The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 11/25/2014 - WEST CENTRAL AREA PLAN/PROSPECT CORRIDOR DESIGN UPDATE: STAFF: November 25, 2014 Ted Shepard, Chief Planner Amy Lewin, Transportation Planner Rebecca Everette, Associate Planner WORK SESSION ITEM City Council SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION West Central Area Plan/Prospect Corridor Design Update. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to request feedback from Council on the next steps for the West Central Area Plan, which is an update to the 1999 West Central Neighborhoods Plan. Planning Services and FC Moves staff initiated the planning process in February 2014 and expect to bring the final plan to Council for consideration of adoption in March 2015. The project team is currently developing the draft policies and recommendations for the plan, which will relate to three overarching topic areas: Land Use & Neighborhood Character, Transportation & Mobility, and Open Space Networks. New designs for the segments of Prospect Road and Lake Street (between Shields Street and College Avenue) are a key component of the Plan. The initial policy direction for the plan, as well as the draft designs for Prospect Road and Lake Street, is presented here for City Council’s consideration. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. Conditional Rezoning allows Council to apply conditions or limit the approved uses when a property is rezoned. This could be used to implement the vision of the West Central Area Plan, primarily along arterial roads. Does Council have any questions regarding the Conditional Rezoning process? 2. How well do the draft designs for Prospect Road and Lake Street meet the vision for Prospect Corridor? 3. Are there any additional policies, strategies, or action items staff should consider to meet the vision of the West Central Area Plan? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION Project Overview The purpose of this planning effort is to revisit and update the 1999 West Central Neighborhoods Plan based on emerging issues and trends. The West Central Area is approximately three square miles in size and generally encompasses the neighborhoods south and west of the CSU Main Campus. The Plan will incorporate new information from related planning efforts and will be organized around the following key topics:  Land Use & Neighborhood Character (e.g., zoning, neighborhood services, historic preservation)  Transportation & Mobility (e.g., connections to MAX, bicycle and pedestrian enhancements, intersection improvements)  Open Space Networks (e.g., parks and open space, wildlife habitat, drainage and floodplain management) The project will also include new conceptual designs for Prospect Road and Lake Street (between Shields Street and College Avenue) that are functional, safe, and well-marked for pedestrians, bicycles, buses, and cars. Staff provided an update on the project to City Council in an October 30 memo (Attachment 1). Since that update, additional outreach was completed and progress was made on a number of tasks. November 25, 2014 Page 2 Community Engagement Since the October 30 memo, staff conducted meetings with the two advisory committees for the project: the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and the Stakeholder Committee. The TAC is composed of representatives from more than 20 City departments, CSU departments, and outside agencies. The Stakeholder Committee is a diverse group that includes neighborhood residents, business owners, major landowners, apartment complex managers, and CSU students and staff. Both committees have met four times to-date to provide input on the plan and will continue to meet as needed until the plan is complete. Staff continues to meet with City and community advisory groups to gather additional input. To date, staff held work sessions with the following advisory boards, commissions, and community groups. Some boards have received multiple presentations, as needed: City Boards:  Affordable Housing Board  Air Quality Advisory Board  Commission on Disability  Landmark Preservation Commission  Natural Resources Advisory Board  Parking Advisory Board  Parks and Recreation Board  Planning and Zoning Board  Senior Advisory Board  Transportation Board Other Groups:  Board of Realtors - Government Affairs Committee  Chamber of Commerce - Local Legislative Affairs Committee  ClimateWise Biz Ed Group  UniverCity Connections Transit & Mobility Task Force West Central Area Plan - Policy Direction and Recommendations Staff is currently developing policies and recommendations for the West Central Area Plan (WCAP) related to Land Use & Neighborhood Character, Transportation & Mobility, and Open Space Networks. Preliminary policy considerations and overall recommendations for each topic area are described below. Land Use & Neighborhood Character Zoning For Land Use and Neighborhood Character Most of the areas within the three-square-mile planning area consist of stable neighborhoods (Attachment 2 - areas in yellow). For the areas that have development or redevelopment potential (Attachment 2 - areas in red), two distinct approaches are proposed: 1. North of Prospect Road between Shields Street and Whitcomb Street: This area is identified as an appropriate area for redevelopment and infill of additional student-oriented housing. The existing zoning, High Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood (H-M-N), is considered to be a sufficient mechanism by which to regulate further development. No changes in zoning are anticipated for this area. 2. Other Areas with Development/Redevelopment Potential: The recommended approach for these areas is to use the existing Conditional Rezoning process. City Council, upon recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board, has the authority to impose reasonable conditions relating to use and orderly development of property. The general concept allows the up-zoning of a parcel to be conditioned so as to permit only those November 25, 2014 Page 3 uses that are suitable for the parcel given the context of the surrounding area. While this authority was first introduced in the City’s Zoning Code in 1972, other regulatory mechanisms have been more typically used over the years to govern land use. For example, a parcel located along an arterial street that is currently zoned Low Density Residential (R-L) may seek to change the zoning of the parcel through the Conditional Rezoning process to a more permissive zoning district, such as the Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood (L-M-N) district, to