The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 10/06/2015 - FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 125, 2015, APPROPRIAgenda Item 10 Item # 10 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY October 6, 2015 City Council STAFF Timothy Kemp, Civil Engineer SUBJECT First Reading of Ordinance No. 125, 2015, Appropriating Prior Year Reserves in the Capital Project Fund for the Building on Basics Intersection Improvements and the Street Oversizing Fund into the Capital Projects Fund for the Timberline Road–Drake Road to Prospect Road Improvement Project, and the Cultural Services and Facilities Fund for the Art in Public Places Program. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to appropriate $1,300,000 of prior year reserves from the Building on Basics Fund and appropriate $200,000 of prior year reserves from the Street Oversizing Fund (total appropriation of $1,500,000) into the Capital Project Fund for the “Timberline Road-Drake Road to Prospect Road” Improvement Project. The initial budget for this project was established in 2013. Between conceptual planning in early 2013 and final design in late 2015, construction prices have risen between 30% and 50%. This appropriation will allow staff to finalize the design and construction of: safety, multi-modal, operational, and landscape improvements. The project will be constructed in 2016. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The “Timberline Road-Drake Road to Prospect Road” was one of the original Building on Basics (BOB) projects approved in 2005. A good portion of the corridor improvements were completed through a special improvement district (SID); the remainder of the improvements were moved to the later years of BOB. In order to bring the street up to current standards, improve safety, reduce congestion, and satisfy the voter- approved ballot language, the following items need to be constructed:  Sidewalk, curb and gutter along the west side of Timberline (Prospect to Bear Mountain);  Landscaped medians and parkways on the rest of Timberline (Prospect to Blackbird);  Landscaped medians on Prospect; and  Right turn lane improvements and pork chop islands at the Timberline and Prospect intersection. In 2011, the Engineering Department completed an Arterial Intersection Prioritization Study which classified the Timberline and Prospect intersection as a top-ranked location for needed safety and operational improvements. This project has been before Council on multiple occasions as staff has worked through the design and right-of-way acquisition phases:  Ordinance No. 181, 2013 (Declaring City Owned Property as Road Right-of-Way); and  Ordinance No. 043, 2015 (Authorizing the Acquisition by Eminent Domain of Certain Lands Necessary to Construct Public Improvements in Connection with the Prospect Road and Timberline Road Intersection Improvements Project). Agenda Item 10 Item # 10 Page 2 The additional funding will allow staff to construct the plan as currently designed. The project components, as listed above, meet all of the BOB ballot language and are essential elements needed to accomplish the long- term operational and safety benefits at this intersection. CITY FINANCIAL IMPACTS This Council action will authorize the appropriation of prior year reserves from the BOB Fund and appropriating prior year reserves in the Street Oversizing Fund, and authorizing the transfer of appropriations from the Street Oversizing Fund into the Capital Project Fund for the “Timberline Road-Drake Road to Prospect Road” improvement project, and transferring appropriations to the Cultural Services and Facilities Fund for the Art in Public Places Program. Staff has identified two funding sources to make up the project shortfall of $1,500,000. The first funding source is from the available BOB quarter-cent sales tax; the second funding source is from prior year reserves in the Street Oversizing Fund. The table below summarizes the existing and requested funding for the project: Funding Summary Prior Appropriation from BOB (2005) $3,500,000 New Appropriation of Prior Year Reserves from BOB $1,300,000 New Appropriation of Prior Year Reserves from Street Oversizing Fund $ 200,000 TOTAL $5,000,000 One percent (1%) of the $1.3 million BOB appropriation ($13,000) will be transferred to the Cultural Services and Facilities fund for a contribution to the Art in Public Places (APP) program. Of the $13,000 APP contribution, $10,140 will be reserved for the APP artwork and $2,860 reserved for the maintenance of the artwork and operations of the APP program. Short and long term economic benefits of the intersection and corridor enhancements:  Safety improvements resulting in fewer accidents;  Easing of traffic congestion resulting in reduced fuel consumption;  Optimization of signal timing to reduce vehicle delay resulting in improved air quality; and  Decrease in accident and delay costs (as calculated per the Highway Safety Manual) PUBLIC OUTREACH Staff is currently working on a detailed Communication and Public Outreach Plan. Implementation of the Plan will begin in early 2016 and go through the end of construction. Key elements of the Plan include the project purpose, infrastructure