Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - COMPLETE AGENDA - 12/09/2014 - COMPLETE AGENDACity of Fort Collins Page 1 Karen Weitkunat, Mayor City Council Chambers Gerry Horak, District 6, Mayor Pro Tem City Hall West Bob Overbeck, District 1 300 LaPorte Avenue Lisa Poppaw, District 2 Fort Collins, Colorado Gino Campana, District 3 Wade Troxell, District 4 Cablecast on City Cable Channel 14 Ross Cunniff, District 5 on the Comcast cable system Carrie Daggett Darin Atteberry Wanda Nelson Interim City Attorney City Manager City Clerk The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. Adjourned Meeting December 9, 2014 6:00 P.M.  CALL MEETING TO ORDER  ROLL CALL 1. Council will consider a motion to adjourn into executive session.  OTHER BUSINESS  ADJOURNMENT City of Fort Collins Page 1 Karen Weitkunat, Mayor Council Information Center (CIC) Gerry Horak, District 6, Mayor Pro Tem City Hall West Bob Overbeck, District 1 300 LaPorte Avenue Lisa Poppaw, District 2 Fort Collins, Colorado Gino Campana, District 3 Wade Troxell, District 4 Cablecast on City Cable Channel 14 Ross Cunniff, District 5 on the Comcast cable system Carrie Daggett Darin Atteberry Wanda Nelson Interim City Attorney City Manager City Clerk The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. City Council Work Session December 9, 2014 After the Adjourned Meeting which begins at 6:00 p.m.  CALL TO ORDER. 1. Renewal of the ¼ - Cent Community Capital Improvement Program and the ¼ - Cent Street Maintenance Program Taxes. (staff: Ginny Sawyer, Darin Atteberry; 10 minute staff presentation; 1 hour discussion) The purpose of this item is to provide materials and recommendations for Council to consider as the ¼ cent tax renewals move forward. 2. Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios. (staff: Lucinda Smith, Bruce Hendee, Steve Catanach; 15 minute staff presentation; 45 minute discussion) The purpose of this work session is to summarize results of the preliminary Climate Action Plan (CAP) strategies analysis, outline next steps for model refinement and scenario development, highlight some key tactics proposed in the CAP strategies, review plans for public engagement, outline the scope of the CAP that staff expects to bring to Council in February, and seek feedback from Council. The CAP being developed for February 2015 will provide a high level road map but will not address implementation details. Council will have an opportunity to indicate if the project is moving in the right direction. In April 2014, City Council asked that an ad hoc committee be formed to develop a proposed updated Climate Action Plan that describes how the community could take to achieve a greenhouse gas emissions reduction goal of 20% below 2005 levels by 2020, 80% below 2005 by 2030, and carbon neutrality (a 100% reduction in net greenhouse gas emission) by the year 2050. This Council work session is the third of four planned work sessions to review progress. City of Fort Collins Page 2  OTHER BUSINESS.  ADJOURNMENT. DATE: STAFF: December 9, 2014 Ginny Sawyer, Policy and Project Manager Darin Atteberry, City Manager WORK SESSION ITEM City Council SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Renewal of the ¼ - Cent Community Capital Improvement Program and the ¼ - Cent Street Maintenance Program Taxes. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to provide materials and recommendations for Council to consider as the ¼ cent tax renewals move forward. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. Are there adjustments Council would like to make to the current project list? 2. Does Council support the recommendation to seek renewal of the Street Maintenance Program for a 10-year term? 3. Does Council support consideration of two resolutions on December 16, 2014? a. Supporting the Capital Improvement Project list and; b. Supporting pursuing a separate initiative sometime in the future for Vine and Lemay and South Timberline road projects? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The current capital improvement ¼ cent tax, Building on Basics, and the Street Maintenance Program ¼ cent tax will both expire December 31, 2015. Both renewals are currently being considered for the April 2015 election. Capital Improvement Staff, Council, and the public have been working and dialoguing since mid-2013 on the creation of a capital improvement project list that represents the highest needs and desires of our community looking forward. The community has supported a dedicated tax for capital improvement since 1973 and having the opportunity to shape and influence the next potential package is an exciting endeavor.  In May 2013, staff compiled a list of unfunded projects approved through master plans. Some projects were added from community-based priorities and through City strategic planning. These projects totaled over $400 Million and were all ranked by budget teams based on the project’s alignment to strategic objectives. Staff prioritized the projects down to approximately $200 million to proceed through extensive public outreach.  Council reviewed the process and projects at a work session in September 2013 and again in December 2013.  Between September 2013 and January 2014, staff met with eight City Boards, the Visit Fort Collins Board, the Chamber Legislative Committee, and a CityWorks Alumni group to seek feedback on both process and projects.  Council reviewed a more refined project list in July 2014.  Major public outreach on the refined list began in August 2014 and has included an interactive website, a Packet Pg. 3 December 9, 2014 Page 2 Board and Commission “Super Meeting,” a CityWorks Alumni Forum, attendance at the South Fort Collins Business Association, a public open house, a Community Issues Forum, a “mini” drop-in at the Senior Center, and a booth at the Sustainable Living Fair.  Council again reviewed the process and projects on September 30 and October 11. At the October 11 Council session many adjustments were made including funding the downtown restroom and the EPIC improvements out of the 2015-16 budget. The trail projects were removed since they have another dedicated funding source. There were also name changes and further project refinement.  In late October the on-line tool was converted to a calculator tool that allowed citizens to select up to $75 million in projects. Staff also continued to meet with City Boards (NRAB, COD, DDA) and the Chamber Legislative Committee. Since October, staff has continued to refine project descriptions, details, titles, operation and maintenance needs, and forecasting. The current spreadsheet (Attachment 2) reflects: 1. Most recent forecasting formula which estimates total ¼ -cent revenue over 10 years at $81.4 million. This forecasting could occur once more before the end of the year to reflect the most recent numbers. 2. A project dollar amount of approximately $74 million. This number represent the total revenue projection minus operation and maintenance costs for four years for projects that require O&M support in the first few years to be successful. Inflation has also been accounted for at a rate of 3% on non-fund projects. 3. Ranking of projects that received Council support. 4. Reflection of all projects that have been considered in the gray area. Street Maintenance Program (SMP) While the SMP does not require the same level of decision making and public engagement, staff has included this topic at all the capital improvement meetings and outreach events and tested opinions on varying terms of the tax. After reviewing and mapping out 10, 12, 15, and 20 year terms, staff is recommending maintaining the 10-year term on the Street Maintenance Program. This program has been widely supported historically and maintaining the 10-year structure supports the message that this is a renewal. Timeline Packet Pg. 4 December 9, 2014 Page 3 Next Steps December 16, 2014 Consider Resolutions (if direction given on December 9.) Goal: Finalize project list to bring forward. January 6, 2015 Goal: Adopt Resolution referring ballot language to the April 2015 ballot. ATTACHMENTS 1. Project Descriptions (PDF) 2. Comprehensive Project Spreadsheet (PDF) 3. On-Line Prioritization as of December 1 (PDF) 4. Powerpoint presentation (PDF) Packet Pg. 5 CULTURE AND RECREATION 1 | P a g e 12/2/2014 CR1 PROJECT TITLE: Southeast Community Center/Pool ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $9.5M-14.5M ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: $200K for Creative Center; $200K for the lap pool Service Area: Community Services Department: Recreation Services Project Location: Fossil Creek Community Park Project Descriptions: Option A: Community Creative Center Cost: $9.5M/ O&M: $200K A unique Community Center focused on innovation, technology, art, recreation and the creative process. The multifaceted complex will include a variety of well-equipped rooms for residents to gather, explore and share ideas. The Center will be a place for the community to try-out new technologies like 3-D printers, laser cutters, robotics and emerging software. It will be a true makerspace with power tools, drill presses, saws, routers, even welding. The Center will include a multi-functional performance space, an ideatorium, where community members can learn and express their creativity through performances, concerts and lectures. The Center will include a social area where local foods and even experimental microbrews could be on the menu. The Center will focus on wellness with fitness rooms for classes from Aikido to Zumba and by connecting to the beautiful surrounding park environment. Option B: Outdoor Leisure Pool, Indoor Lap Pool Cost: $4.5M/ O&M: $200K This Option adds a large outdoor leisure pool with water slides, sprays and jets, decks, a lazy river and open swimming area, plus an indoor 25 meter cool water fitness swimming pool to the Community Center. Funding for the leisure pool is contingent on the community raising at least $1.7M for the indoor lap pool through fund-raising efforts. Why is this Project Needed? Southeast Fort Collins is rapidly growing but it does not have a community center. To improve the quality of life and to create a sense of place, citizens in the southeast need an interesting, creative, convenient place to gather, socialize, create and collaborate. This center, in combination with the surrounding park, will define this rapidly growing area as the epicenter for community-based ideas and innovation. Including a leisure pool takes the project to a new level by providing exciting, fun and healthy aquatic recreation for the whole family. Including the lap pool complements the leisure pool and the Creative Center by providing year-round fitness swimming and a great location for learn to swim classes and other programs. ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 6 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) CULTURE AND RECREATION 2 | P a g e 12/2/2014 CR2 PROJECT TITLE: Water Sustainability Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4.2M ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: $10K Service Area: Community Services Department/Program: Parks and PP&D Project Location: Various parks and SouthRidge Golf Course Project Descriptions: Option A: SouthRidge Golf Course Irrigation System Cost: $2.2M/ O&M 10K This project saves 7 million gallons of water each year by replacing the 30 year old irrigation system at SouthRidge Golf Course with a new, efficient system. Option B: Fossil Creek Community Park Synthetic Turf Cost: $1.25M This project saves 2 million gallons of water annually by installing a synthetic turf field on the oval at Fossil Creek Community Park. Option C: Conversion of Three Parks to Raw Water Irrigation Cost: $750K This project saves 20 million gallons of treated water each year by converting Lee Martinez, Avery and Soft Gold parks to raw water irrigation systems. These parks are currently irrigated with treated water. Why is this Project Needed? Option A: The 30-year-old, inefficient irrigation system for SouthRidge Golf Course has reached the end of its useful life. Replacing it with a new, efficient irrigation system will save more than 7- million gallons of water annually. The current irrigation system breaks down frequently, requiring $50,000 in annual repairs. The City’s Golf Division has been funded by earned revenue for many years but it is a break-even operation, lacking the financial resources necessary to replace the system. Most municipal golf operations do not break even, with 67% requiring General Fund support to meet expenses. The City’s General Fund has supported the Golf Division in the past, primarily related to paying a portion of the debt incurred to build SouthRidge. From 2008 through 2011 the Golf Division lost ~$240,000 and utilized reserves to balance its budget. 2012 was an exceptional weather year making up for much of the loss from the previous four years. Golf in northern Colorado is very competitive and the City has not been able to invest in our three courses to the extent needed. Funding the SouthRidge irrigation system with City capital dollars will allow fee revenues to be used to improve the overall quality of our golf courses and help ensure the Golf Division remains self-funded. Option B: The turf fields in the oval at Fossil Creek Park have never been robust due to poor soil conditions and salty irrigation water. Replacing a large area of the oval with synthetic turf will save 2 million gallons of water each year and it will greatly improve the playability of the fields. The new fields will also stand up to repeated play, so many more games can be scheduled on them. A number of synthetic turf fields have been installed in Colorado and they are highly regarded by staff and users. Synthetic fields also save on maintenance expenses by eliminating mowing and irrigation needs. Packet Pg. 7 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) CULTURE AND RECREATION 3 | P a g e 12/2/2014 Option C: Converting the irrigation systems at Martinez, Avery and Soft Golf parks to raw water saves 20 million gallons in treated water use annually. Reducing treated water consumption is a very important goal in our semi-arid environment. The conversion also reduces operating costs because raw water is much less expensive than treated water. CR3 PROJECT TITLE: Renovation of the Historic Carnegie Building ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2M ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: $10K Service Area: Community Services Department: Cultural Services Project Location: 200 Mathews Street Project Description: This project renovates the historic 1904 Carnegie library building to enhance its use as a Community Creative Center. The creative center concept includes flexible inexpensive spaces for the community to rent to support their creative endeavors. Once fully renovated, the building will house galleries, performance space, classrooms, innovative maker and idea spaces, and a digital class room. The building is currently offering rental gallery space and serving as the home for Beet Street. Fort Collins Public Access Network (FCPAN) will create a studio in the basement level of the building, allowing more of the community to access the cable station. Cultural Services partnered with Beet Street to secure a $100,000 National Endowment for the Arts Our Town grant in 2011. The grant included funds to work with an architect to develop a space use program for transitioning the building to the new community creative center. In addition, in 2012, A&E Design Associates surveyed the building to estimate historic restoration needs. The two plans call for the following work to be completed:  Uncover and restore windows  Add a main staircase to connect all three floors  Add restrooms to the main level  Create tech-rich think-space/lounge  Renovate the lower level to accommodate a studio, wet and dry classrooms, and gallery  Enlarge and outfit the lower level classroom with digital technology for live-streaming  Restore interior floors and finishes, improve HVAC, upgrade electrical, consolidate storage, and fix foundation drainage issues. Why is this project needed? The historic 1904 Carnegie building is one of the oldest, continuously operating public buildings in Fort Collins, designated a local Historic Landmark District by Resolution in 1978. The building is also a contributing structure to the Laurel School Historic District. The building is now the home of the Community Creative Center but it requires renovation and improvements to serve its new purpose, address long-term access and infrastructure issues, and to protect and stabilize this historic treasure. The Community Creative Center at the Carnegie Building is implementing the creative and innovation center concept that supports creative endeavors, provides maker and idea space, and serves as a hub for the integration and collaboration of innovation and creativity. This project will activate this prominent historic landmark building, the courtyard and the surrounding park. Packet Pg. 8 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) CULTURE AND RECREATION 4 | P a g e 12/2/2014 Additional Details: The estimated cost for this work is $2M: $1.47 for renovations and infrastructure improvements and $430,000 for historic restoration. It is possible to apply for a grant from the State Historic Fund up to $200,000 towards historic restoration components of the overall project. CR4 PROJECT TITLE: Completion of the Gardens at the Gardens on Spring Creek ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2M ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: $20K Service Area: Community Services Department/Program: Parks Project Location: At the Gardens on Spring Creek Project Description: This project completes the gardens at the Gardens on Spring Creek by constructing 5 acres of beautiful gardens including the Great Lawn, Prairie Garden, Foothills Garden and the Xeriscape Demonstration Garden. The Great Lawn is a multi-use community venue comprised of an oval turf area surrounded by themed gardens and including a stage. It will host small concerts and plays, festivals, weddings and events. The Prairie and Foothills gardens will showcase our native plants in a landscaped setting to educate visitors and inspire them to use native plants in their gardens. The Xeriscape Demonstration Garden (to be called the Undaunted Garden) will showcase hardy, drought tolerant plants that thrive in our semi-arid environment. Why is this Project Needed? The Gardens on Spring Creek, thanks to funding from Building Community Choices and countless donations, opened in May 2004 with a mission to improve the lives of people and foster environmental stewardship through horticulture. The Gardens has become a destination for residents and tourists alike, with visitation increasing from 1,634 in 2004 to more than 55,000 in 2013. This increase is due to the addition of several large and popular gardens, the availability of high- quality educational programs for youth and adults, and a variety of special events for the community. The