Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 05/05/2015 - ITEMS RELATING TO APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS TO REIMBUAgenda Item 12 Item # 12 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY May 5, 2015 City Council STAFF Jessica Ping-Small, Revenue and Project Manager Mike Beckstead, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT Items Relating to Appropriation of Funds to Reimburse Woodward, Inc. For Development Fees, Capital Improvement Expansion Fees and Use Tax. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Option 1: First Reading of Ordinance No. 057, 2015, Appropriating Prior Year Reserves in the General Fund to Reimburse Woodward, Inc. for Development Fees, Capital Expansion Improvement Fees, and Use Tax. Option 2: First Reading of Ordinance No. 058, 2015, Appropriating Prior Year Reserves in the General, Capital Expansion, and Street Oversizing Funds to Reimburse Woodward, Inc. for Development Fees, Capital Expansion Improvement Fees, and Use Tax. The purpose of this item is to appropriate $2,107,261 of prior year reserves for a rebate to Woodward for fees and use tax as approved by City Council on April 2, 2013 (Ordinance No. 055, 2013). Ordinance No. 055, 2013 approved an agreement between the City, Downtown Development Authority (DDA), and Woodward, Inc. The agreement provides Business Investment Assistance for the relocation of Woodward’s headquarters as well as an expansion of its manufacturing and office facilities to a new location at the corner of Lincoln Avenue and Lemay Avenue. The project will retain or create between 1,400 and 1,700 primary jobs in the City. The City’s assistance includes a rebate of Use Tax, Development Fees, and Capital Improvement Expansion Fees. The Council is presented with two options. Option 1 is an ordinance that would appropriate all rebates from the General Fund’s prior year reserves. Option 2 is an ordinance that would also appropriate all the rebates from the General Fund’s prior year reserves, except for the rebate of Capital Improvement Expansion Fees, which would be appropriated from the prior year reserves in the Capital Expansion and Street Oversizing funds for the rebated Capital Improvement Expansion Fees. Council should adopt only one of the proposed options; the other ordinance will be withdrawn. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of Option 2, Ordinance No. 058, 2015, on First Reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION Agreement Summary On April 2, 2013, City Council adopted Ordinance 055, 2013 approving an Economic Development Project Agreement (“Agreement”) between the City, the DDA, and Woodward, Inc. The Agreement specifies Woodward is eligible for a rebate in three areas: Agenda Item 12 Item # 12 Page 2  Use Tax on Construction Materials and Eligible Equipment (up to 80%)  Development Fees (100%) Capital Improvement Expansion Fees and Utility PIF Fees (up to 50%). Employment Level Requirements The three rebate categories were offered with the stipulation that employment levels must reach or exceed 1,400 employees within the City by December 31, 2018.  If a rebate request is made prior to December 31, 2018, the City will withhold 40% of the rebate until set employment levels have been met  If a rebate request is made prior to December 31, 2018, 60% of the earned rebates will be paid on the schedule agreed upon by Woodward  If the target employment level is reached after December 31, 2018 but before December 31, 2020, Woodward will receive the retained 40 percent less $500,000 (combined between use tax and development fee rebates)  Woodward will not be entitled to the remaining 40 percent if the target level is not reached by December 31, 2020. Rebate Schedule as agreed upon with Woodward Staff has developed a rebate schedule with Woodward which is consistent with the Agreement whereby two rebate applications will be processed each year. The two applications per year consist of the following components:  Application 1 includes: o January through June: Development Review and Capital Improvement Expansion Fees  Application 2 includes: o July through December: Development Review and Capital Improvement Expansion Fees o January through December: Use Tax  Rebate funds will be appropriated by City Council biannually as part of the rebate process. This rebate application is for 2014 and includes use