allow for more housing variety and design flexibility. In constrast to a standard rezoning, the Conditional Rezoning would exclude certain uses that would otherwise be permitted in the L-M-N zone, but are considered to be incompatible with the existing neighborhood, based on land use intensity. A land use analysis, with collaborative engagement among the land owner, neighborhood, and other affected parties, is essential to a Conditional Rezoning. The result is future land uses that are as predictable as they would be with the standard rezoning process. The WCAP Stakeholder Committee discussed this approach for consideration of redevelopment in established areas and recommends that the concept move forward. Design & Compatibility The Stakeholder Committee had significant discussion around issues related to architecture and site design. The general approach is to establish an expectation among all the parties that there will be a high level of collaboration to achieve compatible overall design so that new projects are considered to be a benefit to the neighborhoods. While recognizing the development potential of the H-M-N zone, the emphasis on mitigating the impacts of building height and mass becomes a top priority. Architectural styles such as Craftsman, Prairie, and Mid-Century Modern are well-accepted and will serve as a starting point for achieving neighborhood compatibility. WCAP recommendations include design forums, charrettes, multi-family design competitions, and other approaches that allow for collaboration and increase predictability for both developers and neighborhood residents. Preserving Neighborhood Heritage The first West Central neighborhoods were built in the 1950’s. Since then the area has developed, from north to south, with each neighborhood having its own individual identity. All buildings over 50 years old are potentially eligible for local historic designation, but not every building would be found to be historically significant. A more effective approach is to recognize each neighborhood’s unique overall heritage and to direct efforts to preserve this existing character. Changes to the existing housing stock are expected as a natural progression in a building’s lifecycle. Building additions to existing houses will have the benefit of allowing seniors to age-in-place, accommodating growing families and improving energy efficiency. WCAP recommendations include promoting design scenarios that can help homeowners visualize ways to expand and alter their homes without losing the unique character of their neighborhood. The creation of historic or conservation districts is not included in the current recommendations. Neighborhood Services & Enhancements A key element of the emerging Plan is a set of recommendations for additional neighborhood services and a variety of individual neighborhood physical enhancements to upgrade the quality of life and overall appearance in specific areas (Attachment 2 - areas in orange). Additional service and program recommendations include proactive approaches to code enforcement, new and expanded education programs for landlords and renters, CSU partnership programs, and the establishment of a new District Police Station to be located in the Campus West vicinity. Physical enhancements include improving public street lighting, adding neighborhood entry signage, planting street trees to fill in existing gaps, painting crosswalks as appropriate, improving bridge railings and sidewalks, and building off-street connections between neighborhoods. The Plan will encourage the continued funding of the Engineering Department’s Sidewalk Improvement Program. Transportation & Mobility Several planning efforts that relate to the West Central area have recently been completed or are close to completion, including: November 25, 2014 Page 4  Arterial Intersection Prioritization Study (anticipated completion December 2014)  Bicycle Master Plan (anticipated adoption December 2014)  CSU Parking and Transportation Plan (April 2014) These studies recommend a variety of projects throughout the West Central area, as shown in Attachment 3. The attachment also shows additional areas of focus (intersections and roadway segments) that have arisen as a part of the WCAP technical analysis and public input process. Specific projects and related policies for these areas will be developed and refined over the next few months for inclusion in the final Plan document, including a corridor analysis of Shields Street between Laurel Street and Prospect Road. The corridor analysis will include the assessment of potential grade-separated crossings and other crossing improvements. The Bicycle Master Plan Full Build Network is also included in Attachment 4 and provides the framework for bike-related improvements within the area. Initial ideas related to future transit service in the West Central area include:  Additional transit service between the CSU main campus and the neighborhood west of Shields Street and north of Prospect Road;  Additional transit service in the southwest part of campus (e.g., along Lake Street);  Connections to MAX via Lake Street and/or Prospect Road; and  Exploring shared parking arrangements to provide off-campus “remote” parking supported by transit service to and from campus. Part of the Transportation & Mobility Vision includes the retrofitting of collector and local streets for traffic calming and to better allocate space for all users, particularly for bicyclists and pedestrians. Attachment 5 shows an example of the retrofitting approach. Open Space Networks Supporting a well-connected, functional network of open space is an essential component of the West Central Area Plan, and is reflected in the vision for this topic area (Attachment 6). Since the previous work session, and based on input from Nature in the City and the TAC, the vision was revised to include an additional statement related to the settings and experiences desired within the West Central area (OS2). The Open Space Networks Map (Attachment 7) reflects the community’s aspirations for a connected, high-quality open space system within the West Central area. Many of the Open Space Networks recommendations focus on providing access to nature, whether through additional trail connections or the provision of new parks and open space as redevelopment occurs. Staff is closely coordinating the open space policies and recommendations with the Nature in the City project. Because similar suggestions and concerns have arisen through both planning efforts, the West Central Area Plan offers an opportunity to pilot many of the Nature in the City recommendations in this particular area of the community. For example, Nature in the City recommends further exploration of the multiple values of ditches and canals (e.g., wildlife habitat, recreational access, and irrigation). With three major ditches traversing the West Central area, this is an ideal location to pursue habitat enhancements, ditch crossings, and sidepaths that contribute to a more connected open space system. Enhancements to existing parks and open space will be recommended for a number of specific sites, such as Lilac Park (immediately north of the Gardens on Spring Creek, along the Spring Creek Trail). Lilac Park is the designated neighborhood park for the adjacent neighborhoods, but residents have expressed concerns that it does not adequately serve as such. Staff is currently coordinating with the Park Planning department to identify improvements to this site that would best meet the needs of nearby residents while complementing the Spring Creek Trail, Gardens on Spring Creek, and adjacent CSU property. November 25, 2014 Page 5 Prospect Corridor Design As described in the October 2014 memo to City Council (Attachment 1), draft alternatives for Prospect Road and Lake Street (between Shields and College) were developed, presented to the public, and evaluated. Based on the evaluation, draft designs for both Prospect Road and Lake Street were developed using elements from the various alternatives with additional refinements. The draft designs were shared with residents and business/property owners in the corridor at the October 27 workshop and with the TAC in early November. The designs were refined based on initial feedback from these groups. For example, based on input from property owners, the sidewalk width on the south side was reduced in some areas in a way that eliminated right-of-way (ROW) impacts on 13 residences, while still improving conditions for bicyclists and pedestrians. The overall strategy for the designs is as follows:  Provide holistic designs so that Prospect Road and Lake Street are connected and complement each other as one corridor;  Develop a custom cross-section for Prospect Road that is narrower than the Constrained 4-Lane Arterial cross-section width of 102’ while still providing improved facilities;  Maintain the curb along the south side residential area of Prospect Road to minimize construction costs and ROW impacts;  Focus Prospect Road ROW impacts on areas likely to redevelop (primarily on the north side); and  Coordinate with CSU’s master plans and other plans for redevelopment. Elements currently incorporated into the draft design of Prospect Road include:  Four travel lanes  Center turn lane/median  Tree lawn  Detached sidewalk/shared bike and pedestrian path  Mid-block bike/pedestrian crossing  Transit stops/pullouts Elements currently incorporated into the draft design of Lake Street include:  Two travel lanes  On-street parking  Protected bike lanes with planted buffer  Detached sidewalk  Tree lawn (select locations)  Transit stops The full draft designs are included in Attachment 8, along with the original Prospect Corridor vision. TABLE 1 shows the elements in the draft designs and how they support the Prospect Corridor vision. Staff welcomes Council input related to how well the draft designs meet the corridor vision. TABLE 1. PROSPECT CORRIDOR VISION AND DESIGN Principle Prospect Road Design Elements Lake Street Design Elements VISION: Attractive and functional, well-integrated, mixed-use corridor that serves the mobility needs of nearby neighborhoods, CSU, and the community P1: Safe and comfortable corridor for all modes of travel Vehicle turning movements improved with center turn lanes Detached sidewalk/shared bike and pedestrian path (6’-10’) improved over existing conditions (3’-8’) Sidewalk connections to Lake Street Detached sidewalk (6’) improved over existing conditions (2’-9’) Protected bike lanes improve safety for bicyclists Sidewalk connections to Prospect Road P2: Safe crossings Improved treatments at intersections Improved treatments at intersections November 25, 2014 Page 6 New mid-block bike/pedestrian crossing P3: Attractive gateway to campus, downtown, and midtown Additional landscaping and medians Gateway treatments at intersections Unified streetscape and character Additional landscaping Gateway treatments at intersections Unified streetscape and character P4: Seamless connection to MAX Detached sidewalk/shared bike and pedestrian path provides bike and pedestrian access to MAX Transit stops/pullouts Detached sidewalk/protected bike lane provide bike and pedestrian access to MAX Transit stops The conceptual designs were developed in a way that offers a long-term vision for the corridor while incorporating flexibility to provide practical, context-sensitive solutions for existing land uses in Final Design, if needed. For example, although one concept for Prospect Road includes a detached shared bike and pedestrian path with a tree lawn, in some locations where right-of-way (ROW) is constrained by existing buildings, the tree lawn may need to be reduced or eliminated. In these cases, an interim design could be provided for the existing land use, and the full vision would be incorporated upon redevelopment, which could also include ROW dedication, if needed. The designs will continue to be refined over the next few months, including more detailed intersection design, based on additional analysis and input from an upcoming online questionnaire and additional communications with property owners and tenants. The preliminary planning-level cost estimate for the current draft design on Prospect Road is approximately $8M, including a 20% contingency. The estimate for Lake Street is approximately $7.2M, also with a 20% contingency. The cost breakdown is shown in TABLE 2. Note that the ROW acquisition cost on Lake in particular could decrease through CSU and others granting easements (rather than the City purchasing ROW). The current designs include only minor improvements to intersections; one of the next steps is to further analyze and refine the intersection designs and related costs for inclusion in the final Plan. TABLE 2. PROSPECT CORRIDOR DRAFT DESIGN COST ESTIMATES Category Prospect Road (2015 dollars) Lake Street (2015 dollars) Final Design $1.1M $1.0M Right-of-Way $1.4M $500k Construction $5.5M $5.7M Total $8M $7.2M Note Final costs will likely change based on: How much ROW is acquired (i.e., purchased) versus dedicated through redevelopment or easements Final intersection designs Implementation strategies and actions related to these roadway designs will be presented in the Plan document. As with most transportation capital projects, implementation will likely occur over a period of time, require a phased approach, and involve multiple funding sources. Coordination with Colorado State University (CSU) City staff is working directly with CSU representatives to ensure coordinated planning and public outreach efforts related to CSU’s ongoing update to the master plan for the Main and South Campuses, including the potential on- campus stadium. While the WCAP planning effort considers the potential opportunities and impacts related to CSU’s long-term growth, the specific impacts related to an on-campus stadium are being addressed through a separate City effort. The operational needs and concerns related to the proposed on-campus stadium have been considered in the draft design for the Prospect Corridor and will be addressed at the policy level in the West Central Area Plan. November 25, 2014 Page 7 Next Steps Following the November 25 Work Session, staff and the consultants will draft the policies and recommendations for the draft plan, further refine the designs for Prospect Corridor, and continue to gather public input prior to finalizing the plan. An online questionnaire on the draft Prospect Corridor designs is currently underway, and staff will continue to work with individual property owners to review and refine the designs. Staff anticipates presenting the final plan to City Council for consideration of adoption in March 2015. ATTACHMENTS 1. October 2014 Update Memo (PDF) 2. Areas of Stability, Enhancement, and Development Map (PDF) 3. Transportation Plan Coordination and Opportunities Map (PDF) 4. Bicycle Master Plan Full Build Network (PDF) 5. Street Retrofit Example (PDF) 6. Open Space Vision (Revised) (PDF) 7. Open Space Networks Map (PDF) 8. Prospect Corridor Designs (PDF) 9. PowerPoint Presentation (PDF) ATTACHMENT 1 LU Land Use & Neighborhood Character VISION Vibrant and diverse neighborhoods that provide a high quality of life fcgov.com/westcentral Draft - 11/13/2014 Legend N Areas of Stability, Enhancement, & Development WHOLE FOODS/ KING SOOPERS CSU VETERINARY TEACHING HOSPITAL NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH CENTER SENIOR CENTER ROLLAND MOORE PARK ROSS NATURAL AREA FISCHER NATURAL AREA RED FOX MEADOWS NATURAL AREA AVERY PARK CITY PARK POTENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER POTENTIAL KEY DESTINATION COMMERCIAL CENTER COMMERCIAL CENTER CSU CAMPUS CORE BENNETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LAB/POLARIS SCHOOL BLEVINS MIDDLE SCHOOL POTENTIAL ELIZABETH “MAIN STREET” Coo Co CCC ll llll ll eg egg ee g eeeee Av Avv Avvv Avveeeeeeee COMMERCIAL fcgov.com/westcentral T Transportation & Mobility VISION A connected network that supports people safely walking, biking, or using public transit as DSULPDU\ZD\WRWUDYHOZKLOHEDODQFLQJWKHQHHGIRUHI¿FLHQWDXWRWUDYHOWKURXJKRXWWKHDUHD Transportation Plan Coordination and Opportunities West Central Area Boundary Arterial Intersection Priority Study - Intersections with Recommended Improvements Bicycle Master Plan - “Spot Improvements” CSU Parking and Transportation Plan - Recommended Improvements Other Near-Term Projects (Funded) Roadway Segments Shields Corridor Analysis Prospect Corridor Design Intersections Legend WCAP Additional Areas of Focus BENNETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LAB/POLARIS SCHOOL BLEVINS MIDDLE SCHOOL Draft - 11/13/2014 Ta Taa T TTa TTTa Taaa Taaaa Taft ft ftt fttt fftt ffffff ffffft fttttttt HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHil HHHHHHHHHHHHHHiiiilllllll il illl iiii lllllllllllllllllll Rd RRdd RRRd Rdd RRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRddddddddddddddddddddddddddd Sh Shh Shhh Shhhhh SSSSSSS SSSSSShhhhhhhhhhiiiiieeeeeeeelllllddddssssssssssssssssssss ie iee ieeeee i ld ldd lddd llll dddd ssssssssssssssss St Stt SSt SSSSSttttttttttttttttttttt El Ellll EEl Elll E Ellllliizzzzaaaaaaabbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee iz izz izzab aab ab abb abbbbb abbb aaaaab aaaab a bbbbbeeeeeeeeettttttttttttttttthhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh et eet ett eethhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh SSSt St SSt SStt SSSSSt SSSSSSSSSt SSSSt SSSSSSStttttttttttttttttt CS CSSS CSSSSSSSUUUUUUU CCSSUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU Spr SSSppprrriinnnggggg p pp ing inggg ingg n ng ngggggg CCr Cr CCCCCr Crrrr C CCCrre reeeeekkkkkkkkkk eek ee eeek eekk eeee ek kkk Tr TTrr TTr TTTrai Trrrraaaaa Trrrraa rraaaiiiilllllllll ai ail aai aaaaaa Mas Mass MMM MMMaassoonn as ass aa on onn oo Tra Tr TTTTT TTTra raaaaaaaa raiillllll ii Pr Prrr PPr PPrrrr P PPPPrro roooooooooosssssssppppppppeeeeeeeeeeecct os oss ooos oos osss ossss o pe ppe pee pppe peeect ct cttt cccttt cct RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRddddddddddddd RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRdddddddddddddddddd MMu Mu Muu MMMMMMu MMMMMu MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMuuuullllbbbbeeeerrrrry lb lbbb lbb lllb llbbbber er eeer e ry ryy rry ryyy ryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy ryyyyyyy St SSSSt SSt SStt SSSSSSStttttttttttttttttt La LLa Laaa Laaaaaur LLLLaaauuuurrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeellllllllllll ur urr urrr urrrr urrel ell el eeeel eel St SSt SSSt SSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttt Dr DDr DDrr DDDrrak DDDDDrrraaaaakkkkeeee ak aak aaak akkkkeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Rd RRd RRRR RRRRddddddddddddddddddddd Con Conn CCCCCCCC CCCCCCCCooooonnnnnssssssttttttiiiiittttttuuuuuuttttttiiiooooonnnnn on oo sti stttt stt st ss tut tuu t ut ion ionn ionnn i Av Avvvvv Avv A AAAAAv Avvvvvveeeeeeeee vvvvv eeeeeeeeeeeeee Cas Ca CCCCCCaaaaaaaaassssssssstttttttllllllleeeeeeeeeeeero as ass aaaa tl tle tleee tleeee tlee t le l roc roccc ro rooo roo r rrrooooooo rooocccccccccckkkkkkkkk oc kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr DDDDDDDrrrrrrr Cit Ci Cii CCC CCCCCCCCCCCiiiiiiitttttttttyyy tyyyyyyyyy y yy yyyyyy PPP PP PPPPPPPPPPaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrkkkkkkk P ark arkkk ar aaa rkk Av AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAv AAAAAAvv Avvveeeee eeeeeeee N ATTACHMENT 3 fcgov.com/westcentral T Transportation & Mobility VISION A connected network that supports people safely walking, biking, or using public transit as DSULPDU\ZD\WRWUDYHOZKLOHEDODQFLQJWKHQHHGIRUHI¿FLHQWDXWRWUDYHOWKURXJKRXWWKHDUHD Draft - 11/10/2014 N 0 1/2 MILE 1 MILE Dr DDDDr DDrr Drr DDr DDrrr Drak ak akkkk aak aaaaak aaaaaaaaaaa eeeeeeeeeeeee Rd RRRRd Rdd RRRd RRd Rddd R Bicycle Master Plan - Full Build Network (WCAP Area) SPRIN SPRINN S PR PRIN PRINN N G GG CR CCRR CRE C EK K TTR TTRR T TR R AIL AILLL AAA MASON MASO MA MMMM TRA RAI RAA RA AI AII A I LLLL Sh Shh SSSSSSSSSSS ie ieee iee ieeee ieeeeeeeeee ii ld ldd lddd lddddd llll sssssssss St Stt SSSSSSSSS Co Coo CCCCCCC CCCCCCCC lll ll ll eg egg e g eeeeeeeeeeeeee Av Avv Avvvvvvv AA A eeeeeeeeeeeeeee La LLLa LLa LLLL ke kke keeee SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttt Pr Prr PPPr PPPPr PPr PPrr P os osss oos ooooo pe ppe pee peeee pect ctt ct cct ctttt c RRRRRRRRRRRRRddddddddddddddddddd Ta Taa Taaa TTTTT ft ftt fttttt fttt ftttttt f HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHill ill il illl illlll iiiiiiii lllllllllllllllllllll Rd RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Mu Muu MMu M lb lbb lbbbbbbbber er eer eeeer eeer err eerrr erry ry ryy ryyyyy ryyyyyy SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSttttttttttttttttttttttttttt West Central Area Boundary Paved Trails/Shared-Use Paths Bike Lane Two-Way Sidepath Segment source: Bicycle y( Master Plan (2014) ) Buffered Bike Lane Add Median Signal Improvement Protected Bike Lane Priority Shared Lane Planned Bike Share Station School Legend CS CSS CCS CSSUUUUUUUUU CCSSUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU La LLa Laa L LLLaaaaaauuuurrrreeeeeeellllllllllllllll ur uurr uur urrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee St SSt SSSt SSSSSSSSSSSSSStttt ATTACHMENT 4 fcgov.com/westcentral T Transportation & Mobility VISION A connected network that supports people safely walking, biking, or using public transit as DSULPDU\ZD\WRWUDYHOZKLOHEDODQFLQJWKHQHHGIRUHI¿FLHQWDXWRWUDYHOWKURXJKRXWWKHDUHD Draft - 11/10/2014 6WUHHW5HWUR¿W([DPSOH New retrofit bulb-outs at intersections New retrofit tree islands at mid-block Potential bus stop Springfield Dr N Bryan Ave Constitution Ave &XUUHQWLQWHUVHFWLRQFRQGLWLRQ6SULQJ¿HOG'UDQG&RQVWLWXWLRQ$YH Before $IWHU &XUUHQWVWUHHWFRQGLWLRQ6SULQJ¿HOG'UDQG&RQVWLWXWLRQ$YH 5HWUR¿WEXOERXWVDWLQWHUVHFWLRQFRQGLWLRQ6SULQJ¿HOG'UDQG&RQVWLWXWLRQ$YH 5HWUR¿WWUHHLVODQGVDWPLGEORFNFRQGLWLRQ6SULQJ¿HOG'UDQG&RQVWLWXWLRQ$YH 5(')2; 1$785$/$5($ 52//$1'0225( 3$5. Drak Dra D ra rak akk ak e ee eeRd Rd RR RRd N Laur LLaur LLa LLau Lau La LLLaa el e lS l S ttttttttttttttt Pros PPros Pro ro osspect pect pec peec pecc ect Rd RRd Rdd RRRdddddd Rddddddd RRRd Rddd Rdddddd Maso Mas MMMMMMMMMM aso ass n nSt nS nSSS nnnn S St Coll Col Coo CCC ege egee egeeee egg eeee Ave Avee AAA v %(11(77 (/(0(17$5< 6&+22/ %/(9,16 0,''/( 6&+22/ /$%32/$5,6 6&+22/ Lake Lak Laake Lakke L ak k e S Stttttttttttt Mlb MMMMulb Mulb Ml MMMMlb MMulb Muulb Mulbb MMMMMuulbbb Mu Muul ulb uu lbbbbb l err erry eeerrry eerry err er rry rr rrr ry yyy St SSt SSSt SSSSSSSSSSttttt Sttttt Stt SStt Taft Taf Ta Taa TTTTT aft a ft f Hil Hill Hi Hiii Hii HHHH il ii lRd l lR lRRRRR ll Rd R Shie Shiee Shh S hie hiee lds ldss ld l dss dsss St Stt SSSSSSSSSSS 6SULQJ 66SULQ 6SULQ 6SSUUL 6 SULQJ SUUUL SULQ ULQ U UUL UL QJ JJ J ¿HOG' ¿HOG ¿H ¿¿¿¿H ¿¿¿H ¿¿HHOG HOG' HHOG' HOG HHH HH OG G' G' ' 'UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU Key Map ATTACHMENT 5 OS Open Space Networks VISION A functional network of public and private lands that connects wildlife, plants, and people Comprehensive and ecological approach to stormwater management Access to nature, recreation, and environmental stewardship opportunities Attractive urban tree canopy that supports habitat, character, and shade Parks and open spaces that offer a variety of settings and experiences Preserved and enhanced wildlife habitat corridors Ecologically Healthy Stormwater System Native Habitat Enhancement and Restoration Residential Tree Canopy Retreat from the Urban Environment Street Trees and Median Improvements on Major Streets Exercise and Play Tree Preservation During Redevelopment and New Development Gathering Places Neighborhood Parks, Community Gardens, and Xeriscape Projects Habitat Connectivity Educational Opportunities Road-Side Treatments and Medians Neighborhood Detention and Habitat Network of Multi-Use Trails Habitat Protection Along Irrigation Canals/Ditches We aspire to achieve: 1 OS 3 2 OS OS 4 OS 5 OS fcgov.com/westcentral Draft - 11/1/2014 ATTACHMENT 6 Legend Areas of Potential Open Space Improvements & Additions OS Open Space Networks VISION A functional network of public and private lands that connects wildlife, plants, and people fcgov.com/westcentral West Central Area Boundary Arterial Road Existing Open Space Existing Park Existing Water Body Existing Fort Collins Natural Area Existing Irrigation Canal and Habitat Major Paved Multi-Use Trail Minor Paved Multi-Use Trail Natural Surface Trail CSU Property Opportunity for Open Space Improvements & Additions Schools Opportunity for Open Space/Pocket Parks Provided by Development N 0 1/2 MILE 1 MILE Draft - 11/1/2014 RED FOX NATURAL AREA AVERY PARK ROLLAND MOORE PARK ROSS NATURAL AREA FISCHER NATURAL AREA GARDENS ON SPRING CREEK LILAC PARK gg BENNETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BLEVINS MIDDLE SCHOOL LAB/POLARIS SCHOOL SPRING CREEK TRAIL MASON TRAIL NEW MERCER DITCH LARIMER COUNTY CANAL NO. 2 Legend Areas of Potential Open Space Improvements & Additions N 0 1/2 MILE 1 MILE Ave POTENTIAL CSU CS S TADIUM RED D F FFOOO FO OX NATUR TURAL RAA AL ALL ARREA A EA AA Prospect Corridor Draft Designs a. Prospect Corridor Vision b. Prospect Road Draft Design c. Prospect Road Rendering d. Lake Street Draft Design e. Lake Street Rendering ATTACHMENT 8 P Prospect Corridor VISION Attractive and functional, well-integrated, mixed-use corridor that serves the mobility needs of nearby neighborhoods, CSU, and the community Safe and comfortable corridor for all modes of travel Seamless connection to MAX Safe crossings Attractive gateway to campus, downtown, and midtown Gateway Treatments Automatic Detection of Cyclists at Intersections Pedestrian Refuges Grade Separated or Enhanced Crossings Comfortable Sidewalks Welcoming Intersections Well-Marked Bike Facilities Street Trees and Medians Walk Bike Ride We aspire to achieve: 1 P 3 P 4 P 2 P fcgov.com/westcentral 7UDI¿F6DIHW\DQG(I¿FLHQF\ Draft - 11/13/2014 fcgov.com/westcentral P Prospect Corridor VISION Attractive and functional, well-integrated, mixed-use corridor that serves the mobility needs of nearby neighborhoods, CSU, and the community Draft - 11/13/2014 Prospect Road - Shields Street to College Avenue - Draft Design Section A-A’ 6’ 6’ 10’ 10’ 6’ 10’ 2.5’ 2.5’ 2.5’ 1.5’ 1.5’ 2.5’ 2.5’ 2.5’ 10’ 10’ 10’ Tree lawn Sidewalk Shared bike/ped path Existing ROW - 60’ Total Required ROW - 83’ South Side North Side Existing ROW Existing ROW Section B-B’ 10’ 6’ 10’ 10’ 8’ 10’ 10’ 6’ 10’ Shared bike/ped path Existing spruce trees Raised planted median Tree lawn CSU-Aggie Village North CSU-Aggie Village South Existing ROW - 60’ Total Required ROW - 88’ Existing ROW Existing ROW Section C-C’ 10’ 6’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 6’ 10’ Shared bike/ped path Center turn lane Center turn lane Shared bike/ped path Existing ROW - 60’ Existing ROW Existing ROW Total Required ROW - 87’ 6’ Tree lawn Access point, typ. 10’ Shared bike/ped path Plymouth Congregational Church Street tree 40’ O.C., typ. Potential north/south connection Enhanced intersection treatment with refuge islands Gateway corner refuge Interim condition required with existing land use, typ. Right-of-Way line Potential sidewalk connection to Spring Creek Trail PROSPECT ROAD - DRAFT DESIGN Sheely Drive Shields Street 6’ Sidewalk 0 50 100 150 N fcgov.com/westcentral P Prospect Corridor VISION Attractive and functional, well-integrated, mixed-use corridor that serves the mobility needs of nearby neighborhoods, CSU, and the community Draft - 11/12/2014 Prospect Rd. - Shields Street to College Avenue - Draft Design Prospect Road - View looking west near Prospect Lane intersection 6’ Tree lawn 10’ Shared bike/ped path Pedestrian/bicyclist activated crossing Potential street light gateway banners 6’ Tree lawn Raised, planted median 10’ Travel lane, typical 8’ Sidewalk " !" " "!) "* " "!) fcgov.com/westcentral P Prospect Corridor VISION Attractive and functional, well-integrated, mixed-use corridor that serves the mobility needs of nearby neighborhoods, CSU, and the community Draft - 11/12/2014 Lake Street - Shields Street to College Avenue - Draft Design Lake Street - View looking west near CSU Parking Garage 6’ Sidewalk, typical north and south sides 6’ Bike lane, typical north and south sides 4’ Planted buffer, typical Buffer crossing Campus spine 11’ Travel lane, typical 8’ Parallel parking, typical Center Ave. CSU parking garage Aggie Village North redevelopment 11/18/2014 1 1 City Council Work Session November 25, 2014 Ted Shepard, Chief Planner Amy Lewin, Transportation Planner Rebecca Everette, City Planner 2 Questions for Council 1. Conditional Rezoning allows Council to apply conditions or limit the approved uses when a property is rezoned. This could be used to implement the vision of the Plan, primarily along arterials. Does City Council have any questions regarding the Conditional Rezoning process? 2. How well do the draft designs for Prospect Road and Lake Street meet the vision for Prospect Corridor? 3. Are there any additional policies, strategies, or action items staff should consider to meet the vision of the West Central Area Plan? ATTACHMENT 9 11/18/2014 2 3 Project Overview • Update to 1999 Plan to address ongoing & emerging issues • ~12 month process • Anticipated completion in March 2015 CSU 4 Land Use & Neighborhood Character Transportation & Mobility Open Space Networks POLICY TOPICS VISION IMPLEMENTATION ACTION PLAN Neighborhood Projects Prospect Corridor Design 11/18/2014 3 5 Stakeholder Engagement City Boards: • Affordable Housing Board • Air Quality Advisory Board • Commission on Disability • Landmark Preservation Commission • Natural Resources Advisory Board • Parking Advisory Board • Parks and Recreation Board • Planning and Zoning Board • Senior Advisory Board • Transportation Board Other Groups: • Board of Realtors • Chamber of Commerce • ClimateWise Biz Ed Group • UniverCity Connections Transit & Mobility Task Force Stakeholder Committee: • Neighborhood residents • Business owners • Major landowners • Apartment complex managers • CSU students and staff 6 Land Use & Neighborhood Character Transportation & Mobility Open Space Networks POLICY TOPICS VISION IMPLEMENTATION ACTION PLAN Neighborhood Projects Prospect Corridor Design Land Use & Neighborhood Character 11/18/2014 4 7 Land Use & Neighborhood Character • Conditional rezoning • Design & compatibility • Preserving neighborhood heritage • Neighborhood services & enhancements 8 • Authority first introduced in 1972 • Council can impose reasonable conditions for use & development • Allows up-zoning while excluding unsuitable uses • Focused on redevelopment areas along arterials in the West Central area What is Conditional Rezoning? 11/18/2014 5 9 Land Use & Neighborhood Character Transportation & Mobility Open Space Networks POLICY TOPICS VISION IMPLEMENTATION ACTION PLAN Neighborhood Projects Prospect Corridor Design Transportation & Mobility 10 • Coordination with related efforts: – Arterial Intersection Priority Study – Bicycle Master Plan – CSU Parking and Transportation Plan – Other funded projects • WCAP Focus Areas: – Intersections – Roadway segments – Shields Corridor Analysis – Prospect Corridor Design Transportation & Mobility 11/18/2014 6 11 Transportation & Mobility – Street Retrofit Before After 12 Transportation & Mobility - Transit • Additional transit service to neighborhoods west of CSU • Additional transit service in southern part of campus • Connections to MAX via Lake/Prospect • Shared off-campus parking supported by transit service 11/18/2014 7 13 Land Use & Neighborhood Character Transportation & Mobility Open Space Networks POLICY TOPICS VISION IMPLEMENTATION ACTION PLAN Neighborhood Projects Prospect Corridor Design Open Space Networks 14 Open Space Networks 11/18/2014 8 15 • Close coordination with Nature in the City • Key themes – Connectivity – Access – Range of settings & experiences Open Space Networks 16 Land Use & Neighborhood Character Transportation & Mobility Open Space Networks POLICY TOPICS VISION IMPLEMENTATION ACTION PLAN Neighborhood Projects Prospect ProspectDesign Corridor Design 11/18/2014 9 17 Example segment of Prospect Road Prospect – Existing Conditions 18 Recommended Design Alternatives Evaluation Technical/ Operational Triple Bottom Line Advisory Committees Public Input Alternatives Development WE ARE HERE Design Development Process 11/18/2014 10 19 • Design Prospect & Lake to complement each other as one corridor • Custom cross-section for Prospect—narrower than standard • Maintain curb along south side residential to minimize construction costs & ROW impacts • Focus ROW impacts on areas likely to redevelop • Coordinate with CSU and other redevelopment plans Design Approach 20 Prospect Draft Design – Shields to Whitcomb 11/18/2014 11 21 Preliminary cost estimate: ~$8M Prospect – Draft Design 22 Lake Draft Design – Shields to