXCELLENT OR GOOD AMONG THOSE WHO AMONG THOSE WHO HAVE PARTICIPATED HAVE PARTICIPATED GOOD 49 % GOOD 51 % emonmL SURVAL REM M do How would you rate the overall quality of recreation programs offered by the City of Fort Collins that you and members of your household have participated in during the past 12 months? EXCELLENT HAVE NOT 19 % PARTICIPATED 41 % Fx88 % nn AMONG THOSE WHO HAVE PARTICIPATED GOOD POOR 33 % 1 % FAIR 5 % CmmmmL SURVI& REM Im do Do you feel that there are sufficient public parks , natural areas , and open spaces within walking distance of your residence? 79 % YES emonmL SURVI& REM M do From the following list , please check ALL the communities in the area that you and members of your household have visited or used for parks and recreation facilities in the past 12 months . LARIMER COUNTY ' . LOVELAND • ' . WINDSOR DENVER LA PORTE BOULDER BELLVUE GREELEY WELLINGTON OTHER emonmL SURVAL REM How well do parks , paved trails , How important are quality parks , paved recreation facilities/programs in Fort trails , recreation facilities , and programs Collins reflect the identity of the City? to the identity of Fort Collins? MINIMALLY MINIMALLY 20/ 1 / � NOT IMPORTANT SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT 1 % 19 % 12 % 80 % O O VERY WELL SOMEWHAT OR VERY IMPORTANT VERY VERY WELL IMPORTANT 80 % 85 % R � r I ' Do you agree that parks , paved trails , and recreation facilities in Fort Collins are beautiful ? STRONGLY DISAGREE DISAGREE 2 % 1 % r 98 % AGREE OR STRONGLY AGREE STRONGLY AGREE 55 % emonmL SURVI& REM M am Please indicate if YOU or any member of your household has a need for each type of outdoor facility listed below. Needs Not Needs Met Partly Met COMMUNITY GARDENS 15 . 0 % DOG PARKS 13 . 0 % NAT. AREAS/WILDLIFE HABITAT 13 . 0 % WATER PLAY FEATURES E W 12 . 9 % MOUNTAIN BIKE COURSES 12 . 1 % HIKING TRAILS 10 . 8 % PARK SHELTERS/ PICNIC AREAS 10 . 5 % UNPROGRAMMED SPACES 9 . 4 % DOWNTOWN PARKS & PLAZAS 8 . 9 % COURTS ( P-/ H - BALL, BOCCE ) 8 . 5 % PAVED, MULTI - USE TRAILS 8 . 5 % RENTABLE EVENT SPACE 7 . 4 % BIKE PARKS 6 . 8 % TENNIS COURTS 6 . 3 % RECTANGULAR SPORTS FIELDS 5 . 6 % VOLLEYBALL COURTS 4 . 9 % PLAYGROUNDS 4 . 6 % OTHER 4 . 3 % SKATE PARKS 4 . 1 % BASKETBALL COURTS 4 . 1 % DIAMOND ATHLETIC FIELDS 4 . 0 % alsor SURVI ' REI m do Which FOUR of the OUTDOOR FACILITIES are MOST IMPORTANT to your household ? 1st Choice 2nd 3rr PAVED, MULTI - USE TRAILS 64 . 8 % HIKING TRAILS 57 . 5 % NAT. AREAS/WILDLIFE HABITAT 52 . 6 % UNPROGRAMMED SPACES ' 38 . 2 % PLAYGROUNDS 22 . 5 % DOG PARKS 20 . 9 % DOWNTOWN PARKS & PLAZAS 19 . 2 % COMMUNITY GARDENS 13 . 1 % WATER PLAY FEATURES 12 . 9 % RECTANGULAR SPORTS FIELDS 9 . 8 % MOUNTAIN BIKE COURSES 9 . 0 % PARK SHELTERS/ PICNIC AREAS 8 . 6 % TENNIS COURTS 5 . 9 % COURTS ( P-/ H - BALL, BOCCE ) 4 . 9 % DIAMOND ATHLETIC FIELDS 4 . 1 % RENTABLE EVENT SPACE 3 . 7 % BIKE PARKS 2 . 9 % OTHER 2 . 9 % BASKETBALL COURTS 1 2 . 5 % SKATE PARKS 2 . 0 % VOLLEYBALL COURTS 1 . 8 % SURVI& RE M AN Priority Investment Rating : Outdoor Facilities Low Priority Medium Priority ( 70 + ) High Priority ( 125 + ) NAT. AREAS/WILDLIFE HABITAT 168 HIKING TRAILS 161 PAVED, MULTI - USE TRAILS 157 UNPROGRAMMED SPACES 122 COMMUNITY GARDENS 120 DOG PARKS 120 WATER PLAY FEATURES 106 MOUNTAIN BIKE COURSES 95 DOWNTOWN PARKS & PLAZAS 89 PARK SHELTERS/ PICNIC AREAS 84 PLAYGROUNDS 65 COURTS ( P-/ H - BALL, BOCCE ) 64 RENTABLE EVENT SPACE 55 RECTANGULAR SPORTS FIELDS 53 TENNIS COURTS 51 BIKE PARKS 50 VOLLEYBALL COURTS 36 OTHER 33 DIAMOND ATHLETIC FIELDS 33 BASKETBALL COURTS 31 SKATE PARKS 30 SURVI& RE M AN Priority Investment Rating : Outdoor Facilities Low Priority Medium Priority ( 70 + ) High Priority ( 125 + ) 3 NAT. AREAS/WILDLIFE HABITAT 168 2 HIKING TRAILS 161 1 PAVED, MULTI - USE TRAILS 157 4 UNPROGRAMMED SPACES 1122 COMMUNITY GARDENS 120 DOG PARKS 120 WATER PLAY FEATURES 106 MOUNTAIN BIKE COURSES 95 DOWNTOWN PARKS & PLAZAS 89 PARK SHELTERS/ PICNIC AREAS 84 PLAYGROUNDS 65 COURTS ( P-/ H - BALL, BOCCE ) 64 RENTABLE EVENT SPACE 55 RECTANGULAR SPORTS FIELDS 53 TENNIS COURTS 51 BIKE PARKS 50 VOLLEYBALL COURTS 36 OTHER 33 DIAMOND ATHLETIC FIELDS 33 BASKETBALL COURTS 31 SKATE PARKS 30 emonmL SURVI& REM M am Please indicate if YOU or any member of your household has a need for each type of indoor facility listed below. Needs Needs Not Met Partly Me - INDOOR WATER PARK 22 . 6 % SWIMMING POOL 21 . 9 % EXERCISE & FITNESS EQUIP. 21 . 6 % WALKING/JOGGING TRACK 20 . 0 % MULTI - PURPOSE GYMS 14 . 1 % LAP POOL 13 . 3 % SPACES FOR MEETINGS/PARTIES 13 . 1 % HEALTH CLINIC 12 . 7 % SPACES FOR FITNESS/ DANCE 12 . 0 % ARTS, CRAFTS , GAMES ROOMS 12 . 0 % INDOOR COURTS 11 . 4 % MAKER SPACES 9 . 4 % INDOOR SPORTS FIELDS 7 . 6 % DESIGN LABS 6 . 6 % CLASSROOM SPACES 6 . 2 % DINING . 5 . 0 % COMPUTER ROOMS 3 . 9 % OTHER , 1 . 