Gardens has 180 active volunteers and 25 partnerships with local non-profits and educational organizations. This project will build on The Gardens’ remarkable success and will establish the facility as a “must-see” destination for generations to come. The project will also enable The Gardens to significantly increase revenue through visitor fees and rental of the Great Lawn venue. The final phase for completing The Gardens on Spring Creek is a $3 million dollar expansion of the visitor center, including a conservatory. Gardens staff is currently fundraising for the expansion and for the completion of the gardens. Packet Pg. 9 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) CULTURE AND RECREATION 5 | P a g e 12/2/2014 CR7 PROJECT TITLE: Preserving Our Heritage: City Park Train, Club Tico Renovations, Fire Museum ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1M ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: $25K Service Area: Community Services and PFA Department/Program: Recreation and PFA Project Location: City Park and the Car Barn at Cherry and Howes Street Project Descriptions: Option A: City Park Train Cost: $350K/ O&M: 25K This project brings back the much loved City Park train in a new, expanded location east of the playground. Option B: Club Tico Renovation Cost: $250K This project completes the renovation of Club Tico at City Park by renovating the kitchen and restrooms and adding a second story deck on the south side of the facility. Option C: Creation of a Fire Museum at the Historic Car Barn Cost: $400K The volunteer supported Fire Museum would showcase historic fire engines, uniforms and equipment while telling the fascinating story of fire-fighting in Fort Collins. Why is this Project Needed? Option A: The historic train at City Park sadly reached the end of the tracks in 2011because it could no longer be operated safely. A new train on an expanded track will restore this treasured City Park experience. Option B: Club Tico is a popular dance and event venue but has been showing its age. Through donations and City support much of the facility has been renovated, including the stage and dance floor. This historic community center will realize its old glory through this final phase of restoration. It will also become a sought-after event venue once the kitchen and restrooms are upgraded. Option C: Fort Collins has a rich history of fire-fighting but we don’t have a fire museum. The Fire Museum project will showcase a wonderful collection of fire-fighting memorabilia in a great building and enrich the cultural landscape by telling the story of fire-fighting in our community. Packet Pg. 10 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) ECONOMIC HEALTH 6 | P a g e 12/2/2014 ECH6 PROJECT TITLE: Linden Street Renovations Design & Construction ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2M ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: $12K Service Area: PDT/CMO Department/Program: Engineering, CMO Project Location: Linden Street, Walnut to Jefferson Project Description: This project will fund the final design and construction of the preferred options for the renovation of this important downtown block of Linden Street. The Downtown Development Authority has funded the conceptual design which will be completed in 2014. This block is one of the city’s most programmed streets, hosting festivals, events and concerts throughout the year. While the streetscape is adequate, this block is primarily a place for cars. This project envisions the possibility of a more pedestrian-oriented space in the heart of downtown. Options include a rethinking of the street to make it more like an urban plaza from building face to building face. This concept would reconstruct the entire block into a brick street that could be closed off for special events but still allow vehicle parking in non-event days. As the conceptual design for this project progresses, the design concepts will become more clear and should be defined by the end of 2014. Note: BFO Offer 1.19 is similar. Why is this Project Needed? This project will create a more pedestrian friendly environment extending Old Town north along Linden Street. This project will help connect Old Town to the developing River District. ECH11 PROJECT TITLE: Community Marketplace ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3.5M This number anticipates a 50/50 public/private match, spearheaded by key community stakeholder organizations including the Northern Colorado Food Cluster. The marketplace would be operated by a non-profit. ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: $0 Service Area: Sustainability Services Department/Program: Economic Health Project Location: Block 33, south of the City parking lot along Howes. Project Description: The Community Marketplace project aims to create a multipurpose public facility, which will enhance and support our local food system. The Marketplace may include space to operate a year-round farmer’s market, and other supplementary components, including an artisanal bakery, a local butcher, a community kitchen, a winter greenhouse, and a minimal processing facility. The Marketplace would operate with permanent tenants open year-round for normal business hours, and additional open space for temporary stalls, flexible programming, and larger events. The intent is for the project to become a focal point for local food production in Fort Collins, and Packet Pg. 11 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) ECONOMIC HEALTH 7 | P a g e 12/2/2014 increase the availability of Northern Colorado products, serving as a primary economic driver. Why is this Project Needed? The Community Marketplace has been a past priority of the Fort Collins DDA. However, it has been deprioritized due to funding limitations. The project would also help to drive the supply of locally produced food by providing an additional venue for the sale of these products. Additional Details: A feasibility study was performed on the concept by the DDA in 2011. The results of the study indicate that Fort Collins can support a Community Marketplace as long as it includes an anchor rent-paying tenant. The study also found that Fort Collins could reasonably expect to capture $11.5 million a year in fresh food sales at a centralized Marketplace. Additional details can be provided from the Feasibility Study as requested. Packet Pg. 12 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 8 | P a g e 12/2/2014 ENV3 PROJECT TITLE: Downtown Poudre River Enhancements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4M ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: $50K Service Area: Community Services Department/Program: Natural Areas and PP&D Project Location: Poudre River between Shields Street and Lincoln Avenue Project Descriptions: Option A: Coy Reach Cost: $4M/ O&M: 50K The Coy diversion project (near the Power Plant building) involves modifying or removing the Coy diversion structure, creating a whitewater park with viewing/picnic areas, improving access to the river, enhancing the river’s habitat and beauty, and adding a pedestrian bridge over the river east of College. The project also lowers the river channel to improve flood mitigation and prevent flooding of College Avenue. Why is this Project Needed? The Poudre River is an elemental part of Fort Collins yet it has never been integrated into the fabric of our community. This project will connect the community to the river. The project will significantly improve the river ecosystem and help restore the river’s natural beauty. River recreation will be greatly enhanced by trail improvements, play areas, river access points, picnic areas and a whitewater park. The project will also help protect life and property by improving management of storm water. Other Related Projects: Woodward natural area and river improvements; Sterling and McMurry Ponds river improvements; Shields bridge replacement (County). Additional Details: The Coy diversion project is estimated to cost $7.5 M, with $4M from the capital improvement tax, $1M from the Stormwater Utility, $1M from Natural Areas, and $1.5 M from fund raising efforts. Packet Pg. 13 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) SAFE COMMUNITY 9 | P a g e 12/2/2014 SC2 PROJECT TITLE: Computer Aided Dispatch/Records Management System Upgrades ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2M ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: 0 Service Area: Police Services Department/Program: Information Services Project Location: Police Building and Laptop Computers Project Description: Necessary upgrades/maintenance on CAD/RMS system (2016 thru life of tax at $200K annually) Why is this Project Needed? The current system will age out and parts and support will become obsolete requiring upgrades and/or replacement. Replacement includes 5-year server replacement as outlined in the IT Service Level Agreement (SLA). In public safety departments such as police, fire, and ambulance, it is essential that communications and records systems are consistently operating without system failures. This equipment is important to the ongoing mission to provide for efficient and highly functioning first response to emergency situations, police situations, fires and natural disasters, or any other type of response to provide for public safety. Packet Pg. 14 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) TRANSPORTATION 10 | P a g e 12/2/2014 T5 PROJECT TITLE: Lincoln Avenue Improvements Design & Construction ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $8M ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: $36K Service Area: Planning, Development, & Transportation Department/Program: Engineering Project Location: Lincoln Avenue between Jefferson Street and Lemay Avenue Project Descriptions: Option B: First Phase/First Street to Lemay Improvements Cost: $8M This project would fund the design and construction of improvements to Lincoln Avenue from Jefferson Street to Lemay Avenue excluding any bridge improvements and would represent the level of improvement identified in the Lincoln Corridor Plan for roadway, bike/ped, landscape, and urban design enhancements. This funding level represents the minimal improvement level specified by City Council at the time of the Lincoln Corridor Plan adoption. Why is this Project Needed? Lincoln Avenue currently lacks sidewalks, curb and gutter, left turn lanes and enhancements such as landscaping and urban design. The adjacent land uses are redeveloping, especially the south side (Woodward). Lincoln is an important connection between downtown, the River District, and the East Mulberry area. It is designated as a 2-lane arterial in the Master Street Plan (which is an Appendix to the Transportation Master Plan), but instead of simply applying the standard for 2- lane arterials, other plans (City Plan, 2013 Streetscape Standards) designated it as a special corridor warranting its own plan. The design laid out in the Lincoln Corridor Plan supports the vision areas laid out in the Transportation Master Plan. Additional Details: Note: BFO Offer 17.2 is for neighborhood projects in the plan area identified during the Corridor plan. T9 PROJECT TITLE: Bicycle/Pedestrian Grade-Separated Crossings Fund ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $8M ($800K/year) ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: $ 30K Service Area: Planning, Development, & Transportation Department/Program: FC Moves/ Engineering/Park Planning and Development Project Location: Fort Collins Project Description: This project provides dedicated funding to design and construct high-priority bicycle and pedestrian under- and over-passes. Amount is sufficient to build approximates 4-5 crossings in the life of the tax.  These projects are good candidates for cooperative/partnership projects (CSU, CDOT, Larimer County, Railroads, etc.) and the funds are able to provide matching funds for leveraging opportunities for grants and partnership projects. Packet Pg. 15 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) TRANSPORTATION 11 | P a g e 12/2/2014  These projects are popular with residents and frequently requested. They improve the safety and experience of biking and walking and improve safety and operation of the roadways as well.  Potential projects could include the Power Trail at East Harmony Road, Shields Street west of the CSU Main Campus, Prospect Road near Center Avenue, major arterial crossings by the Mason Trail, and other crossings identified in the Harmony Road Enhanced Travel Corridor Plan and the Midtown in Motion College Avenue Transportation Study.  New grade separations in Fort Collins have a wide range of cost (between $750k and $4M) due to various factors including type of crossing (overpass, underpass), utility conflicts and relocations, flood plain issues, groundwater, railroad issues, etc.  Funding can also be maximized by identifying locations where existing projects or road reconstruction can be modified to include a grade separation for bikes and pedestrians. The intent of this project will be to build the most cost-effective crossings at the highest demand locations. Why is this Project Needed? Grade separated crossings allow bicyclists and pedestrians in high use areas to cross major roadways safely and efficiently. T11 Continuation of Building on Basics Project PROJECT TITLE: Transfort Bus Fleet Replacement ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Total $4.2M ($420K/year ) ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: 0 Service Area: Planning, Development, & Transportation Department/Program: Transfort Project Location: Fort Collins Project Description: The funding of this project would provide the 20% local match needed to replace 40 heavy duty buses and add 10 new specialty buses over the next 10 years. This 20% or, $4.2 million, would be leveraged to receive $16.8 million of federal and state grant funding. Over the next ten years three-quarters of Transfort’s fleet will be beyond its useful life. The replacement of buses beyond their useful life will reduce maintenance expenses and ensure reliable service to the Transfort customer. Why is this Project Needed? With local match funding in place, Transfort can apply for federal funding to procure the needed vehicles. Oftentimes, federal grants require that local funds are already in place prior to the funding award and by ensuring that Transfort has access to local match funding, staff is free to seek out any and all grant opportunities. In turn, by not allowing Transfort’s fleet of vehicles to surpass its useful service life, the City of Fort Collins will reduce preventive maintenance costs by approximately $30,000 per vehicle per year or $1.5M over the span of the project. Additional Details: This project is requesting $4.2M over the next ten years to leverage local match funding for $16.8M in federal grant funding to purchase 50 replacement heavy duty vehicles. The project has the added benefit of saving in excess of $1.5M in preventive maintenance costs that would be incurred otherwise. Packet Pg. 16 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) TRANSPORTATION 12 | P a g e 12/2/2014 T12 Continuation of Building on Basics Project PROJECT TITLE: Arterial Intersection Improvements Fund ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Total $6M ($600K/year) ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: $2K Service Area: Planning, Development, & Transportation Department/Program: Engineering Project Location: Fort Collins Project Description: This project provides funding for improvements to arterial intersections prioritized by congestion and safety improvements for all travel modes.  Previous funding for these projects was highly successful as matching funds for grants and the dollars were doubled over the life of the tax.  Provides additional benefits with landscaping and urban design improvements (such as Harmony and College), bicycle and pedestrian facility improvements, and improved pavement condition.  The fund is a direct and effective way to address citizen concerns regarding worsening traffic, congestion and roadway safety. This project creates a funding source to address the City’s highest priority safety and congestion problems at arterial intersections. Why is this Project Needed? A comprehensive Arterial Intersection Prioritization Study was completed in 2011 and identifies key improvement locations. Some of these projects were completed with BOB funding; this project would continue funding for improvements. Additional Details: These projects have historically been very competitive in the Federal Grant programs. Leveraging of similar funds in the previous Building on Basics tax measure more than doubled the available dollars. T28 PROJECT TITLE: Arterial Roadway Improvements Fund ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Total $8M ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: $3K Service Area: Planning, Development, & Transportation Department/Program: Engineering Project Location: Fort Collins Project Description: This project would create a funding source to address the City’s highest priority safety, mobility, and congestion problems on arterial roadways. These will be high priority arterial roadway projects identified in the City’s Transportation Capital Improvement Plan, Corridor, Master, and Subarea plans. Example projects could include: Prospect between Shields and Lemay; Lincoln between Jefferson and Lemay; College in Mid-Town. Design for these projects would be based upon approved corridor plans and City standards. They typically include improvements for all modes of transportation, urban design features, and landscaping. Packet Pg. 17 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) TRANSPORTATION 13 | P a g e 12/2/2014 Why is this Project Needed? The City has identified a number of high priority arterial roadway projects that are currently unfunded. Additional Details: A typical arterial roadway reconstruction can cost $8-12M per mile. These funds would be available to leverage other eligible funding sources including grants, developer contributions, partnership opportunities, and other agency funds. At this funding level, this amount could partially fund 2-3 arterial road improvement projects. This offer provides the flexibility to react to present and emerging needs, and opportunities as they arise. Packet Pg. 18 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD LIVABILTY 14 | P a g e 12/2/2014 CNL1 PROJECT TITLE: Permanent Supportive Housing ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4M ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: Operations and management will be incorporated in the development budget of housing developed with these funds. Service Area: Sustainability Services Department/Program: Social Sustainability Project Location: TBD Project Description: This project would provide funding for the capital costs of development or rehabilitation of one or more housing projects designated specifically for homeless individuals and families. These funds could be distributed through grants, contracts, or matching funds to assist in meeting the housing needs for the very lowest income residents of our community. An example of how these funds might be used is a project currently being discussed by the Fort Collins Housing Authority which would result in the construction of 60 units of permanent supportive housing for current homeless individuals. The total cost of this project is $12.5M. The City’s funds could be used as a match to obtain funding to complete this project. Supportive housing is an innovative and proven solution to serve people who would not be able to stay housed without a wide range of supportive services. Affordable housing is combined with services to help people facing complex challenges to live with stability, autonomy and dignity. Supportive housing improves housing stability, employment, mental and physical health and reduces active substance use. People in supportive housing live more stable and productive lives. Housing stability and supportive services for these individuals has been proven to reduce other community costs in such areas as reduced emergency room use and reduced response needed by fire and police. These funds would support the capital construction of such possible programs, while local nonprofits would incur all Operations and Maintenance expenses. Why is this Project Needed? Principle LIV 7 in City Plan states that the City envisions that “a variety of housing types and densities for all income levels shall be available throughout the Growth Management Area.” Inclusion of this project in the Building on Basics 2 package will assist in bringing this goal to fruition. Studies estimate there are over 3,000 homeless people in Larimer County. At least 250 of these individuals are chronically homeless, and nearly 1,000 are school-aged children. Our community lacks a sufficient supply of affordable housing. In June 2011 the Colorado Division of Housing released a report on rent burdened households in Colorado. At that time, there were less than 22,000 affordable rental units in Larimer County for households earning $25,000 or less per year and more than twice as many households (roughly 45,700) at that income level. Nearly 54% of renters spend more than 30% of their income for housing. Larimer County is cited as the third most rent-burdened county in the state. When housing costs rise over 30% of a household’s income, the possibility of becoming homeless significantly increases. The Murphy Center for Hope provided services to more than 1,700 (unduplicated) people in the last year and regularly provides services to more than 150 homeless or near homeless persons per Packet Pg. 19 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD LIVABILTY 15 | P a g e 12/2/2014 day. Additionally, The FCHA’s waiting list currently has over 1,900 families/individuals waiting for affordable housing. Other Related Projects: Redtail Ponds is a 60-unit apartment community that will provide 40 units of permanent supportive housing for homeless adults with one or more disability and on-site services ranging from job training to case management. An additional 20 units will provide housing for low income individuals. The Single Room Occupancy (SRO) program provides 27 rooms for homeless individuals in Fort Collins. Resident Managers live on-site and provide a variety of programming to assist residents transitioning from homelessness to a more stable living arrangement. Referrals are made from Catholic Charities Mission and post shelter counseling is provided. Additional Funding Details: The financing for the development and rehabilitation of housing for the homeless is complicated. It is critical for the developer (such as the Fort Collins Housing Authority) to be able to demonstrate community commitment to a project to secure additional funders. This fund will demonstrate that commitment and streamline the development of severely needed housing for the City’s homeless population. CNL2- Safe Routes to Everywhere  Provides on-going funds to design and build pedestrian, bicycle, and transit stop improvements citywide.  Provides annual funds in the amounts of: $1.4M for pedestrian improvements; $500K for bicycle improvements; and $100K for transit stop improvements.  Provides funding for implementation of the Bicycle Master Plan.  Provides funding to eliminate gaps in the pedestrian network and improve ADA compliance.  Sidewalk program is based on $134M in needs identified in a 2013 comprehensive assessment of pedestrian facilities in Fort Collins. CNL2-A PROJECT TITLE: Pedestrian Sidewalk and ADA Compliance Program - Safe Routes to Everywhere ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $14M ($1.4M/year) ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: $17.5K Service Area: Planning, Development, & Transportation Department/Program: FCMoves/Engineering Project Location: Citywide Project Description: The Pedestrian Sidewalk and ADA Compliance Program is based on the 2013 assessment and the program cost has been quantified into a 52-year program. With the $134 million Pedestrian Sidewalk and ADA Compliance Program needs, a sustainable and predictable revenue source is recommended to implement the overall cost of construction of a 52-year compliance program. Projected costs will change over time due to inflation, construction of sidewalks by adjacent property owners and private development, and project scheduling based on construction of Packet Pg. 20 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD LIVABILTY 16 | P a g e 12/2/2014 sidewalks by other City departments (Streets and Engineering Capital Projects Departments). Why is this Project Needed?  The City is not in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Pedestrian Plan is unfunded.  Without funding for the required pedestrian facilities, the City of Fort Collins will continue to be in violation of ADA without a proactive effort toward compliance. Noncompliance puts the City at risk of losing federal grant funds. Other Related Projects: This project is part of a package (bicycle, pedestrian, and transit improvements) that provides funding to implement a suite of multimodal infrastructure improvements intended to support a wide array of transportation choices. Through a combined approach intended to provide safe routes to all destinations, these funds would construct pedestrian improvements for safety and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance, integrated bus stop facilities, and bicycle network connections. Additional Funding Details: Staff will continually seek opportunities to leverage this limited local funding source to receive additional funding from state and federal grants to advance the improvements of the sidewalks, bus stops and bike facilities. CNL2-B PROJECT TITLE: Bicycle Infrastructure Improvements - Safe Routes to Everywhere ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5M ($500k/year) ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: $6.3K Service Area: Planning, Development, & Transportation Department/Program: FCMoves/Engineering Project Location: City-wide Project Description: The 2014 Bicycle Master Plan is in the final stages of development, with anticipated completion in the 4th quarter of 2014. This plan will identify specific bicycle infrastructure improvements that will contribute to a continuous, low-stress network. This package provides funding to be used toward stand-alone bicycle infrastructure projects as well as add-on elements to other projects that complete or enhance the City’s bicycle network. Projects will enhance safety, provide wayfinding, and improve comfort for bicyclists. Note: BFO Offer 1.6 is similar. Why is this Project Needed? This program would be a continuation and expansion of the current Bicycle Master Plan implementation funding in the existing Building on Basics program. This annual, ongoing allocation allows the City to enhance bicycle facilities to create safer, more convenient, and comfortable network. As a Platinum Bicycle Friendly Community, Fort Collins has a national reputation as a premier city for Bicycling. Other Related Projects: This project is part of a package (bicycle, pedestrian, and transit improvements) that provides funding to implement a suite of multimodal infrastructure improvements intended to support a wide Packet Pg. 21 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD LIVABILTY 17 | P a g e 12/2/2014 array of transportation choices. Through a combined approach intended to provide safe routes to all destinations, these funds would construct pedestrian improvements for safety and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance, integrated bus stop facilities, and bicycle network connections. Additional Funding Details: Staff will continually seek opportunities to leverage this limited local funding source to receive additional funding from state and federal grants to advance the improvements of the sidewalks, bus stops and bike facilities. CNL2-C PROJECT TITLE: Bus Stop Improvements -Safe Routes to Everywhere ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1M ($100K/year) ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: $1.3K Service Area: Planning, Development, & Transportation Department/Program: TransFort Project Location: Citywide Project Description: Currently there are more than 200 bus stops within the Transfort system that do not meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) access requirements. This funding would allow Transfort to upgrade 10 bus stops per year to be ADA accessible and improve mobility options for disabled residents of Fort Collins. Other Related Projects: This project is part of a package (bicycle, pedestrian, and transit improvements) that provides funding to implement a suite of multimodal infrastructure improvements intended to support a wide array of transportation choices. Through a combined approach intended to provide safe routes to all destinations, these funds would construct pedestrian improvements for safety and ADA compliance, integrated bus stop facilities, and bicycle network connections. Additional Funding Details: Staff will continually seek opportunities to leverage this limited local funding source to receive additional funding from state and federal grants to advance the improvements of the sidewalks, bus stops and bike facilities. CNL6 PROJECT TITLE: Implementing Nature in the City ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3M ($330K/year) ESTIMATED ANNUAL O&M: $100K Service Area: Sustainability Services Department: Environmental Services Project Location: Throughout the City Project Description: Nature is all around us. Whether it’s a hawk Downtown or a butterfly in our schoolyard; the shade of a cottonwood tree or the tranquility of a flowing creek, nature is the air we breathe, the land Packet Pg. 22 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD LIVABILTY 18 | P a g e 12/2/2014 that surrounds us and the species that inhabit the land. As Fort Collins grows, we want to ensure that every resident is within a 10-minute walk to nature from their home or office. In 2014, Nature in the City developed a vision and strategic plan to incorporate nature into the City’s increasingly urban environment. To achieve this vision, this project will restore 20-30 sites and/or acquire 4-6 parcels to create a connected open space network accessible by all.  Restoration includes adapting stormwater ponds, ditches, streams, waterways, parks and other neighborhood open spaces to include spaces that provide habitat, therapeutic benefits, and opportunities to play. The City will partner with neighborhoods, businesses and other City departments, including Natural Areas, Parks and Stormwater, to achieve these goals.  Acquisition includes parcels that provide key links to the broader corridors of the City, whether for habitat or recreation, as well as linking to existing patches of open space. It will also include sites with high wildlife value or the potential to provide high value. Sites will be prioritized based on their ability to provide all residents access to nature within a 10- minute walk and their contribution to the overall open space network. Why is this Project Needed? The City is transitioning from a large, suburban town to a small, urban city with a projected 250,000 residents. As this happens, it is critical that we protect access to nature and the key open spaces that define our community. Natural spaces within our urban setting are valuable not only as habitats and for aesthetics, but they are also key to preserving quality of life, and the sense of place that makes Fort Collins unique. Sometimes those spaces will be a formal park, trail or Natural Area. Others might be an informal open space or the community garden in your neighborhood or the detention pond where you walk your dog. Even more important than the type of space are the experiences they offer residents. That means having nature nearby, opportunities for personal or family recreation, and a chance to escape from the urban environment, even just for a moment. This project supports land restoration and acquisition beyond the scope of the Open Space tax dollars priorities; additional capital dollars invested now would further this effort in a more timely manner. Other efforts that highlight the need for this effort include the following:  Preserving access to nature and the City’s sense of place is included in four chapters of the City’s Strategic Plan (Community and Neighborhood Livability, Culture and Recreation, Environmental Health, and Economic Health).  The Midtown Urban Design Plan calls for providing open spaces (both small and large) within each character district.  The Plug in to Nature study, by Larimer County, found that the biggest barrier for accessing nature is time. Providing nature closer to home allows people to spend their time experiencing nature, rather than traveling to it.  A California study of 3,000 teenagers found that they had a significantly lower Body Mass Index (BMI) when in close proximity to nature or open spaces.  A United Kingdom study of more than1,000 people concluded that moving to an area with green space will increase your mental health compared with those that move into an area lacking open space. Another study found positive psychological benefits from interacting in urban open space increased with species richness – in other words, the greater the variety of species in a particular area, the happier people are in that space. Packet Pg. 23 Attachment1.1: Project Descriptions (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street Maintenance Program Taxes) Row # Page # Project Capital Annual O& M 4 Years of O&M Not es   +*+897/'4!/*+<'21 5362/'4)+!',+ 5:9+895;+7><.+7+    %/225<!97++93675;+3+498@522+-+;+4:+95/4*+4!97++9+8/-4'4*54897:)9/54    % 533:4/9>7-'4/)8536589/4-'4* +)>)2/4-')/2/9>      # +,,+7854!97++93675;+3+498522+-+;+4:+95/4)524;+4:+ 5:49'/4;+4:+     %  5<495<45:*7+ /;+74.'4)+3+498'79/4+?+-')>750+)9    !  +)7+'9/54'2"7'/24.'4)+3+498588/27++1"7'/2  !*139*)+531453/*(70.67&7(73'*5 6*66.32)8*73)*).(&7*)+82).2, !  +)7+'9/54'2"7'/24.'4)+3+4985<+7"7'/2  !*139*)+531453/*(70.67&7(73'*5 6*66.32)8*73)*).(&7*)+82).2, " '4*,5752/)+'/49+4'4)+')/2/9>   %  5<495<45:*7+ /;+74.'4)+3+498/4*+4/4)524750+)9   # +'2/-4+*$/4+7/;+522+-+95+3'>     # 522+-+/*95<4"7'486579'9/542'4362+3+49'9/54:4*     +*+897/'4 4.'4)+3+49!',+ 5:9+895;+7><.+7+   #-.6*2-&2(*1*27:&6453436*)73)*(5*&6*(3140.&2(*7.1*0.2*  #  /4)524;+4:+3675;+3+4987/*-+   !  7586+)9'4*"/3(+72/4+'9+<'>4.'4)+3+498:7).'8+   !  7586+)9'4*"/3(+72/4+'9+<'>4.'4)+3+498+8/-4   " +-/54'2"7'/4/4-')/2/9>      " '36:8%+8952/)/4-!:(89'9/54                     !" 1 Renewal of ¼-Cent Community Capital Improvement Program and ¼ Cent Street Maintenance Tax City Council Work Session December 9, 2014 ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 28 Attachment1.4: Powerpoint presentation (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street 2 Direction Sought 1. Are there adjustments Council would like to make to the current project list? 2. Does Council support the recommendation to seek renewal of the Street Maintenance Program for a 10-year term? 3. Does Council support staff bringing two resolutions on December 16, 2014? – Supporting the Capital Improvement Project list and; – Supporting pursuing a separate initiative sometime in the future for Vine and Lemay and South Timberline road projects. Packet Pg. 29 Attachment1.4: Powerpoint presentation (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street 3 Background § The Street Maintenance program (SMP) and the Building on Basics (BOB) capital expansion taxes expire December 31, 2015. § Both are a ¼ cent sales tax, and both have been in existence for many years. § These renewals will be considered in April 2015. Packet Pg. 30 Attachment1.4: Powerpoint presentation (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street 4 Background-Council Consideration • September 2013 – Review process and initial project list ($400M) • December 2013 – Review process and smaller project list ($200M) • July 2014 – Review public outreach and more refined project descriptions • September 2014 – Review public outreach and Street maintenance term • October 2014 – Review project drilling platform ($80M) Packet Pg. 31 Attachment1.4: Powerpoint presentation (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street 5 Background-Public Engagement • September 2013-January 2014 – Eight City Boards, Chamber, CityWork Alums • April-May 2014 – Budget Teams review projects for alignment • August 2014-Current – Interactive website, Board and Commission “Super Meeting,” CityWorks Alumni Forum, attendance at the South Fort Collins Business Association, public open house, Community Issues Forum, “mini” drop-in at the Senior Center, booth at the Sustainable Living Fair. Packet Pg. 32 Attachment1.4: Powerpoint presentation (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street 6 Revenue Projections • Most recent forecasting formula estimates total ¼ -cent revenue over 10 years at $81.4 M • Target project dollar amount: approximately $74 M. • Assumptions: – $ years of O&M for select projects – 3% on non-fund projects Packet Pg. 33 Attachment1.4: Powerpoint presentation (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street 7 Timeline Packet Pg. 34 Attachment1.4: Powerpoint presentation (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street 8 Direction Sought 1. Are there adjustments Council would like to make to the current project list? 2. Does Council support the recommendation to seek renewal of the Street Maintenance Program for a 10-year term? 3. Does Council support staff bringing two resolutions on December 16, 2014? – Supporting the Capital Improvement Project list and; – Supporting pursuing a separate initiative sometime in the future for Vine and Lemay and South Timberline road projects. Packet Pg. 35 Attachment1.4: Powerpoint presentation (2699 : Renewal of the Community Capital and Street DATE: STAFF: December 9, 2014 Lucinda Smith, Environmental Sustainability Director Bruce Hendee, Chief Sustainability Officer Steven Catanach, Light & Power Operations Manager WORK SESSION ITEM City Council SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this work session is to summarize results of the preliminary Climate Action Plan (CAP) strategies analysis, outline next steps for model refinement and scenario development, highlight some key tactics proposed in the CAP strategies, review plans for public engagement, outline the scope of the CAP that staff expects to bring to Council in February, and seek feedback from Council. The CAP being developed for February 2015 will provide a high level road map but will not address implementation details. Council will have an opportunity to indicate if the project is moving in the right direction. In April 2014, City Council asked that an ad hoc committee be formed to develop a proposed updated Climate Action Plan that describes how the community could take to achieve a greenhouse gas emissions reduction goal of 20% below 2005 levels by 2020, 80% below 2005 by 2030, and carbon neutrality (a 100% reduction in net greenhouse gas emission) by the year 2050. This Council work session is the third of four planned work sessions to review progress. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. Does Council have feedback on the proposed City policy elements identified thus far? 2. Does Council have any comments on the planned public engagement? 3. Is Council comfortable considering a high level CAP in February 2015 that could be followed by a more detailed implementation plan? 4. Is there any additional information City Council wants staff to investigate before February 2015? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The Climate Action Plan update is occurring under a very ambitious time schedule. There is significant technical expertise being brought to bear through the work of the Brendle Group, Rocky Mountain Institute, Platte River Power Authority, the Citizen Advisory Committee, the CAP staff team, and others. As in 1999 and in 2008, the CAP is intended to be a strategic plan that provides a rational basis for establishing community greenhouse gas reduction goals and serves as a road map for community carbon reduction by outlining a responsible energy future and ways to build a more resilient community. All CAP strategies that involve City Council approval will require further development and vetting though the public process in the future. Anticipated outcomes of setting an aspirational greenhouse gas goal include attracting outside capital as well increased local innovation and entrepreneurial activity. An aspirational goal can drive further action to reduce emissions than would occur without a goal and plan. It can spur the community’s engagement, competitive spirit, and sense of pride. The scope, schedule, and resources for the CAP update project are briefly described below. Packet Pg. 36 December 9, 2014 Page 2 CAP Scope - the updated CAP brought forward for Council consideration in February 2015 will be a high level strategic plan that will contain the following:  Discussion of Need - Risks and consequence of “Business and Usual” and opportunities from accelerated climate action  Description of strategies - and associated tactics for each strategy, including co-benefits  Implementation matrix - a general timeline for implementing strategies and tactics in the following timeframes: o Immediate - current budget cycle (2015-2016), o Near Term - next two budget cycles (2017 - 2020) o Long Term - 2020-2030 and 2030-2050 (Descriptions of strategies in the “2030 to 2050” timeframe will be very generalized.)  Potential Financing Approaches- a set of potential financing approaches, each of which will require further development and exploration to be implemented, and recommended next steps for financing.  Recommendations for monitoring and reporting CAP Schedule - The project schedule has been built with the objective of bringing a draft CAP to City Council on February 17, 2015. Recognizing that many components of the strategic CAP will become clearer with time, staff recommends that the first CAP serve as a strategic scoping plan, and that a more detailed CAP implementation plan be developed once new technology options have been more fully evaluated. CAP Resources - City funded consultant resources, supplemented by RMI’s foundation-funded research, along with the expertise of the Climate Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) and other experts, has focused on exploring best practice strategies to meet the GHG reduction objectives, identifying the costs and benefits, and gathering public input on CAP strategies. Less time has been invested thus far in public awareness-raising about climate change and the need for action, or on exploring multiple innovative financing mechanisms. I. First CAP Model Iteration In October, the Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) completed in-depth research on tactics covering six areas of the CAP. Tactics are defined as implementation steps, best practices, or activities that support the design and implementation of strategies. In November, the Brendle Group compiled that information, along with other inputs and assumptions not addressed in the RMI research, to generate the first run of the CAP model. A few adjustments were made to assumptions documented in the RMI tactics based on additional discussions with staff and local experts. The preliminary model results suggest a number of important things: 1. The first initial run of the CAP model presents a pathway is close to reaching the accelerated GHG reduction objectives. The model run contains strategies that are based on underlying best practice research. Taking into account the uncertainty of the modeling assumptions, the preliminary results are very close to achieving the stated reduction objectives. We believe with further adjustment, these strategies can meet the reduction objectives. Attachment 1 illustrates the set of strategies and their resultant impact on emissions reductions. The CAP team is continuing to refine and calibrate the model. First run results should not anchor Council’s thinking on how the final CAP scenarios will be dialed after incorporating further input. 2. Many of the strategies are “dialed up” to a relatively high implementation rate. 3. Energy strategies provide the greatest GHG reduction potential In the initial model run, the two largest GHG reduction strategies are utility scale renewable energy (38% of total reductions in 2030) and energy efficiency in existing buildings (27% of total reductions in 2030). 4. Electricity is the biggest component of emissions, and renewable energy will play a critical role in achieving the emissions reduction objectives. It is important to determine the appropriate level of utility scale, grid- based renewable and distributed renewables that will maintain reliable electric service. Some concerns have been expressed about the ability to balance and firm very high levels of renewables on the local distribution Packet Pg. 37 December 9, 2014 Page 3 system and regional electric grid. A strong partnership between Fort Collins Utilities and Platte River will be required to design a distributed electricity system that allows the City to reach its goals while increasing grid resiliency. 5. CAP model analysis of cumulative net costs or savings is very dependent on several elements including electric and other rate increases, inclusion or not of a cost for carbon, application of a discount rate, etc. (See Attachment 1 for more detail). Details of the electric rate impacts will be available for City Council in January 2015, following modeling by Platte River Power Authority and subsequent retail rate impact analysis by Fort Collins Utilities. CAP Model Assumptions Like any model, the CAP model functions by performing calculations on assumptions about GHG impacts of reduction strategies and the associated costs. There are a few components of the CAP model assumptions that are either not available now or are undergoing refinement. It is therefore important not to view the preliminary model run as a complete or recommended “Scenario”. Additional work is still needed in a number of areas such as final selection of a discount rate to determine savings, and inclusion or exclusion of elements of the GHG inventory. Attachment 1 describes in more detail choices that still must be made to refine the model and generate a scenario or scenarios. 6. The first CAP model run of strategies would result in the outcomes listed below, by 2030. These outcomes are provided to give some context to the magnitude of change needed. However, adjustments are anticipated to the individual strategies. o Electric supply: o 80% reduction in GHG intensity of all electric power supplied to the Fort Collins electric grid (wholesale and distributed sources) o Existing homes and businesses: o 36% more efficient than today’s buildings o 40% of homes and 10% of commercial buildings are converted to all electric (heating, cooking, etc.) o 22% of homes and 50% of businesses have installed solar o New construction: o Will use only 15% of the energy used by today’s buildings under current code o 45% will have enough solar PV to achieve net zero energy o 30% of new homes and 10% of new businesses will be all electric o Vehicles and Mileage: o 90 percent of new vehicles purchased in 2030 are electric vehicles (EV’s) o Remaining 10% of new vehicles purchased are ~40% more efficient than avg. new stock o People are driving 29% less miles per year (per capita VMT reduction) II. Creating Scenarios Scenarios (a set of GHG reduction strategies) can be built around fundamentally different approaches to GHG reduction. The three major components of successful climate action are:  Role of technology  Role of community engagement and uptake of strategies  Role of financing opportunities Therefore, CAP scenarios can be built around prioritizing each of these components. Each approach has its own risks and uncertainties. Two scenario options are identified below. 1. Scenario based on maximized utility scale renewable energy (technology- based; therefore lower risk of not achieving objectives). Packet Pg. 38 December 9, 2014 Page 4 2. Scenario based on maximizing community participation in strategies such as distributed generation, rooftop and ground mounted solar panels, more electric cars, etc.(behavior based; therefore higher risk of not achieving objectives) III. Platte River Power Authority Integrated Resource Planning Platte River Power Authority (Platte River) has completed modeling of two preliminary scenarios to begin informing their Integrated Resource Planning process. Attachment 2 provides the highlights of this analysis. “RS” is a reference scenario developed assuming no early retirements for existing generation units and relatively constant hydropower supply, with new simple cycle natural gas units added over time to meet forecasted load growth (from a baseline forecast). It includes expansion of demand side management (energy efficiency) technologies at a rate of about 0.5% annually (year after year into the future) and also includes the 200% increase in wind energy additions Platte River plans for its 2015 budget (relative to 2013 actual wind supply). It does not include the 30 MW solar project for 2016 that is being considered for the Rawhide site (bids are being evaluated). The RS case meets reliability requirements, but does not meet Platte River’s Strategic Plan guidelines for GHG reductions or renewable energy additions. If an estimated “cost of carbon” is applied to the RS scenario (represented as a CO2 tax), wholesale electric rates would increase by about 15% by 2020, 54% by 2030 and 90% by 2040 - relative to rates with no CO2 tax. AS-1 represents a first alternative set of generation resources additions (natural gas, wind and solar) that could accomplish the following GHG reduction guidelines:  20% reduction by 2020 relative to 2005  35% reduction by 2030 (as a proxy for the EPA proposed Clean Power Plan)  80% reduction by 2050 relative to 2005 AS-1 does not represent an optimal resource scenario. More modeling work is needed to consider increased levels of demand side management and to evaluate distributed generation options. Further analysis is also required to consider impacts on operations and system reliability associated with large amounts of renewable energy sources added to the electric system (distribution level or utility scale). Though the models have been run through 2050, results beyond a 20-year planning horizon are necessarily simplified and results are much less certain. Assuming a cost of carbon is applied, the difference in wholesale electric rates between RS and AS-1 is about 13% in 2020 and decreases through 2040. Without a “cost of carbon”, the AS-1 scenario is estimated to require rates to be 13% higher than the RS scenario in 2020 and 30% higher in 2030. For context, Fort Collins Utilities customer rates have risen 40% in the past decade. Between now and 2030, wholesale electric rates are forecasted to increase 11% in the RS case. Platte River’s preliminary analysis of the two additional scenarios for Fort Collins will be completed in mid- December. These include: Scenario AS-FC1 - a 20% reduction by 2020, and an 80% reduction by 2030 from Platte River electric system CO2 emissions in 2005, and Scenario AS-FC2- a 20% reduction by 2020, and a 60% reduction by 2030 from Platte River electric system CO2 emissions in 2005. Scenario AS-2 was requested by the City to provide an additional increment between the 2030 CO2 target proposed in the EPA’s Clean Power Plan and the City’s primary scenario, AS-FC1. IV. Potential Policy Elements of CAP Strategies Attachment 3 provides longer descriptions of CAP strategies that include a listing of tactics embedded in the strategies. Achieving an 80% reduction by 2030 will require a full suite of approaches ranging from education and incentives to partnerships and mandates. Staff is interested in knowing whether there are any policy elements Packet Pg. 39 December 9, 2014 Page 5 that Council is not interested in considering at this time, recognizing that there is relatively little room for adjustment while still being able to meet the goal. The list below identifies tactics included in the two CAP strategies that provide the greatest GHG reduction, as currently defined; Increase Energy Efficiency in residential and commercial sectors, and Advanced Renewable Energy at the Utility Scale. Strategy: Increase Energy Efficiency in the Institutional, Commercial, and Industrial Sectors Energy efficiency for existing commercial  Require multifamily, commercial and industrial energy reporting and disclosure  Require energy improvement measures for buildings above an established Energy Use Intensity (EUI) standard  Require certification of building operators who manage base building systems  Require retro-commissioning once every 10 years  Require upgrades of lighting fixtures in non-residential spaces  Institute submetering and requiring proportionate billing for office tenants of at least 5,000 square feet in size, and retail tenants at least 1,000 square feet  Reduce municipal government building energy use by 31 percent by 2030 and provide annual tracking and disclosure  Develop and implement a new utility business model where the utility facilitates deep energy retrofits and the customer can finance projects through on-bill tariffs or other new innovative Demand Response for existing commercial and industrial  Move commercial customers into a demand instructive rate or participation in other demand response programs Strategy: Increase Energy Efficiency in the Residential Sector Energy efficiency for existing residential  Implementing a rental licensing program, which would require landlords to make energy efficiency improvements (or demonstrate compliance) every time they renew their rental license  Developing and providing a new utility business model where a basic standard package of energy efficiency and photovoltaic offerings is extended to all customers and measures are paid back on the customers’ utility bills  Addressing barriers for condominium energy-efficiency improvements (e.g. access to credit)  Engaging in a residential public awareness and educational campaign focused on what residents can do to support achievement of the 80% GHG reduction goal by 2030  Increasing access to energy efficiency loans and funding by integrating options into wellness programs offered by employers to their employees Demand Response for existing residential  Converting residential customers to demand instructive utility rate structures  Developing and providing a new utility business model that provides on-bill financing for residential energy improvements, which would also include Demand Response technology Packet Pg. 40 December 9, 2014 Page 6 Strategy: Advance Renewable Energy at the Utility Scale  This strategy would focus specifically on tactics required to increase large scale renewables to the level needed to meet the City’s goals. This strategy will require close coordination with Platte River’s resource planning activities. VII. Public Engagement on CAP Update Attachment 4 lists the stakeholder and public meetings that are planned and that staff is seeking to set up. City Council will have the opportunity to indicate whether the planned outreach is adequate for the scope of the draft CAP to be considered in February 2015. The CAP public engagement plan is intended to  present the history and benefit of Fort Collins’ climate action planning, including a range of co-benefits  present a potential roadmap (or roadmap options) for meeting the proposed GHG objectives, and associated costs and benefits  gather feedback on the concepts. The CAP public engagement is not:  a robust awareness-raising program to inform the community, citizen and business about the needs for climate action  a community engagement plan or marketing plan for climate action  an opportunity to intentionally explore partnerships built around specific strategies or tactics.  