Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 09/30/2014 - RENEWAL OF THE 1/4-CENT COMMUNITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMDATE: STAFF: September 30, 2014 Ginny Sawyer, Policy and Project Manager Mark Jackson, PDT Deputy Director WORK SESSION ITEM City Council SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Renewal of the ¼-Cent Community Capital Improvement Program and the ¼ Cent Street Maintenance Tax. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to update Council on public outreach efforts and to seek direction on key elements of both the Building on Basics (BOB) 2.0 renewal and the Street Maintenance Program renewal. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. Does Council support seeking a 10-year renewal of the Street Maintenance Program? 2. Should the Vine and Lemay Avenue project remain on the potential BOB 2.0 project list? Or should the project be removed and considered under a separate tax measure? 3. If a separate tax initiative is considered for Vine and Lemay, should other projects also be included? What would be the desired timeframe? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The current capital expansion tax, Building on Basics (BOB) and the Street Maintenance Program tax (SMP) will expire on December 31, 2015. The Fort Collins community has supported street maintenance through a ¼-cent tax since 1989. This quarter- cent tax covers roughly half of the Street Maintenance Program’s costs. Other program funding includes Keep Fort Collins Great money and the General Fund. The Street Maintenance Program maximizes the community’s investment in the street network by performing ongoing maintenance before much more costly repairs or replacement are necessary, extending the usable life of a street. The Street Maintenance Program repairs over 130 lane miles of roads each year. Fort Collins also has a long history of supporting a capital tax program. BOB is a ¼ -cent tax which equates to 25 cents on a $100 purchase. Over the 10-year period (2005 to 2015), BOB will provide almost $58 million dollars for investment in community projects. These dollars have supported the Lincoln Center renovations, the Museum of Discovery, new bike facilities, improvements to North College and Timberline, sidewalk upgrades, and the Senior Center expansion. Both of these tax renewals will be presented to the voters in April 2015. Work to Date-SMP In preparation for seeking the SMP tax renewal request, staff developed a web page and presentation materials with information about the program, its funding sources, the science behind the Street Maintenance Program, and the importance that effective road maintenance has on the community and local economy. As well, staff has engaged in public outreach efforts to tell the story of street maintenance and to gauge citizen feedback on the preferred term of the tax, which has traditionally been 10 years. Street maintenance is an ongoing need now and into the future. Those who participated in outreach efforts did show support for a longer September 30, 2014 Page 2 term, but there were also those who felt that 10 years was an appropriate length of time and suggested that this term also allows for an increase in the future should it be needed. Work to Date-BOB 2.0 In summer/fall of 2013, staff began compiling a list of unfunded needs that have been identified in master plans, the Strategic Plan, or the budgeting process. Since that time the list has been refined and evaluated through multiple lenses, including utilization of the Budgeting for Outcome (BFO) Teams. The original list of projects totaled more than $400 million dollars. Through the process of Council work sessions, Leadership and project team meetings, projects have been eliminated and project costs have been adjusted, resulting in the most current list totaling approximately $290 million dollars. The projected revenue from a ¼ -cent tax is approximately $80 million dollars. Staff has been conducting extensive public outreach with this list of potential projects. (Attachment 1) Outreach has included an interactive website, board and commission “super” meeting, CityWork Alumni Forum, a presence at the Sustainable Living Fair, and a Community Issue Forum with the Center for Public Deliberation. The results and comments from these efforts are included in Attachments 2-5. As well as asking citizens what projects they felt most strongly about (positive or negative), staff also asked the following question: How should the City fund the improvement of the Vine and Lemay intersection?  Keep this project in BOB 2.0?  Consider a separate tax initiative on the ballot for this project alone?  Consider a separate tax initiative on the ballot for this project and 1-2 additional transportation projects? This question is also posted on IdeaLab. Next Steps October Off-Site BOB 2.0 Session Saturday, October 11 Goal: Narrow project list to $80-100 million range. Council will receive materials for this work session in the Thursday, October 9 packet. Materials will include the full project list, a recommended narrowed project list, and project descriptions. December Work Session Tuesday, December 9 Goal: Finalize BOB 2.0 package. January Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 6, 2015 Goal: Adopt a resolution referring ballot language to April 2015 ballot. Staff will continue to engage the public through the January meeting. September 30, 2014 Page 3 ATTACHMENTS 1. Potential Capital Improvement Projects by Outcome Area (PDF) 2. Public Outreach Summary (PDF) 3. Website Project Rankings and Comments (PDF) 4. Online Public Feedback on BOB 2.0 Projects (PDF) 5. Community Issue Forum Comments (PDF) 6. Powerpoint presentation (PDF)  Num Project Annual O& M Culture and Recreation   !5:9.+'89533:4/9>7+'9/;++49+7     %'9+7!:89'/4'(/2/9>3675;+3+498,57'718'4*52,     +45;'9/545,9.+/8957/)'74+-/+:/2*/4-     5362+9/545,9.+'7*+4854!67/4-7++1    +)7+'9/54'2"7'/24.'4)+3+498     Num Project Annual Capital Cost O& M     1 Public Outreach Summary Between August 25 and September 21, staff hosted multiple meetings and open house settings that featured large boards with potential projects and green and red dots. Participants were encouraged to give projects they felt strongly about including in a BOB 2.0 package a green dot and projects they felt should not be included a red dot. The totals and the individual setting results are included. The interactive BOB 2.0 website has been up and promoted since mid-August. The page provides project information and allows participants to select any number of projects they feel is a high priority. They are also able to leave comments. Comments and the overall project rankings are included in this summary. The third week in October this site will become a “budgeting” tool, whereby participants will only be able to select up to $80 million worth of projects. During the Community Issue Forum we were able to collect small group discussion notes and varying demographic data. That information and the final selection of high priority projects is included in these materials. While conducting outreach, staff asked participants the following questions: 1. Since 1989, voters have supported street maintenance through a 1/4 –cent tax. The current tax will expire Dec. 31, 2015. Voters will have the opportunity to renew this tax in April 2015. Should the term of the tax be: 10 years? 15 years? 20 years? Term of SMP? Boards and Commissions 10yrs: 14 15yrs: 3 20yrs: 0 CityWork Alums 10yrs: 1 15yrs: 0 20yrs: 0 Com Forum Open House 10yrs: 6 15yrs: 8 20yrs: 1 Sustainable Living Fair 10yrs: 8 15yrs: 14 20yrs: 18 Total 10yrs: 39 15yrs: 37 20yrs: 39 2. Existing Vine Drive and Lemay Avenue is congested and constrained by the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad. Trains block the intersection and create extended gridlock in the area. This location is a top location for congestion and safety complaints. Existing neighborhoods in this area are becoming increasingly impacted by the congestion on Lemay. a. Keep this project in BOB 2.0. CityWorks: 4 Com. Open House: 3 Sustainable Living Fair: 17 Total: 24 b. Consider a separate tax initiative for this project alone. CityWorks: 1 Com. Open House: 7 Sustainable Living Fair: 13 Total: 21 c. Consider a separate tax initiative for this project and 2-3 additional traffic projects. CityWorks: 1 Com. Open House: 8 Sustainable Living Fair: 6 Total: 13 Boards and Commissions were asked whether they supported a separate tax measure. Nine said yes while 3 said no. The Vine and Lemay question is currently posted on IdeaLab. ATTACHMENT 2 2 Total and individual results of “dot exercise” from Board and Commission meeting, CityWork Alumni Forum, Community Issue Forum Open House, and the Sustainable Living Fair. Total: Highest Priority Projects 1. Safe Routes to Everywhere (Sidewalks, Transit, Bikes) (Continued from BOB) 2. Downtown Restroom 3. Community Marketplace 4. Housing for Chronically Homeless(Homeward 2020) 5. Community Organics Composting and Recycling Facility 6. Bike/Ped Grade Separated Crossings Fund 7. Climate Action Projects 8. Recreational Trail Enhancements 9. Sustainable Child Care Center 10. Implementing Nature in the City 11. Downtown Poudre River Enhancements 12. Bridge Maintenance and Replacement 13. Completion of the Gardens at the Gardens on Spring Creek 14. Water Sustainability Improvements for Parks and Golf 15. Parking Garage & Retail Space 16. Quiet Zone Implementation I-(Downtown /CSU - 16 crossings + 2 ped crossings) 17. College Midtown Transportation Plan Implementation Fund 18. Vine & Lemay Grade Separated Crossing Design, ROW and Construct 19. Neighborhood Revitalization Investments 20. East Mulberry Corridor planning, prelim design, and ROW purchase Total-Lowest Priority: 1. Parking Garage & Retail Space 2. Quiet Zone Implementation I-(Downtown /CSU - 16 crossings + 2 ped crossings) 3. College Median and Streetscape Enhancement & Renovations 4. Community Marketplace 5. Land for Police Maintenance Facility 6. Quiet Zone Implementation