4 % R I � r ' EM sm AN Which FOUR of the INDOOR FACILITIES are MOST IMPORTANT to your household ? 1st Choice 3rd 4th SWIMMING POOL 38 . 6 % EXERCISE & FITNESS EQUIP. �! 38 . 2 % WALKING/JOGGING TRACK 27 . 6 % LAP POOL 18 . 2 % INDOOR WATER PARK 20 . 1 % MULTI = PURPOSE GYMS 16 . 8 % INDOOR COURTS 15 . 5 % SPACES FOR FITNESS/ DANCE 14 . 7 % SPACES FOR MEETINGS/PARTIES 12 . 3 % ARTS, CRAFTS , GAMES ROOMS 9 . 0 % HEALTH CLINIC 8 . 8 % INDOOR SPORTS FIELDS 7 . 8 % DINING 6 . 8 % CLASSROOM SPACES 6 . 7 % MAKER SPACES 5 . 1 % OTHER 2 . 3 % DESIGN LABS 2 . 2 % COMPUTER ROOMS 2 . 0 % alsor SURVI ' REM M AN Priority Investment Rating : Indoor Facilities Low Priority Medium Priority ( 70 + ) High Priority ( 125 + ) SWIMMING POOL 197 EXERCISE & FITNESS EQUIP. 195 WALKING/JOGGING TRACK 160 INDOOR WATER PARK 147 LAP POOL 113 MULTI - PURPOSE GYMS 106 SPACES FOR FITNESS/ DANCE 91 INDOOR COURTS 91 SPACES FOR MEETINGS/PARTIES 90 HEALTH CLINIC 79 ARTS, CRAFTS, GAMES ROOMS 76 MAKER SPACES 55 INDOOR SPORTS FIELDS 54 CLASSROOM SPACES 45 DINING 40 DESIGN LABS 35 COMPUTER ROOMS 22 OTHER 12 alsor SURVI ' REM M AN Priority Investment Rating : Indoor Facilities Low Priority Medium Priority ( 70 + ) High Priority ( 125 + ) * SWIMMING POOL 197 2 EXERCISE & FITNESS EQUIP. 195 13 WALKING/JOGGING TRACK 160 INDOOR WATER PARK 147 A 40'P' LAP POOL 113 MULTI - PURPOSE GYMS 106 SPACES FOR FITNESS/ DANCE 91 INDOOR COURTS 91 SPACES FOR MEETINGS/PARTIES 90 HEALTH CLINIC 79 ARTS, CRAFTS, GAMES ROOMS 76 MAKER SPACES 55 INDOOR SPORTS FIELDS 54 CLASSROOM SPACES 45 DINING 40 DESIGN LABS 35 COMPUTER ROOMS 22 OTHER 12 emonmL SURVI& REM M do Program or Activity Needs . Please indicate if YOU or any member of your household has a need for each type of program or activity listed below. Needs Not Needs Met Partly Met FITNESS/WELLNESS 15 . 0 % FARM & GARDENING 13 . 0 % SENIORS ( 50 + ) 13 . 0 % NATURE (OUTDOOR REC . & ED . ) 12 . 9 % AQUATICS ( LESSN . , FIT. , TEAMS ) 12 . 1 % STEM PROGRAMS 10 . 8 % ARTS & CRAFTS CLASSES 10 . 5 % ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP 9 . 4 % VOLUNTEERING 8 . 9 % SPECIAL EVENTS/ FESTIVALS 8 . 5 % SPORT DROP- IN PLAY 8 . 5 % HISTORY 7 . 4 % SPORTS LEAGUES 6 . 8 % TEENS 6 . 3 % YOUTH & FAMILY 5 . 6 % EARLY CHILDHOOD 4 . 9 % INCLUSION SUPPORT FOR DIS . 1 4 . 6 % SPECIALIZED PROG . FOR DIS . 4 . 3 % ICE SKATING ( LESSN . , CLIN . , TM . ) 4 . 1 % COMPUTER ACCESS 4 . 1 % OTHER 4 . 0 % SURVJ& RESULTS m am Which FOUR of the PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES are MOST IMPORTANT to your household ? 1st Choice '' � � 3rd 4th NATURE (OUTDOOR REC . & ED . ) 43 . 8 % SENIORS ( 50 + ) 33 . 3 % FITNESS/WELLNESS 30 . 9 % SPECIAL EVENTS/ FESTIVALS 29 . 9 % AQUATICS ( LESSN . , FIT. , TEAMS ) w 18 . 0 % SPORTS LEAGUES 17 . 0 % YOUTH & FAMILY 16 . 0 % ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP 13 . 5 % ARTS & CRAFTS CLASSES 12 . 1 % VOLUNTEERING 11 . 2 % FARM & GARDENING 9 . 8 % EARLY CHILDHOOD 8 . 6 % STEM PROGRAMS 8 . 2 % TEENS 7 . 8 % HISTORY ] 6 . 3 % SPORT DROP- IN PLAY 5 . 5 % INCLUSION SUPPORT FOR DIS . 3 . 9 % SPECIALIZED PROG . FOR DIS . 3 . 9 % ICE SKATING ( LESSN . , CLIN . , TM . ) 3 . 9 % COMPUTER ACCESS 1 . 2 % OTHER 1 1 . 2 % SURVI& RE M AN Priority Investment Rating : Programs Low Priority Medium Priority ( 70 + ) High Priority ( 125 + ) NATURE (OUTDOOR REC . & ED . ) 172 FITNESS/WELLNESS 171 SENIORS ( 50 + ) 149 SPECIAL EVENTS/ FESTIVALS 120 AQUATICS ( LESSN . , FIT. , TEAMS ) 108 FARM & GARDENING 96 ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP 88 ARTS & CRAFTS CLASSES 86 SPORTS LEAGUES 85 VOLUNTEERING 82 YOUTH & FAMILY 80 STEM PROGRAMS 78 SPORT DROP- IN PLAY 62 TEENS 62 HISTORY 61 EARLY CHILDHOOD 54 INCLUSION SUPPORT FOR DIS . 41 SPECIALIZED PROG . FOR DIS . 39 ICE SKATING ( LESSN . , CLIN . , TM . ) 31 COMPUTER ACCESS 21 OTHER 7 SURVI& RE M AN Priority Investment Rating : Programs Low Priority Medium Priority ( 70 + ) High Priority ( 125 + ) 1 NATURE (OUTDOOR REC . & ED . ) 172 3 FITNESS/WELLNESS IN 171 4 SENIORS ( 50 + ) 149 2 SPECIAL EVENTS/ FESTIVALS 120 AQUATICS ( LESSN . , FIT. , TEAMS ) 108 FARM & GARDENING 96 ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP 88 ARTS & CRAFTS CLASSES 86 SPORTS LEAGUES 85 VOLUNTEERING 82 YOUTH & FAMILY 80 STEM PROGRAMS 78 SPORT DROP- IN PLAY 62 TEENS 62 HISTORY 61 EARLY CHILDHOOD 54 INCLUSION SUPPORT FOR DIS . 41 SPECIALIZED PROG . FOR DIS . 39 ICE SKATING ( LESSN . , CLIN . , TM . ) 31 COMPUTER ACCESS 21 OTHER 7 emonmL SURVI& REM How supportive are you of some increase in taxes to fund the types of parks , trails , and recreation facilities that are most important to you and your household ? NOT SUPPORTIVE 15 % VERY SUPPORTIVE 35 % r NOT SURE 67 % 17 % VERY OR SOMEWHAT SUPPORTIVE SOMEWHAT SUPPORTIVE 32 % emooL SURVAL REM M am Please CIRCLE ALL the ways you would be willing to travel to . For each , please write in the MAXIMUM minutes you would be willing to travel to get there . PLAYGROUND COMMUNITY CENTER SPORT FIELD COMMUNITY GARDEN hi = d .11 E 0 1 N I 1 0 < 5 < 10 < 15 < 20 < 30 31 + < 5 < 10 < 15 < 20 < 30 31 + < 5 < 10 < 15 < 20 < 30 31 + < 5 < 10 < 15 < 20 < 30 31 + MINUTES MINUTES MINUTES MINUTES emonmL SURVI& REM M do Please check ALL the reasons that prevent you or members of your household from using parks and recreation facilities or programs in Fort Collins more often . DON 'T KNOW WHERE TO GO/WHAT ' S OFFERED 32 . 