Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 02/19/2019 - FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 022, 2019, APPROPRIAgenda Item 8 Item # 8 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY February 19, 2019 City Council STAFF Kaley Zeisel, Transfort Capital Planning/Grant Compliance Mgr Drew Brooks, Director of Transit Chris Van Hall, Legal SUBJECT First Reading of Ordinance No. 022, 2019, Appropriating Unanticipated Grant Revenue from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in the Transit Services Fund and Appropriating Prior Year Reserves in the Transit Services Fund and Authorizing the Transfer of Appropriations from the Transit Services Fund to the Capital Project Fund for the Accessible Infrastructure Enhancement Project and Transferring Appropriations from the Capital Project Fund to the Cultural Services and Facilities Fund for the Art in Public Places Program. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to appropriate unanticipated grant revenue awarded by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to upgrade bus stops throughout the Transfort service area. This infrastructure enhancement project will use FTA grant funds in the amount of $1,520,344 with a local match of $380,086 derived from Community Capital Improvement Program (CCIP) funds. This project will repair or replace concrete pads at bus stops and purchase amenities, such as shelters, over the next two to three years. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The objective of this infrastructure improvement project is to upgrade a significant portion of existing bus stops consistent with the American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), in an effort to maintain local transit opportunities that are accessible for people of all abilities and ages, and to provide accessible bus shelters. Transfort will utilize CCIP local funds over the next several years to match the federal award to increase the funding of the Bus Stop Improvement Project to $1.9 million. The prioritized list of bus stops planned to be upgraded is based on use and proximity to public services. Bus stops are a critical part of the transit system as they serve as the first point of contact between the customer and the transit service; and stops are a factored in a rider’s satisfaction level with overall transportation service. Previous related Council Actions: • Ordinance No. 077, 2015: Adopted new Bus Stop Design Standards and Guidelines; • Ordinance No. 013, 2015: Extended the 0.25% “Building on Basics” capital projects sales and use tax, funding $1,000,000 over ten (10) years for Bus Stop Improvements. Resolution 2015-012 brought this ordinance to the voters in the regular City election; • Resolution 2011-111: Authorized the City Manager or his/her designee to execute and file applications on behalf of the City with the FTA; and • Mayor Troxell submitted a letter in support of Transfort’s application for federal funding of this project. This project supports several key local and regional plans, including: Agenda Item 8 Item # 8 Page 2 • City of Fort Collins 2018 Strategic Plan includes objectives to “improve accessibility to community and City programs” and to “improve aging and/or missing transportation infrastructure.” • North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization (NFRMPO) 2040 Regional Transportation Plan prioritizes providing a multi-modal system that improves accessibility and system continuity. • Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) 2040 Statewide Transit Plan includes a goal to provide convenient transit opportunities for all populations. CITY FINANCIAL IMPACTS Transfort will leverage CCIP funding earmarked for fiscal years 2018-2021 to provide the local match for unanticipated revenue in the amount of $1,520,344, which was awarded by the FTA as 5339(b) funds. Year CCIP Funds Federal Funding Previously appropriated in the Capital Projects Fund 224,500 FY2018 1,520,344 FY2020 100,000 FY2021 55,586 Total Funding 380,086 1,520,344 Percent of Total Project 20% 80% Due to the fact that CCIP for FY2020 and FY2021 is not yet appropriated or approved, Transfort requests the use of Transit reserves to initially provide the local match amount with the FY2020 and FY2021 appropriations being used to backfill transit. This project meets requirements for Art in Public Places (APP) - 1% of the total project costs is $19,004. However, under the previous congressional authorization bill, MAP-21, federal transit funds are no longer available to support public art in transit facilities. Therefore, 5339 funds cannot be used to meet the APP requirement. For this reason, staff is requesting an additional $19,004 be appropriated to be used toward Art in Public Places. If approved, the funding for APP will be drawn from Transfort’s Transit Reserve Funds. The total reserves request from the Transit Services Fund is $174,590 with the intention to backfill $155,586 from CCIP as additional appropriations are granted through the budget process. The overall appropriation request is $1,694,934. ATTACHMENTS 1. Bus Stop Design Standards (PDF) 2. Community Capital Improvement Program Ordinance (CCIP) (PDF) 3. Mayor Troxell Letter of Support for Grant Application (PDF) BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS & GUIDELINES July 21, 2015 ATTACHMENT 1 TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Technical Advisory Committee Noah Al Hadidi, CSU Student Sarah Allmon, Barrier Busters Public Transportation Advisory Group (PTAG) Vivian Armendariz, Citizen Michael Devereaux, PTAG, Commission on Disability Kathryn Grimes, Bike Advisory Commission Jamie Rideoutt, Lamar Advertising Company Ed Roberts, Transportation Board (past member) Carol Thomas, Transfort Safety, Security and Training Manager Project Management Team Emma Belmont, Transfort — Transit Planner Steve Gilchrist, Traffic — Traffic Engineer Aaron Iverson, FC Moves — Senior Transportation Planner Tim Kemp, Engineering — Civil Engineer III Tom Knostman, Streets — Pavement Engineer Kathleen Walker, Transfort — Operations Manager Graphics and Formatting Slate Communications BHA Design Incorporated TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES CONTENTS 1. OVERVIEW 1.1 PURPOSE 1.2 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THESE STANDARDS AND GUIDANCE 1.3 INTEGRATION WITH OTHER STANDARDS GUIDANCE 2. THE BIG PICTURE 2.1 INTRODUCTION 2.2 TRANSIT SYSTEM OVERVIEW 2.3 BUS STOP INSTALLATION AND UPGRADE — HOW DOES IT HAPPEN? 2.4 OBSTACLES TO IMPROVING TRANSIT INFRASTRUCTURE 2.5 BUS STOP MAINTENANCE AND ADVERTISING 3. STREET-SIDE CHARACTERISTICS 3.1 INTRODUCTION 3.2 STOP SPACING 3.3 STOP LOCATING 3.4 IN-STREET DESIGN 3.5 TECHNICAL DETAILS 4. CURB-SIDE CHARACTERISTICS 4.1 INTRODUCTION 4.2 UNIVERSAL DESIGN AND ADA ACCESSIBILITY 4.3 BUS STOP TYPES 4.4 AMENITIES 4.5 BUS STOP TYPE DETERMINATION 5. NEXT STEPS 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5.2 TRANSFORT BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PLAN 5.3 RECOMMENDED FUTURE ACTIONS 6. APPENDIX 6.1 BUS STOP DEVELOPMENT FORM 6.2 LAND USE CODE SECTION 3.6.5 6.3 TECHNICAL DESIGNS (As Incorporated into Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards) 6.4 CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE LETTER OF SUPPORT TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 1 1. OVERVIEW 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of the Bus Stop Design Standards and Guidelines document is to assist City staff, developers, local partners and private property owners in locating and designing bus stops and their associated passenger amenities within the City of Fort Collins as well as the greater Transfort service area. The document consists of five chapters: • Overview — discusses how to use the standards and guidance • The Big Picture — discusses the transit network as it currently exists and the envisioned future of transit service in Fort Collins • Street-side Characteristics — discusses the factors associated with the roadway that influence bus operations • Curb-side Characteristics — discusses the factors associated with the comfort, safety and convenience of patrons at bus stops • Next Steps — discusses Transfort’s approach to pursue capital improvements and outlines related action items related to bus stop accessibility TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 2 1.2 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THESE STANDARDS AND GUIDANCE This guidance document was created with the assistance of a Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC), created by Transfort, comprised of local transit riders, cycling advocates, safety specialists, urban designers, students, media professionals, Transfort staff and other interested parties. The CAC members included individuals with a wide range of abilities and experiences with the transit network. A project management team (PMT) of City staff also assisted in the development of this document. This group focused on the technical components and safety considerations as they relate to bus stops. The following City departments were represented in the PMT: Engineering, FC Moves, Planning, Streets, Traffic, and Transfort. In addition, Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 19 – Guidelines for the Location and Design of Bus Stops, as well as various other transit agency bus stop design documents, provided best practices and general guidance in the development of the standards and guidance outlined in this document. 