Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 11/18/2014 - RESOLUTION 2014-105 AMENDING THE BOARD AND COMMISSAgenda Item 15 Item # 15 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY November 18, 2014 City Council STAFF Wanda Nelson, City Clerk SUBJECT Resolution 2014-105 Amending the Board and Commission Manual Concerning Periodic Reviews. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to amend the Board and Commission Manual by adopting a new Periodic Review Schedule. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION Discussions regarding improving the Board and Commission system began with Plan Fort Collins and the City Council’s 2011-2012 Work Plan. Since then, the following efforts have taken place:  During February and April 2012, staff met with 30 boards and commissions chairs and vice-chairs and 20 staff liaisons to review the current program. Feedback regarding communication between boards and Council, goal alignment, City Council Liaisons, recruitment and selection of members, training, and funding/budget process improvements were discussed.  The Futures Committee addressed the boards and commissions system as a whole at its meeting on August 13, 2012. Specifically, communication, goal alignment, the role of Council Liaisons, recruitment, training, and funding were considered.  A meeting was held on October 29, 2012 with boards and commissions chairpersons and staff liaisons to discuss recommendations from the Futures Committee.  The Women’s Commission held a breakfast meeting on May 22, 2013 to provide an opportunity for board and commission chairpersons to share about upcoming projects and discuss ways to better connect with other boards and commissions.  On June 10, 2013, staff updated the Futures Committee on actions taken related to boards and commissions structure improvements. Staff requested feedback regarding the alignment of the Council’s and boards and commissions’ Work Plans, training opportunities for members and City staff, and future structural models and their relationship to city councils.  A conversation was held in November 2013 at the City Council retreat to discuss the alignment of boards and commissions with the seven Key Outcome Areas, as the matrix demonstrates (attached as Exhibit A to the Resolution).  Over 90 board and commission members attended a meeting on February 24, 2014 to discuss improvements to the board and commission system, learn about their alignment with Council Agenda Item 15 Item # 15 Page 2 priorities. The members and concluded that aligning board and commission work plans and goals with key outcomes was an important element to improving the system.  A meeting with board and commission chairs and vice chairs was held on May 28, 2014 to discuss the City’s Strategic Plan and how the seven key Outcome Areas can be incorporated into board and commission Work Plans.  Through staff liaisons, feedback has been received from board and commission members regarding their alignment to the seven key Outcome Areas and the matrix has been updated with their suggestions. The Leadership Team, while reviewing the Six-Month Agenda Planning Calendar, has requested that the Periodic Board and Commission Review Schedule be amended so that reviews are held according to Outcome Area, with Community and Neighborhood Livability being the first to be reviewed. As noted in Resolution 2014-105, the following schedule permits each board and commission to be reviewed every four years: 2015 Community and Neighborhood Livability 2016 Culture and Recreation, Transportation 2017 Economic Health, Safe Community 2018 Environmental Health, High Performing Government To summarize, the benefits of adopting a new Periodic Review Schedule include: 1. Clear alignment of boards and commissions to the Key Outcome Areas; 2. Review of boards and commissions every four years (rather than the current practice of six years); 3. Outreach by staff to boards and commissions on a particular project or policy will occur according to the respective Outcome Area. - 1 - RESOLUTION 2014-105 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AMENDING THE BOARD AND COMMISSION MANUAL CONCERNING PERIODIC REVIEWS WHEREAS, the City Council has created several boards and commissions whose members are appointed by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk’s Office annually prepares a manual (hereafter referred to as the “Manual”) for members of boards and commissions that includes general information such as board and commission membership lists, conflict of interest guidelines, general information regarding attendance policies and a description of the City Council’s periodic review of the boards and commissions; and WHEREAS, the City Council first adopted the Manual by resolution in 1990 and has since adopted many revisions to the Manual on numerous occasions; and WHEREAS, Plan Fort Collins and City Council’s 2011-2012 Work Plan included a project to “convene a representative group of boards and commissions members to assess and suggest improvements to the boards and commissions processes;” and WHEREAS, in February and April of 2012, staff met with board and commission chairs, vice-chairs and staff liaisons to review the current processes; and WHEREAS, staff gathered feedback regarding communication between boards and City Council, goal alignment, City Council liaisons, recruitment and selection of members, training, and funding/budget process improvements; and WHEREAS, the Futures Committee addressed the board and commission system in August 2012, June 2013, and January 2014 and decided to recommend to the City Council that boards and commissions be more aligned with City Council policies and programs; and WHEREAS, a meeting was held on October 29, 2012, with board and commission chairs and staff liaisons to discuss the August 2012 Futures Committee recommendations; and WHEREAS, staff created a matrix (“the Matrix”) shown in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, describing the alignment of boards and commissions to seven key outcome areas used in the City’s budgeting process (“Outcome Areas”) and the Matrix was discussed by City Council during a November 2013 Council Retreat; and WHEREAS, over 90 board and commission members attended a meeting on February 24, 2014, to discuss improvements to the board and commission system and learn about the Matrix, and they provided feedback indicating that aligning board and commission work plans and goals with the Outcome Areas was an important element to ensuring that the boards and commission are aligned with City Council policies and programs; and - 2 - WHEREAS, since May 2014, staff has gathered feedback from board and commission members, through their respective staff liaisons and officers, regarding their alignment to the seven key Outcome Areas as described in the Matrix; and WHEREAS, the Board and Commission Manual outlines the schedule that City Council uses to periodically review the Boards and Commissions; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has received feedback from individual Councilmembers regarding amendments to the periodic review questionnaire found at pages 17 and 18 of the Manual and the Clerk has incorporated those suggested revisions into the Boards and Commissions Periodic Review Questionnaire (the “Questionnaire”) shown in Exhibit “B”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by the reference; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Periodic Review Schedule contained in the Manual so that periodic reviews are conducted every four years on a rotating schedule according to Outcome Area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That the City Council adopts and approves the Matrix describing each board and commission’s assignment to an Outcome Area. The Matrix is incorporated into the Manual as an appendix. Boards and commissions will be reviewed by their largest connection to an Outcome Area, as described on the Matrix. Section 2. That the provisions relating to Periodic Review and Periodic Review Schedule, contained on pages 14, 15 and 16 of the Manual dated June 2014, are hereby deleted and replaced with the following: Periodic Review The City Council will conduct a periodic review for all boards and commissions. The initial review dates will be staggered, and thereafter each board or commission will be reviewed every four years according to its primary alignment with a Key Outcome Area, as outlined in the matrix found at Appendix A of this manual. A review schedule is provided at the end of this section. The City Council will conduct reviews annually at a work session prior to the annual recruitment process in the Fall. Prior to Council’s review, each board or commission scheduled for review in that calendar year will prepare a periodic review self-assessment questionnaire (“Questionnaire”) which staff will provide to the Council as part of its work session materials. The periodic review questions are included in the Questionnaire at the end of this section. - 3 - The City Clerk’s Office will send the Questionnaire to the staff liaison of each board or commission, along with a schedule indicating the submission deadline and date of Council’s work session. Council requests that the chair and vice chair (or designees) of each board being reviewed attend the work session to answer questions; however, the Council’s review is not intended as a dialogue with the board. At the work session, Council review will consist of the following questions: # What does the board do? (Current functions) # Does the City need a board that does this? # If so, should any of the duties of the board be changed? # Can any of the duties of this board be consolidated with another board? # Is the size of the board appropriate? # Is the work done by the board beneficial and useful to the Council? The discussion at the work session will assist the Council in determining whether it should: # Continue the board without alteration of duties or composition. # Continue the board with amendment to duties and/or composition. # Eliminate the board and its duties. # Eliminate the board and transfer of some or all duties to other existing board(s). The work session will conclude either with (a) a statement that the board should continue without alteration, or (b) direction to staff to prepare legislation making any changes (number of members, duties, etc.). Periodic Review Schedule: 2015 Community and Neighborhood Livability  Affordable Housing Board, Commission on Disability, Community Development Block Grant Commission, Human Relations Commission, Landmark Preservation Commission, Senior Advisory Board, Women’s Commission, Zoning Board of Appeals 2016 Culture and Recreation, Transportation  Cultural Resources Board, Golf Board, Parks and Recreation Board, Youth Advisory Board, Transportation Board 2017 Economic Health, Safe Community  Art in Public Places Board, Building Review Board, Citizen Review Board, Economic Advisory Commission, Parking Advisory Board, Planning and Zoning Board 2018 Environmental Health, High Performing Government - 4 -  Air Quality Advisory Board, Energy Board, Land Conservation Stewardship Board, Natural Resources Advisory Board, Retirement Committee, Water Board Section 3. That the provisions relating to the boards and commissions Questionnaire, contained on pages 17 and 18 of the Manual dated June 2014, are hereby amended to read as shown on the Questionnaire, Exhibit “B”. Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins this 18th day of November, A.D. 2014. _________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk Boards and Commissions Alignment to the Seven Key Outcome Areas Community and Neighborhood Livability Culture and Recreation Economic Health Environmental Health High Performing Government Safe Community Transportation Affordable Housing Board Cultural Resources Board Art in Public Places Board Air Quality Advisory Board Retirement Committee Citizen Review Board Transportation Board Commission on Disability Golf Board Building Review Board Energy Board Community Development Block Grant Commission Building Review Board Air Quality Advisory Board Community Development Block Grant Commission Parks and Recreation Board Economic Advisory Commission Land Conservation Stewardship Board Zoning Board of Appeals Human Relations Commission Commission on Disability Human Relations Commission Youth Advisory Board Parking Advisory Board Natural Resources Advisory Board Citizen Review Board Water Board Senior Advisory Board Landmark Preservation Commission Land Conservation Stewardship Board Planning and Zoning Board Water Board Human Relations Commission Women’s Commission Affordable Housing Board Senior Advisory Board Natural Resources Advisory Board Affordable Housing Board Parks and Recreation Board Youth Advisory Board Natural Resources Advisory Board Women’s Commission Art in Public Places Board Cultural Resources Board Building Review Board Commission on Disability Parking Advisory Board Zoning Board of Appeals Landmark Preservation Commission Landmark Preservation Commission Energy Board Youth Advisory Board Art in Public Places Board Transportation Board Planning and Zoning Board Transportation Board Citizen Review Board Zoning Board of Appeals Zoning Board of Appeals Economic Advisory BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS PERIODIC REVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE BOARD/ COMMISSION NAME: DATE PREPARED: LIST OF MEMBERS: 1. Chair 7. 2. Vice Chair 8. 3. 9. 4. 10. 5. 11. 6. 12. 1. Please indicate the Key Outcome Areas this Board/Commission is aligned with, using (1) for the primary connection, (2) for second largest connection, and (3) for third connection: Community and Neighborhood Livability Culture and Recreation Economic Health Environmental Health High Performing Government Safe Community Transportation 2. How do the current duties of the board, as defined by City Code, align with the Key Outcome Areas identified above? What duties would you suggest be added and/or deleted? 3. Regarding the board’s annual Work Plan: A. How is the Work Plan aligned with the Key Outcome(s) identified above? B. How is the Work Plan aligned with the City’s Strategic Plan? DRAFT EXHIBIT B C. How is the Work Plan aligned with the Agenda Planning Calendar (Six Month Calendar)? D. Does the board effectively accomplish its annual Work Plan? 4. Are board meetings conducted in an effective manner (do the meetings start on time? Are discussions focused around the agenda topic, etc.)? What could be done to improve board meetings? 5. Is the current size of the board appropriate? If not, what suggestions would you make? 6. Please describe the effectiveness of the communications between the board and Council. What could be done to improve these communications? 7. Other comments: Attachments: a. City Code description of duties b. Current Work Plan c. Current Annual Report d. Current Bylaws Commission Community Development Block Grant Commission Golf Board Energy Board Parking Advisory Board Golf Board Planning and Zoning Board Water Board Air Quality Advisory Board Senior Advisory Board Cultural Resources Board Land Conservation Stewardship Board Parks and Recreation Board ■ Largest Connection ■ Secondary Connection ■ Third Largest Connection Updated: November 2014 EXHIBIT A