tax for the entire year and development review fees and capital improvement expansion fees for July through December. Agenda Item 12 Item # 12 Page 3 *Use Tax Rebate only paid once per year and includes use tax for Jan-Dec 2014. **General Fund backfill based on full rebate owed For the application period, Woodward earned a total of $3,512,102 in rebates. Of that amount, 40% is held back pending the aforementioned employee level requirements. The remaining 60% which totals $2,107,261 is requested for rebate at this time. The 40% that is held back has been assigned within the General Fund in recognition of the potential future obligation. General Fund Backfill Discussion When the Agreement was originally signed in 2013, the approach at the time was that the General Fund would be used as “backfill” to make the funds that were impacted by the agreement whole. The original approach is summarized as follows: 2013 Approach:  100% of the Capital Improvement Expansion Fee (“CIE”) rebate will be paid from the General Fund  100% of the Development Review Fee rebate would be paid from the General Fund  100% of the Utility Plant Investment Fees would be paid from the General Fund  100% of the dedicated taxes will be paid from the General Fund o .25% Natural Areas o .25% Streets and Transportation o .25% Building on Basics Projects o .85% Keep Fort Collins Great After further consideration, the approach to backfill the Capital Improvement Expansion Fee funds has been revisited. After reviewing the question of backfill in CIE fees with the City Attorney’s Office, staff is requesting that Council consider a new approach. The new approach would not backfill the CIE funds from the General Fund. No change is being considered to the Development Review Fees, Utility Plant Investment Fees and Dedicated Use Tax approach. The pros of not using the General Fund to backfill the CIE funds are:  Retaining funds within the General Fund provides greater flexibility for future expenditures  General Fund revenue can support capital projects in the future if needed whereas CIE funds cannot support General Fund needs Agenda Item 12 Item # 12 Page 4 The con of the approach is:  CIE funds have less revenue Impact of Backfill to CIE Funds: Factors for City Council Consideration:  The original rebate of CIEs was and is an exception to normal practice  Backfill decision is specific to the Woodward rebate and NOT a long term policy decision on how other rebates may be addressed in the future  No impact to near term projects by not using General Fund backfill o Police and Fire funds primarily used for debt service currently o Street oversizing fees have long term funding requirements that exceed revenue estimates. A general evaluation of street oversizing fees is currently under way with a scheduled completion of late 2015. Options for City Council Consideration Option 1 Approve Woodward rebate with General Fund backfill of all fees subject to the requested rebate including the CIE fees Option 2 Approve the Woodward rebate with General Fund backfill of all funds except for the CIE funds The Council Finance Committee reviewed the rebate at its February meeting and approved the Woodward rebate; however, there was not consensus regarding the backfill discussion. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS The total rebate amount is $2,107,261. Agenda Item 12 Item # 12 Page 5 Option 1 The full amount of $2,107,261 will come from prior year General Fund Reserves and will be appropriated for the purpose of remitting the rebate to Woodward. Option 2 The amount of $1,888,079 will come from prior year General Fund Reserves and the following amounts will come from the CIE Funds:  General Government: $24,879  Police: $7,313  Fire: $12,854  Street Oversizing: $174,136 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The 101.5 acre project included a restoration of a 31-acre river buffer natural area which was transferred to the City upon completion. In addition, a 10-foot wide Poudre Trail was reconstructed through the new natural area. ATTACHMENTS 1. Council Finance Committee minutes, February 9, 2015 (PDF) 2. Powerpoint presentation (PDF) ATTACHMENT 1 1 Woodward Rebate City Council Meeting May 5, 2015 ATTACHMENT 2 2 Woodward Rebate Summary • Rebates Allowed Per the Agreement Ø Use Tax on Construction Materials and Eligible Equipment (80%) Ø Development Fees (100%) Ø Capital