1.3 INTEGRATION WITH OTHER STANDARDS AND GUIDANCE There are various tools that work in tandem with this standards and guidance document. Within the Transfort department, other important guidance tools that may provide guidance on facilities and services include: Transfort Strategic Operating Plan (TSOP), Transfort Operating Manual (TOM), and Transfort Service Standards. Additional documents that govern site development include: Fort Collins Land Use Code (LUC) and Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS). If conflicts arise between these documents, the more specific and/or stringent standard will apply. TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 3 2. THE BIG PICTURE 2.1 INTRODUCTION Bus stops are a critical part of the transit system as they serve as the first point of contact between the customer and the service. In addition, bus stop placement throughout the community acts to promote alternative modes of transportation to the traveling public. The spacing, location and design all affect the operation of the transit system and, in turn, the transit patron’s satisfaction. The standards and guidance in this document are intended to guide the design of transit stops that complement their immediate surroundings, meet the transit patron’s comfort and safety needs, and support an efficient transit network. The placement of transit stops is guided by safety considerations, community context, patron’s origins and destinations, opportunity, and Transfort’s strategic planning efforts. The TSOP is Transfort’s long range planning tool; however, it is possible that community growth and change will occur in ways not anticipated by the TSOP, and therefore routes and bus stops may be different from those envisioned in the TSOP. The TSOP proposed long range routes are depicted in Figure 2 below. 2.2 TRANSIT SYSTEM OVERVIEW The City of Fort Collins operates its own transit system, which is branded as Transfort. Transfort operates fixed route transportation within the City of Fort Collins and in parts of unincorporated Larimer County. Complementary paratransit service is contracted to and operated by Veolia Transportation. A regional express route, known as FLEX, is provided through a partnership between Fort Collins, Loveland, Berthoud, Longmont and Boulder County. Transfort bus stops are located within Fort Collins city limits as well as in unincorporated Larimer County, the City of Loveland, the Town of Berthoud, Boulder County and the City of Longmont. Transfort’s route map (August 2015) is provided below in Figure 1. Following Figure 1 is a map of the long range vision for transit service in and surrounding Fort Collins, Figure 2. This map illustrates the TSOP vision for a full transition into a productivity-based grid system. It incorporates the Phase 3 planned routes, along with additional recommendations from other adopted plans TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 4 and new routes that have been added since the TSOP’s adoption. The purpose of this map is to indicate where new bus stops will be located as development occurs throughout the city. VINE DR. MULBERRY ST. PROSPECT RD. DRAKE RD. HORSETOOTH RD. HARMONY RD. OVERLAND TRAIL TAFT HILL RD. LEMAY AVE. TIMBERLINE RD. I-25 SHIELDS ST. COLLEGE AVE. LAPORTE AVE. ELIZABETH ST. 6 19 91 33 18 16 14 12 10 9 92 81 7 5 32 31 DTC CTC STC 8 2 Figure 1 — Transfort All Routes Map (Effective August 2015) TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 5 Figure 2 — Transfort Strategic Operating Plan Phase 3 Routes and Proposed Changes TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 6 2.3 BUS STOP INSTALLATION AND UPGRADE — HOW DOES IT HAPPEN? There are just over 500 existing bus stops in the Transfort system; of these, some meet the standards outlined in this document and some do not. In addition to existing bus stops that Transfort currently serves, the TSOP sets forth a plan for expanded service which will require new transit facilities throughout Transfort’s service area. There are a variety of ways transit facilities are installed and upgraded throughout the Transfort system, and they are described below: • Transfort’s Capital Improvement Plan — The Improvement Plan, which is based on location specific criteria, identified in the Bus Stop Development Form (Appendix 1) and Section 4.5, prioritizes bus stop improvements in the Transfort Service Area. Transfort anticipates an annual budget of $100,000, based on dedicated tax revenue (Building on Basics), for bus stop improvements. It is estimated that this amount will fund approximately 7–10 bus stops annually. Transfort also pursues grants to fund additional improvements. Improvements are generally implemented according to the Improvement Plan, but obstacles do arise as described in Section 2.4. • Transfort’s Service Agreement for Bus Stops — Transfort contracts with an advertising company for the installation, provision of passenger amenities and maintenance of Transfort’s bus stops. This agreement permits Transfort to request solid surface upgrades to bus stops that are located within public right-of-way (ROW) and installation of passenger amenities at bus stops in Transfort’s service area. In a typical year, this agreement provides for the upgrade of approximately 10 bus stops. • Development and/or Redevelopment — As properties develop and redevelop within city limits the City’s Land Use Code (LUC) requires that the development accommodate both the existing and planned transit network (LUC Section 3.6.5 text included in Appendix 2). This requires developers to provide the necessary transit infrastructure and passenger amenities, if applicable, on or adjacent to their property. Developer responsibilities may include: dedicating additional public ROW; dedicating a Transit Easement; installation of a bus stop solid surface; installation of a bus pullout; and installation of or payment in lieu for TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 7 the applicable bus stop passenger amenities, all in accordance with the standards set forth in this document.  Transfort does not have control over which stops are improved via this method. Bus stop improvements may not be in accordance with the Improvement Plan Priorities set forth in this document. • City Capital Improvement and Street Maintenance Projects — Every year the City’s Engineering and Streets Departments implement capital improvements and street maintenance. These departments manage infrastructure improvements and work with Transfort to help upgrade bus stops, as needed in the area of the project’s impact. Since stops improved through this method are opportunistic, improvements may not reflect the same priorities as listed in the Improvement Plan. TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 8 2.4 OBSTACLES TO IMPROVING TRANSIT INFRASTRUCTURE Many obstacles exist outside of Transfort’s control, which makes providing quality transit facilities challenging at times. Obstacles to improving bus stops include: available space (including public ROW) for stop infrastructure (solid surface and passenger amenities); accessible neighborhood sidewalks connecting to stops; accessible street crossings; and temporary obstacles such as those due to weather events like snow, rain or hail. Transfort actively works with other City departments to make improvements to the sidewalk network and to add accessible bus stops in conjunction with City construction activities. However, it will take many years for all stops to be improved because infrastructure deficiencies are widespread. Images 1, 2 and 3 below demonstrate some of the obstacles that limit transit facility improvements. Image 1 Image 2 Laporte and Overland Eastbound (EB) Obstacles: • Limited public ROW • No sidewalks Shields and Swallow Northbound (NB) Obstacles: • Limited public ROW Image 3 Harmony and Corbett (EB) Obstacles: • Covered section of ditch runs between sidewalk and edge of street TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 9 2.5 BUS STOP MAINTENANCE AND ADVERTISING Transfort, like many transit agencies across the nation, utilizes advertising revenue to provide both maintenance of and passenger amenities at bus stops. Transfort contracts this service with an advertising contractor, allowing them to advertise at Transfort bus stops. In return, Transfort benefits from a portion of the advertising revenue, as well as the contractor’s maintenance of bus stops (including snow removal) and the contractor’s provision of passenger amenities and solid surface installation at locations within public ROW. However, advertising is not permitted at all bus stops within Transfort’s network. In single family residential areas, for example, advertising is limited to side-yards. In addition, certain areas may not be appropriate for advertising, such as historically significant sites. In such cases, Transfort has a limited number of non-advertising bus stop benches and shelters that can be used if advertising is deemed to be incompatible with the character of the area. Images 4–7 below are examples of advertising at Transfort bus stops. Image 4 Harmony and Timberline (EB) Image 5 Image 6 Image 7 Harmony and Larkbunting (WB) Rock Creek at Fossil Ridge High School (EB) Taft Hill and Drake (NB) TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 10 3. STREET-SIDE CHARACTERISTICS 3.1 INTRODUCTION This section discusses preferred and alternative street-side or in-street stop designs. Street-side characteristics refer to features associated with the roadway that influence transit operations. These features include elements such as: traffic speeds, street design, intersection design and the location of acceleration/deceleration lanes. Street-side features influence the location of and in-street design of bus stops. It is important to note that since stop designs were developed based on standard roadway characteristics, the on-site context may call for locations or designs that are tailored to that context. Ultimately, Transfort staff, with the input from the City’s Traffic, Engineering and FC Moves Departments, will make the final decision on the location and design that is appropriate for a given situation. Image 8 Street-side Characteristics TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 11 3.2 STOP SPACING Stop spacing refers to the distance between stops along a bus route. Stop