9 % PEOPLE EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS THERE 23 . 1 % TOO FAR FROM OUR RESIDENCE 21 . 3 % PROGRAM TIMES ARE NOT CONVENIENT 21 . 1 % DESIRED FACILITY/ PROGRAM IS NOT OFFERED 18 . 6 % DON ' T HAVE TIME OR INTEREST 17 . 2 % FEES ARE TOO HIGH 15 . 1 % LACK OF PUBLIC RESTROOMS 13 . 3 % PARKS ARE TOO CROWDED 12 . 1 % AQUATICS ( LESSN . , FIT. , TEAMS ) 11 . 5 % FACILITY OPERATING HOURS NOT CONVENIENT 10 . 0 % REGISTRATION FOR PROGRAMS IS DIFFICULT 8 . 4 % NO VISIBLE PATROLLING PRESENCE 7 . 6 % FACILITIES LACK RIGHT EQUIPMENT 7 . 4 % OTHER 7 . 4 % FACILITIES ARE NOT WELL MAINTAINED 6 . 8 % POOR/UNCOMFORTABLE PARK ATMOSPHERE 4 . 7 % USE FACILITIES IN OTHER CITIES 4 . 3 % POOR CUSTOMER SERVICE BY STAFF 3 . 5 % NOT ACCESSIBLE BY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 3 . 5 % INADEQUATE LIGHTING 3 . 5 % NOT ACCESSIBLE TO PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES 2 . 9 % ACTIVITIES GOING ON MAKE ME FEEL UNSAFE 2 . 0 % 1 HEAR NEGATIVE THINGS ABOUT PARKS 1 . 6 % NOT ENOUGH PEOPLE TO FEEL COMFORTABLE 1 . 4 % FEAR OF GETTING INJURED 1 . 2 % SURVEY R r Im Please check ALL the ways you travel to the parks and recreation facilities that you use . 92 % 80 % 69 % 9 % 4 % 2 % 1 . 4 % 0 . 8 /o o DRIVE WALK BIKE MAX BUS SHARE OTHER SHARE SURVAL REI Please rate how supportive you would be of each of the following actions the City of Fort Collins could take to improve parks , trails , and recreation facilities . NEW PARK DESIGN 1. I1 _ � YG _ _ PARK REFRESH PURCHASING & DEVELOPING NEW REPLACING AMENITIES IN KIND REPLACING W/ DIFFERENT AMENITIES NOT NOT NOT SUPPORTIVE VERY SUPPORTIVE VERY SUPPORTIVE VERY NOT 14 % SUPPORTIVE NOT 16 % SUPPORTIVE NOT 27 % SUPPORTIVE SURE 56 % SURE 45 % SURE 36 % 14 % 16 % 27 % to PF 79 % 77 % 65 % SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT OR VERY OR VERY OR VERY SUPPORTIVE SUPPORTIVE SUPPORTIVE SOMEWHAT SOMEWHAT SUPPORTIVE SUPPORTIVE SOMEWHAT 23 % 33 % SUPPORTIVE 29 % emonmL SURVI& REM do The following are some of the benefits that you and your household may receive from PARKS , TRAILS , RECREATION FACILITIES , AND PROGRAMS provided by the City of Fort Collins . For each potential benefit , please indicate your level of agreement . Strongly Strongly Agree + Disagree Disagree Agree S . Agree IMPROVES PHYSICAL HEALTH & FITNESS I 99 . 0 % MAKES CITY MORE DESIRABLE TO LIVE 98 . 8 % PROVIDES OPPS . FOR LEISURE INTERESTS I 98 . 1 % IMPROVES OVERALL QUALITY OF LIFE I 98 . 1 % IMPROVES MENTAL HEALTH / REDUCES STRESS I 97 . 4 % PRESERVES OPEN SPACE & ENVIRONMENT I 97 . 1 % INC . PROP. VALUES IN SURROUNDING AREAS I 97 . 0 % PROMOTES TOURISM IN CITY I ' 91 . 2 % HELPS ATTRACT NEW RESIDENTS & BUSINESSES ' 90 . 4 % PROTECTS HISTORICAL ASSETS OF CITY I 89 . 7 % INCREASES OPPS . FOR CULTURES TO INTERACT ' 84 . 1 % HELPS REDUCE NEIGHBORHOOD CRIME . 82 . 5 % ATTACHMENT City of 06 - 09 - 20 Fort Collins •7> r, JILWA IV FAA v , y r ' Y. �i J • ).. 5 . F.-. '`� }. ,. . ✓:. a ' .. :t t' r `�'�' !. �i �. ♦ 441. S ,rr ,r5 a , 4+ 1 _ 'r .9a .lii" Jp a -r u:- _a +:t.. y 1 . ,' •, t 'C r tl . 1 r ';k PA . . .. ,1.` i. / Y. v hh �p,r ♦/ lt .• r . , , , . ! .. ^ , r . V ' b V . •1•,t r t/ a' F/�(s•. . � r :. t l; 'r -r`+.i •,5'ia . t�' � . aY � . _ .#. yr. dr' . yy �. . Y . ` i ' r" t •� ., 1 /" . / y .. !rtr ST ." �rL/S�v .�F' Ylyr - er. i>:.,L�! Tr � lr . . . . , r ,[ a . . y. 1 . ' , IY1 � ' � t ' � r� 1 1b.G - 'llae h v.� .�lY9 ,,j `� - �. _ � . •. . r .. )„ t r+r ( r �� } f � + t • 4. - _ k.. , , r;q` r . X'- >.a! t ^ss a . X 1�•i�• .4#fir Yrdr r �, .I 'r `+ I.y jr hr . rjr . � t .. p: �`d^, F ', S .t. . .. JY! r �> -I .� .7 . Vk I + . ,I . .` � , q� :: ' . at us ♦, -y..^ . y,/� - �� '}>' .a ' '♦ .. r r /l t.l '-/, . 1' _ kr,;AIL , Fz IM �. >>- m >T r �a ,. s•�? ti ::.=�r� Is +vl.-•�fi' `r -a y h f t U' . ,�i �'N4�� ��,���,d�+.. V/"%, ` ram �' 4� y , � - -tj � 1 � - ,i. YI'I' .JD^ yr > y !.•1,,��2 ` s Yam. _ �Y� \+~r/jr � '_ A' \ � � ✓ ^�� .. .' tV Y'-� � �✓t` - e .i `'�"M`r r _ _ >' ;�S •- r u .. / . }r1 _ P ''� 1 ! > ' t` ! f -3-. -^/. L.. ' Z r,, , 'J�R'��?t� 1t y • a1 :� - � j i• /� .. r F _ ^t�h _ Pf N •� 1� .: \c , 4 . , S .✓ r ��YI. , "A . • \ At. may. '^c '! r• w ..'• c. r /^ M � _A .r1-4 J� • w , \ . 8 „ ,fir ^ ` .'/ - S' r ,;' ANN ip ' �" t _ .Ll t r , � is - E \ _ ^ . \o , 911 - r , .t R' 1 ' M"► _a� r .