Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 12/06/2014 - HOMELESSNESS IN FORT COLLINSDATE: STAFF: December 6, 2014 Beth Sowder, Interim Director of Social Sustainability Bruce Hendee, Chief Sustainability Officer WORK SESSION ITEM City Council SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Homelessness in Fort Collins. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this work session item is to provide City Council with an update of actions, programs, and processes to address the issue of homelessness in Fort Collins. This item includes the current state of homelessness, best practices proven to address homelessness, what other communities are doing to address homelessness, the role of the City as it relates to homelessness, and potential recommendations or options for Council consideration. Historically and currently, the City has pursued the policy of fund, facilitate, and convene without entering into direct provision of services. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. Does Council agree that the current City role should continue at the same level of funding, facilitating, and convening? 2. Would Council like to see additional services provided by the City? 3. Does Council need additional information or have any suggestions for changes? BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Fort Collins is not alone in its efforts to address homelessness. Nationally, over 600,000 people are experiencing homelessness; 18% are considered chronically homeless; 9% veterans; 23% under 18. The number has declined 9% since 2009. In Denver, almost 6,000 people are experiencing homelessness; 36% women; 43% families; 24% are considered newly homeless. Anecdotal information (Denver Post and Fort Collins Rescue Mission) indicates a rise in Colorado due to marijuana legalization, desire to live in Colorado, and good job market. Many communities conduct a “point-in-time” (PIT) count each year to get an idea of how many people are experiencing homelessness in their community. Fort Collins conducted both a winter and summer count in 2014. Winter PIT Summer PIT 289 individuals 438 individuals 33% families 8% families; 9% travelers 5% veterans 8% veterans 16% chronically homeless 31% chronically homeless To better understand the terms used when discussing homelessness, a few definitions are: Chronic Homelessness - Continually homeless for a year or more; or at least four episodes of homelessness in the past three years. Situational Homelessness - Something happened to cause their homelessness (sickness, loss of job, divorce, etc.). December 6, 2014 Page 2 Transient - Not interested in housing; may be traveling through town or prefer camping. In 2013, the Social Sustainability Department conducted a Gaps Analysis, and it found some gaps related to homelessness in Fort Collins. The gaps included:  Gaps in the continuum of housing  Needs for homeless youth and families  Previously incarcerated people have few choices  People with pets have few choices  Couples or other familial status have difficulties Some projects currently in the works are specific to filling the gaps in the continuum of housing. This includes permanent supportive housing. However, there is still a lack of affordable housing for people in the lowest income levels and very little transitional opportunities available creating barriers to accessing housing. The National Alliance to End Homelessness has identified the minimum requirements for an effective permanent solution to prevent and end homelessness. All items require participation from every section of the community. These requirements include:  Plan - Set of strategies focused on ending homelessness with a wide range of players to make funding and implementation commitments to these strategies. In Fort Collins, Homeward 2020 is the keeper of the 10 year plan.  Data - Homelessness Management Information System (HMIS). This system can be utilized to assess how long people are homeless, what their needs are, what the causes of homelessness are, how people interact with mainstream systems of care, effectiveness of interventions, and the number of homeless.  Emergency Prevention - Emergency homelessness prevention programs including rent/mortgage/utility assistance, case management, landlord/lender intervention, and other strategies to prevent eviction and homelessness.  Systems Prevention - Mainstream programs (mental health, substance abuse, TANF, child welfare, etc.) that provide services to low-income people and assess their housing needs. Placement in stable housing for people released from public institutions.  Outreach - Engagement system designed to reduce barriers and encourage appropriate housing linked with appropriate services.  Shorten Homelessness - Shelters and transitional housing system to reduce or minimize length of time people remain homeless.  Rapid Re-Housing - Skilled housing search and housing placement services available to rapidly re-house all people losing their housing or homeless who want permanent housing.  Services - When people are re-housed, they have rapid access to funded services and programs that provide needed services.  Permanent Housing - Sufficient supply of permanent supportive housing to meet the needs of all chronically homeless. Implementation of a plan to fully address the permanent housing needs of extremely low-income people.  Income - Assists people to secure enough income to afford rent - link with employment and/or benefits - connects them to opportunities for increasing their incomes after housing placement. Housing First is an approach to ending homelessness that centers on providing people experiencing homelessness with housing as quickly as possible and then providing services as needed. This approach has the benefit of being consistent with what most people experiencing homelessness want and seek help to achieve. The three critical elements include: focus on helping individuals and families access and sustain permanent rental housing as quickly as possible; variety of services to promote housing stability and individual well-being; and standard lease agreement for housing. Program models vary significantly depending on the population served. For chronic homelessness, intensive and specialized services will be needed indefinitely. However, the vast majority of homeless individuals and families fall into homelessness after a housing or personal crisis that led them to seek help. For these families and individuals, the Housing First Approach is ideal, as it provides them December 6, 2014 Page 3 with assistance to find permanent housing quickly and without conditions. In turn, they usually need little support or assistance to achieve independence. Best practices by population include:  Chronic Homelessness - Permanent Supportive Housing  Family Homelessness - Rapid Re-Housing with access to services  Youth Homelessness (up to age 25) - Intervention services, housing options, transition support  Veteran Homelessness - Permanent Supportive Housing, Rapid Re-Housing, discharge support Other communities across the nation address homelessness in a variety of ways. Staff has researched the following communities (Attachments 1, 2, 3): Eugene, OR  Approximately 3,000 homeless individuals  Approaches used: o Many programs funded/provided by St. Vincent De Paul o Homeless village including Tiny Homes and Conestoga’s o Step Up Village (Emerald Village) in the planning stage o Homeless camps/Rest Stops (15 people max) o Car Camping o Service Station o Homelessness Management Information System (HMIS) o Veterans housing project o CAHOOTS program - first responder for disputes o 15th Night - emerging program to address homeless youth Danbury, CT  148 people experiencing homelessness in point-in-time count  Multi-pronged approach including provision of certain direct services and collaborative planning  City-run shelter provides 20 beds for men and women, plus an additional five beds for homeless veterans  City offers both a rental assistance program and a day center  City adheres to the “housing first” model  Partnered with Danbury Housing Partnership to develop a Plan to End Chronic Homelessness  