Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNCIL - COMPLETE AGENDA - 07/08/2014 - COMPLETE AGENDACity of Fort Collins Page 1 Karen Weitkunat, Mayor City Council Chambers Gerry Horak, District 6, Mayor Pro-Tem City Hall West Bob Overbeck, District 1 300 LaPorte Avenue Lisa Poppaw, District 2 Fort Collins, Colorado Gino Campana, District 3 Wade Troxell, District 4 Cablecast on City Cable Channel 14 Ross Cunniff, District 5 on the Comcast cable system Steve Roy Darin Atteberry Wanda Nelson City Attorney City Manager City Clerk The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. City Council Special Meeting July 8, 2014 6:00 PM  CALL MEETING TO ORDER  ROLL CALL 1. Council may consider a motion to adjourn into Executive Session. 2. Resolution 2014-057 Appointing an Interim City Attorney.  OTHER BUSINESS  ADJOURNMENT CITY COUNCIL Item # Page 1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY July 15, 2014 City Council STAFF Darin Atteberry, City Manager SUBJECT Resolution 2014-057 Appointing an Interim City Attorney. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to appoint an interim City Attorney. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution. BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION This Resolution appoints an interim City Attorney in light of the unexpected passing last week of Steve Roy, who has served as City Attorney for the City of Fort Collins since 1988. Article VI of the City Charter provides that the City Council shall appoint a City Attorney who shall be licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado, and fix the compensation of a City Attorney. The City Attorney is authorized to appoint Assistant and Deputy City Attorneys, as determined by the Council, and to assign duties to those attorneys. Under the City Charter, the City Attorney has multiple roles. The first is to advise the officers and employees of the City in matters relating to their official powers and duties. This occurs in a fast paced and rapidly changing environment and often entails researching and preparing memoranda to offer legal opinions and advice to the City Council and a variety of other constituents within the organization. The Charter also provides that the City Attorney is responsible for drafting all ordinances and other legal documents that the City needs in the course of its operations. The Charter also assigns the City Attorney responsibility for representing the City in all legal proceedings, including dozens of civil actions and handling the prosecution of cases in Municipal Court. Finally, the Charter provides that the City Attorney is responsible for attending all meetings of the City Council. In addition to Council meetings, the City Attorney oversees participation of legal staff in the meetings of a wide variety of Council committees and City boards and commissions. The quality and timeliness of the legal services provided by the City Attorney, directly and through the City Attorney’s Office, are critical to ensuring that the objectives of the City Council and City staff are met. The Resolution authorizes and requests that the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem discuss and work with the appointed interim City Attorney to develop a proposal for compensation, benefits and other terms of appointment, in consultation with the Human Resources Director. The proposed terms of appointment will then be presented in Ordinance form for Council consideration on First Reading on July 15, 2014. The Resolution provides that the interim appointment continue in effect until such time as the Council officially appoints the new City Attorney, or such earlier time as the Council may, by resolution or motion, subsequently determine to be in the best interests of the City. RESOLUTION 2014-057 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS APPOINTING AN INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY WHEREAS, Stephen Roy, City Attorney of the City of Fort Collins since 1988, died suddenly on July 3, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City Charter places the responsibility for appointing a City Attorney with the City Council; and WHEREAS, the position of City Attorney will remain vacant until the Council has developed and completed a selection process and appointed a new City Attorney; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to appoint an interim City Attorney, pending the completion of the foregoing selection process, to perform the duties of City Attorney. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS as follows: Section 1. That ________________________ is hereby appointed by the Council as interim City Attorney to perform the duties of City Attorney, which appointment shall take effect immediately upon adoption of this Resolution. Section 2. That the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem are hereby authorized and requested to work with the appointed interim City Attorney in consultation with the Human Resources Director, to establish proposed compensation, benefits and other terms of the appointment, to be considered by the City Council on July 15, 2014. Section 3. That the compensation, benefits and other terms of appointment for the interim City Attorney will be established by the Council by ordinance, with first reading no later than July 15, 2014, to be made effective retroactively to the date of the commencement of the interim City Attorney’s duties. Section 4. That this interim appointment will continue in effect until such time as the Council officially appoints the new City Attorney or such earlier time as the Council may, by resolution or motion, subsequently determine to be in the best interests of the City. Passed and adopted at a special meeting of the Council of the City of Fort Collins this 8th day of July, A.D. 2014. _________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk City of Fort Collins Page 1 Karen Weitkunat, Mayor Council Information Center (CIC) Gerry Horak, District 6, Mayor Pro Tem City Hall West Bob Overbeck, District 1 300 LaPorte Avenue Lisa Poppaw, District 2 Fort Collins, Colorado Gino Campana, District 3 Wade Troxell, District 4 Cablecast on City Cable Channel 14 Ross Cunniff, District 5 on the Comcast cable system Steve Roy Darin Atteberry Wanda Nelson City Attorney City Manager City Clerk The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. City Council Work Session July 8, 2014 After Special Meeting, which begins at 6:00 PM  CALL TO ORDER.  ROLL CALL 1. Potential Larimer County Referendum to Extend the Help Preserve Open Space ¼ Cent Sales Tax. (staff: John Stokes; 10 minute staff presentation; 45 minute disucssion) The purpose of this item is to seek Council input on a proposed extension of the County’s ¼ cent open space sales tax, Help Preserve Open Space (HPOS). HPOS provides significant support to the City’s Natural Areas Department (NAD) but is set to expire in 2018. A ballot measure extending the tax may be referred by the Board of County Commissioners to the voters in November. A Council agenda item has been scheduled for August 19th to consider an endorsement of the final HPOS ballot language. Larimer County staff has prepared three potential ballot scenarios for the Commissioners to consider. The alternative preferred by County officials would reduce HPOS revenues received by the NAD by approximately 14%, or $530,000, beginning in 2019. The reduction would represent an overall diminution of NAD revenues by approximately 5% beginning in 2019. Natural Areas staff supports this option as long as the NAD is able to discontinue a $350,000 a year contribution for the development of the paved trail system; and, as long as West Nile Virus treatments continue to be financed by the general fund, a $134,000 annual savings to the NAD. CITY COUNCIL City of Fort Collins Page 2 2. Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan. (staff: John Stokes; 10 minute staff presentation; 1 hour discussion) The purpose of this work session is to review and discuss the Poudre River Downtown Master Plan. The City of Fort Collins is developing a master plan for the Cache la Poudre River in the downtown corridor (Shields Street to Mulberry Street) to improve in-river and bankside recreation, habitat connectivity, restoration and rehabilitation, flood mitigation, channel bank protection, water quality, public safety and access, and transportation. The Master Plan provides a long-term vision and identifies improvements that will take many years to complete.  OTHER BUSINESS.  ADJOURNMENT. DATE: STAFF: July 8, 2014 John Stokes, Natural Resources Director WORK SESSION ITEM City Council SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Potential Larimer County Referendum to Extend the Help Preserve Open Space ¼ Cent Sales Tax. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to seek Council input on a proposed extension of the County’s ¼ cent open space sales tax, Help Preserve Open Space (HPOS). HPOS provides significant support to the City’s Natural Areas Department (NAD) but is set to expire in 2018. A ballot measure extending the tax may be referred by the Board of County Commissioners to the voters in November. A Council agenda item has been scheduled for August 19th to consider an endorsement of the final HPOS ballot language. Larimer County staff has prepared three potential ballot scenarios for the Commissioners to consider. The alternative preferred by County officials would reduce HPOS revenues received by the NAD by approximately 14%, or $530,000, beginning in 2019. The reduction would represent an overall diminution of NAD revenues by approximately 5% beginning in 2019. Natural Areas staff supports this option as long as the NAD is able to discontinue a $350,000 a year contribution for the development of the paved trail system; and, as long as West Nile Virus treatments continue to be financed by the general fund, a $134,000 annual savings to the NAD. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. Is City Council comfortable with the staff recommendation to support the potential ballot issue? 2. Is City Council comfortable with the County’s preferred alternative (which staff supports)? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The original version of HPOS was initiated by citizens and first approved by voters in 1995; the tax was collected from 1996-2003. In 1999 a citizen-initiated extension of the tax was approved by voters and extended the tax from 2004 - 2018. Per the current ballot language, the County can receive between 35-45% of the tax, and the incorporated cities within the County must receive no less than 55% of the tax. Monies are allocated to cities based on population or sales tax revenue generated - whichever benefits each city the most. Currently the County receives 42% of the revenues; the cities receive the remaining 58%. The County must spend 70% of the revenues it receives on land conservation and development of acquired lands and may spend no more than 30% of the revenues on operations and maintenance. Fort Collins may spend the revenues it receives from the County in accordance with the following ballot language: [T]he revenue deposited shall be used to further implement the Fort Collins Natural Areas Plan [Master Plan] and to further implement of the Fort Collins trails program; and that a portion of the revenue shall be used for long-term management and maintenance of natural areas and trails… The Natural Areas Department currently receives approximately 37% of its revenues from the HPOS tax. In 2013 these revenues amounted to $3,814,000. The majority of the revenues are used to support the Department’s operations and maintenance. In addition, these revenues have supported a $350,000 a year contribution for the paved trail system that goes through, and links, the City’s natural areas and parks. This ongoing contribution was instituted in 2003 when City revenues were affected by an economic downturn. Packet Pg. 3 July 8, 2014 Page 2 HPOS revenues are particularly important to the Department due to spending restrictions that are contained in Open Space, Yes! (OSY) the Fort Collins ¼-cent sales tax that supports the NAD. OSY requires that 80% of its revenues be spent on land conservation and restoration; the remaining 20% can be spent on operations and maintenance. Thus, the Department combines HPOS revenues and 20% of OSY revenues to fund core operations (such as trail, parking lot, bathroom, and fencing construction and maintenance as well as other day- to-day functions). For several months a committee has been meeting to assess the financial needs of Larimer County for future management of existing open space lands, as well as acquisition and management of new lands. The committee is composed of citizens, a Fort Collins City Councilmember (Gerry Horak who is an appointed member to the County’s open lands board), County staff, members of the County’s Open Lands Advisory Board and the County’s Parks Advisory Board, and Legacy Land Trust. This discussion has been deeply informed by Our Lands Our Future, an extensive year-long exploration of the future of open lands programs throughout the County. The study was conducted by Larimer County in partnership with local municipal governments, including extensive participation by Fort Collins. A great deal of polling data was collected that demonstrated strong support for continued land conservation and recreation programs on a countywide basis. The full OLOF report can be found at <http://larimer.org/ourlands_ourfuture/> Based on the discussions of the committee, three different scenarios for an extension of HPOS have been developed. All three options keep the sales tax at ¼ of a cent. Each of these options has various financial implications for the County and the cities. The implications have been modeled using a financial analysis tool that was developed for the County as part of the OLOF planning process. Fort Collins’ Natural Areas staff played a key role in developing the model which projects the costs of managing various kinds of land, as well as acquisition costs. Scenario I would retain the City/County revenue share-back at 58% for the cities and 42% for the County. The County’s spending restrictions are altered (from the 70% for conservation/development and 30% for operations) to 35% for acquisition and development, 50% for long-term management, and 15% flexible funds. This approach would allow the County to conserve up to 12,000 acres of land; however, in ten years the County would not have enough revenue to maintain its properties. This scenario would keep revenues to Fort Collins whole. Scenario II would change the share-back ratio from 58/42 to 50/50. The County’s spending restrictions are altered from 70/30 to 35% for acquisition and restoration of land; 50% for management and development; and 15% of the funds would be flexible. The share-back split and changes to the County’s spending restrictions would allow the County to conserve up to 36,000 acres and maintain those lands for 20 years. This scenario would diminish revenues to Fort Collins by $530,000 annually. Scenario III would change the share-back ratio from 58/42 to 52/48. The County’s spending restrictions are altered from 70/30 to 35% for acquisition and restoration of land; 50% for management and development; and 15% of the funds would be flexible. The share-back split and changes to the County’s spending restrictions would allow the County to conserve up to 22,500 acres and maintain those lands for 15 years. This scenario would diminish revenues to Fort Collins by $400,000 annually. County staff and the advisory committee have determined that Scenario II is the preferred alternative. Continuing to conserve land continues to be a very high priority of Larimer County residents as demonstrated by the polling data of the Our Lands Our Future study. This scenario maximizes the ability of the County to continue to conserve land while also providing 20 years of operations, maintenance and capital funding. Natural Areas Department staff supports an extension of the sales tax and, in particular, supports Scenario II. Although it reduces the City’s share-back revenue by an estimated $530,000 annually, staff believes the County open lands program is underfunded and requires these additional resources to adequately manage the lands it holds, as well as those that it hopes to acquire. In addition, the City and County natural areas and open lands programs have a long history of working together to achieve mutual goals. Scenario II has the potential to strengthen Larimer County as a partner and is likely to Packet Pg. 4 July 8, 2014 Page 3 continue to provide direct benefits to Fort Collins residents. For example, many properties have been acquired in partnership and, in turn, these properties have been used to provide community amenities such the Blue Sky trail that links Horsetooth Mountain Park, the Devils Backbone in Loveland, and Coyote Ridge in Fort Collins. The Department’s long-range financial model leads staff to believe that the short and long-term implications to the Natural Areas Department are manageable. This is especially true if Natural Areas is able to discontinue its $350,000 a year contribution for the paved trail system; and, if West Nile Virus management is paid for from the General Fund ($134,000 in 2015). The combined $484,000 a year savings nearly offset the potential loss from the County. In addition to potential financial changes to the existing ballot, the County is proposing a modification that would discontinue the requirement that an elected official from Fort Collins, Loveland, Estes Park, and Berthoud be appointed to its citizen advisory board. Instead, the ballot would require that the County Commissioners appoint an advisory board of at least 9 members based on interests, geography, and location. The logic of this change is that Larimer County is not able to appoint elected officials to the citizen advisory boards of the cities, and the County’s Open Lands Board only makes recommendations to the Commissioners on the County’s portion of HPOS revenues. ATTACHMENTS 1. Powerpoint presentation (PDF) Packet Pg. 5 1 Help Preserve Open Space July 8, 2014 ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 6 Attachment1.1: Powerpoint presentation (2110 : Potential County Referendum to Extend Help Preserve 2 Distribution of HPOS Loveland, $1,904,909 , 16.7% Fort Collins , $3,814,068 , 33.5% Larimer County, $4,777,403 , 42.0% All other municipalities, $891,088 , 7.8% Packet Pg. 7 Attachment1.1: Powerpoint presentation (2110 : Potential County Referendum to Extend Help Preserve 3 Open Space Yes!, $6,474,388 , 57% 1996 HPOS Larimer County 1/4 Cent Sales Tax, $3,765,230 , 33% Earnings on Investments, $23,522, 0% Grants and Donations, $882,000, 8% Miscellaneous Revenue, $227,062 2% Ongoing Natural Area Revenues 2013 $11,372,202 Packet Pg. 8 Attachment1.1: Powerpoint presentation (2110 : Potential County Referendum to Extend Help Preserve 4 2013 Expenditures $10,336,107 Program Management, $709,859 7% Education, $584,754 6% Rangers, $658,362 6% Facility Operations, $500,885, 5% Public Improvements, $963,638 9% Resource Management, $2,492,946, 24% Land Conservation, $4,425,664, 43% Packet Pg. 9 Attachment1.1: Powerpoint presentation (2110 : Potential County Referendum to Extend Help Preserve 5 2013 Expenditures by Category $10,336,107 Personnel, $2,942,928 , 28% O&M, $1,950,219, 19% Capital, $751,133 7% Restoration, $880,034 , 9% Land Conservation, $2,689,174 , 26% Debt Service, $1,122,619 , 11% Packet Pg. 10 Attachment1.1: Powerpoint presentation (2110 : Potential County Referendum to Extend Help Preserve 6 Core Operations • Utilize HPOS primarily for core operations • Due to 80/20 Open Space, Yes! spending restrictions Packet Pg. 11 Attachment1.1: Powerpoint presentation (2110 : Potential County Referendum to Extend Help Preserve 7 Preferred Scenario Ø Preferred by staff & sales tax committee (OLAB members, citizen advocacy group, and Legacy Land Trust) Ø Allows for future conservation of approx. 36,000 ac Ø Larimer County’s internal splits are adjusted: Ø In order to make this option work for the County: • County share changes from 42% to 50% • Cities share changes from 58% to 50% • Allows management of current & future lands for 20 years Packet Pg. 12 Attachment1.1: Powerpoint presentation (2110 : Potential County Referendum to Extend Help Preserve 8 Impact to City • Reduces revenues by ~$530,000 • Manageable if $350,000 trails contribution discontinued • Manageable if $134,000 WNV discontinued Packet Pg. 13 Attachment1.1: Powerpoint presentation (2110 : Potential County Referendum to Extend Help Preserve 9 Staff Support • County needs the additional funding • County and City have been great partners • The additional resources will strengthen the County • The County’s program benefits citizens of Fort Collins Packet Pg. 14 Attachment1.1: Powerpoint presentation (2110 : Potential County Referendum to Extend Help Preserve 10 Process • Municipal feedback by July 11 • Open Lands Board recommendation to BOCC July 17 • BOCC work session July 17 • BOCC adopt resolution for final ballot language July 29 • Possible Council resolution of support August 19 Packet Pg. 15 Attachment1.1: Powerpoint presentation (2110 : Potential County Referendum to Extend Help Preserve DATE: STAFF: July 8, 2014 John Stokes, Natural Resources Director WORK SESSION ITEM City Council SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this work session is to review and discuss the Poudre River Downtown Master Plan. The City of Fort Collins is developing a master plan for the Cache la Poudre River in the downtown corridor (Shields Street to Mulberry Street) to improve in-river and bankside recreation, habitat connectivity, restoration and rehabilitation, flood mitigation, channel bank protection, water quality, public safety and access, and transportation. The Master Plan provides a long-term vision and identifies improvements that will take many years to complete. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. Are there any specific Council reactions to the Master Plan? 2. Is the Master Plan meeting Council’s expectations? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The idea of (and the funding for) creating a Poudre River Downtown Master Plan for the core portion of the River corridor from Shields to Mulberry river was launched in the 2013/14 BFO process. The overarching goal of the Master Plan project is to design a comprehensive, long-term vision for stormwater mitigation, habitat, and recreation improvements from Shields Street to Mulberry. The $675,000 planning budget also includes some funds for engineering and permitting for project elements that can be selected from a menu of options after Council has reviewed and approved the Plan. The budget does not include any construction funds. A BFO offer to implement a portion of the Master Plan (the river reach from College Avenue to the downstream Burlington Northern railroad bridge) has been submitted. Additional potential funding sources include a renewed capital sales tax, other public sources such as Great Outdoors Colorado and the Colorado Water Conservation Board, and private fundraising. Because the vision is long-term in nature, it is anticipated that project elements will be funded and built over a period of perhaps decades. The key objectives of the project are: Flood Mitigation  Improve public safety and protect properties from damaging floods  Eliminate 100-year flood overtopping of College Avenue, and if possible, eliminate the 100-year flow split along Vine Drive  Reconnect the River to its floodplain while maximizing the beneficial environmental and recreation uses of the river corridor Packet Pg. 16 July 8, 2014 Page 2 Habitat  Conserve and restore the existing riparian ecosystem to promote river health and resilience  Deliver continuous, connected aquatic and riparian habitat for fish, wildlife, trees and plants  Achieve and maintain diverse and sustainable native fish, wildlife and plant populations Recreation  Provide a mix of active and passive recreational amenities both in and along the River which encourage a safe, healthy, outdoor lifestyle  Provide community gathering places and promote connectivity between recreational opportunities along the River corridor Key potential improvements that have been identified include:  A kayak park just below the College Avenue bridge  An iconic pedestrian bridge at the Powerhouse Energy Campus  Removing or substantially modifying the Coy Diversion dam  New parking and pedestrian connections at Shields Street  Safe, durable put-ins and take-outs for anglers, boaters, tubers, swimmers  Habitat improvements such as reconnecting the river to its floodplain in select locations, reconnecting in- channel habitat, and replacing non-native vegetation with natives  Park improvements at Lee Martinez and Legacy  Aesthetic improvements, such as the removal and burial of unsightly rip rap and concrete  Flood mitigation improvements, in particular the prevention of the 100-year overtopping of College, as well as numerous other improvements An important facet of the Plan is the notion of transition (please see page 1 - 4, Figures 1.7 and 1.8 in the draft Master Plan). At the western edge of the project area the emphasis is on nature and the experience of nature. The area surrounded by Lee Martinez and Legacy Parks is considered a transition zone that begins to emphasize more active recreation activities. Then, from College to the Burlington Northern bridge there is an area that has a more urban character in terms of design and amenities. From that location downriver, the project transitions back to a primary emphasis on nature. Each of the six “reaches” described in the Plan includes improvements related to the three themes of flood mitigation, recreation and habitat. But there are different blends, or hierarchies, of these values from reach to reach. A great deal of attention in the planning process has been devoted to the area from College Avenue downstream to the Burlington Northern railroad bridge. This area has some of the most interesting opportunities for improvements, while at the same time presenting unique challenges. A key driver at this location is the fact that the Coy diversion structure, a large irrigation dam, is no longer needed to deliver water. Thus, the possibility exists for the structure to be removed or significantly modified to provide multiple benefits. These benefits include: 1. Prevention of College Avenue bridge overtopping during a 100-year flood; 2. Reconnecting aquatic habitat that has been disconnected for over 100 years; 3. Using the drop associated with the Coy structure to develop several good kayaking play waves; 4. Narrowing an over-wide river channel which will provide opportunities for vegetation, and landscaping as well as improvements to accommodate people such as seating areas, trails, a restroom, and parking on Vine Street. (See Reach 3, page 2 - 13 of the draft Master Plan) There has been extensive public outreach (Attachment 7). The great majority of comments have been favorable and supportive. The primary concerns that have been expressed are related to the conceptual drawings for the College Avenue to Burlington Northern bridge. The drawings for this area were created to provide a higher than usual level of detail for a master plan. The rationale for this approach was based on several factors: (1) Staff believes this is the first area that should be improved; and, (2) because there is the possibility of a kayak park Packet Pg. 17 July 8, 2014 Page 3 here, staff wanted to be explicit about the infrastructure that would be necessary and desirable. While many comments have expressed unqualified support for the concept drawings, there have been concerns expressed such as: there is too much hardscape; the design should be oriented primarily or exclusively to habitat restoration; and, that the design will invite too much visitation at this location. From staff’s perspective the concept design certainly can be improved; nevertheless, the essence of the design expresses what staff believes is desirable and needed in this location. The design is an effort to provide a kayaking space, while also providing a focal point on the river where people can gather. From the perspective of the river corridor as a whole, from Overland Trail to I-25, most of the corridor is dominated by habitat improvements and flood mitigation. At this particular location, however, staff supports what it believes are relatively modest facilities for enhanced recreation, while at the same time respecting the other themes of the plan (flood mitigation and habitat). ATTACHMENTS 1. Poudre River Master Plan (draft)(PDF) 2. Trout Unlimited Letter of Support (PDF) 3. Natural Resources Advisory Board memo, June 18, 2014 (PDF) 4. Senior Board Letter, June 16, 2014 (PDF) 5. Land Conservation and Stewardship Board memo (PDF) 6. Downtown Development Authority Letter, July 1, 2014 (PDF) 7. Public Engagement Plan (PDF) 8. Powerpoint presentation (PDF) Packet Pg. 18 July 2, 2014 Packet Pg. 19 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) i | P a g e Acknowledgements CITY OF FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL Karen Weitkunat, Mayor Gerry Horak, Mayor Pro-Tem Gino Campana Ross Cunniff Bob Overbeck Lisa Poppaw Wade Troxell PROJECT STAFF – CITY OF FORT COLLINS John Stokes, Natural Areas Craig Foreman, Park Planning & Development Matt Day, Park Planning & Development – Project Manager Mark Kempton, Utilities - Stormwater Jennifer Shanahan, Natural Resources Zoe Whyman, Natural Areas Rich Bachand, Natural Areas Marsha Hilmes-Robinson, Utilities - Stormwater Matt Zoccali, Environmental Regulatory Specialist Kathleen Benedict, Park Planning & Development Bruce Hendee, Assistant City Manager Cameron Gloss, Planning Manager Lindsay Ex, Environmental Planner Clark Mapes, City Planner Pete Wray, Senior City Planner Ted Sheppard, Chief Planner Aaron Iverson, FC Moves Paul Sizemore, FC Moves Mark Jackson, Deputy Director Planning, Development, and Transportation Randy Hensley, Parking Services STAKEHOLDERS Colorado Parks and Wildlife Colorado State University, Campus Recreation Colorado State University, Engineering Colorado Water Trust Downtown Development Authority Downtown Business Association East Larimer County (ELCO) Water District Fort Collins Community Action Network Fort Collins Museum of Discovery Fort Collins Truck Sales Kayakers – Local Enthusiasts Lake Canal Reservoir Company Mountain Whitewater Descents The Neenan Company New Belgium Brewing North Fort Collins Business Association Odell Brewing Company Pinnacle Consulting Group Poudre Heritage Alliance Poudre Paddlers Powerhouse Energy Institute Ranch-way Feeds Rocky Mountain Fly Casters Save the Poudre UniverCity Connections U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Woodward ii | Page Table of Contents I. Master Plan Overview Executive Summary ............................................................ 