Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 10/10/2017 - BUSINESS ENGAGEMENT ACTION PLANDATE: STAFF: October 10, 2017 SeonAh Kendall, Economic Health Manager Josh Birks, Economic Health Director Jackie Kozak-Thiel, Chief Sustainability Officer WORK SESSION ITEM City Council SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Business Engagement Action Plan. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to provide Council an update in the development and implementation of the Citywide Business Engagement Action Plan. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. Are we addressing the concerns that Council is hearing from the business community? 2. Does the Business Engagement Action Plan support and complement Council priorities? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The Economic Health Office (EHO) was formed in 2009 and joined the newly created Sustainability Service Area (SSA) in 2012 to reflect the triple bottom line approach. The City’s economic health vision is “a healthy, sustainable economy reflecting community values.” The City is intentional in using the term “economic health” vs “economic development” in keeping with the community’s value of a sustainable economy that looks to long-term vitality versus the short-term or individualized gain. Most of the local economy’s stabilization and growth come from the retention of existing businesses. Business Case for Action Why does the City need a Citywide business engagement action plan? The City has two primary customer groups: residents and businesses. The City has always had a healthy relationship with the business community; however, as part of the continuous improvement process staff has heard from external and internal groups and identified several opportunities for improvement (OFI). OFIs identified include a need for a systematic approach to listen, assess and engage with business customers and evaluating and responding to information collected to October 10, 2017 Page 2 improve services. NOTE: Systematic in this context means consistency of approach as well as organizational continuity. Objectives of the Business Engagement Action Plan 1. Improved customer satisfaction with business customers 2. Enhanced relationship between the City and the Business community 3. Increased efficiency and utilization of City resources and staff through a coordinated Citywide business engagement strategy. Business Engagement Action Plan The Citywide Business Engagement Action Plan is a four-stage process. (Attachment 1) Every service area within the City organization connects with the business customer. Phase One - Analysis (May 2017-present) Before developing an engagement strategy, internal analysis must be completed to create a baseline understanding of business engagement within the organization. Phase 1 involves a current state assessment of the organization’s historic and present engagement with businesses. (Attachment 2) The current state assessment aids in identifying issues and gaps before the development of strategy. The Business Engagement Action Plan is not an end in itself, but a means to continuous process improvement and continuous dialogue with our business customer. The journey to economic health is best done in the company of diverse stakeholders with various backgrounds and experiences. The Plan team has convened an industry stakeholder group with a goal of sharing and exchanging information (i.e., be a liaison to the business community and the City). Deliverables include assisting staff in identifying key metrics and to assist in the development of a business engagement spectrum (similar to the citizen engagement spectrum).The two-way communication with the industry stakeholder group will inform and assist in the development of the business engagement spectrum. (Attachment 5) Industry stakeholder group will carry on throughout all four phases of the business engagement action plan. Additionally, the Economic Advisory Commission will be engaged throughout all phases of the plan. NEXT STEPS Remaining Phases and Timeline: Phase Two - Design (October 2017-February 2018)  Develop business engagement strategy  Define metrics o Short-term: utilization of industry stakeholder group for real-time feedback; launch of the National Business Survey to gauge satisfaction and create a baseline for data collection; Business Appreciation Breakfast Feedback Form (Attachment 3) o Long-term: National Business Survey will create a baseline that allows benchmarking with other communities and year-to-year comparison; Small Business Survey to determine the needs specific to small businesses; Performance measurements is a combination of collecting the right data, and understanding how the variables interact to provide insight.  Rollout Citywide strategy for engaging business customer Phase Three - Implementation (March 2018-August 2018)  Implement strategies that can be offered within existing resources  Submit 2019-2020 Budget for Outcomes offers for strategies that require additional financial resources  Develop period status reporting October 10, 2017 Page 3 Phase Four - Review and Modify  Regular review of approach  Modify and improve, as identified The four-phase approach allows the City to connect with businesses to understand the “voice of the customer”, measure customer satisfaction to recognize current and anticipated business issues/challenges to enhance and adjust service delivery. ATTACHMENTS 1. Business Engagement Public Engagement Plan (PDF) 2. Current State Assessment-Phase 1 (PDF) 3. Business Appreciation Breakfast Questionnaire Recap 2017 (PDF) 4. Biz Engagment Charter (PDF) 5. Project Plan Industry Action Group (PDF) 6. Powerpoint presentation (PDF) PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY PROJECT TITLE: Business Engagement Action Plan OVERALL PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT LEVEL: Engage BOTTOM LINE QUESTION: How can the City improve its communications strategy to more effectively and consistently engage with business customers so they are satisfied with the City and our services? Key Messages:  Our business customers deserve the same level of engagement opportunities we give our residents.  We want to partner with stakeholders to develop alternatives and identify solutions.  We want lines of communication with businesses to be open and transparent.  We must be consistent in our relationship with businesses and how we approach them.  We must finesse our relationships with the business customer because of the varying needs of businesses.  Our mission includes a commitment to continuous improvement, which includes our relationships with stakeholders. KEY STAKEHOLDERS: External Employers Chamber of Commerce Board of Realtors Downtown Business Association SFCBA NFCBA Larimer SBDC Innosphere Visit Fort Collins CSU Economic Advisory Council Internal City Council Utilities, PDT, Finance Police Services, Poudre Fire DDA TIMELINE: Phase 1: Analysis Timeframe: May 2017 - present  Conduct assessment of current practices ATTACHMENT 1  Identify issues and gaps Tools and Techniques:  Internal municipal department listening sessions  City employee questionnaire  Create shared glossary (small business vs. primary employer, etc.)  Enabled businesses reporting on Access Fort Collins self-select vs. residents PHASE 2: Design strategy Timeframe: October 2017 – February 2018 Tools and Techniques:  Create external stakeholder team  Develop internal citywide strategy for engaging the business customer  Create annual survey for businesses similar to citizen survey  Define metrics PHASE 3: Implementation Timeframe: March 2018 – August 2018 Potential Tools and Techniques:  Kitchen cabinets  Host Meetups  Industry roundtables  Small business listening sessions with EHO, Utilities, Sales tax, etc.  Business tours for entrepreneurs  Sponsorships  CCTW NOCO events  Women and minority owned listening sessions BUSINESS ENGAGEMENT ACTION PLAN (BEAP) CURRENT STATE ASSESSMENT | Phase 1 Introduction PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to present the findings of the listening sessions, surveys, and research conducted to make recommendations that will help in the creation of a comprehensive Business Engagement Action Plan (BEAP) for the City of Fort Collins. Many departments work with our local business community and may see some overlap in contacts, outreach, and communication which needs a more streamlined approach within our organization. Ultimately, this report will help to:  Lay out a comprehensive Business Engagement Plan  Define a universal segmentation analysis for our business stakeholders  Determine the appropriate level of business engagement (generally) for each segmentation  Identify engagement methods with businesses  Declare roles and responsibilities of each department BACKGROUND The City of Fort Collins and Council have determined that there is a need for a more consistent and measurable system to track its interaction and satisfaction within the business community. The Baldrige process has identified a significant discrepancy between the understanding of customer needs and level of service provided to the City’s business customers compared to its other major customer – residents or citizens. The City needs an effective way of gathering information from its business customers and evaluating and responding to that information. The proposed business engagement action plan will address two major outcomes: 1) Business satisfaction and 2) Improved economic health in the community. METHODS Listening Sessions The departmental listening sessions were chosen based on a vote from the Business Engagement Action Plan Team (BEAP). The BEAP prioritized seven departments as having high business engagement. Departments Involved 1. City Manager’s Office (CMO) 2. Community Development and Neighborhood Services (CDNS) 3. Police Services 4. Poudre Fire Authority (PFA) 5. Sales Tax 6. Utilities – Customer Accounts 7. Utilities - Community Engagement Current Engagement Methods  How are you currently engaging with your customers?  How does your team track customer communication?  How do you share this information with your team? Roles and Responsibilities  Who does what?  When does interaction need to be moved up to the executive/director level? Metrics  What are you measuring and tracking?  How do you determine customer satisfaction? Follow-up  How does your team follow-up when needed and how do you track follow- up?  Is there a time limit requirement on when follow-up must happen? Employee Questionnaire Departments Represented 1. Planning 2. Patrol/Fire 3. Utilities Customer Service 4. City Clerk’s Office 5. Finance, Purchasing, Sales Tax 6. CDNS 7. Sustainability 8. CPIO 9. Cultural Services Questions  How often do you engage with businesses?  How satisfied are you with your overall level of engagement with businesses?  In your opinion, what would help you or your department be more effective when engaging with businesses?  What is your biggest obstacle when it comes to business engagement?  What is your biggest win when it comes to business engagement?  How do you define successful business engagement?  How do you resolve an issue with a business?  How do you provide feedback or intelligence from a business interaction to your colleagues?  What is one thing you think the business community wishes your department did/provide? Case Studies Projects Reviewed  Anheuser Busch Expansion  Downtown Plan  Capital Expansion Fees DEPARTMENT & STAFF RESPONSES Employee Questionnaire Employee questionnaire responses: 41 Responses How satisfied are you with your overall l level of engagement with businesses? Satisfaction level with engagement (Scale of 1-5, 5 being the most satisfied)  5 – 5%  4 – 45%  3 – 42.5%  2 – 7.5%  1 – 0% How often do you engage with businesses? Frequency of business engagement  Hourly - 19.5%  Daily - 39%  Weekly - 22%  Monthly - 19.5% Long questionnaire responses  Large demand for a city-wide Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system  Requests for more coordination in communication between departments to negate duplicated business outreach  A desire to increase consistency, improved messaging in how to start a business, transparency in development review, more communication between City staff and business community Case Studies WHAT WORKED  Projects are most successful when public/community engagement is launched well in advance  Strong partner relationships outside of the organization provide key stakeholders to future projects  High levels of public engagement on the front-end can allow for buy-in from Council  Meeting the businesses where they are. Engagement and conversations most often happened at their business.  Phase summaries helped formalize the message, show progress to the community and provided elegance to each document. These also helped keep the momentum moving. WHAT DIDN’T  Hired consultants may not perform their scope to the level of expectations the City demands or have the full skill- set LESSONS LEARNED  Conduct project debriefs with team upon completion  Roles and expectations should be established on the front end of all projects with all levels of the team, both internal and external OUR OBSERVATIONS 1. The introduction of “Baldrige” sets a negative tone and connotation among some of the departments 2. Lack a centralized location for engagement notes and data 3. No common language or consistent segmentation guidelines 4. Departments don’t realize how often they currently engage with businesses. Business interaction or segmentation is not top of mind. 5. Customer service and relationships are built and maintained differently across departments 6. Need a common tool to manage business “touches” 7. Large demand for a city-wide Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system 8. Requests for more coordination in communication 9. A desire to increase consistency, improved communication, prevent duplication 10. We do not have raw data to support our current or past engagement efforts PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS  “Segmentation” may be jargon within department conversations. Keep the language simple and refer to segmentation as “groups”.  Customer service training and CRM should be prioritized into the Lean training to avoid duplication and create efficiencies across the organization.  Messaging can be tweaked when introducing business engagement to the departments to not put such a focus on Baldrige.  Develop a Code of Conduct or Rules of Engagement with the purpose of presenting to groups and associations to improve dialogue and reduce personal attacks.  Produce a Business Engagement Spectrum to compliment the Public organizations and employers to offer this benefit.  Institute an educational component between Sales Tax and the SBDC to support businesses when they are having trouble paying their sales and use tax  Convene an ongoing Business Engagement team (outside of the BEAP/stem of the BEAP) from various departments to share information, ideas, provide more recommendations. For example, use this as a way to highlight small business visibility, share site visit stories, share strategies, etc.  Add an option in ACCESS Fort Collins for users to identify as a citizen or business, giving us more data to explore what people are asking/inquiring about.  Utilize the Speakers Bureau form on the fcgov.com website to interact with business requests when it goes live  Explore the possibility of adding an Engagement liaison much like the CSU liaison or Special Events position  Explore the possibility of adding an EHO position that would be housed in Planning. APPENDIX  Listening Session Responses  Stakeholder Map  Business Engagement Glossary of Terms  Business Engagement SWOT Analysis  Business Community Participants (?Name?)  Baldrige community winners snapshots – Irving, Texas and Coral Springs, Florida Business Appreciation Breakfast 2017 Survey Results How satisfied were you with the following aspects of the event? Highly Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissastisfied Highly Dissatisfied Responses Location 34 10 3 0 0 47 72.30% 21.30% 6.40% 0.00% 0.00% Breakfast 22 17 8 2 1 50 44.00% 34.00% 16.00% 4.00% 2.00% Business Panel 36 10 3 1 0 50 72.00% 20.00% 6.00% 2.00% 0.00% Event Flow 30 13 4 3 0 50 60.00% 26.00% 8.00% 6.00% 0.00% Keynote 43 5 2 0 0 50 86.00% 10.00% 4.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Responses 50 Overall, the event Percent Responses Exceed my expectations 73.5 36 Met my expectations 2635 13 Total Responses 49 ATTACHMENT 3 Would you recommend this event to colleagues? Percent Responses Yes 96.00% 48 No 2.00% 1 Other write ‐in 2.00% 1 Total Responses 50 What are you grateful for in terms of business? A city that maintains contact and positively reinforces the value of business to the success of a community A vibrant, vital and involved community A collaborative community. City of FOCO, Larimer County Workforce, United Way, the great citizens of NOCO! Community of support and caring leaders! That business in Fort Collins considers gratitude an important theme. The support the City offices provide businesses in areas such as ClimateWise What other comments do you have? Hickenlooper is a fantastic speaker. I have been to all 5 Business Breakfasts ‐ and this was the very best one! Really glad to see a local panel with a diverse business background. T he event was flawless. Congrats to the team that planned and executed it! While it's a great event ‐ there isn't really time/space to connect with other business people at the event I'm grateful for an innovative and supportive community that values investing in the community in tangible ways. The number of small and Independent (as opposed to large franchises or national chain) businesses in Fort Collins, the spirit of enterprise and entrepreneurship here, and the commitment to collaboration among businesses, the City, and the University. Great event! Continue to focus on a healthy economy and publicly celebrate the importance of our local business community. I was inspired by the panel and the vision for growth from Hickenlooper. Thank you for putting on such a meaningful event. Business Retention & Expansion 2017 Survey Results from BAB Survey Is your company growth (head count or sales): Percent Responses Up 81.5% 22 Netural 18.5% 5 Down 0.0% 0 Total Responses 27 Are your feelings about the Northern Colorado economy: Percent Responses Up 85.2% 23 Netural 15.8% 4 Down 0.0% 0 Total Responses 27 Would you consider relocating outside of Northern Colorado: Percent Responses Yes 11.1% 3 No 70.4% 19 Maybe 18.5% 5 Total Responses 27 What is the greatest opportunity facing your business? A vibrant downtown for my development business. Growth and changing workforce Responsible, local growth and development T he educated engaged workforce in NOCO is a definite plus. What is the greatest threat facing your business? Construction costs and land costs are going up more than rents. Is your company any of the following? Percent Responses Women‐owned 29.6% 8 T he National builders coming here hurt the smaller custom builders. T hey are buying up all the ground and there does not appear to be any developers able to develop ground for the local custom builders A growing educated population which is constantly pushing to make this a more progressive and inclusive community. A significant economic downturn. Fort Collins cost of living Shifting public perceptions Complacency (particularly if elected officials take business/economy for granted), cost of housing Irresponsible growth and development. Uninformed opposition, restriction and unnecessary and/or unfair fees/costs. Not enough skilled employees who can afford to live in the area and get around via alternative transportation. Overwhelmed with the amount of high‐quality people and difficult to know which ones to say, "No" to. Minority‐owned 3.7% 1 Employee‐owned 14.8% 4 None 63.0% 17 Total Responses 30 Economic Health Office Project Plan Page 1 10/3/2017 Project Team Charter Enterprise-wide Business Engagement Action Plan Project Team Name: Enterprise-wide Business Engagement Action Plan Strategic Goal: Economic Health & High Performing Government Project Lead: Josh Birks Date: March 24, 2017 Project Statement: The City of Fort Collins has defined two primary customer groups through its Baldridge application process, citizens and businesses. Through the same process, the 2016 Baldridge Feedback Report described a number of Opportunities for Improvement (OFI) specifically related to the City’s interaction and understanding of the business customer. These OFIs include: 1. City does not have a systematic approach to listen to businesses or obtain actionable feedback from them (Category 3.1 – Voice of Customer); 2. City does not have a systematic process for assessing the satisfaction, dissatisfaction, and engagement of its business customers (Category 3.1 – Voice of Customer); 3. City does not have a systematic approach to determine its business customer segments to emphasize and pursue for business growth (Category 3.2 – Customer Engagement); and 4. The City provides no similar or alternative satisfaction results data for business customers’ to the Citizen Survey (Category 7.2 – Customer-Focused Results). NOTE: Systematic in this context means consistency of approach as well as organizational continuity. Business Case: The Baldridge process has identified a discrepancy between the understanding of customer need and level of service provided to the City’s business customers compared to its other major customer – residents or citizens. The City needs an effective way of gathering information from its business customers and evaluating and responding to that information. The proposed business engagement action plan will address two major outcomes: 1. Business Satisfaction – with specific services, the City in general, and the community – the same measure used to determine the ultimate success of the City’s services at addressing the resident/citizen customer; and 2. City Product Offering Refinement – with a focus on business customer need and a goal of improving individual and collective business success in our community – by increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of existing or new City Programs (services and incentives) with the long-term goal of improving economic health in the community. The action plan is further linked to the City’s strategic plan through a number of Strategic Objectives (SO), including but not limited to SO 3.2, 3.4, 3.6, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 7.1, 7.5, & 7.6. ATTACHMENT 4 Economic Health Office Project Plan Page 2 10/3/2017 Measureable Objectives 1. Improved customer satisfaction with business customers 2. Increased efficiency and utilization of business oriented City services 3. Increased return on City efforts to support business retention, expansion, incubation and attraction Other objectives 1. Understand the voice of the business customer: a. Measure business customer satisfaction (in general and for specific City services); b. Understanding of current/anticipated business issues (market conditions, opportunities, regulatory barriers, etc.) that effect the community’s economic health; 2. Identify the types of services to provide and how to provide them effectively to meet business customer needs with the long-term goal of improving economic health in the community; and 3. Understand business customer segments and clarify methods of engagement. Scope - Major Deliverables Engagement System 1. Revised Baldridge Application – likely for 2018 application and 2017 follow-up 2. Current state assessment to include business segmentation, business customer engagement methods, and product offerings 3. Improved coordination across departments in terms of engaging with business customers, including: a. Developing a system for tracking and response/follow-up of business issues; and b. Training for key staff engaging with businesses based on norms established during this plan, or as part of the functional area’s operational processes Business Feedback & Intelligence 1. Centralization of business feedback and intelligence a. Through implementation of a Customer Relationship Management system (linked to the Utilities on-going efforts to identify and pilot such a tool); and b. Development of a “Citizen Survey” style Survey of Business Climate & Satisfaction c. Clear definition of “trigger points” within feedback mechanism to alert a specific department or division to a potential opportunity to engage or intervene to help a business (e.g., falling behind on sales tax may trigger non-payment of utility bills and present an opportunity for EHO to meet with the business and share available resources) 2. Optimized Program Offerings and Processes to Businesses a. Evaluation of which services to provide and how to deliver them well Economic Health Office Project Plan Page 3 10/3/2017 Members and Key Stakeholders (by department): EXECUTIVE SPONSOR Jackie Kozak-Thiel PROJECT TEAM (Internal Working Group) Josh Birks (EHO - Project Director) Blaine (Finance – Sales Tax) SeonAh Kendal (EHO - Project Manager) Emily Wilmsen/David Young (CPIO) Shannon Hein (EHO - Key Business Analyst) Tyler Marr (CMO) Tom Leeson (PDT) Lucas Mouttet (Utilities) TBD (Police Department) TBD (Poudre Fire Authority) ADVISORY TEAM (External Working Group) - TBD KEY INTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS (Regular Progress Updates) * Utilities PDT Kevin Gertig Laurie Kadrich Lisa Rosintoski IES John Phelan Kelly DiMartino Travis Paige Terri Runyan Dan Coldiron Finance Sustainability Services Mike Beckstead Lucinda Smith Beth Sowder CMO Police Services Jeff Mihelich Kevin Cronin *NOTE: The work plan will indicate when and how the Advisory Team will engage in the project, as well as general milestones and check-in points for reporting out to Key Stakeholders. It is anticipated that the Advisory Team will function very similarly to the broadband citizen group. Time Frames/Major Milestones Identified timeline is April 2017 through 4th quarter 2017. Major Milestones are:  Kick-off Meeting (Scheduled for early May)  Develop Work Plan (In Progress)  Current State Assessment Summary (In Progress)  Best Practices and Peer City Learning  Baldridge Application Updates  Identification of Process Improvements & New Systems, to include but not limited to: o CRM; and o Customer Service Training  Implementation NOTE: After each milestone there will be a review with core team and Executive Sponsor for continuation to next milestone. High Level Risks:  Limited availability of Project Team  No funding currently identified for specific implementation steps  Buy-in organization-wide on the importance of addressing this customer base  Sense of urgency Economic Health Office Project Plan Page 4 10/3/2017 Constraints:  Need to continue to provide high level of service while processes are changed and improved  Need to work within existing timelines of BFO, Baldridge application, Strategic Planning, etc.  Wide array of services provided to business customer with potentially varying approaches to engagement  Multiple competing organization wide objectives all demanding time and attention from staff Assets/Opportunities:  Existing EHO full-time vacant position re-tooled to focus on business engagement  Significant external partner interest and willingness to contribute  Senior leadership alignment around the need to act Project Manager Assigned and Authority Level SeonAh Kendall shall be the project manager and has the authority to request team members and will work with Management to secure any necessary resources to complete the project. Cost/Budget/Financial Assumptions: Key cost identification at this time is labor of project team participation and input from key stakeholders. Project Sponsor Authorization: _________________________________________ Josh Birks, Economic Health & Redevelopment Director ________________________________________ Jackie Kozak-Thiel, Chief Sustainability Officer Project Plan Draft 2 8/21/17 Project title: Industry Action Group Project Leader: SeonAh Kendall Team Members: Lucas Mouttet, Shannon Hein Description: Similar to the Broadband Citizen Group, the Industry Action Group is brought together to share and exchange insight. Additionally, this group will be able to provide honest feedback on the City’s Business Engagement Action Plan and share this information and insight with their colleagues, networks and associations that they participate in. Objective: Share and exchange information in regard to the City’s Business Engagement Action Plan.  Be a liaison to the business community regarding the current process, engagement opportunities and share questions/insight back to the BEAP core team  Assist staff design communications for the broader business community Deliverables:  Identify a suite of communication tools to reach businesses of all sizes and industries  Develop marketing/communication plan to assist City employees in identifying the right communication tool for their engagement needs Key Actions / milestones Deadline  Hold a kick-off meeting inviting businesses to participate in the Industry Action Group o Agenda:  Group expectations – what it is and what it is note  Hear from the group on who is missing and where we should do additional outreach  Brainstorm groups we should be talking to/involving  Start crafting messaging and anticipating community questions  Outline future meeting time and schedule (every 6 – 8 weeks) 8/31/17   ATTACHMENT 5 Resources:  Budget: $1,500 (food, materials)  Estimated hours: 2 hours prep per meeting X 2 hour mtg. Meet more often at the beginning, estimate 20 hours in 2017  Location of files / resources:  Staffing this project: 10-10-2017 Business Engagement Action Plan Jackie Kozak-Thiel, Josh Birks, SeonAh Kendall ATTACHMENT 6 Question Business Engagement 1. Are we addressing what Council is hearing from the business community? 2. Does the Business Engagement Action Plan support and complement Council priorities? 2 Council Priorities 3 Strategic Outcome Area Policy – Project EHO Lead/Support Economic Health • Small Business Visibility Ø Lead • Economic Health Focus Ø Business Retention and Expansion Ø Workforce Development Efficiencies Ø Strategic Alignment on Fees Ø Continued Focus on 1-25 Ultimate Design Ø Lead Ø Support Ø Support Ø Support • Connected Smart City Ø Innovation/City as a Platform Ø Broadband Ø Smart City Technology and Infrastructure Ø Lead Ø Support Ø Support Economic Health - Our Vision 4 A healthy, sustainable economy reflecting community values. EHO History 5 2004 Economic Vitality & Sustainability Assessment Group 2005 Economic Action Plan 2006 Industry Cluster Analysis 2009 Economic Health Office (EHO) 2010 Urban Renewal Authority added 2012 EHO Joins Sustainability Service Area 2015 Updated Economic Health Strategic Plan 2016 Added Climate Economy 2017 Launched Business Engagement Action Plan Role of Economic Health 6 EHO Focus 7 Business Support • SeonAh Kendall (Lead) • Shannon Hein (SME) • Vacant (Policy/Metrics) Redevelopment • Patrick Rowe (Lead) Innovation & Climate Economy • Sean Carpenter (Lead) • Jackson Brockway (Innovation) Jackie Kozak Thiel (Chief Sustainability Officer); Josh Birks (Director); Rebecca Hicklin (Support); Emily Wilmsen (Communication) Baldrige Feedback 8 Opportunities for Improvement: Ø Systematic approach to: ü Identify business customer segments ü Listen to businesses ü Assess satisfaction and engagement ü Collect and evaluate information to improve services Business Engagement Vision 9 External Ø Improved business customer satisfaction Ø Enhanced relationship between the City and business community Internal Ø Coordinated City-wide business engagement strategy Business Engagement Action Plan Timeline 10 • Current State Assessment • Stakeholder Convening • Identify Issues & Gaps • Develop Strategy • Define Metrics • Council Engagement • City-wide Strategy for Engaging Business Customer • Implement non BFO items • Budget for Outcomes • Periodic Status Reports (2x/Year) • Regular Review of Approach • Improvements as identified Phase 1: Analysis Phase 2: Design Phase 3: Implementation Phase 4: Review & Modify Business Engagement Assessment 11 Ø A desire to increase consistency, improved communication, prevent duplication ü Demand for a city-wide Customer Relationship Management (CRM) System Ø No common language or consistent segmentation guidelines Ø Customer service and relationships are built and maintained differently City-wide Observations – Listening Sessions & Employee Survey Quick Wins 12 • ACCESS Fort Collins business identification Survey/Data • Pilot CRM • National Business Survey • Small Business Survey Mid-Cycle Offers Business listening session with Mayor and City Manager Business Appreciation Breakfast Business Engagement 13 Council Engagement How Can Council Engage with Businesses? Meet the businesses where they are at. • Coffee talks • Site visits • Listening sessions • Tours • Events 14 Next Steps 15 • Stakeholder Convening o October 2017 • Business Survey o October 2017 • Strategy Development o October 2017 – February 2018 Questions Business Engagement 1. Are we addressing what Council is hearing from the business community? 2. Does the Business Engagement Action Plan support and complement Council priorities? 16 17 Objectives/Agenda • EHO History • Where we came from • Current State Assessment • Council Priorities • Where we are • Business Engagement is a team sport • Where we are headed • How we measure success • How Council can be involved 18 Opportunities for Improvements 19 • Visibility of economic health • Consistent business engagement • Housing attainability • In-town mobility • The right balance between the triple bottom line approach What’s Working 20 • Business assistance packages • Redevelopment • Innosphere partnership • Talent – Labor Force Study; Talent 2.0 • Sector partnerships • Business Appreciation Breakfast • Business site visits It’s a Team Sport 21 Engagement Spectrum.  Create a “How to start a business” roadmap to be shared throughout the City and supporting organizations, so everyone communicates the same path.  Website changes to reflect the observations and recommendations from the BEAP current state assessment  Develop a communication plan in conjunction with Transportation and Utilities for construction projects that can interrupt service or impact business. Provide options and support before project begins, up to one year in advance if possible.  Convene Transfort, DBA and Chamber to improve the Passfort process, making it easier for the pass-through  Downtown Business Association Interaction Discussion Items  Background of the project  Departments Involved  Partnerships and Industries Involved  What Worked?  What Didn’t?  Lessons Learned Questions Segmentation Analysis  How do you define/segment your customers?  What relationship do you want with your customers/what level? ATTACHMENT 2