changes and construction timeline. The Plan will tailor specific communication tools to the traveling public, business owners and local neighborhoods/schools. Additionally, during the conceptual design phase, Staff developed a website for the project. This website will be kept current with design and construction information. <http://www.fcgov.com/engineering/prospect-timberline.php> ATTACHMENTS 1. Location map (PDF) 2. Sustainability Assessment Summary and Tool (PDF) Blackbird Dr E Pros p ect Rd S Timberline Rd Prospect and Timberline Location Map ³ 0 125 250 500 750 1,000 Feet Legend Prospect & Timberline Project Limits ATTACHMENT 1 SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT SUMMARY DATE: February 26, 2015 SUBJECT: Sustainability Assessment (SA) Summary for the Prospect Road and Timberline Road Intersection Improvements Project Key issues identified: • Negative temporary construction impacts to local businesses, commuters, bicycles, pedestrians, and the environment. • No planned buffered bicycle lanes. Suggested mitigation actions: • Detours, pedestrian and bicycle access, and other construction best practices will be used to maintain connectivity and access to local businesses. • The project will provide the ability to install buffered bicycle lanes in the future. ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐ͕Ϭ͘ϱ ^ŽĐŝĂů͕ϭ͘ϱ ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů Ͳϭ͘ϱ ZĂƚŝŶŐ ǀĞƌĂŐĞ͕Ϭ͘ϯ ϭ Ϯ Ϭ ϭ͘Ϭ Ͳϰ͘Ϭ Ͳϯ͘Ϭ ͲϮ͘Ϭ Ͳϭ͘Ϭ Ϭ͘Ϭ ϭ͘Ϭ Ϯ͘Ϭ ϯ͘Ϭ ϰ͘Ϭ ^ƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚǇZĂƚŝŶŐ ZĂƚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŽƵƚŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ ZĂƚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ Rating Legend 3 Very positive 2 Moderately positive 1 Slightly positive 0 Not relevant or neutral -1 Slightly negative -2 Moderately negative, impact likely -3 Very negative, impact expected ATTACHMENT 2 ΎdŚĞ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ^dǁĂƐĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚďǇŵŽĚŝĨǇŝŶŐƚŚĞdƌŝƉůĞŽƚƚŽŵ>ŝŶĞ;d>ͿŶĂůǇƐŝƐdŽŽůĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚďǇƵŐĞŶĞ͕KƌĞŐŽŶ͕:ƵůǇϮϬϬϵ͘ϭ City of Fort Collins SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT TOOL (SAT) (November 2014) Creating a sustainable community Plan Fort Collins is an expression of the community’s resolve to act sustainably: to systemically, creatively, and thoughtfully utilize environmental, human, and economic resources to meet our present needs and those of future generations without compromising the ecosystems upon which we depend. How to use the tool The Sustainability Assessment Tool (SAT) is designed to inform a deeper understanding of how policy and program choices affect the social equity, environmental health and economic health of the community. The City of Fort Collins has developed a Sustainability Assessment Framework that describes the purpose, objectives, and guidelines to assist City Program/Project Managers to determine: • The process for cross-department collaboration in using the SAT • Timing for applying a SAT • When to apply a SAT • How to document the results of the SAT and present at City Council Work Sessions and Regular Council Meetings Further detailed guidance is available at: http://citynet.fcgov.com/sustainability/sustainabilityassessments.php The SAT does not dictate a particular course of action; rather, the analysis provides policy makers and staff with a greater awareness of some of the trade-offs, benefits and consequences associated with a proposal, leading to more mindful decision-making. Brief description of proposal Please provide a brief description of your proposal – 100 words or less dŚŝƐŽƵŶĐŝůĂĐƚŝŽŶŝƚĞŵǁŝůůĂƵƚŚŽƌŝǌĞƚŚĞƵƐĞŽĨĞŵŝŶĞŶƚĚŽŵĂŝŶĨŽƌWƌŽƐƉĞĐƚZŽĂĚĂŶĚdŝŵďĞƌůŝŶĞZŽĂĚ/ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐWƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ Staff lead(s): Please note staff name, position/division and phone number dŝŵ<ĞŵƉ͕ŝǀŝůŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͕ϵϳϬͲϰϭϲͲϮϳϭϵ >ŝŶĚƐĂǇ<ƵŶƚǌ͕ZĞĂůƐƚĂƚĞ^ƉĞĐŝĂůŝƐƚ͕ϵϳϬͲϮϮϭͲϲϮϳϱ Ϯ Social Equity Described: Placing priority upon protecting, respecting, and fulfilling the full range of universal human rights, including those pertaining to civil, political, social, economic, and cultural concerns. Providing adequate access to employment, food, housing, clothing, recreational opportunities, a safe and healthy environment and social services. Eliminating systemic barriers to equitable treatment and inclusion, and accommodating the differences among people. Emphasizing justice, impartiality, and equal opportunity for all. Goal/Outcome: It is our priority to support an equitable and adequate social system that ensures access to employment, food, housing, clothing, education, recreational opportunities, a safe and healthy environment and social services. Additionally, we support equal access to services and seek to avoid negative impact for all people regardless of age, economic status, ability, immigration or citizenship status, race/ethnicity, gender, relationship status, religion, or sexual orientation. Equal opportunities for all people are sought. A community in which basic human