Comprehensive public vetting of each action called for in the plan, since each strategic action will require more analysis and a detailed implementation proposal before Council considers adoption of the strategy or tactic. These engagement needs will be identified as important next steps in the draft CAP. VIII. CAP Financing Approaches Achieving aspirational GHG goals will require significant investments into our community. A primary role for the City is to act as a catalyst for financing. The City can be selective in how much credit it wishes to extend and how much risk to assume; for additional funds it can act as a conduit for third-party capital to directly reach customers, citizens, and businesses. The CAP team and consultants are actively exploring financing approaches that would be appropriate for Fort Collins. Attachment 5 identifies potential financing principles or guidelines for various parties. Next steps in the CAP process involve clarifying the requirements, opportunities and limitations of various potential “actors” in CAP financing, including the City government and Utility, the consumer, and outside investors. Staff has planned a discussion about potential financing strategies with the Council Finance Committee in January 2015. VIII. President’s Task Force on Climate Change and Resiliency and Related Next Steps After more than a year’s work, the President’s State, Local and Tribal Leaders Task Force on Climate Preparedness on which Mayor Weitkunat served, submitted their recommendation to the President. The Task Force organized its report across seven cross-cutting themes: building resilient communities; improving resilience in the Nation’s infrastructure; ensuring resilience of natural resources; preserving human health and supporting resilient populations; supporting climate-smart hazard mitigation and disaster preparedness and recovery; understanding and acting on the economics of resilience; and building capacity. To see the full report visit fcgov.com/taskforce <http://www.fcgov.com/taskforce>. Packet Pg. 41 December 9, 2014 Page 7 As noted in the recommendations report, “Climate change is already affecting communities in every region of the country as well as key sectors of the economy. Recent events like Hurricane Sandy in the Northeast, flooding throughout the Midwest, and severe drought in the West have highlighted the vulnerability of many communities to the impacts of climate change. In 2012 alone, the cost of weather disasters exceeded $110 billion in the United States, and climate change will only increase the frequency and intensity of these events. That is why, even as efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions continue, communities must prepare for the impacts of climate change that can no longer be avoided.” (page 1) “….carbon pollution has been building in our atmosphere for decades, so even as we act to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases that drive climate change, we must also prepare our communities for the impacts that can no longer be avoided. Anticipating and planning for these impacts now can reduce the harm and long-term costs of climate change to communities. Decisions made today about where and how communities grow, the infrastructure they build, and the codes and standards they adopt will affect them long into the future, so decision-makers must take climate change into account as they plan.” (page 4) Following submittal of the recommendations to the President, Task Force members share a commitment to continue collaborating with the Administration as these recommendations are implemented. In Fort Collins, several related actions are in progress or planned. These include: Completing Fort Collins’ participation in the Colorado Local Resilience Project. This is a project of the Colorado Climate Network and the Colorado Municipal League involving 39 jurisdictions with close to 100 representatives to help improve the resilience of Colorado local governments and local resources to possible climate change impacts. Mayor Weitkunat and City staff have representation on the five working groups that include: (1) cross- cutting issues, (2) wildfire response and recovery, (3) infrastructure, (4) natural resources and outdoor recreation, and (5) public health. A final report is anticipated in early 2015. See <http://coclimatenetwork.org/programs/index.html> for more information. Continued coordination with the Climate Hub and other locally based national and international experts on climate change impacts and adaptation. Update of the Climate Action Plan as a means of maximizing opportunities to take actions that have dual-benefits of increasing community resilience and reducing greenhouse gas emissions Completing a Climate Adaptation Plan for the municipal organization, a project funded for 2015 in the recently adopted City budget. Seeking grant opportunities to fund planning, programs or infrastructure to improve Fort Collins resiliency against a changing climate Continued and expanded implementation of City programs to increase community preparedness including awareness-raising about opportunities to make the home a “safe haven” in times of emergency through the Healthy Sustainable Homes Program, and promoting the “Climate Economy” to aid local businesses in adapting to climate change in place and leverage community carbon reduction goals to develop new products and services, through the Economic Health Strategic Plan. IX. Next Steps  CAC help frame scenarios of interest (December)  Public engagement on strategy concepts (November and December)  Refinement of CAP model assumptions  Platte River modeling for Fort Collins scenarios incorporated into CAP model (December)  CAC discuss scenarios (mid-December) Packet Pg. 42 December 9, 2014 Page 8  Triple Bottom Line assessment of scenarios (December and January)  CAC develops recommendation (January)  Coordination with revisions to the Energy Policy recommendations from the Energy Board (January and February)  Public engagement (January and February) Council Dates:  January 13, 2015 - work session on CAP scenarios and Triple Bottom Line Assessment  February 17, 2015 - Council consideration of updated CAP ATTACHMENTS 1. Preliminary CAP Model Outputs (PDF) 2. Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (PDF) 3. CAP Strategy Descriptions (PDF) 4. Public Engagement Details (PDF) 5. Guiding Principles for CAP Financing (PDF) 6. Powerpoint presentation (PDF) Packet Pg. 43 1 Preliminary CAP Model Outputs Figure 1 and Table 1 below illustrate the first CAP model run that is based on a suite of strategies largely informed by the RMI best practice research, and slightly modified by subsequent conversation with staff and others. There are a number of elements and assumptions that are still undergoing refinement, so this should not be viewed as a scenario or a recommendation. Figure 1. Preliminary Run - Emission Reduction by Strategy ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 44 Attachment2.1: Preliminary CAP Model Outputs (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 2 Table 1. Preliminary Run - Percent Emissions Reduction, by Strategy EMISSIONS REDUCTION by STRATEGY (% of Total) 2020 2030 2040 2050 Green Building for New Construction and Redevelopment 10% 7% 5% 4% Shift Land Use Patterns to Shorten Trips and Reduce Demand for Travel 7% 4% 3% 3% Increase Energy Efficiency in the Residential Sector 15% 9% 9% 9% Increase Energy Efficiency in the Institutional, Commercial, and Industrial Sectors 41% 18% 14% 12% Drive Adoption of Multimodal Transport 2% 3% 2% 2% Accelerate Adoption of Fuel Efficient and Electric Vehicles 2% 4% 7% 8% Advance Renewable Energy at the Utility Scale 0% 38% 40% 37% Advance Residential and Commercial Solar Adoption 9% 5% 3% 2% Shift Heating Loads – Electrification, Combined Heat and Power, and Biofuels -3% 5% 11% 15% Road to Zero Waste 16% 8% 7% 7% Figure 2. Preliminary Run - Emission Reduction by Emissions Source Packet Pg. 45 Attachment2.1: Preliminary CAP Model Outputs (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 3 Table 2 below provides a snapshot of the decadal impacts of the overall CAP strategies including: annual and cumulative emissions reduction, resulting net annual emissions, and the resulting net cumulative cost or savings based on an assumed potential impact to electricity rates. This financial analysis assumes a discount rate of 2.5 percent applied to all cost savings and also incorporates an assumed carbon tax for electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuels. Table 2. Preliminary Run – Decadal Summaries 2020 2030 2040 2050 Emissions Reduction (MT CO2e) Cumulative 1,000,000 11,000,000 30,000,000 40,000,000 Annual 300,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Net Annual Emissions MT CO2e 2,000,000 700,000 300,000 70,000 % below 2005 baseline 20% 70% 90% 100% Discounted Net Cumulative Cost/Savings Total (Cost) or Savings - $M ($200) $600 $3,000 $8,000 Average Monthly (Cost) or Savings per Fort Collins Resident ($ per person per month) ($20) $20 $70 $100 Changing factors such as the electric rate increase, removing the cost of carbon, or changing the discount rate would change the estimates of net cost/savings and could shift the net savings to net costs. CAP MODEL AREAS FOR REFINEMENT OR DECISIONS TO CREATE SCENARIOS Like any model, the CAP model functions by performing calculations on assumptions about GHG impacts of reduction strategies and the associated costs. There are a few components of the CAP model input assumptions that are either not available now or are undergoing refinement. It is therefore important not to view the preliminary model run as a complete or recommended “Scenario”. Additional work is still needed in these areas:’  Cost estimates. Preliminary cost estimates have been provided for all the strategies, but they are undergoing review and refinement. Costs are highly depended on business models. Finding new business models that can lower first cost barriers will be critical to successful aggressive climate action.  Electric supply modeling results. Currently, placeholder assumptions have been incorporated to estimate the impacts of PRPA meeting the City’s emissions reduction targets. Actual results from the Platte River modeling will be available in mid December. These results include changes to the electricity emission factor and wholesale electric rates that result from changes in generation source mix. Additional analyses will be conducted by the Fort Collins Utilities to translate the wholesale rate impacts into retail rate impact, by user class. The retail rate impact analysis should be available by late December, prior to the January 13 Council work session.  Further evaluation of who pays and who saves. Currently the CAP model shows the majority of the costs and savings are being borne by the end users, Fort Collins residents and businesses. As Packet Pg. 46 Attachment2.1: Preliminary CAP Model Outputs (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 4 future scenarios are developed and the preferred scenario is crafted, more refined evaluation of alternative business models that engage external financing will be evaluated. In addition to the model inputs and assumptions that are still evolving, there are other model input assumptions that involve a clear choice. These include:  Selection of a discount rate to determine costs and savings. The first model run applies a 2.5% discount rate to savings. (See http://fds.duke.edu/db/attachment/727 for a reference.) Discount rate is defined as the rate used to calculate the present value of cash flows.  Inclusion or exclusion of elements of the GHG inventory. In 2009, Fort Collins decided to add “airline travel” as a Scope 3 element of its community GHG inventory because emissions from air travel have a large impact on climate change. While some communities include airline travel (i.e. Austin, Chicago, Denver, Philadelphia) most do not.  Modification to the population growth rate assumptions  Inclusion or exclusion of a “Cost of Carbon” The CAC will have an opportunity to weigh in on these elements when developing recommendations. Packet Pg. 47 Attachment2.1: Preliminary CAP Model Outputs (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) Platte River System IRP Modeling Update 12/2/14 1 ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 48 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 2 Renewables 20% x 2020 Competitive Rates Minimum Reserve Margin 15% CO2 Reduction • 20% x 2020 • 35% x 2030 • 80% x 2050 System Level Portfolio Planning Guidelines Strong competition Modeled as a tax on CO2 emissions Forecast at $11-$76 per ton Packet Pg. 49 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) Planning Scenarios 3 HS RS AS-1 AS-2 to AS-n Historical (validation) Reference (baseline) Alternatives (optimization / decision support) Common Assumptions: • 40-yr term starting in 2015 • 2015 official load forecast • CO2 and non- CO2 expense scenarios Packet Pg. 50 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 4 RS Load Forecast - 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 MW Actual 2015 Load Forecast 2014 Load Forecast Slowing Municipal load growth: • 2011 forecast for 2020 – 775 MW • 2015 forecast for 2020 – 690 MW (85 MW or 11% reduction) Packet Pg. 51 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) RS Actions 5 GUIDELINE ACTIONS STUDIED (RS) 15% minimum reserve margin 2015 to 2030: No new resources 2030 to 2050: 851 MW of total new natural gas-fired capacity added (combined cycle and peaking) to offset coal retirements and meet load growth Packet Pg. 52 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) - 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 MWh RS Energy Mix Coal Gas Wind Purchases Hydro 6 • Coal dominates Platte River’s energy mix through 2042 • Gas replaces coal generation after normal coal retirement dates Planning focus Packet Pg. 53 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) - 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 4,500,000 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 RS No CO2 • RS CO2 levels increase slightly with no CO2 charges • System modeling includes all surplus sales • Fort Collins accounting currently does not include surplus sales RS CO2 Profile Tons 2020 CO2 Guideline = 2.8 M tons 2030 CO2 Guideline = 2.2 M tons 2050 CO2 Guideline= 0.7 M tons 7 Packet Pg. 54 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) AS-1 Actions to Meet Study Guidelines 8 GUIDELINE ACTIONS STUDIED (AS-1) 20% renewable supply (municipal retail sales) • 100 MW new solar + 65 MW new wind (70 MW new solar above 2016 Rawhide solar project) 20% CO2 reduction -2020- • Retire both Craig coal units (154 MW) • Reduce surplus sales • 40 MW additional solar + 35 MW additional wind 35% CO2 reduction -2030- • Reduce Rawhide energy generation (maintain capacity) • Add new combined cycle gas generation (300 MW) • 340 MW additional solar 80% CO2 reduction -2050- • Retire 280 MW Rawhide coal unit • Add new peaking gas generation (230 MW) • 40 MW additional solar + 1,075 MW additional wind Packet Pg. 55 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) AS-1 Energy Mix - 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 MWh Coal Gas Wind Purchases Hydro Solar • Coal generation reduced to decrease CO2 – but remains part of the resource mix until 2046 • Solar and wind become significant sources over time Platte River’s energy mix becomes more-diversified 9 Packet Pg. 56 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) - 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 AS-1 CO2 Profile Tons AS-1 meets CO2 guidelines at each planning interval 2020 CO2 Guideline = 2.8 M tons 2030 CO2 Guideline = 2.2 M tons 2050 CO2 Guideline= 0.7 M tons 10 Packet Pg. 57 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) - 50 100 150 200 250 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 $/MWh Rate Projections: RS – with and without CO2 expense Vs. 2015 Rate 2020 2030 2040 2050 RS no CO2 4% 11% 52% 207% RS CO2 19% 65% 142% 254% 11 • Identical resource portfolios (both RS) • The difference between the projections is the impact of CO2 expense RS CO2 RS No CO2 Packet Pg. 58 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) - 50 100 150 200 250 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 $/MWh Rate Projections: RS vs. AS-1 (with CO2 expense) 12 AS-1 CO2 With emissions expenses, the difference in rates between the AS-1 and RS portfolios is relatively small Optimization should improve this Vs. 2015 Rate 2020 2030 2040 2050 RS CO2 19% 65% 142% 254% AS1 CO2 32% 74% 133% 304% RS CO2 Packet Pg. 59 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) - 50 100 150 200 250 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 $/MWh Rate Projections: RS vs. AS-1 (no CO2 expense) 13 The difference between AS-1 and RS is the rate impact of diversification without CO2 expense Vs. 2015 Rate 2020 2030 2040 2050 RS no CO2 4% 11% 52% 207% AS1 no CO2 17% 41% 80% 287% RS No CO2 AS-1 No CO2 Packet Pg. 60 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) • Building confidence in modeling capabilities – some uncertainties: – Renewable energy integration at high levels – sub-hourly considerations – EPA final rule – possibly implemented June 2015 • Credible options exist to meet 2020 strategic planning guidelines: – 20% retail renewable energy + 20% reduction in CO2 emissions – Mature / reliable technologies available for application – Need to further consider rate implications • Meeting 2030 EPA proposal more challenging – appears possible • Options / analysis beyond 20 years – unclear / low confidence: – Renewable integration at high levels / system reliability considerations – Evolving technologies need to mature – More / potentially better options in the future – Analysis is focused on 20-year resource decision horizon 14 Summary – System Level Planning Packet Pg. 61 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) • Neither RS nor AS-1 is optimal – just beginning scenario analysis • CO2 expense is the greatest cost factor for Reference Case • Other factors need to be considered – significant & complex: – Fuel price volatility, market dynamics, regulations, transmission, plant operations • Cost of diversification using AS-1 roughly equals CO2 cost • Other benefits possible through resource diversification: – Fuel flexibility – Price certainty (fixed price renewable supply contracts) – Operational flexibility (renewable source integration) – Real reduction of CO2 – Support preferences of owner Municipalities 15 Summary – System Level Planning Packet Pg. 62 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) • Develop additional alternative scenarios and optimize: – Staging of renewable resource additions – Integration of smaller / more flexible gas resources (utility scale) – Additional Craig operational scenarios – Increased energy efficiency and distributed generation – Integrate new EPA CO2 rule (once finalized) • Complete a new system level Integrated Resource Plan: – Much more analysis required – Stakeholder engagement – Platte River Board decision expected during 2015 • Continue evaluating / recommending new resource options: – Rawhide Solar expected in 2016 (30 MW) – Joint Demand Response efforts – Combined Heat and Power evaluations 16 Next Steps – System Level Planning Packet Pg. 63 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) • Perform modeling of more aggressive CO2 reduction scenarios: – Based on IGA with Fort Collins for CAP support – 80% CO2 reduction by 2030 – Evaluate costs / rates & other considerations – Analysis detail / confidence limited due to current CAP schedule (Feb 2015) • Support stakeholder engagement related to electric resource planning 17 Next Steps – Fort Collins Support Packet Pg. 64 Attachment2.2: Platte River System IRP Modeling Update (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 1 Strategy Descriptions Draft December 2, 2014 The following provides draft write-ups for each of the strategies included in the Fort Collins Climate Action Plan (CAP). These descriptions are still in draft form and are intended to provide a general description of each strategy but the details will be revised in future iterations. There are also placeholders for sections that have not yet been developed. OBJECTIVE. CURB FUTURE EMISSIONS GROWTH Strategy 1: Green Building for New Construction and Redevelopment Strategy 2: Shift Land Use Patterns to Shorten Trips and Reduce Demand for Travel OBJECTIVE. REDUCE ENERGY USE IN EXISTING BUILDINGS Strategy 3: Increase Energy Efficiency in the Residential Sector Strategy 4: Increase Energy Efficiency in the Institutional, Commercial, and Industrial Sectors OBJECTIVE. REDUCE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND AND USE MORE FUEL EFFICIENT AND ELECTRIC VEHICLES Strategy 5: Drive Adoption of Multimodal Transport Strategy 6: Accelerate Adoption of Fuel Efficient and Electric Vehicles OBJECTIVE. INCREASE SUPPLY OF RENEWABLE ENERGY FOR ELECTRIC AND THERMAL LOADS Strategy 7: Advance Renewable Energy at the Utility Scale Strategy 8: Advance Residential and Commercial Solar Adoption Strategy 9: Shift Heating Loads – Combined Heat and Power, Biofuels and Electrification OBJECTIVE. REDUCE EMISSIONS FROM WASTE Strategy 10: Road to Zero Waste OBJECTIVE. INSPIRE, ACCELERATE, MOBILIZE, PREPARE Strategy 11: Encourage Eco-Districts/Catalyst Zones Strategy 12: Implement Sequestration/Adaptation Strategy 13: Develop Communications Campaign/Social Mobilization ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 65 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 2 Objective. Curb Future Emissions Growth Strategy 1: Green Building for New Construction and Redevelopment This strategy curbs growth in GHG emissions associated with new buildings and major redevelopments by ensuring new construction incorporates green building practices, such as building energy efficiency, photovoltaics, fuel switching from gas to electric and demand response tactics. Tactics Tactics to implement this strategy would build on the City’s longstanding efforts in green building where the approach is to continually raise the bar for high performing buildings through building code changes over time while supporting and rewarding beyond-compliance efforts. The following summarizes various programmatic, regulatory, and other tactics that are being considered as part of this strategy. Energy efficiency for new construction  Establishing more stringent building codes for new residential and commercial buildings (30 percent beyond the energy efficiency requirement of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code, with ongoing code updates every few years)  Providing education about how to comply with new building codes  Ensuring verification of energy performance  Enforcing code compliance  Providing incentives for performing above minimum levels Solar PV for new construction  Requiring for all new commercial and residential buildings to include solar PV systems (rooftop or ground-mounted) capable of meeting at least 100% of a building’s estimated load on an annual basis  Allowing buildings that consume more energy than can be produced onsite to participate in community solar Fuel switching for new construction  Providing utility programs to encourage fuel switching for new construction and major renovations/replacements  Adopting standards/codes that preference electric space heating and electric loads (versus natural gas) or require certain percentage of new building thermal energy load to be sourced from renewable sources  Incorporating district heating/cooling in new residential developments using geothermal heat pumps  Leveraging the homebuilder network to promote and build all-electric new homes Demand response for new residential construction  Incorporating demand response capabilities into all new residential construction (e.g., demand response capable appliances and home energy management systems) Roles and Responsibilities Role of the City The City of Fort Collins would lead implementation of this strategy by adopting more stringent green building codes and development standards. The City would encourage participation from builders, contractors, and homeowners through educational and training programs, and by offering incentives for Packet Pg. 66 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 3 exceptional energy efficiency performance. In addition, the City would be responsible for ongoing code compliance and verification enforcement activities. Role of the Private Sector The private sector, including builders, contractors, and developers, would support implementation of this strategy by adhering to updated building and development codes, and by participating in training and incentive programs as applicable. Role of Residents and Businesses Residents and businesses would be responsible for ensuring that all new construction or major renovations to their homes/businesses conform to applicable permitting and code requirements. They would also participate in City incentive and educational programs as applicable. Adaptation Impact Co-Benefits Supporting City Policies Packet Pg. 67 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 4 Strategy 2: Shift Land Use Patterns to Shorten Trips and Reduce Demand for Travel This strategy curbs growth in GHG emissions associated with transportation by employing land use changes that shorten trips and reduce the demand for travel. Tactics Tactics to achieve this strategy include creating development patterns that encourage smart growth, support infill/redevelopment and facilitate the use of alternative transportation options such as bicycling, transit, and walking. These tactics could build on existing land use and transportation approaches identified in Plan Fort Collins and the Transportation Master Plan such as targeted redevelopment areas and enhanced travel corridors. Potential tactics to shift land use patterns to shorten trips and reduce demand for travel include the following:  Reducing or eliminating minimum parking requirements for all Fort Collins development to support higher land use intensity  Retrofitting, charging for, and reducing on-street parking by installing parking meters, district permitting, and “smart parking” initiatives (e.g., responsive pricing, mobile parking payments, and meter-based parking sensors)  Pursuing a “complete streets” approach for new road construction  Encouraging mixed-use development patterns that reduce vehicle trips to daily destinations and amenities Roles and Responsibilities Role of the City The City of Fort Collins would support implementation of this strategy by adopting revised codes and policies related to parking, and by continuing to encourage mixed-use development and complete streets. The City would also be responsible for implementing parking management strategies, such as parking meters, district permitting, and enforcement. Role of the Private Sector Private sector developers would support implementation of this strategy by adhering to development codes, and by coordinating with the City, tenants, neighbors, and other stakeholders on parking management strategies, development planning and patterns, and land use mix. Role of Residents and Businesses Residents and businesses would bear the responsibility of actually reducing their vehicle trips to support ongoing implementation this strategy. They would need to coordinate with the City, employees, and neighbors on parking strategies and policies, as well as engage in walking and bicycling to nearby destinations. Adaptation Impact Co-Benefits Supporting City Policies Packet Pg. 68 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 5 Objective. Reduce Energy Use in Existing Buildings Strategy 3: Increase Energy Efficiency in the Residential Sector This strategy employs a two-pronged approach to reducing energy use in homes – retrofitting homes to be more energy efficient and behavior change programs and tactics to help residents live more efficiently within their homes. Tactics The strategy leverages Fort Collins Utilities’ residential demand-side management programs and recently implemented Advanced Meters with emerging business models and policy tools for accelerating home energy upgrades and consumer behavior programs at scale. Specific tactics being considered to increase energy efficiency in the residential sector include the following: Energy efficiency for existing residential  Implementing a rental licensing program, which would require landlords to make energy efficiency improvements (or demonstrate compliance) every time they renew their rental license  Developing and providing a new utility business model where a basic standard package of energy efficiency and photovoltaic offerings is extended to all customers and measures are paid back on the customers’ utility bills  Addressing barriers for condominium energy-efficiency improvements (e.g. access to credit)  Engaging in a residential public awareness and educational campaign focused on what residents can do to support achievement of the 80% GHG reduction goal by 2030  Increasing access to energy efficiency loans and funding by integrating options into wellness programs offered by employers to their employees Demand Response for existing residential  Converting residential customers to demand instructive utility rate structures  Developing and providing a new utility business model that provides on-bill financing for residential energy improvements, which would also include Demand Response technology Roles and Responsibilities Role of the City The City of Fort Collins would support implementation of this strategy by launching and maintaining a rental licensing program, and offering a new utility business model that increases customer participation in energy efficiency, photovoltaic offerings, and Demand Response technologies. The City would also explore opportunities to address barriers for condominium energy efficiency improvements and to integrate energy efficiency loans and funding in to City and other employee wellness or benefit programs. Educational campaigns about the community’s GHG reduction goals, as well as information dissemination about utility rates and utility service models would also be led the City. Role of the Private Sector Contractors, property management companies, landlords and other private sector parties would support implementation of this strategy by participating in rental licensing program and energy efficiency upgrade requirements. Some could also participate in the Integrated Utility Services program Packet Pg. 69 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 6 as installers or integrators working on behalf of the utility to enhance energy efficiency in residences or businesses. Role of Residents and Businesses Residents and businesses would bear the responsibility of actually reducing their vehicle trips to support ongoing implementation this strategy. They would need to coordinate with the City, employees, and neighbors on parking strategies and policies, as well as engage in walking and bicycling to nearby destinations. Adaptation Impact Co-Benefits Supporting City Policies Packet Pg. 70 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 7 Strategy 4: Increase Energy Efficiency in the Institutional, Commercial, and Industrial Sectors This strategy targets energy use reduction in existing commercial, institutional, and industrial buildings and processes. Tactics Similar to residential efficiency, this strategy leverages Fort Collins’ Utilities demand-side management programs to implement efficiency retrofits at scale across various business sectors through a range of policy mechanisms, innovative business models, and targeted programs focused on the highest industrial users and largest commercial property portfolio owners. Specific tactics being considered to increase energy efficiency in non-residential sectors include the following: Energy efficiency for existing commercial  Requiring annual reporting of energy use by large public, commercial and multi-family properties, and public disclosure of results  Calling for energy improvement measures for buildings above an established Energy Use Intensity (EUI) standard and have not taken action to reduce intensity over time  Requiring certification of building operators who manage base building systems and providing training and resources for certification  Requiring retro-commissioning once every 10 years to optimize base building systems  Requiring upgrades of lighting fixtures in non-residential spaces, including the common areas of multi-family properties  Calling for energy audits for commercial and multi-family properties by a licensed professional once every 10 years  Instituting submetering and requiring proportionate billing for office tenants of at least 5,000 square feet in size, and retail tenants at least 1,000 square feet  Reducing municipal government building energy use by 31 percent by 2030 and providing annual tracking and disclosure  Developing and implementing a new utility business model where the utility facilitates deep energy retrofits and the customer can finance projects through on-bill tariffs or other new innovative structures (e.g., Metered Energy Efficiency Transaction Structure (MEETS), or Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy Financing (PACE))  Enacting a public awareness and educational campaign focused on what businesses can do to support achievement of the 80% GHG reduction goal by 2030  Identifying and targeting the top energy consuming commercial portfolio owners and incentives to make deep energy retrofits  Working with Fort Collins’ 15 largest industrial facilities to engineer deep process energy efficiency retrofits Demand Response for existing commercial and industrial  Developing and implementing a new utility business model that provides on-bill financing for commercial energy improvements, which would also include Demand Response technology  Aggregating small commercial clients by a single building management operator to assist with meeting Demand Response needs and to support routine auditing  Moving commercial customers into a demand instructive rate or participation in other demand response programs Packet Pg. 71 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 8  Continuing designated account representatives for large customers, and required forward scheduling reporting to inform usage forecasting and planning Roles and Responsibilities Role of the City The City of Fort Collins would drive implementation of this strategy by adopting codes, standards and policies regarding annual reporting, energy improvement measures, certification of building operators, retro-commissioning, lighting upgrades, and energy audits. In addition, the City would need to lead the implementation of submetering, offering a new Integrated Utility Services (IUS) business model, aggregating small commercial clients, working with large commercial and industrial energy users, and leading by example in City facilities. The City would also be responsible for leading educational campaigns focused on achievement of the community’s GHG reduction goals, informing customers about new rate structures, and other IUS and Demand Response opportunities. Role of Businesses and the Private Sector Private-sector businesses would be responsible for participating in the IUS program, making appropriate upgrades and improvements, and ensuring ongoing monitoring, re-commissioning, and certification of building managers. They would also need to engage employees and customers in the business energy efficiency efforts. Adaptation Impact Co-Benefits Supporting City Policies Packet Pg. 72 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 9 Objective. Reduce Transportation Demand and Use More Fuel Efficient and Electric Vehicles Strategy 5: Drive Adoption of Multimodal Transport This strategy involves developing approaches to reduce the demand for and use of personal vehicles and increase the use of alternative modes, including transit, biking, carpooling, and walking. Tactics Tactics to achieve this strategy could involve price signals that encourage alternative modes, managing traffic, creating a transport network that is safer, more coordinated, and easier to use, and then offering drivers information and resources that encourage them to use the network. They would also include working with employers in reducing commute trip miles by employees. Specific tactics being considered to drive adoption of multimodal transport include the following: Move to a more multimodal transportation system  Offering status and real-time transit and other transportation data to third party developers through an open data platform to support development of web-based or mobile transit apps  Facilitating or support the growth of car share or ride share programs  Continuing to implement and expand bike-share programs  Coordinating and expanding regional mass transportation options for commuters  Campaigning to increase awareness of how transportation costs factor into the total cost of living (e.g., Housing and Transportation Affordability Index)  Developing corporate engagement and incentive programs to provide public transit access and encourage employee bicycling and walking to reduce vehicle miles traveled from commuting Roles and Responsibilities Role of the City The City of Fort Collins would support implementation of this strategy by offering transportation data to third-party developer, and continuing to support bike-share programs, car/ride-share programs. The City would need to coordinate and increase efforts to expand regional mass-transportation options for commuters, and would be a partner in an educational campaign around housing and transportation costs. The City would also need to lead or participate in corporate engagement or inventive programs focused on reducing employee VMT from commuting. Role of the Private Sector The private sector could support implementation of this strategy by developing applications to connect users to real-time transportation data and information, and by introducing new car or ride sharing programs in the community. Moreover, lenders, homebuilders, and employers could participate in a campaign focused on housing and transportation costs. Packet Pg. 73 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 10 Role of Residents and Businesses Residents and businesses would implement this strategy by participating in multi-modal transportation options such as regional mass transit, car or ride-share programs, or bicycling. Businesses could support the transportation choices made by employees by offering incentives or programs focused on reducing commuting VMT, and by locating in areas that have an adequate supply of housing to meet employees’ needs. Adaptation Impact Co-Benefits Supporting City Policies Packet Pg. 74 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 11 Strategy 6: Accelerate Adoption of Fuel Efficient and Electric Vehicles To accelerate the number of fuel efficient and electric vehicles on the roads, this strategy focuses on increasing consumer awareness and expanding infrastructure to support fuel efficient and electric personal vehicles. Additionally, this