II- (Drake to Trilby - 5 crossings) 7. Regional Training Facility 8. Campus West Policing Substation 9. Housing for Chronically Homeless(Homeward 2020) 10. Mason Street Enhancement 11. Southeast Community Creative Center 12. Velo and Fitness Park 13. Southwest Annexation Road Improvements Fund 14. Climate Action Projects 15. Implementing Nature in the City 16. Preserving our Heritage: City Park Train; Club Tico Renovation; Fire Museum 17. South Timberline Road Improvements 18. Downtown Restroom 19. Sustainable Child Care Center 3 20. Downtown Poudre River Enhancements Boards and Commissions-Top 20 Highest Priority Projects: 1. Recreational Trail Enhancements 2. Water Sustainability Improvements for Parks and Golf 3. Sustainable Child Care Center 4. Downtown Poudre River Enhancements 5. Bike/Ped Grade Separated Crossings Fund 6. Bridge Maintenance and Replacement 7. Completion of the Gardens at the Gardens on Spring Creek 8. EPIC Pool Improvements 9. Downtown Restroom 10. Southeast Community Creative Center 11. Community Organics Composting and Recycling Facility 12. Vine & Lemay Grade Separated Crossing Design, ROW and Construct 13. Renovation of the Historic Carnegie Building 14. Housing for Chronically Homeless(Homeward 2020) 15. Linden Street Renovations Design & Construction 16. Neighborhood Revitalization Investments 17. East Mulberry Corridor planning, prelim design, and ROW purchase 18. Downtown Maintenance Shop 19. Climate Action Projects 20. Realigned Vine Drive I - College to Lemay Boards and Commissions- Lowest Priority Projects: 1. Quiet Zone Implementation I-(Downtown /CSU - 16 crossings + 2 ped crossings) 2. College Median and Streetscape Enhancement & Renovations 3. Parking Garage & Retail Space 4. Community Marketplace 5. Quiet Zone Implementation II- (Drake to Trilby - 5 crossings) 6. Velo and Fitness Park 7. Community Organics Composting and Recycling Facility 8. Housing for Chronically Homeless(Homeward 2020) 9. Preserving our Heritage: City Park Train; Club Tico Renovation; Fire Museum 10. Start up for Bike Share 11. Implementing Nature in the City 12. Sustainable Child Care Center 13. Downtown Poudre River Enhancements 14. Bike/Ped Grade Separated Crossings Fund 15. EPIC Pool Improvements 16. Downtown Restroom 17. Southeast Community Creative Center 18. Vine & Lemay Grade Separated Crossing Design, ROW and Construct 19. Renovation of the Historic Carnegie Building 20. Climate Action Projects 4 CityWork Alumi Forum-Top 20 Highest Priority Projects 1. Parking Garage & Retail Space 2. Preserving our Heritage: City Park Train; Club Tico Renovation; Fire Museum 3. Downtown Poudre River Enhancements 4. Vine & Lemay Grade Separated Crossing Design, ROW and Construct 5. Linden Street Renovations Design & Construction 6. Realigned Vine Drive I - College to Lemay 7. Lincoln Neighborhood Projects 8. Housing for Chronically Homeless(Homeward 2020) 9. Downtown Restroom 10. Renovation of the Historic Carnegie Building 11. Transfort Bus Fleet Replacement (Continued from BOB) 12. Mason Street Enhancement 13. East Mulberry Corridor planning, prelim design, and ROW purchase 14. Lincoln Avenue Improvements Design & Construction 15. Jefferson Street Improvements - College Avenue to Lincoln Avenue/Mountain Aveneue 16. Campus West Policing Substation 17. Quiet Zone Implementation I-(Downtown /CSU - 16 crossings + 2 ped crossings) 18. Community Marketplace 19. Community Organics Composting and Recycling Facility 20. Start up for Bike Share CityWork Alumni Forum-Lowest Priority: 1. Community Marketplace 2. Community Organics Composting and Recycling Facility 3. Preserving our Heritage: City Park Train; Club Tico Renovation; Fire Museum 4. Downtown Restroom 5. Regional Training Facility 6. Land for Police Maintenance Facility 7. College Median and Streetscape Enhancement & Renovations 8. Quiet Zone Implementation II- (Drake to Trilby - 5 crossings) 9. Velo and Fitness Park 10. Climate Action Projects 11. Southwest Annexation Road Improvements Fund 12. South Timberline Road Improvements 5 Community Issue Forum Open House-Top 20 Highest Priority Projects: 1. Housing for Chronically Homeless(Homeward 2020) 2. Safe Routes to Everywhere (Sidewalks, Transit, Bikes) (Continued from BOB) 3. Community Organics Composting and Recycling Facility 4. Parking Garage & Retail Space 5. Campus West Policing Substation 6. Downtown Restroom 7. Climate Action Projects 8. Bridge Maintenance and Replacement 9. Vine & Lemay Grade Separated Crossing Design, ROW and Construct 10. Recreational Trail Enhancements 11. Bike/Ped Grade Separated Crossings Fund 12. Implementing Nature in the City 13. Community Marketplace 14. Downtown Poudre River Enhancements 15. Realigned Vine Drive I - College to Lemay 16. Quiet Zone Implementation I-(Downtown /CSU - 16 crossings + 2 ped crossings) 17. EPIC Pool Improvements 18. Completion of the Gardens at the Gardens on Spring Creek 19. West LaPorte Avenue Improvements - Impala Drive to Taft Hill Road 20. Renovation of the Historic Carnegie Building 21. Sustainable Child Care Center Community Issue Forum Open House-Lowest Priority: 1. Land for Police Maintenance Facility 2. Community Marketplace 3. Regional Training Facility 4. Parking Garage & Retail Space 5. Climate Action Projects 6. Housing for Chronically Homeless(Homeward 2020) 7. Campus West Policing Substation 8. Implementing Nature in the City 9. Downtown Poudre River Enhancements 10. Quiet Zone Implementation I-(Downtown /CSU - 16 crossings + 2 ped crossings) 11. Southeast Community Creative Center 12. Velo and Fitness Park 13. Computer Aided Dispatch/Record Management System Upgrades 14. Quiet Zone Implementation II- (Drake to Trilby - 5 crossings) 15. Mason Street Enhancement 16. Safe Routes to Everywhere (Sidewalks, Transit, Bikes) (Continued from BOB) 17. Renovation of the Historic Carnegie Building 18. Sustainable Child Care Center 6 19. Southwest Annexation Road Improvements Fund 20. Linden Street Renovations Design & Construction Sustainable Living Fair-Top 20 Highest Priority Projects: 1. Community Marketplace 2. Safe Routes to Everywhere (Sidewalks, Transit, Bikes) (Continued from BOB) 3. Downtown Restroom 4. Climate Action Projects 5. Community Organics Composting and Recycling Facility 6. Housing for Chronically Homeless(Homeward 2020) 7. Bike/Ped Grade Separated Crossings Fund 8. Implementing Nature in the City 9. Recreational Trail Enhancements 10. Sustainable Child Care Center 11. Downtown Poudre River Enhancements 12. Quiet Zone Implementation I-(Downtown /CSU - 16 crossings + 2 ped crossings) 13. College Midtown Transportation Plan Implementation Fund 14. Neighborhood Revitalization Investments 15. Parking Garage & Retail Space 16. Completion of the Gardens at the Gardens on Spring Creek 17. Start up for Bike Share 18. East Mulberry Corridor planning, prelim design, and ROW purchase 19. Water Sustainability Improvements for Parks and Golf 20. Velo and Fitness Park Sustainable Living Fair-Lowest Priority: 1. Parking Garage & Retail Space 2. College Median and Streetscape Enhancement & Renovations 3. Land for Police Maintenance Facility 4. Quiet Zone Implementation I-(Downtown /CSU - 16 crossings + 2 ped crossings) 5. Campus West Policing Substation 6. Regional Training Facility 7. Quiet Zone Implementation II- (Drake to Trilby - 5 crossings) 8. Mason Street Enhancement 9. Housing for Chronically Homeless(Homeward 2020) 10. Southeast Community Creative Center 11. South Timberline Road Improvements 12. College Midtown Transportation Plan Implementation Fund 13. Lincoln Neighborhood Projects 14. Realigned Vine Drive I - College to Lemay 15. West LaPorte Avenue Improvements - Impala Drive to Taft Hill Road 16. Southwest Annexation Road Improvements Fund 17. Downtown Restroom 18. Sustainable Child Care Center 7 19. Completion of the Gardens at the Gardens on Spring Creek 20. Start up for Bike Share 1 Website Project Rankings and Comments As of September 22, 2014 Citizen Comments from BOB 2.0 Website Fort Collins loves beer, but is safe enough. Cut the safety, stick with the agricultural improvements. Submitted at Sep-22-2014 02:17 PM Most of the projects listed are worthwhile. However, I have picked those that I feel will make the most positive impact on Fort Collins. The community marketplace is long overdue and would be great for residents and local small food businesses. I was appalled the one time I used the current bathroom in Old Town--there was no way to wash hands. Disgusting! We need a modern restroom which includes running water and soap!! With so many festivals/carnivals with food trucks, this is a public health issue. My only concern is that it may be used for habitation by the homeless--perhaps it should be locked at night? Basically, I am always in favor of more emphasis on parks or nature areas. That's what sets Fort Collins apart. And, the Gardens on Spring Creek is a wonderful facility which should be utilized to the fullest. I don't have children myself, but many of my co-workers struggle with child-care issues. Affordable child-care is essential so parents can work/go to school. Honestly, there is a need for affordable child care throughout the city. Submitted at Sep-22-2014 01:45 PM There was discussion on a SE rec center (with sufficient lap lanes for swim team use), but I don't see that on the list. That is the #1 pick for me. Thanks. Submitted at Sep-22-2014 11:22 AM I think the city needs to be sure to support Transfort as much as possible. There have been so many great improvements, but without adding (or continuing to add/upgrade) buses and staff all of the new changes are difficult to implement. Submitted at Sep-22-2014 08:34 AM I believe the time has come in Fort Collins when something like the proposed "Community Marketplace" could succeed very well, if done correctly. Submitted at Sep-21-2014 11:31 AM ATTACHMENT 3 2 Homeless project seems to be a major humanitarian concern. I hope that it can make it to at least near the top of the priority list. Maybe include rehab program for those who can eventually manage on their own by providing some sort of re-entry into mainstream assistance. I personally would like to see the share bike program become a part of www.bcycle.com program. Reasoning being is that it is an international program already in place and a membership card holder can utilize their card anywhere. If a card holder established their card in Denver and moves to Fort Collins then the card would be transferred to new location or if I live in Fort Collins and visit Boulder or Denver then I can utilize their system as well, using the same membership card as long as the bikes remain within the same community. That way I don't have to redo a membership for every community I go to. I ride the bus to Denver and Boulder and will be nice to have a universal card to have for here as well as when I visit areas that have the same program. Vine/Lemay grade separated crossing. I hope that means an under or overpass of the railroad. I think that there is a lack of planning involving the railroad or simply being to cheap when developing on or around railroads. Bridges are done for waterways, but that is out of necessity, but it should also be considered for railway, at least with most major arteries. So, put a bridge or underpass for pete sake. Also, consider detox and rehab for drug and alcohol or least provide grant funding to nonprofits. In this case, utilize special taxation for funding like taxes from marijuana sells. Submitted at Sep-20-2014 10:19 PM Great list of projects - thanks to the City for being visionary! Submitted at Sep-20-2014 11:52 AM We need more protected bicycle lanes in this amazing town! Especially on West Elizabeth Street! Please! Submitted at Sep-20-2014 10:18 AM Yes, please, on the Community Marketplace. Submitted at Sep-20-2014 09:05 AM I have indicated several projects for funding. These are the ones I see as highest priority and I list them below with a priority score 1-5, with 1 being most important. 1 - Safe routes to everywhere, Tranfort Bus Fleet replacement - these initiatives help to make good ways for people to get around FoCo without a car. If funded, they actually can impact quite 3 a few other issues by removing cars from the streets. 2 - Community Marketplace - This idea is wonderful for downtown. Our summer time marketplaces are bustling with people. This continues the market and builds community (and it is a relatively small investment for a potentially big payback). 3 - Bridge maintenance and replacement - No brainer here. If you don't take care of these, then we end up with catastrophic failure. Bottom line: take care of important infrastructure. 4 - Housing for chronically homeless - as FoCo downtown pushes north, one big problem is the number of homeless people at the park at Jefferson and Linden across from the Mission. With added housing, this can help offset the number of chronically homeless and help with the downtown area. 5 - EPIC pool improvements - EPIC is the only real exercise focused pool facility in FoCo. Many, many people benefit from it and it has brought people to FoCo for events. The cost is modest with no ongoing commitment. This is a good cost-to-benefit ratio. Submitted at Sep-20-2014 08:09 AM Fort Collins local vendors needs to have a building like this. It has potential to create a thriving culture created by the people that live here. Something like this, would be good for already established vendors and inspiring for those who wish to begin. This brings consumer and provider together in a unique setting that cannot happen at the grocery store. It puts a face on these items we buy, human interaction in this way is dire to hold onto a technologically advancing world. Submitted at Sep-20-2014 07:04 AM Gardens on Spring Creek 5 acres with no plan for food growing or training? Fort Collins has young farmers who can't find or afford land. The city needs to lead in stressing the importance of food (not commodities) agriculture from the soil up! Submitted at Sep-20-2014 06:47 AM Spring Creek Gardens -- local food production, accessible to residents is a good thing! Finish the project and bring it to full functionality! Community Market -- I'm a member of the Fort Collins Food Cooperative and strongly committed to building our local economy and fostering a "a unique downtown destination bursting with a high quality selection of locally produced, artisan and ethnic products, freshly- made prepared foods, independent merchants, music and community events--- open year round." I love the year round part! 4 Submitted at Sep-19-2014 08:00 PM The outdoor restroom could be accomplished for free by allowing the installer use if for advertising. San Jose used this model a while back. Submitted at Sep-19-2014 04:43 PM A central year-round location for local producers and a farmer's market would be a great boon to the downtown area, attracting people from all over Fort Collins to come shop there. Submitted at Sep-19-2014 03:47 PM The hard part here is not checking everything. The highest priorities in my mind are those that improve transportation in the city, esp for safe bicycling, pedestrians and continued improvement in mass transit. Equally high on my list would be improved services and support for our homeless and low income populations. I love the idea of improvements in deteriorating neighborhoods, but do have concerns that that will then lead to increased gentrification and the eventual ousting of the very people this would be intended to help, (a conundrum indeed). Love, love love the Community Market concept. I have visited a few in my travels, and in fact look for such things when I do. I have also heard others talk about enjoying this type of thing in their own travels. It could be just as much a support for local good as a tourist draw. And of course none of this is possible without a good infrastructure. Well landscaped and planned streets scapes are so important to the health of our city, mentally emotionally and physically. I think it is part of what makes our lovely home so appealing. I just wish people would take the idea home and make their own home towns as lovely, then we can all happily vist each other without overgrowing any one environment. Submitted at Sep-19-2014 01:59 PM Of all the choices I made above, I think the Community Marketplace would have an amazing impact on the economy of Old Town and the overall feel of Old Town Fort Collins. We need more projects like the Community Marketplace and less expansion of places like breweries and distilleries. We have enough places in town to get drunk. Old Town is slowly becoming less about families and kids, and more about night life and adults. Is it possible that the city might start looking at buying up some of the older buildings to offer subsidized rents for the small mom and pop shops that seem to be going under? Too many of these cool little businesses die every year because of super high rents. David 5 Submitted at Sep-19-2014 12:41 PM A downtown community marketplace can serve as a site of food-based economic development not only for Fort Collins, but Northern Colorado. By having an urban center that buys from surrounding rural places, such a market can build stronger ties between the various segments of this part of Colorado. At the same time, a community marketplace will contribute to a green jobs economy, in turn encouraging triple bottom line practices in Fort Collins. Submitted at Sep-19-2014 11:50 AM I am in support of the Community Marketplace project to construct an indoor market hall allowing for year - round operation of a farmer’s market. I am in full support of local food production, local economy, and increasing the availability and opportunity to purchase such Fort Collins products for local citizens! Thank you, Jeff Trow 2606 Gilpin Ave. Loveland, Colorado 80538 Submitted at Sep-19-2014 10:52 AM It's a long time coming!! Submitted at Sep-19-2014 09:51 AM I would love to see a community marketplace in Fort Collins! Submitted at Sep-19-2014 09:36 AM This is a desperately needed hub of community vibrancy. The activities that will go on here are the true foundation of the health of fort collins, the underpinnings of economic, food, and healthcare security start with supporting our local food system. Submitted at Sep-19-2014 09:32 AM Yes, yes, yes to a community market - one of my favorite things to do when I visit other cities! Submitted at Sep-19-2014 08:15 AM 6 thanks for the opportunity to provide feedback! Submitted at Sep-19-2014 08:09 AM I think a Community Marketplace is an amazing idea. It would be so good for our local economy! Submitted at Sep-19-2014 04:28 AM Housing is a CRITICAL issue in Fort Collins, & the best way to address homelessness is to offer affordable housing & support services to help them become self-sufficient. Similarly, child care is often not affordable for young families. We need to offer more quality, affordable child care centers. Submitted at Sep-18-2014 10:27 AM Downtown needs a public restroom, and East Mulberry needs to look better--it's a main entry into the city of Fort Collins. I unequivocally support local food production, so the Community Marketplace is very important to me also. Locally produced food is the freshest and very best offered, and having a year round location to shop for it will make it easier for all of us to access it. Support for local food has grown every year for the past 10 years. I hope we can provide this resource to our community! Submitted at Sep-16-2014 03:21 PM Please bring a year-round Farmer's Market.... I believe many people would support the year round market if people knew EVERY weekend they could go get fresh food. Fort Collins people love to support their farmer! Submitted at Sep-16-2014 08:57 AM These are all fantastic projects that I would love to see accomplished, but I think we need to focus on projects that decrease our environmental impact, make it easier for bikes and pedestrians to get around, and create housing for our residents who are unable to afford to live here. Submitted at Sep-15-2014 03:43 PM Please consider making Bike/Ped grade separated crossings fund a top priority. This will make it much safer for those of us who travel exclusively by bike/foot. Submitted at Sep-15-2014 02:55 PM 7 I would hope that the Southeast Community Center would include a lap pool. So many important projects are named here. It's hard to choose which should go forward or not. I hope many of them can be funded. Submitted at Sep-14-2014 06:59 PM I think this is a great idea. This would provide an entertainment destination as well as shopping facilities for those things not always readily available. Submitted at Sep-13-2014 11:01 AM I love the idea of a Fort Collins market place. I also feel strongly about moving towards a sustainable future by effectively managing our water usage, pursuing sustainable energies, improving pedestrian and bike transit throughout town, and implementing more composting (which could potentially be used to support organic growing in Fort Collins). Submitted at Sep-12-2014 11:16 PM I have hand crafted items for sale and would appreciate the venue. Submitted at Sep-12-2014 08:49 PM I am a strong supporter of this project, particularly as it relates to the creation of a marketplace for locally grown food. I hope that the city will support this vital project that will continue to grow Fort Collins into a unique and desirable place to live work and play. Regards, Ben Nelson Submitted at Sep-12-2014 05:46 PM I think a year round community market featuring local food and art is exactly what Fort Collins needs. It is the sort of thing that makes this city so great and I think it is very much wanted by this community. Thanks Submitted at Sep-12-2014 02:21 PM As a long-time supporter of Fort Collins local business, i think a year-round community market would be a great downtown attraction and would give a great boost to the local economy. 8 Submitted at Sep-12-2014 10:41 AM I strongly support the Community Marketplace project, and urge the City to include it in the capital budget. The Community Marketplace will have strong positive impacts on the community in lots of ways: It will support economic development by providing a venue for local food businesses; it will support local farmers and food producers; it will promote community health through access to healthy feed; it will promote community engagement because that's what public markets do. This is a project with immense upside and few downsides, and there are many people in the community who will actively support it. It also has the potential, depending on siting, to be a bridge across the north-south split in Fort Collins, which would be a hugely good thing. Fort Collins has done a great job of creating a world-class city and place to lvie and work. A Public Market would be a huge positive addition to the community! Submitted at Sep-12-2014 10:34 AM Investing in a community marketplace shows that FTC stands behind its commitment to community and local food, and will bring people downtown, year round, for healthy food and community. Invest! Submitted at Sep-11-2014 09:49 PM This is vital to the health of Fort Collins Submitted at Sep-11-2014 03:27 PM This is vital to the health of Fort Collins and to support our local food economy. Submitted at Sep-11-2014 03:24 PM City Leaders, As owner of Spring Kite Farm, a local organic produce farm and CSA operation located within city limits, I strongly support the city's goal of funding a permanent Community Marketplace. This is a very forward thinking step and will be integral as the community continues to build a healthy, resilient food system. I do, however, have a few concerns: 1) $9M is a bit much. I believe that the newly formed NoCo Food Cluster could leverage $3M from the BOB offer for additional foundation support and private investment. 9 2) There needs to be land acquisition (by the public and/or private sectors, time for collaboration?) attached to this offer. Land values continue to increase in Northern Colorado, and it is time for municipalities take a serious role in securing prime agricultural lands with adequate water right and getting local food producers on those lands with tenure (unique financing options for ownership, long term land leases - 50-100 yrs, etc). It's time to take a long-term approach to food system innovation and investment. Thanks very much for your support! Michael Baute Spring Kite Farm Submitted at Sep-11-2014 01:51 PM I have spent considerable time in Seattle and Vancouver and love the energy Pike's Market and Granville Island brings to their community. Fort Collins has long talked about one, now is the time to create something. I will enhance the downtown area, support our local businesses and artisans and truly make Fort Collins a destination city. Submitted at Sep-11-2014 01:39 PM I am in support of a Fort Collins Community Marketplace. If created it will further enhance the reputation of FTC as a first class place to live, work and play. A new marketplace will create jobs as it supports the local community. Please support this project wholeheartedly. Submitted at Sep-11-2014 11:55 AM Thanks for the opportunity to provide input to city planning. Submitted at Sep-10-2014 03:22 PM The train and Club Tico help Fort Collins stand out. A downtown market is also important and helps Fort Collins stand out. I'm all for bike safety and travel. The Homeless population needs housing. Studies suggest that housing reduces all of the peripheral issues that surround homelessness. Submitted at Sep-10-2014 11:13 AM I do support the community marketplace - people have been doing a lot of good work around our food system. Food will be a very important future need, increasing because farmland is 10 being used east of here for oil and gas development. Distribution, from what I have learned, is a major issue for small farmers. Fort Collins needs this. Although I can find it on this agenda, please fund the SBDC - it has grown into a wonderfully dynamic program. Hope it's not to late for the city to help the program. We need continued support small business in Fort Collins. Submitted at Sep-10-2014 09:40 AM All of these ideas are good ones - I would vote for them all if I thought we could afford them! I have tried to choose projects that: increase quality of life of our city and provide increased support for the qualities that make our city unique (cycling, use and preservation of nature, abundant outdoor/recreational space). Please let me know if you have questions. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input. Joyce Submitted at Sep-10-2014 08:05 AM The community market, housing for the homeless, and the trails are te top priorities. In that order. The market is the most likely to maintain summer employment and generate more income for the city. It's a wise investment. Submitted at Sep-10-2014 12:10 AM I have so many friends with great business ideas that they want to or have already started here in Fort Collins. They all express concerns with a venue for sales- we have the producers- we have the buyers but our downtown farmers market isn't cutting it! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE build us a community market place! I can't wait to go all there all the time and take pride in showing off our ability to facilitate local economic growth as a community! Submitted at Sep-09-2014 10:39 PM I am writing in support of the Community Marketplace in Fort Collins. As a doctoral candidate in Food Systems, I am supportive of the triple bottom line benefits a Community Marketplace would provide. Economically, a year round marketplace would add vitality to the local and regional economy and enhances Fort Collins’s already widely recognized character as one of the best places to live in America! It would also create an attractive, dynamic and diverse experience for shoppers and community members who choose to purchase and consume in ways that support their social and environmental values, while bringing greater economic well-being and sustainability 11 to our local community. Similar to great Public Markets in other cities, a market that draws residents back for repeated shopping, social, cultural and educational experiences, will also become a destination for visitors and tourists. Furthermore, the scope of the Community Marketplace should support other sectors in the local economy like local entrepreneurs that share the commitment to local sustainability and global fairness, especially in areas supported by the City’s other economic development activities. Fort Collins is a unique place with local pride. A Community Marketplace will facilitate building direct relationships between producers, vendors and consumers and ensure that this pride is shared and communicated as more out-of-towners move to our great city. That relationship is based in part on a local culture that gives people the opportunity to know better those with whom they engage in economic and other activities. But that relationship also is based on a vision of sustainability that is not necessarily geographically determined. Being Local is ultimately less about distinct geographical boundaries than about a commitment to alternative relationships promoting social and environmental values. I am in full support of the Community Marketplace and envision it being a place of learning, communing, shopping, eating, conversing and growing as a community. Thanks! Submitted at Sep-09-2014 06:25 PM A community marketplace has been the topic of conversation for many years. It would be a great to have a place like Chelsea Market or Pike Market where local businesses could have a year round place to sell their products. It could also be used to hold events that require a large venue with flooring that can be cleaned (i.e. no hardwood or carpeting). We need a larger place to hold the Winter Market, which is very popular with our community, and this would be a perfect place. Submitted at Sep-09-2014 03:25 PM I would very much like the BOB to support a Community Marketplace. Buying local helps everyone in the community by keeping our spending dollars and tax money in our own town. Local produce is also better for our health. The market will also provide an outlet for new business exploration and growth. It will add to vitality of the Old Town area. Submitted at Sep-09-2014 02:51 PM A community marketplace would be great to support local businesses and help create infrastructure for more local food availability for the public and institutions. 