Downtown businesses concerned about impact of homeless on their businesses Saint Paul, MN  780 people experiencing homelessness in point-in-time count  The City of St. Paul does not provide direct services  Coordinated efforts between the police, providers, and homeless population  City distributes approx. $500,000 each year in HUD grant funding used for homelessness prevention, essential services, operating costs, or improvements to homeless facilities  City set aside $400,000 to fund supportive housing upgrades  St. Paul Police Department recognized by the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness for its Police- Homeless Outreach Program  Effort to end homelessness among veterans in the Twin Cities by January 2015 Burlington, VT  537 people experiencing homelessness in point-in-time count in Chittenden County  City does not provide direct services  Collaborative applicant for the Chittenden County Continuum of Care December 6, 2014 Page 4  City developed a 10-year plan to end homelessness  City has some Housing Trust Fund funding that could go to permanent supportive housing Nashville, TN  2,301 people experiencing homelessness in point-in-time count  City does not provide direct service  Metropolitan Homelessness Commission brings together stakeholders to plan and coordinate on collaborative efforts that support permanent solutions to homelessness  How’s Nashville campaign - purpose to foster collaboration among stakeholders, focus on permanent supportive housing  Online directory of services called Where to Turn in Nashville  Private landlord partnerships  Created a Cold Weather Community Response Plan  Adopt A Meter program - sponsorship for $1,000 used to cover rent and utility deposits, basic furniture, and household goods Phoenix, AZ  5,918 people experiencing homelessness in point-in-time count  City does provide direct services (3 FTE caseworkers)  Human Services Department o Family Advocacy and Homeless Services Division  Bonded in 2001 for Affordable Housing and Homeless Shelter - $1,053,000 o Build Watkins Emergency Shelter  Summer and Winter Respite programs  Homeless Programs Section provides homeless services through contracts with community-based organizations Salt Lake City, UT  247 chronically homeless individuals in point-in-time count  City does not provide direct service, but they do have 1 FTE (Homeless Services Coordinator)  Homeless Outreach Service Team - connects homeless individuals with service providers and resources  Increased Police presence in the Depot District focusing on illegal behavior  Clean Teams - City partnered with Downtown Alliance and Valley Services to implement teams to pick up trash and perform small property maintenance in Depot District  Veterans Court - direct connection to veterans’ treatment options and resources  Homeless Court Denver’s Road Home  The city designated the Denver Department of Human Services to manage implementation of the plan through the program called Denver’s Road Home (DRH). The program’s plan included eight broad goals for ending homelessness: 1. Develop permanent and transitional housing opportunities to meet the needs of low-income individuals. 2. Make safe shelter beds and activities available for all populations both day and night. 3. Increase services for preventing homelessness. 4. Improve access to supportive services that promote long-term stability. 5. Create a homeless outreach program to better connect homeless people and service agencies. 6. Assist people who are homeless in obtaining skills and knowledge necessary to participate in the workforce. 7. Build community awareness and support for programs addressing the needs of the homeless. December 6, 2014 Page 5 8. Reform Denver’s zoning, building and development codes to facilitate an adequate supply of emergency and affordable housing. Fort Collins Process Flow and Community Summit There are many programs in Fort Collins for people experiencing homelessness or near homelessness. However, some improvements in the process flow were identified by the Corporation for Supportive Housing in 2012. As Fort Collins continues to improve the homeless response system flow and ensure the appropriate amount of services for the specific needs in the community, Homeward 2020 is coordinating a community-wide Homelessness Summit. In partnership with Homeward 2020, Bohemian Foundation, Chamber of Commerce, and the City of Fort Collins, the Corporation for Supportive Housing is being contracted to return to Fort Collins and lead a series of facilitated community discussions on long-term and short-term strategies for identifying potential improvements to the services provided to people experiencing homelessness in Fort Collins. There will be two sessions: the first session will take place the third week of January, and the second session will take place the first week of February. See Attachment 4 for detailed overview. City Funding for Housing and Public Service for Homelessness or Homelessness Prevention The primary role the City takes in addressing homelessness in Fort Collins is through supporting and providing funding for several housing and public service functions. See Attachment 5 for explanation of services. Housing Provider/Project 2014 2013 2012 2011 Total FCHA-Redtail Ponds Supportive Housing $350,000 $455,00 0 $586,0 77 $1,391,077 FCHA-TBRA for CDDT $156,24 0 $156,240 FCHA-Village on Redwood $1,312,745 $1,312,745 Housing Catalyst (FCHA)-Cunningham Corner $38,191 $899,65 1 $1,072,8 11 $2,010,653 N2N-Coachlight Plaza $43,257 $34,515 $77,772 Villages-Village on Matuka $380,000 $380,000 Totals $1,744,193 $934,16 6 $1,684,0 51 $586,0 77 $4,948,487 City Funding - Public Service for Homelessness or Homelessness Prevention Agency Name 2014 2013 2012 2011 Total CCN Seniors $15,000 $15,000 $15,00 0 $11,331 $56,331 CCN Shelter & Rapid Rehousing $40,000 $40,000 $40,00 0 $40,000 $160,000 (CHN)NCAP-Client Svc/Hm Prev. $18,514 $14,240 $15,00 0 $24,500 $72,254 Crossroads Safe.-Advocacy $39,000 $31,885 $39,85 3 $42,202 $152,940 DRS-ATI $26,261 $26,186 $23,37 December 6, 2014 Page 6 0 N2N - Rent $36,125 $30,000 $25,00 0 $25,000 $116,125 PS-S-Services for Single Parents $30,000 $33,000 $22,00 0 $22,000 $107,000 Serve 6.8-Murphy Center $18,533 $18,533 Touchstone-CDDT Program $31,328 $28,38 0 $14,000 $73,708 Touchstone-Mental Hlth-Murphy $18,000 $22,500 $10,00 0 $50,500 Totals $390,549 $323,215 $320,3 63 $320,28 9 $1,354,416 Permanent Supportive Housing Fort Collins Housing Authority is currently constructing the first permanent supportive housing development in Fort Collins. It is scheduled to open in February, 2015 and provide 60 units that will serve homeless veterans, homeless with disabilities, and other low-income residents. Permanent Supportive Housing has proven outcomes including:  Improves housing stability  Improves mental and physical health  Reduces substance abuse  Improves income and employment  Creates social and community connections Additional New Services The following programs/projects are relatively new or currently in the process of happening in Fort Collins:  One Village One Family - A mentor supported rapid re-housing program for homeless families being coordinated by Homeless Gear.  Genesis Project - A faith based day center with a mission to serve those in need.  Faith Family Hospitality - A program providing homeless families a place to sleep in participating churches on a weekly rotation.  Municipal Court Special Agency Sessions and Remote Service - Court personnel meets with people in the community at the Murphy Center or at various libraries to provide information on pending charges and discuss options to resolve such charges in a non-emergency setting.  Matthews House Community Life Center and Host Families - A day center with resources for families in poverty. Their host family program case manager matches homeless youth, families, or individuals with home owners willing to provide temporary shelter.  