strategy targets municipal and commercial fleets, including school districts, and focuses on improving efficiency, reducing demand, and shifting to alternative fuel or electric vehicles where possible. Tactics Personal Vehicles This strategy could be achieved through large dealer purchases that meet efficiency or electric vehicle standards so that individuals have these types of vehicles as a local choice. It could also involve educating potential buyers about rebates and incentives available, as well as tax credits that will offset the initial purchase price. Additionally, will be important to make electric vehicle charging stations more numerous and accessible to more users. The following tactics are being considered in order to accelerate the adoption of fuel efficient and electric personal vehicles:  Developing and implementing a campaign to increase exposure of consumers to electric vehicles  Ensuring that electric vehicle charging stations are available, including public charging stations in highly visible, frequently-visited locations, as well as at workplaces and residences  Providing incentives that benefit users and purchasers of alternative-fuel vehicles  Aggregating and incentivizing bulk purchasing of electric vehicles for fleet, car-sharing, or individual use  Working with local automobile dealerships to stock electric vehicles, and provide training and incentives for EV sales  Providing time-of-use pricing and utility programs to incentivize EV charging during off-peak hours  Providing a central market to buy and sell used EV batteries  Integrating personal vehicle use into transportation apps so that owners can evaluate the true costs of driving alongside other transportation options, understand their energy use, carbon footprint, and travel behavior, and can easily adapt to the process of finding and paying for EV charging Commercial Fleets Tactics to implement this strategy could include encouraging the use of trip planning software that optimizes and combines routes and no idling policies. They could also include offering education and incentives for retrofitting to more efficient fuel systems or purchasing alternative fuel or electric fleet vehicles at time of replacement. Tactics being considered to encourage efficiency, demand reduction, and electrification of commercial fleets include the following:  Encouraging the electrification of commercial fleets and point to point mobility service providers (e.g., airport shuttles)  Encouraging the potential mild-hybridization of special-use vehicles (e.g., fire trucks, police cruisers) to reduce idling emissions  Implementing corporate engagement and incentive programs to provide public transit access and encourage employee bicycling and walking to reduce vehicle miles traveled from commuting Packet Pg. 75 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 12 Roles and Responsibilities Role of the City The City of Fort Collins would encourage implementation of this strategy by exposing customers to electric vehicles, and by ensuring the installation and accessibility of EV charging stations in public spaces. The City could also facilitate a battery market or exchange, and provide time-of-use pricing and utility programs to promote off-peak charging. In addition, the City could offer other incentives or programs to encourage individual or fleet purchases of electric vehicles, and could provide open data to support transportation application development. Role of the Private Sector Role of Residents and Businesses Adaptation Impact Co-Benefits Supporting City Policies Packet Pg. 76 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 13 Objective. Increase Supply of Renewable Energy for Electric and Thermal Loads Strategy 7: Advance Renewable Energy at the Utility Scale This strategy looks at what’s possible if Platte River Power Authority were to provide electric power that exceeds the carbon reduction goals within its Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) in order for Fort Collins to achieve its more aggressive carbon reduction goals. Modeling for the IRP is under development and shown in the adjusted business as usual emissions forecast. Tactics This strategy would focus specifically on tactics required to increase large scale renewables to the level needed to meet the City’s goals. This strategy will require close coordination with Platte River Power Authority through finalization of its IRP. Roles and Responsibilities Role of the City Role of the Private Sector Role of Residents and Businesses Adaptation Impact Co-Benefits Supporting City Policies Packet Pg. 77 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 14 Strategy 8: Advance Residential and Commercial Solar Adoption This strategy focuses on increasing the total volume of solar installations for both commercial customers and in homes. Because there are many customers who would like the opportunity for renewables that do not have their own home or business or proper orientation and exposure, this strategy also advances the potential for these customers to adopt and solar energy through community-scale solar installations. Tactics Tactics to achieve this strategy could involve targeting key commercial customers, developing policies that encourage solar in homes, developing outreach materials that identify resources and incentives for solar, educating the community about on-bill financing, power purchase agreement options, and existing rebates. Additionally, tactics will likely need to address barriers to participation or installation, such as slow permitting processes, high costs, and lack of solar installers to meet demand. The following tactics are being considered to help advance residential and commercial solar adoption: Utility-owned, locally sited solar  Offering a PRPA-owned, community-sited ground mount program that would include a block schedule for rates where the first tier would consist of solar  Offering a PRPA-owned, rooftop PV installed “in-front of the meter” (wherein the Utility purchases a portfolio of distributed systems to be located on commercial or residential rooftops and participants receive compensation for use of their rooftop) or “behind the meter” (wherein the Utility has complete control over the resource)  Developing a centralized community solar resource (facilitated by PRPA) in which residential and commercial customers could participate and purchase solar power blocks with locked-in rates for a defined period of time Solar for existing commercial  Developing and implementing an Integrated Utility Services (IUS) program wherein the utility facilitates solar purchases, and consumers can finance PV projects in a number of ways  Identifying and targeting of the top electricity consuming commercial accounts and incenting them to install PV systems that meet 100 percent of their electricity demand  Aggregating demand amongst small and medium sized commercial users and connecting them to developers and PV projects  Using PACE to finance solar PV installations for small and medium-sized businesses  Using commercial crowdsourcing to raise capital for potential community solar projects Solar for existing residential  Developing and implementing a new utility business model where a basic package of bundled energy efficiency and solar offerings are extended to all customers in order to overcome upfront capital cost barriers, and the measures are paid back through the customer’s utility bill  Offering programs to engage and inform customers and expand pricing transparency and competitiveness about solar PV installations  Offering in-store solar sales and customer interaction in large big box stores (e.g., Lowes, Home Depot).  Launching and Green neighborhood and EcoDistrict initiatives Packet Pg. 78 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 15 Roles and Responsibilities Role of the City Role of the Private Sector Role of Residents and Businesses Adaptation Impact Co-Benefits Supporting City Policies Packet Pg. 79 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 16 Strategy 9: Shift Heating Loads – Combined Heat and Power, Biofuels and Electrification This strategy encourages customers to switch away from natural gas for heating their buildings to alternatives such as geothermal, combined heat and power, biofuels, or electrification (when the electricity is supplied by fossil free sources such as solar, wind, etc.). Tactics The best time to take on fuel switching is during new construction or during major renovations or equipment replacements. Tactics to shift heading loads could include the following:  Developing utility programs that encourage all-electric or fuel switching for renovations and replacements in existing homes and businesses  Adopting standards and/or codes for major renovations that preference electric space heating and electric loads (versus natural gas loads)  Adopting standards and/or codes for major renovations that require a certain percentage of new thermal energy load to be sourced from renewable sources Roles and Responsibilities Role of the City Role of the Private Sector Role of Residents and Businesses Adaptation Impact Co-Benefits Supporting City Policies Packet Pg. 80 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 17 Objective. Reduce Emissions from Waste Strategy 10: Road to Zero Waste To reduce GHG emissions from waste, this strategy includes leveraging the City’s Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan: On the Road to Zero Waste, which has a goal of zero waste by 2030. Tactics This strategy would include tactics and programs implemented by both the City as well as private sector waste management businesses. The following summarizes programs for each that are being considered as part of this strategy. City Programs:  Apply community-based social marketing and other outreach/education  Funding support for a Resource Recovery Park  Add yard trimmings collection for single-family residents  Provide recycling to all multi-family residents and businesses  Universal Building code amendments for Construction waste  Operate a Re-use warehouse   Pursue alternatives through regional Zero Waste Plan Private Sector:  Help develop mixed C&D sorting facility in region  Help develop food scraps composting and digestion facilities  Help develop glass sorting facility in region Roles and Responsibilities Role of the City The City would have a significant role in implementing various programs to increase diversion from the landfill and decrease overall waste generation within the community. The current Road to Zero Waste outlines specific tactics towards this goal of net zero. There is a 37 percent gap in total reductions required to achieve net zero that would be achieved through additional programs yet to be identified. Role of the Private Sector Beyond programs implemented by the City, private sector waste management companies would have a role in implementing some of the strategy tactics, as outlined above. Role of Residents and Businesses Fort Collins residents and businesses would be the beneficiaries of the programs provided by the City and private businesses. To receive the services provided, residents and businesses would incur a $0.65 monthly fee for City programs. Additionally, to cover the costs for the new facilities that would be developed by the private sector, residents and businesses would be charged an additional fee of $5.15 per month. Packet Pg. 81 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 18 To cover these costs, residents and businesses would realize the savings from reduced costs to send material to the landfill. An assumption of increased costs to the landfill for consumers from $162/ton to $450/ton between now and 2030 has been assumed. Adaptation Impact Co-Benefits Supporting City Policies Packet Pg. 82 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 19 Objective. Inspire, Accelerate, Mobilize, Prepare Strategy 11: Encourage Eco-Districts/Catalyst Zones Many cities are realizing the value of implementing climate strategies at the neighborhood scale in order to holistically integrate changes in land use, buildings and transportation infrastructure with the community development assets and social networks required to affect change. . The purpose of an EcoDistrict is to provide a platform where citizens, institutions, and businesses partner with municipal leaders and utility providers to co-develop innovative district scale projects that meet ambitious sustainability objectives. The EcoDistrict framework includes principles involving economic, social and environmental sustainability which aligns with the City’s “triple bottom line” and community responsive approaches to decision making. The EcoDistrict performance requirements establish specific goals and targets in the areas of equitable development, community identity, access and mobility, energy and water efficiency, habitat and ecosystem function, materials management, and health and wellbeing, which align with the City’s seven strategic planning outcome areas. Tactics The primary tactic to implement this strategy is coordination of key neighborhood stakeholders and organizations, property developers, local institutions and businesses, the City, and utilities in the development of district scale projects that realize substantial carbon benefits through the implementation of EcoDistrict principles. The project should leverage advances made through Fort ZED partnerships and explore development opportunities that foster innovation and integration of sustainability strategies. City Program and Initiatives:  Block 32  Sustainable Neighborhoods Program  ClimateWise  Georgetown University Energy Prize Community Programs and Initiatives:  Fort ZED  Grant partnership with CSU  Green neighborhood initiatives for PV Cost-Benefit Analysis Roles and Responsibilities Role of the City Role of the Private Sector Role of Residents and Businesses Adaptation Impact Packet Pg. 83 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 20 Strategy 12: Carbon Sequestration and Beneficial Use This strategy aims to leverage carbon benefits which can be maximized through natural and biological systems that incorporate carbon capture and sequestration or provide a beneficial re-use of carbon emissions. Tactics The tactics for implementation of this strategy rely on holistic, systems approaches to land use, waste handling, agroforestry and the built environment. These tactics require strong partnerships among municipal, academic, business and community partners within Fort Collins and regionally. Specifically, involvement of waste management businesses; local ranchers, farmers and feedlot operators; federal and county land and resource managers; academic and research institutions; and the City will be essential for successful implementation. Preserve and Conserve Suitable Lands for Carbon Benefits:  Support and enhance initiatives through the Nature in the City project that establish baseline data for land use categories and climate change indicator species and characteristics. Support future initiatives to establish periodic data collection and land acquisitions that maximize carbon sequestration opportunities.  Support and enhance Poudre River Restoration projects that include restoring natural vegetation and riparian habitats along the river corridor that have the potential to maximize carbon sequestration opportunities.  Support initiatives, in addition to Nature in the City and Poudre River Restoration which develop and preserve open space including; grasslands, agricultural lands, wildlife habitat and corridors, wetlands, watersheds, and groundwater recharge areas that remove and sequester carbon from the atmosphere.  Support acquisition or protection of land for local agriculture and food production that results in net carbon benefits through decreased transportation or production emissions  Support acquisition or protection of land for onsite generation of renewable energy Soil Carbon Sequestration  Work with regional agricultural stakeholders to reduce loss of soil carbon from current agricultural practices, and investigate new methods of soil carbon sequestration such as: o conservation tillage practices that minimize soil disturbance, prevent loss of soil structure, soil compaction, and erosion of nutrient-rich topsoil o reduce pesticide use to prevent damage to soil microbial communities and the breakdown of soil organic matter o encourage use of organic fertilizers to improve soil structure and reduce indirect carbon emissions and environmental impacts from the production and transport of inorganic fertilizers o planting year round cover crops to increase below-ground biomass, improve soil structure, prevent soil erosion, reduce the use of pesticides, and increase soil fertility o replacing crop residue burning with mulching to create more above and below-ground biomass and reduce the erosive loss of valuable topsoil  Work with regional partners to understand the market dynamics and social science component of the low adoption rates of no-till policies along the Front Range Packet Pg. 84 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 21  Incentivize conversion to no-till techniques via programs such as the Natural Resource Conservation Service’s Equip Program (to bridge temporary decreased yields of no-till approaches)  Encourage grazing management best practices that increase forage productivity and quality to reduce loss of carbon from soils  Encourage research and development on the use of bio-char to restore carbon capacity in areas of degraded soil and deforested or burned areas  Promote practices that support healthy microbial communities to improve soil fertility, structure, and formation especially where soils have been degraded.  Promote irrigation management best practices to reduce fertilizer and irrigation requirements, improve soil fertility, and reduce the formation of saline- and sodic-impacted soils that can reduce soil carbon storage Promote and enhance rangeland , and forest management, re-forestation, and re-vegetation:  Support and enhance initiatives through the Forestry Department that implement baseline and periodic forest resources inventory data collection, urban forest management programs, and tree disease mitigation and restoration activities  Establish reforestation of compromised stands and burn areas within the Poudre River watershed to improve soil carbon retention, increase tree canopy carbon sequestration, minimize erosion impacts, and improve water quality (which results in a secondary carbon benefit)  Support ruminant and manure management best practices that reduce methane production to reduce source emissions. Some manure management methods can result in creation of soil amendments beneficial to soil fertility and increased biomass production.  