Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - COMPLETE AGENDA - 07/15/2014 - COMPLETE AGENDACity of Fort Collins Page 1 Karen Weitkunat, Mayor City Council Chambers Gerry Horak, District 6, Mayor Pro Tem City Hall West Bob Overbeck, District 1 300 LaPorte Avenue Lisa Poppaw, District 2 Fort Collins, Colorado Gino Campana, District 3 Wade Troxell, District 4 Cablecast on City Cable Channel 14 Ross Cunniff, District 5 on the Comcast cable system Carrie Daggett Darin Atteberry Wanda Nelson Interim City Attorney City Manager City Clerk The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. Regular Meeting July 15, 2014 (REVISED 7/14/14) Proclamations and Presentations 5:30 p.m. A. Proclamation Declaring July 16, 2014 as Women of Vision Day. B. Proclamation Declaring August 5, 2014 as Neighborhood Night Out. C. Proclamation Declaring July 12-19, 2014 as Flood Awareness Week. Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m.  PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE  CALL MEETING TO ORDER  ROLL CALL  AGENDA REVIEW: CITY MANAGER  City Manager Review of Agenda. City of Fort Collins Page 2  Consent Calendar Review This Review provides an opportunity for Council and citizens to pull items from the Consent Calendar. Anyone may request an item on this calendar be “pulled” off the Consent Calendar and considered separately. o Council-pulled Consent Calendar items will be considered before Discussion Items. o Citizen-pulled Consent Calendar items will be considered after Discussion Items.  CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Individuals who wish to make comments regarding items scheduled on the Consent Calendar or wish to address the Council on items not specifically scheduled on the agenda must first be recognized by the Mayor or Mayor Pro Tem. Before speaking, please sign in at the table in the back of the room. The timer will buzz once when there are 30 seconds left and the light will turn yellow. The timer will buzz again at the end of the speaker’s time. Each speaker is allowed 5 minutes. If there are more than 6 individuals who wish to speak, the Mayor may reduce the time allowed for each individual. ● State your name and address for the record ● Applause, outbursts or other demonstrations by the audience is not allowed ● Keep comments brief; if available, provide a written copy of statement to City Clerk  CITIZEN PARTICIPATION FOLLOW-UP Consent Calendar The Consent Calendar is intended to allow the City Council to spend its time and energy on the important items on a lengthy agenda. Staff recommends approval of the Consent Calendar. Anyone may request an item on this calendar to be "pulled" off the Consent Calendar and considered separately. Agenda items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be considered separately under Pulled Consent Items. The Consent Calendar consists of: ● Ordinances on First Reading that are routine; ● Ordinances on Second Reading that are routine; ● Those of no perceived controversy; ● Routine administrative actions. 1. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 091, 2014, Appropriating Unanticipated Grant Revenue into the Transportation Services Fund for the Safe Routes to School Program. This Ordinance, unanimously adopted on First Reading on July 1, 2014, appropriates unbudgeted funds received through a grant for the Safe Routes to School Program. The City of Fort Collins FC Moves Department has received a $25,822 federal grant through the Colorado Department of Transportation for the 2014-15 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program. This funding will allow the City’s Safe Routes to School Program (administered and staffed by FC Moves) to enhance its pedestrian and bicycle safety education programs. City of Fort Collins Page 3 2. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 092, 2014, Appropriating Prior Year Reserves in the Downtown Development Authority Fund for Expenditure on Projects and Programs in Accordance with the Downtown Plan of Development. This Ordinance, unanimously adopted on First Reading on July 1, 2014, appropriates unanticipated revenue for the Downtown Development Authority for projects and programs that enhance the downtown area. These funds, totaling $1,822,273, are from interest earnings, project savings, and from prior year bond proceeds. The DDA Board has authorized the expenditure on various projects and programs. 3. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 093, 2014, Appropriating Unanticipated Revenue in the Capital Projects Fund for the Willow Street Improvements Project and Authorizing the Transfer of Appropriations from the Building on Basics Pedestrian Plan and ADA Improvements Project into the Willow Street Improvements Project. This ordinance, unanimously adopted on First Reading on July 1, 2014, appropriates DDA and local funds into the Willow Street Improvements Project. Previous planning efforts for the Downtown River District identified improvements along Willow Street as a top priority project within the River District. Engineering design is schedule to begin in summer of 2014. 4. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 094, 2014, Adopting Design Standards for the Old Town Historic District. This Ordinance, unanimously adopted on First Reading on July 1, 2014, updates the Old Town Fort Collins Historic District (Old Town District) Design Standards. The Old Town Design Standards, originally adopted in 1981, require substantial revisions to address current historic preservation practices and development concerns related to infill and redevelopment within and around the Old Town District. The update to the design standards will define and illustrate characteristics for compatible future development within the Old Town District and in the adjacent area, and a means for incorporating modern sustainable building practices into historic preservation projects. 5. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 096, 2014, Authorizing the Mayor to Execute the First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement with the Fort Collins- Loveland Water District, the Fort Collins-Loveland Water District Enterprise and the Fort Collins Water Utility Enterprise. This Ordinance, unanimously adopted on First Reading on July 1, 2014, authorizes the Mayor to execute the First Amendment to the amended and restated intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with the Fort Collins-Loveland Water District, the Fort Collins-Loveland Water District Enterprise, and the City of Fort Collins Water Utility Enterprise for the delivery of potable water. The item will require the party that exceeds the allotment of water allowed for exchange to provide raw water reimbursement in addition to the charges for treatment. 6. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 097, 2014, Authorizing the Mayor to Execute an Intergovernmental Agreement with the North Weld County Water District, the North Weld County Water District Enterprise, and the Fort Collins Water Utility Enterprise for the Delivery of Potable Water. This Ordinance, unanimously adopted on First Reading on July 1, 2014, authorizes the Mayor to execute an amended and restated intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with the North Weld County Water District (NWCWD), the North Weld County Water District Enterprise, and the City of Fort Collins Water Utility Enterprise for the delivery of potable water. The amendment makes adjustments to the costs associated with exchanging water between the City and the NWCWD to reflect actual expenses, adjusts the requirement to balance accounts from annually to monthly, adjusts the allocation of water that is allowed to be exchanged, and provides for the transfer of associated raw water for any imbalance in excess of the allocation. City of Fort Collins Page 4 7. Postponement of Second Reading of Ordinance No. 099, 2014, Amending Chapter 12 of the City Code to Establish Regulations Regarding Disposable Bags to August 19, 2014. Staff requests postponement of Second Reading of this Ordinance to August 19, 2014, at the request of City Council, so that more information can be gathered and compiled to respond to questions and issues raised regarding the ordinance. This Ordinance was adopted on First Reading on July 1, 2014, by a vote of 5-2 (Nays: Troxell, Weitkunat) 8. First Reading of Ordinance No. 100, 2014, Appropriating Prior Year Reserves in the General Fund to Fund High Priority Security Enhancements. The purpose of this item is to appropriate funds in the amount of $210,000 to address high priority security findings identified by a comprehensive security assessment of City buildings. Funding is requested to implement enhancements to address the high priority findings identified in a 2013/2014 City building security assessment performed by Lyon & Associates. Funding will be directed to access control, alarm systems, internal public address systems, security cameras, and minor remodels to increase security workspace hardening. 9. First Reading of Ordinance No. 101, 2014, Amending Article XII of Chapter 23 of City Code Relating to Art in Public Places. The purpose of this item is to amend Article XII of Chapter 23 of the City Code relating to Art in Public Places. This Ordinance increases the threshold for art projects requiring City Council approval from $10,000 to $60,000 to align with the City’s Purchasing Code. 10. First Reading of Ordinance No. 102, 2104, Amending the Fort Collins Traffic Code Regarding Payment of Fares for Use of Public Transportation Vehicles. The purpose of this item is to provide local legislation specific to fare payment requirements on public transportation. This proposed Traffic Code is intended to provide local legislation specific to fare payment requirements on public transportation. This Traffic Code amendment is patterned after an existing Colorado statute that directly addresses fare payment requirements on public transportation; a local code would provide due process of fare violations through Municipal Court. 11. First Reading of Ordinance No. 103, 2014, Authorizing the Conveyance of a Non-Exclusive Waterline Easement and Temporary Construction Easement on City Property to the North Weld County Water District and the East Larimer County Water District. The purpose of this item is to authorize the conveyance of easements on City Property to the East Larimer County Water District and the North Weld County Water District for their NEWT II Water Transmission Pipeline Project. The City of Fort Collins Park Planning Department acquired a parcel of old railroad right of way located east of Taft Hill Road and north of Vine Drive (the “City Property”) for future trail use through the national “Rails to Trails” program. The East Larimer County Water District and North Weld County Water District (collectively, the “Districts”) have begun the second phase of a multi-phase water transmission pipeline project (the NEWT II Project) for the purposes of conveying treated water from the Districts’ Soldier Canyon Filter Plant to their drinking water distribution systems. The alignment of the pipeline will cross a section of the City Property, which is managed by the City Park Planning Department. As such, the Districts have requested a waterline easement from the City for their project. 12. First Reading of Ordinance No. 104, 2014, Authorizing the Conveyance of a Non-Exclusive Utility Easement on City Property to the Nunn Telephone Company. The purpose of this item is to authorize the conveyance of a non-exclusive easement to Nunn Telephone Company (NTC) for the purpose of installing a fiber-optic connection to an AT&T fiber regeneration hut that is located on a portion of the Meadow Springs Ranch. The proposed easement City of Fort Collins Page 5 is 10 feet wide and approximately 690 feet long and would be placed immediately adjacent to an existing access road. 13. Resolution 2014-058 Adopting Amendments to the Financial Management Policies. The purpose of this item is to approve a revised Budget Policy and revised Fund Balance Policy. Since the last update, staff has developed a new framework for updating, controlling, formatting and publishing financial policies. The financial policies evolved as part of the Budget document. In that context they focused on explaining concepts rather than setting policy. Both of these revised policies were created based on policy guidelines from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) presented as best practices. As such, the red line versions of the previous policies have many changes that are not substantive. Staff has come up with a new format for financial policies to keep them consistent across all departments within Financial Services. 14. Resolution 2014-059 Authorizing the City Manager to Enter Into an Agreement With the Members of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium. The purpose of this item is to enter into an agreement with the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium to allow Fort Collins Police Services to continue as a member agency of Coplink, which allows member agencies throughout Colorado to share valuable information in order to solve crimes, develop leads and track suspects leading to their arrest. 15. Resolution 2014-060 Authorizing the City Manager to Enter Into an Agreement With the Poudre School District R-1 for the School Resource Officer Program. The purpose of this item is to authorize the Mayor to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the Poudre School District R-1 (District) and the City of Fort Collins, on behalf of Fort Collins Police Services (FCPS) which updates, replaces and supersedes the previous IGA and continues the School Resource Officer Program. 16. Resolution 2014-061 Adopting the Recommendations of the Cultural Resources Board Regarding Fort Fund Grant Disbursements. The purpose of this item is to adopt the recommendations of the Cultural Resources Board to disburse Fort Fund grants to community events from the Cultural Development and Programming and Tourism Programming Accounts. 17. Resolution 2014-062 Making Appointments to Various Boards and Commissions of the City of Fort Collins. The purpose of this item is to make appointments to various boards and commissions created through resignations or unfulfilled during the annual recruitment process. END CONSENT  CONSENT CALENDAR FOLLOW-UP This is an opportunity for Councilmembers to comment on items adopted or approved on the Consent Calendar.  STAFF REPORTS A. Update on High Park Fire Remediation Efforts. B. Nature in the City Report. C. West Nile Virus Update. City of Fort Collins Page 6  COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS  CONSIDERATION OF COUNCIL-PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Discussion Items The method of debate for discussion items is as follows: ● Mayor introduces the item number, and subject; asks if formal presentation will be made by staff ● Staff presentation (optional) ● Mayor requests citizen comment on the item (five minute limit for each citizen) ● Council questions of staff on the item ● Council motion on the item ● Council discussion ● Final Council comments ● Council vote on the item Note: Time limits for individual agenda items may be revised, at the discretion of the Mayor, to ensure all citizens have an opportunity to speak. Please sign in at the table in the back of the room. The timer will buzz when there are 30 seconds left and the light will turn yellow. It will buzz again at the end of the speaker’s time. 18. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 095, 2014, Amending the Zoning Map of the City by Changing the Zoning Classification for that Certain Property Known as the Harmony/I-25 Rezoning. (staff: Clark Mapes; no staff presentation; 5 minute discussion) This Ordinance, adopted on First Reading on July 1, 2014 by a vote of 6-0 (Campana recused), rezones 264 acres located at the southwest corner of Harmony Road and Interstate 25 from Transition (T) to Harmony Corridor (H-C) and Rural Lands (R-U-L), in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan (City Plan). 19. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 098, 2014, Amending Article III of Chapter 12 of the City Code Pertaining to Smoking in Public Areas. (staff: Beth Sowder; no staff presentation; 10 minute discussion) This Ordinance, adopted on First Reading by a vote of 6-1 (Nays: Weitkunat) expands the City’s Smoking Ordinance to include electronic smoking devices and 100% smoke-free hotel/motel rooms. This item proposes two City Code amendments to expand the City’s Smoking Ordinance: 1. Prohibit the use of electronic smoking devices in all places where conventional smoking is prohibited. 2. Require 100% of hotel/motel rooms to be smoke-free. 20. Resolution 2014-045 Approving an Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement Between the City of Fort Collins and the Poudre Valley Fire Protection District Establishing the Poudre Fire Authority. (staff: Mike Beckstead, Tom DeMint; 5 minute staff presentation; 15 minute discussion) The purpose of this item is to approve the revised Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) which forms the Poudre Fire Authority and the associated Revenue Allocation Formula (RAF) which allocates a share of City revenue toward the provision of fire and rescue services within Fort Collins. City of Fort Collins Page 7 21. First Reading of Ordinance No. 105, 2014 Amending Section 2-581 of the City Code and Setting the Compensation of the Interim City Attorney. (staff: Amy Sharkey; 2 minute staff presentation; 5 minute discussion) The purpose of this item is to establish the salary and compensation provided the interim City Attorney while she serves in this capacity.  CONSIDERATION OF CITIZEN-PULLED CONSENT ITEMS  OTHER BUSINESS  ADJOURNMENT A. Council will consider a motion to cancel the August 5, 2014 Regular Council Meeting for Neighborhood Night Out. B. Council will consider a motion to adjourn to Tuesday, July 22, 2014. Every Council meeting will end no later than 10:30 p.m., except that: (1) any item of business commenced before 10:30 p.m. may be concluded before the meeting is adjourned and (2) the City Council may, by majority vote, extend a meeting until no later than 12:00 a.m. for the purpose of considering additional items of business. Any matter which has been commenced and is still pending at the conclusion of the Council meeting, and all matters scheduled for consideration at the meeting which have not yet been considered by the Council, will be continued to the next regular Council meeting and will be placed first on the discussion agenda for such meeting. PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, women of vision have helped shape the past, present and future of life in our society; and WHEREAS, women of vision have come from diverse backgrounds and philosophies, from homes, churches, the arts, the medical community, education, athletics, government, and business; and WHEREAS, women of vision have applied their training, skills, innovation, creativity and leadership as writers, artists, actors, athletes, doctors, scientists, social and political activists, educators, inventors, wives and mothers to lead, influence and bring about positive change; and WHEREAS, the contributions of these women of vision have often been overlooked and undervalued; and WHEREAS, we stand at a time in history when the importance of vision, innovation, creativity and leadership has never been more critical to our society; and WHEREAS, we seek to provide an inclusive platform designed to ensure women’s voices, ideas and spirits continue to provide inspiration, leadership and encouragement; and WHEREAS, we seek to celebrate female visionaries and leaders and highlight them as role models for our community. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerry Horak, Mayor Pro Tem of the City of Fort Collins, do hereby proclaim July 16, 2014 to be WOMEN OF VISION DAY in Fort Collins and call upon our citizens to recognize the important contributions women of vision have made to improve the quality of life for all. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of the City of Fort Collins this 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: _________________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 8 PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the first Tuesday night in August is celebrated cross the nation as National Night out; and WHEREAS, the City of Fort Collins, in conjunction with the national event, sponsors a unique community building program on August 5, 2014 called “Neighborhood Night Out;” and WHEREAS, Neighborhood Night Out provides an exceptional opportunity for residents throughout the city to join their neighbors in promoting community and safe neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the City of Fort Collins plays a vital role in assisting with neighborhood community building, crime prevention and quality of life enhancement within fort Collins by supporting “Neighborhood Night Out”; and WHEREAS, it is essential that all citizens of Fort Collins be aware of the importance that their participation can have on the safety and enjoyment of their neighborhood; and WHEREAS, I, along with the entire City Council, encourage Fort Collins residents to help make our community a safe and enjoyable place to live, work and play. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerry Horak, Mayor Pro Tem of the City of Fort Collins, do hereby proclaim Tuesday, August 5, 2014, as NEIGHBORHOOD NIGHT OUT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of the City of Fort Collins this 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: _________________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 9 PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, April to September is the season most commonly associated with snowmelt flooding and thunderstorm flash flooding; and WHEREAS, Fort Collins has experienced the social, economic and environmental consequences of loss of life and damage to property caused by flood disasters; and WHEREAS, emergency preparedness depends on the leadership and efforts of public officials dedicated to public safety; and WHEREAS, emergency preparedness requires the establishment of farsighted and proactive public policy; and WHEREAS, the people of Fort Collins can reduce the potential for loss of life and damage to property when threatened by these events, by being informed and prepared, and by taking proper protective action, as evidenced during the September 2013 flood event on the Poudre River. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerry Horak, Mayor Pro Tem of the City of Fort Collins, do hereby proclaim the week of July 12-19, 2014, as FLOOD AWARENESS WEEK IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of the City of Fort Collins this 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: _________________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 10 Agenda Item 1 Item # 1 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Nancy Nichols, Safe Routes to School Coordinator SUBJECT Second Reading of Ordinance No. 091, 2014, Appropriating Unanticipated Grant Revenue into the Transportation Services Fund for the Safe Routes to School Program. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Ordinance, unanimously adopted on First Reading on July 1, 2014, appropriates unbudgeted funds received through a grant for the Safe Routes to School Program. The City of Fort Collins FC Moves Department has received a $25,822 federal grant through the Colorado Department of Transportation for the 2014-15 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program. This funding will allow the City’s Safe Routes to School Program (administered and staffed by FC Moves) to enhance its pedestrian and bicycle safety education programs. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on Second Reading. ATTACHMENTS 1. First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (PDF) 2. Ordinance No. 091, 2014 (PDF) Packet Pg. 11 Agenda Item 9 Item # 9 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 1, 2014 City Council STAFF Nancy Nichols, Safe Routes to School Coordinator SUBJECT First Reading of Ordinance No. 091, 2014, Appropriating Unanticipated Grant Revenue into the Transportation Services Fund for the Safe Routes to School Program. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to appropriate unbudgeted funds received through a grant for the Safe Routes to School Program. The City of Fort Collins FC Moves Department has received a $25,822 federal grant through the Colorado Department of Transportation for the 2014-15 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program. This funding will allow the City’s Safe Routes to School Program (administered and staffed by FC Moves) to enhance its pedestrian and bicycle safety education programs. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION This is the latest of several CDOT grants received by the City’s Safe Routes to School program since 2007, totaling $415,822. The City of Fort Collins FC Moves staff develops and administers the local SRTS program. The success of the program is based on collaborations with local partners including Poudre School District (PSD), Thompson School District, Bicycle and Pedestrian Education Coalition, Healthier Communities Coalition, Safe Kids Larimer County, Boys & Girls Clubs of Larimer County, Bike Fort Collins, various City departments (Traffic Operations, Police, Engineering, Streets), individual schools and parents. Both the 2008 Bicycle Plan and the 2011 Bicycle Safety Education Plan (BSEP) call for the City and community partners to provide bicycle education for children. BSEP specifically recommends that at least 11,000 K-12 students are engaged in safety education annually and that each school has at least one trained bicycle-safety educator. A major goal of the overall SRTS program is to double the number of children who safely bike and walk to school - from an estimated of 20% to 25% of local schoolchildren currently to 50% in 2015 and beyond. Per the grant scope of work, the Fort Collins SRTS program will work with local K-8 schools during the 2014- 15 school year. Specific objectives of the grant include: • Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Education for K-5 Students - The SRTS program will deliver its comprehensive safety education program to physical education classes at the following PSD schools during the 2014-15 school year: Irish Elementary, Laurel Elementary, Linton Elementary, and Putnam Elementary. ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 12 Attachment1.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2144 : SR 091 Safe Routes to School) Agenda Item 9 Item # 9 Page 2 • Safe Routes to School Bike Fleet for Middle-School Students - Expand the existing SRTS bike fleet by purchase of 20 additional bikes to be housed as a satellite SRTS fleet at Lincoln Middle School. After this acquisition, the SRTS fleet will total 73 bikes. This project directly supports City Plan and the City’s Transportation Master Plan: City Plan: Policy SW 2.3 - Support Active Transportation Support means of physically active transportation (e.g., bicycling, walking, wheelchairs, etc.) by continuing bike and pedestrian safety education and encouragement programs, providing law enforcement, and maintaining bike lanes, sidewalks, trails, lighting, and facilities for easy and safe use, as outlined in the Pedestrian Plan and Bicycle Plan. Transportation Master Plan: Policy T 8.1 - Support Active Transportation Support physically active transportation (e.g., bicycling, walking, wheelchairs, etc.) by continuing bike and pedestrian safety education and encouragement programs, providing law enforcement, and maintaining bike lanes, sidewalks, trails, lighting, and facilities for easy and safe use. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) is providing the full $25,822, with no matching funds required. The funds will be allocated as outlined in the CDOT-approved scope of work (see Attachment 1: 2014-15 SRTS Non-infrastructure Grant Application). The City can begin utilizing the funds immediately upon City Council’s approval of this appropriation. Many governmental and nonprofit research organizations are beginning to quantify the economic benefits of active transportation. Economic savings are a clear result when people shift away from motor vehicle use, particularly for short trips, and opt instead to walk or bike. These savings are realized by both individual families as well as the larger community. Choosing to walk or bike translates to personal savings for families through fewer car trips and reduced costs for vehicle maintenance and fuel. For the larger community, reduced automobile emissions combined with a more physically active populace translates to lower health-care costs by reducing the incidence of disease associated with physical inactivity and air pollution. Shifts to active transportation modes also impact the community’s economy through less wear and tear on roadways (reducing road maintenance expenditures) and higher home values in areas with less traffic congestion and less air pollution. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Public-health and environmental agencies are recognizing the connection between active transportation choices and improved health of both people and the environment. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Although motor vehicle emissions have decreased significantly over the past three decades, air pollution from motor vehicles continues to contribute to the degradation of our environment and adverse respiratory and cardiovascular health effects.” The CDC specifically mentions Safe Routes to School as a means of ameliorating the negative impacts of motor vehicle emissions and chronic diseases stemming from physical inactivity among children. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Transportation Board and its Bicycle Advisory Committee receive periodic updates from the SRTS program. Both groups have shown strong support for the program’s goals as well as for grant funding to Packet Pg. 13 Attachment1.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2144 : SR 091 Safe Routes to School) Agenda Item 9 Item # 9 Page 3 support the program. The program is also guided by a PSD Safe Routes to School Steering Committee, which meets three times annually. PUBLIC OUTREACH The 2014-15 SRTS grant application was developed by the City’s FC Moves staff after consultation with key partners, including PSD teachers and staff, the Bicycle and Pedestrian Education Coalition, the Healthier Communities Coalition, and Poudre School District. Public outreach is ongoing throughout the school year. Student, teacher, principal, PTA/PTO, and parent feedback is used to refine programs to be responsive to community needs. ATTACHMENTS 1. 2014-15 SRTS Non-infrastructure Grant Application (PDF) Packet Pg. 14 Attachment1.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2144 : SR 091 Safe Routes to School) - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 091, 2014 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS APPROPRIATING UNANTICIPATED GRANT REVENUE INTO THE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FUND FOR THE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Safe Routes to School Program established by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) is designed to promote the safety of students traveling to and from school and to encourage more students to choose walking or bicycling to and from school; and WHEREAS, the City’s FC Moves Division has received a Safe Routes to School Program grant in the amount of $25,822 from CDOT for State fiscal year 2014 – 2015 (the “Grant”); and WHEREAS, the Grant will be used for bicycle and pedestrian safety education for K-5 students and to expand the Safe Routes to School Bike Fleet for middle-school students; and WHEREAS, the Grant does not require the City to provide local matching funds; and WHEREAS, Article V, Section 9, of the City Charter permits the City Council to make supplemental appropriations by ordinance at any time during the fiscal year, provided that the total amount of such supplemental appropriations, in combination with all previous appropriations for that fiscal year, does not exceed the current estimate of actual and anticipated revenues to be received during the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that the appropriation of the Grant funds will not cause the total amount appropriated in the Transportation Services Fund - FY 2014-2015 Safe Routes to School program to exceed the current estimate of actual and anticipated revenues to be received during the fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS that there is hereby appropriated for expenditure from unanticipated grant revenue in the Transportation Services Fund the sum of TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO DOLLARS ($25,822) for the Safe Routes to School Program. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 1st day of July, A.D. 2014, and to be presented for final passage on the 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 15 Attachment1.2: Ordinance No. 091, 2014 (2144 : SR 091 Safe Routes to School) - 2 - Passed and adopted on final reading on the 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 16 Attachment1.2: Ordinance No. 091, 2014 (2144 : SR 091 Safe Routes to School) Agenda Item 2 Item # 2 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Jennifer Hensley, Finance Coordinator Matt Robenalt, Executive Director SUBJECT Second Reading of Ordinance No. 092, 2014, Appropriating Prior Year Reserves in the Downtown Development Authority Fund for Expenditure on Projects and Programs in Accordance with the Downtown Plan of Development. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Ordinance, unanimously adopted on First Reading on July 1, 2014, appropriates unanticipated revenue for the Downtown Development Authority for projects and programs that enhance the downtown area. These funds, totaling $1,822,273, are from interest earnings, project savings, and from prior year bond proceeds. The DDA Board has authorized the expenditure on various projects and programs. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on Second Reading. ATTACHMENTS 1. First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (PDF) 2. Ordinance No. 092, 2014 (PDF) Packet Pg. 17 Agenda Item 10 Item # 10 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 1, 2014 City Council STAFF Jennifer Hensley, Finance Coordinator Matt Robenalt, Executive Director SUBJECT Second Reading of Ordinance No. 092, 2014, Appropriating Prior Year Reserves in the Downtown Development Authority Fund for Expenditure on Projects and Programs in Accordance with the Downtown Plan of Development. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to appropriate unanticipated revenue for the Downtown Development Authority for projects and programs that enhance the downtown area. These funds, totaling $1,822,273, are from interest earnings, project savings, and from prior year bond proceeds. The DDA Board has authorized the expenditure on various projects and programs. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The Downtown Development Authority (the "DDA") was created in 1981 with the purpose, according to State statute, of planning and implementing projects and programs within the boundaries of the DDA. The DDA and City adopted a Plan of Development that specifies the projects and programs the DDA would undertake. In order to carry out the purposes of the State statute and the Plan of Development, the City, on behalf of the DDA, has issued various notes and tax increment bonds. The first issuance of tax increment bonds occurred in 1984 with subsequent issues through 2012. Over the past year, proceeds from DDA tax increment financing (TIF) revenues that have not been spent have accumulated interest earnings. These funds, as well as the project savings, need to be appropriated for expenditure. The amount of interest earnings is currently $95,209 and project savings is $795,732. Also, the DDA needs to appropriate 2010, 2011, and 2012 bond proceeds that were earmarked “Bonded but not Appropriated” for expenditure in the respective amounts of $379,639, $299,605, and $252,088. The subject funds of this appropriation have been directed by the DDA Board for the following purposes: 1. Old Town Square Renovation: This project will address the overstressed infrastructure and make strategic design improvements to the physical space. Design process, including public engagement, is occurring throughout 2014 with construction anticipated to begin early 2015. 2. Facade Grant Program: Established by the DDA Board in 2006, the Facade Grant Program provides DDA investment of up to 25% of eligible feature costs on vertical façade elements of historic and non- historic buildings in the DDA boundary. To date, the Program has assisted in the enhancement and rehabilitation of twenty-three buildings in the downtown area. ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 18 Attachment2.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2140 : SR 092 DDA Appropriation) Agenda Item 10 Item # 10 Page 2 3. River District Improvements: Willow Street: This project includes continued implementation of the Downtown River District Streetscape Improvement Project Plan. Savings from the DDA’s $1 million contribution to the Linden Street project phase are proposed for redirection into the final design of Willow Street as overseen by the City Engineering Department. 4. Storm Water/Utility Matching Grant - Willow Street: This project will encourage Willow Street property owners to hire a civil engineer to review/coordinate with the City’s engineering design team on storm water and utilities issues related to the owners’ future vision for the property. Staff has provided DDA Board Minutes summaries for all of the projects and programs described above. All of the projects and programs listed for funding through this appropriation have been approved by the DDA Board of Directors. All approvals by the DDA Board are made contingent upon City Council appropriation of these funds to fulfill the DDA’s commitment to the projects and programs. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS The DDA Board has authorized expenditure on the following projects and programs which will be funded with this appropriation: 1. Old Town Square Renovation $1,519,708 2. Facade Grant Program 100,000 3. River District Improvements - Willow Street 187,565 4. Storm Water/Utility Matching Grant - Willow Street 15,000 $1,822,273 BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At its November 14, 2013 meeting, the Downtown Development Authority Board of Directors adopted the appropriation of funds as stated above. ATTACHMENTS 1. DDA Boundary map (PDF) 2. DDA minutes, November 14, 2013 (PDF) Packet Pg. 19 Attachment2.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2140 : SR 092 DDA Appropriation) - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 092, 2014 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS APPROPRIATING PRIOR YEAR RESERVES IN THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FUND FOR EXPENDITURE ON PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOWNTOWN PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, on April 21, 1981, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 046, 1981, establishing the Fort Collins, Colorado Downtown Development Authority (the “DDA”); and WHEREAS, the DDA’s Plan of Development was approved by the City Council on September 8, 1981, and established the purpose of the DDA and the types of projects and programs in which the DDA would participate; and WHEREAS, bond proceeds from 2008 through 2012 have accrued interest earnings in the amount of $95,209; and WHEREAS, DDA and City staff have identified project savings of $795,732 from bond proceeds currently in reserves; and WHEREAS, DDA and City staff have also identified the following bond proceeds that have not yet been appropriated: 2010 Bond Series - $379,639; 2011 Bond Series - $299,605; and 2012 Bond Series - $252,088; and WHEREAS, on November 14, 2013, the Board of Directors of the DDA voted to recommend to the City Council the appropriation of the above-referenced funds for expenditure on DDA projects and programs in accordance with the Downtown Plan of Development; and WHEREAS, Article V, Section 9, of the City Charter permits the City Council to make supplemental appropriations by ordinance at any time during the fiscal year, provided that the total amount of such supplemental appropriations, in combination with all previous appropriations for that fiscal year, does not exceed the current estimate of actual and anticipated revenues to be received during the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that the appropriation of the anticipated revenue as described herein will not cause the total amount appropriated in the DDA Fund to exceed the current estimate of actual and anticipated revenues to be received in that fund during any fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS that there is hereby appropriated for expenditure from reserves in the DDA Fund the sum of ONE MILLION EIGHT HUNDRED SEVEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY-THREE DOLLARS ($1,807,273) to be used for the DDA projects and programs stated below: Packet Pg. 20 Attachment2.2: Ordinance No. 092, 2014 (2140 : SR 092 DDA Appropriation) - 2 - Old Town Square Renovation $1,519,708 Façade Grant Program 100,000 River District Improvements - Willow Street 187,565 Storm Water/Utility Matching Grant - Willow Street 15,000 Total Projects/Programs $1,822,273 Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 1st day of July, A.D. 2014, and to be presented for final passage on the 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading on the 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 21 Attachment2.2: Ordinance No. 092, 2014 (2140 : SR 092 DDA Appropriation) Agenda Item 3 Item # 3 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Kyle Lambrecht, Civil Engineer Dean Klingner, Engineer & Capital Project Manager SUBJECT Second Reading of Ordinance No. 093, 2014, Appropriating Unanticipated Revenue in the Capital Projects Fund for the Willow Street Improvements Project and Authorizing the Transfer of Appropriations from the Building on Basics Pedestrian Plan and ADA Improvements Project into the Willow Street Improvements Project. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This ordinance, unanimously adopted on First Reading on July 1, 2014, appropriates DDA and local funds into the Willow Street Improvements Project. Previous planning efforts for the Downtown River District identified improvements along Willow Street as a top priority project within the River District. Engineering design is schedule to begin in summer of 2014. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on Second Reading. ATTACHMENTS 1. First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (PDF) 2. Ordinance No. 093, 2014 (PDF) Packet Pg. 22 Agenda Item 11 Item # 11 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 1, 2014 City Council STAFF Kyle Lambrecht, Civil Engineer Dean Klingner, Engineer & Capital Project Manager SUBJECT Items Relating to an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Downtown Development Authority for the Willow Street Improvements Project. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Resolution 2014-051 Authorizing the Mayor to Execute an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Downtown Development Authority to Transfer Funding to the Willow Street Improvements Project. B. First Reading of Ordinance No. 093, 2014, Appropriating Unanticipated Revenue in the Capital Projects Fund for the Willow Street Improvements Project and Authorizing the Transfer of Appropriations from the Building on Basics Pedestrian Plan and ADA Improvements Project into the Willow Street Improvements Project. The purpose of this item is to authorize the Mayor to sign an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Downtown Development Authority (DDA) and to appropriate both DDA and local funds into the Willow Street Improvements Project. Previous planning efforts for the Downtown River District identified improvements along Willow Street as a top priority project within the River District. Engineering design is schedule to begin in summer of 2014. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution and Ordinance on First Reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The Downtown River District (District) encompasses an area bordered by Jefferson Street and North College Avenue to the west, Lincoln Street to the southeast, and the Poudre River to the northeast. The District is a unique part of Fort Collins, encompassing the original Old Fort Site, the heart of the community’s beginnings. At the same time, the River District serves as a link to Old Town and the Poudre River for various housing, retail, and mixed use developments. Over the past several years, the City has partnered with the DDA, the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), and other interested stakeholders to establish a list of comprehensive improvements within the District to address both short-term and long-term needs. The overlying goal for the improvements was to create a new sense of place by making the area welcoming, visually pleasing, and ready for infill development. In addition, the City and the DDA developed a prioritization plan recommending high priority projects within the District as funding became available. The plan identified improvements along Willow Street as a high priority. ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 23 Attachment3.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2147 : SR 093 Willow Street Project) Agenda Item 11 Item # 11 Page 2 This Council Action will authorize the Mayor to sign an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the DDA to transfer remaining DDA funds from the recently constructed Linden Streetscape Improvements Project to the Willow Street Improvements Project. This Council Action will also appropriate $187,565 in DDA funds and $57,435 in Development Obligation funds to the Capital Projects fund to begin the engineering design of planned improvements along Willow Street. Goals for the roadway and streetscape improvements along Willow Street include designing:  On-Street Parking  On-Street Bike Lanes  10-foot and 20-foot Sidewalks  Urban Design Features  Culturally Significant Design Features  Utility Upgrades and Improvements  Roadway Improvements All of the planned improvements will be designed to be environmentally sensitive to the Poudre River and will be consistent with previous planning and construction efforts, including the Downtown River District Streetscape Improvements Project, the Fort Collins Downtown River District Preliminary Planset, and the Linden Streetscape Improvements Project. Improvements will also be designed to facilitate infill development and coordinate with development currently in the planning process or already under construction. Construction of designed improvements will occur as funding becomes available. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS The following is a summary of the funding available to begin engineering design for Willow Street within the Downtown River District. Funds to be Appropriated per this Action Downtown Development Authority (DDA) Funds $187,565 Development Obligation Funds $57,435 Total to be Appropriated $245,000 The $187,565 consists of project savings associated with the DDA’s Linden Intersection Grant from the recently completed Linden Streetscape Improvements Project. These funds are currently being retained by the DDA. The City received obligation payments from developers of adjacent property which resulted in additional savings to the DDA’s Linden Intersection Grant of $57,435.00. The DDA intends for the Linden Intersection Grant savings totaling $245,000 to be redirected to the Willow Street Improvements Project. These funds will be used to begin designing improvements along Willow Street. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The project will have a positive impact on long-term air and storm water quality. The addition of improved bicycle and pedestrian facilities, along with on-street parking, will increase the number of people walking and biking along Willow Street, resulting in air quality improvement. All of the planned improvements will be designed to be environmentally sensitive to the Poudre River. Staff anticipates the design of various utility improvements as part of this project, including a new storm sewer system. Once constructed, the new system will include a stormwater quality component to remove suspended solids and hydrocarbon contaminants from roadway drainage prior to discharge into receiving waters. One particular challenge associated with the project is the presence of a known Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Superfund site within the project limits. Staff must follow appropriate design and construction Packet Pg. 24 Attachment3.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2147 : SR 093 Willow Street Project) Agenda Item 11 Item # 11 Page 3 procedures if any underground improvements are to be implemented. Staff is aware of the procedures and is planning to coordinate with interested stakeholders accordingly. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The project team has yet to present to any boards or commissions, but expects to provide regular updates to the City’s Transportation Board, the Landmark Preservation Commission, and others interested in the project. PUBLIC OUTREACH The project team plans significant public outreach throughout the project, including public open houses, individual meetings with property owners, and multimedia outreach, including a project website. In addition, the project team will work closely with the DDA to design a project meeting both the City’s and the DDA’s goals. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map (PDF) 2. DDA staff memo for Willow Street IGA, June 12, 2014 (PDF) Packet Pg. 25 Attachment3.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2147 : SR 093 Willow Street Project) - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 093, 2014 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS APPROPRIATING UNANTICIPATED REVENUE IN THE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND FOR THE WILLOW STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF APPROPRIATIONS FROM THE BUILDING ON BASICS PEDESTRIAN PLAN & ADA IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT INTO THE WILLOW STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT WHEREAS, the City has partnered with the Downtown Development Authority (DDA), the Colorado Department of Transportation, and other interested stakeholders to establish a list of comprehensive improvements within the Downtown River District to address short-term and long-term needs; and WHEREAS, the overarching goal is to create a new sense of place by making the Downtown River District welcoming, visually pleasing, and ready for infill development; and WHEREAS, Willow Street improvements have been identified as a high priority; and WHEREAS, the Willow Street Improvements Project will begin the engineering design of planning improvements including on-street parking, on-street bike lanes, 10 foot and 20 foot sidewalks, utility upgrades and improvements, roadway improvements, and urban and culturally significant design features; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 2014-051, which approved an intergovernmental agreement with the Downtown Development Authority (DDA), the DDA will grant the City $187,565 for the Willow Street Improvements Project; and WHEREAS, in 2013, the City received $57,435 in Development Obligation Funds related to this project, of which $43,890 has already been appropriated, for a total of $245,000 to begin the design of the Willow Street Improvements; and WHEREAS, by the adoption of Ordinance 131, 2013, $43,890 of the Development Obligation Funds was appropriated last year into the BOB Pedestrian Plan and ADA Improvements project and will be transferred with this ordinance into the Willow Street Improvements Project; and WHEREAS, Article V, Section 9, of the City Charter permits the City Council to make supplemental appropriations by ordinance at any time during the fiscal year, provided that the total amount of such supplemental appropriations, in combination with all previous appropriations for that fiscal year, does not exceed the current estimate of actual and anticipated revenues to be received during the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that the appropriation of the revenue as described herein will not cause the total amount appropriated in the Capital Projects Fund to exceed the current estimate of actual and anticipated revenues to be received in that fund during any fiscal Packet Pg. 26 Attachment3.2: Ordinance No. 093, 2014 (2147 : SR 093 Willow Street Project) - 2 - year; and WHEREAS, Article V, Section 10, of the City Charter authorizes the City Council to transfer by ordinance any unexpended and unencumbered appropriated amount or portion thereof from one fund (project) to another fund (project), provided that the purpose for which the transferred funds are to be expended remains unchanged. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That there is hereby appropriated from unanticipated revenue from the DDA in the Capital Projects Fund the sum of ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY-SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($187,565) for expenditure in the Willow Street Improvements Project. Section 2. That there is hereby appropriated from unanticipated Development revenue in the Capital Projects Fund the sum of THIRTEEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($13,545) for expenditure in the Willow Street Improvements Project. Section 3. That the unexpended appropriated amount of FORTY-THREE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED NINETY DOLLARS ($43,890) of Development Obligation Funds in the Capital Projects Fund, Building on Basics Pedestrian Plan & ADA Improvements Project is hereby authorized for transfer to the Willow Street Improvements Project and appropriated therein. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 1st day of July, A.D. 2014, and to be presented for final passage on the 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 27 Attachment3.2: Ordinance No. 093, 2014 (2147 : SR 093 Willow Street Project) - 3 - Passed and adopted on final reading on the 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 28 Attachment3.2: Ordinance No. 093, 2014 (2147 : SR 093 Willow Street Project) Agenda Item 4 Item # 4 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Josh Weinberg, City Planner Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Planner SUBJECT Second Reading of Ordinance No. 094, 2014, Adopting Design Standards for the Old Town Historic District. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Ordinance, unanimously adopted on First Reading on July 1, 2014, updates the Old Town Fort Collins Historic District (Old Town District) Design Standards. The Old Town Design Standards, originally adopted in 1981, require substantial revisions to address current historic preservation practices and development concerns related to infill and redevelopment within and around the Old Town District. The update to the design standards will define and illustrate characteristics for compatible future development within the Old Town District and in the adjacent area, and a means for incorporating modern sustainable building practices into historic preservation projects. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on Second Reading. ATTACHMENTS 1. First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (PDF) 2. Ordinance No. 094, 2014 (PDF) Packet Pg. 29 Agenda Item 12 Item # 12 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 1, 2014 City Council STAFF Josh Weinberg, City Planner Karen McWilliams, Historic Preservation Planner SUBJECT First Reading of Ordinance No. 094, 2014, Adopting Design Standards for the Old Town Historic District. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to update the Old Town Fort Collins Historic District (Old Town District) Design Standards. The Old Town Design Standards, originally adopted in 1981, require substantial revisions to address current historic preservation practices and development concerns related to infill and redevelopment within and around the Old Town District. The update to the design standards will define and illustrate characteristics for compatible future development within the Old Town District and in the adjacent area, and a means for incorporating modern sustainable building practices into historic preservation projects. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION In early 2013, Historic Preservation staff received a grant from the State Historical Fund to partially fund an update to the design standards document for Fort Collins' Old Town Historic Landmark District (Old Town District). Winter & Co. of Boulder, CO was chosen in May 2013 as the project consultant. Primary project goals are to provide clear guidance for LPC members, City staff, property owners, and developers in the review of projects within the District; incorporate elements of green building and sustainable design; and highlight successful preservation projects that have already occurred in the District. Historic Old Town Fort Collins is renowned as a highly successful example of how historic preservation, economic development and community planning have combined to create a dynamic sense of place essential to the community’s quality of life. In 2006, for example, Money Magazine named Fort Collins the best place to live in the United States, and cited Old Town as Fort Collins’ integral social and economic resource. Today, Historic Old Town stands as a link to the past, while serving as an engine for economic development for the community-at-large. Most of the structures within the Old Town District were built between 1878 and the early 1900s. The hub of Fort Collins’ commerce and industry, the District’s buildings underwent numerous alterations and modernizations, notably in the 1960s and the early 1970s. Revitalization began in the late 1970s with local, state, and national register designation, and a communitywide commitment to preservation. Throughout the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s, nearly every historic building within the District was restored and/or rehabilitated. Highlighting these “success stories” is one of the project goals. This document utilizes an innovative and creative format to be user friendly. “Before and after" examples are used to illustrate the document and demonstrate the functionality of the preservation standards. The format makes use of charts and diagrams that help users plan projects efficiently and quickly determine which ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 30 Attachment4.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2146 : SR 094 Old Town Design Standards) Agenda Item 12 Item # 12 Page 2 sections of the document apply. The document also incorporates computer-generated models of alternative approaches for various design topics, including additions, rehabilitation and new construction. Additionally, information on sustainability and the use of substitute materials are interwoven through the document. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS There are no direct financial or economic impacts associated with the adoption of the Design Standards. However, Design Standards for Historic Districts assist property owners to qualify for federal, state and local financial incentive programs available only to designated properties. Additionally, research conducted by Clarion Associates has shown that historically designated buildings and districts retain higher property values than those that are not designated. Clarion attributed this to the fact that future owners also qualify for the financial incentives; the perception that designated properties are better maintained; the appeal of owning a recognized historic landmark; and the assurance of predictability that design review offers. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS There are no direct environmental impacts associated with this project. However, preservation and rehabilitation of historic buildings supports the City’s sustainability goals. As with all historic preservation projects, use of existing materials and infrastructure is maximized, and reduces waste deposits in landfills from demolition. Additionally, historic buildings are traditionally designed to be energy efficient, with many sustainable features that respond to climate and site. When effectively restored and reused, these features bring about substantial energy savings. Such projects also preserve and highlight important and interesting aspects of Fort Collins social history. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Landmark Preservation Commission discussed this item at three work sessions: June 26, October 23, and December 11, 2013. The Commission unanimously recommended adoption of the Design Standards at its regular meeting on May 14, 2014. The Planning and Zoning Board discussed this item at its work session on January 3, 2014. The Board unanimously recommended adoption of the Design Standards at its regular meeting on June 12, 2014. Boards and Commission Outreach - Work Sessions with Landmark Preservation Commission (June 26, October 23, and December 11, 2013) - Work Session with Planning and Zoning Board (January 3, 2014) - Downtown Development Authority (February 13, 2014) - Parking Advisory Board (March 10, 2014) - Natural Resources Advisory Board (March 19, 2014) - Economic Advisory Commission (April 17, 2014) - Landmark Preservation Commission recommendation for adoption (May 14, 2014) - Planning and Zoning Board recommendation for adoption (June 12, 2014) PUBLIC OUTREACH Citizen Outreach - Tour of subject areas with consultant and stakeholder group (June 26, 2013) - Poudre River Project Open House, Lincoln Center (June 26, 2013) - Public Workshops (October 3 and November 13, 2013 and April 30, 2014) - Website: <http://www.fcgov.com/historicpreservation/otrd-design-standards-and-guidelines.php> (October 2013 - May 2014) Packet Pg. 31 Attachment4.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2146 : SR 094 Old Town Design Standards) Agenda Item 12 Item # 12 Page 3 - Poster and table at joint Planning and Transportation open house, Museum and Discovery Science Center (February 20, 2014) - Correspondence with representatives of Save the Poudre and Protect Our Old Town Homes (Ongoing) ATTACHMENTS 1. Old Town Historic District map (PDF) 2. Old Town Historic District Design Standards (PDF) 3. Work Session Summary, April 8, 2014 (PDF) 4. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes, June 12, 2014 (PDF) 5. Landmark Preservation Commission Minutes, May 14, 2014 (PDF) Packet Pg. 32 Attachment4.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2146 : SR 094 Old Town Design Standards) - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 094, 2014 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS ADOPTING DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE OLD TOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code Section 14-2, the City Council has established a public policy encouraging the protection, enhancement and perpetuation of landmarks and landmark districts within the City; and WHEREAS, the Old Town Historic District was designated by Ordinance No. 170, 1979, of the City Council and subsequently amended by Ordinance No. 124, 1998; and WHEREAS, in 2013, the City received a grant from the State Historical Fund to partially fund an update to the Design Standards for the Old Town Historic District to incorporate elements of green building and sustainable design, and to highlight successful preservation projects that have occurred in the Old Town Historic District; and WHEREAS, the new Design Standards will serve to encourage public knowledge and appreciation of the architectural character of Old Town and the history of the City, and will serve as the regulatory document to be used by the City for review of projects within the Old Town Historic District; and WHEREAS, following substantial public outreach, and upon the favorable recommendation of the Landmark Preservation Commission and the Planning and Zoning Board, the City Council has determined that the new Design Standards for the Old Town Historic District are in the best interests of the City and should be adopted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That the new Design Standards for the Old Town Historic District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, are hereby adopted to serve as a regulatory document to be used by the Landmark Preservation Commission and, if applicable, the Planning and Zoning Board in the review and approval of applicable projects located in the Old Town Historic District, which district is more particularly described on Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. That the Design Standards for the Old Town Historic District originally adopted in 1981 are hereby repealed. Packet Pg. 33 Attachment4.2: Ordinance No. 094, 2014 (2146 : SR 094 Old Town Design Standards) - 2 - Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 1st day of July, A.D. 2014, and to be presented for final passage on the 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading on the 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 34 Attachment4.2: Ordinance No. 094, 2014 (2146 : SR 094 Old Town Design Standards) OLD TOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT EXHIBIT A Attachment4.2: Ordinance No. 094, 2014 (2146 : SR 094 Old Town Design Standards) Agenda Item 5 Item # 5 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Jon Haukaas, Water Engr Field Operations Mgr Kevin Gertig, Utilities Executive Director Carol Webb, Regulation & Govt Affairs Manager SUBJECT Second Reading of Ordinance No. 096, 2014, Authorizing the Mayor to Execute the First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement with the Fort Collins-Loveland Water District, the Fort Collins-Loveland Water District Enterprise and the Fort Collins Water Utility Enterprise. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Ordinance, unanimously adopted on First Reading on July 1, 2014, authorizes the Mayor to execute the First Amendment to the amended and restated intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with the Fort Collins- Loveland Water District, the Fort Collins-Loveland Water District Enterprise, and the City of Fort Collins Water Utility Enterprise for the delivery of potable water. The item will require the party that exceeds the allotment of water allowed for exchange to provide raw water reimbursement in addition to the charges for treatment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on Second Reading. ATTACHMENTS 1. First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (PDF) 2. Ordinance No. 096, 2014 (PDF) Packet Pg. 36 Agenda Item 14 Item # 14 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 1, 2014 City Council STAFF Jon Haukaas, Water Engr Field Operations Mgr Kevin Gertig, Utilities Executive Director Carol Webb, Regulation & Govt Affairs Manager SUBJECT First Reading of Ordinance No. 096, 2014, Authorizing the Mayor to Execute the First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement with the Fort Collins-Loveland Water District, the Fort Collins-Loveland Water District Enterprise and the Fort Collins Water Utility Enterprise. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to authorize the Mayor to execute the First Amendment to the amended and restated intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with the Fort Collins-Loveland Water District, the Fort Collins- Loveland Water District Enterprise, and the City of Fort Collins Water Utility Enterprise for the delivery of potable water. The item will require the party that exceeds the allotment of water allowed for exchange to provide raw water reimbursement in addition to the charges for treatment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The original Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement was approved on September 13, 2013 to be effective with the new “Water Year” on November 1, 2013. Upon operationalizing the terms of the Agreement it was discovered that the transfer of raw water along with payment for any water transfer “overages” was not included in the IGA as intended. The terms of the agreement are mutual so that the same settlement terms apply to any imbalance owed to Fort Collins Utilities or FCLWD. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS Approval of this Amendment will allow the party providing excess water in any given month to recover the raw water component associated with producing that potable water. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This ongoing Agreement makes for more efficient use of existing infrastructure, thereby delaying any expansion of the Soldier Canyon Filter Plant owned and operated by the Tri-Districts, or the construction of a new water treatment facility. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The objectives of amending this Agreement were presented to the Water Board on June 20, 2013. The Water Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of amending the Intergovernmental Agreement for the ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 37 Attachment5.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2143 : SR 096 FCLWD IGA) Agenda Item 14 Item # 14 Page 2 Delivery of Potable Water with Fort Collins Loveland Water District and the future amendment to the similar Intergovernmental Agreement with the North Weld County Water District. Packet Pg. 38 Attachment5.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2143 : SR 096 FCLWD IGA) - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 096, 2014 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE FORT COLLINS-LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT, THE FORT COLLINS-LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT ENTERPRISE, AND THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS WATER UTILITY ENTERPRISE FOR THE DELIVERY OF POTABLE WATER WHEREAS, the City owns a water utility which acquires, treats, transmits and distributes potable water (hereinafter referred to as “the City Water Utility”); and WHEREAS, in doing so, the City owns and the City Water Utility operates a water treatment plant located at 4316 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado (hereinafter referred to as “the City’s Treatment Plant”); and WHEREAS, the City Water Utility distributes potable water to its customers through a variety of water transmission facilities located within the City (hereinafter referred to as “the City’s Transmission Facilities”); and WHEREAS, the Fort Collins-Loveland Water District (the “District”) is a special district organized and existing under Colorado law that also operates a water utility which distributes potable water through a variety of water transmission facilities located within Larimer County, Colorado (hereinafter referred to as “the District’s Transmission Facilities”); and WHEREAS, in order to establish updated arrangements for the delivery of potable water by amending and updating previously existing agreements, the City and the District negotiated and presented for formal approval in late 2013 an Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement for the Delivery of Potable Water (the “Agreement”), which was approved on October 15, 2013, by the City Council through its adoption of Ordinance No. 135, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Agreement has been fully signed and implemented by the parties; and WHEREAS, in the course of implementing the Agreement, staff has identified an ambiguity regarding the requirement to provide raw water to offset imbalances in water delivered under the Agreement, and recommends that this requirement be clarified and confirmed amongst the parties to the Agreement through the adoption of a First Amendment to the Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Amendment”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to C.R.S. §29-1-203(1), the City and the District are authorized to cooperate or contract with one another to provide any function, service or facility lawfully authorized to each of them; and WHEREAS, Article II, Section 16 of the Charter of the City of Fort Collins (“Charter”) additionally provides that the City Council may, by resolution or ordinance, enter into contracts Packet Pg. 39 Attachment5.2: Ordinance No. 096, 2014 (2143 : SR 096 FCLWD IGA) - 2 - with other governmental bodies to furnish governmental services and make charges for such services, or enter into cooperative or joint activities with other governmental bodies; and WHEREAS, Article XII, Section 6 of the Charter provides that the City Council shall by ordinance from time to time fix, establish, maintain, and provide for the collection of such rates, fees or charges for water and electricity, as will produce revenues sufficient to pay the cost of operation and maintenance of the utilities in good repair and working order, and for other enumerated purposes; and WHEREAS, the City’s Water Utility Enterprise (the “City Enterprise”) and the Fort Collins-Loveland Water District Enterprise (the “District Enterprise”) were created by the City and the District, respectively, in order to comply with the provisions of Section 20, Article X of the Colorado Constitution and Article 45.1 of Title 37 of the Colorado Revised Statutes and to permit the City and the District, acting through their respective enterprise, to issue revenue bonds and enter into multi-year fiscal obligations in connection with their operation of a water utility; and WHEREAS, the City Enterprise and the District Enterprise are made parties to the Agreement solely for the purpose of entering into any multi-year fiscal obligation imposed under this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Enterprise is authorized in Section 26-43 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins to enter into contracts relating to the City’s water system. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That the Council hereby approves the Amendment, and finds and determines the Agreement to be for the benefit of the City Water Utility and its ratepayers. Section 2. That the Council hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute the Amendment on behalf of the City, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, together with such modifications and additions as the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, determines necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the City or further the purposes of this Ordinance. Packet Pg. 40 Attachment5.2: Ordinance No. 096, 2014 (2143 : SR 096 FCLWD IGA) - 3 - Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 1st day of July, A.D. 2014, and to be presented for final passage on the 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading on the 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 41 Attachment5.2: Ordinance No. 096, 2014 (2143 : SR 096 FCLWD IGA) 1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE DELIVERY OF POTABLE WATER This First Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement for the Delivery of Potable Water (“Water Delivery Agreement” or “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___ day of ________________, 2014, effective as of November 1, 2013, nunc pro tunc, by and between the CITY OF FORT COLLINS, a Colorado municipal corporation, (hereinafter referred to as “the City”), the CITY OF FORT COLLINS WATER UTILITY ENTERPRISE, an enterprise of the City (hereinafter referred to as “the City Enterprise”), the FORT COLLINS-LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, (hereinafter referred to as “the District”), and the FORT COLLINS- LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT ENTERPRISE, an enterprise of the District (hereinafter referred to as “the District Enterprise”) (all collectively referred to as the “Parties”). W I T N E S S E T H : WHEREAS, the Parties entered into the Water Delivery Agreement on September 13, 2013, effective as of November 1, 2013, in order to establish updated terms and conditions for the delivery of potable water; and WHEREAS, the Parties have determined that the transfer of raw water for water delivery overages was intended by them to be an element of the Water Delivery Agreement; and WHEREAS, in order to incorporate said additional term to the Water Delivery Agreement, the Parties desire to enter into, as of the effective date of said Agreement, this First Amendment. EXHIBIT A Packet Pg. 42 Attachment5.2: Ordinance No. 096, 2014 (2143 : SR 096 FCLWD IGA) 2 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, the Parties’ mutual terms, covenants and conditions contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and accuracy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Amendment to Paragraph 4.B. Paragraph 4.B of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: B. For all water delivered under this Agreement, in any given month within a Water Year that the respective amounts requested by and delivered to each of the parties differ by no more than twelve million (12,000,000) gallons (the “Carryover Limit”), then the calculation of applicable overage charges under this subparagraph B will be carried over and incorporated into the calculation and related billing for overage charges for the succeeding month. In any month that the respective amounts requested by and delivered to each of the parties, adjusted by any carryover from the preceding month as set forth above, differ by more than the Carryover Limit, the party receiving the greater amount (the “Owing Party”) shall owe to the other party (the “Owed Party”) compensation (in the form of payment and transfer of raw water) for the difference between the amount delivered in such month and the Carryover Limit (the “Overage”) as described in paragraph C below: 2. Amendment to Paragraph 4.C. Paragraph 4.C of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: C. It is the intent of the Parties to adjust the rate payable for an Overage over approximately a three year period. The City is projecting rate increases of 4% annually over the next several years. The rate shall become equal to the full Packet Pg. 43 Attachment5.2: Ordinance No. 096, 2014 (2143 : SR 096 FCLWD IGA) 3 treatment charges of the City beginning in calendar year 2017. For deliveries in all calendar years after 2017, the rate for overage charges shall be adjusted annually on a calendar year basis at a rate consistent with the overall rate increase to the entire customer base of the City. 1. The schedule to step into the full rate shall be as follows: a. For deliveries in the remainder of calendar year 2013 and the full calendar year 2014, treatment charges shall be due from the Owing Party to the Owed Party on the Overage calculated at the rate of One Dollar and Thirty-Five and Zero Hundredths Cents ($1.3500) per thousand gallons of metered flows. b. For deliveries in calendar year 2015, treatment charges shall be due from the Owing Party to the Owed Party on the Overage calculated at the rate of One Dollar and Sixty-Nine and Twenty Hundredths Cents ($1.6920) per thousand gallons of metered flows. c. For deliveries in calendar year 2016, treatment charges shall be due from the Owing Party to the Owed Party on the Overage calculated at the rate of Two Dollar and Three and Thirty-Eight Hundredths Cents ($2.0338) per thousand gallons of metered flows. 2. Such compensation shall be paid within thirty (30) days after the issuance of the related invoice by the Owed Party and it shall be paid by the City Enterprise or the District Enterprise, as applicable, solely from the net revenues of their respective water utilities. 3. The Owing Party shall transfer raw water from the Colorado-Big Packet Pg. 44 Attachment5.2: Ordinance No. 096, 2014 (2143 : SR 096 FCLWD IGA) 4 Thompson Project (“CBT”) to the Owed Party in an amount equal to the volume of the Overage, within ten (10) days after the issuance of the related invoice by the Owed Party. All transfers of CBT water shall be made in accordance with rules established by the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (“NCWCD”). 4. No Further Modification. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Water Delivery Agreement is unmodified and shall continue in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said City has caused this agreement to be executed by its Mayor, attested to by its City Clerk with the corporate seal of said City hereunto affixed, the said District have caused this agreement to be executed by its president, and the City Enterprise and the District Enterprise have each cause this agreement to be executed by its respective president, as of the day and year first above written, in duplicate. THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS A Municipal Corporation By: __________________________ Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ ________________________ City Clerk Deputy City Attorney Packet Pg. 45 Attachment5.2: Ordinance No. 096, 2014 (2143 : SR 096 FCLWD IGA) 5 CITY OF FORT COLLINS WATER UTILITY ENTERPRISE An Enterprise of the City By: __________________________ Enterprise President ATTEST: _____________________ Enterprise Secretary FORT COLLINS-LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT, A Political Subdivision of the State of Colorado ATTEST: By: , President ___________________________ , Secretary FORT COLLINS - LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT ENTERPRISE, An Enterprise of the District ATTEST: By: , President ___________________________ , Secretary Packet Pg. 46 Attachment5.2: Ordinance No. 096, 2014 (2143 : SR 096 FCLWD IGA) Agenda Item 6 Item # 6 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Jon Haukaas, Water Engr Field Operations Mgr Kevin Gertig, Utilities Executive Director Carol Webb, Regulation & Govt Affairs Manager SUBJECT Second Reading of Ordinance No. 097, 2014, Authorizing the Mayor to Execute an Intergovernmental Agreement with the North Weld County Water District, the North Weld County Water District Enterprise, and the Fort Collins Water Utility Enterprise for the Delivery of Potable Water. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Ordinance, unanimously adopted on First Reading on July 1, 2014, authorizes the Mayor to execute an amended and restated intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with the North Weld County Water District (NWCWD), the North Weld County Water District Enterprise, and the City of Fort Collins Water Utility Enterprise for the delivery of potable water. The amendment makes adjustments to the costs associated with exchanging water between the City and the NWCWD to reflect actual expenses, adjusts the requirement to balance accounts from annually to monthly, adjusts the allocation of water that is allowed to be exchanged, and provides for the transfer of associated raw water for any imbalance in excess of the allocation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on Second Reading. ATTACHMENTS 1. First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (PDF) 2. Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (PDF) Packet Pg. 47 Agenda Item 15 Item # 15 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 1, 2014 City Council STAFF Jon Haukaas, Water Engr Field Operations Mgr Kevin Gertig, Utilities Executive Director Carol Webb, Regulation & Govt Affairs Manager SUBJECT First Reading of Ordinance No. 097, 2014, Authorizing the Mayor to Execute an Intergovernmental Agreement with the North Weld County Water District, the North Weld County Water District Enterprise, and the Fort Collins Water Utility Enterprise for the Delivery of Potable Water. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to authorize the Mayor to execute an amended and restated intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with the North Weld County Water District (NWCWD), the North Weld County Water District Enterprise, and the City of Fort Collins Water Utility Enterprise for the delivery of potable water. The amendment makes adjustments to the costs associated with exchanging water between the City and the NWCWD to reflect actual expenses, adjusts the requirement to balance accounts from annually to monthly, adjusts the allocation of water that is allowed to be exchanged, and provides for the transfer of associated raw water for any imbalance in excess of the allocation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION In 1999, a Joint Transmission Study was completed by Fort Collins Utilities and the Tri-Districts to determine the need for additional transmission capacity throughout the community. An outcome of that study was the determination that the City’s existing infrastructure had sufficient capacity to provide potable water to the North Weld County Water District (NWCWD) on an on-demand, as-available basis, to meet day-to-day demands for the delivery of potable water to customers and avoid expensive duplication of transmission facilities. The current water sharing agreement between the City and NWCWD has been in effect since 2000 for that purpose. Two delivery points into the NWCWD distribution system were specified in the agreement, as were two points of entry into the Fort Collins Utilities transmission system from the Soldier Canyon Filter Plant (SCFP) on behalf of NWCWD. The intention of the water sharing agreement was to allow for an annual balancing between how much water was conveyed through the Fort Collins Utilities transmission system from SCFP and how much water was taken from the Fort Collins Utilities transmission system by NWCWD. No changes are being proposed to the leasing terms and associated transmission charges. Many of the terms of the agreement concerning the balancing and settlement of imbalances are outdated, however, including the amount of water being shared, the points of delivery for any shared water as discussed above and the settlement price of any resulting annual imbalance. In an effort to address these inconsistencies, Fort Collins Utilities and NWCWD have negotiated new terms for the agreement over the past year. ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 48 Attachment6.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Agenda Item 15 Item # 15 Page 2 Ongoing development within the NWCWD service area has decreased the need for daily flows of water through the Fort Collins Utilities transmission system into the NCWWD distribution system. The amended agreement being proposed herein will decrease the daily flow limit from 12 to 9 MGD. (Please note that Fort Collins Utilities amended the existing water sharing agreement with Fort Collins-Loveland Water District to increase the maximum daily flow of that agreement from 9 MGD to 12 MGD in October 2013, hence there is no change in the combined treatment capacity obligation by Fort Collins Utilities for these agreements.) The current water sharing agreement allows for an annual settlement of any imbalance at $0.36 per thousand gallons with no raw water being provided. This settlement price is well below the current direct cost of treatment and much less the current total cost of treatment. As such, the fixed price of settlement, along with no raw water being provided in the settlement, is no longer acceptable to Fort Collins Utilities. To date, all annual imbalances have fallen within the specified 5% limit, which allows the imbalance to be carried forward into the next water year. However, in the foreseeable future, this may not be the case. To make it possible to not require annual settlements in the past, it has been necessary for NWCWD to push significant amounts of water to Fort Collins Utilities during shoulder months (February - April and September - October) in order to offset the significant imbalance that occurs during the irrigation season (May - August). In effect, Fort Collins Utilities has provided NWCWD with treatment capacity to meet their peak demand without compensation in the past. The proposed amendment will address these issues by allowing for annual adjustments in the settlement price, requiring raw water is transferred between parties and requiring monthly settlement of any imbalance in excess of 9 million gallons. The proposed settlement price (the “Overage” charge) for 2014 is $1.6920 per thousand gallons, inclusive of the payment in-lieu of taxes plus transmission charges as outlined in the current agreement. The Overage charge for future years shall reflect all costs to produce treated water at the City’s Treatment Plant and shall be determined by the City’s Cost of Service Study. This rate for overage charges shall be adjusted annually on a calendar year basis at a rate consistent with the overall rate increase to the e4ntire customer base of the City. The terms of the agreement are mutual so that the same settlement terms apply to any imbalance owed to Fort Collins Utilities or NWCWD. Because Fort Collins Utilities has excess treatment capacity and the agreement outlines the right of refusal by either party of water through daily communication, it is not anticipated that Fort Collins Utilities will have a need to take sufficient water from NWCWD to result in a monthly imbalance requiring settlement under normal operating conditions. Lastly, on the water sharing agreement, both parties are agreeable to making the proposed amendments effective beginning with the 2013-14 water year, which began on November 1, 2013. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS The financial impact of the proposed amendment affecting the sharing of water between the two parties is difficult to quantify as it depends greatly on the annual variability in water demand. Monthly imbalances requiring settlement are likely in the irrigation season (May - August) when NWCWD has historically taken more water than it has returned to Fort Collins Utilities. Thus, amending the agreement to have monthly rather than annual settlements may increase the cost of water for NWCWD customers as it will no longer allow NWCWD to effectively use this agreement to meet its summer peak demand through the use of treatment capacity it has not invested in creating. Correspondingly, it may offset some of the indirect treatment costs currently paid by Fort Collins Utilities customers through the monthly settlement of any imbalance. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This ongoing Agreement makes for more efficient use of existing infrastructure thereby delaying any expansion of the SCFP or the construction of a new water treatment facility. The potential environmental impacts of either of those solutions to meet NWCWD’s growing demand for treated water would at a minimum be deferred by several years by continuing with this cooperative arrangement. Packet Pg. 49 Attachment6.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Agenda Item 15 Item # 15 Page 3 BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The objectives of amending this Agreement were presented to the Water Board on June 20, 2013. The Water Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of amending the Intergovernmental Agreement for the Delivery of Potable Water with Fort Collins Loveland Water District and the future amendment to the similar Intergovernmental Agreement with the North Weld County Water District. Packet Pg. 50 Attachment6.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 097, 2014 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, THE NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ENTERPRISE, AND THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS WATER UTILITY ENTERPRISE FOR THE DELIVERY OF POTABLE WATER WHEREAS, the City owns a water system through which it treats, transmits and distributes potable water (the “City Water System”); and WHEREAS, as part of the City Water System, Fort Collins operates a water treatment plant located at 4316 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado (the “City Treatment Plant”); and WHEREAS, the North Weld County Water District (the “District”) is a special district organized and existing under Colorado law that also operates a water system (the “District Water System”) to distribute potable water through a variety of water transmission facilities located within Larimer County, Colorado (“District Transmission Facilities”); and WHEREAS, the City and the District have previously entered into that certain Intergovernmental Agreement for Delivery of Potable Water, dated June 1, 2000 (the “Water Delivery Agreement”), which provides for the delivery of treated water by the City and the District to each other on demand, as available, to meet day-to-day demands for delivery of potable water to their respective customers, and WHEREAS, it is in the mutual interests of the City and the District to establish updated arrangements for the delivery of potable water by amending and updating the Water Delivery Agreement, to reflect the current needs and commitments of the parties, and current rates and requirements for service; and WHEREAS, accordingly, the City and the District have negotiated the terms and conditions set forth in the Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement for Delivery of Potable Water, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Agreement”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to C.R.S. §29-1-203(1), the City and the District are authorized to cooperate or contract with one another to provide any function, service or facility lawfully authorized to each of them; and WHEREAS, Article II, Section 16 of the Charter of the City of Fort Collins (“Charter”) additionally provides that the City Council may, by resolution or ordinance, enter into contracts with other governmental bodies to furnish governmental services and make charges for such services, or enter into cooperative or joint activities with other governmental bodies; and Packet Pg. 51 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) - 2 - WHEREAS, Article XII, Section 6 of the Charter provides that the City Council shall by ordinance from time to time fix, establish, maintain, and provide for the collection of such rates, fees or charges for water and electricity, as will produce revenues sufficient to pay the cost of operation and maintenance of the utilities in good repair and working order, and for other enumerated purposes; and WHEREAS, the City’s Water Utility Enterprise (the “City Enterprise”) and the North Weld County Water District Enterprise (the “District Enterprise”) were created by the City and the District, respectively, in order to comply with the provisions of Section 20, Article X of the Colorado Constitution and Article 45.1 of Title 37 of the Colorado Revised Statutes and to permit the City and the District, acting through their respective enterprise, to issue revenue bonds and enter into multi-year fiscal obligations in connection with their operation of a water utility; and WHEREAS, the City Enterprise and the District Enterprise are made parties to the Agreement solely for the purpose of entering into any multi-year fiscal obligation imposed under this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Enterprise is authorized in Section 26-43 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins to enter into contracts relating to the City’s water system. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That the Council hereby approves the Agreement, including the rates, fees and charges set forth in the Agreement, and finds and determines the Agreement to be for the benefit of the City Water Utility and its ratepayers. Section 2. That the Council hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, together with such modifications and additions as the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, determines necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the City or further the purposes of this Ordinance. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 1st day of July, A.D. 2014, and to be presented for final passage on the 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 52 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) - 3 - Passed and adopted on final reading on the 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 53 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 1 AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE DELIVERY OF POTABLE WATER This Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement for the Delivery of Potable Water (“Water Delivery Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___ day of _______, 2014, effective, nunc pro tunc, as of November 1, 2013, by and between the CITY OF FORT COLLINS, a Colorado municipal corporation, (hereinafter referred to as “the City”), the CITY OF FORT COLLINS WATER UTILITY ENTERPRISE, an enterprise of the City (hereinafter referred to as “the City Enterprise”), the NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, (hereinafter referred to as “the District”), and the NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ENTERPRISE, an enterprise of the District (hereinafter referred to as “the District Enterprise”) (all collectively referred to as the “Parties”). W I T N E S S E T H : WHEREAS, the City is a home rule municipality organized and existing under Colorado law that owns a water utility which acquires, treats, transmits and distributes potable water (hereinafter referred to as “the City Water Utility”); and WHEREAS, in doing so, the City owns and the City Water Utility operates a water treatment plant located at 4316 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado (hereinafter referred to as “the City’s Treatment Plant”); and WHEREAS, the City Water Utility distributes potable water to its customers through a variety of water transmission facilities located within the City (hereinafter referred to as “the City’s Transmission Facilities”); and WHEREAS, the District is a special district organized and existing under Colorado law that also operates a water utility which distributes potable water through a variety of water EXHIBIT A Packet Pg. 54 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 2 transmission facilities located within Larimer and Weld Counties, Colorado (hereinafter referred to as “the District’s Transmission Facilities”); and WHEREAS, the City Enterprise and the District Enterprise were created by the City and the District, respectively, in order to comply with the provisions of Section 20, Article X of the Colorado Constitution and Article 45.1 of Title 37 of the Colorado Revised Statutes in order to permit the City and the District, acting through their respective enterprise, to issue revenue bonds and enter into multi-year fiscal obligations in connection with their operation of a water utility; and WHEREAS, the City Enterprise and the District Enterprise are made parties to this Agreement solely for the purpose of entering into any multi-year fiscal obligation required under this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the District has previously entered into that certain “Amended Intergovernmental Agreement” dated December 9, 1995, (hereinafter referred to as “the Soldier Canyon IGA”) with the East Larimer County Water District (hereinafter referred to as “ELCO”) and the Fort Collins-Loveland Water District (hereinafter referred to as “FCLWD”); and WHEREAS, the Soldier Canyon IGA by its terms created Soldier Canyon as a separate governmental entity pursuant to C.R.S. Section 29-1-203; and WHEREAS, the Soldier Canyon IGA provides that Soldier Canyon shall be responsible for the operation, maintenance and management of the water treatment plant located at 4424 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado, which is jointly owned by the District, ELCO and FCLWD (hereinafter referred to as “the Soldier Canyon Treatment Plant”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to C.R.S. Section 29-1-203(1), governmental entities in Colorado are authorized to cooperate or contract with one another to provide any function, service or Packet Pg. 55 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 3 facility lawfully authorized to each of the cooperating or contracting governmental entities; and WHEREAS, the City and the District have been exploring the possibility of sharing the use of their respective water facilities in order to avoid expensive duplication of these facilities, as well as to find ways to optimize the use of their respective water resources; and WHEREAS, the parties, together with Soldier Canyon, have previously entered into that certain Intergovernmental Agreement for Delivery of Potable Water, dated June 1, 2000 (“Water Delivery Agreement”), which provides for the delivery of treated water by the City and the District to each other on demand, as available, to meet day-to-day demands for delivery of potable water to their respective customers; and WHEREAS, it is in the mutual interests of the City and the District to establish updated arrangements for the delivery of potable water by amending and updating the Water Delivery Agreement, to reflect the current needs and commitments of the parties; and WHEREAS, in order to update the terms of service for the delivery of potable water, the parties have negotiated the terms and conditions set forth herein, which the parties agree amend and restate the Water Delivery Agreement; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the parties, with the consent of Soldier Canyon, to remove Soldier Canyon as a party to the Water Delivery Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the parties’ mutual promises and agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and accuracy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Term of Agreement. The obligations of the parties under this Agreement shall be effective as of November 1, 2013, with rates, charges and raw water requirements applied retroactively to that date, and shall be perpetual in duration and shall not expire unless terminated Packet Pg. 56 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 4 as provided in paragraph 10 or 11 below. 2. Delivery of Potable Water to the District. A. It is the understanding of the parties that due to the configuration of the District’s Transmission Facilities, and the manner in which potable water flows into the District’s System from the City’s Transmission Facilities, it is not necessary for the District to request deliveries from the City. Instead, through its operations, the District will coordinate with the City for the normal operation of its System so as to allow for delivery of potable water from the City’s System to the District’s System on an ongoing basis, at levels consistent with the terms of this Agreement and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein. The District will notify the City in advance of any infrastructure or operational changes in the District’s System the affect the interconnection of the systems covered under this Agreement, except in the event of emergency circumstances, in which case the District shall notify the City as early as reasonably possible of the emergency and related System changes. B. The City shall only be obligated to deliver water to the District to the extent it legally and physically has surplus potable water available after meeting all the needs of the customers of the City Water Utility and provided that it is reasonably practicable for the City to operate its System so as to provide water to the delivery points as requested and as specified in this Agreement; C. In no event, however, shall the City be obligated under this Agreement to deliver to the District more than nine (9) million gallons of potable water in any given day or more than 1.25 billion (1,250,000,000) gallons of potable water in any Water Packet Pg. 57 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 5 Year (a “Water Year”, for purposes of this Agreement, shall mean November 1 of a year to October 31 of the following year). ; and D. For the purposes of water deliveries under this Agreement, all water deliveries from the City to the District shall be at one of the following delivery points: 1. The cross-tie connection between the City’s Treatment Plant and the Soldier Canyon Treatment Plant located at the City’s Treatment Plant (the “Cross-Tie”); and 2. The existing connection between the District’s Transmission Facilities and the City’s Transmission Facilities located in Fort Collins, Colorado, on Summit View Drive, approximately 2,400 feet north of Vine Drive (hereinafter referred to as the “Northeast Delivery Point”). 3. Delivery of Potable Water to the City. It is the understanding of the Parties that the City’s need for delivery of potable water from the District has generally declined over time relative to the District’s need for potable water from the City. The Parties do not anticipate that the City will request water deliveries from the District to exceed any amounts beyond that necessary to offset or balance deliveries to the District under this Agreement. To the extent that the City desires that the District deliver potable water to the City, the City shall specifically request such delivery and designate the date, location and amount of water to be delivered, and the District shall deliver the potable water as requested, subject to the limitations set forth herein. The District shall only be entitled to credit for water requested by the City and actually delivered by the District pursuant to a City request. A. It is the understanding of the Parties that unplanned deliveries of water into the City’s Transmission Facilities have the potential to disrupt the functioning of the Packet Pg. 58 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 6 City’s System and operation of the City’s Water Treatment Plant. Water deliveries to the City other than those requested have the potential to disrupt the operation of the City’s Treatment Plant, and are not permitted. In the event that deliveries from the District to the City begin to exceed that necessary to balance previous deliveries from the City to the District, NWCWD shall immediately inform the Soldier Canyon Treatment Plant to reduce production into the Transmission Systems to a level that does not create a surplus to the City. B. In responding to the City’s request for the delivery of water, the District shall only be obligated to honor the City’s request to the extent it legally and physically has surplus potable water available after meeting all the needs of its customers and provided that it is reasonably practicable for the District to operate its System so as to provide the water to the delivery points as requested and as specified in this Agreement. C. In no event, however, shall the District be obligated under this Agreement to deliver to the City more than nine (9) million gallons of potable water in any given day or more than 1.25 billion (1,250,000,000) gallons of potable water in any Water Year; and D. For the purposes of water deliveries under this Agreement, all water deliveries from the District to the City shall be at one of the following delivery points: 1. The Cross-Tie; and 2. The Northeast Delivery Point. 4. Compensation for Water Delivered. No more than ten (10) days after the end of every month in each Water Year, and no more than fifteen (15) days after the end of every Water Year, Packet Pg. 59 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 7 for all annual charges, the City and the District shall perform an accounting to determine the amount of potable water delivered by each party to the other during the applicable billing period. The parties acknowledge and agree that the rates and charges established pursuant to this paragraph 4 incorporate surcharges, payments in lieu of taxes, and other similar additional charges at the rates established generally for City Utility customers, which will not be separately charged to the District. The charges shall be as set forth herein below. A. The District shall pay annual transmission charges to the City for delivery of water under this Agreement. 1. The District Enterprise shall pay annual transmission charges, as follows: a. Transmission charges at a rate of Fourteen Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars ($14,750.00) for each million gallons, or portion thereof, delivered to the Northeast Delivery Point on the day of the highest peak delivery during the preceding twelve (12) month period. 2. No less frequently than after each Water Year, the City shall invoice the District Enterprise for the total transmission charges under this Agreement and the District Enterprise. In the City’s discretion, the City may from time to time modify the frequency of billings and payment of the transmission charges by providing no less than two (2) months advance written notice to the District. B. For all water delivered under this Agreement, in any given month within a Water Year that the respective amounts requested by and delivered to each of the parties differ by no more than nine million (9,000,000) gallons (the “Carryover Limit”), Packet Pg. 60 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 8 then the calculation of applicable overage charges under this subparagraph B will be carried over and incorporated into the calculation and related billing for overage charges for the succeeding month. In any month that the respective amounts requested by and delivered to each of the parties, adjusted by any carryover from the preceding month as set forth above, differ by more than the Carryover Limit, the party receiving the greater amount (the “Owing Party”) shall owe to the other party (the “Owed Party”) compensation for the difference between this monthly amount delivered and the Carryover Limit (the “Overage”) as described in paragraph C and D below: C. The rate payable for an Overage shall be determined by the City’s Cost of Service Study. The Overage charge shall reflect all costs to produce treated water at the City’s Treatment Plant. This rate for overage charges shall be adjusted annually on a calendar year basis at a rate consistent with the overall rate increase to the entire customer base of the City D. It is the intent of the Parties to adjust the rate payable for an Overage over the 2014 calendar year. 1. The schedule to step into the full rate shall be as follows: a. For deliveries after the effective date and in the remainder of calendar year 2014, treatment charges shall be due from the Owing Party to the Owed Party on the Overage calculated at the rate of One Dollar and Sixty-Nine and Twenty Hundredths Cents ($1.6920) per thousand gallons of metered flows. b. The rate shall become equal to the full treatment charges of the City Packet Pg. 61 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 9 beginning in calendar year 2015 and beyond. The rate for future years shall be adjusted as described in paragraph C above. 2. Such compensation shall be paid within thirty (30) days after the issuance of the related invoice by the Owed Party and it shall be paid by the City Enterprise or the District Enterprise, as applicable, solely from the net revenues of their respective water utilities. 3. The Owing Party agrees to transfer raw water from the Colorado-Big Thompson Project (“CBT”) to the Owed Party in an amount equal to the volume of the Overage. The transfer of the Raw Water Amount for each month shall take place no later than ten (10) days after the end of such previous calendar month. All transfers of CBT water shall be made in accordance with rules established by the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (“NCWCD”). E. Financial obligations of the City in this paragraph 4 are intended and deemed to be the legal obligation of the City Enterprise, and financial obligations of the District in this paragraph 4 are intended and deemed to be the legal obligation of the District Enterprise. F. It is the intent of the parties that overages or imbalances in water delivery amounts will be reconciled on a monthly basis, and no balances will be carried forward from Water Year to Water Year. 5. Water Quality. All potable water delivered to the City by the District and by the District to the City under this Agreement shall meet or exceed all quality standards for potable water that are required by the Environmental Protection Agency (hereinafter referred to as “the EPA”), the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (hereinafter referred to as “the Packet Pg. 62 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 10 CDPHE”)(hereinafter referred to collectively as “the Water Quality Standards”). Responsibility for ensuring that the Water Quality Standards are met for water delivered under this Agreement shall rest upon the party delivering the water up to the point of delivery and upon the party receiving the water after the point of delivery. In the event the EPA CDPHE imposes a water quality standard on the City or the District that is stricter than the standard required of the other, each party shall be required to meet that stricter standard for all potable water it delivers under this Agreement. In the event the City or the District discovers that any water delivered, being delivered or to be delivered by it under this Agreement does not meet in any respect the Water Quality Standards, it shall immediately notify the other party of the problem by telephone, followed by written notice of the problem. Regardless of the foregoing, if at any time and for any reason the City or the District has a good faith concern about whether the potable water to be delivered or being delivered to it under this Agreement meets all of the Water Quality Standards, it may refuse to accept such water. Such refusal shall not be considered as a breach of or default under this Agreement. The City and the District further agree to notify the other party in writing of any proposed change to their respective water treatment processes before implementing such change if it could affect the quality of potable water delivered under this Agreement. 6. Metering and Infrastructure. In order to accurately account for the potable water delivered under this Agreement, metering, recording and telemetry devices shall be installed and maintained at the points of delivery specified in this Agreement. The City and the District agree to share with each other the data from their respective metering devices. A. The City may freely inspect each meter and metering point for any delivery point for water under this Agreement in its discretion. The City may provide testing and Packet Pg. 63 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 11 calibration of meters as it determines necessary to maintain accurate meter readings. B. The parties acknowledge and agree that metering of flows at each of the delivery points is critical for the effective operation of this Agreement. In the event that a District-owned meter is not properly functioning to accurately measure flows, the parties agree to first attempt to cooperatively determine the flow estimation. If agreement on estimation cannot be reached, the City reserves the right to close the affected connection between the District’s System and the City’s System, until such time as a meter that will accurately measure the flows at that delivery point is installed and operable. C. In order to enhance the efficiency and reliability of the metering of deliveries, the Parties agree that the City may, at its option, install new meters at the delivery points that will measure real-time usage. If installed by the City, upon installation said meters will be operated and maintained by the City. The flow information from these meters will be used for determining the volumes of water delivered to the District and in the water accounting, instead of the water meters currently installed and owned by the District, which will no longer be in use under the Water Agreements. In the event that a dispute regarding volumes delivered for a monthly or annual billing as to an amount that exceeds the allowed nine million (9,000,000) gallons, the City agrees to calibrate the meter at that time (if not in the usual maintenance schedule). The City will provide volume information in real time to the District in a format compatible with the District’s data collection systems. 7. Maintenance and Repairs. If the City or the District anticipates that any scheduled Packet Pg. 64 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 12 maintenance or repair of its respective facilities could significantly interfere with the delivery of potable water under this Agreement, that party shall give the other party, if reasonably practicable, at least seven (7) calendar days prior written notice of the scheduled maintenance or repairs. Also, when reasonably practicable, the City and the District shall attempt to schedule such maintenance and repairs during periods of low demand by the other party for potable water under this Agreement. If, however, an unscheduled interruption of service under this Agreement occurs and in order to restore such service it is necessary to make repairs to the affected facilities, the party whose facilities are affected shall promptly notify the other party of the problem and proceed with due diligence to make the needed repairs. 8. District’s Obligations with respect to Soldier Canyon Filter Plant (Soldier Canyon). The parties acknowledge and agree that the District may perform its obligations under this Agreement through Soldier Canyon to the extent they involve or relate to the delivery of water to the City, including, without limitation: (a) satisfying the Water Quality Standards and the testing, monitoring and reporting requirements and standards set forth in paragraph 5, above; (b) furnishing, installing and maintaining metering, recording and telemetry devices at the Soldier Canyon Treatment Plant pursuant to paragraph 6, above; and (c) physically controlling the delivery of water to the City in accordance with paragraph 3, above., provided, however, that the District will remain responsible for satisfactory performance of its obligations as a condition of the enjoyment by the District of the benefits of this Agreement. 9. Future Cooperative Intergovernmental Agreements. The parties acknowledge that the City and the District are currently in the process of evaluating opportunities for future coordination, collaboration and shared services in order to provide efficient and cost-effective services to their respective customers. Accordingly, the parties acknowledge that the Packet Pg. 65 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 13 arrangements set forth in this Agreement may be superseded or modified in the future to reflect the outcome of those efforts. 10. Termination for Breach. Both the City and the District may terminate this Agreement upon a material breach by the other party of any term or condition of this Agreement if such breach continues for a substantial and unreasonable period of time, but in any event if the breach has continued for a period of sixty (60) days after receipt by the breaching party from the non- breaching party of a written notice of the existence of such breach. Notwithstanding any provision contained herein to the contrary, in no event shall the City or the District terminate this Agreement if the party at fault proceeds, after receiving said notice, with due diligence to correct or rectify the material breach regardless of the duration of such breach. Termination of this Agreement shall not, however, be the sole remedy of either party and any exercise of this right to terminate shall not preclude the pursuit of any other remedy available in law or in equity to the non-breaching party. 11. Termination/Transfer. This Agreement shall continue in effect for so long as Fort Collins continues to provide treated water unless and until terminated: 1) by operation of law; or 2) by either party upon the provision of written notice of termination no less than two (2) years in advance of the date of termination; 3) by mutual agreement of the parties or 4) in the event Fort Collins discontinues operation of its treated water system. The parties acknowledge and agree that the obligations of Fort Collins may be assigned or transferred by Fort Collins to any successor-in-interest capable of providing water service consistent with the terms of the Agreement and all applicable laws. 12. Force Majeure. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, it is agreed that in the event and to the extent that fire, flood, earthquake, natural catastrophe, explosion, Packet Pg. 66 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 14 accident, war, illegality, act of God, or any other cause beyond the control of any party hereto, or strikes or labor troubles (whether or not within the power of the party affected to settle the same) prevents or delays performance by any party to this Agreement, such party shall be relieved of the consequences thereof without liability, so long as and to the extent that performance is prevented by such cause; provided, however, that such party shall exercise due diligence in its efforts to resume performance within a reasonable period of time. 13. Cooperation of the Parties. The City and the District acknowledge that it is difficult to anticipate all of the activities, situations and other factors which may be relevant to them in satisfying their respective obligations under this Agreement. Therefore, the parties acknowledge that it will be necessary for them to cooperate with each other relative to any such unforeseen situations. In furtherance thereof, the City and the District agree that at the end of every Water Year, their representatives shall meet to discuss, in good faith, any modifications that any party believes necessary or appropriate to this Agreement in order to avoid an inequitable situation. In the event that the parties shall mutually agree to any such modification, it shall only be effective if set forth in writing and signed by all of the parties hereto. 14. Governing Law and Enforceability. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. In addition, the parties hereto recognize that there are legal constraints imposed upon the City and the District by the constitutions, statutes, and rules and regulations of the State of Colorado and of the United States, and imposed upon them by the City Charter and City Code, and that, subject to such constraints, the parties intend to carry out the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, in no event shall any of the parties hereto exercise any power or take any action which shall be prohibited by applicable law. Whenever possible, each provision of this Packet Pg. 67 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 15 Agreement shall be interpreted in such a manner so as to be effective and valid under applicable law. 15. Indemnification. A. In connection with the City’s performance of its obligations under this Agreement, the City agrees, to the extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless the District, and their respective officers and employees, against all liabilities, claims and demands which arise from any negligent act or omission of the City, or of its officers or employees, provided that such act or omission by the City’s officers or employees occurred during the performance of their duties and within the scope of their employment. In addition, the City agrees, to the extent permitted by law, to indemnify the District, and their respective officers and employees, from all costs and expenses related to defending such liabilities, claims and demands, including but not limited to, litigation costs and reasonable attorney’s fees whether or not any such liabilities, claims and demands are groundless, frivolous, false or fraudulent. B. In connection with the District’s performance of its obligations under this Agreement, the District agrees, to the extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless the City, and their respective officers and employees, against all liabilities, claims and demands which arise from any negligent act or omission of the District, or of its officers or employees, provided that such act or omission by the District’s officers or employees occurred during the performance of their duties and within the scope of their employment. In addition, the District agrees, to the extent permitted by law, to indemnify the City, and their respective Packet Pg. 68 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 16 officers and employees, from all costs and expenses related to defending such liabilities, claims and demands, including but not limited to, litigation costs and reasonable attorney’s fees, whether or not such liabilities, claims and demands are groundless, frivolous, false or fraudulent. To the extent the District will rely on third parties, such as Soldier Canyon, to carry out elements of the District’s performance hereunder, the District shall be responsible for ensuring any such third parties provide adequate insurance, warranties and performance to protect the City from loss or damage from any such performance, and the District shall be liable to the City for claims, demands or losses of or by the City that are not cured or remedied by, or for which the District has not secured full recourse for the benefit of the City against such third parties. 16. Inspection of Records. Each party agrees to allow each of the other parties to this Agreement to inspect and copy at reasonable times, with reasonable advance notice, all of its relevant records needed by any other party to verify the quantities of potable water delivered under this Agreement and to verify compliance with the standards and requirements of this Agreement. 17. Assignment. This Agreement shall not be assigned by any of the parties hereto without the prior written consent of all the other parties hereto, each in its sole discretion. 18. Default/Remedies/Immunity. If any party fails to comply with the provisions of this Agreement, the other party or parties, after providing written notification to the noncomplying party and upon the failure of the noncomplying party or parties to achieve compliance within thirty (30) days, may seek all such remedies as are available under Colorado law, including but not limited to termination of this Agreement, or actual damages, but excluding any exemplary and/or consequential damages. In the event litigation is required to enforce this Agreement, the Packet Pg. 69 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 17 prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to payment by the defaulting party or parties of actual attorneys’ fees and costs incurred. Nothing in this paragraph 18 or any other provision of this Agreement shall, however, be construed as a waiver of the notice requirements, defenses, immunities, and limitations any of the Parties may have under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, C.R.S. §§ 24-10-101, et seq., or any other defenses, immunities, or limitations of liability available by law. The duties and obligations imposed by this Agreement and the rights and remedies available hereunder to the parties hereto are in addition to, and are not to be construed in any way as a limitation of, any rights and remedies available to them which are otherwise imposed by law or regulation, and the provisions of this paragraph will be as effective as if repeated specifically in the Agreement in connection with each particular duty, obligation, right, and remedy to which they apply. 19. Applicable Law. The laws of the State of Colorado and rules and regulations issued pursuant thereto, except for choice of law principles, will be applied in the interpretation, execution and enforcement of this Agreement. 20. Notices. Other than invoice billings which may be sent by first class mail or electronic mail, any notice, request, demand, consent or approval, or other communication required or permitted hereunder will be in writing and may be personally delivered, or deposited in the United States mail or accepted for delivery by an overnight delivery service, with proper postage and address as follows: District: District Manager North Weld County Water District 33247 Highway 85 Lucerne, CO 80646 Packet Pg. 70 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 18 City: Utilities Executive Director City of Fort Collins P.O. Box 580 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 Any party hereto may at any time designate a different person or address for purposes of receiving notice by so informing the other parties in writing. Notice shall be deemed effective upon actual receipt thereof, or three (3) days after being deposited in the United States mail or accepted by an overnight delivery service, whichever first occurs. 21. Complete Agreement. To the extent provided herein, this Agreement supersedes any and all prior written or oral agreements and there are no covenants, conditions, or agreements between the parties except as set forth herein. No prior or contemporaneous addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto will have any force or affect whatsoever unless embodied herein in writing. 22. No Third Party Beneficiary. The terms and conditions of this Agreement, and all rights of action relating thereto, are strictly reserved to the parties, and nothing in this Agreement shall give or allow any claim or right or cause of action whatsoever by any other person not included in this Agreement. Any person and/or entity, other than the parties receiving services or benefits under this Agreement, shall be deemed an incidental beneficiary only. 23. Relationship of Parties. This Agreement does not create and shall not be construed as creating a relationship of joint ventures, partners, or employer-employee, between the Parties. The Parties intend that this Agreement be interpreted as creating an independent contractor relationship. Pursuant to that intent, it is agreed that the conduct and control of the duties required by the Agreement shall lie solely with each Party respectively, and each Party shall be free to exercise reasonable discretion in the performance of its individual duties under this Agreement. Neither Party shall, with respect to any activity, be considered an agent or employee of the other Packet Pg. 71 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 19 Party. 24. Waiver. No waiver or delay of enforcement by any of the parties hereto of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be or shall be construed as a waiver of any other term or condition, nor shall a waiver of any breach of this Agreement be deemed to constitute a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same provision of this Agreement. 25. Construction. This Agreement shall be construed according to its fair meaning and as if it was prepared by all the parties hereto and shall be deemed to be and contain the entire agreement between the parties hereto. There shall be deemed to be no other terms, conditions, promises, understandings, statements or representations, expressed or implied, concerning this Agreement, unless set forth in writing and signed by all of the parties hereto. Paragraph headings in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and shall in no way define, limit or prescribe the scope or intent of any provision of this Agreement. 26. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement, or the application of such provision to any person, entity or circumstance, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities or circumstances other than those in which it was held invalid, shall not be affected. 27. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties have each executed this Agreement as of the date and year set forth above. Packet Pg. 72 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 20 THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO, A Municipal Corporation ATTEST: By: Karen Weitkunat, Mayor ___________________________ City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ Deputy City Attorney CITY OF FORT COLLINS WATER UTILITY ENTERPRISE, An Enterprise of the City ATTEST: By: Karen Weitkunat, President ___________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 73 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Amended and Restated Water Delivery Agreement - NWCWD July 1, 2014 21 NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, A Political Subdivision of the State of Colorado ATTEST: By: _______________, President ___________________________ _______________, Secretary NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ENTERPRISE, An Enterprise of the District ATTEST: By: ___________________, President ___________________________ ________________, Secretary By its signature below, the Soldier Canyon Filter Plant agrees that it is no longer a party to this Agreement and has no further rights or responsibilities hereunder. SOLDIER CANYON FILTER PLANT, A Governmental Entity Created by Intergovernmental Agreement ATTEST: By: _____________________, President ___________________________ ___________________, Secretary Packet Pg. 74 Attachment6.2: Ordinance No. 097, 2014 (2142 : SR 097 NWCWD IGA) Agenda Item 7 Item # 7 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Susie Gordon, Senior Environmental Planner SUBJECT Postponement of Second Reading of Ordinance No. 099, 2014, Amending Chapter 12 of the City Code to Establish Regulations Regarding Disposable Bags to August 19, 2014. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Staff requests postponement of Second Reading of this Ordinance to August 19, 2014, at the request of City Council, so that more information can be gathered and compiled to respond to questions and issues raised regarding the ordinance. This Ordinance was adopted on First Reading on July 1, 2014, by a vote of 5-2 (Nays: Troxell, Weitkunat) Packet Pg. 75 Agenda Item 8 Item # 8 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Gerry Paul, Director of Purchasing & Risk Management Mike Beckstead, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT First Reading of Ordinance No. 100, 2014, Appropriating Prior Year Reserves in the General Fund to Fund High Priority Security Enhancements. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to appropriate funds in the amount of $210,000 to address high priority security findings identified by a comprehensive security assessment of City buildings. Funding is requested to implement enhancements to address the high priority findings identified in a 2013/2014 City building security assessment performed by Lyon & Associates. Funding will be directed to access control, alarm systems, internal public address systems, security cameras, and minor remodels to increase security workspace hardening. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading. Management staff presented and recommended implementation of fifty-five (55) high risk priority security enhancements to ELT staff on May 7, 2014. The ELT endorsed implementation of the enhancements without delay to increase security for City staff and citizens. Staff recommends appropriation of funds in the amount of $210,000 for this project from prior year reserves in the General Fund. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION There has been an increase in incidents of negative interaction with individuals across the City contributing to employee’s heightened awareness and concern for security particularly in high use public environments. In 2013, the Risk Management office contracted with a security consultant to conduct comprehensive security assessments of 19 City building. At the conclusion of the assessment, 260 findings were identified and with the assistance of the security consultant, City Risk Management staff categorized each finding as high priority, medium priority, low priority or procedural. Fifty-five (55) of the findings were categorized as high priority. Prioritization Criteria: High priority assessment enhancements address areas of highest probability for increased risk of employee or citizen injury, use of existing voice over internet protocol (VOIP) phone systems to enhance emergency communications in City buildings, and security cameras installed in areas of high use by children such as recreation facilities. The list of high priority items was provided to Operations Services and Information Technology for price quotes. The price to accomplish all items on the list as proposed by the security consultant is $538,460. After review, a scaled back alternative option was proposed that functionally achieves similar levels of enhanced security with an estimated price of $210,000. Packet Pg. 76 Agenda Item 8 Item # 8 Page 2 Implementation of the high priority items will increase the level of security in City facilities creating a safe, healthy and secure environment for both employees and citizens. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS The total cost to implement the recommended high priority enhancements is $210,000. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS While no air, soil or water environments will be impacted by this request, the safety and security of the employee and citizen environment will be enhanced. ATTACHMENTS 1. Security High Priority List (PDF) Packet Pg. 77 High Priority Type Location Task description Priority Low Medium High Estimated Cost Contact Comments Access Control AC 215 North Mason Muni Court Install lockboxes for weapons in the space previously occupied by the Fire Extinguisher cabinet. High $3,500 Ops Services AC 281 N. College Keyless fob entry access control should be provided on XX doors. (waiting on floor plan to include number of doors to fob) Hoping to have this information 3/27/14 High $35,000 Ops Services 2,500 per door X 11 doors and adding 4 doors $38,500 Alarms ALM Mulberry Pool The Reception Desk should be equipped with a panic/duress alarm which when activated will send an alarm to the contract alarm company, but will also actuate the camera call-up system which will display the scene on up to five computers, and activate strobe lights in designated offices. High $5,000 Ops Services Option II - Panic button installation to monitoring company without call-up to camera or strobe systems. ALM City Park Pool Consideration should be given to installing an intrusion alarm on the Chemical Storage Room, which when activated will emit a very loud audible alarm. High $5,000 Ops Services ALM City Park Pool A panic/duress alarm interfaced with camera call-up software should be installed beneath the counter in the Cashiers Office. If the alarm is activated, the camera behind the Cashier will automatically display the situation on 5 previously designated computers. High $5,000 Ops Services Option II - Panic button installation to monitoring company without call-up to camera or strobe systems. Summary - City of Fort Collins Building Security Assessments 2013/2014 Legend: Type Location Task description Priority Low Medium High Estimated Cost Contact Comments ALM Atzlan Community Center A panic/duress alarm should be installed at the front counter, which when activated will cause strobe lights in five different offices to commence flashing, and if tied in with camera call-up software, will display the situation on 5 computer screens High $5,000 Ops Services Option II - Panic button installation to monitoring company without call-up to camera or strobe systems. ALM Lee Martinez Farm A panic/duress alarm should be installed on the wall immediately behind the Receptionist/Cashier, and a large smile icon placed directly beneath it. When activated, the alarm should activate strobe lights in various locations to alert other personnel of possible danger. High $5,000 Ops Services ALM Museum of Discovery Install a panic/duress alarm at the Reception Desk, which when activated, will cause the CCTV camera located on the wall behind the receptionist to display the activity on 5 computer screens of pre-designated personnel. High $5,000 Ops Services Option II - Panic button installation to monitoring company without call-up to camera or strobe systems. ALM Museum of Discovery Install a panic/duress alarm at the Cashiers Counter in the Gift Shop. High $5,000 Ops Services ALM Senior Center A panic/duress alarm should be installed at the Reception Desk, which when activated will display the activity as captured by the nearest CCTV camera on 5 computer screens, as well as activate strobe lights in the offices of five Staff members. High $5,000 Ops Services Option II - Panic button installation to monitoring company without call-up to camera or strobe systems. ALM Type Location Task description Priority Low Medium High Estimated Cost Contact Comments ALM City Park Shop Install a panic/duress alarm at the Reception Desk, which when activated will display the activity as captured by the nearest CCTV camera on five computer screens of pre- selected Staff, as well as activate strobe lights in those same 5 offices. High $5,000 Ops Services Option II - Panic button installation without call-up to camera system or strobe. ALM 215 North Mason Muni Court Install a panic/duress alarm at the Judges Bench. When activated, a CCTV camera will display the ongoing scene on 5 computers in the Municipal Court Offices, and actuate strobe lights in the Foyer of the Courtroom, and the main hallway. High $5,000 Ops Services Option II - Panic button installation without call-up to camera system or strobe. ALM 215 North Mason Muni Court A second panic alarm should be installed in the Bailiffs Box. High $100 Ops Services ALM 215 North Mason Muni Court A panic/duress alarm should be installed in attny office desk, which when activated will actuate a strobe light located above his door in the hallway.. High $5,000 Ops Services ALM 215 North Mason Muni Court A panic/duress alarm should be installed in attny office desk, which when activated will actuate a strobe light located above his door in the hallway High $100 Ops Services ALM 215 North Mason Muni Court Panic/duress alarms should be installed at all front counter positions, which when activated, will actuate the camera and display the situation on 5 Staff computers. High $5,000 Ops Services ALM CMO Type Location Task description Priority Low Medium High Estimated Cost Contact Comments PA Atzlan Community Center Strong consideration should be given to updating and repairing the existing Public Address (PA) system. Currently it cannot be understood in some areas, and cannot be heard in others. The system should provide an option whereby the person in charge of the Reception Desk can override all other communications. High $450 Ops Services Option II - VOIP system only $25 per phone extension. PA Museum of Discovery While the facility does have a Public Address system, with recent renovations some areas are currently uncovered. The system should be expanded to include these areas. High $875 Ops Services / Kathy Henggeler Option II - VOIP system only $25 per phone extension. PA Senior Center The facility has one Public Address System (PA) which is in the Natatorium which allow employees to contact the Reception Desk. It apparently does not work consistently well, nor do employees know how to use the system. Consideration should be given to repairing the existing system, and with integration software, expand the system to the entire building. High Ops Services Option II - Already budgeted as part of the remodel. PA Traffic Department The VOIP telephone system should be integrated with the Public Address system, and at least two speakers should be mounted in the yard. High $500 Kathy Henggeler Option II - VOIP system only $25 per phone extension. PA 281 N. College The VOIP telephone system should be integrated with the Public Address system. High $2,725 Type Location Task description Priority Low Medium High Estimated Cost Contact Comments RMDL 215 North Mason Muni Court Kevlar or other bullet resistant material should be installed under underneath the jusdes bench similar to what was provided under council benches. High $20,000 Ops Services $25,000 Security Cameras SC Mulberry Pool Install a CCTV camera in the Southwest Corner of the Lobby to monitor visitors entering and exiting the building, particularly minor children. High $1,931 Jared Soares a video management and storage server would be required per physical location/department. Facilities that house multiple departments/workgroups, may share the server. However, this may be dependent on regulatory guidelines and departmental needs/requirements for a higher level of security and privacy. Approximate cost of server is $8,500.00. Mulberry Pool Server $8,500 SC Mulberry Pool Install a CCTV camera at top of the stairs between the 1st and 2nd floors. High $1,931 Jared Soares SC Mulberry Pool Install a CCTV camera high on the Southwest wall of the natatorium in a position to view all pool activities. High $1,931 Jared Soares SC Mulberry Pool Install a CCTV camera on the Northeast corner of the cycling/exercise room in a position to monitor the pool recreation area and the bleachers. High $1,931 Jared Soares SC Mulberry Pool Position a CCTV camera on the North wall in a position to monitor the Equipment Room and the Chemical Storage Room. High $1,931 Jared Soares 5 Packet Pg. 82 Type Location Task description Priority Low Medium High Estimated Cost Contact Comments SC City Park Pool A CCTV camera should be mounted on the wall behind the cashier, and a monitor placed inside the Lifeguards Office High $1,931 Jared Soares a video management and storage server would be required per physical location/department. Facilities that house multiple departments/workgroups, may share the server. However, this may be dependent on regulatory guidelines and departmental needs/requirements for a higher level of security and privacy. Approximate cost of server is $8,500.00. City Park Pool Server $8,500 SC City Park Pool Mount a second CCTV camera on the exterior wall of the Lifeguards Office in a position to view Chemical Storage and Maintenance Building, as well as the East side of the pool. High $1,931 Jared Soares SC City Park Pool Place a third CCTV cameras underneath the roof overhang of the Club Tico building in a position to view the pool and the water slides. High $1,931 Jared Soares SC Nix Farm Install a CCTV camera on the North wall of the Reception area of the Nix Farm House in a position to view visitors entering the building and the Receptionist. High $1,931 Jared Soares a video management and storage server would be required per physical location/department. Facilities that house multiple departments/workgroups, may share the server. However, this may be dependent on regulatory guidelines and departmental needs/requirements for a higher level of security and privacy. Approximate cost of server is $8,500.00. 6 Packet Pg. 83 Type Location Task description Priority Low Medium High Estimated Cost Contact Comments Nix Farm Server $8,500 SC Nix Farm Install two (2) CCTV cameras in the Shop in a position to monitor the two personnel doors and the garage doors. High $1,931 Jared Soares $44,810 Safety SFTY EPIC Install a plastic yellow chain across the loading dock, and install alternating black and yellow tape on the lip of the dock to prevent an individual from inadvertently falling into the truck bay High Ops Services To be completed through Recreation SFTY Mulberry Pool From a safety and emergency evacuation perspective, the lips of all stairs on the two staircases between the 1st and 2nd floors, and all the stairs in the Natatorium should be highlighted with non-skid black and yellow tape. High Ops Services To be completed through Recreation SFTY City Park Pool The lips of all stairs in the Mechanical Room should be highlighted with non-skid florescent black and yellow tape. High Ops Services To be completed through Recreation SFTY Atzlan Community Center The lips of all stairs between the 1st and 2nd floors should be highlighted with non-skid florescent yellow and black tape. High Ops Services To be completed through Recreation SFTY Museum of Discovery Pathway lighting should be installed on both sides of the stairs in the Digital Dome, and the lip of each stair clearly delineated to prevent slips and falls. High $15,000 Ops Services SFTY Senior Center Type Location Task description Priority Low Medium High Estimated Cost Contact Comments 215 North Mason Muni Court The Security Officer assigned to the Municipal Court works from 7:30am - 11:00am Monday, Wednesday and Thursday. His presence may also be required at trials and hearing on civil infractions, which may occur after the regularly assigned hours. As there is no security in this building, and taking into account it's openness and the critical function performed therein, it might be prudent to extend the hours of operation to 7:30am - 4:30pm, Monday through Friday. High Dept. Administrative. An offer is being developed in the 15/16 BFO for funding to staff security guard. $2,500 Total $207,360 8 Packet Pg. 85 Attachment8.1: Security High Priority List (2099 : Funding High Priority Security Enhancements) - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 100, 2014 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS APPROPRIATING PRIOR YEAR RESERVES IN THE GENERAL FUND TO FUND HIGH PRIORITY SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS WHEREAS, the City is committed to providing the public and employees with safe and secure facilities and work environments; and WHEREAS, a comprehensive security assessment was completed in 2013 to address the increase in incidents of negative interaction that has resulted in heightened awareness and concern for security in high-use public environments; and WHEREAS, the assessment identified 260 findings with 55 of the findings classified as high priority; and WHEREAS, staff is requesting $210,000 from prior year General Fund reserves to implement enhancements to address the high priority security findings; and WHEREAS, staff recommends this project be funded from the General Fund as this project focuses on public and employee security; and WHEREAS, funding will include alarm systems, internal public address systems, security cameras, and minor remodels to increase security workspace hardening; and WHEREAS, Article V, Section 9, of the City Charter permits the City Council to appropriate by ordinance at any time during the fiscal year such funds for expenditure as may be available from reserves accumulated in prior years, notwithstanding that such reserves were not previously appropriated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS that there is hereby appropriated for expenditure from prior year reserves in the General Fund the sum of TWO HUNDRED TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($210,000) to fund high priority security enhancements. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 15th day of July, A.D. 2014, and to be presented for final passage on the19th day of August, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 86 - 2 - Passed and adopted on final reading on the 19th day of August, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 87 Agenda Item 9 Item # 9 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Ellen Martin, Visual Arts Administrator SUBJECT First Reading of Ordinance No. 101, 2014, Amending Article XII of Chapter 23 of City Code Relating to Art in Public Places. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to amend Article XII of Chapter 23 of the City Code relating to Art in Public Places. This Ordinance increases the threshold for art projects requiring City Council approval from $10,000 to $60,000 to align with the City’s Purchasing Code. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION Council established the Art in Public Places (APP) program by adopting Ordinance No. 020, 1995 which added Section 23-303 to the City Code. The Council permanently adopted the APP Program, and reenacted City Code Chapter 23, Article XII, with certain modifications in 2012. Currently, Chapter 23, Article XII (Art in Public Places), requires any art project with a cost of $10,000 or more be approved by City Council, after the project has been reviewed and voted on by the APP Board and before going to contract. The APP Board is requesting this threshold be increased to $60,000. The threshold has not changed since the APP program’s inception in 1995. Given inflation and increases in the City’s purchasing threshold over the years, this is a much needed change that will more efficiently utilize limited staff resources. The APP Board is also requesting this budget threshold be reviewed every five years to remain in alignment with the City Purchasing Code. The City’s Director of Purchasing has recommended the APP program budget threshold increase to $60,000 to be consistent with existing Purchasing Code exemptions, including City Code Chapter 8, Article IV, Section 8-161(a) (1), which authorizes the Purchasing Agent to negotiate without formal competition the purchase of materials, professional services, services or construction not to exceed $60,000 per project. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS Implementing this modification would change the City Code to state that the APP Board would make recommendations to the City Council concerning the use of funds in excess of sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) for the acquisition, installation, donation, and maintenance of works of art. Projects approved by the APP Board that involve sixty thousand dollars or less will be submitted to the Purchasing Agent for contracting, without going to the City Council. Packet Pg. 88 Agenda Item 9 Item # 9 Page 2 BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At its March 26, 2014 meeting, the APP Board discussed this City Code revision with Councilmember Overbeck. The APP Board sent a memo to the Mayor and Councilmembers on June 10, 2014, recommending the Code change (Attachment 1). ATTACHMENTS 1. Art in Public Places Board Memo, June 10, 2014 (PDF) Packet Pg. 89 1 Cultural Services Art in Public Places Lincoln Center 417 W. Magnolia St Fort Collins, CO 80521 970.416-2789 970.221-6373 – fax www.fcgov.com/artspublic Date: June 10, 2014 To: Mayor and Councilmembers From: Liz Good, Chair, Art in Public Places Board Purpose: Art in Public Places City Code Revision Dear Mayor and Councilmembers, As active members of the Art in Public Places (APP) Board and involved citizens in the Fort Collins community, we want to thank you for your support of the City of Fort Collins’ Art in Public Places program. At the March 26, 2014 meeting, Council Liaison Bob Overbeck joined the APP meeting to get input from the Board members. Discussion was had regarding raising the threshold for APP projects that go before City Council. • The APP Board requests the amount at which art projects require City Council approval be raised from $10,000 and above to $60,000 and above. Currently, the Art in Public Places ordinance requires art projects that are $10,000 or more be approved by resolution by City Council before going to contract. The APP Board is requesting this threshold amount be increased, as it hasn’t changed since the program’s inception in 1995. Given inflation and increases in the City’s purchasing threshold over the years, this is a much needed change. We also request that this budget threshold be reviewed every five years to remain in alignment. City Council would still review the large, impactful projects. With input from Gerry Paul, Director of Purchasing, the threshold is suggested to be increased to $60,000, to be consistent with other Purchasing Code exemptions. The Purchasing Code authorizes the Purchasing Director to negotiate without formal competition the purchase of materials, professional services, services or construction not to exceed $60,000 per year. The APP Board also looks forward to continuing our conversation with Councilmember Overbeck on ways to increase support and forward the goals of the Art in Public Places program. Some of these topics include how the General Fund can support special gateway projects, increase staff hours enabling further outreach to raise public awareness and involvement and to implement special projects, and expanding APP’s role with private development. Thank you for considering our request to increase the threshold requiring City Council approval on art projects. Should Council support this effort, we will work with the appropriate City staff to prepare an Ordinance change to be brought to City Council for approval. Packet Pg. 90 Attachment9.1: Art in Public Places Board Memo, June 10, 2014 (2131 : Art in Public Places City Code Revision) - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 101, 2014 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AMENDING ARTICLE XII OF CHAPTER 23 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES WHEREAS, on April 25, 1995, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 020, 1995, establishing the Art in Public Places (APP) Program, adopting the Art in Public Places Guidelines, and setting goals and requirements for the acquisition, maintenance and exhibition of public art by the City; and WHEREAS, On April 7, 1998, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 047, 1998, which reenacted the APP Provisions of the City Code with certain modifications; and WHEREAS, Section 8-161(a) of the City Code currently authorizes the Purchasing Agent to negotiate and contract for purchases of materials, professional services, and construction costing sixty thousand dollars or less without first submitting such purchases for City Council approval; and WHEREAS, City staff is proposing an amendment to the APP provisions in Article XII of Chapter 23 of the City Code to align the APP purchasing threshold with purchasing exemptions elsewhere in the City Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment would increase the threshold for which City Council approval is required prior to contacting for certain APP projects, increasing it from $10,000 to $60,000; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to amend Article XII of Chapter 23 of the City Code as provided herein to align the APP purchasing threshold with purchasing exemptions elsewhere in the City Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That Section 23-308 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 23-308. Acquisition of works of art. The APP Board shall make recommendations to the City Council concerning the use of funds in excess of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.) sixty thousand ($60,000) for the acquisition, installation and maintenance of works of art. The construction project from which the funds were generated should generally be the site where the funds will be used. However, funds may be expended at other sites when the APP Board determines such expenditure is appropriate based on the considerations set forth in the guidelines. The APP Board may appoint a selection committee to make recommendations to the APP Board concerning the selection of artists, works of art and the placement of works of art. The selection committee may include artists, architects, City representatives and members of the public. Packet Pg. 91 - 2 - Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 15th day of July, A.D. 2014, and to be presented for final passage on the19th day of August, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading on the 19th day of August, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 92 Agenda Item 10 Item # 10 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Carol Thomas, Transfort Safety Security Training Manager SUBJECT First Reading of Ordinance No. 102, 2104, Amending the Fort Collins Traffic Code Regarding Payment of Fares for Use of Public Transportation Vehicles. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to provide local legislation specific to fare payment requirements on public transportation. This proposed Traffic Code is intended to provide local legislation specific to fare payment requirements on public transportation. This Traffic Code amendment is patterned after an existing Colorado statute that directly addresses fare payment requirements on public transportation; a local code would provide due process of fare violations through Municipal Court. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION Standard public transit vehicles have an on-board fare box through which fare payment is accounted for: upon boarding, customers deposit a cash fare, slide a transit pass or show a youth ID, which is monitored by the bus operator. In May 2014, the City launched a bus rapid transit (BRT) system that accounts for fares in a different way. Similar to light rail systems, BRT vehicles do not have in-vehicle fare boxes; instead, customers purchase a single fare or transit pass before boarding, at ticket vending machines that are located on each platform and at transit centers. An off-board payment system significantly speeds up the boarding process since customers may board through any door, but it requires legal enforcement since there isn’t a fare box. Enforcement of valid fare payment on BRT will be carried out through random fare checks by authorized transit staff (Transit Service Officers) and/or public law enforcement officials, who will issue citations for fare violations; adoption of a local Traffic Code will allow these violations to be processed through Municipal Court. The BRT introductory fare-free period will end in August 2014, at which time customers will be required to purchase a fare prior to boarding. This is a new type of payment system, and in light of this, Transfort will utilize a phased enforcement approach that will begin with public outreach and education. The adoption of this new Traffic Code provision, which is patterned from the state statute on the same topic (Section 42-4-1416, C.R.S), will permit citations to be written into Municipal Court. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS Under the adoption of a City Traffic Code, all collected fines would go to the City’s General Fund. Packet Pg. 93 - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 102, 2014 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AMENDING THE FORT COLLINS TRAFFIC CODE REGARDING PAYMENT OF FARES FOR USE OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION VEHICLES WHEREAS, on February 18, 2003, by Ordinance No. 016, 2003, the City Council adopted the Fort Collins Traffic Code (the “Traffic Code”); and WHEREAS, in May, 2014, the City launched a bus rapid transit service with an off-board fare payment system where customers will purchase fares prior to the boarding of buses and receive a proof of payment document at the time of purchase; and WHEREAS, this off-board fare payment system will require enforcement by Transit Service Officers when proof of payment is not monitored by bus operators through a fare box; and WHEREAS, a phased enforcement approach will be utilized so that the public is familiarized with and educated about the fare purchase process and the need to produce proof of fare payment when requested by City enforcement personnel; and WHEREAS, those enforcing the fare payment process need a clear, efficient, and fair process for issuing citations into Municipal Court when other enforcement methods have not been successful; and WHEREAS, Section 42-4-1416, C.R.S. of the Colorado state traffic code provides a model for the enforcement in those situations where persons fail to present valid transit passes when riding buses; and WHEREAS, the adoption of a provision similar to that in the Colorado state traffic code in the City’s Traffic Code will provide a clear, efficient, and fair method of enforcing the fare payment requirements in the City’s Municipal Court; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the Traffic Code amendment that has been proposed is in the best interest of the City and is necessary for the health, safety and welfare of its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That Section 1416 of the Fort Collins Traffic Code is hereby renumbered to Section 1417. Section 2. That a new Section 1416 of the Fort Collins Traffic Code is hereby adopted to read as follows: Packet Pg. 94 - 2 - 1416. Failure to pay fare or present a valid transit pass. (1) A person commits failure to present a valid transit pass if the person occupies, rides in, or uses a public transportation vehicle without paying the applicable fare or providing a valid transit pass. (2) A person shall not occupy, ride in, or use a public transportation vehicle without paying the applicable fare at the time of boarding the public transportation vehicle or without having possession of proof of prior fare payment. A person shall present proof of prior fare payment upon demand of a transit service officer, peace officer, or any other employee or agent of a public transportation entity. (3) A violation of this section is a traffic infraction. (4) As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires: (a) "Proof of prior fare payment" means: (I) A transit pass valid for the day and time of use; (II) A receipt showing payment of the applicable fare for use of a public transportation vehicle during the day and time specified in the receipt; or (III) A prepaid ticket or series of tickets showing cancellation by a public transportation entity used within the day and time specified in the ticket. (b) "Public transportation entity" means a mass transit district, mass transit authority, or any other public entity authorized under the laws of this state to provide mass transportation services to the general public. (c) "Public transportation vehicle" means a bus, train, light rail vehicle, or any other mode of transportation used by a public transportation entity to provide transportation services to the general public. (d) "Transit pass" means any pass, coupon, transfer, card, identification, token, ticket, or other document, issued by a public transportation entity or issued pursuant to an agreement with a public transportation entity, used to obtain public transit. Packet Pg. 95 - 3 - Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 15th day of July, A.D. 2014, and to be presented for final passage on the19th day of August, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading on the 19th day of August, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 96 Agenda Item 11 Item # 11 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Lindsay Kuntz, Real Estate Specialist Jason Stutzman, Civil Engineer III SUBJECT First Reading of Ordinance No. 103, 2014, Authorizing the Conveyance of a Non-Exclusive Waterline Easement and Temporary Construction Easement on City Property to the North Weld County Water District and the East Larimer County Water District. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to authorize the conveyance of easements on City Property to the East Larimer County Water District and the North Weld County Water District for their NEWT II Water Transmission Pipeline Project. The City of Fort Collins Park Planning Department acquired a parcel of old railroad right of way located east of Taft Hill Road and north of Vine Drive (the “City Property”) for future trail use through the national “Rails to Trails” program. The East Larimer County Water District and North Weld County Water District (collectively, the “Districts”) have begun the second phase of a multi-phase water transmission pipeline project (the NEWT II Project) for the purposes of conveying treated water from the Districts’ Soldier Canyon Filter Plant to their drinking water distribution systems. The alignment of the pipeline will cross a section of the City Property, which is managed by the City Park Planning Department. As such, the Districts have requested a waterline easement from the City for their project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of this Ordinance on First Reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The City Property, identified as parcel number 97032-00-949, was an old railroad right of way purchased in 1990 from Burlington Northern Railroad Company. The property was acquired by the City Park Planning Department as part of the Rails to Trails program to be used for future trail purposes, and the property remains vacant. The Districts’ NEWT Project began in 2009, with the first phase being completed in 2010. The second phase of the project (NEWT II) will connect the western end of the pipeline from phase one to the Districts’ Soldier Canyon Filter Plant. This connection will involve the installation of 19,000 feet of 42” diameter waterline. The Districts have requested a waterline easement and temporary construction easement for the new pipeline alignment that crosses the City Property. The installation of the pipeline on the City Property will be done by open trenching of the area. The Districts will then restore the City Property to its original condition after their work is complete including grading and reseeding of the area. The anticipated schedule for the NEWT II Project is September 2014 to May 2015. The work on the City Property will take approximately four to six weeks and is likely to occur between November 2014 and April 2015. The Districts will be required to notify the City prior to beginning construction activities on the City Property. No above ground improvements will be installed in the easement areas. Park Planning staff has evaluated the proposed easements and does not Packet Pg. 97 Agenda Item 11 Item # 11 Page 2 believe the conveyance of the easement will interfere with the intended future use of the City Property for trail purposes. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS Real Estate Services reviewed comparable sales information and recent appraisal information of nearby properties to estimate a fair market value for the easements. The estimated just compensation for the permanent easement, temporary construction easement, and fee for processing the easement request is $2787. ATTACHMENTS 1. NEWT II Easements Location Map (JPG) 2. NEWT II Project Summary and Easement Detail (PDF) Packet Pg. 98 Packet Pg. 99 Attachment11.1: NEWT II Easements Location Map (2068 : NEWT II Old RR ROW) East Larimer County Water District and North Weld County Water District NEWT II Water Transmission Pipeline Project Project Summary Project Description: The NEWT II project is the second phase of a multi-phase water transmission pipeline project that will convey treated water for the East Larimer County Water District (ELCO) and North Weld County Water District (NWCWD) (collectively, the Districts) from the Soldier Canyon Filter Plant, located at the Soldier Canyon Dam of Horsetooth Reservoir, to the Districts’ drinking water distribution systems. The primary reasons for installation of the waterline are 1) provide transmission line redundancy and 2) provide additional transmission line capacity to serve current and future customer needs. The first phase of the project (NEWT I) was completed in 2010. NEWT II involves the installation of approximately 19,000 feet of 42” diameter waterline from the Soldier Canyon Filter Plant to the vicinity of Lincoln Junior High, approximately ½-mile west of North Shields Avenue and a ¼-mile north of Vine Drive. This second phase will connect to the western end of the previously completed NEWT I pipeline. Figures 1 and 2 show the general area of the eastern end of the NEWT II pipeline and the location of the easement to be acquired. Figure 3 is the pipeline design drawing showing the crossing of the City property. Duration of Project on City Property: Actual pipe installation pace varies depending on terrain and complexity of installation at a specific location. Due to the topography, crossing of a ditch and installation of an access bridge on the property immediately adjacent to the City property, it is anticipated that work in this area may last from four to six weeks. Type of Work/Disturbance That Will Occur on City Property The type of work will involve surface grading, trenching, pipe installation and backfilling. After the pipe is installed the ground will be brought back to its original grade and seeded/reclaimed. The contractor will also be using the easement for access to areas to the east and west for construction of the pipeline along those segments. Expected Schedule of Work The overall project schedule is September 2014 through May 2015. No exact schedule of when the contractor will be working on the property is available at this time because a contractor has not yet been hired. Once a contractor is hired (anticipated to be by August 1, 2014), they will submit a schedule for construction activity. However, the adjacent irrigation ditch has limits on the time the pipeline construction can cross, those time limits being November 1 through April 1. Because of this time limit for the ditch crossing it is likely safe to assume the work across the City property will be done sometime within that time frame. East Larimer County Water District North Weld County Water District 970-493-2044 970-356-3020 "UUBDINFOU 1BHFPG Packet Pg. 100 Attachment11.2: NEWT II Project Summary and Easement Detail (2068 : NEWT II Old RR ROW) NEWT II Water Pipeline Project N2-13 – City of Fort Collins Old RR Right-of-Way Easement Project Description Planned Mitigation The property will be restored to its original grade and reseeded as required by the City. No wetlands or other environmentally sensitive areas will be crossed on the City property and therefore no other circumstances requiring specific mitigation measures are known to exist. East Larimer County Water District North Weld County Water District 970-493-2044 970-356-3020 2 "UUBDINFOU 1BHFPG Packet Pg. 101 Attachment11.2: NEWT II Project Summary and Easement Detail (2068 : NEWT II Old RR ROW) "UUBDINFOU1BHFPG NEWT II East Terminus - Connects to Existing NEWT I Pipeline Figure 1 - General Vicinity Map NEWT II Alignment Old RR Right-of- Way Taft Hill Road Pac "UUBDINFOU1BHFPG City of Fort Collins/ Old RR Right-of- Way NEWT II Alignment Figure 2 - Easement Map Area of easement to be acquired Pac WIRE FENCE WIRE FENCE ELECTRIC FENCE WIRE FENCE FLOWLINE SWALE IRRIGATION DITCH DISPOSAL AREA UNA 100' COMMUNICATION TRANSMISSION EASEMENT TO BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY. (REC. NO. 90023707) 30' COMMUNICATION EASEMENT THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY (BOOK 1175 PAGE 415) T T T 65' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 40' PERMANENT EASEMENT 40' PERMANENT EASEMENT 40' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 15' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 42" DIP 42" DIP CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION IN AREA OF OVERHEAD POWER LINE WITH UTILITY. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF NEW TRENCH AREA ARTHUR DITCH CROSSING (SEE SHEET C18 FOR CROSSING DETAIL) 40' TEMP CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE FENCE TO INSTALL WATERLINE AND THEN REPLACE TO IMPROVED OR IN-KIND CONDITION. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE FENCE TO INSTALL WATERLINE AND THEN REPLACE TO IMPROVED OR IN-KIND CONDITION. +00 173+00 174+00 175+00 176+00 177+00 178+00 179+00 180+00 181+00 - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 103, 2014 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A NON-EXCLUSIVE WATERLINE EASEMENT AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ON CITY PROPERTY TO THE NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND THE EAST LARIMER COUNTY WATER DISTRICT WHEREAS, in 1989, the City and Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BNSF) entered into an Offer to Purchase and Interim Trail Use/Railbanking Agreement (the “Railbanking Agreement”) in accordance with Section 8(d) of the National Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. Section 1247(d); and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Railbanking Agreement was to allow the City to purchase, for recreational trail purposes, a portion of BNSF’s rail line between Fort Collins and Laporte that BNSF otherwise intended to abandon; and WHEREAS, in 1990, pursuant to the Railbanking Agreement, BNSF quitclaimed to the City a parcel of real property located in Fort Collins, Colorado, identified in County records as parcel number 97032-00-949 (the “City Property”); and WHEREAS, in 1993 the District Court for Larimer County ruled in Case No. 91CV474-3 that the City’s interest in the City Property amounted only to an easement, that BNSF still retained the underlying title to the City Property, and that property owners adjacent to the City Property have a right of reverter in the City Property if the Railroad ever formally abandons its interests there; and WHEREAS, BNSF has advised the City, through its attorney, that it disagrees with the District Court’s ruling and believes that it no longer has any interest in the City Property; and WHEREAS, the North Weld County Water District and the East Larimer County Water District (the “Districts”) have requested two easements on the City Property: a waterline easement consisting of .104 acres as described on Exhibit “A”, attached and incorporated herein by reference, and a temporary construction easement consisting of .167 acres, as described on Exhibit “B”, attached and incorporated herein by reference (together, the “Easements”); and WHEREAS, the proposed Easements would be used to install an underground pipeline to connect the Soldier Canyon Water Filter Plant to the Districts’ distribution systems as part of their North Weld - ELCO Water Transmission Pipeline - Phase II (“NEWT II”) Project; and WHEREAS, the Districts will compensate the City $2,787.00 for the estimated fair market value of the Easements and for staff processing time; and WHEREAS, City staff has identified no negative impacts to the City expected to result from the granting of the Easements; and Packet Pg. 105 - 2 - WHEREAS, City staff has advised the Districts that the City may not be the only owner of property interests in the City Property, and that the City can only grant the Easements to the extent of its ownership interest and cannot warrant its title to the City Property; and WHEREAS, Section 23-111(a) of the City Code provides that the City Council is authorized to sell, convey, or otherwise dispose of any and all interests in real property owned in the name of the City, provided that the Council first finds, by ordinance, that such sale or other disposition is in the best interests of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That the conveyance of the Easements on the City Property to the Districts as provided herein is in the best interests of the City. Section 2. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute such documents as are necessary to convey the Easements to the Districts on terms and conditions consistent with this Ordinance, together with such additional terms and conditions as the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, determines are necessary or appropriate to protect the interests of the City, including, but not limited to, any necessary changes to the legal descriptions of the Easements, so long as such changes do not materially increase the size or change the character of the Easements. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 15th day of July, A.D. 2014, and to be presented for final passage on the19th day of August, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading on the 19th day of August, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 106 Packe Attachment1: Exhibit A (2069 : NEWT II Old RR ROW Ordinance) Packe # Packe # Packe # Attachment2: Exhibit B (2069 : NEWT II Old RR ROW Ordinance) # Packe Agenda Item 12 Item # 12 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Patrick Rowe, Real Estate Specialist Jason Graham, Water Reclamation/Biosolids Manager Ronald Russell, Technical Services Supervisor SUBJECT First Reading of Ordinance No. 104, 2014, Authorizing the Conveyance of a Non-Exclusive Utility Easement on City Property to the Nunn Telephone Company. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to authorize the conveyance of a non-exclusive easement to Nunn Telephone Company (NTC) for the purpose of installing a fiber-optic connection to an AT&T fiber regeneration hut that is located on a portion of the Meadow Springs Ranch. The proposed easement is 10 feet wide and approximately 690 feet long and would be placed immediately adjacent to an existing access road. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION Nunn Telephone Company (NTC), a telephone and internet service provider that serves northeast Larimer County and northwest Weld County, has requested a non-exclusive utility easement from the City to allow NTC to install a fiber-optic line between Weld County Road 15 and an AT&T fiber regeneration hut located on a portion of Meadow Springs Ranch (MSR). MSR is a 26,600 acre property owned by the City and managed by the Water Reclamation and Biosolids Division as a site for land application of biosolids. The easement request pertains to the southeast corner of MSR and per Utilities staff, will have no effect on City operations. The proposed easement is 10 feet wide and approximately 690 feet long and would be located immediately adjacent to the existing access road that serves the AT&T fiber hut. Installation of the 690 foot fiber-optic run will occur using a combination of equipment, but in general, a 4-inch slot will be trenched to a nominal depth of 36 inches (no less than 24 inches). After the cable is located, the soil will be replaced and compacted. To achieve a more natural look, the vegetation will be allowed to recover on its own; however, the City may request additional restoration efforts from NTC at the City’s discretion. Additionally, NTC will be required to control weeds within the disturbed areas. Upon review of the easement proposal, and given the City’s positive experience in working with NTC on a prior easement request, City staff is confident that the easement will cause minimal or no lasting disturbance. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS Real Estate Services reviewed value information for Meadows Springs Ranch to determine a compensation estimate for the requested easement. Given the easement’s small size and the low dollar per acre values that are appropriate for MSR, the concluded easement value was below a minimum threshold that Real Estate Packet Pg. 114 Agenda Item 12 Item # 12 Page 2 Services determined would be appropriate, and thus a nominal value of $2,500 has been concluded. Along with the property value of the easement, NTC must compensate the City a $1,000 processing fee which will be used to offset staff time to process the easement request. Additionally, NTC is responsible for any costs necessary to restore the property, including re-seeding and addressing weeds, if applicable. NTC has paid the City the $1,000 processing fee and will pay the easement compensation at the time of the easement conveyance. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Upon review of the easement proposal, and given the City’s positive experience in working with NTC on a prior easement request, City staff is confident that the easement proposal and associated work will cause minimal or no lasting environmental impact. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION On June 19, 2014, the Water Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of a permanent utility easement to NTC, provided that the additional requirement of addressing noxious weeds will also be added to the City’s agreement with NTC. City staff concurs with the Water Board's recommendation regarding noxious weeds and this additional requirement will be added to the City-NTC easement agreement. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map (PDF) 2. Easement Alignment Photos (PDF) 3. Easement Conditions (PDF) 4. Water Board Minutes (PDF) Packet Pg. 115 ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 116 Attachment12.1: Location Map (2130 : City-Nunn Utility Easement) Easement Alignment Photos Figure 1. Proposed easement would align with right side of this access road as viewed from Weld County Road 15. AT&T fiber regeneration hut is seen in the distance. Figure 2. Proposed easement would align with left side of this access road as viewed from AT&T fiber regeneration hut. Weld County Road 15 is seen in the distance. ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 117 Attachment12.2: Easement Alignment Photos (2130 : City-Nunn Utility Easement) Water Reclamation Division 3036 Environmental Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 970.221.6900 970.221.6970 - fax fcgov.com/utilities Conditions for City of Fort Collins Approval of Nunn Telephone Company Easement Proposed at Meadow Springs Ranch Meadow Springs Ranch (MSR) is owned by the City of Fort Collins and is managed by the Water Reclamation and Biosolids (WRB) Division. Granting an easement conveys a property right that must be approved by City Council. Water Board will review the easement proposal and provide City Council with a recommended action. Nunn Telephone Company (NTC) must accept the conditions below in order to receive approval of the proposed utility easement. Additional conditions may be added as the proposal is reviewed by the City. WRB and Real Estate Services staff will work with NTC during the review process.  NTC and its contractors must minimize impact on the affected land by managing their activity to limit the area and visibility of disturbed land. Activity will be restricted to the designated area of the easement.  NTC must restore affected areas, including surface grade, fences, and gates, to a condition that is equal or better than the condition prior to any disturbance caused by NTC activity.  NTC will be responsible for restoration of damage caused by any activities to maintain or repair the cable after it has been installed.  The disturbed area will not be seeded unless native vegetation fails to satisfactorily reestablish within two growing seasons. If the City determines seeding is needed, the seed mix will be designated by the City.  NTC will be responsible for addressing noxious weeds that may develop in disturbed areas which occur in the first two growing seasons following the disturbance and for the two growing seasons following seeding if it is necessary. NTC will coordinate any weed abatement actions with City Staff in order to ensure that best practices are followed.  NTC must minimize their interference with City and grazing association operations at MSR.  NTC must provide WRB with advance notification for all work performed on the easement including any work performed after the installation.  Cash compensation will be required for the value of the easement property. Due to the small size of the easement, a nominal value of $2,500 has been assigned for the property. NTC must also pay a $1,000 fee to offset staff time to process the easement. NTC must provide the City with full payment for the easement property and processing prior to transfer of the easement deed. If additional administrative costs occur after transfer of the deed, NTC will pay those costs within 30 days of being notified.  NTC will be responsible for damages not acceptably reclaimed as determined by acceptable appraisal techniques. ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 118 Attachment12.3: Easement Conditions (2130 : City-Nunn Utility Easement) Excerpt from Unapproved Water Board Minutes, June 19, 2014 Nunn Telephone Company Fiber-Optic Easement at Meadow Springs Ranch (Attachments available upon request.) Technical Services Supervisor Ron Russell (Utilities Water Reclamation & Biosolids Division) presented information, along with Real Estate Specialist III Patrick Rowe, and Water Reclamation & Biosolids Manager Jason Graham. Meadow Springs Ranch (MSR), owned by the City and managed by the Water Reclamation and Biosolids Division, contains 26,600 acres, about 40 square miles, extending from the Buckeye exit of I-25 at Rawhide Power Plant to about a mile from the Wyoming border. The proposed easement is in lower right hand corner of map. Mr. Russell stated the easement is needed for NTC to make a connection to an AT&T fiber-optic regeneration hut located on MSR, to continue receiving service from the hut. He described the installation process; surface disturbance (vegetation) is not at a high level. Previous easement work by NTC in fall 2013 did not cause long-term damage. Discussion Highlights  A board member inquired if there is a better time (season) than others to do the easement work. Mr. Russell stated seeding probably won’t be required due to the disturbed area’s potential to recover on its own, therefore timing won’t make a difference. Mr. Russell stated if seeding were required, he would work with Natural Areas to determine the best seed mix and other such details.  A board member expressed concerns about invasive plants such as Dalmatian toadflax thriving in disturbed areas. Mr. Russell stated a requirement for Nunn Telephone Company to control weeds will be added to the conditions for granting the easement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Utilities staff has reviewed the easement proposal from NTC and found the easement will have minimal environmental disturbance or impact on Utilities activities at Meadow Springs Ranch. Discussion on the motion: There was no discussion on the motion. Vote on the motion: It passed unanimously. Board Member Brian Brown moved for City Council to consider approval of an Ordinance authorizing conveyance of a permanent utility easement to Nunn Telephone Company on the City property Meadow Springs Ranch, with additional of adding noxious weeds in the agreement. Board Member Brunswig seconded the motion. ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 119 Attachment12.4: Water Board Minutes (2130 : City-Nunn Utility Easement) - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 104, 2014 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A NON-EXCLUSIVE UTILITY EASEMENT ON CITY PROPERTY TO THE NUNN TELEPHONE COMPANY WHEREAS, the City is the owner of real property located in Larimer County and Weld County, Colorado, known as Meadow Springs Ranch (the “City Property”); and WHEREAS, the City Property is managed by the City’s Water Reclamation and Biosolids Division as a site for land application of biosolids; and WHEREAS, Nunn Telephone Company (NTC) is requesting a utility easement ten feet wide and approximately 690 feet long across the City Property for the installation and maintenance of a fiber-optic line between Weld County Road 15 and an AT&T fiber regeneration hut located on the City Property; and WHEREAS, the proposed easement is described on Exhibit “A”, attached and incorporated herein by reference (the “Easement”); and WHEREAS, the Easement would be located immediately adjacent to an existing access road that serves the AT&T fiber hut; and WHEREAS, NTC has agreed to pay the City $2,500 as compensation for the Easement, plus a $1,000 processing fee for City staff’s time to process this request; and WHEREAS, City staff has not identified any negative impacts to the City Property expected to result from the grant of the Easement and related work; and WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on June 19, 2014, the Water Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Easement conveyance provided that NTC agrees as part of the Easement agreement to be responsible for controlling noxious weeds within the area disturbed by NTC’s activities; and WHEREAS, Section 23-111 of the City Code provides that the City Council is authorized to sell, convey, or otherwise dispose of any and all interests in real property owned in the name of the City, provided that the City Council first finds, by ordinance, that such sale or other disposition is in the best interest of the City and, with respect to real property that is part of the City’s water or utility systems, that the disposition will not materially impair the viability of the particular utility system as a whole and will be for the benefit of the citizens of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Packet Pg. 120 - 2 - Section 1. That the City Council hereby finds that the conveyance of the Easement on the City Property to NTC as provided herein is in the best interest of the City, will not impair the City’s wastewater utility system, and will be for the benefit of the citizens of the City. Section 2. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute such documents as are necessary to convey the Easement to NTC on terms and conditions consistent with this Ordinance, together with such additional terms and conditions as the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, determines are necessary or appropriate to protect the interests of the City or effectuate the purposes of this Ordinance, including, but not limited to, any necessary corrections to the legal description of the Easement, so long as such changes do not materially increase the size or change the character of the Easement. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 15th day of July, A.D. 2014, and to be presented for final passage on the19th day of August, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading on the 19th day of August, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 121 Packet Pg. 122 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2137 : City-Nunn Utility Easement ORD) Packet Pg. 123 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2137 : City-Nunn Utility Easement ORD) Agenda Item 13 Item # 13 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF John Voss, Controller/Assistant Financial Officer SUBJECT Resolution 2014-058 Adopting Amendments to the Financial Management Policies. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to approve a revised Budget Policy and revised Fund Balance Policy. Since the last update, staff has developed a new framework for updating, controlling, formatting and publishing financial policies. The financial policies evolved as part of the Budget document. In that context they focused on explaining concepts rather than setting policy. Both of these revised policies were created based on policy guidelines from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) presented as best practices. As such, the red line versions of the previous policies have many changes that are not substantive. Staff has come up with a new format for financial policies to keep them consistent across all departments within Financial Services. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The financial policies evolved as part of the Budget document. In that context they focused on explaining concepts rather than setting policy. Both of these revised policies were created based on policy guidelines from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) presented as best practices. As such, the red line versions of the previous policies have many changes that are not substantive. Staff has come up with a new format for financial policies to keep them consistent across all departments within Financial Services. BUDGET - The last change to the Budget Policy was in 2005. The new structure follows GFOA recommendations. The City Charter governs many aspects of the budget process. Specific references and linkages to the charter are included within the revised budget policy. Additionally, the revised budget policy includes: A. An overview B. Principles for budget planning C. Scope - content of recommended budget, basis of budgeting and budget calendar D. Roles and responsibilities E. Budgeting control system F. Balanced budget definition FUND BALANCE- The last change to Reserve Policy was in 2008. The new proposed policy was developed following GFOA’s best practices. Besides the major formatting changes, the significant policy changes are as follows: Packet Pg. 124 Agenda Item 13 Item # 13 Page 2 A. Updated and defined new terminology B. Shifted focus to minimums, not maximums or target balances. C. Clarified that the Emergency Reserve in the General Fund is in addition to the current 60 day minimum. D. Special Revenues funds no longer are required to have a minimum balance. This is in alignment with GFOA recommendations, in which dedicated revenues are intended to be spent on set purposes. E. Internal Services Funds were all previously all 2% of operating expenses. The uniqueness of each’s activity requires different approaches. The Equipment (fleet) Fund, Data & Communications Fund, and Utility Customer Service Fund will no longer have a minimum balance. The Self Insurance Fund will maintain a minimum of 25% of annual expenses and the Benefits Fund will maintain a minimum of 30% of annual medical and dental expenses. F. Utility Funds were simplified by combining several separate minimum balances into to a single 25% of operating expenses, excluding power purchased for resale. Certain restrictions were removed that referred to other balances mandated by other sources, i.e. Art In Public Places, Water Rights Reserve, etc. Their objective is to restrict to purpose, whereas this policy is about maintaining minimum balances. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS There are no immediate impacts. The long term strength of the City's financial and economic conditions should be enhanced and preserved by following of these policies. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Council Finance Committee reviewed the proposed new fund balance policy on April 21, 2014 and the proposed new budget policy on May 19, 2014. ATTACHMENTS 1. Current Budget Policy (PDF) 2. Current Fund Balances Policy, with redline and strike through (PDF) 3. Council Finance Committee minutes, April 21, 2014 (PDF) 4. Council Finance Committee minutes, May 19, 2014 (PDF) Packet Pg. 125 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES TABLE OF CONTENTS The Financial Management Policies are a compendium of all City policies that shape the Budget. They are intended to assist the Council and the City Manager in preparing the Budget and help communicate to residents and customers how the community goals are being addressed. BUDGET POLICY 1.1 Overview ...................................................................................................... 1.2 Charter Process Requirements .................................................................... 1.3 Changes to Adopted Budget ........................................................................ 1.4 Lapsed Appropriations ................................................................................. 1.5 Budget Philosophy and Preparation ............................................................ 1.6 Principles for Budget Planning ..................................................................... ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 126 Attachment13.1: Current Budget Policy (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) BUDGET POLICY 1.1. OVERVIEW The budget is a long-range plan by which the City Council sets financial policy. Through the budget, services are implemented. The budget along with the annual appropriation ordinance provides the basis for the control of expenditures. For the City of Fort Collins, direction for the budget emanates from many distinct sources. The State Constitution and the City Charter provide the basic legal requirements and time lines for the process. Council goals, ordinances and resolutions provide additional direction and respond to the needs of the community. (INCLUDED) 1.2. CHARTER PROCESS REQUIREMENTS a. Budget Term The fiscal year of the City is the calendar year. The City may adopt budgets for a budget term of one fiscal year or more. After the Charter amendment in 1997 allowing the budget term to be more than one fiscal year, the Council has adopted two-year budgets that correspond with the election cycle. (INCLUDED) b. Budget Recommendation On or before the first Monday in September preceding each budget term, the City Manager shall file with the City Clerk a proposed budget for the ensuing budget term along with an explanatory message. The proposed budget shall provide a complete financial plan for each fund of the City and shall include appropriate financial statements for each type of fund showing comparative figures for the last completed fiscal year, comparative figures for the current year, and the City Manager=s recommendations for the ensuing budget term. (INCLUDED) c. Public Record, Hearing The City Manager=s proposed budget shall be a public record and be available to the public for inspection and copying. The City Council shall, within ten (10) days after the filing of the proposed budget, set a time for a public hearing. At the hearing, the public may comment upon the proposed budget. (INCLUDED) d. Adoption of Budget and Appropriation of Funds After the public hearing and before the last day of November preceding the budget term, the Council shall adopt the budget, by ordinance, for the ensuing term. Before the last day of November of each fiscal year, the Council shall appropriate such sums of money as it deems necessary to defray all expenditures of the City during the ensuing fiscal year. The appropriation of funds shall be accomplished by passage of the annual appropriation ordinance. The appropriation of funds shall be based upon the budget as approved by the Council but need not be itemized further than by fund with the exception of capital projects and federal or state grants, which shall be summarized by individual project or grant. (INCLUDED) 1.3. CHANGES TO ADOPTED BUDGET Packet Pg. 127 Attachment13.1: Current Budget Policy (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) After the commencement of the fiscal year, the amounts appropriated for the proposed expenditures in the adopted budget are not subject to repeal and are considered appropriated for the purposes specified. The expenditures of City operating funds cannot exceed the budgeted appropriations for their respective fund. In certain cases, however, adopted budgets may be increased, decreased, or amounts transferred between funds. a. Budget Increases (INCLUDED) 1. Supplemental Appropriations B The Council, upon recommendation by the City Manager, may make supplemental appropriations from actual revenues received, anticipated revenues, and prior year reserves provided that the total amount of the supplemental appropriation plus previous appropriations for the fiscal year does not exceed the actual or anticipated revenue total or the available reserve balance. No appropriation can be made which exceeds the revenues, reserves, or other funds anticipated or available except for emergencies due to accident or unforeseen event arising after the adoption of the annual appropriation. 2. Unanticipated Revenue B If a fund receives revenue during the fiscal year from a source that was not anticipated at the time of budget adoption such as grants, bond issue or implementation of a new fee, Council may appropriate such revenue for expenditure. 3. Encumbrance Carryover B If a fund has open and valid purchase orders at the end of a fiscal year, those related appropriations are encumbered and carried over to the ensuing fiscal year and added to the budgeted appropriations to cover the actual expense when it occurs. b. Budget Decreases (INCLUDED) The budget may also be decreased below adopted appropriations during the fiscal year. Changes in service demand, economic conditions, projected growth limits, and Council goals and direction may cause such budget reductions. Each service area is responsible for developing a plan to reduce appropriations. Each plan must be in place and ready for implementation should the need arise. If the City Manager directs budget reductions, Council will be informed immediately and the appropriations will be set aside through administrative action. While this administrative action does not lower the appropriations within a fund, expenditures from the fund shall not exceed the amount recommended by the City Manager. If the circumstances leading to the implementation of reductions change, the appropriations may be made available for expenditure. c. Level of Control and Budget Transfers (INCLUDED) 1. Control of expenditures is exercised at the fund level. Fund managers are responsible for all expenditures made against appropriations within their fund and can allocate available resources within the fund. 2. During the fiscal year, the Council may by ordinance and upon the recommendation of the City Manager, transfer any unexpended and Packet Pg. 128 Attachment13.1: Current Budget Policy (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) unencumbered appropriated amount from one fund or capital project account to another fund or capital project account, provided that: (a) the purpose for which the transferred funds are to be spent remains unchanged; (b) the purpose for which the funds were initially appropriated no longer exists; or (c) the transfer is from a fund or capital project account in which the amount appropriated exceeds the amount needed to accomplish the purpose specified by the appropriation. 1.4. LAPSED APPROPRIATIONS (INCLUDED) All appropriations not spent or unencumbered at the end of the fiscal year lapse into the fund balance applicable to the specific fund, except for: a. Capital Projects - appropriations for capital projects which do not lapse until the project is completed and closed out; and b. Grant Funds - appropriations for federal or state grants which do not lapse until the expiration of the grant. Council can terminate a capital project or a federal or state grant at any time prior to completion of the project or expiration of the grant. 1.5. BUDGET PHILOSOPHY a. Philosophy (NOT INCLUDED) The City of Fort Collins is committed to presenting a sound financial plan for operations and capital improvements within growth limit guidelines. To achieve this end, the City utilizes conservative growth and revenue forecasts and: $ Prepares multi-year financial plans for operations and capital improvements; $ Allows staff to manage the operating and capital budgets, with City Council deciding allocations in both; $ Adopts financial management policies which establish guidelines for multi- year financial plans; $ Establishes budgets for all funds based on adopted policies; $ Appropriates the budget in accordance with the City Charter and State Constitution; $ Adjusts the budget to reflect changes in the local economy, changes in priorities, and receipt of unbudgeted revenues; Packet Pg. 129 Attachment13.1: Current Budget Policy (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) $ Organizes the budget so that revenues are related to expenditures as much as possible; $ Provides department managers with immediate access to revenue and expenditure information for controlling their annual expenditures against appropriations; $ Utilizes a performance measurement system for all activities in the City; $ Evaluates recommendations that have a budget impact in light of annual appropriations and multi-year financial plans. b. Budget Preparation (INCLUDED) While the Charter establishes time limits and the essential content of the City Manager=s proposed budget and the adoption of the budget, the language is silent on the budget preparation process. The City=s Financial and Management Policies guide budget preparation and long- range planning. The City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Budget Director, and designated Service Area Directors develops the guidelines, consistent with the Policies, to be used for budget preparation. The aforementioned individuals are collectively referred to as the Budget Leadership Team. During the development of the budget, various department and division representatives may be called on to provide their expertise . In addition, the City Council and the Executive Lead Team provide guidance during preparation. The City=s 2006-2007 biennial budget was prepared using a process called Budgeting for Outcomes (ABFO@). The purpose of utilizing the BFO approach is to: $ Identify what=s important to a community and develop a sound financial and service plan to achieve those outcomes; $ Allocate dollars based on current priorities and results, not simply increase last year=s spending; $ Effectively deal with revenue limitations; and $ Emphasize accountability, efficiency, innovation and partnerships. In March, programs develop multi-year revenue projections and submit them to the Budget Office. These revenue projections effectively Aset the price of government@; the amount available for purchasing outcomes/results. City Council adopts the outcomes/results that form the foundation of the budget. The revenues are then allocated, by the Leadership Team, across the outcomes. Results Teams, organized by outcome/result, prepare ARequests for Results@ (ARFR=s@) that include strategy maps, two to three high level indicators to measure results, and purchasing strategies. Sellers (departments/divisions) prepare Aoffers@ in response to the RFR=s. The Seller=s offers are reviewed by the Results Teams, ranked, and recommended for inclusion or omission from the City Manager=s recommended budget, based upon the offer=s merits and the resources available, given the outcome/result. Packet Pg. 130 Attachment13.1: Current Budget Policy (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) The City Manager=s budget recommendation is submitted to City Council before the first Monday in September. The recommended budget is made available for public inspection at this time. In September, a recommended budget-in-brief is published in the local newspaper for public information. In addition, two public hearings and Council work sessions are held in September and October. The budget for the ensuing budget term is adopted no later than November 30. 1.6 PRINCIPLES FOR BUDGET PLANNING The City provides a wide variety of services to the residents of the community. It is the responsibility of City Council to adopt a budget and manage the available resources to best meet the service needs for the overall good of the community. (INCLUDED) To aid in planning for the allocation of resources to meet the good of the whole community, Council adopted Resolution 2001-161, that set forth the Principles for Budget Planning. Those Principles as adopted by Council are as follows: (NOT INCLUDED FROM HERE DOWN) a. The City should strive to attain the lowest possible interest rates on debt in order to minimize the cost to taxpayers and users of City services. b. The City should maintain adequate reserve levels to ensure minimal loss of service to the community should there be unforeseen reductions in revenues or a catastrophic occurrence. c. Employees of the City are a valuable resource in providing services to the community, and a compensation policy should be maintained for City employees that reflects the value of attracting and retaining quality employees. d. Primary services are those services that are necessary for the good of the entire community. They are basic to the safety, health, and welfare of the community, and the allocation of all resources necessary for the provision of primary services is the first priority in budget preparation. Primary services are: Police Fire Development Review Affordable Housing Neighborhood and Building Services Water Transportation Electric Engineering Pedestrian Access Wastewater Stormwater Natural Resources Facilities Maintenance (all public facilities including parks) e. Secondary services are those services that enhance the quality of life of the residents and to many, increase the value of living and working in the community. While the value of secondary services is recognized, the allocation of resources to those services shall be considered only after the necessary allocation has been made to fund primary services. Secondary services are: Packet Pg. 131 Attachment13.1: Current Budget Policy (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) Recreation Human Rights Golf Parks Library Human Services Contract Natural Areas Performing Arts Cemeteries Airport Museum f. Support services provide the management, guidelines, and operational assistance to carry out the provision of primary and secondary services. Resources should be allocated to support services to support the level and quality of primary and secondary services expected and desired by the community. Support services are: General Administration Budget Clerical Support Information Technology Real Estate Services Finance Human Resources Fleet Management Geographic Information Systems Legal City Clerk Municipal Court g. No new services, other than those identified as primary services, shall be undertaken by the City until all existing primary, secondary, and support services have received a sufficient level of funding to meet the needs of the community. h. Any adjustment to the existing budget shall take into account the effect that such adjustment would have on future budget resources. Packet Pg. 132 Attachment13.1: Current Budget Policy (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) RESERVE POLICIESFUND BALANCE MINIMUMS 5.1. POLICY STATEMENTPURPOSE AND BENEFITS The accumulation of reserves protects the City from uncontrollable increases in expenditures or unforeseen reductions in revenues, or a combination of the two. It also allows for the prudent financing of capital construction and replacement projects.To set minimum fund balances so as to mitigate risks, maintain good standing with rating agencies, and ensure cash is available when revenue is unavailable. The policy is sets minimum fund balances, not targets or maximum balances. Each fund should be evaluated by staff to determine the appropriateness of maintaining fund balances above the minimums set in this policy. Contingencies for severe weather, prolonged drought, and anticipated capital spending should be considered independently from this policy. 5.2 APPLICABLE TO Funds – This policy applies to all City funds. It does not apply to URA, DDA, PFA and Library. 5.32. GOVERNMENTAL TYPES OF FUNDS AND FUND BALANCESRESERVES The Equity on balance sheet of a governmental fund is called Fund Balance. The current classifications of Fund Balance in governmental funds are primarily based on the origin of the constraints. The following categories are in decreasing order of constraints. Non-Spendable Permanent endowments or assets in a non-liquid form Restricted Involve a third party: State Legislation or Contractual Agreements Committed Set by formal action of the City Council Assigned By staff, and/or residual balances in a Special Revenue Fund Unassigned Remaining balances in the General Fund Minimums outlined in section 5.5 relate only to Assigned and Unassigned balances. 5.4 PROPRIETARY FUND AND WORKING CAPITAL Internal Service Funds and Enterprise Funds are accounted for nearly identical to the private sector. The balance sheets include long term assets and long term liabilities. The resulting Equity section on their balance sheet, called Net Position, is not a good measure of spendable financial resources. To get to spendable financial resources, a common calculation is to take Current Assets and subtract Current Liabilities, with the net result called Working Capital. To further refine, for purposes of this policy, certain required restrictions are further subtracted and result in Available Working Capital. Some examples of required restrictions are unspent monies for Art in Public Places, Water Rights, and existing appropriations for capital projects. The minimums outlined in section 5.5 relate to Available Working Capital. The City of Fort Collins maintains reserves that are required by law or contract and that serve a specific purpose. These types of reserves are Formatted: Font: Bold, Underline Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Font: Bold, Underline ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 133 Attachment13.2: Current Fund Balances Policy, with redline and strike through (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) considered restricted and are not available for other uses. Within specific funds, additional reserves may be maintained according to adopted policies. All expenditures of reserves must be approved by Council. This may occur during the budget process or throughout the budget year. 5.5 MINIMUM BALANCES The following Minimum Balances refers to Assigned and Unassigned Fund Balances in governmental funds and Available Working Capital in the Internal Service Funds and Enterprise Funds. a. GENERAL FUND Restricted for Emergencies - This reserve is required under Article X, Section 20 of the State Constitution. This reserve can only be used for declared emergencies. Three percent or more of the City's fiscal year spending, less bonded debt service must be reserved Designated for Affordable Housing - This reserve is restricted for affordable housing use. City Council may appropriate funds for affordable housing purposes. Funds appropriated for the promotion of affordable housing and not expended during the year shall lapse to the Affordable Housing Reserve. Any appropriation from this reserve shall be restricted for the purpose of affordable housing. Designated for Contingencies - This reserve is what is left after all the other reserves and designations are calculated. It is available for the financing of any needs deemed appropriate by the City Council. Monies held in this reserve may be appropriated during the current budget year and may also be used for the ensuing budget years as a financing source if projected expenditures needed to maintain appropriate levels of service exceed projected revenues. Of all General Fund reserves, this is the most flexible. 60 Day Liquidity Goal - The Designation Commitment for Contingency should be at least 60 days (17%) of the subsequent year’s originally adopted budgeted expenditures and transfers out. The calculation for the minimum level shall exclude expenditures and transfers out for large and unusual one-time items. Important note – the 60 Day Liquidity Goal is in addition to the Restricted Balance required by Article X, Section 20 of the State Constitution. This reserve must equal 3% of non-exempt revenue and can only be used for declared emergencies. Fiscal emergencies are specifically excluded by the State Constitution as qualifying use of this reserve. Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.5", Keep with next, Keep lines together Formatted: Justified, Keep with next, Keep lines together Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.5", Keep with next, Keep lines together Formatted: Justified, Keep with next, Keep lines together Packet Pg. 134 Attachment13.2: Current Fund Balances Policy, with redline and strike through (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) b. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Examples of special revenue funds are: Transportation Services Fund, Natural Areas Fund, Cemetery Fund, Cultural Services & Facilities Fund, Perpetual Care Fund, Recreation Fund, Street Oversizing Fund, and the Transit Services Fund. The fund equity of special revenue funds is classified as reserved or unreserved. Unreserved portions may be classified as either designated or undesignated. Designated fund balances represent amounts identified by management for future use. Reserved fund balances indicate that portion of fund equity, segregated for future use, which are legally required to be segregated in accordance with legal and contractual provisions. Fund managers are allowed to identify fund equity designations (unreserved) provided resources are available in excess of the fund equity used to fulfill reserved balances and those designations determined by policy. Designated for Operations – This reserve designation is established to provide for unforeseen revenue losses. If something happens to the economy, there is flexibility without worrying that current expenditures will exceed the total revenue available. The revenue reserve is calculated, as a minimum, at an amount equal to 2% of projected operating expenditures by fund. The Operations Reserve is not appropriated as part of the annual budget, but may be utilized at the end of the fiscal year, if necessary. No minimum balance is required. c. DEBT SERVICE FUNDS No minimum fund balance is required. Debt service funds are generally not expected or managed to carry any fund balance reserves. Their function is to make debt payments, and receive transfers from other funds to cover the payments, or collect special revenues dedicated for debt service. d. CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS No minimum fund balance is required. d. ENTERPRISE FUNDS Enterprise funds use full accrual based accounting. Their Equity or Fund Balance on a balance sheet is referred to as Net Assets. In general, Net Assets are subdivided into three areas, somewhat based on increasing levels of liquidity. The first division is Nets Assets Invested in Capital Assets, less Related Debt. This class of Net Assets is not liquid at all, and hence not subject to appropriation. The second division is Nets Assets Restricted to Debt Service. This class of Nets Assets, if it exists at all, is imposed by debt covenants. Although each covenant is unique, it commonly equals the next year’s debt service payments. The last division is Unrestricted Net Assets, which ultimately is the remaining after the other two divisions are satisfied. It is this class of net assets that the following policies address.Enterprise funds focus on working capital rather than fund balance. Enterprise Funds shall maintain a minimum Available Working Capital equal to 25% of Operating Expenses, less Depreciation. In the case of L&P, operating expenses will include Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.5" Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.5" Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 0.5" Packet Pg. 135 Attachment13.2: Current Fund Balances Policy, with redline and strike through (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) purchased renewable energy for resale but will not include regular purchased power for resale (i.e. Platte River Power Authority). Electric Utility The following policies pertain to the electric utility-Light and Power Fund. Since the utility is debt-free, these policies pertain primarily to maintenance of reserves. The utility shall be operated: 1. To provide an operating reserve equal to 8% of budgeted operating expenditures, excluding the cost of purchased power; 2. To provide a future capital improvements reserve in an amount equal to the average annual cost (excluding debt financing) of the approved five-year capital improvement plan, considering any changes which, from time to time, may be made in such plan; 3. To provide a purchase power reserve up to approximately 25% of the annual revenue from the sale of electrical energy. This reserve shall be used to partially off-set, defer, or mitigate the impact of purchase power cost increases due to factors such as federal power issues. Significant changes to the 25% level shall be reported to the Council during the budget process; 4. Capital Outlay Reserve – at an amount needed to maintain capital assets and equipment reserve at an amount equal to the capital asset replacement schedule; 5. Priority for the accumulation of reserves shall be as follows: reserves shall first be accumulated in the operating reserve, second in future capital improvements reserve, third in the purchase power reserve. In addition, 1% of specified capital project appropriations shall be reserved and restricted for the City's Art in Public Places program. After reserves are funded, any remaining working capital shall be added to the purchase power reserve. Water Utility The following policies pertain to the water utility-Water Fund. Flow of Funds The City has committed to maintain rates and charges sufficient to generate sufficient “net revenues” of the water system to pay principal and interest on its water revenue bonds and general obligation water bonds. Net revenues include all revenues referred to above, less operation and maintenance (O&M) expenses. O&M expenses are those expenses necessary to operate, maintain, and repair the water system, but do not include any allowance for depreciation or capital replacements and improvements. After all O&M expenses are paid, the remaining net revenue is pledged to pay the revenue bonds principal, interest, and related costs. After all O&M and debt services expenses are paid, the City is required to maintain the following revenue bond accounts: 1. Principal and Interest Reserve - at an amount equal to the accrued principal and interest on the water revenue bonds; or 2. Debt Service Reserve - at an amount specified in the bond ordinances. Formatted: Indent: Hanging: 0.5" Packet Pg. 136 Attachment13.2: Current Fund Balances Policy, with redline and strike through (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) Any remaining net revenues of the Water Fund may be used for any lawful purpose. These are used, in part, to fund major and minor capital improvements and the following reserves: 1. Operating Reserve - at an amount equal to 5% of the projected operating revenue for the ensuing year; Important note – The Water Fund holds a balance for 2. Restricted Water Rights. The balance Reserve - at an amount equals to the amount of cash in-lieu-of water rights payments and raw water surcharges less any expendituresexpenses for acquiring water rights and water storage; The enterprises funds should also be accumulating available working capital above these minimums for the purposes of funding future capital projects. 