Winter Overflow Shelter - A collective effort of the local shelters, the United Way, and the faith based community to provide additional shelter beds in the winter when permanent shelter space is inadequate. Additional New Housing Projects/Programs  Governor’s Office Permanent Supportive Housing Toolkit - A team from Fort Collins was selected to participate. By participating, our community’s projects get a priority for tax credits. The Fort Collins team includes representatives from the Fort Collins Housing Authority, Homeward 2020, Neighbor to Neighbor, and Serve 6.8.  Community Capital Improvement Program Offer - For a second permanent supportive housing project. December 6, 2014 Page 7 Education, Outreach, and Data  Community Summit - As mentioned above, Homeward 2020, Bohemian Foundation, Chamber of Commerce, and the City of Fort Collins, are coordinating a series of facilitated community discussions on long-term and short-term strategies for identifying potential improvements to the services provided to people experiencing homelessness in Fort Collins. There will be two sessions: the first session will take place the third week of January, and the second session will take place the first week of February.  Advisory Committee - The Downtown Development Authority has started conversations with homeless service providers, activists, representatives from the faith community, and City representatives from Social Sustainability and Police Services to possibly create an advisory committee to address homelessness and develop education for the business community.  Homelessness Management Information System (HMIS) - The City included a budget offer that was approved to support HMIS in Northern Colorado. The on-line system will enable non-profit service, shelter, and housing providers in different locations across Northern Colorado to collect and share information that can be used to enhance service delivery and provide important data to better understand what services are used and what gaps remain. City’s Role Traditionally, the City has been a funder, convener, facilitator, and enforcer of laws. The City has provided funding for many housing projects and service programs. This work is done by: Social Sustainability, Police Services, Neighborhood Services, Municipal Court, City Attorney’s Office, Fort Collins Housing Authority, and Poudre Fire Authority. Potential Options for Council Consideration 1. Staff recommends that the City continue to support and fund housing and service programs that are proven to support chronic and situational homelessness. 2. Staff recommends that the City continue to partner, convene, ad facilitate community services and inter- agency task force or advisory committee. 3. Consider providing additional lockers needed at the Murphy Center and a fence to secure the outdoor location. 4. Staff recommends taking an active role in the upcoming Community Summit and that the City carefully considers how the City can assist with implementation of recommended outcomes. Another work session with City Council after the Summit is recommended. 5. Staff recommends re-evaluating the need in the community after the upcoming projects and programs are functioning. 6. Other ideas from other communities. 7. Consider exploring potential programs through the court process. This could include looking at programs available in other courts to see if they could be available to people going through the Municipal Court process. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff memo re: Eugene Oregon trip to review Homeless strategies (PDF) 2. Homelessness Research Memo (PDF) 3. Report on City Homelessness Role (PDF) 4. DRAFT Overview for the Fort Collins Community Conversations on Homelessness (PDF) 5. Housing Providers and Agencies Preventing Homelessness (PDF) 6. Powerpoint presentation (PDF) City Manager’s Office City Hall 300 LaPorte Ave. PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6505 970.224.6107 - fax fcgov.com Memorandum DRAFT DT: November 10, 2014 TO: Mayor Weitkunat and City Council Members TH: Darin Atteberry, City Manager Jeff Mihelich, Deputy City Manager FM: Bruce Hendee, Chief Sustainability Officer Cc: Lieutenant Jim Byrne RE: Eugene, Oregon trip to review Homeless strategies Summary Jeff Mihelich, Bruce Hendee, and Jim Byrne visited Eugene Oregon On October 30 th to review ongoing efforts by the City of Eugene on homeless. Overall the visit was productive and informative. Eugene has a substantial population of homeless individuals. Some of this is likely due to a high unemployment rate of approximately 9%. According to the City of Eugene Web site and corroborated by City Officials, there approximately 3,000 homeless in Eugene and approximately 10,000 in Lane County. The trend in homelessness began in earnest during the Occupy movement although many of the homelessness activities have been happening over many years. Working with the homeless has become a part of the community’s culture and they seem to make it a big focus of the community activities. Major activities include:  A homeless village including Tiny homes and Conestoga’s.  A Step Up Village called Emerald Village is in the planning stage  Homeless camps/Rest Stops ( 15 people max per rest stop)  Car camping  Homeless Service Station  Homeless Management Information System  Veteran’s housing project  including homeless camps, service centers, a homeless village, a Veteran’s housing project ATTACHMENT 1 2 | P a g e  “CAHOOTS” a City funded program that provides 2 vans and EMT’s (not paid as EMTs- volunteers). The Cahoots program is a first responder to disputes with homeless and low income residents. It is staffed by a clinic called White Bird which is a 40 year old Clinic.  15 th Night – An emerging program to address the critical timeframe in which youth are homeless St. Vincent De Paul (St. Vinnie’s) This organization with roots in the Catholic Church is a significant part of the homeless work in the community dating back to 1953. St. Vinnie’s has become a significant force in the community with an annual operating budget of $25M-$30M. They own and operate a retail thrift store, a boutique store, a used car lot, develop affordable housing projects, manage the car camping program, fund and operate the Eugene Service Station, provide homeless shelters, manage a recycling center, provide emergency services for things like food and rent assistance, operate a business incubator, assist with employment services etc. Clearly their efforts in the community are a significant part of the overall reason the community has such a substantial base of support for low income residents. The CEO Terry McDonald has been in this job for over 40 years. Background  Opportunity Village - This village sponsored by the City of Eugene and a Faith Based organization. It sits on City owned land and the City has empowered the village through providing the land virtually for free and minimizing code enforcement. There are 33 residents and a governing “Council” consisting of residents whom self- enforce rules of the village. Residents may apply to the Council and the Church to become residents. There are posted rules of conduct. There are no maximum stay lengths but the village is only a little over a year old. The village is located in an industrial district and is next to Public Works and Park’s department land. The village is enclosed in chain link fence with two strands of barbed wire fencing and has a gate which is closed at night for security. Police indicate there are few problems and residents do a good job of self- enforcement. Within the village there are basically two types of housing with a central facility which is a Yurt structure which serves as a community room. During cold nights residents can stay in the Yurt. The Yurt also has computers, games and other functions. The two types of housing consist of a “Conestoga” which is a canvas type structure closed on both ends which provides very small “tiny homes” approximately 60-100SF. A second form of tiny home is a small slant roofed structure designed by a local architect. It is not bad but not great either. All homes are placed on sleds and are movable in order to avoid code and state statute compliance issues. No flames are permitted in the residences and there is no heat or electricity. 3 | P a g e There is a single bathroom building with a men’s and women’s restroom with a shower. This is also a temporary structure. On one side of the building there is a washer and dryer for clothing. There is also a donated work building constructed by local university students which serves for small projects by residents. Residents of Opportunity do not own residences nor do they build equity. Cost to stay is $3/night. Villagers help the parks department by cleaning restrooms at parks. It is not likely Opportunity Village could exist within the city of Fort Collins because it would not meet our building codes and there is no heat which would make it prohibitive in Colorado’s climate. Emerald Village This is a step up facility proposed across the street from Opportunity Village. Again the Faith Community is the primary provider and is planning on giving residents low cost “homes” in which they pay more rent but grow equity in the homes as they pay them down. Paying in this case means rent free but paying utilities. This is a form of transitional housing where residents have jobs and are working their way back into society. There is no limit on stay length but they have to apply to be able to get transitional housing. This village will have heating and electricity. Rest Stops These are small campgrounds of less than an acre. They are enabled by the City but operated by not for profits. They are limited by ordinance to 15 residents. Couples are permitted. Some of the rest stops are specifically for veterans. Like Opportunity Village they are located within chain link fence with barbed wire on top with a gate. The rest stops are closed during the day and residents are required to exit the camps. They are closed at night for security. Car Camps The name is not quite accurate. They really are campers that are located on various properties. The car camp program is operated by St. Vinnie’s with permission of the City. There is a designated person (Keith) that is charged with enforcement of the car camping program. Campers are actually in demand in some locations for security. Specifically they are often requested at construction sites to stem the theft of valuable construction materials. They are also located in other areas in the City including some parks sites. Park site stay lengths are limited to 90 days. There is no limit on stay length and from what we were able to witness, they were quite unattractive. Each Car Camp requires electricity and a port a pottie (paid by St. Vinnie’s). Residents are screened by St. Vinnie’s prior to be accepted. The car camping program has been in place since 1997. 4 | P a g e 30-40 units managed by St. Vinnie’s. Max of 4 residents/site. Camper vehicles must have wheels. Some residents have been in car camp sites for 3 years. Police Services pays $79,000 out of their budget a year for the management of this program. If there is a complaint St. Vinnie’s can pull the camp permit. Cost of program is about $90/month per site. They lose about $40K per year on the program.  Family Camping Program This is managed by St. Vinnie’s. They manage 1300 units  Service Station This is a one stop service station for the homeless. This is primarily supported by St. Vinnie’s. The facility provides a place for homeless to come and socialize, to do laundry, to get food, and to check in. The service station has lockers, bike storage, a kitchen, a food pantry, bathrooms, and showers.  Veteran’s Program The Veteran’s program was started by the City Manager and several others in the community including St. Vinnie’s. The intention of this program is to provide re-entry for Veteran’s. This program purchases under-utilized or vacant properties, guts them and rebuilds them into nice small homes. They then rent the homes at very low rates to veterans for up to two years. They have 6 homes in the program to date.  15 th Day Program This is a personal mission of the City Manager. There is evidence to indicate youth that remain homeless for more than 14 days have an 85% chance of becoming chronically homeless. The City Manager together with a team of agencies including the County and school district are currently working on a program to place a firewall at the 14 th day to prevent youth from getting to the 15 th day. The program is being design and is not yet in action. 5 | P a g e 6 | P a g e 7 | P a g e 8 | P a g e 9 | P a g e 10 | P a g e 11 | P a g e 12 | P a g e 13 | P a g e 1 of 3 | P a g e City Manager’s Office PO Box 580 300 LaPorte Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6505 970.224.6107 - fax fcgov.com MEMORANDUM Date: October 30, 2014 To: Jeff Mihelich, Deputy City Manager From: Travis Machalek, Graduate Management Assistant Re: Homelessness Review of Danbury, CT; Saint Paul, MN; and “Campland on the Bay”, San Diego, CA Executive Summary Research was conducted on two municipalities and one private site mentioned in an Access Fort Collins request. The two municipalities (Danbury, CT and Saint Paul, MN) approach the issue of homelessness in two different manners. Danbury provides direct services (including a shelter) and collaborates with local entities in planning efforts directed at ending homelessness. Saint Paul provides funding to area non-profits working to address homelessness and participates in a successful police/provider/homeless population collaboration. Campland on the Bay (the private site mentioned in the Access Fort Collins request) is not, and has never been, a facility intended to serve individuals experiencing homelessness. More information on each of these entities can be found below. Danbury, CT Danbury, CT (population 83,000) is located approximately 70 miles northeast of New York City. The January 2014 point-in-time count identified 148 people in the Danbury region that were experiencing homelessness. The City of Danbury’s has taken a multi-pronged approach to addressing homelessness, including the provision of certain direct services and collaborative planning with the Danbury Housing Partnership. The City of Danbury runs one of the three local, year-round shelters (the other two are operated by non-profits). The City-run shelter provides 20 beds for men and women, plus an additional five beds designated for homeless veterans. A valid Connecticut ID is required in order to stay at the City shelter; a requirement that was implemented due to an influx of homeless individuals from neighboring jurisdictions (NYC). In addition to the shelter, the City of Danbury offers both a rental assistance program and a day center (information/referrals, screening for entitlement eligibility, and advocacy). In September of 2014, the City received a $650,000 grant from the state Department of Health to be used for security deposits, utility deposits, rent subsidies, and related expenses.1 The City adheres to the “Housing First” model, coupled with strict case management. 1 http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Danbury-gets-650-000-to-aid-homeless-renters-5732024.php ATTACHMENT 2 2 of 3 | P a g e The City of Danbury also approaches the issue of homelessness through collaborative planning. In 2014, the City partnered with the Danbury Housing Partnership to develop a Plan to End Chronic Homelessness (two consultants were retained to assist in the development of the plan: Public Consulting Group and solutions4community LLC). The plan contains action items to address the overall goals of “Increased Income & Economic Security”, “Improved Health & Effective Use of Health Services”, and “Increased Supply of Supportive Housing”. A review of news articles in the local paper (The News Times) reveals tension between the community and the homeless population. Downtown business owners are concerned about the impact of homeless individuals in the downtown area on their businesses. Solutions proposed in downtown partnership public meetings range from asking the package liquor stores to open up an hour later in the morning to banning social services offices from the downtown district.2 Additionally, one of the non-profit shelters that doubles as a soup kitchen (Dorothy Day Hospitality House) has drawn attention from Council due to concerns over the prevalence of drug activity in the area that has been attributed to the facility. Saint Paul, MN Saint Paul, MN (population 294,873) is the second largest city in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul metropolitan area (population 3.46 million). As of the January 22, 2014 point-in-time count, there were 780 homeless individuals (emergency shelters and unsheltered counts) in the Saint Paul area. The City of Saint Paul does not provide social services. Rather, its approach to addressing homelessness consists of coordinated efforts between the police, providers, and homeless population, as well as the utilization of funding mechanisms to provide support to the community of non-profits working on homelessness in the area. In terms of financial support, the City distributes roughly $500,000 each year in HUD Emergency Solutions Grant funding to organizations working to address homelessness in the Saint Paul area. These grant funds can be used for homelessness prevention, essential services, operating costs, or improvements to homeless facilities. Beyond the ECS funding, the City has set aside $400,000 from a Capital and Cultural Services ½¢ sales tax to fund supportive housing upgrades. The Saint Paul Police Department has been recognized by the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness for its Police-Homeless Outreach Program (P-HOP). The program (a partnership between the City of Saint Paul and the South Metro Human Services) consists of a P-HOP worker from the South metro Human Services who is stationed in a police sub-station and works with law enforcement to improve outcomes for homeless individuals with multiple police encounters. The Police Department also participates in “police-provider forums”, where police and providers consult each other on the best ways to help people experiencing homelessness. These forums have helped to build trust and knowledge sharing between the police, the providers, and the homeless population. Homelessness in Saint Paul is generally addressed with the same urgency as other issues in the community. That is to say, there is not a consistent voice in the community driving work on this issue at this time. However, it is important to note that in January of this year, the Mayors of both Saint Paul and Minneapolis announced an effort to end homelessness among veterans in the Twin Cities by January 2015. 2 http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Nowhere-to-go-Danbury-homeless-speak-out-4758917.php#page-1 3 of 3 | P a g e San Diego, CA (Campland on the Bay) Campland on the Bay (San Diego, CA) is a privately-owned, family-oriented recreation and entertainment location. Daily winter rates range from $39 for a Dry Site (not by the ocean) to $288.27 for a Super Site. Weekly winter rates range from $342 for a Limited Site to $1,278 for a Super Site. Summer rates are slightly higher. Campland has leased the property on which it is located from the City of San Diego since 1967. Beyond acting as the lessor, there appears to be no other City of San Diego involvement in the project. There is no indication that this commercial facility is, or ever has been, intended to serve as a facility for individuals experiencing homelessness. THE ROLE OF THE CITY IN HOMELESSNESS EFFORTS A review of various levels of city government involvement in efforts to address homelessness ATTACHMENT 3 Table of Contents Burlington, VT ............................................................................................................................ 2 Nashville, TN (Combined City-County Metro Government) ..................................................... 3 Phoenix, AZ ................................................................................................................................ 4 Salt Lake City, UT ...................................................................................................................... 5 Burlington, VT Direct Service Provision: No FTE Dedicated to Homelessness: 0 Programs of note:  The City is collaborative applicant for the Chittenden County Continuum of Care o Co-Chair of Continuum is a City Employee o City acts as a driver of policy and provides technical assistance  City developed a 10-Year Plan to End Homelessness (2004) o Recommendations for action included:  Increase supply of affordable housing  Increase the supply of permanent supportive housing  Increase transitional housing opportunities, with associated services, for those who need temporary supports before moving into independent permanent housing arrangements  Develop additional capacity to serve those who need permanent housing, but are resistant to traditional service models, including low demand/low engagement shelter/housing and harm reduction programs  Provide the resources necessary to help people maintain a stable housing situation and to prevent homelessness  Stably rehouse victims of domestic violence as soon as possible  Reduce discriminatory/cultural barriers to obtaining and keeping housing and services  Help people move into and keep employment, either at a livable wage or with sufficient additional supports to yield a livable wage equivalent  Develop a comprehensive housing and supportive services approach to ease the re-entry process of ex-offenders and to improve the likelihood for successful outcomes  Make sure that treatment for drug and alcohol abuse and for mental illness is readily and promptly available to those willing to accept it  Improve access to delivery of services  Improve the local delivery of services  Develop educational strategies to reduce homelessness  Develop better ways of measuring who, and how many, are homeless and what their individual needs are  The City has some Housing Trust Fund funding that could go to permanent supportive housing o The majority of funding distributed by the City to address homelessness is federal grant money Nashville, TN (Combined City-County Metro Government) Direct Service Provision: No FTE Dedicated to Homelessness: 4 Programs of note:  Metropolitan Homelessness Commission (MHC) o Brings together advocates, nonprofit organizations, for-profit business leaders, government agencies, and the general public  Planning and coordinating entity focused on collaborative efforts that support permanent solutions to homelessness o Created to implement the City’s Ten Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness o In June, 2014 Metro Council established commission as a permanent body of metro government  Responsibilities include:  To implement a coordinated and focused approach to ending homelessness and to develop measurable goals;  To assure participation of all stakeholders including homeless persons;  To maintain accurate, current data on homeless populations; and  To educate the public, service providers and other interested parties on issues related to homelessness. o FY 2013 budget of $1,465,200  How’s Nashville campaign o Launched by MHC in 2013 o Purpose is to foster collaboration among stakeholders from the nonprofit, business, faith-based, private, and government sectors to improve the local system in regard to the housing placement rate and retention of housing for individuals and families experiencing homelessness or at risk of homelessness. o Focused on permanent supportive housing  Online directory of services called Where to Turn in Nashville o Created by The Contributor  A nonprofit weekly street paper distributed by homeless individuals  Private Landlord Partnerships o Several private landlords set aside a few units at discounted rates to house people identified by How’s Nashville partners as vulnerable  Created a Cold Weather Community Response Plan o Different levels of cold triggering different responses o Partnership between government and nonprofit organizations  Adopt A Meter program o 26 donation meters posted in high-foot-traffic areas in downtown o Adopt-a-Meter offers a one-year sponsorship for $1,000 per meter  $1,000 used to cover rent and utility deposits, basic furniture, and household goods Phoenix, AZ Direct Service Provision: Yes (Caseworkers) FTE Dedicated to Homelessness: 3 Programs of note:  Human Services Department o Family Advocacy and Homeless Services Division  FY 2014-2015 Budget of $4, 654,482  Combination of CDBG/HUD funds ($1,641, 600), General Funds ($2,981,914), and Other Funds (30,968)  11 FTEs in FY 2014-2015  3 for Homeless Program o One Administrative Assistant II o Two Caseworkers  Bonded in 2001 for Affordable Housing and Homeless Shelter - $1,053,000 o Built Watkins Emergency Shelter  Operated through a contract with a nonprofit organization  Year-round emergency shelter for homes single women and families  Sleeping accommodations  Meals  Laundry  Clothing  Health care  Behavioral health  Housing resources  Case management  Summer and Winter Respite programs o Coordinate collection, storage, and distribution of essential items  Items distributed by local community and faith-based homeless outreach teams  Items include : water, sunscreen hats, hygiene items, blankets, shoes, and seasonal clothing  Homeless Programs Section supports homeless services through contracts with community-based organizations to provide emergency shelter, transitional housing, permanent supportive housing, and other supportive services for homeless families and individuals Salt Lake City, UT Direct Service Provision: No FTE Dedicated to Homelessness: 1 (Homeless Services Coordinator) Programs of note:  Full-time Homeless Services Coordinator o Administers federal emergency solutions grants (ESG) o Coordinates City’s efforts to combat homelessness  Works directly with service providers and other funding agencies  Contracted with Director of Stegner Environmental Dispute Resolution (EDR) Program of the University of Utah’s Law school to conduct a three-month study that will give the City a long-term situation analysis of homeless issues in Downtown  Homeless Outreach Service Team (HOST) o Launched in 2011 to connect homeless individuals with social service providers and resources o Trainings and regular meetings between PD officers and providers o Leverage meter donations and tax-deductible bank donations to help fund program o HOST reference card enable police officers to reach providers with one call o Once a week, various service e providers and City’s police department go to Pioneer Park or other outdoor location and contact people who do not usually use homeless services  Increased Police Presence in the Depot District (hot spot) o Increase of ten officers and two sergeants assigned to Depot District, Main Street, and Library Square o Super Operations  Officers from Community Intelligence Unit, Narcotics, Detectives, Public Relations, Salt Lake Information Center, and Patrol deployed  Operations conducted over the course of a week  Move from covert to overt in progression o Undercover Narcotics and Vice Operations  Weekly undercover operations in Depot District  Target illegal drug dealing, drug solicitation, prostitution, and other related crimes o Increased Patrols  Clean Teams o City partnered with Downtown Alliance and Valley Services to implement o Teams walk every street in Depot District once or twice a day  Pick up Trash  Perform small property maintenance o Valley Services supervises and employs the clean teams  Local nonprofit that employs individuals who suffer from mental illness or have been hindered by other life challenges  Janitorial service/Catering  Offers business related education programs o Clean Team members are made up of users of the Weigand Center (Homeless Day Center)  Clean Team work may lead to other employment opportunities with Valley Services  Veterans Court o Allows direct connection to veterans’ treatment options and resources  Homeless Court o In operation since 2004 o Allows informal setting for hearing offenses like public intoxication, open container, and trespass to be heard. o Certain offenses not fully considered in homeless court based on seriousness (i.e. DUI, domestic violence, other assaultive conduct) DRAFT Overview for the Fort Collins Community Conversations on Homelessness Background Due to a number of concerns in Spring and Summer 2014, the City of Fort Collins recognized a need to convene a forum or summit on homelessness. The City convened an initial meeting with Homeward 2020, the Bohemian Foundation, and the Chamber of Commerce to discuss what such a forum could accomplish. Homeward 2020 suggested utilizing CSH (the Corporation for Supportive Housing, a national expert on developing effective responses to homelessness) to facilitate these discussions. CSH provided technical assistance to the Fort Collins community in 2012 to develop an initial systems map demonstrating the current flow through services by someone experiencing homeless. Since this initial meeting, Homeward 2020, the City of Fort Collins, the Bohemian Foundation, and the Chamber of Commerce have committed to co-planning a set of community conversations on homelessness, to be held in Winter 2015, utilizing CSH as the primary consultant and facilitator. Additional meetings have been held between these community partners and CSH to develop the following outcomes and objectives. Planning continues to ensure these conversations will be well- managed, productive, and effective in achieving our collective outcomes. Key Outcomes for Community Conversations: 1. Community can actively voice concerns, offer ideas, and commit to participating in solutions that make homelessness rare, short-lived, and non-recurring 2. Frustrations of community are heard and incorporated into planning 3. Community develops a model for productive dialogue for addressing complex, charged issues 4. Community knows how to participate in collective efforts to address homelessness and who is taking on which aspects of the system 5. An action plan outlining steps in the short-, medium-, and long-term is constructed 6. Immediate action is able to be taken to begin implementing changes to the homelessness response system As currently proposed, the community conversations will be comprised of two separate sessions. The primary purpose of the first session is to provide an opportunity to develop a community-wide understanding of homelessness and its impacts on the community through facilitated dialogue. The primary purpose of the second session is to develop actionable, creative, and collaborative solutions to address homelessness. A description and key objectives of each session are included below. The details of each session are still in the process of being finalized as additional information and feedback from community partners is incorporated into the planning process. Session 1: Educational Feedback Session (est. date Jan. 20, 21, or 22) CSH would begin by conducting an initial in-person session to introduce the community conversations, provide an educational context regarding homelessness, and foster dialogue on addressing street homelessness. This session would take approximately 2-3 hours and could be repeated twice in the same day (morning and afternoon.) These sessions will be broadly open to the community and include a wide variety of stakeholders. ATTACHMENT 4 Key Objectives for Session 1: 1. Increase knowledge of homelessness, its impact, and the current response system 2. Increase readiness among community to take action 3. Collect and refine data and information regarding the homelessness response system to inform Session 2 4. Provide a space for facilitated, effective dialogue around homelessness Following Session 1, CSH would work with Fort Collins community partners and other relevant community stakeholders to obtain and analyze key data regarding system performance and gaps in order to further develop the agenda for Session 2. Session 2: Developing Actionable, Creative, and Collaborative Solutions (est. date Feb. 3, 4, or 5) Session 2 will be informed by the results of Session 1 above and any feedback obtained through additional meetings, focus groups, or community surveys conducted by community partners. This in-depth one-day session will walk participants through clearly defining and prioritizing gaps/challenges within the system and developing concrete action steps to address them. CSH will provide a brief report summarizing the engagement and providing recommendations. Key Objectives for Session 2: 1. Develop an action plan for addressing gaps and challenges in the homelessness response system 2. Increase buy-in and commitment from participants to implement action plan 1 HOUSING PROVIDERS AND NON-PROFIT AGENCIES FUNDED BY CITY OF FORT COLLINS WORKING TO PREVENT HOMELESSNESS OR WORKING WITH PEOPLE WHO ARE HOMELESS AFFORDABLE HOUSING FORT COLLINS HOUSING AUTHORITY: Redtail Ponds Permanent Supportive Housing Fort Collins Housing Authority is building Redtail Ponds Permanent Supportive Housing. This affordable housing project will provide 60 units of housing for the chronically homeless, and those at risk of homelessness. Residents will receive long-term case management and supportive services. FORT COLLINS HOUSING AUTHORITY: Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) for CDDT The Fort Collins Housing Authority provides rental assistance to chronically homeless people through the Tenant Based Rental Assistance program. The Community Dual Disorders Treatment (CDDT) program works with people suffering from both severe mental illness and a severe substance abuse disorder. Housing eligibility, compliance, coaching, housing search, lease negotiations, housing retention and re-housing issues are among the functions of the CDDT program. FORT COLLINS HOUSING AUTHORITY: Village on Redwood: A Vibrant, Sustainable Community Fort Collins Housing Authority will be building a new affordable rental housing community. Once built, Seventy-Two: A Vibrant Sustainable Community will provide 72 units of affordable rental housing to households with incomes between 0-60% Area Median Income (AMI). HOUSING CATALYST (FCHA): Villages on Cunningham Corner Rehabilitation Housing Catalyst, LLC, a wholly-owned entity of Fort Collins Housing Authority, purchased and is e rehabilitating 284 units of permanently affordable rental housing at the Villages at Cunningham Corner, located at the northeast corner of Horsetooth Road and Shields Street. Most of the residents at this community have household incomes between 30-60% of AMI. NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR Neighbor to Neighbor provides stable, affordable rental housing low-income and extremely low- income residents. Coachlight Plaza offers 68 rental units to clients earning 30% AMI or less. VILLAGES, LTD. (FCHA): Village on Matuka Villages, Ltd., the non-profit arm of Fort Collins Housing Authority, was funded to rehabilitate 20 permanently affordable rental units at the Villages on Matuka Court, located off of East Conifer. The residents at this community have household incomes between 0-30% of AMI. ATTACHMENT 5 2 PUBLIC SERVICE CATHOLIC CHARITIES: Senior Services Senior Outreach Services provides assistance to at-risk elderly with the goal of enabling them to maintain greater health, safety, and independence. This program assists at-risk elderly to remain in their homes. CATHOLIC CHARITIES: Shelter and Post-Shelter Services Catholic Charities’ shelter (the Mission) provides shelter, food, case management, resource navigation, benefits application assistance, and transitional housing help in support of the homeless and near homeless. COLORADO HEALTH NETWORK dba NORTHERN COLORADO AIDS PROJECT (NCAP): Client Services The Case Management and Homelessness Prevention Programs help families and individuals coping with HIV/AIDS retain their household stability and health as their ability to be financially independent diminishes. CROSSROADS SAFEHOUSE: Domestic Violence Family Advocacy Program Crossroads provides emergency shelter, services and outreach to abused adults who face homelessness at a full-service facility. DISABLED RESOURCE SERVICES: Access to Independence (ATI) Program The ATI Program provides supportive case management and community assistance to increase the independence of adults with severe disabilities many of whom have either been homeless or are at risk of becoming homeless. HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION INITIATIVE (HPI): Emergency Rental Assistance Emergency Rent Assistance provides temporary funding to cover the cost of rent for families facing eviction. THE MATTHEWS HOUSE: Empowering Youth Program The Matthews House intensively works with at-risk, homeless, and abused youth, ages 16-21, transitioning them to become contributing adult community members. Case management, independent living skills, and aftercare are offered towards achieving self-sufficiency. NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR (N2N): Housing Counseling Housing Counseling consists of the following services: Emergency Rent Assistance Counseling, Pre- rental Counseling, Landlord/Tenant Counseling, Pre-purchase Counseling/Homebuyer Classes and Training, Mortgage Default Counseling and Reverse Mortgage Counseling. NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR (N2N): Rent Assistance Neighbor to Neighbor’s Emergency Rent Assistance Program provides rent assistance and first month’s rent for residents who need financial assistance to maintain housing. Clients are assisted 3 with a one-time payment up to $350 for rent assistance, and up to $500 towards a first month’s rent payment. PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY (PS-S): Services for Single-Parent Families The mission of Project Self-Sufficiency is to assist low-income single parents in their efforts to build and maintain strong, healthy families, achieve economic independence, and become free from community and government assistance, many are homeless or at risk or becoming homeless. SERVE 6.8: Sister Mary Alice Murphy Center for Hope Serve 6.8 assumed ownership and the operations function for the Murphy Center in summer of 2013. The request funding covers a portion of salaries for the five resource specialists working with clients who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. TOUCHSTONE HEALTH PARTNERS: Community Dual Disorders Treatment (CDDT) Program The CDDT is a collaboration of Larimer Center for Mental Health, the Health District of Northern Larimer County and the Fort Collins Housing Authority, which combines intensive case management and therapeutic services with housing assistance for persons with severe mental illness and severe substance abuse disorders, many of whom are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. TOUCHSTONE HEALTH PARTNERS: Critical Mental Health Services--Murphy Center The Mental Health specialist at the Murphy Center does initial mental health assessments, provides up to 10 short-term therapy sessions, collaborates for a spectrum of care with other community health providers, and performs crisis intervention triage, as necessary for people who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. Homelessness Defining the issue in Fort Collins ATTACHMENT 6 Direction Sought • Does Council agree that the current City role should continue at the same level of funding, facilitating, and convening? • Would Council like to see additional services provided by the City? • Does Council need additional information or have any suggestions for changes? 2 State of Homelessness Nationally: • 610,042 people experiencing homelessness – 222,197 families – 387,845 individuals – Approx. 50,000 youth – 18% chronically homeless – 9% veterans – Almost one quarter (23%) under 18 – The number has declined 9% since 2009 *Source: National Alliance to End Homelessness 3 State of Homelessness Colorado: • Denver – 5,812 (January 2014) – 36% women – 43% families – 24% “newly” homeless – Anecdotal information (DenverPost and FC Rescue Mission) indicates reasons for rise in Colorado • Rise due to marijuana • Hot job market • Desire to live in Fort Collins *Source: The Gathering Place 4 State of Homelessness Fort Collins: • 289 individuals – Winter PIT – 33% families – 5% veterans – 16% chronically homeless • 438 individuals – Summer PIT – 8% families – 9% travelers – 8% veterans – 31% chronically homeless *Source: Homeward 2020 Point-in-Time Count 5 Definition of Terms • Chronic Homelessness – continually homeless for a year or more, or at least 4 episodes of homelessness in the past 3 years. • Situational Homelessness – Something happened to cause their homelessness (sickness, loss of job, divorce, etc.) • Transient – not interested in housing; may be traveling through town or prefer camping 6 Gaps Analysis • Gaps in continuum of housing • Needs for homeless youth and families • Previously incarcerated have few choices • People with pets have few choices • Couples or other familial situations 7 Best Practices • Clear, deliberate, comprehensive strategy • Plan – Homeward 2020 has 10 year plan • Data – Point In Time Counts and Homelessness Management Information System (HMIS) • Emergency Prevention • Systems Prevention 8 Source: National Alliance to End Homelessness Best Practices • Outreach • Shorten Homelessness • Rapid Re-Housing • Supportive Services • Permanent Housing • Income 9 “Rare, Short-lived, and Non Recurring” Best Practices by Population • Chronic Homelessness – Permanent Supportive Housing • Family Homelessness – Rapid Re- Housing with access to services • Youth Homelessness (up to age 25) – Intervention services, housing options, transition support • Veteran Homelessness – Permanent Supportive Housing, Rapid Re-Housing, Discharge Support 10 Housing First Approach • Emphasizes stable, permanent housing • Focus on quick access • Variety of services to promote stability and well- being • Standard lease agreement 11 Proven Outcomes 12 Permanent Supportive Housing Permanent Supportive Housing Improves housing stability Improves housing stability Improves mental and physical health Improves mental and physical health Reduces substance abuse Reduces substance abuse Improves income and employment Improves income and employment Creates social and community connections Creates social and community connections Permanent Supportive Housing 13 Opening February 2015! 60 Units Serving: Homeless veterans Homeless w/ a disability Other low-income residents Developed and owned by the Fort Collins Housing Authority Eugene, OR Eugene, OR • Approx. 3,000 homeless • “Tiny homes” • Opportunity Village/Emerald Village • Homeless camps/rest stops • Car camping • Service station • HMIS • Veteran’s housing 14 15 Opportunity Village, Eugene Eugene, OR 16 St. Vincent de Paul Service Station Rest Stops Car Camping “Tiny Homes” 17 Opportunity Village Eugene Other examples Salt Lake City, UT Salt Lake City, UT • 247 chronically homeless • City does not provide direct service • 1 FTE – Homeless Services Coordinator • Homeless Outreach Service Team (HOST) • Increased Police presence in Depot District focusing on illegal behavior • Clean Teams- Daily Cleaning • Veterans Court • Homeless Court • Homeless Services Coordinator 18 Stepped up patrols in Depot District focus on pragmatic solutions and compassion Salt Lake City, UT Salt Lake City, UT 19 What Salt Lake City did was simple: It created attractive housing that street people actually longed to live in, provided the new residents with plenty of on-site counseling to help them with problems such as drug abuse and unemployment, and put one person in charge who could get government and nonprofit agencies to work together. Funding Process Flowchart Process 20 Funders Service Providers People in Need Enforcement Recidivism Independent Living Intake Screening Sentencing Alternatives Courts/Special Agency Sessions People breaking law 21 Sentencing Alternatives City Funding – Housing Projects Homelessness Prevention Housing Provider/Project 2014 2013 2012 2011 Total FCHA-Redtail Ponds Supportive Housing $350,000 $455,000 $586,077 $1,391,077 FCHA-Tenant based Rental Assistancefor Community Dual DisordersTreatment $156,240 $156,240 FCHA-Village on Redwood $1,312,745 $1,312,745 Housing Catalyst (FCHA)-Cunningham Corner $38,191 $899,651 $1,072,811 $2,010,653 Neighbor to Neighbor -Coachlight Plaza $43,257 $34,515 $77,772 Villages-Village on Matuka $380,000 $380,000 Totals $1,744,193 $934,166 $1,684,051 $586,077 $4,948,487 22 City Funding for Public Service Public Service Funding for Homelessness or Homelessness Prevention Service Provider Name 2014 2013 2012 2011 Total Catholic Charities Senior Services $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $11,331 $56,331 Catholic Charities Shelter & Rapid Rehousing $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $160,000 Colorado Health Network $18,514 $14,240 $15,000 $24,500 $72,254 Crossroads Safe.-Advocacy $39,000 $31,885 $39,853 $42,202 $152,940 Disabled Resource Services $26,261 $26,186 $23,370 $28,442 $104,259 Homeless Prevention Initiative- Rent Assistance $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $180,000 Matthews House-Youth Prog. $34,158 $32,229 $27,000 $27,639 $121,026 Neighbor to Neighbor - Housing Counseling $38,630 $33,175 $29,760 $40,175 $141,740 Neighbor to Neighbor – Rent assistance $36,125 $30,000 $25,000 $25,000 $116,125 Project Self Sufficiency-Services for Parents $30,000 $33,000 $22,000 $22,000 $107,000 Timberline Church Serve 6.8-Murphy Center $18,533 $18,533 Touchstone-CDDT Program $31,328 $28,380 $14,000 $73,708 Touchstone-Mental Health-Murphy $18,000 $22,500 $10,000 $50,500 Totals $390,549 $323,215 $320,363 $320,289 $1,354,416 23 New Service Provider programs • One Village One Family • Genesis Project • Faith Family Hospitality • Municipal Court Special Agency Sessions* • Matthews House Community Life Center* • Winter Overflow Shelter* 24 * City Funded Other New Housing • Governor’s Office Permanent Supportive Housing Toolkit • Community Capital Improvement Program offer – second permanent supportive housing project 25 City’s Role How • Funder • Convener • Facilitator • Enforce Laws Who • Social Sustainability • Police • Neighborhood Services • Municipal Court • City Attorney’s Office • Fort Collins Housing Authority • Poudre Fire Authority 26 Next Steps • Homeward 2020 – Community Summit – Around January 20, 21, 22 for first session – First week of February for second session • DDA, homeless providers, City, others – starting an advisory committee • HMIS system – City funded budget item 27 Direction Sought 28 • Does Council agree that the current City role should continue at the same level of funding, facilitating, and convening? • Would Council like to see additional services provided by the City? • Does Council need additional information or have any suggestions for changes? 29 Back Up Slides Aggregated Process Flow 30 Re-designed Process Flow 31 Danbury, CT Danbury, CT • 148 people homeless • Multi-pronged approach – some direct service • City-run shelter, rental assistance, and day center • Housing First model • Partnered to develop Plan to End Chronic Homelessness • Downtown businesses concerns 32 Saint Paul, MN Saint Paul, MN • 780 people homeless • City does not provide direct service • Coordinated efforts • City distributes HUD funding and sets aside funds • St. Paul Police Department recognized for program • Effort to end homelessness among veterans 33 Burlington, VT Burlington, VT • 537 people homeless • City does not provide direct service • Collaborate with Chittenden County Continuum of Care • Developed 10-year plan to end homelessness • Housing Trust Funds 34 Nashville, TN Nashville, TN • 2,301 people homeless • City does not provide direct service • Metropolitan Homelessness Commission • How’s Nashville campaign • Online directory of services • Private landlord partnerships • Cold Weather Community Response Plan • Adopt A Meter program 35 Phoenix, AZ Phoenix, AZ • 5,918 people homeless • City does provide direct services: – 3 FTE caseworkers – Human Services Department – Affordable Housing and Homeless Shelter – Summer and Winter Respite programs – Homeless Programs Section 36 Recommendations/Options • Continue to support/fund housing and services that are proven (chronic and situational) • Continue to partner, convene, and facilitate community services/inter-agency task force • Provide specific responses such as lockers at Murphy Center 37 Recommendations/Options • Other ideas from other communities (?) –Camping – Tiny homes –Ambassadors • Outcomes from Community Summit • Impact of upcoming projects 38 0 $28,442 $104,259 HPI-Emerg. Rent Assistance $45,000 $45,000 $45,00 0 $45,000 $180,000 Matthews House-Youth Prog. $34,158 $32,229 $27,00 0 $27,639 $121,026 N2N - Housing Counseling $38,630 $33,175 $29,76 $40,175 $141,740