HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 10/04/2016 - RESOLUTION 2016-077 AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUAgenda Item 7
Item # 7 Page 1
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY October 4, 2016
City Council
STAFF
Mark Jackson, PDT Deputy Director
SUBJECT
Resolution 2016-077 Authorizing the Mayor to Execute the Intergovernmental Agreement for Funding I-25
Improvements.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this item is to authorize the Mayor to enter into an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with
Larimer County and seven other municipalities outlining the method by which local funds will be appropriated
and contributed to Larimer County for the purpose of helping to accelerate improvements to I-25 in Northern
Colorado.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution.
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION
Numerous efforts, initiatives, and actions have been taken or are underway to accelerate improvements to
Interstate 25 (I-25) in Northern Colorado. I-25 is the key interstate linkage in Northern Colorado, and serves as
a major freight route as well as traveler connection between the Denver metro area to the south. Current
infrastructure deficiencies, combined with increasing travel demand on the corridor result in safety and
congestion issues along the Northern Colorado I-25 Corridor. The Colorado Department of Transportation
(CDOT) estimates improvements to I-25 between SH-14 (Mulberry) and SH-402 to cost $237 million.
Council adopted Resolution 2015-100 (Attachment 1) on November 17, 2015, stating its support for a Larimer
County proposal to use increased County mill levy funds to facilitate funding for Interstate 25 (I-25)
improvements. Larimer County proposes to temporarily reapportion part of its General Fund mill levy funds to
the County’s Road and Bridge Fund for a period of five years. These reapportioned funds are estimated to
generate a total of $10 million over the course of the five year period. The increase in the County Road and
Bridge Mill Levy revenues received by the City and the other municipalities will be available to fund
construction of roads and streets within their boundaries, making funds from the City’s general fund or other
funds available for contribution to the I-25 improvements. The County proposes using these contributions for
improvements and local match opportunities on the I-25 Corridor within Larimer County. All eight Larimer
County municipalities adopted resolutions supporting the proposal.
Fort Collins currently receives approximately $550,000 per year from the County Road and Bridge Fund. This
proposal will not affect the amount of funds Fort Collins currently receives. Because of increased property
valuations, only an amount equal to the resulting incremental increase in revenue will be contributed to Larimer
County under the IGA for I-25 uses. As the local share of County Road and Bridge levy funds must be used for
improvements within the City boundaries, the City of Fort Collins proposes to annually remit Transportation
Fund reserves equal to the amount of increased funding received from Larimer County, preserving the County
Road and Bridge funds received specifically for local transportation projects.
Agenda Item 7
Item # 7 Page 2
It is estimated that Fort Collins’ share of increased Larimer County Road and Bridge Funds will total
approximately $2.22 million over the span of five years as proposed.
CITY FINANCIAL IMPACTS
Larimer County’s proposal does not modify the total mill levy, and does not decrease the amount of Road and
Bridge Levy funds currently received by the City of Fort Collins. Creation of a source of local match funding is
advantageous in order to take advantage of funding partnerships and grant opportunities that may arise to help
improve the I-25 corridor. This contribution, combined with additional commitments from regional agencies and
private development, results in $25 million identified and committed for local match. This regional collaboration
and commitment helped accelerate the schedule for I-25 improvements in Northern Colorado by fifteen years.
BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Transportation Board was briefed in February 2016 (Attachment 3) about pending improvements to I-25
and strategies for accelerating the schedule of construction, including the proposed IGA with Larimer County to
contribute funds for I-25. Board response was positive and supportive.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
The Colorado Department of Transportation has held numerous open house meetings and provided project
information for many years about I-25 improvements, including the I-25 Environmental Impact Statement
(2011), and more recent improvements including the I-25/SH-392 interchange, Berthoud Hill Climbing Lane
project and Crossroad Boulevard Bridge Improvement project. The City of Fort Collins has been an active
partner in CDOT efforts impacting Fort Collins.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution 2015-100 (PDF)
2. Larimer County Letter-Funding Package (PDF)
3. Transportation Board minutes, February 17, 2016 (PDF)
ATTACHMENT 1
August 2016
Great news! Northern Colorado successfully put together a funding package to expand I-25, adding one lane in
each direction for 14 miles from Johnstown/Loveland to Ft. Collins. The project includes important transit,
pedestrian, and cycling improvements that will connect Northern Colorado communities to each other and to the
Denver Metro region, enhancing economic opportunities for residents and businesses.