( �Mle-r:.;�r 9�, Sw yrt 1 ' � .s .. .2. - A Air _ • ` , s. - .,1 ¢ • _.a ,"� f. i ' �,{¢� P e ' - � ' 7 Za )� . , '\ a.. I %� .� pq •� ,�••tof l r . �( _ _ r '3: Y.'r 1 <`� . + r ,S l t �. ' ire. L � . :f r tr..f� �. - � r ^ • /1 \.,' , ISI IA `' a + / _ r ti i �`•, .�.g,. f.. ' _y=,' ,f+ L �. lam, . / - �• a.^ � IvIA. r -tea'or. It +'y of ,a ._.♦ �a4 4, t .p� ? 9 /lJ 1rb ���x� JtllY��,' �.. i t � 1 F } r ` Parks & Recreation Master Plan r It ` Community Services OLIN of MM �t Collins pop W� M PM QUESTIONS FOR COUNCIL What feedback do Councilmembers have on the proposed goals ? Do Councilmembers have questions or reactions to the proposed holistic vision framework for public space? FartCollins o Co ' PLANNING Community Engagement Analysis Statistically Funding Open HouseSeries 2 Valid Survey Strategies 1 Open House Benchmarking Series 1 Stakeholder 7 Interviews 1 Level of Our City City Council Website City Council Work Session Best Service Work Session Practices Project Needs Priority Final Master Initiation Assessment Setting Plan Fall Winter Spring - Summer Summer - Fall 2019 2020 2020 J 2020 City of Fort Collins PROCESS STATISTICALLY VALID SURVEY LEVEL OF OPEN HOUSES & POP - UPS SERVICE CORE TEAM , STAFF, BOARD MEMBERS STANDARDS STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS . � r POLICY MASTER FRAMEWORK PLAN BENCHMARKING LIFE CYCLE , AMENITIES / FACILITIES INVENTORY ' REFRESH , _ BUILD OUT TRENDS AND BENEFITS ♦ _ PARTNERSHIPS & FUNDING INVENTORY RECREATION ASSESSMENT FACILITY / DESIGN ASSESSMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES 4 Fort Collins COMPONENTSPROPOSED PLAN Introduction Policy Recommendations / • Vision Strategic Directions Context • Goals , Actions with Rationales • Benchmarking ( integrated throughout ) • Value of Parks and Recreation • Standards ( Level of Service , Access , Design ) • Existing Plans • Ongoing Planning Efforts Implementation Plan • Demographic / Recreation Trends • Implementation Responsibilities • Partners Existing Conditions and Interpretation • Time Frames • Public Space Network • Funding • Recreation Facilities • Trails Physical Vision Plan • Ownership ( Other Parts of the System ) Appendices • Programs Summary of Engagement and Interpretation City of For/lt Collins !` Our Understanding Fort Collins HISTORY = NETWORK 1873 - 1962 : Pre Plan Era - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Public Space Acreage 1 50000 45000 r 40000 35000 30000 h - 25000 1952: City Park Pool 20000 15000 10000 5000 mm5,652 - 1873 1963 1974 1988 1996 2008 2019 • Rec Facilities — Parks 1873 - City of Fort Collins is established 1937 - Recreation Commission forms L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �! ; Nf �� Sou. a Ew. USGS. MM Fort Collins HISTORY = NETWORK 1963 Parks & Recreation Plan - 1973 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - " Public Space Acreage 1 50000 45000 r 40000 T 35000 30000 - 25000 20000 15000 10000 : 8,411 l2 i 5000 1873 1963 1974 1988 1996 2008 2019 • Rec Facilities — Parks 1873 - City of Fort Collins is established 1937 - Recreation Commission forms 1963 - First Parks & Rec Plan L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �! ' Nf � Soul a: Ew. USGS. MM Fort Collins HISTORY = NETWORK 1974 Open Space Plan - 1987 Public Space Acreage 1 50000 45000 - - - - - - - - - - - - ' 40000Mill 35000 30000 T 1978: North Aztlan CC - • 25000 1974: Mulberry Pool • 20000 - • 15000 10000 i93600 f � 5000 L -rr 987: EPIC 04 1873 1963 1974 1988 1996 2008 2019 r • Rec Facilities — Parks l 1873 - City of Fort Collins is established J 1937 - Recreation Commission forms 1963 - First Parks & Rec Plan 1974 - Open Space Plan is written, trail system is planned - - - _ _ _ L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (V - • � �"�!� �� � $001LR6_ E611. USG$. MM Fort Collins HISTORY = NETWORK 1988 Parks & Recreation Plan - 1995 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Public Space Acreage 1 50000 45000 r 40000 P 35000 30000 25000 • 20000 • • 15000 ~� 11,683 10000 5000 '�- 476 _ `' • 1995: Senior Center 1873 1963 1974 1988 1996 2008 2019 • • Rec Facilities — Parks — Natural Areas 1873 - City of Fort Collins is established 1937 - Recreation Commission forms � : 1 1963 - First Parks & Rec Plan 1974 - Open Space Plan is written, trail system is planned -- 1988 - Parks & Rec Plan 1992 - Natural Areas Program is established L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 Fort Collins HISTORY = NETWORK 1996 Parks & Recreation Plan - 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Public Space Acreage 50000 45000 Woo s- 40000 i40 551 7 35000 30000 � 25000 . - • � ` - • - - 20000 , 15000 �r 10000 5000 - 765 �' • 1873 1963 1974 1988 1996 2008 2019 n� • Rec Facilities — Parks — Natural Areas 1873 - City of Fort Collins is established 1pl 1937 - Recreation Commission forms � �{" � � - 1 J 1963 - First Parks & Rec Plan 1974 - Open Space