3. Art in Public Places Reserve - at an amount equal to 1% of eligible capital projects whose appropriations exceed $250,000; 4. Capital Outlay Reserve – at an amount needed to maintain capital assets and equipment reserve at an amount equal to the capital asset replacement schedule; 5. Capital Projects Reserve - at an amount equal to remaining working capital after all other reserves are satisfied. Wastewater Utility The following policies pertain to the wastewater utility-Wastewater Fund. 1. Flow of Funds The first charge against Wastewater Fund revenue is operation and maintenance (O&M) expenses--those expenses necessary to operate, maintain, and repair the sewer system. After all O&M expenses have been paid, the remaining net revenue is pledged to pay the sewer revenue bonds principal, interest, and related costs. After all O&M and debt services expenses are paid, the City is required to maintain the following reserve accounts (listed in pledge order): 1. Principal and Interest Reserve - at an amount equal to the accrued principal and interest on the sewer revenue bonds; or 2. Debt Service Reserve - at an amount specified in the bond ordinances. 3. Wastewater Bond Capital Reserve - at an amount equal to 25% of the O&M expenses budgeted for the fiscal year. Any remaining net pledged revenues of the Wastewater Fund may be used for any lawful purpose. These are used, in part, to fund major and minor capital improvements and the following reserves: 1. Operating Reserve - at an amount equal to 5% of the projected operating revenue for the ensuing year; Packet Pg. 137 Attachment13.2: Current Fund Balances Policy, with redline and strike through (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) 2. Art in Public Places Reserve--at an amount equal to 1% of eligible capital projects whose appropriations exceed $250,000; 3. Capital Outlay Reserve – at an amount needed to maintain capital assets and equipment reserve at an amount equal to the capital asset replacement schedule; 4. Capital Projects Reserve - at an amount equal to remaining working capital after all other reserves are satisfied. Stormwater Utility The following policies pertain to the stormwater utility - Storm Drainage Fund. 1. Flow of Funds The first charge against Storm Drainage Fund revenue is operation and maintenance (O&M) expenses-those expenses necessary to operate, maintain, and repair the storm drainage system. After all O&M expenses have been paid, the remaining net revenue is pledged to pay the storm drainage revenue bonds principal, interest, and related costs. After all O&M and debt service expenses are paid, the City is required to maintain the following reserve accounts (listed in pledge order): 1. Principal and interest reserve-at an amount equal to the accrued principal and interest on the storm drainage revenue bonds; 2. Debt service reserve-at an amount specified in the bond ordinances. Any remaining net pledged revenues of the Storm Drainage Fund may be used for any lawful purpose. These are used, in part, to fund major and minor capital improvements and the following reserves: 1. Operating Reserve--at an amount equal to 5% of the projected operating revenue for the ensuing year; 2. Art in Public Places Reserve - at an amount equal to 1% of eligible capital projects whose appropriations exceed $250,000; and 3. Capital Outlay Reserve – at an amount needed to maintain capital assets and equipment reserve at an amount equal to the capital asset replacement schedule; 4. Capital Projects Reserve - at an amount equal to remaining working capital after all other reserves are satisfied. Golf Fund Designated for Operations – This reserve designation is established to provide for unforeseen revenue losses. If something happens to the economy, there is flexibility without worrying that current expenditures will exceed the total revenue available. The revenue reserve is calculated, as a minimum, at an amount equal to 2% of projected operating expenditures by fund. The Operations Reserve is not appropriated as part of the annual budget, but may be utilized at the end of the fiscal year, if necessary. Packet Pg. 138 Attachment13.2: Current Fund Balances Policy, with redline and strike through (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) e. INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Internal Service funds account for certain support services provided to other funds. By imposing charges to the users of the services, they recover their costs. The City’s Internal Service Funds are used to account for the City’s fleet maintenance (Equipment Fund), management information services and communication services (Data and Communications Services Fund), self-insurance of employee health care and other employee benefits (Benefits Fund), and a risk management insurance program (Self Insurance Fund). Accounting guidelines strongly encourage internal service fund to charge only enough to the recovery of the cost of the service, including depreciation, rather than making a profit. However, in certain situations it is appropriate to establish fund balance reserves policies. For example, customer-approved master plans and independent third-party actuarial reviews (Benefits Fund and Self Insurance Fund) guide the level of reserves. Designated for Operations – This reserve designation is established to provide for unforeseen revenue losses. If something happens to the economy, there is flexibility without worrying that current expenditures will exceed the total revenue available. The revenue reserve is calculated, as a minimum, at an amount equal to 2% of projected operating expenditures by fund. The Operations Reserve is not appropriated as part of the annual budget, but may be utilized at the end of the fiscal year, if necessary.Each fund is a unique operation and will maintain a minimum Available Working Capital as follows: 601 Equipment Fund 8.3% Of annual operating expenses, excluding depreciation 602 Self-Insurance Fund 25.0% Of annual operating expenses 603 Data & Communications Fund 0.0% N/A 604 Benefits Fund 30.0% Of annual medical and dental expenses 605 Utility Customer Service Fund 0.0% N/A 5.6 BELOW MINIMUM When circumstances result in balances below the minimum, staff should develop a plan to restore minimums fund balances and present it to Council Finance Committee. Definitions Non-Spendable Fund Balances – Applicable to governmental funds. Permanent endowments or assets in a non-liquid form such as long term inter-agency loans. Restricted Fund Balances – Applicable to governmental funds. Involve a third party such as State Legislative requirements, voter ballot language, or the Contractual Agreements with parties external to the City. Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.5" Formatted: Font: 10 pt Formatted Table Formatted: Right Formatted: Left Formatted: Font: 10 pt Formatted: Font: 10 pt Formatted: Right Formatted: Left Formatted: Font: 10 pt Formatted: Font: 10 pt Formatted: Right Formatted: Font: 10 pt Formatted: Left Formatted: Font: 10 pt Formatted: Font: 10 pt Formatted: Right Formatted: Left Formatted: Font: 10 pt Formatted: Right Formatted: Left Formatted: No widow/orphan control, Border: Top: (No border), Bottom: (No border), Left: (No border), Right: (No border), Tab stops: Not at -0.83" + -0.5" + 0" + 0.5" + 0.88" + 1.25" + 1.63" + 2" + 2.5" + 3" + 3.5" + 4" + 4.5" + 5" + 5.5" + 6" + 6.5" Committed Fund Balances – Applicable to governmental funds. Involve a of formal action by the City Council. An example is traffic calming revenues are required to be spent on traffic calming activities. Any unspent monies at end of year are classified as Committed to Traffic Calming in the General Fund. Assigned Fund Balances – Are applicable to governmental funds. Assignments can be made by senior management. They represent the intent to use the monies for a specific purpose. An example of this it this the one time Harmony Road monies transferred by the State to the City. Although required to be used on Harmony Road, staff intends to use the monies only on Harmony Road improvements. These monies are considered when measuring compliance with minimum fund balances. Unassigned Fund Balances – Are applicable only to the General Fund. These monies are considered when measuring compliance with minimum fund balances. Working Capital – Is a term applicable to Internal Service and Enterprise Funds. It is the difference between Current Assets and Current Liabilities. Not all Working Capital is available. Available Working Capital does not include Restrictions for debt, Art in Public Places, approved capital appropriations, and other restrictions. Liquidity – Assets range from cash to land. The more easily and quickly an asset can be converted to cash determines its relative liquidity. Reserves – A legacy term that previously referred to fund balances, or fund balances set aside for a specific purpose. It is no longer used on financial statements. Fund Balance – Is a term applicable to Governmental Funds. Fund balance or Equity is the difference between Assets and Liabilities. Since governmental funds do not have long term assets and long term debt on their balance sheet, fund balance is similar and approximates working capital in the private sector and enterprise funds. Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.5" Packet Pg. 140 Attachment13.2: Current Fund Balances Policy, with redline and strike through (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.5" Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, Not Bold, Font color: Auto Packet Pg. 141 Attachment13.2: Current Fund Balances Policy, with redline and strike through (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 142 Attachment13.3: Council Finance Committee minutes, April 21, 2014 (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) Packet Pg. 143 Attachment13.4: Council Finance Committee minutes, May 19, 2014 (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) Packet Pg. 144 Attachment13.4: Council Finance Committee minutes, May 19, 2014 (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) - 1 - RESOLUTION 2014-058 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES WHEREAS, City Council has adopted Financial Management Policies for the City pursuant to Resolution 1994-174 (the “Policies”); and WHEREAS, Resolution 1994-174 provides that City Council may adopt amendments to the Policies, which the Council has done several times over the years; and WHEREAS, the City Financial Officer and City Manager have recommended new amendments to the Policies related to the City’s budget and fund balance minimums; and WHEREAS, the City is committed to sound and efficient financial planning and management consistent with the best practices as established by the Government Finance Officers Association (“GFOA”); and WHEREAS, the amendments to the Policies related to budget are set out in the “Budget Policy” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit “A” (“Amended Budget Policy”); and WHEREAS, the amendments to the Policies concerning “Fund Balance Minimums” are attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated by reference (“Amended Fund Balance Minimums”); and WHEREAS, the Amended Budget Policy and the Amended Fund Balance Minimums (jointly, “Amendments”) establish guidelines for sound and efficient financial planning and management, reflect the City’s current legal requirements that apply to the City’s financial activities, and constitute GFOA best practices; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to adopt these Amendments in pursuit of its objective of sound and efficient financial planning and management. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, as follows: Section 1. That the City Council hereby approves and adopts the Amended Budget Policy and the Amended Fund Balance Minimums. Section 2. That the Amendments shall be included as part of the Policies, and the Policies, as previously amended and as amended herein, shall hereafter remain in effect until the same are amended or repealed by subsequent action of the City Council. Packet Pg. 145 - 2 - Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins this 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. _________________________________ Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 146 Financial Management Policy Budget Policy Issue Date: Version: 2 Issued by: Lawrence Pollack Financial Policy – Budget 1 1.1 Overview The Fort Collins City Charter establishes time limits and the essential content of the City Manager’s proposed budget, however the budget preparation process is not prescribed, but is developed by the City Manager with input from the City Council. The fiscal year of the City is the calendar year. The City may adopt budgets for a budget term of one fiscal year or more. After the Charter amendment in 1997 allowing the budget term to be more than one fiscal year, the Council has adopted two-year budgets that correspond with the election cycle. The budget is a 2-year plan by which the City Council sets the financial and operational priorities for the City - through the budget, services are implemented. The budget along with the annual appropriation ordinance provides the basis for the control of expenditures. The State Constitution and the City Charter provide the basic legal requirements and time lines for the process. Council goals, ordinances and resolutions provide additional direction and respond to the needs of the community. 1.2 Principals for Budget Planning The City provides a wide variety of services to the residents of the community. It is in the power of the City Council to adopt a budget and manage the available resources to best meet the service needs for the overall good of the community (City Charter Article II, Section 5 (c)). Objective: Governments allocate scarce resources to programs and services through the budget process. As a result, it is one of the most important activities undertaken by governments. The purpose of this policy is to establish parameters and provide guidance governing the budget for the City of Fort Collins (City). Applicability: This budget policy applies to all funds and Service Areas of the City. Authorized by: City Council EXHIBIT A Packet Pg. 147 Attachment1: Exhbit A (2149 : Financial Policies Updates RESO) Financial Policy – Budget 2 In 2005 the City Council, on recommendation from the City manager, endorsed the Budgeting for Outcomes budget process. At a high level, the budgeting for outcomes methodology can be summarized as: 1. Determine how much money is available. The budget should be built on expected revenues. This would include base revenues, any new revenue sources, and the potential use of fund balance. 2. Prioritize results. The results or outcomes that matter most to citizens should be defined. Elected leaders should determine what programs are most important to their constituents. 3. Allocate resources among high priority results. The allocations should be made in a fair and objective manner. 4. Conduct analysis to determine what strategies, programs, and activities will best achieve desired results. 5. Budget available dollars to the most significant programs and activities. The objective is to maximize the benefit of the available resources. 6. Set measures of annual progress, monitor, and close the feedback loop. These measures should spell out the expected results and outcomes and how they will be measured. 7. Check what actually happened. This involves using performance measures to compare actual versus budgeted results. 8. Communicate performance results. Internal and external stakeholders should be informed of the results in an understandable format. At that time, the City Council also identified the key outcomes it believed should be used in the new budget process. In addition, the 2005-2007 Policy Agenda sets forth the implementation and continued improvement of the collaborative budget process, aligning spending with desired outcomes. In 2012, the City Council passed resolution 2012-076 promoting improved results through performance measures and data-driven decision making. In reference to the budget, an outcome-based performance measurement system will help ensure that available resources are used to achieve excellent results at low cost to the taxpayers and will enhance the citizen’s understanding of the City and the services it provides. 1.3 Scope A. Comprehensiveness The proposed budget shall provide a complete financial plan for each fund of the city and shall include appropriate financial statements for each type of fund showing comparative figures for the last completed fiscal year, comparative figures for the current year, and the City Manager's recommendations for the ensuing budget term (City Charter Article V, Part 1, Section 2). In addition, the City of Fort Collins Budget Document may include items such Packet Pg. 148 Attachment1: Exhbit A (2149 : Financial Policies Updates RESO) Financial Policy – Budget 3 as: 1) Statement of organization-wide strategic goals. 2) A description of the budget process, including a timeline. 3) A Glossary of Budget Terms. 4) A City of Fort Collins organizational chart. 5) Letter from the City Manager. 6) Budget Overview which may include: a) The economic outlook; b) Revenue assumptions; c) Summary of use of reserves; d) Budget priorities and highlights. 7) Copy of signed appropriation ordinance and a schedule of 2nd year proposed appropriations. 8) Revenue, expense and changes in fund balance summaries. 9) Summary of employee full-time equivalent staffing by service area and department. 10) A section for each of the key strategic Outcomes, which may include: a) Information indicating how the Offers in the Outcome are funded, by fund; b) Major key purchases; c) Major enhancements purchased; d) Detailed listing of all offers funded and unfunded; e) Strategic objectives of the Outcome. 11) Fund Statements. 12) Overview of debt position. 13) Current Capital Improvement Plan. 14) Summary of changes to user fees. 15) Summary of property tax mill levy and assessments. The annual appropriation ordinance shall also include the levy in mills, as fixed by the Council, upon each dollar of the assessed valuation of all taxable property within the city, such levy representing the amount of taxes for city purposes necessary to provide, during the ensuing fiscal year, for all properly authorized expenditures to be incurred by the city, including interest and principal of general obligation bonds. If the Council fails in any year to make said tax levy as above provided, then the rate last fixed shall be the levy fixed for the ensuing fiscal year and the Financial Officer shall so certify (City Charter Article V, Part 1, section 5). B. Budget Form The City of Fort Collins uses the Budgeting For Outcomes model to create the City budget. A new budget is designed from the ground up based on the results desired in each of the Outcomes defined by the City. The BFO budget-building process includes four steps: 1) Determine how much revenue will be available (the price people pay); Packet Pg. 149 Attachment1: Exhbit A (2149 : Financial Policies Updates RESO) Financial Policy – Budget 4 2) Determine the priorities of the City and its citizens and the results to be achieved; 3) Allocate the revenue needed to achieve the desired results; 4) Determine which budget items will best produce the desired results at the price allocated. C. Basis of Budgeting All budgetary procedures conform to state regulations and to generally accepted accounting principles. The basis or principle used for budgeting is the same as that used for accounting, with a few exceptions, and varies according to the fund type. Governmental Funds use the modified-accrual basis of accounting. This means that revenues are recognized when they are earned, measurable and available. Expenditures are recognized in the period that liabilities are due and payable. The budgetary basis is the same and is used in the General Fund, Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds, and Capital Project Funds. Proprietary and Fiduciary Funds use the full accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized when they are earned and expenses are recognized when liabilities are incurred. However, the budgetary basis in these funds is primarily based on the modified-accrual approach. Instead of authorizing budget for depreciation of capital assets, the budget measures and appropriates cash outflows for capital acquisition and construction, which is a modified-accrual approach. In full accrual based accounting debt proceeds are recorded as liabilities rather than a revenue (funding source). For these reasons a reconciliation and adjustment is made on these fund statements to show the difference between the budgetary basis and the accounting basis. D. Budget Calendar The fiscal and accounting year shall be the same as the calendar year. "Budget term" shall mean the fiscal year(s) for which any budget is adopted and in which it is to be administered. Council shall set by ordinance the term for which it shall adopt budgets in accordance with this Article (City Charter Article V, Part 1, section 1). On or before the first Monday in September, commencing in 2010 and every other year thereafter, the City Manager shall file with the City Clerk a proposed budget for the City for the ensuing two-year term (City Charter Article V, Part 1, section 2). The Council shall, within ten (10) days after the filing of said proposed budget with the City Clerk, set a time certain for public hearing and cause notice of such public hearing to be given by publication. At the hearing, all persons may appear and comment on any or all items and estimates in the proposed budget. Upon completion of the public hearing the Council may revise the budget estimates (City Charter Article V, Part 1, section 3). Packet Pg. 150 Attachment1: Exhbit A (2149 : Financial Policies Updates RESO) Financial Policy – Budget 5 After said public hearing and before the last day of November preceding the budget term, the Council shall adopt the budget for the ensuing term. The adoption of the budget shall be by ordinance. Before the last day of November of each fiscal year, the Council shall appropriate such sums of money as it deems necessary to defray all expenditures of the city during the ensuing fiscal year. The appropriation of funds shall be accomplished by passage of the annual appropriation ordinance. Such appropriation of funds shall be based upon the budget as approved by the Council but need not be itemized further than by fund with the exception of capital projects and federal or state grants which shall be summarized by individual project or grant (City Charter Article V, Part 1, section 4). Appropriations for each year of the two-year budget will be approved by the City Council annually. Appropriations for the 2nd year of the biannual budget are adopted during the budget revision process. That process allows for adjustments to the originally adopted biennial budget that address new Council priorities or support changing needs based on economic conditions. The City Manager may present any budget adjustment recommendations to the City Council in Work Sessions and then Council may amend the budget and, as required by the State and City Charter, appropriate or authorize expenditures for the coming fiscal year. 1.4 Roles and Responsibilities All powers of the city and the determination of all matters of policy shall be vested in the Council except as otherwise provided by the Charter. Without limitation of the foregoing, the Council shall have power to adopt the budget of the city. The City Manager shall be responsible to the Council for the proper administration of all affairs of the City and to that end shall have power and be required to prepare the budget and submit it to the Council and be responsible for its administration after adoption. The City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, along with the other executive directors, known as the Budget Lead Team (BLT), develop the guidelines, consistent with the policies, to be used for budget preparation. During the development of the budget, various department and division representatives may be called upon to provide their expertise. From April through June, City staff from all departments and divisions prepares the Offers (budget requests) for inclusion in the budget. 1.5 Budgeting Control System No appropriation shall be made by the Council which exceeds the revenues, reserves or other funds anticipated or available at the time of the appropriation, except for emergency expenses incurred by reason of a casualty, accident or unforeseen contingency arising after the passage of the annual appropriation ordinance (City Charter Article V, Part I, Section 8 Packet Pg. 151 Attachment1: Exhbit A (2149 : Financial Policies Updates RESO) Financial Policy – Budget 6 (a)). Control of expenditures is exercised at the fund level. Fund managers are responsible for all expenditures made against appropriations within their fund and can allocate available resources within the fund. All appropriations unexpended or unencumbered at the end of the fiscal year shall lapse to the applicable general or special fund, except for:  appropriations for capital projects which shall not lapse until the completion of the capital project; and  federal or state grants which shall not lapse until the expiration of the federal or state grant (City Charter Article V, Part I, Section 11). A. Budget Transfers Between Funds or Capital Projects During the fiscal year, the Council may, by ordinance, upon the recommendation of the City Manager, transfer any unexpended and unencumbered appropriated amount or portion thereof from one fund or capital project account to another fund or capital project account provided that: 1) the purpose for which the transferred funds are to be expended remains unchanged; 2) the purpose for which the funds were initially appropriated no longer exists; or 3) the proposed transfer is from a fund or capital project account in which the amount appropriated exceeds the amount needed to accomplish the purpose specified in the appropriation ordinance (City Charter Article V, Part I, Section 10 (b)). Within a Fund Budget control is maintained at the departmental level. The Chief Financial Officer Manager has the authority to approve departmental expenses greater than budget so long as expenses are less than budget within a fund. In no case may the total expenditures of a particular fund exceed that which is appropriated by the City Council (City Charter Article V, Part I, Section 10 (a)). B. Applicable Amendments to the Budget Budget Increases There generally are four opportunities during the fiscal year for supplemental additions to the current year annual appropriation approved by Council: 1) The first is through the encumbrance carry-forward process whereby approved purchase orders that cannot be executed prior to the end of the fiscal year will have available budget carried forward into the new year. Packet Pg. 152 Attachment1: Exhbit A (2149 : Financial Policies Updates RESO) Financial Policy – Budget 7 2) The second is usually adopted in March/April to re-appropriate funds from the previous year’s ending balance for projects or obligations that were approved but not completed during that year. 3) The third opportunity in the 2nd half of the year is used to fine-tune (clean-up) the current fiscal year for previously unforeseen events. In addition, if revenue is received during the fiscal year from a source that was not anticipated at the time of budget adoption or appropriation for the fiscal year, such as grants or implementation of a new fee, Council may appropriate that unanticipated revenue for expenditure when received anytime during the year. 4) Lastly, the Council, upon recommendation of the City Manager, may make supplemental appropriations by ordinance at any time during the fiscal year; provided, however, that the total amount of such supplemental appropriations, in combination with all previous appropriations for that fiscal year, shall not exceed the then current estimate of actual and anticipated revenues to be received by the city during the fiscal year. This provision shall not prevent the Council from appropriating by ordinance at any time during the fiscal year such funds for expenditure as may be available from reserves accumulated in prior years, notwithstanding that such reserves were not previously appropriated (City Charter Article V, Part I, Section 9). Budget Decreases/Frozen Appropriations The budget may be decreased below adopted appropriations during the fiscal year due to changes in service demand, changes in economic conditions, and/or changes in Council goals. Each service area is responsible for developing a plan to reduce appropriations, which will be ready for implementation should the need arise. If the City Manager directs budget reductions, Council will be informed and the appropriations will be “set aside” through administrative action. While the appropriation amount is not changed, expenditures shall not exceed the reduced amount recommended by the City Manager. 1.6 Balanced Budget Definition All funds are required to balance. As such, total anticipated revenues must equal the sum of budgeted expenditures for each fund. Revenues are derived from two sources: current revenue charges and unallocated reserves carried forward from prior years. Packet Pg. 153 Attachment1: Exhbit A (2149 : Financial Policies Updates RESO) Financial Management Policy 5 Fund Balance Minimums Issue Date: April 15, 2008 Version: 2 Issued by: City Council Financial Policy 5 – Reserve Policy 1 5.1 Governmental Funds and Fund Balances To set minimum fund balances so as to mitigate risks, maintain good standing with rating agencies, and ensure cash is available when revenue is unavailable. The policy is sets minimum fund balances, not targets or maximum balances. Each fund should be evaluated by staff to determine the appropriateness of maintaining fund balances above the minimums set in this policy. Contingencies for severe weather, prolonged drought, and anticipated capital spending should be considered independently from this policy. The Equity on balance sheet of a governmental fund is called Fund Balance. The current classifications of Fund Balance in governmental funds are primarily based on the origin of the constraints. The following categories are in decreasing order of constraints. Non-Spendable Permanent endowments or assets in a non-liquid form Restricted Involve a third party: State Legislation or Contractual Agreements Committed Set by formal action of the City Council Assigned By staff, and/or residual balances in a Special Revenue Fund Objective: To set minimum fund balances as to mitigate risk, maintain good standing with rating agencies, and ensure cash is available when revenue is unavailable. The policy sets minimum fund balances, not targets or maximum balances. Each fund should be evaluated by staff to determine the appropriateness of maintaining fund balances above the minimums set in this policy. Contingencies for severe weather, prolonged drought, and anticipated capital spending should be considered independently from this policy. Applicability: Funds—This policy applies to all City funds. It does not apply to URA, DDA, PFA and Library. Authorized by: City Council Resolution 1994-174 and 2008-038. EXHIBIT B Packet Pg. 154 Attachment2: Exhibit B (2149 : Financial Policies Updates RESO) Financial Policy 5 – Reserve Policy 2 Unassigned Remaining balances in the General Fund Minimums outlined in section 5.2 relate only to Assigned and Unassigned balances. 5.2 Proprietary Fund and Working Capital Internal Service Funds and Enterprise Funds are accounted for nearly identical to the private sector. The balance sheets include long term assets and long term liabilities. The resulting Equity section on their balance sheet, called Net Position, is not a good measure of spendable financial resources. To get to spendable financial resources, a common calculation is to take Current Assets and subtract Current Liabilities, with the net result called Working Capital. To further refine, for purposes of this policy, certain required restrictions are further subtracted and result in Available Working Capital. Some examples of required restrictions are unspent monies for Art in Public Places, Water Rights, and existing appropriations for capital projects. The minimums outlined in section 5.5 relate to Available Working Capital. 5.3 Minimum Balances The following Minimum Balances refers to Assigned and Unassigned Fund Balances in governmental funds and Available Working Capital in the Internal Service Funds and Enterprise Funds. A. General Fund 60 Day Liquidity Goal - The Commitment for Contingency should be at least 60 days (17%) of the subsequent year’s originally adopted budgeted expenditures and transfers out. The calculation for the minimum level shall exclude expenditures and transfers out for large and unusual one-time items. Important note – the 60 Day Liquidity Goal is in addition to the Restricted Balance required by Article X, Section 20 of the State Constitution. This reserve must equal 3% of non-exempt revenue and can only be used for declared emergencies. Fiscal emergencies are specifically excluded by the State Constitution as qualifying use of this reserve. B. Special Revenue Funds Packet Pg. 155 Attachment2: Exhibit B (2149 : Financial Policies Updates RESO) Financial Policy 5 – Reserve Policy 3 No minimum balance is required. C. Debt Service Funds No minimum balance is required. D. Capital Project Funds No minimum balance is required. E. Enterprise Funds Enterprise funds focus on working capital rather than fund balance. Enterprise Funds shall maintain a minimum Available Working Capital equal to 25% of Operating Expenses, less Depreciation. In the case of L&P, operating expenses will include purchased renewable energy for resale but will not include regular purchased power for resale (i.e. Platte River Power Authority). Important note – The Water Fund holds a balance for Restricted Water Rights. The balance equals the amount of cash in-lieu-of water rights payments and raw water surcharges less any expenses for acquiring water rights and water storage; The enterprises funds should also be accumulating available working capital above these minimums for the purposes of funding future capital projects. F. Internal Service Funds Each fund is a unique operation and will maintain a minimum Available Working Capital as follows: 601 Equipment Fund 8.3% Of annual operating expenses, excluding depreciation 602 Self-Insurance Fund 25.0% Of annual operating expenses 603 Data & Communications Fund 0.0% N/A 604 Benefits Fund 30.0% Of annual medical and dental expenses 605 Utility Customer Service Fund 0.0% N/A Packet Pg. 156 Attachment2: Exhibit B (2149 : Financial Policies Updates RESO) Financial Policy 5 – Reserve Policy 4 5.4 Below Minimum When circumstances result in balances below the minimum, staff should develop a plan to restore minimums fund balances and present it to Council Finance Committee. Packet Pg. 157 Attachment2: Exhibit B (2149 : Financial Policies Updates RESO) Financial Policy 5 – Reserve Policy 5 Definitions Non Spendable Fund Balances: Applicable to governmental funds. Permanent endowments or assets in a non-liquid form such as long term inter-agency loans. Restricted Fund Balances: Applicable to governmental funds. Involve a third party such as State Legislative requirements, voter ballot language, or the Contractual Agreements with parties external to the City. Committed Fund Balances: Applicable to governmental funds. Involve a of formal action by the City Council. An example is traffic calming revenues are required to be spent on traffic calming activities. Any unspent monies at end of year are classified as Committed to Traffic Calming in the General Fund. Assigned Fund Balances: Are applicable to governmental funds. Assignments can be made by senior management. They represent the intent to use the monies for a specific purpose. An example of this it this the one time Harmony Road monies transferred by the State to the City. Although required to be used on Harmony Road, staff intends to use the monies only on Harmony Road improvements. These monies are considered when measuring compliance with minimum fund balances. Unassigned Fund Balances: Are applicable only to the General Fund. These monies are considered when measuring compliance with minimum fund balances. Working Capital: Is a term applicable to Internal Service and Enterprise Funds. It is the difference between Current Assets and Current Liabilities. Not all Working Capital is available. Available Working Capital does not include Restrictions for debt, Art in Public Places, approved capital appropriations, and other restrictions. Liquidity: Assets range from cash to land. The more easily and quickly an asset can be converted to cash determines its relative liquidity. Reserves: A legacy term that previously referred to fund balances, or fund balances set aside for a specific purpose. It is no longer used on financial statements. Fund Balance: Is a term applicable to Governmental Funds. Fund balance or Equity is the difference between Assets and Liabilities. Since governmental funds do not have long term assets and long term debt on their balance sheet, fund balance is similar and approximates working capital in the private sector and enterprise funds. Packet Pg. 158 Attachment2: Exhibit B (2149 : Financial Policies Updates RESO) Financial Policy 5 – Reserve Policy 6 Getting Help Please contact the Controller with any questions at 970.221.6772. Packet Pg. 159 Attachment2: Exhibit B (2149 : Financial Policies Updates RESO) Agenda Item 14 Item # 14 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Cory Christensen, Police Captain SUBJECT Resolution 2014-059 Authorizing the City Manager to Enter Into an Agreement With the Members of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to enter into an agreement with the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium to allow Fort Collins Police Services to continue as a member agency of Coplink, which allows member agencies throughout Colorado to share valuable information in order to solve crimes, develop leads and track suspects leading to their arrest. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The Colorado Information Sharing Consortium (CISC) began in 2007 with an information sharing tool known as Coplink for law enforcement agencies throughout the State of Colorado. The purpose of this network is for law enforcement to share records and computer-aided dispatch data information with member agencies. Fort Collins Police Services entered into an agreement to participate in April 2008 through a Memorandum of Understanding. CISC began with 11 agencies participating and currently consists of a participation rate of 93 agencies. The value of this information sharing technology has been a useful and vital crime fighting tool. Coplink creates the ability to locate information on suspects, witnesses, vehicles and other useful information. Currently, the Cornsortium has operated through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The initiators of CISC have completed an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) for its member agencies to adopt in order for a more formal and sound governing structure. The IGA is beneficial in that it allows CISC the protections of governmental immunity, the ability to enter into enforceable contracts, hire employees, and apply for and accept grants. It also allows for the institution of an Executive Director. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACT The cost to the agency for Coplink through the Consortium annually is $5,182. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Memo to Council, March 3, 2014 (PDF) Packet Pg. 160 Administration 2221 South Timberline Road PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6550 970.224.6088 - fax fcgov.com To: Mayor Weitkunat and Council Members Thru: Darin Atteberry, City Manager John Hutto, Chief of Police From: Deputy Chief Jim Szakmeister Reference: Inter- Governmental Agreement – Colorado Information Sharing Consortium Date: March 3, 2014 Background The Colorado Information Sharing Consortium (CSIC) began in 2007 by eleven law enforcement agencies as core partners. At that time, CSIC consisted of Adams County Sheriff, Arapahoe County Sheriff, Jefferson County Sheriff, Mesa County Sheriff, Douglas County Sheriff, Colorado Department of Public Safety, Aurora Police Department, Colorado Springs Police Department, Commerce City Police Department, Denver Police Department, and Grand Junction Police Department. Since then, the Consortium consists of 93 agencies in the State of Colorado. CSIC was formed in order to address the need to link law enforcement agencies with each other’s records management and computer-aided dispatch data systems and share sensitive law enforcement information for law enforcement related purposes. As a result, CSIC contracted a product known as Coplink. Officers can access this system through desktops, cell phones, or laptop computers and gain valuable information regarding suspects, suspect vehicles, and other related information. Police Services entered into a Memorandum of Understanding in January, 2010 and have actively utilized this service since. In 2013, nearly 6500 queries were made in the Coplink system by officers of Police Services. It is a tool that helps officers and detectives solve crimes. Benefits of an Inter-Governmental Agreement for CISC CISC is seeking to create a more formal and sound governing structure by requiring each participating agency to enter into this Inter-Governmental Agreement. The following benefits are:  Allows for the protections of governmental immunity;  Allows for the Consortium to enter into enforceable contracts, hire employees, and apply for and accept grant funding;  Allows for the institution of an Executive Director; ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 161 Attachment14.1: Staff Memo to Council, March 3, 2014 (1757 : Colorado Information Sharing Consortium)  As a governmental Authority, is subject to the Open Meetings Act and Colorado Open Records Act. Financial Impact This agreement does not create any specific financial obligation for any agency. All agencies retain the same obligation to pay their reasonable share of costs for the consortium. Any participating agency always has the option to opt out. Estimated annual cost to Police Services: $5,182 Packet Pg. 162 Attachment14.1: Staff Memo to Council, March 3, 2014 (1757 : Colorado Information Sharing Consortium) - 1 - RESOLUTION 2014-059 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE MEMBERS OF THE COLORADO INFORMATION SHARING CONSORTIUM WHEREAS, the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium (“CISC”) began in 2007 with an information sharing computer software, known as Coplink, for law enforcement agencies throughout the State of Colorado; and WHEREAS, the purpose of Coplink is for Colorado law enforcement agencies to share their records and computer-aided dispatch data information with member agencies; and WHEREAS, effective April 14, 2008, the City, through Fort Collins Police Services (“FCPS”) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the “MOU”) with the CISC to become a member agency and to participate in Coplink; and WHEREAS, the value of this information sharing technology has been a useful and vital crime fighting tool; and WHEREAS, FCPS believes that is in the best interests of the City and the citizens of the City for FCPS to continue as a member agency and to participate in Coplink; and WHEREAS, the CISC began in 2007 with eleven (11) member agencies, and has grown to include 93 member agencies in 2014; and WHEREAS, with its rapid growth of member agencies, the CISC determined that it was in the public’s best interest to formalize the CISC into a legal entity in order to permit the CISC to enter into contracts and utilize economies of scale for the purchase of future services, products, and maintenance and to enter into information sharing agreements with jurisdictions outside the State of Colorado; and WHEREAS, the CISC has drafted the “Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium,” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” (the “Agreement”), to replace and supersede all previously existing MOU’s; and WHEREAS, FCPS recommends the City become a party to the Agreement, which will replace and supersede the 2008 MOU. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” together with such modifications and additions as the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, determines necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the City or further the purposes of this Resolution. Packet Pg. 163 - 2 - Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins this 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. _________________________________ Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 164 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT OF THE COLORADO INFORMATION SHARING CONSORTIUM EXHIBIT A Packet Pg. 165 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium ii TABLE OF CONTENTS RECITALS DEFINITIONS 01. Definitions ........................................................................................................ 2 CREATION OF THE COLORADO INFORMATION SHARING CONSORTIUM 02. Creation of the CISC ......................................................................................... 2 03. Principal Place of Business ............................................................................... 2 04. CISC Purpose ................................................................................................... 3 DATA SHARING AGREEMENT 05. Data Sharing ..................................................................................................... 3 06. Data Use ........................................................................................................... 3 07. Personnel Authorized to Access Data ................................................................ 3 08. Data Security .................................................................................................... 3 09. Data Custody and Control ................................................................................. 3 10. Data Accuracy .................................................................................................. 3 11. Intelligence Information .................................................................................... 3 POWERS OF THE COLORADO INFORMATION SHARING CONSORTIUM 12. Powers of the CISC ........................................................................................... 4 13. Restrictions on Powers of the CISC ................................................................... 4 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 14. Board of Directors............................................................................................. 5 15. Number of Directors, Term, and Term Limits ................................................... 5 16. Eligibility, Appointment, Removal, and Vacancies............................................ 5 17. Compensation ................................................................................................... 5 18. Action of the Board at a Meeting....................................................................... 5 19. Committees ....................................................................................................... 6 20. Alternates and Absentee Voting ........................................................................ 6 21. Representative’s Right to Attend Meetings ........................................................ 6 MANAGEMENT OF THE CISC 22. CISC Manager .................................................................................................. 6 23. Additional Assistance from Assigned Employees .............................................. 7 FINANCIAL 24. Deposits and Expenditures ................................................................................ 8 25. Fiscal Agent ...................................................................................................... 8 26. Fiscal Year ........................................................................................................ 8 27. No Multiple Year Fiscal Obligations ................................................................. 8 RIGHTS OF PARTIES 28. No Duty to Pay Membership, Annual, or Other Fees ......................................... 8 29. Voluntary Assumption of Debts ........................................................................ 8 30. Financial Responsibility .................................................................................... 8 Packet Pg. 166 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium iii 31. Examination of Records .................................................................................... 8 32. Addition of New Parties .................................................................................... 9 33. Right to Terminate Participation........................................................................ 9 GENERAL PROVISIONS 34. Amendments ..................................................................................................... 9 35. Construction and Interpretation ......................................................................... 9 36. Duplicate Counterparts ...................................................................................... 9 37. Entire Agreement ............................................................................................ 10 38. Governing Law ............................................................................................... 10 39. Indemnification ............................................................................................... 10 40. Mediation ........................................................................................................ 10 41. No Third-Party Beneficiaries........................................................................... 10 42. Severability ..................................................................................................... 10 43. Term ............................................................................................................... 10 44. Termination .................................................................................................... 10 Packet Pg. 167 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium Page 1 of 16 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT OF THE COLORADO INFORMATION SHARING CONSORTIUM THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is effective as of the [ ] day of [ ], 2014 (the “Effective Date,” as further defined below) by and between the Adams County Sheriff’s Office, the Arapahoe County Sheriff’s Office, the City of Aurora, the Colorado Department of Public Safety of the State of Colorado, the City of Colorado Springs, the City of Commerce City, the City and County of Denver, the Douglas County Sheriff’s Office, the City of Grand Junction, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Jefferson, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Mesa, and all other entities or agencies that sign this Agreement consistent with the requirements herein (individually a “Party” and collectively the “Parties”). RECITALS WHEREAS, the Parties are each authorized to lawfully provide, establish, maintain, and operate law enforcement services; WHEREAS, Part 2 of Article 1, Title 29 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (the “C.R.S.”) encourages and authorizes intergovernmental agreements for the joint and cooperative provision of public services; WHEREAS, C.R.S. § 29-1-203 authorizes governments to cooperate and contract with one another to provide any function, service, or facility lawfully authorized to each and to establish a separate legal entity to do so; WHEREAS, 21 U.S.C. § 873 and regulations promulgated thereunder authorize certain agencies within the Federal government to cooperate with local, state, tribal, and Federal agencies for the purpose of exchanging certain information; WHEREAS, the Parties, along with other Colorado law enforcement entities, have previously entered into a nonbinding and voluntary memorandum of understanding (the “MOU”) to jointly develop the statewide Colorado Information Sharing Consortium (the “CISC”) with the purpose and intent of sharing law enforcement information, primarily through a software product known as COPLINK; WHEREAS, the Parties, along with the other signatories of the MOU, have determined that it is in the public’s best interest to formalize the CISC into a legal entity in order to permit the CISC to enter into contracts and utilize economies of scale for the purchase of future services, products, and maintenance and to enter into information sharing agreements with jurisdictions outside the State of Colorado; WHEREAS, the Parties and other signatories of the MOU have agreed to organize and operate a separate legal entity pursuant to C.R.S. § 29-1-203(4), which shall be known as the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium; and Packet Pg. 168 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium Page 2 of 16 WHEREAS, the Parties intend for other entities or agencies to join as Parties to this Agreement by signing a separate signature page to this Agreement consistent with the requirements herein. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows: DEFINITIONS 1. Definitions. In addition to the above defined terms, the following terms shall have the meaning ascribed to them. a. “Assigned Employee” shall mean a Party’s employee assigned to work full- or part-time on behalf of the CISC. b. “Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of the CISC. c. “Data” shall mean facts, detailed information, police report narratives, supplemental report narratives, other text-related information as determined and released by each Party’s internal information sharing policy, and other materials provided by a Party to the CISC. “Data” shall not mean Intelligence Information (defined below). d. “Director” shall mean a director on the Board of the CISC. e. “Effective Date” shall be the date written in the preamble, which shall be the date on which the sixth Party signed this Agreement. f. “Intelligence Information” shall mean evaluated data relevant to the identification of criminal activity engaged in by an individual or organization reasonably suspected of involvement in criminal activity that meets criminal intelligence system submission criteria as set forth in Part 23 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Intelligence Information is a criminal justice record pursuant to C.R.S. § 24-72-302(4). g. “Manager” shall mean a person who is assigned to manage the day-to-day operations of the CISC. h. “Representative” shall mean the chief law enforcement officer of each Party or the person designated by the chief law enforcement officer of each Party. CREATION OF THE COLORADO INFORMATION SHARING CONSORTIUM 2. Creation of the CISC. Pursuant to C.R.S. § 29-1-203(4), the Parties hereby create a separate legal entity known as the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium, or CISC, which shall have the powers, authorities, duties, privileges, immunities, rights, and responsibilities as set forth herein. 3. Principal Place of Business. The principal place of business of the CISC shall be 15001 East Alameda Parkway, Aurora, CO 80012, unless and until otherwise established from time to time by the Board. Packet Pg. 169 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium Page 3 of 16 4. CISC Purpose. The purpose of the CISC is to facilitate the sharing of Data and Intelligence Information between the Parties and non-Party governmental entities and agencies authorized by the Board. DATA SHARING AGREEMENT 5. Data Sharing. Each Party shall share Data with the Parties and with non-Party governmental entities or agencies authorized by the Board. 6. Data Use. Shared Data shall only be used for law enforcement purposes consistent with the welfare and protection of the general public. 7. Personnel Authorized to Access Data. Only the Parties’ employees and employees of non-Party governmental entities or agencies authorized by the Board shall be allowed to access the Data. All persons with access to the Data must first pass an adequate background screen. The Board shall determine what constitutes an adequate background screen for the purpose of access to Data. 8. Data Security. The Parties and any non-Party governmental entities or agencies authorized by the Board shall maintain, enforce, and follow security requirements for the Data as specified by the Board, including requirements on network configuration and network access. 9. Data Custody and Control. Each Party shall retain custody and control and shall remain the official custodian of any Data shared by that Party. The CISC shall not have custody and control and shall not be the official custodian of any Data. The CISC shall not release any Data pursuant to a request under Part 2 or Part 3 of Article 72, Title 24, C.R.S. or pursuant to a subpoena unless specifically ordered to do so by a court of competent jurisdiction. 10. Data Accuracy. The Parties understand that the Data shared by the Parties may not be accurate. The Board may set standards and requirements for Parties to correct inaccurate Data. 11. Intelligence Information. a. No Obligation to Share. No Party shall be required to share Intelligence Information and may deny a request to share Intelligence Information for any reason. b. Standard for Sharing. When Intelligence Information is disseminated through the CISC, it shall be disseminated consistent with Part 23 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations. c. Policies and Procedures. The Board may set policies and procedures regarding Intelligence Information use, receipt, maintenance, security, and dissemination not inconsistent with Part 23 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations. d. Intelligence Information Custody and Control. All Intelligence Information shall remain the sole proprietary information of the Party contributing that Intelligence Information. Each Party shall retain custody and control and shall remain the official custodian of any Intelligence Information shared by that Party. The CISC shall not have custody and control and shall not be the official custodian of any Intelligence Information. The CISC shall not release any Intelligence Information pursuant to a Packet Pg. 170 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium Page 4 of 16 request under Part 2 or Part 3 of Article 72, Title 24, C.R.S. or pursuant to a subpoena unless specifically ordered to do so by a court of competent jurisdiction. POWERS OF THE COLORADO INFORMATION SHARING CONSORTIUM 12. Powers of the CISC. In order to enable the CISC to carry out its functions and provide the services described herein, the CISC shall have the power: a. Acquire Property. To acquire, hold, lease (as lessor or lessee), sell, or otherwise dispose of any legal or equitable interest in real or personal property; b. Add Parties. To approve other governmental entities or agencies authorized to lawfully provide, establish, maintain, or operate law enforcement services to join the CISC on the conditions determined by the Board; c. Adopt Rules and Regulations. To adopt rules and regulations regarding the exercise of its powers and the carrying out of its purposes; d. Apply for Grants. To apply for and receive grants in its own name; e. Conduct Business. To conduct its business and affairs for the benefit of the Parties and their residents; f. Contract. To enter into, make, and perform contracts of every kind; g. Engage Agents. To engage, employ, or appoint agents, including but not limited to accountants, architects, attorneys, consultants, employees, engineers, and managers and to pay the direct and indirect reasonable costs of such agents for services rendered to the CISC; h. Fees and Charges. To assess, fix, maintain, and revise fees and charges for functions, services, or facilities provided by the CISC or to cover the cost of operating and managing the CISC; however, pursuant to paragraph 28, neither the CISC nor any Party shall have the power to compel a Party to pay any fees, rates, or charges; i. Incur Debt. To incur debts and obligations, deliver bonds or notes for monies borrowed or other obligations of the CISC, and to secure the payment of such bonds or obligations, except that no party shall be liable for any debts or obligations of the CISC; j. Legal Process. To litigate, arbitrate, or mediate in its own name; k. Receive Contributions. To receive contributions of gifts, grants, or services; and l. Terminate a Party’s Participation in this Agreement. To terminate or limit a Party’s participation in this Agreement. 13. Restrictions on Powers of the CISC. The CISC shall not have the power: a. Eminent Domain. To take property by eminent domain; Packet Pg. 171 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium Page 5 of 16 b. Obligate Payment. To obligate a Party to pay any money to the CISC or to another Party, except that the CISC may enter into contracts with Parties for the payment of money; or c. Tax. To impose taxes. BOARD OF DIRECTORS 14. Board of Directors. The governing body of the CISC shall be the Board, in which all administrative and legislative power of the CISC is vested. The purpose of the Board is to set policy for the CISC and decide important issues of the CISC. 15. Number of Directors, Term, and Term Limits. There shall be eleven (11) Directors on the Board. Six (6) Directors shall have terms that expire on March 31 of every even numbered year. Five (5) Directors shall have terms that expire on March 31 of every odd numbered year. There shall be no limit to the number of terms an individual may serve as a Director. 16. Eligibility, Appointment, Removal, and Vacancies. Each Director must be an employee of a Party. If a Director is no longer employed by a Party, the Director shall no longer be a Director. A Director may resign at any time and for any reason by giving two weeks prior written notice to the Board. A vacant Director position shall be filled by majority vote of the Representatives as soon as practicable. a. Initial Appointment. The initial Directors shall be appointed by the Representatives of the eleven named Parties listed in the preamble of this Agreement. The Representatives of the first six (6) named Parties that agree to and sign this Agreement shall each appoint one Director, whose terms shall expire on March 31, 2016. The Representatives of the next five (5) named Parties that agree to and sign this Agreement shall each appoint one Director, whose terms shall expire on March 31, 2015. b. Subsequent Appointment. After the initial Directors’ terms expire, all subsequent Directors shall be appointed by a majority vote of the Representatives. 17. Compensation. A Director shall not receive compensation for the Director’s service to the CISC. The Board may provide for reimbursement to a Director, Representative, or other person for actual and reasonable expenses incurred while performing duties for the CISC. At no time shall a Director or a Representative be considered an employee of the CISC. 18. Action by the Board at a Meeting. Meetings of the Board may be held at any place that a majority of the Directors on the Board may determine. Directors may attend the meeting in person or by conference telephone or similar communications equipment, and such participation at a meeting shall constitute attendance. The following rules shall apply. a. Quorum. The attendance of at least a majority of the Directors of the Board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. b. Voting. The affirmative vote of a majority of the Directors on the Board that are present at any meeting at which there is a quorum shall be an act of the Board, unless a supermajority is specified herein or by rules adopted by the Board. Packet Pg. 172 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium Page 6 of 16 c. Minutes. Minutes of each meeting and a record of each decision shall be kept by the Board. 19. Committees. The Board may designate one or more committees that shall serve at the pleasure of the Board. Any committees shall have the powers and responsibilities granted by the Board to that committee. 20. Alternates and Absentee Voting. A Director may appoint an alternate who will have the same voting rights as the Director when participating in Board meetings in the absence of the Director. Alternates must be employed by a Party. Absentee voting, where a Director votes without attending a meeting (whether in person or by other communications equipment) or without appointing an alternate, is not allowed. 21. Representative’s Right to Attend Meetings. Each Representative, or an alternate, shall have the right to attend, whether in person or by conference telephone or similar communications equipment, any meeting of the Board and to voice opinions on any matter concerning the CISC. MANAGEMENT OF THE CISC 22. CISC Manager. a. Appointment. Upon request from the Board, the Representatives shall jointly nominate one or more persons to be the Manager and submit those persons’ names to the Board. Based on those nominations, the Board shall select one or more persons to be the Manager. The appointment of a Manager shall be contingent upon the approval of the Representative of the Party employing the Manager. b. CISC Manager. The Manager shall manage the day-to-day operations of the CISC and undertake and execute the Board’s instructions and directions. The Manager shall have the administrative authority necessary to perform the tasks and responsibilities assigned pursuant to this Agreement. The Board may grant to the Manager any additional administrative authority as the Board deems necessary. The Manager shall attend all meetings of the Board and follow the Board’s instructions and directions. c. Eligibility and Employment. The person(s) serving as the Manager must be an employee of a Party at all times during that person’s tenure as the Manager. The Manager shall not be considered an employee of the CISC. The Board may hire an employee of the CISC under terms written and negotiated by the Board to perform the duties of the Manager under the supervision and direction of the Board. d. Term. The Manager’s term is expected to last for two (2) years, but the actual length (whether longer or shorter) shall be determined by agreement between the Board and the Representative of the Party employing the Manager. Whether the Manager works full- or part-time on CISC matters shall be determined by agreement between the Board and the Representative of the Party employing the Manager. The Board may remove the Manager at any time and for any reason. The Representative of the Party employing the Manager may recall the Manager at any time and for any reason by giving sixty (60) days prior written notice to the Board, unless the Representative and the Board agree to other notification requirements. Packet Pg. 173 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium Page 7 of 16 e. Compensation. The Party employing the Manager shall bear the full cost of the Manager. The CISC shall not be obligated to reimburse the Party employing the Manager for the cost of the Manager. However, the Board may assess an annual fee on the Parties to reimburse the Party employing the Manager (or the CISC, if the CISC hires an employee to perform the duties of the Manager) for all or part of the costs associated with employing the Manager. As is stated in paragraph 28 of this Agreement, and consistent with that paragraph, no Party is obligated to pay any annual fees but may be denied access to the CISC or face other non-monetary penalties. 23. Additional Assistance from Assigned Employees. a. Appointment. The Board may seek an Assigned Employee from the Parties. Upon request from the Board, any Representative may volunteer one or more Assigned Employees to work full- or part-time on behalf of the CISC. The Board may accept or decline the person volunteered to become an Assigned Employee. b. Assigned Employees. Each Assigned Employee shall work under the supervision and direction of the Manager. Each Assigned Employee shall have the administrative authority necessary to undertake and execute the tasks and responsibilities assigned by the Manager and the Board. The Board may grant to any Assigned Employee any additional administrative authority as the Board deems necessary. An Assigned Employee shall attend meetings of the Board if and when the Board or the Manager requests that Assigned Employee’s presence. c. Eligibility and Employment. Any person serving as an Assigned Employee must be an employee of a Party at all times during that person’s tenure as an Assigned Employee. The Assigned Employee shall not be considered an employee of the CISC. The Board may hire one or more full- or part-time employees of the CISC under terms written and negotiated by the Board to work under the supervision and direction of the Manager and the Board. d. Term. The Assigned Employee’s term shall be determined by agreement between the Board and the Representative of the Party employing the Assigned Employee. Whether the Assigned Employee works full- or part-time on CISC matters shall be determined by agreement between the Board and the Representative of the Party employing the Assigned Employee. The Board may remove the Assigned Employee at any time and for any reason. The Representative of the Party employing the Assigned Employee may recall the Assigned Employee at any time and for any reason by giving thirty (30) days prior written notice to the Board, unless the Representative and the Board agree to other notification requirements. e. Compensation. The Party employing an Assigned Employee shall bear the full cost of that Assigned Employee. The CISC shall not be obligated to reimburse the Party employing the Assigned Employee for the cost of the Assigned Employee. However, the Board may assess an annual fee on the Parties to reimburse the Party employing the Assigned Employee (or the CISC, if the CISC employs an employee to perform the duties of the Assigned Employee) for all or part of the costs associated with employing the Assigned Employee. As is stated in paragraph 28 of this Agreement, and consistent Packet Pg. 174 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium Page 8 of 16 with that paragraph, no Party is obligated to pay any annual fees but may be denied access to the CISC or face other non-monetary penalties. FINANCIAL 24. Deposits and Expenditures. All funds of the CISC shall be deposited to the credit of the CISC in an interest bearing account. No payments or withdrawals of such funds in an amount over five hundred dollars ($500) shall be allowed without prior approval of the Board and the written authorization of two (2) Directors. Payments or withdrawals of such funds in amounts up to and including five hundred dollars ($500) may be authorized by the Manager. 25. Fiscal Agent. The Board may request that a Party or other entity be the fiscal agent for the CISC. 26. Fiscal Year. The fiscal year of the CISC shall be January 1 through December 31 of each year. 27. No Multiple Year Fiscal Obligations. The Parties do not intend to create a multiple year fiscal obligation for any Party by virtue of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge that any future monetary obligations of any Party are subject to sufficient appropriations by each Party and such appropriations are not guaranteed to be made. RIGHTS OF PARTIES 28. No Duty to Pay Membership, Annual, or Other Fees. No Party shall be required by this Agreement to pay any membership, annual, or other fees or charges imposed by the Board. The sole remedy for the failure of a Party to pay any fees or charges shall be, at the Board’s discretion, (a) exclusion from the CISC, (b) denial of Data and Intelligence Information sharing with other Parties through the CISC, (c) loss of any or all of the privileges and rights of a Party, (d) termination of the non-paying Party’s participation in this Agreement, or (e) any combination of the foregoing as determined by the Board. 29. Voluntary Assumption of Debts. A Party may voluntarily elect to be liable, in whole or in part, for any or all of the debts, liabilities, or obligations of the CISC at the sole discretion of that Party. 30. Financial Responsibility. The CISC shall not be required to pay any Party’s costs associated with acquiring or maintaining any hardware or licensed software necessary for that Party to participate in the CISC. The Board may agree to pay for expenses incurred by a Party that, in furtherance of the CISC’s purposes, (a) maintains goods for use by other Parties or (b) provides services to other Parties. 31. Examination of Records. Any authorized agent of a Party, including an authorized auditor or his or her representative, has the right to access and the right to examine any pertinent fiscal books, documents, papers, and records of the CISC involving fiscal transactions for three (3) years after the date of the fiscal transaction. Packet Pg. 175 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium Page 9 of 16 32. Addition of New Parties. a. Law Enforcement Requirement. All Parties, and any entity or agency that becomes a Party, must be governmental entities or agencies that are authorized to lawfully provide, establish, maintain, and operate law enforcement services. b. Signatories of the MOU. All entities and agencies that signed the MOU prior to the Effective Date are vested with approval to become Parties by signing a separate signature page to this Agreement that states that the new Party agrees to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Upon delivery of the signed signature page to the Manager, satisfaction of any conditions imposed by the Board, and payment of any CISC membership fees, if applicable, such entity or agency shall be a Party. c. Non-Signatories of the MOU. Any entity or agency that did not sign the MOU prior to the Effective Date may become a Party by (i) gaining approval of the Board and (ii) signing a separate signature page to this Agreement that states that the new Party agrees to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Upon delivery of the signed signature page to the Manager, satisfaction of any conditions imposed by the Board, and payment of any CISC membership fees, if applicable, such entity or agency shall be a Party. d. CISC Membership Fee. Any entity or agency that signed the MOU prior to the Effective Date and paid a CISC membership fee at that time shall not be required to pay an additional membership fee in order to join the CISC. Any entity or agency that (i) signed the MOU prior to the Effective Date but did not pay a CISC membership fee at the time or (ii) did not sign the MOU prior to the Effective Date may be required to pay a CISC membership fee in an amount determined by the Board as a condition of becoming a Party. 33. Right to Terminate Participation. A Party may terminate its participation in this Agreement by giving written notice to the Board at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of termination, unless the Board and a specific Party have agreed on a different notice period. GENERAL PROVISIONS 34. Amendments. This Agreement shall not be amended unless seventy-five percent (75%) of the Representatives approve such amendment in writing. The sole remedy for any Party that disagrees with any amendments is to terminate its participation in this Agreement. 35. Construction and Interpretation. The table of contents and the section and other headings and subheadings contained in this Agreement are solely for the purpose of reference, are not part of the agreement of the Parties, and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. 36. Duplicate Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original. The signature of any Party to any counterpart shall be deemed a signature to, and may be appended to, any other counterpart. Packet Pg. 176 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium Page 10 of 16 37. Entire Agreement. This Agreement embodies the entire understanding and agreement among the Parties concerning the CISC and supersedes any and all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements, including the MOU. 38. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of Colorado to the extent not inconsistent with Federal law. 39. Indemnification. Without waiving the protections, limitations, and requirements of the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act in Article 10, Title 24, C.R.S., each Director, Representative, Manager, Assigned Employee, officer, agent, and volunteer shall be provided with a legal defense and indemnification as provided by that person’s employer to the extent not inconsistent with Federal law. 40. Mediation. In the event of a dispute between the Parties regarding the interpretation of this Agreement or regarding any issue arising under this Agreement, the Parties hereby agree to the following mediation procedure. First, the disagreeing Parties will submit the issue to the Representatives, who will mediate the disagreement and try to devise an acceptable solution. If that process fails, the disagreeing Parties will submit the issue to the highest elected officials of each Party (e.g., the Mayor of a city or the County Commissioners of a county) who will mediate the disagreement and try to devise an acceptable solution. The highest elected official of each Party may approve a designee to mediate on behalf of that Party. The Parties agree to mediate in good faith. If any disagreeing Party requests a mediator, the disagreeing Parties shall jointly select a mediator and share the cost of the mediator equally. Decisions by the Board are not subject to mediation. This paragraph shall apply to the extent not inconsistent with Federal law. 41. No Third-Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to create any third-party benefits or beneficiaries or create a right or cause of action for the enforcement of this Agreement’s terms in any entity or person not a Party to this Agreement including any agents, employees, officers, or volunteers of any Party or any entity with whom the CISC contracts. 42. Severability. In the event that any of the terms, covenants, or conditions of this Agreement or their application shall be held invalid as to any Party, entity, or person by a court of competent jurisdiction, (a) the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, (b) such determination shall not affect or impair the validity or enforceability of any other provision, and (c) the remaining provisions shall be interpreted and applied so far as possible to reflect the original intent and purpose of this Agreement. 43. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be unlimited and shall extend until terminated as provided herein. 44. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated upon agreement in writing of seventy- five percent (75%) of the Representatives. Upon termination of the CISC, any monetary funds held by the CISC shall be distributed, after paying the debts and obligations of the CISC, to the Parties proportionate with the number of sworn law enforcement officers employed by each Party. Additionally, upon termination of the CISC, any non-monetary assets shall become the property of the Party in possession of those assets. [SIGNATURE PAGES TO FOLLOW] Packet Pg. 177 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium Page 11 of 16 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement effective as of the Effective Date. The Adams County Sheriff’s Office By: Name: Doug Darr Title: Adams County Sheriff Date: Attest: ________________________________ Name: ________________________________ The Arapahoe County Sheriff’s Office By: Name: David C. Walcher Title: Arapahoe County Sheriff Date: Attest: ________________________________ Name: ________________________________ Packet Pg. 178 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium Page 12 of 16 The City of Aurora By: Name: Title: Date: Attest: ________________________________ Name: ________________________________ The Colorado Department of Public Safety By: Name: Title: Date: Attest: ________________________________ Name: ________________________________ Packet Pg. 179 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium Page 13 of 16 The City of Colorado Springs By: Name: Title: Date: Attest: ________________________________ Name: ________________________________ The City of Commerce City By: Name: Title: Date: Attest: ________________________________ Name: ________________________________ Packet Pg. 180 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium Page 14 of 16 The City and County of Denver By: Name: Title: Date: Attest: ________________________________ Name: ________________________________ The Douglas County Sheriff’s Office By: Name: David Weaver Title: Douglas County Sheriff Date: Attest: ________________________________ Name: ________________________________ Packet Pg. 181 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Intergovernmental Agreement of the Colorado Information Sharing Consortium Page 15 of 16 The City of Grand Junction By: Name: Title: Date: Attest: ________________________________ Name: ________________________________ The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Jefferson By: Name: Title: Date: Attest: ________________________________ Name: ________________________________ Packet Pg. 182 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Packet Pg. 183 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2109 : Colorado Informatoin Sharing Consortium RESO) Agenda Item 15 Item # 15 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Jim Byrne, Police Lieutenant SUBJECT Resolution 2014-060 Authorizing the City Manager to Enter Into an Agreement With the Poudre School District R-1 for the School Resource Officer Program. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to authorize the Mayor to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the Poudre School District R-1 (District) and the City of Fort Collins, on behalf of Fort Collins Police Services (FCPS) which updates, replaces and supersedes the previous IGA and continues the School Resource Officer Program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The previous IGA between the City and the District had not been updated since 2004. Both FCPS and PSD agree that the program has been very successful, and wanted to focus on updating language to conform with current practices. The operational foundations of the program are basically unchanged, with the successful model of SRO/Principal partnership remaining intact. Staffing selection, training, and supervision of the School Resource Officer (SRO) Program remains within the purview of FCPS with input from PSD. At the request of PSD, the program was increased by one SRO in 2014. This increase allowed for a SRO to be assigned to each high school and middle school in the district. Coverage of elementary schools is provided by SROs assigned to middle schools. The program now has eleven SROs and one sergeant. Any future growth will likely require an additional police supervisor for the program. In 2014 FCPS and PSD staff teamed up to provide training for over 130 school administrators in response to critical incidents. The very successful training was developed and coordinated through the SRO staff and is expected to be the foundation for annual training between FCPS and PSD staff. For the last five years, SROs have averaged writing over 600 police reports annually. They are also formally involved in mentoring partnerships, community outreach programs, crisis intervention, safety assessments, and staff trainings. The current partner-based relationship used by FCPS and PSD to manage the SRO program is recognized by others as a model for other agencies and districts. The Intergovernmental Agreement was vetted by City staff, including the City Attorney’s Office. It was approved unanimously by the PSD School Board on June 10, 2014. Packet Pg. 184 Agenda Item 15 Item # 15 Page 2 FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS Funding for the operation of the SRO program is currently based on the base operating costs for each officer and the supervisor. The rate is based on 225 operating days of the program, with SRO officers being solely dedicated to FCPS operations for about 5 weeks during the summer of each year. For the agreed upon 225 operating days that the officers are dedicated to SRO duties, PSD and FCPS split the basic operating costs 50/50. The new contract allows for PSD to pay FCPS on a quarterly basis for services provided in the previous quarter. This is a change from the 2004 IGA in which PSD paid annually for services to be provided in the upcoming year. Such change was requested by PSD for business purposes and does not impact FCPS operations or budgeting. In the event that an SRO position is vacated, and FCPS is unable to immediately fill the vacancy, the amount paid by PSD will be pro-rated. The amount owed is subject to change annually, depending on FCPS personnel costs, and both parties agree to update numbers annually to allow for those changes. For the current 2014/2015 year the cost per officer is $124,572, and the cost for the sergeant is $146,687. Allowing for the 225 contractual days equates to PSD paying FCPS approximately $57,653 annually per SRO and $66,291 for the sergeant. The Resolution authorizes the City Manager to enter into up to four, one-year extensions to the term of the Agreement, which extensions may include such modifications and additions as the City Manager determines necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the City or further the purpose of the Resolution. Although the contract language has changed a little to accommodate current business practices, the functionality and financial contribution shared by PSD and FCPS remains consistent with past agreements and practices. Packet Pg. 185 - 1 - RESOLUTION 2014-060 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE POUDRE SCHOOL DISTRICT R-1 FOR THE SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER PROGRAM WHEREAS, effective July 6, 2004, the Poudre School District R-1 (the “District”) and the City entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement (the “2004 IGA”) for The School Resource Officer Program (the “Program”); and WHEREAS, the goals of the program are to: 1. Provide a safe learning environment and help reduce school violence; 2. Improve school law enforcement collaboration; and 3. Improve perceptions and relations between students, staff and law enforcement officials; and WHEREAS, the District and the City both recognize that over the years, the program has provided outstanding benefits for the citizens of the City, the District and particularly for the students of the District’s schools located within the City; and WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is in the best interests of the District, the City and the citizens of the City for the District and the City to continue with the program; and WHEREAS, the parties recommend updating the Agreement to conform to current practices and to allow for pay on a quarterly basis as set forth in the proposed “Agreement Between the Poudre School District R-1 and the City of Fort Collins for the School Resource Officer Program” which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” (the “Agreement”); and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the District and the City that the Agreement replace and supersede in all respects the 2004 IGA; and WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement is for a period of one-year; and WHEREAS, the District and the City may wish to amend the Agreement in the future to address among other things, changes in current practices, funding and/or the addition of new positions, or to extend the term of the Agreement with or without amendments for up to four additional one-year terms. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Agreement in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” together with such modifications and Packet Pg. 186 - 2 - additions as the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, determines necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the City or further the purposes of this Resolution. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into up to four, one- year extensions to the term of the Agreement, which extensions may include such modifications and additions as the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, determines necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the City or further the purpose of this Resolution, including updated dollar amounts to reflect changes in related salaries, staff time and the number of positions funded. Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins this 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. _________________________________ Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 187 EXHIBIT A Packet Pg. 188 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2108 : School Resource Officer RESO) Packet Pg. 189 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2108 : School Resource Officer RESO) Packet Pg. 190 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2108 : School Resource Officer RESO) Packet Pg. 191 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2108 : School Resource Officer RESO) Packet Pg. 192 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2108 : School Resource Officer RESO) Packet Pg. 193 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2108 : School Resource Officer RESO) Packet Pg. 194 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2108 : School Resource Officer RESO) Packet Pg. 195 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2108 : School Resource Officer RESO) Packet Pg. 196 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2108 : School Resource Officer RESO) Packet Pg. 197 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2108 : School Resource Officer RESO) Packet Pg. 198 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2108 : School Resource Officer RESO) Packet Pg. 199 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2108 : School Resource Officer RESO) Packet Pg. 200 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2108 : School Resource Officer RESO) Packet Pg. 201 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2108 : School Resource Officer RESO) Agenda Item 16 Item # 16 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Jill Stilwell, Cultural Services and Facilities Director SUBJECT Resolution 2014-061 Adopting the Recommendations of the Cultural Resources Board Regarding Fort Fund Grant Disbursements. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to adopt the recommendations of the Cultural Resources Board to disburse Fort Fund grants to community events from the Cultural Development and Programming and Tourism Programming Accounts. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The Fort Fund grant program, established in 1989, disburses funds from the City’s Cultural Development and Programming Account and the Tourism Programming Account in accordance with the provisions of Section 25- 244 of the City Code, where 25% of the revenue from the lodging tax funds is applied to the Cultural Development and Programming Account to support cultural events; an additional 5% of revenue from lodging tax is dedicated to the Tourism Programming Account to support tourism events and activities. Local non-profit organizations may apply to the Fort Fund for cultural and/or tourism event support. The City Council appointed the Cultural Resources Board to review grant applications based on approved guidelines and make recommendations for Fort Fund disbursements to City Council, pursuant to Ordinance No. 028, 1992 and Section 2-203 (3) of the City Code. Fort Fund grants support events that enrich the cultural life of the community, promote local heritage and diversity, provide opportunities for cultural participation, help define Fort Collins as a cultural center and tourist destination, have wide appeal for a significant part of the community, and promote the general welfare of the City’s inhabitants. Fort Fund consists of a three-tiered funding system: Tier #1 was established as an annual programming tier for organizations whose primary purpose is to present three or more public events annually. These groups may apply for funding from Tier #1 each April. Tier #2 allows organizations that are not eligible for Tier #1 support to apply for funding of events. Applications for support from Tier #2 are accepted each January and June. The Cultural Innovation Tier #3 was established to further the goal of making Fort Collins a cultural center and destination. The Cultural Innovation Tier #3 grants address a need in the cultural activity of Fort Collins, perpetuate the Tourism Account by generating overnight stays in local hotels, and/or develop new arts, cultural, or heritage tourism activities that have the potential to impact Fort Collins’ cultural and economic growth. Organizations may apply for funding from the Cultural Innovation Tier #3 each April. Packet Pg. 202 Agenda Item 16 Item # 16 Page 2 June 2014 Funding Session At its June 25, 2014 regular meeting, the Cultural Resources Board reviewed 24 Tier #2 applications, with total requests equaling $81,150. The following table summarizes the amount and sources of available funds in 2014: FY 2014 AVAILABLE FUNDING AMOUNT SOURCE $215,973 FY 2014 Cultural Development and Programming Account (CDP) $48,750 FY 2014 Tourism Programming Account (TP) $46,969 Unspent Appropriations 2013 (CDP) $36,923 Unanticipated Lodging Tax 2013 (CDP) $1,592 Unspent Appropriations 2013 (TP) $7,385 Unanticipated Lodging Tax 2013 (TP) $357,319 Total Funding Available for 2014 FUNDS ALLOCATED TO June 2014 FUNDING SESSION $61,719 Amount from Cultural Development and Programming Account (CDP) $26,527 Amount from Tourism Programming Account (TP) $88,246 Total amount allocated to June 2014 Session 25% % of Total FY2014 Funds allocated to June 2014 Session The Cultural Resources Board scored each application using the Funding Criteria outlined in the Fort Fund Guidelines (attached) and discussed each application at the June 25, 2014, meeting. The Board discussion is outlined in the draft minutes (attached). The Board is recommending disbursement of $56,500 from the City’s Cultural Development and Programming Account and $5,000 from the Tourism Programming Account, totaling $61,600 to 24 applicants as outlined in Exhibit A to the Resolution. Of the total amount requested by applicants, 76% is being recommended for funding from available funds. The following table summarizes the utilization of funds from all sources. Recommended Funding % of Total Category $56,500 64% Cultural Development and Programming Account $5,000 6% Tourism Account $26,746 30% Unallocated $88,246 100.0% Funds Allocated to April 2014 Session The $26,746 of unallocated funds and the additional $36,923 of unanticipated 2013 Lodging Tax revenue will be carried forward to the 2015 funding session. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACT The Fort Fund grant program, established in 1989, disburses funds from the City’s Cultural Development and Programming Account and Tourism Programming Account in accordance with the provisions of Section 25-244 of the City Code. This Resolution would distribute $56,500 from the Cultural Development and Programming Account and $5,000 from the Tourism Programming Account to local non-profit organizations. Each organization must provide funds to match the grant amount. These funds were budgeted and appropriated in the 2014 budget. Packet Pg. 203 Agenda Item 16 Item # 16 Page 3 BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Cultural Resources Board (CRB) is presenting these recommendations to City Council on events that should receive funding and the amounts from the available Cultural Development and Programming Account and Tourism Programming Account. Exhibit A to Resolution 2014-061 presents the allocations recommended by the CRB to the City Council for Tier #2. ATTACHMENTS 1. Fort Fund Guidelines (PDF) 2. Cultural Resources Board Draft Minutes, June 25, 2014 (PDF) Packet Pg. 204 The Cultural Development & Programming and Tourism Accounts (Fort Fund) is funded by an allocation of the lodging tax revenues. Applications are reviewed by the Cultural Resources Board of the City of Fort Collins and recommendations to fund events are submitted to the Fort Collins City Council for final approval. The objective of Fort Fund is to provide funds to foster, encourage, and promote 1) cultural development and programming, and 2) economic and tourism development. The overarching goal for Fort Fund is to serve as a catalyst in making Fort Collins a cultural center and destination. Fort Fund supports events that: • Enrich the cultural life of the Fort Collins community • Promote local heritage and diversity • Provide opportunities for community members to participate in, create, learn from or experience arts and culture • Help to define Fort Collins as a destination for arts and culture • Elevate the community and broaden perspectives • Have wide appeal for a significant part of the community • Promote the general welfare of the inhabitants of the City. The following will not be considered for funding: • Applications for funds solely to print brochures, magazines or promotional materials, or for capital improvements. • Any event in which the net proceeds or profit from the event is donated by the sponsor to another organization and/or individual. Funds will not be disbursed directly after each funding session. Organizations recommended for grant monies by the Cultural Resources Board must first be approved by the City Council. ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 205 Attachment16.1: Fort Fund Guidelines (2123 : Fort Fund June 2014) Funding Tiers & Application Deadlines An organization and/or event may receive funding from one or more of the following three tiers as described below. Specific application deadlines are listed immediately following each tier. Requests must be for a minimum of $500. Funding is subject to the amount of available funds per funding session. The Cultural Resources Board reserves the right to not fund an organization if it does not fully meet the criteria. Fort Fund will now only accept one application per organization per funding session. Colorado State University organizations are required to submit their applications through the Sponsored Programs Office. All applications are to be submitted to the Lincoln Center Administration Office, 417 W. Magnolia, Fort Collins, CO, 80521 by 5p.m. on the date stated. Postmark does not qualify. Please direct all questions regarding the application process to Gail Budner at (970) 221-6737. TIER # 1: Annual Programming Fund Organizations are eligible to apply for funding from Tier #1 if they meet the following criteria: 1. The primary purpose of the organization is to present three or more different public performances, events or exhibits per year. 2. The organization has proven annual program success for three previous years. Organizations that meet the criteria may apply for up to $15,000 per year (July 1 - June 30). The organization must submit a mission statement stating the organizations' officially accepted primary purpose; provide evidence of having presented three or more performances, events, or exhibits for three previous years; submit financial statements for the three most recently completed fiscal years; provide a list of the organization's current Board of Directors, their business/organizational affiliations, the date they were elected to the Board and their term limit date; and submit a Tourism Impact form. Fort Fund will only accept one Tier #1 application per organization per calendar year. Organizations that apply for this level of funding would have to show that no more than 35% of their projected expenses are coming from Fort Fund. Proposal Deadline for Tier #1: First Tuesday of April, 5:00 p.m. Requests must be for a minimum of $500 and a maximum of $15,000 Request amount cannot exceed 35% of the total projected expenses Packet Pg. 206 Attachment16.1: Fort Fund Guidelines (2123 : Fort Fund June 2014) TIER # 2: Special Events Fund Organizations that present event(s) may apply for up to $5,000 for a single event or series of events per funding session. Events would have to be held within one year of the funding session. Fort Fund will only accept one Tier #2 application per organization per funding session at which Tier #2 applications are accepted. The organization must submit a financial statement from the most recently completed fiscal year and submit a Tourism Impact form. Organizations funded under Tier #1 could apply one time per calendar year for up to $5,000 under Tier 2, but the event cannot also be funded under Tier 1. Organizations that apply for this level of funding would have to show that no more than 50% of their projected expenses are coming from Fort Fund. Proposal Deadline for Tier #2: First Tuesday of January, 5p.m.; First Tuesday of June, 5p.m. Requests must be for a minimum of $500 and a maximum of $5,000 Request amount cannot exceed 50% of the total event expenses Cultural Innovation Fund (CIF) - Formerly Tier #4 Organizations are eligible to apply for up to $25,000 from the CIF if they seek funding for an activity or event that will increase Fort Collins' identity as a cultural center and tourist destination. The term 'activity' can mean event, projects, products, exhibits, festivals, programs, etc. and can be in the area of arts, nature, heritage, recreation, science, and /or humanities. The event or activity must meet the eligibility requirements and the strategies outlined below: CIF Strategies: Proposals should address specific strategies to increase Fort Collins' identity as a cultural center and tourism destination, resulting in at least one of the following benefits: 1. Address a need in the cultural activity of Fort Collins 2. Perpetuate the Tourism Fund by generating over night stays in local hotels 3. Develop new arts, cultural, or heritage tourism activities and products that have the potential to impact Fort Collins cultural and economic growth. These events or activities should enrich the cultural life available in the city because they will serve as an attraction to visitors, represent new cultural offerings or can be described as unique, innovative or inventive. The organization must submit a mission statement stating the organizations' officially accepted primary purpose; provide evidence of having been in existence for at least three years; submit financial statements for the three most recently completed fiscal years; provide a list of current Board members; and submit a Tourism Impact form. CIF applicants may also be required to present an oral presentation to the Cultural Resources Board. Packet Pg. 207 Attachment16.1: Fort Fund Guidelines (2123 : Fort Fund June 2014) Fort Fund will only accept one CIF application per organization per calendar year. Request amount cannot exceed 50% of the total activity expenses. Request amount requires a dollar-for- dollar cash match. Neither in-kind contributions nor Fort Fund dollars from current or previous grants may be used in calculating the organization's match. Activities funded under the CIF shall not be simultaneously funded under Tiers #2 of Fort Fund. CIF funded activities can only apply for a maximum of three years and must compete each time. Proposal Deadline for the CIF: First Tuesday of April, 5:00p.m. Requests must be for a minimum of $500 and a maximum of $25,000 Request amount cannot exceed 50% of the total activity expenses All applications are to be submitted to the Lincoln Center Administration Office, 417 W. Magnolia, Fort Collins, CO, 80521 by 5p.m. on the date stated. Postmark does not qualify. Please direct all questions regarding the application process to Gail Budner, (970) 221-6737. Packet Pg. 208 Attachment16.1: Fort Fund Guidelines (2123 : Fort Fund June 2014) Eligibility Requirements Organizations chartered in Colorado with IRS non-profit status may submit an application for consideration. Written proof of this status must accompany all applications. All organizations that fall under the same IRS non-profit tax status will be considered the same unit for funding. • For all Tiers, Fort Fund will only accept one application per organization per funding session. Colorado State University organizations are required to submit their applications through the Sponsored Programs office. • Applications must be submitted on the forms provided at www.fcgov.com/fortfund and must arrive at the Lincoln Center administration office by the date/time listed as the deadline. Postmarks are not valid. Late applications will not be reviewed. • Events must be held in Fort Collins or in the Fort Collins Growth Management Area. • Events must be open to the general public and efforts must be made to advertise and make the public aware of the opportunity to attend and/or participate in the event. • Events or activities must provide a direct public benefit of a reasonably general character to a significant number of City residents. • Events may occur no earlier than 45 days after the application deadline. • Events funded under Tier #1 must be completed by June 30th of the year following the date of funding. Events funded under Tier #2 must be completed within one year of the date of the funding session. Events funded under the CIF must be completed within 18 months of the funding session. • The applicant organization must be in good standing with the Fort Fund program. The applicant must not be delinquent on any previous mid-year or final Fort Fund reports; must have used the new Fort Fund logo on promotional materials; and must have listed the funded event on the Fort Collins Convention and Visitors Bureau website calendar. Organizations not in good standing will not be considered for funding for one calendar year. • Religious, sectarian or faith-based organizations may apply for funding, but only for events which are secular (non-religious) in nature. Fort Fund money may not be used for events that promote religion. • Fort Fund does not consider applications for funds solely to print brochures, magazines or promotional materials, or for general operating support or capital improvements. Additional Eligibility Requirements for Tier #1 and the CIF: • The organization must have and submit an officially adopted mission statement expressing their primary purpose. • The organization has been in existence for a minimum of three years, and provides financial statements for the previous three completed fiscal years prior to the application date. • For Tier #1, the organization must show evidence of having presented three or more performances, events, or exhibits for three previous years. Packet Pg. 209 Attachment16.1: Fort Fund Guidelines (2123 : Fort Fund June 2014) Criteria For Funding The following criteria are used by the Cultural Resourced Board to evaluate applications that have met all the eligibility requirements. Funding is based on how well an event or activity meets these criteria. Funding is subject to the amount of available funds per funding session. The Cultural Resources Board reserves the right to not fund an organization if it does not fully meet the criteria. Fort Fund supports events that: 1. Are of the highest quality; 2. Bring awareness of the arts to the local community; 3. Aspire to bring regional and national recognition to Fort Collins; 4. Are engaging and innovative and/or original; 5. Build a wide range of arts and culture offerings; 6. Raise arts and culture quality and participation to a new level; 7. Have an impact on the community economically, culturally or both; 8. Present strong evidence of leveraging other funding sources; All applicants are required to submit the Tourism Impact form. The information provided on the form will be reviewed as part of the application. Packet Pg. 210 Attachment16.1: Fort Fund Guidelines (2123 : Fort Fund June 2014) Grant Requirements Organizations applying for Tier #1 funding cannot apply for more than 35% of their total projected annual expenses. Organizations applying for funding from Tier #2 may request funding for no more than 50% of the total projected expenses for any event. Organizations applying for the CIF cannot apply for more than 50% of their total projected expenses. • The amount requested under Tiers #1 and #2 must be matched with either cash or a combination of cash and in-kind services. At least one-half of the matching funds must be cash. For example, if an event is projected to cost $2,000, the amount requested from Fort Fund may not exceed $1,000. A $1,000 request would have to be matched with either $1,000 in projected cash revenues or at least $500 in cash and no more than $500 of in-kind services. The CIF requires the requested amount be matched dollar-for-dollar in cash. Neither in-kind contributions nor Fort Fund dollars from current or previous grants may be used in calculating the organization's match for the CIF. • Contracts for services with the City of Fort Collins must be signed prior to the issuance of funds. • All funds must be used for direct costs of the event(s) within the time frame as required by contract, or returned immediately to the Cultural Development and Programming Account. If the event changes significantly, the Cultural Resources Board must be notified in writing. Funding for the event may be re-evaluated at that time. • Organizations that receive funding must recognize the support of the City. All publicity and advertisements (including posters, programs, banners, flyers, newspaper ads and postcards) of the funded event must include the City's Fort Fund logo. If there is no printed material, a Fort Fund banner must be exhibited at the event. Organizations must also list the funded event on the Fort Collins Convention and Visitors Bureau website calendar at www.visitftcollins.com/events. • Organizations funded under Tier #1 must submit a financial mid-year and annual report by the date required in their contract. Organizations funded under Tier #2 and the CIF must submit a written report within sixty (60) days of the completion of an event. These reports, which evaluate estimated attendance, promotional materials, in-kind services, actual cash expenses and actual revenues must be submitted to the Cultural Resources Board through the Lincoln Center Administration Office. All reports must be signed by a representative of the organization that receives funding, verifying their accuracy. Records of the event need to be available for inspection upon request of the Cultural Resources Board. If the financial reports are not completed as required by contract, your organization's future funding may be effected. All organizations must provide a final report for previously granted funds before the contract for any new funding will be processed. • A member of the Cultural Resources Board may be assigned to each event to act as a liaison between funded organizations and the Board. If tickets are required for admission to an event and are not extended to the liaison as a courtesy, tickets will be purchased from the Cultural Development and Programming Account. • If the activity or event changes significantly from what was proposed in the original application, including date, location, or content, the organization must notify the Cultural Resources Board in writing at 417 W. Magnolia St., Fort Collins, CO 80521. Funding, even if already distributed, may be reevaluated at that time. Packet Pg. 211 Attachment16.1: Fort Fund Guidelines (2123 : Fort Fund June 2014) FORT FUND OVERVIEW Fort Fund, the City of Fort Collins’ Cultural Development & Programming and Tourism Accounts, is funded by an allocation of the lodging tax revenues collected within the city limits of Fort Collins. Applications are reviewed three times a year by the City of Fort Collins Cultural Resources Board and recommendations for funding are submitted to the Fort Collins City Council for final approval. The objective of Fort Fund is to foster, encourage, and promote cultural and/or tourism activities in Fort Collins. Fort Fund offers three tiers. Tiers 1 and 2 primarily fund events that are artistic, ethnic, historic, educational or recreational in nature and reflect the values and traditions of Fort Collins. Events of this type will have wide appeal for a significant part of the community, thereby advancing the good of all. The resulting economic and noneconomic benefits of these events will promote the general welfare of the inhabitants of Fort Collins. FORT FUND (FORMERLY TIER 4) CULTURAL INNOVATION FUND The Cultural Innovation Fund embodies the above, and is primarily focused on activities that will increase Fort Collins’ identity as a cultural center and tourist destination. The term “activity” can mean events, projects, products, exhibits, festivals, programs, etc. These activities can be in the area of arts, nature, heritage, recreation, science, and/or humanities and shall be designed to develop new arts, culture or heritage tourism activities and products that have the potential to impact Fort Collins’ economic and cultural growth and perpetuate the Tourism Fund by generating over night stays in the city’s hotels and lodges. These activities should enrich the cultural life available in the city because they will serve as an attraction to visitors, represent new cultural offerings or can be described as unique, innovative or inventive. The activities should be designed to meet the strategies and criteria as listed below. CIF ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS: 1. The applicant organization must be a non-profit organization, or the governmental equivalent. Written proof of this status must accompany all applications. All organizations that fall under the same IRS non profit tax status will be considered the same unit for funding. 2. The organization has an officially adopted mission statement expressing their primary purpose. 3. The organization has been in existence for a minimum of three years. 4. The organization can provide financial statements for the previous three completed fiscal years from their application date. 5. Activities funded under the CIF shall not be simultaneously funded under Tier 2 of Fort Fund. 6. Funding under the CIF shall be available for a maximum of three years to any one activity and applicants must compete each time for funding. 7. Applicants must submit a completed Tourism Impact form with their application. 8. Activities must be held in Fort Collins or in such other location as will accomplish the CIF strategies. 9. The activities may not commence prior to thirty days following the funding session date (funding session is the fourth Wednesday of April). Packet Pg. 212 Attachment16.1: Fort Fund Guidelines (2123 : Fort Fund June 2014) 10. Activities funded under the CIF must be completed within 18 months of the funding session date (the fourth Wednesday of April). 11. Activities must benefit and be accessible and/or open to the general public. 12. Religious, sectarian or ‘faith-based’ organizations may apply for funding for activities which are secular (non-religious) in nature. Fort Fund monies may not be used to promote religion. 13. Activities must provide a direct public benefit of reasonably general character to a significant number of Fort Collins’ residents and meet the strategies as outlined below. STRATEGIES: Proposals should address specific strategies to increase Fort Collins’ identity as a cultural center and tourism destination, resulting in at least two of the following benefits: 1. Address a need in the cultural activity of Fort Collins 2. Perpetuate the Tourism Fund by generating over night stays in local hotels 3. Develop new arts, cultural, or heritage tourism activities and products that have the potential to impact Fort Collins cultural and economic growth. Fort Fund will not fund capital improvements or projects, or any activity in which the net profit or proceeds from the activity is donated by the sponsor to another organization and/or individual. CIF GRANT REQUEST AMOUNT • Maximum Request Amount: $25,000 (a higher amount may be considered) • Minimum Request Amount: $500 • Funding is subject to the amount available per funding session. The Cultural Resources Board reserves the right to not fund any organization if it does not fully meet the criteria. • Request amount cannot exceed 50% of the total activity expenses. • Request amount requires a dollar-for-dollar cash match. • In-kind contributions may not be used in calculating the organization’s match. • Fort Fund monies, from current or previous funding sessions, may not be used in calculating the organization’s match. • Activities funded under the CIF cannot be simultaneously funded under Tier 2 of Fort fund. • Funding under the CIF shall be available for a maximum of three years to any one activity and applicants must compete each time for funding. CIF APPLICATIONS DUE: First Tuesday of April by 5:00 p.m. To the Lincoln Center Administration Office 417 West Magnolia Street, Fort Collins LATE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED Packet Pg. 213 Attachment16.1: Fort Fund Guidelines (2123 : Fort Fund June 2014) Notification of Award: The Cultural Resources Board will review applications on the fourth Wednesday of April, provide a recommendation for funding to City Council, who will then approve the recommendation at a regularly scheduled Council meeting in May. Applicants will be notified by mail after the Council meeting. GRANT AWARD REQUIREMENTS • Contracts for services with the City of Fort Collins must be signed prior to the issuance of funds. The funds must be spent on the activity within 18 months of the funding session. • All funds must be used for direct costs of the activity within the time frame as required by contract, or returned immediately to the Cultural Development and Programming Account. • If the activity changes significantly, the Cultural Resources Board must be notified in writing. Funding, even if already distributed to the organization, may be re-evaluated at that time. • Organizations that receive funding must recognize the support of the City. All publicity and advertisement of the funded activity must include the Fort Fund logo. Downloadable images are available on the Fort Fund website at www.fcgov.com/fortfund and a Fort Fund banner to exhibit at the activity is available through the Lincoln Center Administration Office. Organizations must also list the funded activity on the Fort Collins Convention and Visitors Bureau website calendar at www.visitftcollins.com/events. • Organizations funded under the CIF must submit a written report within sixty (60) days of the completion of an activity. These reports, which evaluate estimated attendance, promotional materials, in-kind services, actual cash expenses and actual revenues, must be submitted to the Cultural Resources Board through the Lincoln Center Administration Office. All reports must be signed by a representative of the organization that receives funding, verifying their accuracy. Records of the activity need to be available for inspection upon request of the Cultural Resources Board. • A member of the Cultural Resources Board may be assigned to each organization receiving a CIF Grant to act as liaison between funded organizations and the Board. If tickets are required for admission to an activity and are not extended to the liaison as a courtesy, tickets will be then purchased from the Cultural Development and Programming Account. Packet Pg. 214 Attachment16.1: Fort Fund Guidelines (2123 : Fort Fund June 2014) Cultural Resources Board Lincoln Center 417 W. Magnolia St Fort Collins, CO 80521 970.221-6735 970.221-6373 – fax . DRAFT CULTURAL RESOURCES BOARD MINUTES Regular Meeting – Wednesday, June 25, 2014 5:00 p.m. Lincoln Center, 419 W. Magnolia Street, Fort Collins, CO 80521 Council Liaison: Wade Troxell Staff Liaison: Jill Stilwell Chairperson: Maggie Dennis Phone: 590-3790 (cell) Vice-Chair: Chris Clemmer A regular meeting of the Cultural Resources Board was held on Tuesday, June 25, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. The following members were present: Board Members present: Janet Gilligan, Maggie Dennis, Jesse Solomon Francisco Gutierrez, Tedi Cox, Chris Clemmer Board Members absent: none Staff Members present: Jill Stilwell, Gail Budner Guests Present: Katy Schneider, Visit Fort Collins I. Call to Order: p.m. – 5:11 Ms. Dennis II. Consideration of agenda/Hot Topics: none III. Consideration and approval of the minutes from May 29, 2014. Ms. Gilligan made a motion to accept the minutes as amended. Mr. Solomon seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. IV. Public input: None V. Fort Fund - Discussion and funding recommendations: Prior to reviewing and awarding grant monies to the Fort Fund Tier 2 applicants, the Board discussed the eligibility and the quality of the applications and the available budget for this session. The Board then reviewed 24 applications and developed their recommendations for funding as outlined below and on the attached spreadsheet. Ms. Dennis disclosed her conflict of interest and abstained from scoring and deliberating on the Poudre Landmarks Foundation, Inc. and the Poudre River Public Library application. Mr. Solomon disclosed his conflict of interest and abstained from scoring and deliberating on the HalfMoon Arts application. ARCINDA: JAVA & Indonesian Gamelan Music, Songs and Dance Location and Date: CSU International House; September 12, 2014 Amount Requested: $1,000 Amount Recommended: $500 BAS BLEU THEATRE COMPANY: 2014-2015 Readers’ Theatre Series Location and Date: Bas Bleu Theatre Company; September 2014 – June 2015 ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 215 Attachment16.2: Cultural Resources Board Draft Minutes, June 25, 2014 (2123 : Fort Fund June 2014) Amount Requested: $5,000 Amount Recommended: $4,000 CANYON CONCERT BALLET: Dancing with the Stars of Fort Collins 2015 Location and Date: The Agave Room; February 21, 2015 Amount Requested: $750 Amount Recommended: $750 CENTER FOR FINE ART PHOTOGRAPHY: Shootapalooza Location and Date: The Center of Fine Art Photography; October 3-10, 2014 Amount Requested: $3,000 Amount Recommended: $2,000 DISABLED RESOURCE SERVICES: Colorado Person-First Festival Location and Date: Civic Center Park, September 13, 2014 Amount Requested: $1,000 Amount Recommended: $1,000 ETHOS WEST CHAMBER MUSIC: The Colorado of Jazz – Gardens Concert Location and Date: The Gardens on Spring Creek; August 24, 2014 Amount Requested: $900 Amount Recommended: $900 FORT COLLINS CHILDREN’S THEATRE: Fall Production Location and Date: Lincoln Center Performance Hall; November 21-23, 2014 Amount Requested: $5,000 Amount Recommended: $5,000 FORT COLLINS FIGURE SKATING CLUB: 2015 Southwestern Regional Figure Skating Championships and 2014 Southwestern Nine States Championships Location and Date: Edora Pool & Ice Center; October 16-21, 2014 Amount Requested: $5,000 Amount Recommended: $5,000 FORT COLLINS MUSEUM OF ART: Marilyn: Celebrating an American Icon Exhibition Location and Date: Fort Collins Museum of Art; November 1 – December 27, 2014 Amount Requested: $5,000 Amount Recommended: $5,000 FORT COLLINS MUSEUM OF DISCOVERY: FCMoD’s Discovery DASH! Location and Date: Fort Collins Museum of Discovery; September 13, 2014 Amount Requested: $5,000 Amount Recommended: $3,000 FORT COLLINS PUBLIC ACCESS NETWORK: Downtown FC Historical Video Project Location and Date: Downtown Fort Collins; Week-ends in July, August or September, 2014 Amount Requested: $2,000 Amount Recommended: $500 FORT COLLINS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: Outside the Box 2014-2015 Series Location and Date: 4 local venues; October 5, 2014 – March 26, 2015 Amount Requested: $5,000 Amount Recommended: $5,000 FORT COLLINS SYMPHONY GUILD: 2015 Musical Zoo Location and Date: Timberline Church; February 15, 2015 Amount Requested: $5,000 Amount Recommended: $5,000 FRIENDS OF LARIMER COUNTY OPEN LANDS: NoCo Nature Festival Location and Date: Nix Farm Natural Areas Department Headquarters; September 27, 2014 March 29 and May 24, 2014 Amount Requested: $3,000 Amount Recommended: $2,000 Packet Pg. 216 Attachment16.2: Cultural Resources Board Draft Minutes, June 25, 2014 (2123 : Fort Fund June 2014) GLBT COMMUNITY CENTER OF COLORADO: Fort Collins Pride-Fest 2014 Location: Avogadro’s Number, September 27-28, 2014 Amount Requested: $1,500 Amount Recommended: $750 GELLER CENTER: Xaniscape Location and Date: Geller Center Lawn; September 13, 2014 Amount Requested: $3,500 Amount Recommended: $2,000 HALFMOON ARTS: Music in the Gallery Location and Date: Community Creative Center, Carnegie Building; August 23, 2014 Amount Requested: $3,000 Amount Recommended: $1,500 HIGH PERFORMANCE DANCE THEATRE: Shimmy & Shakes / New Visions Dance Competition 2015 Location and Date: Lincoln Center Magnolia Theatre; October 10-11, 2014 / February 6-7, 2015 Amount Requested: $4,000 Amount Recommended: $2,500 HORSETOOTH PRODUCTIONS: Fort Collins Fringe Festival Location and Date: Community Creative Center, Carnegie Building; September 5-6, 2014 Amount Requested: $1,000 Amount Recommended: $700 NOCO CHAPTER OF THE COLORADO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY: Lindenmeier Symposium Location and Date; Northside Aztlan Center; Fort Collins Museum of Discovery; Soapstone Prairie Natural Areas; October 19-22, 2014 Amount Requested: $5,000 Amount Recommended: $4,000 OPERA FORT COLLINS GUILD: Songs in Summer Location and Date: The Hixon Residence; August 7, 2014 Amount Requested: $1,500 Amount Recommended: $1,500 POUDRE LANDMARKS FOUNDATION, INC: Time Travelers Ball: Celebrating the 150th Anniversary of Fort Collins Location and Date: Fort Collins Masonic Temple; October 18, 2014 July 25 - November 21, 2014 Amount Requested: $5,000 Amount Recommended: $3,500 POUDRE RIVER PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT: Authors Alive! Location and Date: Local Libraries and the Hilton Fort Collins; September 2014 – April 2015 Amount Requested: $5,000 Amount Recommended: $5,000 SPOKESBUZZ FORT COLLINS: SpokesBUZZ 5th Annual CD Release Location and Date: Hodi’s Half Note; December 2014 Amount Requested: $5,000 Amount Recommended: $500 Packet Pg. 217 Attachment16.2: Cultural Resources Board Draft Minutes, June 25, 2014 (2123 : Fort Fund June 2014) Total Funding Requested by Applicants: $81,150 Total Funding Recommended for disbursement by CRB: $61,600 Total Unfunded Balance: $19,550 % of Requests Funded: 76% Ms. Gilligan made a motion to submit these recommendations for Fort Fund disbursements to City Council for their approval. Mr. Solomon seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Liaisons will be assigned by the Board for recently funded events at the scheduled meeting in July. VI. Other Business: The Board requested that the meeting next month be moved up a week from July 31st to July 24th. The time and room will remain the same. Ms. Budner will amend the date on the City’s Boards and Commissions website. VII. Adjournment: 6:47 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Gail Budner Administrative Clerk II Packet Pg. 218 Attachment16.2: Cultural Resources Board Draft Minutes, June 25, 2014 (2123 : Fort Fund June 2014) - 1 - RESOLUTION 2014-061 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CULTURAL RESOURCES BOARD REGARDING FORT FUND GRANT DISBURSEMENTS WHEREAS, the City disburses funds from the City’s Cultural Development and Programming Account and Tourism Programming Account in accordance with Section 25-244 of the City Code through its Fort Fund Program; and WHEREAS, the City’s Cultural Resources Board reviews applications from the community for Fort Fund monies and makes recommendations to the City Council in accordance with Section 2-203(3) of the City Code, and in accordance with the administrative guidelines for the Fort Fund program (the “Fort Fund Guidelines”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 25-244 of the City Code, the Community Cultural Development and Programming Account was established for the purpose of funding cultural development and programming activities, and the Tourism Programming Account was established for the purpose of funding tourist-related special events; and WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on June 25, 2014, the Cultural Resources Board recommended funding for various proposals as set forth on Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the criteria and considerations set forth in Section 2-203 of the City Code and the Fort Fund Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the proposals recommended by the Cultural Resources Board provide a public benefit to the Fort Collins community by supporting cultural development and programming activities within the City and promoting the use of public accommodations within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to adopt the recommendations of the Cultural Resources Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That the City Council hereby finds that the distribution of funds through the Fort Fund program, as recommended by the Cultural Resources Board on June 25, 2014, serves a public purpose that benefits the community. Section 2. That funds in the total amount of FIFTY SIX THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($56,500) in the City’s Cultural Development and Programming Account and FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,000) in the Tourism Programming Account, are hereby approved for distribution in accordance with the recommendations of the Cultural Resources Board as set forth on Exhibit “A”. Packet Pg. 219 - 2 - Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins this 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. _________________________________ Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 220 EXHIBIT A FORT FUND GRANT PROGRAM June 2014 APPLICANT PROPOSED EVENT/DATE FUNDING REQUESTS CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT & PROGRAMMING TOURISM PROGRAMMING UNFUNDED BALANCE PERCENT OF REQUEST FUNDED ARCINDA JAVA & Indonesian Gamelan Music Location: CSU International House September 12, 2014 This event showcases a highlight of Indonesia as a part of Asian culture and presents a collaboration $1,000 $500 $0 $500 50% between their tratitional and modern music. Bas Bleu Theatre Company 2014-2015 Readers' Theatre Series Location: Bas Bleu Theatre Company September 2014 - June 2015 The Reader's Theatre series is unique to the area, allowing the audience to re-discover the imaginative $5,000 $4,000 $0 $1,000 80% thrill of 'seeing' a play by hearing it skillfully read. Canyon Concert Ballet Dancing with the Stars Fort Collins 2015 Location: The Agave Room February 21, 2015 This event will feature performances by local 'celebrities' and their professional dance partners. $750 $750 $0 $0 100% Center for Fine Art Photography Shootapalooza Location: The Center of Fine Art Photography October 3-10, 2014 Shootapalooza is a week long photography festival that highlights the work of alternative / historic process $3,000 $2,000 $0 $1,000 67% artists. Disabled Resource Services Colorado Person-First Festival Location: Civic Center Park September 13, 2014 This event consists of a parade followed by an outdoor music festival affirming the value of people with $1,000 $1,000 $0 $0 100% disabilities. Ethos West Chamber Orchestra The Colors of Jazz - Gardens Concert Location: The Gardens on Spring Creek August 24, 2014 Ethos West is joining with the Gardens on Spring Creek to present an evening outdoor concert, featuring $900 $900 $0 $0 100% jazz musicians. Fort Collins Childre's Theatre Fall Production Location: Lincoln Center Performance Hall November 21-23, 2014 This production features a fully staged musical, a professional staff, talented young and experienced adult $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 100% actors, and a live orchestra appealing to families with children of all ages Fort Collins Figure Skating Club 2015 SW Regional Skating Championships Location: Edora Pool & Ice Center 2014 SW Nine States Championships October 16-21, 2014 The first 'qualifying' event will provide an opportunity to watch a high level of figure skating. The 'non-qualifying' $5,000 $0 $5,000 $0 100% competition will also bring quality skaters to the area, giving them the opportunity to compete on a regional level. Fort Collins Museum of Art Marilyn: Celebrating an American Icon Exhibit CULTURAL RESOURCES BOARD RECOMMENDATION Fort Fund Tier 2: Special Events Fund Packet Pg. 221 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2151 : Fort Fund June 2014-RESOLUTION) APPLICANT PROPOSED EVENT/DATE FUNDING REQUESTS CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT & PROGRAMMING TOURISM PROGRAMMING UNFUNDED BALANCE PERCENT OF REQUEST FUNDED CULTURAL RESOURCES BOARD RECOMMENDATION Location: Fort Collins Museum of Art November 1 - December 27, 2014 Featuring more than 100 paintings, photographs and videos of the starlet by more than 50 artists, the exhibition $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 100% examines the imageof Marilyn Monroe that still electrifies the world half a century after her death. Fort Collins Museum of Discovery FCMoD's Discovery DASH! Location: Fort Collins Museum of Discovery September 13, 2014 Discovery DASH! is a costumed, team-based scavenger hunt and triva contest held at the Museum & throughout $5,000 $3,000 $0 $2,000 60% Old Town with elements of the Amazing Race, trivia questions and a barbeque in the Musuem's back yard. Fort Collins Public Access Network Downtown FC Historical Video Project Location: Downtown Fort Collins Week-ends in July, August or September This project would chronicle the history of downtown Fort Collins during the 1800's and focus on the historical $2,000 $500 $0 $1,500 25% buildings, the railroad, and some interesting 'founding fathers.' Fort Collins Symphony Association Outside the Box 2014-2015 Series Location: 4 Local Venues October 5, 2014 - March 26, 2015 Outside the Box is now an established series of events sponsored by the Symphony that are specifically $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 100% designed to introduce classical music to diverse audiences in our community. Fort Collins Symphony Guild 2015 Musical Zoo Location: Timberline Church February 15, 2015 Guests will experience a program with a carnival-like atmosphere brimming with a large variety of musical artists. $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 100% Patrons, ranging from the community's very youngest to it's very oldest, can try out the instruments of their choice. Friends of Larimer County Open Lands NoCo Nature Festival Location: Nix Farm Natural Areas Dept. Headquarters September 27, 2014 The festival is a free day of fun and learning opportunities celebrating the local environment and wildlife. $3,000 $2,000 $0 $1,000 67% GLBT Community Center of Colorado Fort Collins PrideFest 2014 Location: Avogadro's Number September 27-28, 2014 This event will feature live entertainment, including musical, comedy and drag performances and family-friendly $1,500 $750 $0 $750 50% activities to celebrate and promote the heritage and culture of the GLBT community in Northern Colorado. Geller Center Xaniscape Location: Geller Center Lawn September 13, 2014 Local bands and musicians of diverse genres - representing the whole of the Fort Collins community - perform $3,500 $2,000 $0 $1,500 57% throughout the day at an outdoor concert. Pariticipation is encouraged. Halfmoon Arts Music in the Gallery Location: Community Creative Center August 23, 2014 This musical performance event will feature local Colorado junior high and high school youth performing blue $3,000 $1,500 $0 $1,500 50% grass, folk, classical and pop music while spotlighting and encouraging youth participation in the arts. High Performance Dance Theatre Shimmy & Shakes / New Visions Competition 2015 Location: Lincoln Center Magnolia Theatre October 10-11, 2014 & February 6-7, 2015 Shimmy & Shakes is inspired by great musical artists and dances from the 50's through today. The Dance $4,000 $2,500 $0 $1,500 63% Competition will showcase dancers from age 6-18 years old, giving them a chance to perform in front of judges. Horsetooth Productions Fort Collins Fringe Festival Packet Pg. 222 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2151 : Fort Fund June 2014-RESOLUTION) APPLICANT PROPOSED EVENT/DATE FUNDING REQUESTS CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT & PROGRAMMING TOURISM PROGRAMMING UNFUNDED BALANCE PERCENT OF REQUEST FUNDED CULTURAL RESOURCES BOARD RECOMMENDATION Location: Community Creative Center/Carnegie Bldg. September 5-6, 2014 Fringe' is theatre that is off the beaten path and gives a fresh, new opportunity to performing artists, writers, $1,000 $700 $0 $300 70% directors, audiences, local businesses and organizations to collaborate, explore and present new work. NOCO Chapter of the Colorado Lindenmeier Symposium Archaeological Society October 19-22, 2014 Location: Northside Aztlan Center; FC Museum of Discovery; Soapstone Prairie Natural Areas This four day symposium is honoring the 8th anniversary of the first Smithsonian archaeologist's visit to $5,000 $4,000 $0 $1,000 80% Lindenmeir, one of the most significant Ice Age American Indian sites in North America. Opera Fort Collins Guild Songs in Summer Location: The Hixon Residence August 7, 2014 Featured artists will take the stage in a garden setting along with a trio of younger singers during a time of year $1,500 $1,500 $0 $0 100% when the community offers many musical opportunities but none of the semi-classical variety. Poudre Landmarks Foundation, Inc. Time Travelers Ball: Celebrating the Location: Fort Collins Masonic Temple 150th Anniversary of Fort Collins October 18, 2014 This event will focus community attention on the 150th anniversary of Fort Collins. Local history will be $5,000 $3,500 $0 $1,500 70% celebrated throughout this fundraising event. Poudre River Public Library District Authors Alive! Location: Local libraries and the Hilton Fort Collins September 2014 - April 2015 Authors Alive! will bring under one umbrella the many author and literary programs sponsored or co-sponsored $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 100% by the Library District. Presentations include discussions of an author's latest work and their writing process. SpokesBUZZ Fort Collins SpokesBUZZ 5th Annual CD Release Location: Hodi's Half Note December 2014 The event is a showcase of all of the talent from the class of 2015 bands. Twelve bands will perform 3-song sets $5,000 $500 $0 $4,500 10% selected to give the patrons a connetion to their style. Total Funding Requested by Applicants $81,150 Total Funding Recommended for disbursement by CRB $56,600 $5,000 Total Unfunded Balance $19,550 % of Requested Amounts Funded 76% Scores are based on application materials and Fort Fund's "Criteria for Funding." Packet Pg. 223 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2151 : Fort Fund June 2014-RESOLUTION) Agenda Item 17 Item # 17 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Wanda Nelson, City Clerk SUBJECT Resolution 2014-062 Making Appointments to Various Boards and Commissions of the City of Fort Collins. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to make appointments to various boards and commissions created through resignations or unfulfilled during the annual recruitment process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION This Resolution makes nine appointments to seven boards and commissions to fill current vacancies which currently exist with terms to begin immediately. Names of those individuals recommended to fill current vacancies have been inserted in the Resolution with the expiration date following the names. Packet Pg. 224 - 1 - RESOLUTION 2014-062 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO VARIOUS BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS WHEREAS, vacancies currently exist on various boards, commissions, and authorities of the City due to resignations by board members or positions unfulfilled at the time of term expirations. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to make appointments to fill the vacancies which exist on the various boards, commissions, and authorities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: That the following named persons are hereby appointed to fill current vacancies on the boards and commissions hereinafter indicated, with terms to begin immediately and to expire as set forth after each name: Air Quality Advisory Board Expiration of Term Gregory Miller December 31, 2017 Art in Public Places Board Renee Sherman December 31, 2015 Carol Ann Hixon December 31, 2017 Citizen Review Board Dennis Hanno December 31, 2016 Senior Advisory Board Patricia Housley December 31, 2016 Suzanne King December 31, 2017 Transportation Board Expiration of Term Gary Thomas December 31, 2015 Water Board Alex Maas December 31, 2016 Packet Pg. 225 - 2 - Women’s Commission Heather Zoccali December 31, 2015 Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins this 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. _________________________________ Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 226 Agenda Item 18 Item # 18 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Clark Mapes, City Planner SUBJECT Second Reading of Ordinance No. 095, 2014, Amending the Zoning Map of the City by Changing the Zoning Classification for that Certain Property Known as the Harmony/I-25 Rezoning. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Ordinance, adopted on First Reading on July 1, 2014 by a vote of 6-0 (Campana recused), rezones 264 acres located at the southwest corner of Harmony Road and Interstate 25 from Transition (T) to Harmony Corridor (H-C) and Rural Lands (R-U-L), in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan (City Plan). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on Second Reading. ATTACHMENTS 1. First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (PDF) 2. Ordinance No. 095, 2014 (PDF) Packet Pg. 227 Agenda Item 13 Item # 13 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 1, 2014 City Council STAFF Clark Mapes, City Planner SUBJECT First Reading of Ordinance No. 095, 2014, Amending the Zoning Map of the City by Changing the Zoning Classification for that Certain Property Known as the Harmony/I-25 Rezoning. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to rezone 264 acres located at the southwest corner of Harmony Road and Interstate 25 from Transition (T) to Harmony Corridor (H-C) and Rural Lands (R-U-L), in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan (City Plan). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Ordinance on First Reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The property was annexed and zoned on October 6, 2009 as the Riverwalk Annexation. The property was held in the T, Transition zone district at the time of annexation, as the former owner was continuing to explore possible alternative land use and zoning concepts. The T zone is a holding zone for properties where there are no specific or imminent plans for development. No additional development is permitted in the zone. It is typically used to allow property owners and the City to consider zoning alternatives while the property is held in the T zone. Any rezone request for property in the T zone is treated differently than other rezone requests, because the T zone specifies requirements for the City to process the request quickly. Section 4.12(B)(2) of the Land Use Code states: “The owner of any property in the T District may at any time petition the City to remove the property from this zone district and place it in another zone district. Unless the following time limitations are waived by the petitioner, any such petition shall be referred to the Planning and Zoning Board to be considered at the next regular meeting of such board which is scheduled at least thirty (30) days from the date the petition is filed with the City Clerk. Within sixty (60) days from the date the matter is considered by the Board, the City Council shall change the zoning for the property in question to another zone district authorized under this Article.” The current request was received April 4, 2014; the Planning and Zoning Board considered the item at its May 8 Hearing. The Board forwarded a recommendation of approval to City Council, on the Board’s consent agenda. Typically, requests to rezone property out of the T zone into zone districts that are in accordance with the City Structure Plan, are routine procedural matters. ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 228 Attachment18.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2139 : SR 095 Harmony/I-25 Rezoning) Agenda Item 13 Item # 13 Page 2 Subject Area The subject area extends one mile southward from Harmony Road to Kechter Road, and ½ mile westward from Interstate 25 to Strauss Cabin Road. This area is divided into a north half and a south half for zoning purposes. The adopted Harmony Corridor Plan provides policy guidance for land use in the north half of the subject area. It shows a land use designation of “Basic Industrial Non-Retail Employment Activity Center”, which is a specific designation that is implemented by H-C, Harmony Corridor zoning; thus, the requested zoning is consistent with the plan. The Harmony Corridor Plan further describes this area as a community gateway with special opportunities to emphasize the Poudre River valley landscape setting in any future land use and development. This policy guidance from the Harmony Corridor Plan is reflected in City Plan, with its map of future land uses called the City Structure Plan. The specific terminology on the City Structure Plan map is slightly different from the Harmony Corridor Plan, but the meaning of the designations is consistent. City Plan provides the policy guidance for land use in the south half of the subject area. The City Structure Plan shows a designation of Rural Lands, to which the requested zoning corresponds. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS Staff finds no direct financial or economic impacts resulting from the requested rezoning. The rezoning would implement the Harmony Corridor Plan and City Plan, which both reflect community consideration of economic issues as part of balanced comprehensive planning. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The physical environment will not be directly impacted by the requested rezoning. Rezoning will enable ensuing submittal of development applications, and development plans are required to comply with Land Use Code standards for development, including Environmental and Natural Area Protection standards to address potential environmental impacts. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION On May 8, 2014, the Planning and Zoning Board voted unanimously to support a recommendation to City Council to approve the proposed rezoning. The recommendation was part of the Planning and Zoning Board Consent Calendar and was not discussed. PUBLIC OUTREACH No neighborhood meeting was required for this rezoning. No known controversy or neighborhood impacts are involved with the rezoning. Any subsequent development applications are required to comply with Land Use Code standards for public involvement in development review. ATTACHMENTS 1. Vicinity Map (PDF) 2. Harmony Corridor Plan Map (PDF) 3. Structure Plan Map (PDF) 4. Proposed Zoning Map (PDF) 5. Existing T Zoning Map (PDF) Packet Pg. 229 Attachment18.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2139 : SR 095 Harmony/I-25 Rezoning) - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 095, 2014 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE HARMONY/I-25 REZONING WHEREAS, Division 1.3 of the Land Use Code of the City establishes the Zoning Map and Zone Districts of the City; and WHEREAS, Division 2.9 of the Land Use Code of the City establishes procedures and criteria for reviewing the rezoning of land; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the foregoing, the City Council has considered the rezoning of the property that is the subject of this Ordinance, and has determined that said property should be rezoned as hereafter provided; and WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and/or is warranted by changed conditions within the neighborhood surrounding and including the subject property; and WHEREAS, to the extent applicable, the City Council has also analyzed the proposed rezoning against the consideration as established in Section 2.9.4(H)(3) of the Land Use Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That the Zoning Map adopted by Division 1.3 of the Land Use Code of the City be, and the same hereby is, amended by changing the zoning classification from Transition (“T”) Zone District to Harmony Corridor (“H-C”) and Rural Lands (“R-U-L”) zone districts for the following described properties in the City known as the Harmony/I-25 Rezoning: Property to be Rezoned to the Harmony Corridor Zone District: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN NORTHWEST QUARTER SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 6 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; IN THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, AND LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO; BEING A PORTION OF THE RIVERWALK ANNEXATION, AS RECORDED AT THE LARIMER COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE. SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3, FROM WHENCE THE NORTH QUARTER (1/4) CORNER OF SECTION 3 BEARS N 89°29'55” E A DISTANCE OF 2640.37 FEET ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 3; AND CONSIDERING ALL OTHER BEARINGS RELATIVE THERETO; Packet Pg. 230 Attachment18.2: Ordinance No. 095, 2014 (2139 : SR 095 Harmony/I-25 Rezoning) - 2 - THENCE ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 3 S0144'18”E A DISTANCE OF 2649.34 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER (1/4) CORNER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 6 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST, IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OF STRAUSS CABIN ROAD, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 87°52'12" E A DISTANCE OF 2388.22 FEET; THENCE N 2°02'35" W A DISTANCE OF 61.06 FEET; THENCE N 2°02'35" W A DISTANCE OF 1172.05 FEET; THENCE N 2°02'35" W A DISTANCE OF 613.34 FEET; THENCE N 24°15'59" W A DISTANCE OF 793.35 FEET; THENCE N 56°56'01" W A DISTANCE OF 82.86 FEET; THENCE N 89°36'28" W A DISTANCE OF 265.38 FEET; THENCE S 0°30'05" W A DISTANCE OF 80.15 FEET; THENCE S 0°30'05" W A DISTANCE OF 93.75 FEET; THENCE N 89°29'55" W A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; THENCE N 0°30'05" E A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE N 89°29'55" W A DISTANCE OF 25.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 227.62 FEET; THENCE N 83°44'43" W A DISTANCE OF 156.80 FEET; THENCE N 83°57'55" W A DISTANCE OF 29.18 FEET; THENCE S 72°49'06" W A DISTANCE OF 56.60 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 32.81 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24°18'57", AN ARC LENGTH OF 13.92 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS S 60°39'40" W A DISTANCE OF 13.82 FEET; THENCE S 48°30'14" W A DISTANCE OF 98.38 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 92.87 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 51°11'22", AN ARC LENGTH OF 82.97 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS S 74°05'55" W A DISTANCE OF 80.24 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 92.87 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 77°31'59", AN ARC LENGTH OF 125.67 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS N 41°32'24" W A DISTANCE OF 116.30 FEET; THENCE N 84°57'34" W A DISTANCE OF 86.41 FEET; THENCE N 89°18'55" W A DISTANCE OF 245.96 FEET; THENCE N 89°47'25" W A DISTANCE OF 670.81 FEET; THENCE N 1°44'18" W A DISTANCE OF 20.01 FEET; THENCE N 89°47'25" W A DISTANCE OF 30.01 FEET; THENCE S 1°44'18" E A DISTANCE OF 2618.34 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 138.55 ACRES (6,035,140 SQUARE FEET) MORE OR LESS. Property to be Rezoned to the Rural Lands Zone District: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SOUTHWEST QUARTER SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 6 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; IN THE CITY OF Packet Pg. 231 Attachment18.2: Ordinance No. 095, 2014 (2139 : SR 095 Harmony/I-25 Rezoning) - 3 - FORT COLLINS, AND LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO; BEING A PORTION OF THE RIVERWALK ANNEXATION, AS RECORDED AT THE LARIMER COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE. SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3, FROM WHENCE THE NORTH QUARTER (1/4) CORNER OF SECTION 3 BEARS N 89°29'55” E A DISTANCE OF 2640.37 FEET ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 3; AND CONSIDERING ALL OTHER BEARINGS RELATIVE THERETO; THENCE ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 3 S0144'18”E A DISTANCE OF 2649.34 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER (1/4) CORNER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 6 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST, IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OF STRAUSS CABIN ROAD, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 87°52'12" E A DISTANCE OF 2388.22 FEET; THENCE S 2°02'35" E A DISTANCE OF 2339.03 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE, CONVEX TO THE RIGHT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 11295.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°41'19", AN ARC LENGTH OF 135.77 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS S 01°43'13" E A DISTANCE OF 135.77 FEET; THENCE S 84°55'54" W A DISTANCE OF 574.58 FEET; THENCE S 0°55'24" W A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET; THENCE N 89°04'36" W A DISTANCE OF 1274.18 FEET; THENCE N 9°16'32" W A DISTANCE OF 324.41 FEET; THENCE N 1°46'32" W A DISTANCE OF 289.41 FEET; THENCE N 32°46'32" W A DISTANCE OF 144.50 FEET; THENCE N 23°39'02" W A DISTANCE OF 631.96 FEET; THENCE N 1°50'02" E A DISTANCE OF 208.47 FEET; THENCE N 17°13'48" W A DISTANCE OF 746.06 FEET; THENCE N 46°09'32" W A DISTANCE OF 10.66 FEET; THENCE N 1°49'14" W A DISTANCE OF 384.29 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 125.91 ACRES (5,484,422 SQUARE FEET) MORE OR LESS. Section 2. That the Sign District Map adopted pursuant to Section 3.8.7(E) of the Land Use Code of the City is hereby changed and amended by showing that the above-described property to be rezoned into the Harmony Corridor zone district is not included in the Residential Neighborhood Sign District, and that the property to be rezoned into the Rural Lands zone district is included in the Residential Neighborhood Sign District. Section 3. That the City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to amend said Zoning Map in accordance with this Ordinance. Packet Pg. 232 Attachment18.2: Ordinance No. 095, 2014 (2139 : SR 095 Harmony/I-25 Rezoning) - 4 - Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 1st day of July, A.D. 2014, and to be presented for final passage on the 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading on the 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 233 Attachment18.2: Ordinance No. 095, 2014 (2139 : SR 095 Harmony/I-25 Rezoning) Agenda Item 19 Item # 19 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Beth Sowder, Neighborhood Services Manager SUBJECT Second Reading of Ordinance No. 098, 2014, Amending Article III of Chapter 12 of the City Code Pertaining to Smoking in Public Areas. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Ordinance, adopted on First Reading by a vote of 6-1 (Nays: Weitkunat) expands the City’s Smoking Ordinance to include electronic smoking devices and 100% smoke-free hotel/motel rooms. This item proposes two City Code amendments to expand the City’s Smoking Ordinance: 1. Prohibit the use of electronic smoking devices in all places where conventional smoking is prohibited. 2. Require 100% of hotel/motel rooms to be smoke-free. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on Second Reading. ATTACHMENTS 1. First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (PDF) 2. Ordinance No. 098, 2014 (PDF) Packet Pg. 234 Agenda Item 21 Item # 21 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 1, 2014 City Council STAFF Beth Sowder, Neighborhood Services Manager SUBJECT First Reading of Ordinance No. 098, 2014, Amending Article III of Chapter 12 of the City Code Pertaining to Smoking in Public Areas. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to propose expansions to the City’s Smoking Ordinance to include electronic smoking devices and 100% smoke-free hotel/motel rooms. This item proposes two City Code amendments to expand the City’s Smoking Ordinance: 1. Prohibit the use of electronic smoking devices in all places where conventional smoking is prohibited. 2. Require 100% of hotel/motel rooms to be smoke-free. This item provides background information, community feedback, and information about actions taken in other communities. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION History In 1984, Fort Collins was the first city in Colorado to pass a comprehensive smoking ordinance. The ordinance limited smoking in public buildings and required restaurants to have no-smoking sections. In 2003, Fort Collins was one of the first communities in Colorado to designate bars, restaurants, and workplaces as smoke-free. The Fort Collins’ Smoking Ordinance was amended in 2006 to conform to the Colorado Indoor Clean Air Act which helped the community regulate smoking in all indoor public places. Fort Collins expanded the smoking ordinance in 2013 to prohibit smoking in outdoor dining areas, bar patios, and Transfort’s public transit facilities. During the April 8, 2014 City Council Work Session regarding additional smoking ordinance expansion options, Council directed staff to move forward with the following: 1. Prohibit the use of electronic cigarettes and vaporizing devices in all places where conventional smoking is prohibited 2. Require 100% hotel/motel rooms to be smoke-free. 3. Ban smoking in all parks, trails, and natural areas. 4. Prohibit smoking at public events and festivals. 5. Make Old Town/Downtown area smoke-free. ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 235 Attachment19.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2145 : SR 098 Smoking) Agenda Item 21 Item # 21 Page 2 This item focuses on the first two items - electronic cigarettes and vaporizing devices and 100% hotel/motel rooms. The other items are scheduled for City Council consideration on October 7, 2014. 1. Electronic Smoking Devices Electronic smoking devices are not currently regulated within the city. This proposal adds electronic smoking devices to the smoking ordinance banning their use from all areas where conventional smoking is prohibited. This includes bars, restaurants, workplaces, outdoor dining areas, bar patios, and transit facilities. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is beginning to consider regulation of electronic smoking devices. They have recently proposed regulations that would require registration with the FDA, not allowing free samples, minimum age requirements, and ingredient disclosure. They are currently in a 75 day public comment period. Electronic cigarettes or vaporizers are devices that vaporize and deliver to the lungs of the user a chemical mixture composed of nicotine, propylene glycol and other chemicals. (See Attachment 1) Some e-devices are offered without nicotine, and some are offered in candy or fruit flavors that can be attractive to youth. When users inhale, a battery operated vaporizer heats a liquid solution into a vapor. E-devices are also being used with highly concentrated marijuana oil or wax, and may provide a discreet way of using marijuana in public settings. While vapor from electronic devices likely contain fewer toxins and carcinogens than those found in traditional tobacco smoke, this alone does not mean that breathing e-cigarette vapor is “safe.” One recent study examined secondhand emissions from several e-cigarette brands and found that e-cigarette users not only ingest but also emit toxins and harmful ultrafine and fine particles, posting potential health risks to those nearby. Although the long-term effects of electronic smoking devices require further study, the FDA has found that some devices contain toxins and carcinogens and has expressed concerns about their safety. Use of electronic devices and vaporizers, particularly in places where conventional smoking is prohibited, may interfere with smokers’ attempts to quit by making it easier for them to maintain their nicotine addiction. Children and youth who experiment with electronic devices may become addicted to nicotine and ultimately switch to smoking cigarettes. Even small amounts of liquid nicotine used in refillable devices can be poisonous to children. The use of electronic smoking devices may be visually similar to the smoking of cigarettes, and has already been observed in locations where smoking is prohibited, creating concern and confusion. The use of electronic smoking devices where smoking is prohibited may increase the social acceptability and appeal of smoking, particularly for youth. Staff has spoken with several bar and restaurant managers who have confirmed electronic smoking devices being used in their establishments. Some have decided not to allow their use in their establishment, while others are waiting for direction from the City. Several state and local governments have decided to regulate the use of electronic smoking devices (Attachment 2): • Utah, New Jersey, and North Dakota - passed legislation prohibiting e-cigarettes wherever regular smoking is banned • 10 States (including Colorado) - passed legislation regulating e-cigarette use in certain places such as school property and State workplaces • Nationally, 172 municipalities (including large metropolitan cities like New York and Chicago) include e- cigarettes in their local smoking ordinances. The Fort Collins smoking survey conducted in March 2014 (See Attachment 3) had more than 2,100 respondents and asked: Do you think electronic smoking devices should be regulated in the same manner as regular smoking products? The results show: Packet Pg. 236 Attachment19.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2145 : SR 098 Smoking) Agenda Item 21 Item # 21 Page 3 • Yes 48% • No 30% • No Opinion 22% Additionally, the City hosted a public open house to gather more input. Approximately, 35 people provided input either in person or in writing. (See Attachment 4) The input regarding electronic smoking devices were mixed with some people in favor of regulating them while others opposed regulation because of the lack of evidence showing negative health impacts to bystanders. The TobacNO Youth Coalition provided a statement of support to limit public use of e-cigarettes (Attachment 5). Additionally, the Larimer County Board of Health voted to support adding electronic smoking devices to the city’s smoking ordinance (Attachment 6). 2. 100% Hotel/Motel Rooms The current Fort Collins Smoking Ordinance aligns with the Colorado Clean Indoor Air Act, requiring at least 75% of hotel or motel rooms to be non-smoking. Additionally, the City’s smoking ordinance prohibits smoking within 20 feet of any entryway; all other outdoor areas are not required to be smoke-free. If Council chooses to adopt it, this proposal would require 100% of hotel/motel rooms be smoke-free. The primary benefit of this requirement would be to protect hospitality industry workers who may have considerable exposure as well as other patrons. In 2006, the U.S. Surgeon General’s report determined there was no risk-free level of secondhand smoke. The 2014 Surgeon General’s report expanded the list of diseases and adverse health effects caused by secondhand smoke and, for the first time, linked secondhand smoke exposure to strokes in adults. Tobacco smoke exposure is especially dangerous for the health of children, pregnant women, and persons with chronic diseases who might visit local hotels/motels as well as hospitality workers who may have considerable exposure during work. Of recent concern is third-hand smoke, the tobacco residue from cigarettes, cigars, and other combustible tobacco products that is left behind after smoking and built up on surfaces and furnishings. These sticky, highly toxic particulates, like nicotine, can cling to walls and ceilings and be absorbed into carpets, draperies, and other upholsteries. Nicotine remains on surfaces for days and weeks, so carcinogens continue to be created over time, which are then inhaled, absorbed, or ingested. Though the effects of third-hand smoke are not yet clear, a 2013 study in hotels found that when a hotel allows smoking in any of its rooms, the smoke gets into all of its rooms. Nationally, the following have 100% smoke-free hotel/motel room requirements (Attachment 7): • 98 municipalities (none in Colorado) • 5 states (Indiana, Michigan, Nebraska, North Dakota, and Wisconsin) • Many large hotel chains (including Marriott, Westin, and Comfort Inn). The Fort Collins smoking survey (Attachment 3) asked: Do you think 100% of hotel/motel rooms in the City of Fort Collins should be smoke-free? The results show: • Yes 56% • No 34% • No Opinion 10% Additionally, input received at the public open house was mixed on this topic. Some believe that hotels/motels should be 100% smoke-free while others believe it should be up to the business owner to decide (Attachment 4). Packet Pg. 237 Attachment19.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2145 : SR 098 Smoking) Agenda Item 21 Item # 21 Page 4 The Larimer County Board of Health voted to support adding the requirement that all hotel/motel rooms in the City of Fort Collins city limits be 100% smoke-free inside (Attachment 6). There are currently five hotels/motels in Fort Collins that allow smoking in their guest rooms. Staff reached out individually to each of them and spoke with the owner and/or manager in an effort to understand their concerns, what could make it easier for them, and what timeframe they would need to make the transition to 100% smoke-free rooms if Council chooses to adopt this ordinance. The responses were: • One motel is currently moving toward converting its smoking rooms to non-smoking rooms. They only have one more room to convert, so they do not believe this will be a problem for them. They would not like the City to ban smoking on their entire property as they would like to provide an outdoor smoking place for patrons. • One motel is planning to use the fall to convert their smoking rooms to non-smoking rooms (they would like to do this while the North College road construction is occurring). They did not have concerns about the ordinance, but they would like to have until January 1st before the ordinance becomes effective. • One motel stated that they are fine with the changes happening and it doesn’t matter to them what the timing is. Their longer-term guests usually stay in their smoking rooms, but they have cleaned up their motel a lot in the past couple of years and are continuing to make improvements. The owner would be happy to go smoke-free because she has health issues that are further impacted by smoke. They are more concerned about the North College road construction and lack of parking than a smoking ban. • One of the motels is a national chain specifically marketed for extended stays. They would need to comply with their corporate policies if they are required to go 100% smoke-free. They have a lengthy process to get approvals to build an outdoor structure for smokers which they would want to provide. A delayed implementation date would be helpful. • One motel is extremely concerned and believes his business would not survive if Council approves this ordinance. Most of his customers are extended stay (more than a couple nights) and are smokers. He believes that this should be his decision; not the City’s. Based on this input, staff recommends an implementation date of January 1, 2015 if Council chooses to adopt the 100% hotel/motel smoke-free rooms amendment. FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS There are no financial impacts to the City. Enforcement will be done in the same manner with the same staff as it is currently done for both of these potential amendments. Education and outreach will be conducted by current staff. There may be some financial/economic impact to the five (5) hotels/motels that currently allow smoking. The impact could be negative or positive. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS There would be improved air quality in hotels/motels that currently allow smoking. PUBLIC OUTREACH The City engaged in public outreach in an effort to understand the level of community support for expanding the smoking ordinance to include prohibiting electronic smoking devices in all places where conventional smoking is prohibited and require 100% of hotel/motel rooms to be smoke-free (Attachment 8). Public engagement efforts included: Packet Pg. 238 Attachment19.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2145 : SR 098 Smoking) Agenda Item 21 Item # 21 Page 5 • On-line informal survey - February-March 2014 - over 2,100 responses • Public Open House - May 22, 2014 • Email communications in response to public open house • One-on-one meetings with hotel/motel owners/managers • Site visits • Social media, press release, and website. ATTACHMENTS 1. E-cigarettes and Vapor Photo Glossary (PDF) 2. U.S. State and Local Laws Regulating Use of Electronic Cigarettes (PDF) 3. Fort Collins Smoking Survey 2014 (PDF) 4. Smoking Expansion Options Public Open House Summary of Input, May 22, 2014 (PDF) 5. TobacNO Youth Coalition Statement of Support (PDF) 6. Larimer County Board of Health Statement of Support (PDF) 7. State and Local 100% Smokefree Hotel and Motel Guest Room Laws (PDF) 8. Public Engagement Plan (PDF) 9. City Council Work Session Summary April 8, 2014 (PDF) 10. PowerPoint Presentation (PDF) Packet Pg. 239 Attachment19.1: First Reading Agenda Item Summary (w/o attachments) (2145 : SR 098 Smoking) - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 098, 2014 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AMENDING ARTICLE III OF CHAPTER 12 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS PERTAINING TO SMOKING IN PUBLIC AREAS WHEREAS, Chapter 12, Article III of the City Code currently prohibits conventional smoking in public places; and WHEREAS, electronic smoking devices are not currently regulated within the City Code; and WHEREAS, although electronic smoking devices do not contain tobacco, the users of such devices inhale vaporized liquid nicotine or other liquids created by heat through an electronic ignition system and exhale the vapor in a way that simulates conventional smoking; and WHEREAS, the United States Food and Drug Administration has conducted laboratory tests on numerous brands of electronic smoking devices and have found that they contain toxic chemicals and carcinogens in addition to nicotine; and WHEREAS, the City Council has previously found and determined that there is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke; and WHEREAS, the concern over the health impacts of secondhand, and now third-hand smoke, continues to rise among the citizens of Fort Collins; and WHEREAS, the use of electronic smoking devices in public places and in places of employment returns smoking to the public consciousness and complicates enforcement of the laws governing conventional smoking in public places; and WHEREAS, under the current City Code, hotel and motel owners may permit smoking in twenty-five (25) percent of hotel and motel rooms; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City that Article III of Chapter 12 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins be amended to require one hundred (100) percent of all hotel and motel rooms be smoke-free and to require that electronic smoking devices be regulated similarly to conventional smoking. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That Section 12-56 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby amended to add new definitions and amend existing definitions, to read as follows: Electronic smoking device shall mean an electric or battery-operated device, the use of which resembles conventional smoking, which can be used to deliver substances, Packet Pg. 240 Attachment19.2: Ordinance No. 098, 2014 (2145 : SR 098 Smoking) - 2 - including, but not limited to, nicotine, tobacco, or marijuana, to the person using such device. Electronic smoking device shall include, without limitation, an electronic cigarette, cigar, cigarillo, pipe, or hookah. Electronic smoking device shall not include any product approved by the food and drug administration as a drug or medical device that is used in accordance with its purpose. . . . Smoke or smoking shall mean: (1) Carrying or placing of a an electronic smoking device, lighted cigarette, lighted cigar, lighted pipe, or any other lighted smoking equipment in one's mouth for the purpose of inhaling or exhaling smoke or vapor or blowing smoke rings; (2) Placing of an electronic smoking device, lighted cigarette, lighted cigar, lighted pipe, or any other lighted smoking equipment in an ashtray or other receptacle, and allowing smoke or vapor to diffuse in the air; (3) Carrying or placing of an electronic smoking device or lighted cigarette or lighted cigar or lighted pipe or any other lighted smoking equipment in one's hands or any appendage or device and allowing smoke or vapor to diffuse in the air; or (4) Inhaling or exhaling smoke or vapor from an electronic smoking device, lighted cigarette, lighted cigar, lighted pipe, or any other lighted smoking equipment. . . . Tobacco shall mean cigarettes, cigars, cheroots, stogies and periques; granulated, plug cut, crimp cut, ready rubbed and other smoking tobacco; snuff and snuff flour, cavendish, plug and twist tobacco; fine-cut and other chewing tobacco; shorts, refuse scraps, clippings, cuttings, and seepings of tobacco; and other kinds and forms of tobacco, prepared in such manner as to be suitable for both chewing or for smoking in a cigarette, pipe, electronic smoking device or otherwise, or both for chewing and smoking. Tobacco also includes cloves, marijuana, and any other plant matter or product that is packaged for smoking. Section 2. That Section 12-62 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby amended to read as follows: Notwithstanding any other provision of this Article to the contrary, retail tobacco businesses shall be exempt from the smoking prohibition set forth in § 12-59 above, provided that the following conditions shall apply: Packet Pg. 241 Attachment19.2: Ordinance No. 098, 2014 (2145 : SR 098 Smoking) - 3 - (1) The business must be designed, constructed and operated in such fashion as to prevent smoke originating on its premises from entering any smoke-free area. It must be also physically separated from other establishments and independently ventilated as prescribed by the most current building and mechanical codes adopted by the City and as administered by the Building Official. (2) The business must, prior to allowing smoking on the premises, first obtain a certificate of occupancy from the Building Official allowing such smoking in or on the premises of the store depicting floor space used for retail sales and floor space used for other purposes. Any certificate of occupancy allowing smoking shall be conditioned upon compliance with these regulations and conformance to the floor plan approved by the Building Official as the basis for issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Failure to comply with these regulations and any other laws applicable to the sale and consumption of tobacco products shall be cause for revocation of the certificate of occupancy. (3) A violation of any of the conditions or limitations of a certificate of occupancy for a retail tobacco business, whether by the store owner, proprietor, manager, employee, agent or otherwise, or violation of the requirements for operation of a retail tobacco business set forth in this Article, shall be the responsibility of the business owner and shall be grounds for revocation of the certificate of occupancy, in addition to any other penalties imposed by the provisions of § 12-67. (4) Persons under eighteen (18) years of age shall not be permitted on the premises of the business, and proof of age shall be required for all persons entering the business. The retail tobacco business shall be responsible for providing adequate staffing and training so as to ensure an effective system for preventing persons under eighteen (18) years of age from entering the business. (5) In addition to other signs required to be posted pursuant to this Article, any retail tobacco business shall post and maintain a sign at all public entrances thereto, in a conspicuous position clearly visible upon entry, stating the phrase "Persons under the age of 18 not permitted". In addition, the sign, or another similarly posted sign, shall state the phrase "Surgeon General's Warning: Smoking Can Cause Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, Emphysema, and May Complicate Pregnancy". Any sign required hereunder shall meet the size and location requirements of Subsection 12-63(b). Section 3. That the amendments made by Section 2 of this Ordinance shall not take effect until 12:01 am, January 1, 2015. Packet Pg. 242 Attachment19.2: Ordinance No. 098, 2014 (2145 : SR 098 Smoking) - 4 - Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 1st day of July, A.D. 2014, and to be presented for final passage on the 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading on the 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 243 Attachment19.2: Ordinance No. 098, 2014 (2145 : SR 098 Smoking) Agenda Item 20 Item # 20 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Mike Beckstead, Chief Financial Officer Tom DeMint, PFA Fire Chief SUBJECT Resolution 2014-045 Approving an Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement Between the City of Fort Collins and the Poudre Valley Fire Protection District Establishing the Poudre Fire Authority. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to approve the revised Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) which forms the Poudre Fire Authority and the associated Revenue Allocation Formula (RAF) which allocates a share of City revenue toward the provision of fire and rescue services within Fort Collins. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION Since 1981, the City of Fort Collins (City) and the Poudre Valley Fire Protection District (PVFPD) have had an intergovernmental agreement to provide joint fire protection and rescue services within their respective boundaries. The two “parent” entities jointly govern Poudre Fire Authority (PFA) through representation on the PFA Board of Directors. The overall purpose of the joint service model has been to consolidate two existing fire departments into one Fire Authority which would provide timely, efficient and cost-effective service within the combined boundaries of the two entities. The RAF was designed to “pass through” a predictable revenue stream from each entity to the PFA for its operations and capital needs. The PFA Board of Directors is charged with administering that funding stream for the benefit of both partners. Over the past nine months, City staff and PFA staff have worked together to update the current IGA between the PVFPD and City. While some changes are recommended in the general terms of the IGA (see below), the primary issue under review has been the RAF, which details the financial contributions of each party to the operation of the Poudre Fire Authority. The basic components of both the original and the proposed new RAF include the following factors:  Cost Sharing between City and District The original formula was based on an 80%/20% split in the total costs of operating PFA between the City of Fort Collins and PVFPD. The split was calculated based on the relative share of call volume and assessed value of properties protected. Packet Pg. 244 Agenda Item 20 Item # 20 Page 2  City Contribution Calculation The City has calculated its share of the funding formula based on a share of its general sales and use tax revenue, plus a share of its property tax revenue. In 2010, the City also added a dedicated funding stream from its Keep Fort Collins Great voter approved sales and use tax.  District Contribution The District contributes its entire property tax mill levy revenues (less minimal District expenses) directly to PFA. The mill levy rate has fluctuated through the years based on the amount of revenue it needed to generate to meet its share of the cost of PFA operations. In 2010, the District increased its mill levy to 10.595 mills to match the increase in City contributions through KFCG. In addition, the Town of Timnath contributes a share of its Urban Renewal Authority tax increment in lieu of the District property taxes that the URA properties would have otherwise paid to the District. In 2014, the City’s actual contributions to PFA totaled $20.1 Million (RAF at $17.8M and KFCG at $2.3M). With the preliminary budgeted City revenue of $21.7M in 2015, PFA will see an increase in City funding of $1.4M or approximately 7%. This represents normal revenue growth (approximately 3%) PLUS the first step in closing the City’s funding gap with first year of the phase-in (approximately $0.5M). District revenue projections for 2015 will be developed in the near future as property tax projections from Larimer and Weld Counties become available. Intergovernmental Agreement Update In addition to discussions regarding the funding formula, City staff and PFA staff have met regularly over the past several months to review the details of the IGA document. Key changes in the terms of the agreement have included such provisions as:  Appointment of the “5th Member” of the Board (this language remains the same as the original agreement);  Impact of annexations on the financial agreement;  Appointment of a legal advisor to the Authority;  Inclusion of specific references to “Rescue” services as part of the scope of PFA’s services;  Elimination of language which distinguishes between an “Administrative Chief” and “Executive Chief;”  Clarification of the PFA’s role in contracting for EMS Ambulance Services within the jurisdiction; and  Additions regarding TABOR limitations. April 2, 2014 Joint Meeting Recap On April 2, City Council and the PVFPD Board met in joint session to review the proposed IGA and Revenue Allocation Formula. Comments and suggestions from that meeting led to the following adjustments to the final IGA document presented with this Resolution: 1. The City’s RAF has been simplified to include three components instead of four—.29 cents of sales and use tax, 67.5% of Property Tax and the KFCG revenue dedicated to Fire emergency services. Previous versions of the IGA had distinguished between property taxes for operations and maintenance and those dedicated to capital. Under the proposed IGA, all City contributions are provided to PFA to be distributed between O&M and capital needs, as determined by the PFA Board and PFA staff. 2. Language regarding the phase-in period for the City’s increased contribution was clarified. 3. Exhibit A, “Funding Formula and Revenue Allocation Formula” was amended to include a description of “Other Revenues” which PFA generates itself, without contribution from the City or the District. These revenues consist primarily of fees generated in the development review process, but also include grants, Packet Pg. 245 Agenda Item 20 Item # 20 Page 3 reimbursements, investment income and miscellaneous revenue. Language in this Exhibit was also modified to better express the City’s commitment of revenues affected by Urban Renewal Authorities. 4. PFA’s ability to incur bonded debt was clarified to reinforce that PFA does not have the legal authority to issue General Obligation bonds, but does have the ability to incur some other types of debt with approval of the PFA Board. 5. Section 2.2 N of the Agreement was modified to provide more detailed direction regarding PFA annual performance report to the City and the District. 6. The description of the ambulance related service authorized in the IGA was modified to be in line with state law and the PFA’s intention to contract for ambulance services dispatched through the City’s public safety answering point (PSAP), known as the dispatch center. Changes from the current IGA are highlighted in yellow in the proposed IGA. Changes from the draft IGA presented at the joint meeting on April 2nd are highlighted with double underlining in the proposed IGA. City Council also asked for a cost estimate for the in-kind services provided by the City to the PFA. These in- kind services, detailed in Exhibit B of the IGA, reduce the overall cost of providing fire service. PFA utilizes City support services in order to take advantage of the economies of scale created by not duplicating basic administrative functions. City staff estimates that the total annual cost of these services is approximately $400,000. These estimates were determined by calculating a pro rata share of the City’s total cost for each service and allocating those costs to PFA. For example, administration of benefits programs for all City, PFA and Library District employees was calculated to be approximately $500,000 per year, including City staff, consultants, actuaries, etc. Since PFA employees represent approximately 10% of the total employees served, the PFA’s share would be calculated at $50,000 per year. However, as part of this analysis, the City considered whether any of its actual costs would be reduced if PFA no longer participated in the City’s benefits program, and concluded that the cost savings would be minimal since virtually all of the same staff and contracted work would be done each year, with or without PFA employees being covered. The use of automated systems for much of the “per employee” work results in very little marginal cost for the addition of 200 employees. In each case, City staff has concluded that no staff positions could be eliminated if PFA were no longer served, and minimal marginal costs are actually incurred. After many months of work between the City and the District, the final approval of the IGA will take place in two stages. On May 12, the District Board approved the final IGA by unanimous vote. At the July 15, 2014 Regular Meeting, City Council will consider the same resolution. The overall schedule for consideration of the financial proposal and the IGA update has been:  City Council Finance Committee review (Financial issues) March 17  PVFPD Board briefing and discussion (Financial Implications and provisions of IGA) March 24  PFA Board discussion (Update to Board on PVFPD and City discussions) March 25  PVFPD and City Council Joint Meeting (Review terms of IGA and RAF; develop consensus on terms to prepare for formal consideration) April 2  PVFPD Consideration of Resolution 2014 - 03 to Approve IGA and RAF May 12 City Council Consideration of Resolution to Approve IGA and RAF July 15 Incorporation of RAF into City Budget Process Summer 2014 FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC IMPACTS Three components—Cost Sharing between District and City, City Contribution Calculation, and the District Contribution—were applied to develop a new proposed Funding Agreement and RAF for future contributions. The components of the proposed formula include: Packet Pg. 246 Agenda Item 20 Item # 20 Page 4 Total Cost Current Budget Level of Service 2014 $24.7 million Adequate Funding for Level of Service, 2014 $27.5 million Split (based on the five- year average blend of service calls & assessed value) City 82.5% $22.7 million District 17.5% $ 4.8 million City Funding Shortfall City 2014 Contribution $20.1 million City Funding Shortfall $ 2.6 million City Contribution Sales and Use Tax .29 cents of one cent of 2.25% Base Sales and Use Tax Property Tax 67.5% of Property Tax KFCG As defined in ballot language District Contribution Property Tax 10.595 Mills Timnath URA Tax Increment in lieu of District Property Tax The proposed City RAF variables (29% of one cent of sales tax and 67.5% of property tax) were determined based on the City’s 2014 revenue forecasts and the targeted $22.7M for the City contribution. At $22.7M, the City’s contribution equals 82.5% of the PFA Level of Service Budget and requires an additional $2.6M of funding over the budgeted 2014 funding of $20.1M. The 82.5% allocation of costs reflects a blend of service calls and assessed value between the City and the District. City staff is proposing that the $2.6M funding gap be closed over a five-year period. Going forward, the RAF will utilize the City’s Sales, Use & Property Tax revenue forecasts to develop PFA funding, and during the next five years, a declining portion of the $2.6M shortfall will be deducted from the RAF calculated PFA funding. Budget Projections: The table below reflects how the phase-in will work. The City RAF amount in the 2015 Budgeted and 2016 Budgeted columns reflect the City’s current estimates of revenue that will be provided to PFA in 2015 and 2016. Calculation for the remaining years in the table below assumes the previously used 3% per year growth assumption for illustration purposes only. Packet Pg. 247 Agenda Item 20 Item # 20 Page 5 City Contribution Projections, 2015 – 2020 (millions of dollars) 2014 2015 Budgeted 2016 Budgeted 2017 2018 2019 2020 City RAF Amount $20.4 $21.2 $21.9 $22.5 $23.3 $24.1 $25.0 + KFCG $2.3 $2.6 $2.7 $2.6 $2.6 $2.7 $2.8 City Calculated Contribution $22.7 $23.8 $24.6 $25.1 $26.0 $26.8 $27.8 Phase-in Adjustment Yrs Total = 5 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% - Phase-in Adjustment Amount ($2.6) ($2.1) ($1.6) ($1.0) ($0.5) $0.00 City Actual Contribution $20.1 $21.7 $23.0 $24.1 $25.4 $26.8 $27.8 ATTACHMENTS 1. History of Poudre Fire Authority (PDF) 2. IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (PDF) 3. Powerpoint presentation (PDF) Packet Pg. 248 1 ATTACHMENT 1 Poudre Fire Authority History June 3, 2014 In 1981, the City of Fort Collins and the Poudre Valley Fire Protection District developed an intergovernmental agreement to provide joint fire protection and rescue services within their respective boundaries. The two entities entered into a “trial period” of consolidation and then entered into the current Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) in 1987. The Poudre Fire Authority is a consolidated fire service model which combined the City Fire Department with the District Fire Department to provide service in both the District and the City. The District surrounds the City of Fort Collins, and also encompasses the Town of Timnath, LaPorte, Bellvue, Horsetooth and Redstone Canyon for a total of 235 square miles of Northern Colorado. It is a Special District under Colorado law, governed by a five-member Board of Directors elected by residents of the District. Prior to the consolidation, the District was serving areas on all sides of the City, and often crossing through the City to reach calls in various parts of its service area. In addition, each entity provided mutual aid within the other’s boundaries. The combination of the two departments created a much more efficient service plan, saved resources by using existing and future stations to serve both urban and rural settings, and reduced overhead costs. Other service models were considered, including mutual aid contracts, contracts for service and creation of a Special District which encompassed both the City limits and the existing District boundaries. Changes in State law created an opportunity for a Fire Authority to be establish which would take advantage of the assets of both existing departments, maintain the relationship between the City and the District, and provide an efficient response system. The consolidated departments brought together staff, facilities, equipment, dispatch services and administration to provide services in the PFA boundaries. At the time of consolidation, the participants estimated that the creation of the PFA would result in a cost savings of over $1 million per year for the City and the District because of shared resources and shared stations. Over the years, these savings have increased. A 2007 estimate concluded that the savings to the City alone resulting from the PFA would have been over $2 million. If the partnership with PVFPD did not exist the City would likely need to increase its O&M funding by $2,400,000 to maintain existing services, plus some portion of a capital cost to replace facilities and apparatus that now jointly serve both areas. These figures were calculated based on the cost of replacing stations and staff located in the District but with current response areas substantially within the City limits. The District would also likely see cost increases as it relocated or revised its service plan to provide services to areas on all sides of the City. Since this analysis, annual savings have continued to increase through the shared model. The joining of forces created by PFA have resulted in improved insurance ratings, lower long- term costs to the taxpayer, enhanced ability to respond to large scale emergencies, and coordinated strategic planning. Packet Pg. 249 Attachment20.1: History of Poudre Fire Authority (2121 : PFA IGA) 2 Governance of the PFA was established as an independent Board of Directors. The Board was established to include two members appointed from the City Council, two members appointed from the PVFPD Board, and one member appointed by the other members. This 5th member has typically been the Fort Collins City Manager. A set of Bylaws was adopted in 1987 which sets forth the structure and timing of the PFA Board meetings and the process for selection of officers of the Board. The PFA relies on the City, Town of Timnath, Larimer and Weld Counties, or the District to adopt any policy or regulation which requires the force of law, since PFA does not have any regulatory power separate from those entities. Growth of Poudre Fire Authority When the PFA was created in 1981, the combined City and District population was approximately 91,400. It provided service from seven paid fire stations with 104 paid employees. Calls for service totaled 3,141 in 1981. As both the City and the District have grown over time, so has the PFA. The PFA population has grown to the current 185,000 residents. Employees have increased to 185 full-time employees, plus 30 volunteer firefighters. Calls for service are 5.5 times higher than in 1981, and since 1993 calls per line fire staff member have nearly doubled. This increase in demand and workload reflects both the growth of the communities and the increasing call for more types of services than were provided in the past. The addition of technical rescue services, swift water rescue, hazardous materials response and other types of services reflect the expectations of the community for emergency services response well beyond fire response alone. Other measures of growth in the PFA include the addition of six stations, additional crews for truck companies within existing stations, and the development of the Training Center. Over time, a greater percentage of growth in several measures is attributable to the City. A greater percentage of assessed valuation of protected structures is within the City, as are a larger percentage of calls. These facts are consistent with a gradual growth of the City through annexations of District properties into the City limits. Original PFA Revenue Allocation Formula The City and PVFPD have shared in the funding of PFA through a model outlined in the 1987 Intergovernmental Agreement. Each partner has its own method for providing funding for its share of operations and maintenance and capital needs. CITY OF FORT COLLINS: The funding formula agreement for the City’s share of PFA was established as a fixed sum contract each year. The formula was developed to provide a relatively stable funding source, but which would follow the growth and decline of City revenues in both sales and use taxes and property taxes. The fixed sum was to be estimated during the budget process to be the equivalent of .303 of one cent of the existing 2.25% sales and use tax, and 67.09% of the City’s property tax mill levy. This amount was to be appropriated as a part of the City’s annual budget. The PFA’s appropriation was not to vary based on actual year end collections, whether they were higher or lower than the budget projection. Early documents from the City note that in a downturn in the economy, the City “may approach the Authority to accept a lesser amount than what has been budgeted. The City could not require the Authority to cut back.” These funds were directed to the Operation and Maintenance needs of PFA. Packet Pg. 250 Attachment20.1: History of Poudre Fire Authority (2121 : PFA IGA) 3 In 1993, City Council acknowledged that it needed to provide additional funding to PFA for capital needs and increased its mill levy to provide a dedicated 1 mill allocation to PFA’s capital fund. In 1996 the dedicated 1 mill usage was expanded to include operations and maintenance costs in addition to apparatus replacement and capital needs not funded. In the 1990’s, the City applied TABOR limits to its allocations to PFA and made adjustments (increases or decreases) for items such as annexations, economic downturns, etc. After 2008, the City began to allocate funds to PFA based on a percentage increase over previous years, rather than a calculation of the previous Revenue Allocation Formula. In 2010, City voters approved the Keep Fort Collins Great sales and use tax package including dedicated funds for new fire services. POUDRE VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: The District’s financial commitment to the PFA for each year is based on property tax receipts as projected by Larimer and Weld Counties in December of each year. The District’s mill levy has fluctuated between 4.75 mills and 11.81 mills since 1981. The highest rate was in place in 1987 as the District raised revenues to pay off a bond for Station 7 in LaPorte. In 2010, District voters approved a mill levy increase from 9.301 to 10.595 mills, to provide PFA with additional funds matching the increase in revenue provided by the City in the Keep Fort Collins Great (KFCG) program. The District’s increase did not include a sunset provision similar to the one included in the KFCG program. Each year, the District Board allocates most of its revenue directly to PFA, holding back enough revenue to cover the District’s operating costs and projected capital needs. Over recent years, the District has built up a capital fund dedicated to the construction of Station 8 in Timnath. The District is expected to transfer $1.4 million from these funds to PFA’s capital budget in either 2014 or 2015 for the planned construction of Station 8. PFA BOARD: The IGA requires the City Council and the District to annually approve their PFA budget contribution as an appropriation prior to the end of each year. After the allocation is set, the funds are turned over to PFA to be budgeted by the PFA Board. All funds are transferred to PFA, which receives its expenditure authorization from the PFA Board. Under the terms of the IGA, PFA is authorized to retain any unexpended funds in reserve, without further approval of the City or the District. Packet Pg. 251 Attachment20.1: History of Poudre Fire Authority (2121 : PFA IGA) 4 Poudre Fire Authority Revenue Allocation Formula History 1987-2014 City of Fort Collins PVFPD Sales and Use Tax Property Tax Capital Mill levy Keep Fort Collins Great Property Tax 1987- 1990 .303 of one cent of the City’s 2.25% base sales tax rate 67.09% of City Property Tax N/A N/A 11.81 Mills (varied with debt service level) 1991 – 2006 .303 of one cent of the City’s 2.25% base sales tax rate 67.09% of City Property Tax 1 mill N/A 9.301 Mills 2007-2010 Fixed percent increase over previous year 1 mill N/A 9.301 Mills 2010-2014 Fixed percent increase over previous year 1 mill 11% of .85% KFCG sales and use tax 10.595 Mills Proposed 2015 .29 of one cent of the City’s 2.25% base sales tax rate 67.5% of City Property Tax N/A 11% of .85% KFCG sales and use tax 10.595 Mills plus ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 253 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 254 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 255 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 256 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 257 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 258 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 259 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 260 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 261 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 262 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 263 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 264 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 265 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 266 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 267 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 268 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 269 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 270 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 271 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 272 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) Packet Pg. 273 Attachment20.2: IGA between City and District (redline/strikeout version) (2121 : PFA IGA) 1 PFA IGA July 15, 2014 ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 274 Attachment20.3: Powerpoint presentation (2121 : PFA IGA) 2 IGA History IGA Agreement and Revenue Allocation Formula has met the needs of the Authority and City for over 30 years • Current IGA established in 1987 • Defined authority of the PFA Board & Fire Chief • Governing Board • Personnel • Purchases & Disposition of Assets • Described funding mechanism for the District and the City • District – Mill Levy based • City – Revenue Allocation Formula o Original approximately 50%/50% Property Tax & Sales tax o Recent data 2/3 Property Tax, 1/3 Sales Tax (w/o KFCG) • Objective of revising the IGA: • Update authority levels & services provided by City • Update Revenue Allocation Formula Packet Pg. 275 Attachment20.3: Powerpoint presentation (2121 : PFA IGA) 3 Revenue Revenue Growth from the District is Greater than from the City… City’s Contribution has Grown at a Rate Greater than City Revenue 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 1997 - 2014 PFA City and District Revenue City Contribution District Contribution Growth Rates 4.99% = City Revenue (Sales, Use, Property Tax, & KFCG) 5.03% = City Contribution to PFA 5.45% = District Contribution to PFA 5.12% = PFA Revenue Packet Pg. 276 Attachment20.3: Powerpoint presentation (2121 : PFA IGA) 4 Calls Per Firefighter/Captain Average 3% Annual Improvement in Productivity 67.20 75.63 72.32 74.88 74.23 74.04 81.54 86.10 92.69 95.89 98.83 102.86 92.84 95.43 99.88 105.09 110.54 114.90 117.77 118.04 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Packet Pg. 277 Attachment20.3: Powerpoint presentation (2121 : PFA IGA) 5 Level of Service Based Budget Analysis PFA Level of Service Budget requires an additional $2.8M over current 2014 budget of $24.7M 2014 O&M Capital Total Current Budget (w/o fees & review) $23.8 $0.9 $24.7 Personnel Net 0.7 0.7 Other Costs .4 0.4 Legal costs .1 0.1 Funding to restore Capital 1.6 1.6 Level of Service Budget Target $25.0 $2.5 $27.5 Packet Pg. 278 Attachment20.3: Powerpoint presentation (2121 : PFA IGA) 6 Funding Mechanism Phase in of Additional City Contribution Over Five Years…. Provides PFA Certainty of Revenue Growth District Revenue - $4.6M 2014 revenue: • Property Taxes at 10.595 mills • TIF Revenue for Station 8 from Town of Timnath City Revenue – $22.7M 2014 revenue: • Sales Tax - 29% of one cent of 2.25% GF Sales and Use Tax revenue • 1 mill of City property tax for Capital • 67.5% of remaining City property tax revenue • 11% of KFCG revenue Phase in of City’s additional $2.6M • Phased in over 5 years Packet Pg. 279 Attachment20.3: Powerpoint presentation (2121 : PFA IGA) 7 IGA Terms Updated All IGA Changes Have Been Reviewed by Both the City and District Attorneys • Updated to reflect previously approved amendments • Reaffirm selection of “5th” member of Board • Update authorities of Chief • Purchases • Asset Disposition • Update to reflect current services provided by City • See Exhibit B of the IGA • RAF formula and worksheet included as attachment to IGA • Future transparency and consistency – Exhibit A in the IGA • Impact of Annexations and URA’s included with IGA • Large annexations – adjust RAF variables to be revenue neutral • URA/TIF – discussion to understand implications Packet Pg. 280 Attachment20.3: Powerpoint presentation (2121 : PFA IGA) 8 BACK-UP Packet Pg. 281 Attachment20.3: Powerpoint presentation (2121 : PFA IGA) 9 - 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 1997 - 2014 PFA Expenses Personnel Exp Non-Personnel Exp Capital Exp Expenditures Personnel Cost Consistently at 87% of O&M…. Capital Funding has Been Used to Support O&M Growth Rates 4.57% = Non-Personnel Expense 4.94% = Personnel Expense 5.73% = Total Expense (Incl Capital) 86% of O&M 14% of O&M 87% of O&M 13% of O&M Packet Pg. 282 Attachment20.3: Powerpoint presentation (2121 : PFA IGA) 10 Staffing Analysis Line, Command & Uniform Staffing has Declined Since 1998 From 93.8% to 89.7% of Total Staffing 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Employee count by category Line and Command Staff 40 hour Uniformed Professional/Technical Support Clerical Admin Support 93.8% 6.2% 10.3% 89.7% Packet Pg. 283 Attachment20.3: Powerpoint presentation (2121 : PFA IGA) 11 Required Funding Adjustments 2014 Level of Service Budget Calculates $2.6M Shortfall from City Contribution District City Average 5 yr Calls 16.1% 83.9% Average 5 yr Assessed Value 18.8% 81.2% Blended 17.5% 82.5% Budget Share $4.8M $22.7M 2014 Current Contributions $4.6M $20.1M 2014 Funding Shortfall $0.2M $2.6M Packet Pg. 284 Attachment20.3: Powerpoint presentation (2121 : PFA IGA) 12 City Funding over Time Proposed New RAF Goes Into Effect in 2015. Packet Pg. 285 Attachment20.3: Powerpoint presentation (2121 : PFA IGA) 13 Station 5 and 7 Kitchen Wear and Tear Packet Pg. 286 Attachment20.3: Powerpoint presentation (2121 : PFA IGA) 14 Deferred Maintenance Station 5 Roof Packet Pg. 287 Attachment20.3: Powerpoint presentation (2121 : PFA IGA) 15 Station 7 inadequate facilities for male and female firefighters working together Bathroom privacy issues and single dorm room for all firefighters Packet Pg. 288 Attachment20.3: Powerpoint presentation (2121 : PFA IGA) - 1 - RESOLUTION 2014-045 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS APPROVING AN AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AND THE POUDRE VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ESTABLISHING THE POUDRE FIRE AUTHORITY WHEREAS, on November 3, 1987, the City of Fort Collins (the “City”) and the Poudre Valley Fire Protection District (the “District”) entered into an intergovernmental agreement (the “Agreement”) providing for the continuation of an independent governmental entity known as the Poudre Fire Authority (the “PFA”) which was originally formed in 1981, for the purpose of providing fire protection services within the City and the District; and WHEREAS, since 1987, the City and the District have entered into three addenda to the Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City and the District have recognized the need to amend and restate the Agreement and have worked cooperatively to identify and address issues of mutual interest, including the establishment of a new revenue allocation formula to help ensure a predictable revenue stream for the PFA for its operations and capital needs; and WHEREAS, Article XIV, Section 18 of the Colorado Constitution and Section 29-1-201, Colorado Revised Statutes, encourage governments to make the most efficient and effective use of their powers and responsibilities by cooperating and contracting among themselves; and WHEREAS, the City and the District have a history of successful cooperation in the provision of fire protection services in their respective jurisdictions through the creation of the PFA, which will be continued by the adoption of an amended and restated Agreement; and WHEREAS, City staff recommends that the City Council approve and authorize the execution of the Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement Establishing the Poudre Fire Authority. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, that the Mayor is hereby authorized to enter into the Amended and Restated Intergovernmental Agreement Establishing the Poudre Fire Authority in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, with such modifications or additional terms and conditions as the Mayor, in consultation with the City Manager and City Attorney, determines to be necessary or appropriate to protect the interests of the City and effectuate the purposes of this Resolution. Packet Pg. 289 - 2 - Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins this 15th day of July, A.D. 2014. _________________________________ Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 290 Packet Pg. 291 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 292 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 293 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 294 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 295 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 296 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 297 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 298 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 299 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 300 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 301 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 302 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 303 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 304 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 305 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 306 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 307 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 308 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 309 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Packet Pg. 310 Attachment1: Exhibit A (2122 : PFA IGA - RESO) Agenda Item 21 Item # 21 Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Amy Sharkey, Benefits & HRIS Manager SUBJECT First Reading of Ordinance No. 105, 2014 Amending Section 2-581 of the City Code and Setting the Compensation of the Interim City Attorney. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to establish the salary and compensation provided the interim City Attorney while she serves in this capacity. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION City Council appointed Carrie Daggett as interim City Attorney, effective immediately, via Resolution 2014-057 on July 8, 2014. City Council appointed her to this position with the understanding that her compensation would be adjusted and that the compensation increase would be made effective with the date of her appointment as interim City Attorney. The Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem have discussed compensation terms with her, in consultation with Human Resources Department staff, and each recommend adoption of the proposed compensation, as set forth in the Ordinance. Packet Pg. 311 - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. 105, 2014 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AMENDING SECTION 2-581 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AND SETTING THE COMPENSATION OF THE INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY WHEREAS, pursuant to Article VI, Section 1 of the City Charter, the City Council is responsible for fixing the compensation of the City Attorney; and WHEREAS, the City is committed to compensating its employees in a manner which is fair, competitive and understandable; and WHEREAS, the City’s pay philosophy is based on total compensation, which includes not only base salary but also deferred compensation payments, vacation and holiday leave, and amounts paid by the City for medical, dental, life and long-term disability insurance; and WHEREAS, City Attorney, Stephen J. Roy passed away suddenly on July 3, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City Council, through adoption of Resolution 2014-057, has appointed Carrie Daggett as the interim City Attorney; and WHEREAS, this interim appointment will continue in effect until such time as the City Council officially appoints the new City Attorney or such earlier time as the Council may subsequently determine to be in the best interest of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council agrees that at such time as the interim City Attorney is relieved of her duties as interim City Attorney, she will be returned to the position of Deputy City Attorney unless the City Council appoints her as the new City Attorney; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes, based upon the added responsibilities placed on the Deputy City Attorney, that the base salary of the interim City Attorney should be established at the amount of $145,367, per annum, effective July 8, 2014. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That Section 2-581 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 2-581. Salary of the City Attorney. The base salary to be paid the interim City Attorney shall be one hundred seventy- nine thousand ninety-threeone hundred forty five thousand three hundred and sixty seven dollars ($179,093145,367.) per annum, payable in biweekly installments. Sixty (60) percent of such sum shall be charged to general government expense, twenty (20) percent to the City water utility and twenty (20) percent to the City electric utility. Packet Pg. 312 - 2 - Section 2. That the effective date of the salary adjustment referred to in Section 1 above shall be July 8, 2014. Section 3. That the interim City Attorney shall be entitled to compensation at the end of payroll year 2014 for accrued but unused vacation time in excess of the maximum rollover limit of 340 hours, not to exceed a total of 120 hours, at a rate of sixty nine dollars and eighty nine cents ($69.89) per hour, for a maximum payment of eight thousand three hundred eighty seven dollars ($8,387.). Section 4. That at such time as the interim City Attorney is relieved of her duties as interim City Attorney, she will be returned to the position of Deputy City Attorney unless the City Council appoints her as the new City Attorney. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 15th day of July, A.D. 2014, and to be presented for final passage on the19th day of August, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading on the 19th day of August, A.D. 2014. __________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk Packet Pg. 313 Town of Timnath TIF revenue in lieu of property tax Packet Pg. 252 Attachment20.1: History of Poudre Fire Authority (2121 : PFA IGA) Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 0.5" Formatted: Indent: Left: 0" Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 0.5" Formatted: Font: Bold, Underline Packet Pg. 139 Attachment13.2: Current Fund Balances Policy, with redline and strike through (2027 : Financial Policies Updates) 182+00 183+00 184+00 HORIZONTAL DEFLECTION STA. 178+72.99, N 1462757.92 E 3110091.92 HORIZONTAL DEFLECTION STA. 178+92.99, N 1462758.66 E 3110111.90 HORIZONTAL DEFLECTION STA. 179+12.99, N 1462759.92 E 3110131.86 HORIZONTAL DEFLECTION STA. 179+32.99, N 1462761.71 E 3110151.78 42"~22 1/2° BEND STA. 179+52.99, N 1462764.02 E 3110171.65 42"~45° BEND STA. 182+84.37, N 1462925.30 E 3110461.13 COMBINATION AIR VALVE WITH VAULT - 12" (SEE DETAIL SHEET CD3) STA. 177+66.62, N 1462758.31 E 3109985.55 HORIZONTAL DEFLECTION STA. 183+58.14, N 1462905.12 E 3110532.09 BLOWOFF (SEE DETAIL SHEET CD2) STA. 174+38.92, N 1462759.51 E 3109657.85 5010 5006 5006 5012 5012 5006 5010 5010 5010 A A B B STA: 182+84.37 42"~45° HORIZONTAL BEND EXISTING GRADE AT PIPE CENTERLINE 42" PIPE 42" PIPE PROPOSED GRADE AT PIPE CENTERLINE (FILL EXISTING TRENCH AREA TO PROPOSED GRADE SHOWN. USE DIRT FROM NEW TRENCH AREA DESIGNATED ON PLAN VIEW) STA: 174+38.92 BLOWOFF STA: 177+66.62 COMBINATION AIR VALVE WITH VAULT - 12" ARTHUR DITCH SEE SHEET C18 FOR CROSSING DETAIL CROSSING TO INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT CONCRETE BOX CULVERT STA: 179+52.99 42"~22 1/2° HORIZONTAL BEND STA: 179+70.65 EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE (ELEVATION UNKNOWN) TYPE 3 TRENCH (FOR DIP) TYPE 3 TRENCH (FOR DIP) TYPE 4 TRENCH (FOR DIP) FLOW FILL TOP STA 177+66.62 TRENCH ARTHUR DITCH CROSSING BID ITEM 180+75 TO 181+50 5032.87 5031.16 5028.88 5026.58 5025.04 5023.83 5024.44 5026.31 5029.36 5032.47 5033.92 5032.78 5030.28 5036.10 5031.12 5027.15 5021.34 5017.44 5010.99 5014.75 5006.31 5005.04 5003.48 5007.59 5006.70 5005.61 172+00 173+00 174+00 175+00 176+00 177+00 178+00 179+00 180+00 181+00 182+00 183+00 184+00 5010 5020 5030 5040 5 5 5 5 5021.00 5021.00 5021.00 5021.00 5021.00 5021.00 5023.26 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 4+70 EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE TRENCH AREA SECTION A SCALE: 1" = 50' 5010 5020 5030 5040 5010 5020 5030 5040 5029.48 5021.00 5019.44 5+00 6+00 6+63 EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE TRENCH AREA SECTION B SCALE: 1" = 50' Reviewed: Book No.: Date: Design/Drawn: # Date: Description: Field: WATER TRANSMISSION PLAN & PROFILE 172+00 - 184+50 RL RCS C15 - - 0 SCALE: 1"=50' 25 50 100 GROUP www.f-w.com Engineers | Architects | Surveyors | Scientists 1612 SPECHT POINT ROAD, SUITE 105 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525 (970) 484-7477 / info@f-w.com Project No.: 05-29-2014 0131430.00 NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT / NEWT II WATER TRANSMISSION PIPELINE KEY MAP EAST LARMIER COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 4970 4980 5000 4990 5010 5020 5030 5040 4970 4980 5000 4990 5010 5020 5030 5040 MATCHLINE 184+50 SEE SHEET C16 MATCHLINE 172+00 SEE SHEET C14 MATCHLINE 172+00 SEE SHEET C14 MATCHLINE 184+50 SEE SHEET C16 NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR TO PLACE ONE-FOOT (1') OF COMPACTED CLAY ON SMALL LATERAL DITCH SIDES AND BOTTOMS TO EXTENTS OF DISTURBED AREA DUE TO PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE TWELVE INCHES (12") OF CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE ON ALL GRAVEL ROAD/DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS. COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS IN SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE MET OR EXCEEDED. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN DRAINAGE IN SMALL LATERAL DITCHES DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND RECONSTRUCT AFTER WATERLINE CONSTRUCTION. THIS INCLUDES WORKING WITH CULVERTS. 4. ALL MONITORING WELLS SHALL NOT BE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. DISPOSAL AREA BID ITEM ARTHUR DITCH CROSSING BID ITEM "UUBDINFOU1BHFPG Packet Pg The lips of all stairs should be highlighted with black and florescent yellow non-skid tape. High Ops Services To be completed through Recreation $15,000 Atzlan Community Center The playground on the East Side of the Center is approximately 75% fenced. Given the age of the children using this playground, and its proximity to the Poudre River, the railroad tracks and the walking / bike trail, consideration should be given to completely enclosing the playground and adding two gates on the West side. High $2,500 Ops Services 7 Packet Pg. 84 Attachment8.1: Security High Priority List (2099 : Funding High Priority Security Enhancements) Attachment8.1: Security High Priority List (2099 : Funding High Priority Security Enhancements) Attachment8.1: Security High Priority List (2099 : Funding High Priority Security Enhancements) Kathy Henggeler Option II - VOIP system only $25 per phone extension. PA Streets Department A public address (PA) system should be installed in the main office, the maintenance facilities and the maintenance yard, and integrated into the VOIP telephone system. High $875 Ops Services / Kathy Henggeler Option II - VOIP system only $25 per phone extension. PA City Park Shop Install a public address (PA) system through out the building, and in the maintenance yard, integrating it with the VOIP telephone system.. High $925 Ops & Kathy Henggeler Option II - VOIP system only $25 per phone extension. $6,350 Remodel RMDL 215 North Mason Muni Court A door with an electro magnetic lock should be installed between the Judges bench and the wall High $5,000 Ops Services 4 Packet Pg. 81 Attachment8.1: Security High Priority List (2099 : Funding High Priority Security Enhancements) The Receptionist desks should be equipped with panic/duress alarms. Camera Call-Up software should be integrated into the Panic/Duress alarm, so that if the alarm is activated, it would actuate the closest CCTV camera which would automatically display the situation on 5 Staff computers, as well as actuate strobe lights in those offices. High $5,000 Ops Services Option II - Panic button installation to monitoring company without call-up to camera or strobe systems. $75,200 Public Address Systems 3 Packet Pg. 80 Attachment8.1: Security High Priority List (2099 : Funding High Priority Security Enhancements) Traffic Department Panic/duress alarms should be installed at both positions at the Reception Desk. When activated, the alarm should activate strobe lights in at least 3-5 offices of Staff members who are normally on site. High $5,000 Ops Services Option II - Panic button installation to monitoring company without call-up to camera or strobe systems. ALM Streets Department Panic/duress alarms should be installed at both Receptionist positions, which when activated would activate 3-5 strobe lights in offices of Staff members normally on site. High $5,000 Ops Services 2 Packet Pg. 79 Attachment8.1: Security High Priority List (2099 : Funding High Priority Security Enhancements) AC = Access Control ALM = Alarms PA = Public Address Sys. PCD = Procedural SC = Security Camera (CCTV) SFTY = Safety More detailed descriptions of line items are available in departmental security assessment available upon request from Risk Management. 1 Packet Pg. 78 Attachment8.1: Security High Priority List (2099 : Funding High Priority Security Enhancements)