College 11/18/2014 12 23 Preliminary cost estimate: ~$7.2M Lake Draft Design 24 Principle Prospect Road Lake Street VISION: Attractive and functional, well-integrated, mixed-use corridor that serves the mobility needs of nearby neighborhoods, CSU, and the community Safe & comfortable corridor for all modes of travel x Center turn lanes x Detached sidewalk/shared path x Sidewalk connections to Lake x Detached sidewalk x Protected bike lanes x Sidewalk connections to Prospect Safe crossings x Improved intersection treatments x New mid-block crossing x Improved intersection treatments Attractive gateway to campus, downtown, & midtown x Additional landscaping & medians x Gateway treatments at intersections x Unified streetscape & character x Additional landscaping x Gateway treatments at intersections x Unified streetscape & character Seamless connection to MAX x Detached sidewalk/shared path connecting to MAX x Transit stops/pullouts x Detached sidewalk/shared path connecting to MAX x Transit stops Prospect Corridor Vision 11/18/2014 13 25 Next Steps • Continue to develop recommendations for policies, programs, land use considerations, action items, and priorities • Refine Prospect Corridor designs • Develop draft Plan document • Public Outreach – Prospect Online Survey – November 2014 – Additional Prospect Property Owner/Tenant Outreach – Fall 2014 – Draft Plan – January 2015 • Council consideration of adoption – March 2015 26 Questions for Council 1. Conditional Rezoning allows Council to apply conditions or limit the approved uses when a property is rezoned. This could be used to implement the vision of the Plan, primarily along arterials. Does City Council have any questions regarding the Conditional Rezoning process? 2. How well do the draft designs for Prospect Road and Lake Street meet the vision for Prospect Corridor? 3. Are there any additional policies, strategies, or action items staff should consider to meet the vision of the West Central Area Plan? #"* 0 $!)//+* )5+* 3+ % 3+# ' "" "!) * 2 "!( # ! " """ " " " !" " "!) "* " "!) #"* 0 $!)//+* )5+* 3+ % 3+ "" "!) * 6 "!& 4 "!( 0 "!( # " " """ $# " !" " "!) "* " "!) #"* 0 $!)//+* )5+* 3+ % /.+ ! " 3+# ' "" "!) * 4 "!( # 1 "!(% " $#"$# fcgov.com/westcentral P Prospect Corridor VISION Attractive and functional, well-integrated, mixed-use corridor that serves the mobility needs of nearby neighborhoods, CSU, and the community Draft - 11/13/2014 Lake Street - Shields Street to College Avenue - Draft Design Lake Street Draft Design ! ! ! Legend Potential Right-of- Way (ROW) dedication/acquisition Pedestrian Wayfinding Transfort Stop Note - Total required ROW dimension includes 18” curb/gutter around planted buffer per LCUASS standards. The south side maintains the existing curb/gutter. * Wider than typical (6’) tree lawn to avoid utility conflicts. Section A-A’ South Side North Side Planted buffer Detached walk Parallel parking Travel lane Tree lawn Bike lane Existing curb CSU - Aggie Village North 6’ 13’* 6’ 4’ 4’ 1.5’ 1.5’ 8’ 6’ 8’ 11’ 11’ 8’ Existing ROW Existing ROW Existing ROW - 60’ Total Required ROW - 88’ AA’ 8’ Parallel parking Bike lanes 8’ Parallel parking 11’ Travel lanes 12’ Bike path to potential 11’ Travel lanes underpass Wider tree lawn to avoid impacts to ex. steam chillers CSU - Aggie Village North Future CSU Project Future CSU Project Existing curb maintained (South only) Existing curb/sidewalk maintained (South only) To potential underpass Right-of-Way line Access point, typ. Bus turnaround Buffer crossing 6’ Striped buffered bike lane Center Avenue CSU - Parking Garage East Drive Lake Street College Avenue 10’ Shared bike/ped path Mason Corridor Mason trail Access point, typ. Plymouth Congregational Church CSU - PERC Buffer tree, typ. Buffer crossing, typ. Buffer crossing, typ. Islamic Center Right-of-Way line Transfort stop, Bike box typ. Shields Street Potential sidewalk connection to Spring Creek Trail Pedestrian crossing Existing Residential Neighborhood Potential CSU Stadium Whitcomb Street Future condition on Whitcomb - Tree lawn detached sidewalk and bike lane 4’ Planted buffer 4’ Planted buffer 8’ Parallel parking 11’ Travel lanes 6’ Striped bike lane 6’ Bike lane 6’ Bike lane 6’ Sidewalk Existing curb maintained 6’ Sidewalk (South only) 6’ Striped buffered bike lane Gateway corner refuge 050100 150 N Interim condition required with existing off-street 90 degree parking Gateway corner refuge Interim condition required with existing land use 6’ Tree lawn Right-of-Way line 10’ Shared bike/ped path 6’ Sidewalk 6’ Tree lawn Potential pedestrian activated crossing Potential 8’ sidewalk connections to Lake Street Existing Residential Neighborhood AA’ Access point, typ. Prospect Lane Transfort stop, typ. Whitcomb Street Future condition on Whitcomb - Tree lawn detached sidewalk and bike lane CC’ Bay Road Prospect Station Connection to Lake Street Hilton Fort Collins College Avenue Existing trees to remain 10’ Shared bike/ped path 10’ Shared bike/ped path Raised median Interim condition required with existing land use, typ. Right-of-Way line Mason Corridor Enhanced crosswalk for Mason Corridor trail Desired bus pull-out Enhanced crosswalk w/ ped. signal Bus pull-out 6’ Tree lawn 10’ Shared bike/ped path 10’ Shared bike/ped path Transfort stop, typ. 6’ Tree lawn 10’ Shared bike/ped path Right-of-Way line Raised median CSU - Aggie Village North Center Avenue BB’ Potential Bike box underpass Potential underpass CSU - Parking Garage Legend Potential Right-of-Way (ROW) dedication/acquisition Pedestrian Wayfinding Transfort Stop Interim condition required with existing land use South Side North Side South Side North Side Sidewalk connection Mason trail Mason Trail ! ! ! *Note - Total required ROW dimension includes 30” curb/gutter along street per LCUASS standards *Note - Total required ROW dimension includes 30” curb/gutter along street and 18” curb/gutter around median(s) per LCUASS standards *Note - Total required ROW dimension includes 30” curb/gutter along street per LCUASS standards Enhanced intersection treatment with refuge islands Gateway corner refuge Refer to Midtown in Motion for College Ave corridor !) * !) # * /.+ ) * 4(6+ %) # * 4+ % /.+ ) * 4(6+ %) # * /3 !'/3( /1 !'5(% 4(# 2 $ / # !) * !) # * 2 $ /.+ 4+ % /.+ 0 !'0( 0 !'0( $# !) * !) # * /.+ 4+ % /.+ ## /3 !'/3( 4 !'4(# $# $# 2 $ / # en ennn e t nnd ndss n ee rrr CCCC C’ Bay Bayy B Ro Rooad add Prospect Station Conn nnec necttiiooon nt n t to oo L ake St Sttree re ree e ttt Hil Hii ton on Fo F rt t Co Col ol ollllin lin l s ss Exi Existi st sti sting ng tre tr rrrrr rrr re rrrre rr es to tto remmm remain ain in innnn innnnnnnn 10’ 10’SSSShhhhaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeee 0’ 0’’’ 000’’’ 0 d bbike b ike ike//pe peeeeeeeeeed d p path ath attt th tt 10’ 0’SSSShhhhaaaarrreee d bb b bike ike kee//p pe d dd p ath a Rai Raised sed sssss me m dia diann Int nteri eri er m c cond ond oondddddddd o iti itii it itiiiion on ooon onnn req re uired ed wit wwit i h heee e exxis xis x tin tinng g gll l an and ann uuse, , typ. Rig Right- ht- ht hht of- oo Way ay aaaa li line ne Mas M on Cor C rrrid rid iddor Enh nn anc aanc nc n ed eed e cr cro ccr ccrr crossw ssw sss alk lk fo foooo foor rrr Mas Ma asssson on onnnn Co Coor Cor C CCCCC r rid ri ridd idddddddor or oor o tr tra trail illlll Des DDDes D sire re red reed dd db d b us usss pu pul ppuul p ul ull-ll-l-o out Enh En EEnhhhhhhanc anc aaaa n ed eddddddd eedd d cro cross sssw ssww ssw ssswwalk alk a k w/ ped pedd p d..ssign s ign iig i gn gnnn al aaall Bus us pu pull- ll- -out 6’ Tree lawn 10’ Shared bike/ped path 10’ 10’SSShhhaaarrreeee d db dbbike b ike ike//ped pe d ppath p ath Tra Tr nsf nsffooooorrtt sf st sttop, op, op ty tyy typ. p. 6’ 6 Tre Treee T eeeeeeeeee el eeel eeeeeeeee l awwwn aw wn w 10’ 10 0’ 000’SSSSSSShhhhhhhh are ared d db bbbbb bb bbike b ike ik ikkkk ike//pe pee p ped d pp p ath at th Right-of-Way line Raised median CSU - Aggie Village North Center Avenue BBB B’ Pot Potent ot ent entt ential ial Bikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkeee e ebb eeeeeeeeeeeeee b bb boxx o und underp erp erpass ass a Potential underpass CSU -Par P kin kinnnggg g GGGGGara G ara raa r ge gggeeeee g Sid Sidewa ewa ewalk lk lkk con ccon c n nec necttttiiiiooooonnnnnn Mas M on ttra tra t il Mas Ma on onn ooonn Tra Traail il Enh nh nn aaanc anced e int i ers rs rrs rrseeccttiioonnnnn tr treat eat eeatme me wit withr h rrrrefu efu effu efuuuggggge ffu ffuu fu fuu f ge gggggge ggggggggg isl i an ann Gat Gatewa ewa ww y c cccccccorn orn ornnnner er eeeeeeer ref re refuge ug ugge ugggg Ref Refeer er to Mid Midtow tow towwnnn in Mot Mo ion ionnnnnn fo foor r C Col ol olllege ege g Ave AA co ccorri rri rrridor dor gggg AVE AVERY VERY ER PA PARK ARK K RO ROLL OLLA OLLAND OLL ND D MO MOORE OR PARK ARKK ROSS RO NATUR NATU TU TUUU AL AREA R REA EA A FIS FISCH FISCHER CHHEEEE C HHHEE HEEERR ER RRR NAT NATU NN ATURAL ATUR ATU TU TUU T LL AR ARR A AAA EA GGARDE GARDENS NS ON ONN SPRI SPRIN S G CRE C EKKK EK EEE LILAC A C PARK PARKKKKK PAR ARK Dr Drrrrak ak aa eeee Rd Rddd Ta Taa Taaft ft f HHHHHHHHHHHHHHill il illllll Rdd Rd RRRRRd Sh Shh SS S ie ieee ieelddddddddsssssssss ielddddssss St SS S Mu Muu Muuuuulb lb lbbb lbbber err er rrrry ry rrrrry rry rrry yyyy SSSSSSSttttttttt Co Coo Coll ll lllleg eg eeeeee ee Av Aveeee BEN ENNN NNE NNEE NE ETT ET E T ELEM EELEM E EMEENNNN ENT E ENNTARY NTTTARY NN NT TA RRY R SCH S CHOOO HHHO HO OOOOOOOL O O BBLEVINSSS MI MIDD I LEEEE SCHO SCHOOOOOL OL LAB/ L /POLA POLARIS RIS SCHO CHOOOL OL La Lake ke Sttt SSS La LLa L Laa Laur ur uurrrel urel el e SSSSSttt SStt SPRIN P PRING G CREEK CREEEK E TRAIL TR AIL MASON MA M TRAILL NEW NN EWWWWMERCER EW WWWM W MMMMMMMME MMEE M ERC RCER R RCERRR C ER R DITTC DITC DI D DDD DIT TCCHHH TCHH TC T TCH CCHHH LAR LLA ARIM AR ARI A RIMME RIM RIMER MMER MMMER ER E RCO R COUN C COU CO OUNTY O U UNTY TY CANAL CCAN C CAN ANAL ANA NNA AL L NOO NO N NO. O O2 O. 2 Eliz El EEE Elizabethh E izab iz i abet ab a ethhhhh ethh St Stt SSt Pr PPPros P os ospe ppppe pppe pe pp pect pppp cct ct c RRRRRRdddd RRRRRdddd ATTACHMENT 7 CENTER COMMERCIAL CENTER COMMERCIAL CENTER GARDENS ON SPRING CREEK * 6LJQL¿FDQW1HZ'HYHORSPHQW5HGHYHORSPHQW6LJQL¿FDQWQHZGHYHO- * RSPHQWUHGHYHORSPHQWDQWLFLSDWHGRQYDFDQWSDUFHOVSRWHQWLDOO\UHVXOWLQJLQ FKDQJHRIXVHRULQWHQVLW\ 6RPH1HZ'HYHORSPHQW5HGHYHORSPHQW6RPHPDUNHWGULYHQLQ¿OODQG UHGHYHORSPHQWOLNHO\WRRFFXU Neighborhood Enhancements6RPHUHLQYHVWPHQWLQLQIUDVWUXFWXUHDQG SRWHQWLDODGGLWLRQVUHQRYDWLRQV Areas of Stability6WDEOHDUHDVXQOLNHO\WRFKDQJHVLJQL¿FDQWO\ 3DUNV 2SHQ6SDFH 0DMRU7UDLOV &683URSHUW\ 3RWHQWLDO(OL]DEHWK³0DLQ6WUHHW´ ([LVWLQJ(OHPHQWV 3RWHQWLDO2SSRUWXQLWLHV 6FKRROV .H\'HVWLQDWLRQV :HVW&HQWUDO$UHD%RXQGDU\ 3RWHQWLDO.H\'HVWLQDWLRQV $5($62)67$%,/,7<(1+$1&(0(17 '(9(/230(17 $UWHULDO5RDG MOBY ARENA SAFEWAY SHOPPING CENTER KING SOOOOO SOOPERS Ave POO POTENTIAL CS CSU STADIU TA IUM Dr DD ak akk aaa eeee Rd Rdd R SPRIN S NG G CR CRE CRR R EK KT TT TR AIL IL I MASON MASONN S ON TRAI R L Sh SSS Shields ie ieeeld e ld lddddd lddssss St Sttt SS WHOL WHO H EEE FOOD OOD O S/ SS/ K SOOP SOOPER ER CSU CS CCSU C VETE VETERINA RINA RIN RINARY RY TEAC TEA TEACHING HING ING NG HOSP SP SS ITAL TALL NATU ATURAL RAL L RESO E URCE URCESSSS RES RESE RESEEARCH ARCH CEN CENT CENTT CENTER ER EEER SEN SENNIII NI N NIOOOR I ORR CCE CEN ENNN ENNT NT NTTTTER ER ERRR ROLL RO ROL R OLL AND AN AAN MOOR MOO MO E PARK ROSS ROOSSSS OOSS NATU NN A TU RAL RA AREA REA REAA EA EAA FISC FIS SC S HER HE HERR HERRR ER ERR RRRRR NATU NAT NAA AT ATU TU TURA TUU RAL RA RAA AAAA AL AAL A ARE AREA REEEA EAA EA EE A RED FOX MEAD MEADOWS OWS OWSS NATU NATURAL RAL AREA AVER AVE AVERRRYYYYYYY PARK R CCCC RRKKK POTEEEE TE ENT ENTIAL IAL IA IAA I AL NEIGHHHHHHHHH HB HBB H ORH OORH O R OOD OODDD CENTEEEEE EER ER ERR POT P OT ENT E TT IAL IAA KE KK YYYY DES DE DDD TIN TTIN TINNATI ATI ATION TI T ON OON O COMMMER M CIAALLLLLLLL IALLL CEN CC TER ER COM CCOM CO C OO MER ME MEE MERCIA CIA IA IAALLLL CEN CENNN C E TER TE TTEE T CSU SU CAMP AMP MP M US UUUS UU CORE COR C OR BENN NNN N ETT ET EE ELE ELEM ELEMM EM EEM E ENTA EN EEEEN E RY RYY SCHO CH CHOOOL OL LAB/ AB/ B/POL POLA POLAA POLARIS RIS SCHO CH H OL OLL VINSSS DDDLEE LLL OOOOOOOOL OL OO POT PO P PPO PPPOT OOOT OT OOT OOOTENT ENT EN ENTTT ENNTT ENNTTIA NTIA N IA IAAL IAL IIAAL IIAAAL AL A ALL EEEEL EL E ELL ELLIZA EEEELL EEEL IZAA ZA Z AAA AABET AAAAAAA BETTHHH “M “MA “MAA IN INN INNN NNNN STR T REET” RRRR C ll llll l AA COMM COOMM ERC ERCI R AL CENT CEN CENNNT EE ER ERR COMM M ERCI ERC E RCI C AL AA CEN CENT CENN ER ERRRR COMM COM MMM ERCI RC RCI C AL AAL CENT CE NT N ER ERRRR EE La LLL ke kee k SSSSSSSSttttt Pr PPrrrooos PPP Prospect oossss os o pe ppppp ct t Rd RRRRRddd R RRdd Rddd GARD GARDEN ENS ON ONN SPR SPRI S RI NG C CRREEK REEK MMOB MOB MOBBY Y YARENNA A Ta Taaaaaa TTT ft ftttt fttt fffff HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHil il ill iiiii lllllll Rd RRRRRR Drake Rd CITY TY TTYY PAR PAAAA PAA PA K EEWAY WAY A PPPING PPINGG PIN PI GG TTER TER PER ERS RS RR Mu MMu Muuu Mulb Mulber lb lbb lber er eeer eer eee e ry ryy ryyy SSSSSStttt St El EEEl E Elizabeth izz iz izzab ab abbet et eeee hhh Stt S St La LLLa LLaur ur uurrrel el ell ee SSSSSStttttt ATTACHMENT 2