Key components of the expansion include:
x Construct 14 miles of Managed Lanes, High Occupant
Vehicles/Tolled Express Lane (HOV/TEL) from the
Highway 14 exit in Fort Collins to the Highway 402 exit in
Johnstown/Loveland
x Replace 2 aging bridges and widen 2 additional structures
x Relocate the US 34 Park-n-Ride to Kendall Parkway,
improving regional bus service performance
x Create new pedestrian and bicycle access under I-25 at
Kendall Parkway
x Connect 34.4 miles of the Cache la Poudre Regional Trail
under I-25. The trail will also serve as a wildlife corridor.
The list below breaks down the funding that make up the $237
million dollar project.
x $157 million CDOT State Funds, including up to
$50 million in tolls from High Performance Toll
Enterprise (HPTE)
x $30 million Federal Funds
x $25 million Local and District Government Contributions
o Larimer County Mill Levy, $10m
o Metro District, $6m
o City of Fort Collins, $2m
o City of Loveland, $2m
o Weld County, $2m
o Town of Johnstown, $1m
o Town of Windsor, $1m
ATTACHMENT 2
August 2016
o Town of Berthoud, $500k
o Town of Timnath, $500k
x $15 million TIGER
x $10 million GOCO, Other state funds
All of the municipalities in Larimer County agreed last fall to utilize revenue raised by a temporary increase in
the County’s road and bridge mill levy to help pay for I-25 improvements. An IGA is in process to formalize
the agreement amongst the eight municipalities and the County. An estimate of the Mill Levy funds through
Larimer County breakdown as follows:
3
Transportation Board
February 17, 2016 ATTACHMENT 3
• FC Bikes Program Update – Greegor/Heimann/Gaskill-Fox
Greegor introduced Nick Heimann and Jamie Gaskill-Fox. She stated two goals
fundamental to the 2014 Bicycle Master Plan relate to increasing bicycling and improving
safety. She briefly discussed the bicycle wayfinding plan and the 2020 low-stress
network.
Thomas noted there is only one plow truck in the City fleet that can plow the
roundabouts and asked if the roundabouts on bicycle routes are being plowed well
enough. Greegor replied she has not heard feedback specific to the roundabouts.
Sizemore stated FC Moves will be working with Streets for a collaborative budget offer
looking at enhancements to the low-stress network snow maintenance.
Greegor made an announcement about the upcoming bike share program.
Heimann stated FC Bikes has been making efforts to coordinate its program with the
Bicycle Master Plan and announced new seasonal bike campaigns for 2016.
Additionally, he stated the program has pushed a consistent, seasonally branded look on
social media sites. Heimann went on to discuss the success of the Winter Bike to Work
Day and announced various spring campaigns and events.
Brown asked about Women’s Bicycling Month. Heimann replied it is not a brand new
initiative; however, it takes some existing classes for women and brands them together
and incorporates a large social media aspect.
Heimann discussed the two 2015 open streets events and announced possible streets
for the upcoming 2016 events.
Gaskill-Fox provided handouts for the Bicycle Ambassador Program and the Bicycle-
Friendly Driver Program. She discussed educational and collaboration efforts in relation
to the Bicycle Master Plan and discussed the class for the Bicycle-Friendly Driver
Program, which has been focused on companies with vehicle fleets. Gaskill-Fox also
discussed the School Bicycle Ambassador Program noting the Bicycle-Friendly Driver
Program will likely be part of that program. Thomas suggested the Board take the class
and Gaskill-Fox noted there are public sessions available through the Recreator.
Thomas asked if vehicles can use bike lanes when turning right. Gaskill-Fox replied in
the affirmative.
(**Secretary’s Note: The Board took a brief recess at this point in the meeting.)
• Interstate 25 Status Update – Jackson
Jackson discussed the importance of I-25 to the region and noted a great deal of
Interstate-oriented development has occurred in neighboring communities. He noted
Fort Collins has specifically opted out of that type of development, at least for the time
being. Jackson stated the overarching document which will be used to make
improvements to the corridor in Northern Colorado is the North I-25 Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS), which was passed in 2011. Jackson discussed the components
of the EIS relating to high-occupancy vehicle lanes, new bridges, and transit, as well as
4
commuter rail service. Additionally, Jackson discussed upcoming construction projects
to create a semi-truck climbing lane and to address safety issues at the Crossroads
intersection. He stated Colorado was not selected for the Presidential Sustainability
Resiliency Grant and went on to discuss funding sources which do exist, including those
from Larimer County. Jackson also discussed lobbying efforts for funding at the State
level, noting CDOT can barely afford to maintain its existing infrastructure. The state is
currently seeking a sustainable funding source for maintenance.
Jackson discussed possible plans for the corridor in terms of transit and discussed the
Bustang service and its success to this point. He stated transit is polling more popularly
than ever.
8. ACTION ITEMS
• Election of Officers – Duvall/Sizemore
Duvall noted this is her last year on the Board and expressed concern regarding a Chair
vacancy for January and February of 2017. She asked Berklund if she would consider
the Chair position.
Thomas suggested the possibility of Shenk moving from Vice Chair to Chair.
Sizemore noted the Board has until March to make the decision should members want
to wait until more members are present.
After a brief discussion, the Board opted to reschedule the item to March and email
suggestions on Chair and Vice Chair nominations as necessary.
9. REPORTS
• Boardmember Reports
Duvall announced the Super Board meeting for tomorrow.
• Staff Report
Sizemore provided an update on snow plowing to this point in the season. He stated he
is working to get a meeting scheduled at Traffic Operations.
10. OTHER BUSINESS
None.
11. ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 8:56 p.m. by unanimous consent.
-1-
RESOLUTION 2016-077
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL
AGREEMENT FOR FUNDING I-25 IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, Interstate 25 (“I-25”) serves as the primary north-south highway connection
for Northern Colorado, including Larimer County, Colorado (“County”), the City of Fort Collins,
Colorado (“City”), and the City of Loveland, Colorado, the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, the
Town of Timnath, Colorado, the Town of Berthoud, Colorado, the Town of Windsor, Colorado,
the Town of Wellington, Colorado, and the Town of Johnstown, Colorado (individually referred
to as “Municipality” or collectively as “Municipalities”).
WHEREAS, I-25 is the primary roadway route for regional connectivity to commerce,
health care, education and employment; and
WHEREAS, I-25 is designated as a federal freight route; and
WHEREAS, I-25 in Northern Colorado is considered significantly congested such that
traffic flow is impaired and quality of life is adversely affected; and
WHEREAS, the Colorado Department of Transportation (“CDOT”) completed an
Environmental Impact Statement in August 2011 that identified and evaluated multi-modal
transportation improvements along approximately 60 miles of the I-25 corridor from the Fort
Collins/Wellington area to Denver and identified areas of I-25 and associated structures such as
bridges that needed to be expanded and/or improved; and
WHEREAS, CDOT has proposed to expand I-25 from two lanes (north and south) to
three lanes (north and south) for approximately fourteen miles between State Highway14 and
State Highway 402, replace the Cache la Poudre Bridge and the Union Pacific Railroad Bridge
north of State Highway 34, expand the Kendall Parkway Crossing under I-25 and expand the
Bridge over the Big Thompson River and the Bridge over the Great Western Railway to
accommodate a third travel lane (collectively “Project”); and
WHEREAS, funding for the Project is proposed to include contributions from
government at federal, state, county, and municipal levels and other sources; and
WHEREAS, increased property values for Larimer County property owners in 2015 have
provided an opportunity to increase the County Road and Bridge Mill Levy within the County’s
total Mill Levy commencing in 2016 and for a period of four years thereafter without detriment
to other County programs, without decreasing the amount shared back to the Municipalities in
2015 pursuant to C.R,S. §43-2-202(2), and without increasing the total County Mill Levy; and
WHEREAS, the increased County Road and Bridge Mill Levy is projected to generate
additional revenues to the Municipalities, including the City, of approximately $10 million over
five years commencing with calendar year 2016 , and
-2-
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2015, City Council adopted Resolution 2015-100
expressing its support for and willingness to contribute funds to County annually for five years
for CDOT’s use on the Project; and
WHEREAS, each of the Municipalities has also adopted a Resolution expressing its
support for and willingness to contribute funds to County annually for five years for CDOT’s use
on the Project; and
WHEREAS, C.R,S. §43-2-202(4), requires that the City and each Municipality spend its
share of the County Road and Bridge Mill Levy revenues for the construction of roads and
streets located within its corporate boundaries and the City; and
WHEREAS, the increase in the City’s share of the County Road and Bridge Mill Levy
revenues will be utilized to fund construction of roads and streets within its corporate
boundaries, making funds available from the City’s general fund or other designated fund for
contribution to the Project in an amount equal to its share of increased County Road and Bridge
Mill Levy revenues; and
WHEREAS, the City’s contribution to the Project will serve a public purpose by
producing significant economic benefits to the citizens of Fort Collins, including preserving the
economic vitality of the City, maintaining and increasing employment in the City, stabilizing and
improving the long term tax base of the City, and providing additional economic health benefits
and improvements to the quality of life for the City citizens by improving transportation facilities
connecting the City and its citizens to commerce, health care, education and employment in the
Northern Colorado region; and
WHEREAS, in light of the benefits to the City and its citizens, it is in the best interest of
the City to enter into an agreement with the County and the Municipalities to fund the Project;
and
WHEREAS, the City, the County and the Municipalities are authorized pursuant to
Article XIV, Section 18 of the Colorado Constitution and Section 29-1-201, et seq., Colorado
Revised Statutes, to enter into intergovernmental agreements for the purpose of providing any
service or performing any function which they can perform individually.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FORT COLLINS:
Section 1. That the City Council hereby makes any and all determinations and
findings contained in the recitals set forth above.
Section 2. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the Intergovernmental
Agreement for Funding I-25 Improvements substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit
“A,” with such additional terms and conditions as the City Manager, in consultation with the
City Attorney, determines to be necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the City or
effectuate the purposes of this Resolution.
-3-
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins this 4th
day of October, A.D. 2016.
_________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Clerk
Page 1 of 15
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR FUNDING
I-25 IMPROVEMENTS
This Intergovernmental Agreement for Funding I-25 Improvements (“Agreement”) is
made and effective on ____________________, 2016, by and among the Board of County
Commissioners of Larimer County, Colorado (referred to as “County”), and the City of Fort
Collins, Colorado, the City of Loveland, Colorado, the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, the Town
of Timnath, Colorado, the Town of Berthoud, Colorado, the Town of Windsor, Colorado, the
Town of Wellington, Colorado, and the Town of Johnstown, Colorado (individually referred to
as “Municipality” or collectively as “Municipalities”). (The County and Municipalities will
jointly be referred to as the “Parties.”)
I. RECITALS
A. Interstate 25 (“I-25”) serves as the primary north-south highway connection for
Northern Colorado, including the County and the Municipalities.
B. I-25 is the primary roadway route for regional connectivity to commerce, health
care, education and employment.
C. I-25 is designated as a federal freight route.
D. I-25 in Northern Colorado is considered significantly congested such that traffic
flow is impaired and quality of life is adversely affected.
E. The Colorado Department of Transportation (“CDOT”) completed an
Environmental Impact Statement in August 2011 that identified and evaluated multi-modal
transportation improvements along approximately 60 miles of the I-25 corridor from the Fort
Collins/Wellington area to Denver. The Statement identified areas of I-25 and associated
structures such as bridges that needed to be expanded and/or improved.
F. CDOT has proposed to expand I-25 from two lanes (north and south) to three
lanes (north and south) for approximately fourteen miles between State Highway14 and State
Highway 402, replace the Cache la Poudre Bridge and the Union Pacific Railroad Bridge north
of State Highway 34, expand the Kendall Parkway Crossing under I-25 and expand the Bridge
over the Big Thompson River and the Bridge over the Great Western Railway to accommodate a
third travel lane (collectively “Project”).
G. Funding for the Project is proposed to include contributions from government at
federal, state, county, and municipal levels and other sources.
H. Increased property values for Larimer County property owners in 2015 have
provided an opportunity to increase the County Road and Bridge Mill Levy within the County’s
total Mill Levy commencing in 2016 and for a period of four years thereafter by an estimated
EXHIBIT A
Page 2 of 15
amount sufficient to generate an additional $2 million annually without detriment to other
County programs, without decreasing the amount shared back to the Municipalities in 2015
pursuant to C.R,S. §43-2-202(2) (the “2015 Share Back”), and without increasing the total
County Mill Levy.
I. The increased County Road and Bridge Mill Levy is projected to generate
approximately $10 million in excess of the 2015 Share Back (the “Increased Municipal Share
Back”) over five years commencing with calendar year 2016 for CDOT’s use on the Project.
J. The Municipalities have each adopted Resolutions expressing their willingness to
contribute funds to County annually for five years for CDOT’s use on the Project subject to the
terms of this Agreement.
K. County and Municipalities are authorized pursuant to Article XIV, Section 18 of
the Colorado Constitution and Section 29-1-201, et seq., Colorado Revised Statutes, to enter
into intergovernmental agreements for the purpose of providing any service or performing any
function which they can perform individually.
II. CONSIDERATION
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and obligations herein expressed,
the County and Municipalities agree as follows.
III. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Commencing in calendar year 2017 and continuing for calendar years 2018, 2019,
2020 and 2021, each Municipality shall pay to County from such Municipality’s general fund or
such other fund as such Municipality may designate, an annual contribution in an amount equal
to that portion of the Increased Municipal Share Back paid by the County to each Municipality
pursuant to C.R.S. §43-2-202 (2) (“Municipality Contribution”) to be used as a portion of the
“local match” for the Project, subject to the terms set forth in this Agreement.
2. County shall notify (“Notification”) each Municipality in writing no later than
January 31 in calendar years 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021 the total amount of the Increased
Municipal Share Back” received by such Municipality during the previous calendar year.
3. Within 30 days after receipt of the Notification, each Municipality shall give
written notice to the County stating whether or not such Municipality has budgeted and
appropriated funds for the current calendar year to make its annual Municipality Contribution as
set forth in Paragraph 1 above.
4. Provided the Municipality has budgeted and appropriated funds, such
Municipality shall pay its Municipality Contribution to County within 60 days following such
Municipality’s receipt from County of its Notification.
Page 3 of 15
5. County shall contribute an amount equal to the County’s share of the County
Road and Bridge Mill Levy revenues received pursuant to C.R.S. §43-2-202(2) attributable to
the increase in the County Road and Bridge Mill Levy specified in Recital H above (“County
Contribution). No later than February 28 in calendar years 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021,
County shall give written notice to each Municipality affirming that County has (or has not)
budgeted and appropriated funds for the current calendar year to make its annual County
Contribution.
6. County shall deposit the County Contribution and the Municipality Contributions
into a separately identifiable account (“Contributions Fund”) and shall maintain records as to
such account sufficient to identify all deposits and withdrawals from such account.
7. County is authorized to pay to CDOT funds in the Contributions Fund for
CDOT’s use in the Project pursuant to an intergovernmental agreement to be executed between
County and CDOT.
8. County shall maintain accurate accounts of any and all amounts paid to CDOT
from the Contributions Fund. County shall provide to Municipalities information detailing
Project payments to CDOT from the Contributions Fund.
9. If County or a majority of Municipalities, after consultation with the other Parties,
determines all or any part of the Project is not feasible due to inadequacy of funds or other
impediments, and provided amounts remain in the Contributions Fund, County shall so notify
Municipalities in writing. Within 90 days after such notification,
a. County shall make a payment to County and to each Municipality of any
amount remaining in the Contributions Fund attributable to County and such Municipality’s
respective percentage contribution ,
OR,
b. In lieu of such payment, the Parties may agree in writing to an alternative
use of the Contribution Funds, provided such alternative use benefits roads or transportation
systems located within the jurisdiction(s) of the Parties so agreeing.
10. Any notice or other communication given by any party to another relating to this
Agreement must be hand-delivered or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt
requested, or by overnight commercial courier, addressed to such other party at its respective
addresses set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and such notice or other communication will
be deemed given when so hand-delivered or three (3) business days after so mailed, or the next
business day after being deposited with an overnight commercial courier.
11. The obligations of the County and Municipalities to commit or expend funds after
calendar year 2016 are subject to and conditioned on the annual appropriation of funds sufficient
and intended to carry out said obligations by the respective governing bodies of County and
Municipalities in their sole discretion.
Page 4 of 15
12. This Agreement is to be construed according to its fair meaning and as if prepared
by all parties hereto and is deemed to be and contain the entire understanding and agreement
between the parties hereto. There shall be deemed to be no other terms, conditions, promises,
understandings, statements, or representations, expressed or implied, concerning this Agreement
unless set forth in writing and signed by the Parties hereto.
13. This Agreement cannot be modified except in writing signed by all Parties.
14. This Agreement will be governed by and its terms construed under the laws of the
State of Colorado. Venue for any action shall be in Larimer County, State of Colorado.
15. Nothing contained herein is deemed or should be construed by the Parties or by
any third party as creating the relationship of principle and agent, a partnership or a joint venture
between the Parties, or an employment relationship between the Parties.
16. This Agreement is made for the sole and exclusive benefit of County and
Municipalities, their successors and assigns, and it is not made for the benefit of any third party.
17. If any term or condition of this Agreement is held to be invalid by final judgment
of any court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity of such a term or condition, will not in any
way affect any of the other terms or conditions of this Agreement, provided that the invalidity of
any such term or condition does not materially prejudice any Party in their respective rights and
obligations under the valid terms and conditions of this Agreement.
18. No party will be deemed in violation of this Agreement if prevented from
performing any of its respective obligations hereunder by reason of strikes, boycotts, labor
disputes, embargoes, shortage of energy or materials, acts of God, acts of public enemies, acts of
superior governmental authorities, weather conditions, rights, rebellions, sabotage, or any other
circumstances for which it is not responsible or that are not within its control.
19. This Agreement may be signed by the Parties in counterpart.
Page 5 of 15
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO
By: _____________________________________
Title: ____________________________________
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Approved as to form:
___________________________________
County Attorney
Jshdocs/county/Agreement for funding I-25 improvements Final
Page 6 of 15
CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
By: _____________________________________
Title: _____________________________________
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Approved as to form:
___________________________________
City Attorney
Page 7 of 15
CITY OF LOVELAND, COLORADO
By: _____________________________________
Title: _____________________________________
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Approved as to form:
___________________________________
City Attorney
Page 8 of 15
TOWN OF ESTES PARK
By: _____________________________________
Title: _____________________________________
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Approved as to form:
___________________________________
Town Attorney
Page 9 of 15
TOWN OF TIMNATH, COLORADO
By: _____________________________________
Title: _____________________________________
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Approved as to form:
___________________________________
Town Attorney
Page 10 of 15
TOWN OF BERTHOUD, COLORADO
By: _____________________________________
Title: _____________________________________
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Approved as to form:
___________________________________
Town Attorney
Page 11 of 15
TOWN OF WINDSOR, COLORADO
By: _____________________________________
Title: _____________________________________
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Approved as to form:
___________________________________
Town Attorney
Page 12 of 15
TOWN OF WELLINGTON, COLORADO
By: _____________________________________
Title: _____________________________________
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Approved as to form:
___________________________________
Town Attorney
Page 13 of 15
TOWN OF JOHNSTOWN, COLORADO
By: _____________________________________
Title: _____________________________________
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Approved as to form:
___________________________________
Town Attorney
Page 14 of 15
EXHIBIT “A”
To County:
County Manager
Larimer County, Colorado
P.O. Box 1190
Fort Collins, CO 80522
To Fort Collins:
City Manager
City of Fort Collins
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
With copy to:
City Attorney
City of Fort Collins
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
To Loveland:
City Manager
City of Loveland
500 East 3
rd
Street, Suite 330
Loveland, CO 80537
With copy to:
City Attorney
City of Loveland
500 East 3
rd
Street, Suite 330
Loveland, CO 80537
To Estes Park:
Town Administrator
P.O. Box 1200
Estes Park, CO 80517
Page 15 of 15
To Timnath:
Town Manager
4800 Goodman Street
Timnath, CO 80547
To Berthoud:
Town Administrator
P.O. Box 1229
Berthoud, CO 80513
To Windsor:
Town Manager
301 Walnut Street
Windsor, CO 80550
To Wellington:
The Town of Wellington
3735 Cleveland Avenue
P.O. Box 127
Wellington, CO 80549
With copy to:
March, Olive and Pharris, LLC
Attn: Brad March
1312 S. College Ave.
Fort Collins, CO 80524
To Johnstown:
Town Manager
450 S. Parish Ave.
Johnstown, CO 80534