rights are addressed, basic human needs are met, and all people have access to tools and resources to develop their capacity. This tool will help identify how the proposal affects community members and if there is a difference in how the decisions affect one or more social groups. Areas of consideration in creating a vibrant socially equitable Fort Collins are: basic needs, inclusion, community safety, culture, neighborhoods, and advancing social equity. Analysis Prompts • The prompts below are examples of the issues that need to be addressed. They are not a checklist. Not all prompts and issues will be relevant for any one project. Issues not covered by these prompts may be very pertinent to a proposal - please include them in the analysis. • Is this proposal affected by any current policy, procedure or action plan? Has advice been sought from organizations that have a high level of expertise, or may be significantly affected by this proposal? Proposal Description dŚŝƐŽƵŶĐŝůĂĐƚŝŽŶŝƚĞŵǁŝůůĂƵƚŚŽƌŝǌĞƚŚĞƵƐĞŽĨĞŵŝŶĞŶƚĚŽŵĂŝŶĨŽƌƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲ ǁĂǇĂĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶĂƚƚŚĞWƌŽƐƉĞĐƚͬdŝŵďĞƌůŝŶĞ/ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ 1. Meeting Basic Human Needs • How does the proposal impact access to food, shelter, employment, health care, educational and recreational opportunities, a safe and healthy living environment or social services? • Does this proposal affect the physical or mental health of individuals, or the status of public health in our community? • How does this proposal contribute to helping people achieve and maintain an adequate standard of living, including housing, or food affordability, employment opportunities, healthy families, or other resiliency factors? Analysis/Discussion ƚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ŐĂƉƐŝŶƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚďŝĐǇĐůĞĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚǇĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇ ĞǆŝƐƚ͘dŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŐĂƉƐďǇĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŶŐƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐĂŶĚ ďŝĐǇĐůĞůĂŶĞƐ͘ůůƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐǁŝůůĐŽŵƉůǇǁŝƚŚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ dŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶŵŽƌĞĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĨůŽǁĚƵĞŝŶůĂƌŐĞƉĂƌƚƚŽƚŚĞ ŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĂĨƌĞĞƌŝŐŚƚƚƵƌŶ͘>ĞƐƐǀĞŚŝĐůĞĐŽŶŐĞƐƚŝŽŶǁŝůůůŝŬĞůǇƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶ ƌĞĚƵĐĞĚĨƌƵƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌĐŽŵŵƵƚĞƌƐ͘ dŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇŶĞŐĂƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽůŽĐĂůƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͕ďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐĂŶĚƚŚĞ ƚƌĂǀĞůŝŶŐƉƵďůŝĐĂƐĂƌĞƐƵůƚŽĨĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐ͘dŚĞƌĞǁŝůůĂůƐŽďĞĂ ƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇĐůŽƐƵƌĞŽĨƚŚĞ^ƉƌŝŶŐƌĞĞŬdƌĂŝůĂƚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘ 2. Addressing Inequities and being Inclusive • Are there any inequities to specific population subsets in this proposal? If so, how will they be addressed? • Does this proposal meet the standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act? • How does this proposal support the participation, growth WƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚďŝĐǇĐůĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚǇǁŝůůůŝŬĞůǇƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚƋƵĂůŝƚǇŽĨůŝĨĞ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐĂĐĐĞƐƐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͕ĨŽƌƐĞŶŝŽƌƐ͕ǇŽƵƚŚ͕ ƉĞŽƉůĞǁŝƚŚĚŝƐĂďŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘ dŚĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞǁŝůůƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶďĞƚƚĞƌĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽůŽĐĂů ďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͘ ϯ and healthy development of our youth? Does it include Developmental Assets? • If the proposal affects a vulnerable section of our community (i.e. youth, persons with disabilities, etc.) ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇĞǆŝƐƚƐ͘dŚĞƐŚŽƌƚĞƌĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞǁŝůůƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶĂŵŽƌĞĐŽŵĨŽƌƚĂďůĞĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ ĨŽƌŵĂŶǇƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐĂůŝŬĞůǇƐĂĨĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ͘ dŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƚŚĞ^ƉƌŝŶŐƌĞĞŬdƌĂŝů͕ƉƌŽŵŽƚŝŶŐƚƌĂŝů ƵƐĞ͘ dŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƚŚĞĂďŝůŝƚǇĨŽƌŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƚŝŽŶŽĨďƵĨĨĞƌĞĚďŝĐǇĐůĞůĂŶĞƐĂƚĂ ĨƵƚƵƌĞƚŝŵĞ͘ 3. Ensuring Community Safety • How does this proposal address the specific safety and personal security needs of groups within the community, including women, people with disabilities, seniors, minorities, religious groups, children, immigrants, workers and others? WƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚďŝĐǇĐůĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞǁŝůůůŝŬĞůǇƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶĂ ƐĂĨĞƌĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĨŽƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐĂŶĚďŝĐǇĐůŝƐƚƐ͘ dŚĞƐŚŽƌƚĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚďǇƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůůŝŬĞůǇƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶƐĂĨĞƌ ĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͘ ƵĨĨĞƌĞĚďŝĐǇĐůĞůĂŶĞƐĂƌĞŶŽƚƉůĂŶŶĞĚĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ 4. Culture • Is this proposal culturally appropriate and how does it affirm or deny the cultures of diverse communities? • How does this proposal create opportunities for artistic and cultural expression? dŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐŵĂŶǇĐƵůƚƵƌĂůůǇͲƌŝĐŚĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐƌƚŝŶWƵďůŝĐ WůĂĐĞƐ͕ƵƌďĂŶĚĞƐŝŐŶĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶďƌŝĚŐĞĞŶŚĂŶĐĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂŶĚ ůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚŵĞĚŝĂŶƐͬƉĂƌŬǁĂǇƐ͘ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůůǇ͕ƐŽŵĞŽĨƚŚĞƐŝůŽƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇůŽĐĂƚĞĚ ŶĞĂƌƚŚĞŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶǁŝůůďĞƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂŶĚƌĞƉƵƌƉŽƐĞĚŝŶĂŝƚǇĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇ ƉĂƌŬ͘ dŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐŝŶƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚŵĂƚĐŚƚŚĞďƌĂŶĚĂŶĚƐƉŝƌŝƚŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͕ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂƐĞŶƐĞŽĨƉůĂĐĞĂƚƚŚĞŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚǁŝůůĞŶŚĂŶĐĞƚŚĞĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐŽĨ ƚŚŝƐŐĂƚĞǁĂǇŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶ͘ 5. Addressing the Needs of Neighborhoods • How does this proposal impact specific Fort Collins neighborhoods? • How are community members, stakeholders and interested parties provided with opportunities for meaningful participation in the decision making process of this proposal? • How does this proposal enhance neighborhoods and stakeholders’ sense of commitment and stewardship to our community? dŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůŚĂǀĞĂƉŽƐŝƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚŽŶƚŚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐŽĨůŽĐĂůƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐƚŽ ŶĞĂƌďǇďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͕ƚƌĂŝůƐ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĚĞƐƚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘tŝƚŚƚŚĞƉƌĞƐĞŶĐĞŽĨŶĞĂƌďǇ ĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚĐŽŵƉůĞǆĞƐ͕ŵĂŶǇŽĨƚŚĞůŽĐĂůƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐŵĂǇŶŽƚŚĂǀĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽ ǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐĂŶĚŵĂǇƌĞůǇŚĞĂǀŝůǇŽŶǁĂůŬŝŶŐŽƌďŝĐǇĐůŝŶŐ͘ ƐĂƌĞƐƵůƚŽĨƚŚĞĞŶŚĂŶĐĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůůŝŬĞůǇŝŶƐƚŝůůĂƐĞŶƐĞŽĨ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƉƌŝĚĞ͕ĐƌĞĂƚŝŶŐĂƐĞŶƐĞŽĨƉůĂĐĞĨŽƌƚŚĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͘ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚ͕ŽƉĞŶŚŽƵƐĞƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌƉƵďůŝĐŝŶƉƵƚĂƌĞ ƉůĂŶŶĞĚĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƉŚĂƐĞŽĨƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ dŚĞƌĞƉƵƌƉŽƐŝŶŐŽĨƐŽŵĞŽĨƚŚĞƐŝůŽƐĂƚƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶǁŝůůƉŽƐŝƚŝǀĞůǇ ŝŵƉĂĐƚŽƚŚĞƌŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐŝŶƚŚĞŝƚǇƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞŚĞƌŝƚĂŐĞ ĂŶĚĐƵůƚƵƌĞŽĨ&ŽƌƚŽůůŝŶƐ͘ 6. Building Capacity to Advance Social Equity • What plans have been made to communicate about and share the activities and impacts of this proposal within the City organization and/or the community? • How does this proposal strengthen collaboration and ϰ Key issues: WŽƐŝƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚŽŶǀĞŚŝĐƵůĂƌĐŽŵŵƵƚĞƌƐ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ĂŶĚďŝĐǇĐůŝƐƚƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘ ĞǀĞůŽƉĂƐƚƌŽŶŐƐĞŶƐĞŽĨƉůĂĐĞ͕ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇĂŶĚĐƵůƚƵƌĞƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂŶĚĚĞƐŝŐŶĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ >ĂĐŬŽĨďƵĨĨĞƌĞĚďŝĐǇĐůĞůĂŶĞƐ͘ dĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇŶĞŐĂƚŝǀĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͘ Potential mitigation strategies: /ŶƐƚĂůůďƵĨĨĞƌĞĚďŝĐǇĐůĞůĂŶĞƐ͘ ĞƚŽƵƌƌŽƵƚĞƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐĨŽƌǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐ͕ďŝĐǇĐůĞƐĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͘ Overall, the effect of this proposal on social equity would be: Please reach a consensus or take a group average on the rating, enter an “x” in one of the following boxes and indicate the overall rating. Rating represents group consensus X Rating represents group average нϯ нϮ нϭ Ϭ Ͳϭ ͲϮ Ͳϯ Very positive Moderately positive Slightly positive Not relevant or neutral Slightly negative Moderately negative, impact likely Very negative, impact expected y Environmental Health Described: Healthy, resilient ecosystems, clean air, water, and land. Decreased pollution and waste, lower carbon emissions that contribute to climate change, lower fossil fuel use, decreased or no toxic product use. Prevent pollution, reduce use, promote reuse, and recycle natural resources. Goal/Outcome: Protect, preserve, and restore the natural environment to ensure long-term maintenance of ecosystem functions necessary for support of future generations of all species. Avoid or eliminate adverse environmental impacts of all activities, continually review all activities to identify and implement strategies to prevent pollution; reduce energy consumption and increase energy efficiency; conserve water; reduce consumption and waste of natural resources; reuse, recycle and purchase recycled content products; reduce reliance on non-renewable resources. Analysis Prompts • The prompts below are examples of issues that need to be addressed. They are not a checklist. Not all prompts and issues will be relevant for any one project. Issues not covered by these prompts may be very pertinent to a proposal - please include them in the analysis. • Is this proposal affected by any current policy, procedure or action plan? Has advice been sought from organizations that have a high level ϱ • Does this proposal affect ecosystem functions or processes related to land, water, air, or plant or animal communities? • Will this proposal generate data or knowledge related to the use of resources? • Will this proposal promote or support education in prevention of pollution, and effective practices for reducing, reusing, and recycling of natural resources? • Does this proposal require or promote the continuous improvement of the environmental performance of the City organization or community? • Will this proposal affect the visual/landscape or aesthetic elements of the community? ĚĚŝŶŐĂƐƚĂŶĚͲĂůŽŶĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶďƌŝĚŐĞŝŶůŝĞƵŽĨǁŝĚĞŶŝŶŐƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƌŽĂĚǁĂǇ ďƌŝĚŐĞǁŝůůŚĂǀĞůĞƐƐŝŵƉĂĐƚŽŶƚŚĞ^ƉƌŝŶŐƌĞĞŬ͘ dŚĞƌĞŝƐƚŚĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚǇĨŽƌƌĞƵƐĞŽŶƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚŽĨĂŶĂůƌĞĂĚǇͲ ĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶďƌŝĚŐĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇĂƚĂŶŽƚŚĞƌůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘ /ƚŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƌŽĂĚǁĂǇǁŝĚĞŶŝŶŐǁŝůůŚĂǀĞ ŶĞŐĂƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŽŶƚŚĞůŽĐĂůĞĐŽƐǇƐƚĞŵƐ͘ >ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚĂƌĞĂƐĂŶĚƚƌĞĞƐǁŝůůďĞĂĚĚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘ dŚĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚŽĨƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĨůŽǁǁŝůůůŝŬĞůǇƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶƌĞĚƵĐĞĚĂŝƌƉŽůůƵƚŝŽŶ͘ ^ƚĂĨĨĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞƐƌĞĐǇĐůŝŶŐŽĨĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĂƚ,ŽĨĨŵĂŶDŝůůĂƐŽƉƉŽƐĞĚ ƚŽƌĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƚŽĂůĂŶĚĨŝůů͘ 2. Climate Change • Does this proposal directly generate or require the generation of greenhouse gases (such as through electricity consumption or transportation)? • How does this proposal align with the carbon reduction goals for 2020 goal adopted by the City Council? • Will this proposal, or ongoing operations result in an increase or decrease in greenhouse gas emissions? • How does this proposal affect the community’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or otherwise mitigate adverse climate change activities? WƌŽũĞĐƚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐǁŝůůƐƵƉƉŽƌƚďŝĐǇĐůĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƚƌĂǀĞůƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂŶĚƐĂĨĞƚǇŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ƐĂƌĞƐƵůƚ͕ŝƚŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŽƚĂů ǀĞŚŝĐůĞŵŝůĞƐƚƌĂǀĞůĞĚǁŝůůďĞƌĞĚƵĐĞĚ͘ dŚĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶŽĨƚƌĞĞƐĂŶĚǀĞŐĞƚĂƚŝŽŶ͕ŝŶĐŽŶũƵŶĐƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚƌĞĚƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨŝĚůĞƚŝŵĞ ĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĨůŽǁ͕ǁŝůůůŝŬĞůǇƌĞĚƵĐĞĐĂƌďŽŶĂŶĚŐƌĞĞŶŚŽƵƐĞŐĂƐ ĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ͘ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐǁŝůůƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌŝůǇŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ͘ 3. Protect, Preserve, Restore • Does this proposal result in the development or modification of land resources or ecosystem functions? • Does this proposal align itself with policies and procedures related to the preservation or restoration of natural habitat, greenways, protected wetlands, migratory pathways, or the urban growth boundary • How does this proposal serve to protect, preserve, or restore important ecological functions or processes? EŽƚƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ 4. Pollution Prevention • Does this proposal generate, or cause to be generated, waste products that can contaminate the environment? • Does this proposal require or promote pollution prevention /ƚŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚĂůĂƌŐĞƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐŐĞŶĞƌĂƚĞĚĂƐ ƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůďĞƌĞĐǇĐůĞĚĂƚ,ŽĨĨŵĂŶDŝůů͕ĚŝǀĞƌƚŝŶŐƚŚĞƐĞŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ ϲ through choice of materials, chemicals, operational practices and/or engineering controls? • Does this proposal require or promote prevention of pollution from toxic substances or other pollutants regulated by the state or federal government? • Will this proposal create significant amounts of waste or pollution? 