Improvement Expansion Fees (CIE) & Utility PIFs (50%) • Rebates Schedule as agreed upon with Woodward Ø 2 applications per year Ø Application 1 – Covers January - June § Includes Development Review and Capital Improvement Expansion Fees (CIE), and Utility PIF Ø Application 2 Includes: § June-December – Dev. Review, CIE Fees, Utility PIFs § January-December – Use Tax 3 Estimated Current Rebate Due For Period July 1, 2014 – December 31, 2014 Total Due: $2,107,261 Rebate Payment Development Fees 100% CIE Fees 50% Utility PIF 50% Use Tax 80%* Not Eligible for Rebate Total Total Fees Collected $493 $730 $2,278 $1,893 $295 $5,691 Rebate Owed 493 365 1,139 1,514 N/A 3,512 Rebate Eligible for Payment - 60% 296 219 684 909 N/A 2,107 Rebate Holdback- 40% 197 146 456 606 N/A 1,405 General Fund Backfill** 0 365 1,139 632 N/A 2,137 *Use Tax Rebate only paid once per year - $1.9M reflects 12 months of fees collected ** General Fund backfill based on full rebate owed ($ 000s) 4 General Fund Backfill • At the time the Woodward agreement was approved, the structure was to “backfill” CIE fees from the General Fund • After further consideration, the approach to backfill CIE fees has been revisited with City Attorney’s Office • A new option identified - Fund the CIE rebates out of the capital improvement expansion funds instead of the general fund • All other rebates to be paid from the General Fund 5 Pros and Cons of Alternative Approach • Pros – Future Spending Flexibility ØRetaining funds within the General Fund provides greater flexibility for future expenditures ØGeneral Fund revenue can support capital projects in the future if needed whereas CIE funds cannot support General Fund needs • Cons ØCIE funds have less revenue 6 Impact of Backfill to CIE Funds CIE Fund ($ 000s) 2014 Yearend Balance Fees Paid Rebate Earned Rebate Owed 60% % of Year End General Government $7,562 $83 $42 $25 .5% Police 927 24 12 7 1.2% Fire 847 43 21 13 2.4% Street Oversizing 14,505 580 290 174 1.9% Total $365 $219 Total impact to General Fund: $365k ($ 000s) 7 Additional Considerations • Rebate of CEIs was/is an exception to normal practice • Backfill decision is specific to the Woodward rebate and NOT a long term policy decision on how other rebates may be addressed in the future • No impact to near term projects by not using General Fund backfill – Police and Fire funds primarily used for debt service currently – Street oversizing fees have long term funding requirements that exceed revenue estimates 8 Summary of Options for Council • Option 1: ØApprove Woodward rebate with General Fund backfill of CIE funds • Option 2: ØApprove Woodward rebate with NO General Fund backfill of CIE funds - 1 - OPTION 1 ORDINANCE NO. 057, 2015 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS APPROPRIATING PRIOR YEAR RESERVES IN THE GENERAL FUND TO REIMBURSE WOODWARD, INC. FOR DEVELOPMENT FEES, CAPITAL EXPANSION IMPROVEMENT FEES, AND USE TAX WHEREAS, the City, the Fort Collins Downtown Development Authority, and Woodward, Inc. (“Woodward”) entered into that certain “Agreement with Woodward, Inc.” dated April 16, 2013 (the “Agreement”), which Agreement provides business investment assistance for the relocation of Woodward’s headquarters and the expansion of its manufacturing and office facilities in Fort Collins; and WHEREAS, the Agreement specifies that Woodward is eligible for reimbursement from the City for the following paid by it to the City: (1) Use Tax on Construction Materials and Eligible Equipment, (2) Development Fees, and (3) Capital Improvement Expansion Fees; and WHEREAS, under the Agreement, Woodward can apply for reimbursement biannually for Development Review and Capital Improvement Expansion Fees and once a year for the Use Tax rebate; and WHEREAS, all funds reimbursed must be appropriated by Council as part of the rebate process; and WHEREAS, the Agreement was approved by City Council pursuant to Ordinance No. 055, 2013, on April 2, 2013; and WHEREAS, the current reimbursement due to Woodward for the period of July 1, 2014, through December, 31, 2014, is $2,107,261 for eligible fees and Use Tax; and WHEREAS, staff is requesting appropriation of the full amount, $2,107,261 from prior year reserves in the General Fund to reimburse Woodward in accordance with the Agreement; and WHEREAS, Article V, Section 9, of the City Charter also permits the City Council to appropriate by