Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - COMPLETE AGENDA - 01/13/2015 - COMPLETE AGENDACity of Fort Collins Page 1 Karen Weitkunat, Mayor City Council Chambers Gerry Horak, District 6, Mayor Pro Tem City Hall West Bob Overbeck, District 1 300 LaPorte Avenue Lisa Poppaw, District 2 Fort Collins, Colorado Gino Campana, District 3 Wade Troxell, District 4 Cablecast on City Cable Channel 14 Ross Cunniff, District 5 on the Comcast cable system Carrie Daggett Darin Atteberry Wanda Nelson Interim City Attorney City Manager City Clerk The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. Adjourned Meeting January 13, 2015 6:00 PM  CALL MEETING TO ORDER  ROLL CALL 1. Council will consider a motion to adjourn into executive session. 2. Resolution 2015-006 Selecting Final Candidates for the City Attorney Position. (staff: Janet Miller; 3 minute staff presentation; 15 minute discussion) The purpose of this item is to identify the candidates who will be finalists in the selection process for the City Attorney position.  OTHER BUSINESS  ADJOURNMENT Agenda Item 2 Item # 2 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY January 13, 2015 City Council STAFF Janet Miller, Human Resources Director SUBJECT Resolution 2015-006 Selecting Final Candidates for the City Attorney Position. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to identify the candidates who will be finalists in the selection process for the City Attorney position. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The City began a recruitment process for the City Attorney position in October 2014 with the support of an executive recruitment firm, Slavin Management Consultants (Slavin). Additionally, Council by Resolution 2014-076, appointed a committee comprised of Mayor Karen Weitkunat, Councilmember Wade Troxell and Councilmember Gino Campana to assist in matters related to the recruitment and selection process. Slavin presented possible finalist candidates' resumes and credentials to the Committee for consideration. Council meets in Executive Session on January 13, 2015 to discuss the qualifications of these candidates and to consider which of those may move forward as finalists for the position. This Resolution narrows the field of candidates and identifies those who will be finalists. Packet Pg. 2 - 1 - RESOLUTION 2015-006 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS SELECTING FINAL CANDIDATES FOR THE CITY ATTORNEY POSITION WHEREAS, on July 22, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution 2014-065 establishing a recruitment process for appointment of the City Attorney; and WHEREAS, the City Council chose to post the position for application by current City employees and external candidates using a search firm to recruit the potential candidates; and WHEREAS, on August 19, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution 2014-076 appointing a Council Committee to make recommendations to the City Council regarding matters related to the City Attorney recruitment and selection process; and WHEREAS, on December 16, 2014, the Council Committee reviewed the applications of those who applied for the City Attorney position, with the assistance of City staff and the search firm; and WHEREAS, on December 16, 2014, the Council Committee members expressed preference for five of the candidates as the best qualified for the City Attorney position. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS that the following persons are selected as finalists for the City Attorney position: ______________________________, ______________________________, ______________________________, ______________________________, ______________________________. Passed and adopted at an adjourned meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins held this 13th day of January, A.D. 2015. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 3 City of Fort Collins Page 1 Karen Weitkunat, Mayor Council Information Center (CIC) Gerry Horak, District 6, Mayor Pro Tem City Hall West Bob Overbeck, District 1 300 LaPorte Avenue Lisa Poppaw, District 2 Fort Collins, Colorado Gino Campana, District 3 Wade Troxell, District 4 Cablecast on City Cable Channel 14 Ross Cunniff, District 5 on the Comcast cable system Carrie Daggett Darin Atteberry Wanda Nelson Interim City Attorney City Manager City Clerk The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. City Council Work Session January 13, 2015 After the Adjourned Council Meeting, which begins at 6:00 p.m. Agenda Revised – 1/12/15  CALL TO ORDER. 1. Community Buildout Update. (staff: Cameron Gloss, Jeff Mihelich, Bruce Hendee, Laurie Kadrich; 15 minute staff presentation; 45 minute discussion) The purpose of this item is to present the City’s most recent populations projections, possible community buildout scenarios, and implications for growth on our carbon footprint. Materials presented by staff will show growth trends that will help inform ongoing policy discussions such as the Climate Action Plan. This item is being brought forward to Council at the request of the Futures Committee. 2. Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment. (staff: Lucinda Smith, Bruce Hendee; 15 minute staff presentation; 45 minute discussion) The purpose of this work session is to present analysis progress on the Climate Action Plan (CAP) update and outline Triple Bottom Line impacts and benefits associated with the strategies in the draft CAP. The CAP will provide a high level framework to set Fort Collins on the path to achieve carbon emissions reduction objectives as requested by Council, but will not determine future implementation details. Implementation details will be developed as strategies and tactics are considered on a case- by-case basis, and will be brought forward to Council for approval prior to implementation. In April 2014, City Council asked that an ad hoc committee be formed to develop a proposed updated Climate Action Plan that describes how the community could achieve a greenhouse gas emissions reduction goal of 20% below 2005 levels by 2020, 80% below 2005 by 2030, and carbon neutrality (a 100% reduction in net greenhouse gas emissions) by the year 2050. This Council work session is the final of four work sessions to review progress. City of Fort Collins Page 2 3. Colorado State University On-Campus Stadium Intergovernmental Agreement Update. (staff: Jeff Mihelich, Karen Cumbo; 10 minute staff presentation; 30 minute discussion) The purpose of this item is to update Council on plans to develop an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Colorado State University regarding infrastructure improvements and event day operations related to an on-campus stadium, and seek their direction regarding key mitigation issues. 4. West Nile Virus Management Review. (staff: Dan Weinheimer, Mike Calhoon; 10 minute staff presentation; 30 minute discussion) ITEM POSTPONED TO FEBRUARY 10, 2015 The purpose of this item is to review the 2014 West Nile virus (WNV) season and to discuss the off- season work plan in preparation for the 2015 WNV season. Staff will present WNV health data, a review of the City Council-approved budget enhancements, a work plan for the Technical Advisory Committee and a proposed plan for City-Larimer County coordination meetings.  OTHER BUSINESS.  ADJOURNMENT. DATE: STAFF: January 13, 2015 Cameron Gloss, Planning Manager Jeff Mihelich, Deputy City Manager Bruce Hendee, Chief Sustainability Officer Laurie Kadrich, Community Development & Neighborhood Services Dir WORK SESSION ITEM City Council SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Community Buildout Update. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to present the City’s most recent populations projections, possible community buildout scenarios, and implications for growth on our carbon footprint. Materials presented by staff will show growth trends that will help inform ongoing policy discussions such as the Climate Action Plan. This item is being brought forward to Council at the request of the Futures Committee. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED This is an information item, in preparation for the Climate Action Plan discussion and questions, therefore no specific questions are posed to Council. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION 2014 Population Estimate Planning staff prepares annual population estimates and projections that are used by numerous public and private sector interests. Various City departments use the information in planning for water, wastewater, electric, stormwater, land use, transportation, police coverage, and other services. The preliminary 2014 population estimate for the City is 155,400 and the Fort Collins Growth Management Area (GMA) is 169,000. Using the 2.371% compounded growth rate observed over the past 20 years, the GMA is projected to grow to 218,680 people in the next ten years. This figure is based on Colorado State Demographer projections, historic growth rates, employment forecasts, and other sources. Our population growth closely matches the rate of growth projected during the creation of City Plan. The first iteration of the Plan anticipated a population of 150,000 by the year 2015 based upon a compounded annual 2.167% growth rate. As a point of comparison, the actual growth rate during the last twenty years was 2.371%. Historical population and housing statistics dating back to 1950 can be found in Attachment 1. The City relies on the State Demography Office to provide final population estimates, although estimates for a given year area are typically not completed until the latter part of the following year (e.g., the 2012 estimates were not completed until August 2013). Unfortunately, this reflects a 1.5 year lag in the final information. Prior to obtaining the State estimate, Planning staff calculates a preliminary population estimate in January of the subject year. When the State finalizes their population numbers, the preliminary estimate is replaced with the new State estimate. Packet Pg. 3 January 13, 2015 Page 2 The methodology for calculating the preliminary population estimate in 2014 is as follows:  2013 housing units (FC) = 62,875  Net increase housing units (FC) = 1,411  Combined total housing units = 64,286  Vacancy Rate 2.71 (State) = 1,742 (vacant HU)  Occupied housing units = 62,544  Average Household Size (State) = 2.37  62,544 x 2.37 = 148,229 (Household population)  + Group Quarter Population (State) = 7,167  Household Pop. + Group Quarter Pop. = 155,396  Round off (nearest hundredths) = 155,400 2013 ESTIMATE 2014 ESTIMATE Housing Unit Total 61,728 62,875 Net Increase 1,147 1,411 Total Housing Units 62,875 64,286 Vacancy Rate 3.20% 2.71% Vacant Housing Units 2,012 1,742 Occupied Housing Units 60,863 62,544 Average Household Size 2.37 2.37 Household Population 144,245 148,229 Group Quarter Population 7,085 7,167 Total Population 151,330 155,396 Preliminary Population Estimate 151,330 155,400 Community Buildout Analysis Based on historic growth rates and development potential under present regulations, Fort Collins has up to a 17- year supply of buildable land, with buildout projected for 2032. Staff maintains a Buildable Lands Inventory that is a database of developable lands within the existing GMA. It provides the basis for estimating the remaining development capacity of the GMA which is referred to as a “buildout analysis”. The buildout analysis explains what is likely to happen if the Fort Collins community grows to the full extent allowed under City Plan and the Land Use Code, within the present Growth Management Area (GMA) boundary. The analysis assumes new development and construction on remaining, vacant or redevelopment parcels that are not encumbered by natural resource lands-floodways, natural resources and required buffers- along with public facilities like parks and schools. It also takes into account the growth of Colorado State University based on the latest adopted campus master plans. The 2014 Buildout Analysis concludes that: Packet Pg. 4 January 13, 2015 Page 3  The existing Growth Management Area can accommodate 236,000 - 255,000 people total depending on the intensity of new development and level of redevelopment. In 2014, the population was 155,396. The remaining capacity of the GMA is approximately 81,000 - 100,000 people. Using the recent historical average population growth rate (2.371%), the GMA reaches capacity between 2028- 2032. This represents an additional 10-year residential supply than previously projected.  As our inventory of lands available for development dwindle, redevelopment and infill will become stronger possibilities. Redevelopment is estimated to add approximately 10,000 residents and 4,500 - 7,500 jobs. Detailed subarea plans, primarily for Midtown, Downtown, and North College, form the basis for zoning allowances that are used as the basis for these figures.  The jobs-housing balance is approximately 1.5 jobs per residential unit. This is forecast to stay about the same in the future. The jobs-housing balance for the State of Colorado is approximately 1.73 jobs to one residential unit. 2040 Socio-Economic Forecast for the North Front Range The North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization (NFRMPO) maintains an on-going Land Use Allocation Model that is divided into six subareas: City of Fort Collins, City of Loveland, City of Greeley, remainder of the NFRMPO modeling area, and the ozone nonattainment area of Larimer County and Weld Counties. Buildout data represents development of land based on comprehensive plans throughout the NFRMPO area and serves as maximums for growth in the land use model, which provides the basis for the travel demand model, which is used to project future travel volumes on roadways and transit ridership. Some of the preliminary findings from the NFRMPO 2040 regional demographic and economic forecasts will be presented to Council at the work session. The Final NFRMPO regional demographic and economic forecast report will provide:  A regional forecast with major macroeconomic indicators and subarea totals out to the year 2040;  A population and household demographic forecast out to the year 2040 for the persons and households projected to be in the NFRMPO region; and  Complete documentation of the models. ATTACHMENTS 1. Population History (PDF) 2. Powerpoint presentation (PDF) Packet Pg. 5 YEAR CENSUS POPULATION (APRIL) CENSUS HOUSING (APRIL) CITY SIZE SQ. MI. (JANUARY) CITY POPULATION ESTIMATE (JULY) Preliminary CITY HOUSING ESTIMATE (JULY) CITY HOUSING UNIT PERMITS HOUSING ANNUAL GROWTH RATE ESTIMATED POPULATION INCREASE PER YEAR 1950 14,937 N/A 2.97 14,937 N/A N/A N/A 1960 25,027 7,951 6.00 25,027 7,951 N/A N/A '50-'60 Increase 10,090 N/A 3.03 N/A N/A Percentage 67.6% N/A 102.0% Average Annual Population Growth Rate = 5.3% 1970 43,337 13,838 10.52 43,337 13,838 634 4.6% 1,255 '60-'70 Increase 18,310 5,887 4.52 N/A N/A Percentage 73.2% 74.0% 75.3% Average Annual Population Growth Rate = 5.6% 1980 65,092 25,382 21.65 65,092 25,382 991 3.9% 2,354 '70-'80 Increase 21,755 11,544 11.13 10,993 1,099 Percentage 50.2% 83.4% 105.8% Average Annual Population Growth Rate = 4.2% 1981 25.34 67,446 26,373 608 2.3% 1,444 1982 68,534 (7/1/82) 27.34 68,890 26,981 532 2.0% 1,264 1983 27.59 70,153 27,513 1,329 4.8% 3,156 1984 70,721 (7/1/84) 29.43 73,310 28,842 1,615 5.6% 3,836 1985 32.28 77,145 30,457 1,493 4.9% 3,546 1986 32.46 80,691 31,950 901 2.8% 2,140 1987 34.95 82,831 32,851 879 2.7% 2,088 1988 36.38 84,919 33,730 774 2.3% 1,838 1989 38.89 86,757 34,504 572 1.7% 1,001 1990 87,758 35,357 40.65 87,758 35,357 728 2.1% 1,681 '80-'90 Increase 22,666 9,975 19.00 9,694 969 Percentage 34.8% 39.3% 87.8% Average Annual Population Growth Rate = 3.0% 1991 41.09 89,439 36,085 666 1.8% 1,678 1992 41.86 91,117 36,751 894 2.4% 2,064 1993 42.12 93,181 37,645 1,173 3.1% 2,708 1994 42.65 95,889 38,818 1,462 3.8% 3,837 1995 44.02 99,726 40,480 1,232 3.0% 2,844 1996 104,196 (7/1/96) 44.20 102,571 41,712 1,762 4.2% 3,652 HISTORIC POPULATION AND HOUSING UNIT STATISTICS 1 ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 6 Attachment1.1: Population History (2774 : Community Buildout Update) YEAR CENSUS POPULATION (APRIL) CENSUS HOUSING (APRIL) CITY SIZE SQ. MI. (JANUARY) CITY POPULATION ESTIMATE (JULY) Preliminary CITY HOUSING ESTIMATE (JULY) CITY HOUSING UNIT PERMITS HOUSING ANNUAL GROWTH RATE ESTIMATED POPULATION INCREASE PER YEAR 1997 44.20 106,223 43,294 1,315 3.0% 2,758 1998 44.90 108,981 44,489 1,703 3.8% 3,931 1999 113,432 (7/1/99) 45.68 112,912 46,192 1,892 4.1% 5,740 2000 118,652 47,755 46.44 118,652 47,755 1,582 4.4% 5,205 '90-'00 Increase 30,894 12,398 5.79 30,894 12,827 Percentage 35.2% 35.1% 14.2% 35.2% Average Annual Population Growth Rate = 3.1% 2001 122,479 46.98 123,857 49,337 1,899 3.8% 2,431 2002 124,621 49.43 126,288 51,236 1,579 3.1% 1,179 2003 125,933 50.51 127,467 52,815 1,422 2.7% 2,649 2004 126,995 51.00 130,116 54,237 1,386 2.6% 786 2005 128,017 51.12 130,902 55,623 1,160 2.1% 2,288 2006 129,467 51.57 133,190 56,783 887 1.6% 2,171 2007 135,397 52.08 135,361 57,670 601 1.0% 2,250 2008 136,665 2008 ACS 52.72 137,611 58,271 778 1.3% 2,476 2009 133,801 2009 ACS 53.38 140,087 59,049 1,105 1.9% 2,463 2010 143,986 60,503 55.46 143,986 60,503 313 0.5% 709 '00-'10 Increase 25,334 12,748 9.02 25,334 12,399 Percentage 21.4% 26.7% 19.4% 21.4% Average Annual Population Growth Rate = 1.9% 2011 2011 ACS 55.58 146,573 60,813 857 1.4% 2,587 2012 148,634 2012 ACS 55.69 148,167 61,673 1,147 1.9% 1,594 2013 2013 ACS 55.83 152,205 62,875 1,411 2.2% 4,038 2014 56.61 155,400 P 64,286 3,194 HOUSING NET INCREASE: Starting in 2002, the Building & Zoning Department began tracking the addition of new housing units through the issuance of building permits and new manufactured units, and the loss of housing units through demolition or conversion to non-residential uses. This column, thus, represents data on the net increase of housing units in the city. In 2003, the City annexed a county enclave containing 91 housing units; in 2009, the City annexed a county enclave conatining 866 units. These units were added to the Building Departments new/demolished/converted data. POPULATION ESTIMATES: Population estimates are made by the State Demographer's Office. However, an estimate for a given year is typically not completed until the latter part of the following year. Therefore, the City uses building permit information to produce preliminary estimates for years not yet covered by the State. The City estimates are identified with a "P" in the above table. When the State completes their methodology to produce a year's estimate, that estimate then takes the place of the City's preliminary estimate. 2 Packet Pg. 7 Attachment1.1: Population History (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 1 Fort Collins Community Buildout Analysis January 13, 2015 City Council Work Session ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 8 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 2 Work Session Purposes q Review data and trends that illustrate a likely future development pattern q Provide background information that can inform future discussions on the Climate Action Plan Packet Pg. 9 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 3 Today’s Population q 155,400 - City q 169,000 - GMA Packet Pg. 10 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 4 History of Fort Collins Growth Boundary 1979 Urban Service Area Study 1980 Urban Growth Area-1st IGA 2000 Growth Management Area-Amended IGA 2004 City Plan LaPorte SE AB Fossil Creek Reservoir Foothills Packet Pg. 11 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 5 Buildout Analysis What will likely happen if the Fort Collins community grows to the full extent allowed under City Plan and the Land Use Code Packet Pg. 12 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 6 Greenfield vs. Infill vs. Infill Redevelopment creation of new housing or other buildings on scattered vacant sites in a built-up area. Redevelopment q A more intensive use of existing underused buildings and sites (often including building additions and floor plan reconfiguration); or q Rehabilitation and adaptive re-use of historic buildings and sites, often for new uses; or q Removal of existing building(s), followed by a replacement with different buildings, often larger and containing more intensive uses. Packet Pg. 13 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 7 + Existing GMA (including recent Timnath IGA amendment) + Uses and Intensity under City Plan and Land Use Code + Buildable lands are remaining, vacant or redevelopable parcels in the Growth Management Area – Natural areas – conservation easements – future park/school locations – natural resource buffers – floodways Assumptions Packet Pg. 14 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 8 Assumptions q Approved/In-Process Projects : q under construction q Approved, but not yet built q proposals under review q 2012 CSU Master Plan q New densities similar to recent averages – historical scenario q Maximize the potential density permitted in each zoning district – maximum scenario Packet Pg. 15 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 9 GMA Population Buildout *Average population growth (City of Fort Collins only; 10-yr. average): 1.85% GMA Population Capacity (historic development densities) 236,384 GMA Population Capacity (high development densities) 255,247 GMA Population Buildout Scenarios (Year): Scenario 1% Avg. Annual Population Growth 2% Avg. Annual Population Growth 3% Avg. Annual Population Growth Historic Development Density 2040 + 2031 2025 Maximum Development Density 2040+ 2036 2028 Packet Pg. 16 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 10 Date of Population Buildout Packet Pg. 17 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 11 Buildable Lands Packet Pg. 18 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 12 Mulberry/Mt. Vista Packet Pg. 19 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 13 Downtown/Midtown Packet Pg. 20 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 14 Packet Pg. 21 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 15 2040 Regional Employment Growth Packet Pg. 22 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 16 Packet Pg. 23 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 17 2040 Regional Residential Growth Packet Pg. 24 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 18 Fort Collins Housing becoming less attainable Packet Pg. 25 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 19 Packet Pg. 26 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 20 Boulder & Fort Collins Commuting • Fort Collins –55% of workers live in Fort Collins Source: 2014 Housing Affordability Policy Study (HAPS) • Boulder –33.7% of workers live in Boulder Source: 2012 Commuting Patterns Survey, Boulder Economic Council Packet Pg. 27 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 21 Housing Affordability ‘Gaps’ 2000 Comparison Packet Pg. 28 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 22 Housing Affordability ‘Gaps’ 2012 Comparison Packet Pg. 29 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 23 Boulder Housing: Location of Affordable Households $77k income 50,000 workers commute to Boulder per day Source: Boulder Co. Trends 2013 Source: BBC Research & Consulting and 2012 MLS • Single Family Unit • Attached Unit Packet Pg. 30 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 24 Recent Shift in Commuting Patterns Packet Pg. 31 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 25 Using Carbon Emissions to Measure Sustainability City Plan Principle ENV 11: …”to reduce the impact of the Fort Collins community on global climate change, the Fort Collins community will reduce greenhouse gas emissions 20% below 2005 levels by 2020 and 80% by 2050.” How does community size and density impact carbon emissions? Packet Pg. 32 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 26 Carbon Footprint Source: Purdue University Vulcan Project CO2 Emissions Emissions Composite Map: -Powerplant -Industrial -Mobile Source -Residential/Commercial Metric tons Packet Pg. 33 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 27 Carbon Footprint Per Capita Packet Pg. 34 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 28 Development Patterns impact carbon emissions Source: Purdue University Total Emissions Per Capita Emissions Packet Pg. 35 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 29 Recapping the Data • The North Front Range will continue to grow and its communities will be faced with growth-related challenges. • Fort Collins Buildout Analysis depicts a 13- 40+year land supply, dependent on the rate of growth and City Plan, and an ultimate population between 236,000- 255,000 residents. • Community size and density substantially impact carbon emissions. Packet Pg. 36 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 30 Need for Community Balance • Data speaks to the need for a Balanced Community: – Balance of Housing and Jobs – Attainable housing relative to wages – A continuum of housing types in ‘complete’ and diverse neighborhoods – Employment and services near housing – A balanced transportation system Packet Pg. 37 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) 31 Upcoming Opportunities to Address Land Use and Climate Policy q Community Climate Action Plan – 2015 q Affordable Housing Strategic Plan – 2015 q City Plan Update – projected 2017 Packet Pg. 38 Attachment1.2: Powerpoint presentation (2774 : Community Buildout Update) DATE: STAFF: January 13, 2015 Lucinda Smith, Environmental Sustainability Director Bruce Hendee, Chief Sustainability Officer WORK SESSION ITEM City Council SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this work session is to present analysis progress on the Climate Action Plan (CAP) update and outline Triple Bottom Line impacts and benefits associated with the strategies in the draft CAP. The CAP will provide a high level framework to set Fort Collins on the path to achieve carbon emissions reduction objectives as requested by Council, but will not determine future implementation details. Implementation details will be developed as strategies and tactics are considered on a case-by-case basis, and will be brought forward to Council for approval prior to implementation. In April 2014, City Council asked that an ad hoc committee be formed to develop a proposed updated Climate Action Plan that describes how the community could achieve a greenhouse gas emissions reduction goal of 20% below 2005 levels by 2020, 80% below 2005 by 2030, and carbon neutrality (a 100% reduction in net greenhouse gas emissions) by the year 2050. This Council work session is the final of four work sessions to review progress. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. Does the modeling analysis provide City Council with appropriate information to understand the path to achieving the 2020, 2030 and 2050 reduction objectives? 2. Is City Council comfortable considering updated community GHG goals and an updated Climate Action Plan framework at the February 17, 2015 meeting? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION In April 2014, City Council initiated an effort to develop an updated Climate Action Plan that would outline the steps necessary to reduce community greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions:  20% below 2005 levels by 2020,  80% below 2005 by 2030, and  carbon neutrality (a 100% reduction in net greenhouse gas emission) by the year 2050. This direction was based on analysis provided from the “Stepping Up” report prepared by the Rocky Mountain Institute to answer the question of how quickly Fort Collins could technically and cost-effectively accelerate its 80% GHG reduction goal, plus additional analysis of alternative new goals provided by The Brendle Group. When considering a policy goal and strategic plan such as this, questions that are typically considered include: - What would it take? - What are the impacts of taking the action? Of not taking action? - What is the correct/logical order of steps? - Can it be funded? The information presented below is intended to address these questions to the extent possible, based on analysis that has been completed to date. The analysis effort has been significant and a framework has been outlined that could achieve the majority of the requested reduction objectives. The analysis approach is based on examples Packet Pg. 39 January 13, 2015 Page 2 from best practices nationally and technoeconomic analysis of foreseeable cost trends and adoption rates for specific strategies. Still, many uncertainties about the future exist. These uncertainties include details of the electric grid systems integration, electric storage and balancing requirements to complement high level of wind/solar, and the overall integration of technology from various sectors. Researchers around the world are working to address these types of questions, and Fort Collins and its partner Platte River Power Authority can play an important role in the evolution of energy systems by engaging in this research and development. Other areas of uncertainty include decisions on national carbon pricing and finalization of Platte River Power Authority’s Integrated Resource Plan for its future electric generation supply mix. The development and implementation of the CAP is, by nature, an iterative process. The CAP framework provides a high-level structure within which the “Plan, Do, Check, Act”’ model that Fort Collins embraces can operate on a shorter time cycle. Accordingly, the CAP will provide a framework that enables periodic evaluation and updates that consider advancements in technology, community engagement, and financing approaches. Strategies and tactics can be modified within the overall framework of the plan to minimize costs, avoid unfavorable outcomes, and take advantage of new technical and economic opportunities. Anticipated outcomes of setting aspirational greenhouse gas goals include attracting outside capital as well as increased local innovation and entrepreneurial activity. An aspirational goal can drive further action to reduce emissions than would occur without a goal and plan. It can spur the community’s engagement, competitive spirit, and sense of pride. The following excerpt of the draft 2015 Energy Policy summarizes the opportunity available to Fort Collins: Leadership by City government and Utilities in promoting efficiency and the transition to renewable sources will provide certainty to businesses and investors to make projects happen. There will be an economic multiplier and a draw for businesses who sell outside the City. A statement of the City’s commitment to aggressively cut greenhouse gas emissions would, in itself, play a major role in enabling acceleration. This commitment is backed by significant decision- making power and implementation capabilities of Fort Collins Utilities and Platte River Power Authority. A public GHG target would send a credible signal to interested stakeholders to engage. For those who are on the fence, ratification would provide a bold directive to act. A bold public target would alert the nation that an energy transformation is underway in Fort Collins, drawing energy leaders, funders, and researchers to participate. City government can organize projects to catalyze private industry not only to achieve this (energy) policy’s goals but also to improve the local economy. (excerpt from draft 2015 Energy Policy Update) The 2015 draft Energy Policy is currently under development by the Energy Board. It will be synchronized with CAP goals and brought forward for Council consideration sometime after February 2015. WHAT WILL IT TAKE? In mid-December, a scenario (compilation of GHG reducing strategies) was developed based on judgments from staff, the Brendle Group, and poll results from the Climate Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC). That scenario was presented to the CAC on Dec. 15th and further refined based on feedback from the CAC into “Scenario 1”, presented below. Scenario 1, summarized below, reflects a compilation of strategies that are aggressive yet potentially achievable. Other scenarios are possible. Table 1. Estimated Metric Tons CO2e reduced by Scenario 1 and Percent Reduction from Baseline Achieved by Quantified Strategies 2020 2030 2040 2050 % below 2005 Baseline 25% 75% 86% 92% The remaining unquantified reductions may be addressed through further evaluation now or can be clarified in future updates to the CAP. Recall that the 2008 Fort Collins Climate Action Plan was an “interim strategic plan for 2020” that quantified only 90% of the 2020 goal. Copenhagen’s ambitious plan to achieve carbon neutrality for the community by 2025 contains 6% “new, unidentified” initiatives.” Packet Pg. 40 January 13, 2015 Page 3 (Seehttp://subsite.kk.dk/sitecore/content/Subsites/CityOfCopenhagen/SubsiteFrontpage/Business/Growth_and_p artnerships/~/media/F5A7EC91E7AC4B0891F37331642555C4.ashx>) Anticipated Outcomes of Scenario 1 in 2030 o Electric supply: o 80% reduction in GHG intensity of all electric power supplied to the Fort Collins electric grid (wholesale and distributed sources) o Platte River’s Craig coal units 1 & 2 (approx. 155 MW) both retire at the end of 2019 o Platte River’s Rawhide coal unit capacity factor falls from about 90% to about 60% by 2029 in response to increased distributed generation o Rawhide (approx. 280 MW) would retire from the fleet in 2029 o Platte River’s surplus sales drop by approximately 60 o Platte River adds about 200 MW of reciprocating natural gas engines to provide energy when wind, solar and distributed resources are not sufficient to meet City needs. o Existing homes and businesses:(reduced the percent of existing buildings achieving all electric and having solar from Dec. 9 analysis) o 36% more efficient than today’s buildings o 100% will have enough solar PV to achieve net zero energy o 25% of homes and 5% of commercial buildings no longer use natural gas for heating, cooking, etc.) (reduced from 12/9 summary) o 22% of homes and 50% of businesses have installed solar o New construction:(increased the percent of new buildings achieving all electric and having solar form (from Dec. 9 analysis) o By 2030, new construction will use only 15% of the energy used by today’s buildings under current code o 50% of new homes and 25% of new businesses will be all electric o Vehicles and Mileage: (reduced the percent of new vehicles being EV from Dec. 9 analysis, increased the percent of new vehicle purchases) o 50% of new vehicles purchased by 2030 are electric vehicles (EV’s) o Remaining 50% of new vehicles purchased are ~40% more efficient than avg. new stock o People are driving 29% less miles per year (per capita VMT reduction) Attachment 1 provides more details about Scenario 1 and a summary of Platte River Power Authority’s modeling analysis for Fort Collins. The relationship between the CAP and Platte River modeling inputs and outputs is still under review and adjustments may impact the final scenario results. SOCIETAL COSTS AND BENEFITS Of great interest to the community and stakeholders are the costs and savings that are estimated for the suite of strategies needed to achieve reductions. The table below shows the net costs and savings for the suite of strategies contained in Scenario 1. The cost estimates are very sensitive to input assumptions, so costs are presented in ranges to address this issue. The costs and benefits reported are net societal costs and benefits, so they reflect a diverse portfolio of investments made by Fort Collins Utilities, Platte River Power Authority, third parties providing finance for energy efficiency investments, and the City itself, as well as individual businesses and homeowners. Fort Collins Utilities’ proposed Integrated Utility Services model, for example, would provide a financing structure whereby homeowners would see net benefits from energy efficiency investments beginning in year one, since these investments would be financed over time rather than paid up front. Scenario 1 is estimated to deliver a net savings to the Fort Collins community of $1B - $2B by 2040 and $3B to $7B by 2050, using net present values under two discount scenarios (2.5% and 5%). Achieving these long term savings requires making investments over the next 10-15 years to improve energy efficiency in buildings, revamp electricity supply infrastructure, acquire lower emissions vehicles, implement new city programs, and other measures. The total amount of this investment is equivalent to approximately $30/month per person in 2020, Packet Pg. 41 January 13, 2015 Page 4 yielding a net savings of ~ $50-$100/person/month by 2050. It is important to note, however, that the impact of some costs will spread out over time through financing. Table 2. Estimated Range of Cost Impacts 2020 2030 2040 2050 Discounted Net Cumulative Cost/Savings (Using 2.5% discount) Total (Cost) or Savings - $M ($292) $388 $2,800 $7,100 Average Monthly Societal (Cost) or Savings, shown as $ per person per month ($28) $13 $56 $98 Discounted Net Cumulative Cost/Savings (Using 5% discount) Total (Cost) or Savings - $M ($278) $196 $1,600 $3,600 Average Monthly Societal (Cost) or Savings, shown as $ per person per month ($27) $6 $32 $50 * The average monthly cost/savings-per-household equivalent is provided to provide a sense of the overall level and timing of costs (investments) and savings (benefits) to the community. It does not indicate the cash flow impact on households or businesses. By financing cost-effective investments, households and businesses can see net benefits immediately. When considering these costs and saving, it is important to also consider that “business as usual” has costs associated with it. Conservative Elements of the Analysis It is important to note that the CAP model currently has a number of conservativisms built into it. The CAP model does not consider indirect cost benefits that will accrue from:  improved public health resulting from more active modes of transportation (walking and bicycling)  improved public health resulting from reductions in air pollution emission  indirect economic and social health benefit to the community through increased resiliency to predicted climate change impacts such as increased flooding,  indirect economic benefit to the community from job creation through CAP research and program implementation In addition, uptake of energy efficiency programs is based on today’s energy rate, yet as rates rise, energy efficiency become more compelling and more cost-effective. Uncertainties in the Resource Analysis Platte River’s modeling for Fort Collins assessed necessary changes to their entire system to reach an 80% and a 60% reduction in carbon emissions. If Fort Collins only wanted to increase its share of cleaner energy, the overall magnitude of system changes needed would be lower. Fort Collins would have to take on the total incremental cost of new cleaner resources and cover its share of fixed system cost, but that total cost might be less than the total cost associated with the entire system revision. With the unprecedented amounts of solar assumed added to the distribution system, several items must be considered. Moving forward, it will be critical for Fort Collins to partner with Platte River in order to ensure reliable and cost-effective execution of low-carbon strategies. The current analysis includes the following caveats from Platte River: System engineering  The model does not include equipment or systems at the distribution level (storage / other technologies) to integrate the large amount of PV solar. Packet Pg. 42 January 13, 2015 Page 5 Business Operations  It is assumed that all required integration services can be purchased from the balancing authority at the posted rate (with an assumed escalator).  It is assumed that the market will be deep enough to buy and sell as needed to match loads and resources on an hourly basis Construction times and installation  Additions of new resources may be beyond the 15 years available  Electrification infrastructure challenges - EV’s and electric appliances  Decommissioning of existing resources and stranded fixed costs for existing systems  Transmission may not be available for large amounts of wind and solar New air quality permits will be needed for new gas generation such as combined heat and power located within the City will require state air quality permits. TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE IMPACTS City Plan (2011) defines Fort Collins’ commitment to sustainability as the resolve to act “systemically, creatively, and thoughtfully utilize environmental, human, and economic resources to meet our present needs and those of future generations without compromising the ecosystems upon which we depend.” To that end, the City has completed a Sustainability Assessment Tool (SAT) of the current CAP “Accelerated” scenario”. Attachment 2 provides the SAT and summary. Key impacts are summarized below. Mitigation measures need to be developed to address any significant inequitable negative coat impacts. RISKS OF TAKING OR NOT TAKING ACTION Decisions to advance down the path towards an accelerated GHG gal should consider risks of action and risks of inaction. The list below outlines some risk considerations of either approach. Risks of Inaction (Business-as-Usual)  Exposure to economic impacts from fossil fuel price volatility and fuel supply shocks.  Greater congestion and worsening air quality reduce Fort Collins’ quality of life and distinctiveness as a community.  Greater energy-related cash flow out of the community and smaller in-community investment in efficiency, renewables, and new technology.  Fort Collins loses its position as a leader in clean tech market to other communities and misses out on opportunities attract investor capital and innovative businesses.  Missed opportunities to secure R&D funding from the federal government or other sources for advanced energy economy. Risks of Accelerated Action (proposed CAP)  Premature investment into technologies that have not reached optimum development or cost-effectiveness (Can be mitigated by careful consideration of which programs to implement first)  Inequitable cost burden to any segment of the community (must be mitigated by careful vetting of individual strategies or projects)  Risk of damaging credibility by striving for an aspirational goal (setting an aspirational itself does not come with any financial penalty for not meeting the goal)  Challenges of integrating high levels of renewable electricity supply could result in electrical system instability if not properly managed. POTENTIAL ACTIONS FOR EARLY IMPLEMENTATION In order to reach a reduction objective of 80% below 2005 by 2030, many actions need to start very soon. However, there is still a sequencing logic that should prevail as strategies are implemented. As always, climate action strategies will start building upon the multiple successful initiatives already underway, including Utilities Packet Pg. 43 January 13, 2015 Page 6 programs, transit and alternative mode programs, Road to Zero Waste objectives, and City Plan land use objectives. Additionally, different strategies have different returns on investment when considering carbon reduction ($/tons reduced) versus simply a monetary perspective (Return on Investment). Strategies can and should be timed to optimize total CO2 reduction, financial return and $/ton CO2 avoided. The projects or strategies with greater payback should be prioritized and implemented first to support and even generate revenues to subsequent actions. A few strategies are recommended for immediate implementation, beginning in 2015. These are outlined below. Planning  Develop a CAP implementation plan that provides more detail on which tactics and programs must be implemented by 2020, and in what order, and identifies anticipated budget needs. Buildings  Pilot Integrated Utility Services Model  2015 building code update and compliance  Provide incentives for above code buildings Energy Supply  Expand partnership with Platte River on efficiency programs  Partner with others on electric system distribution systems integration research  Increased incentives and new mechanisms for increased solar PV  Develop programs that benefit low/fixed income such as Low Income Solar Pilot  Consider Time-of-Use and low income electric rate structures Transportation  Provide open transportation data and encourage development of transportation data apps  Car/Bike/Ride share programs  Employer engagement on VMT reduction  Drive Electric Northern Colorado - Work Place Challenge Road to Zero Waste  Advanced waste stream optimization to explore waste stream optimization and then seed funding to implement highest and best uses of key waste sectors such as organics.  Universal Recycling Ordinance to explore ways to offer recycling to commercial businesses that have the costs embedded trash rates, as is currently done for the residential sector. Public Engagement  Evolve ClimateWise (ClimateWise 2.0)  Georgetown University Energy Prize- has the objective to double the amount of energy savings in the residential and municipal/school district sectors by 2016 over 2013/2014 efficiency levels. Winner gains a $5M purse to advance efficiency.  Develop and implement a pilot neighborhood campaign  Develop and implement strategic community engagement strategies Financing Mechanism Development  Pilot public private partnership to leverage outside finance via on-bill financing or Integrated Utilities Services program  Research one or a limited number of additional financing mechanisms to enable quicker actions. Packet Pg. 44 January 13, 2015 Page 7 CAP FINANCING and FUNDING To realize a community carbon reduction of 80% by 2030, several major initiatives need to be implemented. This will require investment into infrastructure as well as efficiency upgrades. The major funding needs for the CAP include renewable energy, energy efficiency programs and facility upgrades, and transit infrastructure. The net societal costs and benefits show a net cumulative savings by 2050 of approximately $7 billion dollars. Therefore, the savings exceed the costs over the time horizon considered by the analysis. The challenge then of funding the CAP is developing business models that allow for the diverse portfolio of investments made by Fort Collins Utilities, Platte River Power Authority, third parties providing finance for energy efficiency investments, and the City itself, as well as individual businesses and homeowners to leverage these savings. Though no city has done something at this scale before, the CAP is potentially feasible and can be executed through a new business models that will dramatically increase customer adoption and maximize benefits and profits for the community. The City can play a critical role in financing this endeavor by leveraging limited City dollars to attract other private and public funds. City staff, along with support from RMI and The Brendle Group, has been researching available funding mechanisms to support the implementation of the CAP. The list of funding mechanisms below is not intended to be an exhaustive list but does illustrate the primary methods of funding carbon reduction and climate action efforts across the United States. The financing mechanisms largely rely on entity borrowing funds, whether household, business, or government, that must be repaid. The intent is to develop business models that rely on these financing mechanisms to access the anticipated net savings from the CAP in later years to amortize the initial costs associated with the proposed strategies and tactics reducing initial costs for pursuing the CAP. The mechanisms fall into three main categories:  Individual and Business Financing - These mechanisms provide access to borrowing or funds that individuals and businesses can use to make investments in energy efficiency, distributed power, and other similar investments. In general, these financing mechanism aid individuals and businesses in amortizing initial costs in improvements over time to reduce the upfront costs. In some cases, the government, whether it is municipal, county, or state, can aggregate the investments into a larger pool to reduce borrowing costs (e.g., On-bill financing, Property Assessed Clean Energy Bonds or Tax Increment Financing).  Government Financing - These mechanisms involve the government borrowing funds, whether it is municipal, county, or state, directly to support investments in utility scale energy efficiency, solar rebates, transit infrastructure, and other similar investments. The intent is to use the borrowing power of the government to accelerate adoption of key strategies, reduce risk to private lenders of consumer lending programs, make key investments in municipal infrastructure (e.g., public transit) to support carbon reduction goals. In many cases, the borrowing still requires a funding source to justify the debt which can range from the existing revenues (e.g., taxes and/or fees) available to the government to new revenues (e.g., new taxes and/or fees).  Other Sources of Funds - The last category captures a series of potential funding sources that do not logically fall into the other two categories. These may include new governmental revenue sources (e.g. User Fees, Development Exactions, and Public Benefit Funds) or donations from private parties interested in furthering carbon reduction goals. Attachment 3 provides a list of potential financing mechanisms, an assessment of the amount of financing needed and the financing mechanisms appropriate to each cost category, and the current proposed guidelines for CAP financing. The Council Finance Committee will discuss financing approaches in January and February 2015. CAP IMPLEMENTATION PROCESSES There are a number of key checks and balances in the processes needed to implement CAP strategies that should serve to ensure that costs of future actions remain commensurate with community values. 1. Financing Guiding Principles - A set of guiding principles for investment is being developed as part of the framework plan. These guiding principles provide a set of boundary conditions for the implementation of Packet Pg. 45 January 13, 2015 Page 8 the plan with the goal of mitigation a portion of the risk inherent with the unknowns of a framework plan. (See Attachment 3) 2. City Council Review and Vetting of Individual Strategies - Any CAP strategy or program that requires City Council action will need to be independently designed to the operational level then discussed and vetted before Council consideration. 3. City Budget process - The City’s biennial budget process allocates City budget in a balanced way that considers a range of strategic objectives and community needs, and prioritizes decision according ly. 4. CAP Update Process - The CAP itself will need to be reviewed periodically (at least every five years) to ensure that the latest technological innovations are being considered. PUBLIC ENGAGEMERNT Phase I public engagement (intended to provide a background on the CAP, discuss the need for an update, and seek input generally and on strategy concepts) was conducted from July through December 2015, including ten stakeholders groups, four Council advisory boards and one public forum. The themes heard through Phase I engagement are provided below:  Concerns about affordable housing/Cost of living  Too much burden placed on business  Long term benefits outweigh the costs  Increase renewable energy to multifamily units  County and state collaboration opportunities should be taken advantage of  Need for more East to west bus travel  Increase bike share program  Use SmartTrips  Increase composting opportunities  Need more analysis on closing, impacts, and opportunities for the Larimer County Landfill  It is important for the city to take action/protect the environment  Transportation concerns for those (especially senior citizens) living outside of city limits  This may only be successful with greater incentives for groups that will be impacted the most in terms of cost  General support for increasing renewables Phase II public engagement is planned for January and early February, and will involve seeking public input on the CAP draft framework concepts and the estimated impacts through presentations to at least ten stakeholder groups, eight Council advisory boards, plus two open houses scheduled for January 22 and 29, and a Web-based comment form. More details about input received to date is provided in Attachment 4. NEXT STEPS  Final Scenario adjustments (January)  CAC develops recommendation (January)  Draft CAP framework document (January)  Coordination with revisions to the Energy Policy recommendations from the Energy Board (January and February)  Public engagement (January and February) Council Date:  February 17, 2015 - Council consideration of updated CAP framework Packet Pg. 46 January 13, 2015 Page 9 ATTACHMENTS 1. Model Outputs (PDF) 2. Sustainability Assessment (PDF) 3. Financing Needs and Potential Tools (PDF) 4. Public Input To Date (PDF) 5. Work Session Summaries, August 12, October 28 and December 9, 2014 (PDF) 6. Powerpoint presentation (PDF) Packet Pg. 47 1 Scenario 1 - CAP Model Output and Platte River Modeling Scenario1 Scenario 1 reflects a compilation of strategies that are significantly aggressive yet potentially achievable. It generally reflects best practice tactics research by the Rocky Mountain Institute, followed by some modifications made by staff and The Brendle Group. It reflects initial preferences of the Citizen Advisory committee members, based on the results of an informal on-line survey (12/9/14) and an informal poll on 12/15/14. Population growth: 2050 population of 260,000 PRPA Model: FC80 (calculates an 20% reduction by 2020, and an 80% reduction by 2030 from Platte River electric system CO2 emissions from 2005) Figure 1 and Table 1 below provide CAP model outputs that have been updated since the results presented to Council on December 9, 2014. Figure 1. Emissions Reduction by Fuel Type (Scenario 1) The analysis revisions incorported into Scenario 1 (that have occurred since the inforamtion presnted to Counci on December 9, 2014) include the following points: 1) Airline travel has been removed from the analysis. It was a recommendation by staff, informally supported by the CAC, to remove airline travel from the community GHG inventory. Airline travel 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020 2023 2026 2029 2032 2035 2038 2041 2044 2047 2050 GHG Emissions (metric tons CO2e) Millions Emissions Reduction by Focus Area Electricity Natural Gas Gasoline/Diesel Air Travel Solid Waste Other Remaining Gap BAU Forecast Adjusted BAU Forecast Emissions Reduction Goal ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 48 Attachment2.1: Model Outputs (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) 2 is not required according to the standard community GHG reporting protocol, is not included by a vast majority of communities, and the local community does not have significant influence over it. (Note: Emissions from airline travel will continue be tracked but now reported as “information only” in future Fort Collins community GHG inventories.) 2) Platte River Power Authority’s analysis of system-wide electric generation model runs for Fort Collins have been completed. Scenario 1 includes the FC80 run, identifying a system using City assumptions that calculate a 20% reduction by 2020 and an 80% reduction by 2030 from Platte River electric system CO2 emissions compared to 2005 levels. 3) Electric retails rates have been entered into the model that reflect changes in Platte River’s wholesale rates and additional changes to Fort Collins Utilities’ retail rates that include the estimated cost of Utility-offered programs and services include in the modeled strategies. Figure 2. Relative Contribution by Strategy in 2030 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 GHG Emissions (million metric tons) 2030 Baseline GHG Emissions Effects Packet Pg. 49 Attachment2.1: Model Outputs (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) 3 Table 1. Key Metrics by Strategy in Scenario 1 Platte River Modeling The Modeling Process Under an Intergovernmental Agreement with the City of Fort Collins, Platte River Power Authority has applied its in-house modeling and analysis expertise and outside consulting resources to conduct modeling to support Fort Collins CAP update. The majority of the assumptions in the model were provided by the City. Platte River has completed its modeling of two scenarios for Fort Collins: Scenario AS-FC80 - a 20% reduction by 2020, and an 80% reduction by 2030 from Platte River electric system CO2 emissions in 2005, and Scenario AS-FC60- a 20% reduction by 2020, and a 60% reduction by 2030 from Platte River electric system CO2 emissions in 2005. Scenario AS-2 was requested by the City to provide an additional increment between the 2030 CO2 target proposed in the EPA’s Clean Power Plan and the City’s primary scenario, AS-FC1. Inputs to Platte River’s Modeling Both scenarios modeled by Plate River for Fort Collins are comprised of six main adjustments to Platte River’s generation system to accommodate City system ch that were mutually agreed upon by the City , Platte River and Brendle Group. • Additional electricity demand from EV charging • Additional electricity demand from fuel switching • Reduced electricity demand from efficiency, • Reduced electricity demand from distributed solar, • Reduced electricity demand from distributed CHP • Distributed biomass is treated as a PR system resource FC80 contains the following changes: o Platte River’s Craig coal units 1 & 2 (approx. 155 MW) both retire at the end of 2019 o Platte River’s Rawhide coal unit capacity factor falls from about 90% to about 60% by 2029 in response to increased distributed generation o Rawhide (approx. 280 MW) would retire from the fleet in 2029 o Platte River’s surplus sales drop by approximately 60%; o Platte River adds about 200 MW of reciprocating natural gas engines to provide energy when wind, solar and distributed sources are not sufficient to meet City needs KEY METRICS by STRATEGY 2020 2030 2040 2050 Cumulative Energy Saved in New Construction (GBtu) 479 3,853 8,619 14,948 Cumulative VMT Reduced (millions) 264 1,822 4,185 6,779 Cumulative Energy Saved in Existing Residential Buildings (GBtu) 2,219 17,245 49,135 93,071 Cumulative Energy Saved in Existing CII Buildings (GBtu) 2,535 19,698 56,124 106,309 Cumulative VMT Reduced (millions) 90 1,294 2,962 4,793 Total FE and EV Sales 8,958 59,418 124,250 195,441 Installed Solar PV Capacity (MW) 32 135 221 256 Packet Pg. 50 Attachment2.1: Model Outputs (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) 4 Platte River Modeling Analysis Caveats Platte River has identified caveats to systems that were modeled for Fort Collins. A number of these concerns will require further investigation before implementing such large levels of renewables and removing existing resources. It is not clear that new systems meet electrical safety and reliability standards Detailed electric system modeling is needed  Wholesale level – renewables integration / reliability  City distribution level – operations / reliability / renewables integration  Analysis to date has considered only hourly increments – need to do sub-hourly  Additional modeling needed to consider integration of wholesale/retail systems City level PV solar capacity added is assumed roughly equal to the peak load  This level of renewable additions is unprecedented No storage is assumed for PV solar integration at the distribution level Uncertainties exist regarding permitting of combined heat & power sources  No emissions are currently produced in the City from electric generation  NOx emissions limits constrain the size of generation that can be added  Other permitting issues not yet considered – land, water, etc. Future wholesale wind and solar balancing costs unknown  Model assumes costs are covered by Xcel – current scenario (low renewables)  Additional new resources or electric storage may be required – at added cost All federal hydropower allocations cannot be delivered at high solar levels  Excess solar is assumed sold to the market when not needed – validity uncertain Large wholesale market purchases are required to serve load when solar not available  Amounts to nearly 20% of total deliveries to the City – unrealistic  CO2 emissions are not currently included – source evaluation needed When solar and wind are at high levels – large sales to the market are required  Such sales may not be possible – market and other constraints Transmission may not be available for large amounts of wind and solar  It is assumed that purchases are possible using transmission  More regional transmissions studies are needed to evaluate true costs Stranded fixed costs are not included for the existing system:  Decommissioning of coal units / fuel supply agreements / other factors  Need more time to evaluate these costs Construction times required for adding new resources is constrained  Financing and installation of renewable resources  Decommissioning of existing resources  Electrification infrastructure challenges – EV’s and electric appliances Packet Pg. 51 Attachment2.1: Model Outputs (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) Packet Pg. 52 Attachment2.2: Sustainability Assessment (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) Packet Pg. 53 Attachment2.2: Sustainability Assessment (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) Packet Pg. 54 Attachment2.2: Sustainability Assessment (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) Packet Pg. 55 Attachment2.2: Sustainability Assessment (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) Packet Pg. 56 Attachment2.2: Sustainability Assessment (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) Packet Pg. 57 Attachment2.2: Sustainability Assessment (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) Packet Pg. 58 Attachment2.2: Sustainability Assessment (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) Packet Pg. 59 Attachment2.2: Sustainability Assessment (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) Packet Pg. 60 Attachment2.2: Sustainability Assessment (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) Packet Pg. 61 Attachment2.2: Sustainability Assessment (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) Packet Pg. 62 Attachment2.2: Sustainability Assessment (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) Packet Pg. 63 Attachment2.2: Sustainability Assessment (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) Packet Pg. 64 Attachment2.2: Sustainability Assessment (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) 1 CAP Financing Needs and Potential Tools This attachment provides three elements; a list of potential financing mechanisms (pages 2-4), an assessment of the amount of financing needed and the financing mechanisms appropriate to each cost category (pages 5-6) and the current proposed guidelines for CAP financing (page 7). Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 65 Attachment2.3: Financing Needs and Potential Tools (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact 2 Potential CAP Financing Mechanisms Borrower Category Financing Mechanism Likely Borrower Capital Providers Comments Individuals and Business Financing Savings This can be both revenue and financing Traditional bank loan or consumer lending (CCs) Fort Collins Citizen Banks or finance companies Not necessarily the best at doing this kind of financing Mortgage/Home Equity Fort Collins Citizen Banks or finance companies New build will rely on this significantly Purchase Power Agreements Fort Collins Citizens Third party developers They raise their own capital Energy Efficiency Loans Fort Collins Citizen Utility, banks or finance companies Often private market, 2013 saw successful secondary market in Pennsylvania, subsidized loans typically $4- 5K to consumers MEETS Small/Mid Commercial ESCOs They raise their own capital On-bill Financing (PPP) Fort Collins Citizen Utility reserves and third party investors Attracts private capital when combined with some form of public credit enhancement Property Assessed Clean Energy State then County authorized- Municipal opt-in Institutional investors In place in Colorado for both Residential and Commercial. Property attached county backed financing (low cost to municipality, affects debt) Tax Increment Financing (PPP) Municipality (to lend to developers) Municipal bond investors Need to designate certain geographies as special districts to qualify Linked Deposit Fort Collins Citizens CRA Bank Resources Below market rate investing Packet Pg. 66 Attachment2.3: Financing Needs and Potential Tools (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and 3 Financing Mechanism Likely Borrower Capital Providers Comments Government Financing General Obligation Municipal Municipal bond investors Can be a part of a General Obligation bond that also funds other items, typically passed by voters Green Bonds State/ Municipal/Compan ies Government and or private sector investors Could be used to raise funds to back other loan programs. Private companies also issue green bonds. QECBs State(to Municipalities) Federal government and institutional investors Low interest specifically targeted federally backed bond that can fund Energy Efficiency loans etc. (typically $500,000 at the state level) Social Impact Bonds Municipal Used for social purpose, e.g. Denver's for homelessness Loan Loss Reserve Fund (PPP) Municipal City funds – General Obligation Bonds if necessary, Philanthropy, Government Grants Typically 10% of a Loan program backed by City expands options in market for "riskier" loans. Debt Service reserves (PPP) Municipal City funds – – General Obligation Bonds if necessary Public Sector risk mitigation fund (typically 10% of projects/funds) Loan Guarantees (PPP) Federal/State to Municipal City funds – – General Obligation Bonds if necessary Risky for public agency Pooled bond financing Regional Working with other municipalities to get better rates/ more capital. Contribute towards shared debt service reserve of 5% of the principal. Packet Pg. 67 Attachment2.3: Financing Needs and Potential Tools (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and 4 Financing Mechanism Likely Borrower Capital Providers Comments City Revenue Sources Philanthropic N/A unless PRIs or MRIs Foundations PRIs, Foundations, Smart Growth Funds, etc. Leverage STAR User Fees Do not have to securitize Collected via special districts, tolls, etc. Other financing mechanisms listed would securitize these (Gos, Green Bonds) Development Exactions Do not have to securitize Fees charged to developers. Other financing mechanisms listed would securitize these (Gos, Green Bonds). Do not necessarily need to securitize. Utility Government Grants Department Of Energy, State of Colorado, Housing and Urban Development, etc. Public Benefit Funds Surcharge on Utility bills; would need structure and authorization. Can then be secured in the market if necessary. Packet Pg. 68 Attachment2.3: Financing Needs and Potential Tools (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and 5 CAP Financing Needs and Potential Mechanisms BUILDINGS Existing Building Energy Conservation Measures New Building Energy Conservation Measures (Utility?) Program Costs Heat Pumps 2030 costs $391 Million $33 Million $130 Million $32 Million 2050 costs $682Million $40 Million $227 Million $80 Million Financing Strategies  On-Bill Financing  MEETS (  PACE ((Property Assessed Clean Energy Bonds)  Home Equity  Traditional Loans  Mortgage  On-Bill financing  MEETS  New Utility Business Model (IUS financing spread)  Rate payers  GO’s  On-Bill financing  Mortgage  Home Equity ELECTRIC SUPPLY Utility Electric Distributed Solar Solar Rebates System Balancing 2030 costs $571 Million $458 Million $154 Million 20502 costs $2.1 Billion $692 Million $173 Million Financing Strategies  Self-funded through rate payers  Power Purchase Agreement  New Utility Business models (such as Integrated Utility Services)  PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy Bonds)  Mortgage/Home Equity  Self-funded  GO’s 6 TRANSPORTATION Public Transit Infrastructure Individual Electric Vehicles and Charging Infrastructure Community Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure 2030 costs $238 Million $ 54 Million $ 13 Million 20502 costs $269 Million $ 125 Million $ 83 Million Financing Strategies  Gov. grants  Tax Increment Financing  Parking revenue  Government Financing  Traditional Car leases  Traditional Car loans  Vision Fleets (muni)  Commercial CapEx  Self-funded  Gov. grants  Government Financing  New Business Models Packet Pg. 70 Attachment2.3: Financing Needs and Potential Tools (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact 7 Guiding Principles for Climate Action Plan Financing DRAFT - January 6, 2015 City/Utility: 1. No significant adverse impact on the City’s balance sheet 2. No adverse impact on the City’s credit rating 3. The City’s investment should catalyze investment in strategies by end-users and the third parties 4. Internally the City’s priority is utility rate revenue before general fund revenue Platte River Power Authority 1. Maintain Minimum Energy Reserve Margin of 15 percent 2. Achieve Renewables of 20 percent by 2020 3. Maintain Competitive Rates (Platte River should remain the lowest cost wholesale power provider located in Colorado) 4. Achieve CO2 Reduction of 20 percent by 2020, 35 percent by 2030, and 80 percent by 2050 Consumers/End Users 1. Access to affordable energy and value-added services. 2. Feel happy and confident in the results of services provided. 3. Experience a streamlined purchase process. 4. Experience enhanced customer service. 5. An understanding of benefits versus costs that allows each user to make their own determination of value. Private/Third Party Sources of Capital 1. Earn returns commensurate with level of risk assumed. 2. Recognition of the key role of capital providers in the implementation of the CAP. 3. Honesty and transparency in setting the expectations of capital providers. 4. Recognition of the fixed costs associated with establishing financing programs, and the key role of scale in reducing the cost of capital. 5. Ensure that public sector commitments, if any, to support or scale programs are honored. 6. Cooperation on the part of local stakeholders to help address any barriers to the provision of capital or its timely repayment 7. Frameworks around the provision of capital must follow established protocols and are not subject to change from one administration to the next. Packet Pg. 71 Attachment2.3: Financing Needs and Potential Tools (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact 1 Public Input To Date Phase I public engagement was intended to provide a background on the CAP, discuss the need for an update, and seek input generally and on strategy concepts. The input received from these initiatives is provided below. CAP- E-Comments to Date: 12/3/14 (e-mail) Greetings, LucindaS, & thanks for leading the dozens of people attending the Climate Action mtg at the Sr Center this eve. --However, I was shocked to learn near the end of the "table sessions" that the R/E person from RMI did not know about www.FutureEarth.org (FE) or the fact that CSU & CU-Boulder are sharing the "Global hub" for the entire USA .......!! Tokyo, Stockholm, Montreal, Paris are also "global hubs." --There will be hundreds of "leading thinkers" re Climate Change & its effects, mitigation mechanisms, etc. over the next few yrs ........ Many will be interested to know "why was Colo's Front Range chosen" and "what makes this area special," etc.? --The FE science effort at CSU is being led by Prof. Dennis Ojima Dennis.Ojima@colostate.edu and the admin support is provided by Prof. Diana Wall, Director of the School of Global Environmental Sustainability Diana.Wall@colostate.edu I hope that the majority of participants in this 80% cut by 2030 effort can realize that FtC needs to strive to be a "model to the Planet," not just Colorado or the Rocky Mtns, etc. I left my contact info with the person from RMI, so perhaps some "sights can be raised" in this effort ............ Sincerely, Dr. John Grant WEB SITE 12/4/14 This is a solution looking for a problem. City council's job should be to provide power efficiently and at the lowest rate possible for the citizens (customers). The city council needs to work for the citizens of Fort Collins and not the other way around. If you really asked the citizens of Fort Collins how important this initiative is compared to what it will do to rates, you will find out that most believe it is a waste of time and money. Unfortunately, most of us are too busy trying to make ends meet with skyrocketing utility rates in this city to find the time to attend your stupid meetings. If you really want to find out what the city wants, charge two different rates: Energy from fossil fuels and energy from "renewable sources". Give us a choice. Once you tell the truth about cost, very few would opt to pay the higher rate for your "renewable" energy. The belief that we have the ability to change the climate of earth by our actions is idiotic, naive and arrogant. WEB SITE 12/4/14 At the Climate Action Plan forum on December 3rd, Scott Denning talked about the considerable investments required in the 19th century to make indoor plumbing available to people in the industrializing countries. Benefits included reduced incidence of epidemic diseases, improved general health, and convenience. Similarly, making the changes needed to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions substantially will require considerable investments in the 21st century. Chief among the many benefits will be passing down a climate that will support human civilization to our children, grandchildren, and future generations. The business-as-usual path to catastrophic global warming is a dead-end for humanity. There will no jobs and no opportunity for profit on a dead planet. We need to keep this in mind when we talk about the costs of making the switch to a low-carbon economy. Fort ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 72 Attachment2.4: Public Input To Date (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) 2 Collins has an opportunity to lead the way and show other cities and governments how to make the deep cuts in their greenhouse gas emissions that will be required if we are to avoid catastrophic global warming. City “Service Area Request” 12/16/14 Tim Johnson provided the following idea as to how to make the climate action plan have individual level actions: CO2 /Climate Change/Empowerment of Personal Actions Empowering individuals to set personal goals which contribute to reduction of greenhouse gases. By using alternative modes of travel/reducing VMT, the following calculations show how much an individual can contribute by personal action. In aggregate, the numbers help achieve community goals. 1) 1 gallon hydrocarbona (CH2)n = ~5.6 # (pounds) 2) Mass change ratio for oxidation of (CH2): 44/14 = 22/7 (CH2)n >>>>> CO2 mass (14) (44) Oxidizing 1 gallon (5.6#) (CH2)n >>>>>> 17.6 # of CO2 (44/14 x 5.6)a Many iterations are possible for personal goals regarding greenhouse gas reduction. To avoid producing your weight in CO2 per year by using alternative modes of transportation, or 5x your weight etc.: 1) Divide your weight (pounds) by 17 to get the number of gallons of gas (not consumed) that would produce your equivalent weight in CO2. 2) Multiply the gallon number by your vehicle mileage. See example below. Individual’s Weight, 170 pounds. 170 # CO2/17 # CO2 per gallon gas = 10 gallons gas use avoided. Thus, by cycling/walking/transit in place of personal VMT, then one avoids producing 170 # CO2 produced from the 10 gallons of gas. If one’s vehicle averages 25-30mpg, that would translate to 250-300 miles, an easy target by alternative modes. If one's goal is save 5x your weight, multiply by 5 etc. If your vehicle is far less efficient (lower mpg) this goal is much easier, and vice versa. Avoiding 1 ton of CO2 production equates to saving 118 gallons (CH2). That translates to 2950-3540 miles using the mileage assumption above. This takes more dedication but is doable, and many in FC do. aMethylene (CH2) >>>>> CO2 is a simplification. The 17.6 # CO2/gallon gas number is ~2% higher because of that. 17 # CO2/gallon is easier and sufficient for this exercise. A fuel mix density = ~ 0.7 was assumed from the density of octane. Octane is used as the representative hydrocarbon in the fuel mix. The density of octane is from the Handbook of Chem. and Physics. Fuel mixes are a mix of mid length hydrocarbon chains ranging mainly from 6-10 carbons with some isomeric branching and with modest density variations. Web site 12/21/14 Thank you for taking on the challenge to reduce our impact on the climate and our environment. Has the City of Fort Collins considered divesting from fossil fuels? I would encourage the city to do that and would be happy to contribute toward this goal. Thank you and Happy Holidays! Packet Pg. 73 Attachment2.4: Public Input To Date (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) 3 December 3, 2014 CAP Public Open House Feedback Approximately 80 people attended an open house on the CAP on December 3, 2014 at the Senior Center. Dr. Scott Denning presented “Climate Change; Simple, Serious, Solvable”, followed by a staff presentation about the CAP update. Participants than visited table to ask about/comment on the 5 CAP strategy areas. Feedback from the table sessions is provided below. Renewable Energy/Utilities  White roof ordinance, strict solar orientation, disincentive to large housing  Increase incentives for residential solar  Increase rates to aggressively fund renewables  Wind-blown pollutants from Weld County fracking operations  Increase rates via a surcharge on carbon emissions  7: Seems unrealistic coal/combined cycle gas will be needed no matter what for base-load  Link with county, state, etc. efficiency programs (esp. target low income population)  Gamification of energy usage (using the smart meters)  Increased renewable outreach to multifamily units Transportation  Mason trail congestion and commuting time concerns  East to west bus travel  Bike share program  Smart Trips: connect with businesses to offer discounts/incentives, more Smart Trips education/marketing (Bellingham, WA as an example) Waste  Ranking system applied to waste (similar to electricity reports)  Neighborhood composting  Education/outreach including time lapse photos of landfill  Encourage trash collection companies to incorporate composting (curbside composting)  Methane capture for landfill?  Promote household compost containers via rebates  Composting at schools  Need more analysis on the closing, impact, and opportunities for the Larimer County Landfill Other  Urban Agriculture  What type of resistance is anticipated? Packet Pg. 74 Attachment2.4: Public Input To Date (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) 4 Informal, non-statistical paper survey results of participants forum Dec. 3 Forum (n=44) Phase II public engagement is planned for January and early February, and will involve seeking public input on the CAP draft Framework concepts and the estimated impacts through presentations to at least ten stakeholder groups, eight Council advisory boards, plus two open houses scheduled for January 22 and 29, and wide promotion of a Web-based comment form. Question Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know No Response Even though climate change is a global issue, it is important for cities such as Fort Collins to take action. 98% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% Does the process to update the Climate Action Plan sound fair and reasonable? 32% 36% 11% 2% 0% 9% 9% The Climate Action Plan update should include use of more renewable energy sources for energy production 89% 7% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% The Climate Action Plan update should expand energy efficiency opportunities for residential homes 89% 9% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% The Climate Action Plan update should support policies and programs that help to reduce energy usage in commercial buildings 93% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% The Climate Action Plan update should work to expand the public transit system in Fort Collins 64% 32% 2% 0% 2% 0% 0% The Climate Action Plan update should work to create better connectivity from transit stops to neighborhoods 73% 14% 7% 2% 0% 2% 2% The Climate Action Plan update should support cleaner fuels and more efficient vehicles, including electric vehicles 68% 23% 5% 0% 0% 2% 2% I am motivated to help Fort Collins rise to the challenge of doing its part as a city to address climate change 77% 20% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% Yes No Don't Know Were you aware Fort Collins had a Climate Action Plan established already? 37 (84%) 7 (16%) 0 Voluntary Actions Mandates and Required Actions Both Roughly Equally Other Should Policies to reduce climate change rely primarily on: 1 (2%) 9 (20%) 28 (64%) 6 (14%) Under 18 18-34 35-54 55+ No Response My age is: 0 7 (16%) 14 (32%) 22 (50%) 1 (2%) 2 or less years 3-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years 20+ years I have lived in Fort Collins 5 (11%) 5 (11%) 5 (11%) 16 (36%) 13 (30%) 80521 80523 80524 80525 80526 80527 80528 Other My zip code is: 12 (27%) 0 13 (30%) 9 (20%) 8 (18%) 0 1 (2%) 1 (2%) Packet Pg. 75 Attachment2.4: Public Input To Date (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact Assessment) Packet Pg. 76 Attachment2.5: Work Session Summaries, August 12, October 28 and December 9, 2014 (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Packet Pg. 77 Attachment2.5: Work Session Summaries, August 12, October 28 and December 9, 2014 (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Packet Pg. 78 Attachment2.5: Work Session Summaries, August 12, October 28 and December 9, 2014 (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Climate Action Plan - Strategies 1 City Council Work Session January 13, 2015 Climate Action Plan: Scenario and Triple Bottom Line Impacts ATTACHMENT 6 Packet Pg. 79 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Direction Sought 2 1. Does the modeling analysis provide City Council with appropriate information to understand the path to achieving the 2020, 2030 and 2050 reduction objectives? 2. Is City Council comfortable considering updated community GHG goals and an updated Climate Action Plan framework at the February 17, 2015 meeting? Packet Pg. 80 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Role of Goal and CAP Goal • Community leadership • Attract outside capital • Enhance innovation • Spur community engagement Climate Action Plan (CAP) • Demonstrates feasibility • High level strategic plan • Roadmap for 15+ years • Requires periodic updates • Each action requires further analysis and vetting 3 Packet Pg. 81 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple 4 Analysis: • Incorporated Platte River modeling results • Removed airline travel from quantification Strategies: • Reduced number of existing buildings that are net zero • Increased number of new buildings that are net zero • Reduced number of new vehicles that need to be electric vehicles Changes to analysis since Dec. 9 Packet Pg. 82 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple 5 Platte River Analysis: FC80 2015 2035 Packet Pg. 83 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple 6 Platte River Analysis: Uncertainties • System Engineering • Business Operations • Construction times & installation • Emissions Permitting Packet Pg. 84 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple 7 • Green Building for New Construction and Redevelopment • Shift Land Use Patterns to Shorten/Reduce Number of Trips • Increase Energy Efficiency – Residential • Increase Energy Efficiency – Commercial and Industrial • Drive Adoption of Multi-Modal Transportation • Fuel Efficient & Electric Personal Vehicles • Advance Cleaner Energy at the Utility Scale • Advance Residential and Commercial Solar Adoption • Shift Heating Loads Away from Natural Gas • Road to Zero Waste • Carbon Sequestration Scenario 1 – Quantified Strategies Packet Pg. 85 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple 8 Scenario 1 Packet Pg. 86 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple 2020 2030 2040 2050 % below 2005 baseline 25% 75% 86% 92% Net Cumulative Costs/Savings $292M cost $388 savings $2.8B Savings $7B Savings Avg. monthly cost/savings per resident $28 cost $13 savings $56 savings $98 savings 9 - Includes Cost of Carbon for all fuels - Includes 2.5% discount rate Scenario 1 * *Does not indicate the cash flow impact to households or businesses Packet Pg. 87 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple 10 Scenario 1 Packet Pg. 88 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple 11 - 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 Renewable Energy (MWh) Platte River Current Wind and Solar Supply Trend 11 15 Total Carbon Free – 32% 19% Hydro 11% Wind 2% Solar Source Transitions Packet Pg. 89 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple 12 Elements Not Included in Cost/Savings Calc. • Improved public health from more active modes of transportation (walking and bicycling) • Improved public health from reduced air pollution • Indirect economic and social benefit from increased resiliency to predicted climate change impacts • Indirect economic benefit to the community through increased jobs supported by CAP • Indirect cost savings from VMT reduction Packet Pg. 90 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Key Triple Bottom Line Impacts 13 Societal • Could result in increased building costs that negatively impacts housing affordability • Longer-term saving will benefit community • Improved mobility options • Improved building comfort and productivity • Increased community resiliency to climate change impacts Packet Pg. 91 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Key Triple Bottom Line Impacts 14 Environmental • Reduced air pollution • Reduced waste generation and development of new landfills may be postponed • Potential negative impacts from resource extraction and wildlife habitat from expanded renewables Packet Pg. 92 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Key Triple Bottom Line Impacts 15 Economic • Possible regressive economic impact on small businesses and lower margin businesses • Some strategies in this scenario may present increased implementation costs for businesses • Potential increased job creation in clean energy/innovation economy Packet Pg. 93 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Financing Tools - Examples 16 Individual and Business Financing • On-bill financing, • Property Assessed Clean Energy Bonds • Tax Increment Financing). Government Financing • Taxes and/or fees Other Sources of Funds • User Fees • Development Exactions • Public Benefit Funds • Donations Packet Pg. 94 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple CAP Implementation Processes 17 • Financing Guiding Principles • City Council Review and Vetting of Individual Strategies • City Budget Process • Periodic CAP Update Process Packet Pg. 95 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple 18 Is it Possible? What would it take? • Current analysis provides majority of 2030 pathway • Issues including storage and system integration must still be addressed • Implementation details will be developed and vetted for Council review case-by-case Impacts? • Higher initial costs, can be mitigated with careful planning • Net savings for community after 2030 • Increased resiliency Can it be funded? • Financing tools are in development to leverage outside capital • Additional City budget support will be needed Key Considerations Packet Pg. 96 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple 19 CAP Next Steps • Final scenario adjustments (January) • CAC develops recommendation (January) • Draft CAP framework document (January) • Coordination with Energy Policy Updates (Jan/Feb) • Public engagement (Jan/Feb) • February 17, 2015 Council action Packet Pg. 97 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Direction Sought 20 1. Does the modeling analysis provide City Council with appropriate information to understand the path to achieving the 2020, 2030 and 2050 reduction objectives? 2. Is City Council comfortable considering updated community GHG goals and an updated Climate Action Plan framework at the February 17, 2015 meeting? Packet Pg. 98 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple DATE: STAFF: January 13, 2015 Jeff Mihelich, Deputy City Manager Karen Cumbo, Director of PDT WORK SESSION ITEM City Council SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Colorado State University On-Campus Stadium Intergovernmental Agreement Update. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to update Council on plans to develop an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Colorado State University regarding infrastructure improvements and event day operations related to an on- campus stadium, and seek their direction regarding key mitigation issues. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. What key elements do Council want considered as part of the IGA discussions and negotiations with CSU? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION Colorado State University (CSU) is moving forward with plans to build a new on-campus stadium for football and other events. Construction and operations of the stadium will have significant impacts on nearby residents and the community in general. Council adopted Resolution 2014-109 on December 2, 2014 stating their intent to enter into an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with CSU that identifies key impacts and mitigation strategies, and determines responsibilities for costs incurred. Since adoption of Resolution 2014-109, City Executive Management and staff met with CSU Executive staff to determine a course of action and schedule for development of an IGA. As a result of that meeting, it is anticipated that an IGA can be delivered for Council consideration by March 17. This IGA will identify key stadium-related infrastructure improvements, and financial responsibility or shared responsibility between CSU and the City of Fort Collins. Key elements of event-related operations will also be addressed, although at a less specific level until such time as more formal operations plans and agreements are developed. Critical infrastructure improvements to be addressed and negotiated include:  Transportation improvements including roadway capacity, intersection improvements/turning movements, and traffic signalization needs  Transit staging facilities  Pedestrian and bicycle facilities  Parking facilities and event planning  Noise and lighting impacts  Water, wastewater, and stormwater utilities The City and CSU have established a negotiating team and developed an accelerated schedule to reconcile each party’s mitigation plan so that work can focus on the elements that are not included in both. Schedule City and CSU staff teams will work together throughout the first quarter of 2015 to craft a draft IGA for Council and CSU consideration, no later than March 17, 2015. Packet Pg. 99 January 13, 2015 Page 2 ATTACHMENTS 1. Powerpoint presentation (PDF) Packet Pg. 100 1 CSU On Campus Stadium Intergovernmental Agreement Jeff Mihelich, Deputy City Manager Karen Cumbo, PDT Director January 13, 2015 Process and Schedule Update ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 101 Attachment3.1: Powerpoint presentation (2797 : City-CSU Stadium IGA) 2 Direction Sought: What key elements do Council want considered as part of the IGA discussions and negotiations with CSU? Packet Pg. 102 Attachment3.1: Powerpoint presentation (2797 : City-CSU Stadium IGA) 3 CSU On Campus Stadium: • CSU Board of Governors approval to proceed • Council adopted Resolution 2014-109 on December 2, 2014 – Directed Staff to enter into an IGA with CSU – Infrastructure mitigation related to the Stadium’s impacts – Event-related operations plans to be developed as well Packet Pg. 103 Attachment3.1: Powerpoint presentation (2797 : City-CSU Stadium IGA) 4 Area Map: N Packet Pg. 104 Attachment3.1: Powerpoint presentation (2797 : City-CSU Stadium IGA) 5 Key Mitigation Areas: • Transportation and Transit Infrastructure – Road Capacity & Intersection Improvements – Traffic Signalization Needs – Bike & Ped Infrastructure & Facilities – Transit Staging Facilities – Parking Facilities • Utilities Infrastructure – Water, Wastewater, Stormwater • Noise & Lighting Impacts Packet Pg. 105 Attachment3.1: Powerpoint presentation (2797 : City-CSU Stadium IGA) 6 IGA Schedule & Process • Council to consider IGA no later than March 17, 2015 • CSU and City Negotiation Teams Mobilized – Weekly Meetings – Staff Support Teams • Primary focus will be on areas of discussion remaining between CSU and the City Packet Pg. 106 Attachment3.1: Powerpoint presentation (2797 : City-CSU Stadium IGA) 7 Direction Sought: What key elements do Council want considered as part of the IGA discussions and negotiations with CSU? Packet Pg. 107 Attachment3.1: Powerpoint presentation (2797 : City-CSU Stadium IGA) DATE: STAFF: January 13, 2015 Dan Weinheimer, Policy & Project Manager Mike Calhoon, Parks Supervisor WORK SESSION ITEM City Council ITEM POSTPONED TO FEBRUARY 10, 2015 SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION West Nile Virus Management Review. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to review the 2014 West Nile virus (WNV) season and to discuss the off-season work plan in preparation for the 2015 WNV season. Staff will present WNV health data, a review of the City Council- approved budget enhancements, a work plan for the Technical Advisory Committee and a proposed plan for City- Larimer County coordination meetings. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. Does City Council support the work plan of the West Nile Virus Technical Advisory Committee? 2. Does City Council support the plan for the City and Larimer County coordination meetings? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The 2014 West Nile virus (WNV) season concluded with several positive milestones and also highlighted additional work needed to prepare for the 2015 season. Positive items include a low number of identified human cases, increased volume and diversity of public outreach, maintaining a strong working relationship with Colorado State University on trapping and testing, and implementing a business opt-out program. Areas staff intends to work on in the off-season are the roles and responsibilities of the City and Larimer County, enhancing larval control efforts, refining the business opt-out program, examining industry best practices, and further addressing public outreach. 2014 Season Summary - Trap Data Trapping and testing mosquitoes continued in 2014 utilizing contractor Colorado Mosquito Control (CMC) to conduct larval management and maintain the City’s traps. Colorado State University (CSU) was paid to conduct mosquito testing and to develop the weekly vector index. The vector index used the four quadrant zones approved by the City Council - dividing the community at College Avenue and Drake Road. The vector index in Fort Collins peaked at 0.63 in Zone 4 (southeast quadrant). 2014 Season Summary - Communication In addition to the standard communication tools used in the past to educate and inform the public about WNV, this season the Communications and Public Involvement Office (CPIO) expanded its outreach efforts with a new Beat the Buzz campaign focused on the Four Ds (Drain, Dress, Deet, and Dusk & Dawn). Using website updates and social media posts, CPIO helped disseminate the latest information on the disease as well as timely and effective ways to protect yourself. With more than two dozen posts throughout the summer, including weekly updates of the vector index and trap data, the fcgov.com/westnile website received more than January 13, 2015 Page 2 to a new business opt out application, new interactive maps, new educational videos and materials translated into Spanish. Staff also went into the community educating the public at nearly 20 different events. Using rack cards, FAQs and insect repellent bracelets, we reached an estimated 3,000 residents throughout the community. In addition, the City partnered with such organizations as the Senior Center, golf courses and Homeless Gear in order to target hard to reach segments, distributing an additional 1,000 insect repellent bracelets to homeless and elderly residents. In total, CPIO distributed 4,000 insect repellent bracelets throughout Fort Collins to raise awareness about WNV. Cable 14 recorded nine new WNV educational videos, including six PSAs. Videos also featured a broad overview, a look at the adulticiding program and a City at a Glance with City Manager Darin Atteberry and Technical Advisory Committee members. Some videos offered Spanish subtitles. The videos received more than 2,000 views and helped spread vital information throughout the community. CPIO rolled out an extensive WNV press release and ad campaign that ran in print, radio and TV. Publications included in that campaign were the Coloradoan, Style Magazine, The Recreator and Clear Channel Communications. When Larimer County announced it would be adulticiding, the City offered to assist with communications by utilizing CPIO’s services. CPIO helped the County communicate dates and times of adulticiding via spotlight posts, social media, NextDoor, email notifications and outreach at events. The City also created maps of the spray area for the County and let the County use its GPS devices on spraying vehicles. The GPS devices received over 1400 page views during the two nights of applications. Larimer County Spray Event Larimer County Department of Health and Environment unilaterally authorized an adulticide spray event within the southeast zone for August 15 and 18. The spray area was south of Harmony Road, north of Carpenter Road, east of Lemay and west of I-25. Based on publicly available trap data from the City data network, the Larimer County Health Director identified a vector index in the spray area of 1.1. The Health Director presented her information to the Board of Health, receiving its approval to implement an emergency adulticide operation within the southeast zone. The Health Director presented her findings to the County Commissioners, receiving their support for the Board of Health decision. City Councilmember Overbeck and City staff were present at the County Commissioner’s meeting and testified on the matter. Once a decision to spray was made, the City Manager authorized Fort Collins resources to aid the County in communicating the decision to residents. Communications and Public Involvement Office (CPIO) resources were used to inform residents of the spray area and timing. WNV Management Program resources were used to track the CMC trucks during the spray event. The County’s evaluation of the application was summarized as follows: In Fort Collins during Week 34, there were 9 WNV positive mosquito samples (“pools”) city-wide, 7 from the SE quadrant, and 2 from the NE quadrant. Since the Week 34 reports from CSU to the city deal only with the entire SE quadrant, it is useful to break the information from this area into the sprayed and unsprayed areas. Southeast FC Sprayed area Southeast FC Unsprayed areas WNV infected mosquito “pools” 4 1 WNV+ pool from 8 traps (7 light traps, 1 gravid trap) 6 WNV + pools from 10 traps (8 light traps, 2 gravid traps) Total Culex trapped C. Tarsalis C.pipiens C.pipiens 217 in 7 light traps (31 per trap) 20 in 7 light traps (2.9 per trap) 6 in 1 gravid trap (6 per trap) 477 in 8 light traps (59.6 per trap) 180 in 8 light traps (22.5 per trap) 233 in 2 gravid traps (116.5 per trap) Vector index for SE sector (0.35 for entire sector) 0.14 0.55 Packet Pg. 109 January 13, 2015 Page 3 Proposed Off-season Work Plan The West Nile Virus Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) convened December 16 with a review of the 2014 season data. The TAC will meet monthly until April 2015. Staff anticipates that this will provide enough time to operationalize any TAC recommendations. Staff plans that the TAC focus on changes to the existing policy and plan documents and spend significant work time in small teams that would report back to the larger TAC for discussion. Teams would focus on:  Agriculture - o Consider approaches to minimize standing water in canals and on farms, protecting pollinators and developing best practices for both urban and traditional farms  Roles/responsibilities - o Assess the operational roles of the city and county and develop framework for a vector district approach  Public outreach - o Evaluate 2014 public outreach, recommend new opportunities and update the program manual  Business Opt Out program - o Consider improvements to the business opt out application and site inspection process  Best Practices - o Review of the scientific literature and consider new operational practices. City-Larimer County Coordination Staff has met once with Larimer County Public Health Department officials in December and has plans to convene regular City-County meetings on WNV management. These meetings are meant to develop predictability as to the thresholds and actions that the Larimer County Public Health Director plans to take to address WNV. As was demonstrated in 2014, the County may pay for spraying within Fort Collins at lower thresholds than called for by the City’s WNV Management Plan calls for. City staff would like to address the following topics at the City/County meetings:  Adulticide use: o Determine the vector index threshold used by Larimer County Health Department o Understand the spray zone methodology utilized by the County Health Director  Communication: o Developing a collaborative communication resource framework o Developing a process for notifying the City and citizens in the affected area of the County’s intent to spray  Larval Control: o Determine the amount of Larimer County funding available for larval control o Gain County support on expanding the larval control area northeast of Fort Collins’ incorporated limits o Cooperate with CSU Extension and Larimer County on integrated pest management (IPM) training and preventative outreach to farms. ATTACHMENTS 1. 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (PDF) 2. 2014 Public Engagement Report (PDF) 3. Powerpoint presentation (PDF) Packet Pg. 110  2014 Annual Report City of Fort Collins Mosquito Control Program Colorado Mosquito Control 7000 North Broadway Suite 108 Denver, CO 80221 Tel (303) 428-5908 Fax 866-929-1204 Website: www.comosquitocontrol.com ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 111 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) On the Cover: This photo captured by CBS Denver on June 3rd reminds us of the peak runoff and flooding that hit parts of the Poudre River, St. Vrain, and South Platte along the Northern Front Range, in the first half of June 2014. Snow melt runoff which occurred over a short period resulted from warm temperature trends in late May and early June. This caused some areas of Northern Colorado to become flooded again, following the record floods of September 2013. The stagnant pools that flooding left behind created spikes in adult Culex tarsalis mosquitoes during mid-July. Continued rainfall in July created higher than average nuisance mosquito abundance in parts of Northern Colorado. Fortunately, Culex spp. mosquito abundance was lower than observed in 2013 in many areas of Northern Colorado. West Nile virus activity in 2014 was markedly higher in Weld County, but overall risks levels remained below action thresholds in many communities in Boulder and Larimer Counties. Increased activity associated with West Nile virus in Weld County was likely a result of increased agricultural irrigation and afternoon rainfall when compared to the 2012 and 2013 seasons. Packet Pg. 112 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) City of Fort Collins Mosquito Management Operations Annual Report For 2014 Table of Contents Page PROGRAM OBJECTIVES 2 CMC OBJECTIVES 2 2014 SEASON PERSPECTIVE 3 HIGH PLAINS REGION & FORT COLLINS/ LOVELAND AREA CLIMATE COMPARISON DATA WEST NILE VIRUS SEASON 8 US & COUNTY MAP (2014 HUMAN CASE MAP) COLORADO MAP (2014 HUMAN CASE MAP) COUNTY LIST (2014 HUMAN CASE REPORTS) LARVAL MOSQUITO CONTROL 11 LARVAL SITE INSPECTIONS & TREATMENTS IN FORT COLLINS LARVAL ACREAGE TREATMENTS IN FORT COLLINS LARVICIDE PRODUCT APPLICATION BY TYPE CMC SURVEILLANCE LABORATORY 15 CDC SURVEILLANCE LIGHT & GRAVID TRAP DATA CDPHE SEASONAL ADULT MOSQUITO POPULATION DATA COMPARISON CSU WEST NILE VIRUS MOSQUITO SAMPLE TESTING RESULTS ADULT MOSQUITO CONTROL 22 SEASON DETAILS WITH ANNUAL COMPARISON PUBLIC RELATIONS AND EDUCATION 24 MOSQUITOLINE CALLS IN THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS SUMMARY 27 APPENDIX: GRAPHICS AND DATA SUMMARIES 28 CDC LIGHT TRAP COMPOSITE SUMMARIES 2014 CDC GRAVID TRAP COMPOSITE SUMMARIES 2014 ADULT MOSQUITO SURVEILLANCE LIGHT & GRAVID TRAP GENUS SUMMARIES 2014 ADULT SAMPLE POOL TEST RESULTS FOR WEST NILE VIRUS POSITIVE LOCATIONS 2014 ADULT MOSQUITO CONTROL APPLICATION REPORT FOR FORT COLLINS 2014 Packet Pg. 113 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 2 - Program Objectives The City of Fort Collins completed its 11th year of cost effective biorational Integrated Mosquito Management in 2014. The primary objective of the City of Fort Collins Mosquito Management Program is to employ trained field biologists to suppress the development of larval mosquitoes in the aquatic habitats. CMC prioritizes, at minimum 95% of resource allocation on larval control efforts. Surveillance monitoring of adult mosquito populations via a mosquito trapping network enables the assessment of the vector mosquito abundance, as well as West Nile virus risk in the City of Fort Collins. This goal enables a reduction in both the overall mosquito populations and the threat of mosquito borne disease transmission at the least possible cost, while minimizing the impact on the people and natural environment. CMC maintains its commitment to offer environmentally sensitive and technologically advanced Integrated Mosquito Management (IMM) programs to its customers and community residents. CMC works diligently to maintain the cooperative efforts for mosquito control and epizootic response management between the City of Fort Collins, Larimer County Department of Health & Environment, and surrounding local municipalities. The value of this cooperative program and its underlying data sharing and communications in the interest of public health cannot be over-emphasized. CMC Objectives Colorado Mosquito Control is a large-scale contractor specializing in complete Integrated Mosquito Management services. CMC utilizes an aggressive preemptive Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach to control mosquito populations within contracted areas. CMC currently has programs across the state of Colorado, providing services for homeowners associations, incorporated cities and towns, Native American reservations, and encephalitis surveillance monitoring programs for county health departments. CMC values the opportunity to work closely with contracted communities to continue to offer high quality programs during tougher economic times. Colorado Mosquito Control (CMC) as the contractor for the City of Fort Collins will continue to use proven scientific Integrated Pest Management (IPM) methods of survey, inspection, diagnosis, biological/biochemical controls, and limited low-toxicity pesticide applications to professionally accomplish the program objectives. CMC employs trained field and surveillance technicians who understand constantly changing mosquito populations. This enables a quick response to variations in environmental factors. All of the methods and materials used have been reviewed and registered by the U.S. EPA, the Centers for Disease Control, the Colorado Department of Agriculture and the American Mosquito Control Association. Packet Pg. 114 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 3 - 2014 Season Perspective The 2014 summer can best be described as cool and wet. The High Plains Region (South Dakota, North Dakota, Kansas, Nebraska, Montana, Wyoming, and Colorado) went from one precipitation extreme to the other over the course of the summer. Snowpack levels which had not been seen since 2011 and above average rainfall during July and August, which fell across many parts of Colorado, helped ease the severe drought conditions experienced in the 2012 and 2013 seasons. The last remaining area of exceptional drought (D4) in eastern Colorado was downgraded to extreme drought (D3) at the end of the 2014 summer. The High Plains Region experienced a range in temperatures with a combination of both warm spring-like days and bitterly cold days during January 2014, while precipitation was sparse for most of the region. Drought conditions across the eastern Plains of Colorado continued during the start of the New Year and a mid-month dust storm in the area of Pueblo, Colorado caused several accidents and closed I-25 for a portion of the day. Not all areas of the High Plains Region were lacking snowfall in January. Parts of northern Colorado, as well as pockets in Wyoming and North Dakota received above normal precipitation. By the end of January, Wyoming’s statewide snowpack was 113 percent of average and Colorado’s statewide snowpack was 94 percent of average, both of which fared much better than snowpack levels recorded at this time in 2013. The average temperature in the month of January 2014 was 29.88oF in Fort Collins, 29.11oF in Loveland, 27.82oF in Johnstown, and 30.11oF in the City of Longmont, as obtained from the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (http://www.northernwater.org). The total precipitation that occurred in the month of January 2014 was 0.42” in Fort Collins, 0.67” in Loveland, 1.22” in Johnstown and 1.01” in the City of Longmont. The majority of the High Plains Region recorded temperatures which averaged well below normal with the exception of portions of Colorado and Wyoming during February 2014. Precipitation across much of the High Plains Region was below normal in February, while parts of the Rockies picked up quite a bit of snow. The average temperature in the month of February 2014 was 26.73oF in Fort Collins, 26.64oF in Loveland, 25.11oF in Johnstown, and 27.31oF in the City of Longmont. The total precipitation that occurred in the month of February 2014 was 0.68” in Fort Collins, 0.75” in Loveland, 0.26” in Johnstown and 0.26” in the City of Longmont (http://www.northernwater.org). While parts of the High Plains Region, including North and South Dakota were seeing record lows in temperatures, most of the western side of the Region was unaffected by the cold snaps and ended March near to above normal. The areas of Boulder, Larimer and Weld counties were at normal or averaged 2oF above normal in March 2014. The only areas receiving ample precipitation were northern and central Wyoming and north-central Colorado. Colorado’s statewide average snowpack at the end of March was at 114 percent of average. The average temperature in the month of March was 39.28oF in Fort Collins, 40.14oF in Loveland, 39.30oF in Johnstown, and 40.79oF in the City of Longmont. The total precipitation that occurred in the month of March 2014 was 1.48” in Fort Collins, 1.05” in Loveland, 0.96” in Johnstown and 0.86” in the City of Longmont (http://www.northernwater.org). Packet Pg. 115 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 4 - Although parts of the plains were dry, the mountain snowpack continued to be above average in Colorado, Wyoming, and Montana. Cooler temperatures, high winds and scattered showers occurred in areas of Colorado during April 2014. Some crops in the High Plains Region were damaged by the high winds which caused dust storms and uprooted winter wheat in some areas. The average temperature in the month of April was 48.69oF in Fort Collins, 49.29oF in Loveland, 48.55oF in Johnstown, and 49.61oF in the City of Longmont. The total precipitation that occurred in the month of April 2014 was 0.43” in Fort Collins, 0.41” in Loveland, 0.40” in Johnstown and 0.81” in the City of Longmont (http://www.northernwater.org). Average temperatures in the High Plains Region were near normal in May, but above normal precipitation spanned from western to northern Colorado. The total rainfall that fell in May 2014 was 6.14” in Loveland and 4.06” in Fort Collins. The City of Longmont received a total of 2.18” of rain in May. The Town of Johnstown received a total of 4.1”of rainfall. The average temperature in May was 56.97oF in Loveland and 56.26oF in central Fort Collins. The average temperature in Longmont was 56.78oF. The average temperature in Johnstown was 56.05oF in May 2014 (http://www.northernwater.org). Notable weather events occurred on Mother’s Day which brought accumulating snowfall to the west and severe weather to the east of the High Plains Region. Snowfall amounts ranged between 1 and 2 feet (30-61 cm) in the mountains of Colorado and Wyoming. Travel delays were numerous as portions of I-25 and I-70 in Colorado closed and portions of I-80 were closed in Wyoming and Nebraska. According to the SNOTEL Data report Colorado Snow pack was at 210% statewide. Snow pack along the Yampa & White River Basins was at 143% of average, 171% of average along the North Platte, and 340% of average along the South Platte River at the end of May 2014. Temperatures hovered 2.0oF above or below normal in much of Colorado in June 2014. Only a few locations in southern Colorado made it into the 2.0-4.0oF above normal range. The average temperature in the month of June was 65.6oF in Fort Collins, 66.2oF in Loveland, 65.4oF in Johnstown, and 66.0oF in the City of Longmont. The total rainfall in the month of June was 1.34” in Fort Collins, 0.58” in Loveland, 0.63” in Johnstown and 0.63” in the City of Longmont (http://www.northernwater.org). Packet Pg. 116 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 5 - Many areas along the Front Range of northern Colorado were at normal or 2.0oF below normal in July 2014, while central Colorado received above average precipitation compared to normal. The average temperature in the month of July 2014 was 70.9oF in Fort Collins, 71.4oF in Loveland, 70.8oF in Johnstown, and 71.4oF in the City of Longmont. The total rainfall in the month of July 2014 was 3.57” in Fort Collins, 2.44” in Loveland, 2.54” in Johnstown and 2.95” in the City of Longmont (http://www.northernwater.org). Precipitation at Denver International Airport was 3.85” compared to a departure of 1.69” during July, which was 178% of the normal for this month. August 2014 was a cool and wet month for most of the High Plains Region. A broad area of below normal temperatures encompassed Colorado. The average temperature in the month of August 2014 was 68.5oF in Fort Collins, 69.0oF in Loveland, 68.0oF in Johnstown, and 68.8oF in the City of Longmont (http://www.northernwater.org). The total rainfall that occurred in August was 0.82” in Fort Collins, 1.74” in Loveland, 0.2” in Johnstown and 1.4” in the City of Longmont. Heavy rains led to improvements in the drought levels during August 2014 across the High Plains Region. Precipitation at Denver International Airport was 2.73” compared to a departure of 1.04” during August, which was 162% of the normal for this month. Nuisance reports and larval mosquito production subsided as the days became shorter and nighttime temperatures cooled into September. Please note: CMC accessed climate summary information contained in this section from the High Plains Regional Climate Center Climate Summary Reports, located online at http://www.hprcc.unl.edu/publications. Packet Pg. 117 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 6 - Source: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov Packet Pg. 118 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 7 - Week 2014 Precipitation (inches) 2014 Running Total Avg of All Seasons (2003-2013) Percentage of Average (2003-2013) 12 0.04 0.04 0.48 7.36% 13 0.08 0.12 0.15 53.66% 14 0.16 0.27 0.12 124.91% 15 0.01 0.28 0.30 1.69% 16 0.29 0.57 0.55 52.55% 17 0.02 0.58 0.46 3.29% 18 0.00 0.58 0.37 0.00% 19 1.04 1.62 0.61 170.18% 20 1.51 3.12 0.44 343.46% 21 2.39 5.51 0.21 1150.66% 22 0.21 5.72 0.43 49.39% 23 0.02 5.74 0.78 2.56% 24 0.62 6.36 0.29 213.79% 25 0.15 6.50 0.41 35.41% 26 0.20 6.70 0.26 76.39% 27 0.03 6.73 0.48 6.20% 28 0.59 7.32 0.26 223.22% 29 0.89 8.21 0.10 861.50% 30 0.09 8.29 0.43 19.74% 31 1.46 9.75 0.42 344.56% 32 0.23 9.98 0.22 105.20% 33 0.25 10.22 0.37 65.85% 34 0.55 10.77 0.27 204.43% 35 0.25 11.02 0.41 60.64% 36 0.22 11.24 0.14 155.38% 37 0.68 11.91 0.81 83.17% 38 0.05 11.96 0.21 23.99% 39 0.06 12.02 0.28 21.75% 2014 Precipitation Comparison for Loveland/ Fort Collins Packet Pg. 119 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 8 - West Nile Virus Season West Nile virus (WNV) disease was first identified in Uganda in 1937. Since that time, activity has been documented throughout Africa, Europe, West and Central Asia, and areas of the Middle East. The virus made its first appearance to North America in 1999 when it was documented in New York City. WNV comes from a family of viruses known as Flaviviridae and is closely related to other encephalitis-causing viruses that can have severe effects on both humans and animals, including Western equine encephalitis and St. Louis encephalitis in our region. Since the introduction of WNV to the United States in New York City in 1999, the virus has made a complete westward expansion to the West Coast. Starting in the Northeastern parts of the United States, the virus steadily spread through the South, the Midwest, the Rocky Mountain region and to the Western States. This extensive distribution is due to the ability of WNV to establish and persist in the wide variety of ecosystems present across the country. WNV has been detected in 65 different mosquito species in the U.S., though it appears that only a few Culex species drive epizootic and epidemic transmission (WNV Guidelines CDC 2014). Although West Nile virus has been endemic to the United States since 1999, researchers continue to acquire an understanding for some of the factors which contribute to region specific spikes in vector abundance and human risk. We still do not understand why some humans develop West Nile fever while other infections develop into more serious West Nile encephalitis or West Nile meningitis cases. Additionally, physicians and researchers continue to seek answers to the variable recovery times and occurrence of deaths that result with some infections. WNV has expanded to the point that it can now be found in all 48 contiguous states and has produced two additional, large nationwide epidemics in 2003 and 2012 (WNV Guidelines CDC 2013). As of September 30th of 2014, a total of 46 states and the District of Columbia have reported West Nile virus infections in people, birds, or mosquitoes. Overall, 1,177 cases of West Nile virus disease in people have been reported to the CDC (www.cdc.gov). Of these human cases, 656 (56%) were classified as neuroinvasive disease (such as meningitis or encephalitis) and 521 (44%) of the total cases reported were classified as non-neuroinvasive disease. Colorado 2014 There have been 79 documented cases of human WNV infections in Colorado as of October 2nd. Of the 79 human cases reported from Colorado, 10 human cases of WNV were reported from Boulder County, 11 human cases were reported from Larimer County, and 20 cases were reported from Weld County. The majority of cases, to date, were uncomplicated fever (61%); 17 (22%) were meningitis, and 14 (18%) were encephalitis. Two human deaths associated with West Nile virus infection were reported from Denver (1) and Pueblo (1) Counties. There were 195 confirmed WN positive mosquito pools out of 2,212 pools submitted from Colorado. West Nile virus infected mosquito pools by county location include; Adams (9), Arapahoe (2), Boulder (16), Delta (19), Denver (1), Jefferson (2), Larimer (70), Mesa (6), Pueblo (6), and Weld (64). The first WN+ mosquito samples were collected from Adams, Boulder, Delta, Mesa and Weld Counties during mid-June. Packet Pg. 120 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 9 - West Nile Virus Neuroinvasive Disease Incidence United States, 2014 (as of September 30, 2014) Source: http://diseasemaps.usgs.gov/wnv_us_human.html ArboNET County-level Data, US Map Source: http://www.cdc.gov/westnile/statsMaps/preliminaryMapsData/incidencestatedate.html Packet Pg. 121 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 10 - Source: https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/cdphe/west-nile-virus-data Packet Pg. 122 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 11 - Larval Mosquito Control Larval mosquito control can be an extremely effective way to manage mosquitoes, thereby reducing the number of potential disease vectors and annoyances associated with biting adults. Years of research and practical experience have shown that the most effective way to control mosquito populations is through an aggressive Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach. This approach aims at using a variety of concepts, tools, and products to reduce a pest population to a tolerable level. Pre-season larval control work involved ground truthing GIS maps and remapping areas where new development or flooding had occurred following the 2013 season. CMC began larval site inspections in many areas during the week of April 15th. Hiring of seasonal field technicians began in March and continued into May. CMC’s Annual Field Technician Classroom Training Day took place on May 19th with over 50 new and returning field technicians in attendance. Field training by CMC management and veteran employees lasted through May and full time field activities were in force by mid-May 2014. The City of Fort Collins added enhancements to the larval control program in 2014 to combat the early and post season presence of larval mosquitoes. Additionally, city council approved expanding the larval control service area in 2014 to reduce potential mosquitoes from emerging from areas outside city limits and flying into the city. The 2014 City of Fort Collins Mosquito Management staff consisted of 16 Full-time Equivalent employees (FTE). Specifically, we had 1 Operations Manager, 1 Field Supervisor, 10 Field Technicians, 0.5 Surveillance Supervisor, 1 Surveillance Technician, 1 Urban Backyard Inspection/ Public Relations technician, 0.5 QC Inspector, 0.5 Office Staff, and 0.5 Maintenance Technician. Packet Pg. 123 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 12 - The larval coverage area for the City of Fort Collins now includes 120 square miles of private and public lands, where resident contact has been made and permission has been granted. To date, there are 762 active larval mosquito habitats and 517 mandatory sites (weekly or twice/week inspections based on seasonal potential) included in the inspection and larviciding programs for the City of Fort Collins. There were 127 backyard sites included in the 2014 backyard / public relations program. There were 18 new larval sites added to the active larval inspection program and 2 new backyard sites found in 2014. CMC located an additional 36 new larval habitats in 2014 with the approval of the expanded larval service area. CMC continues to work on obtaining property permission at those sites. Two hundred and fifty sites have been mapped and listed as not active sites due to the low potential to produce mosquito larvae. In 2014 Colorado Mosquito Control performed 6,130 larval site inspections, of which 5,432 sites (88.6%) were wet upon inspection and 3,303 (60.6%) were producing mosquito larvae in the City of Fort Collins. An estimated 8.5 billion mosquito larvae were eliminated before emerging as biting adults via larvicide applications. CMC applied 26,327.3 lbs. of VectoBac (Bti), 479.1 lbs. of Vectolex (Bs), 4.4 lbs. of Altosid, and 258.0 gallons of BVA mineral oil to 2,573.0 acres of lands in the City of Fort Collins. In 2014 CMC performed 194 larval mosquito inspections at residential backyards and urban sites, of which 169 sites (87.1%) were wet upon inspection and 104 (16.6%) were producing mosquito larvae within the City of Fort Collins. An estimated 2.2 million mosquito larvae were eliminated before emerging as biting adults via larvicide applications. CMC applied 0.7 lbs. of VectoBac (Bti), 2.6 lbs. of Altosid, and 0.4 gallons of BVA mineral oil to 1.8 acres of backyards and urban lands in the City of Fort Collins. Packet Pg. 124 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 13 - Packet Pg. 125 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 14 - In 2014 CMC performed 54 inspections of storm drain grids (totaling approximately 390 drains) within Fort Collins, of which 92.6% of the drains were wet upon inspection and 4.0% were producing mosquito larvae or treated for the potential to produce larvae in the City of Fort Collins. An estimated 700,000 mosquito larvae were eliminated before emerging as biting adults via larvicide applications at storm drains in Fort Collins. CMC applied 5.6 lbs. of Altosid and 0.1 gallons of BVA mineral oil to 0.6 acres of storm drains in the City of Fort Collins. Larval mosquito control can be achieved in several ways including biological, biochemical, chemical, and mechanical means. No single larvicide product will work effectively in every habitat where mosquito larvae are found, so a variety of products and methods should be employed. Additionally, although there are a variety of methods for reducing larval populations some may have greater consequence than benefit. Mechanical or habitat modification is a technique which CMC uses, but the area to be modified and the extent to which the work will affect the surrounding area must be carefully reviewed. Permanent ecological damage may occur if extensive habitat change has taken place. True biological controls may, too, have costs which outweigh the benefits or competency of their control capacity. CMC’s favored method of larval mosquito control is through bacterial bio-rational products. The main product used by CMC is a variety of bacteria (Bacillus thuringiensis var. israeliensis). Bti as it is known has become the cornerstone of mosquito control programs throughout the world. The benefits include its efficacy and lack of environmental impacts. When used properly successful control without impact to aquatic invertebrates, birds, mammals, fish, amphibians, reptiles, or humans can be achieved. A broad label allows for the use of the product in the majority of the habitats throughout the service area. Another bacterial product closely related to Bti is Bacillus sphaericus (Bs). In addition to all of the benefits of Bti, Bs is by definition a true biological control agent in that it remains in the system through multiple broods, or generations, of mosquitoes. Other larval control products include a growth regulators (Altosid), mineral oils (BVA larviciding oil), and an organophosphate (Abate). Methoprene (Altosid) is a synthetic copy of a juvenile growth hormone in larval mosquitoes. The hormone prevents normal development of the adult mosquito in the pupal stage eventually causing death. Abate serves as an effective product, but label restrictions limit its use in many areas. CMC limits the use of chemical larvicides to areas with little biodiversity, such as road side ditches, or areas which chronically produce large amounts of mosquitoes but uses them only as a last resort. Mineral oil is the only product effective on the pupal stage and therefore, is an essential tool when pupae are found. A variety of tools must be used to prevent resistance and ensure the best method is applied for the given situation. 2014 Quality Control CMC performed quality control inspections in the field during June. There were a total of 40 sites inspected, with correct estimation of acreage, product selection and application rate, thoroughness of inspection and time spent inspecting occurring at 80.1% of the sites. CMC found the major source of inspection errors (19.9% of total sites inspected for quality control) were over approximations in acreage. This is likely a result of high water levels that occurred with snow pack and confusion over the true sizes of the sites. CMC worked with technicians to reinforce the importance of accurate acreage when applying larval control products. Packet Pg. 126 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 15 - CMC Surveillance Laboratory Information about mosquito abundance and species identity is critical to a successful mosquito control program. Colorado Mosquito Control employs two kinds of traps to monitor mosquito populations. The most commonly used is the CDC light trap which uses carbon-dioxide from dry ice as bait to attract female mosquitoes seeking a blood meal from a breathing animal. Once attracted by the CO2, the mosquitoes are lured by a small light to a fan that pulls them into a net for collection. The gravid trap uses a tub of highly-organic water as bait to attract female mosquitoes that are looking for a place to lay their eggs. A fan placed close to the water surface forces mosquitoes that come to the water into a collection net. Once back in the laboratory, the contents of the trap nets are counted and identified by technicians trained to recognize the Colorado mosquito species. In 2014, Colorado Mosquito Control monitored a statewide network of hundreds of weekly trap sites, collecting 505,697 adult mosquitoes that were counted and identified to species by the CMC Surveillance Laboratory. While individual traps provide only limited information, trap data is interpreted in the context of historical records for the same trap site, going back in time more than a decade. Individual traps are also compared to other traps from around the region that were set on the same night and therefore exposed to similar weather conditions. Technicians working in the Surveillance Laboratory at Colorado Mosquito Control are trained to provide accurate species-level identification of mosquito specimens, for both adults and larvae. Additionally, the CMC Surveillance Laboratory conducts an intensive larval identification program with larval mosquito samples collected by I&L technicians prior to larviciding being identified to species. This information is now invaluable in targeting mosquito control efforts as we gain a greater understanding of the habitat types preferred by Colorado mosquito species and the seasonality of these habitats as sites for mosquito development. Packet Pg. 127 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 16 - Specimens and data collected from these traps and larval identification are used in: Determining effectiveness of larval control efforts. Each mosquito species prefers specific kinds of habitats for larval development. If a trap includes large numbers, it could indicate the presence of an unknown larval habitat and, based on the species identification and known habitat preference for that species, direct field technicians as to possible sources of the mosquitoes collected. Determining larval and adult mosquito species. This helps to illustrate the threat of mosquito-borne disease amplification and transmission. Determining where adult control efforts were necessary. While mosquito eradication is impossible, significant population reduction is achievable. In places where larval control was insufficient, especially in neighborhoods where adult mosquitoes migrated in from larval sources outside of the control area, it may be necessary to use adulticide methods, such as ULV truck fogging or barrier sprays of nearby harborage areas. Trap counts that exceeded an acceptable threshold for an area would trigger adult control measures. Surveillance for Mosquito-borne Disease. Historically, CMC efforts were targeted primarily at controlling mosquito nuisance problems with limited disease surveillance. However, since the arrival of the West Nile virus in Colorado in August of 2002, the paradigm has shifted toward disease prevention and control. Accurate species identification of the mosquitoes in the traps is important when monitoring species population trends. It also is necessary for evaluating whether a population spike represents an actual increase in disease transmission potential or only an increased nuisance level. SURVEILLANCE LIGHT TRAP DATA In 2014, an average of 43 surveillance light traps monitored adult mosquito populations within the City of Fort Collins. Surveillance trapping began the week of June 1st and was concluded on August 30th, per the City’s mosquito surveillance budget. There were 542 CDC light surveillance traps set during 2014 within City of Fort Collins, which collected a total of 73,339 mosquitoes. There was an average of 135 mosquitoes caught per trap per night and an average 55 Culex mosquitoes per trap per night. The composition of mosquitoes collected was 40.9% (30,023) Culex spp., 57.0% (41,832) Aedes/ Ochlerotatus spp., 0.1% (64) Coquillettidia perturbans, 24 (less than 1.0%) Anopheles spp., and 1.9% (1,396) Culiseta spp. Please refer to the Light Trap Genus Summary for a weekly breakdown of mosquitoes collected by trap location. Packet Pg. 128 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 17 - Packet Pg. 129 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 18 - CDC SURVEILLANCE GRAVID TRAP DATA COMPARISON The Technical Advisory Committee which reviews the City of Fort Collins Mosquito Management Program and provides ideas to city council which improve the program and data collection made the suggestion to increase the number of gravid traps being set in city limits from 5 to 10 traps in 2013. This suggestion was approved by city council and incorporated into the budget for West Nile virus mosquito surveillance in 2013. The enhancements to gravid trapping were included in the budget again in 2014. Gravid traps were set weekly at the 10 locations to obtain a better understanding and confidence for West Nile virus transmission activity across the City of Fort Collins. Gravid traps primarily attract Culex pipiens, which prefer avian hosts when seeking a blood meal. Trapping and testing of Culex pipiens mosquitoes provides an indicator of viral amplification based on the infection rates and abundance of Culex pipiens. There were 127 gravid traps set in 2014, which collected a total of 3,789 mosquitoes. The species breakdown of mosquitoes collected included; 17 (0.4%) Aedes/Ochlerotatus spp., 7 (0.2%) Culiseta inornata, 247 (6.5%) Culex spp., 67 (1.8%) Culex tarsalis, and 3,451 (91.8%) Culex pipiens mosquitoes. Please refer to 2014 Fort Collins Gravid Trap Composite Data Summary for season trends and gravid trapping species breakdown. CDPHE SEASONAL ADULT MOSQUITO POPULATION DATA COMPARISON The Sentinel Encephalitis Surveillance Program was funded by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), the City of Fort Collins and the City of Loveland for the eighth season. CMC maintained the sentinel system with five surveillance traps at permanent locations within a five mile radius (the center point at Fossil Ridge High School). The five surveillance trap locations were (FC-04) Bighorn Drive, (FC-14) Fort Collins Visitors Center, (FC-53) Egret and Rookery, (FC-67) Poudre River Trail at Mulberry and Lemay, and (LV-095) Waterfront at Boyd Lake. All Culex mosquitoes were sent to and tested by CSU. CSU sent test result data to the CDPHE for input into ArboNet. The sentinel light traps were set once a week from June 3rd to August 28th. There were 67 sentinel surveillance traps set in 2014, which collected a total of 17,569 mosquitoes. Packet Pg. 130 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 19 - CSU WEST NILE VIRUS MOSQUITO SAMPLE TESTING RESULTS Many local health departments have moved towards mosquito-based surveillance indicators to assess the weekly risk of West Nile transmission and guide response decisions for mosquito adulticiding. The vector index and infection rate is derived by testing the collected mosquitoes from CMC surveillance trapping for WNV infection. This value is closely monitored by the CDPHE and local health departments to evaluate the risk posed by the vector mosquito population. As defined in the CDC guidelines for West Nile virus surveillance, prevention and control the vector index (VI) is an estimate of the number of West Nile virus infected mosquitoes in an area. This number can serve as a human health risk value. An operational value of 0.75, which was derived from comparison of historical data for human infections, as well as relative abundance and infection in mosquitoes, serves an indicator of high risk for West Nile virus transmission to humans in the corresponding area (https://www.colorado.gov/). As the value of the vector index increases there is a corresponding risk of human disease and this value can be used to offset epidemics. Due to budget cutbacks associated with West Nile virus surveillance in recent years, the CDPHE does not have the ability to test mosquitoes from across the state. As a result, there is very limited testing done within unincorporated Larimer County. As stated on the CDPHE website, the seasonal variation of West Nile virus risk can change throughout a summer and it is best to assume you have some risk for WNV if you have mosquitoes. Graph provided by CDPHE: https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/DC_CD_Zoo-West-Nile-Virus-Report-2014_0.pdf Packet Pg. 131 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 20 - As reported by Dr. Lars Eisen with Colorado State University’s Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, CSU tested a total of 1,685 mosquito pools in the 2014 mosquito season. Of these, 1,351 pools came from Fort Collins and 334 pools were collected from Loveland. Of the Fort Collins mosquito pools, 847 pools were comprised of Cx. tarsalis and 504 pools were comprised Cx. pipiens mosquitoes. Of the Loveland mosquito pools, 220 pools were comprised Cx. tarsalis and 114 pools were comprised Cx. pipiens mosquitoes. Testing of mosquitoes for West Nile virus is paid for by the City of Fort Collins and Loveland. All tested pools were negative in weeks 23-29 (June 1st- July 19th) in both Fort Collins and Loveland. WNV positive pools were then recorded each week from both cities in weeks 30-35 (July 20th-August 30th). There were 52 WNV positive pools collected from Fort Collins and 23 WN+ pools from Loveland. The greatest number of WNV positive pools for a single week was recorded in week 32 (August 3rd-9th). There were a total of 27 WNV positive pools collected during this week from across Fort Collins and Loveland, of which 17 were from Fort Collins and 10 from Loveland. The CDPHE and CSU ceased mosquito testing for WNV on August 29th. Packet Pg. 132 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 21 - PLEASE VISIT CMC’S DASHBOARD FOR ONLINE ACCESS TO TRAP LOCATIONS: HTTP://WWW.COMOSQUITOCONTROL.COM/FTCOLLINS.HTML Packet Pg. 133 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 22 - ADULT MOSQUITO CONTROL The goal of Colorado Mosquito Control is to provide all residents of Larimer County Cooperative Programs with the best options for effective modern mosquito management. The primary emphasis of the City of Fort Collins Mosquito Management Program is to control mosquitoes in the larval stage, using biological control products. Although the City of Fort Collins does not have an adulticiding component built into their mosquito control program, it is important to note that CMC did adulticide in city limits of Fort Collins in 2014 due to elevated West Nile risk in the southeast portion of the city. The request to perform ground based ULV adulticiding was made by the Larimer County Department of Health and Environment. Colorado Mosquito Control traveled 199.9 miles of roads and trails in Fort Collins and surrounding county lands, totaling 7,268.34 acres of lands. The applications were performed on August 15th and 18th. Packet Pg. 134 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 23 - CMC also performed mosquito spraying in 2014 at the request of Greenstone and Lindenwood HOA’s. CMC utilized the water-based products AquaLuer 20-20 for ULV adult mosquito control in all spraying applications. CMC uses state of the art technology, calibrated application timing, and least-toxic products to minimize non-target impacts. All adult mosquito control is accomplished using Ultra Low Volume (ULV) fogging equipment and performed after dusk when the majority of mosquito species are most active. This type of equipment produces droplets averaging 12 microns in diameter and allows for a minimal amount of product to be put into the environment. These treatments take place in the evening when mosquitoes are flying in greater numbers and non- target insect activity (for example, day-flying pollinators like bees) is greatly reduced. Using this application technique, the overall goal of minimal environmental impact and effective adult control is achieved in the targeted area. Packet Pg. 135 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 24 - Public Relations and Education CMC believes in and remains dedicated to providing strong Public Outreach and Education Programs to all of our accounts. Citizen complaints, inquiry, information and satisfaction surveys can aid in evaluating the effectiveness of a program. CMC constantly looks for ways to better serve the communities we work with and appreciates both the citizen and local media involvement for the betterment of the programs we offer. We have clearly demonstrated that commitment and belief by proactively serving the community (and all of our contracted communities) with numerous innovative programs, activities and services. Customer service is always a high priority for CMC. We take pride in training each and every technician so that they have the confidence and information to provide residents with the correct answers to sometimes difficult questions. Each field technician spends part of their day responding to resident concerns in their work area. This in-field customer service personalizes the mosquito control program, provides us with local information on mosquito activity and facilitates the valuable opportunity to truly communicate face-to-face with the residents we serve. MosquitoLine™ CMC maintains a toll-free (in Colorado) telephone line: (877) 276-4306 and local lines at 970- 962-2582 and 970-663-5697 (at no cost to the customer) to accept calls from the public concerning: Information about mosquito biology and source reduction of mosquito habitats Information on program components, operations, and monitoring efforts within the City Seasonal West Nile virus activity Personal protection options for mosquito annoyances and West Nile virus risk Reports and concerns of mosquitoes and possible larval mosquito habitats and perform larvicide applications to control mosquito larvae at no cost to the property owner Opt their property out of any adulticide spraying via a shut-off list Request notification when adulticide spraying is planned in and around their neighborhood Request health and safety information about mosquito control operations and pesticide products used in the City of Fort Collins Packet Pg. 136 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 25 - CMC has provided Mosquito Hotlines to the residents in communities which we are contracted to also reduce workload by municipal personnel. This enables direct communication and response by mosquito control employees to resident concern about West Nile Virus and larval site activity and treatment. CMC will maintain a log of calls received and will summarize call activity in monthly and annual reports. In 2014 CMC fielded 124 phone calls from City of Fort Collins residents. Of these, there were forty seven requests for information regarding the city’s mosquito control program, questions about when and where mosquito spraying would occur and West Nile virus risk. There were twelve requests to be added to the call notification list or requests for shutoff of sprays around their homes within the City of Fort Collins. There were fifty seven new larval sites reports, in which a CMC technician inspected the area for standing water. If the habitat posed potential for mosquito larvae, then CMC would treat and add the site into the routine inspection program for the City of Fort Collins. There were two mosquito annoyance calls received in 2014. CMC responded to these mosquito annoyances by either providing trap data for the local area or inspecting the area for new sites that may be producing mosquitoes and causing the annoyance. There were six requests for special event sprays at private residences. Packet Pg. 137 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 26 - CALL NOTIFICATION &SHUTOFF SYSTEM CMC continued to maintain a comprehensive Call Notification & Shutoff database to notify residents on the list when conducting ULV adulticide spray applications within 2 blocks of their property or within the effective ULV spray drift distance (300-500 ft depending on wind speed and direction). All Shutoff locations are mapped in ArcView GIS. Call & Shutoff forms are available online and may be submitted via mail. As of 2014, there are 159 residents of Fort Collins on the Call, Email & Shutoff Notification Program. FREE FISH STOCKING PROGRAM CMC will continue to work with residents to supply larvivorous fish to those residents with ornamental and closed-system ponds that are not currently stocked with fish and that may be producing mosquito problems in their neighborhoods. CMC technicians will physically visit the resident’s homes to distribute fish. FLOATER TRAP PLACEMENT for annoyance reports at resident homes at locations away from standard trapping zones. DAILY POSTING OF ULV SPRAY ZONES posted by 3 pm for resident notification http://www.comosquitocontrol.com/SpraySchedules.html Packet Pg. 138 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 Annual Report of Mosquito Management Operations Colorado Mosquito Control - 27 - Summary Human cases of West Nile virus disease over the last 15 years, as reported by the CDC, support the on-going need for data driven surveillance and sound integrated mosquito management efforts. Reports for human infections of West Nile virus disease ranks Colorado at 12.6% of the number of documented cases nationally. It is likely that the primary vector of WNV, Cx. tarsalis for this region, will continue to present human health risks for the foreseeable future given land use patterns and urban development across the agricultural communities of Colorado. West Nile virus is endemic to the region. Those risks for West Nile virus transmission are dependent every summer on surveillance monitoring, the application of biological and chemical controls, and public education outreach. Packet Pg. 139 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 1,396 Genus proportions: Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 41,832 24 30,023 64 57.0 % 0.0 % 40.9 % 1.9 % 0.1 % ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. 2014 Larimer CDC Light Trap Composite Data Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 542 135 73,339 Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) campestris Aedes (Oc.) hendersoni Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis Aedes (Oc.) melanimon Aedes (Oc.) increpitus Aedes (Oc.) trivittatus Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis Aedes vexans Aedes cinereus Anopheles earlei Anopheles hermsi Culex pipiens Coquillettidia perturbans Culex salinarius Aedes/Ochlerotatus spp Culex spp 6 16 4562 884 701 52 93 35492 24 23 1 2735 64 50 2 378 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 493 86.8 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 66 11.6 % 9 1.6 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-011: Golden Currant Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 568 47 Light/CO2 Golden Currant and Banyan 105°8 7.41 W 40°34 10.969 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 33 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 4 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 2 Aedes vexans 454 Culex pipiens 14 Culex tarsalis 52 Culiseta inornata 9 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 6 5.8 % 0.7 % 0.4 % 79.9 % 2.5 % 9.2 % 1.6 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 2,249 67.4 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 1 0.0 % 901 27.0 % 184 5.5 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-014: Fort Collins Vistors Center Season: 2014 Location: GPS: 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 293 32.2 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 578 63.4 % 40 4.4 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-023: Boltz Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 911 70 Light/CO2 Boltz Junior High School 105°3 50.927 W 40°32 39.707 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 82 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 1 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 1 Aedes vexans 209 Culex pipiens 29 Culex spp 12 Culex tarsalis 537 Culiseta inornata 40 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 44 9.0 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 22.9 % 3.2 % 1.3 % 58.9 % 4.4 % 0.1 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 1,324 37.9 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 2,145 61.3 % 25 0.7 % 3 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-027: San Luis Season: 2014 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 1,148 67.1 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 549 32.1 % 14 0.8 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-034: Country Club Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 1,711 132 Light/CO2 Dead end at Richards Lake Rd 105°3 9.194 W 40°37 36.997 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 69 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 21 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 55 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 1 Aedes (Oc.) trivittatus 3 Aedes vexans 999 Culex pipiens 18 Culex spp 2 Culex tarsalis 529 Culiseta inornata 14 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 42 4.0 % 1.2 % 3.2 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 58.4 % 1.1 % 0.1 % 30.9 % 0.8 % 0.5 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 4,403 81.1 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 1 0.0 % 938 17.3 % 62 1.1 % 26 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 1,037 55.0 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 769 40.8 % 80 4.2 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-039: Fossil Creek South (Greenstone) Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 14 1,886 135 Light/CO2 Timberline and Cty Rd 32 in Fossil Creek FCNA 105°2 21.49 W 40°28 50.93 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) campestris 1 Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 712 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 27 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 1 Aedes vexans 296 Culex pipiens 19 Culex salinarius 10 Culex spp 9 Culex tarsalis 731 Culiseta inornata 80 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 55 0.1 % 37.8 % 1.4 % 0.1 % 15.7 % 1.0 % 0.5 % 0.5 % 38.8 % 4.2 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 564 51.2 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 520 47.2 % 18 1.6 % 0 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 72 25.6 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 205 73.0 % 4 1.4 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-047: Keenland & Twin Oak Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 281 22 Light/CO2 at detention basin off of Keenland and Twin Oak 105°3 10.212 W 40°30 54.927 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 4 Aedes vexans 67 Aedes/Ochlerotatus spp 1 Culex pipiens 6 Culex tarsalis 199 Culiseta inornata 4 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 16 1.4 % 23.8 % 0.4 % 2.1 % 70.8 % 1.4 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 79 37.8 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 122 58.4 % 8 3.8 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-049: Casa Grande and Downing Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 333 17.9 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 1,518 81.6 % 9 0.5 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-053: Egret and Rookery Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 14 1,860 133 Light/CO2 3480 Egret Lane 105°0 41.824 W 40°29 52.274 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 89 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 9 Aedes vexans 235 Culex pipiens 18 Culex spp 20 Culex tarsalis 1480 Culiseta inornata 9 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 108 4.8 % 0.5 % 12.6 % 1.0 % 1.1 % 79.6 % 0.5 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 160 62.3 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 91 35.4 % 6 2.3 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-054: 737 Parliament Court Season: 2014 Location: GPS: 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 993 64.3 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 519 33.6 % 33 2.1 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-059: Springwood and Lockwood Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 1,545 119 Light/CO2 Nelson Farm Stormwater Detention Pond 105°2 45.851 W 40°32 32.495 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 39 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 3 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 1 Aedes vexans 950 Culex pipiens 131 Culex tarsalis 388 Culiseta inornata 33 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 40 2.5 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 61.5 % 8.5 % 25.1 % 2.1 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 77 47.8 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 81 50.3 % 3 1.9 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-060: 808 Pondersosa Season: 2014 Location: GPS: 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 1,761 94.6 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 71 3.8 % 29 1.6 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-063: Red Fox Meadows FCNA Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 1,861 155 Light/CO2 Red Fox Meadows FCNA @ Heatherridge Apartment 105°6 17.715 W 40°33 55.531 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 1 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 7 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 3 Aedes (Oc.) trivittatus 2 Aedes cinereus 1 Aedes vexans 1747 Culex pipiens 8 Culex tarsalis 63 Culiseta inornata 29 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 6 0.1 % 0.4 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 93.9 % 0.4 % 3.4 % 1.6 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 1,485 49.4 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 1,457 48.5 % 65 2.2 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 76 38.4 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 102 51.5 % 20 10.1 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-068: 502 Crest Drive Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 198 16 Light/CO2 Along trees on southside of pond 105°5 9.522 W 40°30 58.885 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 4 Aedes vexans 72 Culex pipiens 9 Culex tarsalis 93 Culiseta inornata 20 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 8 2.0 % 36.4 % 4.5 % 47.0 % 10.1 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 1,015 73.6 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 346 25.1 % 18 1.3 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-069: Linden Lake Rd Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 14 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 514 58.9 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 347 39.8 % 11 1.3 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-073: 118 Grant Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 872 73 Light/CO2 In alley btwn Oak and Mountain near green shed 105°5 20.495 W 40°35 9.876 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 6 Aedes (Oc.) hendersoni 1 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 2 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 4 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 1 Aedes (Oc.) trivittatus 4 Aedes vexans 496 Culex pipiens 39 Culex tarsalis 308 Culiseta inornata 11 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 29 0.7 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.5 % 0.1 % 0.5 % 56.9 % 4.5 % 35.3 % 1.3 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 1,026 68.0 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 472 31.3 % 10 0.7 % 0 7 Genus proportions: Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 17 0 3,765 0 0.4 % 0.0 % 99.4 % 0.2 % 0.0 % ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. 