spacing takes into consideration the trade-offs between vehicle travel times and walking distances to bus stops. While more frequently placed bus stops reduce walking distances, it also slows down bus service. In contrast, longer distances between stops increases vehicle speed but may result in customers having to walk longer distances to get to bus stops. This is described in TCRP’s Report 19 as trade- offs between operating efficiencies and customer accessibility, as follows: Table 1 — Trade-offs of Stop Spacing TCRP Report 19 also describes the industry standards for bus stop spacing typically being subdivided by land use types/densities or locating stops near major trip generators. This suggests using closer spaced stops in more densely populated areas, such as the central business core, and increasing space between stops when approaching more suburban and rural areas of the community. In addition Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) type routes generally suggest an increased distance between stops to decrease travel times. Table 2 below describes typical ranges for the different land use environments. Transfort uses these ranges as references, but in general the main considerations for bus stop locating and spacing are safety, such as reducing bus and vehicle conflicts, and major trip generators, such as, community activity centers and concentrations of residences and businesses. Where feasible, stops shall be located approximately ¼ mile apart. In locations where stop spacing is more then ⅓ mile apart, a midpoint stop may be considered if adjacent land uses warrant such additional stop placement. Close stops (every block or ⅛ mile – ¼ mile spacing) Further distance between stops (Beyond ¼ mile spacing) •Short walking distances •More frequent stops, creating longer travel time •Longer walking distances •Less frequent stops, creating shorter travel time TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 12 Table 2 — Recommended Bus Stop Spacing 3.3 STOP LOCATING There are three location options for bus stops: near-side, far-side and mid-block, as shown in Figure 3 below. Far-side stops are, in general, Transfort’s preferred stop location because they are shown to be the safest for passengers exiting the bus and minimize conflicts with other vehicles. However, a mid-block or near-side stop may be more appropriate in some situations. Many factors influence the location of stops, such as site specific safety considerations, traffic patterns, intersection geometry, passenger origins and destinations, pedestrian accessibility, route design and available space. Transfort staff determine which stop location is most appropriate for each individual situation, and Table 3 may be used to help make a decision based on the trade- offs of each possible location. Environment Route Type Spacing Range Urban Area (within a City Plan Activity Center, see Figure 20 in Section 4.5) Local Route ⅛ – ¼ Mile Express or Bus Rapid Transit Route ½ – 1 Mile or As Needed Suburban Area Local Route ¼ – ½ Mile Express or Bus Rapid Transit Route 1 Mile or As Needed Rural Area Local Route As Needed Express or Bus Rapid Transit Route As Needed TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 13 Figure 3 — Near-Side, Far-Side and Mid-Block Stops Locations TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 14 STOP LOCATION ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES NEAR-SIDE STOP Use if: • Destinations are focused at the near-side corner • Route pattern calls for near-side location • Available space is limited on far-side • Allows passengers to access buses close to the crosswalk • Eliminates the potential for double stopping — passenger loading can occur when bus is stopped at the signal • Increases conflict with right-turning vehicles • May result in stopping buses obscuring curbside traffic control devices and crossing pedestrians • May block the through traffic lanes during peak hours • May cause sight distance problems for pedestrians and motorists • May increase rear-end accidents if drivers aren’t anticipating the bus stopping before the intersection • Vehicles may attempt to turn in front of a stopped bus that is beginning to pull away FAR-SIDE STOP Use if: • Destinations are on both sides of street or on the far side of the intersection • Minimizes conflicts between right- turning vehicles and buses • Allows for additional right-turn capacity (because bus is not stopping in the right turn lane) • Minimizes sight distance difficulties on approach to intersections • Encourages pedestrians to cross behind the bus • Bus can merge into traffic more easily, taking advantage of gaps • Stopped buses may block intersections during congested periods • May cause a bus to stop twice in short order: once at a red light and once at the bus stop • May increase rear-end accidents if drivers do not anticipate the bus stopping after the intersection TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 15 3.4 IN-STREET DESIGN The In-Street Design refers to the location that the bus stops in the street to approach the bus stop, such as in a bus pullout, travel lane, bike lane or on a road shoulder. Determining what design is appropriate depends on safety considerations, street design, available space, ridership and other factors. Most of Transfort’s buses stop in bike or travel lanes, but bus pullouts may be used in areas where there is high ridership, a large number of route transfers or where traffic is considered to be high volume. Queue jumps refer to an intersection design that allows the bus to move ahead of queueing traffic to progress through high congestion intersections quicker. Queue jumps and bus pullouts typically originate from recommendations of a corridor, sub-area or service-related planning effort (e.g. Harmony Road Enhanced Travel Corridor Alternatives Analysis, Lincoln Corridor Plan, or West Central Area Plan). In addition, a bus pullout may be required when multiple routes transfer at the location. Foothills Mall provides an example of such a situation. In-Street Design alternatives are illustrated below in Figures 4 and 5. Bus pullouts, shall be designed to the detail shown in LCUASS drawing 711. The flow chart in Figure 6 helps to determine what In-Street Design is appropriate, and the trade-off of each design is described in Table 4. TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 16 Figure 4 — In-Street Bus Stop Design Alternatives TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 17 Figure 5 — Bus Stop Zone Dimensions (where on-street parking is present) TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 18 Figure 6 — In-Street Design Recommendations Is a design recommended as part of an adopted plan? YES Use design identified in the Plan NO Is the stop a transfer location? YES What volume of transfers are anticipated? NO Is there on-street parking? YES NO A Bulbout stop is most likely appropriate A Curbside stop is appropriate HIGH VOLUME (BRT connections or more than 3 routes serve the stop) LOW VOLUME (2-3 low frequency routes) How many travel lanes are on the adjacent road? A Bus Pullout or Open Bus Bay is appropriate 1 in each direction A Bus Pullout or Open Bus Bay is appropriate 2 or more in each direction TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 19 STOP LOCATION ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES CURBSIDE STOP (Typical) • Provides easy approach for bus drivers and results in minimal delay to the bus • Simple design and inexpensive to install • Easy to relocate • Can cause traffic delays since bus stops in the travel lane • May cause drivers to make unsafe passing maneuvers BUS PULLOUT (Route transfer stop and/or on roads with two travel lanes) • Bus is out of travel lane, minimizing delay to traffic • Passengers board/alight out of traffic • Re-entry into congested traffic can be difficult and cause delays • Expensive to install, making relocation difficult/expensive OPEN BUS BAY • Allows the bus to decelerate in the intersection • See Bus Pullout advantages • See Bus Pullout disadvantages QUEUE JUMP • Allows bus to bypass queued traffic • See Bus Pullout advantages • May delay right turning vehicles • See Bus Pullout disadvantages BULBOUT/NUB (For locations with on-street parking) • Removes fewer parking spaces than others • Decreases walking distances to bus stops for pedestrians • Provides additional sidewalk area for passengers • Results in minimal delay for buses • Costs more to install compared to curbside stops • See Curbside Stop disadvantages Table 4 — Recommended Bus Stop In-Street Design TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 20 4. CURB-SIDE CHARACTERISTICS 4.1 INTRODUCTION This section describes criteria that all bus stops shall meet, provides preferred layout of passenger amenities at stops and recommends how amenities should be distributed throughout the Transfort service area. Curbside characteristics refer to features associated with the comfort, safety and convenience of customers at bus stops outside of the roadway. These features include factors like sidewalk width, connections to adjacent land uses, and bus stop passenger amenities such as shelters, benches, bike racks, trash and recycling receptacles and lighting. Newly constructed or altered bus stops shall meet the standards in this section to the maximum extent feasible. Image 9 Curb-side Characteristics TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 21 4.2 UNIVERSAL DESIGN AND ADA ACCESSIBILITY The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 regulated enforceable accessibility standards for new construction and alterations to places of public accommodation, which include bus stops. The 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design, the most recent guidance, outlines the following four basic principles to accomplishing ADA accessibility at bus stops, as it applies to all newly constructed or altered Transfort bus stops. 