1‐1 Purpose and Need .............................................................. 1‐2 Project Mission ................................................................... 1‐2 Primary Objectives ............................................................. 1‐2 Outreach and Engagement ................................................. 1‐2 Relationship to Other Planning Documents ....................... 1‐3 Supporting Studies ............................................................. 1‐3 Land Use Transitions .......................................................... 1‐5 Character Zones .................................................................. 1‐5 Overview of the Poudre River Downtown Master Plan ..... 1‐5 II. Master Plan by Reach Reach 1 Shields Street to Salyer Natural Area ...................... 2‐1 Reach 1 Background and Fundamental Opportunities ...... 2‐3 Related Projects .................................................................. 2‐3 Flood Mitigation and Bank Stabilization ............................. 2‐3 Habitat/Ecological Restoration and Protection .................. 2‐4 Recreation and Access ........................................................ 2‐4 Reach 2 Lee Martinez Park to the Museum of Discovery ..... 2‐7 Reach 2 Background and Fundamental Opportunities ...... 2‐9 Related Projects .................................................................. 2‐9 Flood Mitigation and Bank Stabilization ............................. 2‐9 Habitat/Ecological Restoration and Protection ................ 2‐10 Recreation and Access ...................................................... 2‐11 Reach 3 Museum of Discovery to BNSF Railroad ................ 2‐13 Reach 3 Background and Fundamental Opportunities .... 2‐15 Related Projects ................................................................ 2‐15 Flood Mitigation and Bank Stabilization ........................... 2‐15 Habitat/Ecological Restoration and Protection ................ 2‐17 Recreation and Access ...................................................... 2‐17 Phase II Environmental Site Assessment .......................... 2‐18 Reach 4 BNSF Railroad to Linden Street ............................. 2‐21 Reach 4 Background and Fundamental Opportunities .... 2‐23 Related Projects ................................................................ 2‐23 Flood Mitigation and Bank Stabilization ........................... 2‐23 Habitat/Ecological Restoration and Protection ................ 2‐23 Recreation and Access ...................................................... 2‐24 Reach 5 Linden Street to Lincoln Avenue ........................... 2‐27 Reach 5 Background and Fundamental Opportunities .... 2‐29 Related Projects and Documents ..................................... 2‐29 Flood Mitigation and Bank Stabilization .......................... 2‐29 Habitat/Ecological Restoration and Protection ................ 2‐31 Recreation and Access ...................................................... 2‐31 Reach 6 Lincoln Avenue to Mulberry Street ....................... 2‐35 Reach 6 Background and Fundamental Opportunities .... 2‐37 Related Projects and Documents ..................................... 2‐37 Flood Mitigation and Bank Stabilization .......................... 2‐37 Habitat/Ecological Restoration and Protection ................ 2‐38 Recreation and Access ...................................................... 2‐38 III. Visual Glossary/Design Guidelines River Bed Stabilization ........................................................ 3‐1 River Bank Stabilization and Restoration ........................... 3‐2 Rock Riprap Toe Stabilization .......................................... 3‐2 Rock Riprap Toe Stabilization with Root Wads ............... 3‐3 Stacked Boulder Toe Stabilzation .................................... 3‐4 River Access ........................................................................ 3‐5 Put Ins/Take Outs ............................................................... 3‐6 In‐Channel Whitewater Features ....................................... 3‐7 iii | Page LIST OF FIGURES (continued) Figure 2.12 Informal River Access and Play Area on the North River Bank Directly Upstream of the Hickory Pedestrian Bridge .................................. 2‐9 Figure 2.13 View of the Mounded Tree Dump Site in Lee Martinez Park .............................................. 2‐9 Figure 2.14 Bank Stabilization Needs Map for Reach 2 ...... 2‐10 Figure 2.15 Exposed Riprap on the North Bank at Legacy Park ....................................................... 2‐10 Figure 2.16 Lake Canal Diversion Dam ................................ 2‐10 Figure 2.17 View of the Poudre River between Lee Martinez Park and Legacy Park ................. 2‐11 Figure 2.18 Master Plan for Reach 3 ................................... 2‐14 Figure 2.19 View Looking East Just Downstream of College Avenue ................................................. 2‐15 Figure 2.20 Coy Diversion Structure, Boat Chute ............... 2‐15 Figure 2.21 Cross Section Comparison of the Existing and Proposed Channel East of College Avenue ...... 2‐16 Figure 2.22 Bank Stabilization Needs Map for Reach 3 ...... 2‐17 Figure 2.23 Bank Erosion, Concrete Rubble, and Exposed Plastic Turf Mat on South Bank, West of the BNSF Railroad ............................... 2‐18 Figure 2.24 Bank Erosion and Exposed Rock Riprap on South Bank, West of the BNSF Railroad ........... 2‐18 Figure 2.25 Conceptual Site Plan for Reach 3 ..................... 2‐19 Figure 2.26 Character Sketch, View Looking Southeast from the College Avenue Bridge ...................... 2‐20 Figure 2.27 Master Plan for Reach 4 ................................... 2‐22 Figure 2.28 River Access/Small Beach with Sentinel Boulders at the Gustav Swanson Natural Area ............... 2‐23 Figure 2.29 Bank Stabilization Needs Map for Reach 4 ...... 2‐23 Figure 2.30 Poudre Trail along Old Heritage Park (Block One Development is Under Construction in the Background) ..................... 2‐24 Figure 2.31 Conceptual Site Plan for Reach 4 ..................... 2‐25 Figure 2.32 Master Plan for Reach 5 ................................... 2‐28 Figure 2.33 Historic Concrete Structure Obstructing the Upstream Side of the Lincoln Avenue Bridge .. 2‐29 Figure 2.34 Adjacent Industrial Land Use and Concrete Rubble along Southwest Bank ......................... 2‐29 Figure 2.35 Cross Section between Linden Street and Lincoln Avenue (Looking Downstream) Illustrating the Side Channel and the Terraced Southwest Bank ................................ 2‐30 Figure 2.36 Bank Stabilization Needs Map for Reach 5 ...... 2‐31 Figure 2.37 View along the Northeast River Bank Looking Downstream (the Oxbow Levee and paved trail are on the left) .......................................... 2‐31 Figure 2.38 View from the Poudre Trail to the Southeast across the River (Ranch‐Way Feeds is in the Background) ............................. 2‐31 Figure 2.39 Conceptual Site Plan for Reach 5 ..................... 2‐32 Figure 2.40 Character Sketch, View Looking Southeast from the Linden Street Bridge ......................... 2‐33 Figure 2.41 Master Plan for Reach 6 ................................... 2‐36 Figure 2.42 Side Channel Flowing Past the Mulberry Wastewater Treatment Facility ....................... 2‐37 Figure 2.43 Steep High Bank Adjacent to the Former Pickle Plant Site ................................................ 2‐37 Packet Pg. 23 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Master Plan Overview 1-1 | P a g e Executive Summary The Cache la Poudre River is treasured by a community that values it for a variety of recreational activities and the tranquility of a natural corridor, while also depending on it as a water source for municipal and agricultural uses. Moreover, the Poudre River corridor serves numerous other functions such as carrying flood flows, providing vital habitat within and along the river, enhancing water quality, and regulating climate. The Downtown reach of the river – the section from Shields Street to Mulberry - is a gateway feature that greets visitors as they enter the City from both the north and east. This Master Plan envisions nearly three miles of sustainable river corridor (Shields Street to Mulberry Street) that provides habitat, recreation, and flood mitigation benefits. This is a long-term plan consisting of numerous elements that will take many years to complete. This plan integrates improvements to support many high-quality and safe recreational experiences, better protection against flood damage, and restored habitat connectivity for optimal river health and resiliency. Physical improvements which support sustainable use of the river corridor by the community will allow people to continue to enjoy their river, but in a way that supports a functioning ecosystem by providing connected habitat for fish, terrestrial wildlife, trees and plants, while also enhancing protection of the community during floods. Figure 1.1 Poudre River Looking West to the Shields Street Bridge For many years, the City of Fort Collins has actively sought to preserve the Poudre River corridor for the benefit of nature, people and flood protection. A substantial portion of the river’s floodplain has been placed in public ownership, as open space within the City’s system of Natural Areas. On-going improvements at McMurry Natural Area near Shields Street, as well as the recent addition of the 31-acre natural area upstream of Mulberry Street, at the site of the old Link ‘n Greens Golf Course, demonstrates the City’s continuing commitment to enhance the environmental and habitat value along the river. The Poudre River Trail system is a jewel that is the envy of many communities and was recently lauded by visiting officials from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. With respect to other recreation enhancements, the City has established four parks adjacent to the river. Two of these parks, Lee Martinez and Buckingham, have been cornerstones of their respective neighborhoods for many years. The City is currently planning improvements to Heritage, Lee Martinez and Legacy Parks to better celebrate the river and enhance a wide variety of recreational opportunities near the river. Figure 1.2 Poudre River Looking Northwest at the Burlington Northern- Santa Fe Railroad Bridge The City of Fort Collins has long been a leader in flood awareness and protection. This is particularly true along the river where flood mitigation measures have been continually planned and implemented since the 1970s. The City is recognized by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as one of the most flood resistant communities in the country. This was most fortunately demonstrated during the recent Flood of September 2013, during which the river experienced it highest flood flow in more than 80 years, but suffered only minor damage to both private property and public infrastructure. While the City has realized remarkable achievements along the Poudre River, much more can be done in numerous areas, especially with regard to the beneficial functions of reconnecting the river to in floodplain, flood resilience, habitat enhancements, and providing opportunities for people to responsibly access and enjoy the river. Indeed, much work will need to be accomplished in order to accommodate and balance future demands that Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 1-2 | P a g e Purpose and Need During the planning process members of the community, stakeholders, City Council and City staff have repeatedly expressed the importance of the Poudre River to our community, and described it as “the lifeblood of our city”, a “jewel”, the “heart of our city” and said that they’re “glad that the Poudre River is getting the attention it deserves”. These words illustrate the emotional connection that our community has with the Poudre River, and the river’s importance as a part of our city. This project is intended to design and facilitate a beautiful river corridor that provides recreation and flood mitigation, while also restoring and preserving vital habitat. Figure 1.4 Concrete Rubble in Channel Bed and on Eroding Bank Downstream of Linden Street The Poudre River Downtown Master Plan was envisioned with multiple goals in mind. Two of the goals are providing recreational opportunities and conserving nature, and sometimes pursuing both simultaneously can result in conflict. It is clear, however, that the quality of the recreational experience is closely associated with the quality and health of the natural environment. The river provides a focus for people’s health and wellbeing and there are many associated physical and mental benefits for those people pursuing various recreational activities. The Poudre River also serves as a valuable resource for educating school children and the public alike, thus promoting the ideals of environmental sustainability and wildlife conservation. Figure 1.5 Lake Canal Diversion Structure near Lee Martinez Park Flood-related challenges and opportunities are primarily linked to constrictions of the river channel, and structures that have been placed in the river, both of which inhibit flood flows. There are opportunities to relieve constrictions and modify structures to reduce flood damage and flooding impacts to private property and buildings, as well as public infrastructure. In addition, constrictions of the river channel have generally resulted in the river being disconnected from the floodplain and have adversely impacted riparian habitat, while in-channel structures are impediments to aquatic and boating connectivity up and down the river. Modifications to these features would substantially improve aquatic and riparian habitat, overall stream health and function, and the floating/boating experience. High public use of the Poudre River through Downtown Fort Collins reflects the intrinsic attractiveness of the river as well as the success of community- funded improvements. Building on this success, and delivering a world class example of a healthy working river, will require further improvements related to biological health and resiliency, recreational access, flood conveyance and floodplain connectivity. Project Mission Stewardship – Experience –Sustainability – Education The Poudre River Downtown Project will plan and design integrated, and to the extent possible, mutually supportive improvements related to habitat, recreation and flood mitigation. Primary Objectives Habitat  Conserve and restore the existing riparian ecosystem to promote river health and resiliency.  Deliver continuous, connected aquatic and riparian habitat for fish, wildlife, trees and plants.  Achieve and maintain diverse and sustainable native fish, wildlife and plant populations. Recreation  Provide a mix of active and passive recreational amenities both in and along the river which encourage a safe, healthy, outdoor lifestyle. Master Plan Overview 1-3 | P a g e Figure 1.6 Day on the River with City Staff and the Consultant Team Several primary themes emerged from the outreach and engagement process. These themes gravitated around:  improving access to the river;  providing recreational opportunities within and along the river;  desire for a whitewater park;  stewardship of existing riparian and aquatic habitat;  habitat enhancement along the riparian corridor;  improving aquatic connectivity; and  enhancing health and safety along the river through flood mitigation. Relationship The river and lands to Other along the Planning Poudre River Documents have been the focus of a variety of planning and management efforts through the years. Preparation of the Poudre River Downtown Master Plan has included review of these other planning documents. The current Master Plan has incorporated the ideas and concepts of these previously-adopted plans in an effort to promote consistency and continuities across the broad planning spectrum with the City. These other planning documents include: Framework for Environmental Action (1992). This plan identified action for the Poudre River corridor including development of a land acquisition program, natural areas plan, and mitigation manual. City Land Use Code (1997). This code established a variety of river protection regulations including land use districts and a development buffer zone, which extends 300 feet from both sides of the river in most areas with a smaller buffer in the downtown core. Cache La Poudre River Master Drainageway Plan (2001). This plan identified flood hazards and estimated potential flood damages along the Poudre River from Taft Hill Road to I-25. The plan also evaluated alternatives and estimated potential costs for protecting property, public safety, and other resources within the study area. Poudre River Enhancement Plan (2003). This plan identified improvements directed at improving habitat along the river from Lincoln Avenue upstream to College Avenue, with particular focus on the reach from Lincoln Avenue to Linden Street. The plan also identified the need for a levee between Lincoln and Linden; the Oxbow Levee has since been constructed. North College Corridor Plan (2007). The mission of this planning effort is to catalyze ongoing improvements to remove constraints and foster desirable development and redevelopment. Among other things, this plan promotes development activity that strengthens relationships – such as the corridor to Downtown; and development and activity to the natural environs of the river, canal corridors, and other outdoor spaces such as future drainageways. North College Drainage Plan (2008). This plan developed alternatives to mitigate local flooding in the area north of Vine Drive between the UPRRR and Lemay Avenue, particularly along North College Avenue. The resulting plan included an integrated system of large storm sewers, detention facilities and an open channel/swale. Fort Collins Park Policy Plan (2008). The purpose of the Parks and Recreation Policy Plan Update is to assess the park and recreation needs of the Fort Collins community, evaluate the City’s current services, and provide clear and implementable recommendations to deliver the level of service needed to meet the community’s changing needs for the next ten years. City Plan Fort Collins (updated 2011). The City’s comprehensive City Plan was first completed in 1997, updated in 2004, and updated again on February 15, 2011 and titled: “City Plan Fort Collins.” City Plan Fort Collins contains an array of principles and policies that underscore the community’s support for the Poudre River ecosystem, Flood Management and Parks and Recreation. The following are pertinent principles and polices:  Stormwater and Flood Management - Principle ENV 18  Poudre River Corridor - Principles ENV 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 & 29 Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 1-4 | P a g e Figure 1.7 Land Use Transition Concept Figure 1.8 Land Use Transition Diagram Packet Pg. 27 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Master Plan Overview 1-5 | P a g e  Anderson Consulting Engineers, “Poudre River Downtown Project, Qualitative Geomorphic Assessment of the Cache La Poudre River, Shields Street to Mulberry Street,” December 19, 2013.  Miller Ecological Consultants, “Habitat Inventory Results for Cache La Poudre River in Fort Collins and Summary of Fish Presence and Swimming Speeds,” January 28, 2014.  Tatanka Historical Associates, “Historic Structures along the Cache La Poudre River Corridor, Mulberry Street to Shields Street,” December 27, 2013.  Walsh Environmental, “Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, Poudre River Downtown Project, Fort Collins, Colorado,” May 30, 2014. Land Use Transitions The downtown reach of the Poudre River provides multiple opportunities for the adjacent urbanized environment to interface with the natural environment within the riparian corridor. At a macro-scale, this can be envisioned by considering land use transitions moving both laterally (into and out of the river corridor) and longitudinally (starting in the core downtown area and traveling both east and west along the river corridor). Progressive zones which provide transitions from areas of more human activity to areas which emphasize habitat and the natural environment are illustrated with the Land Use Transition Concept and Land Use Transition Diagram provided in Figures 1.7 and 1.8 (at left). The land use transition zones (Natural, Transition, Urban Interface) are conceptual, not absolute. The concept of transitioning from Natural to Urban was considered throughout the master planning process, but there are numerous instances where specific sites blur the lines. For example, the Gustav Swanson Natural Area is located within the Urban Interface Zone due primarily to the proximity and intensity of surrounding urbanized development, but the site will remain a natural riparian forest supporting urban wildlife habitat and passive human use. Conversely, the McMurry Natural Area is located within the Natural Use Zone and recreational uses such as boating, fishing, picnicking are encouraged. The blending of land uses, which blurs transition zones, is also illustrated in Figure 1.9 where multiple land uses co-exist on opposite banks of the river between Linden Street and Lincoln Avenue. Considering these transitions at a finer level of detail requires thoughtful consideration of the context that includes existing natural resources, requirements for sustainable habitat, aquatic and terrestrial wildlife activities, human behavior, and surrounding land uses. One of the most challenging aspects of promoting riparian habitat health in an urban setting is the ability to provide a continuum of habitat such that contiguous wildlife movement up and down the river is supported along at least one river bank and within the river itself. Figure 1.9 Variations in Land Use and Character on Opposing Channel Banks within the Reach between Linden and Lincoln Character Zones The Character Zone Map provided in Figure 1.10 was prepared in an effort to better define areas which would best support habitat stewardship and enhancements, areas where human activity could be focused and access to the river provided, and approaches for resolving potential challenges in sensitive areas where humans and wildlife will likely interact. The Character Zones are generally defined as follows: Habitat Conservation Area - A zone emphasizing conservation and preservation of sensitive habitat. Protection Area - A zone which prioritizes protecting existing habitat while allowing trail-side activities. Natural Experience Area - A zone which encourages visitors to connect with nature and enjoy low-impact recreation. Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 1-6 | P a g e Figure 1.10a Character Zone Map (West Side) Packet Pg. 29 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Master Plan Overview 1-7 | P a g e Figure 1.10b Character Zone Map (East Side) Packet Pg. 30 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 1-8 | P a g e Figure 1.11a Master Plan Overview Map (West Side) Packet Pg. 31 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Master Plan Overview 1-9 | P a g e Figure 1.11b Master Plan Overview Map (East Side) Packet Pg. 32 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Packet Pg. 33 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 2-1 | P a g e REACH 1 Shields Street to Salyer Natural Area REACH 1 REACH 2 REACH 3 REACH 4 REACH 5 REACH 6 Packet Pg. 34 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 2-2 | P a g e Figure 2.1 Master Plan for Reach 1 Packet Pg. 35 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Reach 1 Shields Street to Salyer Natural Area 2-3 | P a g e Reach 1 Background and Fundamental Opportunities The Poudre River begins its course through Fort Collins’ urban center as it passes under Shields Street. This is a beautiful stretch of the river corridor that feels rural in character due to the presence of McMurry Natural Area, Salyer Natural Area, the mature cottonwood forest, and the larger privately owned parcels adjacent to the corridor. The City and County have either attended to or are currently addressing several of the safety, flood mitigation, bank stabilization and habitat restoration objectives in this reach as part of other projects. This project complements previous efforts and places emphasis on the provision of sustainable trails and access to the river. Figure 2.2 Poudre River Looking West (McMurry Natural Area is on right) Outside of the river itself, the most distinct features found in this reach are the McMurry Ponds which encourage people to explore away from the river’s edge. Visitors routinely participate in a wide range of activities from: solitary nature reflection; birding; socializing with groups of friends; playing in the water; walking with family, friends and dogs; fishing; floating the river; kayaking the ponds; and picnicking. The greenway corridor constricts as it crosses east past Shields Street. There may be opportunities to expand the corridor through land acquisition from willing landowners. The expansion would help provide opportunities to: protect properties from flooding; reconnect the floodplain to its overbank areas; enhance and restore the river ecosystem, and provide for additional recreation opportunities. Opportunities for expansion of the river greenway in this reach include:  Lowering the near-river portion of the Salyer Natural Area to reconnect this area to the river during 2-year to 5-year flow events  Potential land acquisitions from willing landowners in areas that directly adjoin the river and/or that adjoin public lands. Related Projects  Shields Street Bridge replacement, including parking and river access points.  Poudre-o-meter – a combined river access/flood level demonstration feature located just downstream of the Shields Street Bridge.  The McMurry Natural Area Ecological Restoration Project was completed in Spring 2014.  Vegetative landscaping improvements for exposed riprap on the south bank of the river near Wood Street.  Private Development. Natural area buffers located within adjacent private properties will require designs intended to blend with the existing river character. Flood Mitigation and Bank Stabilization Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with flood mitigation and bank stabilization include the following:  Insurable structures are located within the regulatory (100-year, aka 1% annual chance of occurrence) floodplain in the upper and middle portion of this reach. In addition, at approximately mid-reach, a residential development is proposed in the near overbank south of the river. Consequently, particular care will be required to ensure that any project which includes improvements within the river corridor (i.e., floodway) do not increase 100-year water surface elevations.  Opportunities for reducing 100-year flood elevations should be investigated in conjunction with future improvements within this reach. On-going and potential future improvements through McMurry and Salyer Natural Areas, which are intended to reconnect the river to its floodplain by lowering extensive portions of the overbank, will promote reduction in flood elevations and will help to maintain stable banks and support riparian vegetation. Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 2-4 | P a g e Habitat/Ecological Restoration and Protection McMurry Natural Area restoration projects were completed in Spring 2014 and helped meet the following objectives:  Protecting existing high quality riparian forests, wetlands, and native plants.  Improving streambanks by lowering high banks and reconnecting the floodplain to river (for 2 to 5+ year events), removing rubble/debris, and repairing severely eroding banks.  Improving riparian habitat and connectivity, both lateral and longitudinally, by creating wetlands, expanding riparian forest and shrub cover, and increasing diversity for native birds, amphibians, and other wildlife.  Moving the trail back from river’s edge to improve corridor for small riparian mammals.  Maintaining backwater channel habitat.  Removing concrete rubble from channel banks.  Maintaining in-stream habitat connectivity and diversity.  