2014 Larimer CDC Gravid Trap Composite Data Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 127 30 3,789 Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis Aedes vexans Aedes (Oc.) trivittatus Culex pipiens Aedes/Ochlerotatus spp Culex tarsalis Culex spp Culiseta inornata 2 13 1 3451 1 67 247 7 0.1 % 0.3 % 0.0 % 91.1 % 0.0 % 1.8 % 6.5 % 0.2 % Average Culex per trap/night: 30 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 2 0.3 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 753 99.5 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 5 3.4 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 143 96.0 % 1 0.7 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-066gr: Prospect Ponds @ Drake Water Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 149 11 Prospect Ponds @ Drake Water Reclamation Facility 105°1 21.635 W 40°33 30.973 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes vexans 5 Culex pipiens 140 Culex tarsalis 3 Culiseta inornata 1 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 11 3.4 % 94.0 % 2.0 % 0.7 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 1 0.4 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 221 98.2 % 3 1.3 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-075gr: North Sage Creek Gravid Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 225 17 north of creek west of Ziegler 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 1 0.7 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 148 99.3 % 0 0.0 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-090gr: Mountain Grandview Cemetery Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 149 11 Ditch on SE end of Mountain Grandview Cemetery 105°6 40.91 W 40°34 57.089 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes vexans 1 Culex pipiens 145 Culex tarsalis 3 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 11 0.7 % 97.3 % 2.0 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 1 1.0 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 98 99.0 % 0 0.0 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-091gr: PVH Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 99 8 Parking lot on south side of PVH 105°3 16.028 W 40°34 14.45 N Species collected and abundance: Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 1 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-006 LIGHT Larimer 07/14/2014 North Linden 111 0 114 2 0 227 FC-006 LIGHT Larimer 07/07/2014 North Linden 86 0 77 3 0 166 FC-006 LIGHT Larimer 06/30/2014 North Linden 124 0 62 12 0 198 FC-006 LIGHT Larimer 08/04/2014 North Linden 246 1 262 5 0 514 FC-006 LIGHT Larimer 07/28/2014 North Linden 236 1 199 5 0 441 FC-006 LIGHT Larimer 07/21/2014 North Linden 138 0 389 20 0 547 FC-006 LIGHT Larimer 06/02/2014 North Linden 121 0 0 0 0 121 FC-004 LIGHT Larimer 08/25/2014 Bighorn Drive 26 0 111 12 0 149 FC-006 LIGHT Larimer 06/23/2014 North Linden 29 0 1 0 0 30 FC-006 LIGHT Larimer 06/16/2014 North Linden 125 0 5 0 0 130 FC-006 LIGHT Larimer 06/09/2014 North Linden 21 0 2 2 0 25 FC-006 LIGHT Larimer 08/11/2014 North Linden 127 0 43 0 0 170 FC-011 LIGHT Larimer 06/04/2014 Golden Currant 42 0 5 0 0 47 FC-006 LIGHT Larimer 08/25/2014 North Linden 61 0 56 3 0 120 FC-006 LIGHT Larimer 08/18/2014 North Linden 44 0 83 2 0 129 FC-011 LIGHT Larimer 06/18/2014 Golden Currant 81 0 1 4 0 86 FC-011 LIGHT Larimer 06/11/2014 Golden Currant 67 0 3 1 0 71 FC-001 LIGHT Larimer 07/24/2014 Magic Carpet 25 0 56 1 0 82 FC-001 LIGHT Larimer 07/17/2014 Magic Carpet 4 0 8 2 0 14 FC-001 LIGHT Larimer 07/10/2014 Magic Carpet 21 0 27 0 0 48 FC-001 LIGHT Larimer 08/21/2014 Magic Carpet 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-001 LIGHT Larimer 08/14/2014 Magic Carpet 46 0 17 0 0 63 FC-001 LIGHT Larimer 08/07/2014 Magic Carpet 11 0 42 0 0 53 FC-001 LIGHT Larimer 06/12/2014 Magic Carpet 18 0 0 0 0 18 FC-001 LIGHT Larimer 06/05/2014 Magic Carpet 10 0 1 0 0 11 FC-004 LIGHT Larimer 08/18/2014 Bighorn Drive 10 0 183 17 0 210 FC-001 LIGHT Larimer 07/03/2014 Magic Carpet 4 0 19 0 0 23 FC-001 LIGHT Larimer 06/26/2014 Magic Carpet 1 0 3 0 0 4 FC-001 LIGHT Larimer 06/19/2014 Magic Carpet 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-001 LIGHT Larimer 08/28/2014 Magic Carpet 33 0 3 0 0 36 FC-004 LIGHT Larimer 07/21/2014 Bighorn Drive 27 0 296 1 0 324 FC-004 LIGHT Larimer 07/14/2014 Bighorn Drive 7 0 96 3 0 106 FC-004 LIGHT Larimer 07/07/2014 Bighorn Drive 84 0 186 4 0 274 FC-004 LIGHT Larimer 08/11/2014 Bighorn Drive 39 0 272 17 0 328 FC-004 LIGHT Larimer 08/04/2014 Bighorn Drive 77 0 500 27 0 604 FC-004 LIGHT Larimer 07/28/2014 Bighorn Drive 32 0 219 11 0 262 FC-004 LIGHT Larimer 06/16/2014 Bighorn Drive 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-004 LIGHT Larimer 06/09/2014 Bighorn Drive 1 0 0 0 0 1 FC-004 LIGHT Larimer 06/02/2014 Bighorn Drive 10 0 2 0 0 12 FC-004 LIGHT Larimer 06/30/2014 Bighorn Drive 9 0 65 19 0 93 FC-004 LIGHT Larimer 06/23/2014 Bighorn Drive 6 0 8 1 0 15 FC-004 LIGHT Larimer 06/17/2014 Bighorn Drive 7 0 5 0 0 12 Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 154 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 2 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-015 LIGHT Larimer 07/16/2014 Stuart and Dorset 6 0 3 2 0 11 FC-015 LIGHT Larimer 07/09/2014 Stuart and Dorset 5 0 5 1 0 11 FC-015 LIGHT Larimer 07/23/2014 Stuart and Dorset 38 0 19 0 0 57 FC-015 LIGHT Larimer 08/13/2014 Stuart and Dorset 15 0 16 1 0 32 FC-015 LIGHT Larimer 08/06/2014 Stuart and Dorset 26 0 18 0 0 44 FC-015 LIGHT Larimer 07/02/2014 Stuart and Dorset 3 0 3 0 0 6 FC-015 LIGHT Larimer 06/04/2014 Stuart and Dorset 24 0 1 0 0 25 FC-014 LIGHT Larimer 08/25/2014 Fort Collins Vistors Center 18 0 20 1 0 39 FC-015 LIGHT Larimer 06/11/2014 Stuart and Dorset 12 0 1 0 0 13 FC-015 LIGHT Larimer 06/25/2014 Stuart and Dorset 8 0 0 1 0 9 FC-015 LIGHT Larimer 06/18/2014 Stuart and Dorset 7 0 1 2 0 10 FC-019 LIGHT Larimer 07/07/2014 Edora Park 12 0 39 0 0 51 FC-019 LIGHT Larimer 06/30/2014 Edora Park 7 0 3 2 0 12 FC-019 LIGHT Larimer 07/14/2014 Edora Park 24 0 18 0 0 42 FC-019 LIGHT Larimer 06/23/2014 Edora Park 14 0 2 4 0 20 FC-015 LIGHT Larimer 08/27/2014 Stuart and Dorset 3 0 12 0 0 15 FC-015 LIGHT Larimer 08/19/2014 Stuart and Dorset 22 0 27 3 0 52 FC-019 LIGHT Larimer 06/02/2014 Edora Park 11 0 3 1 0 15 FC-019 LIGHT Larimer 06/16/2014 Edora Park 2 0 2 0 0 4 FC-019 LIGHT Larimer 06/09/2014 Edora Park 4 0 1 0 0 5 FC-011 LIGHT Larimer 08/13/2014 Golden Currant 12 0 1 0 0 13 FC-011 LIGHT Larimer 08/06/2014 Golden Currant 17 0 8 0 0 25 FC-011 LIGHT Larimer 08/19/2014 Golden Currant 7 0 6 0 0 13 FC-014 LIGHT Larimer 06/02/2014 Fort Collins Vistors Center 160 0 2 0 0 162 FC-011 LIGHT Larimer 08/27/2014 Golden Currant 5 0 9 0 0 14 FC-011 LIGHT Larimer 07/23/2014 Golden Currant 164 0 10 0 0 174 FC-011 LIGHT Larimer 06/25/2014 Golden Currant 12 0 0 0 0 12 FC-014 LIGHT Larimer 08/18/2014 Fort Collins Vistors Center 72 0 46 4 0 122 FC-011 LIGHT Larimer 07/02/2014 Golden Currant 27 0 13 3 0 43 FC-011 LIGHT Larimer 07/16/2014 Golden Currant 1 0 5 0 0 6 FC-011 LIGHT Larimer 07/09/2014 Golden Currant 58 0 5 1 0 64 FC-014 LIGHT Larimer 07/22/2014 Fort Collins Vistors Center 344 0 203 31 0 578 FC-014 LIGHT Larimer 07/21/2014 Fort Collins Vistors Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-014 LIGHT Larimer 07/28/2014 Fort Collins Vistors Center 280 0 263 84 0 627 FC-014 LIGHT Larimer 08/11/2014 Fort Collins Vistors Center 24 0 21 9 0 54 FC-014 LIGHT Larimer 08/04/2014 Fort Collins Vistors Center 99 0 78 19 0 196 FC-014 LIGHT Larimer 07/14/2014 Fort Collins Vistors Center 188 1 83 6 0 278 FC-014 LIGHT Larimer 06/16/2014 Fort Collins Vistors Center 63 0 15 0 0 78 FC-014 LIGHT Larimer 06/09/2014 Fort Collins Vistors Center 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-014 LIGHT Larimer 06/23/2014 Fort Collins Vistors Center 50 0 9 16 0 75 FC-014 LIGHT Larimer 07/07/2014 Fort Collins Vistors Center 801 0 100 3 0 904 FC-014 LIGHT Larimer 06/30/2014 Fort Collins Vistors Center 150 0 61 11 0 222 Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 155 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 3 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-027 LIGHT Larimer 08/12/2014 San Luis 236 0 100 3 0 339 FC-027 LIGHT Larimer 08/05/2014 San Luis 128 0 281 3 0 412 FC-027 LIGHT Larimer 08/20/2014 San Luis 52 0 240 0 0 292 FC-029 LIGHT Larimer 06/05/2014 Bens Park 25 0 0 1 0 26 FC-027 LIGHT Larimer 08/26/2014 San Luis 17 0 64 1 0 82 FC-027 LIGHT Larimer 07/29/2014 San Luis 85 0 506 1 0 592 FC-027 LIGHT Larimer 07/01/2014 San Luis 28 0 190 2 0 220 FC-027 LIGHT Larimer 06/24/2014 San Luis 45 0 45 1 0 91 FC-027 LIGHT Larimer 07/08/2014 San Luis 398 0 135 0 3 536 FC-027 LIGHT Larimer 07/22/2014 San Luis 156 0 482 4 0 642 FC-027 LIGHT Larimer 07/15/2014 San Luis 40 0 83 8 0 131 FC-029 LIGHT Larimer 08/07/2014 Bens Park 13 0 23 2 0 38 FC-029 LIGHT Larimer 07/24/2014 Bens Park 76 0 75 2 0 153 FC-029 LIGHT Larimer 08/14/2014 Bens Park 318 0 54 11 0 383 FC-029 LIGHT Larimer 07/17/2014 Bens Park 5 0 20 1 0 26 FC-029 LIGHT Larimer 06/19/2014 Bens Park 6 0 1 1 0 8 FC-029 LIGHT Larimer 06/12/2014 Bens Park 35 0 0 4 0 39 FC-029 LIGHT Larimer 06/26/2014 Bens Park 4 0 5 1 0 10 FC-029 LIGHT Larimer 07/10/2014 Bens Park 18 0 36 0 0 54 FC-029 LIGHT Larimer 07/03/2014 Bens Park 6 0 3 0 0 9 FC-023 LIGHT Larimer 06/03/2014 Boltz 56 0 0 0 0 56 FC-019 LIGHT Larimer 08/25/2014 Edora Park 12 0 23 0 0 35 FC-023 LIGHT Larimer 06/10/2014 Boltz 35 0 0 1 0 36 FC-023 LIGHT Larimer 06/24/2014 Boltz 12 0 7 3 0 22 FC-023 LIGHT Larimer 06/17/2014 Boltz 23 0 1 0 0 24 FC-019 LIGHT Larimer 08/18/2014 Edora Park 58 0 176 3 0 237 FC-019 LIGHT Larimer 07/21/2014 Edora Park 51 0 138 5 0 194 FC-027 LIGHT Larimer 06/17/2014 San Luis 66 0 3 2 0 71 FC-019 LIGHT Larimer 07/28/2014 Edora Park 40 0 110 7 0 157 FC-019 LIGHT Larimer 08/11/2014 Edora Park 10 2 70 2 0 84 FC-019 LIGHT Larimer 08/04/2014 Edora Park 18 1 126 9 0 154 FC-023 LIGHT Larimer 08/20/2014 Boltz 5 0 4 0 0 9 FC-023 LIGHT Larimer 08/12/2014 Boltz 12 0 20 3 0 35 FC-023 LIGHT Larimer 08/26/2014 Boltz 3 0 8 0 0 11 FC-027 LIGHT Larimer 06/10/2014 San Luis 22 0 0 0 0 22 FC-027 LIGHT Larimer 06/03/2014 San Luis 51 0 16 0 0 67 FC-023 LIGHT Larimer 08/05/2014 Boltz 14 0 27 0 0 41 FC-023 LIGHT Larimer 07/08/2014 Boltz 27 0 39 5 0 71 FC-023 LIGHT Larimer 07/01/2014 Boltz 6 0 11 3 0 20 FC-023 LIGHT Larimer 07/15/2014 Boltz 3 0 55 1 0 59 FC-023 LIGHT Larimer 07/29/2014 Boltz 57 0 206 20 0 283 FC-023 LIGHT Larimer 07/22/2014 Boltz 40 0 200 4 0 244 Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 156 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 4 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-034 LIGHT Larimer 08/25/2014 Country Club 41 0 12 0 0 53 FC-034 LIGHT Larimer 08/18/2014 Country Club 22 0 75 2 0 99 FC-036 LIGHT Larimer 06/02/2014 Hemlock 253 0 8 0 0 261 FC-036 LIGHT Larimer 06/16/2014 Hemlock 876 0 18 4 0 898 FC-036 LIGHT Larimer 06/09/2014 Hemlock 60 0 4 1 0 65 FC-034 LIGHT Larimer 08/11/2014 Country Club 94 0 58 0 0 152 FC-034 LIGHT Larimer 07/21/2014 Country Club 206 0 34 0 0 240 FC-034 LIGHT Larimer 07/14/2014 Country Club 89 0 73 1 0 163 FC-034 LIGHT Larimer 07/28/2014 Country Club 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-034 LIGHT Larimer 08/04/2014 Country Club 39 0 76 1 0 116 FC-034 LIGHT Larimer 07/29/2014 Country Club 80 0 79 1 0 160 FC-036 LIGHT Larimer 08/11/2014 Hemlock 229 1 55 1 0 286 FC-036 LIGHT Larimer 08/04/2014 Hemlock 341 0 80 2 2 425 FC-036 LIGHT Larimer 08/18/2014 Hemlock 101 0 20 0 0 121 FC-036 LIGHT Larimer 07/28/2014 Hemlock 754 0 261 0 2 1,017 FC-036 LIGHT Larimer 06/30/2014 Hemlock 332 0 103 23 0 458 FC-036 LIGHT Larimer 06/23/2014 Hemlock 304 0 7 2 0 313 FC-036 LIGHT Larimer 07/07/2014 Hemlock 396 0 95 12 9 512 FC-036 LIGHT Larimer 07/21/2014 Hemlock 291 0 165 4 12 472 FC-036 LIGHT Larimer 07/14/2014 Hemlock 391 0 102 12 1 506 FC-031 LIGHT Larimer 07/01/2014 Willow Springs 30 0 49 6 0 85 FC-031 LIGHT Larimer 06/24/2014 Willow Springs 13 0 14 4 0 31 FC-031 LIGHT Larimer 07/08/2014 Willow Springs 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-031 LIGHT Larimer 07/15/2014 Willow Springs 21 0 10 3 0 34 FC-031 LIGHT Larimer 07/10/2014 Willow Springs 17 0 14 2 0 33 FC-031 LIGHT Larimer 06/17/2014 Willow Springs 19 0 2 1 0 22 FC-029 LIGHT Larimer 08/21/2014 Bens Park 60 0 28 0 0 88 FC-034 LIGHT Larimer 07/07/2014 Country Club 97 0 64 2 0 163 FC-029 LIGHT Larimer 08/28/2014 Bens Park 8 0 4 0 0 12 FC-031 LIGHT Larimer 06/10/2014 Willow Springs 27 0 2 1 0 30 FC-031 LIGHT Larimer 06/03/2014 Willow Springs 62 0 1 1 0 64 FC-034 LIGHT Larimer 06/09/2014 Country Club 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-034 LIGHT Larimer 06/02/2014 Country Club 128 0 0 1 0 129 FC-034 LIGHT Larimer 06/16/2014 Country Club 185 0 10 0 0 195 FC-034 LIGHT Larimer 06/30/2014 Country Club 101 0 60 0 0 161 FC-034 LIGHT Larimer 06/23/2014 Country Club 66 0 8 6 0 80 FC-031 LIGHT Larimer 08/26/2014 Willow Springs 1 0 24 1 0 26 FC-031 LIGHT Larimer 07/29/2014 Willow Springs 37 0 323 9 0 369 FC-031 LIGHT Larimer 07/22/2014 Willow Springs 50 0 334 14 0 398 FC-031 LIGHT Larimer 08/05/2014 Willow Springs 58 0 319 12 0 389 FC-031 LIGHT Larimer 08/20/2014 Willow Springs 5 0 13 0 0 18 FC-031 LIGHT Larimer 08/12/2014 Willow Springs 68 0 41 7 0 116 Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 157 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 5 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-039 LIGHT Larimer 06/17/2014 Fossil Creek South (Green 49 0 12 3 0 64 FC-039 LIGHT Larimer 06/10/2014 Fossil Creek South (Green 13 0 6 4 0 23 FC-039 LIGHT Larimer 06/24/2014 Fossil Creek South (Green 20 0 35 25 0 80 FC-039 LIGHT Larimer 07/08/2014 Fossil Creek South (Green 64 0 36 1 0 101 FC-039 LIGHT Larimer 07/01/2014 Fossil Creek South (Green 2 0 20 1 0 23 FC-039 LIGHT Larimer 06/03/2014 Fossil Creek South (Green 131 0 1 0 0 132 FC-038 LIGHT Larimer 08/11/2014 Lochside Lane 27 0 29 1 0 57 FC-038 LIGHT Larimer 08/04/2014 Lochside Lane 38 0 140 3 0 181 FC-038 LIGHT Larimer 08/18/2014 Lochside Lane 57 0 128 2 0 187 FC-039 LIGHT Larimer 05/28/2014 Fossil Creek South (Green 26 0 2 1 0 29 FC-038 LIGHT Larimer 08/25/2014 Lochside Lane 30 0 33 3 0 66 FC-039 LIGHT Larimer 08/20/2014 Fossil Creek South (Green 14 0 44 1 0 59 FC-039 LIGHT Larimer 08/14/2014 Fossil Creek South (Green 348 0 140 7 0 495 FC-039 LIGHT Larimer 08/26/2014 Fossil Creek South (Green 30 0 12 5 0 47 FC-039 LIGHT Larimer 08/12/2014 Fossil Creek South (Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-039 LIGHT Larimer 07/22/2014 Fossil Creek South (Green 57 0 143 7 0 207 FC-039 LIGHT Larimer 07/15/2014 Fossil Creek South (Green 100 0 45 10 0 155 FC-039 LIGHT Larimer 07/29/2014 Fossil Creek South (Green 122 0 106 8 0 236 FC-039 LIGHT Larimer 08/06/2014 Fossil Creek South (Green 61 0 167 7 0 235 FC-039 LIGHT Larimer 08/05/2014 Fossil Creek South (Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-037 LIGHT Larimer 07/10/2014 Chelsea Ridge 32 0 28 0 0 60 FC-037 LIGHT Larimer 07/03/2014 Chelsea Ridge 26 0 29 3 0 58 FC-037 LIGHT Larimer 07/17/2014 Chelsea Ridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-037 LIGHT Larimer 08/07/2014 Chelsea Ridge 22 0 52 3 0 77 FC-037 LIGHT Larimer 07/24/2014 Chelsea Ridge 22 0 109 5 0 136 FC-037 LIGHT Larimer 06/26/2014 Chelsea Ridge 10 0 6 0 0 16 FC-036 LIGHT Larimer 08/25/2014 Hemlock 75 0 20 1 0 96 FC-038 LIGHT Larimer 07/28/2014 Lochside Lane 140 0 434 3 0 577 FC-037 LIGHT Larimer 06/05/2014 Chelsea Ridge 14 0 0 0 0 14 FC-037 LIGHT Larimer 06/19/2014 Chelsea Ridge 9 0 0 1 0 10 FC-037 LIGHT Larimer 06/12/2014 Chelsea Ridge 31 0 0 0 0 31 FC-038 LIGHT Larimer 06/30/2014 Lochside Lane 103 0 43 7 0 153 FC-038 LIGHT Larimer 06/23/2014 Lochside Lane 10 0 0 1 0 11 FC-038 LIGHT Larimer 07/07/2014 Lochside Lane 200 0 115 2 0 317 FC-038 LIGHT Larimer 07/21/2014 Lochside Lane 246 0 259 8 0 513 FC-038 LIGHT Larimer 07/14/2014 Lochside Lane 30 0 43 1 0 74 FC-038 LIGHT Larimer 06/16/2014 Lochside Lane 104 0 2 2 0 108 FC-037 LIGHT Larimer 08/21/2014 Chelsea Ridge 12 0 19 1 0 32 FC-037 LIGHT Larimer 08/14/2014 Chelsea Ridge 23 0 66 1 0 90 FC-037 LIGHT Larimer 08/28/2014 Chelsea Ridge 6 0 22 1 0 29 FC-038 LIGHT Larimer 06/09/2014 Lochside Lane 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-038 LIGHT Larimer 06/02/2014 Lochside Lane 105 0 1 3 0 109 Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 158 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 6 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-046 LIGHT Larimer 06/24/2014 725 Westshore Court 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-046 LIGHT Larimer 06/17/2014 725 Westshore Court 10 0 0 0 0 10 FC-046 LIGHT Larimer 06/25/2014 725 Westshore Court 8 0 0 0 0 8 FC-046 LIGHT Larimer 07/08/2014 725 Westshore Court 9 0 22 1 0 32 FC-046 LIGHT Larimer 07/01/2014 725 Westshore Court 5 0 27 2 0 34 FC-046 LIGHT Larimer 06/10/2014 725 Westshore Court 65 0 0 0 0 65 FC-041 LIGHT Larimer 08/13/2014 Fishback 32 0 120 1 0 153 FC-041 LIGHT Larimer 08/06/2014 Fishback 20 0 36 0 0 56 FC-041 LIGHT Larimer 08/19/2014 Fishback 16 0 54 0 0 70 FC-046 LIGHT Larimer 06/03/2014 725 Westshore Court 12 0 0 0 0 12 FC-041 LIGHT Larimer 08/27/2014 Fishback 4 0 7 0 0 11 FC-047 LIGHT Larimer 06/03/2014 Keenland & Twin Oak 4 0 0 0 0 4 FC-046 LIGHT Larimer 08/26/2014 725 Westshore Court 6 0 16 1 0 23 FC-047 LIGHT Larimer 06/10/2014 Keenland & Twin Oak 6 0 0 0 0 6 FC-046 LIGHT Larimer 08/20/2014 725 Westshore Court 3 0 14 0 0 17 FC-046 LIGHT Larimer 07/22/2014 725 Westshore Court 29 0 136 1 0 166 FC-046 LIGHT Larimer 07/15/2014 725 Westshore Court 7 0 9 0 0 16 FC-046 LIGHT Larimer 07/29/2014 725 Westshore Court 62 0 100 15 0 177 FC-046 LIGHT Larimer 08/12/2014 725 Westshore Court 14 0 97 1 0 112 FC-046 LIGHT Larimer 08/05/2014 725 Westshore Court 34 0 202 2 0 238 FC-040 LIGHT Larimer 07/07/2014 Redwood 63 0 65 3 0 131 FC-040 LIGHT Larimer 07/01/2014 Redwood 5 0 10 2 0 17 FC-040 LIGHT Larimer 07/14/2014 Redwood 44 0 41 1 0 86 FC-040 LIGHT Larimer 07/28/2014 Redwood 49 0 106 2 0 157 FC-040 LIGHT Larimer 07/21/2014 Redwood 206 0 103 8 0 317 FC-040 LIGHT Larimer 06/30/2014 Redwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-040 LIGHT Larimer 06/02/2014 Redwood 26 0 1 0 0 27 FC-041 LIGHT Larimer 07/23/2014 Fishback 220 0 321 3 0 544 FC-040 LIGHT Larimer 06/09/2014 Redwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-040 LIGHT Larimer 06/23/2014 Redwood 5 0 5 0 0 10 FC-040 LIGHT Larimer 06/16/2014 Redwood 12 0 0 0 0 12 FC-041 LIGHT Larimer 06/25/2014 Fishback 21 0 6 0 0 27 FC-041 LIGHT Larimer 06/18/2014 Fishback 26 0 2 0 0 28 FC-041 LIGHT Larimer 07/02/2014 Fishback 23 0 34 3 0 60 FC-041 LIGHT Larimer 07/16/2014 Fishback 14 0 39 0 0 53 FC-041 LIGHT Larimer 07/09/2014 Fishback 30 0 94 1 0 125 FC-041 LIGHT Larimer 06/11/2014 Fishback 43 0 1 0 0 44 FC-040 LIGHT Larimer 08/11/2014 Redwood 58 0 73 1 0 132 FC-040 LIGHT Larimer 08/04/2014 Redwood 72 0 102 1 0 175 FC-040 LIGHT Larimer 08/18/2014 Redwood 19 0 9 0 0 28 FC-041 LIGHT Larimer 06/04/2014 Fishback 61 0 2 1 0 64 FC-040 LIGHT Larimer 08/25/2014 Redwood 5 0 5 0 0 10 Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 159 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 7 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-050 LIGHT Larimer 07/15/2014 Golden Meadows Ditch 5 0 18 1 0 24 FC-050 LIGHT Larimer 07/08/2014 Golden Meadows Ditch 52 0 65 0 0 117 FC-050 LIGHT Larimer 07/22/2014 Golden Meadows Ditch 22 0 232 7 0 261 FC-050 LIGHT Larimer 08/05/2014 Golden Meadows Ditch 26 0 169 13 0 208 FC-050 LIGHT Larimer 07/29/2014 Golden Meadows Ditch 33 0 276 10 0 319 FC-050 LIGHT Larimer 07/01/2014 Golden Meadows Ditch 3 0 38 7 0 48 FC-050 LIGHT Larimer 06/03/2014 Golden Meadows Ditch 22 0 0 0 0 22 FC-049 LIGHT Larimer 08/27/2014 Casa Grande and Downin 1 0 9 0 0 10 FC-050 LIGHT Larimer 06/10/2014 Golden Meadows Ditch 10 0 0 0 0 10 FC-050 LIGHT Larimer 06/24/2014 Golden Meadows Ditch 8 0 6 2 0 16 FC-050 LIGHT Larimer 06/17/2014 Golden Meadows Ditch 29 0 8 1 0 38 FC-052 LIGHT Larimer 06/25/2014 603 Gilgalad Way 28 0 2 4 0 34 FC-052 LIGHT Larimer 06/18/2014 603 Gilgalad Way 237 0 2 4 0 243 FC-052 LIGHT Larimer 07/02/2014 603 Gilgalad Way 126 0 5 7 0 138 FC-052 LIGHT Larimer 06/11/2014 603 Gilgalad Way 5 0 0 0 0 5 FC-050 LIGHT Larimer 08/20/2014 Golden Meadows Ditch 56 0 101 2 0 159 FC-050 LIGHT Larimer 08/12/2014 Golden Meadows Ditch 22 0 161 16 0 199 FC-050 LIGHT Larimer 08/26/2014 Golden Meadows Ditch 6 0 47 2 0 55 FC-052 LIGHT Larimer 06/05/2014 603 Gilgalad Way 176 0 2 1 0 179 FC-052 LIGHT Larimer 06/04/2014 603 Gilgalad Way 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-047 LIGHT Larimer 07/29/2014 Keenland & Twin Oak 9 0 29 2 0 40 FC-047 LIGHT Larimer 07/22/2014 Keenland & Twin Oak 6 0 46 0 0 52 FC-047 LIGHT Larimer 08/05/2014 Keenland & Twin Oak 14 0 30 0 0 44 FC-047 LIGHT Larimer 08/20/2014 Keenland & Twin Oak 0 0 2 0 0 2 FC-047 LIGHT Larimer 08/12/2014 Keenland & Twin Oak 19 0 55 0 0 74 FC-047 LIGHT Larimer 07/15/2014 Keenland & Twin Oak 1 0 4 0 0 5 FC-047 LIGHT Larimer 06/17/2014 Keenland & Twin Oak 0 0 1 0 0 1 FC-049 LIGHT Larimer 08/19/2014 Casa Grande and Downin 2 0 8 2 0 12 FC-047 LIGHT Larimer 06/24/2014 Keenland & Twin Oak 5 0 0 0 0 5 FC-047 LIGHT Larimer 07/08/2014 Keenland & Twin Oak 5 0 22 0 0 27 FC-047 LIGHT Larimer 07/01/2014 Keenland & Twin Oak 1 0 8 2 0 11 FC-049 LIGHT Larimer 07/16/2014 Casa Grande and Downin 0 0 4 0 0 4 FC-049 LIGHT Larimer 07/09/2014 Casa Grande and Downin 12 0 12 1 0 25 FC-049 LIGHT Larimer 07/23/2014 Casa Grande and Downin 13 0 43 0 0 56 FC-049 LIGHT Larimer 08/13/2014 Casa Grande and Downin 6 0 27 0 0 33 FC-049 LIGHT Larimer 08/06/2014 Casa Grande and Downin 4 0 13 0 0 17 FC-049 LIGHT Larimer 07/02/2014 Casa Grande and Downin 6 0 3 4 0 13 FC-049 LIGHT Larimer 06/04/2014 Casa Grande and Downin 10 0 0 0 0 10 FC-047 LIGHT Larimer 08/26/2014 Keenland & Twin Oak 2 0 8 0 0 10 FC-049 LIGHT Larimer 06/11/2014 Casa Grande and Downin 20 0 0 0 0 20 FC-049 LIGHT Larimer 06/25/2014 Casa Grande and Downin 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-049 LIGHT Larimer 06/18/2014 Casa Grande and Downin 5 0 3 1 0 9 Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 160 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 8 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-054 LIGHT Larimer 07/24/2014 737 Parliament Court 15 0 20 0 0 35 FC-054 LIGHT Larimer 07/17/2014 737 Parliament Court 4 0 8 0 0 12 FC-054 LIGHT Larimer 08/07/2014 737 Parliament Court 7 0 4 0 0 11 FC-054 LIGHT Larimer 08/21/2014 737 Parliament Court 6 0 8 0 0 14 FC-054 LIGHT Larimer 08/14/2014 737 Parliament Court 33 0 21 1 0 55 FC-054 LIGHT Larimer 07/10/2014 737 Parliament Court 19 0 13 1 0 33 FC-054 LIGHT Larimer 06/12/2014 737 Parliament Court 35 0 0 1 0 36 FC-054 LIGHT Larimer 06/05/2014 737 Parliament Court 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-054 LIGHT Larimer 06/19/2014 737 Parliament Court 8 0 0 3 0 11 FC-054 LIGHT Larimer 07/03/2014 737 Parliament Court 2 0 2 0 0 4 FC-054 LIGHT Larimer 06/26/2014 737 Parliament Court 15 0 5 0 0 20 FC-057 LIGHT Larimer 07/17/2014 Registry Ridge- End of Ra 0 0 9 0 0 9 FC-057 LIGHT Larimer 07/10/2014 Registry Ridge- End of Ra 10 0 5 1 0 16 FC-057 LIGHT Larimer 07/24/2014 Registry Ridge- End of Ra 11 0 26 0 0 37 FC-057 LIGHT Larimer 07/03/2014 Registry Ridge- End of Ra 5 0 10 1 0 16 FC-057 LIGHT Larimer 06/05/2014 Registry Ridge- End of Ra 12 0 0 0 0 12 FC-054 LIGHT Larimer 08/28/2014 737 Parliament Court 16 0 10 0 0 26 FC-057 LIGHT Larimer 06/12/2014 Registry Ridge- End of Ra 20 0 0 1 0 21 FC-057 LIGHT Larimer 06/26/2014 Registry Ridge- End of Ra 7 0 5 3 0 15 FC-057 LIGHT Larimer 06/19/2014 Registry Ridge- End of Ra 5 0 0 0 0 5 FC-052 LIGHT Larimer 08/20/2014 603 Gilgalad Way 46 0 39 0 0 85 FC-052 LIGHT Larimer 08/19/2014 603 Gilgalad Way 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-052 LIGHT Larimer 08/27/2014 603 Gilgalad Way 35 0 11 2 0 48 FC-053 LIGHT Larimer 06/09/2014 Egret and Rookery 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-053 LIGHT Larimer 06/02/2014 Egret and Rookery 17 0 3 0 0 20 FC-052 LIGHT Larimer 08/13/2014 603 Gilgalad Way 17 0 43 0 0 60 FC-052 LIGHT Larimer 07/09/2014 603 Gilgalad Way 201 0 34 5 0 240 FC-053 LIGHT Larimer 08/25/2014 Egret and Rookery 6 0 22 1 0 29 FC-052 LIGHT Larimer 07/16/2014 603 Gilgalad Way 36 0 24 13 0 73 FC-052 LIGHT Larimer 08/06/2014 603 Gilgalad Way 56 0 3 0 0 59 FC-052 LIGHT Larimer 07/23/2014 603 Gilgalad Way 677 0 82 2 0 761 FC-053 LIGHT Larimer 08/04/2014 Egret and Rookery 11 0 339 0 0 350 FC-053 LIGHT Larimer 07/28/2014 Egret and Rookery 20 0 171 1 0 192 FC-053 LIGHT Larimer 08/11/2014 Egret and Rookery 58 0 93 0 0 151 FC-053 LIGHT Larimer 08/20/2014 Egret and Rookery 26 0 23 1 0 50 FC-053 LIGHT Larimer 08/18/2014 Egret and Rookery 5 0 53 1 0 59 FC-053 LIGHT Larimer 07/21/2014 Egret and Rookery 85 0 189 1 0 275 FC-053 LIGHT Larimer 06/23/2014 Egret and Rookery 18 0 39 2 0 59 FC-053 LIGHT Larimer 06/16/2014 Egret and Rookery 16 0 7 0 0 23 FC-053 LIGHT Larimer 06/30/2014 Egret and Rookery 8 0 320 0 0 328 FC-053 LIGHT Larimer 07/14/2014 Egret and Rookery 19 0 32 0 0 51 FC-053 LIGHT Larimer 07/07/2014 Egret and Rookery 44 0 227 2 0 273 Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 161 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 9 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-059 LIGHT Larimer 08/26/2014 Springwood and Lockwoo 37 0 52 1 0 90 FC-059 LIGHT Larimer 08/20/2014 Springwood and Lockwoo 155 0 79 5 0 239 FC-060 LIGHT Larimer 06/04/2014 808 Pondersosa 7 0 0 0 0 7 FC-060 LIGHT Larimer 06/18/2014 808 Pondersosa 4 0 0 0 0 4 FC-060 LIGHT Larimer 06/11/2014 808 Pondersosa 2 0 1 0 0 3 FC-059 LIGHT Larimer 08/14/2014 Springwood and Lockwoo 193 0 157 4 0 354 FC-059 LIGHT Larimer 07/22/2014 Springwood and Lockwoo 68 0 58 2 0 128 FC-059 LIGHT Larimer 07/15/2014 Springwood and Lockwoo 29 0 26 1 0 56 FC-059 LIGHT Larimer 07/29/2014 Springwood and Lockwoo 132 0 63 8 0 203 FC-059 LIGHT Larimer 08/12/2014 Springwood and Lockwoo 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-059 LIGHT Larimer 08/05/2014 Springwood and Lockwoo 58 0 44 4 0 106 FC-060 LIGHT Larimer 08/19/2014 808 Pondersosa 1 0 7 0 0 8 FC-060 LIGHT Larimer 08/13/2014 808 Pondersosa 5 0 16 0 0 21 FC-060 LIGHT Larimer 08/27/2014 808 Pondersosa 1 0 1 0 0 2 FC-060 LIGHT Larimer 08/06/2014 808 Pondersosa 11 0 14 0 0 25 FC-060 LIGHT Larimer 07/02/2014 808 Pondersosa 2 0 7 1 0 10 FC-060 LIGHT Larimer 06/25/2014 808 Pondersosa 19 0 3 0 0 22 FC-060 LIGHT Larimer 07/09/2014 808 Pondersosa 8 0 9 2 0 19 FC-060 LIGHT Larimer 07/23/2014 808 Pondersosa 10 0 22 0 0 32 FC-060 LIGHT Larimer 07/16/2014 808 Pondersosa 7 0 1 0 0 8 FC-058 LIGHT Larimer 06/18/2014 Spring Creek Trail @ Mich 163 0 0 2 0 165 FC-058 LIGHT Larimer 06/11/2014 Spring Creek Trail @ Mich 165 0 0 2 0 167 FC-058 LIGHT Larimer 06/25/2014 Spring Creek Trail @ Mich 39 0 0 1 0 40 FC-058 LIGHT Larimer 07/09/2014 Spring Creek Trail @ Mich 31 0 3 1 0 35 FC-058 LIGHT Larimer 07/02/2014 Spring Creek Trail @ Mich 92 0 3 17 0 112 FC-058 LIGHT Larimer 06/04/2014 Spring Creek Trail @ Mich 68 0 0 0 0 68 FC-057 LIGHT Larimer 08/07/2014 Registry Ridge- End of Ra 4 0 23 0 0 27 FC-059 LIGHT Larimer 07/08/2014 Springwood and Lockwoo 77 0 27 3 0 107 FC-057 LIGHT Larimer 08/14/2014 Registry Ridge- End of Ra 19 0 6 1 0 26 FC-057 LIGHT Larimer 08/28/2014 Registry Ridge- End of Ra 3 0 1 0 0 4 FC-057 LIGHT Larimer 08/21/2014 Registry Ridge- End of Ra 4 0 4 0 0 8 FC-059 LIGHT Larimer 06/10/2014 Springwood and Lockwoo 60 0 1 0 0 61 FC-059 LIGHT Larimer 06/03/2014 Springwood and Lockwoo 47 0 2 1 0 50 FC-059 LIGHT Larimer 06/17/2014 Springwood and Lockwoo 114 0 1 1 0 116 FC-059 LIGHT Larimer 07/01/2014 Springwood and Lockwoo 7 0 3 3 0 13 FC-059 LIGHT Larimer 06/24/2014 Springwood and Lockwoo 16 0 6 0 0 22 FC-058 LIGHT Larimer 08/27/2014 Spring Creek Trail @ Mich 14 0 10 1 0 25 FC-058 LIGHT Larimer 07/23/2014 Spring Creek Trail @ Mich 14 0 17 0 0 31 FC-058 LIGHT Larimer 07/16/2014 Spring Creek Trail @ Mich 6 0 8 0 0 14 FC-058 LIGHT Larimer 08/06/2014 Spring Creek Trail @ Mich 32 0 12 1 0 45 FC-058 LIGHT Larimer 08/19/2014 Spring Creek Trail @ Mich 25 0 6 1 0 32 FC-058 LIGHT Larimer 08/13/2014 Spring Creek Trail @ Mich 22 0 17 2 0 41 Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 162 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 10 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-063 LIGHT Larimer 07/02/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 208 0 7 10 0 225 FC-063 LIGHT Larimer 06/25/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 167 0 0 1 0 168 FC-063 LIGHT Larimer 07/09/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 46 0 3 1 0 50 FC-063 LIGHT Larimer 07/23/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 139 0 19 1 0 159 FC-063 LIGHT Larimer 07/16/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 27 0 18 8 0 53 FC-063 LIGHT Larimer 06/18/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 392 0 1 3 0 396 FC-062 LIGHT Larimer 08/28/2014 Waters Edge at Blue Mes 10 0 7 0 0 17 FC-062 LIGHT Larimer 08/21/2014 Waters Edge at Blue Mes 14 0 9 0 0 23 FC-063 LIGHT Larimer 06/04/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-063 LIGHT Larimer 06/11/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 193 0 0 2 0 195 FC-063 LIGHT Larimer 06/05/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 137 0 0 2 0 139 FC-064 LIGHT Larimer 06/24/2014 West Chase @ Kechter F 123 0 43 8 0 174 FC-064 LIGHT Larimer 06/17/2014 West Chase @ Kechter F 219 0 51 5 0 275 FC-064 LIGHT Larimer 07/01/2014 West Chase @ Kechter F 52 0 51 9 0 112 FC-064 LIGHT Larimer 06/10/2014 West Chase @ Kechter F 182 0 8 1 0 191 FC-063 LIGHT Larimer 08/13/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 53 0 3 0 0 56 FC-063 LIGHT Larimer 08/06/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 318 0 7 1 0 326 FC-063 LIGHT Larimer 08/19/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 60 0 8 0 0 68 FC-064 LIGHT Larimer 06/03/2014 West Chase @ Kechter F 212 0 4 0 0 216 FC-063 LIGHT Larimer 08/27/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 21 0 5 0 0 26 FC-061 LIGHT Larimer 07/16/2014 