ordinance at any time during the fiscal year such funds for expenditure as may be available from reserves accumulated in prior years, notwithstanding that such reserves were not previously appropriated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS that there is hereby appropriated for expenditure from prior year reserves in the General Fund the sum of TWO MILLION ONE HUNDRED SEVEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-ONE DOLLARS ($2,107,261) to reimburse Woodward for Development Fees, Capital Expansion Improvement Fees, and Use Tax as required by the Agreement. - 2 - Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 5th day of May, A.D. 2015, and to be presented for final passage on the 19th day of May, A.D. 2015. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading on the 19th day of May, A.D. 2015. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk - 1 - OPTION 2 ORDINANCE NO. 058, 2015 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS APPROPRIATING PRIOR YEAR RESERVES IN THE GENERAL, CAPITAL EXPANSION, AND STREET OVERSIZING FUNDS TO REIMBURSE WOODWARD, INC. FOR DEVELOPMENT FEES, CAPITAL EXPANSION IMPROVEMENT FEES, AND USE TAX WHEREAS, the City, the Fort Collins Downtown Development Authority, and Woodward, Inc. (“Woodward”) entered into that certain “Agreement with Woodward, Inc.” dated April 16, 2013 (the “Agreement”), which Agreement provides business investment assistance for the relocation of Woodward’s headquarters and the expansion of its manufacturing and office facilities in Fort Collins; and WHEREAS, the Agreement specifies that Woodward is eligible for reimbursement from the City for the following paid by it to the City: (1) Use Tax on Construction Materials and Eligible Equipment, (2) Development Fees, and (3) Capital Improvement Expansion Fees; and WHEREAS, under the Agreement, Woodward can apply for reimbursement biannually for Development Review and Capital Improvement Expansion Fees and once a year for the Use Tax rebate; and WHEREAS, all funds reimbursed must be appropriated by Council as part of the rebate process; and WHEREAS, the Agreement was approved by City Council pursuant to Ordinance No. 055, 2013, on April 2, 2013; and WHEREAS, the current reimbursement due to Woodward for the period of July 1, 2014, through December, 31, 2014, is $2,107,261 for eligible fees and Use Tax; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, staff is requesting appropriation of the full amount to reimburse Woodward from prior year reserves from the following funds: General Fund: $1,888,079 Capital Expansion Fund General Govt. $ 24,879 Police $ 7,313 Fire $ 12,854 Capital Expansion Fund: $ 45,046 Street Oversizing Fund: $ 174,136 Total Reimbursement Request: $2,107,261 - 2 - WHEREAS, Article V, Section 9, of the City Charter also permits the City Council to appropriate by ordinance at any time during the fiscal year such funds for expenditure as may be available from reserves accumulated in prior years, notwithstanding that such reserves were not previously appropriated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That there is hereby appropriated for expenditure from prior year reserves in the General Fund the sum of ONE MILLION EIGHT HUNDRED EIGHTY EIGHT THOUSAND SEVENTY NINE DOLLARS ($1,888,079) to reimburse Woodward for Development Fees and Use Tax as required by the Agreement. Section 2. That there is hereby appropriated for expenditure from prior year reserves in the Capital Expansion Fund the sum of FORTY FIVE THOUSAND FORTY SIX DOLLARS ($45,046) to reimburse Woodward for General Government, Police and Fire Capital Expansion Improvement Fees as required by the Agreement. Section 3. That there is hereby appropriated for expenditure from prior year reserves in the Street Oversizing Fund the sum of ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY FOUR THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED THIRTY SIX DOLLARS ($174,136) to reimburse Woodward for Street Oversizing Capital Expansion Improvement Fees as required by the Agreement. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 5th day of May, A.D. 2015, and to be presented for final passage on the 19th day of May, A.D. 2015. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk - 3 - Passed and adopted on final reading on the 19th day of May, A.D. 2015. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk