Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 03/10/2016 - OLD TOWN PLANNING PROJECTSDATE: STAFF: March 10, 2016 Cameron Gloss, Planning Manager Pete Wray, Senior City Planner Seth Lorson, City Planner WORK SESSION ITEM City Council SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Old Town Planning Projects. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to provide an update on the progress of three long-range planning projects that are taking place simultaneously in the greater Old Town Area. Updates will be provided for the Downtown Plan, Old Town Neighborhoods Plan, and the Old Town Neighborhood Design Guidelines. The last City Council update on these ongoing projects was provided at the August 11, 2015 Work Session. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. Given the work to date, are there additional issues that should be addressed? 2. Is there additional public engagement needed? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION DOWNTOWN PLAN The new Downtown Plan will replace the successful 1989 Downtown Plan, with a new plan for the next 10-20 years. The 1989 plan has guided budgets, projects, investments, regulations, and other actions for 25 years. Its mission has been achieved and its recommendations largely fulfilled. Downtown’s r evitalization results from countless decisions on several hundred million dollars’ worth of investments and actions by the public and private sectors meeting constant challenges and risks within a unifying vision and framework. Project Approach The project is being driven by public involvement, with the aim of a truly community-based plan with broad awareness and understanding among a complete range of interests. The process is organized around six topic areas:  Arts and Culture (Creative Industries)  Operations and Management  Energy and Environment  Market and Economy  Transportation and Parking  Urban Design Working Groups Six corresponding Working Groups guide the development of the new Plan. These groups consist of technical specialists, City staff, and key stakeholders relevant to each topic area. The groups are led by a City Staff member and facilitated by another group member with special expertise and interest. March 10, 2016 Page 2 Timeline and Plan Status to Date Given the recent spike in development submittals and resulting staff workload, the timeline for Downtown Plan adoption has been extended approximately three months beyond the original targeted completion date of August 2016. It is anticipated that the draft Plan document will be available for public review by the end of the summer with adoption in the fall. Public Engagement Over the past six months since the last work session, the second phase (Visioning) has been completed and the third phase (Choices and Strategies) is almost complete. Staff has interacted with over a dozen boards and commissions, the aforementioned working groups, and hundreds of residents and visitors. The following is an overview of our engagement efforts since last August: Public Events: - NewWest Fest Visioning Event - Open Streets Event Parking Survey - City Comforts Workshop - 2-Day Vision Design Charrette - Downtown/OTN Transitions Workshop - UrbanLab First Friday Gallery Walk event - Community Choices Open House - Community Choices Workshop # 1 - Community Choices Workshop # 2 - Online Survey - Textizen Survey - Community Groups - Studio 14 Downtown Plan video - Working Group Members - Working Group Meetings - City Boards and Commissions (# visits to date): o Affordable Housing Board (1) o Air Quality Advisory Board (1) o Art in Public Places Board (2) o Bicycle Advisory Committee (1) o Commission on Disability (2) o Downtown Development Association (5) o Downtown Business Association (5) o Economic Advisory Commission (1) o Energy Board (1) o Human Relations Commission (1) o Landmark Preservation Commission (1) o Natural Resources Advisory Board (1) o Parking Advisory Board (5) o Parks and Recreation Board (1) o Planning and Zoning Board (8) o Senior Advisory Board (1) March 10, 2016 Page 3 o Transportation Board (2) o Water Board (1) o Super Board Meeting (Multiple Boards and Commissions represented) (1) Summary of Phase 2: Visioning The focus of the Visioning Phase was to develop draft vision statements supported by preliminary strategies to achieve the vision for each topic area. These were to then to be vetted with the public in Phase 3. The draft vision and strategies structured the conversation on next steps – how to effectively weigh tradeoffs and priorities so that the vision can be put into action. A key result of Phase 2 was the identification of 11 different character districts within the overall Downtown Plan area. This recognizes and clarifies the distinctions between various parts that make up the whole of downtown. The Phase 2 summary report is included as Attachment 1. Phase 3: Choices and Strategies Alternative concepts related to the topic areas are being explored during Phase 3. The concepts will be applied and fitted to the 11 character districts as appropriate. Concepts are being evaluated using public outreach, sustainability assessments, and technical analyses. Options represent difficult choices and tradeoffs with respect to costs and benefits, be they financial, social or environmental. The following list of key issues provided a focus at recent community choices public outreach events. While the list is not exhaustive, it is indicative of some of our most pressing challenges: Operation and Maintenance Where should pedestrian enhancements and maintenance expand next? Which Improvements would be most important? Arts and Culture What should the City’s role be in the support of creative industries? Market and Economy What kinds of incentives make sense for downtown? How do we resolve the tension between what we desire and what we are willing to pay for? Transportation How should we encourage people to park in the most appropriate locations based on the length of stay? Where should bicycle parking be located? Energy and Environment Which Climate Action Plan (CAP) strategies should be prioritized Downtown? How do we best achieve specific CAP strategies? Urban Design How should we design buildings that are consistent with the desired character? Which street design elements are most important? Next Steps- Downtown Plan Development and Implementation Program Following completion of Phase 3, the Downtown Plan document will be drafted, including key implementation actions. Recommendations regarding the allocation of time, effort, and resources will be developed so that the Plan can be readily be put into practice. As policies, programs and investment priorities emerge during this phase; a consultant will assist staff in assessing capabilities of the public and private sectors to carry out initiatives to continue Downtown’s success under the new plan. March 10, 2016 Page 4 OLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS PLAN The Old Town Neighborhoods Plan is a combined update of the 1986 East Side Neighborhood Plan and the 1989 West Side Neighborhood Plan. The Old Town Neighborhoods generally encompass the predominantly residential neighborhoods to the west and southeast of Downtown. The purpose of the planning effort is to update the neighborhood vision, explore ongoing and emerging trends, and update policy direction, with a focus on neighborhood character, land use, transportation, and sustainability. In conjunction with the Plan, this effort also includes an assessment of the Mulberry Street and Shields Street corridors for feasibility of integrating bike and pedestrian improvements. Timeline and Plan Status to Date At a previous City Council Work Session in August 2015, staff presented details on the trends, issues, and opportunities identified by stakeholders during early public outreach. Since the prior update, the draft neighborhood vision was developed and ongoing planning efforts are now focused on identifying potential plan framework options, strategies, and policies. Given the recent spike in development submittals and resulting staff workload, the timeline for the Old Town Neighborhood Plan adoption has been extended approximately three months beyond the original targeted completion date of May 2016. It is anticipated that the draft Plan document will be available for public review by summer with adoption in September. Public Engagement Outreach for the Old Town Neighborhoods Plan have been targeted primarily at stakeholders living and working within the two neighborhoods. Community discussions have been incorporated into the process with an online questionnaire and public workshop this past fall. The following list provides an overview of engagement events and activities to date for the planning process since last summer: - Neighborhood Night Out - Neighborhood Visioning Photo Contest - Visioning & Choices/Options Online Questionnaires - Remington Open Streets Event - City Park Food Truck Rally - Old Town Neighborhoods Plan / Downtown Plan Transitions Workshop - Eastside & Westside Stakeholder Committee Meetings - Choices & Options Workshop - Neighborhood Postcard Mailings - City Boards and Commissions - Community Group Meetings March 10, 2016 Page 5 Phase Two: Visioning Developed with the input of project stakeholders, the Old Town Neighborhoods Vision reflects the values, opportunities, and priorities for the neighborhoods as they relate to the key Plan topic areas of neighborhood character, land use, transportation, and sustainability. The vision structure includes individual vision statements supported by neighborhood values. The vision will be used to guide development of the Plan framework and associated policies and programs. As a mature, established area of the community, the neighborhood vision emphasizes the physical and social/cultural elements of the neighborhoods that already make them a great place to live, and the desire to celebrate and enhance defining neighborhood qualities such as a diversity of home sizes and styles, historic resources and the connection to the community’s early history, mature landscaping, and proximity to downtown, CSU, and the Poudre River. The full neighborhood vision is included as part of Attachment 2. Phase Three: Plan Framework / Potential Land Use and Transportation Options / Strategies The Old Town Neighborhoods Plan will include development of a framework plan to showcase potential land-use and transportation changes and important policies and programs illustrating how the neighborhood vision will be achieved. Attachment 3 includes the draft framework plan recently shared with the Old Town Neighborhoods Plan Stakeholder Committee and highlights the following potential options and strategies shared at recent outreach events. Attachment 4 includes a detailed description of options presented to date and a summary of stakeholder input. Land Use and Urban Design:  Land Use Designation Adjustments Review designation of the Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood (LMN) zoning enclaves surrounded by neighborhood conservation zoning in the Westside Neighborhood.  Transition Buffer Area Design Standards Explore potential design standards in the Neighborhood Conservation Buffer zone district bordering downtown to enhance the compatibility and transition of development into the neighborhoods.  Accessory Dwelling Unit Standards Examine current standards and requirements for accessory dwelling units, such as carriage houses, and their impact on neighborhood affordability, aging-in-place, short term rentals, and overall neighborhood compatibility.  New Design Guidelines for Existing Neighborhood Conservation Zones Finalize the updated Old Town Neighborhoods Design Guidelines (shared at the August 2014 Work Session) with recommendations on how to design contextual and compatible new homes and additions in the Old Town Neighborhoods. Transportation and Mobility:  Neighborhood Greenways Select residential streets with low volumes of traffic and enhanced bike, pedestrian, and streetscape amenities, such as the recently-completed Remington Greenway project. Neighborhood greenways align with the Bicycle Master Plan low-stress network and the forthcoming Bicycle Wayfinding Master Plan community routes.  Mulberry Street Alternatives Explore potential enhancements to bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Traffic volumes on Mulberry between City Park Avenue and Taft Hill Road may allow for lane restriping from 4 travel lanes to 2 travel lanes and a center turn lane, along with buffered bike lanes and wider sidewalks. East of City Park March 10, 2016 Page 6 Avenue, Magnolia Street could be utilized as a parallel route for bikes and pedestrians as a neighborhood greenway. Attachment 5 highlights potential design elements of the Mulberry Street design.  Shields Street Alternatives Explore potential enhancements to bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Traffic volumes on Shields between Magnolia Street and Laporte Avenue may allow for lane restriping from 4 travel lanes to 2 travel lanes and a center turn lane, along with buffered bike lanes and wider sidewalks. On Shields between Mulberry Street and Laurel Street, a reduction in vehicle lane widths may allow for sidewalk widening as a shared bike/pedestrian path. Attachment 5 highlights potential design elements and cross sections of the Shields Street design. Other Initiatives:  Climate Action Plan Implementation Identify the specific role and impact the neighborhood study area can contribute to community Climate Action Plan goals. Recognize the importance of building energy efficiency and multi-modal transportation in the Old Town Neighborhoods and highlight available programs to support energy upgrades and alternative transportation.  Support & Enhance Existing Programs Continued support of existing City programs and policies that support the character and quality of life in the Old Town Neighborhoods, including programs to maintain and fill gaps in the neighborhood tree canopy, encouraging continued funding for the Sidewalk Improvement Program, Safe Routes to School, and promotion of Historic Preservation’s Design Assistance Program. Continue to support neighborhood- initiated requests for historic designations and inclusion in the Residential Parking Permit Program. Next Steps - Plan Development and Implementation Program Following completion of Phase 3, the Old Town Neighborhoods Plan document, including key implementation actions, will emerge during the final phases of the project. Recommendations regarding the allocation of time, effort, and resources will be identified so that the Plan can readily be put into practice. Ongoing outreach and board and commission updates are planned throughout the spring and summer to gather additional input. Staff anticipates presenting the final plan to City Council for consideration of adoption in late summer. ATTACHMENTS 1. Downtown Plan: Phase 2 Summary (PDF) 2. Old Town Neighborhoods Plan: Phase 2 - Vision (PDF) 3. Old Town Neighborhoods Plan: Phase 3 - Plan Framework (PDF) 4. Old Town Neighborhoods Plan: Summary of Options and Strategies Input (PDF) 5. Old Town Neighborhoods Plan: Transportation and Mobility Options (PDF) 6. Work Session Summary, August 11, 2015 (PDF) 7. Powerpoint presentation (PDF) Downtown The Fort Collins Plan Phase 2 Summary: A Renewed Vision October 2015 ATTACHMENT 1 2 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 3 About the Downtown Plan The Fort Collins Downtown Plan serves as a guide and inspiration for budgets, projects, programs, investments, regulations and other efforts focused in the downtown area. Adopted by City Council in 1989, the previous plan helped shape the downtown as it exists today. The new Downtown Plan is a partnership with the Downtown Development Authority and the Downtown Business Association and will update the vision, policy direction, and action items for the next 10-20 years. In addition, the new Downtown Plan will incorporate recently completed planning efforts (e.g., the Poudre River Downtown Master Plan, the citywide Pedestrian Plan, and the Bicycle Master Plan) into a comprehensive plan for downtown Fort Collins. When adopted, the Downtown Plan will serve as the overarching policy document guiding private development and public investment. Process and Timeline The process of developing the Downtown Plan consists of five interrelated phases, each with its own purpose and objectives. The Downtown Plan will be closely coordinated with the Old Town Neighborhoods Plan, which covers the residential areas to the west and south of downtown. Phase 1: Issues Identification (Jan-May 2015) Phase 2: A Renewed Vision (Jun-Sept 2015) Phase 3: Choices & Strategies (Oct-Dec 2015) Phase 4: Document Development (Jan-Mar 2016) Phase 5: Implementation & Plan Adoption (Apr-Jul 2016) Downtown Plan Boundaries Mountain Ave Laporte Ave Maple St Cherry St Laurel St Mulberry St Myrtle St Riverside Ave Poudre River Magnolia St Mason St College Ave Howes St Meldrum St Sherwood St Lemay Ave Whitcomb St Olive St Oak St Old Town 4 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 5 Phase 2 began in June 2015 and concluded in September 2015. The vision phase built on the issues identified in phase 1 to determine what downtown might look and feel like as issues are addressed. The purpose of this phase was to engage working groups, residents, visitors, business owners, downtown employees, and other stakeholders in creating a future vision for downtown. The vision statements developed in phase 2 help guide the selection of choices and strategies for downtown, which will be evaluated in phase 3 of the planning process. PHASE 2: A RENEWED VISION FOR DOWNTOWN • Working Group Meetings • Character Districts Design Charrette • Presentations to City Boards & Commissions • Presentations to DDA, DBA, and other community groups • Colorado Brewer’s Festival • Downtown Walking Tours • “A New Vision for Downtown” event • Farmers’ Market • Bohemian Nights at NewWestFest • Character Districts Drop-In Open House • “City Comforts with David Sucher” event • Website • City Facebook and Twitter feeds • Nextdoor postings • Online survey (Survey Gizmo) • Text message survey (Textizen) • Keypad polling • Project email list • DBA and business email lists • Posters, postcards, and business cards • Press releases • fcgov.com announcements • Giveaway items (stickers, tattoos, lip balm, bike lights) 6 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 7 Downtown’s Future Downtown Fort Collins today is at the core of the City’s identity, serving both as a symbol of the city’s best qualities and as the center of its public and private life. Previous planning efforts have been instrumental in achieving this success – the downtown area has seen tremendous revitalization over recent decades, and is recognized as one of the most successful downtowns in the country. In order to renew and sustain downtown’s success into the future, a renewed downtown vision is needed. The 2015 Downtown Plan offers a roadmap for the protection of the qualities that have made downtown successful, and for addressing issues that remain or that have arisen, many of which result from downtown’s success and growth. Anchoring the Plan is a vision for downtown’s future. This vision will guide the cooperation of public and private stakeholders on the path toward an even more vibrant downtown. . Keys to the Vision ACTIVE – AUTHENTIC – DISTINCTIVE – INNOVATIVE – INVITING Downtown Fort Collins is… Vision Extensive public outreach and discussion formed the basis to develop vision statements that guide plan goals, strategies and implementation. Walking tours, workshop events and a detailed online survey shaped the vision. Goals In phase 1, key goals were identified for each topic area. In phase 2, respondents to the online visioning survey were asked to rank each goal in order of its importance. The goals listed for each topic area are presented in ranked order. Strategies Strategies for achieving the goals are a synthesis of hundreds of suggestions from stakeholders and attendees at public outreach events. The effectiveness of the strategies identified in this section, as well as additional strategies that emerge from the planning process, will be explored further in phase 3. Arts + Culture Downtown Management Energy + Environment Market + Economy Transportation + Parking Urban Design 8 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 9 Arts + Culture Vision In 2035, downtown Fort Collins is the hub of artistic and cultural activity in the City, with a diverse range of creative and social offerings that are accessible to many different audiences. Local artists benefit from affordable studio and live-work spaces in addition to a variety of accessible and well-supported venues. Vibrant social spaces and unique cultural assets enrich the lives of residents, the economic health of the downtown area, and the experiences of visitors. Formal and informal avenues for artistic expression drive the evolution of culture in the community. Sculptures Sidewalk art (ex: rain activated) Street performers (busking) Interactive (ex: light swings) Light projection art Graffiti art Street musicians (busking) 3D murals Very large murals 284 236 230 214 195 170 107 92 80 Phase 2 outreach – What public art would you like to see in downtown Fort Collins? Attendees at the visioning event and participants in the online survey were asked to select types of public art that would be appropriate in the downtown area. The most frequently selected options were sculptures, street musicians, and interactive art installations. Note: Respondents could select up to three options; there were 574 individual respondents. Goals (in ranked order): In Phase 1, five emerging priorities were identified for Arts + Culture. The visioning survey for Phase 2 asked respondents to rank the emerging priorities in the order of their importance. Create a culture of support for artists and creative people to maintain downtown vibrancy Explore ways to support arts and culture with facilities, infrastructure, events, and funding Make it easier for creative businesses to thrive downtown Improve affordability of live/work and studio space for artists and creative people Explore opportunities to incorporate more local art into downtown properties and businesses Strategies (How can we achieve these goals?): Potential strategies to achieve the Arts + Culture goals were developed in phase 2 of the plan, and will be explored further in phase 3. Establish a Creative Council that includes representatives from downtown’s arts and culture community charged with strengthening this niche through marketing, events and resource development. Create an Arts Coordinator position at the City that will support the Creative Council and be a central organizer for arts groups, resource development and marketing efforts. Support the effort to create a State certified Creative District that includes downtown Fort Collins, and incorporate Creative District implementation efforts into the proposed Creative Council. Explore opportunities for subculture expression through art, such as graffiti and street performance. Promote and market the downtown arts and culture scene both locally and regionally, including the development of events that showcase and celebrate arts and culture. Explore the creation of an arts ambassador program similar to that in Boise, Idaho. Develop an arts incubator space to foster local creativity and retain arts and culture in the downtown. Explore the creation of a regional sales tax to support arts and culture similar to the Scientific and Cultural Facilities District in Denver. Explore ways to incentivize artisan work spaces and galleries in new development. Develop a plan for better utilization of public spaces and alleys to support arts and culture related uses. Create a public arts initiative that results in more visual arts installations throughout the downtown. Continue the Art in Public Places program. 10 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 11 Downtown Management Vision Downtown Fort Collins remains committed to high quality maintenance and administration. Downtown continues to be a safe, clean, and beautiful place to socialize, recreate, and conduct business for people of all ages and backgrounds. Law enforcement is predictable and comfortable for all people. Homelessness has in particular been addressed, balancing the rights and needs of all groups. Daily life, business, and cultural events have combined to strengthen the sense of community in the downtown area. Smartphones Pedestrian info map Pedestrian business directory Avoid sign clutter Banner system Design/art theme sign style Historic sign style Use utility boxes/sidewalks Gateway features 268 263 252 220 167 147 134 99 86 Phase 2 outreach – What types of wayfinding are most appropriate in the downtown area? Attendees at the Downtown Plan Visioning Event and participants in the online survey were asked to select types of wayfinding that would be appropriate in the downtown area. The most frequently selected options were smartphone applications, avoiding sign clutter, and historic sign styles. Note: Respondents could select up to three options; there were 574 individual respondents. Goals (in ranked order): In phase 1, six emerging goals were identified for Downtown Management. The visioning survey for phase 2 asked respondents to rank the goals in the order of their importance. Maintain and improve pedestrian space to emphasize walkability and pedestrian priority Address problematic behavior; maintain a sense of safety for all to be comfortable downtown Work to address the needs of the homeless population & improve understanding of issues Increase maintenance capabilities to keep up with growth Balance the number and scale of events, activities, and promotions; avoid ‘large event fatigue’ Improve overall communications and messaging about downtown Strategies (How can we achieve these goals?): Potential strategies to achieve the Downtown Management goals were developed in phase 2 of the plan, and will be explored further in phase 3. Prioritize pedestrian spaces by adding detail to guidelines for encroachments onto downtown sidewalks. Revisit the process for permitting sidewalk cafes and other potential obstructions. Consider peripheral parking with shuttles or transit to downtown retail areas; incentivize resident, employee and visitor use of parking garages to increase availability of on-street parking. Maintain a permanent District One Police substation on the east side of the railroad tracks. Continue to focus on quality of life, referral to services, and keeping the peace as primary policing strategies. Form a funding partnership to hire an outreach coordinator who can develop and lead a downtown outreach program for people experiencing homelessness. Sustain the current level of maintenance in the historic core of the downtown area, investigate funding sources to expand maintenance to other areas, and ensure a permanent Parks maintenance and storage shop in a convenient downtown location. Implement a scheduling system for events and festivals that will minimize street closures, spread out large events, and offer a wide variety of activities for all downtown visitors. Create a cohesive wayfinding strategy for the downtown area. 1 12 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 13 Energy + Environment Vision Downtown Fort Collins actively pursues sustainability in all operations and in development. Downtown is exemplary of city-wide climate protection efforts, having incorporated innovative technologies for responsible conservation and energy production. From anywhere downtown, people can easily access the Poudre River, parks, and natural areas. The presence of nature is felt even in downtown’s most urban spaces, as it is cultivated as an essential amenity. Recreational access to nature is balanced with the need to preserve and protect natural resources, while stormwater management and utility infrastructure ensures existing and future needs are met. Street tree canopy Trail/path Green roof Plaza Community garden Wetland area Pocket park Living wall Planted courtyard 293 250 242 190 165 160 155 107 87 Phase 2 outreach – Which improvements are most appropriate for incorporating more nature into the downtown area? Attendees at the Downtown Plan Visioning Event and participants in the online survey were asked to select improvements that could incorporate more nature into the downtown area. The most frequently selected improvements were street tree canopy, plazas, and pocket parks. Note: Respondents could select up to three options; there were 574 individual respondents. Goals (in ranked order): In phase 1, five emerging goals were identified for Energy + Environment. The visioning survey for phase 2 asked respondents to rank the goals in the order of their importance. Connect to and protect the Poudre River Corridor and other unique natural resources. Pursue and support innovative energy and environmental projects. Incorporate nature and opportunities to escape the urban environment into existing and new development. Enhance downtown’s capacity to manage stormwater and flooding. Showcase and celebrate energy innovation and environmental stewardship. Strategies (How can we achieve these goals?): A number of potential strategies to achieve the Energy + Environment goals were developed in phase 2 of the plan, and will be explored further in phase 3. Support the implementation of the Poudre River Downtown Master Plan, including trail connections, habitat protection areas, recreational opportunities, community gathering places, and educational opportunities. Balance development along the Poudre River to ensure that the river continues to offer natural habitat, flood protection, and other ecological benefits. Explore incentives and regulations to encourage innovative energy projects in new development. Examples of eligible projects could include rooftop solar, electric vehicle charging, low impact development, green roofs, and living walls. Create a program to encourage energy-efficiency for existing buildings and historic buildings. Explore new approaches to waste management, including shared facilities, increased opportunities for recycling and composting, waste to energy conversion, and more. Encourage or require sustainable building materials for new development and public amenities. 14 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 15 Attendees at the visioning event and participants to the online survey were asked to select types of live/work space that would be appropriate in the downtown area. The most frequently selected options were apartments over stores, lofts above workshop/retail space, and lofts above workshop space. Note: Choices varied more by image than title. There were 534 individual respondents. Phase 2 outreach – What is the best way to provide joint living and working opportunities downtown? Market + Economy Vision Downtown Fort Collins is the economic engine for the region and one of the most distinctive small downtowns in the nation. Downtown has become a diverse employment center where retail, finance, government, and services thrive. Residents and visitors experience downtown as a center for creativity featuring a wide variety of unique retail shops, high-quality dining and entertainment options, and a strong local business community. A broad range of housing types is available to meet the needs of diverse age groups, lifestyles, and incomes. Downtown is also recognized as a center for innovation, where businesses partner with Colorado State University to advance knowledge-based industries. Apartment over a store Loft above flex space Loft above workshop Loft above workshop/retail Apartment above workshop Loft with ground-level office Loft above workshop Housing above/behind office Housing between office space 293 266 226 199 168 124 101 57 56 Goals (in ranked order):In phase 1, five emerging goals were identified for Market + Economy. The visioning survey for phase 2 asked respondents to rank the goals in the order of their importance. Help independent, local, and small businesses survive downtown Encourage affordability of housing and commercial space, both for rent and purchase Develop strategies to ensure available, accessible, and adequate parking Maintain emphasis on high-quality development while making approval processes easier Develop financial and other incentives to create public-private partnerships downtown Strategies (How can we achieve these goals?): A number of potential strategies to achieve the Market + Economy goals were developed in phase 2 of the plan, and will be explored further in phase 3. Explore the feasibility of subsidies, incentives, or other financial tools to help small businesses afford rental rates in the downtown area. Investigate opportunities to establish a retail business incubator program that could provide business development services, technical assistance, and general business support. Encourage density in key areas downtown (for example, the Mason corridor) to increase the supply of housing and commercial space. Examine potential financial or other incentives for new developments that agree to provide affordable housing and commercial space. Consider a range of options for on-street paid parking, while encouraging longer-term users to utilize parking garages. Develop a coordinated approach with the Transportation + Parking topic area. Clarify land use code requirements for new and infill development so that the development process is predictable and consistent. Streamline routine processes where possible. Expand investment from the historic core into other parts of the downtown area by creating new Business Improvement Districts, General Improvement Districts, or other potential funding mechanisms. Investigate a contingency plan for the expiration of the Downtown Development Authority (DDA) by identifying alternative organization structures that will continue to promote the DDA’s existing mission. 1 1 1 1 2 16 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 17 Transportation + Parking Vision Downtown Fort Collins is easily, comfortably, and safely accessed and navigated by multiple modes of transportation. Pedestrian mobility is improved and continues to be a strong emphasis. The transit network, including stops, has grown significantly, and there are low-stress, safe, comfortable options for biking. Vehicular accessibility is maintained, and parking for cars and bicycles is adequate and available. Overall, the transportation system supports the sustainability and social, economic, and environmental vibrancy of downtown. Goals (in ranked order): In phase 1, five emerging goals were identified for Transportation + Parking. The visioning survey for phase 2 asked respondents to rank the goals in the order of their importance. Continue to improve conditions for walking and biking Create better connections for all modes of travel throughout the downtown area Develop strategies to ensure adequate parking downtown Examine opportunities to improve convenience of MAX, buses and other transit service Investigate innovative ways to reduce parking demand Strategies (How can we achieve these goals?): A number of potential strategies to achieve the Transportation + Parking goals were developed in phase 2 of the plan, and will be explored further in phase 3. Create a low-stress bicycle network throughout the downtown area by implementing recommendations from the Bicycle Master Plan (2014). Improve key intersections and add missing sidewalks for the safety and comfort of bicyclists and pedestrians. Investigate opportunities to create more car-free areas on a temporary or permanent basis. Add more transit service, including new routes and expanded service frequency/hours on existing routes. Improve circulation and access for buses at the Downtown Transit Center. Implement car share and bike share programs. Explore opportunities for a downtown circulator to connect MAX, parking garages, and key activity centers. Consider a range of options for on-street paid parking, while encouraging longer-term users to utilize parking garages. Add more bike parking at strategic locations. (See next page) Examine options for communicating real-time travel information, such as where parking is currently available, time until the next bus or MAX service, etc. Look for opportunities to create park-n-rides outside of downtown and provide supporting transit service into the downtown area. Protected bike lane - planters Buffered bike lane Shared use path Bike lane with green paint Two-way protected bike lane Conventional bike lane Protected bike lane - delineators Neighborhood greenway Raised protected bike lane 307 263 181 171 163 127 106 94 92 Phase 2 outreach – Which bikeways are most appropriate for downtown Fort Collins? Attendees at the Downtown Plan Visioning Event and participants in the online survey were asked to select bikeways that would be appropriate in the downtown area. The most frequently selected options were bike lanes protected with planters, bike lanes with green paint, and bike lanes protected with delineators. Note: Respondents could select up to three options; there were 543 individual respondents. 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 18 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 19 ttt 2 HOURS FREE (then paid) 1 HOUR FREE (then paid) FREE PARKING 30 MIN. FREE (then paid) TIME- LIMITED PARKING (THEN LEAVE) 20 MIN. FREE (then paid) PAID PARKING Provides two-hour, free on-street parking with enforcement Provides a moderate amount of free on-street parking Preserves a limited amount of free on-street parking Promotes turnover Does not provide any free on-street parking Promotes turnover Fort Collins Boulder Missoula Sioux Falls Eugene On-Street Parking Management Strategies Garage Parking Management Strategies FREE PARKING PAID PARKING FIRST HOUR FREE Provides all day, free off-street parking Offers a viable alternative to on-street parking Attractive to both short- and long-term parkers Provides a moderate amount of free off-street parking Attractive to both short- and long- term parkers Does not provide any free off-street parking Less attractive for short-term parkers Boulder 20 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 21 Urban Design Vision Downtown Fort Collins embraces its rich heritage of design by preserving existing historic structures and creating new buildings that merit designation as future landmarks. A variety of distinct character districts are recognizable within the downtown, each evoking a unique sense of place. Streets, sidewalks and common public spaces are attractive and inspire feelings of comfort. Transition sequences between downtown and the surrounding neighborhoods, as well as between different character districts, are seamless. Downtown gateways provide an inviting sense of arrival. Brownstone units Stacked units Four-plexes Loft units Row houses Townhouses Attached single-family units Apartments Attached single units 292 227 209 197 183 137 114 73 60 Phase 2 outreach – Which housing types would be most appropriate in the downtown area? Respondents to the Online Visioning Survey and attendees at the Downtown Plan Visioning Event were asked to select types of housing that would be appropriate in the downtown area. The most frequently selected options were brownstone units, loft units, and attached single-family units. Note: Respondents could select up to three options; there were 544 individual respondents. Goals (in ranked order): In phase 1, five emerging goals were identified for Urban Design. The visioning survey for phase 2 asked respondents to rank the goals in the order of their importance. Preserve design elements that contribute to the character and authenticity of downtown Investigate the potential for new or expanded facilities for outdoor markets, performances, and other community gatherings Enhance the gateways into downtown Implement design guidelines and/or policies to provide a smooth transition from downtown edges into surrounding neighborhoods Promote integration of diverse architectural styles while maintaining compatibility Strategies (How can we achieve these goals?): A number of potential strategies to achieve the Urban Design goals were developed in phase 2 of the plan, and will be explored further in phase 3. Develop design guidelines like the Old Town and River District guidelines for the other Downtown Character Districts. Adopt form-based Land Use Code elements for each character district that set standards for building height, massing, streetscape, and courtyard design while retaining creative options for building style, materials, and details. (See next page) Create more pedestrian spaces throughout the downtown area; combine wide sidewalks and comfortable pedestrian experiences with plazas, pedestrian streets, and other spaces. Redevelop the Streetcar Barn into a community gathering space, community marketplace, museum, or other public-oriented use. Improve signage in the downtown area to facilitate wayfinding to destinations, bike and vehicle parking, and transportation options. Add landscaping, art, signage, and buildings at key gateway points to welcome residents and visitors to the downtown area. Clarify compatibility requirements for new development at the edges of the downtown area. Encourage increased density in key areas downtown (for example, the Mason corridor) to increase the supply of housing and commercial space in the downtown area. 1 2 22 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 23 Historic District: Maximum height is 3 stories, with a 4th allowed if stepped back to a 35 degree angle from the top of the 3rd story. * Mason North, Civic Center, and Canyon Avenue: Maximum height is carefully stated based on extensive public discussion among strongly competing interests during the Downtown Strategic Plan (2006). Stated height limits vary block-by-block. Limits are stated in both stories and feet with explanation of the intent, rather than simply stating exact numerical limits. Buildings over 3 stories must step down to a 1 or 2 story base portion along streets. * Campus North: Maximum height is 5 stories. * River District: Maximum height is 5 stories. Buildings must be stepped down to 3 stories abutting streets and 1 story abutting the river. * Entryway Corridor: Maximum height is 3 stories. * All zoning height limits work in conjunction with regulations for compatibility. If historic buildings are adjacent, those existing buildings and the pattern of development are a major consideration in shaping new buildings, and can require lower heights than the stated limits. This issue would benefit from clarification in zoning district standards compatibility. 10-12 Stories 150 ft. 3 Stories 7-9 Stories 115 ft. 3-4 Stories 56 ft. 5-6 Stories 85 ft. 3-4 Stories 45 ft. 5 Stories 2.5 Stories Campus North District Canyon Avenue District Civic District Entryway Corridor River District North Mason District Historic District Existing Code Requirements by District Building Height, Mass and Scale in the Downtown Downtown is seeing significant development activity throughout its boundaries. As infill and density 24 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 25 LAUREL MULBERRY N COLLEGE R IVERSIDE MOUNTAIN CHERRY VINE Canyon Avenue District Historic District Civic District North Mason District River District Oxbow District Innovation District Poudre Natural District Lincoln Corridor Entryway Corridor Campus North District Downtown Character Districts The Downtown Plan area encompasses much more than the historic core of downtown Fort Collins. The character of downtown is varied and complex – for example, the part of downtown directly north of Colorado State University does not have the same form or function as the civic district or Lincoln corridor areas. To incorporate this complexity and better plan for the entire downtown, eleven Character Districts were identified based on buildings, streets and land uses. What Will Downtown Look Like in the Future? The following sections illustrate potential changes and improvements in each of the downtown Character Districts. Walking tours, a design charrette and a drop-in workshop were held to begin incorporating the vision for each topic area into the various Character Districts. Ideas and comments from residents, working group members, and other downtown stakeholders were summarized in a series of illustrations representing the key opportunities that emerged for each District. Notes and maps from the design charrette and drop-in workshop are available on the Downtown Plan website at fcgov.com/downtown. 26 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 27 Innovation District Future character: A mix of uses supporting partnerships in innovation with a sense of place, grounded in the Poudre River floodplain Redesign Vine Drive as a “green street,” incorporating innovative stormwater management techniques and enhanced bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Showcase innovation and sustainability through site and green building design, district energy use, and innovative agricultural concepts on naturally constrained property (e.g., agriculture production within the floodplain). N View looking southeast College Linden Vine Build on the success of existing innovative businesses and include residential uses to support live/ work possibilities. Capitalize on sports elements of kayaking, running, and biking. Create an “energy gateway” to downtown, including information on renewable energy. Enhance landscaping along College Avenue. College 28 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 29 Oxbow District Future character: A mix of uses with significant open space; characterized by large canopy trees and views to the Poudre River floodplain Protect the tree canopy that delineates the original Oxbow through creative site planning and design. Encourage design themes that support the natural context of horizontal roof lines that protect views and the use of natural building materials. Enhance the River frontage with more plaza areas and public access. Support commercial, residential and mixed-uses within the district. Minimize negative impacts to the adjacent historic neighborhood. Linden Willow Buckingham N View looking northeast 30 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 31 Poudre Natural District Future character: Poudre River open space emphasizing habitat, water quality and river access Provide spur trail connections between the Poudre River Trail and key destinations. Create a pedestrian bridge crossing of the Poudre River east of College Avenue. Develop the trail system on the southwest side of the Poudre River. Continue vegetation and habitat enhancement along the River corridor. Take advantage of educational opportunities afforded by the Poudre River, Sanitary Sewer N View looking north treatment facility and solar garden. 32 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 33 Celebrate the history of Fort Collins’ birthplace through signage and design. Promote building and site design character that respects our agricultural and industrial heritage. Continue to add more residents to the district. Expand mid-block pedestrian network by reinstituting vacated alley and street rights-of-way. College Ave Willow St N View looking east River District Future character: A mix of uses bridging downtown with our agricultural and industrial heritage, while emphasizing connection to the Poudre River Tame Jefferson Street, lowering vehicle speeds and making it more inviting through landscaping and pedestrian improvements. Develop opportunities for artist live/work, fabrication, artist retail within existing buildings on the north side of Jefferson Street. “Welcome to Downtown!” wayfinding. Jefferson intersections with Mountain and Enhance connections to the Poudre River Linden need to be pedestrian friendly. Linden St Jefferson St College Ave Lincoln Ave 34 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 35 Lincoln Corridor Future character: An active, vibrant destination and connection that celebrates the area’s industrial heritage as a model for sustainability Examine the 300 ft. River buffer dimension along Lincoln Corridor and consider higher quality habitat in exchange for buffer reduction. The commercial frontage along Lemay north of Mulberry should respect the site proximity to the River and share design elements found in the Lincoln Corridor. Consider a transit circulator connecting to the corridor to the Historic District. Promote industrial and mixed uses that have activity along Lincoln Avenue. Provide a buffer and transition between higher- intensity industrial uses and the Buckingham neighborhood to lessen impacts. Explore bike path and/or sidewalk construction west of Odell Brewing Company. Lemay Lincoln Mulberry N View looking southwest 36 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 37 North Mason District Future character: A mix of uses emphasizing residential character and compatibility with the adjacent neighborhoods Create an appropriate transition in height, scale and intensity at the edge of the district as it abuts the residential neighborhood. Provide a variety of owner-occupied housing, including townhouses, urban lofts, attached single family houses, along with rental units. Utilize the Streetcar Barn for future community use. Provide incentives and requirements that will result in a range of building heights and design variety. Use the abandoned railroad right-of-way near Mason Street and Cherry Street for bicycle and pedestrian improvements and amenities. Emphasize Howes Street as a low-stress bicycle route and Mason Street as a long-distance bicycle route/pedestrian way. Howes Meldrum Mason Cherry N View looking southeast 38 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 39 Provide more space(s) for open air markets, large events and performing arts. The Civic Center may be too big – bringing civic uses close together would provide more land for private development. Public sector should lead the way in energy innovation and environmental stewardship within this district. Increase programmable space for recreation/ events to bring people in at other times of day/ week. Retain the mid-block “pedestrian spine” between Mason Street and Howes Street throughout the district. Laporte Mountain Oak College Civic District Future character: Fort Collins’ civic heart, which is organized by open space, emphasizes permanence and civic pride, and creates strong connections to the historic downtown Promote mixed-use within Civic buildings to make the area more active. Enhance Howes Street as downtown’s “green boulevard”, incorporating generous landscaping with bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Howes Maple Mason N View looking southwest 40 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 41 Canyon Avenue District Future character: Commercial office/residential uses that provide a sense of permanence, with a mid-century and park-like character Vary massing from building to building to avoid monotony found in some other communities, e.g., Denver’s LoDo and Boulder’s Canyon Blvd. Add building height and density, but “soften” through design. Reimagine Canyon Avenue for other purposes, e.g., festival street (farmer’s market, food trucks, art), downtown circulator street, a hybrid street (circulator by day/festival street at night), or multi-modal street. Use building setbacks and stepbacks to change the perception of density and reduce impacts of taller buildings to maintain the established character of Downtown. Provide opportunities for better parking management, through car and bicycle share programs and electric vehicle charging stations in strategic locations, a district parking structure, and shared parking between residential and office users. Retain the opportunity to protect views and solar access by using building stepbacks for patios, green roofs and rooftop decks. Retain the large canopy trees and green setbacks along streets. Incorporate pocket parks and small natural spaces. Create gateway improvements, including buildings, public art, landscaping, and pedestrian improvements along Mulberry Street, with particular focus on the College, Mason, and Canyon Avenue intersections. Provide better signage and wayfinding within the District to modify circulation and reduce congestion on College Avenue. Canyon Mulberry College Mason Howes Meldrum Whitcomb N View looking northeast 42 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 43 Historic District Keep the area “historically authentic” with new development compatible with the historic character. Future character: The heart of historic downtown with a mix of uses emphasizing community gathering, authenticity and historic integrity Install smaller, more distributed bike racks – with closer access to destinations. Improve signs that promote easier wayfinding to destinations, parking and transportation options. Develop a parking management strategy that promotes parking availability through parking structures and high turnover of on-street parking. Create new and enhanced spaces that allow for an escape from the urban environment, including courtyards, plazas, pocket parks, rooftop patios, and parklets. Continue to support patio culture, but manage encroachments along sidewalks – plantings, bikes/ bike racks, sandwich boards – so that pedestrian movements are not restricted. College Mountain Oak Olive N View looking northeast 44 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 45 Campus North District Future character: A mix of uses supporting campus needs with efficient structures that emphasize connectivity to CSU Celebrate the “hippie, bohemian, college feel” of the area with future design and construction. Promote arts and culture and Nature in the City, including murals, train music, plant murals/green walls and pocket sculpture parks. Support more mixed use development along Mason Street. Implement on-street bicycle lanes along Mason Street. Increase bicycle and car share opportunities. Protect the generous green landscape along College Avenue, respecting the historic green setbacks, broad parkways, and landscape median, except in limited cases near Laurel St where an more urban streetscape is desired. Widen College Avenue sidewalks on the west side of the street to create space for a cycletrack. Maintain 2-3 story building heights along College Ave from Laurel St to Myrtle St, with substantially greater stepbacks above 3 stories. Building heights rise from Myrtle St to Mulberry St. College Mason Mulberry Laurel Howes N View looking northwest 46 The Downtown Plan Phase 2 Summary 47 Entryway Corridor Future character: A scenic residential and commercial movement corridor that references the area’s railroad heritage Within strategic locations, remove access points and construct intersection neckdowns at Riverside that will free up space for landscaping and new sidewalks. Widen/redesign sidewalks on the southwest side of Riverside as redevelopment occurs. Rezone existing residential properties west of Riverside to promote a more residential character. Maximize tree planting and landscaping along the northeast side of Riverside to create an inviting feeling of entry into Downtown. Create a gateway feature through landscape, art, signs, and buildings at the Mulberry/Riverside intersection. Mulberry Riverside N View looking northwest fcgov.com/downtown Old Town Neighborhoods Plan | Vision Vision Structure The Old Town Neighborhoods vision is comprised of four topic areas: Unique, Livable, Connected, and Sustainable, shown below. These topic areas represent the defining physical and cultural elements of the neighborhood, and are supported by value statements that identify specific principles to guide future policies and projects. Combined, the vision statements and values for each topic area describe neighborhood elements to preserve or enhance for the present and future. The goal of the neighborhood vision is to provide the foundation for future neighborhood policies, programs, and projects. Neighborhood Vision The Old Town Neighborhoods are Unique, Livable, Connected, and Sustainable. As mature, established neighborhoods, many of the ideas and opportunities expressed by stakeholders in support of the Old Town Neighborhoods vision emphasize preserving and enhancing the qualities that already make the neighborhoods a great place to live. Developed with the aid of residents, a stakeholder group, City staff, and elected officials, the vision for the Old Town Neighborhoods reflects a collection of values, opportunities, and feelings about the neighborhoods as they exist today and as they are envisioned in the future. The vision also builds upon many of the ideas expressed in the original neighborhood plans developed in the 1980s. While the neighborhoods have evolved and face new challenges and opportunities, the ideas of celebrating their one-of- a-kind elements, enhancing mobility, and promoting neighborhood pride continue. UNIQUE Neighborhood character, history, & design LIVABLE Neighborhood land-use & transitions to downtown/CSU CONNECTED Neighborhood travel & mobility SUSTAINABLE Social, environmental & financial vibrancy POLICIES PROGRAMS PROJECTS 1 ATTACHMENT 2 Old Town Neighborhoods Plan | Vision Unique Diversity of Building Styles Historic Context Compatible Design Single-Family Character Landscaping and Tree Canopy Livable Anticipate and Manage Change Smooth Transitions Neighborhood Identity Social Interaction High Quality of Life Connected Enhanced Arterial Corridors Improved Connectivity Safe Travel Environment Walkability and Bikeability Grid Street Pattern Sustainable Variety of Housing Choices Socioeconomic Diversity Connected Open Space Network Environmental Stewardship Adequate Infrastructure Vision at a Glance Summarized below are the broad neighborhood elements within each topic area. The following pages illustrate these elements and incorporate the neighborhood’s values. 2 Old Town Neighborhoods Plan | Vision Vision Statement: Celebrating and enhancing the qualities that make the neighborhoods unique and that foster “Old Town Charm” Values: • Recognizing and protecting historic resources • Celebrating the eclectic mix and diversity of home sizes, styles, and residents • New construction that is sensitive to the neighborhood character and context • Well-maintained landscaping and tree canopies Unique Diverse home sizes, styles, and unique landscaping 3 Old Town Neighborhoods Plan | Vision Vision Statement: Neighborhoods designed for friendly interactions and a high quality of life Values: • Maintaining the stability of single-family neighborhoods • Compatible buffer areas between the neighborhoods and Downtown / CSU • Front porches, urban gardens, and quiet streets that promote friendly interactions, evening strolls, and neighborhood pride Livable Compatible transitions from downtown to the neighborhoods 4 Old Town Neighborhoods Plan | Vision Vision Statement: Neighborhoods integrated into the community with safe and convenient travel options Values: • Multiple travel options that take advantage of the historic street grid pattern and short neighborhood blocks • Easy-to-cross arterial streets that balance functionality as both commuting corridors and neighborhood streets • Continued enhancement of the neighborhood bicycle and pedestrian networks Connected Safe and convenient travel options to nearby amenities and destinations 5 Old Town Neighborhoods Plan | Vision Vision Statement: Neighborhoods with the resources and knowledge to help maintain and improve their economic, social, and environmental vibrancy Values: • A variety of housing choices to sustain the capability to live in the neighborhoods for all ages, income levels, and family situations • Connected green spaces, urban gardens, and access to nearby natural amenities • Environmental stewardship • Renewed neighborhood infrastructure for the present and future Sustainable Environmental sustainability with urban agriculture, neighborhood greenways, and solar power generation 6 Old Town Neighborhoods Plan | Vision What We Heard... “Preserving the character of these neighborhoods is important in keeping Fort Collins as we know it, but it is also important to allow home owners to express themselves and have the homes of their dreams. In 200 years none of these buildings will be the same and it’s important to design a plan to accommodate for change and to build on existing ideas...” “We have gridded streets which are great for multi- modal transportation. Let’s make that even better.” “I would love to see the bike and walking routes continue to be upgraded until the sidewalks and bike lanes connect citywide.” “Old Town has charm that isn’t found in newer developments. It is interesting, unique, and beautiful with its wide streets and diverse appearance. I love the diverse population of Old Town too.” “Historic properties are what make Old Town unique, but retaining the character of Old Town is more about variety than it is about sameness.” 7 Old Town Neighborhoods Plan | Vision What do you like most about the Old Town Neighborhoods? Summer 2015 Visioning Survey - top responses: Mature Trees & Landscaping Diversity of Home Sizes & Styles Walkable Street Pattern Residents appreciate and value unique and mature landscaping throughout the neighborhood. Tree-lined streets, foliage, and flower gardens add richness through every season. The evolution of the Old Town Neighborhoods has resulted in a diverse mix of architectural styles and home sizes residents recognize as a defining feature of the neighborhoods. Short blocks and close proximity to a variety of destinations like downtown and CSU create a pleasant and convenient walking environment. 8 Zoning Map Neighborhood Conservation - Medium Density Neighborhood Conservation - Low Density Legend 0 500 1000 2000 FEET N CITY OF FORT COLLINS Freight Rail Line City Boundary Neighborhood Boundary Parcel Low Density Residential Neighborhood Conservation - Buffer Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood Community Commercial Public Open Lands Open Space / Park Stream / River / Reservoir Employment General Commercial Downtown NCL NCM NCB CC E LMN RL POL S SHIELDS ST N SHIELDS ST W MULBERRY ST E MULBERRY ST LAUREL SCHOOL WHITCOMB STREET SHEELY DRIVE OLD TOWN SC CHOOL C H OO O OL L BBB MAX MAX 1 RY 3 3 3 Framework Development: Combined December Workshop & Online Questionnaire Summary LMN POCKETS Background: Potential changes to Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood (LMN) zoning in the Westside Neighborhood to reduce zoning enclaves which permit non-residential land-uses. Option: Consider rezoning some of the LMN pockets to either Neighborhood Conservation, Low Density (NCL) or Neighborhood Conservation, Medium Density (NCM) in the interior of the neighborhood, while leaving LMN zoning along edges or major intersections where non-residential uses currently exist. Comments & Feedback: LMN is more flexible than other zoning for affordable housing; reducing LMN eliminates choices for housing types LMN makes more sense along neighborhood edges Worried certain non-residential land-uses like office can be placed in LMN pockets Preserve zoning for Beaver’s Market Alternative option: work to reduce non-conforming uses over time TRANSITION AREAS Background: Prior feedback indicated the existing, permitted land-uses in the transition areas such as the Neighborhood Conservation Buffer (NCB) zone district were appropriate, but better design could help improve the interface between downtown and the neighborhoods. Option: Explore adding design standards for the NCB zone for new or redeveloping sites. Comments & Feedback: NCB areas should be treated individually Worried about rent-by-the-bedroom projects Design standards okay - but they should be less restrictive than NCL/NCM given the nature of the area as a buffer Creates another burden on home development = higher prices Adequate parking needed in transition areas I like this I sort of like this I feel neutral I don’t like this I need more info 33.3% 23.3% 15.0% 5.0% 23.3% I like this I sort of like this I feel neutral I don’t like this I need more info 42.6% 27.9% 5.9% 12.0% 11.6% The following information summarizes impressions and comments from neighborhood stakeholders on specific proposals for land-use or transportation changes in the Old Town Neighborhoods. The data is combined from feedback at a December workshop and an online questionnaire. Although the survey and data collected is not scientific, it will be used to help understand how neighbors feel about the specific transportation and land-use options presented. ATTACHMENT 4 Framework Development: Combined December Workshop & Online Questionnaire Summary TRANSITION AREAS - SITE DESIGN ELEMENTS Background: If potential design standards are utilized in the transition areas between downtown and the neighborhoods, which site or building design elements are critical to compatibility? Comments & Feedback: Ensure adequate parking for new projects More landscaping needed for non-residential uses (leafy neighborhood look & feel) Height is important to protect access to winter sun New standards need to leave enough room for creativity Encourage reuse of existing buildings NEIGHBORHOOD GREENWAYS Background: Improving pedestrian & bicycle mobility in the neighborhoods has been a high priority for project stakeholders, as well as finding ways to incorporate more sustainable features and practices into the neighborhoods. Option: Create a network of neighborhood greenways linking the neighborhoods together and with the rest of the community. Elements could include striped bike lanes, wayfinding, unique landscaping or sustainability features such as bio-swales. The greenway network would likely correspond to routes identified in the draft Bicycle Wayfinding Plan. Comments & Feedback: East-west routes are important for connectivity, as is a north- south route in the Westside Neighborhood Need intersection treatments at arterial intersections Should consider maintenance needs of enhanced landscaping or drainage elements If wayfinding is added, try to fit the character of the neighborhoods Other: land use, upper floor stepbacks, building materials, roof form Top Selections: Landscape setbacks Size (floor area) Massing & proportion Building height Ground floor character Other 16.4% 15.8% 10.2% 19.8% 11.9% 26.0% I like this I sort of like this I feel neutral I don’t like this 65.8% I need more info 17.7% 5.1% 2.5% 8.9% Framework Development: Combined December Workshop & Online Questionnaire Summary ARTERIAL CORRIDORS - MULBERRY STREET Background: Strong interest in exploring ways to improve bike and pedestrian infrastructure along arterial corridors while also maintaining the streets as important commuting corridors. Long-term goals require more capital and right-of-way acquisition -- what opportunities and strategies exist to improve travel for all modes in a shorter time-frame? Option: Utilizing existing right-of-way, explore a 4-lane to 3-lane conversion on Mulberry west of City Park Avenue with a new center turn lane, buffered bike lanes, and future sidewalk expansion. East of City Park, utilize Magnolia as a neighborhood greenway for enhanced bike and pedestrian travel with a potential en- hanced crossing at Shields Street. I like this I sort of like this I feel neutral I don’t like this I need more info Comments & Feedback: Could be parking conflicts along Magnolia Street Turn lanes and center turn lanes would improve safety Would like enhanced bus service along Mulberry High-speed roads may never capture certain segments of cyclists and pedestrians; less comfortable and feels unsafe Safe & convenient crossings are crucial to making Magnolia work Worried about impacts to traffic/delays; street seems to be working fine as-is. 56.3% 21.9% 7.8% 4.7% 9.4% ARTERIAL CORRIDORS - SHIELDS STREET Background: Strong interest in exploring ways to improve bike and pedestrian infrastructure along arterial corridors while also maintaining the streets as important commuting corridors. Long-term goals require more capital and right-of-way acquisition -- what opportunities and strategies exist to improve travel for all modes in a shorter time-frame? Option: Utilizing existing right-of-way, explore a 4-lane to 3-lane conversion on Shields Street north of Mag- nolia Street and reduced vehicle lane widths. Changes would create a new center turn lane for vehicles, buffered bike lanes, and eventual sidewalk widening. South of Mulberry, decrease vehicle lane widths to con- struct an 8-foot shared bike/pedestrian pathway where the sidewalk currently exists. I like this I sort of like this I feel neutral I don’t like this I need more info Comments & Feedback: Center turn lane will help prevent backed-up traffic in the middle lanes as they presently exist More concerns about reducing vehicles along segments of Shields than along West Mulberry due to traffic volume Shared bike/ped path south of Laurel doesn’t seem wide enough for both users; difficulty enforcing one-way for bikes Shields still seems inadequate for bikes, but it’s the only true north-south route in this part of the neighborhoods Proposed changes still don’t solve the issue of snow build- up in winter 42.4% 25.8% 12.1% 9.1% MULBERRY STREET Segment 1 dĂŌ,ŝůůZĚƚŽŝƚLJWĂƌŬǀĞ Segment 2 ŝƚLJWĂƌŬǀĞƚŽ tŚŝƚĐŽŵď^ƚ Segment 3 tŚŝƚĐŽŵď^ƚƚŽ ZŝǀĞƌƐŝĚĞǀĞ SHIELDS STREET Segment 1 >ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƚŽDĂŐŶŽůŝĂ^ƚ Segment 2 DĂŐŶŽůŝĂ^ƚƚŽ>ĂƉŽƌƚĞǀĞ Segment 3 >ĂƉŽƌƚĞǀĞƚŽsŝŶĞƌ dŚĞKůĚdŽǁŶEĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐWůĂŶŝƐƐƚƵĚLJŝŶŐĐŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐĂŶĚŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐĂůŽŶŐ ƚŚĞDƵůďĞƌƌLJΘ^ŚŝĞůĚƐĂƌƚĞƌŝĂůĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƐ͘dŚĞƌĞŚĂƐďĞĞŶƐƚƌŽŶŐŝŶƚĞƌĞƐƚŝŶĞdžƉůŽƌŝŶŐ ƐŚŽƌƚĂŶĚŵĞĚŝƵŵͲƚĞƌŵŽƉƟŽŶƐƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞďŝĐLJĐůĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĂŶĚƐĂĨĞƚLJǁŚŝůĞŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐƚƌĂǀĞůĨŽƌǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐ͘WŽƚĞŶƟĂůŽƉƟŽŶƐĨŽƌĞĂĐŚĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌ ƵƟůŝnjŝŶŐƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂLJĂƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƉĂŐĞƐ͘ 1 2 3 1 2 3 Shields / Mulberry dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶΘDŽďŝůŝƚLJKƉƟŽŶƐ ATTACHMENT 5 DƵůďĞƌƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͗WŽƚĞŶƟĂůKƉƟŽŶƐďLJ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚϭ͗dĂŌ,ŝůůZŽĂĚƚŽŝƚLJWĂƌŬǀĞŶƵĞ ͲdžƉůŽƌĞƐƚƌŝƉŝŶŐĐŽŶǀĞƌƐŝŽŶĨƌŽŵĨŽƵƌǀĞŚŝĐůĞƚƌĂǀĞůůĂŶĞƐƚŽ ƚǁŽǀĞŚŝĐůĞƚƌĂǀĞůůĂŶĞƐĂŶĚĐĞŶƚĞƌƚƵƌŶůĂŶĞ ͲĚĚďƵīĞƌĞĚďŝŬĞůĂŶĞƐ Ͳ^ŝĚĞǁĂůŬǁŝĚĞŶŝŶŐΘƉŽƚĞŶƟĂůĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐĞŶŚĂŶĐĞŵĞŶƚƐ ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚƐϮΘϯ͗ŝƚLJWĂƌŬǀĞŶƵĞƚŽZŝǀĞƌƐŝĚĞǀĞŶƵĞ Ͳ&ŽƵƌǀĞŚŝĐůĞƚƌĂǀĞůůĂŶĞƐƌĞŵĂŝŶ ͲdžĂŵŝŶĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬǁŝĚĞŶŝŶŐΘĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐĞŶŚĂŶĐĞŵĞŶƚƐ Ͳ/ŶƐƚĂůůŵŝƐƐŝŶŐƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐĞŐŵĞŶƚƐ;ŶĞĂƌZŝǀĞƌƐŝĚĞǀĞͿ ͲhƟůŝnjĞDĂŐŶŽůŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚĂƐƉĂƌĂůůĞůƌŽƵƚĞĨŽƌďŝŬĞƐ DĂŐŶŽůŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĂƌĂůůĞůZŽƵƚĞ ͲŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂĚŽƉƟŶŐŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚŐƌĞĞŶǁĂLJĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͗ ͲdǁŽǀĞŚŝĐůĞƚƌĂǀĞůůĂŶĞƐΘƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƌĞŵĂŝŶ ͲĚĚďƵīĞƌĞĚŽƌĚŽƵďůĞͲďƵīĞƌĞĚďŝŬĞůĂŶĞƐ ͲZĞǀŝĞǁŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƟŽŶŵĂŶŐĞŵĞŶƚͬŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƟŽŶĐĂůŵŝŶŐ ͲdžƉůŽƌĞĞŶŚĂŶĐĞĚĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐĂƚ^ŚŝĞůĚƐ^ƚƌĞĞƚ ^ŚŝĞůĚƐ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͗WŽƚĞŶƟĂůKƉƟŽŶƐďLJ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚϭ͗>ĂƵƌĞů^ƚƌĞĞƚƚŽDĂŐŶŽůŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚ Ͳ&ŽƵƌǀĞŚŝĐůĞƚƌĂǀĞůůĂŶĞƐƌĞŵĂŝŶ ͲZĞĚƵĐĞǀĞŚŝĐůĞůĂŶĞǁŝĚƚŚƐ ͲtŝĚĞŶƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐƚŽϴͲĨĞĞƚ Ͳ^ŚĂƌĞĚŽŶĞͲǁĂLJďŝŬĞͬƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƉĂƚŚǁĂLJƐ ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚϮ͗DĂŐŶŽůŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚƚŽ>ĂƉŽƌƚĞǀĞŶƵĞ ͲdžƉůŽƌĞƐƚƌŝƉŝŶŐĐŽŶǀĞƌƐŝŽŶĨƌŽŵĨŽƵƌǀĞŚŝĐůĞƚƌĂǀĞůůĂŶĞƐƚŽ ƚǁŽǀĞŚŝĐůĞƚƌĂǀĞůůĂŶĞƐĂŶĚĐĞŶƚĞƌƚƵƌŶůĂŶĞ ͲĚĚďƵīĞƌĞĚďŝŬĞůĂŶĞƐ Ͳ^ŝĚĞǁĂůŬǁŝĚĞŶŝŶŐ ͲŶŚĂŶĐĞĚĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐĂƚ^ŚŝĞůĚƐͬDĂŐŶŽůŝĂŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƟŽŶ ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚϯ͗>ĂƉŽƌƚĞǀĞŶƵĞƚŽsŝŶĞƌŝǀĞ ͲdǁŽǀĞŚŝĐůĞƚƌĂǀĞůůĂŶĞƐƌĞŵĂŝŶ ͲĚĚďƵīĞƌĞĚďŝŬĞůĂŶĞƐ Ͳ^ŝĚĞǁĂůŬǁŝĚĞŶŝŶŐ ͲdžƉůŽƌĞŽŶͲƐƚƌĞĞƚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĐŽŶĮŐƵƌĂƟŽŶ ATTACHMENT 6 Old Town Planning Projects Downtown Plan Old Town Neighborhoods Plan March 10, 2016 ATTACHMENT 7 The Fort Collins Downtown Plan General direction sought and specific questions to be answered: • Given the work to date, are there additional issues that should be addressed? • Is there additional public engagement needed? Plan Boundary Plan Boundaries Timeline Community Engagement Downtown Plan has engaged thousands! Public Events (NewWestFest, Brewers Fest…) Downtown Plan Events (open houses, workshops, focus groups, charrettes…) Community Groups (DDA, DBA…) City Boards and Commissions (P&Z, PAB…) Media (online and text questionnaires, Ch 14…) PHASE 3 Choices and Strategies Vision ‐ What Downtown looks like in 2035 Goals ‐ Topic‐specific goals that support the vision Strategies – Ways to accomplish the goals Topic Areas / Working Groups ARTS AND CULTURE Big Idea –Create a centralized resource for creatives. Question – What should the City’s role be in the support of arts and culture? Response –City should provide space, staff, and support other organizations. DOWNTOWN MANAGEMENT Big Idea – Expand pedestrian enhancements and maintenance to keep up with growth. Question – What areas and enhancements should the plan address? Response – Top 5 areas of consideration are Canyon Ave., museum connections, Jefferson St., Linden St. (river to Vine), and non‐enhanced alleys. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Big Idea –Implement Climate Action Plan (CAP) strategies in downtown. Question –Which CAP priorities are most important to emphasize in the downtown area? Response –Energy efficient retrofits, green building, rooftop solar, recycling and composting, and increased transportation options. MARKET AND ECONOMY Big Idea –As downtown continues to grow, ensure that new development helps achieve community goals. Question –Which community goals are most important to encourage in downtown development? Response –(Workshop on March 2) URBAN DESIGN Big Idea –Create new design standards for buildings and streets that result in desired character and predictability. Question –Long‐standing policies call for greater density, and building height downtown. How should this vision be realized? Response –(Workshop on March 2) TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING Big Idea –Create a strategic approach to bike parking management. Question –Where should additional bike parking be located? Response –Use on‐street parking spaces, alleys, and parking garages to avoid crowding pedestrian areas; consider functional bike racks that are artistic. Project Overview 16 Old Town Neighborhoods Plan • Combined update of the East Side & West Side Neighborhood Plans • Explore emerging trends, issues, opportunities • Update neighborhood vision/policies • Study Shields & Mulberry arterial corridors Study Area & Timeline 17 Phase 1: Existing Conditions Phase 2: Visioning Phase 3: Plan Framework Phase 4: Policies & Strategies (Spring 2016) Phase 5: Implementation & Adoption (Summer 2016) We Are Here Neighborhood Vision 18 UNIQUE ‐ Celebrating and enhancing the qualities that make the neighborhoods unique and that foster “Old Town Charm” LIVABLE – Neighborhoods designed for friendly interactions and a high quality of life Neighborhood Vision 19 CONNECTED – Neighborhoods integrated into the community with safe and convenient travel options SUSTAINABLE – Neighborhoods with the resources and knowledge to help maintain and improve their economic, social, and environmental vibrancy 20 21 Land Use Designations Westside Neighborhood: • Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood (LMN) zoning pockets • Explore LMN land use designation & consistency with adjacent zoning 22 Land Use Designations Workshop & Online Questionnaire Feedback Potential Option: • Evaluate LMN pockets individually for neighborhood conservation zoning • LMN zoning may be appropriate along neighborhood edges or located at active intersections 23 Neighborhood Greenways Neighborhood Greenways: • Low-volume streets with enhanced bike, pedestrian, and streetscape amenities • Ex: Remington Greenway • Spectrum of potential greenway elements Residential bike lanes Curb extensions Signage / Wayfinding Stormwater enhancement Potential Greenway Elements: 24 Neighborhood Greenways Workshop & Online Questionnaire Feedback Potential Option: • Establish ~4 neighborhood greenway routes • Build upon routes identified in the Bicycle Master Plan & Bicycle Wayfinding Master Plan 25 Shields & Mulberry Corridors Arterial Corridors: • Study existing conditions, opportunities, constraints • Interest in enhancing conditions for bikes & pedestrians • What are potential options using the existing right-of- way? 26 Mulberry Street Taft Hill Rd to City Park Ave Magnolia St Parallel Route 27 Mulberry Street & Magnolia Street Workshop & Online Questionnaire Feedback 28 Shields Street Laurel St to Magnolia St • 4 vehicle travel lanes remain • Explore vehicle lane width reductions • Move cubs in & widen sidewalks • Shared one-way bike & pedestrian path Magnolia St to Vine Dr • 4-lane to 3-lane with center turn lane (Magnolia to Laporte) • Add buffered bike lanes • Explore on-street parking configuration (north of Laporte) 29 Shields Street Workshop & Online Questionnaire Feedback Next Steps 30 Spring: • Develop policies & strategies • Continue stakeholder group and Boards & Commissions outreach • Public Event: March 29 Summer: • Develop implementation program • Finalize Design Guidelines • Draft plan document • Board & Commissions recommendations General direction sought and specific questions to be answered: • Given the work to date, are there additional issues that should be addressed? • Is there additional public engagement needed? Thank you 10.6% 4 4 5 5 2 1 W ELIZABETH ST W LAKE ST CONSTITUTION AVE W PLUM ST S TAFT HILL RD N TAFT HILL RD LAPORTE AVE W VINE DR CHERRY ST E MOUNTAIN AVE RIVERSIDE AVE VINE DR BUCKINGHAM ST E LINCOLN AVE LINDEN ST WILLOW ST JEFFERSON ST WALNUT ST S HOWES ST N HOWES ST S LOOMIS AVE S COLLEGE AVE N COLLEGE AVE S LEMAY AVE N LEMAY AVE S MASON ST N MASON ST REMINGTON ST STOVER ST W LAKE ST E LAUREL ST E ELIZABETH ST E PITKIN ST E PROSPECT RD W PROSPECT RD W MOUNTAIN AVE Lee Martinez Park Udall Natural Area Old Fort Collins Heritage Park Natural Area City Park Legacy Park Sheldon Lake Cache la Poudre River Cache la Poudre River Eastside Park DOWNTOWN COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY EASTSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD WESTSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD University Village Complex Discovery Museum City Park Pool University Center For The Arts At CSU Public Library Lincoln Center Mulberry Pool 287 287 14 14 Dunn Elementary Putnam Elementary Fullana Elementary Centennial High School Laurel Elementary Harris Bilingual Immersion Lesher Middle School Barton Early Childhood Center The Lab School St. Joseph’s Catholic School Prioritized Bike Routes1 Greenways Gateways Max Transit Line 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 MILES N 1. Routes taken from the Fort Collins Bicycle System Wayfinding Plan 2. Locations taken from Colorado Tree Coalition’s Noteable Tree Tour in Fort Collins Plan Framework Areas of Preservation and Enhancement Arterial Streets Parks & Open Space Buffer Transition Downtown Master Plan Boundary LMN Land Use Legend EXISTING ELEMENTS FUTURE ELEMENTS Neighborhood Boundary City Boundary Trails Roadway Building Steams, Rivers, Lakes Designated Land Use Change Historic Districts Employment Land Use Noteable Trees22 Trees Greenway Designations Key Projects Shields Corridor Improvements Mulberry Corridor Improvements Buffer Transition Area Future Land Use Changes 1 2 3 4 5 ATTACHMENT 3 increases, the question arises: How can new, larger buildings not only be compatible with the existing context, but become valuable assets? In phase 1 &2 of the Downtown Plan community members expressed concern about future development’s impact on the downtown, especially on historic resources. The development community also expressed the need to clarify the Code requirements regarding what is plausible to build. Look for outreach in early 2016 specifically tailored to building and site design. Now is the time to revisit the conversation about urban form and compatibility in the downtown. To the right: Maximum current building height allowance in the downtown area, as well as Code sections that relate to development in different districts. This graphic was used at the Character District Design Charrette Maximum Building Heights 4 3 5 1 1 1 2 2 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 What’s Next? Phase 3 is underway! All of the strategies developed in phase 2 are being further analyzed and refined. Keep an eye out for outreach events in early 2016 aimed at choosing which strategies will best fulfill the vision and goals. Missoula Eugene Fort Collins Sioux Falls Key Issues: Throughout multiple stakeholder conversations and planning efforts, the following key issues were identified: Perceived lack of adequate parking turnover and accessibility. Concern about potential neighborhood impacts due to the increased pace of development. Need for better communication about parking locations and availability. Desire to move away from a punitive, enforcement-driven funding model. Objectives: Increase the availability, ease of access to and turnover of on-street parking. Develop a parking management system that is supportive of businesses, neighborhoods, and visitors. Provide and communicate a variety of options for parking and for traveling to and around Downtown. Encourage the use of alternate modes of transportation to reduce parking demand. Identify a sustainable funding source for future access and transportation infrastructure investment. Additional Strategies to be Considered with On-Street & Garage Parking: Expand Enforcement • To evenings and weekends Manage Employee Parking • Options / incentives to move employees off-street. Residential Parking Permit Program • Reduce spillover impact on neighborhoods. Enhanced Communication, Education and Wayfinding • Help customers find parking quickly and easily. Alternative Funding Options • Parking district • Impact fee Transportation Circulation Options • Circulator shuttle • Bike share Increase Supply • Parking garages • Surface lots Park & Ride • MAX L o n g - T e r m S h o r t - T e r m L e n g t h O f S t a y On-Street Garage One-Stop Shop Quick Lunch Shopping Around Long Dinner Employees The “spectrum of options” for parking management (above) shows different management methods that can be combined to create a balanced parking plan. Research was done on peer cities to examine the pros and cons of different management methods. Downtown Parking Community Dialogue The Downtown Parking Community Dialogue is a separate but integrally related public outreach project that is fully coordinated and aligned with the Downtown Plan. It is a continued dialogue that builds on the policies of the Parking Plan: Downtown and Surrounding Neighborhoods. Parking access and turn-over in downtown has been identified as an issue for the Market + Economy and Transportation + Parking topic areas. The following information has been used for discussions regarding choices and strategies with the public and downtown stakeholders. The Downtown Parking Community Dialogue is anticipated to bring recommendations to the Parking Advisory Board, the Planning and Zoning Board, and City Council in Spring 2016. 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 What’s Next? Phase 3 is underway! All of the strategies developed in phase 2 are being further analyzed and refined. Keep an eye out for outreach events in early 2016 aimed at choosing which strategies will best fulfill the vision and goals. 2 2 2 2 4 4 3 3 5 5 5 5 What’s Next? Phase 3 is underway! All of the strategies developed in phase 2 are being further analyzed and refined. Keep an eye out for outreach events in early 2016 aimed at choosing which strategies will best fulfill the vision and goals. Develop the civic center complex as a model “green district” to demonstrate innovation in energy efficiency, sustainability, and stewardship. Identify opportunities to implement the Nature in the City Strategic Plan in the downtown area. Coordinate with long-range utility and stormwater management plans to implement specific projects that will improve the function of downtown’s stormwater system. 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 What’s Next? Phase 3 is underway! All of the strategies developed in phase 2 are being further analyzed and refined. Keep an eye out for outreach events in early 2016 aimed at choosing which strategies will best fulfill the vision and goals. 1 1 2 6 2 4 6 4 4 3 3 3 5 5 What’s Next? Phase 3 is underway! All of the strategies developed in phase 2 are being further analyzed and refined. Keep an eye out for outreach events in early 2016 aimed at choosing which strategies will best fulfill the vision and goals. 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 To organize the Downtown Plan, six key topic areas were identified. An overarching vision statement was established for each topic area (above) during phase 2. Each statement is supported by 5-6 goals. The goals are followed by suggested strategies to be further refined in phase 3. • The active core of the city, with multiple transportation options that can be easily, comfortably, and safely navigated by all users • An authentic urban setting where a commitment to historic preservation blends seamlessly with high- quality new development and architecture • A distinctive regional destination for arts and culture, one-of-a-kind retail and entertainment options, and exceptional architecture in a charming, historic setting • A center for innovative approaches to social, economic, and environmental sustainability that is driven by a creative, collaborative start-up culture • An inviting, friendly place for people of all ages and backgrounds to live,socialize, recreate, and conduct business Outreach The outreach strategy for phase 2 utilized a broad range of public engagement approaches and techniques including public events, small- group meetings, online and mobile engagement, participation in community events, and broadcast notification and outreach. A series of downtown walking tours helped attendees explore the downtown Character Districts, while attendance at weekend festivals like Bohemian Nights at NewWestFest and the Colorado Brewer’s Festival allowed the Downtown Plan team to interact with a broad cross-section of residents and visitors. Over 700 people contributed input through an online Visioning Survey (over 400 completed the survey). Thousands more people shared their thoughts and visions at public events throughout the summer. Translation services for Spanish and other languages were available on an as-needed basis. Surveys and Public Feedback An online survey was conducted during July and August 2015 to collect community visions and preferences for the future of downtown. The survey covered six different topic areas and asked respondents to rank a list of goals and share their visions for each topic area. The survey also included several visual assessment questions that provided respondents an opportunity to select pictures that best represented their preferences. The visual assessment questions included in the online survey were excerpts from a visual assessment administered at the New Vision for Downtown event on July 13, 2015. An additional parking survey was conducted at Bohemian Nights at NewWestFest (August 14-15, 2015) and Open Streets (September 20, 2015) to explore community preferences about downtown parking. Both the Downtown Plan Visioning Survey and the parking survey included opportunities for respondents to provide open-ended comments. Comments were also collected at public events throughout phase 2 of the Downtown Plan. Hundreds of comments were recorded and synthesized, and this synthesis supplemented formal survey results to inform development of a new downtown vision. Selected results from the surveys and visual assessment polling are presented in each of the following sections. A full compilation of survey results (including open-ended comments) from phase 2 can be downloaded from the Downtown Plan website at fcgov.com/downtown. Surveys conducted in phase 2: • Downtown Plan Visioning Survey (701 respondents) • Parking survey (51 respondents) • Visual Assessment Keypad Polling (117 respondents) • Text message survey (44 respondents) Stakeholder Engagement Public Events Broadcast Outreach Online & Mobile Activities Square Canyon Ave Linden St Vine Dr Lincoln Ave N CSU