12 Submitted at Sep-09-2014 02:32 PM This form is very helpful to understand what is possible and I liked that it included O&M impact. Next time I would recommend a running tally at the bottom (like a shopping cart) that would allow citizens/voters to see how much what they want will cost them/us, and have it turn from green to red when more items are selected than the predicted funding from the tax. This form was challenging to figure out the real cost on a yearly basis of what I believe would help Fort Collins. We can't have it all, and understanding the impact of choices at an individual level would help us and City Council make effective decisions on where to focus our efforts as a community. Thanks for reaching out for input! Chris Submitted at Sep-09-2014 02:27 PM This would be a game charger for fort collins and make encourage more produces to be available. Submitted at Sep-09-2014 02:19 PM Thank you for offering a place for public voice. Submitted at Sep-09-2014 02:15 PM Great public input option Submitted at Sep-09-2014 10:15 AM These are all good projects. However, I would rank CR1 highest because presently there are no City recreation centers in southeast Fort Collins. Yet the southeast is still a major growth path for both residential and commercial development. Keep up the great work! Your vision and commitment are encouraging. Submitted at Sep-08-2014 10:14 AM The geographic limits on the Quiet Zone Implementation item lists "from Drake to Trilby". Please consider extending this geographic zone to the southern limit of the city which is Carpenter Road. Since the recent development of oil and gas in our region, the rail line that used to carry one or two very small trains a day now services hundred car oil tanker trains a number of times 13 during the day and night. Please consider in you planning process that train noise and safety issues extend to other regions of the city than just CSU and Downtown. Submitted at Sep-08-2014 08:37 AM So many great project ideas, really hard to pick just a few. Seeing as a majority of our community utilizes the College Ave/Midtown corridor and there is so much redevelopment happening there I'd love to see investment in midtown sooner rather than later. We've made the plans for Midtown, now let's build! Submitted at Sep-03-2014 11:52 PM I'm getting sick of waiting for a kayak park. the people have shown interest and followed the appropriate processes and I feel as though we are being met with resistance. Submitted at Sep-03-2014 10:26 AM I'm submitting this to support the Poudre River kayak play park. This is a tremendous opportunity to implement a community oriented project that will help people recognize and appreciate the Poudre. Play parks offer economic upsides for communities through events/competitions. Play parks also offer a safe environment for people to develop kayaking skills, a benefit that will lead to increasing safety and interest in the sport. Submitted at Sep-03-2014 10:12 AM The Poudre Downtown project Reach 3 of the Master plan missed funds from the General fund for 2015-2016 because of one staff persons decision This is very unfortunate considering the communities interest and financial contribution to the project. This should be at the top of the BOB list of projects. There is currently $158,000 in liquid private funds ready to fund a whitewater park in Downtown Fort Collins. There's no reason to let those funds go to waste. Thank you City leadership. Submitted at Sep-02-2014 02:13 PM Many of these projects fall in the "Would Be Nice!" category. I feel as a Country, as a State and as a City we can no longer afford "Bigger, Better, Shiner" projects; we need to focus on "Basic Infrastructure Construction and Maintenance." We have already built more than we can afford to maintain or certainly replace. We certainly cannot afford to build the BNSF railroad overpass, we must work the BNSF and the PUC to make an at grade crossing work; as it will be too expensive, too massive, too ugly, and we will never be able to afford the maintenance and ultimate replacement. Submitted at Sep-02-2014 12:15 PM 14 It makes no sense why city council would solicit community feedback for a SE Recreation & Arts Center, which clearly indicated what we want, and then do a complete 180 and turn it into a creative center. SE Fort Collins is full of families! We need pools, both competitive & leisure, and a place to recreate. We want a regular rec center, one where we can swim, exercise, take various classes, and put the kids in child care for a couple of hours. None of this creative center stuff! If there's money left over, fine, use It to turn the Carnegie building into a creative center. But SE FoCo NEEDS a rec center, something we'll use everyday!!! It's misleading to ask us to prioritize the BOB projects with the $10M creative center and not give us the option to vote for the $35M rec center that we really want! All of FoCo's tax dollars have gone to the north and the central areas for far too long. The amount of residents and growth happening here warrants a rec center! Don't waste $10M of our money on something we will hardly use. $35M on a full service rec facility will be money well spent!!! Submitted at Aug-29-2014 03:12 AM Obviously I would love to support every one of these projects! They all sound beneficial in some way. I mainly focused on projects that I would support being completed in the very near future. If I was looking at long-term development, some of these priorities may shift, especially the transportation projects. Submitted at Aug-22-2014 07:42 AM Thank you for allowing us to provide input. I have lived in other cities where they have raised a local-option sales tax but were not transparent as to how the funds will be spent. I have lived in a few smaller cities throughout the US. Fort Collins' trail system and the ability to travel across the city without a car continues to set us apart from these other cities. Thanks so much. Tom Hromatka Submitted at Aug-21-2014 10:02 AM I think this whole idea is great and I support whatever projects are chosen. Submitted at Aug-20-2014 12:15 PM I don't get this at all; there have been multiple surveys and public input sessions and even proposals for a recreation center and all of a sudden we get this weird thing out of nowhere. It is long long since time for a pool on the south side of town, and we have been being promised a rec center for nearly as long as I have lived in Fort Collins. You need to rethink some things and start to invest in the south side of town, we pay lots of taxes and end up going to Loveland half of the time because their facilities are better and closer ... Submitted at Aug-18-2014 07:03 PM 15 South-side rec center (say northside with a swim team pool), yes. Creative center, NO, NO, NO! Maybe climate action plan. Will need to wait and see what it says. If it is as stupid as the bag fee NO, example don't tell me to reduce my in-town driving then vote to widen roads and freeways for more cars. If it things like residential roof-top solar, mirco-grid, grey-water, pod-cars, etc, probably a YES. Submitted at Aug-18-2014 04:39 PM Less emphasis on bikes and more on automobile flow and efficiency. Cars hugely outnumber bikes so less stopping and traffic delays would do more for the environment that socially engineering us to use bikes. They're not practical for busy working/tax-paying citizens. Submitted at Aug-18-2014 12:16 PM Southeast rec center should be a rec center, not a "creative center". If you don't include a pool, you have doomed it to obscurity. The southeast part of town needs safe recreation, bike trails, and crossings on Harmony for the people that don't drive. There are no safe ways to get to Preston, Fossil, or Zach for pedestrians or bicyclists. EPIC and Mulberry pills are overcrowded and have both been recently updated... It is time for a pool and rec center on the south end of town! Submitted at Aug-18-2014 10:28 AM Many worthwhile projects,with limited funding. It's very difficult to choose some over others, especially with regard to infrastructure/road projects. Submitted at Aug-18-2014 09:36 AM Let's hope the improvements keep coming--they make it easy to be proud to live in Fort Collins. Submitted at Aug-18-2014 09:32 AM I believe the grade separated crossing at Vine and Lemay is needed in order to allow development in the northern part of the City. Submitted at Aug-18-2014 09:19 AM I am terribly disappointed to not see an new swimming facility included in this list. Fort Collins is in desperate, DESPERATE need of more year-round pool time/space. Fort Collins/Loveland was just names one of the top "swimming communities" in the entire nation (thanks much in part to Loveland), but there is never enough space for the local swimming teams, as well as the general public. As much pride as the city takes in being a "recreator's mecca", city leadership 16 should be ashamed at how far behind it lacks in pool facilities for it's residents, particularly compared to it's neighbor to the south, and the rest of Colorado. Submitted at Aug-18-2014 08:36 AM It looks like a great list to pick from. Submitted at Aug-18-2014 08:08 AM What happened to SE Pool/Rec Center project? That seems MUCH more useful than some generic "cultural center". Also, for a city this large, it's sad that our only public outdoor pool offers no lap swimming or diving boards. Recently spent a great day at Sunset Pool in Longmont and was reminded how lacking the pool situation in Fort Collins is. -Eric Submitted at Aug-18-2014 06:02 AM Choosing projects with zero budget constraints is pointless... Redesign this survey with a "salary cap" feature so hard choices must be made, if you want realistic results... or keep the if we won the lottery & had all the money in the world mentality ... lol government spending Submitted at Aug-18-2014 02:29 AM The southeast rec center idea has turned from a rec center to a creative center. Why? That's not what we voted on at the visioning session. We want a pool! A big one! We want this to be for families. This part of town is full of families. That's what we need. Submitted at Aug-17-2014 09:47 PM                    1 Community Issue Forum Keypads and Discussion Keypad results What part of the City do you live in? (by quadrant) Responses Percent Count East of College Ave and North of Drake 18.75% 3 East of College Ave and South of Drake 37.50% 6 West of College Ave and North of Drake 25.00% 4 West of College Ave and South of Drake 18.75% 3 16 What decade were you born? Responses Percent Count After 1990 38.89% 7 1980s 11.11% 2 1970s 11.11% 2 1960s 5.56% 1 1950s 11.11% 2 1940s 11.11% 2 1930s 5.56% 1 1920s 0.00% 0 1910s 0.00% 0 1900s 0.00% 0 18 Which three projects do you support the most? Responses Percent Count ENV 1 – Climate action projects 22.45% 11 CNL1 – Housing for chronically homeless 20.41% 10 CNL2 – Safe routes to everywhere 14.29% 7 T13 - Bridge maintenance and replacement 12.24% 6 CR 5 – Trail enhancements 8.16% 4 ENV 2 – Composting and recycling facility 6.12% 3 HPG 1- Parking garage and retail space 6.12% 3 ECH 1 – Downtown restroom 4.08% 2 SC5 – Campus west policing station 4.08% 2 T1 – Vine and Lemay 2.04% 1 49 Existing Vine Drive and Lemay Avenue is congested and constrained by the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad. Trains block the intersection and create extended gridlock in the area. This location is a top location for congestion and safety complaints. Existing neighborhoods in this area are becoming increasingly impacted by the congestion on Lemay. Responses Percent Count This project should stay in BOB 2.0 11.76% 2 Consider a separate tax initiative for this project alone 35.29% 6 Consider a separate tax initiative for this project and 2-3 52.94% 9 ATTACHMENT 5 2 additional traffic projects. 17 Since 1989, voters have supported street maintenance through a 1/4 –cent tax. The current tax will expire Dec. 31, 2015. Voters will have the opportunity to renew this tax in April 2015. Should the term of the tax be: Responses Percent Count 10 years 47.06% 8 15 years 35.29% 6 20 years 17.65% 3 17 Community Issue Forum-Small Table Discussion Table Notes from all Tables Tables chose which proposals they discussed, so some proposals were not discussed and some were discussed by multiple tables. CR1 Southeast Community Creative Center  Encourages youth in FoCo. They are our future, and we need to show them the importance of art, physical health, etc. CR2 Water Sustainability Improvements for Parks and Golf  Doesn’t cost too much, makes a big impact and is easy to add. CR 5 Recreational Trail Enhancements  The trails should be a mixture of concrete and runner safe material to provide a safe environment for runners and bikers  Potential project benefits: - May encourage transportation alternatives to cars - Encourages a healthy community - New trails should be biker and runner friendly - The wider trails will be safer for bikers and runners  Potential project drawbacks: - May be bigger projects that should be focused on  Widening of bike path would be beneficial, some accidents/collisions have nearly occurred. CR 6 EPIC Pool Improvements  Current EPIC Pool is rundown, the showers need repairs, and there is currently insufficient funds to take care of it  The pool is run down and dirty  Potential project benefits: - Improves quality and experiences for children - Is one of the few pools in Fort Collins with lap lanes, needs to be in good shape - Encourages a healthy community  Potential project drawbacks: - We have the Keep Fort Collins Great tax to fix problems like this; the money from BOB should be used for bigger projects  (Lifeguard, works at EPIC). Many different people go to EPIC, but there are lots of problems with the pool itself. The pumps aren’t working well—had to close the pool for a couple of days 3 because of this. It’s a loss of revenue for the city when the pool isn’t open. Gets very busy when there are swim meets.  (Takes grandkids there) There are some HVAC problems that need to be addressed; people could get sick.  This isn’t a new project. ECH 1 Downtown Restroom  Support: - Just think it's necessary. Downtown is one of the greatest parts of Fort Collins, but are lacking some these basic, fundamental and functional things (also parking situation). - Low cost, so could be a good filler project...however, yes it does fall more under the category of DDA responsibilities.  Concern: - This could be a DDA project- they are already talking about it so why should it be funded by us.  Rest of downtown is nice; family area, lots of pedestrians, nice impression, high-traffic area; restroom would be good for entire downtown image  Not many accessible restrooms: inconveniences families with small children, creates strife between shop/restaurant owners and citizens  No new restroom/current restroom is public health issue  Who would be in charge of upkeep? -Whoever is has failed in upkeep up current restroom  How is O&M $0? Is it pulled from general fund and not BOB?  Proposed area is "slum" of downtown; Montezuma Fuller alley is nice but leads to "slum" Oak Street (location of current restroom) is high-traffic: live music, families  Puts pressure on restaurants/stores  Facilitator: Reasons not to fund? - Priorities - people should be higher up - Experience of people matters, not pretty city - CNL1 more important - Why not paid for by general fund? Why from BOB? - Only 350k - Could use BOB funding elsewhere - Consensus: great question ECH 5 East Mulberry Corridor planning, prelim design, and ROW purchase  Three people noted: this is an important issue that the city definitely needs to look at  Potential project benefits: -May draw traffic away from busier streets (Harmony and College) -May develop the North side of town -Because it is in city limits, the construction would have to meet our requirements/standards  Potential project drawbacks: -Is $300,000 enough money to actually improve anything? -It is at the edge of the city growth area -There should be a separate budget for this ECH 7 Willow Street Improvements – College Avenue to Linden Street Design and Construction  Willow is nice around United Way, but suddenly becomes "depressing"  Not accessible area, limited space, "black hole"  Connect to Poudre River corridor? 4  Ranch Feeds (?) is oldest business in FC - would be nice to integrate  North FC needs renovation; "slum"  Current lighting, sandstones signs are nice; came from BOB?  What do these "improvements" entail exactly?  Bob Blue theatre - would be awesome to make it accessible to downtown  Would help culture, recreation ECH 11 Community Marketplace  Place for farmers market, would be nice to have indoor market when weather is bad, good community building, help preserve identity of Fort Collins  Concerns: - Have heard from people that live close to current marketplace have gotten negative feedback from other shop owners - Would rather see the DDA pick up this project when their funding increases- get funding form tax payers in their area. - Agree, this project would be better funded by DDA  (Goes to farmer’s market a lot). It’s growing, popular and it would be nice to have a place to go all year round.  Would be nice, but it should be funded by commercial activity: vendors, developers, etc., not the city.  Not all farmers’ markets are self-sustaining, all need some public/city support. Creating a space for them would give money back to the farmers.  If farmers’ markets can’t support themselves, then maybe they shouldn’t exist.  They can’t support themselves and family farms are on the decline because people aren’t willing to pay for the real cost of food. ENV 1 Climate Action Projects  Support: - Make Fort Collins stand out in environmental reputation - Has potential to more than pay for itself - Would greatly help the local economy to have Fort Collins be recognized as an innovative, progressive place - Would keep Fort Collins up to national standards, good reputation and good example to set - Can't put this off any longer - Energy efficiency is important for our economy and our status as an "up and coming" city - Need to focus on this as a community value that represents our citizens - Keeps us competitive with surrounding communities (Boulder)  Concern: -This is a farce- without the breweries, Fort Collins would be unpopulated (Knows people who had recycling businesses that went out of business)  Climate is clearly changing, must react now or we are "dead in water" in 5-10 years when playing catch-up  But FC can't do it alone  But what FC is doing now isn't enough  Description shortcoming: what does this entail exactly? Meaning is ambiguous  Can't count on alternative energy yet, too much variation (calm days, cloudy days, windy days)  Would standing structures be integrated, or would incentives be offered?  How is this only $4M? 5  We are already doing things like recycling, less water consumption  This is working, but it's not enough  Solar isn't viable option for everyone (costly)  Carbon comes from driving  Develop better bus systems to kill 2 birds with 1 stone?  Move toward electric cars? But doesn't work for heavy hauling  City has to set an example  Sustainability is "niche" area in FC  Make options accessible to all  Solar too expensive for all, transport needs fixing  Has to be gradual change  For it, but would like investment to be sustainable, impactful, not just token gesture  Needs to be based in education, behavior changes, creating long-term impact  Are there solar farms in FC?-Yes, on Laporte towards foothills  What amount of energy generated?-Not sure, not very much; not enough. Is pilot program to see feasibility  We live in windy area, consistent, but not enough  In future, FC may offer incentives for choosing alternative energy  Concern with climate adaptations. They’ve done an excellent job in the community reducing greenhouse gases in the city, in non-profits and in local businesses. This is a helpful project for government to take on.  The technology isn’t there yet. (Has solar system on factory building) and it only produces so much money. The payback on it is 62 years and the panels only last 25 years. It’s going to be 10-15 years before solar panels catch up with what’s needed. It’s not cost effective today. We need to get away from coal fired plants and move toward natural gas. We need more hydroelectric power. Would support this project if it were focused on hydroelectric power.  (n response to above) Water challenges; water isn’t a dominate feature of the landscape in FoCo. ENV 2 Community Organics Composting and Recycling Facility  It’s wise to mine the wasted. Lots of resources would be brought into play. We’re wasting vital materials now, and we need to revisit how to do smart composting.  Should be recycling. HPG 1 Parking Garage & Retail Space  Support: -If it's downtown, then it's a great idea and much needed -Many agree that downtown parking structure is needed- would benefit business owners in the area and bring more traffic into their shops/restaurants if people had somewhere to park  Concerns: -This should be funded by DDA- not by our taxes. -Problem isn't funding, it's getting permission and votes from surrounding businesses. -Already parking garages being built? (Otterbox?)  FoCo is a beautiful city, and this project isn’t a priority, but it would attract more people to the city and parking downtown is horrible.  Rather than building parking garages, get people to ride bikes.  This is needed, but it’s a commercial project, not a city one. Get someone to build it and then have people pay for it. 6  People are cheap and will find the free spots.  Businesses would like additional parking. SC 2 Computer Aided Dispatch/Record Management System Upgrades  Support: -Would improve efficiency in the system- key concern with safety is timing of arrival and response -This would make the whole city safer- benefit a wide breadth of people -Out of all SC projects, this one makes the most sense and impact.  Concern: -Just got a new system only 4-5 years ago- not outdated yet. Would rather see the money go to SC3. -Is there a tie in with the data terminals? (participant question) -Present system is fine as is. SC 3 Land for Police Maintenance Facility  Support: - With this project there would be a training area built- this would eliminate the commute and make our police training more local and safer. Officers wouldn't have to go to West Minster to train. Having a training facility close by would reduce costs and this way, if we needed them, they would be close by. - Also support having a center closer to town; keep in mind Loveland would pitch in for this project by buying time shares in the project - Can benefit multiple communities  Concern: - This isn't a huge priority; lots of people commute...it's not a big deal to commute. - Expensive and the positives don't make the cost worth it. The current situation is fine. - Keep Fort Collins Great already donated a lot to police forces SC 5 Campus West Policing Substation  Support: - Lives in this area- doesn't feel safe, lots of crime happening around here. Concerned about elderly neighbors and more vulnerable residents of this area (women and elderly population). - Police department needs these tools, it is a small price to pay for safety of citizens - Would also benefit campus and students  Concern: - Initial cost is low, yes, but the annual maintenance and extra costs to keep this going is very high - Already 4 designated officers in this area - This area already has police and security patrolling individual apartment complexes- not necessary to add more. Transportation T1 Vine & Lemay Grade Separated Crossing Design, ROW and Construct  For it, because if buses aren't replaced with age then there will be no buses; we've invested in MAX but need to maintain what we have; buses don't run on diesel, which is good  Why would we not want this?  Is there alternate transport that's more energy-efficient?  Bus system is underutilized because it doesn't go everywhere, doesn't have useful hours  If we invest in public transportation, we have to talk about how to expand ridership 7  High school perspective: has used bus before, took 1.5 hours (driving takes 10 min); wants to drive instead of spending entire time on bus  Could be made more user-friendly?  Bus doesn't run past 6pm in Ridgeview area  Not efficient for most T3 South Timberline Road Improvements  (Has to travel Timberline a lot) The stretch from the south end of town to Carpenter Rd. is two lanes and there’s no room for bikes and no sidewalks. There are a lot of schools in that area and in the morning traffic is heavily congested.  (Doesn’t travel Timberline). Doesn’t know enough about this project to support it. T11 Transfort Bus Fleet Replacement (Continued from BOB)  Group agreed that busses should work on running schedules for holidays, Sundays, and late nights  Potential project benefits: -natural gas driven -less pollution  Potential project drawbacks: -Do not like the idea of adding more busses and shuttles like the new Max busses T12 Arterial Intersection Improvements Fund (Continued from BOB)  There’re a lot of dangerous intersections in FoCo. Some places would flow easier if there were just right hand turn lanes. This isn’t super expensive, and it would be fast improvements. If there were a right hand turn lane Riverside and Lemay you wouldn’t have to wait for someone to turn. Cars also pollute when they are idling while waiting.  Outside Mulberry Pool is very bad, people have gotten hit.  Q: what has been done about this in the last 10 years? (wants clarification on this) T13 Bridge Maintenance and Replacement  Support: - Infrastructure/good transportation is fundamental - Would create new jobs - Our bridges are not up to par nationally - Could encourage other communities to follow our lead  Concern: - Price tag very high- 25% of total budget - This should be part of the transportation fund - These projects are not lasting as long as they should be- don't want to spend this much every 10 years  Big consensus on liking this option  Don't want bridges to collapse, concrete is missing, rebar is showing, need to keep roads safe Includes pedestrian/bike access  Group likes this  Mulberry/Lemay bridge has dedicated pedestrian/bike sections  Dangerous without these sections  We haven’t kept up with this. There are over 200 bridges in FoCo, and it will be bad if they’re not properly maintained in an appropriate timeline. Therefore this should be the city’s number one priority.  Have heard about this all across city. 8  Everyone uses bridges. CNL1 Housing for Chronically Homeless(Homeward 2020)  Support: - One of the few projects that would pay for itself (medical costs, jail costs, etc.), the investment is made back up. -Others agree that this is a priority - Some people intentionally commit crimes just to go to jail and have a place to stay for the night- would reduce the need for this - Good idea as long as there are counseling services to that they can get jobs and get back on their feet and give back to the community  Concerns: - Building this housing will only encourage homeless people to come here from Denver- "keep them in Denver"  *Most popular in group*  There's lots of people in need in FC, if we want to be world-class then we need to address all socioeconomic classes; "talk the talk and walk the walk"  This option addresses concerns in relatively inexpensive, sustainable way  Economically, plan may pay for itself over long term  Denver did similar idea, pays $13K (per person?), saves $15K (per person?) per year in medical costs, criminal justice costs, shelter costs.  No longer paying for issues if they have home; breaks cycle  Gives tools, resources for jobs, treatment for mental health issues, support and infrastructure  Program in Salt Lake City that's been proven to work  Perspective of citizens with HW2020: can pull many donations to offest costs, SLC program has done great job, and FC is not doing justice to community with homeless  SLC program is inexpensive (?)  CNL1 has example in SLC program  Is investment that works  Can't save planet with climate projects, but CAN help homeless here  Where would housing be? What kind of housing?  Women's shelter has been constructed near Trillby (?)  Not desirable for families to be near  Dangerous to have housing near residential area?  Perspective of citizen raised in housing projects: understands stigmatization; incorporating housing into neighborhoods is good, homeless aren't so obvious then. "Not my backyard" is everywhere, belief that property values go down, undesirable feeling is common. Dangers exist, but dangers exist everywhere in life.  We have example of this working: Red Tail Ponds  Would need to be near public transportation  RTP has lots of criteria: proximity to transportation, population they're serving, cost  There is perception that dangers exist  Many homeless have criminal background for menial things ("liability crimes"): sleeping outside, public urination, etc  Can be proactive/preventative with dedicated housing staff  Ability to stabilize, help homeless to be healthy  Housing has stabilizing effect 9  Personal story: citizens knows someone who was sick, homeless veteran; now in housing with voucher, in school. This man is not exception to rule, but IS rule  Tension: is there enough subsidized housing in Fort Collins already?  If this happens, it needs to be all inclusive  Potential project benefits: - Allows homeless people to get on their feet again (repeated 3 times) - Helps veterans  Potential project drawbacks: - Where would we put the houses? Neighbors may not be happy about having them in their neighborhood - Is there any place left in the city to build extra housing?  (Story told about offering a homeless man a job with great starting pay and he turned it down; therefore it is believed that extra housing isn't deserved)  Growing need in Fort Collins; solution that works; many invested in it  More projects on the list should be done by non-government entities. Government should do other things such as streets. In the past, if a person had a problem, then family/neighbors/church/non- profits would help; now people have gotten used to going straight to the government for help and it’s too easy to bypass other social steps for aid. This money should go to infrastructure improvements.  This money will leverage other money funders want to see local support and bring money into our community.  Concern for people on the streets, research shows what works. We’ve backed away from the sense that government also helps with the public good; some things need a little help/leverage. The soup kitchen has an impact. Some of these things are out of people’s control and $5 million doesn’t seem like a whole lot to put towards this issue. CNL2 Safe Routes to Everywhere (Sidewalks, Transit, Bikes) (Continued from BOB)  Need to have safe transit  Should make Transfort better  Chicago transport is great, runs every 15-20min  Like MAX?  City needs more buses, we don't have enough  Need safe sidewalks, well-lit, wide, safe crossings; if people just follow rules/have common courtesy, system works  With redesign, create safe ways to cross major streets without risking life  Multiple group members choose to drive to avoid walking on College, no safe way to cross  Believe that this should be in the city budget instead of BOB tax  In order to make them safe, group believed the routes need to be monitored  Potential project benefits: - May increase bus availability - Provides safe routes for children to get to school - Underpass trails provide safety from traffic - Improves friendliness of Fort Collins - Encourages healthy lifestyles - Provides alternatives to cars - Reduces pollution/global warming - Allows us to get places easier (especially in bad weather) 10  Potential project drawbacks: - Would all ADA curbs be beneficial? - Would they routes be wheel chair accessible? CNL5 Sustainable Child Care Center  Group believed the safe routes to everywhere (CNL2) will also benefit this project  Potential project benefits: - Keeps more people in the city with more child care options - Two people said flexible hours will aid families who work irregular hours - May add in bus routes  Potential project drawbacks: - Workers in these centers do not make enough money as it is  Why would the city being paying for daycare? This is a private activity, not for government involvement. Notes on this question “Overall, would you tend to support a few number of high cost projects, or a higher number of lower cost projects?” • Shouldn't necessarily be one or the other- having a good mix is most important. More important to focus on the criteria (from question number 3) than on the number of projects. • Encouraging that we are only at 68% with 10 projects, and some of them are even very costly yet we still have room for more. • Table consensus that having a mix is most important Notes on criteria question: “When city council has to make tough decisions between projects, what do you think the most important criteria should be?” • The amount of population that benefits from it • Equal access to all citizens • Helping the underprivileged/those who need extra help • "Most bang for buck" • Multiplier effect- things that make back up the money we spend on them or will continue to grow and benefit community • Citizen (particularly elderly) safety • Urgency (how badly do we need it?) • Whether or not there is someone else who should be funding it (DDA for example) • How far we can make money stretch, which has largest impact, which will raise city profile; reach is HUGE for all projects • Safe Route - will help a lot of people • Projects need to be TANGIBLE • Discovery Museum was great because citizens can see taxes at work • Budgets are often obscured, can be hard to interpret, can create suspicion; need tangibility in projects • Greatest impact matters most • Climate action is important because it affects people in the future • Affects large amount of people in less personal way; CNL1 helps fewer people but in more direct way • Deeper vs. broader; need to balance • How is funding leveraged? • What is government contributing? Investments are better with outside funding, not just tax money • Important to have multiple funding venues 11 • Senior Center came from BOB tax AND other fundraising • Bricks, chairs, events • Foundation grants • Group wants to see match from outside funding • Group can tell that FC is strategic about funding • Costs should not be a priority; the needs of the city should be • Projects have to be sellable in order to get people to agree with them and vote for them-(three agreements) Everyone in the city should be included or have a way to benefit from what is being constructed; all-encompassing • the projects have to have a personality in order to sell to the public projects need to be relevant to current city needs • Cost • Number of people impacted • Value for money • More lower ticket items than one large expensive project 1 Renewal of ¼-Cent Community Capital Improvement Program and ¼ Cent Street Maintenance Tax City Council Work Session September 30, 2014 ATTACHMENT 6 2 Direction Sought § Does Council support seeking a 10-year renewal of the Street Maintenance Program? § Should the Vine and Lemay Avenue project remain on the potential BOB 2.0 project list? Or, should the project be removed and considered under a separate tax measure? § If a separate tax initiative for Vine and Lemay is considered, should other projects be included? What would be the desired timeframe? 3 Background § The Street Maintenance program (SMP) and the Building on Basics (BOB) capital expansion taxes expire December 31, 2015. § Both are a ¼ cent sales tax, and both have been in existence for many years. § These renewals will be considered in April 2015. 4 Work to Date-SMP § Education and Presentation materials § Feedback on term of the tax • 10 years? • 15 years? • 20 years? § Majority of outreach shows support for 10 or 20 years 5 Work to Date - BOB 2.0 § Developed project list from approved Master Plans and Strategic Objectives. § Utilized Budget Teams to rate projects against Strategic Outcomes. § Narrowed original list ($400M) to current list ($290M) § Public Outreach…What are the priorities? 6 Public Engagement § Interactive Website § Board and Commission “Super” Meeting § CityWork Alumni Forum § Community Issue Forum-Open House § Community Issue Forum-Small Group Process § Sustainable Living Fair-Open House 7 Pubic Engagement – High Priorities • Safe Routes to Everywhere (Sidewalks, Transit, Bikes) • Downtown Restroom • Community Marketplace • Housing for Chronically Homeless(Homeward 2020) • Community Organics Composting and Recycling Facility • Bike/Ped Grade Separated Crossings Fund • Climate Action Projects • Recreational Trail Enhancements • Sustainable Child Care Center • Implementing Nature in the City 8 Public Engagement Existing Vine Drive and Lemay Avenue is congested and constrained by the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad. Trains block the intersection and create extended gridlock in the area. This location is a top location for congestion and safety complaints. Existing neighborhoods in this area are becoming increasingly impacted by the congestion on Lemay. Keep this project in BOB 2.0. Total: 24 Consider a separate tax initiative for this project alone. Total: 21 Consider a separate tax initiative for this project and 2-3 additional traffic projects. Total: 13 9 Timeline 2014 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Election 4/7/2015 Ballots Mailed 3/20/2015 Legal Deadline to Adopt Ballot Language 2/3/2015 Council Meeting: Refer Ballot Language 1/6/2015 Council Work Session 12/9/2014 Council Off-Site Session 10/11/2014 Council Work Session 7/22/2014 Council Work Session 9/30/2014 10 BOB 2.0-Milestones § July 22: Narrow Project List ($400M to ~$250M)a § July-September: Public Engagement a § September Work Session: Update a § October Off-Site Session: Narrow to $80-$100M § December Work Session: Finalize Package § January Regular Meeting: Refer Ballot 11 Direction Sought § Does Council support seeking a 10-year renewal of the Street Maintenance Program? § Should the Vine and Lemay Avenue project remain on the potential BOB 2.0 project list? Or, should the project be removed and considered under a separate tax measure? § If a separate tax initiative is considered, should other projects be included? What would be the desired timeframe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ommunity and Neighborhood Livability   5:8/4-,57.754/)'22>53+2+8853+<'7*     !',+75:9+895;+7><.+7+!/*+<'218"7'48/9/1+8     /4)524+/-.(57.55*750+)98    !:89'/4'(2+./2*'7++49+7       362+3+49/4-'9:7+/49.+/9>      +/-.(57.55* +;/9'2/?'9/544;+893+498    /*.'*((/)&.1)!"&$%*,%**!&0&'&.1                    5523675;+3+498   7+8+7;/4-5:7+7/9'-+/9>'71"7'/42:("/)5 +45;'9/54/7+:8+:3    $+25'4*/94+88'71    /*.'/'./,")!" ,".&*)       Economic Health   5<495<4 +897553     :/+9&54+362+3+49'9/545<495<4!# )7588/4-8 6+*)7588/4-8       :/+9&54+362+3+49'9/547'1+95"7/2(> )7588/4-8      '854!97++94.'4)+3+49      '89:2(+77>577/*5762'44/4-67+2/3*+8/-4'4* %6:7).'8+   /4*+4!97++9 +45;'9/548      %/225<!97++93675;+3+498      5<495<4'/49+4'4)+!.56     +*/'4'4*!97++98)'6+4.'4)+3+49 +45;'9/548       533:4/9>'71+962')+   /*.' *)*(& "'.%      Environmental Health   2/3'9+)9/54750+)98    533:4/9>7-'4/)8536589/4-'4* +)>)2/4-')/2/9>      5<495<45:*7+ /;+74.'4)+3+498    /*.')0&,*)(").'"'.%     High Performing Government   '71/4-'7'-+ +9'/2!6')+         Safe Community   +-/54'2"7'/4/4-')/2/9>      536:9+7/*+*/86'9). +)57*'4'-+3+49!>89+3#6-7'*+8    '4*,5752/)+'/49+4'4)+')/2/9>     '36:8%+8952/)/4-!:(89'9/54    /*.'#"*((/)&.1       Transportation  $/4++3'>7'*+!+6'7'9+*7588/4-+8/-4 %'4*54897:)9    Capital Cost                 ATTACHMENT 1