Holley Environ. Plant Res 18 0 16 1 0 35 FC-061 LIGHT Larimer 07/09/2014 Holley Environ. Plant Res 67 0 56 0 0 123 FC-061 LIGHT Larimer 07/23/2014 Holley Environ. Plant Res 145 0 106 1 0 252 FC-061 LIGHT Larimer 08/13/2014 Holley Environ. Plant Res 148 0 56 0 0 204 FC-061 LIGHT Larimer 08/06/2014 Holley Environ. Plant Res 69 0 27 0 0 96 FC-061 LIGHT Larimer 07/02/2014 Holley Environ. Plant Res 28 0 15 0 0 43 FC-061 LIGHT Larimer 06/04/2014 Holley Environ. Plant Res 276 0 11 1 0 288 FC-062 LIGHT Larimer 08/14/2014 Waters Edge at Blue Mes 17 0 9 0 0 26 FC-061 LIGHT Larimer 06/11/2014 Holley Environ. Plant Res 110 0 1 0 0 111 FC-061 LIGHT Larimer 06/25/2014 Holley Environ. Plant Res 42 0 4 2 0 48 FC-061 LIGHT Larimer 06/18/2014 Holley Environ. Plant Res 155 0 2 2 0 159 FC-062 LIGHT Larimer 07/10/2014 Waters Edge at Blue Mes 10 0 1 1 0 12 FC-062 LIGHT Larimer 07/03/2014 Waters Edge at Blue Mes 8 0 1 0 0 9 FC-062 LIGHT Larimer 07/17/2014 Waters Edge at Blue Mes 11 0 9 0 0 20 FC-062 LIGHT Larimer 08/07/2014 Waters Edge at Blue Mes 7 0 30 0 0 37 FC-062 LIGHT Larimer 07/24/2014 Waters Edge at Blue Mes 12 0 16 1 0 29 FC-062 LIGHT Larimer 06/26/2014 Waters Edge at Blue Mes 2 0 0 0 0 2 FC-061 LIGHT Larimer 08/27/2014 Holley Environ. Plant Res 20 0 18 2 0 40 FC-061 LIGHT Larimer 08/19/2014 Holley Environ. Plant Res 102 0 65 1 0 168 FC-062 LIGHT Larimer 06/05/2014 Waters Edge at Blue Mes 17 0 0 0 0 17 FC-062 LIGHT Larimer 06/19/2014 Waters Edge at Blue Mes 2 0 0 0 0 2 FC-062 LIGHT Larimer 06/12/2014 Waters Edge at Blue Mes 15 0 0 0 0 15 Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 163 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 11 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-067 LIGHT Larimer 07/21/2014 Poudre River Drive at bike 199 0 613 4 4 820 FC-067 LIGHT Larimer 07/14/2014 Poudre River Drive at bike 406 0 47 0 2 455 FC-067 LIGHT Larimer 07/28/2014 Poudre River Drive at bike 930 0 622 0 0 1,552 FC-067 LIGHT Larimer 08/11/2014 Poudre River Drive at bike 221 1 150 0 1 373 FC-067 LIGHT Larimer 08/04/2014 Poudre River Drive at bike 478 2 274 3 0 757 FC-067 LIGHT Larimer 07/07/2014 Poudre River Drive at bike 892 0 353 8 4 1,257 FC-067 LIGHT Larimer 06/09/2014 Poudre River Drive at bike 11 0 1 0 0 12 FC-067 LIGHT Larimer 06/02/2014 Poudre River Drive at bike 351 0 2 0 0 353 FC-067 LIGHT Larimer 06/16/2014 Poudre River Drive at bike 153 0 26 0 0 179 FC-067 LIGHT Larimer 06/30/2014 Poudre River Drive at bike 642 0 267 27 6 942 FC-067 LIGHT Larimer 06/23/2014 Poudre River Drive at bike 508 0 48 3 2 561 FC-068 LIGHT Larimer 07/10/2014 502 Crest Drive 2 0 9 1 0 12 FC-068 LIGHT Larimer 07/03/2014 502 Crest Drive 0 0 10 1 0 11 FC-068 LIGHT Larimer 07/17/2014 502 Crest Drive 2 0 5 0 0 7 FC-068 LIGHT Larimer 06/26/2014 502 Crest Drive 1 0 0 1 0 2 FC-067 LIGHT Larimer 08/25/2014 Poudre River Drive at bike 210 1 42 2 0 255 FC-067 LIGHT Larimer 08/18/2014 Poudre River Drive at bike 419 0 199 0 0 618 FC-068 LIGHT Larimer 06/05/2014 502 Crest Drive 12 0 0 0 0 12 FC-068 LIGHT Larimer 06/19/2014 502 Crest Drive 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-068 LIGHT Larimer 06/12/2014 502 Crest Drive 7 0 0 0 0 7 FC-064 LIGHT Larimer 08/20/2014 West Chase @ Kechter F 29 0 38 2 0 69 FC-064 LIGHT Larimer 08/12/2014 West Chase @ Kechter F 274 0 81 0 0 355 FC-064 LIGHT Larimer 08/26/2014 West Chase @ Kechter F 29 0 53 4 0 86 FC-066 LIGHT Larimer 06/09/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 7 0 2 4 0 13 FC-066 LIGHT Larimer 06/02/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 35 0 2 0 0 37 FC-064 LIGHT Larimer 08/05/2014 West Chase @ Kechter F 56 0 241 1 0 298 FC-064 LIGHT Larimer 07/08/2014 West Chase @ Kechter F 70 0 129 17 0 216 FC-066 LIGHT Larimer 08/25/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 278 0 63 5 0 346 FC-064 LIGHT Larimer 07/15/2014 West Chase @ Kechter F 19 0 84 13 0 116 FC-064 LIGHT Larimer 07/29/2014 West Chase @ Kechter F 84 0 193 0 0 277 FC-064 LIGHT Larimer 07/22/2014 West Chase @ Kechter F 136 0 481 5 0 622 FC-066 LIGHT Larimer 07/28/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 692 2 245 28 2 969 FC-066 LIGHT Larimer 07/21/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 1686 4 215 20 0 1,925 FC-066 LIGHT Larimer 08/04/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 578 0 143 12 0 733 FC-066 LIGHT Larimer 08/18/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 184 0 80 3 0 267 FC-066 LIGHT Larimer 08/11/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 162 1 19 3 0 185 FC-066 LIGHT Larimer 07/14/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 1138 0 84 4 0 1,226 FC-066 LIGHT Larimer 06/23/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 186 0 39 8 0 233 FC-066 LIGHT Larimer 06/16/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 247 0 6 0 0 253 FC-066 LIGHT Larimer 06/30/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-066 LIGHT Larimer 07/07/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 1344 6 219 12 12 1,593 FC-066 LIGHT Larimer 07/01/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 129 0 73 12 2 216 Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 164 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 12 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-071 LIGHT Larimer 08/21/2014 Silvergate Road 2 0 3 0 0 5 FC-071 LIGHT Larimer 08/14/2014 Silvergate Road 4 0 6 0 0 10 FC-071 LIGHT Larimer 08/28/2014 Silvergate Road 0 0 1 0 0 1 FC-072 LIGHT Larimer 06/09/2014 422 Lake Drive Alley 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-072 LIGHT Larimer 06/02/2014 422 Lake Drive Alley 7 0 0 0 0 7 FC-071 LIGHT Larimer 08/07/2014 Silvergate Road 2 0 10 0 0 12 FC-071 LIGHT Larimer 07/03/2014 Silvergate Road 1 0 0 0 0 1 FC-071 LIGHT Larimer 06/26/2014 Silvergate Road 1 0 0 0 0 1 FC-071 LIGHT Larimer 07/10/2014 Silvergate Road 5 0 0 0 0 5 FC-071 LIGHT Larimer 07/24/2014 Silvergate Road 3 0 5 0 0 8 FC-071 LIGHT Larimer 07/17/2014 Silvergate Road 1 0 2 0 0 3 FC-072 LIGHT Larimer 08/04/2014 422 Lake Drive Alley 59 0 408 1 0 468 FC-072 LIGHT Larimer 07/28/2014 422 Lake Drive Alley 46 0 522 0 0 568 FC-072 LIGHT Larimer 08/11/2014 422 Lake Drive Alley 29 0 209 0 0 238 FC-072 LIGHT Larimer 07/21/2014 422 Lake Drive Alley 21 0 316 0 0 337 FC-072 LIGHT Larimer 06/23/2014 422 Lake Drive Alley 20 0 2 0 0 22 FC-072 LIGHT Larimer 06/16/2014 422 Lake Drive Alley 10 0 2 0 0 12 FC-072 LIGHT Larimer 06/30/2014 422 Lake Drive Alley 15 0 26 5 0 46 FC-072 LIGHT Larimer 07/14/2014 422 Lake Drive Alley 12 0 55 5 0 72 FC-072 LIGHT Larimer 07/07/2014 422 Lake Drive Alley 26 0 98 9 0 133 FC-069 LIGHT Larimer 06/02/2014 Linden Lake Rd 116 0 0 0 0 116 FC-069 LIGHT Larimer 05/28/2014 Linden Lake Rd 6 0 0 0 0 6 FC-069 LIGHT Larimer 06/09/2014 Linden Lake Rd 9 0 0 2 0 11 FC-069 LIGHT Larimer 06/23/2014 Linden Lake Rd 13 0 1 1 0 15 FC-069 LIGHT Larimer 06/16/2014 Linden Lake Rd 43 0 1 0 0 44 FC-068 LIGHT Larimer 08/28/2014 502 Crest Drive 1 0 1 1 0 3 FC-068 LIGHT Larimer 07/24/2014 502 Crest Drive 15 0 47 11 0 73 FC-071 LIGHT Larimer 06/19/2014 Silvergate Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-068 LIGHT Larimer 08/07/2014 502 Crest Drive 5 0 7 2 0 14 FC-068 LIGHT Larimer 08/21/2014 502 Crest Drive 6 0 14 2 0 22 FC-068 LIGHT Larimer 08/14/2014 502 Crest Drive 25 0 9 1 0 35 FC-069 LIGHT Larimer 08/18/2014 Linden Lake Rd 58 0 40 0 0 98 FC-069 LIGHT Larimer 08/11/2014 Linden Lake Rd 73 0 22 1 0 96 FC-069 LIGHT Larimer 08/25/2014 Linden Lake Rd 36 0 14 2 0 52 FC-071 LIGHT Larimer 06/12/2014 Silvergate Road 2 0 1 0 0 3 FC-071 LIGHT Larimer 06/05/2014 Silvergate Road 5 0 0 0 0 5 FC-069 LIGHT Larimer 08/04/2014 Linden Lake Rd 51 0 50 2 0 103 FC-069 LIGHT Larimer 07/07/2014 Linden Lake Rd 98 0 32 3 0 133 FC-069 LIGHT Larimer 06/30/2014 Linden Lake Rd 85 0 19 4 0 108 FC-069 LIGHT Larimer 07/14/2014 Linden Lake Rd 30 0 14 1 0 45 FC-069 LIGHT Larimer 07/28/2014 Linden Lake Rd 115 0 59 0 0 174 FC-069 LIGHT Larimer 07/21/2014 Linden Lake Rd 282 0 94 2 0 378 Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 165 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 13 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-075 LIGHT Larimer 06/17/2014 North Sage Creek 20 0 3 2 0 25 FC-075 LIGHT Larimer 06/10/2014 North Sage Creek 32 0 1 0 0 33 FC-075 LIGHT Larimer 06/24/2014 North Sage Creek 20 0 28 0 0 48 FC-075 LIGHT Larimer 07/08/2014 North Sage Creek 73 0 164 0 0 237 FC-075 LIGHT Larimer 07/01/2014 North Sage Creek 10 0 82 5 0 97 FC-075 LIGHT Larimer 06/03/2014 North Sage Creek 45 0 5 0 0 50 FC-074 LIGHT Larimer 08/05/2014 Rockcreek 113 0 131 2 0 246 FC-074 LIGHT Larimer 07/29/2014 Rockcreek 45 0 36 0 0 81 FC-074 LIGHT Larimer 08/12/2014 Rockcreek 422 0 31 0 0 453 FC-074 LIGHT Larimer 08/26/2014 Rockcreek 9 0 5 1 0 15 FC-074 LIGHT Larimer 08/20/2014 Rockcreek 33 0 27 0 0 60 FC-093 LIGHT Larimer 06/05/2014 Lopez Elementary School 40 0 8 1 0 49 FC-075 LIGHT Larimer 08/26/2014 North Sage Creek 12 0 69 3 0 84 FC-093 LIGHT Larimer 06/12/2014 Lopez Elementary School 27 0 5 0 0 32 FC-075 LIGHT Larimer 08/20/2014 North Sage Creek 3 0 31 1 0 35 FC-075 LIGHT Larimer 07/22/2014 North Sage Creek 96 0 305 4 0 405 FC-075 LIGHT Larimer 07/15/2014 North Sage Creek 10 0 36 0 0 46 FC-075 LIGHT Larimer 07/29/2014 North Sage Creek 43 0 258 2 0 303 FC-075 LIGHT Larimer 08/12/2014 North Sage Creek 31 0 31 0 0 62 FC-075 LIGHT Larimer 08/05/2014 North Sage Creek 64 0 496 4 0 564 FC-073 LIGHT Larimer 07/02/2014 118 Grant 12 0 17 1 0 30 FC-073 LIGHT Larimer 06/25/2014 118 Grant 14 0 0 0 0 14 FC-073 LIGHT Larimer 07/09/2014 118 Grant 30 0 52 5 0 87 FC-073 LIGHT Larimer 07/23/2014 118 Grant 173 0 103 2 0 278 FC-073 LIGHT Larimer 07/16/2014 118 Grant 16 0 35 1 0 52 FC-073 LIGHT Larimer 06/18/2014 118 Grant 36 0 4 0 0 40 FC-072 LIGHT Larimer 08/18/2014 422 Lake Drive Alley 13 0 222 1 0 236 FC-074 LIGHT Larimer 07/22/2014 Rockcreek 181 0 208 2 0 391 FC-072 LIGHT Larimer 08/25/2014 422 Lake Drive Alley 7 0 46 0 0 53 FC-073 LIGHT Larimer 06/11/2014 118 Grant 58 0 1 1 0 60 FC-073 LIGHT Larimer 06/04/2014 118 Grant 38 0 0 0 0 38 FC-074 LIGHT Larimer 06/24/2014 Rockcreek 4 0 0 0 0 4 FC-074 LIGHT Larimer 06/17/2014 Rockcreek 19 0 4 0 0 23 FC-074 LIGHT Larimer 07/01/2014 Rockcreek 39 0 11 2 0 52 FC-074 LIGHT Larimer 07/15/2014 Rockcreek 32 0 19 1 0 52 FC-074 LIGHT Larimer 07/08/2014 Rockcreek 16 0 0 0 0 16 FC-074 LIGHT Larimer 06/10/2014 Rockcreek 61 0 0 2 0 63 FC-073 LIGHT Larimer 08/13/2014 118 Grant 54 0 35 0 0 89 FC-073 LIGHT Larimer 08/06/2014 118 Grant 57 0 55 0 0 112 FC-073 LIGHT Larimer 08/19/2014 118 Grant 20 0 41 1 0 62 FC-074 LIGHT Larimer 06/03/2014 Rockcreek 52 0 0 0 0 52 FC-073 LIGHT Larimer 08/27/2014 118 Grant 6 0 4 0 0 10 Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 166 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 14 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-093 LIGHT Larimer 08/07/2014 Lopez Elementary School 52 0 51 1 0 104 FC-093 LIGHT Larimer 07/17/2014 Lopez Elementary School 9 0 13 2 0 24 FC-093 LIGHT Larimer 08/14/2014 Lopez Elementary School 60 0 82 3 0 145 FC-093 LIGHT Larimer 08/28/2014 Lopez Elementary School 3 0 10 1 0 14 FC-093 LIGHT Larimer 08/21/2014 Lopez Elementary School 19 0 14 0 0 33 FC-093 LIGHT Larimer 06/26/2014 Lopez Elementary School 6 0 6 3 0 15 FC-093 LIGHT Larimer 06/19/2014 Lopez Elementary School 5 0 1 2 0 8 FC-093 LIGHT Larimer 07/24/2014 Lopez Elementary School 77 0 157 7 0 241 FC-093 LIGHT Larimer 07/10/2014 Lopez Elementary School 110 0 46 2 0 158 FC-093 LIGHT Larimer 07/03/2014 Lopez Elementary School 14 0 43 1 0 58 24 1,396 73,339 41,832 30,023 64 41,832 24 30,023 1,396 64 TOTAL % 57 % 0 % 41 % 2 % 0 % Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 167 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Tuesday, September 23, 2014 1 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-063gr GRAVID Larimer 07/23/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 0 0 20 0 0 20 FC-063gr GRAVID Larimer 07/16/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 0 0 11 0 0 11 FC-063gr GRAVID Larimer 07/09/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 0 0 50 0 0 50 FC-063gr GRAVID Larimer 08/19/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 0 0 21 0 0 21 FC-063gr GRAVID Larimer 08/13/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 0 0 250 0 0 250 FC-063gr GRAVID Larimer 08/06/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 0 0 3 0 0 3 FC-063gr GRAVID Larimer 06/11/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 0 0 2 0 0 2 FC-063gr GRAVID Larimer 06/04/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 1 0 1 0 0 2 FC-063gr GRAVID Larimer 07/02/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 0 0 1 0 0 1 FC-063gr GRAVID Larimer 06/25/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 0 0 11 0 0 11 FC-063gr GRAVID Larimer 06/18/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 1 0 0 0 0 1 FC-063gr GRAVID Larimer 08/27/2014 Red Fox Meadows FCNA 0 0 122 0 0 122 FC-066gr GRAVID Larimer 06/16/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 0 0 2 0 0 2 FC-066gr GRAVID Larimer 06/09/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-066gr GRAVID Larimer 06/02/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 0 0 2 0 0 2 FC-066gr GRAVID Larimer 06/30/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 0 0 5 0 0 5 FC-066gr GRAVID Larimer 06/23/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-029gr GRAVID Larimer 07/24/2014 Bens Park 0 0 140 0 0 140 FC-029gr GRAVID Larimer 07/17/2014 Bens Park 0 0 17 0 0 17 FC-029gr GRAVID Larimer 07/10/2014 Bens Park 0 0 19 0 0 19 FC-029gr GRAVID Larimer 08/21/2014 Bens Park 0 0 57 0 0 57 FC-029gr GRAVID Larimer 08/14/2014 Bens Park 0 0 309 0 0 309 FC-029gr GRAVID Larimer 08/07/2014 Bens Park 0 0 137 1 0 138 FC-029gr GRAVID Larimer 06/12/2014 Bens Park 2 0 3 0 0 5 FC-029gr GRAVID Larimer 06/05/2014 Bens Park 0 0 1 0 0 1 FC-040gr GRAVID Larimer 08/25/2014 Redwood 0 0 84 1 0 85 FC-029gr GRAVID Larimer 07/03/2014 Bens Park 0 0 47 1 0 48 FC-029gr GRAVID Larimer 06/26/2014 Bens Park 0 0 6 0 0 6 FC-029gr GRAVID Larimer 06/19/2014 Bens Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-029gr GRAVID Larimer 08/28/2014 Bens Park 0 0 17 0 0 17 FC-040gr GRAVID Larimer 07/28/2014 Redwood 0 0 14 0 0 14 FC-040gr GRAVID Larimer 07/21/2014 Redwood 0 0 8 0 0 8 FC-040gr GRAVID Larimer 07/14/2014 Redwood 0 0 28 0 0 28 FC-040gr GRAVID Larimer 08/18/2014 Redwood 0 0 28 0 0 28 FC-040gr GRAVID Larimer 08/11/2014 Redwood 0 0 70 0 0 70 FC-040gr GRAVID Larimer 08/04/2014 Redwood 2 0 129 0 0 131 FC-040gr GRAVID Larimer 06/16/2014 Redwood 0 0 2 0 0 2 FC-040gr GRAVID Larimer 06/09/2014 Redwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-040gr GRAVID Larimer 06/02/2014 Redwood 0 0 2 0 0 2 FC-040gr GRAVID Larimer 07/07/2014 Redwood 0 0 15 0 0 15 FC-040gr GRAVID Larimer 06/30/2014 Redwood 0 0 10 0 0 10 FC-040gr GRAVID Larimer 06/23/2014 Redwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 168 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Tuesday, September 23, 2014 2 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-088gr GRAVID Larimer 07/22/2014 English Ranch Park 0 0 95 0 0 95 FC-088gr GRAVID Larimer 07/15/2014 English Ranch Park 0 0 23 0 0 23 FC-088gr GRAVID Larimer 07/29/2014 English Ranch Park 0 0 53 0 0 53 FC-088gr GRAVID Larimer 08/12/2014 English Ranch Park 0 0 42 0 0 42 FC-088gr GRAVID Larimer 08/05/2014 English Ranch Park 0 0 57 0 0 57 FC-088gr GRAVID Larimer 07/09/2014 English Ranch Park 0 0 103 0 0 103 FC-088gr GRAVID Larimer 06/17/2014 English Ranch Park 0 0 12 0 0 12 FC-088gr GRAVID Larimer 06/10/2014 English Ranch Park 0 0 9 0 0 9 FC-088gr GRAVID Larimer 06/24/2014 English Ranch Park 0 0 57 0 0 57 FC-088gr GRAVID Larimer 07/08/2014 English Ranch Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-088gr GRAVID Larimer 07/01/2014 English Ranch Park 0 0 11 0 0 11 FC-089gr GRAVID Larimer 07/10/2014 Kunz Ct and Brook Dr 0 0 55 0 0 55 FC-089gr GRAVID Larimer 07/03/2014 Kunz Ct and Brook Dr 0 0 15 0 0 15 FC-089gr GRAVID Larimer 07/17/2014 Kunz Ct and Brook Dr 0 0 16 0 0 16 FC-089gr GRAVID Larimer 06/26/2014 Kunz Ct and Brook Dr 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-088gr GRAVID Larimer 08/26/2014 English Ranch Park 0 0 228 0 0 228 FC-088gr GRAVID Larimer 08/20/2014 English Ranch Park 0 0 168 0 0 168 FC-089gr GRAVID Larimer 06/05/2014 Kunz Ct and Brook Dr 0 0 3 0 0 3 FC-089gr GRAVID Larimer 06/19/2014 Kunz Ct and Brook Dr 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-089gr GRAVID Larimer 06/12/2014 Kunz Ct and Brook Dr 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-066gr GRAVID Larimer 08/18/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 0 0 28 1 0 29 FC-066gr GRAVID Larimer 08/11/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-066gr GRAVID Larimer 08/25/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 0 0 36 0 0 36 FC-075gr GRAVID Larimer 06/10/2014 North Sage Creek Gravid 1 0 0 1 0 2 FC-075gr GRAVID Larimer 06/03/2014 North Sage Creek Gravid 0 0 1 0 0 1 FC-066gr GRAVID Larimer 08/04/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 1 0 24 0 0 25 FC-066gr GRAVID Larimer 07/07/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 0 0 4 0 0 4 FC-088gr GRAVID Larimer 06/03/2014 English Ranch Park 0 0 4 0 0 4 FC-066gr GRAVID Larimer 07/14/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 2 0 7 0 0 9 FC-066gr GRAVID Larimer 07/28/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 2 0 22 0 0 24 FC-066gr GRAVID Larimer 07/21/2014 Prospect Ponds @ Drake 0 0 13 0 0 13 FC-075gr GRAVID Larimer 08/05/2014 North Sage Creek Gravid 0 0 44 1 0 45 FC-075gr GRAVID Larimer 07/29/2014 North Sage Creek Gravid 0 0 21 0 0 21 FC-075gr GRAVID Larimer 08/12/2014 North Sage Creek Gravid 0 0 19 0 0 19 FC-075gr GRAVID Larimer 08/26/2014 North Sage Creek Gravid 0 0 81 1 0 82 FC-075gr GRAVID Larimer 08/20/2014 North Sage Creek Gravid 0 0 6 0 0 6 FC-075gr GRAVID Larimer 07/22/2014 North Sage Creek Gravid 0 0 19 0 0 19 FC-075gr GRAVID Larimer 06/24/2014 North Sage Creek Gravid 0 0 2 0 0 2 FC-075gr GRAVID Larimer 06/17/2014 North Sage Creek Gravid 0 0 1 0 0 1 FC-075gr GRAVID Larimer 07/01/2014 North Sage Creek Gravid 0 0 11 0 0 11 FC-075gr GRAVID Larimer 07/15/2014 North Sage Creek Gravid 0 0 7 0 0 7 FC-075gr GRAVID Larimer 07/08/2014 North Sage Creek Gravid 0 0 9 0 0 9 Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 169 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Tuesday, September 23, 2014 3 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-091gr GRAVID Larimer 08/18/2014 PVH 0 0 8 0 0 8 FC-091gr GRAVID Larimer 08/11/2014 PVH 1 0 18 0 0 19 FC-091gr GRAVID Larimer 08/25/2014 PVH 0 0 8 0 0 8 FC-092gr GRAVID Larimer 06/09/2014 Udall Natural Area 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-092gr GRAVID Larimer 06/02/2014 Udall Natural Area 0 0 2 0 0 2 FC-091gr GRAVID Larimer 08/04/2014 PVH 0 0 22 0 0 22 FC-091gr GRAVID Larimer 07/07/2014 PVH 0 0 11 0 0 11 FC-091gr GRAVID Larimer 06/23/2014 PVH 0 0 1 0 0 1 FC-091gr GRAVID Larimer 07/14/2014 PVH 0 0 13 0 0 13 FC-091gr GRAVID Larimer 07/28/2014 PVH 0 0 5 0 0 5 FC-091gr GRAVID Larimer 07/21/2014 PVH 0 0 9 0 0 9 FC-092gr GRAVID Larimer 08/04/2014 Udall Natural Area 0 0 63 0 0 63 FC-092gr GRAVID Larimer 07/28/2014 Udall Natural Area 0 0 23 0 0 23 FC-092gr GRAVID Larimer 08/11/2014 Udall Natural Area 0 0 8 0 0 8 FC-092gr GRAVID Larimer 07/21/2014 Udall Natural Area 0 0 9 0 0 9 FC-092gr GRAVID Larimer 06/23/2014 Udall Natural Area 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-092gr GRAVID Larimer 06/16/2014 Udall Natural Area 1 0 0 0 0 1 FC-092gr GRAVID Larimer 06/30/2014 Udall Natural Area 0 0 8 0 0 8 FC-092gr GRAVID Larimer 07/14/2014 Udall Natural Area 0 0 5 0 0 5 FC-092gr GRAVID Larimer 07/07/2014 Udall Natural Area 0 0 13 0 0 13 FC-090gr GRAVID Larimer 06/11/2014 Mountain Grandview Cem 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-090gr GRAVID Larimer 06/04/2014 Mountain Grandview Cem 1 0 0 0 0 1 FC-090gr GRAVID Larimer 06/18/2014 Mountain Grandview Cem 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-090gr GRAVID Larimer 06/25/2014 Mountain Grandview Cem 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-090gr GRAVID Larimer 06/18/2014 Mountain Grandview Cem 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-089gr GRAVID Larimer 08/28/2014 Kunz Ct and Brook Dr 0 0 12 0 0 12 FC-089gr GRAVID Larimer 07/24/2014 Kunz Ct and Brook Dr 2 0 102 0 0 104 FC-091gr GRAVID Larimer 06/30/2014 PVH 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-089gr GRAVID Larimer 08/07/2014 Kunz Ct and Brook Dr 0 0 55 0 0 55 FC-089gr GRAVID Larimer 08/21/2014 Kunz Ct and Brook Dr 0 0 67 0 0 67 FC-089gr GRAVID Larimer 08/14/2014 Kunz Ct and Brook Dr 0 0 184 0 0 184 FC-090gr GRAVID Larimer 07/02/2014 Mountain Grandview Cem 0 0 5 0 0 5 FC-090gr GRAVID Larimer 08/27/2014 Mountain Grandview Cem 0 0 20 0 0 20 FC-090gr GRAVID Larimer 08/19/2014 Mountain Grandview Cem 0 0 5 0 0 5 FC-091gr GRAVID Larimer 06/02/2014 PVH 0 0 1 0 0 1 FC-091gr GRAVID Larimer 06/16/2014 PVH 0 0 2 0 0 2 FC-091gr GRAVID Larimer 06/09/2014 PVH 0 0 0 0 0 0 FC-090gr GRAVID Larimer 07/16/2014 Mountain Grandview Cem 0 0 4 0 0 4 FC-090gr GRAVID Larimer 07/09/2014 Mountain Grandview Cem 0 0 19 0 0 19 FC-090gr GRAVID Larimer 07/23/2014 Mountain Grandview Cem 0 0 67 0 0 67 FC-090gr GRAVID Larimer 08/13/2014 Mountain Grandview Cem 0 0 21 0 0 21 FC-090gr GRAVID Larimer 08/06/2014 Mountain Grandview Cem 0 0 7 0 0 7 Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 170 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adult Trap Data - Genus Summary TRAP-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Tuesday, September 23, 2014 4 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-092gr GRAVID Larimer 08/18/2014 Udall Natural Area 0 0 2 0 0 2 FC-092gr GRAVID Larimer 08/25/2014 Udall Natural Area 0 0 16 0 0 16 0 7 3,789 17 3,765 0 17 0 3,765 7 0 TOTAL % 0 % 0 % 99 % 0 % 0 % Trap # Type County Date Ae/Oc An Cx Cs Other TOTAL Packet Pg. 171 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Mosquito Pool Testing Sample Collection Trap Quantity Species Type Notes Results POOL-001 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Contr 07/29/2014 FC-031 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6327 Larimer 07/29/2014 FC-031 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6326 Larimer 07/29/2014 FC-064 38 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 38 CSU-6318 Larimer 07/29/2014 FC-027 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6306 Larimer 07/29/2014 FC-039 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6272 Larimer 07/28/2014 FC-072 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6262 Larimer 07/28/2014 FC-038 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6226 Larimer 07/28/2014 FC-069 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6194 Larimer 07/28/2014 FC-019 40 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 40 CSU-6192 Larimer 07/28/2014 FC-053 20 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 20 CSU-6189 Larimer 07/22/2014 FC-064 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6099 Larimer 07/22/2014 FC-039 43 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 43 CSU-6017 Larimer 07/21/2014 FC-004 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-5952 Larimer Packet Pg. 172 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Mosquito Pool Testing Sample Collection Trap Quantity Species Type Notes Results POOL-001 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Contr 08/05/2014 FC-027 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6548 Larimer 08/05/2014 FC-031 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6537 Larimer 08/05/2014 FC-074 26 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 26 CSU-6535 Larimer 08/05/2014 FC-074 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6534 Larimer 08/05/2014 FC-047 29 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 29 CSU-6508 Larimer 08/05/2014 FC-088gr 53 Culex pipiens GRAVID POSITIVE Total in pool 53 CSU-6485 Larimer 08/04/2014 FC-040 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6453 Larimer 08/04/2014 FC-053 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6389 Larimer 08/04/2014 FC-053 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6387 Larimer 08/04/2014 FC-038 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6377 Larimer 08/04/2014 FC-040gr 27 Culex pipiens GRAVID POSITIVE Total in pool 27 CSU-6355 Larimer 08/04/2014 FC-040gr 50 Culex pipiens GRAVID POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6354 Larimer 07/29/2014 FC-050 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6347 Larimer Packet Pg. 173 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Mosquito Pool Testing Sample Collection Trap Quantity Species Type Notes Results POOL-001 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Contr 08/14/2014 FC-029 47 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 47 CSU-6825 Larimer 08/14/2014 FC-059 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6822 Larimer 08/14/2014 FC-029gr 50 Culex pipiens GRAVID POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6807 Larimer 08/13/2014 FC-063gr 50 Culex pipiens GRAVID POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6752 Larimer 08/12/2014 FC-023 15 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 15 CSU-6732 Larimer 08/12/2014 FC-027 45 Culex pipiens LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 45 CSU-6712 Larimer 08/11/2014 FC-006 20 Culex pipiens LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 20 CSU-6692 Larimer 08/11/2014 FC-006 23 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 23 CSU-6691 Larimer 08/07/2014 FC-062 3 Culex pipiens LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 3 CSU-6618 Larimer 08/07/2014 FC-029gr 50 Culex pipiens GRAVID POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6607 Larimer 08/06/2014 FC-041 32 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 32 CSU-6579 Larimer 08/06/2014 FC-063 7 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 7 CSU-6578 Larimer 08/06/2014 FC-039 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6569 Larimer Packet Pg. 174 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Mosquito Pool Testing Sample Collection Trap Quantity Species Type Notes Results POOL-001 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Sunday, October 05, 2014 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Contr 08/26/2014 FC-088gr 50 Culex pipiens GRAVID POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-7028 Larimer 08/26/2014 FC-039 10 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 10 CSU-7013 Larimer 08/25/2014 FC-067 33 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 33 CSU-7009 Larimer 08/14/2014 FC-093 50 Culex tarsalis LIGHT POSITIVE Total in pool 50 CSU-6836 Larimer Packet Pg. 175 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Adulticide Data Customer Subdiv/Area Material Start Time End Time Miles ADULT-002 CMMS - Comprehensive Mosquito Management System Monday, September 22, 2014 1 ©2006 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. 