5. Rethink, Replace, Reduce, Reuse, Recirculate/Recycle • Does this proposal prioritize the rethinking of the materials or goods needed, reduction of resource or materials use, reuse of current natural resources or materials or energy products, or result in byproducts that are recyclable or can be re-circulated? dŚĞƌĞĞǆŝƐƚƐĂƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚǇƚŽƌĞƵƐĞĂƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶďƌŝĚŐĞ͕ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇ ůŽĐĂƚĞĚĞůƐĞǁŚĞƌĞ͕ŽŶƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ dŚĞƐŝůŽƐƚŽďĞƌĞŵŽǀĞĚĨƌŽŵƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶĂƌĞƚŽďĞƌĞƉƵƌƉŽƐĞĚĂƚ ĂŶŽƚŚĞƌůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŝŶƚŚĞŝƚǇ͘ /ƚŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚ͕ĂƐǁŝƚŚŽƚŚĞƌƌŽĂĚǁĂǇŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ƚŚĞĂƐƉŚĂůƚ ĂŶĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞǁĂƐƚĞŐĞŶĞƌĂƚĞĚǁŝůůďĞƌĞĐǇĐůĞĚ͘ 6. Emphasize Local • Does this proposal emphasize use of local materials, vendors, and or services to reduce resources and environmental impact of producing and transporting proposed goods and materials? • Will the proposal cause adverse environmental effects somewhere other than the place where the action will take place? dŚĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůďĞĂǁĂƌĚĞĚĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨĂĐŽŵƉĞƚŝƚŝǀĞďŝĚĚŝŶŐ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͘/ƚŝƐĐŽŵŵŽŶĨŽƌůŽĐĂůĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌƐƚŽďŝĚŽŶĂŶĚďĞĂǁĂƌĚĞĚƐŝŵŝůĂƌ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚƐ͘ DĂƚĞƌŝĂůĨŽƌƐŝŵŝůĂƌĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƐŐĞŶĞƌĂůůǇůŽĐĂůůǇƐŽƵƌĐĞĚ͕ĂŶĚŝƚŝƐ ĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůůŝŬĞůǇďĞůŽĐĂůůǇƐŽƵƌĐĞĚĂƐǁĞůů͘ Environmental Health Summary Key issues: EĞŐĂƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŽŶĂŝƌƋƵĂůŝƚǇĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐ͘ EĞŐĂƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŽŶůŽĐĂůĞĐŽƐǇƐƚĞŵƐĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƌŽĂĚǁĂǇǁŝĚĞŶŝŶŐ͘ WŽƐŝƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚŽŶĂŝƌƋƵĂůŝƚǇĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶĐǇĂŶĚƉƌŽŵŽƚŝŽŶŽĨŵƵůƚŝͲŵŽĚĂůƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘ ZĞƵƐĞĂŶĚƌĞƉƵƌƉŽƐŝŶŐŽĨƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŝƚǇ͘ Potential mitigation strategies: ĞƐƚƉƌĂĐƚŝĐĞŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐǁŝůůďĞƚĂŬĞŶĚƵƌŝŶŐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƚŽŵŝƚŝŐĂƚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͘ dƌĞĞƐĂŶĚǀĞŐĞƚĂƚŝŽŶǁŝůůďĞĂĚĚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘ Overall, the effect of this proposal on environmental health would be: Please reach a consensus or take a group average on the rating, enter an “x” in one of нϯ нϮ нϭ Ϭ Ͳϭ ͲϮ Ͳϯ ϳ the following boxes and indicate the overall rating. Rating represents group consensus X Rating represents group average Very positive Moderately positive Slightly positive Not relevant or neutral Slightly negative Moderately negative, impact likely Very negative, impact expected y Economic Health Described: Support of healthy local economy with new jobs, businesses, and economic opportunities; focus on development of a diverse economy, enhanced sustainable practices for existing businesses, green and clean technology jobs, creation or retention of family waged jobs. Goal/Outcome: A stable, diverse and equitable economy; support of business development opportunities. Analysis Prompts • The prompts below are examples of the issues that need to be addressed. They are not a checklist. Not all prompts and issues will be relevant for any one project. Issues not covered by these prompts may be very pertinent to a proposal - please include them in the analysis • Is this proposal affected by any current policy, procedure or action plan? Has advice been sought from organizations that have a high level of expertise, or may be significantly affected by this proposal? 