1) Surface — the bus stop boarding and alighting area shall have a firm, stable surface; 2) Dimensions — the bus stop boarding and alighting area shall provide a clear length of 8' minimum, measured from the curb, and a clear width of 5' minimum, measured parallel to the roadway. Figure 6 — ADA Dimensions of Bus Boarding and Alighting Area 3) Connection — the bus stop boarding and alighting area shall be connected to streets, sidewalks, or pedestrian paths by an accessible route, of at least 4' wide. 4) Slope — the slope of the bus stop boarding and alighting area shall be the same as the roadway to the maximum extent practical, and not steeper than 1:48, a 2% grade. TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 22 If a bus stop has a shelter, there shall be a minimum clear floor space of 30" wide by 48" deep inside the shelter and an accessible path leading from the shelter to the boarding and alighting area. Figure 7 — ADA Interior Bus Shelter Space 4.3 BUS STOP TYPES Transfort has four typical stop types tailored to the context of each stop area. Higher ridership areas or areas with high concentrations of youth, senior, disabled or low-income populations are recommended to have a higher level of patron amenities such as a shelter, bench, bike rack, trash receptacle and lighting. Lower ridership areas may have fewer amenities. The Bus Stop Development Form (Appendix 1) will assist in determining what stop type is appropriate. The stop types are described below: TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 23 Figure 8 Type I Standard (Detached sidewalk) Figure 9 Type I Constrained (Attached sidewalk) Images 10 and 11 — Existing Type I Standard Stop Examples: Shields and Rolland Moore Park SB Bus Stop Harmony and Taft Hill EB Bus Stop • Type I – Sign Stop — A bus stop with a bus stop sign and basic ADA accessible landing surface are the primary features of this stop type, meaning there is no bench or shelter. This is the most basic stop type and is appropriate for low land-use density and low ridership areas. Figures 8 and 9 and images 10 and 11 show standard and constrained options for this type of stop, depending on the available right-of-way and sidewalk design. TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 24 Figure 10 Type II Standard (Detached sidewalk) Figure 11 Type II Constrained (Attached sidewalk) Images 12 and 13 — Existing Type II Standard and Constrained Examples (to comply with above design, these stops need the addition of a bike rack and trash receptacle) Shields and Centre Avenue NB Bus Stop Lincoln Avenue and Buckingham Park WB Bus Stop • Type II – Bench Stop — This describes a bus stop with a stand-alone bench as the primary feature, and which does not include a shelter. The stop should also have a bus stop sign, bike rack and trash receptacle. The most appropriate use of Bench Stops is areas with low to mid ridership potential. Figures 10 and 11 and images 12 and 13 show standard and constrained options for Type II – Bench Stops. TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 25 • Type III – Shelter Stop — This describes a bus stop with a shelter as the primary feature. This stop type should also include a bus stop sign, at least one bench, a trash receptacle, one or more bike racks, interior lighting and advertising panels. A Shelter Stop should be used in areas with medium to high ridership potential, high concentrations of elderly, youth, disabled and low-income populations and in areas with high exposure to the elements. • There are four alternative designs for Type III stops. The alternative chosen depends on the sidewalk design, public right-of-way and existing structures that may render the standard design impractical. Transfort staff will assist in determining which design is appropriate for each individual situation. Figures 12–19 and images 14–17 show examples of Type III Shelter Stop configurations. The existing stop images aren’t necessarily compliant with the organization/siting recommendations for passenger amenities in this section, for the appropriate organization/siting of passenger amenities, see the “amenity detail” following each Type III configuration. Figure 12 Type III Standard (Detached sidewalk) TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 26 Figure 13 Type III Standard (Detached sidewalk) — Amenity Detail Figure 14 Type III Constrained (Detached sidewalk) Figure 15 Type III Constrained (Detached sidewalk) — Amenity Detail TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 27 Figure 16 Type III Constrained (Attached sidewalk) Figure 17 Type III Constrained (Attached sidewalk) — Amenity detail Figure 18 Type III Wide Parkway (Detached sidewalk) TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 28 Figure 19 Type III Wide Parkway (Detached sidewalk bus stop) — Amenity detail Image 14 and 15 Existing Type III Examples * These do not meet the siting/organization of passenger amenity recommendations detailed in this section. Over time stops will be upgraded to meet revised standards, see Section 5.2 for more information. Images 16 and 17 — New Shelter Examples TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 29 • Type IV – Station Stop — This describes a bus stop that has enhanced passenger amenities such as a ticket vending machine, real time next bus LED and/or digital signage, a unique shelter structure, as well as the standard passenger amenities provided at Type III stops. Elements required at a Station Stop include those identified in Image 18 and Section 4.4 below. MAX Stations are currently the only Station Stops in Transfort’s system. Stations should be used on specialty routes, most often in Enhanced Travel Corridors as defined in the Transportation Master Plan as “uniquely designed corridors that are planned to incorporate high frequency transit, bicycling and walking as part of the corridor.” Image 18 — Example Station Stop Image 19 — Troutman Station (Concept) Image 20 — Troutman Station (Built) TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 30 4.4 PASSENGER AMENITIES Passenger amenities are a significant element in attracting people to use public transportation. Shelters are the most preferred passenger amenity because they offer the best protection from the elements. Other important amenities include: benches; customer information such as transit maps; real-time bus arrival information and directional signage; lighting; bike racks; and trash and recycling facilities. All passenger amenities should be located within public right-of-way or within a dedicated transit easement. The Bus Stop Passenger Amenities required, based on Stop Type described in Section 4.3, are provided in Table 5. In addition, see the Bus Stop Development Form in Appendix 1 for determining stop type. • Bus Stop Sign — All active bus stops (except Type IV Station Stops) are required to have a Transfort bus stop sign. Signage includes a round bus stop sign and a routes served sign. Transfort will arrange for the installation of the signage at the time service is initiated at a stop. • Solid Surface and full ADA Accessibility — All newly constructed or altered bus stops shall have a solid surface at least as large as the minimum size described in the Stop Types in Section 4.3 and comply with the four dimensions of accessibility described in Section 4.2. Newly implemented routes offer an exception to this rule, as sometimes stop locations need to be monitored to ensure they are in the best location prior to making the full investment upgrading the stop infrastructure. Final stop locations are generally finalized within two years. • Bench – All new benches shall be selected from the options described in this section and shall be powder coated in either RAL 7047 (for benches in shelters) or RAL 7039 (for stand-alone benches), refer to the Shelter Paint Colors on page 31. Images 21-23 depict the acceptable options. Image 21 Image 22 Image 23 6' Stand-alone ad bench REF RFB-14 4793-121 5–7' In-shelter non-ad bench REF SFB-02 14001-121 5' In-shelter non-ad bench REF SFB-08 12096-121 TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 31 • Shelter — All new shelters (not including Type IV Stations) shall be selected from the options described in this section and be powder coated in RAL 7047 and RAL 6017 as depicted in the examples below. Walls shall be either perforated metal or custom glass with the official Transfort branded banner and routes served information as shown in images 24–27. A double-sided advertising panel is the standard requirement. The non-ad shelter option is only available upon Transfort’s approval. In addition, shelters are preferred to incorporate solar panels for lighting or shall be directly wired for electric service. Image 24 Image 25 14' Standard Non-advertising shelter (Use must be approved by Transfort) REF SIGNA-TFP14 15' Standard advertising shelter REF SIGA-TFP15 25340-00 Image 26 Image 27 18' Upgraded ad shelter with V-ad Panels REF SIGA-TFV 24343 15' Upgraded ad shelter with glass walls REF SIGA-TFG15 25341-00 TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 32 RAL Paint Colors SHELTER PAINT COLORS GREEN: #RAL 6017 SILVER: #RAL 7047 TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 33 • Bike Racks — Bike racks are recommended at all bus stops and specifically required at all type II–IV stops. The preferred bike rack style is a simple hitching post or inverted U, as shown below, and should be powder coated in RAL 7047, RAL 7039 or RAL 6017. Image 28 (2 bike) Image 29 (2 bike)Image 30 (4 or 5 bike) REF SFM-05 25390-121 REF SFM-06 25391-121 REF SFM-10 25392-121 • Trash and Recycling Receptacles — Trash and recycling receptacles are required at all Type III and IV stops and are an option at Type I and II stops. Lower ridership stops may utilize a pole mounted trash receptacle, and higher ridership stops (projected over 25 daily boardings) shall provide a stand-alone trash receptacle from the options below, and should be powder coated in RAL 7047 or RAL 7039. Image 31 Image 32 Pole Mounted REF SFTR-10 25393-121 25394-121 32 Gallon Steel Strap REF SFTR-11 25395-121 25396-121 TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 34 • Lighting — Solar lighting panels are included on the roof of the approved shelter options described previously. Type I and II stops typically do not have their own lighting, and instead utilize nearby street lights and lighting from neighboring businesses. Pole mounted lighting may be an option for stops with limited nearby lighting. • Transit System Map — Transfort installs transit system maps at high ridership Type III stops (over 50 daily boardings). System maps are only installed at Type III stops because the shelter provides a mounting location for the map display case. • Transit Route Map/Schedules(s) — Transfort typically installs individual route maps at high ridership Type III stops (over 50 daily boardings). Route maps are only installed at Type III stops because the shelter provides a mounting location for the map display case. • Ticket Vending Machine (TVM) — Ticket vending machines are included at MAX stations and in the example Type IV Station Stop design, as shown in Images 18–20. However, while TVMs remain a recommended element, the need for TVMs may be reduced as Transfort moves towards mobile ticket purchase options. • Digital Signage — Digital signage is recommended at all Type IV Station Stops and may be installed by Transfort at high use and/or transfer bus stops. Digital signs, which are LED panels and/or LCD screens, typically display real-time bus arrival information, rider alerts, and other critical passenger information. • Ground Mounted Tactile — Type IV Station Stops are recommended to include ground mounted tactile surfaces adjacent to boarding and alighting areas. • Paper Schedules — Paper schedules are typically provided just at transit centers, but could be considered for high ridership stops as needed. This information would be provided by Transfort. • Security Cameras and Emergency Call Box — Security cameras and emergency call boxes are recommended to be provided at Type IV Station Stops. • Wind Screen — Wind screens are integrated into the standard shelter designs, but depending on the orientation of the shelter, the standard wind screens may not be adequate for the specific location. If wind is deemed to be an issue at a particular stop, a custom wind panel should be considered in addition to or in lieu of the standard shelter wind panel. TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 35 • Secure Bike Parking — Secure bike parking is an optional element at any stop, but should be considered at high use stops, especially transit centers and/or park-n-rides. • Braille Signage — Braille signage is not a standard element at bus stops, but has been recommended to be evaluated further following the completion of this document. Section 5.3 discusses next steps related to Braille Signage. • Wayfinding Signage — Wayfinding signage is optional at all bus stops but is recommended at Type IV Station stops. Bus Stop Amenities Type I Type II Type III Type IV Bus Stop Sign Solid Surface 5' x 8' Landing Pad 4' Path Connection to adjacent sidewalks Minimal Slope Bench Shelter Custom Shelter Bike Rack(s) (At least 1 rack recommended at all stops [except Type I], additional racks may be required based on projected ridership) Trash and Recycling Facilities Lighting Transit System Map Route Map/Schedule(s) Ticket Vending Machine (TVM) Digital Signage Ground Mounted Tactile Paper Schedules Security Cameras and Emergency Call-box Wind Screen Secure Bike Parking Braille Signage Wayfinding Signage Legend: Required Amenity Recommended Amenity Optional Amenity Table 5 — Bus Stop Amenities TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 36 4.5 BUS STOP TYPE DETERMINATION The selection of the appropriate stop type should consider both qualitative and quantitative measures, such as: • ridership potential and/or existing ridership, • neighboring land uses, including concentrations of youth, seniors, disabled, and low-income populations (e.g. schools, housing or social service agencies) • proximity to defined activity centers (as part of City Plan), and • exposure to the elements. As new stops are developed, the following criteria should be used to determine the appropriate stop type. Please refer to the Bus Stop Development Form in Appendix 1 for a site specific evaluation form. Higher priority for upgrades should be given to bus stops with mid-high ridership (above 50 boardings per day), demographic considerations such as youth, senior, disabled and low-income population concentrations within ¼ mile of the stop, and stops with high exposure to the elements. Criterion Type I – Sign Type II – Bench Type III – Shelter Type IV – Station Ridership Potential (existing or projected) Low Ridership (<25 daily boardings) Low–Med Ridership (25–50 daily boardings) Med–High Ridership (>50 daily boardings) Very High Ridership (250+ daily boardings) Land Use Density (Refer to Zoning Map) RUL, UE, RF, RL, or POL NCL, NCB, LMN, RC, RDR, NC, CL, E, I NCM, MMN, HMN, D, CC, CCN, CCR, CG, CS, HC Youth, Seniors or Disabled Populations Concentrations Within a ⅛ mile of population concentrations Located in an Activity Center (City Plan— Targeted Infill and Redevelopment Area map, see Figure 20 below) Recommended Located in an Enhanced Travel Corridor Recommended High Exposure to the Elements Recommended Table 6 — Bus Stop Type Criteria TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 37 Figure 20 — Targeted Infill and Redevelopment Map, City Plan, 2010 TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 38 As noted previously, Transfort serves just over 500 bus stops; some of which meet the design and amenity distribution standards outlined in Sections 3 and 4. This section is intended to describe Transfort’s plan to bring bus stops into compliance with these standards as well as the City’s Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan as adopted in 1992. The Transition Plan set forth a five year approach to achieving full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act standards. At that time, Transfort had a much smaller service area and anticipated that full compliance could be achieved through a $17,000 investment in bus stop solid surface improvements. The plan presumed that once existing stops were brought into compliance, future stops would be developed in accordance with the ADA standards. However, that was not the case and many of Transfort’s current stops are not compliant with ADA standards. In 2013, a full inventory of bus stops was completed. This identified that only 32% of Transfort’s stops met the ADA standards described in Section 4.2. Since 2013’s inventory, service has been eliminated in some areas (College Avenue and Timberline Road) and new service has been added to other areas (Mason Corridor, North Timberline Road, West Vine Drive, East Drake Road and East Horsetooth Road). In addition, as of spring 2015, approximately 50 stops had been upgraded to meet ADA standards. Transfort managed projects upgrading 27 stops, including 18 MAX stations and nine stops throughout the community; private development upgraded upwards of seven stops; and Transfort’s advertising contractor upgraded 16 stops. Based on this information Transfort estimates that now approximately 35% of bus stops meet ADA accessibility requirements. Inventorying of bus stops is ongoing and Transfort will have a more accurate understanding of ADA compliance by the end of 2015. Based on the previous estimate, approximately 330 bus stops in Transfort’s service area are not in compliance with ADA standards. Many of these are located in areas with limited neighborhood sidewalks. In addition to the cost of any necessary connecting sidewalks, bus stop improvements can range between $2,500 to $30,000 depending on the available public ROW and other site specific characteristics (an average is estimated at $10,000 for each stop). Stops on the low 5. NEXT STEPS 5.1 INTRODUCTION TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 39 end are generally within public ROW and have level grading to build on. Stops on the higher end are in areas that often require negotiations with private property owners before any accessible infrastructure can be installed and where drainage or grading challenges are present. The obstacles to upgrading bus stops is described more thoroughly in Section 2.4. This information leads Transfort to estimate that full compliance with ADA standards would cost between $3,000,000 and $5,000,000 (in 2015 dollars). Transfort’s Bus Stop Improvement Plan, in Section 5.2, describes Transfort’s phased approach to achieving (at a minimum) ADA accessibility at all bus stops as well as compliance with the bus stop type and amenity distribution standards in this document. Section 2.3 — “Bus Stop Installation and Upgrade — How does it happen?” explains the four primary ways that bus stops are upgraded: • Transfort Bus Stop Improvement Plan • Transfort’s Advertising Contractor • Development and/or Redevelopment • City Capital Projects and Street Maintenance Program This section focuses on stops improved through the Transfort Bus Stop Improvement Plan and by Transfort’s advertising contractor. Transfort’s Bus Stop Improvement Plan is not all inclusive of every Transfort stop, since two other improvement methods, Development/Redevelopment and City Capital Projects – Street Maintenance Projects, will also result in upgraded stops throughout the community. 5.2 TRANSFORT BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PLAN This April, City of Fort Collins residents approved a 10-year 0.25% sales tax for Capital Projects. In addition to other City Capital Projects, this tax includes a dedication of an average of $100,000 a year to bus stop improvements in the Transfort service area. It is anticipated that this will fund an average of 10 stops a year over the next 10 years for a total of 100 stops (between 2016 and 2026). This TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 40 funding can also serve as local as leverage for grants for additional stop improvements. In addition, Transfort can work with their advertising contractor to upgrade additional stops within public ROW. Based on this identified funding source and Transfort’s working relationship with their advertising contractor, Transfort projects an average of 15–20 stops be improved to meet the new design standards each year based on the priorities described in Section 4.5. To reiterate, priority for bus stop upgrades are given to areas that do not meet ADA requirements and meet the following criteria: • Mid-high ridership (above 50 boardings per day), • Demographic considerations such as youth, senior, disabled and low-income population concentrations within ¼ mile of the stop • Stops with high exposure to the elements 5.3 RECOMMENDED FUTURE ACTIONS • Grant Funding — The City should pursue grant funding to leverage the limited local funding to accelerate the Transfort Bus Stop Improvement Plan. • Snow Removal on Adjacent Sidewalks — The inconsistent removal of snow surrounding bus stops was a point of concern for the Citizen Advisory Committee that helped guide the development of this document. Transfort would not be the appropriate leader to initiating this discussion, but the City’s Street Maintenance and Code Enforcement Departments will be made aware of the concerns expressed. • Braille Signage — Braille signage was identified as an element of interest by the Citizen Advisory Committee that guided the development of this document. Following the adoption of this document, Transfort will establish a group of interested transit users to help determine how Braille signage could be implemented and what the Braille signage should say. TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 41 6. APPENDIX THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 42 6.1 BUS STOP DEVELOPMENT FORM Is a design recommended as part of an adopted plan? YES Use design identified in the Plan NO Is the stop a transfer location? YES What volume of transfers are anticipated? NO Is there on-street parking? YES NO A Bulbout stop is most likely appropriate A Curbside stop is appropriate HIGH VOLUME (BRT connections or more than 3 routes serve the stop) LOW VOLUME (2-3 low frequency routes) How many travel lanes are on the adjacent road? A Bus Pullout or Open Bus Bay is appropriate 1 in each direction A Bus Pullout or Open Bus Bay is appropriate 2 or more in each direction Transfort Bus Stop Checklist To be filled out by Transfort Staff Location (cross streets): __________________________________________________ Block Location: ¨ Near-side ¨ Far-side ¨ Mid-block Service: ¨ On Existing Transit Route ¨ Future Transit Route Street-Side Design Considerations: TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 43 Curb-side Design Considerations: Projected Ridership (boardings) Low Ridership (<25 daily boardings) – 0 points Moderate Ridership (25–50 daily boardings) – 2 points High Ridership (>50 daily boardings) – 5 points Very High Ridership (200+ daily boardings) – 10 points Land Use Density (Zoning) Low Density (RUL, UE, RF, RL, POL or County) – 0 points Medium Density (NCL, NCB, LMN, RC, RDR, NC, CL, E, I) – 2 points Higher Density (NCM, MMN, HMN, D, CC, CCN, CCR, CG, CS, HC) – 5 points Youth, Senior, Disabled or Low-income Population Concentrations (includes schools, dedicated housing, and social service entities) Within a ¼ mile of population concentrations – 2 points Within a ⅛ mile of population concentrations – 5 points Activity Center Within a designated Activity Center or on CSU’s campus – 2 points Enhanced Transportation Corridor (ETC) Located along an ETC – 2 points Designated as Station in an ETC plan – 15 points High Exposure to Elements In areas with exposure to wind, rain, high traffic speed, etc. – 5 points TOTAL Scoring Type I Stop — Basic accessibility required Type II Stop — Basic accessibility and bench required Type III Type III – Basic accessibility, standard shelter, trash and 1 bike rack (2 bikes) Type III – Basic accessibility, standard shelter, trash and 2 bike racks (4 bikes) Optional Type IV (upon consideration by transit provider) Score Range 0 – 1 2 – 4 5 – 10 11 – 15 >15 In-street and Curb-side Design Recommended In-Street Design: ¨ Curb-side Stop ¨ Bulbout Stop ¨ Bus Pullout Stop ¨ Open Bay Stop ¨ Queue Jump Stop Recommended Curb-side Stop Type: ¨ Type I (Sign Stop) ¨ Type II (Bench Stop) ¨ Type III (Shelter Stop) ¨ Type III (Shelter Stop – 2 bike racks) ¨ Type IV (Station Stop) TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 44 6.2 LAND USE CODE SECTION 3.6.5 3.6.5 Bus Stop Design Standards (update in progress) (A) Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to ensure that new development adequately accommodates existing and planned transit service by integrating facilities designed and located appropriately for transit into the development plan. (B) General Standard. All development located on an existing or planned transit route shall install a transit stop and other associated facilities on an easement dedicated to the City or within public right-of-way as prescribed by the City of Fort Collins Bus Stop Design Standards and Guidelines in effect at the time of installation, unless the Director of Community Services determines that adequate transit facilities consistent with the Transit Design Standards already exist to serve the needs of the development. All development located on existing transit routes will accommodate the transit facilities by providing the same at the time of construction. All development located on planned routes will accommodate said facilities by including the same in the development plan and escrowing funds in order to enable the city or its agents to construct the transit facilities at the time transit service is provided to the development. All facilities installed shall, upon acceptance by the City, become the property of the City and shall be maintained by the City or its agent. (C) Location of Existing and Planned Transit Routes. For the purposes of application of this standard, the location of existing transit routes shall be defined by the Transfort Route Map in effect at the time the application is approved. The location of planned transit routes shall be defined according to the Transfort Strategic Operating Plan, as amended. TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 45 6.3 TECHNICAL DESIGNS (As Incorporated into Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards) TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 46 TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 47 TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 48 6.4 CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE LETTER OF SUPPORT TRANSFORT BUS STOP DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 49 Ordinance Approved by Voters April 7, 2015 See Also Resolution 2015-019 ORDINANCE NO. 013, 2015 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS EXTENDING THE EXPIRING TWENTY-FIVE HUNDREDTHS PERCENT (0.25%) “BUILDING ON BASICS” CAPITAL PROJECTS SALES AND USE TAX FOR A PERIOD OF TEN YEARS FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING REVENUE FOR THE “COMMUNITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM” CAPITAL PROJECTS AND RELATED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE WHEREAS, the City of Fort Collins has heretofore enacted a comprehensive retail sales and use tax, which enactment is codified in Chapter 25, Article III of the Code of the City of Fort Collins (the “Code”); and WHEREAS, the amount of such tax presently imposed by the Code, as contained in Code Section 25-75(a), includes a twenty-five hundredths percent (0.25%) tax for the construction of the capital projects identified in Ordinance No. 092, 2005, which Ordinance was approved by the City’s voters on November 1, 2005, and which projects were approved by the City Council in accordance with the provisions of said Ordinance (the “Existing Tax”); and WHEREAS, the Existing Tax is scheduled to expire at midnight at the end of December 31, 2015; and WHEREAS, on January 20, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution 2015-012 identifying various projects that it believes should be funded by the extension of the Existing Tax, and submitting to the registered electors of the City the question of whether an ordinance extending the Existing Tax for a period of ten years should be enacted to obtain additional revenues for the planning, design, real property acquisition, construction, and operation and maintenance for certain capital projects as part of the “Community Capital Improvement Program”; and WHEREAS, at a regular City election on April 7, 2015, the voters of the City of Fort Collins approved the extension of the Existing Tax for the foregoing purposes and determined that, upon the expiration of the Existing Tax, it is necessary and desirable that a twenty-five hundredths percent (0.25%) sales and use tax be imposed on all items taxable under the Code, subject to the exceptions contained in City Code Section 25-73(c) and (d) and Section 25-74(b), commencing January 1, 2016, for the purpose of obtaining revenues for the planning, design, real property acquisition, and construction of the aforementioned capital projects and for the operation and maintenance of some of them. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That Section 25-75(a) of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 25-75. Rate of tax. (a) The amount of tax hereby levied is three and eight-five hundredths (3.85) percent of the purchase price of tangible personal property or taxable services except that the amount of use tax levied on manufacturing equipment is three (3) percent of the purchase price. Twenty-five one-hundredths (0.25) percent of such amount is a tax which shall expire at midnight on December 31, 2030, the proceeds of which shall be used for the purposes of acquiring, operating and maintaining open spaces, community separators, natural areas, wildlife habitat, riparian areas, wetlands and valued agricultural lands, and to provide for the appropriate use and enjoyment of these areas by the citizenry, pursuant to the provisions of the Citizen-Initiated Ordinance No. 1, 2002. Another twenty-five one-hundredths (0.25) percent is a tax which shall expire at midnight on December 31, 2015, the proceeds of which shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of planning, design, right-of-way acquisition, incidental upgrades and other costs associated with the repair and renovation of City streets, including, but not limited to, curbs, gutters, bridges, sidewalks, parkway shoulders and medians. Another twenty-five one-hundredths (0.25) percent is a tax which shall expire at midnight on December 31, 20152025, the proceeds of which shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of planning, design, right-of-wayreal property acquisition, and construction ATTACHMENT 2 Ordinance Approved by Voters April 7, 2015 See Also Resolution 2015-019 and at least seven (7) years of operation and maintenance of certainthe capital projects specified in the "Building on BasicsCommunity Capital Improvement Program" and five (5) years of operation and maintenance for those capital projects specified in Ordinance No. 013, 2015,capital project program, all of which shall be subject to the terms and conditions of Ordinance No. 92, 2005Ordinance No. 013, 2015. Another eighty-five one-hundredths (0.85) percent is a tax which shall expire at midnight on December 31, 2021, the proceeds of which shall be used in accordance with the terms and conditions of Ordinance No. 126, 2010. Section 2. That the revenue generated by the twenty-five hundredths percent (0.25%) sales and use tax imposed pursuant to this Ordinance (the “Tax”) shall be used, to the extent that such revenues are sufficient, for the planning, design, real property acquisition, construction, and operation and maintenance for the capital projects described on Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Projects”), subject to the following terms and conditions: (a) The design, scheduling and amount of tax revenue to be set aside for the planning, design, real property acquisition, and construction for the Projects, and the operation and maintenance for those Projects for which operation and maintenance funding is provided on Exhibit “A”, shall be determined by the City Council; provided, however, that no decision regarding the design or cost of any of these Projects shall substantially change its essential character or eliminate any of its components from that described on Exhibit “A”, except as expressly permitted under subsection 2(b) below, nor shall any decision fund less than five (5) years of operation and maintenance for any of the Projects for which such funding is provided for on Exhibit “A”, unless the Council has determined that such Project shall not be undertaken pursuant to subsection 2(b), below. This provision shall not be construed as prohibiting the City Council from: i. enhancing the scope or design of any of the Projects, or increasing the cost thereof, unless such enhancement or increase in cost would substantially impair the City's ability to fully fund the planning, design, real property acquisition, and construction for any of the Projects described on Exhibit “A” or the operation and maintenance for five (5) years from the date of completion of their construction for those of the Projects for which operation and maintenance funding is provided on Exhibit “A”, excepting only the Projects, if any, which have been eliminated by the City Council pursuant to the provisions of subsection (b) below; or ii. using any other revenues lawfully available to the City to enhance the scope or design of any of the Projects, or to fund, in whole or in part, the planning, design, real property acquisition, construction, operation and/or maintenance for any such Projects. (b) The planning, design, real property acquisition and construction for all of the Projects shall be undertaken and completed by the City unless the City Council determines by resolution, after receiving a recommendation from the City Manager, that it is no longer legally or financially feasible to undertake and complete any of the Projects without substantially altering the essential character of the same from that described on Exhibit “A” or, with regard to the Projects described in subparagraphs (c) and (d) below, the contingency required for each of these Projects is not reasonably likely to be satisfied. (c) The use of any revenues generated by the Tax for construction of the “Downtown Poudre River Enhancements and Kayak Park” (the “Poudre River Project”) shall be expressly contingent upon a determination by the City Council, after receiving a report and recommendation from the City Manager, that the City has received for the Poudre River Project at least $1,500,000 in any combination of contributions and pledges of cash and other property acceptable to the City Council. The City’s use of revenues generated by the Tax for the planning, design and real property acquisition of the Poudre River Project shall not be subject to this contingency. Ordinance Approved by Voters April 7, 2015 See Also Resolution 2015-019 (d) The use of any revenues generated by the Tax for the real property acquisition for and construction of the Gardens on Spring Creek Visitors Center Expansion (the “Gardens on Spring Creek Project”) shall be expressly contingent upon a determination by the City Council, after receiving a report and recommendation from the City Manager, that the City has received for the Gardens on Spring Creek Project at least $1,000,000 of any combination of contributions and pledges of cash and other property acceptable to the City Council. The City’s use of revenues generated by the Tax for the planning and design of the Gardens on Spring Creek Project shall not be subject to this contingency. (e) The Projects shall be subject to all applicable provisions in Article XII of Chapter 23, as amended, of the City Code relating to art in public places. Section 3. That any revenues generated by the Tax and remaining unexpended and unencumbered after the completion of the construction of all of the Projects described on Exhibit “A”, excluding any of these Projects eliminated by the City Council under the provisions of Section 2(b) above, may, in the discretion of the City Council, be used to fund additional operation and maintenance of the Projects or for the planning, design, real property acquisition, construction, operation and/or maintenance for any other capital project approved by the City Council. Section 4. That the full amount of revenues derived from the Tax may be retained and expended by the City, notwithstanding any state revenue or expenditure limitations including, but not limited to, those contained in Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution. Section 5. That the amendment of Section 25-75(a) of the City Code as set forth herein shall take effect at 12:01 a.m. on January 1, 2016. Section 6. That except as provided herein, all other provisions of Chapter 25 of the City Code shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect unless otherwise rescinded or modified by action of the Council. Exhibit A Project Descriptions Community Capital Improvement Program 2015 Estimated Capital Cost (2015 dollars) Estimated Annual Operations and Maintenance Cost (2015 dollars) Pedestrian Sidewalk/ Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Compliance – Safe Routes to Everywhere $14,000,000 No O&M Funds This project will provide an annual fund to begin the implementation of a 52-year compliance program to eliminate gaps in the City’s pedestrian network and improve ADA compliance. Ordinance Approved by Voters April 7, 2015 See Also Resolution 2015-019 Bicycle Infrastructure Improvements – Safe Routes to Everywhere $5,000,000 No O&M Funds This project will provide an annual fund to begin implementation of the City’s 2014 Bicycle Master Plan. This project will provide an annual fund to be used toward stand-alone bicycle infrastructure projects as well as add-on elements to other projects that complete or enhance the City’s bicycle network. Projects will enhance safety, provide wayfinding, and improve comfort and access for bicyclists. Bus Stop Improvements – Safe Routes to Everywhere $1,000,000 No O&M Funds This project will provide an annual fund to make ADA improvements and upgrade bus stops throughout the City. Downtown Poudre River Enhancements and Kayak Park $4,000,000 $50,000 This project creates a whitewater kayak park with viewing/picnic areas, adds a pedestrian bridge over the river, improves access to the river and enhances the river’s habitat and beauty. The project also lowers the river channel to improve flood mitigation and prevent flooding of College Avenue. Bike/Ped Grade Separated Crossings Fund $6,000,000 $20,000 This project will provide an annual fund to construct top priority grade-separated bicycle and pedestrian crossings across arterial roadways. Transfort Bus Fleet Replacement $2,000,000 No O&M Funds This project will provide an annual fund to meet the local match needed to replace heavy duty buses over the next 10 years. This fund will be leveraged to receive an 80% match of federal and state grant funding. Arterial Intersection Improvements Fund $6,000,000 No O&M Funds This project will provide an annual fund for improvements to arterial intersections, prioritized by congestion, with safety improvements for all travel modes. Implementing Nature in the City $3,000,000 $100,000 This project will provide an annual fund to protect access to nature and the key natural spaces that define our community by filling in gaps to achieve a 10-minute walk to nature or by enhancing species connectivity, and by enhancing existing sites to provide greater habitat variety and natural experiences. Gardens on Spring Creek Visitor’s Center Expansion $2,000,000 $40,000 This project will double the square footage of the Visitor’s Center at the Gardens on Spring Creek and will add meeting rooms, a new entryway with gift shop, a conservatory, a small café, and additional office space. Southeast Community Center with Outdoor Pool $14,000,000 $230,000 This project will build a Community Center in southeast Fort Collins focused on innovation, technology, art, recreation and the creative process. The Center will also have a large outdoor leisure pool with water slides, sprays and jets, decks, a lazy river and open swimming area. Ordinance Approved by Voters April 7, 2015 See Also Resolution 2015-019 Affordable Housing Fund $4,000,000 No O&M Funds This project will fund capital costs of development or rehabilitation of one or more public or private housing projects designated specifically for low income individuals and families. Lincoln Avenue West Segment Road Improvements $5,300,000 $42,200 This project will fund design, right-of-way, and construction of improvements to the west segment of Lincoln Avenue located between the Union Pacific Railroad Tracks just north of Jefferson Street to 1 st Street, including the Poudre River Bridge. City Park Train $350,000 No O&M Funds This project will bring back the City Park train in a new, expanded location in City Park. Renovation of the Historic Carnegie Building $1,700,000 $25,000 This project will renovate the historic 1904 Carnegie library building to enhance its use as a Community Center. The Center will host special events, community meetings, art exhibits and symposiums in the heart of Downtown. Linden Street Renovations Design & Construction $3,000,000 $12,000 This project will fund final design, construction, and right-of-way acquisition for the renovation of the downtown 200 block of Linden Street. Club Tico Renovation $250,000 No O&M Funds This project will complete the renovation of Club Tico at City Park by renovating the kitchen and restrooms and adding a second story deck overlooking Sheldon Lake and City Park Pool. Willow Street Renovations Design & Construction $3,500,000 $11,000 This project will fund final design and construction of improvements to Willow Street between College Avenue and Linden Street as identified in the River District Infrastructure Plan. ATTACHMENT 3 -1- ORDINANCE NO. 022, 2019 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS APPROPRIATING UNANTICIPATED GRANT REVENUE FROM THE FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) IN THE TRANSIT SERVICES FUND AND APPROPRIATING PRIOR YEAR RESERVES IN THE TRANSIT SERVICES FUND AND AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF APPROPRIATIONS FROM THE TRANSIT SERVICES FUND TO THE CAPITAL PROJECT FUND FOR THE ACCESSIBLE INFRASTRUCTURE ENHANCEMENT PROJECT AND TRANSFERRING APPROPRIATIONS FROM THE CAPITAL PROJECT FUND TO THE CULTURAL SERVICES AND FACILITIES FUND FOR THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PROGRAM WHEREAS; the City was awarded a competitive grant by the Federal Transit Administration (“FTA”) to upgrade bus stops through the Transfort service area in the amount of $1,520,344 (the “Grant”); and WHEREAS, the Grant will be used to repair or replace concrete pads at bus stops and purchase amenities, such as accessible bus shelters, over the next 2-3 years; and WHEREAS; the Grant requires the City to provide a local match of $380,086 that would typically be derived from the Community Capital Improvement Program (“CCIP”) funds, however, CCIP funds for Fiscal year 2020 and 2021 have not yet been appropriated or approved; and WHEREAS, because of the above, the local match that would typically come from CCIP for year 2020 and 2021 will come from Tranfort’s Transit Reserve Funds and these reserve funds will be replenished by the 2020 and 2021 CCIP funds as they become available; and WHEREAS; the City’s Art in Public Places (“APP”) Ordinance requires $19,004 to be appropriated towards the City’s APP Program, and so an additional $19,004 will be appropriated from Transfort’s Transit Reserve Funds to satisfy the APP requirement; and WHEREAS, this appropriation benefits public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Fort Collins and serves the public purpose of enhancing bus stops that are utilized by citizens for public transportation; and WHEREAS, Article V, Section 9, of the City Charter permits the City Council to make supplemental appropriations by ordinance at any time during the fiscal year, provided that the total amount of such supplemental appropriations, in combination with all previous appropriations for that fiscal year, does not exceed the current estimate of actual and anticipated revenues to be received during the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended the appropriation described herein and determined that this appropriation is available and previously unappropriated from the Transit Services Fund and will not cause the total amount appropriated in the Transit Services Fund to exceed the current estimate of actual and anticipated revenues to be received in that fund during any fiscal year; and -2- WHEREAS, Article V, Section 9 of the City Charter permits the City Council to appropriate by ordinance at any time during the fiscal year such funds for expenditure as may be available from reserves accumulated in prior years, notwithstanding that such reserves were not previously appropriated; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended the appropriation described herein and determined that this appropriation is available and previously unappropriated from the Transit Services Fund and will not cause the total amount appropriated in the Transit Services Fund to exceed the current estimate of actual and anticipated revenues to be received in that fund during any fiscal year; and WHEREAS, Article V, Section 10 of the City Charter authorizes the City Council to transfer by ordinance any unexpended and unencumbered appropriated amount or portion thereof from one fund or capital project to another fund or capital project, provided that the purpose for which the transferred funds are to be expended remains unchanged; the purpose for which the funds were initially appropriated no longer exists; or the proposed transfer is from a fund or capital project in which the amount appropriated exceeds the amount needed to accomplish the purpose specified in the appropriation ordinance; and WHEREAS, this project involves construction estimated to cost more than $250,000, as such, Section 23-304 of the City Code requires one percent of these qualified appropriations to be transferred to the Cultural Services and Facilities Fund for a contribution to the Art in Public Places (APP) program; and WHEREAS, FTA funds are ineligible for public art purposes, as Section 23-304 of the City Code otherwise requires, due to grant restriction on the use of the funds and therefore reserves from the Transit Services Fund are being requested to cover the amount needed for the APP program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That the City Council hereby makes and adopts the determinations and findings contained in the recitals set forth above. Section 2. That there is hereby appropriated for expenditure unanticipated revenue in the Transit Services Fund the sum of ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED TWENTY THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FORTY-FOUR DOLLARS ($1,520,344) for transfer to the Capital Projects Fund for the Accessible Infrastructure Enhancement Project and appropriated therein. Section 3. That there is hereby appropriated for expenditure from reserves in the Transit Services Fund the sum of ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED NINETY DOLLARS ($174,590) for transfer to the Capital Projects Fund for the Accessible Infrastructure Enhancement Project and appropriated therein. -3- 4. That the unexpended appropriated amount of FOURTEEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED TWENTY-THREE DOLLARS ($14,823) in the Capital Projects Fund - Accessible Infrastructure Enhancement Project is authorized for transfer to the Cultural Services and Facilities Fund and appropriated therein for the Art in Public Places Art Project. Section 5. That the unexpended appropriated amount of THREE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED DOLLARS ($3,800) in the Capital Projects Fund - Accessible Infrastructure Enhancement Project is authorized for transfer to the Cultural Services and Facilities Fund and appropriated therein for the Art in Public Places Program Operations. Section 6. That the unexpended appropriated amount of THREE HUNDRED EIGHTY-ONE DOLLARS ($381) in the Capital Projects Fund - Accessible Infrastructure Enhancement Project is authorized for transfer to the Cultural Services and Facilities Fund and appropriated therein for the Art in Public Places Program Maintenance. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 19th day of February, A.D. 2019, and to be presented for final passage on the 5th day of March, A.D. 2019. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading on the 5th day of March, A.D. 2019. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk MID-BLOCK STOP Use if: • Block size is large and/or destinations are focused mid-block • Route pattern calls for mid-block stop • Minimizes sight distance difficulties at intersections • Removes the influence of traffic congestion occurring at intersections • Encourages passengers to cross mid-block (jaywalk) • Increases walking distance for patrons to cross at intersections Table 3 — Recommended Bus Stop Location