Providing specified public access area for protection of near shore vegetation, and re-establish near shore vegetation to contribute to in-stream productivity. Potential opportunities for improvements in Salyer Natural Area include:  Increasing diversity by enhancing the mosaic of native riparian plant communities.  Creating backwater channel wetlands.  Enhancing 2-year to 5-year overbank flooding opportunities.  Protecting existing native plant zones, particularly in northern portion of this natural area.  Stabilizing actively eroding banks and re-establish riparian vegetation. Recreation and Access Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with recreation and access include the following:  Creating settings where people are encouraged to interact with and learn about nature and local heritage. Potential interpretive and educational topics for this section of the river include: wetlands; water birds; hydrology; flood level awareness at the “Poudre-o-meter” at McMurry (Figure 2.5); and the historic Mason & Hottel Mill Race. Figure 2.5 Poudre-o-meter at McMurry Natural Area  Designating and creating beaches and river access areas in both McMurry Natural Area and Salyer Natural Area; these areas could be identified and managed as anticipated high-use, focal points.  Providing sustainable trail connections.  Collaborating with Larimer County on the design and reconstruction of the Shields Street Bridge to include pedestrian river access, a trailhead parking lot, and other amenities consistent with visitor needs. Figure 2.6 Tubing Enthusiasts Enjoying the River  A large concrete headgate structure (Figure 2.7), that appears to be associated with the historic Mason & Hottel Mill Race (Auntie Stone’s Mill Race), is located where a line drawn due north from Loomis Street meets the trail and south bank of the river. Design and install interpretive signs describing this structure’s original function and historical significance. Further information concerning this structure is provided in the Historical Structures report (Tatanka, 2014).  Improving the physical and visual connection to and from Shields Street to the river. This could be accomplished with additional signage, trail connections, bridge enhancements, and/or landscape enhancements.  Providing wayfinding signs to assist visitors in navigating between various destinations along the river. Figure 2.7 Historic Mason & Hottel Mill Race Headgate Structure Reach 1 Shields Street to Salyer Natural Area 2-5 | P a g e restrooms, picnic shelter, basketball, in-line hockey, a ball field, a multi-purpose open turf play area, a dog park, and a BMX area. Figure 2.8 Tributary Stream at McMurry Natural Area Showing Impacts Caused by Heavy Visitor Use  The existing pedestrian bridge located at the east edge of McMurry Natural Area should be renovated or replaced to provide a safe and accessible route across the river (Figure 2.9). Figure 2.9 McMurry Pedestrian Bridge, Note Non-Compliant Railing  A recurring comment is that there is a general lack of public access to the river from areas on the north side of the river. To address this issue, the master plan recommends development of additional potential parking in Legacy Park and/or Salyer Natural Area. Parking should be consolidated where possible to preserve the natural river environment.  The following table provides a summary of both existing and proposed public parking located within or near the river corridor in this reach. Parking in these areas is provided for multiple uses and is not guaranteed for river use. Parking Location Number of Spaces Shields Street, Larimer County (gravel) 42 (proposed) Utility Service Center (paved) TBD McMurry Natural Area (gravel) 6 to 8 Soft Gold Park (paved) 29  Larimer County is currently designing a new parking lot west of Shields Street, on the north side of the river. The new parking lot will include a total of 42 spaces.  Wood Street will be extended north to serve the proposed residential development (Pateros Creek) located east of Wood Street, south of the river. Wood Street could be designed to accommodate on-street parking (parallel or diagonal) in order to provide convenient public parking for trail and river users.  The master plan illustrates a potential public parking lot within the existing Utility Service Center parking lot. This parking area, if provided, should open to the public and signed appropriately.  Bike parking spaces should be provided in close proximity to each river put-in/take-out. The location and number of spaces will vary depending on individual site characteristics. Packet Pg. 38 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 2-7 | P a g e REACH 2 Lee Martinez Park to the Museum of Discovery REACH 1 REACH 2 REACH 3 REACH 4 REACH 5 REACH 6 Packet Pg. 39 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 2-8 | P a g e Figure 2.10 Master Plan for Reach 2 Packet Pg. 40 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Reach 2 Lee Martinez Park to the Museum of Discovery 2-9 | P a g e Reach 2 Background and Fundamental Opportunities This section of the river is flanked by Lee Martinez Park, Legacy Park, Rivers Edge Natural Area, The Farm, and The Museum of Discovery Museum. Other prominent man-made features found within the river corridor include the Hickory Pedestrian Bridge, the Lake Canal Diversion Structure, and the Union Pacific Railroad trestle bridge. A unique and wonderful aspect of this river reach is the native riparian forest found in the west portion of Lee Martinez Park, which is the most expansive tree gallery within the project area. According to Colorado Natural Heritage mapping of riparian areas in the lower Poudre River watershed, this is one of only a handful of contiguous forests greater than 15 acres in size remaining between the mouth of the canyon and Greeley. It is a wild and magical place that is home to a diverse collection of wildlife, and is a place where people go to “escape” from the city to experience nature’s beauty and wonder (Figure 2.11). Figure 2.11 View of the Riparian Forest in Lee Martinez Park It’s also interesting to note that within the City of Fort Collins there are a total of three public parks having direct access to the Poudre River and two of the parks are located in this reach on opposing sides of the river. For this reason, these parks offer unique recreational and educational opportunities that cannot be found in other parks. At the same time these parks should be carefully integrated into the riparian corridor to respect and preserve the natural beauty found here. Opportunities for expansion of the river greenway in this reach include potential land acquisitions from landowners in areas that directly adjoin the river and/or public lands using the City’s “Willing Seller - Willing Buyer” program. Figure 2.12 Informal River Access and Play Area on the North River Bank Directly Upstream of the Hickory Pedestrian Bridge Related  Legacy Projects Park and Lee Martinez Park (which includes The Farm and the Museum of Discovery) will be master planned by the City’s Park Planning Department as part of a separate effort and public process.  The Old Town Basin Water Quality Master Plan (2012) identifies the need for water quality pond expansion in Lee Martinez Park.  The North College Drainage Plan (2008) identifies the need for a large water quality pond in River’s Edge Natural Area.  Museum of Discovery’s future plans include additional enhancements within the museum grounds between the building and the river.  The Tree dump in Lee Martinez Community Park is identified as an area to mitigate, make improvements to the flood plain, and enhance natural and recreational opportunities. Flood Mitigation and Bank Stabilization Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with flood mitigation and bank stabilization include the following:  There are a limited number of insurable structures located within or close to the regulatory floodplain in the lower portion of this reach. Consequently, particular care will be required to ensure that any project which includes improvements within the river corridor (i.e., floodway) do not increase 100-year water surface elevations.  Currently, 100-year flows would overtop College Avenue; however, the solution for eliminating overtopping of College Avenue requires that tailwater be reduced in the reach downstream of College. Improvements required to eliminate overtopping of College Avenue are addressed in Reach 3.  Even with the proposed downstream improvements, College Avenue may still overtop if a sufficient amount of woody debris collects on the numerous wooden piers associated with the UPRR Bridge. It is recommended that discussions be held with the UPRR in an effort to Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 2-10 | P a g e  Implementing the previously identified water quality pond improvements within Lee Martinez Park, while exploring opportunities to enhance and protect valuable bird habitat and avoiding encroachments into usable park space.  Implementing the previously identified water quality pond improvements within the River’s Edge Natural Area, while incorporating both wetland and upland habitat enhancements.  Lowering the bank elevation and improving the hardened (riprap) river bank in Legacy Park by replacing the riprap with boulder toe erosion protection, burying the existing riprap, or a combination of both. In either case, the upper bank should be vegetated with native grasses and shrubs along with trees planted on the upper bank.  Creating a cobble point bar, underlain with native sand and gravel, on the right bank of the river on the inside bend upstream of the Lake Canal Diversion Structure, and incorporating alternating bars consisting of cobble, gravel and sand in order to narrow the width of the channel in the relatively straight reach downstream of the Hickory Bridge.  Stabilizing the south channel bank in the vicinity and upstream of the UPRR Bridge by installing rock riprap toe protection (backfilled) with vegetative cover (grasses, shrubs and/or willows) along the upper bank. Figure 2.14 Bank Stabilization Needs Map for Reach 2  Optional bank improvements for the areas illustrated in Figure 2.14 above include: o Rock riprap toe protection (backfilled and/or buried) with revegetation (native grasses, willows and shrubs); or o Stacked boulder toe protection with revegetation (native grasses, willows and shrubs). Habitat/Ecological Restoration and Protection Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with habitat/ecological restoration and protection include the following:  Protecting large and continuous patches of native riparian forest and wetland mosaics.  Improving ecological diversity of the riparian forest understory and upland shrub habitat for native bird species.  Removing of undesirable non-native tree/plant species.  Burying existing riprap on the river bank in Legacy Park and revegetating with native grasses, willows and shrubs (Figure 2.15). Figure 2.15 Exposed Riprap on the North Bank at Legacy Park  Improving travel corridors for riparian wildlife by providing a combination of a vegetated river’s edge, larger offsets to parking and trails from the river, and providing designated river access and recreation areas. Wildlife connectivity would be improved; however, limited fragmentation may persist.  Designing future stormwater quality ponds to integrate habitat features and prevent or minimize impact to mature forest and high quality bird habitat.  Providing in-stream cover in the backwater upstream of the Lake Canal Diversion Structure to improve aquatic habitat structure.  The Lake Canal Diversion Structure, in its current form (Figure 2.16), causes significant impact to the river’s health. The diversion dam prevents fish passage and causes unnatural pooling that extends nearly 1,300 feet upstream, negatively impacting fish habitat. o Short-term opportunities include: Providing fish and boat passage to avoid bank erosion due to portage activities, by either modifying the west end of the diversion dam, or creating a bypass channel. o Long-term opportunities include: Evaluating potential of removing the diversion dam which could help improve river health. If the ditch company is willing to explore opportunities with the City, and Reach 2 Lee Martinez Park to the Museum of Discovery 2-11 | P a g e Recreation and Access Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with recreation and access include the following:  Lee Martinez Park and Legacy Park will be master planned as part of a separate public design process.  Lee Martinez Park is defined as a Community Park in the Parks and Recreation Policy Plan and currently includes the following amenities: o Trails o Parking o Tennis Courts (4) - lighted o One Shelter (drop-in only) o Playground o Ball Diamonds (2) – lighted o Basketball Courts (3) – lighted o The Farm o Museum of Discovery  As part of Lee Martinez Park, The Farm has provided family fun since 1985, and serves as an educational and interactive experience for Fort Collins residents and visitors. Features include: o Farm animals o Hands-on experiences o Interactive family fun o Birthday party rentals o Museum & The Farm Store o Hayrides (routed through Parks, Natural Areas) o Pony rides o Special events  Strengthen the relationship between the Museum of Discovery, Parks, Natural Areas, the river and downtown by incorporating educational and demonstration areas.  Legacy Park currently includes a gravel parking area and a small shelter, but the majority of the site is currently undeveloped. The Legacy Park site is utilized for community events such as the Sustainable Living Fair and the Poudre River Festival.  The section of river between Lee Martinez and Legacy Park is unique in that it is the only place in the city having public parks on both sides of the river (Figure 2.17), and is already very popular for recreation. Improved amenities should enhance the swimming, wading tubing/boating, and play experience while protecting the environment from further degradation caused by intensive use. River bank improvements should be designed to withstand the existing and anticipated use of this area. Bank stabilization and other improvements may include hardscape/stone terraces, ADA river access, picnic shelters, benches and other features intended to support river-related recreation.  The Lake Canal diversion dam backs up water in this reach, so the river is generally deeper and slower moving, and this has become a favorite area for swimmers (Figure 2.12). Figure 2.17 View of the Poudre River between Lee Martinez Park and Legacy Park  Formalizing put-ins/take-outs for boaters and tubers at the following three locations: o Lee Martinez Park across from Legacy Park o East end of Legacy Park o Upstream of the UPRR Bridge in Lee Martinez Park  Preserving the existing riparian forest in the northwest section of Lee Martinez Park, as it is a valuable refuge for wildlife and a peaceful setting people.  Removing the existing Hickory Pedestrian Bridge and relocating it to 2-13 | P a g e REACH 3 Museum of Discovery to BNSF Railroad REACH 1 REACH 2 REACH 3 REACH 4 REACH 5 REACH 6 Packet Pg. 44 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 2-14 | P a g e Figure 2.18 Master Plan for Reach 3 Packet Pg. 45 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Reach 3 Museum of Discovery to BNSF Railroad 2-15 | P a g e Reach 3 Background and Fundamental Opportunities Reach 3 is located east of Lee Martinez Park and north of Downtown Fort Collins, and is surrounded by considerable urban development. Consequently, the river and its floodplain are highly altered and influenced by structures including bridges, two railroads, concrete flood walls, a diversion structure and adjacent private development. Channelization of the river is extreme between College and the BNSF Railroad Bridge (Figure 2.19). Likewise, limited riparian forest habitat and a minimal corridor for wildlife movement reflect the most acute confinement on the river’s 12-mile journey through Fort Collins. Figure 2.19 View Looking East Just Downstream of College Avenue The master plan envisions a major remodel of this river reach, creating an active and vibrant setting where people are encouraged to engage with and play in the river in an urban setting. The transformation would begin by removing the existing Coy Ditch Diversion structure and boulder-lined “boat chute” (Figure 2.20). After removing these structures, the river channel would be narrowed to a more natural, sustainable width and deepened by implementing a variety of terraces to improve natural river function, increase flood capacity, to provide additional space for bank improvements and riparian habitat. Changes to channel cross section in this area are illustrated in Figure 2.21 (provided on the following page). The improved channel would be stabilized by constructing four in-stream sloping rock features, two of which would incorporate whitewater wave features and “holes”. An added benefit is that the new sloping rock features would be designed to allow fish passage creating aquatic connectivity that hasn’t existed in this reach of the river since the Coy Diversion was constructed. Additional space on the river banks, created by narrowing the river channel, may incorporate: a river overlook; terraced seating areas on the south river bank; ADA river access; put-in/take-out areas, habitat enhancements; and a pedestrian bridge over the river between College and the BNSF Bridge. Facilities such as parking, restrooms, new trails and trail improvements, the pedestrian bridge, terraced viewing areas, put-in/take-out areas and water play areas would be needed to support the anticipated use of this area. Opportunities for expansion of the river greenway in this reach include potential land acquisitions from landowners in areas that directly adjoin the river and/or public lands using the City’s “Willing Seller - Willing Buyer” program. Specific examples could include:  Consider purchasing private property located between the river and Vine Street, between College Avenue and the BNSF Railroad, in order to remove existing structures from the floodway and to create visitor amenities, such as additional open space and parking.  Explore the possibility of purchasing the existing Xcel property and relocating Xcel’s existing natural gas pump station to a location near Vine Street. If successful, this area could be converted to a combination of habitat and recreational features. Related Projects  Private Development. Natural area buffers located within adjacent private properties shall be designed to blend with the existing river character. Refer to the City Land Use Code for natural area buffer standards and requirements. Flood Mitigation and Bank Stabilization Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with flood mitigation Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 2-16 | P a g e Figure 2.21 Cross Section Comparison of the Existing and Proposed Channel East of College Avenue Packet Pg. 47 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Reach 3 Museum of Discovery to BNSF Railroad 2-17 | P a g e Figure 2.22 Bank Stabilization Needs Map for Reach 3 Habitat/Ecological Restoration and Protection Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with habitat/ecological restoration and protection include the following:  The Coy Diversion structure and boat chute significantly impact fish passage and create a large upstream pool within the river. In addition, these structures are unattractive and visually dominant features in the landscape. Fish passage and aquatic habitat improvements would be integrated into the recreational improvements when both the Coy Diversion and boat chute are removed.  Existing river banks near the Coy Diversion are dominated by vertical concrete walls, a variety of rail fences, and steep slopes. Remove, replace, mask or enhance walls and fences where possible to create an attractive corridor.  If compatible with other improvements within this reach, lowering the Poudre River Trail along the south side of the river would reconnect the river to at least a narrow portion of the floodplain.  This stretch of the river is envisioned as an area that can accommodate visitor use that is higher than adjoining reaches. Wildlife connectivity improvements would be provided along the river banks to the greatest extent possible, although some fragmentation will likely remain.  Wildlife connectivity is currently provided beneath College Avenue by the bridge’s northernmost span and can be enhanced by improving vegetation along the north bank.  Improving the backwater and poor fish habitat condition upstream of Coy Diversion Structure by reconfiguring/modifying/lowering the in-stream structures.  Creating riffles and pools similar to those present in the river upstream and downstream of this reach.  This area contains a significant amount of non-native vegetation. As the area is improved, non-native vegetation will be replaced with native species.  Historically, the John G. Coy Ditch flowed through two small ponds in the Gustav Swanson Natural Area. However, water is no longer being diverted at the Coy Diversion, and as a result the ditch and the ponds have dried up. The ditch and the ponds should be filled and these areas should be restored to blend with the surroundings. Recreation and Access Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with recreation and access include the following:  The area north of the river is envisioned to have a park-like setting that is blended into the natural river setting. Activities and amenities may include a beach, river play, unstructured imaginative natural play areas, picnic shelters, restrooms, trails and parking.  The historic character, architectural forms and materials found in the Power House Energy Institute could be incorporated into an iconic pedestrian bridge and hardscape features within the river corridor to blend the old and the new.  Potential interpretive/educational topics for this section of the river include: historic power generation techniques, geothermal, coal, demonstration water wheel, in-stream flow measurements, Coy ditch, irrigation, the grotto, old water works facility (Gustav Swanson), etc.  Approximately 9 feet of fall exists within the channel between College Avenue and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Bridge making this the most suitable location for a whitewater play park in the project area. The master plan includes two whitewater wave features, each having 1.5 to 2 feet of fall.  It is proposed that the College Avenue Bridge and areas surrounding the Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 2-18 | P a g e Phase II Environmental Site Assessment As part of this master planning effort, a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment was completed for the reach between College Avenue and the BNSF Railroad. The primary objective of this assessment was to determine whether or not construction of river improvements through this reach might be expected to encounter non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) contamination from the nearby Poudre River‒Aztlan Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Removal Action Site. Based on this assessment, there were no indications that NAPL contamination in the underlying bedrock was present or would be encountered. Other contaminants, not associated with the NAPL plume, were identified during the subsurface investigation; however, most of these substances were present at levels below USEPA/State standards, or established background levels. Some potential contaminants of concern were identified, including asbestos, petroleum hydrocarbon and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compounds, and arsenic. Due to the possibility of encountering one or more of these compounds in the soil, it is recommended that the previously-approved Soil Characterization and Management Plan for the site be followed during construction. If contaminated soils are encountered during construction, it is recommended that these soils be managed in accordance with a Materials Management Plan which is aimed at limiting exposure and ensuring proper disposal of all impacted materials (Walsh, 2014). Figure 2.23 Bank Erosion, Concrete Rubble, and Exposed Plastic Turf Mat on South Bank, West of the BNSF Railroad Figure 2.24 Bank Erosion and Exposed Rock Riprap on South Bank, West of the BNSF Railroad Packet Pg. 49 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Reach 3 Museum of Discovery to BNSF Railroad 2-19 | P a g e Figure 2.25 Conceptual Site Plan for Reach 3 Packet Pg. 50 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 2-20 | P a g e Figure 2.26 Character Sketch, View Looking Southeast from the College Avenue Bridge Packet Pg. 51 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 2-21 | P a g e REACH 4 BNSF Railroad to Linden Street REACH 1 REACH 2 REACH 3 REACH 4 REACH 5 REACH 6 Packet Pg. 52 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 2-22 | P a g e Figure 2.27 Master Plan for Reach 4 Packet Pg. 53 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Reach 4 BNSF Railroad to Linden Street 2-23 | P a g e Reach 4 Background and Fundamental Opportunities This Reach is located north of Downtown Fort Collins, east of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad Bridge and west of Linden Street. Like Reach 3, it is surrounded by considerable urban development; the river and its floodplain have been highly altered and influenced by structures including bridges and private development. The river is bordered on the north by Gustav Swanson Natural Area, and on the south by Old Fort Collins Heritage Park/Northside Aztlan Community Center, United Way and the recently constructed Legacy Apartments. Figure 2.28 River Access/Small Beach with Sentinel Boulders at the Gustav Swanson Natural Area Portions of Old Heritage Park and Northside Aztlan Community Center were identified as part of the Poudre River-Aztlan Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) Site. Historical uses of properties adjacent to these sites included a coal gasification plant, a gas station, a land fill and a petroleum distribution facility. Per an order from EPA, focused removal actions reduced exposure and migration of NAPL (non-aqueous phase liquid) contaminants to the public and river waters. As part of the cleanup, significant site reclamation occurred. Restoration of the riverbed and both banks, as well as extensive revegetation with native plants along both banks, was completed to improve overall habitat quality. The presence of these underground contaminants limits the city’s ability to disturb and reshape the ground within Old Heritage Park, the south river bank, and the adjacent channel bed. Opportunities for expansion of the river greenway in this reach include:  Potential land acquisitions from landowners in areas that directly adjoin the river and/or public lands using the City’s “Willing Seller - Willing Buyer” program.  Other opportunities to enhance the corridor, Downtown culture, and local vibe should be evaluated if and when adjacent properties become available. Related Projects  The Master Plan for Old Fort Collins Heritage Park will be developed by the Park Planning Department as part of a separate public process.  Private Development. Natural area buffers located within adjacent private properties shall be designed to blend with the existing river character. Refer to the City Land Use Code for natural area buffer standards and requirements. Flood Mitigation and Bank Stabilization Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with flood mitigation and bank stabilization include the following:  There are no insurable structures located within the regulatory floodplain through this reach; however, there are numerous insurable structures located adjacent to the floodplain north of the river. Consequently, care will be required to ensure that any project which includes improvements within the river corridor (i.e., floodway) does not increase 100-year water surface elevations such that private property or insurable structures are adversely impacted.  Currently, 100-year flows would spill east along Vine Drive starting west of the BNSFRR, requiring the definition of a regulatory split flow path from Linden Street to Dry Creek, near Lemay Avenue. It appears that a combination of improvements, including widening of the north overbank through the BNSFRR Bridge, and elimination of the floodplain constriction upstream of Linden Street, along with lowering/removal of the Coy Diversion and boat chute would likely eliminate (or reduce to nuisance/non-regulatory flood levels) this 100-year flow split.  Other opportunities for reducing 100-year flood elevations within this reach are not likely practical given the presence of contaminated soils in Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 2-24 | P a g e  Creating low vegetated bench features along the river’s edge to reduce the channel width in over-widened areas, where feasible, and providing riparian habitat enhancements. Recreation and Access Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with recreation and access include the following:  Upgrading the Linden Street Bridge (i.e., vertical monuments, architectural treatments, enhanced railings, appropriate lighting, signage, public art, and elevated river overlook areas) is suggested to strengthen the visual connection between Downtown Fort Collins and the Poudre River. Figure 2.30 Poudre Trail along Old Heritage Park (Block One Development is Under Construction in the Background)  Providing wayfinding signs within the river corridor to make visitors aware of the local destinations and attractions.  Adding bank enhancements, landscape treatments, and park amenities along the Poudre Trail to create a more inviting atmosphere within Old Fort Collins Heritage Park, with the understanding that improvements must comply with CERCLA requirements for the site.  Adding a terraced river access area on the right bank upstream of Linden Street to provide a connection from Linden Street to the river.  Developing a “Poudre Interpretive Walk” on the south side of the river. Portions of this area are associated with the earliest historic roots of the City and were part of the original Fort/Encampment site. The Heritage Walk would extend between Linden Street and the Museum of Discovery, telling Fort Collins’ story using the character of the downtown alleys with brick pavers, seating areas, and interactive/interpretive features. The Heritage Walk could be incorporated into future improvements within Old Fort Collins Heritage Park, in a manner similar to that illustrated in Figure 2.31.  Potential interpretive and educational topics for this section of the river include: the river’s history, the “Fort”, founding of the city, local railroad history, agricultural use of the river, and early industry.  Providing wheelchair access to the river’s edge where possible.  Including one put-in/take-out area immediately downstream of the BNSF Railroad Bridge on the south bank.  Providing two small river access points on the north river bank.  Strengthening pedestrian connections to the river greenway at Linden Street from the north and south, and through the Aztlan Center/Old Fort Collins Heritage Park from the south, to provide identifiable, safe and attractive access to the river.  Regrading under the existing Linden Street Bridge, or replacing the bridge, in order to accommodate routing of the Poudre Trail under the northernmost bridge span would eliminate the at-grade crossing at Linden Street; the only at-grade street crossing for the trail within the project area.  The following is a summary of the existing and proposed public parking located within or near the river corridor in this reach. Parking in these areas is provided for multiple uses and is not guaranteed for river use. Additional parking may be required with increased use of the river corridor and surrounding areas. Parking Location Number of Existing Spaces Aztlan Center (paved) 180 Gustav Swanson Natural Area (paved) 10 to 12 Linden Street (on-street parking south of the river – paved) 68  Adding on-street parking on Linden Street north of the river.  Where appropriate, bike parking spaces should be provided in close Reach 4 BNSF Railroad to Linden Street 2-25 | P a g e Figure 2.31 Conceptual Site Plan for Reach 4 Packet Pg. 56 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 2-27 | P a g e REACH 5 Linden Street to Lincoln Avenue REACH 1 REACH 2 REACH 4 REACH 5 REACH 6 REACH 3 Packet Pg. 57 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 2-28 | P a g e Figure 2.32 Master Plan for Reach 5 Packet Pg. 58 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Reach 5 Linden Street to Lincoln Avenue 2-29 | P a g e Reach 5 Background and Fundamental Opportunities This reach is located in the City’s “River District” which is described in the City’s Land Use Code as an area “intended to reestablish the linkage between Old Town and the River through redevelopment in the Cache la Poudre River (the "River") corridor. This District offers opportunities for more intensive redevelopment of housing, businesses and workplaces to complement Downtown. Improvements should highlight the historic origin of Fort Collins and the unique relationship of the waterway and railways to the urban environment as well as expand cultural opportunities in the Downtown area.” In this reach the river is bordered by considerable urban development along the southwest bank. Like reaches upstream, the river and its floodplain are highly altered and influenced by structures including bridges, the levee, and adjacent private development. Channelization of the river is extreme, and associated riparian forest habitat and wildlife movement are impacted by the acute confinement of the river corridor. Figure 2.33 Historic Concrete Structure Obstructing the Upstream Side of the Lincoln Avenue Bridge The transformation of this area will support each of the primary project objectives (habitat restoration, flood mitigation, recreation); however, the emphasis in this Reach is placed on habitat restoration. When completed the northeast overbank areas will be lowered and converted into a side channel and backwater wetland having a diverse wetland mosaic that will enhance opportunities for natural processes to drive ecosystem renewal. In addition, the steep southwest bank will be cleaned up, terraced/stabilized and re-vegetated adding beauty and improving the River’s health. Figure 2.34 Adjacent Industrial Land Use and Concrete Rubble along Southwest Bank  Opportunities for expansion of the river greenway in this reach include potential land acquisitions from landowners in areas that directly adjoin the river and/or public lands using the City’s “Willing Seller - Willing Buyer” program. Related Projects and Documents  Poudre River Enhancement Plan (2003). Many of the ideas presented in the Poudre River Enhancement Plan (2003) have been carried forward in this master plan. However some modifications have been made to address public comments and current circumstances.  The City’s Land Use Code, Section 4.17 – River Downtown Redevelopment District, identifies both opportunities and requirements associated with improvements specific to this reach.  The newly-adopted Fort Collins River Downtown Redevelopment Zone Guidelines (2014) provides enhanced design standards for this area in an effort to better address neighborhood, site, and building attributes, while maintaining the agricultural-industrial character of this unique portion of the City. In addition, specific streetscape improvements are identified for Willow Street.  The recently-adopted Lincoln Corridor Plan (2014) seeks to provide an enhanced level of amenities along Lincoln Avenue that restores its importance as a primary entry to the heart of the City, as well as providing an important connection from Downtown to the east and northeast. This plan also identifies a priority list of related neighborhood improvements.  Private Development. Natural area buffers located within adjacent private properties should be designed to enhance and blend with proposed river improvements. Refer to the City Land Use Code for natural area buffer standards and requirements. Flood Mitigation and Bank Stabilization Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with flood mitigation and bank stabilization include the following: Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 2-30 | P a g e Figure 2.35 Cross Section between Linden Street and Lincoln Avenue (Looking Downstream) Illustrating the Side Channel and the Terraced Southwest Bank Packet Pg. 60 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Reach 5 Linden Street to Lincoln Avenue 2-31 | P a g e  Other opportunities for reducing 100-year flood elevations within this reach are not currently practical due to limitations with respect to the presence of the Oxbow Levee, as well as private landownership and current land use along the southwest bank. However, future improvements should investigate the possibility of incorporating additional flood mitigation elements. Figure 2.36 Bank Stabilization Needs Map for Reach 5  Bank stabilization and improvements for the areas illustrated in Figure 2.36 include revegetation of both banks along with either rock riprap toe protection or, where banks are near vertical, stacked boulder toe protection. The southwest bank within this reach will require special treatment with terracing of two of more stacked boulder installations (forming low walls similar to those used along Block One), as shown in Figure 2.35. The northeast bank through this reach would be an appropriate location for incorporating root wad installations (in conjunction with rock riprap toe protection). Habitat/Ecological Restoration and Protection Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with habitat/ecological restoration and protection include the following:  Lowering floodplain and expand riparian and upland vegetation width between river and the soft trail on the northeast bank (Figure 2.35).  Replacing concrete rubble and riprap with bank treatments that include natural elements and improving edge habitat for riparian and aquatic species on the southwest bank. Figure 2.37 View along the Northeast River Bank Looking Downstream (the Oxbow Levee and paved trail are on the left)  Integrating additional wetland and backwater habitat features into proposed enhancements while improving lateral connectivity to floodplains at high flows.  Improving wildlife travel corridor/buffer near the river’s edge and creating a designated visitor access area along the northeast bank.  Creating low vegetated bench features along the river’s edge to reduce the channel width in over-widened areas, where feasible, and providing riparian habitat enhancements.  Improving in-stream cover for native aquatic species.  Expanding the riparian forest on the northeast bank, where possible, while maintaining a minimum offset of 15 feet from the toe of the levee for all woody plantings. Recreation and Access Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with recreation and access include the following:  Providing a trail spur to connect with the Poudre Trail underpass at Linden Street identified in Reach 4.  The high steep bank on southwest side limits access to the river, but offers an opportunity for a public overlook (as shown in Figure 2.39) to coincide with future alley improvements southwest of the river.  Incorporating visual buffering and noise reduction with southwest bank improvements.  Potential interpretive and educational topics for this section of the river include: Auntie Stone’s Mill (which is incorporated in the Ranch-Way Feeds facility) and the Poudre stream gage. Figure 2.38 View from the Poudre Trail to the Southeast across the River (Ranch-Way Feeds is in the Background)  Utilizing the bridges that bookend this reach to celebrate and announce the river’s presence, and to strengthen the relationship between the river and Downtown Fort Collins.  Upgrading these bridges (i.e., vertical monuments, architectural treatments, enhanced railings, lighting, signage, public art, and elevated Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 2-32 | P a g e Figure 2.39 Conceptual Site Plan for Reach 5 Packet Pg. 62 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Reach 5 Linden Street to Lincoln Avenue 2-33 | P a g e Figure 2.40 Character Sketch, View Looking Southeast from the Linden Street Bridge Packet Pg. 63 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 2-35 | P a g e REACH 6 Lincoln Avenue to Mulberry Street REACH 1 REACH 2 REACH 3 REACH 4 REACH 5 REACH 6 Packet Pg. 64 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 2-36 | P a g e Figure 2.41 Master Plan for Reach 6 Packet Pg. 65 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Reach 6 Lincoln Avenue to Mulberry Street 2-37 | P a g e Reach 6 Background and Fundamental Opportunities This western portion of this Reach is bordered by a collection of industrial sites on the north, and the Udall Natural Area on the south. A change in character is found to the east as the greenway transitions into the newly acquired and enhanced 31-acre Natural Area, the former Pickle Plant Site, and the Mulberry Wastewater Treatment Facility. Figure 2.42 Side Channel Flowing Past the Mulberry Wastewater Treatment Facility A majority of the significant changes in this reach are currently taking place in the newly acquired Natural Area. This 31-acre natural area was formerly part of the Link-n-Greens Golf Course and was donated to the City by Woodward, Inc. in 2013. The new Natural Area is included in this master plan, but its conversion to a natural area is occurring now. These improvements, combined with the existing ponds and upland areas within the Udall Natural Area offer an important respite for wildlife. Improvements to the high steep banks adjacent to the former Pickle Plant and Udall Natural Area are anticipated as part of this Master Plan, as well as a new river overlook/outdoor classroom on the southwest river bank downstream of Lincoln Avenue. The master plan also identifies a new trail underpass of Riverside Avenue and the UP Railroad, at the intersection with Olive Street, providing a convenient, separated-grade linkage from the residential neighborhoods southwest of Riverside Avenue to the Udall Natural Area and the Poudre River. Opportunities for expansion of the river greenway in this reach include potential land acquisitions from landowners in areas that directly adjoin the river and/or public lands using the City’s “Willing Seller - Willing Buyer” program. Expansion of the would provide space for improving the riparian corridor and the trail users’ experience of the river environment. Related Projects and Documents  Potential Solar Farm at former Pickle Plant site.  Magnolia Street Stormwater Outfall Project.  Mulberry Street (State Hwy 14) Bridge and Streetscape Improvements.  Lincoln Corridor Plan.  Previous Cache La Poudre River Restoration planning within the Udall Natural Area.  Woodward Technology Center development.  Private Development. Natural area buffers located within adjacent private properties should be designed to blend with the natural river setting. Refer to the City Land Use Code for natural area buffer standards and requirements. Flood Mitigation and Bank Stabilization Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with flood mitigation and bank stabilization include the following:  There are several insurable structures located within the regulatory floodplain north of the river through of this reach. Consequently, particular care will be required to ensure that any project which includes improvements within the river corridor (i.e., floodway) does not increase 100-year water surface elevations.  Proposed bank improvements along the Udall Natural Area may provide modest reductions in 100-year flood elevations. Other opportunities for reducing 100-year flood elevations within this reach are limited due to the close proximity of the dedicated water quality ponds within the Udall Natural Area and the presence of private property north of the river. However, future improvements should investigate the possibility of incorporating additional flood mitigation elements.  A portion of the City’s Mulberry Wastewater Treatment Facility, including several insurable structures, are located within the regulatory Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 2-38 | P a g e Figure 2.44 Bank Stabilization Needs Map for Reach 6  Investigating wetland and habitat enhancements in conjunction with the planned water Quality pond enlargement in the Udall Natural Area.  Bank stabilization and improvements for the areas illustrated in Figure 2.44 include revegetation of both banks along with either rock riprap toe protection or, along steeper banks, stacked boulder toe protection. The southwest bank along the Pickle Plant Site will require special treatment with earthen terracing (as shown in Figure 2.46, provided on the following page) or terracing of two or more stacked boulder installations (as identified previously in Figure 2.35 for Reach 5). The banks through this reach provide opportunities for incorporating root wad installations (in conjunction with rock riprap toe protection). Habitat/Ecological Restoration and Protection Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with habitat/ecological restoration and protection include the following:  The new 31-acre Natural Area is being converted from a golf course to a natural area. Changes include: re-grading (lowering) much of the site to improve lateral connectivity to floodplains at high flows, an oxbow pond, wetlands, expansion of the riparian forest (native tree plantings), riparian grasslands, native landscape restoration, and realignment of the Poudre Trail away from the river.  Increasing the upland vegetation buffer between the river and urban development within the western portion of this reach.  Restoring the southwest riverbank directly downstream of Lincoln Street to: increase riparian forest width and enhance in-channel wetlands.  Removing old automobiles, concrete rubble, and other non-natural materials from the riverbank and improving near shore aquatic habitat, including in-stream cover.  Relocating the large storm drain outfall and headwall located downstream of Lincoln Avenue back away from the river channel, and creating an outfall pool.  Protecting existing riparian forest and the wetland mosaic, including offsetting trails to maintain buffers.  Re-grading and improving the southwest river bank at the Pickle Plant Site using a natural terraced treatment.  Integrating upland shrub plantings along the edge of the forest to increase structural diversity for improved riparian bird habitat.  Creating low vegetated bench features along the river’s edge to reduce the channel width in over-widened areas, where feasible, and providing riparian habitat enhancements. Figure 2.45 Fisherman Enjoying a Beautiful Autumn Afternoon on the Poudre River Recreation and Access Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with recreation and access include the following:  Incorporating a public education feature in the Udall Natural Area concerning the treatment of stormwater runoff in a natural setting.  Incorporating a river overlook with the planned bank restoration in the Udall Natural Area.  Providing visual and sound damping buffers, to the extent possible, between the Poudre Trail and the adjacent industrial sites in the northwestern portion of this reach. This leg of the trail is one of the least inviting sections within the entire master planning area due to the adjacent chain link fencing, outdoor storage of industrial equipment and materials, and noise.  Including two put-ins/take-outs in this reach; with one to be located on the northeast bank downstream of Lincoln Avenue, and the other to be located on the north bank upstream of Mulberry Street. (It is worth Reach 6 Lincoln Avenue to Mulberry Street 2-39 | P a g e Figure 2.46 Cross Section (Looking Downstream) Illustrating the Terraced Bank Adjacent to the Pickle Plant Site and Lowering of the Northeast Overbank Packet Pg. 68 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Packet Pg. 69 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Visual Glossary/Design Guidelines 3-1 | P a g e 1 2 River Bed Stabilization A number of specific reaches of the Poudre River through Fort Collins have incised downstream of irrigation diversion structures. This has resulted in over-steepened bed slopes which generally preclude the passage of fish and other aquatic species, particularly in the upstream direction, and typically cannot easily be navigated by boaters and floaters. In order to reduce the local river bed slope in these areas, thereby reconnecting aquatic habitat and promoting safe passage for humans, a series of sloping rock features are envisioned in these locations. On the Poudre River, these features may consist of a crest formed by small to moderate size boulders, followed downstream by a field of rock riprap placed at no greater than an 8 to 10 percent slope. This riprap should be backfilled with native gravel and cobble bed material to produce a bed surface that is natural in appearance and texture. Small to moderate size boulders should be placed randomly within the riprap field such that they protrude above the plane of the bed, creating an uneven channel bed surface and providing shelter zones that promote fish passage. The maximum vertical transition across any one of these sloping rock features should be less than 2 feet. Shallow pools should be formed at the downstream end of these features to provide water depth variability, particularly during low flows, and to control hydraulic conditions during larger flow events. Two sloping rock features are shown in the accompanying photographs: 1. A single sloping rock feature operating under a moderate flow rate. 2. A series of two sloping rock features (A and B) operating under a moderate flow rate in a recently stabilized river reach. A  B  Packet Pg. 70 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 3-2 | P a g e 1 2 River Bank Stabilization and Restoration In many places through Fort Collins, the Poudre River’s banks have been altered by any number of historical impacts, and/or they show signs of erosion or bank retreat. Generally through confined areas, such as the Poudre Downtown reach, bank instabilities or bank movement are not acceptable for a variety of reasons. Overall goals of river bank stabilization and restoration are to create banks that are stable, safe for ingress/egress under emergency conditions, ecologically functioning, and aesthetically pleasing. To achieve these goals, stream banks should not be unnaturally steep and should have native vegetation to provide riparian and aquatic habitat value. Ideally, the stream banks would allow overbank flooding at progressively higher levels, reflecting typical conditions for an alluvial stream. Depending on local geomorphic conditions and available space, stream bank improvements may include removing concrete and other debris, re-grading steep eroded banks, creating low and mid-level terraces, and planting with native trees, shrubs, and herbaceous species. In natural settings, lateral river bank stability is often afforded by an interweaving root matrix of streamside trees, shrubs and willows; this condition cannot be replicated in the short-term by a stream bank improvement project. In lieu of a live root matrix, river bank stabilization is promoted by the installation of hardened toe materials overlain with native plantings. The hardened materials provide short-term stabilization, while the native plantings are intended to provide long-term stability, streamside shade and cover, and biotic mass in the riparian zone. Rock Riprap Toe Stabilization Within the Poudre Downtown reach, hardened toe protection will generally take the form of rock riprap or stacked boulders. With the former, the rock riprap should be backfilled with native gravel, sand and cobble to provide further stability, promote a more natural surface appearance, and offer an initial substrate for establishing streamside vegetation such as willows or shrubs. The backfilled riprap can be fully buried to create a softer surface for ingress and egress, but maintenance will be required as the finer cover soils (such as sand and silt) will likely be carried away during even low annual flow events. The accompanying photographs show the southwest bank of the Poudre River, along the Northside – Aztlan Community Center: 1. Soon after installation of the CERCLA remediation measures and rock riprap toe protection. 2. After eight years of vegetation re-establishment along the bank. Packet Pg. 71 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Visual Glossary/Design Guidelines 3-3 | P a g e River Bank Stabilization and Restoration (continued) In general, it is beneficial to add wood and biotic mass to the river in order to promote the health of aquatic species. Rock Riprap Toe Stabilization with Root Wads In locations where conditions allow, root wads can be installed along with rock riprap toe protection, with the woody materials providing physical cover, disrupting local flow patterns, promoting the formation of local scour holes, and delivering immediate biota loading. These features cannot be built in all locations, as robust root wad installations designed to withstand severe flow conditions require a large construction disturbance zone. In addition, installing these root wads, such as those shown here, are relatively labor intensive compared to placing standard riprap. Packet Pg. 72 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 3-4 | P a g e River Bank Stabilization and Restoration (continued) In many locations, existing river banks may be too steep to support a stable rock riprap installation. In these cases, alternative bank toe stabilization measures need to be identified. Stacked Boulder Toe Stabilization As an alternative to rock riprap in locations where the banks are steep, stacked boulders can be used to provide the requisite hardened toe protection. Where banks are exceedingly tall and space is not available to move the top of bank back away from the river, multiple offset stacked boulder groups can be used. This results in a bank treatment which essentially consists of a series of two or more stacked boulder walls. The near-channel, stacked boulder toe can also be utilized as a hardened access point to the river by increasing the batter of the stacked boulders, providing a stepped river edge that is conducive to ingress/egress and seating. The accompanying photographs show a recently completed stacked boulder toe installation, prior to the establishment of mature vegetation. However, it is evident that most of the existing mature vegetation was preserved during construction. Packet Pg. 73 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Visual Glossary/Design Guidelines 3-5 | P a g e River Access River access areas are envisioned as informal spaces that are natural in character and are accessed from either the river or the trails. They are typically separated from vehicular access and their use is less intensive as compared to Put-ins/Take-outs. The scale of each river access will vary depending on its location, site specific features and anticipated use. Trails connecting to these areas (other than the Poudre Trail) should be narrow, soft paved and roughly perpendicular to the river bank in order to minimize impacts to habitat connectivity along the river. Packet Pg. 74 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 3-6 | P a g e Put-Ins/Take-Outs Put-ins/Take-outs are planned in areas where more intensive recreational access to the river is anticipated. They are typically associated with major street crossings, parks and/or trailhead parking lots. The scale and character of each Put-in/Take-out will vary depending on its setting, physical site characteristics, and anticipated use. Trails connecting to these areas may be paved or soft, and where practical they should be roughly perpendicular to the river bank in order to minimize impacts to habitat connectivity along the river. Width of connecting trails will depend on anticipated use. Packet Pg. 75 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Visual Glossary/Design Guidelines 3-7 | P a g e In-Channel Whitewater Features The primary objective for the whitewater park is to create a fun and dynamic place to kayak, float, wade and play in the Poudre River that also meets the project’s joint goals of habitat improvement and flood mitigation. The whitewater park should provide recreation opportunities for all of the visitors to the river corridor, not just those who choose to enter the river, and it should be constructed from natural materials that complement the remainder of the restoration project. The improvements should also include solutions to address fish passage or flood mitigation. Packet Pg. 76 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Packet Pg. 77 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Project Formulation, Phasing and Costs 4-1 | P a g e Project Formulation and Prioritization Based on all of the planning work conducted for the Poudre River Downtown Project, the River Team – a group consisting of City staff and members of the consultant team – developed a list of project elements intended to address the objectives and opportunities identified along the entire study reach, from Shields Street to Mulberry Street. These project elements were specific items that would eventually need to be grouped into bundled projects for purposes of implementation. All suggestions received as a result of the outreach and engagement efforts were carefully considered, with particular emphasis placed on stakeholder feedback and public comments. The list of potential project elements was compiled in the context of previous and on- going planning efforts across all City departments. An initial list of more than 30 project elements and/or concepts was developed, such as: river bank habitat enhancements at Legacy Park; trail underpass at Linden Street; modify/lower the Coy Diversion; tree dump remediation; and many others. These items represented improvements necessary to promote completion of the Master Plan, but excluded enhancements that would be implemented by other City projects or on- going projects by other entities. Each of the project elements were evaluated by the River Team using a decision matrix which utilized the following nine objectives:  Conserve and restore riparian ecosystem;  Aquatic connectivity;  Terrestrial connectivity;  Protect properties from damaging floods;  Eliminate overtopping of College Avenue and the Vine Flow Split;  Reconnect the river to its floodplain  Provide a mix of recreational opportunities in and along the river;  Provide community gathering places; and  Connectivity between recreational opportunities along the river. The results of this evaluation served to identify project elements which would meet multiple objectives, and attempted to find common ground where conflicting priorities were inevitable. Given this evaluation, the potential list of project elements was refined and a number of additional project components, concepts, and action items identified, resulting in a more robust inventory of more than 40 elements. These potential project elements were then prioritized by each member of the River Team using a ranking/scoring system. The results of this effort were compiled and a composite project element priority list prepared. Project Grouping and Phasing Each of the items on the resulting priority list was evaluated with respect to location, proximity to other project elements, and types of construction required. Project groupings were defined with the primary objective of ensuring that no section of the river channel would be disturbed more than once during the course of implementing this Master Plan. The resulting project grouping is shown in the Project Roster provided at the end of this section. The location and approximate extent of the grouped projects are identified in Figure 4.1. Phasing of the projects was determined based on the previously identified priority of the individual project elements, as well as logical sequencing of adjacent or related projects. The phasing priority indicated in the Project Roster, as well as in Figure 4.1, provides only a guide for implementing the numerous Poudre River enhancement projects which comprise this Master Plan. Many other factors may influence the actual project implementation sequence, such as opportunities to dovetail with other roadway, utility, stormwater, or development projects. Opinion of Project Implementation Costs An opinion of project implementation cost was identified for each of the Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 4-2 | P a g e Figure 4.1a Project Phasing Map (West Side) 7 1 8 4 5 6 2 Packet Pg. 79 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Project Formulation, Phasing and Costs 4-3 | P a g e Figure 4.1b Project Phasing Map (East Side) 1 12 4 9 3 11 10 5 6 2 Packet Pg. 80 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 4-4 | P a g e Project Roster (Including Opinion of Implementation Costs) PROJECT ID DESCRIPTION COST ($1,000) TOTAL COST ($) PROJECT ID DESCRIPTION COST ($1,000) TOTAL COST ($) 1 MUSEUM OF DISCOVERY TO BNSF RAILROAD (w/ WHITEWATER PARK) $6,000,000 4 GUSTAV SWANSON NATURAL AREA $700,000 Modify/Lower Coy Diversion Structure 250 North Bank Habitat Enhancements/Stabilization between BNSFRR and Linden 300 Modify/Lower Boat Chute Structure 150 Miscellaneous Site Improvements (trail spurs, river access, plantings, etc) 400 Lower Trail on South Bank between College Ave and BNSFRR 150 5 ICONIC PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE EAST OF COLLEGE AVENUE $1,500,000 River Habitat Enhancements/Stabilization between College Ave and BNSFRR 500 New Pedestrian Bridge East of College Ave 1,500 Hardscape Terraced Urban River Edge(s) East of College Ave 500 6 OLD FORT COLLINS HERITAGE PARK $1,400,000 River Put-in / Take-out between College Ave and BNSFRR (3) 150 Old Fort Collins Heritage Park Enhancements 700 Construct Parking Lot along South Side of Vine, w/ Vine Drive Improvements 430 Expanded Parking at Aztlan Center 300 Miscellaneous Site Improvements (trail to river, restroom, landscaping, etc) 650 River Put-in / Take-out Downstream of BNSFRR (1) 150 Whitewater Park 1,000 Terraced River Access Upstream of Linden 200 New Pedestrian Bridge East of College Ave, Foundation Only 100 Heritage Walk 150 Connect North Bank Trail through BNSFRR Bridge 140 7 SALYER AND MCMURRY NATURAL AREAS $1,150,000 Construct New Trail along North Side of River West of BNSFRR 100 Salyer Natural Area Restoration / Improvements 500 Heritage Walk 220 Modify / Replace Existing McMurry Bridge 300 Hazardous Materials Remediation 400 River Bank Enhancements/Stabilization 200 Design, Permitting, Art in Public Places, and Contingency 1,260 River Put-in / Take-out Near McMurry Bridge (1) 50 2 LEE MARTINEZ PARK / LEGACY PARK CORRIDOR $5,600,000 River Accesses in McMurry and Salyer Natural Areas (3) 100 River Bank Habitat Enhancements at Legacy Park 300 8 WOOD STREET AREA $50,000 River Play Improvements/Cobble Trail along Legacy and Lee Martinez Parks 200 River Put-in / Take-out Near Woods St (1) 50 Lower/Remediate Tree Dump Area, Reconnect Floodplain 500 9 UDALL PROPERTY $300,000 Wild Zone Natural Play Zone in Tree Dump Area 500 South Bank Habitat Enhancements through Udall Property 300 Lee Martinez Park Improvements, South of the Poudre Trail 2,000 10 PICKLE PLANT SITE $1,500,000 Remove/Relocate Hickory Pedestrian Bridge 300 South Bank Habitat Enhancements through Pickle Plant Property 1,500 Reconfigure Parking and Access to Legacy Park 400 11 MULBERRY STREET AREA $200,000 Regrade Portion of Legacy Park to Reconnect Floodplain 100 River Put-in / Take-out Upstream of Mulberry St (1) 100 Legacy Park Improvements 1,000 Expand Existing Parking Area Upstream of Mulberry St (gravel) 100 Modify Lake Canal Diversion Structure for Fish and Tubing Passage 150 12 RIVERSIDE AVENUE / OLIVE STREET $6,200,000 River Put-in / Take-out at Lee Martinez and Legacy (3) 150 Riverside/UPRR Underpass at Olive 6,000 3 PREP AREA – LINDEN STREET TO LINCOLN AVENUE $2,700,000 Trail Connection along UPRR, Lincoln to Pickle Plant Site 200 Implement Poudre River Enhancement Plan between Linden and Lincoln 2,000 FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES (no costs identified) Trail Underpass at Linden Street 200 Opportunities Fund for Maintaining In-Stream Flows South Bank Overlook 200 Willing Seller Property Acquisition River Put-in / Take-out Downstream of Linden and Lincoln (2) 100 Other Opportunities Identified in the Reach Descriptions (Section II) Construct Parking Lot (or On-Street Parking) East of Linden and Lincoln (2) 200 Packet Pg. 81 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Packet Pg. 82 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Appendix 5‐1 | Page Outreach and Engagement Day on the River – July 1, 2013 ‐ The River Team and the consultant team spend a full day touring the project corridor. Stakeholders Listening Session – July 9, 2013 – included representatives from Poudre Heritage Alliance, CSU Campus Recreation, Poudre Paddlers, Rocky Mountain Flycasters, Save the Poudre, UniverCity Connections, Colorado Water Trust, Museum of Discovery, New Belgium Brewery, North Fort Collins Business Association, Colorado Parks and Wildlife, The Neenan Company, Odell Brewing, Woodward, Fort Collins Downtown Development Authority, Ranch‐Way Feeds, ELCO, Fort Collins Truck Sales, Mountain Whitewater Descents, and Fort Collins Community Action Network. Design Charette – July 11 & 12, 2013 ‐ The consultant team facilitated a two‐ day design charette with the River Team to kick‐off the design process and to discuss big picture opportunities and issues related to the project. Attendees included staff members from Natural Areas, Parks & Recreation, Stormwater Department, Water Department, Planning and key members of the consultant team. River Team Meetings – periodic meetings have taken place throughout the master planning process. Attendees included representatives from Natural Areas, Parks & Recreation and Stormwater. Meetings and Discussions with Other City Departments – Lindsay Ex/Planning, Matt Zoccali/Utilities ‐ Regulatory and Government Affairs, Donny Dustin/Water Department, Adam Jokerst/Water Department. Poudre River Projects Open House – June 26, 2013 The public was invited to learn about and give input on over 25 projects happening in the Cache la Poudre River corridor. This Master Plan was represented alongside other construction projects, trail closures, drought and fire work, habitat restoration, flood mitigation and planning efforts. Project Open House #1/Whitewater Park Meeting – Sept 5, 2013 Participation was extensive with approximately 175 people participating in the open house. During the open house questionnaires were distributed to attendees and 84 responses were received. An online “virtual” open house presented the same information and posed the same feedback questions. Nineteen (19) people participated online. Board Meetings. John Stokes presented the conceptual master plan to the following City boards and commissions.  Natural Resources Advisory Board – Sept 18, 2013  Land Conservation and Stewardship Advisory Board’s ‐ Sept 18, 2013  Parks and Recreation Board – Sept 25, 2013 Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) and U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (USACOE) – River Team representatives and the consultant team attended two on‐site meetings with CPW and USACOE to discuss early ideas for the project.  Terrestrial Habitat and Wildlife Connectivity Site Visit – Aug 14, 2013 – CPW, City NA Staff, and key members of the consultant team  Aquatic Habitat and Connectivity Site Visit – Sept 27, 2013 – CPW, USACE, City NA Staff, and key members of the consultant team ELCO and Lake Canal ‐ John Stokes attended meetings with ELCO and Lake Canal Vine Drive Property Owners – John Stokes attended meetings with individual property owners along Vine Drive Council Work Session – John Stokes gave a brief project overviews to City Council – Oct 8, 2013 and July 8, 2014 Kayaker Meeting – River Team representatives and key members of the consultant team hosted 2 meetings with a small group of the kayaking community.  Hydrology meeting – August 23, 2013  Whitewater park options – Dec 2, 2013 Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 5‐2 | P a g e  This is an extremely managed system, with many constraints, and many opportunities. There should be considerable ability to please almost everyone, as long as everyone is reasonable.  Flood mitigation, habitat and recreation are all important. These are all things that are good for Fort Collins. Beautification General beautification of the area is important to make it more of an inviting area to recreate and appreciate. Connections / Access to River  Promote commercial/ retail connecting from Maple to Conifer to better connect social, economic, and ecological values of the downtown river area.  Improve bike access to northern community and provide more access to Vine Drive.  Make canoe put‐in and take‐out places readily accessible by auto near major road intersections.  Some liked the idea of an iconic bridge that will bring people and make downtown an even better place to be. Restoration/Habitat  Support restoration opportunities, and would like to see more restoration action.  Naturalize river corridor as much as possible, include flood plains.  Remove all concrete in the riverbanks, and create a more natural appearance.  Habitat restoration is a priority. Community benefit secondary (recreation).  Do not clear vegetation for “Views”! Increase (not decrease) riparian vegetation. Flood Mitigation  Reduce flood potential on East Vine.  The 2013 flood occurred during the master planning process and heightened the interest in the impacts of potential flooding. River Flows  With most of the proposed actions based on current river flows, some asked how the City plans to manage for the variability in river flow based on future water demands.  Some community members would like to see some acknowledgement of the impact of water withdrawals on the Poudre in town to educate and possibly generate more public support to mitigate these.  Explore management options to maintain current river flows, or even increase flows if possible. Concerns about Additional Recreation  Excited about the recreation projects but concerned about the additional draw this may have and the impact “extra” people have on the tranquility of the Poudre River today.  Minimize parking lots, asphalt; concrete structures/surfaces along the corridor….people need further exercise, let them ride/walk further to access the corridor (except for vehicles of handicapped). Support for Additional Recreation  Create an area that attracts people to the Poudre River.  This town sorely needs a revitalized river corridor for ALL, kayakers and non‐kayakers.  Would love some swimming holes, rope swings and other activities that cater to families. Support Whitewater Park  Please consider a whitewater park. It offers economic and community benefits.  Whitewater parks are good for communities. Supporters encouraged Appendix 5‐3 | Page Relationship to ‘City Plan Fort Collins’ City Plan Fort Collin (2011) – The City’s comprehensive City Plan was first completed in 1997, updated in 2004, and updated again on February 15, 2011 and entitled “City Plan Fort Collins.” City Plan Fort Collins contains an array of principles and policies that underscore the community’s support for the Poudre River ecosystem, Flood Management and Parks & Recreation. The following are pertinent principles and polices: STORMWATER AND FLOOD MANAGEMENT Principle ENV 18: The City will minimize potentially hazardous conditions associated with flooding, recognize and manage for the preservation of floodplain values, adhere to all City mandated codes, policies, and goals, and comply with all State and Federally mandated laws and regulations related to the management of activities in flood prone areas. Policy ENV 18.1 – Balance Environmental, Human and Economic Concerns Recognize and manage floodplains with the intent to provide a balance between economic, environmental, and human (including safety) considerations within floodplain lands. Policy ENV 18.2 – Manage Risks Seek to minimize risk to life and property by structural and non‐structural design or modification of actions in the floodplain where it is not otherwise practical to place structures and human activities outside of the floodplain. Discourage new development in the 100‐year floodplain to avoid additional modifications and structural controls. Policy ENV 18.3 – Minimize Flood Damage Recognize that maintenance, restoration, and enhancement of the natural resources and the beneficial functions of floodplains is a concurrent goal with reducing human and wildlife vulnerability to flood damage. Policy ENV 18.4 – Manage Floodplain Require structures and facilities that are unavoidably located in the floodplain to be designed to be consistent with the intent of the standards and criteria of the City of Fort Collins and the National Flood Insurance Program. Policy ENV 18.5 – Provide Education Inform the public about the hazards of flooding and develop and disseminate the most accurate information obtainable on local flood hazards. Educate the public about the natural and beneficial functions and uses of floodplains. Policy ENV 18.6 – Modify Detention Requirements for Redevelopment Modify detention requirements to allow for greater flexibility of options for meeting National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) rules and create mechanisms to satisfy detention requirements through a more holistic approach that includes Low Impact Development (LID) tools and satisfying such requirements on a sub‐watershed basis rather than exclusively on an individual parcel specific basis. POUDRE RIVER CORRIDOR Principle ENV 24: The City will support a healthy and resilient Cache la Poudre ecosystem, and protect, enhance and restore the ecological values of the River. Policy ENV 24.1 – Support Ecological Resilience Support a healthy river ecosystem that is resilient; i.e., a river ecosystem that has the capacity to persist and adapt over time in the face of natural and human‐caused challenges. Protect or enhance opportunities for natural processes to drive ecosystem renewal. Policy ENV 24.2 – Conserve Natural Features Conserve and protect important natural areas and natural values within Poudre River Downtown Master Plan 5‐4 | P a g e Policy ENV 26.2 – Integrate Watershed and Stormwater Management Design stormwater systems within the Poudre River watershed to minimize the introduction of human‐caused pollutants. Educational programs and demonstration projects will be pursued to enhance public understanding of pollution prevention efforts. Policy ENV 26.3‐ Ensure Setbacks for Channel Instability and Improve Channel Migration Apply buffer zones and consider vertical and lateral channel stability with new development and redevelopment to ensure adequate setbacks are provided to account for lateral migration of the River channel across the floodplain and vertical degradation. The resiliency of the Poudre River ecosystem is tied directly to the ability of the channel to migrate back and forth across the floodplain. Therefore, make efforts to protect the capacity of the channel to move laterally across the landscape and to seek opportunities to improve or restore the function of channel migration. Policy ENV 26.4 – Development in the Floodplain The Poudre River 100‐year floodplain will be protected by implementing best management conservation techniques and floodplain regulations. Floodplain regulations shall promote public safety, protect the Poudre River corridor, and allow natural hydraulic and hydrologic processes to occur. Principle ENV 27: Historic landmarks, cultural landscapes, and scenic and aesthetic qualities will be protected within the Poudre River Corridor. Policy ENV 27.1 – Protect Historic Landmarks and Cultural Landscapes Protect historic landmarks and significant cultural landscapes within the Cache la Poudre River National Heritage Area, which extends for 45 miles and includes the lands within the River’s 100‐year floodplain. Protection of the historic and cultural resources will be accomplished using land acquisition, local landmark designation, conservation easements, land use policies, and development and design standards. Policy ENV 27.2 – Maintain and Enhance Visual Resources Locate and design development within the Poudre River Corridor to best maintain or enhance views of the River, its natural setting, the protected corridor features, and the foothills and mountains. Policy ENV 27.3 – Develop Landscape Guidelines Develop guidelines for landscape treatment and streetscapes within the Poudre River Corridor that include the use of materials that are native to the Poudre River Corridor and will integrate developed areas within the natural context of the River corridor. Policy ENV 27.4 – Restore and Enhance Restore or enhance degraded or disturbed areas of the Poudre River Corridor to improve ecological conditions, aesthetics, and recreation access. Restoration and enhancement projects may be performed cooperatively with private landowners and volunteer community groups. Principle ENV 28: The City will encourage learning and community awareness of the Poudre River’s historic, cultural and natural heritage through education and interpretation. Policy ENV 28.1 – Support Educational and Environmental Learning Opportunities Support and provide historical, cultural, and environmental learning opportunities in the Poudre River Corridor. The Cache la Poudre River National Heritage Area was formed to provide for the interpretation of the unique and significant contributions of cultural and historic lands, waterways, and structures to our national heritage. Integrate education with interpretation, which may include interpretive trails and educational facilities as well as outdoor laboratories for lessons on wildlife habitat, gravel extraction and reclamation, floodplain Appendix 5‐5 | Page Policy LIV 44.1 – Maintain System of Open Lands Maintain a system of publicly‐owned open lands to protect the integrity of wildlife habitat and conservation sites, protect corridors between natural areas, conserve outstanding examples of Fort Collins' diverse natural heritage, and provide a broad range of opportunities for educational, interpretive, and recreational programs to meet community needs. (Also see the Open Lands section in the Environmental Health chapter.) Policy LIV 44.2 – Provide Parks Facilities Maintain and facilitate the development of a well balanced system of parks, trails, and recreation facilities to provide a variety of recreational opportunities, as identified in the Parks and Recreation Policy Plan (2008). (Also see the Culture, Parks and Recreation chapter’s Parks and Recreation section.) Policy LIV 44.3 – Retain Water Corridors Retain water corridors to provide adequate drainage in order to maintain the safety of lives and property and provide land for recreation, habitat conservation, and wildlife movement. Water corridors help define the edges of the community and form parts of community separators and other open lands, in addition to serving their primary function as drainage corridors. (Also see the Stormwater and Water Resources sections of the Environmental Health chapter.) Policy LIV 44.4 – Utilize Buffers Utilize buffers and other requirements for development along water corridors and near other natural features to preserve, protect, enhance, and restore important wildlife habitat, riparian areas, wildlife corridors, and other natural features, and to maintain channel stability, water conveyance, and flood protection. Policy LIV 44.5 – Interconnect Trails/Paths Integrate a trail/path system that connects open lands, parks, and water corridor areas, excluding motorized vehicles (except emergency and maintenance vehicle access). Pay special attention to environmentally sensitive trail design, location, and construction. POUDRE RIVER CORRIDOR OVERLAY Principle LIV 45: Adjacent land uses will be carefully managed to ensure that the diverse community values of the Poudre River Corridor are protected and enhanced. Policy LIV 45.3 – River Segments The Poudre River Corridor has distinct segments containing unique characteristics, opportunities, and constraints as defined below and shown in Figure LIV 5. 2. Community River Segment (Shields Street to College Avenue) In this segment, existing neighborhoods are located in close proximity to existing public parks and natural areas and the recreational trail along the river. This segment should emphasize convenient access and way finding for residents to the river corridor for both active and passive recreational and leisure opportunities. The cottonwood forests, adjacent wetlands and ponds, and associated wildlife habitat in close proximity to downtown make this an ideal section for people of all ages to experience the natural setting of the Poudre River. Natural habitat and floodplain values will be preserved and protected. 3. Historic and Cultural Core Segment (College Avenue to Lemay Avenue). This segment of the river includes many of the community’s oldest and most significant historic and cultural features, the Old Town Historic District, and Downtown. It also contains innovative, and integrated, stormwater and natural area features. Land uses in the area should be more flexible than in other river segments and emphasize connecting the 1609 Wagon Tongue Ct. Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 (970) 481-2924 TROUT UNLIMITED’s MISSION To conserve, protect and restore North America’s coldwater fisheries and their watersheds. TROUT UNLIMITED Chapter 010 www.rockymtnflycasters.org Dear Mayor Weitkunat; Council Members Campana, Cunniff, Horak, Overbeck, Poppaw, Troxell and Manager Atteberry I write this today to share with you, and express publicly, the support of Rocky Mountain Flycasters and Trout Unlimited for the Poudre River Downtown Project. We are greatly impressed by the planning on this project to date and we believe the project has been well conceived and designed. It effectively satisfies many of the principles that are core to the mission of Trout Unlimited. Trout Unlimited believes that conservation should be a true partnership between landowners, agencies, municipalities, and all stakeholders. We work to protect critical habitat, to reconnect degraded waterways and restore populations to coldwater fisheries. Through sound science, we shape our priorities with critical data on the health of these fisheries. The Poudre River Downtown Project is an outstanding model that reflects the spirit of a partnering process. John Stokes and his team at Natural Areas Department are to be commended for the inclusive and professional manner by which they have developed this fine project. With your approval, this project presents the City the opportunity to bring to fruition a much needed restoration. In many of its lower reaches the Poudre has become nothing more than a simple and efficient resource conduit. In those reaches its inability to function as a natural waterway prevents the existence of a healthy riparian area; increases the impacts of flooding; and fails to allow the full enjoyment of the river by the community at-large. The Board of Trustees of Rocky Mountain Flycasters, which locally represents over 1,000 members, fully supports the Poudre River Downtown Project, including the proposed white water park. We extend to the City and the Natural Areas Department the cooperation and assistance of Trout Unlimited through our local chapter. Most importantly, to us, we support the inclusion of recommendations offered by Colorado Parks and Wildlife and other natural resources regulatory agencies. We also ask that the Council be forward looking in future budgeting so that the initial improvements are sustained with adequate operations and maintenance dollars to prevent deterioration of the improvements over time. We anticipate that this area will become a high use area. As long as it is well maintained and incorporates controlled access that minimizes user- caused stream bank degradation, there is reason to believe that the Poudre River Downtown Project can become a world-class improvement in a world-class City Sincerely, Dick Jefferies, President Rocky Mountain Flycasters djefferies@q.com Board of Trustees President Dick Jefferies Vice-President Sean Cronin Treasurer Tom Culbertson Secretary Lance Asherin Past President Leland Evans At Large: Bill Perrill Gil Coleman Leadership Team Community Outreach Wil Huett Conservation ATTACHMENT 3 Packet Pg. 89 Attachment2.3: Natural Resources Advisory Board memo, June 18, 2014 (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Packet Pg. 90 Attachment2.3: Natural Resources Advisory Board memo, June 18, 2014 (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) ATTACHMENT 4 Packet Pg. 91 Attachment2.4: Senior Board Letter, June 16, 2014 (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 1 Natural Areas Department 1745 Hoffman Mill Road PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.416-2815 970.416-2211 - fax fcgov.com/naturalareas naturalareas@fcgov.com M E M O R A N D U M To: The Fort Collins City Council From: The Fort Collins Land Conservation and Stewardship Board (LCSB), Trudy Haines, Chair Subject: LCSB feedback re: Poudre River Downtown Project & Kayak Park Design ____________________________________________________________________________________ The Fort Collins Land Conservation and Stewardship Board (LCSB) reviewed the planning documents and artistic renderings of the Poudre River Downtown Project. The LCSB recently toured the area with City staff. The LCSB lists the following concerns and makes the following recommendations: Re: The Overall Poudre River Downtown Project Comments x The LCSB supports various design aspects of the Master Plan and sees benefits. x Funding sources should be the City General fund, Keep Fort Collins Great, Building on Basis II and private contributions. Open Space funds derived from dedicated City and County sales taxes should contribute to the Project only to the extent that the Project increases the acreage of Natural Areas x Overall, the Master Plan costs for the Poudre River Downtown Project could be as high as $20 million to the City of Fort Collins. There is an opportunity cost for such a major investment by the City. A recent citizen survey, Our Lands, Our Future, clearly indicates the main desire of the citizenry is to “preserve more natural areas”. Given the tremendous growth pressures facing the area and citizen opinion, the LCSB believes that investing in more natural areas land is where money should be allocated. Re: Specific Comments Regarding the Kayak Park x Habitat protection, both flora and fauna, at the Kayak Park location is the major concern of the LCSB. A poor design could be extremely harmful to plant and animal species. x The LCSB recognizes the benefits of removing upstream fish passage disruptions and creating more uniform grades with small drops. Within the whitewater recreation area, these drops should be designed with slow water passages parallel to the more concentrated recreation flow features. x As currently illustrated, the design accommodates too many people at one location on the river. The LCSB requests the park be designed to disseminate people in small group settings with more vegetation and less rock and/or concrete. Small groups are much less impactful to the environment which also translates to reduced maintenance and patrol costs. The LCSB recommends a design with these objectives in mind. ATTACHMENT 5 Packet Pg. 92 Attachment2.5: Land Conservation and Stewardship Board memo (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 2 x As illustrated, the amphitheater-like design could encourage competitive events and other intense usage, e.g. concerts and event-staging (weddings, parties, etc.). Requests for such event-type venues would require continual policing, particularly if groups had to perpetually be told, “No”. Because of this, we do not support this design element. x Maintenance and upkeep fees are a concern. Where will these funds originate? It is the understanding of the LCSB that construction of the kayak park would be paid for by private donations only. However, continual funds will be needed for upkeep, especially in the event of a natural disaster. x The recent Our Lands, Our Future citizen survey specifically identified the citizens’ top priority for land use as: “trails for walking, biking, and hiking”. The citizen survey listed “kayaking” at their lowest end of preference. Public money should be spent for the greater good as requested by the citizens. x Citizens indicate they prefer a natural, tranquil experience along the river. The design, as it stands, would encourage grouping and discourage tranquility. In summary: Habitat preservation and protection, while providing opportunities for the enjoyment of natural areas where appropriate, is the main focus of the LCSB. The “look and feel” of the Downtown River Project should promote a tranquil, natural environment for low- impact, outdoor recreation rather than large, “venue-type” gatherings. The LCSB believes that a variety of recreational river opportunities can exist in tandem with maintaining the environmental integrity of the Poudre River. The key is to scatter small, carefully planned activity areas along the river. Additionally, constructed river features should be evaluated periodically on a scheduled basis, to ensure continuous benefits to the Poudre River flora and fauna. Please refer to the sketches and comments below. This area of the Poudre River is of great concern to the LCSB. As this illustration suggests, the river at this point resembles more of an “amusement park” genre than a tranquil place of respite. The citizens have clearly indicated they want their experiences on the Poudre River to be peaceful and tranquil. Packet Pg. 93 Attachment2.5: Land Conservation and Stewardship Board memo (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 3 This illustration indicates an “amphitheater” type gathering place as well as an “observation deck” with a roof. The LCSB is concerned that this design will lend itself to continual requests for venue events that require policing, high maintenance, and harm to habitat and wildlife. Packet Pg. 94 Attachment2.5: Land Conservation and Stewardship Board memo (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) ATTACHMENT 6 Packet Pg. 95 Attachment2.6: Downtown Development Authority Letter, July 1, 2014 (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Packet Pg. 96 Attachment2.6: Downtown Development Authority Letter, July 1, 2014 (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY PROJECT TITLE: POUDRE RIVER DOWNTOWN PROJECT OVERALL PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT LEVEL: Inform and Consult BOTTOM LINE QUESTION: What are your thoughts on the Master Plan? KEY STAKEHOLDERS: Visitors to the area, recreationists, environmental interests, neighbors, landowners, ditch companies, business community (especially downtown), City Council, City Leaders TIMELINE: June 6, 2013 Project Kick-Off Meeting June 26, 2013 Poudre River Open House (also included other projects) July 2013 Stakeholder Listening Sessions Sept 5, 2013 Open House –Concept plans, kayaking opportunities/constraints presentation Oct 8, 2013 City Council Work Session Oct 2013 Design Scenario Formulation/Plan Assessment Nov 2013 Open House #2 – Draft Master Plan Winter/Spring 2013 Prepare Master Plan Document Spring 2014 Present draft plan to boards, commissions July 8, 2014 Present draft plan to Council August 19, 2015 Council adoption by resolution of draft plan Key Messages:  Please share your input.  