Plan is written, trail system is planned - 1988 - Parks & Rec Plan 1992 - Natural Areas Program is established 1996 - Parks & Rec Plan r ' ' Sources'. Ertl. GSGS, NGM F M wm � 0� 00 f W Fort Collins HISTORY = NETWORK 2008 Parks & Recreation Plan - 2020 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Public Space Acreage � '` - - - - - - - - - - '=• 50000 ' 45000 s- 40000 7 35000 / 30000 25000 20000 4 15000 a �� 10000 s 5000 861 tiC °f" 1873 1963 1974 1988 1996 2008 2019 ` • Rec Facilities — Parks — Natural Areas ��^t 2016: Footh Is tivlt C t �• � rr 1873 - City of Fort Collins is established �► 1937 - Recreation Commission forms I �.r V ML 1963 - First Parks & Rec Plan y ; 1974 - Open Space Plan is written, trail system is planned ML 1988 - Parks & Rec Plan 1992 - Natural Areas Program is established 7 1996 - Parks & Rec Plan 2008 - Parks & Rec Plan ��� , r 2013 - Paved Recreation Trail Master Plan 2014 - Natural Areas Master Plan ` ` Sources: Ertl. USGS, NOM Eiiiiii­ Fort Collins LEVEL OF SERVICE City Plan - 10 minute walk to public space WHERE WILL WE FOCUS OUR EFFORTS? GHG Emission Reduction Progress & Targets 2017 emit heat. Scientists ttribute a z;million warming:increase . - . . - - 4J million to an 2ozo 20°/p to mmmo What is COe? X REDUCTION emitted naturally and from 0% aFnucriox - EnergyE - natural gas. gasoline and . . Globalaso.oao _... _..... -_ 2030 warming contributions from of carbon dioxide equivalent 2050 Policies seek to increase the amount of CO. that would have the same global warming potential as other GHGs. Community carbon inventory 11, number of residents who have ' • • " WT IT TAAKE?KE? • access to natural areas , parks and/ come from... T or open space within a 10 - minute 21% - Natural gas IPID ASTE walk of their home , emphasizing Water-related factors USTAINABLE VIDECRE, BUILDING NATURAL I S: F PRACTICES USAGE existing gaps and areas planned Changes recommended in this City Plan update reflect a focus on: for intensification . . Prioritizing pragmatic, positive =Transition from fossil fuel to Coordinating clim a atlaptation and cos[-effective solutions renewable-energy systems and resilience p nning efforts Policies seek to ensure Focus on policies and City Plan pro as a coordinated affordability, reliability infrastructure to transition and cokes' set of policies and sustainability in their electricity sources, natural gas to Stan ongoing climate implementation. use in buildings and petroleum adap ion and resilience planning a Promoting sustainable for transportation to renewably th ghout the community development practices supplied electricity ncreasing access to Policies seek to reduce net energy .Aligning land use antl and water use in new and existing transportation decisions Policies seek to increase the development. The Structure Plan and number of residents who have .Water resources Transportation Plan work in access to natural areas, parks antl/ Policies seek to ensure that water tandem to promote development or open space within a 10-minute is used wisely and our community patterns and transportation walk of their home, emphasizing is prepared for a changing climate. behaviors that reduce VMT. existing gaps and areas planned FORT COLLINS CITY PLAN lo CityF6rt CollinsCo ' SERVICELEVEL OF Areas within a 10 minute walk of Parks and Natural Areas ■ Parks i Natural Areas ' 0 P-L ' r h " ML f � W r .7 F714p f m Fort Collins LEVEL OF SERVICE Areas within a 10 minute walk of Parks and Natural Areas ■ Parks ■ Natural Areassib - Gaps _ � - - - J h � 1 l ` W moo MAI I I r, f no Fort Collins LEVEL OF SERVICE Areas within a 10 minute walk of Mni Parks and Natural Areas ■ Parks ■ Natural Areas , : �N h _. ff Gapse, IPA �7 V r n Fort Collins = IMAGEABILITY How is the city ' s public space network represented ? : ,IA - - p tv All 1 ainl - I V r Fb Visit Fort Collins City of Fort Collins City of Fort Collins Fort Collins Chamber of Commerce Natural Areas Trail Map Fort Collins IMAGEABILITY - What does the city ' s image of public space want to be? - - ------ ----- ------ n IP n _ 7 - • 4FO 4ro Visit Fort Collins City of Fort Collins City of Fort Collins Fort Collins Chamber of Natural Areas Trail Map Commerce Fort Collins Boston ( 1878 - 1896 ) Minneapolis ( 1916 ) _ _ _ • _ MAP OF II 9NNEAPOLIS PARK SYSTEM Y r Mred� w i 1 EMERALD - POND / ��,' RrveaaAv NECKLACE w _ :. . O PLWFED v4vEas a �.�..._ ARNOLD • ! BACK BAY FENS ARBORETUM Igo LL LEGEND ,� Feu. O xwaw PUBLIC . BOSfON DD .n.cwa GARDEN S'OMMON .cunmm4 ws�uEr wiururx sin.�'•"�•� crcuu 1F - •w ^.. I ,\ Fort Collins IMAGEABILITY Philadelphia 46 ... .. . Ph� .+dp�. . � rI NYS-' 1VAN I .1 — l � x ram.. .... ..-.._. �..... v - - � • . j Ll bl o 4 V � i \l II il1Y ` I SD L ' Lbi � \ 111 = > 1 : '• Owl it 2 i it • : • 11 . 111 . . . . \ . • ! �L f . Ili 111,{ • t1 . 