08/18/2014 ZONE 54 AquaLuer 20-20 20:17:00 20:53:00 9.2 08/18/2014 ZONE 62 AquaLuer 20-20 21:08:00 21:53:00 13.0 08/15/2014 ZONE 62 AquaLuer 20-20 21:16:00 22:03:00 13.1 08/18/2014 ZONE 57 AquaLuer 20-20 20:20:00 21:11:00 9.2 08/18/2014 ZONE 61 AquaLuer 20-20 20:15:00 20:56:00 9.0 08/18/2014 FOSSIL CREEK RESERVOIR AquaLuer 20-20 20:32:00 21:53:00 16.0 08/18/2014 ZONE 64 AquaLuer 20-20 22:10:00 22:49:00 8.4 08/18/2014 ZONE 60 AquaLuer 20-20 21:43:00 22:22:00 9.0 08/18/2014 ZONE 55 AquaLuer 20-20 21:00:00 21:33:00 7.0 08/15/2014 ZONE 60 AquaLuer 20-20 22:08:00 22:48:00 10.0 08/15/2014 ZONE 57 AquaLuer 20-20 20:29:00 21:20:00 11.9 08/18/2014 ZONE 56 AquaLuer 20-20 21:18:00 22:42:00 17.5 08/15/2014 ZONE 61 AquaLuer 20-20 20:20:00 21:03:00 9.0 08/15/2014 ZONE 56 AquaLuer 20-20 21:33:00 22:48:00 16.3 08/15/2014 ZONE 54 AquaLuer 20-20 20:27:00 21:05:00 9.5 08/15/2014 ZONE 64 AquaLuer 20-20 20:42:00 23:12:00 24.8 08/15/2014 ZONE 55 AquaLuer 20-20 21:05:00 21:39:00 7.0 Truck ULV Sum 199.9 Avg 11.8 Min 7.0 Max 24.8 Truck ULV Fort Collins, City of Grand Total 199.9 Packet Pg. 176 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 WEST NILE VIRUS PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT 1 2014 West Nile Virus Public Engagement Report OBJECTIVE Help reduce the risk of human West Nile virus (WNV) infection while limiting adverse human health and environmental impacts through public education and outreach. TOOLS AND METHODOLOGY* Website Using fcgov.com spotlight Beat the Buzz and Four D posts combined with updates to fcgov.com/westnile CPIO helped disseminate the latest information on the disease as well as timely and effective ways to protect yourself. With more than two dozen posts throughout the summer, including weekly updates of the vector index and trap data, the fcgov.com/westnile website received more than 6,000 page views in July and August. In addition to the standard WNV data, the website offered residents access to a new business opt out application, new interactive maps, new educational videos and translated materials in Spanish. Social Media In order to reach a broad demographic, including the younger and more tech savvy population, CPIO engaged in an extensive social media campaign to raise awareness about the Four D’s using short videos and the Beat the ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 177 Attachment4.2: 2014 Public Engagement Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2 2014 WEST NILE VIRUS PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT Buzz campaign. Between April 1 and Sept. 1, CPIO posted 17 social media messages that garnered more than 27,300 impressions. That included a 200 click- through rate to fcgov.com to learn more. Posts ranged from PSA information on the Four Ds to assisting the County with disseminating information about adulticiding. Community Engagement In addition to the web presence, CPIO staff went into the community engaging both mainstream and hard-to-reach segments of the population. Our team identified nearly 20 different events to reach various segments of the population. Events included CSU’s Lagoon Series, NewWestFest, Fourth of July Parade and Farmers’ Markets. Using rack cards, FAQs and insect repellent bracelets, we reached an estimated 3,000 residents throughout the community. In addition, the City partnered with such organizations as the Senior Center, golf courses and Homeless Gear in order to target hard to reach segments, distributing an additional 1,000 insect repellent bracelets to homeless and elderly residents. Staff presents WNV information to the public at the CSU Lagoon Series - July 2, 2014 Staff presents WNV information to the public at the Colorado Brewers’ Festival - June 28 & 29, 2014 Videos Cable 14 recorded nine new WNV educational videos, including six PSAs. Videos also featured a broad overview, a look at the adulticiding program and a City at the Glance with City Manager Darin Atteberry and Technical Advisory Committee members. Some videos offered Spanish subtitles. The videos received more than 2,000 views and helped spread vital information throughout the community. Print Media The WNV season was well documented in local and state media agencies this summer by newspapers, television news and news radio. To ensure that accurate and timely information made it to the public as needed, CPIO rolled out an extensive WNV press release and ad campaign that ran in print, radio and TV. Publications included in that campaign included the Coloradoan, Style Magazine, The Recreator and Clear Channel Communications. Packet Pg. 178 Attachment4.2: 2014 Public Engagement Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2014 WEST NILE VIRUS PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT 3 Recognizing that not everyone reads or watches mainstream media, CPIO also created 300 English and 200 Spanish posters that were posted throughout the community, specifically targeting hotspots where the disease was prevalent. The City also hung 16 Beat the Buzz banners throughout the City along with two bench advertisements. Larimer County Assistance When Larimer County announced it would be adulticiding, the City offered to assist with communications by offering CPIO’s services. CPIO helped the County communicate dates and times of adulticiding via spotlight posts, social media, NextDoor, email notifications and outreach at events. The City also created maps of the spray area for the County and let the County use its GPS devices on spraying vehicles. Staff Time This project represented a major time investment for CPIO and was a No. 1 priority for several weeks running. It’s estimated, between staff working in the office during standard work hours in addition to working out of the office on nights and weekends for outreach, throughout two months more than 330 hours of CPIO staff time was dedicated to this project. *To view the full plan and schedule, please see the attached Gannt Chart and Public Engagement Plan. Packet Pg. 179 Attachment4.2: 2014 Public Engagement Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 1 West Nile Virus Management Program 2014 Season Review January 13, 2015 ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 180 Attachment4.3: Powerpoint presentation (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2 QUESTIONS • Does City Council support the proposed work plan of the West Nile Virus Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)? • Does City Council support the plan for the City and Larimer County coordination meetings? Packet Pg. 181 Attachment4.3: Powerpoint presentation (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 3 WNV PROGRAM HISTORY • West Nile virus present in Northern Colorado since 2003 • Larimer, Weld and Boulder counties have high human infection rates • City has used an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program since 2003 – Best management practice – Limit use of pesticides – No nuisance spray – Volunteer Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Packet Pg. 182 Attachment4.3: Powerpoint presentation (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 4 2014 SEASON SUMMARY • Cool and wet summer • 115 WNV cases statewide – 18 cases in Larimer County – 8 cases in Fort Collins – 0 neuro-invasive cases in Fort Collins • Weld County had highest number of human cases in Colorado Packet Pg. 183 Attachment4.3: Powerpoint presentation (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 5 2014 OPERATIONS • Additional funding: – Public outreach – Larval control area • Expanded area • Longer larval control season • Business opt-out program • Larimer County spray event Packet Pg. 184 Attachment4.3: Powerpoint presentation (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 6 OFFSEASON WORK PLAN • Monthly TAC meetings • TAC “teams” – Resources – Zones – Best Management Practice (BMP) review – Communication program review – Business opt-out program review • City and Larimer County staff-level meetings Packet Pg. 185 Attachment4.3: Powerpoint presentation (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 7 QUESTIONS • Does City Council support the proposed work plan of the West Nile Virus Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)? • Does City Council support the plan for the City and Larimer County coordination meetings? Packet Pg. 186 Attachment4.3: Powerpoint presentation (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Aedes vexans 1 Culex pipiens 93 Culex spp 1 Culex tarsalis 4 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 8 1.0 % 93.9 % 1.0 % 4.0 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 1 0.7 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 149 99.3 % 0 0.0 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-092gr: Udall Natural Area Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 150 12 Along Poudre River on the east side of Udall Natur 105°4 9.388 W 40°35 17.601 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) trivittatus 1 Culex pipiens 149 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 11 0.7 % 99.3 % Packet Pg. 153 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 105°1 13.014 W 40°30 40.935 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes/Ochlerotatus spp 1 Culex pipiens 201 Culex spp 19 Culex tarsalis 1 Culiseta inornata 3 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 17 0.4 % 89.3 % 8.4 % 0.4 % 1.3 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 0 0.0 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 862 100.0 % 0 0.0 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-088gr: English Ranch Park Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 862 66 English Ranch Park at Caribou Dr 105°1 54.889 W 40°32 0.199 N Species collected and abundance: Culex pipiens 763 Culex spp 53 Culex tarsalis 46 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 66 88.5 % 6.1 % 5.3 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 2 0.4 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 509 99.6 % 0 0.0 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-089gr: Kunz Ct and Brook Dr Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 511 43 Dead end at Kunz Ct and Brook Dr 105°6 2.974 W 40°32 10.829 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes vexans 2 Culex pipiens 461 Culex spp 45 Culex tarsalis 3 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 42 0.4 % 90.2 % 8.8 % 0.6 % Packet Pg. 152 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 2 0.3 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-029gr: Bens Park Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 757 63 Fossil Ridge Park on Fossil Creek Parkway 105°4 16.253 W 40°30 40.76 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes vexans 2 Culex pipiens 663 Culex spp 87 Culex tarsalis 3 Culiseta inornata 2 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 63 0.3 % 87.6 % 11.5 % 0.4 % 0.3 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 2 0.5 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 390 99.2 % 1 0.3 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-040gr: Redwood Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 393 30 Redwood and Conifer at Electrical Post 105°4 0.739 W 40°36 11.173 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 2 Culex pipiens 374 Culex spp 13 Culex tarsalis 3 Culiseta inornata 1 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 30 0.5 % 95.2 % 3.3 % 0.8 % 0.3 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 2 0.4 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 492 99.6 % 0 0.0 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-063gr: Red Fox Meadows FCNA Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 494 41 Red Fox Meadows FCNA @ Heatherridge Apartment 105°6 19.055 W 40°33 55.615 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes vexans 2 Culex pipiens 462 Culex spp 29 Culex tarsalis 1 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 41 0.4 % 93.5 % 5.9 % 0.2 % Packet Pg. 151 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-074: Rockcreek Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 1,508 116 Light/CO2 In trees east of detention basin on Rockcreek 105°0 10.324 W 40°30 49.36 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 670 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 2 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 17 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 14 Aedes (Oc.) trivittatus 1 Aedes vexans 322 Culex pipiens 5 Culex tarsalis 467 Culiseta inornata 10 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 36 44.4 % 0.1 % 1.1 % 0.9 % 0.1 % 21.4 % 0.3 % 31.0 % 0.7 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 459 23.1 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 1,509 75.9 % 21 1.1 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-075: North Sage Creek Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 1,989 153 Light/CO2 North of creek along Ziegler 105°1 13.068 W 40°30 40.967 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) campestris 1 Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 66 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 1 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 9 Aedes vexans 382 Culex pipiens 117 Culex spp 3 Culex tarsalis 1389 Culiseta inornata 21 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 116 0.1 % 3.3 % 0.1 % 0.5 % 19.2 % 5.9 % 0.2 % 69.8 % 1.1 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 422 47.9 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 436 49.5 % 23 2.6 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-093: Lopez Elementary School Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 881 73 Light/CO2 Along ditch on south side of school 105°5 19.457 W 40°31 51.858 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 25 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 1 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 1 Aedes vexans 395 Culex pipiens 42 Culex spp 3 Culex tarsalis 391 Culiseta inornata 23 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 36 2.8 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 44.8 % 4.8 % 0.3 % 44.4 % 2.6 % Packet Pg. 150 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 1,379 98 Light/CO2 along E side of 2005 Linden Lake Rd 105°3 11.042 W 40°36 52.367 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 60 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 12 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 28 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 1 Aedes vexans 914 Culex pipiens 31 Culex tarsalis 315 Culiseta inornata 18 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 25 4.4 % 0.9 % 2.0 % 0.1 % 66.3 % 2.2 % 22.8 % 1.3 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 26 48.1 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 28 51.9 % 0 0.0 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-071: Silvergate Road Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 54 4 Light/CO2 Silvergate Road at sidewalk btwn 1700 and 1712 105°6 28.92 W 40°31 38.807 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 7 Aedes vexans 19 Culex pipiens 2 Culex tarsalis 26 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 2 13.0 % 35.2 % 3.7 % 48.1 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 265 12.1 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 1,906 87.0 % 21 1.0 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-072: 422 Lake Drive Alley Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 2,192 169 Light/CO2 alley way of 422 Lake Drive 105°4 15.874 W 40°34 9.467 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 8 Aedes (Oc.) hendersoni 4 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 1 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 2 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 1 Aedes (Oc.) trivittatus 4 Aedes vexans 245 Culex pipiens 158 Culex spp 2 Culex tarsalis 1746 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 147 0.4 % 0.2 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 11.2 % 7.2 % 0.1 % 79.7 % Culiseta inornata 21 1.0 % Packet Pg. 149 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) FC-064: West Chase @ Kechter Farm Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 3,007 231 Light/CO2 Dead end at East Trilby 105°1 47.312 W 40°29 54.713 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 234 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 1 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 63 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 3 Aedes (Oc.) trivittatus 1 Aedes vexans 1183 Culex pipiens 40 Culex spp 3 Culex tarsalis 1414 Culiseta inornata 65 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 112 7.8 % 0.0 % 2.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 39.3 % 1.3 % 0.1 % 47.0 % 2.2 % 0.2 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 6,666 83.4 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 13 0.2 % 1,190 14.9 % 111 1.4 % 16 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-066: Prospect Ponds @ Drake Water Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 7,996 615 Light/CO2 Prospect Ponds @ Drake Water Reclamation Facility 105°1 21.544 W 40°33 31.245 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 627 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 148 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 125 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 44 Aedes vexans 5722 Anopheles earlei 13 Coquillettidia perturbans 16 Culex pipiens 293 Culex spp 4 Culex tarsalis 893 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 92 7.8 % 1.9 % 1.6 % 0.6 % 71.6 % 0.2 % 0.2 % 3.7 % 0.1 % 11.2 % Culiseta inornata 111 1.4 % 0.2 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 5,420 66.6 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 4 0.0 % 2,644 32.5 % 47 0.6 % 19 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-067: Poudre River Drive at bike trail Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 8,134 626 Light/CO2 Lemay and Poudre River Drive East of Drs office 105°3 20.10 W 40°34 44.27 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 58 Aedes (Oc.) hendersoni 7 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 151 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 164 Aedes (Oc.) trivittatus 15 Aedes vexans 5025 Anopheles earlei 4 Coquillettidia perturbans 19 Culex pipiens 116 Culex salinarius 9 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 203 0.7 % 0.1 % 1.9 % 2.0 % 0.2 % 61.8 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 1.4 % 0.1 % Culex spp 76 Culex tarsalis 2443 0.9 % 30.0 % Culiseta inornata 47 0.6 % Packet Pg. 148 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 161 13 Light/CO2 808 Pondersosa 105°7 12.873 W 40°34 42.93 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 2 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 1 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 1 Aedes vexans 73 Culex pipiens 12 Culex spp 2 Culex tarsalis 67 Culiseta inornata 3 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 7 1.2 % 0.6 % 0.6 % 45.3 % 7.5 % 1.2 % 41.6 % 1.9 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 1,180 75.3 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 377 24.1 % 10 0.6 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-061: Holley Environ. Plant Research Ctr Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 1,567 131 Light/CO2 Cardinal Royal European Mountain Ash-801 W. Lake 105°5 29.938 W 40°34 8.95 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 25 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 5 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 7 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 6 Aedes (Oc.) trivittatus 1 Aedes vexans 1136 Culex pipiens 32 Culex tarsalis 345 Culiseta inornata 10 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 31 1.6 % 0.3 % 0.4 % 0.4 % 0.1 % 72.5 % 2.0 % 22.0 % 0.6 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 125 59.8 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 82 39.2 % 2 1.0 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-062: Waters Edge at Blue Mesa Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 209 17 Light/CO2 Waters Edge FCNA at Blue Mesa Court 105°5 14.813 W 40°32 32.648 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 34 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 4 Aedes vexans 87 Culex pipiens 11 Culex tarsalis 71 Culiseta inornata 2 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 7 16.3 % 1.9 % 41.6 % 5.3 % 34.0 % 1.0 % Packet Pg. 147 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 257 21 Light/CO2 behind 737 along drainage ditch 105°3 47.701 W 40°30 1.229 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 21 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 3 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 1 Aedes vexans 135 Culex pipiens 8 Culex tarsalis 83 Culiseta inornata 6 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 8 8.2 % 1.2 % 0.4 % 52.5 % 3.1 % 32.3 % 2.3 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 100 51.0 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 89 45.4 % 7 3.6 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-057: Registry Ridge- End of Ranger Dr Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 196 16 Light/CO2 between 7262 and 7256 at drainage to open space 105°6 18.361 W 40°29 3.172 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) campestris 1 Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 85 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 2 Aedes vexans 12 Culex pipiens 3 Culex tarsalis 86 Culiseta inornata 7 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 7 0.5 % 43.4 % 1.0 % 6.1 % 1.5 % 43.9 % 3.6 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 671 86.6 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 76 9.8 % 28 3.6 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-058: Spring Creek Trail @ Michener Dr Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 775 65 Light/CO2 Spring Creek Trail at Michener Drive 105°7 32.8 W 40°32 55.31 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 8 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 223 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 1 Aedes vexans 439 Culex pipiens 18 Culex tarsalis 58 Culiseta inornata 28 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 6 1.0 % 28.8 % 0.1 % 56.6 % 2.3 % 7.5 % 3.6 % Packet Pg. 146 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 209 17 Light/CO2 along west side of ditch off Downing 105°6 22.768 W 40°32 30.438 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 1 Aedes (Oc.) trivittatus 1 Aedes vexans 77 Culex pipiens 30 Culex spp 5 Culex tarsalis 87 Culiseta inornata 8 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 10 0.5 % 0.5 % 36.8 % 14.4 % 2.4 % 41.6 % 3.8 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 294 19.9 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 1,121 75.9 % 61 4.1 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-050: Golden Meadows Ditch Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 1,476 114 Light/CO2 park at 1513 Ticonderoga along ditch 105°3 2.137 W 40°31 46.099 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 13 Aedes (Oc.) hendersoni 1 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 1 Aedes vexans 279 Culex pipiens 273 Culex salinarius 8 Culex spp 7 Culex tarsalis 833 Culiseta inornata 61 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 86 0.9 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 18.9 % 18.5 % 0.5 % 0.5 % 56.4 % 4.1 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 1,640 85.2 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 247 12.8 % 38 2.0 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-052: 603 Gilgalad Way Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 1,925 160 Light/CO2 603 Gilgalad Way 105°5 12.4 W 40°33 41.782 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 51 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 2 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 13 Aedes (Oc.) trivittatus 3 Aedes cinereus 23 Aedes vexans 1548 Culex pipiens 7 Culex tarsalis 240 Culiseta inornata 38 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 21 2.6 % 0.1 % 0.7 % 0.2 % 1.2 % 80.4 % 0.4 % 12.5 % 2.0 % Packet Pg. 145 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-040: Redwood Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 1,102 85 Light/CO2 Redwood and Conifer at Electrical Post 105°4 0.702 W 40°36 11.215 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 117 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 8 Aedes vexans 439 Culex pipiens 47 Culex tarsalis 473 Culiseta inornata 18 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 40 10.6 % 0.7 % 39.8 % 4.3 % 42.9 % 1.6 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 510 41.3 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 716 58.0 % 9 0.7 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-041: Fishback Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 1,235 103 Light/CO2 Fishback and Richards Place Alley 105°6 17.066 W 40°35 16.486 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 7 Aedes (Oc.) hendersoni 2 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 6 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 7 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 1 Aedes (Oc.) trivittatus 7 Aedes vexans 480 Culex pipiens 74 Culex spp 4 Culex tarsalis 638 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 60 0.6 % 0.2 % 0.5 % 0.6 % 0.1 % 0.6 % 38.9 % 6.0 % 0.3 % 51.7 % Culiseta inornata 9 0.7 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 264 29.0 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 623 68.5 % 23 2.5 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-046: 725 Westshore Court Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 910 70 Light/CO2 725 Westshore Court 105°3 54.179 W 40°31 46.702 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 13 Aedes vexans 251 Culex pipiens 32 Culex salinarius 2 Culex tarsalis 589 Culiseta inornata 23 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 48 1.4 % 27.6 % 3.5 % 0.2 % 64.7 % 2.5 % Packet Pg. 144 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-036: Hemlock Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 5,430 418 Light/CO2 Hemlock Street at Rivers Edge FCNA 105°4 46.561 W 40°36 0.936 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) campestris 2 Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 97 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 68 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 208 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 9 Aedes (Oc.) trivittatus 7 Aedes vexans 4012 Anopheles earlei 1 Coquillettidia perturbans 26 Culex pipiens 49 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 72 0.0 % 1.8 % 1.3 % 3.8 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 73.9 % 0.0 % 0.5 % 0.9 % Culex spp 5 Culex tarsalis 884 0.1 % 16.3 % Culiseta inornata 62 1.1 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 207 37.4 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 331 59.9 % 15 2.7 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-037: Chelsea Ridge Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 553 46 Light/CO2 1113 Wooded Creek Court 105°5 53.779 W 40°31 0.383 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 16 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 5 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 1 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 1 Aedes vexans 184 Culex pipiens 17 Culex tarsalis 314 Culiseta inornata 15 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 28 2.9 % 0.9 % 0.2 % 0.2 % 33.3 % 3.1 % 56.8 % 2.7 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 1,090 46.3 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 1,227 52.1 % 36 1.5 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-038: Lochside Lane Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 2,353 181 Light/CO2 Lochside Lane and Glenloch Drive 105°0 23.939 W 40°35 56.584 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 172 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 3 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 18 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 2 Aedes vexans 895 Culex pipiens 113 Culex spp 22 Culex tarsalis 1092 Culiseta inornata 36 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 94 7.3 % 0.1 % 0.8 % 0.1 % 38.0 % 4.8 % 0.9 % 46.4 % 1.5 % Packet Pg. 143 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 3,497 269 Light/CO2 behind 3001 San Luis along ditch 105°2 0.499 W 40°32 48.397 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 122 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 20 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 6 Aedes vexans 1175 Aedes/Ochlerotatus spp 1 Coquillettidia perturbans 3 Culex pipiens 237 Culex spp 34 Culex tarsalis 1874 Culiseta inornata 25 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 165 3.5 % 0.6 % 0.2 % 33.6 % 0.0 % 0.1 % 6.8 % 1.0 % 53.6 % 0.7 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 574 67.8 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 249 29.4 % 23 2.7 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-029: Bens Park Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 846 70 Light/CO2 Fossil Ridge Park on Fossil Creek Parkway 105°4 18.841 W 40°30 40.889 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 63 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 4 Aedes vexans 507 Culex pipiens 23 Culex tarsalis 226 Culiseta inornata 23 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 21 7.4 % 0.5 % 59.9 % 2.7 % 26.7 % 2.7 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 408 25.3 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 1,146 71.0 % 61 3.8 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-031: Willow Springs Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 1,615 124 Light/CO2 Timberline just past Willow Springs Way 105°2 22.327 W 40°30 22.144 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 132 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 12 Aedes vexans 264 Culex pipiens 28 Culex spp 7 Culex tarsalis 1111 Culiseta inornata 61 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 88 8.2 % 0.7 % 16.3 % 1.7 % 0.4 % 68.8 % 3.8 % Packet Pg. 142 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 3,335 257 Light/CO2 off Prospect at nature trail and creek 105°0 21.948 W 40°33 54.938 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 543 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 2 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 14 Aedes (Oc.) trivittatus 3 Aedes vexans 1687 Anopheles earlei 1 Culex pipiens 32 Culex salinarius 7 Culex spp 33 Culex tarsalis 829 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 69 16.3 % 0.1 % 0.4 % 0.1 % 50.6 % 0.0 % 1.0 % 0.2 % 1.0 % 24.9 % Culiseta inornata 184 5.5 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 169 59.3 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 106 37.2 % 10 3.5 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-015: Stuart and Dorset Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 12 285 24 Light/CO2 Stuart and Romedale ditch 105°7 26.741 W 40°33 36.036 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 6 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 2 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 2 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 1 Aedes vexans 158 Culex pipiens 24 Culex spp 4 Culex tarsalis 78 Culiseta inornata 10 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 9 2.1 % 0.7 % 0.7 % 0.4 % 55.4 % 8.4 % 1.4 % 27.4 % 3.5 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 263 26.0 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 3 0.3 % 711 70.4 % 33 3.3 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-019: Edora Park Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 1,010 78 Light/CO2 Prospect and Welch in Edora Park 105°3 9.045 W 40°33 56.073 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 14 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 3 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 3 Aedes vexans 243 Anopheles earlei 3 Culex pipiens 164 Culex spp 1 Culex tarsalis 546 Culiseta inornata 33 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 55 1.4 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 24.1 % 0.3 % 16.2 % 0.1 % 54.1 % 3.3 % Packet Pg. 141 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management) 6.2 % 1.2 % 1.0 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 48.4 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 3.7 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.0 % 0.5 % Average Culex per trap/night: 55 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 173 49.1 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 176 50.0 % 3 0.9 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-001: Magic Carpet Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 11 352 32 Light/CO2 Hudson and Avondale detention basin 105°4 57.405 W 40°29 28.251 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 67 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 1 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 2 Aedes vexans 103 Culex pipiens 9 Culex tarsalis 167 Culiseta inornata 3 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 16 19.0 % 0.3 % 0.6 % 29.3 % 2.6 % 47.4 % 0.9 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 335 14.0 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 0 0.0 % 1,943 81.3 % 112 4.7 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-004: Bighorn Drive Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 2,390 184 Light/CO2 Along side fence of 2201 Bighorn Drive 105°2 14.944 W 40°32 5.767 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 58 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 3 Aedes vexans 274 Culex pipiens 157 Culex salinarius 14 Culex spp 107 Culex tarsalis 1665 Culiseta inornata 112 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 149 2.4 % 0.1 % 11.5 % 6.6 % 0.6 % 4.5 % 69.7 % 4.7 % 0.0 % Genus Number Percent of Total Aedes/Ochlerotatus 1,469 52.1 % Anopheles Culex Culiseta Other 2 0.1 % 1,293 45.9 % 54 1.9 % 0 Genus Proportions: ©2008 Colorado Mosquito Control, Inc. FC-006: North Linden Season: 2014 Location: GPS: Total number of trap/nights set: Total number of mosquitoes collected: Average mosquitoes per trap/night: 13 2,818 217 Light/CO2 North Linden at east side of bike trail 105°4 16.043 W 40°35 28.573 N Species collected and abundance: Aedes (Oc.) campestris 1 Aedes (Oc.) dorsalis 102 Aedes (Oc.) hendersoni 1 Aedes (Oc.) increpitus 5 Aedes (Oc.) melanimon 55 Aedes (Oc.) nigromaculis 3 Aedes vexans 1302 Anopheles earlei 1 Anopheles hermsi 1 Culex pipiens 240 Trap Type: Average Culex per trap/night: 99 0.0 % 3.6 % 0.0 % 0.2 % 2.0 % 0.1 % 46.2 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 8.5 % Culex spp 13 Culex tarsalis 1040 0.5 % 36.9 % Culiseta inornata 54 1.9 % Packet Pg. 140 Attachment4.1: 2014 City of Fort Collins Annual Report (2795 : West Nile Virus Management)  Rate Payers  Value of Solar Rate Structure ROAD TO ZERO WASTE/LAND USE Private business Programs End User Fees City Programs 2030 costs $88 Million $44 Million $9 Million 2050 costs $213 Million $85 Million $21 Million Financing Strategies   Self-funded  Rates  Government Financing Packet Pg. 69 Attachment2.3: Financing Needs and Potential Tools (2770 : Climate Action Plan - Scenario Analysis and Triple Bottom Line Impact