The Poudre River Downtown Project will plan and design integrated and mutually supportive improvements related to flood mitigation, habitat, and recreation. FLOOD MITIGATION GOALS • Improve public safety and protect properties from damaging floods. • Eliminate 100-year flood overtopping of College Avenue and, if possible, eliminate the 100-year flow split along Vine Drive. • Reconnect the river to its floodplain while maximizing the beneficial environmental and recreational uses of the river corridor. HABITAT GOALS  Conserve and restore the existing riparian ecosystem to promote river health and resiliency.  Deliver continuous, connected aquatic and riparian habitat for fish, wildlife, trees and plants.  Achieve and maintain diverse and sustainable native fish, wildlife and plant populations. RECREATION GOALS • Provide a mix of active and passive recreational amenities both in and along the river which encourage a safe, healthy, outdoor lifestyle. ATTACHMENT 7 Packet Pg. 97 Attachment2.7: Public Engagement Plan (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) • Provide community gathering places and promote connectivity between recreational opportunities along the river corridor. Tools and Techniques  Broad invitations to open houses including direct mail to neighbors, online calendar listings, website coverage, press releases  Communication to Boards and Commissions, also e-newsletters, social media, and email to interested individuals and groups  Website devoted to this project with feedback form and “river projects” website  Board and commission presentations  Stakeholder listening sessions, as needed Presentations to Date:  Presentations on multiple occasions to the Land Conservation and Stewardship Board, Parks and Recreation Board, Water Board  Presentations to Youth Advisory Board, Commission on Disability, Landmark Preservation Commission, Senior Advisory Board, Transportation Board, Planning and Zoning Commission  Presentations to Trout Unlimited, Save the Poudre, Downtown Development Authority, Downtown Business Authority, North College Business Association, Fort Collins Convention and Visitors Bureau, Chamber of Commerce  Council work session presentation on October 8, 2013  Two open houses, June 26, 2013 and February 27, 2014. Attended by over 200 and 175 people respectively. The June open house included a break out session for kayak enthusiasts.  Site tours were conducted with the Land Conservation and Stewardship Board, Natural Resources Advisory Board, Colorado Parks and Wildlife staff, and United States Army Corps of Engineers personnel Additional outreach: • Early meeting in 2013 with about two dozen key stakeholders including landowners, business representatives, recreation advocates, and environmental interests • Several meetings with kayak park advocates • Coloradoan column by John Stokes • Online calendars • Postcard handed out at events prior to Open House • Natural Areas Enews, Economic Health Enews, Fort Shorts • City utility bill insert listing • Email invites to the open houses to over 200 people including boards and commissions, neighbors, natural areas stakeholders, recreation stakeholders, community groups, media, and businesses. • Posters at 125 locations around town, in natural area kiosks • Cable 14 bulletin board slide • News release to print, radio and tv • City website and Citynet spotlight • Ads in Coloradoan and on KUNC • Social media (facebook, twitter, NextDoor) • Project managers developed project-specific mailing lists/outreach Packet Pg. 98 Attachment2.7: Public Engagement Plan (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 1 Poudre River Downtown Master Plan July 8, 2014 ATTACHMENT 8 Packet Pg. 99 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 2 Habitat - Stewardship - Experience Sustainability The Poudre River Downtown Project will plan and design integrated, and to the extent possible, mutually supportive improvements related to habitat, recreation and flood mitigation. Packet Pg. 100 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 3 Transitions Packet Pg. 101 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 4 Reconnecting Habitat Packet Pg. 102 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 5 Fish Bypass Packet Pg. 103 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 6 Dam Deconstruction Packet Pg. 104 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 7 Recreation – Blue Trail Packet Pg. 105 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 8 Access to the River Packet Pg. 106 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 9 Access and Parking Packet Pg. 107 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 10 Flood Mitigation Packet Pg. 108 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 11 Packet Pg. 109 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 12 Stable Banks Packet Pg. 110 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 13 College Avenue to the BNSF Packet Pg. 111 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 14 College Avenue to BNSF Packet Pg. 112 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 15 Packet Pg. 113 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 16 College Avenue to the BNSF Packet Pg. 114 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 17 Rebuild the Channel Packet Pg. 115 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) 18 College Avenue Perspective Packet Pg. 116 Attachment2.8: Powerpoint presentation (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) City of Fort Collins Page 1 urban renewal authority Karen Weitkunat, Chairperson City Council Chambers Gerry Horak, Vice-Chairperson City Hall West Bob Overbeck 300 LaPorte Avenue Lisa Poppaw Fort Collins, Colorado Gino Campana Wade Troxell Ross Cunniff Cablecast on City Cable Channel 14 on the Comcast cable system Steve Roy Darin Atteberry Wanda Nelson City Attorney Executive Director Secretary The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224- 6001) for assistance. URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY BOARD WORK SESSION July 8, 2014 (after the City Council Work Session)  CALL TO ORDER.  ROLL CALL 1. Urban Renewal Authority Financial Management Policy - Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Parameters. (staff: Tom Leeson; 10 minute staff presentation; 30 minute discussion) The purpose of this item is to discuss a series of new financial parameters to be used in developing the TIF commitments made to individual projects. The Fort Collins Urban Renewal Authority (URA) has been engaged in a process of continuous improvement since the beginning of 2012. Recent improvements include:  Reorganization by moving the management of the URA from the Finance Department to Economic Health allowing for an independent review by Finance;  Changes to the method for estimating Tax Increment generated by a project, consistent with the proven track record of the Downtown Development Authority’s approach;  Increased consultation with outside legal counsel relative to specific URA financing, operations, and formation issues; and  Documentation and tracking of the Redevelopment Agreement negotiation, adoption, and execution process. The item presented to the URA Board continues the process of improvement by presenting a series of parameters to be used in developing the TIF commitments made to individual projects by URA staff. City of Fort Collins Page 2 2. New Approach for URA Process. (staff; Tom Leeson; 10 minute staff presentation; 30 minute discussion) The purpose of this item is to discuss a new URA process when forming urban renewal plan areas and TIF Districts that goes well beyond the State requirements. The process for forming new urban renewal areas and TIF Districts should be more strategic with regards to the public improvements, land uses, design standards, as well as public and private amenities, and include a detailed implementation strategy that identifies timing of improvements, cost estimates, responsible parties and realistic approach to various financing mechanisms. Furthermore, it is recommended this new process be applied to a new TIF District in the Midtown UR Plan Area. In this manner, the URA can drive the implementation of the Midtown Plan, the Midtown in Motion Plan, and City Plan. By working with property owners, taxing districts, stakeholders, and the members of the community, the URA can be deliberate in its redevelopment efforts, as opposed to waiting for proposals from the private sector.  OTHER BUSINESS.  ADJOURNMENT. DATE: STAFF: July 8, 2014 Tom Leeson, Redevelopment Program Manager WORK SESSION ITEM Urban Renewal Authority Board SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Urban Renewal Authority Financial Management Policy - Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Parameters. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to discuss a series of new financial parameters to be used in developing the TIF commitments made to individual projects. The Fort Collins Urban Renewal Authority (URA) has been engaged in a process of continuous improvement since the beginning of 2012. Recent improvements include:  Reorganization by moving the management of the URA from the Finance Department to Economic Health allowing for an independent review by Finance;  Changes to the method for estimating Tax Increment generated by a project, consistent with the proven track record of the Downtown Development Authority’s approach;  Increased consultation with outside legal counsel relative to specific URA financing, operations, and formation issues; and  Documentation and tracking of the Redevelopment Agreement negotiation, adoption, and execution process. The item presented to the URA Board continues the process of improvement by presenting a series of parameters to be used in developing the TIF commitments made to individual projects by URA staff. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. What questions does the URA Board have about the proposed TIF commitment parameters? 2. Does the URA Board feel the financial parameters are ready to consider for adoption? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The attached proposed URA Financial Management Policy (Financial Policy)(Attachment 1) addresses a concern consistently voiced by URA Board members in the past two years. The concern relates to over- commitment of TIF dollars to individual redevelopment projects. This concerns stems from recent experience where initial estimates of the TIF generated by a project exceeded the initial actual TIF generated by the project. One measure taken to address this concern has been adopting a method of estimating the TIF anticipated from a project by using the approach employed by the DDA. This approach has a long proven track record. In addition, estimates of TIF over the course of an Urban Renewal Plan Area (Plan Area) life have been adjusted to assume no growth (0% appreciation) as an additional layer of conservatism. The proposed Financial Policy provides additional insulation to address this concern. The Financial Policy is intended to provide a set of operating norms for future TIF commitments to be used by URA staff. The financing parameters presented represent a range of preferred methods. The decision to use one method over another or to blend methods will be contingent upon a project’s need for gap financing, the size of the particular project, the type of improvements supported by the TIF and/or the public benefit provided by the project. Packet Pg. 3 July 8, 2014 Page 2 The attached proposed Financial Policy (Attachment 1) provides parameters related to the two primary approaches to providing TIF commitments: (a) lump sum payments to the project (historically the prevalent approach) and (b) payments to the project over time. In addition, the application or use of TIF is primarily for two of the three previously outlined URA assistance purposes: (a) Create - When existing conditions on a site make private market rate redevelopment impractical (i.e., environmental contamination or insufficient infrastructure) so providing TIF assistance removes financial barriers and helps to create a project that would not otherwise happen, and (b) Enhance - When conditions on a site are such that the likely market rate redevelopment outcome is not consistent with goals for Targeted Redevelopment and Infill Areas. In these cases, providing TIF assistance changes the scope of the project so that it conforms, or exceeds identified objectives in City Plan. Specific details of the proposed financing parameters are provided in the attached Financial Policy (Attachment 1). It should be noted the URA Finance Committee reviewed the financial parameters at its meeting on November 21, 2013. Generally the Committee was supportive of the parameters. Council Member Cunnifff expressed concern that the maximum percentages may still be too high, considering future projects and the possibility of slippage. Mayor Weitkunat emphasized the recommended percentages are maximums not targets and that all but two projects have fallen well below 75% (Attachment 2). ATTACHMENTS 1. TIF Financing Policy (PDF) 2. URA Finance Committee minutes, November 21, 2013 (PDF) 3. Powerpoint presentation (PDF) Packet Pg. 4 URA Financial Management Policy 20 Tax Increment Financing Issue Date: TBD Version: 1 Issued by: Director Economic Health Financial Policy 20 – Tax Increment Financing 1 20.1 Guiding Principles A. Retaining a percentage of the total tax increment collected guards against the risk associated with rising interest rates, a diminution of assessed value, and other market risks. B. During volatile and/or rising rate environments, consideration will be given to reducing the amount of TIF committed by the URA as a hedge against dramatic rate increases that increase the cost of financing to the URA Objective: The following parameters are intended to provide a set of operating norms for financing URA projects. The financing parameters represent a range of preferred methods. The decision to utilize a particular financing method is contingent upon a project’s need for gap financing, the size of a particular deal, the type of improvements supported by public financing and/or the public benefit provided. Applicability: This policy applies to Fort Collins Urban Renewal Authority. Authorized by: Urban Renewal Authority Board ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 5 Attachment1.1: TIF Financing Policy (2125 : URA-Financial Management Policy) Tax Increment Financing Parameters Financial Policy 20 – Tax Increment Financing 2 20.2 TIF Parameters URA Assistance Purpose: Create URA Assistance Purpose: Enhance Element Lump Sum Payment Pay Over Time Lump Sum Payment Pay Over Time Max % TIF Commitment Available to Support Project 75%* 90%** 75%* 75% TIF Payment Calculation Fixed $ Commitment (a) % of Actual Annual Tax Increment collected (b) Fixed Annual $ Commitment Fixed $ Commitment (a) % of Actual Annual Tax Increment collected (b) Fix Annual $ Commitment URA Cost of Capital Borrowing Costs: -City Interagency Loan Policy -Bank Loan Underwriting Req. -Other: Section 108 standards N/A Borrowing Costs: -City Interagency Loan Policy -Bank Loan Underwriting Req. -Other: Section 108 standards N/A Developer Cost Capital N/A -Negotiated -Limited by the Max % TIF Commitment Available Tax Increment Financing Parameters Financial Policy 20 – Tax Increment Financing 3 TIF reimbursed will be prorated based on the actual TIF received. b. In the first year, if actual TIF comes in higher than the Estimate of Value, the TIF reimbursed will be based on the original Estimate of Value calculation. c. The actual TIF paid does not grow with inflation. Once established in (b) above, it stays constant. Once established by (a), it can grow to equal (b) but not exceed (b). 20.4 Definitions A. Create: When existing conditions on a site make private market rate redevelopment impractical (i.e., environmental contamination or insufficient infrastructure) so providing TIF assistance removes financial barriers and helps to create a project that would not otherwise happen. B. Enhance: When conditions on a site are such that the likely market rate redevelopment outcome is not consistent with goals for Targeted Redevelopment and Infill Areas. In these cases, providing TIF assistance changes the scope of a project so that it conforms, or exceeds identified objectives in City Plan. Packet Pg. 7 Attachment1.1: TIF Financing Policy (2125 : URA-Financial Management Policy) Finance Administration 215 N. Mason 2nd Floor PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6788 970.221.6782 - fax fcgov.com URA Finance Committee Meeting Minutes 11/21/13 10:00 to 11:30 a.m. CIC Room Council Attendees: Mayor Karen Weitkunat, Bob Overbeck, Ross Cunniff Staff: Darin Atteberry, Mike Beckstead, Josh Birks, Karl Gannon, Bruce Hendee, Mark Jackson, Diane Jones, Tom Leeson, Ken Mannon, Lawrence Pollack, Kurt Ravenschlag, Jessica Ping- Small, Peggy Streeter, Steve Roy, John Voss, Katie Wiggett, Timothy Wilder Others: Approval of the Minutes of September 16, 2013 Mayor Karen Weitkunat moved to approve the minutes for the September 16, 2013 meeting. Minutes were approved unanimously. URA Financial Parameters Josh Birks said that the Fort Collins Urban Renewal Authority (URA) has been engaged in a process of continuous improvement since the beginning of 2012. Recent improvements include:  Reorganization moving the management of the URA out from under the Finance Department allowing for an independent review by Finance;  Changes to the method for estimating Tax Increment generated by a project, consistent with the proven track record of the Downtown Development Authority’s approach;  Increased consultation with outside legal counsel relative to specific URA financing, operations, and formation issues; and  Documentation of the Redevelopment Agreement negotiation, adoption, and execution process. Josh added that, while historically the City has been the URA’s primary source for loans, the URA is looking at other funding options (i.e. the federal government, banks, etc.). This is one way we are broadening our horizons. Josh noted that the presented policy continues the process of improvement by presenting a series of parameters for developing the TIF commitments made to individual projects by URA staff. These parameters are defined by the URA’s purpose to create and to enhance. ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 8 Attachment1.2: URA Finance Committee minutes, November 21, 2013 (2125 : URA-Financial Management Policy) 2 The Financial Policy is intended to provide a set of operating norms for future TIF commitments to be used by URA staff. The financing parameters presented represent a range of preferred methods. The decision to use one method over another or to blend methods will be contingent upon a project’s need for gap financing, the size of the particular project, the type of improvements supported by the TIF and/or the public benefit provided by the project. The proposed Financial Policy provides parameters related to the two primary approaches to providing TIF commitments: (a) lump sum payments (historically the prevalent approach) and (b) pay over time. Ross Cunniff asked how Staff settled on the maximum percentages for TIF. Mike replied that the numbers were the result of balancing risk with achieving results. Staff determined that at 75%, the URA could achieve its goals without too much risk. It is a conservative maximum limit. Ross asked how this maximum percentage compares with the DDA’s. Josh answered that the primary distinction between the DDA and the URA is that the DDA has a dual purpose, adding to blight renewal the maintenance of the downtown area whereas the URA’s sole purpose is blight renewal. Because of this distinction, the DDA retains more TIF to cover the cost of maintenance. The problem the URA faces is trying to keep the TIF low while also maximizing public improvements. For example, the TIF on the mall project would be lower if we abandoned such improvements as the YAC and the underpass. Ross asked how any remaining TIF funds are used. Mike replied that any excess TIF stayed in the URA to be used to improve the same area for which it was collected. Steve Roy will look into the legal parameters for using such funds. Mike noted that the DDA uses a line of credit mechanism that satisfies the debt obligation attached to excess TIF revenue; the URA could use a similar mechanism. Mike noted that the conservative parameters of this policy may limit the kind of projects the URA can take on in the future. Josh Birks added that this policy creates a forced dialogue between Staff and Council if the URA wants to go outside these parameters. Only Council can decide to make an exception. Ross expressed concern that the maximum percentages may still be too high, considering future projects and the possibility of slippage. Mayor Weitkunat said that we should emphasize that those percentages are maximums not targets and that all but two projects have fallen well below 75%. Next Steps The URA TIF Policy will be discussed in more detail at a future work session. Packet Pg. 9 Attachment1.2: URA Finance Committee minutes, November 21, 2013 (2125 : URA-Financial Management Policy) 1 URA Financial Management Policy Tax Increment Financing Parameters URA Board Meeting July 8, 2014 ATTACHMENT 3 2 Direction Sought • Does the URA Board have questions about the proposed TIF commitment parameters? • Does the URA Board feel the financial parameters are ready for adoption? 3 Recent Improvements • Reorganization allowing for an independent review by Finance • Changes to the method for estimating Tax Increment generated by a project • Increased consultation with outside legal counsel • Documentation of the Redevelopment Agreement negotiation, adoption, and execution process 4 URA Assistance Purpose: Create URA Assistance Purpose: Enhance Element Lump Sum Payment Pay Over Time Lump Sum Payment Pay Over Time Max % TIF Commitment 75% (Including borrowing costs) 90% (75% in Prospect South) 75%* 75% TIF Payment Calculation Fixed $ Commitment a) % of Actual Annual Tax Increment collected b) Fixed Annual $ Commitment Fixed $ Commitment a) % of Actual Annual Tax Increment collected b) Fix Annual $ Commitment URA Cost of Capital Borrowing Costs: -City Interagency Loan Policy -Bank Loan Underwriting Req. -Other: Section 108 standards N/A Borrowing Costs: -City Interagency Loan Policy -Bank Loan Underwriting Req. -Other: Section 108 standards N/A Developer Cost Capital N/A -Negotiated -Limited by the Max % TIF Commitment Available N/A -Negotiated -Limited by the Max % TIF Commitment Available % TIF Contribution relative to Total Project Cost 5 Direction Sought • Does the URA Board have questions about the proposed TIF commitment parameters? • Does the URA Board feel the financial parameters are ready for adoption? DATE: STAFF: July 8, 2014 Tom Leeson, Redevelopment Program Manager WORK SESSION ITEM Urban Renewal Authority Board SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION New Approach for URA Process. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to discuss a new URA process when forming urban renewal plan areas and TIF Districts that goes well beyond the State requirements. The process for forming new urban renewal areas and TIF Districts should be more strategic with regards to the public improvements, land uses, design standards, as well as public and private amenities, and include a detailed implementation strategy that identifies timing of improvements, cost estimates, responsible parties and realistic approach to various financing mechanisms. Furthermore, it is recommended this new process be applied to a new TIF District in the Midtown UR Plan Area. In this manner, the URA can drive the implementation of the Midtown Plan, the Midtown in Motion Plan, and City Plan. By working with property owners, taxing districts, stakeholders, and the members of the community, the URA can be deliberate in its redevelopment efforts, as opposed to waiting for proposals from the private sector. GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED 1. Does the URA Board support the new approach regarding the methodology for establishing new TIF Districts and new urban renewal plan areas? 2. Does the Board support the URA staff initiating the new process of identifying redevelopment opportunities within the Midtown Urban Renewal Plan area? BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION New Plan Area Formation Process The Fort Collins Urban Renewal has been focused on remediating blight by partnering with the private sector at the project level. While the projects adhere to the intended development patterns delineated in City Plan and planning documents, there is no specific redevelopment plan for the Urban Areas. In an effort to respond more directly to the City Plan objectives, the URA should continue to focus on remediating blight while also emphasizing the creation of great places. Place making involves looking at, listening to, and asking questions of the people who live, work and play in a particular space, to discover needs and aspirations. This information is then used to create a common vision for that place. The vision can evolve quickly into an implementation strategy, beginning with small-scale, doable improvements that can immediately bring benefits to public spaces and the people who use them. To date, the Fort Collins URA has created two urban renewal areas (North College and Midtown), both of which cover relatively large areas (See Attachment 1 for map). The two urban renewal areas were created in conformance with the Colorado Urban Renewal law and were accompanied by the required urban renewal blight studies and plans. The North College Urban Renewal Plan and the Midtown Urban Renewal Plan both follow the statutory requirements; however, neither Plan is specific about the desired type of redevelopment and infrastructure improvements to be financed with Tax Increment Financing (TIF). Packet Pg. 15 July 8, 2014 Page 2 The Fort Collins URA has traditionally considered individual project proposals and assessed TIF financing for each particular project. While there have been successful redevelopment projects, the current approach has resulted in relatively sporadic redevelopment activity. Additionally, since the urban renewal areas are large, it has been difficult to develop a cohesive redevelopment strategy that focuses on the specific improvements needed to remediate all of the identified blight. Additionally, the approach results in trying to analyze each proposed project independently and how it addresses the public benefit in terms of infrastructure improvements and blight remediation. In many communities, the urban renewal plan is used to identify the blight conditions per state statute and provide a specific plan for remediating the blight and creating great places. Plan elements typically include identifying specific infrastructure improvements, desired land uses, preferred urban design elements, necessary pedestrian connections, gateway features, and open space opportunities, to name a few. The purpose of a more specific plan is to identify specific projects, design elements, and costs that might be undertaken to redevelop and revitalize an area. It allows the broader community, underlying property owners, and stakeholders to be more focused and deliberate in identifying the types of projects and improvements needed in a particular urban renewal area, and results in greater buy-in of the identified objectives as a result of the increased level of collaboration. A similar process can be followed for the creation of new TIF districts within a plan area. For these reasons, it is recommended the URA engage in a new process when forming new urban renewal plan areas and new TIF Districts that goes well beyond the state requirements and focuses on achieving a strong sense of place. The process for forming new urban renewal areas and TIF Districts should be collaborative and include property owners, taxing districts, stakeholders, and the members of the broader community. Additionally, the plans should focus on smaller areas and be more strategic with regards to the public improvements, land uses, design standards, as well as public and private amenities. A more specific urban renewal plan/TIF District should also include a detailed implementation strategy that identifies timing of improvements, cost estimates, responsible parties and realistic approach to various financing mechanisms. The plan should also identify the public improvements, the private improvements, and those improvements that are appropriate for a public/private partnership (Attachment 2). Midtown Urban Renewal Plan Area Furthermore, in an effort to be more focused in terms of implementation for the Midtown Plan, it is recommended this new planning process be applied to a new TIF District. The URA should engage in a community process to identify a new and more strategic area to be targeted for infill and redevelopment following the process described above. In this manner, the URA can drive the implementation of the Midtown Plan, the Midtown in Motion Plan, and City Plan. By working with property owners, taxing districts, stakeholders, and the members of the community, the URA can be deliberate in its redevelopment efforts, as opposed to waiting for proposals from the private sector. ATTACHMENTS 1. URA Project Map (PDF) 2. Comparison matrix (PDF) 3. Powerpoint presentation (PDF) Packet Pg. 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !11 9 8 7 5 4 3 2 1 10 6 COLLEGE DRAKE WILLOX VINE PROSPECT HARMONY MASON REMINGTON HOWES HORSETOOTH LAUREL MOUNTAIN RIVERSIDE BOARDWALK LAPORTE LINCOLN JOHN F KENNEDY LANDINGS JEFFERSON MASON STOVER SWALLOW LAKE PITKIN STUART LAUREL CONIFER CENTRE REDWOOD CHERRY LINDEN ELIZABETH COLUMBIA LOOMIS HICKORY MEADOWLARK BOARDWALK STANFORD MANHATTAN HINSDALE Urban Renewal Plan Area Adoption Process Comparison Matrix Current UR Plan Approval Process New UR Plan/TIF District Approval Process Process to determine UR Plan area  Informed by policies and goals within City Plan  Informed by policies and goals within City Plan  Collaborative process with steering committee and stakeholders  Evaluate multiple areas for greatest potential for redevelopment  Evaluation of potential redevelopment opportunities with proximity to transit Determination of Blight and public process  Notice by mail of study  City Council Resolution to Proceed  Public informed well in advance of study  Property owners part of process identifying blight conditions  Notice by mail of study  City Council Resolution to Proceed Draft & Adopt Urban Renewal Plan  Informed by Colorado Urban Renewal Law  County Impact Report provided to County within 30 days of plan adoption  Plan drafted by City staff/ minimal public outreach  Notice to taxing entities and affected interests  P&Z Recommendation  City Council Resolution to Adopt  Follows more traditional sub-area planning process, while also meeting Statutory requirements  Establish working group/steering committee that includes stakeholders (including taxing districts)  Draft goals and objectives for area  Draft alternative scenarios (include alternatives analysis)  Public hearings/workshops  Notice to taxing entities and affected interests  P&Z Recommendation  County Impact Report provided to County within 30 days of plan adoption  City Council Resolution to Adopt What is included in UR Plan?  Legal Description of area and TIF District  Statutory requirements: o Blight conditions o Plan objectives o UR Activities o Project Financing (TIF)  Legal Description of area and TIF District  Statutory requirements  Alternative and preferred land use program  Potential zoning amendments and other regulatory tools needed for implementation (design standards)  Identified public and private improvements o Parking structures, pedestrian improvements, gathering spaces, etc. o PPPs  Build out scenarios ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 18 Attachment2.2: Comparison matrix (2128 : URA-New Approach for URA Process) Urban Renewal Plan Area Adoption Process Comparison Matrix  Market/financial analysis  Implementation strategy o Project financing o Timing o Responsible parties Packet Pg. 19 Attachment2.2: Comparison matrix (2128 : URA-New Approach for URA Process) 1 New Approach for URA Process URA Board Meeting July 8, 2014 ATTACHMENT 3 2 Direction Sought • Does the URA Board support the new approach regarding the methodology for establishing new TIF Districts and urban renewal plan areas? • Does the Board support the URA staff initiating the new process of identifying redevelopment opportunities within the Midtown Urban Renewal Plan area? 3 Focus on Place Making • URA has focused on individual projects • Focus on remediating blight while emphasizing the creation great places • Place making involves looking at, listening to, and asking questions of the people who live, work and play in a particular space, to discover needs and aspirations. 4 North College Avenue URA 5 Midtown URA Urban Renewal Areas: • Large areas • Not specific about desired development type • Not specific about improvements • No implementation plan • Wait-and-See Approach 6 URA Plan Process In most communities the urban renewal plan is used: • Identify the blight conditions • Provide a specific plan for remediating the blight • Focused on creating great places Plan Elements Include: • Identifying specific infrastructure improvements • Desired land uses • Urban design elements • Necessary pedestrian connections • Gateway features 7 URA Plan/TIF District Process URA Plan/New TIF District Process should: • Identify specific projects, design elements, and costs to redevelop and revitalize an area. • Allows broader community, property owners, and stakeholders to be more focused and deliberate • Identifying the types of projects and improvements • Results in greater buy-in of the identified objectives • Greater collaboration. 8 URA Plan/TIF District Process • Focus on smaller areas • Strategic with regards improvements, land uses, design standards, amenities. • Include implementation strategy. • Identify improvements that are appropriate for a public/private partnership 9 Midtown Urban Renewal Area • New process applied to new TIF District in Midtown • Be more focused and strategic in terms of implementation • Drive the implementation of the Midtown Plan, Midtown in Motion Plan, and City Plan 10 Amended Midtown Urban Renewal Plan Engage in a community process to identify a new and more strategic area to be targeted for infill and redevelopment Deliberate in redevelopment efforts. 11 Direction Sought • Does the URA Board support the new approach regarding the methodology for establishing new TIF Districts and urban renewal plan areas? • Does the Board support the URA staff initiating the new process of identifying redevelopment opportunities within the Midtown Urban Renewal Plan area? TROUTMAN WABASH BUCKINGHAM RESEARCH JEROME MONROE STOVER North College Marketplace: King Soopers grocery store-anchored shopping center developed by Loveland Commercial. Project Cost = $40 M Total Increment = $15.5 M Total Reimbursement = $8 M Reimbursement % of Project Cost = 20% Reimbursement % of Total Increment = 51.6% Reimbursement + Financing % of Total Increment = 71.6% Urban Renewal Plan Area Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District Streets Approved Projects ! 1 ! 2 ! 3 ! 4 ! 5 ! 7 ! 8 ! 9 ! 10 6 Kaufman & Robinson, Inc.: New 10,000 sq. ft. building for business expansion. Project Cost = $1.6 M Total Increment = $600,000 Total Reimbursement = $193,000 Reimbursement % of Project Cost = 12.1% Reimbursement % of Total Increment = 32.2% Reimbursement + Financing % of Total Increment = 37.5% The Summit: 676-bed student housing project with 8,000 sq. ft. commercial space, located adjacent to MAX BRT. Project Cost = $44 M Total Increment = $7 M Total Reimbursement = $5 M Reimbursement % of Project Cost = 11.4% Reimbursement % of Total Increment = 71.4% Reimbursement + Financing % of Total Increment = 100% Prospect Station: 32-unit housing project with 1,000 sq. ft. commercial space, located adjacent to MAX BRT and Mason Trail. Project Cost = $5.9 M Total Increment = $865,340 Total Reimbursement = $494,000 Reimbursement % of Project Cost = 8.4% Reimbursement % of Total Increment = 57.1% Reimbursement + Financing % of Total Increment = 77.3%* North College Avenue Road Improvements: Asphalt overlay, urban design elements, on-street bike lane, updated stormwater system, and safety improvements Project Cost = $11.2 M Total Increment = No direct increment generated Total Reimbursement = $2.7 M Reimbursement % of Project Cost = 24.1% Reimbursement % of Total Increment = N/A Reimbursement + Financing % of Total Increment = N/A Valley Steel & Wire Company: 19,000 sq. ft. expansion of existing facility; URA funded the associated sewer expansion. Project Cost = $900,000 Total Increment = $510,000 Total Reimbursement = $110,000 Reimbursement % of Project Cost = 12.2% Reimbursement % of Total Increment = 21.6% Reimbursement + Financing % of Total Increment = 25.5% Innosphere: New 31,000 sq. ft. LEED Platinum building for the regional technology incubator. Project Cost = $7.2 M Total Increment = $4.3 M Total Reimbursement = $2.8 M Reimbursement % of Project Cost = 38.9% Reimbursement % of Total Increment = 65.1% Reimbursement + Financing % of Total Increment = 86.0% Jax Mercantile: Expansion of existing store to increase retail capacity by 25%. Project Cost = $1.2 M Total Increment = $656,000 Total Reimbursement = $172,000 Reimbursement % of Project Cost = 14.3% Reimbursement % of Total Increment = 26.2% Reimbursement + Financing % of Total Increment = 33.4% Northeast College Corridor Outrall (NECCO) Detention Pond: Future regional detention pond purchased by the City of Fort Collins. Project Cost = $1.22 M Total Increment = No direct increment generated Total Reimbursement = $326,000 Reimbursement % of Project Cost = 26.7% Reimbursement % of Total Increment = N/A Reimbursement + Financing % of Total Increment = N/A Aspen Heights: 220-unit student-oriented housing project. Project Cost = $46.5 M Total Increment = $2.5 M Total Reimbursement = $792,166 Reimbursement % of Project Cost = 1.7% Reimbursement % of Total Increment = 31.7% Reimbursement + Financing % of Total Increment = 31.7% I Pending Projects ! 11 Foothills Mall Fort Collins Urban Renewal Authority Project Map * Final financing cost not yet established ATTACHMENT 1 Packet Pg. 17 Attachment2.1: URA Project Map (2128 : URA-New Approach for URA Process) 25% 15% N/A -Negotiated -Limited by the Max % TIF Commitment Available % TIF Contribution relative to Total Project Cost 25% 15% *Includes borrowing costs **Max % TIF Commitment on Future Prospect South projects limited to 75% 20.3 General Procedures: A. The Larimer County Estimate of Value provided to the developer/property owner shall be utilized for estimating future tax increment collections associated with a project. There shall be no annual appreciation applied to the estimate. B. Growth Estimate in cash flow analysis will be held at 0% C. Cash flows shall be based on absolute dollars and NPV. The discount rate used shall equal the URA cost of capital. D. The term of a City loan to the URA shall be based on the estimated TIF stream. The term shall be minimized to the greatest extent possible given the estimated cash flow. E. The minimum time to process the request for payment from the development will be 90 calendar days. F. In the pay over-time as a Fixed Annual $ Commitment as described in (b) above: a. In the first year if actual TIF comes in lower than the Estimate of Value, the actual Packet Pg. 6 Attachment1.1: TIF Financing Policy (2125 : URA-Financial Management Policy) Dave Piske Fishing Trips Mark Miller Membership Linda Jefferies Newsletter Bob Green Programs Brad Kiehne Project Healing Waters Bill Perrill Raffles Cullen Emsing Web Master Paul Wehr Youth Outreach Dennis Cook Collaborations and Projects Coalition for the Poudre River Watershed Dick Jefferies Big Thompson River Restoration Coalition Dave Piske Eagles Nest Guy Turenne Phantom Canyon Scott Baily Gateway Park Dave Morse ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 88 Attachment2.2: Trout Unlimited Letter of Support (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) river to Downtown, providing multi‐purpose spaces that celebrate the historic relevance of the river to the community, continuing the important and unique relationship between the waterway and surrounding urban environment, and maintaining those natural elements of the river as it passes through Downtown. The natural and beneficial floodplain functions will be protected. Natural habitat, wildlife movement, and flood hazards will be managed to protect public safety while maintaining recreational values. Redevelopment opportunities are permitted and shall be harmonious with the river corridor and its values. PARKS AND RECREATION Principle CPR 4: The City will maintain and provide a variety of high quality recreational opportunities to the community through an interconnected and diverse network of parks, trails, recreation facilities, public spaces, and natural areas. Policy CPR 4.1 ‐ Provide World‐Class Facilities Maintain and facilitate the development of a well‐balanced system of parks, trails, and recreation facilities to provide a variety of recreational opportunities, as identified in the Parks and Recreation Policy Plan (2008). Policy CPR 4.2 – Interconnect the System Support an interconnected regional and local system of parks, trails and open lands, and promote community interaction. Where environmentally appropriate, line irrigation ditches and storm drainageways with trails to connect to destinations such as schools, open lands, and Neighborhood Centers. Special attention must be paid to environmentally sensitive trail design, location and construction. (Also see the Environmental Health chapter’s Open Lands section.) Policy CPR 4.3 – Adhere to Best Management Practices Follow Environmental Best Management Practices for the maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, such as water conservation and the use of untreated water for irrigation purposes in appropriate areas, managing turf and adhering to policies for weed and pest control, utilizing low emission equipment and providing renewal energy opportunities, reducing solid waste through composting and recycling, and certifying sanctuary areas through Audubon International. Policy CPR 4.4 – Forge and Maintain Partnerships Develop and maintain effective public and private partnerships to provide a comprehensive system of parks, common open lands, and outdoor spaces. Principle CPR 5: The City will adapt parks and recreation facilities to meet the range of needs of a changing community. Policy CPR 5.1 ‐ Address Changing Needs Seek input from the public, and review recreation trends to adapt existing facilities and programs and provide new types of parks and recreation facilities and programs that meet the needs of a changing population and community (e.g., increasing recreational options for the growing senior population, providing coordinated recreational/ cultural activities for youth, providing more frequent resting places along sidewalks, etc.). Policy CPR 5.2 – Provide Multi‐Purpose Lands Maintain and develop partnerships among City departments (e.g., Parks and Recreation, Open Lands, Transportation, Stormwater, etc.) and other organizations to provide multi‐purpose parks and open lands to maximize and leverage available resources. (Also see the Environmental Health and Transportation chapters.) Packet Pg. 87 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) management, rural heritage, farming, pollution prevention, and conservation/reconstruction of historic sites and structures. Principle ENV 29: The City will collaborate with gravel mining interests to ensure that mining operations are conducted to meet community values and restore ecological function. Policy ENV 29.1 – Gravel Mined Land Purchases Evaluate areas along the Poudre River that have been mined for gravel for acquisition for public open lands purposes. Policy ENV 29.2 – Reclaim Gravel Mined Areas Collaborate with gravel mining interests to develop innovative approaches to gravel mine reclamation that will provide wildlife habitat, restoration of native landscapes, recreational opportunities, water storage, and other public values. DOWTOWN DISTRICT Principle LIV 32: The Downtown will serve as a focal point and primary destination and activity center for the community, with the design of buildings, streets, parking areas, and public spaces reinforcing the area’s unique and distinctive character. Policy LIV 32.3 – Encourage After‐Hour Activities Encourage uses that expand the range of activities, such as entertainment (cinema, music, and live theater), restaurants, hotel/convention facilities, and residential uses, for all segments of the population, including families, students, retirees, couples, and singles. By incorporating a mix of uses within the Downtown District, a more active environment will be created during working hours and at night. Policy LIV 32.5– Maintain Visual Character Maintain and reinforce the visual distinctiveness of Downtown and its component sub‐districts. With new buildings and public spaces, respect and be sensitive to the design integrity by enhancing visual continuity and sense of place through the use of building materials and design features sensitive to the character of Downtown and by reflecting excellence and high quality in their design. Policy LIV 32.8 – Design for Safety Provide a sense of security and safety for users through the design of buildings, parking areas, and streets. Add to a secure 24‐hour Downtown environment for employees, students, and visitors by collectively addressing adequate lighting, visibility, and location of public facilities. Policy LIV 32.9– Design to Enhance Activity Design streets and public spaces Downtown to be attractive, accessible, functional, and designed to enhance pedestrian and bicycle activity: a. Use public art, landscaping, way finding signage, and other street features to create a comfortable and pleasant environment for the pedestrian while also providing continuous and clearly‐expressed pedestrian circulation linkages to interconnect the Downtown District with surrounding neighborhoods and districts. b. Ensure that city streets and gathering spaces will link and provide connections between Old Town, the Civic Center, surrounding neighborhoods, and the Poudre River. OPEN LANDS, PARKS, WATER CORRIDORS Principle LIV 44: Open Lands, Parks, and Water Corridors form an interconnected system that provides habitat essential to the conservation of plants, animals, and their associated ecosystems; serves the needs for drainage and water conveyance; and provides opportunities for recreational, educational, environmental, transportation, and other activities. Packet Pg. 86 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) the Poudre River Corridor. This will include acquiring land for public natural areas and conservation easements to protect natural area values on privately‐owned lands, establishing appropriate cooperative agreements with adjacent landowners, developing and applying development regulations and design standards, and promoting public education and outreach programs, and other techniques as appropriate. Policy ENV 24.3 – Provide Natural Area Protection Buffers Maintain natural area protection buffers along both banks of the Poudre River to protect natural features and scenic qualities, and to account for the natural instability of the River channel. The buffer should be a minimum of three hundred (300) feet wide, beginning at the outer limits of the river bank, or areas of riparian vegetation. One known exception to this general policy is the stretch of the river between North College Avenue and Lincoln Avenue, where a narrower minimum buffer distance is more appropriate due to the constraints of existing development and the area’s proximity to downtown. Policy ENV 24.4 – Restore and Enhance Restore or enhance degraded or disturbed areas of the Poudre River Corridor to improve natural habitat conditions, biodiversity, and aesthetic and recreational values. Restoration and enhancement projects may be performed cooperatively with adjacent private landowners and volunteer community groups. Policy ENV 24.5 – Coordinate to Provide Adequate Instream Flows Work to quantify and provide adequate instream flows to maintain the ecological functionality, recreational, and scenic values of the Cache la Poudre River through Fort Collins. Principle ENV 25: The City will provide enhanced recreation opportunities within the Poudre River Corridor, with an emphasis on scenic values, heritage education, and interpretation while avoiding or minimizing impacts to environmentally sensitive areas. Policy ENV 25.1 – Minimize Impacts Locate and design recreational features within the Poudre River Corridor in a way that avoids or minimizes impacts to natural areas, wildlife habitat, water quality, and other environmental values. Policy ENV 25.2 – Integrate Parks and Recreation Sites In addition to existing facilities such as Lee Martinez Park, the Parks and Recreation Policy Plan identifies future recreation facilities in the Poudre River Corridor. Place emphasis on integrating natural, environmental, historic, and cultural values within new public recreation sites. Policy ENV 25.3 – Extend the Poudre River Trail Extend the Poudre River Trail system downstream to Harmony Road and then to Greeley through partnerships with Larimer County, Weld County, and other Northern Colorado interests. Location and design will account for and avoid or minimize impact to environmentally sensitive areas. Policy ENV 25.4 – Develop Trail/Path Linkages Develop additional trails or paths, as appropriate, to link the Poudre River Corridor to adjacent city neighborhoods and districts to provide public access within the Poudre River Corridor. These trail/path connections will be located and designed to avoid or minimize impacts to environmentally sensitive areas. Principle ENV 26: The City will manage the Poudre River floodplain to minimize potentially hazardous conditions while promoting natural processes associated with flooding, erosion, and channel migration to occur over time as appropriate. Packet Pg. 85 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) City Council members to familiarize themselves with other whitewater parks in: Colorado; Casper, WY; Charles City, IA; and Farmington, NM.  After 20 years of watching the topic of a whitewater recreation project come up and down, several participants were excited that the Poudre River Downtown Project will see it through to completion.  The proposed whitewater park will be a unique opportunity to show case our active community that cherishes boating. Please don’t let this project fail our community and families. Will use this for decades to come!  Small children up to centurions partake in the fun and activities these places provide. It is truly an opportunity for our community to have an amazing experience. Concerns about Whitewater Park  Several participants would prefer not to have a whitewater park because of concerns about overuse of the river. However, if a whitewater park is built they would prefer that it be located just east of College.  Some would prefer not to have a whitewater park if habitat can’t be adequately maintained.  Concerns were expressed about the intensity of development between College and the Burlington Northern Railroad Bridge. Some recommended that the current design for this specific portion of the proposed project be scaled back considerably. The river can still offer some kayak and rafting “whitewater features” and some parking, but blend restoration more harmoniously with the existing natural areas and make a few family‐friendly water features too.  With the limited flows, it doesn’t make sense to focus on the whitewater park. Focus instead on trying to return the river to a natural state while providing access for people to enjoy as they see fit (hiking, biking, fishing, picnics, etc.).  The full blown whitewater park does not seem feasible. Some expressed concerns about the City investing a significant amount of money into something that gets used 30‐40 days of the year. Sometimes less during low water years. Invest it in natural areas or parks that a larger segment of the population can enjoy, not just the Kayakers. Boating and Tubing  Would like to see friendly portages around diversion dams and coy ditch. Hauling a 40 lb. boat up a steep rocky bank is no fun. Also, if boating/ tubing is a goal, the river hazards need to be managed from a RECREATION stand point as well as a flood stand point.  Encourage family canoeing by rebuilding obstructions that now require portaging. Especially restore access near Mulberry Street and Shields Street.  Would like the whole section between Shields and Mulberry be usable, connected and safe for tubing. Packet Pg. 84 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Public Open House #2 – February 27, 2014 The online “virtual” open house web site will be updated presenting the same information and posed the same feedback questions. Additional Presentations to Stakeholder Groups  Presentation at a Save the Poudre event on March 25.  Meeting with Save the Poudre board members on March 26.  Presentation to the North College Business Association on March 26.  Presentation to DDA on April 10.  Presentation to Trout Unlimited and Rocky Mountain Flycasters on April 21.  Presentation to the FC Convention and Visitors Bureau on April 22. Additional Presentations to Boards and Commissions  Site walk with the Land Conservation and Stewardship Board and the Natural Resources Advisory Board on May 2.  Presentation to the Land Conservation and Stewardship Board on May 14.  Presentations to the Water Board and Planning and Zoning Board on June 5. Master Plan Adoption by City Council – Planned for August, 2014 Public Comments Comments received during the public outreach process include several recurring themes which are briefly summarized below. The comments received were insightful, represented diverse points of view, and greatly influenced the development of the project goals and master plan. Comments Regarding Master Plan  The plans are thoughtful …can hardly wait to see them implemented!  Like the offerings which came together with much thought! Importance of the Poudre River  This project represents a great opportunity for the community to rediscover the lifeblood of our city – The Cache La Poudre River!  Glad the Poudre River is getting the attention it deserves….the jewel not every town can own!  Love the idea of creating a community focused river corridor. The Poudre is the heart of our city and the concepts presented all appear to enhance this great treasure of ours. Collaboration  Impressed by the collaboration and plan. Eager to support and keep track of the project’s many phases. Public Process  Some said that they were impressed by the number of people who came to the Open Houses, and that they enjoyed the public process. Balanced Approach  Improvements need to balance benefits related to flood damage/safety, public parks and recreation opportunities and river function (aquatics and wildlife)  Multiuse to promote habitat for fish, birds and inverts as well as recreation is a must….balance must be achieved. More water in stream is needed for all things. Packet Pg. 83 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) items within the Project Roster based on a concept-level understanding of specific construction items required for each project. Costs for the College to BNSFRR Project were refined to a higher degree than the other projects, due to a need to support preliminary budgeting efforts for what was envisioned as the initial project to be carried forward from this Master Plan. The resulting concept-level opinion of implementation cost associated with each project is provided in the Project Roster provided at the end of this section. Packet Pg. 78 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) noting that access to public parking is limited at both locations, as well as along this entire reach.)  Providing two small river access points on the north river bank across from the Wastewater Treatment Facility that will be served by soft surface connecting trails.  Access to the river corridor between Lincoln and Mulberry is limited due to private ownership of adjacent property, the presence of the UP Railroad paralleling Riverside Avenue, and a lack of intervening streets and bridges crossing the river. Where possible, trail connections to the Poudre Trail should be pursued.  Providing a trail underpass of Riverside Avenue and the UP Railroad at the Olive Street intersection. This underpass would connect the historical residential neighborhood to the southwest with the Udall Natural Area and the Poudre River. This project should be designed and coordinated with the proposed Magnolia Street Stormwater Outfall Project.  The intersection of Mulberry and Riverside represents an opportunity to create a gateway to Downtown Fort Collins. Improvements could include enhanced streetscaping, gateway monuments, lighting, and public art. These improvements should be designed in conjunction with the potential solar farm and CDOT’s Mulberry Street Bridge Project.  Adding on-street parking near the river along Lincoln Avenue, or consider purchasing property near the Lincoln Avenue Bridge to construct a trailhead and a parking area.  Informal gravel parking is available near the entrance to the Mulberry Wastewater Treatment Facility, but street access to that site is challenging.  Several parking spaces have been designated as “Trail Parking” in front of Home Depot along the east side of Lemay Avenue; however this does not provide convenient access to the river. More convenient parking opportunities should be pursued. UNSTABLE BANKS AND/OR BANKS CONTAINING CONCRETE RUBBLE AND DEBRIS ARE SHOWN IN BOTH RED AND GREEN (AREAS IN GREEN ARE BEING ADDRESSED BY CURRENT PROJECTS) Packet Pg. 67 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) floodplain southwest of the river, directly upstream of Mulberry Street. While the wastewater treatment plant’s buildings and facilities have been flood proofed, particular care will be required to ensure that any project which includes improvements within the river corridor (i.e., floodway) does not increase 100-year water surface elevations. Figure 2.43 Steep High Bank Adjacent to the Former Pickle Plant Site  Flood mitigation measures are currently being implemented as part of the new 31-acre Natural Area Project. These consist primarily of lowering a significant portion of the overbank north and east of the river, thereby reconnecting the river to the floodplain.  Flood levels should be reduced when CDOT completes the replacement of the Mulberry Bridge (project for completion in 2015).  Opportunities for eliminating overtopping of Lemay Avenue during the 100-year flood are being addressed by the City and CDOT as part of another project. Packet Pg. 66 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) river overlook areas) to strengthen the visual connection between Downtown Fort Collins and the Poudre River, and provide safe, accessible and convenient multi-modal connections to the river. Views of the bridges from the street and the greenway corridor should be considered in their design (Figures 2.39 and 2.40).  Including one put-in/take-out for tubers and boaters on the northeast bank directly downstream of Linden Street (Figures 2.39 and 2.40).  Buckingham Park is served by 24 on-street parking spaces located along the west side of 1st Street, northeast of the river. There are no other public parking spaces located near the river at Lincoln Avenue. If possible, Lincoln Avenue should be designed to accommodate on-street parking in close proximity to the river. Alternatively, the City may consider purchasing property near the Lincoln Avenue Bridge in order to construct a small trailhead and parking for the greenway corridor.  The River Downtown Redevelopment Zone Guidelines align with additional on-street parking to be constructed on Willow Street. This parking would be relatively close to the river and could accommodate trail users. UNSTABLE BANKS AND/OR BANKS CONTAINING CONCRETE RUBBLE AND DEBRIS ARE SHOWN IN RED Packet Pg. 61 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan)  There are no insurable structures located within the regulatory floodplain through this reach. However, the Buckingham Neighborhood and other existing buildings, houses, and infrastructure to the northeast are protected from flooding by the Poudre River during a 100-year event by a regulatory levee which spans this entire reach. Freeboard requirements along the levee must be maintained in order to preserve the levee’s regulatory status with FEMA. Consequently, particular care will be required to ensure that any project which includes improvements within the river corridor (i.e., floodway) do not increase 100-year water surface elevations.  Implementing the Poudre River Enhancement Project (PREP) Plan, or a modestly altered version of that plan. Features included in the PREP Plan are: bank stabilization improvements, in conjunction with limited riparian vegetation enhancements, along the southwest bank; stabilization and vegetative improvements along the northeast bank; and the creation of a secondary slough-like channel located between the river channel and the levee. The secondary channel would greatly expand the riparian habitat corridor and provide flood flow conveyance when flows in the river exceed roughly a 2-year event. This flood mitigation benefit may lower 100-year flood levels and may allow for additional habitat enhancements along the southwest bank. These improvements are represented in the cross section illustrated in Figure 2.35 (provided on the following page).  Removing the historic cconcrete structure currently located on northeast river bank upstream of Lincoln Avenue to increase the flood conveyance capacity of the channel and the Lincoln Avenue Bridge.  Extending the bank stabilization and restoration techniques used adjacent to the Block One Development to create a cohesive appearance along the southwest bank between Linden Street and Lincoln Avenue. Packet Pg. 59 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) proximity to each river put-in/take-out. The location and number of spaces will vary depending on individual site characteristics. Packet Pg. 55 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) the Aztlan Site and the contaminant mitigation countermeasures along the southwest bank through much of this reach. However, future improvements should investigate the possibility of incorporating additional flood mitigation elements. Figure 2.29 Bank Stabilization Needs Map for Reach 4  Bank stabilization and improvements for the areas illustrated in Figure 2.29 include revegetation of both banks along with either rock riprap toe protection or, where banks are near vertical, stacked boulder toe protection. Habitat/Ecological Restoration and Protection Specific issues and potential opportunities associated with habitat/ecological restoration and protection include the following:  Severely eroding and steep banks specifically in the vicinity of the BNSFRR’s Linden Street Bridge and at the informal river access point with the Gustav Swanson Natural Area should be stabilized and replanted with native vegetation.  Protecting and improving diversity of existing forest and shrubs, as well as enhancing riparian grasslands.  It would be beneficial to create riffles and pools similar to those present in the river upstream and downstream of this reach. However, the possibilities for this occurring are limited due to the previous CERCLA remediation efforts.  Similarly, improving lateral connectivity to the south bank floodplain at high flows will not be possible in this reach due to the CERCLA remediation measures.  Removing concrete rubble, along with reshaping and vegetating banks, to improve near shore aquatic habitat. UNSTABLE BANKS AND/OR BANKS CONTAINING CONCRETE RUBBLE AND DEBRIS ARE SHOWN IN RED Packet Pg. 54 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) bridge be enhanced to highlight river’s presence and to reinforce the downtown gateway. Improvements could include: architectural bridge treatments, enhanced bridge railings, streetscape improvements, appropriate lighting, signage, public art, etc. Bridge detailing and character should incorporate materials and forms found in the recently constructed Lake Canal pedestrian bridges and “tree like” vertical features on the west side of College Avenue near Vine Drive (see Figures 2.25 and 2.26 provided at the end of this section).  The experience of walking along College Avenue to the river should be enhanced. Streetscape treatments should extend up to and across the Gateway Bridge.  The Grotto near the Power House Energy Institute is a designated historic landmark/landscape. Originally, the Grotto acted a cooling pond for the Power Plant prior to putting the water back in the river. Future grotto enhancements should honor the original historic design intent.  Blind spots and sharp turns are a safety concern where the existing Poudre Trail crosses under the BNSF Railroad Bridge. Options for realigning the trail to address this issue should be evaluated.  Providing a trail connection to Gustav Swanson Natural Area under the north side of BNSF Railroad Bridge. There is a long range opportunity to locate the trail in a new culvert under the BNSF farther away from the river which could enhance wildlife connections along the river and provide additional flood conveyance and mitigation.  A new iconic pedestrian bridge (i.e. suspension bridge) is illustrated in the master plan downstream of the College Avenue Bridge which would greatly improve the north/south connection across the river and provide a unique overlook for the river (see Figures 2.25 and 2.26 provided at the end of this section).  A “History Walk” is planned along the River, Linden Street, and Willow Street. Representatives from the City, Museum of Discovery and CSU should coordinate needs and opportunities.  There are no existing public parking spaces located within or near the river corridor in this reach, and public parking would be needed to support increased use associated with the whitewater park. Fortunately, the City Stormwater Department owns a lot abutting the south side of Vine Drive which can accommodate a new parking lot.  Where appropriate, bike parking spaces should be provided in close proximity to river put-in/take-outs and other significant stopping points. Location and number of spaces would vary depending on individual site characteristics.  Where lighting is required for safe access, it will be low level, down directional, accent type lighting that will terminate at 11 p.m.. Lighting would be confined to areas such as stairs, and other areas with potential safety concerns.  Provide ADA river access and accessible fishing. UNSTABLE BANKS AND/OR BANKS CONTAINING CONCRETE RUBBLE AND DEBRIS ARE SHOWN IN RED Packet Pg. 48 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) and bank stabilization include the following:  There are numerous insurable structures located within the regulatory floodplain north of the river through of this reach. Consequently, particular care would be required to ensure that any project which includes improvements within the river corridor (i.e., floodway) do not increase 100-year water surface elevations.  Currently, 100-year flows overtop College Avenue. Removal of the Coy Ditch Diversion structure and the boat chute, while lowering the channel bed through this reach, would eliminate overtopping of College Avenue during the 100-year flood (provided adequate real-time maintenance is provided at the UPRR Bridge upstream of College Avenue).  Currently, 100-year flows spill east along Vine Drive, requiring the definition of a regulatory split flow path from Linden Street to Dry Creek, near Lemay Avenue. It appears that by removing the Coy Diversion and the boat chute, as well as implementing a combination of additional improvements (which include opening up the north overbank under the BNSFRR Bridge and reducing the floodplain constriction at Linden) it would be possible to eliminate the 100-year flow split along Vine Drive or reduce the split to nuisance/non-regulatory flood levels. Figure 2.20 Coy Diversion Structure (left photo), Boat Chute (right photo)  Other opportunities for reducing 100-year flood elevations should be investigated in conjunction with future improvements within this reach.  Bank stabilization and improvements for the areas illustrated in Figure 2.22 include revegetation of both banks along with either rock riprap toe protection or, where banks are near vertical, stacked boulder toe protection. Packet Pg. 46 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) provide a direct connection between Lee Martinez Park and Legacy Park.  Potential interpretive and educational topics for this section of the river include: local railroad history, bird nesting and migration, water quality needs, and local settlement history (the mill race which served Auntie Stone’s Mill passed through Lee Martinez Park).  Significant opportunity exists to announce the river’s presence and to strengthen the connection to the river by providing consistent and recognizable wayfinding signs. Specific examples include: o Installing signage at the north end of the Mason Street Corridor to direct visitors to the Poudre River Trail/Greenway. o Cherry Street. The existing wayfinding sign is mounted on a power pole east of Sherwood Street. This sign should be updated or replaced in order to include directional information for the Poudre River Trail/Greenway.  The following is a summary of the existing public parking located within or near the river corridor in this reach. Parking in these areas is provided for multiple uses and is not guaranteed for river use. Additional parking may be required with increased use of the river corridor and surrounding areas. Parking Location Number of Existing Spaces Lee Martinez Park (paved) 70 The Farm (paved) 41 (approx.) Legacy Park (gravel) 20 to 30 Fort Collins Museum of Discovery (paved) 85  Where appropriate, bicycle parking spaces should be provided in close proximity to each river put-in/take-out and other significant stopping points. The location and number of spaces will vary depending on individual site characteristics. Packet Pg. 43 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) if the water rights and delivery rights of the ditch company can be protected, there may be opportunities to evaluate alternative diversion structure designs and water delivery options. Figure 2.16 Lake Canal Diversion Dam UNSTABLE BANKS AND/OR BANKS CONTAINING CONCRETE RUBBLE AND DEBRIS ARE SHOWN IN RED Packet Pg. 42 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) reduce the number of bridge piers and/or implement an emergency maintenance program which would remove woody debris from the bridge piers in an expedited manner during flood events.  Other opportunities for reducing 100-year flood elevations should be investigated in conjunction with future improvements within this reach. Proposed improvements through Lee Martinez Park, which are intended to reconnect the river to its floodplain by lowering the grade of the tree dump site, will promote the reduction in flood elevations (Figure 2.13). Figure 2.13 View of the Mounded Tree Dump Site in Lee Martinez Park Packet Pg. 41 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan)  Developing improved river access areas including safe areas for water based recreation including tubing, playing, nature art, splashing, etc. Three river accesses are illustrated on the master plan for this reach.  The trail along the north river bank crosses a stream and has become devoid of vegetation through the years due to heavy visitor use (Figure 2.8). This area will continue to be a place where people can get muddy and wet.  Improving trail connection between Soft Gold Park and the river. Soft Gold Park is a Neighborhood Park located north of the river greenway, adjacent to Magpie Meander Natural Area, which provides additional recreational use opportunities. Park features include: parking, trails, Packet Pg. 37 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan)  Lowering the river bank at the upstream end of Salyer Natural Area to allow higher flows to enter the proposed backwater wetland area during larger events.  Bank improvement options for the areas illustrated in Figure 2.3 include: rock toe protection and revegetation in areas where river migration and/or bank retreat is not acceptable; or bio-stabilization for areas where river movement and/or bank retreat is acceptable. Figure 2.3 Bank Stabilization Needs Map for Reach 1  The south river bank includes a section of exposed riprap armoring near the proposed extension of Wood Street (shown in Figure 2.4). A plan has been developed, as part of the McMurray Natural Area Ecological Restoration Project, to enhance this river bank; the City Stormwater Department will take the lead on implementing this plan. Ultimately, this bank will be enhanced to blend with the natural surroundings by adding soil cover and installing willow plantings. Figure 2.4 Exposed Riprap Bank Armoring near Wood Street UNSTABLE BANKS AND/OR BANKS CONTAINING CONCRETE RUBBLE AND DEBRIS ARE SHOWN IN BOTH RED AND GREEN (AREAS IN GREEN ARE BEING ADDRESSED BY CURRENT PROJECTS) Packet Pg. 36 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Focal Recreation Area- A zone supporting a variety of recreational opportunities. Park Natural Feature - A zone that is a blend of nature, recreation and stormwater improvements. Urban Area - A zone which includes existing development and adjacent land suitable for future development. Much time was spent debating the location and extent of the Character Zones, particularly the Focal Recreation Zone. Opinions varied widely on this subject. Passionate arguments were made by participants with respect to increased recreational use of the river, both for and against. Some felt strongly that the river should be preserved and enhanced as a natural resource with limited passive recreational use, while others felt that additional recreational opportunities in and around the river would add to the vibrancy and culture of the City. Compromises were made and the character zones attempt to strike a balance serving both perspectives. As with the land use transition zones, the character zone boundaries are not absolute. The size and shape of each zone will likely be refined in the future as specific projects are carried toward implementation. Overview of the Poudre River Downtown Master Plan The Master Plan Overview Map, presented in Figure 1.11, represents the culmination of the master planning process for the Poudre River Downtown Project. Preparation of the Master Plan Overview Map considered the needs voiced by the community, and requirements identified by professionals with expertise covering a wide range of scientific and social disciplines. For detailed information, reference is made to the ‘Master Plan by Reach’ descriptions provided in the following section. Packet Pg. 28 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan)  Downtown District – Principle LIV 32  Open Lands, Parks, Water Corridors – Principle LIV 44  Poudre River Corridor Overlay – Principle LIV 45  Parks and Recreation – Principles CPR 4 & 5 (The full text of each of the Principles listed above is provided in the Appendix of this document) Cache la Poudre River Natural Areas Management Plan (updated 2011). The Cache la Poudre River Management Plan Update is divided into two parts. Part I (Chapters 1 - 6) provides broad background, context, overarching management goals, objectives, and strategies for all natural areas along the river including a broad review of management since the first management plan was adopted in 2002 and the new management zoning system. Part II (Chapters 7 - 13) describes key issues, actions, and management zones for each planning unit or individual natural area. Old Town Basin Water Quality Master Plan (2012). This plan evaluated existing water quality features in the Old Town Basin, identified under- served areas, and formulated a plan of water quality facilities intended to meet federal, state and local water quality treatment requirements. Fort Collins Master Street Plan (Amended 2013). The Fort Collins street master plan identifies anticipated roadway enhancements, including street realignment and widening needs, and potential grade separated rail crossings. Lincoln Corridor Plan (2014). This plan seeks to provide an enhanced level of amenities along Lincoln Avenue that restores its importance as a primary entry to the heart of the City, as well as providing an important connection from Downtown to the east and northeast. This plan also identifies a priority list of related neighborhood improvements. Fort Collins River Downtown Redevelopment Zone Guidelines (2014). These guidelines provides enhanced design standards for the R-D-R zone district in an effort to better address neighborhood, site, and building attributes, while maintaining the agricultural-industrial character of this unique portion of the City. Supporting Studies As part of the Poudre River Downtown planning effort, several supporting studies encompassing a range of specific disciplines were completed by the project’s consultant team. These studies included an aquatic habitat analysis, a geomorphic assessment of the river subsequent to the 2013 Flood, an evaluation of historical resources, and a Phase II environmental assessment for the area between College Avenue and the BNSF Railroad. The reports produced by the consultant team are cited below. Packet Pg. 26 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan)  Provide community gathering places and promote connectivity between recreational opportunities along the river corridor. Flood Mitigation  Improve public safety and protect properties from damaging floods  Eliminate 100-year flood overtopping of College Avenue and, if possible, eliminate the 100-year flow split along Vine Drive.  Reconnect the river to its floodplain while maximizing the beneficial environmental and recreational uses of the river corridor. Outreach and Engagement The Fort Collins community’s connection to the Poudre River is wide ranging and deeply emotional. In an effort to ensure that the spectrum of opinions, views, and visions held by the community is represented in the Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan, a broad cross-section of community members and city staff were invited to share their thoughts about this plan. This community engagement occurred through many avenues and numerous occasions throughout the planning process, including: inter-departmental staff meetings and a design charette, public open houses and focused stakeholder outreach meetings, project website development, presentations to and discussions with numerous City Boards, and City Council work sessions. Outreach for the Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan extended to both state and federal agencies in the form of site visits, meetings and correspondence. In particular, Colorado Parks and Wildlife and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers were engaged in the planning effort. A list of specific outreach and engagement events and a summary of the feedback received can be found in the Appendix. Packet Pg. 25 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) will be placed on the river. In recent decades, water rights along the river have been utilized to a greater extent, thereby reducing the water available for in-stream habitat and recreation purposes. At the same time, particularly during the summer, thousands of people throng to the area to swim, tube, picnic, walk, bike, fish, bird watch, and generally enjoy the river corridor. A survey conducted in 2008 determined that over 500,000 people a year use the river corridor, with much of that use occurring in the downtown area. Over the last few years, City staff has noticed a dramatic increase in summer use. The City expects this trend to continue, especially with the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery and the Mason Street Transportation Corridor projects, as well as various downtown residential redevelopment and infill projects. Several unmet flood mitigation needs exist, particularly reducing the potential for flood flows to overtop College Avenue/Hwy 287 during large floods. In addition, development may further constrict the river corridor and reduce its capacity to carry flood flows. Careful planning and thoughtful foresight now will provide the basis for implementing future improvements which seek to maximize the three equally important themes of the Downtown river corridor: (1) Enhanced Habitat; (2) Improved Recreational Opportunities; and (3) Increased Flood Mitigation. The City has been diligent with, and continues to be dedicated to, working with all facets of the community, and its broad spectrum of interests, to rehabilitate and enhance the downtown portion of the Poudre River corridor. Figure 1.3 Poudre River Looking South to the Mulberry Street Bridge Packet Pg. 24 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) Figure 2.44 Bank Stabilization Needs Map for Reach 6 ...... 2‐38 Figure 2.45 Fisherman Enjoying a Beautiful Autumn Afternoon on the Poudre River ........................ 2‐38 Figure 2.46 Cross Section (Looking Downstream) Illustrating the Terraced Bank Adjacent to the Pickle Plant Site and Lowering of the Northeast Overbank ......................................... 2‐39 Figure 4.1a Project Phasing Map (West Side) ....................... 4‐2 Figure 4.1b Project Phasing Map (East Side) ......................... 4‐3 Packet Pg. 22 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) IV. Project Formulation, Phasing and Costs Project Formulation and Prioritization ............................... 4‐1 Project Grouping and Phasing ............................................ 4‐1 Opinion of Project Implementation Costs .......................... 4‐1 V. Appendix Outreach and Engagement ................................................. 5‐1 Public Comments ................................................................ 5‐1 Relationship to ‘City Plan Fort Collins’ ............................... 5‐3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Poudre River Looking West to the Shields Street Bridge ....................................................... 1‐1 Figure 1.2 Poudre River Looking Northwest at the Burlington Northern‐Santa Fe Railroad Bridge ... 1‐1 Figure 1.3 Poudre River Looking South to the Mulberry Street Bridge ....................................................... 1‐1 Figure 1.4 Concrete Rubble in Channel Bed and on Eroding Bank Downstream of Linden Street ...... 1‐2 Figure 1.5 Lake Canal Diversion Structure near Lee Martinez Park ............................................... 1‐2 Figure 1.6 Day on the River with City Staff and the Consultant Team ................................................. 1‐3 Figure 1.7 Land Use Transition Concept .............................. 1‐4 Figure 1.8 Land Use Transition Diagram .............................. 1‐4 Figure 1.9 Variations in Land Use and Character on Opposing Channel Banks within the Reach between Linden and Lincoln ............................... 1‐5 Figure 1.10a Character Zone Map (West Side) ........................ 1‐6 Figure 1.10b Character Zone Map (East Side) ......................... 1‐7 Figure 1.11a Master Plan Overview Map (West Side) ............. 1‐8 Figure 1.11b Master Plan Overview Map (East Side) .............. 1‐9 Figure 2.1 Master Plan for Reach 1 ..................................... 2‐2 Figure 2.2 Poudre River Looking West (McMurry Natural Area is on right) .................... 2‐3 Figure 2.3 Bank Stabilization Needs Map for Reach 1 ......... 2‐3 Figure 2.4 Exposed Riprap Bank Armoring near Wood Street ........................................................ 2‐3 Figure 2.5 Poudre‐o‐meter at McMurry Natural Area ........ 2‐4 Figure 2.6 Tubing Enthusiasts Enjoying the River ................ 2‐4 Figure 2.7 Historic Mason & Hottel Mill Race Headgate Structure ............................................. 2‐4 Figure 2.8 Tributary Stream at McMurry Natural Area Showing Impacts Caused by Heavy Visitor Use .. 2‐5 Figure 2.9 McMurry Pedestrian Bridge, Note Non‐Compliant Railing ............................... 2‐5 Figure 2.10 Master Plan for Reach 2 ..................................... 2‐8 Figure 2.11 View of the Riparian Forest in Lee Martinez Park ............................................... 2‐9 Packet Pg. 21 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan) BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Commission on Disability Cultural Resources Board Downtown Development Authority Economic Advisory Commission Land Conservation Stewardship Board Landmark Preservation Commission Natural Resources Advisory Board Parking Advisory Board Parks and Recreation Board Planning and Zoning Board Senior Advisory Board Transportation Board Water Board Youth Advisory Board MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC Many property owners, business owners, and several hundred members of the public participated in this planning effort. Thank you to all who contributed to this Plan. CONSULTANTS Anderson Consulting Engineers – Lead Consultant BHA Design Biohabitats Miller Ecological S2O Design Tatanka Historical Associates Walsh Environmental Packet Pg. 20 Attachment2.1: Poudre River Master Plan (draft) (2112 : Poudre River Downtown Project Master Plan)