1. Infrastructure and Government • How will this proposal benefit the local economy? • If this proposal is an investment in infrastructure is it designed and will it be managed to optimize the use of resources including operating in a fossil fuel constrained society? • Can the proposal be funded partially or fully by grants, user fees or charges, staged development, or partnering with another agency? • How will the proposal impact business growth or operations (ability to complete desired project or remain in operation), such as access to needed permits, infrastructure and capital? Analysis/Discussion WƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚǇĨŽƌďŝĐǇĐůĞƐĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐǁŝůůůŝŬĞůǇďĞŶĞĨŝƚ ƚŚĞůŽĐĂůďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͘ /ƚŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐďĞŶĞĨŝƚƐĂƐĂƌĞƐƵůƚŽĨŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚĐŽŵŵƵƚŝŶŐƚŝŵĞƐ͘ WƌŽũĞĐƚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐǁŝůůƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞŐĞŶĞƌĂůĂƚƚƌĂĐƚŝǀĞŶĞƐƐĂŶĚĂƉƉĞĂůŽĨƚŚĞ ŝƚǇ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂůůǇƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞďŝĐǇĐůĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĐƵůƚƵƌĞĨŽƵŶĚŝŶ ƚŚĞŝƚǇ͘ ϴ entrepreneurial activity? • Will “clean technology” or “green” jobs be created in this proposal? • How will the proposal impact start-up or existing businesses or development projects? ďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͘ dĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇŶĞŐĂƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽůŽĐĂůďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐĂƐĂƌĞƐƵůƚŽĨĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂƌĞ ůŝŬĞůǇ͘ 4. Support or Develop Sustainable Businesses • What percentage of this proposal budget relies on local services or products? Identify purchases from Larimer County and the State of Colorado. • Will this proposal enhance the tools available to businesses to incorporate more sustainable practices in operations and products? • Are there opportunities to profile sustainable and socially responsible leadership of local businesses or educate businesses on triple bottom line practices? /ƚŝƐƚǇƉŝĐĂůĨŽƌĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌƐĂŶĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐƵƉƉůŝĞƌƐƚŽďĞůŽĐĂůĨŽƌ ƚŚŝƐƚǇƉĞŽĨƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ DĂŶǇŽĨƚŚĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐƵƐĞĚŝŶƌŽĂĚǁĂǇƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂƌĞĐŽŵƉƌŝƐĞĚŽĨ ůŽĐĂůůǇͲƐŽƵƌĐĞĚĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ͘ 5. Relevance to Local Economic Development Strategy Economic Prosperity Summary Key issues: >ŽŶŐͲƚĞƌŵďĞŶĞĨŝƚƐƚŽůŽĐĂůďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐĐĞƐƐĂŶĚĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚǇ͘ /ŵƉƌŽǀĞĚĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƐŐĞŶĞƌĂůĂƉƉĞĂůŽĨƚŚĞŝƚǇ͘ /ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŽďŝĐǇĐůĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƚŚĞĐƵůƚƵƌĞŽĨƚŚĞŝƚǇ͘ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐǁŝůůůŝŬĞůǇŚĂǀĞĂƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇŶĞŐĂƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚŽŶůŽĐĂůďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͘ Potential mitigation strategies: ŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚǇƚŽůŽĐĂůďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐǁŝůůďĞŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĞĚĨŽƌǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐĂŶĚďŝĐǇĐůĞƐĚƵƌŝŶŐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ Overall, the effect of this proposal on economic prosperity will be: Please reach a consensus or take a group average on the rating, enter an “x” in one of the following boxes and indicate the overall rating. Rating represents group consensus X Rating represents group average нϯ нϮ нϭ Ϭ Ͳϭ ͲϮ Ͳϯ Very positive Moderately positive Slightly positive Not relevant or neutral Slightly negative Moderately negative, impact likely Very negative, impact - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 125, 2015 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS APPROPRIATING PRIOR YEAR RESERVES IN THE CAPITAL PROJECT FUND FOR THE BUILDING ON BASICS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AND THE STREET OVERSIZING FUND INTO THE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND FOR THE TIMBERLINE ROAD - DRAKE ROAD TO PROSPECT ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND THE CULTURAL SERVICES AND FACILITIES FUND FOR THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PROGRAM WHEREAS, in 2011, the Engineering Department completed an Arterial Intersection Priority Study which classified the Timberline and Prospect intersection as a top priority for needed safety and operational improvements; and WHEREAS, in 2013, the budget for the project was established as part of the Building on Basics (BOB) Intersection Improvements Project; and WHEREAS, the project will be constructed in 2016; and WHEREAS, between conceptual planning in 2013 and construction in 2016, construction prices will have risen between 30% to 50%; and WHEREAS, due to escalating construction costs, additional funds in the amount of $1,300,000 from available prior year reserves BOB taxes in the Capital Projects Fund and $200,000 of available prior year reserves in the Street Oversizing Fund have been identified by City staff to be used for the project; and WHEREAS, one percent of the appropriation for the construction project, ($13,000) must be transferred to the Cultural Services and Facilities Fund for a contribution to the Art in Public Places (APP) program, with $10,140 reserved for the APP artwork project and $2,860 reserved for the maintenance of the artwork and operations of the APP program; and WHEREAS, Article V, Section 9, of the City Charter permits the City Council to make supplemental appropriations by ordinance at any time during the fiscal year, provided that the total amount of such supplemental appropriations, in combination with all previous appropriations for that fiscal year, does not exceed the current estimate of actual and anticipated revenues to be received during the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that the appropriation of the revenue as described herein will not cause the total amount appropriated in the Capital Projects Fund or the Street Oversizing Fund to exceed the current estimate of actual and anticipated revenues during fiscal year 2015. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: - 2 - Section 1. That there is hereby appropriated from prior year reserves in the Capital Projects Fund the sum of ONE MILLION THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,300,000) for expenditure in the Capital Projects Fund for the Timberline and Prospect BOB Intersection Improvements Project. Section 2. That there is hereby appropriated from prior year reserves in the Street Oversizing Fund the sum of TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($200,000) and is authorized for transfer to and expenditure in the Capital Projects Fund for the Timberline and Prospect BOB Intersection Improvements Project. Section 3. That the unexpended appropriated amount of TEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED FORTY DOLLARS ($10,140) in the Capital Projects Fund for the Timberline and Prospect BOB Intersection Improvements Project is authorized for transfer to the Cultural Services and Facilities Fund and appropriated therein for the Art in Public Places Art Project. Section 4. That the unexpended appropriated amount of TWO THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED SIXTY DOLLARS ($2,860) in the Capital Projects Fund for the Timberline and Prospect BOB Intersection Improvements Project is authorized for transfer to the Cultural Services and Facilities Fund and appropriated therein for the Art in Public Places Program Maintenance and Operations. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 6th day of October, A.D. 2015, and to be presented for final passage on the 20th day of October, A.D. 2015. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading on the 20th day of October, A.D. 2015. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk expected y /ŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐǁŝůůĚŝƌĞĐƚůǇŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽůŽĐĂůĞŵƉůŽǇĞƌƐ ĂŶĚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͘ dŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇŶĞŐĂƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽůŽĐĂůďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐĐĞƐƐĚƵƌŝŶŐ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ 2. Employment and Training • What are the impacts of this proposal on job creation within Larimer County? • Are apprenticeships, volunteer or intern opportunities available? • How will this proposal enhance the skills of the local workforce? /ƚŝƐůŝŬĞůǇƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇǁŽƌŬĨŽƌůŽĐĂůĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌƐ ĚƵƌŝŶŐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ 3. Diversified and Innovative Economy • How does this proposal support innovative or ^ĞǀĞƌĂůƐŵĂůůĂŶĚͬŽƌƐƚĂƌƚͲƵƉďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐǁŝůůďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞǀŝĐŝŶŝƚǇŽĨƚŚŝƐ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘WƌŽũĞĐƚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐǁŝůůŚĂǀĞĚŝƌĞĐƚƉŽƐŝƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĨŽƌƚŚĞƐĞ ĨƌŽŵĂůĂŶĚĨŝůů͘ of expertise, or may be significantly affected by this proposal? 1. Environmental Impact Analysis/Discussion cooperation between the City organization and community members? dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚĞĂŵǁŝůůĞŶŐĂŐĞŝŶƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇŽǁŶĞƌŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĚŝƌĞĐƚ ĐŽŶƚĂĐƚ͕ŽƉĞŶŚŽƵƐĞƐ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐ͘ ŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶďĞƚǁĞĞŶǀĂƌŝŽƵƐŝƚǇĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ;ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͕EĂƚƵƌĂůƌĞĂƐ͕ WĂƌŬƐ͕hƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘ͿŚĂƐĂŶĚǁŝůůďĞĂŬĞǇĞůĞŵĞŶƚŝŶƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂŶĚ ĞǆĞĐƵƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ Social Equity Summary dŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂƐŚŽƌƚĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞĨŽƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƚŚĂŶ