Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - AGENDA ITEM - 11/06/2012 - FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 125, 2012 AMENDINGDATE: November 6, 2012 STAFF: Jon Haukaas, Ken Sampley Mark Kempton AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL 20 SUBJECT First Reading of Ordinance No. 125, 2012 Amending Section 26-543 of the City Code to Update the Stormwater Master Drainage Plans to Include Basin-Specific Water Quality Best Management Practices and Stream Restoration. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Fort Collins’ Stormwater Master Plan has been updated to include stormwater quality and stream restoration projects, alongside the already identified stormwater flood control projects. The Master Plan update utilizes results and information obtained from the Stormwater Utility Repurposing program in conjunction with basin and stream specific recommendations obtained from the following two program efforts: A. Basin-Specific Stormwater Quality Best Management Practices (BMP) Selected Plans; and, B. Stream Restoration and Stability Study and Prioritization with the Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Tool. The BMP Selected Plans include recommendations for the treatment of stormwater within portions of the City that developed prior to the adoption of stormwater quality criteria. The majority of the BMP projects include the retrofit of existing stormwater detention ponds to include water quality treatment facilities. Funding for the construction of the identified BMP and stream restoration projects will be drawn from existing stormwater fees. This funding request is included in the current 2013/2014 Budgeting for Outcomes (BFO) process for Environmental Health. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The City of Fort Collins updated the Stormwater Master Plans and 100-Year event Floodplain Maps for each of the City’s thirteen (13) drainage basins after the devastating 1997 flood. The Stormwater Drainage Basin Master Plan (a combination of separately completed master plans for all 13 drainage basins), approved by City Council in June 2004, describes the flooding history of each basin, identifies potential problem areas and recommends improvements. The Master Plan: • Recommends cost-effective projects to remove properties from floodplains, reduce risk and reduce street flooding; • Offers guidance for new development in the basins; • Identifies approaches to enhance riparian habitat along stream corridors and improve water quality; and, • Offers broad guidance to stabilize streams where necessary. In 2008, Council directed staff to review the purpose and components of the City’s Stormwater Program. Staff organized the Stormwater Utility Repurposing program review into 14 major components as outlined below: A. Stormwater Purpose Statement B. Best Management Practices (BMP) Policy Update C. Stormwater Criteria Update D. Detention Pond Construction / Landscape Guidelines E. Stormwater Quality GIS Coverage F. Low Impact Development (LID) Demonstration Projects G. LID Policy Review H. Stormwater Quality Sampling Review I. City-Owned BMP Review J. Home Owners Association (HOA) Assistance Program K. Level of Protection Policy L. Rates M. Floodplain Regulations N. Urban Stream Health Assessment November 6, 2012 -2- ITEM 20 Information and results from these major components were utilized to update the Stormwater Master Plans to address storm water quality considerations and to include stream restoration and stability projects that will protect the City’s urban watersheds, and preserve the natural and beneficial functions of floodplains. The purpose of the Master Plan Update is not to re-evaluate the previously-identified flood control capital improvement projects; but, to identify areas where storm water quality and stream improvements are necessary and identify where they may be incorporated into existing or future flood-control projects. Studies and Results 1. Basin-Specific Stormwater Quality BMP Selected Plans In 2011, the Utilities Stormwater Division contracted with three local engineering consultants to prepare basin-specific water quality Best Management Practices (BMP) selected plans for ten of the City’s master drainage basins: Spring Creek Dry Creek Fox Meadows Old Town Mail Creek Canal Importation Fossil Creek West Vine Foothills McClelland’s Creek Boxelder Creek and Cooper Slough were preliminarily evaluated, then removed from further analysis since the majority of these basins are currently undeveloped; they exceed the goal of at least 40% of undeveloped/BMP coverage land. Future development within the two basins will be required to install water quality BMP facilities in accordance with City stormwater criteria. The 40% coverage goal was obtained from the Urban Stream Health Assessment study, performed by CSU in 2010. In all basins, the stormwater quality BMPs were analyzed and sited to meet or exceed the recommended 40% coverage goal. In order to complete the basin-specific BMP selected plans, the following work was performed: • Hydrologic model updates (to include significant urban development since 2002) • Hydrologic sensitivity analyses • Conceptual water quality BMPs • Alternative analysis of BMPs • Triple Bottom Line (TBL) analysis of the BMP alternatives • Draft Selected Plans • Public outreach process • Stream Restoration MCDA Prioritization • Final Selected Plan. Exhibits of the proposed stormwater quality BMP improvements for each of the ten drainage basins are included as Attachment 1. A map for the Boxelder Creek/Cooper Slough basin is also included to display the proposed stream restoration reaches within the basin. The majority of the BMP improvements consist of retrofitting existing stormwater detention ponds to include water quality treatment. Other BMPs include in-pipe mechanical BMPs, and irrigation ditch relocations. Typical pond retrofits include adding new water quality outlets to existing ponds; excavating the sides of existing ponds to achieve additional water quality volume; moving, replanting, or planting new trees; along with close coordination with neighboring properties. 2. Stream Restoration/Stability Study and Prioritization of Stream Restoration Projects In 2011, a study conducted by Colorado State University, on behalf of the Fort Collins Stormwater Division, was authorized to help prioritize future stream management and rehabilitation work within the City. Assessments (including field work) were completed between June and October of 2011. The study built upon work completed previously in the Urban Stream Health Assessment Study and specifically investigated the following ten stream sections within the city limits of Fort Collins: November 6, 2012 -3- ITEM 20 Burns Tributary Clearview Channel Foothills Creek Fossil Creek Langs Gulch Mail Creek McClellands Creek Spring Creek Stanton Creek Boxelder Creek (downstream of Vine Drive) The study provided detailed habitat, susceptibility, and baseline geomorphic data for roughly 17 miles of channels across ten streams. The objectives of the study were to: • Perform a geomorphic assessment on a segment-by-segment basis of the ten streams listed above to determine channel evolution stage, channel susceptibility to vertical and lateral erosion, and stream habitat condition; • Use the resulting data to identify geomorphic thresholds that sustain meandering channels and other heterogeneous physical habitats and use this information to assess candidate restoration reaches; and, • Identify and prioritize future stream management and rehabilitation work through the development of a Multi- Criterion Decision Analysis (MCDA) matrix that can be used to select projects that simultaneously improve habitat, reduce susceptibility, and provide the geomorphic conditions that sustain diverse and stable channels. - Issues identified within the study include obstacles to fish passage caused by irrigation diversion structures, dams, and rock grade control structures, which are usually in place to protect existing infrastructure. Other identified issues include severe bank erosion which contributes to poor water quality, unsafe areas for the public, threats to infrastructure such as sewer lines, and the loss of property to the stream. Irrigation flows conveyed through the many of the City’s streams contribute to the bank erosion through sustained, unvarying flows. These irrigation flows also affect the frequency of flows in the streams, negatively affecting aquatic and riparian habitats. 2a. Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Tool Prioritization of Stream Restoration Projects and associated BMP Installations A MCDA framework for prioritizing stream rehabilitation projects was completed to target areas where the greatest opportunities exist for simultaneously improving habitat and connectivity while stabilizing high-risk, erosion-susceptible reaches. The four major criteria for MCDA scoring were: • Environmental Benefit • Economics • Social Value • Erosion Potential Based upon Triple Bottom Line (TBL) principles, all criteria were given equal weight within the MCDA tool. The MCDA sub-criteria, weights, and reach scores were developed by a multi-discipline team consisting of staff from several City Departments including Utilities, Natural Areas, Environmental Sustainability, and Environmental Planning. A member of the public, representing the Natural Resources Advisory Board also participated in the MCDA tool completion process. The completed MCDA Tool is included as Attachment 2 to this AIS. The stream prioritization results also include the tributary stormwater BMPs that link to the appropriate downstream stream restoration reach. The goal of the stream restoration projects is to restore the City’s streams to a natural state, or as natural state as possible, given the constraints of the urban setting in which they occur. The restoration will be achieved by stopping and repairing stream bank erosion, removing obstacles to fish passage such as grade controls, ensuring good stormwater quality, re-vegetating stream banks, and promoting good stream and watershed management practices. Future stream restoration and stormwater quality BMPs will be implemented according to the project ranking within the finalized MCDA Tool. Projects will be analyzed and designed using the same multi-disciplinary approach utilized in the completion of the MCDA Tool, with input from affected property owners being a crucial part of the design, construction, and maintenance of several of the stream restoration and BMP projects. November 6, 2012 -4- ITEM 20 FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS Based upon input from Council at the April 24, 2012 Work Session, a percentage of current stormwater fees will be used to fund the completion of the identified stormwater quality BMP and stream restoration projects. Beginning in 2013, Stormwater Capital Improvement Project (CIP) funding will be allocated into separate sub-categories in accordance with the following percentages (dollar amounts to be rounded): • 16% Stream restoration and stormwater quality BMPs • 20% Opportunity fund to address unforeseen projects such as development related storm sewers, or cash matches with government entities (i.e. West Vine Basin Stormwater Improvements with Larimer County) • 64% Flood control capital improvement projects (previously 100% of funds) Accordingly, to achieve the goals of the Stormwater Master Plan, Fort Collins Utilities has submitted a $650,000 per year Budgeting for Outcomes (BFO) offer for stream restoration/stormwater quality in the 2013/2014 budget process. It should be noted that there is no proposed increase in stormwater fees to construct these additional projects. Staff will continue to investigate additional funding sources such as the utilization of the Natural Resources Department Stream Rehabilitation Funds identified in the 2010 Keep Fort Collins Great Sales Tax package ($250,000 per year); applying for various grant programs such as the Colorado Healthy Rivers Grant Fund, or the EPA Small Watershed Grant Program. Estimated ranges of project costs* for stream restoration and stormwater quality BMPs in the City’s streams and basins are as follows: Boxelder Creek (Stream only) $1,117,800 to $2,353,500 Canal Importation Basin (Stream and BMP) $1,586,000 to $1,816,000 Dry Creek Basin (Stream and BMP) $2,976,900 to $5,111,900 Foothills Creek Basin (Stream and BMP) $2,922,000 to $3,777,000 Fossil Creek Basin (Stream and BMP) $20,605,800 to $26,153,500 Fox Meadows Basin (BMP only) $808,200 Mail Creek (Stream and BMP) $4,837,200 McClellands Creek Basin (Stream and BMP) $5,380,400 to $9,679,900 Old Town Basin (BMP only) $1,539,100 Spring Creek Basin (Stream and BMP) $7,648,700 to $10,157,600 West Vine Basin (Stream and BMP) $2,835,300 to $4,144,700 Total costs range from: $52,257,400 to $70,378,500 * Upper cost ranges are based upon a per linear foot construction cost. Cost ranges are presented due to the fact that not all stream restoration work requires capital construction. Several stream reaches may be rehabilitated through minor construction and watershed/vegetation management. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The health of the City’s physical environment will be positively affected as a result of the Master Plan Update. Water quality throughout the City will be greatly improved, while several of the eroding banks within the City’s waterways will be repaired and stabilized. Wildlife habitat will be improved and new riparian habitat will be planted along the streams. Impediments to the passage of fish throughout the streams will be removed, allowing for a greater number and diversity of aquatic species along the streams. Excessive sediment and pollutants will be removed from the streams as a result of the installation of new stormwater quality BMPs in basins that currently have no stormwater quality treatment. The projects in the Plan will also serve to protect existing infrastructures such as sanitary sewers, preventing potential sewage spills in the City’s natural streams. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading. November 6, 2012 -5- ITEM 20 BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Master Plan Update was presented to boards and City Council on previous occasions. They include: 1. Water Board – January 19, 2012 2. Natural Resources Advisory Board (NRAB) - February 22, 2012 3. Water Board – April 19, 2012 4. City Council Work Session – April 24, 2012 5. NRAB – September 19, 2012 6. Water Board – September 20, 2012 The Stormwater Master Plan Update was presented to both the NRAB and the Water Board on September 19 and September 20, 2012, respectively. The Plan Update was unanimously recommended for adoption by both Boards. Draft minutes from both meetings are included as Attachments 3 and 4. PUBLIC OUTREACH The public outreach process for the Stormwater Master Plan Update has been ongoing since June 2011, and has included the following elements: • Basin-specific focus group meetings for affected stakeholders such as CSU, Poudre School District, home owners associations (HOA), various City departments, and the Downtown Development Authority. • Website explaining the Master Plan Update – fcgov.com/stormwater-plan - 170 unique hits as of September 25. • Article in the City News flyer – included in Utility Bills to all Utilities customers directing customers to the Master Plan website • Booth at the New West Fest – direct contact with over 250 people, with several thousand people stopping to look at the booth signage • Online survey of 674 citizens about general stormwater issues within the City, including water quality and stream restoration • Facebook update directing City followers to the Master Plan website • Twitter update directing City followers to the Master Plan website The conceptual BMP alternatives were presented for initial public review and input through a series of Focus Group meetings in summer 2011. Representatives from City departments, homeowners associations, management companies for existing BMP facilities, large businesses and institutions (i.e., Colorado State University), and interested citizen groups (i.e., Save the Poudre). The future public outreach process for the individual stormwater quality and stream restoration projects identified in the Master Plan Update will include the following elements; • Project-specific meetings and/or Open Houses for affected stakeholders such as HOAs, individual property owners, City departments, and interested organizations • Website explaining the individual project, the project schedule, and ways for the public to provide feedback and comments • Mailers to potentially affected stakeholders informing them of Open House times and topics • Ongoing social media updates The projects will be presented and discussed with all affected parties through a collaborative outreach process where all participants will be allowed the opportunity to provide meaningful feedback and potentially affect the final design of the project. A Public Engagement Plan, which details the current and ongoing outreach process for the update and for future projects, is included as Attachment 5. The Public Engagement Plan was submitted to City Council for review in June 2012. In an online Stormwater survey conducted by Fort Collins Utilities in August 2012, over 90% of the 674 respondents indicated that protecting and improving water quality is important to them. The reduction of pollutants in stormwater runoff was ranked second in importance only second to maintaining existing stormwater infrastructure. 75% of November 6, 2012 -6- ITEM 20 respondents also felt that the City’s streams have become more polluted over the last 20 years. Fort Collins Utilities will use the results of the survey to guide and inform our future public outreach efforts regarding the specific projects identified within the Master Plan Update. ATTACHMENTS 1. Stormwater Quality and Stream Restoration Selected Plans for 11 Drainage Basins 2. Stream Rehabilitation Project Prioritization Results (MCDA Tool) 3. Excerpt from Draft Water Board Meeting Minutes 4. Draft Natural Resources Advisory Board Meeting Minutes 5. Public Engagement Plan • h ‘ cL r Legend Canal Importation Basin WQ Not Evaluated Water Drains Into Irrigation System Proposed BMP Basin Type Proposed Water Quality Pond Proprietary Mechanical BMP Flood Control and Water Quality Flood Control Only Water Quality Only 4’ Proposed Improvement 1 Undeveloped Area Proposed Stream Restoration and Habitat Improvements I i Village West Pond Retrofit Existing Pond to accomodate Water Quality Volume .—;- ri ,, ‘ ! 1, —• Outlet To Accomodate Water Qualfty Volume Pond ; Proposed Stream Restoration and Habitat Improvements . 4’ -I f Proposed Wallenberg Pond Construct Pond to accomodate j Water Quality Volume Manchester Pond Construct Proprietary Mechanical BMP at pond outlet. CD r L’ •‘ Cityof CANAL IMPORTATION BASIN 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 ANdERSoN CoNsulTiNq ENqiNEERS, INC. Fort ColLins MANAGEMENT I Civil Water Resources • Environmental p ROPOSED CON D IT I ON S BMP MAP Feet S Attachment 1 - Page 1 —V b?’” —jProposedStreamRest ___-—‘ Habitat Improvements A Proposed Stream Restoration and - Habitat Improvements on and .4), : a’ .• City of COOPER SLOUGH BASIN ANdERSON CoNsuLTiNq ENqINEERs, INC. Fort ColLins PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION • W -E I Water Resources • Environmental AN D HAB I TAT I M PROVEMENTS Legend Cooper Slough Subbasins Proposed Stream Restoration and Habitat Improvements 0 1,250 2,500 5,000 S Feet Attachment 1 - Page 2 Dry Creek Master Plan Water Quality Conceptual Alternatives TerryLake Road Pond Ratio fit Existing Pond to accommodate Water Quality. Volume : ) TArry L.A. Pheasant Rige Pond Retrofit Existing Pond to accommodate Water Quality Volume ‘i . F,, • . IA’ I I Lindenmeier Lake Water Quality Treatment provided in Existing Lindenmeler Lake Spalding Lane Pond a Retrofit Existing Pond to accommodate Waler Quality Volume • ‘. •.-• .• •4 .. •-•-•‘ L /1 ‘i Proposed Adriel Hills Pond • Buyout Property and place Water Quality Pond - I ,i. I , Dry Creek Basin Boundary Proposed BMP Basin Type ECCO Regional Water [Quality Pond .- * I, ““ •Qi -,i ,‘ *I•-’• ,• .• -i;- — I Y c 4 -• ‘AYREs ASSOCIATES D1C3 Channel nprovements Flood Control Only FOOTHILLS BASIN Master Plan Water Quality Concepetual Alternatives I : sç 1! - ., .--- ., Lake . Waler Sherwood Quality Treatment A. provided In Existing Lake Sherwood :: ‘2 •,l• /_ Soulhmoor Village Pond • Retrofit Existing Pond to accommodate Water Quality Volume .1 : :T. 5.- ts ‘i 4 L.k, Sherwood : -1 i11 . C a — t r:, . -7 1 • . . I . ,.c .. • r- . —. •h .r.’ Wev$!—.._ Foothills Basin Boundary Proposed BMP Basin Type Wince L.ke Flood Control Only Water Quality Only Flood Control and Water Quality HhSchooiPondj Retrofit Existing Pond to accommodate Water Quality I . -. - I Volume Collindale PUn Pond L —. • Retrofit Existing Pond to accommodate Water Quality - - J Proposed Improvements None 4 Proposed Conceptual Water Quality Alternatives Proposed Water Quality Pond Undeveloped Area 4 _‘;- : - , Fossil Creek Basin Proposed BMP Basin Type Flood Control Only Water Quality Only Flood Control and Water Quality r Proposed Improvements 4; Proposed Selected Plan Water Quality Alternatives . Ditch Diversion Natural Area Proposed Stream Restoration .d. and Habitat Improvements -_ .i. City of Fort CoLLins Er1GIr1EJIrlG, IhC Fossil Creek Basin Selected Plan - Water Quality Improvements V.] 1: E HARMONY RD r IL ‘, -v BrookwoodlApplewooel E,tge Pond it Retrofit Existing Pond to accommodate Water Quality Volume - NMD, LCC #2 Canal Diversion System (Via Mall Creek Ditch) ;•t _. Doo Meadow Pond New Pond for Water Quality VolumJ KECHTER RD Proposed St,esm P ---n - — Habitat Improvemet E TRILBY U) 1:, [ \ South Lems v/Cementer Pond L New Pond for Water Quality Volume I __--V. L ; . 1. rn E Co RD 30 Attachment 1 - Page 5 • d: •e rW 14 e. >Ivir - Woodland Park Pond • Retrofit Existing Pond to accommodate [Water Quality Volume p.. ‘1 It - -4 - j. 1 ;êt. ‘4’. ii ., I —I 4 :,. . - . ,firox Meadows Pond — Retrofit Existing Pond to accommodate Water Quality Volume t ,. -‘: Collindaie Golf Course -: Source Control BMPs j - ‘, .. (see reporttexl) A 0 HORSiTOOTH RD •,1 I Stone Ridge Pond - Alternative to FCRIF) location (EDit!)) —. Sunstone VIIlae Regional Pond } Retrofit Existing Pond to accommodate Water Quality Volume _ ___ • I Fox Meadows Basin Proposed BMP Basin Type Flood Control Only Water Quality Only Flood Control 4 ., ( A Proposed Conceptual Water Quality Alternatives Proposed Water Quality Pond Undeveloped Area Water —“-—- Stream - Canal Parks Natural Area Proposed Stream Restor and Habitat Improvements Water Mail Creek Master Plan Quality Conceptual Plan I” :f FTroulman Pond • Retrofit Existing Pond to accommodate Water Quality — ‘. L Volume - _1- •.‘ .•.--, ••7--’’_ ‘ : Woodridge Pond Retrofit Existing Pond to accommodate Water Quality Volume Larkborough Pond • Retrofit Existing Pond 10 accommodate Water Quality _VoIt,nm I: I T Mail Creek Basin Boundary Fairway Pond I . Retrofit Existing Pond to accommodate Water Quality Volume Proposed BMP Basin Type Flood Control Only Water Quality Only Flood Control and Water Quality Proposed Improvements AYRES ASSOCIATES I None 1 0 LXJ I IXE 7 (Ill) ,.. es’- ‘ C accommodate ‘d - - Willow Springs Pond / Retmfit Existing Pond to accommodate Waler Quality Volume ] ‘44 . • - 4,; VV$ 7 4 — .V* 1 t 1i VVV-VwV •SV S -v KECHTER RD Proposed Stream Restoration 1 and Habitat improvements i V --:* - dV• V Harmony Crossing Pond 1 •--Vo Retrofit Existing Pond to accommodate Water Quality Volume _J 0 V it trotit Existing Pond to accommodate - Water Quality Volume / k. - p V V L V RetrofitEXdngPondto Water Quaii Volume 19 I 1 Preston Jr High Pond V Retrofit Water Quality Existing Volume Pond to accommodate I - J 1 C z C C-) (I) (I) D - Legend Old Town Basin Proposed BMP Basin Type Flood Control Only Water Quality Only Proposed Improvements • Existing Outfall — ——— Storm/Sewer Line Stream/Canal ,‘_-. -- Propose Lemay WQ Pond • Construct Pond to accomodate Water Quality Volume - ‘s• ., .,l ‘, 1 : HowesStreetWQ • Retrofit Existing Pond to accomodate Water Quality Volume : tidal! NaturalArea ii • Retrofit Existing Ponds to accomodate Water Quality Volume 0 V . Proposed Water Quality Pond Proprietary Mechanical BMP Flood Control and Water Quality - r • ANdERsoN C0N5ULTINq ENqirlEERs, INc. Cityof OLD TOWN BASIN 0 750 1,500 3,000 Fort ColLins MANAGEMENT W E I Civil • Waler Resources • Enviromnenia/ P R OP OS ED CON D IT10N B M P MAP Feet S I 1_ I Attachment 1 - Page 9 I - —_:: Kensington Pond • Retrofit Existing Pond To Accomodate Water Quality Volume - ,_ i’-’ •‘:,•. , i.’. Proposed Centre Ave Pond • Construct Pond ToAccomodate Water Quality Volume 1 s ,. Proposed CSU Ropes Pond • Construct Pond To Accomodate Water Quality Volume -. : f Proposed Stream esrc Habitat Improvements E r - “ j_;, “V I Rossborough Park Pond • Install Water Quality Outlet To Accomodate Water Quality Volume Water Quality Volume • -• ‘-•i p L Z r,’, ç ‘,.‘ < • •_;• - = Spring Canyon Park Pond (Optional) • Retrofit Existing Pond To Accomodate Water Quality Volume -y nd I I. Ii U n:. fr c Proposed Taft and Horsetooth Pond • Construct Pond To Accomodate Water Quality Volume - Proposed Edora Pond Construct Pond To Accomodate Water Quality Volume -•.•• Hoiywood - Irish Pond Retrofit Existing Pond to accommodate Water Quality Volume z.’ • L West New Vine Pond Regional for Water Pond Qualify Volume r 1-V’ z -J w > 0 • r-’” I • r ! ‘I I:. -. I 5•5 b 1:, 5 1’ HORSETOOTH RESERVOIR 4 54 .5.. i Westland Pond - •New Pond for Water Quality Volume W MULBERRY ST S - •qC- ,/ • Proposed Stream Restoration -• 1s and Habitat rCanyonCreek Improvements along • . S 4 — J WestVineBasin 4 I 0 -IS -J z F U (sr Proposed BMP Basin Type if C (Q)N F$Ff CoLLins IhC. W ELIZABETH ST _q•S- 1 • •55 F — 1. S. S Overall Reach Creek Name Rank Reach Subreach Score Length (ft) Location Associated BMPs Notes Fossil 1412.9 2250 Upstream of Lemay through Fossil Park Design needs to incorporate Mail Creek 1‐1 Spring 2152.5 810 Between RR tracks and Riverside Mail 3312.5 980 Directly north of Meadow Passway Construct all proposed improvemnts in Mail Creek BMP Selected Plan* Mail 4112.3 3240 Confluence with Fossil Creek, northwest from Fossil Park Dependent on Fossil Creek 4‐1 design Fossil 5112.3 1120 Between RR tracks and Trilby Rd Spring 6 Remove Edora Dam 2.2 NA Along north side of Edora Park, west of Riverside Ave Spring 7162.2 780 Between Riverside Ave and Edora Dam Construct new Edora Park Pond Should be constructed at same time as Edora Dam removal. Spring 8322.1 1040 Directly west of Lemay Ave Fossil 9212.0 1880 North of Trilby Rd partway through Paragon Point open space Construct new WQ Pond in Prairie Dog Meadow NA Spring 10 Reconnect to Poudre 1.9 NA From confluence with Poudre River through Cattail Chorus NA Fossil 11 9 1 1.9 2130 From Applewood Estates pond through neighborhood to Shields Fossil 12 8 1 1.8 2020 From RR tracks through open space to Applewood Estates pond Stanton 13 1 1 1.8 4630 From confluence with Fossil Creek to Carpenter Rd Construct new WQ Pond at Lemay Ave and Carpenter Road Mail 14 2 1 1.8 1370 Between Mail Creek Ln and Meadow Passway Boxelder 15 3 3 1.8 1180 Directly west of I‐25 crossing Will need to be completed in conjunction with Boxelder Regional improvements. Fossil 16 3 1 1.8 1130 Runs southeast partly through the gold course Reach is through the golf course Spring 17 5 1 1.8 1590 Just east of Stover St to just southwest of Stuart St Retrofit Woodwest Detention Pond and Retrofit CSU Vet Hospital Pond* Spring 18 1 4 1.7 870 Between Timberline Rd detention Pond and RR tracks Fossil 19 3 2 1.7 1210 From Lemay Ave southeast partly through the golf course Reach is through the golf course Overall Reach Creek Name Rank Reach Subreach Score Length (ft) Location Associated BMPs Notes Spring 26 4 1 1.6 1550 Just west of Lemay Ave to just east of Stover St Boxelder 27 6 1 1.6 1330 Through private property south of Vine Dr Spring 28 2 1 1.5 1070 Between Edora Dam and Welch St Should be designed and possibly constructed at same time as Edora Dam removal. Spring 29 1 3 1.5 1180 Between Prospect Rd and Timberline Rd Foothills 30 1 1 1.5 1470 Between confluence with FCRID and Chase Dr McClellands 31 7 1 1.5 From White Willow Dr west through HOA open space Retrofit Willow Springs Pond Mail 32 3 2 1.5 1490 From Fairway Estates dam south through HOA open space Retrofit Fairway Estates Pond This reach is tied to the proposed flow control on Fairway Dam McClellands 33 6 1 1.5 Through Stetson Creek HOA open space Primarliy land management issues Burns 34 1 1 1.4 1780 From confluence with Fossil Creek north to Shields St Boxelder 35 3 1 1.4 2860 Directly north of Prospect Rd through provate property Will need to be completed in conjunction with Boxelder Regional improvements Fossil 36 6 1 1.4 2410 Through HOA open space along Fossil Creek Pkwy Foothills 37 2 1 1.4 1530 Between Chase Dr and Rigden Pkwy Retrofit Fort Collins High School Pond Primarliy land management issues Boxelder 38 1 4 1.4 Through open space south of Prospect Rd Coordinate with Natural Areas McClellands 39 3 1 1.4 1250 Between Ziegler Rd and Corbett Dr through HOA open space Retrofit Preston Junior High School Pond Coordinate with HOA for drop structure improvements Spring 40 3 1 1.4 1600 Between Welch St and Lemay Ave Spring 41 5 2 1.4 1890 From just SW of Stuart St to RR tracks west of College Retrofit Kensington Pond and Construct new Centre Ave Pond* McClellands 42 4 1 1.3 630 Between Corbett Dr and Rabbit Creek Rd through HOA open space Retrofit Harmony Crossing Pond Overall Reach Creek Name Rank Reach Subreach Score Length (ft) Location Associated BMPs Notes Boxelder 51 1 1 1.2 1770 From confluence with Poudre River north adjacent to BE Sanitation USGS gage location, Coordinate with Natural Areas Boxelder 52 6 3 1.2 1450 Through private property south of Vine Dr McClellands 53 5 1 1.2 2200 Through private property SE of Stetson Creek neighborhood Dependent on McClellands Reach 5‐2 and outfall from Kechter Crossing Spring 54 1 2 1.2 580 Through open space directly north pf Prospect Rd Boxelder 55 5 3 1.1 1880 Through private property north of Mulberry St Boxelder 56 6 2 1.0 1460 Through private property south of Vine Dr Clearview 57 1 1 1.0 360 Between Avery Park pond and Castlerock Dr Foothills 58 3 B 0.7 From Horsetooth Rd NE through HOA property to Power Trail Retrofit Southmoor Village Pond Clearview 59 3 D 0.6 Between Taft Hill Rd and Hillcrest Dr Foothills 60 2 C 0.6 Between Rigden Pkwy and Power Trail Retrofit Collindale PUD Pond and Retrofit Parkwood East Pond* 3 Excerpt from Unapproved Water Board Minutes, September 20, 2012 Page 1 of 3 Stormwater Master Plan Update (Attachments available upon request). Stormwater and Floodplain Manager Ken Sampley introduced the item and introduced Stormwater Master Planning Manager Mark Kempton. Mr. Kempton began the presentation by discussing the key results that will be achieved by updating the Master Plan. These include integrating flood control and water quality projects into one comprehensive plan, a prioritized listing of stream rehabilitation projects, and a prioritized listing of retrofitted stormwater Best Management Practice (BMP) projects. The Master Plan was originally presented to the Water Board in January, and again in April. It was presented at a City Council Work Session in April. Staff has also presented it to the Natural Resources Advisory Board (NRAB). The Master Plan Updates will be finalized using data, information, and results from two separate program efforts: Basin-Specific BMP Selected Plans and the Stream Restoration and Stability Study. Mr. Kempton showed a map outlining the Basin-Specific BMP Selected Plan for different areas of the City. He also presented a map showing the proposed Canal Importation (CI) Basin Management for the Village West Pond. The proposed BMPs include excavating the pond and providing a new water quality outlet, maintaining the existing pond invert, and moving and/or replanting trees. This requires close interaction with affected neighbors. A board member expressed concern about potential flooding in the area as it relates to the Horsetooth Dams. Mr. Kempton stated the ponds would be inundated and have no flood attenuation effects in the unlikely event of a Horsetooth dam break. He also stated it is not staff’s intent to remove all existing trees and vegetation for existing pond areas, but to work closely with adjacent property owners to save and/or relocate as many trees as possible within the pond footprint. Mr. Kempton presented the goal for the Stream Restoration and Stability Study:  Prioritize future stream management and rehabilitation work on 10 streams within the City of Fort Collins in coordination with the Basin-Specific BMP Selected Plans. Mr. Kempton identified some problems that resulted from the study, including obstacles to fish passage and erosion problems. Erosion problems are present with Clearview Channel, Fossil Creek near Lemay Avenue, Spring Creek, and Stanton Creek. Irrigation flows are transported through several of the City’s natural streams. These drastically alter the natural flow regime – high, sustained flows cause erosion. Diversion structures and dams impede fish passage and habitat connectivity. Mr. Kempton presented information on the Multi-Criterion Decision Analysis (MCDA) Tool. This is used to assess and prioritize stream rehabilitation and associated BMP projects. This provides a meaningful way to prioritize projects, and rates the importance of environment, social, and economic benefits to the project. The MCDA Working Group consisted of Utilities, Natural Resources, Sustainability, Planning, and a member of the Natural Resources Advisory Board. ATTACHMENT 3 Excerpt from Unapproved Water Board Minutes, September 20, 2012 Page 2 of 3 Completion of the MCDA Tool included videos of each stream reach linked in Google Earth and a three hour field visit to representative reaches. 12 people evaluated 17 miles of stream in three separate meetings. The top four results from the MCDA Tool include:  Fossil Creek west of Lemay Avenue  Mail Creek by Werner Elementary School  Spring Creek just east of Riverside Avenue  Mail Creek near Fossil Creek Mr. Kempton presented before and after pictures from the stream restoration project on McClellands Creek during April and August 2012. Mr. Kempton presented information on the Public Outreach Process. This included a booth at New West Fest, Facebook and Twitter updates, a website (www.fcgov.com/stormwater-plan), and Utility bill mailers. Mr. Kempton outlined the Funding Considerations for the project. These include Flood Control Projects currently identified and funded using existing stormwater fees. Currently there is no dedicated stormwater funding source for Stream Rehabilitation/BMP projects. Mr. Kempton presented the Project Schedule:  July – September 2012 (Public Outreach)  August 2012 (Complete stream rehabilitation prioritization using the MCDA tool)  September 2012 (Present results to NRAB and Water Board)  November 2012 (Present results to City Council)  2013/2014 (Implement stream restoration and/or BMP projects) Next steps in the process include developing a new Stream Restoration Program. This includes Public Outreach, Irrigation Flow Management, Design, Capital Projects, Monitoring, Maintenance, and Planning and Zoning. The new program also includes vegetation management and riparian buffer standards. Staff recommends approval of the Stormwater Master Plan Update. Highlights from the discussion:  A board member expressed appreciation for staff’s efforts on the project. The board member is impressed with the work completed thus far.  A board member expressed concern about the amount identified for restoration and BMPs. The board member questioned if other departments will share in the maintenance costs. Mr. Haukaas stated staff will leverage funds where they can, such as partnering with Natural Areas or Homeowner Associations. Grant funding is also a possibility. The estimated numbers are based on today’s priorities and needs. More specific project details will come later and will be adjusted after bonds are paid and debt is reduced.  A board member questioned the cost for a rehabilitated stream reach. Mr. Kempton stated this depends on the design. Excerpt from Unapproved Water Board Minutes, September 20, 2012 Page 3 of 3 Discussion on the motion: There was no discussion on the motion. Vote on the motion: It passed unanimously. Mr. Sampley stated the item will be presented to Council on November 6, 2012. He encouraged members of the Water Board to attend. Board Member Brunswig moved that the Water Board recommend approval and adoption of the Stormwater Master Plan Update. Board Member Eccleston seconded the motion. ATTACHMENT 4 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PLAN PROJECT TITLE: STORMWATER MASTER PLAN UPDATE – STREAM RESTORATION AND STORMWATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LEAD: UTILITIES ‐ STORMWATER MASTER PLANNING OVERALL PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT LEVEL: Variable depending on Phase BOTTOM LINE QUESTION: Does the public and directly affected parties agree with the stream restoration and stormwater quality goals and methods outlined in the master plan update? KEY STAKEHOLDERS: Fort Collins residents, HOAs, Poudre School District, CSU, Larimer County, various City of Fort Collins Departments, irrigation ditch companies, and private landowners. TIMELINE: June 2012‐June 2017 and on through the implementation of all master plans in 2050 ‐ ongoing until initial projects are completed over a 5‐year period PHASE 1: Inform Timeframe: June‐August 2012 Key Messages:  Inform City residents and other governmental entities about the proposed update to the stormwater master plan including: o Effects of urbanization – increased stormwater runoff can result in life‐safety risks, damage to public and private property, erosion and impacts on waterways and natural areas, pollution of creeks and the Poudre River; o Original Stormwater Master Plans (circa 2003) focused primarily on flood control projects that addressed life‐safety and reduced property damage; o Increased emphasis in last 10 years (including Federal Mandates) on quality of stormwater runoff and its impact on rivers, creeks, water supply, etc. and why it is important to have healthy streams; o Key Updated master plan elements include;  Maintain original listing of flood control projects  Identified stream reaches that need to be restored  Identified locations where BMPs are needed to improve stormwater quality (i.e. existing stormwater detention pond areas to be retrofitted to capture pollutants and provide water quality treatment)  No increase in stormwater fees proposed  Developed proposed multi‐pronged funding approach for CIP portion of stormwater fees  20% of CIP funds for opportunity projects  64% of CIP funds for flood control projects (and associated BMP retrofits)  16% of CIP funds for restoration of stream reaches (and associated BMP retrofits) o Restore streams to provide quality wildlife habitat and stable stream banks o Address irrigation ditch flows in the streams that cause bank erosion and degrade wildlife habitat o Address public safety issues such as high, steep banks and eroding culverts or bridges. 1 ATTACHMENT 5 Tools and Techniques  Public open houses  Focus Group meetings  Web & fcgov.com  Social media  News releases  Utility bill insert  City Works program PHASE 2: Involve/Collaborate Timeframe: January 2013 – December 2017 Key Messages:  Same as Phase 1 and how can we mitigate impacts to affected property owners while still achieving the stream restoration and stormwater quality goals of the individual projects  Prioritized listing of CIP projects (flood control with BMP retrofits, stream restoration with BMP retrofits, opportunity/city development/adequate public facilities) and proposed funding  Estimated timeframes, milestones for the first 3‐5 years Tools and Techniques  Individual meetings with affected property owners regarding the proposed projects  Neighborhood open houses PHASE 3: Inform Timeframe: January 2013 – December 2017 Key Messages:  Continue to inform and remind city residents about the ongoing implementation of the original stormwater master plan, the water quality and stream restoration update to the master plan and inform residents about the general functions and benefits of the Stormwater Department.  Prioritized listing of CIP projects (flood control with BMP retrofits, stream restoration with BMP retrofits, opportunity/city development/adequate public facilities) and proposed funding  Estimated timeframes, milestones for the first 3‐5 years  Maintain overall listing of total stormwater CIP project needs, Tools and Techniques  Same as Phase 1  New flood markers along Spring Creek and the Cache la Poudre River  New signage along restored sections of stream explaining the functions and benefits of the stream corridors  Highlighting stream restoration success stories in City News and on the City website 2 ORDINANCE NO. 125, 2012 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AMENDING SECTION 26-543 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS TO UPDATE THE STORMWATER MASTER DRAINAGE PLANS TO INCLUDE BASIN-SPECIFIC WATER QUALITY BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND STREAM RESTORATION WHEREAS, Section 26-543 of the City Code adopted a master drainage plan for drainage basins in and affecting the City, to be used as the basis for City storm drainage capital improvements planning and determinations related to storm drainage impacts and requirements for developments in the city; and WHEREAS, on April 6, 2010, the City Council adopted on second reading Ordinance No. 030, 2010, amending Section 26-492 of the City Code so as to declare that the purpose of the City Stormwater Utility is to provide an integrated, sustainable stormwater management program that reflects the community’s values of protecting and restoring the City’s watersheds, including the Cache la Poudre River and its tributaries; and WHEREAS, the environmental benefits identified in Section 26-492 include preserving the natural and beneficial functions of floodplains, enhancing stormwater quality, and preserving riparian habitat; and WHEREAS, in order to identify areas in which stormwater quality and stream improvements are needed to promote these benefits, and identify opportunities to incorporate such improvements into existing and future flood control projects, City staff has completed extensive analysis and assessment of these concerns in cooperation with Colorado State University; and WHEREAS, based on such review, staff has prepared for Council consideration basin- specific water quality best management practices and stream restoration and stability improvements in the form of updates to the existing City drainage master plan (the “2012 Updates”), and WHEREAS, the conceptual basis for the 2012 Updates was presented to the Council for consideration at its work session on April 24, 2012, and staff has incorporated the input provided by the Council at that time in the 2012 Updates; and WHEREAS, the 2012 Updates were presented to the Natural Resources Advisory Board (“NRAB”) on September 19, 2012, and at that time the NRAB voted unanimously to recommend that the Council adopt them; and WHEREAS, the 2012 Updates were also presented to the Water Board on September 20, 2012, and at that time the Water Board voted unanimously to recommend that the Council adopt them; and WHEREAS, the Council has determined that the adoption and implementation of the 2012 Updates will promote the purposes of the Stormwater Utility and advance the holistic and integrated management of stormwater in Fort Collins. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS that Section 26-543(a) of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 26-543. Master drainage plans. (a) Master drainage plans are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this Article for the following stormwater basins of the City: (1) McClellands Creek Master Drainage Plan Update, prepared by ICON Engineering, Inc., dated November 2000 and revised March 2003. (2) East Harmony Portion of McClellands Creek Master Drainage Plan Update, prepared by ICON Engineering, Inc., dated August 1999 and revised July 2001. (3) Foothills Basin, prepared by URS Corporation, Inc., dated April 2003. (4) Dry Creek Master Plan, prepared by URS Corporation, Inc., dated December 2002. (5) West Vine Master Plan, prepared by URS Corporation Inc., dated November 2002. (6) Spring Creek Basin Master Drainage Plan, prepared by Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated June 2003. (7) Fossil Creek Drainage Basin Master Drainageway Planning Restudy, prepared by ICON Engineering, Inc., dated February 2003. (8) Old Town Basin Master Drainage Plan, prepared by Anderson Engineering Consultants, Inc., dated September 2003. (9) Fox Meadows Basin Drainage Master Plan Update, prepared by ICON Engineering, Inc., dated December 2002 and revised February 2003. (10) Mail Creek Master Plan, prepared by URS Corporation, Inc., dated April 2003. (11) Cache la Poudre River Master Drainageway Plan, prepared by Ayres Associates, Inc., dated August 2001. (12) Boxelder/Cooper Slough Basin, prepared by Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated December 2002 and revised November 2003. -2- (13) Canal Importation Master Drainage Plan, prepared by Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated April 2001. (14) Boxelder Regional Stormwater Master Plan, prepared by PBS&J, Inc., dated October 2006. (1) Boxelder Creek/Cooper Slough Basin: a.. Boxelder/Cooper Slough Basin, prepared by Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated December 2002 and revised November 2003; b. Boxelder Regional Stormwater Master Plan, prepared by PBS&J, Inc., dated October 2006; and c. Stormwater Quality and Stream Restoration Update to the Boxelder Creek/Cooper Slough Basin Stormwater Master Drainage Plan, prepared by Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated October 2012. (2) Cache la Poudre River Basin: a. Cache la Poudre River Master Drainageway Plan, prepared by Ayres Associates, Inc., dated August 2001. (3) Canal Importation Basin: a. Canal Importation Master Drainage Plan, prepared by Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated April 2001; and b. Stormwater Quality and Stream Restoration Update to the Canal Importation Basin Stormwater Master Drainage Plan, prepared by Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated October 2012. (4) Dry Creek Basin: a. Dry Creek Master Plan, prepared by URS Corporation, Inc., dated December 2002; b. Stormwater Quality and Stream Restoration Update to the Dry Creek Basin Stormwater Master Drainage Plan, prepared by Ayres Associates, dated October 2012. (5) Foothills Basin: a. Foothills Basin, prepared by URS Corporation, Inc., dated April 2003; and b. Stormwater Quality and Stream Restoration Update to the Foothills Basin Stormwater Master Drainage Plan, prepared by Ayres Associates, dated October 2012. (6) Fossil Creek Basin: -3- a. Fossil Creek Drainage Basin Master Drainageway Planning Restudy, prepared by ICON Engineering, Inc., dated February 2003; and b. Stormwater Quality and Stream Restoration Update to the Fossil Creek Basin Stormwater Master Drainage Plan, prepared by ICON Engineering, Inc., dated October 2012. (7) Fox Meadows Basin: a. Fox Meadows Basin Drainage Master Plan Update, prepared by ICON Engineering, Inc., dated December 2002 and revised February 2003; and b. Stormwater Quality and Stream Restoration Update to the Fox Meadows Basin Stormwater Master Drainage Plan, prepared by ICON Engineering, Inc., dated October 2012. (8) Mail Creek Basin: a. Mail Creek Master Plan, prepared by URS Corporation, Inc., dated April 2003; and b. Stormwater Quality and Stream Restoration Update to the Mail Creek Basin Stormwater Master Drainage Plan, prepared by Ayres Associates, dated October 2012. (9) McClellands Creek Basin: a. McClellands Creek Master Drainage Plan Update, prepared by ICON Engineering, Inc., dated November 2000 and revised March 2003; b. East Harmony Portion of McClellands Creek Master Drainage Plan Update, prepared by ICON Engineering, Inc., dated August 1999 and revised July 2001; and c. Stormwater Quality and Stream Restoration Update to the McClellands Creek Basin Stormwater Master Drainage Plan, prepared by ICON Engineering, Inc., dated October 2012. (10) Old Town Basin: a. Old Town Basin Master Drainage Plan, prepared by Anderson Engineering Consultants, Inc., dated September 2003; and b. Stormwater Quality and Stream Restoration Update to the Old Town Basin Stormwater Master Drainage Plan, prepared by Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated October 2012. (11) Spring Creek Basin: a. Spring Creek Basin Master Drainage Plan, prepared by Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated June 2003; and b. Stormwater Quality and Stream Restoration Update to the Spring Creek Basin Stormwater Master Drainage Plan, -4- prepared by Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated October 2012. (12) West Vine Basin: a. West Vine Master Plan, prepared by URS Corporation Inc., dated November 2002; and b. Stormwater Quality and Stream Restoration Update to the West Vine Basin Stormwater Master Drainage Plan, prepared by Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated October 2012. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 6th day of November, A.D. 2012, and to be presented for final passage on the 20th day of November, A.D. 2012. _________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading on the 20th day of November, A.D. 2012. _________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk -5- Coordinate with HOA for drop structure improvements Boxelder 43 4 1 1.3 1410 Directly east of I‐25 crossing through private property Will need to be completed in conjunction with Boxelder Regional improvements Boxelder 44 1 3 1.3 2340 Through open space south of Prospect Rd Coordinate with Natural Areas Boxelder 45 5 1 1.3 770 Through private property north of Mulberry St Spring 46 1 1 1.2 520 From entrance to Cattail Chorus NA west to bike trail crossing Dependent on connection of Spring Creek to Poudre River Fossil 47 7 1 1.2 2610 Between College and RR tracks through natural area Retrofit Brookwood/Applewood Estates Pond Dependent on drop structure removal in Reach 6‐ 2 Spring 48 7 1 1.2 820 From entrance to Hill Pond west through open space Retrofit Spring Canyon Pond and Construct new Taft/Horsetooth Pond* Boxelder 49 1 2 1.2 1270 Through open space south of Prospect Rd Coordinate with Natural Areas Boxelder 50 5 2 1.2 1240 Through private property north of Mulberry St 2 Spring 20 6 2 1.7 1150 Between Centre Ave and Hillpond Retrofit Rossborough Park Pond and Retrofit Wagon Wheel Pond* Coordinate with CSU/Horticulture Center McClellands 21 7 2 1.7 From RR tracks west of Timberline Rd east through neighborhood Retrofit Miramont Pond and Retrofit Oakridge Pond* Fossil 22 6 2 1.7 3530 From College Ave east through HOA open space Drop structure removal and irrigation structure needs to be included in this reach. McClellands 23 5 2 1.6 Through Stetson Creek HOA open space Fossil 24 2 2 1.6 3430 Through Paragon Point HOA open space Clearview 25 2 1 1.6 1440 Between Castlerock Dr and Taft Hill Rd Retrofit Deerfield Ponds 1 ATTACHMENT 2 Flood Control Only I Water Quality Only •S7S - iSS .f 44 •n: •5,4•5 5.1 .. 1i — 1 ;‘ : S ______ •5545• 5.-. ..-- 5 ‘S Flood Control and Water Quality 5* Proposed Improvements • /\Proposed Selected Plan ProposediWater Quality Improvements Proposed Habitat Proposed, Improvements West Vine Basin Selected Plan - Water Quality & Habitat Improvements Natural Area Proposed Stream Restoration and Habitat Improvements w+i - - 0 •-. --- i., 2640 Feet •.‘ TmcnU.1251flTW’ Attachment 1 - Page 11 ‘- ‘- rP! CSU Vet Hospital Pond f V • Retrofit Existing Pond To Accomodate Water Quality Volume — 1 • LL J- comodate Woodwest Detention Pond Construct Proprietary Mechanical BMPAt Pond Outlet. Proposed BMP Basin Type Legend ifI Spring Creek Basin WQ Not Evaluated Water Drains Into Irrigation System Proposed Water Quality Pond Proprietary Mechanical BMP Flood Control and Water Quality Flood Control Only Water Quality Only Proposed Improvement Undeveloped Area Proposed Stream Restoration and Habitat Improvements r--S ANdERsoN CoNsu[TiNq ENqiNEERs, INc. City of MANAGEMENT W E Civil • IVater Resources • Environmental Fort CoLLins SPRING CREEK BASIN 0 1,250 2,500 5,000 PROPOSED CONDITI0N B M P MAP Feet S ‘5- Attachment 1 - Page 10 I— Cl, A V V I McClellands Creek Basin Proposed BMP Basin Type Flood Control Only Water Quality Only Flood Control and Water Quality Proposed Improvements Proposed Selected Plan Water Quality Alternatives Natural Area 4 Vi -- •VV . r-c , . ‘I -3 Proposed Stream Restoration and Habitat Improvements V JVC!IN Ft cowns EricIhEEIr-1G, IHC. I r McClellands Creek Basin Selected Plan - Water Quality Improvements 4- Attachment 1 - Page 8 FeBI NOIP Imege 200’I Attachment 1 - Page 7 and Water Quality —4 Proposed Selected Plan Lf°J Water Quality Alternatives FPLPciLd New Pond to accommodate Water Quality Volume Proposed Improvements CO RD 40 a -z _.& , L r. S -- ,.‘.--, _,. - •r’ ill •# ‘-‘• - ‘ Golden Meadow Pond 7. • Retrofit Existing Pond to accommodate Water Quality Volume I t Cityof i[(C(i Fort ColLins Er1GIrlEEIhG, IhC 0 HARMONY RD I * - Hewiitt-Packard Ponds _-“ Retrofit Existing Pond to accommodate Water Qusilty Volume Fox Meadows Basin Selected Plan - Water Quality Improvements I N H “v-’ L S 2,000 Feet Attachment 1 - Page 6 Water -“--—-- Stream - Canal Parks Proposed Stream Restoration and Habitat Improvements 5 1r NAPIr9o.2OO9 Attachment 1 - Page 4 Water Quality Only Flood Control and Water Quality Proposed Improvements None - . I / Proposed Conceptual !ffd Water Quality Alternatives A Proposed Water Quality Pond Undeveloped Area Water -r---- Stream - Canal Parks Existing Proposed Natural Area 0 0 Ore Attachment 1 - Page 3