Engage municipal, academic, and federal agency partners in maximizing urban forestry management for carbon benefits including supporting research on sequestration species combinations within ground-cover, mid-story and canopy species that maximize carbon sequestration within this region  Anticipate and plan for changes in tree canopy and shrub and grassland cover due to the environmental effects of climate change  Restore vegetative communities and guilds on degraded rangelands  Convert reflective and impervious surfaces to vegetated areas with drought tolerant native species, edible landscaping, or trees to increase above and below ground biomass and increase carbon benefits Promote innovative waste optimization efforts:  Support the goals of the Road to Zero Waste plan by investigating waste stream flows and energy related opportunities that result in a net carbon benefit  Catalyze regional opportunities for implementing a full-cycle waste optimization scheme that includes 1) composting of yard, food, and agricultural vegetative waste 2) anaerobic digestion of agricultural plant-based wastes and manure 3) distribution and use of soil supplement products from compost and digestion operations, and 4) capture and use of produced methane gas from compost and digestion operations o Nurture regional partnerships with farmers and ranchers to capture agricultural solid organic wastes Packet Pg. 85 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 22 o Create organic waste collection programs for ranchers, feedlot operator, crop producers and local dairies o Launch distribution program of fully decomposed municipal compost to commercial customers and local food producers to stimulate compost market economics  Investigate bio-char and biogas co-production technologies from corn stover, beetle pine kill and cleared ash woods (assuming future Emerald Ash Bore losses) via fast pyrolysis techniques  Encourage and incentivize the use of garbage disposal appliances for residential and commercial use to increase food waste diversion to municipal wastewater digestion facilities  Re-route carbon intensive industrial waste streams back into building products to assist in permanent carbon capture such as diversion of fly ash from solid waste mono-fills at coal fired energy sources to beneficial uses such as road base material or concrete ingredients. Heat Island:  Support initiatives to reduce carbon impacts from heat island effects such as: o Installing cool and green roofs, o Installing or converting heat absorbing impervious surfaces to vegetated areas and cool pavements o Construction of green walls or other shading structures over exposed walls and surfaces o Strategic planting of shade trees in and around the built environment  Convert reflective and impervious surfaces to vegetated areas with drought tolerant native species, edible landscaping, or trees to provide shade, cooling, and insulating. Cost-Benefit Analysis Roles and Responsibilities Role of the City The Role of the Private Sector Private sector buy-in to sequestration programs to be aided by market development and adoption processes for highest possible market penetration. Large scale industry and production facilities can lead the way in adoption of new processes in order to ready local markets for affordability of adoption across scales. Currently understood market economics for precedent economies should be scaled to the local level in order to achieve maximum market penetration. Role of Residents and Businesses Residential and commercial customers must be aided in adoption programs through proper equipping of household and businesses (such as widespread solid waste recycling and waste stream access). Residents and businesses can and should be educated on the importance of program participation and aided in uptake in order to achieve individual scale buy-in. Adaptation Impact  Increased resiliency of watershed and agricultural lands Packet Pg. 86 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 23  Implementing carbon mitigation strategies such as carbon sequestration helps to reduce and/or delay the need for certain adaptation strategies in the future Co-Benefits  Improved air quality  Improved soil health and fertility  Improved groundwater and surface water quality  Improved long term carbon holding potential  Decreased erosion  Increased ecosystem service functionality  Increased access to greenspace improves overall quality of life  Stimulation of local economy through job creation, new production and new Supporting City Policies  Road to Zero Waste Plan  Fort Collins Air Quality Plan  Roadmap for Coordinated and Enhanced Green Building Services  Nature in the City  Poudre River Projects  Forestry Department Urban Forest Inventory Packet Pg. 87 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) 24 Strategy 13: Develop Communications Campaign/Social Mobilization Tactics City Programs:  Private Sector: Roles and Responsibilities Adaptation Impact Co-Benefits Supporting City Policies Packet Pg. 88 Attachment2.3: CAP Strategy Descriptions (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT DETAILS PROJECT TITLE: Climate Action Plan Update OVERALL PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT LEVEL: Involve Key Stakeholders, get their ideas while also sharing a limited list (16-18) of key strategies determined by Citizen Advisory Committee where we need input. BOTTOM LINE QUESTION: Does the community support the draft proposed plan (when developed)? KEY STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT: General public 3 Public Forums (Dec 3 -Senior Center; January 22 -Lincoln Center; January 29 - Harmony Library, Community Room) Relevant Council Boards and Commissions Air Quality Advisory Board (October and January 26) Economic Advisory Commissions (December (tentative?) and January requested) Energy Board (December 4 and February 5) Natural Resources Advisory Board (October and January 21) Water Board (December 4 and January requested) Transportation Board (November 19, January requested) Colorado Clean Energy Cluster Colorado Clean Energy Cluster Board (November 20) Stakeholder Group Chamber LLAC (November 21 and January requested) North Fort Collins Business Association (November 19) requested future Downtown Business Association (January 15) Downtown Development Authority (December 11 and February 12) South Fort Collins Business Association (requested) Fort Collins Board of Realtors (December 9 and January 15) Fort Collins Sustainability Group (December 8 and January 12) Northern Colorado Renewable Energy Society (January 20) FortZED Steering Committee (November 7) Northern Colorado Clean Cities Coalition (January 5) Kiwanis Eye Openers (July; January requested) City Issues and Answers (December 4) CSU Sustainability Committee (December 15) Alliance for Sustainable Colorado (January 15) Climate Change Risk Management Specialists (Invited to Open Houses) ClimateWise partners and Utilities key accounts – incorporated into other events Colorado State University – Sustainability Committee (December 15) Clean Water Innovation Cluster – pending South Fort Collins Business Association – requested Interfaith Council – requested Local Food Cluster – requested Visit Colorado - requested CSU Faculty Club – requestedGeorgie15 ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 89 Attachment2.4: Public Engagement Details (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) Guiding Principles for Climate Action Plan Financing Draft 11/19/14 City/Utility: 1. No significant adverse impact on the City’s balance sheet 2. No adverse impact on the City’s credit rating 3. The City’s investment should catalyze investment in strategies by end-users and the third parties 4. Internally the City’s priority is utility rate revenue before general fund revenue Platte River Power Authority 1. Maintain Competitive Rates (Platte River should remain the lowest cost wholesale power provider located in Colorado) Other IPR Planning Objectives  Maintain Minimum Energy Reserve Margin of 15 percent  Achieve Renewables of 20 percent by 2020  Achieve CO2 Reduction of 20 percent by 2020, 35 percent by 2030, and 80 percent by 2050 Consumers/End Users 1. Affordable, reliable energy 2. An understanding of benefits versus costs that allows each user to make their own determination of value 3. Others? Private/Third Party Sources of Capital 1. ATTACHMENT 5 Packet Pg. 90 Attachment2.5: Guiding Principles for CAP Financing (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenarios) Climate Action Plan - Strategies 1 City Council Work Session December 9, 2014 Climate Action Plan Preliminary Strategy Analysis ATTACHMENT 6 Packet Pg. 91 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting CAP Update Process 2 2014 Spg/Sum Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 2015 2/17/15 Council Action 1/13/15 Council Work Session: Scenarios /TBL Impact Platte River modeling for Fort Collins complete 12/9 Council Work Session: Strategy Analysis/ Interim Scenarios January: Citizen Advisory Committee Wraps up 8/12 Council Work Session: Framework April: GHG Reduction Objectives Set 10/28 Council Work Session: High Level Strategies Brendle Group Model developed; strategies identified RMI Tactics Research Completed June: Citizen Advisory Committee kicks off Packet Pg. 92 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Direction Sought 3 1. Does Council have feedback on the proposed City policy elements identified thus far? 2. Does Council have any comments on the planned public engagement? 3. Is Council comfortable considering a high level CAP in February 2015 that could be followed by a more detailed implementation plan? 4. Is there additional information City Council wants staff to investigate before February 2015? Packet Pg. 93 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Role of Goal and CAP Goal • Community leadership • Attract outside capital • Enhance innovation • Spur community engagement CAP • Demonstrates feasibility • High level strategic plan • Roadmap for 15+ years • Requires periodic updates • Each action requires further analysis and vetting Packet Pg. 94 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting First CAP Model Iteration - Strategies 5 Approximates: • 23% by 2020 • 73% by 2030 • 97 % by 2050 (Below 2005) Res. Energy Efficiency CII Energy Efficiency Advanced Renewables Packet Pg. 95 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting First CAP Model Iteration 6 Packet Pg. 96 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting 7 Electric supply: • 80% reduction in electricity GHG intensity Existing homes and businesses: • Are 36% more efficient • 40% of homes and 10% of existing commercial buildings are converted to all electric (heating, cooking, etc.) • 22% of homes and 50% of businesses have installed solar As modeled, this would require…in the next 15 years Packet Pg. 97 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting 8 New construction: • Will be 85% more efficient than current code • 45% have enough solar PV to achieve net zero energy • 30% of new homes & 10% of new businesses are all electric Vehicles and Mileage • 90 % new purchases are electric vehicles • Remaining 10 % are ~40% more efficient than avg. new stock • People are driving 29% less miles per year As modeled, this would require…in the next 15 years Packet Pg. 98 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting 9 First CAP Model Iteration: Net Cost /Savings 2020 2030 2040 2050 % below 2005 baseline 23% 73% 87% 97% Net Cumulative Costs/Savings $200M cost $600M Savings $3B Savings $8B Savings Avg. monthly cost/savings per resident $20 cost $20 savings $20 savings $100 savings Packet Pg. 99 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Findings of the First Model Iteration 10 o Strategies can essentially meet the goals, with minor adjustments o Renewable Energy is the largest strategy (38% of reduction in 2030) o Energy efficiency is the second largest (27% of reduction in 2030) Packet Pg. 100 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Key Variables in Model 11 o Discount rate (for estimating costs/savings over time) o Cost of carbon o Elements to include in GHG Inventory (e. g. airline travel?) o Amount of renewables in electric system Packet Pg. 101 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Scenario Options • More emphasis on utility scale renewable energy – Technology- based – Lower risk of not achieving • More emphasis on maximizing community participation – Behavior-based – Greater risk of not achieving 12 Packet Pg. 102 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Key Policy Elements of draft CAP 13 Energy efficiency for existing commercial • Energy reporting and disclosure • Energy improvement measures • Certification of building operators who manage base building systems • Retro-commissioning every 10 years • Upgrades of lighting fixtures • Rate Structures that incentivize reduced demand Packet Pg. 103 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Key Policy Elements of draft CAP 14 Energy efficiency for residential • Rental licensing program requiring compliance or efficiency improvements • New utility business model • Address barriers for condominium energy efficiency • Awareness and Education • Increase access to loans and funding • Convert residential customers to demand instructive utility rate Packet Pg. 104 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting CAP Public Engagement 15 Public Open Houses • December 3 • January 22 and 29 Civic Groups • Fort Collins Sustainability Group • Northern Colo. Renewable Energy Society • Northern Colo Clean Cities Coalition • Chamber LLAC • North Fort Collins Business Association • Fort Collins Board of Realtors • Downtown Business Association • Downtown Development Authority • Kiwanis Eye Openers • CSU Sustainability Committee Packet Pg. 105 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting CAP Public Engagement 16 Council Advisory Boards • Air Quality Advisory Board • Economic Advisory Commission • Energy Board • Natural Resources Advisory Board • Transportation Board • Water Board Numerous additional presentations requested • Interfaith Council • Visit Colorado • Etc. Packet Pg. 106 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting 17 White House Task Force On Climate Preparedness and Resilience Report completed November 2014 • Climate Resilience Toolkit • Host one of seven “Climate Hubs” • Host to FEMA National Exercise Related Next Steps • Continued collaboration among Task Force members • Colorado Local Resilience Project • CAP update • Municipal Climate Adaptation Plan Packet Pg. 107 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting 18 CAP Next Steps • CAC frame scenarios of interest (Dec) • Public engagement on strategy concepts (Nov/Dec) • Platte River modeling for Fort Collins scenarios incorporated into CAP model (Dec) • Triple Bottom Line assessment of scenarios (Dec/Jan) • CAC develops recommendation (Jan) • Coordination with Energy Policy Updates (Jan/Feb) • Public engagement (Jan/Feb) • Jan 13, 2015 Council work session • February 17, 2015 Council action Packet Pg. 108 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting Direction Sought 19 1. Does Council have feedback on the proposed City policy elements identified thus far? 2. Does Council have any comments on the planned public engagement? 3. Is Council comfortable considering a high level CAP in February 2015 that could be followed by a more detailed implementation plan? 4. Is there additional information City Council wants staff to investigate before February 2015? Packet Pg. 109 Attachment2.6: Powerpoint presentation (2682 : Climate Action Plan - Strategy Analysis and Crafting ! #$ # % & ' ( )   *  )(   (  )*  + )  ,   -)./   !, -*  0!!    .  1 - -)  % & *2 *3 $  -)*4  )1  0)  '  +  * 5)*   ))2* 6   ,   -).    $ $  ) %  & 6 1-)0*7   ,   -). *( -*  *2 *3 $    2  * * *2 *3   + 2    8/9:;<=> 8 ATTACHMENT 3     '854!97++94.'4)+3+49     :/+9&54+362+3+49'9/545<495<4 !# )7588/4-8 6+*)7588/4-8       :/+9&54+362+3+49'9/547'1+95"7/2(> )7588/4-8       !:89'/4'(2+./2*'7++49+7      !  +)7+'9/54'2"7'/24.'4)+3+498'4'2"7'/2  !*139*)+531453/*(70.67&7(73'*5 6*66.32)8*73)*).(&7*)+82).2,  !  +)7+'9/54'2"7'/24.'4)+3+498;+72'4* 5'*"7'/2  !*139*)+531453/*(70.67&7(73'*5 6*66.32)8*73)*).(&7*)+82).2,  !  +)7+'9/54'2"7'/24.'4)+3+498/8) +8975538 +89895687/41/4-5:49'/48  !*139*)+531453/*(70.67&7(73'*5 6*66.32)8*73)*).(&7*)+82).2,  # !5:9.<+8944+='9/54 5'*3675;+3+498:4*     5<495<4'/49+4'4)+!.56    # %+89'579+;+4:+3675;+3+49836'2'7/;+95"',9/22 5'*      !  !5:9.+'89533:4/9>+49+7 +/8:7+'4*536+9/9/;+552    !  $+25'4*/94+88'71         '71/4-'7'-+ +9'/2!6')+        '89:2(+77>577/*5762'44/4-67+2/3*+8/-4'4* %6:7).'8+  Row # Page # Project Capital Annual O& M Notes  # $/4++3'>7'*+!+6'7'9+*7588/4-+8/-4 %'4*54897:)9   # !5:9."/3(+72/4+ 5'*3675;+3+498   !:(959'2   ID              %*56.32  #-.6.6&+82)&2)(380)'*5*)8(*):380)5*6807.2+*:*5453/*(76.14539*1*276    /)>)2+4,7'897:)9:7+3675;+3+498!',+ 5:9+895;+7><.+7+  #-.6.6&+82)&2)(380)'*5*)8(*):380)5*6807.2+*:*5453/*(76.14539*1*276    :8!9563675;+3+498!',+ 5:9+895;+7><.+7+  #-.6.6&+82)&2)(380)'*5*)8(*):380)5*6807.2+*:*5453/*(76.14539*1*276 %   5<495<45:*7+ /;+74.'4)+3+4985<495<4 '>'1'71    3675*)8(*)+531 73 +3003:.2,(73'*5 382(.06*66.32 #  /1+ +*7'*+!+6'7'9+*7588/4-8:4*    #-.6.6&+82)&2)(380)'*5*)8(*):380)5*6807.2+*:*5453/*(76.14539*1*276  # "7'48,579:82++9 +62')+3+49   #-.6.6&+82)&2)(380)'*5*)8(*):380)5*6807.2+*:*5453/*(76.14539*1*276  # 79+7/'249+78+)9/543675;+3+498:4*  #-.6.6&+82)&2)(380)'*5*)8(*):380)5*6807.2+*:*5453/*(76.14539*1*276  !  %'9+7!:89'/4'(/2/9>3675;+3+498!5:9.7/*-+77/-'9/54!>89+3    !  %'9+7!:89'/4'(/2/9>3675;+3+498588/27++1!>49.+9/)":7,       362+3+49/4-'9:7+/49.+/9>    #-.6.6&+82)&2)(380)'*5*)8(*):380)5*6807.2+*:*5453/*(76.14539*1*276 "  536:9+7/*+*/86'9). +)57*'4'-+3+49!>89+3#6-7'*+8  ! 5362+9/545,9.+'7*+48'99.+'7*+4854!67/4-7++1    !  !5:9.+'89533:4/9>+49+7     !  !5:9.+'89533:4/9>+49+7 +/8:7+'4*'6552**95+49+7     #   /4)524;+4:+3675;+3+498+8/-454897:)9/54%/9.5:97/*-+    !:(959'2         /4*+4!97++9 +45;'9/548+8/-454897:)9/54   53/*(7.2(5*&6*)+531 73 '&6*)32+*&6.'.0.7;   +73'4+49!:66579/;+5:8/4-  3675*)8(*)+531 73 453/*(767.005*7&.261&7(-$2.76)534+531 73    533:4/9>'71+962')+   (73'*5 382(.0).5*(7.3273(327.28*453/*(7(326.)*5&7.32  ! +45;'9/545,9.+/8957/)'74+-/+:/2*/4-   (73'*5 382(.0).5*(7.3273(327.28*453/*(7(326.)*5&7.32 !  /7+:8+:3   (73'*5 382(.0).5*(7.3273(327.28*453/*(7(326.)*5&7.32 !  2:("/)5 +45;'9/54  (73'*5 382(.0).5*(7.3273(327.28*453/*(7(326.)*5&7.32 !  /9>'71"7'/4  (73'*5 382(.0).5*(7.3273(327.28*453/*(7(326.)*5&7.32 !  %'9+7!:89'/4'(/2/9>3675;+3+498,57'718'4*52,'7154;+78/5495 '<%'9+777/-'9/54   (73'*5 382(.0).5*(7.3273(327.28*453/*(7(326.)*5&7.32 #  79+7/'2 5'*<'>3675;+3+498:4*  *:453/*(7&))*)&77-*).5*(7.323+382(.0  !:(959'2        5<495<4 +897553  39*).273'8),*7&7(73'*5 6*66.32+82)*).2      !  +)7+'9/54'2"7'/24.'4)+3+498!67/4-7++1"7'/2   !*139*)+531453/*(70.67&7(73'*5 6*66.32)8*73)*).(&7*)+82).2,  !  +)7+'9/54'2"7'/24.'4)+3+4985:7*7+ /;+7"7'/2   !*139*)+531453/*(70.67&7(73'*5 6*66.32)8*73)*).(&7*)+82).2,  !  5523675;+3+498   39*).273'8),*7&7(73'*5 6*66.32+82)*).2       4;+893+498/4+/-.(57.55* +8957'9/54       522+-++*/'4'4*!97++98)'6+4.'4)+3+49 +45;'9/548      /4)524+/-.(57.55*"7'/2    #  !9'79:6,57/1+!.'7+    # 7/*-+'/49+4'4)+'4* +62')+3+49   % 2/3'9+)9/54750+)98  ID                %*56.32 ATTACHMENT 2