1 � � 1 t \ 1 _ • •` t • • . i 1 1 I , l I • ' I_____JLJ�� e r • r 1 • ' Fj i i I n --- • to411m, like • • Fort Collins IMAGEABILITY San Antonio Y�1N to J /6 -. � •� � UY�f� M.W. ,Y W Y4m � � ti � 0 IYlfy�l•11OMN. � M 1 M1 .an. cex � `) *• � '•is? "� . wm � '°'r"'y^ .urea 61 v.�i�.'.:.�/, FI . C - RIVERALx t � tly " " r r_ \ 1 ® �w��.r �•�� A cis � � � Pat w,r t10 - Iz ; Y6[Y. . ®�Wru..u� ® • Yr Q mraar•. . L V , �� i P rwaa fia una. ,.ram feW 001, .:.14kS10f • IW ��`� • YAW O y ka 16p.n 1p mttttte r..0 c.ap.ae at ms r fup4k . cat Meta r� Wtitmway .1 � <i.a�way.Wa � cat M+ r 4 Fort Collins CONCEPTUALpw� Fort Collins - Complete System ? .— J \ 4 J 1 1 y 4 r Fort Collins pop VISION HIERARCHY C ' ► CE VISION LIPVB NATURAL TRAILS PARKS & STORMWATER FOCO POUDRE AREAS MASTER MASTER PLAN RECREATION MASTER PLAN CREATES SCHOOL PLAN VISION VISION MASTER PLAN VISION VISION DISTRICT VISION VISION Fort Collins DRAFT VISION Parks , trails , and recreation facilities in Fort Collins are an invitation to all residents to sustain and build wellness , curiosity, innovation , and community - as part of the city ' s iconic , interconnected network of public space . FartCollins o Coll ' WilORGANIZATION CITY COMMUNITY SERVICES John Stokes * RECREATIONDEVELOPMENTR NATURAL AREAS CULTURAL OPERATION New SERVICES SERVICES Mike Calhoon Bob Adams Kurt Friesen Zoe Shark * Jim McDonald Ken Mannon Director Director Director Director Director Director • Maintenance • Programming Purchasing land , Purchase & • Manages Gardens Indoor facility - Parks - Indoor water rights manage Natural on Spring Creek maintenance - Trails - Outdoor Design of new Areas • Manages Cultural - Medians • Manages parks Nature - based Centers and Public - Street Trees recreation Build new paved education Art • Outdoor Facility facilities trails programming • Manages Scheduling Development Nature in the City Community • Natural Area Gardens • Park Rangers Review Rangers Parks Forestry Golf Cemetery * Interim City of For/lt Collins !` Engagement to Date Fort Collins IIIIIIIIPPPP� ENGAGEMENT Who we have spoken with Organizations ( Stakeholders ) • Bicycle Colorado • Liberty Charter School • Bike Fort Collins • Northern Colorado Disc Golf • CSU • Overland Mountain Bike Association • Cycles for Youth • Poudre School District • Downtown Business Association • Rocky Mountain Adventures • Downtown Development Authority • Tennis Association • Fort Collins Areas Swim Team • Triple Crown Sports • Fort Collins Baseball Club • Twin Silo BMX • Fort Collins Running Club • University Bike Advisory Committee • Fort Collins Ultimate Frisbee • Visit Fort Collins • Fort Collins Womens Hockey • YourGroupRide . com • Larimer County Dept of the Built Environment f on Fort Collins ENGAGEMENT Statistically Valid Survey � Native American: 0.9% Asian: 3.4% Other: 3.5% Black: 1 .6% Target Responses : U 0 Responses Obtained : 511 White: 88.9% City Breakdown Confidence Level : 95 % Asian: 3% � NativeAmerican: 2% Other: 1 % Black: 2% Precision : • 433 % White: 91 % Survey Breakdown City of Fort Collins ENGAGEMENT How important are quality parks , paved trails , recreation facilities , and programs to the identity of Fort Collins? MINIMALLY 2 % NOT IMPORTANT SOMEWHAT 1 % 12 % 97 % SOMEWHAT OR VERY IMPORTANT VERY IMPORTANT 85 % Fort Collins Which FOUR of the OUTDOOR FACILITIES are MOST IMPORTANT to your household ? 1st Choice 3rd 4th PAVED, MULTI - USE TRAILS 64 . 8 % HIKING TRAILS 57 . 5 % NAT. AREAS/WILDLIFE HABITAT ' 52 . 6 % UNPROGRAMMED SPACES 38 . 2 % DOG PARKS DOWNTOWN PARKS & PLAZAS COMMUNITY GARDENS WATER PLAY FEATURES 12 . 9 % RECTANGULAR SPORTS FIELDS 9 . 8 % MOUNTAIN BIKE COURSES 9 . 0 % PARK SHELTERS/PICNIC AREAS 8 . 6 % TENNIS COURTS 5 . 9 % COURTS ( P=/H - BALL, BOCCE) ■ 4 . 9 % DIAMOND ATHLETIC FIELDS 4 . 1 % RENTABLE EVENT SPACE 3 . 7 % BIKE PARKS 2 . 9 % OTHER 2 . 9 % BASKETBALL COURTS 2 . 5 % SKATE PARKS Li 2 . 0 % VOLLEYBALL COURTS [I 1 . 8 % • Fort Collins Which FOUR of the INDOOR FACILITIES are MOST IMPORTANT to your household ? 1st Choice 2nd 3rc ' } � SWIMMING POOL 38 . 6 % EXERCISE & FITNESS EQUIP. 38 . 2 % WALKING/JOGGING TRACK 27 . 6 % LAP POOL 20 . 1 % INDOOR WATER PARK MULTI - PURPOSE GYMS INDOOR COURTS SPACES FOR FITNESS/DANCE SPACES FOR MEETINGS/PARTIES 12 . .5 % ARTS, CRAFTS, GAMES ROOMS 9 . 0 % HEALTH CLINIC 8 . 8 % INDOOR SPORTS FIELDS 7 . 8 % DINING 6 . 8 % CLASSROOM SPACES E 6 . 7 % MAKER SPACES F—ff 5 . 1 % OTHER L[ 2 . 3 % DESIGN LABS 1 2 . 2 % COMPUTER ROOMS ITT 2 . 0 % f pop Fort Collins ir ENGAGEMENT Which FOUR of the PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES are MOST IMPORTANT to your household ? 1st Choice 2nd 3rd _ 4th NATURE (OUTDOOR REC . & ED . ) 1W 43 . 8 % SENIORS ( 50 + ) 33 . 3 % FITNESS/WELLNESS 30 . 9 % SPECIAL EVENTS/ FESTIVALS 29 . 9 % 18 . 0 % SPORTS LEAGUES 17 . 0 % YOUTH & FAMILY 16 . 0 % ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP 13 . 5 % ARTS & CRAFTS CLASSES 12 . 1 % VOLUNTEERING 11 . 2 % FARM & GARDENING 9 . 8 % EARLY CHILDHOOD 8 . 6 % STEM PROGRAMS 8 . 2 % TEENS 7 . 8 % HISTORY LM 6 . 3 % SPORT DROP- IN PLAY 5 . 5 % INCLUSION SUPPORT FOR DIS . 3 . 9 % SPECIALIZED PROG . FOR DIS . 3 . 9 % ICE SKATING ( LESSN ., CLIN ., TM . ) 3 . 9 % COMPUTER ACCESS 1 . 2 % OTHER 1 . 2 % Fort Collins ENGAGEMENT Z t What improvements would encourage youwalk or bike to more to lk - % Public Open Houses ® YY kA perks Oj v _ { i t r t : A, Admomw ANN Ilk AM ''a" ':• z' >4q, • , �``0°na„i my Your _ r - Y Fort Collins ppppp� ENGAGEMENT Pop Up Engagement • Foothills Mall • Visit Fort Collins • Library 4 ti t Describe Fort Collins parks and recreation in three words. , — NMWAM to spfld 01 ,h wn9 mpovrmenrs to parks and r -+ tyr... ♦., s: w RKe, r ma yoo enocafe to each? Describe Fort Collins parks and recreation in three Des<riba los parpues y la recreation de Fort Collins en hes palabras. b' •' ^"• '° '• •••^^^ '-+^ `- •^ ••• ...•.. � M 11 Al r. * f a J rs s n[n _ Tell us ■ here! r I r r � ■ — rl i b r I ur a/d M _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ d Oro 1 . J R6Creat 1 City of Fort Collins PROCESS ENGAGEMENT STATISTICALLY VALID SURVEY LEVEL OF OPEN HOUSES & POP - UPS SERVICE CORE TEAM , STAFF, BOARD MEMBERS STANDARDS STAKEHOLDER INTERil V 11 IEWANALYSIS II POLICY MASTER III q FRAMEWORK PLAN BENCHMARKING LIFE CYCLE , AMENITIES / FACILITIES INVENTORY REFRESH , BUILD OUT TRENDS AND BENEFITS PARTNERSHIPS & FUNDING INVENTORY RECREATION ASSESSMENT FACILITY / DESIGN ASSIIIESSMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES 35 Fort Collins FRAMEWORKPOLICY LOS ANGELES RIVER MASTER PLAN WHAT Goal 6 . Provide equitable , inclusive , an ideal future state and safe access to parks and trails . WHY rationale In online surveys , the top two activities that people participate in along the river are walking ( 53 % ) and bicycling ( 40 % ) , yet the top two reasons people do not visit the river are safety concerns ( 48 % ) and lack of activities ( 46 % ) . This is apparent when looking at available parks and trails . Many cities along the LA River do not meet the World Health Organization ' s minimum standards of 2 . 2 acres of parks per thousand people , and only 31 of the river ' s 51 miles have trails . Fort Collins FRAMEWORKPOLICY LOS ANGELES RIVER MASTER PLAN WHAT Goal 6 . Provide equitable , inclusive , an ideal future state and safe access to parks and trails . Actions 6 .1 . Fill gaps to create a that move towards the ideal state connected system of multi - modal trails . Methods 6 .1 .1 . Complete missing sections of the LA specific implementation steps for actions River bike path . 6 .1 . 2 . Complete planned county and municipal trails that connect to the LA River, such as the Compton Creek trail . Fort Collins FRAMEWORKPOLICY LOS ANGELES RIVER MASTER PLAN WHAT Goal 6 . Provide equitable , inclusive , an ideal future state and safe access to parks and trails . Actions 6 .1 . Fill gaps to create a that move towards the ideal state connected system of multi - modal trails . WHO parties responsible for Implementation Department of Parks and Recreation potential implementation partners municipal parks and recreation departments HOW existing funding sources capital budget potential new funding sources Lower LA River Parks District WHEN timeframe long - term ( 0 - 20 years ) •t ;i siIi . ' l � ..:g �i ! v .fW t ?'tea:•,:,p0i" Parks Recreation Trails , + jo. �Ib1;4 ry ::^ 0 I. A A - •r _ , _ ., �,.;:%s' .. . �- 1 IS _ __. 'a, � ORi Count � _ - , I ._i Resources Funding Partnerships O & M 1191C ., _ • ; , = Recreator - • ' all110, iuiu+ill Id I. ' Economic - Health Communication Design Safety Fort of RECREATION Fort Collins has fewer programs in a mature stage and more programs in the saturated and decline phases of their life cycle than is best practice . Q observation / analysis 04 stakeholder conversations :.',i public input Fort of RECREATION Fort Collins has fewer programs in a mature stage and more programs in the saturated and decline phases of their life cycle than is best practice . Facility availability is hindering city program and club growth , particularly fields , indoor spaces , ice , pools . Q observation / analysis 04 stakeholder conversations :.',i public input Fort of RECREATION Fort Collins has fewer programs in a mature stage and more programs in the saturated and decline phases of their life cycle than is best practice . Facility availability is hindering city program and club growth , particularly fields , indoor spaces , ice , pools . 41 % of residents haven ' t participated in recreation programs in the past year. Q observation / analysis 04 stakeholder conversations :.',i public input Fort of RECREATION Fort Collins has fewer programs in a mature stage and more programs in the saturated and decline phases of their life cycle than is best practice . Facility availability is hindering city program and club growth , particularly fields , indoor spaces , ice , pools . Q 41 % of residents haven ' t participated in recreation programs in the past year. City Council is interested in maker and innovation spaces . Facility fees are low compared to other communities ; groups would pay more . -A, ` 88 % of those who have participated rate programs as excellent or good . ( More people in the east central area and fewer people in the southwest rate them as excellent . ) 90 % of people who have visited rate the physical condition of recreation facilities as excellent or good . ( Fewer people in the northeast and southwest rated them as excellent . ) Q �� �� Three of the most important indoor facilities are related to aquatics — pools , lap pools , and water parks — followed by exercise and fitness and walking tracks . Q observation / analysis 04 stakeholder conversation ._ 419 public input wp� Fort Collins PROPOSED GOAL Provide equitable access to recreational experiences . W • Provide recreational amenities z 0 according to level of service standards . • Expand year - round usability of existing a recreational amenities . c� z • Strive for universal access . o • Ensure program offerings continue to a respond to changing user needs . �' • Continue to expand access through the J a reduced rate program and adaptive z recreation z w H O a •t 1hL I ifl.•` ��,111 1! Parks Recreation Trails Provide equitable access to parks. Provide equitable access to Expand the active transportation recreational experiences, network to support access to parks and recreation . II/ -- ' �►^` r L7.7 OE FV `r. di IL l CO, Resources Funding Partnerships O & M Protect and enhance natural and Ensure the financial sustainability of Strengthen partnerships to leverage Ensure parks, paved trails, and recreation historic resources in parks, and parks and recreation , resources for mutual benefit , facilities are operated and maintained increase related activities, efficiently and to defined standards. Recreator . . . • 1 f Economic Health communication Design Safety Promote the synergy between parks, Improve marketing and Elevate the design and connection Continue to enhance safety and recreation, and economic health , communication to enhance operations to nature in parks and recreation security in all parks and facilities, and user satisfaction. facilities. FartCollins o Co ' PLANNING Community Engagement Analysis Statistically Funding Open HouseSeries 2 Valid Survey Strategies 1 Open House Benchmarking Series 1 Stakeholder 7 Interviews 1 Level of Our City City Council Website City Council Work Session Best Service Work Session Practices Project Needs Priority Final Master Initiation Assessment Setting Plan Fall Winter Spring - Summer Summer - Fall 2019 2020 2020 J 2020 Fort Collins DRAFT VISION Parks , trails , and recreation facilities in Fort Collins are an invitation to all residents to sustain and build wellness , curiosity, innovation , and community - as part of the city ' s iconic , interconnected network of public space . Fort Collins FUNDING ANALYSIS Capital Investment Park and Operations & Lifecycle Facility New Parks and Maintenance Replacement Refresh Facilities Total • of Ownership of MM �t Collins pop W� M PM QUESTIONS FOR COUNCIL What feedback do Councilmembers have on the proposed goals ? Do Councilmembers have questions or reactions to the proposed holistic vision framework for public space? Fort Collins Parks : Provide equitable access to parks . Recreation : Provide equitable access to recreational experiences . Trails : Expand the active transportation network to support access to parks and recreation . Resources : Protect and enhance natural and historic resources in What feedback do parks , and increase related activities . Co u n c i l m e m b e rs have on the Funding : Ensure the financial sustainability of parks and recreation . Partnerships : Strengthen partnerships to leverage resources for proposed goals ? mutual benefit . O & M : Ensure parks , paved trails , and recreation facilities are operated and maintained efficiently and to defined standards . Economic Health : Promote the synergy between parks , recreation , and economic health . Communication : Improve marketing and communication to enhance operations and user satisfaction . Design : Elevate the design and connection to nature in parks and recreation facilities . Safety: Continue to enhance safety and security in all parks and facilities . • Fort Collins pugLlC SPACE VISION Do Councilmembers have questions or reactions to the proposed holistic vision NATURAL AREAS TRAILS PARKS & STORMWATER FOCO POUDRE MASTER PLAN MASTER PLAN RECREATION MASTER PLAN CREATES SCHOOL framework for public space ? VISION VISION MASTER PLAN VISION VISION DISTRICT VISION VISION